Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 2832 - Contract - THC - Historic Preservation Programs - 05/12/1988BLL:da RESOLUTION Resolution #2832 May 12, 1988 Item 16 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock a Contract and all related documents during the effective dates of the Contract, by and between the City of Lubbock and the Texas Historical Commission for historic preservation programs, attached herewith, which shall be spread upon the minutes of the Council and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall constitute and be a part of this Resolution as if fully copied herein in detail. Passed by the City Council this 12th day of May , 1988. c --� _ � 'B.C. MCMINN, MAYOR EST,- RanefteBoyd, City Secret ry APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ii Jim er ram, Assistant City Manager for eve opment Services APPROVED AS TO FORM: Benjamin Lin on, Assistan City Attorney Z T.R. FER'ENBACH, SAN ANTONIO CHAIRMAN MRS. H4.. LONGdl"t.GORE VICE-CHAIRMAN DR. DAN A. WILLIS. FORT WORTH SECRETARY MRS. LUNELLE A. ANDERSON. SAN MARCOS JOHN M. BENNETT. SAN ANTONIO CARRIELU B. CHRISTENSEN, AUSTIN GEORGE CHRISTIAN, AUSTIN TEXAS P.O. BOX 12276 CURTIS TUNNELL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR HISTORICAL AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 RICHARD H. COLLINS. DALLAS HAROLD D.COURSON,►ERRYTON MARTHA J. CROWLEY. RICHARDSON MAXINE E. FLOURNOY. ALICE BETTY L HANNA, BRECKENRIDGE SUZANNE W. HARRIS, SAN ANTONIO KARL A. KOMATSU. FORT WORTH W. MERRIMAN MORTON, HOUSTON JAMES S. NABORS, LAKE JACKSON .. GAY RATLIFF, AUSTIN EVANGELINE L WHORTON, GALVESTON ISLAND COMMISSION (512)463-6100 CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANT This agreement is entered into by the Texas Historical Commission, a State Agency, hereinafter referred to as the Commission, and the City of Lubbock hereinafter referred to as the Contractor, pursuant to a grant made to the Texas Historical Commission for Fiscal Year 1988, by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, under the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, P.L. 89-665 (16 U.S.C.S. Sec. 470 f). This grant is made for the purpose of funding a project or projects to be undertaken by the Contractor as a participant in the Certified Local Government program. The CONTRACTOR in consideration of the hereinafter monetary sum to be paid by the Commission agrees as follows: Sec. 1. The Contractor shall undertake and complete the project and/or projects detailed in the Project Proposal (Attachment I), to be executed within the jurisdiction of the City of Lubbock, Texas, in the County of Lubbock, Texas. Sec. 2. It is agreed that the Contractor shall be an independent Contractor for the purposes of this Agreement. The Contractor shall not be considered the agent, the servant, or the employee of the Commission for any purpose whatsoever. The liabilities of any kind arising from the performance of the contracted work covered by this Agreement and all Appendices thereto are the responsibility of the Contractor. Sec. 3. In the event that the Contractor proposes to undertake an inventory of cultural resources in the City of Lubbock then the Contractor shall be required to enter into an Architectural Survey Agreement with the Commission, and to fulfill all of the requirements stated in that contract document and in "Guidelines for Survey and Planning Grants" (Attachment II). Sec. 4. In the event that the Contractor proposes to undertake the preparation of a nomination to the National Register of Historic Places, the Contractor shall utilize the current forms in use by the Commission, as well as the current instructions for the completion of such forms, which are also provided by the Commission. .9� &aee V79mCW! Ae ✓7lAfClrllG �/IPd�i7!/C1�102 k Sec. 5. The staff employed by the Contractor shall meet the criteria for employment as prescribed by the Commission as outlined in "Guidelines for Survey and Planning Grants" (Attachment II) and be employed by competitive procurement. Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in federally -assisted programs on the basis of race, color and/or national origin. In all cases the person(s) employed by the Contractor to complete the work specified in Sec. 1 must meet with the approval of the Commission. The professional hired must also attend an orientation session with the Commission's National Register staff prior to commencing work. Sec. 6. The Contractor shall keep accurate financial records available for audit by the Commission or by Federal auditors three years from Project End Date in accordance with Federal Management Circulars A.87 and OMB A 102 (Revised) and the National Register Programs Guidelines - NPS 49. Sec. 7. All grant funds shall be spent in the manner and amounts specified in the approved detailed Budget, a copy of which is attached to this document as Attachment I. Sec. 8. The work covered by this Agreement shall begin May 1, 1988 and be completed by July 31, 1989. If for any reason the work is not completed by such date or if the Agreement is cancelled due to Contractor's default, then all amounts paid under this Agreement shall be immediately due and repayable to the Commission. It is further agreed that all materials stipulated in Attachment I and all reimbursement requests be submitted to the Commission by August 31, 1989. Sec. 9. All documents referred to herein are hereby specifically adopted as part of this Agreement, as is set forth herein. The COMMISSION, in consideration of the hereinbefore described undertaking by the Contractor, agrees as follows: The Commission shall reimburse the Contractor exclusively from U.S. Department of the Interior grant-in-aid funds for historic preservation (Certified Local Government) upon the receipt and approval of invoices from the Contractor as long as the Contractor is in compliance with this .. Agreement, up to the total grant sum of $7,800 as specified in the Grant Award Letter (Attachment III). Such payments to be made as requested over a period of 15 months for services actually rendered, or if mutually agreed, in one lump sum up to the total grant sum, upon completion and approval of all the requirements set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor shall submit documented reimbursement requests to the Commission and the Commission will in turn reimburse the Contractor up to one half of the requested figure. It is further agreed that a sum not to exceed 25% of the total granted sum will be retained by the Commission until all stipulated materials and properly documented reimbursement requests are submitted by the Contractor. s A IT IS FURTHER AGREED and understood by both parties that: Sec. 1. All materials published, printed, or used for public distribution funded in whole or in part by the Commission will note on its materials that the Texas Historical Commission and the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, aided in financially assisting this work. Sec. 2. This Agreement may not be amended by either party without the written consent of the other party. In special cases, adjustment of the contractual requirements may be necessary pursuant to recommendations by the National Register Department with the approval of the Texas Historical Commission. WITNESS OUR HANDS this 1`�� day of 1999. THE TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION by: Cu is unne Executive Director C • by: Contractor APPROVED AS TO FORM: I f1h by: ssistant Attorney General Attachment I: Project Proposal and Budget Attachment II: "Guidelines for Survey and Planning Grants" Attachment III: Grant Award Letter ATTACMM I Project Proposal: The City of Lubbock Planning Department and the Southwest Collection at Texas Tech propose a joint effort to locate, print, index and provide appropriate archival storage for significant photographs of Lubbock. The photographs will be available at the Southwest collection for use by scholars, architects, building owners, and students. The collection of photographs and index will be useful to persons preparing applications for local and state historical markers and to those preparing nominations to the National Register of Historic Places. They will also be a useful complement to the City of Lubbock Historic Site Survey. The project professional staff will select photographs for printing from a variety of sources. Collections identified include unprinted negatives from the Brown's Studio Collection (1920x -1940s), the Rollin Herald Collection (1940x -present), the C.W. Ratliff Collection (1920x-19�0s), all in the Southwest Collection, and the privately held Reeve's Studio Collection (1930s -present) and Lubbock Chamber of Commerce Collection (1910s -present). All collections will be examined and negatives selected for printing to the limit of the funds specified in the grant budget proposal. Student assistants will prepare negatives for copying, refile negatives after copying, house copy prints, and index the photographs for reference. The students will also enter data from the index into the Southwest Collection's computerized finding aids. Current Address: Telephone: Birthdate: EDUCATION SALLY STILL ABBE 4124 Chicago Business Lubbock, Texas 794i4 Address: (806) 792-7826 July 10, 1954 P.O. Box 2000 Lubbock,Texas 79457 Telephone: (806) 762-6411, ext. 2106 M.A. in interdisciplinary studies (Historic Preservation emphasis), December 1982. B.A. in history, Texas Tech University, May 1976. Teaching Certificate, Broadfield Social Studies, Texas Tech University, May, 1979. Additional graduate courses in architectural history, park administration, historical resource interpretation, and archives management. Assistant Planner, City of Lubbock. One of six professional positions in small department. Duties include update of Lubbock Comprehensive Land Use Plan, revision and editing of other land use documents. Liaison to property owners in the Broadway Historic Corridor. Primary responsibility for Historic Preservation Program, including historic landmark designations, public information including working with building owners, research and survey. October 1981.- present. Contract, Texas Historical Commission, to research and write National Register Nomination for the Plainview Commercial Historic District. July - August 1981. Contract,;Ranching Heritage Association, to research and write.the :. history of the Ropes Santa Fe depot donated to the Ranching Heritage Center, Museum of Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas. June - July 1981. Collections inventorier. Southwest Collection, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas. January - June 1981. Research Assistant. "The Last Migration: European Folk Islands in Northwest Texas." Conducted research in Southwest Collection and in ethnic communities in the South Plains area for a traveling exhibit now in preparation. Panhandle -Plains Historical :iuseum, Canyon,.Texas, October 1980 - January 1981. ow PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (cont.) Historian and field survey worker. Historic/Architectural Survey of Roosevelt and Chaves Counties, New Mexico. Conducted with three co-workers, a survey (including photographs of each structure and complete architectural description) of more than 7,500 buildings in these two counties as part of the New tiexico'Historic Buildings Inventory. Was personally responsible for compiling and writing text for sixty page report to the New Mexico Preservation Bureau. September 1979 - October 1980. Research Assistant and Field Worker. Nevada Historic Engineering Site Inventory, History of Engineering Program, Department of Civil Engineering, Texas Tech University, June - September, 1979. Substitute Teacher, Lubbock Independent School District, March - May, 1979. Security guard and historic resource interpreter, Ranching Heritage Center, The Museum of Texas Tech University, Summer, 1977. Teaching Assistant, History Department, 1976-1978. Assisted Dr. Paul Woods in U. S. History to.18761, and Dr. Harry Jebsen in U. S. History 1876 to present. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Phi Kappa Phi, national academic honorary, 1982. Phi Alpha Theta, National history honorary. Secretary, 1975-76. President, 1978-791 Zeta Iota Chapter. Lubbock Heritage Society. Membership Chairman, 1985-86, Treasurer, 1986-1987. National Trust for Historic Preservation. jvmj 0a Mv1p&j_;4W;ffl "A History of Overton South," presented at a symposium on neighborhood preservation presented by the Center for Public Service, Texas Tech University, October 14, 1977. Publications"A Kind of Camelot?--Lubbock's Overton South." The Museum Journal, 1979. "Plainview Commercial Historic District." Hale County History, 1982. REFEREITCES Willard B. Robinson, Professor, Department of Architecture, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Te;. -as. James W. I:itchen, Professor, Department of Park Administration and Landscape Architecture, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas. REFERENCES (Cont.) Bobby D. Weaver, Curator of Ethnology, Panhandle -Plains Historical Museum, Canyon, Texas. Henson, Randall D., Associate Planner, City of Lubbock - Planning, Lubbock, Texas. RELATED SKILLS Photography. Capable of using 35 mm. SLR and cameras with 2 and 1/4" negative format. Preparing National Register of Historic Places nominations. Now listed on the National Register are: N -C -O Railroad Depot, Reno, Nevada. Plainview Commercial Historic District. Warren A. Bacon Home, Lubbock. Lynn County Courthouse, Tahoka. First National Bank, Sweetwater; Lubbock High School, Lubbock. Sweetwater Commercial Historic District. Stamford Multiple Resource District. Schneider Hotel, Pampa. Preparing and presenting audio-visual presentations. These experiences range from showing 16 mm..films to preparing slide - tape lectures on various subjects. Public speaking to groups interested in preservation. These include architectural preservation classes, Junior Historian groups, and interested citizens. Map reading.and interpretation, including location of UTI -4 points. Research skills using traditional and non-traditional sources, including state, county, and local records and historic photographs. VITA CYNTHIA L. MARTIN Assistant Archivist Southwest Collection Box 4090, Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409 3214-A 66th Street Lubbock, TX 79413 EDUCATION: Home Phone: 806-793-9525 Business Phone: 806-742-3749 B. A. (Social Welfare), Texas Tech University, 1974 M. A. (History), Texas Tech University, 1986 Thesis: "Diplomacy on the Southern Plains: Ute -Comanche Relations in the Eighteenth Century" Currently working toward Ph.D. (History), Texas Tech University Major fields: Western American, Native American and Environmental History EMPLOYMENT: Teaching Assistant, Department of History, Texas Tech University, 1979-1981; 1983. Graduate Assistant, Southwest Collection, Texas Tech University, 1982-1984. Assistant Archivist, Southwest Collection, Texas Tech University, 1984 -present. SEMINARS ATTENDED: Archives and the Law, University of Texas Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Austin, Texas, 1985. Public Administration Institute: Management Development, Texas State Library, Lubbock, Texas, 1985. Archival Appraisal: Theory and Practice, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Austin, Texas, 1986. Care and Administration of Photographs and Photograph. Collections, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Austin, Texas, 1987 SCHOLARLY PRESENTATIONS: "Diplomacy on the Southern Plains: Ute -Comanche Relations in the Eighteenth Century," Southwestern Social Science Association, 1981; Llano Estacado Corral of Westerners International, 1981. "American Indian Diplomacy: Spanish -Comanche Treaty of 1786," American Society for Ethnohistory, 1984. "The Myth of 'Hereditary Enemies:' The Ute and Comanche in New Mexico," Historical Society of New Mexico, 1985. "Historic Film as a Reflection of Popular Culture," Texas/Southwest Popular Culture Association, 1986. Pr -Trading on the Tehuacanna: George Barnard and Torrey's Trading House," Texas State Historical Association, 1987. "The Southwest Collection: New Materials, New Directions," West Texas Historical Association, 1987. And That's the Way it Was': The Southwest Collection Newsfilm Project," Society of Southwest Archivists, 1987. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: "History and Culture of the Comanche Indians," Docent Training, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 1981, 1982. "The Family Survives," Docent Training, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 1983. "Cowboy Heritage," Summer Youth Class, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 1982-83. "Lubbock, Then and Now," Slide -tape Presentation, Lubbock Public Schools, 1984-85. "Lubbock: The City that Should Not Have Been,;" Slide -tape Presentation, 1986. "Recent Publications of Interest to West Texans," West Texas Historical Association Yearbook, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987. Author of successful grant proposal funded by the National Historical Publications and Records Commission for providing intellectual and physical access to the Southwest Collection Newsfilm Collection. MEMBERSHIPS: American Society for Ethnohistory Lubbock Heritage Society Society of Southwest Archivists Texas State Historical Association West Texas Historical Association Western Historical Association Westerners International Phi Alpha Theta Phi Kappa Phi CITY OF LUBBOCK 1987-1988 C.L.G. GRANT FUNDS REQUEST SOUTHWEST COLLECTION/CITY PHOTO PROJECT CITY OF LUBBOCK MATCH Photograph processing and printing (Provided by the Southwest Collection from State of Texas Higher Education Assistance Fund) Archival storage materials and other supplies Southwest Collection Professional; Staff (for supervision and historical and archival expertise) 140 hours @ $11.00 hour City of Lubbock Professional,Staff (for grant administration Viand some historical research) 75 hours @ $12.87 hour Total match GRANT FUNDS REQUESTED Student Assistants 1000 hours @ $5.00 Travel expenses to C.L.G. conference Additional Photograph processing and printing Total funds requested $5,000.00 $ 300.00 $1,540.00 $ 965.25 7,805.25 $5,000.00 300.00 2.500.00 $7,800.00 t 0 Guidelines for Survey and Planning Grants LAOT LVwwrIeM "I.fk .iv, Pre Application Manual TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION NATIONAL REGISTER PROGRAMS P.O. Box 12276 Austin, Texas 78711 [512) 463-6094 Revised 1/88 ATTA II 9 O PART I: INTRODUCTION TO SURVEY AND PLANNING GRANTS With the enactment of the National Historic Preservation Act in 1966, the Secretary of the Interior was directed to expand and maintain a national register of historic places and to give maximum encouragement to state governments to develop statewide historic preservation programs of their own. The Act recognized that one of the prerequisites for an effective national preservation program was the identification of historic resources across the country thr-ugh comprehensive statewide surveys. A grants-in-aid program established by the Act made limited funding available through the National Park Service of the U.S. Department of the Interior for such survey work at both the state and local levels. Surveys and their resulting inventories form an important basis for planning decisions that affect the quality of our community life. In order to plan for the preservation and enhancement of the historic environment, it is necessary to determine what properties make up that environment. Broad and thorough coverage of the environment in a survey generally leads to a multiple property nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. Therefore, the effectiveness of the National Register as a planning tool depends upon the quality and comprehensiveness of the preceeding survey activity. Survey and planning grants in Texas are administered through the National Register Programs office of the Texas Historical Commission. They are distributed as 50-50 matching grants, which, with the exception of General Revenue Sharing and Community Development Block Grant monies, must be matched with non-federal funds. These grants can be used to hire a professional (see Standards for Professional Qualifications) preservation planner, historian, archeologist, or architectural historian to conduct a survey, prepare National Register nominations, or formulate strategies for preservation planning. What is a Survey? Surveys are a process of identifying and gathering data on a community's historic resources. They are generally as comprehensive as possible in their effort to record all of the pre -1945 historic and/or archeological sites, buildings, objects, structures, and districts within a given geographical boundary giving them a high, medium, or low priority ranking. To an extent, surveys then concentrate on all high priority properties that may be eligible for inclusion in a National Register multiple property nomination. This includes all resources that are of significance in American history, architecture, archeology and culture, and which are generally more than 50 years of age. Because we are also concerned with locally significant neighborhoods and properties, and, since with the passage of time an increasing number of properties will continue to fall within the 50 -year time range, we recommend that more recent properties and properties of local significance be included in a survey. The following are suggestions about the range of resources that may be considered significant within the context of a survey. r + BUILDINGS: Definition: A building, such as a house, barn, church, hotel, or similar construction is created to shelter any form of human activity. Building may also be used to refer to a historically and functionally related unit, such as a courthouse and jail or a house and barn. (1) Notable examples of architectural styles and periods or methods of construction, as well as particular local or regional types. (2) Buildings illustrating the history and development of such diverse areas as communications, community planning, government, conservation, economics, education, literature, music, and landscape architecture. (3) Stores and businesses and other properties that provide a physical record of the experiences of particular ethnic groups. (4) Markets and commercial structures or blocks. (5) Buildings by great architects or master builders and important works by minor ones. (6) Architectural curiosities, buildings which are one -of -a -kind. (7) Sole or rare survivors of an important architectural style or type. (8) Studios of American artists, writers, or musicians during the years of significant activity. (9) Institutions that provide evidence of the cultural history of a community, such as churches, universities, art centers, theaters, and entertainment halls. (10) Buildings where significant technological advances or inventories in any field occurred (agricultural experiment stations, laboratories, etc.). (11) Vernacular or folk buildings including secondary or outbuildings. (12) A few interiors of buildings that retain significant features. SITES: Definition: A site is the location of a significant event, a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or structure, whether standing, ruined, or vanished, where the location itself possesses historical, cultural, or archeological value regardless of the value of any existing structure. (1) Archeological sites containing information that may be of value in answering particular research questions. (2) Archeological sites containing information that may shed light on broad trends in local, state, or national history. (3) Sites of cultural importance to local people or ethnic groups, such as locations of important events in their history, historic or prehistoric cemeteries, or shrines. (4) Sites associated with events important in the history of the community as a whole, such as battlefields, trails, etc. (5) Cemeteries associated with important events or people, or whose study can provide important information about history or prehistory, or landscape significance. (6) Ruins of historically or archeologically important buildings or structures. (7) Historically important shipwrecks. (8) Cemeteries important for the architectural or artistic qualities of their constituent structures and monuments. (9) Constructed landscapes that exemplify principles, trends, or schools of thought in landscape architecture, or that represent fine examples of the landscape architect's art. [Cemeteries are important cultural properties to survey, but usually are not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.] OBJECTS: Definition: The term object is used to distinguish from buildings and structures those constructions that are primarily artistic in nature or are relatively small in scale and simply constructed. Although it may be, by nature or design, movable, an object is associated with a specific setting or environment, such as statuary in a designed landscape. (1) Objects important to the cultural life of a community and related to a specific location, such as fountains, road markers, outdoor sculpture, etc. (2) Objects important to scientific, historical, or art historical research such as statuary, ships, locomotives, etc. STRUCTURES: Definition: The term structure is used to distinguish from buildings those functional constructions made usually for purposes other than creating shelter. (1) Industrial and engineering structures including mills, kilns, quarries, aqueducts, weirs, processing plants, utility or pumping stations, and dams. (2) Transportation structures such as railroads, turnpikes, canals, tunnels, bridges, roundhouses, lighthouses, and wharves. (3) Agricultural structures such as granaries, silos, corncribs, and apiaries. r (4) Movable structures associated with important processes of transportation, industrial development, social history, recreation, and military history DISTRICTS: Definition: A district possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development. (1) Groups of buildings that physically and spatially comprise a specific environment: groups of related buildings that represent the standards and tastes of a community or neighborhood during one period of history, unrelated structures that represent a progression of various styles and functions, or cohesive townscapes or streetscapes that possess an identity of place. (2) Groups of buildings, structures, and/or sites representative of, or associated with a particular social, ethnic, or economic group during a particular period. -(3) Farmlands and related farm structures (silos, barns, granaries, irrigation canals) that possess an identity of time and place. (4) Groups of structures and buildings that show the industrial or technological developments of the community, state, or nation. (5) Groups of buildings representing historical development patterns, such as commercial and trade centers, county seats, and mill towns. (6) Groups of sites, structures, and/or buildings containing archeological data and probably representing a historic or prehistoric settlement system or pattern of related activities. (7) Groups of educational buildings and their associated spaces (school and university campuses, etc.) (8) Extensive constructed landscapes, such as large parks, that represent the work of a master landscape architect or the concepts and directions of a school of landscape architecture. (9) Landscapes that have been shaped by historical processes of land use and retain visual and cultural characteristics indicative of such processes. Why undertake a survey? The increasing competition for land use and uncertain economies of rural and urban areas in the State leave the survival of many prehistoric and historic resources in serious doubt. Although new construction will inevitably replace some of these resources, the completion of a survey can lead to the development of a preservation plan that takes into account the relative values and significance of all historically and architecturally significant buildings, sites, residential neighborhoods, and rural and urban spaces. A preservation plan can help channel growth into the least sensitive areas of the environment and limit the loss of valuable resources. In addition to serving as planning tools, surveys can help in locating potential Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks and State Archeological Landmarks. These designations, as well as National Register multiple property nominations, can make those same properties eligible for economic benefits, such as tax credits, and State and federal grants for historic preservation. What are the products of a completed survey? (1) A typewritten Texas Historic Sites Inventory Form or its approved equivalent or State of Texas Archeological Site Data Form of every prehistoric or historic property in the survey area. (See Appendices A & B) (2) Negatives of all surveyed sites with proper identification of each view. These may be either 4" X 5" or 35mm format. If 35mm format is used, each roll of film must be accompanied by two contact sheets and one completed Photo Index sheet. (See Appendix B) In addition, 35mm slides of all high priority properties and representative streetscapes are required. (3) Detailed maps that identify the location of all surveyed properties and districts. Local maps with building footprints or USGS 7.5 series maps may be used to clearly identify surveyed sites and their site numbers. If USGS maps are used these will be provided by the Texas Historical Commission. (See Appendix C) For archeological surveys, USGS maps must be used and must clearly identify all site locations with trinomial numbers. (4) Two copies of a final report which outlines the survey's purpose and methods, and makes recommendations for local, state, and federal historical designation and other appropriate preservation measures. This report must be in conformance with Federal Register, Volume 48, No. 190. (Available from the Texas Historical Commission) Additional products, if requested by the grant recipient, may result from the survey work including sketch maps, sketch plans, and the outlining of local preservation strategies. What is a National Register Nomination? National Register nominations may be for individual properties, districts, or multiple properties. A multiple property nomination, the most comprehensive one, includes all historic and/or prehistoric properties within a given geographic area that have been identified in a comprehensive survey as meeting the criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. This can include any combination of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant at the local, state, or national level. What are preservation planning activities? In general, activities for the continued identification and evaluation of historic properties and for their protection and enhancement are considered preservation planning activities. These may include preparation of a comprehensive historic preservation plan, development of historic preservation or district ordinances, establishment of financial incentive programs for preservation, and public education activities. PART II: SURVEY AND PLANNING METHODOLOGY The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning, Identi ication, Evaluation, Documentation and Registration are the guidelines prepared by the National Park Service of the U.S. Department of the Interior for grants awarded from the Historic Preservation Fund. The Standards provide a general methodology for survey and planning activities on many levels and different scales. Therefore, all work completedwith assistance of the survey and planning grants of the State Historic Preservation Office must be in conformance with these Standards. A copy of these may be obtained from the National Register Programs office of the Texas Historical Commission. What are the elements of preservation planning? A historic resources survey of a community has as one of its main purposes the development of a complete, fully documented, comprehensive inventory of the community's historic properties. To achieve this end using cost-effective, broad, and unbiased methods, the Standards for Preservation Planning recommend the preparation of historic contexts. A historic context is a broad pattern of historical development in a community or its region with geographic, temporal, and thematic boundaries. Historic resources, both standing and archeological, represent these contexts. For example, if a community began as a port city in the 19th century, its functions as such may reflected in its street plan, in the character of some neighborhoods, in the location of warehouses and commercial buildings, or in archeological remains buried beneath more recent development. The operation of the 19th -century port is thus one historic context that influences the nature and distribution of the community's resources, and should influence survey efforts designed to find and document such resources. Historic contexts are developed on the basis of background data on the community's history and prehistory, or on such data from the surrounding area. To uncover such data, survey planners should conduct initial research into the community's history and the history and prehistory of the region in which it lies, and should consult knowledgeable authorities. An initial statement of historic contexts should be developed during these earliest stages of planning to guide development of the actual survey design. At the point of planning the survey, it may be feasible to define them only in broad, general terms; sufficient flexibility should always be maintained to allow changes to take place as the survey progresses. In this manner, historic contexts are almost always refined, modified, added to, and elaborated on as the survey itself proceeds. An outline of statewide historic contexts is available from the National Register Programs office of the Texas Historical Commission. These are considered a guide for surveys, registration and documentation that will eventually lead to the establishment of fully developed contexts or those contexts narrowed down to specific property or resource types with defined protection strategies. How are survey goals and priorities established? A great deal of preparation is necessary before beginning any survey effort. During the initial stages of research, survey goals should be established based on the developed historic contexts. This will provide information crucial for determining the scope and focus of the proposed work. For example, suppose that a community (a) was the probable location of a prehistoric Indian village near the confluence of two streams; (b) was a port during the early 19th century; and (c) experienced growth in the middle to late 19th century as rural Blacks established neighborhoods of shotgun houses near urban centers and merchants built opulent houses in another related neighborhood. Goals for the first -stage reconnaissance -level survey effort might be (a) to determine whether soil strata that might contain the archeological remains of the Indian village still exist under the modern streets and houses that overlay the old stream confluence; (b) to determine the boundaries of the early 19th century port, identify major buildings from the period, identify buildings requiring further study to determine whether they represent repeatedly modernized 19th -century buildings, and determine locations of likely archeological interest; (c) to identify historic neighborhoods that retain their architectural and cultural integrity. The means to achieving these goals can then be assigned priorities based on such factors as work already conducted, available funding, planning and development constraints, and survey opportunities. How is the survey conducted? The first step is to determine the boundaries of the survey area. This usually is determined by the funding agency or organization and follows an established political boundary. If dealing with standing structures in densely populated urban areas, however, other boundaries might be considered. In most archeological studies, boundaries may follow topographic or environmental zones, such as valley floors, or river basins. Regardless of the boundaries, a survey consists of two major components: (a) archival research, (b) field work and recording of information. Although archival research begins before field work, and much information is recorded as the result of field work, both normally will be simultaneous activities. Those conducting them should interact and provide each other with advice and suggestions. (A) Performing archival research Archival research should examine factors such as the area's historical or prehistoric development, political boundaries, settlement patterns, and geographic features. Good sources of historic information include back issues of newspapers and periodicals, city directories, census records, old maps and photographs, Sanborn Insurance maps, county histories, tax rolls, and deed records. Local libraries and county courthouses often have many of these and other historical records. Prehistoric background information can be found in published and unpublished studies, theses, and dissertations. The Texas State Library and Archives in Austin, the Barker Texas History Center at the University of Texas, the Southwest Collection at Texas Tech, the Institute of Texan Cultures in San Antonio, the Texas Historical Commission libraries and other State and local archives are useful resource centers for both historic and prehistoric reference materials. Locally collected information is.vital in any survey effort. Dis— plays and collections at libraries, schools, and museums; articles in local newspapers; guided tours of historic homes; meetings with local groups or clubs; and oral history projects can all help gather information and local support for a survey. Local historians, genealogists, and other knowledgeable individuals also should be enlisted in the effort. (B) Field Work and Recording Procedures Field work is usually divided into two types: reconnaissance and intensive surveys. A reconnaissance survey should document: (1) The boundaries of the area surveyed; (2) Major properties of 50 years of age or more; (3) The method of survey, including the extent of survey coverage; (4) Comment on the kinds of historic properties present in the survey area; (5) Specific properties that were identified, and the categories of information collected; and (6) Areas examined that did not yield historic properties. An intensive survey should document: (1) The boundaries of the area surveyed; (2) All properties of 50 years of age or more; (3) The method of survey, including an estimate of the extent of survey coverage; (4) A record of the precise location of all properties identified; (5) Information on the appearance, significance, integrity, and boundaries of each property sufficient to permit an evaluation of its significance; and (6) Comment on and estimates of areas where resources have been lost. Sometimes both types are conducted as related parts of the same survey project; in other cases, reconnaissance is used to plan and focus later intensive survey. In general, the Texas Historical Commission now funds only intensive surveys. The field work generally consists of identifying resources, photographing them, recording basic site data, marking a field map, and sometimes completing a site plan for all properties which appear to be of historical, architectural, or archeological significance. In a survey of above -ground resources, this process entails driving or walking every street in a community, and evaluating every site and structure individually on the basis of the established criteria. The information gained through this process can then be cross-referenced with the archival findings. A Historic Sites Inventory Form or an approved equivalent is completed for every property deemed to be of cultural or historical value at that point. These forms are then keyed to a map of the survey area, so that the general patterns of chronology, growth, and concentration can easily be identified. (See Appendices A and C). In archeological surveys, standard predictive survey methods are employed, and sites are recorded on State of Texas Archeological Site Data Forms (see Appendix D). All archeological sites should be plotted on the largest scale USGS topographic sheets available (7.5 minute scale is preferred). [Please refer to National Register Bulletin 24, Guidelines For Local Surveys: A Basis For Preservation Planning by the National Register of Historic Places Interagency Resources, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior for more information on survey and planning "techniques. Available from the National Register Programs office, Texas Historical Commission.] PART III: HOW TO APPLY FOR SURVEY AND PLANNING GRANTS Survey and planning grants are allocated annually by the Texas Historical Commission in accordance with the State Historic Preservation Plan to assist in preservation planning projects and compilation of an inventory of the State's historic resources. These grants are allocated from the Historic Preservation Fund awarded to the Texas Historical Commission of the State of Texas by the U.S. Department of the Interior. As explained earlier, with other grants awarded through the Texas Historical Commission, survey and planning grants must be matched on a 50-50 basis. Since the funding is federal in origin, only non-federal monies may be used as a match, with the exception of General Revenue Sharing and Community Development Block Grant monies. The match can consist of cash or in-kind contributions. Cash contributions are the grant recipient's cash outlay of money from non-federal sources, except for General Revenue or Community Development funds. In-kind contributions are the value of non-cash contributions provided by the grant recipient or non-federal third parties. Pre -Application Procedures A signed National Register Survey Grant Pre Application Form must be submitted to the Texas Historical Commission in order for a nonprofit organization or governmental entity to be eligible for a survey and planning grant. The Pre -Application Form also should describe the need, proposed work, project professionals, expected costs with matching capabilities, anticipated project duration, and any deadlines and specific schedules to which the applicant must adhere. A Project Proposal provided by the selected project professionals should accompany the Pre -Application Form. (See "Project Proposal") For a list of current project professionals, r contact the National Register Programs office of the Texas Historical Commission and forward the selected project professionals a formal Request for Proposals. The deadline for submittal of a Pre -Application Form to the Texas Historical Commission is 5:00 p.m. on April 1, 1988. Grant Allocations Announcement of the grant allocations will be made by the Historical Commission as early as possible in each fiscal year beginning each October 1, but because the actual date of receipt of federal monies may vary, some flexibility is necessary in the time schedule for completion of projects. Funds will be awarded to eligible applicants on a competitive basis giving priority to those conforming to the goals of the State Historic Preservation Officer and State Historic Preservation Plan. Such priorities may be subject to change as a result of alterations in federal "historic preservation programs. The review of applications will focus on, but not be limited to, the continuation of survey work already underway, initiation of survey work in areas identified as priorities both rural and urban, and the preparation of multiple property National Register nominations. The Texas Historical Commission prefers that Project Proposals phase proposed work to separate survey activities from National Register nomination preparation. Project Proposal Once the award is made, a detailed description of what is to be accomplished with this grant award must be submitted for the approval of the Texas Historical Commission prior to project implementation. The grant recipient may use the original or an amended version of the pre -application proposal for formal approval. This Project Proposal should include: (1) a description of the existing circumstances prompting the need for this survey; (2) a description of the proposed scope of work --what can be expected to be accomplished; (3) a list of proposed project personnel and their professional qualifications; (4) documentation indicating the competitive process used to select the project professionals; (5) a budget summary and detailed budget breakdown and narrative; (A budget narrative must be submitted with the proposed budget to explain expendi- tures by item. Calculations justifying all entries should be shown. Iden- tify all sources of matching funds.) (6) proposed project start and end dates; (7) an outline of anticipated future phases of work; and . k (8) plans for utilization of data gathered in this phase. Note: Costs associated with activities carried out to influence legislation pending before Congress, commonly referred to as "lobbying," are unallow- able as charges to the National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund. These grants must conform to provisions of 18 USC 1913: "No part of the money appropriated by any enactment of Congress, may be used directly or indirectly to pay for any personal service, advertisement, telegram, telephone, letter, printed or written matter, or other device, intended or designed to influence in any manner a Member of Congress, to favor or oppose, by vote or otherwise, any legislation or appropriation by Congress, whether before or after the introduction of any bill or resolution proposing such legislation or appropriation; but this shall not prevent officers or employees of the United States or its departments or agencies from communicating to Members of Congress on the request of any Member, or to Congress through proper official channels, requests for legislation or appropriation which they deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the public business." Procurement of Project Professional The grant recipient must perform competitive procurement procedures to obtain the project professional. The grant recipient must contact at least three qualified professionals for written bids usually through the issuance of Request for Proposals.(The Texas Historical Commission has samples of such requests if needed.) In addition, the grant recipient may want to advertise for written bids in such broad market publications as the "Commerce Business Daily", newspapers, professional journals, etc. The Texas Historical Commission has resumes of interested and qualified parties on file that grant recipients should use for contacts. This file contains resumes for minority business enterprises as well, and every effort should be made to contact these minority businesses. The Texas Historical Commission does not endorse any party; these resumes are for informational purposes only. The invitation to bid (Request for Proposals), proposals received, statement explaining selection process must be submitted to the Texas Historical Commission as part of the Project Proposal. Standards for Professional Qualifications To insure that appropriate historical, architectural, archeological and cultural properties are identified for the public benefit through grants-in-aid assistance, the following minimal professional standards for historical, architectural, and archeological documentation have been established by Preservation Assistance Division, National Park Service Personnel. Those persons supervising the surveys must be professionally qualified in accordance with 36 CFR 61 as follows: Professional Requirements "In the following definitions, a year of full-time professional experience need not consist of a continuous year of full-time work but may be made up of discontinuous periods of full-time or part-time work adding up to the equivalent of a year of full-time experience. (a) History. The minimum professional qualifications in history are a graduate degree in history or closely related field; or a bachelor's degree in history or a related field plus one of the following: (1) at least two years of full-time experience in research, writing, teaching, interpre- tation, or other demonstrable professional activity with an academic institution, historical organization or agency, museum, or other pro- fessional institution; or (2) substantial contribution through research and publication to the body of scholarly knowledge in the field of history. (b) Archeology. The minimum professional qualifications in archeology are: (1) a graduate degree in archeology, anthropology, or closely related field, or equivalent training accepted for accreditation purposes by the Society of Professional Archeologists, (2) demonstrated ability to carry research to completion of theses, research reports, or similar documents, and (3) at least 16 months of professional experience and/or specialized training in archeological field, laboratory, or library research, admini- stration, or management, including at least 4 months experience in archeo- logical field research and at least one year of experience and/or specialized training in the kind of activity the individual proposes to practice. For example, persons supervising field archeology should have at least 1 year or its equivalent in field experience an/or specialized field training, including at least six months in a supervisory role. Persons engaged to do archival or documentary research should have had at least 1 year experience and/or specialized training in such work. Archeologists engaged in regional or agency planning or compliance with historic preservation procedures should have had at least 1 year of experience in work directly pertinent to planning, compliance actions, etc. and/or specialized historic preservation or cultural resource management training. A practitioner of prehistoric archeology should have had at least 1 year of experience or specialized training in research concerning archeological resources of the prehistoric period. A practitioner of historic archeology should have had at least 1 year of experience in research concerning archeological resources of the historic period. Experience in archeo- logical research in the region where the project will be undertaken is usually desirable. (c) Architectural History. The minimum professional qualifications in architectural history are a graduate degree in architectural history, his- toric preservation, or closely related field, with course work in American architectural history; or a bachelor's degree in architectural history, with a concentration in American architecture; or a bachelor's degree in architectural history, historic preservation, or closely related field plus one of the following: (1) at least two years full-time experience in re- search, writing, or teaching in American history or restoration architec- ture with an academic institution, historical organization or agency, mu- seum, or other professional institution; or (2) substantial contribution through research and publication to the body of scholarly knowledge in the field of American architectural history. (d) Historical Architecture. The minimum professional qualifications in historical architecture are a professional degree in architecture or a state license to practice architecture, plus one of the following: (1) at least 1 year of graduate study in architectural preservation, American history, preservation planning, or closely related field and at least 1 year of full-time professional experience on preservation and restoration projects; or (2) at least 2 years of full-time professional experience on preservation and restoration projects. Experience on preservation and res- toration projects shall include detailed investigations of historic struc- tures, preparation of historic structures research reports, and preparation of plans and specifications for preservation projects." Regulations of the U. S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in federally -assisted programs on the basis of race, color and/or national origin. Review and Approval of the Project Proposal Project Proposals should be submitted to the Texas Historical Commis- sion for review and approval with the Pre -Application so as to expedite the project and avoid additional delays due to deadline backlogs. Orientation Meeting A meeting with the staff of the Texas Historical Commission will be required for all grant recipients shortly after the grant award is announced. The project supervisor, project professional, and the grant recipient's fiscal officer will be required to attend. The purpose of the meeting is both to establish survey priorities and a timetable for completion, and formalize the budget and reimbursement procedures. A time and date for the meeting will be arranged following sub- mittal of the Pre -application Form, project proposal, approval of the grants by the Texas Historical Commission, and issuance of award letters. No work should begin prior to the orientation meeting and receipt by the Texas Historical Commission of a signed written contract. Project Implementation A. Project Contract. A contractual agreement (approved by the State Attorney General) specifying the approximate scope of work, a timetable for completion and budgetary concerns will be prepared by the Texas Historical Commission on the basis of the Project Proposal and the subsequent consultations with the grant recipient. The agreement must be signed by the parties involved prior to commencement of work. B. Reimbursement. All payments to the grant recipient will be strictly on a reimbursement basis, and all payments will be on a one-to-one match. Invoices and cancelled checks for total payment to the project professional(s) should be submitted by the grant recipient; one-half of these totals will then be reimbursed to the grant recipient.(See "assurances," p. 13) Reimbursement can be requested monthly, quarterly, or as a lump sum at the completion of the project. The following project documentation must be submitted to the Texas Historical Commission in order for reimbursement to be considered: 1.Procurement documents (invitation to bid, proposals received, statement explaining selection of project professional). 2.Signed contractual agreement: (a) Contract signed by the parties involved after the Project Proposal has been approved. 3. Assurances: Each request for reimbursement submitted to the Texas Historical Commission is to contain: (1) A letter requesting reimbursement which lists: (a) the number of the request (first, second, third, etc.) (b) time period in which costs were incurred. (c) costs currently listed. (2) Verification of each cost currently claimed. This will include copies of statements, and if in-kind contributions are made, copies of timesheets signed by both the employee (or volunteer) and supervisor. (3) Verification of each corresponding payment (copies of cancelled checks). 4. Monthly progress reports, due to the Commission by the 10th day of the following month. The Commission will then reimburse the grant recipient for one-half of the documented allowable expenditures made during the project period covered by the request. Note: The Commission will not process requests for reimbursement of expenses incurred prior to the project start date. C. Project Review. A periodic review will be made by the Texas Historical Commission, National Register Programs staff, to monitor project progress and to assist with any difficulties encountered. The grant recipient is responsible for informing the Commission, in writing, of significant problems, delays, and/or adverse conditions that materially affect planned performance. Additional reviews may be requested by either party at any time. Following review, the contract may be amended if necessary. Amendments may be necessary if the project is proceeding more rapidly or slowly than anticipated, and survey work may be added to, or deleted from, the contract. D. Revisions to proposed work/costs. All revisions to the Project Proposal must be requested in writing prior to implementation. The Commission will grant approval or denial in written form. Only when written approval has been granted may the proposed work be implemented. E. Project Certification and Final Report. Twenty-five percent (25X) of the grant awards will be retained by the Commission and paid upon receipt and certification of the completed survey material and two copies of a detailed, documented Final Report. All survey material will be reviewed within twenty-one days of submission to the Texas Historical Commission, National Register Programs office. Survey material may be returned if it is determined that the submitted data are incomplete. Corrected or amended survey data should be returned to the Commission within 30 days for certification and final payment. Final products that do not meet the terms of the grant agreement and/or that do not comply with the appropriate Secretary of Interior Standards and the terms of the National Register Programs Guidelines - NPS 49 will not be reimbursed. The completed survey forms, contact sheets, label sheets, photo- graphic negatives, slides, and final reports generated by the work of the project professional shall all be the property of the Commission. F. Fiscal Records. It will be the responsibility of the grant recipient to maintain all financial records (receipts, invoices, and timetables) in _accordance with Federal Management Circular A.87 and OMB A 102 (revised) for a period of three years beyond the Project End Date. It will be the responsibility of the grant recipient (if state or local government) to acquire an independent audit, in accordance with OMB A-128, if the grant award is between $25,000 and $100,000 a year. However, all grant recipients, including non -profits, are encouraged to acquire an independent audit. TEXAS HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY FORM — TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION (rev. 8.82) APPENDIX 1. County BosqueBOS 5. USGS Quad No. 3197-342 Site No. 1 7 City/Rural Norse Community UTM Sector L4lh26Q2n/351 1770 2. Name Joseph and Anna Olson Farm 6. Date: Factual 1872 Est. Address Off of FM 182, 5 miles southeast 7. Architect/Builder—Joseph and Jacob Olson of Clifton Contractor 3. Owner R. E. Henderson / D. M. McTaggart 8, Stylelrype Pioneer Norwegian Vernacular Address7224 Westover, Waco TX 76710 9. Original Use Red dente 4. Block/Lot Present Use -Vacant 10. Description 2 -story stone and wood frame house. Ground -floor is limestone masonry with wood _frame attic. Single door entrance with double -hung, six over six lights. One story _ porch extends full-length of front (southl facade Lintel over doorway engraved 111872" Detached stone smokehouse, with stone lean-to and cellar stands east of main hots _ 11. Present Condition _poor - presently abandoned, with broken windows but stable roof. 12. Significance Good example_ of Pioneer, stone Norwegian farm house. Joseph and Anna Olson arrived in Bosque Com y in 1858_ Thin romhinatinn of stnne and wnod rnnetri,rtion is imigie in thn rneint)c� hrnf not i nrnmmnn in Nnrwav nnrp eprmrPd nc Tarnh Ql enn l c It mtepnmr, 13. Relationship to Site: Moved Date or Original Site (describe) --'114: Bibliography Jacob Olscn Memoirs in Bosque 15. fnform,ant R, Radde and Ray Byford. - - County Museum 16. Recorder DH/DM Date 7-79 DESIGNATIONS PHOTO DATA TNRIS No. nld THC Code B&W 4x5s Slides ❑ RTHL ❑ HABS (no.) TEX- 35mm Negs. NR: ❑ Individual ❑ Historic. District YEAR DRWR ROLL FAME ROLL FRME ® Thematic ❑ Multiple -Resource 01 01 to NR File Name Norwegian_ Settlement Them.to Other to NAME. OLS [ N�tIS�......_.. _.__....._......._.__._....__. ADDRESS:. 0 Ff FI'1 ) n , 5 t, sJf S Set Ci Cit ow CO QUAD BLK .�- CITY LOT Me VIEW:' s W Q %ol �e RECORDED BY: DATE:-- —7-79 TEXAS HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY 35mm PHOTO INDEX APPENDIX B TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION FILM TYPE Plus -x YEAR DRWR ROLL SURVEYTITLEN=Wegian Settl m n n gosque Com Y O1 PHOTOGRAPHER- D: Hardy DATE 7-12-79 CO QUAD NO. FRME CITY SITE NO_ fJ ARA B/Ar%r%nCef- s_s � Y , • ! I �. APPENDIX lv t + i �, • r. • r apo i r 11 .0 STC t + / sit • `� ' ^� • � � •era � P< c • \ �a.,�,. i ; , _ ' 51'Tc • `� '. • � est :: _., • ,� ;� - �., _ I ,� ; - , Our .n ion ., tn�t Wo J° h ; p \ - �eS6 a?S .1031 � � 1•�• �'.+ � � , � •a7s yrs@ i U! Is16* ass .7 ! ,\.:�♦•. _ esti ,.` ,. • est i � = •asr— gyp' GOU Mme 10 Sugar)lf� �. Mountain) _ ego �ar1/7 r23 624 Wwsr SPRING! 625 r. r.: •::r, .. r a+uaNw rc'.•Nt,;���u+'\ 40r 027 SCALE 1:24 000 0 1 MILE 1000 _ 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET 1 1 KILOMETER L - CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET TEXAs�, NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 ' L� State of Texas • ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE DATA FORM Instructions: Answer all questions. Be specific in distinguishing between "none"and "none observed" or "unknown'; if in doubt, enter "unknown." Where question is followed by(Yes)(No), simply circle answer. Enter measurements in metric. Attachments may be used to complete any question: at question, write "See Attachment "and number attachments consecutively. List all attachments at end of this form. GENERAL INFORMATION Temporary Site No. Permanent Site No. Site Name Project Name Project Funding Source(s) Owner and Address Informant and Address Additional Sources of Information Previous Investigations Who What When Why Name of Original Recorder of Site RECORDING INFORMATION Name of Recorder Institutional Affiliation, if any Date LOCATIONAL INFORMATION County USGS Map Name & No Elevation UTM: Zone Easting Northing Latitude— Longitude atitude—Longitude Description of Location (include nearby USGS topographic landmarks as well as on-site references; note mileages, distances, etc.) Permanent Site No. CULTURAL MANIFESTATIONS Site Size (estimate if necessary) At Present At Original Occupation Basis for Determination Circumstances of Observation Depth of Cultural Deposit Basis for Determination Time Periods of Occupation (e.g., Prehistoric -Early Archaic; may be multiple) Components (refers to discreet occupations) Single (Yes) (No) Multiple (Yes) (No) Unknown (Yes) (No) Basis for Determination Site Type (e.g.. open campsite, military post. rockshelter) Cultural Features (If present, describe; e.g., burned rock midden, hearth, structural remains; how do they relate to components, time periods, physiography; how many are there, spatial distribution, size, contents, etc.) 3 Artifactual Materials Present (kinds of materials, distribu- tion across site, relationship to features, etc.) Discussion of Site (comments, observations, impressions) Additional Comments Permanent Site No. 1 SKETCH MAP OF SITE AND SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES (include North arrow and scale; note if map was not made on site). Attach photocopy of topographic map showing site location. U TEXAS P.O. BOX 12276 HI S TO CURTIS TUNNELL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR R I C A L AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 April 18, 1988 Hon. B. C. "Peck" McMinn, Mayor City of Lubbock P. 0. Box 2000 Lubbock, Texas 79457 Dear Mayor McMinn: ATTACMM I I I COMMISSION (512)463-6100 We are pleased to announce on behalf of the Texas Historical Commission that a grant of $7,800 has been allocated for the City of Lubbock in conjunction with theii participation in the Certified Local Government program. Funding for this grant has been provided by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, under the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. To remain eligible for this grant allocation, it is necessary for the project coordinator and the project professional to jointly participate in a grant orientation session. These sessions will be held with the Commission staff members who will be working with you on this project, and are designed to familiarize you with the granting process. A Project Proposal will also need to be prepared and submitted to the Commission before final grant approval can be made. Failure to participate in an orientation session and to submit a Project Proposal before commencement of work on this project will be cause for this grant allocation to revert to the Texas Historical `. Commission for reallocation to another project. It is, therefore, important that upon receipt of this letter you contact Dwayne Jones at (512) 463-6094 to arrange the necessary grant orientation session. Please note that no work should begin prior to your grant orientation session and approval from the Texas Historical Commission of your Project Proposal. This approval will be in the form of a written contract between you and the Texas Historical Commission. .!/m eS'laleci99 !fa2� la .y'�a1�orL We look forward to assisting you in this most worthwhile preservation endeavor. Sincerely, T.R. Fehrenbach Chairman xc: Hon. Lloyd Bentsen Hon. Phil Gramm Hon. Larry Combest Hon. John T. Montford Hon. Nolan J. Robnett Hon. Ron D. Givens Mr. Jim Nabors Dr. Donald Abbe Curtis Ehell Executive Director