HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 2511 - Agreement - Barton Aschman Associates - Reversible Lane Concept Study, 34Th St - 01/22/1987JWF:js
RESOLUTION
Resolution #2511
January 22, 1987
Agenda Item #21
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and
directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock an Agreement to
be entered into by and between the City of Lubbock and consultants Barton-
Aschman Associates, Inc., for the study of a reversible lane concept on 34th
Street, attached herewith, which shall be spread upon the minutes of the
Council and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall constitute and
be a part of this Resolution as if fully copied herein in detail.
Passed by the City Council this 22nd day of January , 1987•
G
B. C. Mc I N, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Ranet Boyd, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
, 01�6f S2�'
�.
David E. Woosley, Traffic Engin
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
14, �;A V-Iuk
J.o th Fullingim, Assistar�l City
Att ney
Usol utiee51Z
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
§ CONSULTANT CONTRACT
CITY OF LUBBOCK §
THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LUBBOCK
(City) and BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. ("Consultant"), to conduct a
study of the feasibility of a reversible lane concept or other
Transportation Systems Management (TSM) improvements.
A G R E E M E N T
1. This Contract becomes effective on execution by the City and shall
terminate on or before September 30, 1987 unless otherwise terminated
or modified as hereinafter provided.
2. Consultant shall perform the services identified in the statement of
services, attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof, and herein
called the "Work". This Contract shall be administered on behalf of the
City by the Traffic Engineer for the City of Lubbock.
3. For the performance of the Work by the Consultant, City agrees to pay
Consultant for all services approved by the Traffic Engineer, a sum not to
exceed $70,000 including fixed fee of the amount not to exceed $8,016.27.
All payments shall be made in accordance with the Fee Schedule identified
and attached hereto and marked Exhibit B. All allowable costs for reim-
bursement under this contract must be in accordance with 48 CFR Chapter 1,
Part 31, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 31).
Page 1 of 8
10-86
,;2
• S �
4. The Consultant shall submit invoices to the City for payment. The
City shall make payment to the Consultant within thirty days from receipt
of the Consultant's request for payment, provided the invoice is properly
prepared, executed and documented. The maximum cost of $70,000.00 shall
not be exceeded without written approval of the City.
5. On the day of
19 the City and
the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation entered into
agreement for the development of a study of the feasibility of a
reversible lane at the described roadway. This agreement, hereinafter
called the Prime Contract, is incorporated herein by reference and made
an integral part of this Contract. The Consultant is bound, responsible,
obligated and liable to the City in performance of the work as the City is
bound, responsible, obligated and liable to the State Department of
Highways and Public Transportation under the Prime Contract. The Prime
Contract and this Contract shall be interpreted together and in harmony
with one another. The Consultant hereby agrees to comply with the provi-
sions of the Prime Contract. In case of conflict, ambiguity, or discre-
pancy between this Contract and the Prime Contract, the provisions of the
Prime Contract shall take precedence.
6. The term of this Contract shall begin with execution hereof. All Work
through task 5.5 of Exhibit A is planned to be completed within three
months; however, the Consultant will not be held responsible for delays
outside his control such as late delivery of data as described in Table 1
of Exhibit A or delays in scheduling meetings described in Tasks 4 and 5.
The Traffic Engineer may extend the duration of the project.
Page 2of8
10-86
7. The Traffic Engineer may terminate the performance of work in whole or
in part on ten (10) days' written notice to Consultant. City agrees to pay
Consultant for all services completed prior to the effective day of such
notice.
8. The Consultant shall make such revisions in the work included in this
contract which has been completed as are necessary to correct errors
appearing therein when required to do so by the City. No additional com-
pensation shall be paid for this work. If the City finds it necesary to
request changes in previously satisfactory completed work or parts thereof,
the Consultant shall make such revisions if requested and as directed by
the City by supplemental agreement. This will be considered as additional
work and paid for as specified under paragraph 9.
9. Work not specifically described under Exhibit A, "Work Plan", must be
approved by supplemental agreement to this Contract by the City before any
additional work can be undertaken by the Consultant. If the Consultant is of
the opinion that any work it has been directed to perform is beyond the scope
of this Contract and constitutes extra work, the Consultant shall promplty
notify the City in writing.
In the event the City finds such work does constitute extra work, then the City
shall provide extra compensation for doing this additional work on the same
bas -is as covered under paragraph 8 and as provided under a supplemental
agreement.
Page 3 of 8
�5
The fixed fee shall be adjusted if additional work is approved by supplemental
agreement and performed by the Consultant.
10. The Consultant warrants that he has access to all required equipment and
instrumentation required for work under this Contract, and that equipment and
instrumentation will be available for Contract work.
All employees of the Consultant shall have such knowledge and experience as
will enable them to perform the duties assigned to them. Any employee of the
Consultant who, in the opinion of the City, is incompetent or whose conduct
becomes detrimental to the work, shall immediately be removed from association
with this Contract.
11. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, the State, and FHWA whole
and harmless against any and all claims for damages, costs, injuries, and expen-
ses to persons or property arising out of, or in connection with, any negligent
act, error, or omission of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, asso-
ciates or subcontractors, in the performance of this Contract.
12. This Contract is made subject to the charter and regulations of the
City, as amended, and all applicable laws of the State of Texas. Venue of
any legal action under this Contract shall be exclusively in Lubbock
County, Texas; and in.construing this Contract, the laws and court decisions
of the State of Texas shall control. -
Page 4of8
10-86
'4�
13. U. S. Department of Transportation Requirements
A. Audit and Inspection of Records. The Consultant shall permit the
authorized representatives of the City, the U. S. Department of
Transportation, and the Comptroller General of the United States to inspect
and audit all data records of the Consultant relating to his performance
under the Contract until the expiration of three (3) years after final
payment under the Contract.
The consultant further agrees to include in all his subcontracts
hereunder a provision to the effect that the subcontractor agrees that the
City, the Department of Transportation, and the Comptroller General of the
United States or any of their duly authorized representatives shall, until
the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under subcontract,
have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books,
documents, papers, and records of such contractor, involving transactions
related to the subcontractor. The term "subcontract" as used in this
clause excludes (1) purchase orders not exceeding $10,000 and (2) sub-
contracts or purchase orders for public utility services at rates
established for uniform applicability to the general public.
B. Equal Employment Opportunity. In connection with the execution of this
Contract, the Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or
applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, sex, or national
origin. The consultant shall take affirmative actions to ensure that
applicants are employed, and that employees are treated, during their
employment, without regard to their race, religion, color, sex, or national
origin. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
Page 5 of 8
10-86
G? i
employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment advertising;
layoff, or termination; rates of pay, or other forms of compensation; and
selection for training, including apprenticeship.
C. Interest of Members of Congress. No member of or delegate to the
Congress of the United States shall be admitted to any share or part of
this Contract or to any benefit arising therefrom.
D. Interest of Public Officials. No member, officer, or employee of the
public body of or a local public body during his tenure or for one year
thereafter shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Contract or
the proceeds thereof.
E. Minority Business Enterprise. In connection with the performance of
this Contract, the Consultant will cooperate with the City in meeting its
commitments and goals with regard to the maximum utilization of minority
business enterprises and will use its best efforts to ensure that minority
business enterprises shall have the maximum practicable opportunities to
compete for subcontract work under this Contract.
F. Compliance With Regulations. During the performance of this Contract,
the Consultant, for itself, its assignees, and successors, agrees to comply
with the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in federally assisted
programs of the Department of Transportation, Title 49, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter
referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference
and made part of this Contract.
Page 6of8
G. Ownership of Engineering documents. Data, computer media, reports,
and maps prepared or obtained under the terms of this Contract will be
delivered to and become the property of the City. Study charts,
computations, original drawings, and other data prepared or obtained under
this Contract will be made available, upon request, to the City without
restriction or limitation on their use. No material produced in whole or
in part under this Contract will be subject to copyright.
The Consultant shall submit 25 reports to the City for final review
and approval. The Consultant's endorsement will be placed on the documents
produced under this Contract. All official reports published by the Consultant
for the City as a result of this project will contain an acknowledgment as
follows:
"Prepared in cooperation with the U. S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Highway Administration."
Further, for reports prepared for distribution to the public, a
disclaimer statement as follows will be included:
"The contents of this report reflect the views of the Consultant,
which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data pre-
sented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect official views
or policies of the City of Lubbock, the State Department of Highways
and Public Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration."
H. Arbitration. Any dispute concerning a question of fact in connection
with the work not disposed of by agreement between the Consultant and the
Traffic Engineer will be referred to the City Manager, City of Lubbock.
Page 7 of 8
10-86
aq
I. Substitution of Subcontractors. The CITY must approve all substitu-
tions of subcontractors to determine if the minority business enterprise
percentage goal will be decreased by substitution of a minority contractor
with a majority contractor.
EXECUTED THIS the 22nd day of January 1987, by CITY.
CITY OF LUBBOCK
BY
B. C. McMINN
MAYOR
TITLE
ATTEST:
City, retary, Ranette Boyd
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
David E. Woosley,
Traffic Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
. <Az
J. W6rth Fullinghim,
�spliistant City Attorney f
Page 8 of 8
1 :.
BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
BYE_ _
CON R CTING OFFICER
\C `4s:.%1%�sc�iC
TITLE
a
310
EXHIBIT A
WORK PROGRAM
3i
EXHIBIT A
34th STREET REVERSIBLE LANE AND CORRIDOR STUD'
WORK PROGRAM
The 34th Street route study work program is divided into five tasks. Each task is
outlined below in several work steps. The project limits for the study shall be between
Avenue Q and Slide Road.
Task 1: Identify Problem Locations and Potential Improvements
Subtasks
1.1 Discuss perceived or known problems for the 34th Street corridor with transpor-
tation agencies having jurisdiction on route; also discuss past studies, planned
improvements, and other relevant information.
1.2 Review past studies and plans for route improvements. Assemble available data
from city and other agency files (see Table 1).
1.3 Prepare forms and procedures for conducting necessary additional surveys. Any
standard forms and procedures developed by the city or SDHPT will be used to be
compatible with the agency's other data. The most recent editions of The Manual of
Traffic Engineering Studies published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers
describes procedures and contains sample forms for most likely data collection
activities; these or other similar procedures prepared previously by the consultant
will be used if the city has no specific procedures or forms.
1.4 Review procedures and forms with city staff.
1.5 Refine procedures and forms as appropriate and conduct field surveys.
1.6 Conduct thorough field reconnaissance during peak and other periods experiencing
traffic problems; also observe daytime off-peak traffic operations during typical
weekdays (Monday through Friday).
1.7 Conduct A.M. and P.M. peak period reconnaissance of traffic operations on route
during typical weekdays (Monday through Friday). Each location appearing to have
traffic flow problems should be observed for at least 15 minutes to enable proper
assessment of problems and causes. This subtask will be conducted by experienced
senior traffic engineers. The reconnaissance should include both route and -inter-
section and driveway evaluations. Identify candidate TSM actions which could
potentially alleviate existing problems and/or increase capacity.
1.S Summarize findings and review in meeting with city staff; reach agreement on what
types of TSM actions will be studied.
Outout
Determination of problems (or opportunities) to be studied and potential TSM
actions to improve traffic flow.
1 of 6
Table I
DATA ANIS MAPS TO BE PROVIDED BY CITY FOR 34TH STREET CORRIDOR
-- Available recent and historic traffic counts
-- Accident summaries (last two years)
-- Past studies and proposed improvements, including known commitments
-- Traffic impact studies for proposed developments
aerial photograph reproducibles (1" = 2001)
-- Reproducible planimetric maps (1" = 100' or V = 200' as needed)
-- City design standards
-- CIP (roadway) list and other tentative improvements
-- Traffic signal inventory
-- SDHPT traffic projections, as selected by City
-- City data summary forms
-- Right-of-way maps
-- As -built plans, as available
2of6
33
Task 2: Collect Appropriate Data
Subtasks
2.1 Identify needed data to be collected and locations on route sections where it should
be collected (see Table 2 for list of potential data to be collected).
2.2 Collect data identified in Task 2.1.
2.3 Summarize data and observations. Correlate findings.
Output
Inventory data and engineering commentary on each of the selected problem
locations as well as the route.
Task 3: Analyze Observations and Data
Subtasks
3.1 Analyze data and observations summarized in Task 2 to confirm the extent of
problems (or opportunities). Key factors to be reviewed should include level of
service, stops and delays, travel time and speed, traffic diversion or shortcutting,
frequent traffic law violations resulting from congestion or delays, signing, signal
phasing and progression, sight distance, etc.
3.2 Determine causes of deficiencies and potential solutions.
3.3 Determine opportunities and alternatives to increase corridor capacity through spot
and/or route improvements on study route.
3.4 Review findings of Tasks 2 and 3 with city staff.
Output
Files for route and spot locations containing detailed analyses and identification of
problem causes and extents and potential solutions. The same information will be
available where no existing deficiency is present, but where significant opportunity exists
for increasing capacity or reducing travel time, or otherwise improving traffic flow.
Task 4: Test Potential TSM Actions and Develop Recommendations
Subtasks
4.1 L•valuate alternative improvements in terms of resulting level of service, travel
time and speed, stops and delays, and route capacity increase. Evaluate impacts on
pedestrian, bicycle, and transit. Also consider relative cost, right-of-way,- land-
use/neighborhood impacts, and institutional considerations; expeditious implement -
ability should be given priority..
3 of 6
- 3�
Table 2
POTENITIAL DATA TO DE COLLECTED FOR
TH STREET
Corridor and Route Data
-- Twenty-four hour counts as necessary, including hourly data for selected locations;
pedestrians will be included where there is substantial activity
Peak and off-peak turning movement counts
Speed -delay runs
-- Speed limits
-- Transit routes, headways, bus stops, and transit centers
Major traffic generators
Roadway cross-sections (pavement, right-of-way)
-- Curb parking conditions
Intersection Data
(for locations to be studied for improvement; recorded on appropriate forms)
Pavement widths — Traffic control devices
.—Turn restrictions
Alignments
-- Traffic lanes — Signal phasing, timing, controller types
Adjacent land -use (general)
Sus stops, loading zones, parking --Adjacent
flight -of -way widths — General pavement condition
-- Level of pedestrian activity. -- Sight distance limitations
Sidewalk conditions
Accident collision diagrams
--
Engineering judgments as to problems, — Driveway locations
magnitude of problems,
potential solutions
4of6 3S
�.2 Prepare rough scaled schematic drawings of both typical and specific physical
improvements. Drawings will be suitable for inclusion in the final report and will
include critical dimensions, traffic control device locations, existing and recom-
mended geometrics, and approximate right-of-way requirements, if any.
4.3 Prepare in tabular form a listing by location indicating problems and _rec6mmended
actions. Include estimates of benefits.
4.4 Review tentative recommendations with city staff.
4.5 Prepare presentation materials for public meeting with City Council and/or other
interested groups.
4.6 Meet with public representatives to review findings and tentative recommendations
and alternatives considered.
4.7 Review public meeting input with city staff.
4.8 Based on review input, refine recommendations and supporting material.
Output
Tables or lists of recommended improvements and actions, rough schematics, and
other appropriate information relative to problems, needs, impacts and benefits.
Task 5: Develop Implementation Strategy
S!:Stasks
5.1 Review recommended actions and group into effective packages which will generate
significant and worthwhile traffic flow improvements.
5.2 Prepare approximate cost estimates to implement recommended actions for each
group of improvements.
5.3 Based on systematic evaluation of improvement benefits and costs, prioritize
recommended actions.
5.; Review with city staff and identify requirements to implement each group of
actions.
5.5 Prepare draft report summarizing findings, conclusions, and recommendations
and transmit five copies for review by the city, State and FHWA.
5.6 Review draft report with city staff.
5.7 Revise draft report to address city, State and FHWA comments and print 20
copies of final report.
5.8 Prepare materials for presentation to City Council.
5.9 Present findings, conclusions and recommendations to City Council.
5 of 6 3
output
Final report containing prioritized systematic groups of recommendations. The
report should include summaries of pertinent data, analysis procedures, and findings,
alternative improvements evaluated, recommended improvements, resulting benefits (and
disbenefits), and estimated costs. Drawings of geometric improvements should be
provided at a level of detail agreed upon prior to study initiation.
Signal phasing and timing, designation of traffic control devices, and related
information will be provided as necessary to support t -ie recommended actions in the level
of detail desired by the city.
6 of 6
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
VI. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. The performance of this contract will be
monitored by the following schedule.
23
1
2
3
4
5
b
7
Execute Consultant Contract
X
Pre -Study Conference
X
Complete Data Collection
X
Complete Data Analysis
X
Draft Report to Department
X
Department Review of 'Draft
Report Complete
X
Final Report to Department
X
Project Claim and Periodic
Report
X
X
X
X
23
LVNIKAI PRICING PROPOSAL
fIRESfARC11 i(vn nEwraol�.�cCvT,
Orr -cc of Aln—,.,,,c,.$
Appto,al a\u. 29-I(O1' 3 '
$'hit f«t.n s !« «.r w•hre 0: •«b-issi.. of toil er rnic:nt drl[ (/tf FPR 1-3.007-3)
t�i1 [baa«assn for /ht Optional form
,.rd
?Act r.0.
1
wthssritnf
by the toeNatuntelF.eti�i`td
2
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
Stott$($A"0108$(AVK(slo4(rVt«1s"to --
••OMt a1K1 A0ocl3S
820 Davis Street
34th Street Reversible Lane Project
Evanston, Illinois 60204
Lubbock, Texas
is
6v4S10.4(%/ ANO 40CAltOrgy, YVn((! MOtR U f0 41 1(4104-10
gg tRt ad Suite 199
TOTAL *A.O{N41 O/ /t o.o$A'
Ic°« t $otK$IAI�a...o
69,146.07
DETAIL DESCRIPTION OF COST ELEMENTS
1. ONfCt AtAt(tlAt ttir..:r, ar
TOTAL 4(f ( 4
EST COST (SJ
EST COST'
�• FWC1(AS[01AINS
�. wteoNre4,ato news
t. OtNt4.�(1J 4ww MA(t1$A(
(!J VOW STAa0A4000[w(4CIAllttAtS
(JJ Iwl(401MISI0N^t 111rwlt(1S JAI arbt, t1.. a "j
rorAL Wffr.CT.V.tTCRI�I.
7. MAt(tut O"(4/t(Ap• (RrI, 7G \�$ �rNt J
'
1
1
). OIR(CT 14,401 JJpw/I)
ESTIMATED RATE/
EST
Principal Associate
HOURS HOUR
COST IS)
Associate
373 34,. 2
_4,405.261:-'-
Clerical/Draf FILng
405 16.63
6,735. 15t'..' 735.15','
*Includes 30.02% frin
200 16.00
3,200.0q
es
j
1
r07:tL otRECr LAzoit
_
�. (.404 OWNWAD (Sp ai/j Dore w or Coll cewer),
OH 14,74 f 14, St.
.. ..•
..
EST COST (S) f
Over ea
1.1956
rOT.tr. LA008 081iRI4EAL)
3. S1(CtAI 1(STt•rf fb.! /:.q I{d/ we,1 of iian,rwr,rr irtrrlt.aiauJ
,. s �' s x :rs 129101.39
(s1 COst (s)
4. S►tCIAI (OU11rAtM �!/ /irrn r4..Rt) (11rA.itr .II Er4.iit AJ
MEAL SPECIAL TEfrl.VC
1. 11Av(t (if /mew tLrrjr) fCi,, de&ili aw enwdN/ Smeda i
.. n.rasroa4,rlON
CST COST ♦sJ
,,,,V
000.0rtIt
ol(A1 01 SU4NSI(MC(
nnrtL TRAVEL
:..6.103S. 01D
4.- CONSIATA041 ttr..r:
Est CUSt tS1 I
TOTAL C'VN3V1.T.�NTS
03-11t O t(Ct Casts t10—,
I
h.650.0.0
to
i
IILlwl tnl 4,w, .O.+w.yttAhvl (V(.vst (F.0
1 J tO�aUgy
/• n10•Gorr' 157- of Iter
TOTAL n1REC7• COST AND as.I.R111-40 1
Y. a/ taw iwr.r mar. J•
°,'.t,. fs,'l,r.4r0:0 1,129L s
i
nd 49,016
.2-7
tOT.tr. IJTt.tLt'fl.D COST AXU ft! 01C rrrurr ^9,1 A(;.0 7
orTIO\AI. FORM ;,C
Octehte 19, 1
can,.! :r...., A.,.,....,••...,
IPit 1-16wBe.
7040-101 ,
i
!
EXHIBIT B
Page 1 of 4
This propoul it subanit/sd (at ult in conntttinn aa•iah /nal in felpvntf to /Qrlrr.�r NIY'. rlt.J
34th Street Reversible Lane Project
i Lubbock, Texas
........ s.. ARrrun .nd the fuutnaaea rL.a 1. G.Itv••
.r..: rena•c.r our ne sa .a.......a-. �. v . ..... ...... ... ............. .. ..._ ._. __.._ -- -i
lY/to NAM( ANO lit(( - SIGNAIUt( �
W. Jack Hatchell dA1_
Vice President ----,
NAM[ 01 fit" D tC CM SVtw:S1Gr•
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. September 19, 19°
EXHIBIT A—SUPPORTING SCHEDULE (Spr(i%. if more spare it llreded. rite rei-rrici
COS[ fl NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION Off Jiolneff S) EST COST (5 1
7 Transportation
Airfare 20 round -trips at $150) 3-000
Car Mental (20 days at $50) 1-000
Per Diem or Subsistence
Lodging(24 room nights at 888
Meals (46 days at $25) 1,150
9 Telephone, postage, etc. 100
Report printing, reproduction costs 400
Field crew for data collection j 1,150
I. MAS ANY (R(CUf1V( ACENCY Of TMC UNITED STATES COWtNMEHt PERFORMCO ANY REVICW Of YOUR ACCOUNTS Ot RECORDS IN CONNICTION W's" ANY O:'a( 1
COV(RNM[HT PRIME COWRACI OR SUSCONIRACT WI MIN THE PAST fWIM MORINS?
C, US 0 No (!/Pa. iJiwti/j WOW.)
Ml N,D AODt( S Of tEWEWI ��``Mc ANO tH0� vvm S. aSa le Street
"Me'
Defense Contract A enc Chica o IL 60605
tEUfwON! mum$(# I I It (14$10#4
(312) 353-6554
It. Witt you REOUIRE IME USE Of ANY GOV(RNMENt PROPERTY W THE PtUORMANC( Of RMS PROPOSED CONT2AC11
C3YES [D NO (If Jvl, ;111-1 ;f, 00 eflVelf tr N/twfrn'wjf)
' t 00 YOV JEOVIR( GOVCRNMENI CONTIACI FINANCING tO PERFORM THIS PIO►OS(O CONIRACT?
Q it HO ((� )n.:Irwl f).J r 0 ADVANCE PAYMEHIS O rtorXCSS PAYMENTS 02 [:] GUARANlEtO (OARS
Ve. DO YOU HOW HOLO ANY CONTRACT (Of. JI )*r A+f'f .raP pfA%ftil) 102 100 SAM( OR SIMItAt WOOS CMI(D IGt lY I-$
►RO►OS(o CONTRACT?
YES L NO (it )N, it/twlili.J:
V. DOES IMPS CCS! SJ -MARY CONfOtM W/TM 11•.E COST PtINCIPI(S $ET FORTH w ACEffCY REGOIAWINS?
QYIS 0 NO (it .f. f.�/ .'.r f. ff.0n• of HO..raf 1..j./
AnTi(1\41
}If llr t'fftf J•If t.11/wrl..+! w++ • rr+awr.
2
Page 2 of 4
¢6
/• DIS • A ' V
Task Estimated jet
1. Identify Problem Locations and
Potential Improvements $12.,936.07
2. Collect Appropriate Data 9,250
3. Analyze Observations and Data 12,760
4. Test Potential TSM Actions and
Develop Reations 14,760
5. Develop Implementation Strategy 19,440
TOTAL $69,146.07
Page 3 of 4
A
q r
i
Staff
34th Street Reversible Lane Project
Table 1 - Project Staffing Plan
Role in Estinated Person
Project 1 2 3
Jack Hatchell
Principal -in -
Charge
Brian Bochner
Principal -
Advisor
Sheldon Johnson
Principal -
Project Director
Jim Janovsky
Associate
Tom Horkan
Associate
Technical/
Clerical
Support
Hours by Work Task
4 5 Total
8 8 8 15 25 64
8 8 8 15 25 64
40 30 50 50 75 245
20 30 30 30 40 150
50 40 50 50 65 255
20 20 20 65 75 200
146 136 166 225 305 978
Page 4 of 4