Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 2414 - Amendment To 1986-87 Community Development Block Grant - 08/28/1986HW: da RESOLUTION Resolution #2414 Auaust 28, 1986 Agenda Item #30 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and directed to execute and submit for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock the amended Community Development Block Grant Application of 1986-87 for the year 1986 and related documents, attached herewith, which Application shall be spread upon the minutes of the Council and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall constitute and be a part of this Resolution as if fully copied herein in detail. Passed by the City Council this 28th day of 1986. B.C. McMINN, MAYOR ATTEST: Ranett oyd, City Secretay APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Sandy Og et e, Community Development Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: Harold Willard, Assistant City Attorney August Resolution #2414 OMB ADDroval No_ 0348-0006 PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE i INV V Lv rtJ I V I.VIII 1 r_N 1 _-_ ArrKUvtu AS TO FORM �,„,..,nr,� �.,�m "' '--- , ,� p Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 2 APPLI- a. NUMBER 3. STATE a. NUMBER /287$6 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE CANT'S APPLI- SAI -TX 1010201 APPLI- CATION CATION IDENTI- 1. TYPE OF ❑ NOTICE OF INTENT (OPTIONAL) SUBMISSION IDENTI- FIER FIER NOTE TO BE b. DATE year month day b. DATE ASSIGNED Year month day (Mark ap- El PREAPPLICATION ASSIGNED propriate ❑ APPLICATION 19 BY STATE 19 box) Leave Blank 4. LEGAL APPLICANT/RECIPIENT 5. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) a. Applicant Name City of Lubbock 6. b. Organization Unit Community Development Department c. Street/P.O. Box P. 0. BOX 2000 GRAM a. NUMBER 11 14 I * 12 11 I 81 d. City Lubbock e• counri • Lubbock I. State Texas g. ZIP Code. 79457 (From CFDA) MULTIPLE ❑ b. TITLE COmmUn t t Devel opme h. Contact Person (Name Sandy Ogletree & Telephone No•) 8o6-762-6411, Ext. 2290 Block Grant 7. TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT (Use section IV of this form to Orovida a summary description of the S. TYPE OF APPLICANT/RECIPIENT Project-) 1 986-87 Community Development Block Grant a-M'w"te o- mm A"Wy ZC--Sdmate W Application (Amended) 1 -Higher Ed"fiond InWOUM org-4-ben A-hdienTt" i W Neighborhood Revitalization and Public D --County K -Ogler (Specify): E -Cay - Facilities Improvements F-Schod Disfiet E Enter appropriate letter Z a U a 9. AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT (Names of cities counties, stater, etc) 10. ESTIMATED NUMBER 11. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE OF PERSONS BENEFITING A -. �r°"CB o City Lubbock 173,449 tw errant Erten oppro- �`°'" pri ".le"Z) of U N 12. PROPOSED FUNDING 13. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: 14. TYPE OF APPLICATION A -New C-PAMSM E-Augmwftbon a. APPLICANT b. PROJECT a- Renews D--Cootinoaeon Enter appropriate letter a a. FEDERAL $2,262,000 •� b. APPLICANT .00 1 9th 1 9th 17. TYPE OF CHANGE (For 14c or l4e) A -Increase Ddlam F -Other (Specify). c. STATE .00 15. PROJECT START DATE 16. PROJECT DURATION D -Increase Year month day D-oeaease ouraWn d. LOCAL -00 e-CancelInenn 9 86-06-01 12 Months Enter apWo 18. DATE DUE TO Year month soy e. OTHER priate letter(s) T70'� f. Total 1$2,262,000 .00 FEDERAL AGENCY ► 19 86 09 15 „. •- ., ,p. ,. , ;: a -• 19. FEDERAL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQU Housing & Urban DeveloRment,Ft.Worth,TXIDENTIFICATION 20. EXISTING FEDERAL GRANTEST NUMBER a. ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT (IF APPROPRIATE) b. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT (IF KNOWN B -86 -MC -48-0022 Community Planning & Development Victor J. Hancock c. ADDRESS Fort Worth Regional Office 21. REMARKS ADDED P.O. Box 2905Yes Fort Worth, Texas 76113 ❑ No To the best of my knowledge and belief, a. YES, THIS NOTICE OF INTENT/PREAPPLICATION/APPLICATION WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO THE STATE z g P2. THE data in this preapplication/application EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON: a APPLICANT are true and correct, the document has DATE LL CERTIFIES been duly authorized by the governing F THAT► body of the applicant andthe applicant the assurances b. NO, PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E.O. 12372 will comply with attached if the assistance is approved. OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW ❑ Z23. a. TYPED NAME AND TITLE b. SIGNATURE P CERTIFYING (I WREPRE- tn SENTATIVE B. C. McMinn, Mayor X. 24. APPLICA- Year month day 25. FEDERAL APPLICATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 26. FEDEIRAL GRANT IDENTIFICATION TION RECEIVED 19 27. ACTION TAKEN 28. FUNDING Year month day 30. Year month date STARTING J ❑ a. AWARDED 29, ACTION DATED -19 DATE 19 Q Z C 1- ❑ b. REJECTED a. FEDERAL $ .00 31. CONTACT FOR •ADDITIONAL INFORMA- 32. Year month date W ❑ c. RETURNED FOR TION (Name and telephone number) ENDING DATE 19 I a AMENDMENT b. APPLICANT 00 Z z ❑ d. RETURNED FOR c. STATE .00 33. REMARKS ADDED o w E.O. 12372 SUBMISSION d. LOCAL .00 P a BY APPLICANT TO W STATE e. OTHER ❑ e. DEFERRED ❑ f. WITHDRAWN ❑ ❑ f_ TOTAL $ .00 Yes No n• _tY1AJi1 F:9 n n n n i. PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE i INV V Lv rtJ I V I.VIII 1 r_N 1 _-_ ArrKUvtu AS TO FORM �,„,..,nr,� �.,�m "' '--- , ,� p Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF -424 This is a standard form used by applicants as a required facesheet for preapplications and applications submitted in accordance with OMB Circular A-102. It -will be used by Federal agencies to obtain applicant certification that states which have established a review and comment procedure in response to Executive Order 12372 and have selected the program to be 'included in their process have been given an opportunity to review the applicant's submission. APPLICANT PROCEDURES FOR SECTION I Applicant will complete all items in Section I with the exception of Box 3, "State Application Identifier." If an item is not applicable, write "NA." If additional space is needed, insert an asterisk " ." and use Section IV. An explanation follows for each item: /tern 1. Mark appropriate box. Preapplication and application are described in OMB Circular A-102 and Federal agency program instructions. Use Item (a revision or augmentation under item 14), indicate only the amount of 28d -amount from local government, if applicant is not a local govern - of this form as a Notice of Intent is at State option. Federal agencies do ment. 28e --amount from any other sources, explain in Section IV. Date action was taken on this request. the change. For decreases, enclose the amount in parentheses. If both basic and supplemental amounts are included, breakout in Section IV. not require Notices of Intent. Date funds will become available. For multiple program funding, use totals and show program breakouts 2a. Applicant's own control number, if desired. Date after which funds will no longer be available for obligation. in Section IV. 12a -amount requested from Federal Government. 2b. Date Section I is prepared (at applicant's option). Federal remarks and/or attachment of additional remarks. 12b -amount applicant will contribute. 12o -amount from State, if applicant is not a State. '12d -amount from local government, if 3a. Number assigned by State. applicant is not a local government. 12e -amount from any other 3b. Date assigned by State. sources, explain in Section IV. 4a -4h. Legal name of applicant, name of primary organizational unit which will 13b. The district(s) where most of action work will be accomplished. If city - undertake the assistance activity, complete address of applicant, and' wide or State-wide, covering several districts, write "city-wide" or "State wide." name and telephone number of the P person who can provide further information about this request. 14 "A A. New. submittal for project not previously funded. 5. Employer Identification Number (EIN) of applicant as assigned by the B. Renewal. An extension for an additional funding/budget period for a Internal Revenue Service. project having no projected completion date, but for which Federal 6a. Use Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number assigned support must be renewed each year. to program under which assistance is requested. If more than one C. Revision. A modification to project nature or scope which may result program (e.g., joint funding), check "multiple" and explain in Section in funding change (increase or decrease). IV. If unknown, cite Public Law or U.S. Code. D. Continuation. An extension for an additional funding/budget period 6b. Program title from CFDA. Abbreviate if necessary. for a project with a projected completion date. 7. Use Section IV to provide a summary description of the project. If E. Augmentation. A requirement for additional funds for a project appropriate, i.e., if project affects particular sites as, for example, previously awarded funds in the same funding/budget period. construction or real property projects, attach a map showing the Project nature and scope unchanged. 8. project location. "City" includes town, township or other municipality. 15. Approximate date project expected to begin (usually associated with estimated date of availability of funding). 9. List only largest unit or units affected, such as State, county, or city. 16. Estimated number of months to complete project after Federal funds 10. Estimated number of persons directly tjenefiting from project. are available. 11. Check the type(s) of assistance requested. 17. Complete only for revisions (item 14c), or augmentations (item 14e). A. Basic Grant -,an original request for Federal funds. 18. Date preapplication/application must be submitted to Federal agency B. Supplemental Grant -a request to increase a basic grant in certain in order to be eligible for funding consideration. cases where the eligible applicant cannot supply the required matching share of the basic Federal program (e.g., grants awarded 19. Name and address of the Federal agency to which this request is addressed. Indicate as clearly as possible the name the by the Appalachian Regional Commission to provide the applicant a matching share). of office to which the application will be delivered. E. Other. Explain in Section IV. 20. Existing Federal grant identification number if this is not a new request 12. Amount requested or to be contributed during the first funding/budget and directly relates to a previous Federal action. Otherwise, write "NA." period by each contributor. Value of in-kind contributions should be included. If the action is a change in dollar amount of an existing 21. Check appropriate box as to whether Section IV of form contains grant remarks and/or additional remarks are attached. APPLICANT PROCEDURES FOR SECTION it Applicants will always complete either item 22a or 22b and items 23a and 23b. 22a. Complete if application is subject to Executive Order 12372 (State review and comment). 22b. Check if application is not subject to E.O. 12372. 23a. Name and title of authorized representative of legal applicant. FEDERAL AGENCY PROCEDURES FOR SECTION 111 Applicant completes only Sections I and H. Section III is completed by Federal agencies. 26. Use to identify award actions. will contribute. 28c -amount from State, if applicant is not a State. 27. Use Section IV to amplify where appropriate. 28d -amount from local government, if applicant is not a local govern - 28. Amount to be contributed during the first funding/budget period b 29. each ment. 28e --amount from any other sources, explain in Section IV. Date action was taken on this request. contributor. Value of in-kind contributions will be included. If the action is a change in dollar amount of an existing grant (a revision or 30. Date funds will become available. augmentation under item 14), indicate only the amount of change. For 31. decreases, enclose the amount in parentheses. If both basic and Name and telephone number of agency person who can provide more information regarding this assistance, supplemental amounts are included, breakout in Section IV. For multiple 32• Date after which funds will no longer be available for obligation. program funding, use totals and show program breakouts in Section IV. 33. 28a -amount awarded by Federal Government. 28b -amount applicant Check appropriate box as 'to whether Section IV of form contains Federal remarks and/or attachment of additional remarks. Yi GPO 1984 0 - 461 -?75 17'7'71 Resolution #2414 FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR THE CITY OF LUBBOCK JUNE 1, 1986 - MAY 31, 1987 (As Amended August 28, 1986) The City of Lubbock, through the receipt of $2,262,000.00 in Community Development Block Grant funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, proposes to implement its Community Development Program which has been developed so as to give maximum feasible priority to: 1. Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight. 2. Principally benefit persons of low and moderate incomes. In order to implement this program, the Lubbock City Council has approved the following programs: A. Concentrated Code Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 358,195 B. Neighborhood Redevelopment . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,263,279 Arnett Benson Redevelopment . . . . . .$ 146,000 Arnett Benson Detroit Widening . . . . . 41,600 Phyllis Wheatley . . . . . . . . . . . . 158,000 Residential Rehabilitation . . . . . . . 600,000 Emergency Repair . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,000 Field Services . . . . . . . . . . . . 217,679 C. Community Service Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,000 Locks for the Elderly. . . . . . . . . . . 10,000 Paint -Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000 Weatherization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75,000 D. Community Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,210 Guadalupe Neighborhood Center . . . . . . 25,000 Parkway Neighborhood Center . . . . . . 15,210 E. Park Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191,145 Berry Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,445 Lake 6 Road -Low Water Crossing . . . . . .141,700 Area Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,000 F. Program Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154,171 G. Indirect Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,000 H. Contingency Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 50,000 Community Development Entitlement Program . . . .$2,262,000 August 28, 1986 Proposed Projects Amendment to 1986-87 CDBG Program Lake 6 Road $141,700 Parks - Area Lighting 38,000 Berry Park Improvements 10,323 Parks - Lake 6 Road - Low Water Crossing This project will provide the final link between the North and South roads at Lake A. A low water crossing East of Dam #6, connecting asphalt paving and street lights are the elements needed for completion. Parks - Park Area Lighting This project will provide area (security) lights at Davies (N. Ave. N and Clemson), Stubbs (36th St. and Ave. N), Aztlan (Ist St. and Ave. K), and Madgen (Boston and Amherst). Some of these parks currently have area lighting but it Is outdated or beyond repair. This will help to make park patrons and adjacent neighbors feel more secure. Parks - Berry Park Improvements This project will provide a basketball court. This request was made by the neighborhood group. Staff Comments Originally the City supplemented its 1986-87 CDBG program with $190,023 to decrease the percentage of the federal reduction from 30% to 22%. These projects were funded In the 1986-87 Statement of Objectives with unallocated program Income from the Community Development program. The discussion with the CDAC and the City Council included the possibility of funding these projects with entitlement funds If the City received an amendment, thus returning the program income for allocation at another time. The recommen- dation is to follow that discussion and to fund these projects with the CDBG amendment and release the CDBG program Income. Concentrated Code Enforcement $138,977 This project provides for the inspection and enforcement of all weed, rubbish, and junk vehicle codes in the C.D. Target Area, as well as the enforcement of the Minimum Housing Code. The purpose of this program is to prevent the growth of slum and blighting Influences by the early detection and prevention of deterioration in neighborhoods. By Identifying and prosecuting (when necessary) violations of City codes, this program will help arrest the decline of the neighborhoods in the early stages. Proposed Projects Page -2- Staff Comments It is recommended that the code enforcement project be supplemented by $138,977 for personnel expenses and direct activity costs. Previously the code enforcement project budget included the funding of 5 1/2 full-time positions. This included 2 positions in the Legal department, 1 in the Building Inspection department and 2 1/2 in the Codes Administration department. With the reduction to the CDBG program, the Building Inspection person was transitioned to the Community Development field services budget, one Codes Administration person remained in the code enforcement project budget, and the remaining 3 1/2 positions were transitioned to the General Fund budget. Also, the code enforcement activity budget was reduced from $187,000 to $150,000. The code enforcement budget was reduced from $363,663 in 1985-86 to $219,218 in 1986-87. The recommendation is to increase the code enforcement budget by $138,977, to $358,195. This increase will; a) continue to fund 1 position from the legal department which had been transitioned to the General Fund. The allocation of $25,000 is to fund the position and associated expenses, and b) increase the activity line Item from $150,000 to $263,977. The primary reason for this increase is the anticipated cost of the demolition of the Coronado apartments and the Rose Hotel. The estimates for these two projects is approximately $100,000. CD Residential Rehabilitation $ 50,000 Rehabilitation of owner occupied single-family dwellings under No -Interest Deferred Loan Program. The proposed project will include 25 rehabilitations on a City-wide basis and 35 rehabilitations on a targeted basis. The targeted areas include Arnett Benson, Bozeman -Elliston, Meadowbrook Villa, Thunderbird, Cherry Point, Lyndale Acres, McCrumments Second, Brown School, Coronado, Bean School, East Manhattan Heights and the Posey School Area. Staff Comments Housing programs have historically been a major emphasis of the CDBG program. The residential rehabilitation program provides funding for rehabilitation of owner -occupied, single-family housing. This program includes targeted and city-wide projects for low income residents. The maximum loan is $10,000 and is forgiveable after 5 years If the property remains in a standard condition and the owner continues to reside in the property. The current allocation is $550,000. The 1985-86 allocation to rehabilitation was $600,000. With the amendment the project budget will increase to $600,000. This will assist approximately 70 households. Proposed Projects Page -3- The production of the rehabilitation department has increased from 1.5 cases per month to 7 cases per month, and it is anticipated that the additional funds can be utilized by the end of the program year. CD - Administration $ 7.000 This project is for the administration of the Community Development Program. The Administrative Section Includes the CD Administrator, Administrative Assistant, Secretary, and Bookkeeper. All of the office supplies and support services for the department are budgeted in the administrative budget. This proposed 1986-87 budget reflects the recent reorganization of Community Development and Office of Neighborhood Redevelopment. The Rehab & Redev. Coordinator, formerly Director, is now budgeted as a field service expense. Staff Comments The 1986-87 Community Development Administration budget was reduced by $26,896 or 16%. This reduction was primarily due to the transition and subsequent elimination of Office of Neighborhood Redevelopment Administration. Additionally, Community Development administration adopted a reduced level package which eliminated $10,500 in public information items, supplies, printing and training. The request for $7,000 to supplement the Community Development Administration budget is to reinstate some of the public information Items as well as augment administrative line items which were reduced. The following Is a breakdown by line item: 42311 Maintenance Motor Vehicle: The field staff vehicles have needed extensive types of repairs this summer. For this reason, the budget of $2,000 for 4 vehicles was underestimated. The supplement of $1,000 is to accommodate the maintenance costs until the replacement vehicle is available. 43431 Professional Services: It is anticipated that professional services will be required for the proposed tax increment financing project, land appraisals, title searches, and other costs associated with new projects. This project was decreased from $8,000. Current Proposed Budget Budget 2,000 3,000 2,000 3,500 Proposed Projects Page -4- 43433 Special Projects: 1,000 4,000 The publication of the "Town Crier" tabloid, the production of program brochures and other public information tools were elimi- nated. This increase will be utilized to fund the following: $2,500 for cable channel programming; $500 for program bro- chures, $500 for leverage loan program brochures and start-up information and $500 for miscellaneous and information tools. 43434 Advertising: 3,810 4,810 The increase of $1,000 is requested due to the cost and number of legal ads which are required for Urban Renewal activity. The approved budget of $500 was underestimated. A legal ad costs $250 for an Urban Renewal Plan change and one change has been completed and at least two more changes are anticipated. Also, the amendment process will require additional advertising which was not budgeted. 43451 Dues, Travel & Training: 3,300 3,800 The current budget was a $1,800 decrease from 1985-86. The increase of $500 is proposed to compensate for the additional training oppor- tunities for the staff which have been scheduled by HUD. There has been a renewed interest in training of City staffs by HUD and thus far this year the City's C.D. staff has benefited from training on the Environmental Clearance process, the Section 312 program, the Rental Rehabilitation program and an economic development program. These workshops were not scheduled prior to the budget preparation but generally have no registration fees. The travel costs are reasonable and the training has proven very successful in establishing rapport and increasing the City's compliance and efficiency.