HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 3072 - Contract - THC - Historical Preservation Programs Funding - 04/27/1989DGV:js
RESOLUTION
Resolution #3072
April 27, 1.989
Item #16
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and
directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock a Contract and
all related documents during the effective dates of the Contract, by and be-
tween the City of Lubbock and the Texas Historical Commission for historic
preservation programs, attached herewith, which shall be spread upon the
minutes of the Council and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall
constitute and be a part of this Resolution as if fully copied herein in de-
tail.
Passed by the City Council this 27th day of April 1989.
'B. C. McMINN, MAYOR
Secretar
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
i ertram, Assistant City Manager
fo D velopment Services
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Uonala u. Vandiver, First Assistant
City Attorney
�w
CURTIS TUNNELL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
TEXAS HISTORICAL
P.O. BOX 12276 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711
Resolution #3072
COMMI S S I ON
(512)463-6100
CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANT
This agreement is entered into by the Texas Historical
Commission, a State Agency, hereinafter referred to as the
Commission, and the City of Lubbock, hereinafter referred to as
the Contractor, pursuant to a grant made to the Texas Historical
Commission for Fiscal Year 1989, by the U.S. Department of the
Interior, National Park Service, under the provisions of the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, P.L. 89-665 (16
U.S.C.S. Sec. 470 f). This grant is made for the purpose of
funding a project or projects to be undertaken by the Contractor
as a participant in the Certified Local Government program.
The Contractor in consideration of the hereinafter monetary
sum to be paid by the Commission agrees as follows:
.SEC. 1. The Contractor shall undertake and complete the
project and/or projects detailed in the Project Proposal
(Attachment I), to be executed within the jurisdiction of the
City of Lubbock, Texas, in the County of Lubbock, Texas.
SEC. 2. It is agreed that the Contractor shall be an
independent Contractor for the purposes of this Agreement. The
Contractor shall not be considered the agent, the servant, or the
employee of the Commission for any purpose whatsoever. The
liabilities of any kind arising from the performance of the
contracted work covered by this Agreement and all Appendices
thereto are the responsibility of the Contractor.
SEC. 3.* In the event that the Contractor proposes to
undertake an inventory of cultural resources in the City of
Lubbock, then the Contractor shall be required to enter into an
Architectural Survey Agreement with the Commission, and to
fulfill all of the requirements stated in that contract document
and in "Guidelines for Survey and Planning Grants" (Attachment
II)
SEC. 4. In the event that the Contractor proposes to
undertake the preparation of a nomination to the National
Register of Historic Places, the Contractor shall utilize the
Y re S!«<e
current forms in use by the Commission, as well as the current
instructions for the completion of such forms, which are also
provided by the Commission.
SEC. 5. The staff employed by the Contractor shall meet the
criteria for employment as prescribed by the Commission as
outlined in "Guidelines for Survey and Planning Grants"
(Attachment,II) and be employed by competitive procurement.
Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly
prohibit unlawful discrimination in federally -assisted programs
on the basis of race, color, and/or national origin. In all
cases the person(s) employed by the Contractor to complete the
work specified in Sec. 1 must meet with the approval of the
Commission. The professional hired must also attend an
orientation session with the Commission's National Register staff
prior to commencing work. J
SEC. 6. The Contractor shall keep accurate financial
records available for audit by the Commission or by Federal
auditors three years from Project End Date in accordance with
Federal= Management Circulars A.87- and -OMB A 102 (revised); OMB A
128 and the National Register Programs Guidelines - NPS 49
SEC. 7. All grant fund's -"shall -be spent'- in the manner and
amounts specified in the approved detailed Budget, a copy of
which is attached -to this -document -as Attachment I.
SEC. 8. The work covered by this Agreement shall begin May
1, 1989 and be completed by July 31, 1990. If for any reason the
work is not completed by such date or if the Agreement is
cancelled due to Contractor's default, then all amounts paid
under this Agreement shall be immediately due and repayable to
the Commission. It is further agreed that -all materials
stipulated in Attachment I and all reimbursement requests be
submitted to the Commission by August 31, 1990.
naG-�`C: 9.` �,i`'8ocumeits ref"re ..
3s��i �ierein� are` here7�y '--
ppeMI-ic-ally`adopted as part - of` this" Afire hent; as-- Is set forth
herein. - -
�rbie,C+lISSION;-in consideration of the hereinbefore
described undertaking by the Contractor, agrees as follows:
The Commission shall reimburse the Contractor exclusively
.from U.S. Department of the Interior grant-in-aid funds for
historic preservation (Certified -Local Government) upon the
receipt and approval of invoices from the Contractor as long as
the Contractor is in compliance -with this Agreement, up to the
total grant sum of $3,500 as specified in the Grant Award Letter
(Attachment III). Such payments to be made as requested over a
period of fifteen (15) months for services actually rendered, or
if mutually agreed, in one lump sum up to the total grant sum,
upon completion and approval of all the requirements set forth in
this Agreement. The Contractor shall submit documented
reimbursement requests to the Commission and the Commission will
in turn -reimburse the Contractor;.up_to one. half of the requested
figure. It is further. ---A
greed that a sum not to exceed 25% of the
total granted sum will be retained by the Commission until all -
stipulated -.materials and properly documented reimbursement
requests are submitted by the Contractor.
IT IS FURTHER AGREED and understood by both parties that:
SEC. 1.- All materials published,_printed,,,or..used for
public distribution.funded-in whole or.in.part by the Commission
will -note on its materials that the Texas Historical Commission
and the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service,
aided -.in -financially assisting this work.
SEC. 2. This Agreement may not be amended by either party''
without the written consent of the other party. In special
cases, adjustment of the contractual requirements may be..
necessary pursuant to recommendations by. -the National Register
Department -with the:approval-of the Texas Historical Commission.
WITNESS -.OUR HANDSrthis 27th day of April
THE TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
Curtis Tunnell
Executive Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM: by:
�- • • e��K
Contractor Mayor, City of Lubbock
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
x jn,
bY•
_ Assistant Attorney General
Attachment*, I: Project Proposal,and Budget.
Attachment II: "Guidelines for Survey -& Planning Grants"
Attachment III: Grant Award Letter
ATTACHMENT I
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The primary expenditure of the requested funds would be for
a symposium on the preservation of religious architecture in the
Southwest. The purpose of the symposium, which would be targeted
to architects, clergy, preservationists, and students, is to create
public awareness of the need to preserve historic religious
buildings in the Southwest and to provide information about
appropriate restoration and preservation procedures. The regionally
focused symposium is based on the Sacred Trusts Conference held
in Philadelphia in 1988. Few individuals from the Southwest
attended the national conference, yet the continuing loss of
important churches indicates the need for awareness and education
in the Southwest.
Speakers with expertise in several important fields related to
church preservation will share information with participants in
the November 3, 1984 conference. A tentative list of speakers and
topics includes: Alfonso Alcocer, Universidad:de Guanajuato,
Church Preservation in Mexico; Constance Beaumont, National Trust
for Historic Preservation, An Overview of Church Preservation in
the United States; Nancy.Arnon, New Mexico Community Foundation,
Community Awareness and Involvement; Stan Graves, Texas Historical
Commission, Adaptive Reuse: Opportunities and Implementation;
Father Martinez, Diocese of New Mexico, Problems in Maintenance
of Historic Churches; Arturo Parra, Universidad de Guanajuato,
Restoration Techniques in Mexico; Carolyn Peterson, Architect,
Historic Restoration of Houses of Worship; Blair Reeves, University
of Florida, The Place of the Historic Church in the Modern
Community; Willard B. Robinson, Texas Tech University, Aesthetic
Content of Historic Churches; and John P. White, Texas Tech
University, Procedures for Recording Historic Churches.
Announcements will be made in Heritage, the Medallion, New Mexico
Architecture, New Mexico Magazine, Preservation News, Texas Archi-
tect, Texas Hlghways,and the newsletters,of the Certified Local
Government Program, Historic Santa Fe Foundation, New Mexico
Preservation Coalition, Preservation Texas, and the Lubbock
Heritage Society. Registration materials will be mailed to
National Trust members, Texas Society of Architects members,
Medallion subscribers, and selected church organizations. Poster
announcements will be send to schools of architecture and preserva-
tion organizations.
Presentations at the conference will be made available in printed
form. A modest charge will be made to offset the cost of
reproduction.
LIM
M
Scope of Services
Page 2
'Ff' —';,willnq. ccv
ek,travel,'"16Aging an food
expenses for
people to attend the 1989 Certified Local Government
Conference in Austin. Tentatively, 2 Commission members,
one staff member, and one member of the Southwest Collection
staff are planning to attend,to participate in the conference
and present a program on the current C.L.G. funded photo
Preservation project.
CLG Funds
Travel for four people to C.L.G. Conference
@ $150.00 each $ 600.00
Room and Meals for four people
at C.L.G. Conference (two nights in hotel) 600.00
Printing and Postage Expense for
Preservation of Religious Architecture Symposium 1,300.00
Honoraria for 5 speakers
@ $200.00 each 1,000.00
Total
$ 3,500.00
Matching Funds -
Travel for 7 speakers
@ $300.00
average each
$ 2,100.00
Room expense.for 7 speakers
@ $100.00
average each
700.00
Sally Abbe
40 hours
@ $13.64 per hour
$ 545.60
30.29% benefits
165.26
52.87% indirect
288.46
Total City
in-kind
999.32
Total
$ 3,799.32
-Sources of Match include: College of Architecture, Texas Tech
University, $3,500 and Professor Robinson's time; Lubbock
Heritage Society, $500; Lubbock Chapter, A.I.A., $500; and
National Trust for Historic Preservation, $1,000.
ATTACHMENT II
Guidelines for Survey and Planning Grants
APPLICATION MANUAL
TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
NATIONAL REGISTER PROGRAMS OFFICE
P.O. BOX 12276
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711
(512) 463-6094
.c KS E
H
Revised 10/88
GUIDELINES FOR SURVEY AND PLANNING GRANTS
TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
PART Is INTRODUCTION TO SURVEY AND PLANNING GRANTS
With the enactment of the National Historic Preservation Act in 1966, the
Secretary of the Interior was directed to expand and maintain a national register
of historic places and to give maximum encouragement to state governments to
develop statewide historic preservation programs of their own. The Act
recognized that one of the prerequisites for an effective national preservation
program was the identification of historic resources across the country through
comprehensive statewide surveys. A grants-in-aid program established by the Act
made limited funding available through the National Park Service of the U.S.
Department of the Interior for such survey work at both the state and local
levels.
Surveys and their resulting inventories form an important basis for planning
decisions that affect the quality of our community life. In order to plan for
the preservation and enhancement of the historic environment, it is necessary to
determine what properties make up that environment. Broad and thorough coverage
of the environment in a survey generally leads to a multiple property nomination
to the National Register of Historic Places. Therefore, the effectiveness of the
National Register as a planning tool depends upon the quality and thoroughness of
the preceeding survey activity.
Survey and planning grants in Texas are administered through the National
Register Programs office of the Texas Historical Commission (THC). They are
distributed as 50--50 matching grants, which, with the exception of General
Revenue Sharing and Community Development Block Grant monies, must be matched
with non-federal funds. These grants can be used to hire a professional (see
Standards for Professional Qualifications) preservation planner, historian,
archeologist., or architectural historian to conduct a survey, prepare National
Register nominations, or formulate strategies for preservation planning.
What is a Survey?
Surveys are a process of identifying and gathering data on a community's historic
resources. Generally as comprehensive as possible, surveys record all pre -1945
historic and/or archeological sites, buildings, objects, structures, and
districts within a given geographical boundary and assigning high, medium, or low
priority rankings to these rankings. The initial identification is followed by a
phase which concentrates on all high priority properties that may be eligible for
inclusion in a National Register multiple property nomination. This includes all
resources that are of significance in American history, architecture, archeology
and culture, and which are generally more than 50 years of age. As locally
significant neighborhoods and properties are also of concern and, since the
passage of time will bring an increasing number of properties within the 50 -year
time range, the THC recommends that more recent properties and properties of
local significance be included in a survey.
The following are suggestions about the range of resources that may be considered
significant within the context of a survey.
. BUILDINGS:
Definition: A building, such as a house, barn, church, hotel, or similar
construction is created to shelter any form of human activity. Building may also
be used to refer to a historically and functionally related unit, such as a
courthouse and jail or a house and barn. Examples to document include:
1) Notable examples of architectural styles and periods or methods of
construction, as well as particular local or regional types.
2) Buildings illustrating the history and development of such diverse areas
as communications, community planning, government, conservation,
economics, education, literature, music, and landscape architecture.
3) Stores and businesses and other properties that provide a physical
record of the experiences of particular ethnic groups.
4) Markets and commercial structures or blocks.
5) Buildings by great architects or master builders and important works
by minor ones.
6) Architectural curiosities, buildings which are one--of--a--kind.
7) Sole or rare survivors of an important architectural style or type.
8) Studios of American artists, writers, or musicians during the years of
significant activity.
9) Institutions that provide evidence of the cultural history of a
community, such as churches, universities, art centers, theaters,
and entertainment halls.
10) Buildings where significant technological advances or inventions in any
field occurred (agricultural experiment stations, laboratories, etc.).
11) Vernacular or folk buildings, including secondary or outbuildings.
12) A few interiors of buildings that retain significant features.
SITES:
Definition: A site is the location of a significant event, a prehistoric or
historic occupation or activity, or a building or structure, whether standing,
ruined, or vanished, where the location itself possesses historical, cultural, or
archeological value regardless of the value of any existing structure.
1) Archeological sites containing information that may be of value in
answering particular research questions.
2) Archeological sites containing information that may shed light on broad
trends in local, state, or national history.
3) Sites of cultural importance to local people or ethnic groups, such as
locations of important events in their history, historic or prehistoric
cemeteries, or shrines.
4) Sites associated with events important in the history of the community
as a whole, such as battlefields, trails, etc.
5) Cemeteries associated with important events or people, or whose study
can provide important information about history or prehistory, or
landscape significance.
6) Ruins of historically or archeologically important buildings or
structures
7) Historically important shipwrecks.
8) Cemeteries important for the architectural or artistic qualities of their
constituent structures and monuments. [Cemeteries are important cultural
properties to survey, but usually are ineligible for inclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places.]
E
9) Constructed landscapes that exemplify principles, trends, or schools of
thought in landscape architecture, or that represent fine examples of
the landscape architect's art.
OBJECTS:
Definition: The term object is used to distinguish from buildings and structures
those constructions that are primarily artistic in nature or are relatively small
in scale and simply constructed. Although it may be, by nature or design,
movable, an object is associated with a specific setting or environment, such as
statuary in a designed landscape.
1) Objects important to the cultural life of a community and related to a
specific location, such as fountains, road markers, sculpture, etc.
2) Objects important to scientific, historical, or art historical research
such as statuary, ships, locomotives, etc.
STRUCTURES:
Definition: The term structure is used to distinguish from buildings those
functional constructions made usually for purposes other than creating shelter.
1) Industrial and engineering structures including mills, kilns, quarries,
aqueducts, processing plants, utility or pumping stations, and dams.
2) Transportation structures such as railroads, turnpikes, canals, tunnels,
bridges, roundhouses, lighthouses, and wharves.
3) Agricultural structures such as granaries, silos, and corncribs.
4) Movable structures associated with important processes of transportation,
industrial development, social history and military history.
DISTRICTS:
Definition: A district possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or
continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects united historically or
aesthetically by plan or physical development.
1) Groups of buildings that physically and spatially comprise a specific
environment: groups of related buildings that represent the standards
and tastes of a community or neighborhood during one period of history,
unrelated structures that represent a progression of various styles and
functions, or cohesive townscapes or streetscapes that possess an
identity of place.
2) Groups of buildings, structures, and/or sites representative of, or
associated with a particular social, ethnic, or economic group during
a particular period.
3) Farmlands and related farm structures (silos, barns, granaries, irrigation
canals) that possess an identity of time and place.
4) Groups of structures and buildings that show the industrial or
technological developments of the community, state, or nation.
5) Groups of buildings representing historical development patterns, such
as commercial and trade centers, county seats, and mill towns.
6) Groups of sites, structures, and/or buildings containing archeological
data and probably representing a historic or prehistoric settlement
system or pattern of related activities.
T
7) Groups of educational buildings and their associated spaces (school and
university campuses, etc.)
8) Extensive constructed landscapes, such as large parks, that represent the
work of a master landscape architect or the concepts and directions of
of a school of landscape architecture.
9) Landscapes that have been shaped by historical processes of land use and
retain visual and cultural characteristics indicative of such processes.
Why undertake a survey?
The increasing competition for land use and uncertain economies of rural and
urban areas in the State leave the survival of many prehistoric and historic
resources in serious doubt. Although new construction will inevitably replace
some of these resources, the completion of a survey can lead to the development
of a preservation plan that takes into account the relative significance of all
historically and architecturally significant buildings, sites, residential
neighborhoods, and rural and urban spaces. A preservation plan can help channel
growth into the least sensitive areas of the environment and limit the loss of
valuable resources.
In addition to serving as planning tools, surveys can help in locating potential
Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks and State Archeological Landmarks. These
designations, as well as National Register multiple property nominations, can
make those same properties eligible for economic benefits, such as tax credits,
and State and federal grants for historic preservation.
What are the products of a completed survey?
1) A typewritten Texas Historic Sites Inventory Form or its approved equivalent
or State of Texas Archeological Site Data Form of every prehistoric or
historic property in the survey area. (See Appendices A & B)
2) Negatives of all surveyed sites with proper identification of each view.
These may be either 4" % 5" or 35mm format. If 35mm format is used, each
roll of film must be accompanied by one contact sheet and one completed
Photo Index sheet (See Appendix B). In addition, 35mm slides of all high
priority properties and representative streetscapes are required.
3) Detailed maps that identify the location of all surveyed properties and
districts. Local maps with building footprints or USGS 7.5 series maps may
be used to clearly identify surveyed sites and their site numbers. If USGS
maps are used these will be provided by the THC
(See Appendix C). For archeological surveys, USGS maps must be used and
must clearly identify all site locations with trinomial numbers.
4) Two copies of a final report which outlines the survey's purpose and methods,
and makes recommendations for local, state, and federal historical
designation and other appropriate preservation measures. This report must
be in conformance with Federal Register, Volume 48, No. 190. (Available from
the THC)
4
V IL
Additional products, if requested by the grant recipient, may result from the
survey work including sketch maps, sketch plans, and the outlining of local
preservation strategies.
What is a National Register Nomination?
National Register nominations may be for individual properties, districts, or
multiple properties. A multiple property nomination, the most comprehensive one,
includes all historic and/or prehistoric properties within a given geographic
area that have been identified in a comprehensive survey as meeting the criteria
for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. This can include any
combination of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant
at the local, state, or national level.
What are preservation planning activities?
In general, activities for the continued identification and evaluation of
historic properties and for their protection and enhancement are considered
preservation planning activities. These may include preparation of a
comprehensive historic preservation plan, development of historic preservation or
district_ ordinances, establishment of financial incentive programs for
preservation, and public education activities.
PART II: SURVEY AND PLANNING METHODOLOGY
The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning,
Identification, Evaluation, Documentation and Registration are the guidelines
prepared by the National Park Service of the U.S. Department of the Interior for
grants awarded from the Historic Preservation Fund. The Standards provide a
general methodology for survey and planning activities on many levels and
different scales. Therefore, all work completed with assistance of the survey
and planning grants of the State Historic Preservation Office must be in
conformance with these Standards. Copies may be obtained from the National
Register Programs office of the THC.
What are the elements of preservation planning?
A historic resources survey of a community has as one of its main purposes the
development of a complete, fully documented, comprehensive inventory of the
community's historic properties. To achieve this end using cost-effective,
broad, and unbiased methods, the Standards for Preservation Planning recommend
the preparation of historic contexts.
A historic context is a broad pattern of historical development in a community or
region with geographic, temporal, and thematic boundaries. Historic resources,
both standing and archeological, represent these contexts. For example, if a
community began as a port city in the 19th century, its functions as such may be
reflected in its street plan, the character of its neighborhoods, the location of
warehouses and commercial buildings, or archeological remains buried beneath more
recent development. The operation of the 19th -century port is thus one historic
context that influences the nature and distribution of the community's resources,
and should influence survey efforts designed to find and document such resources.
Historic contexts are developed on the basis of background data on the history
and prehistory of the community and its surrounding area. To uncover such data,
survey planners should conduct initial research into the community's history and
the history and prehistory of the region in which it lies, in consultation with
knowledgeable authorities. An initial statement of historic contexts should be
developed during the earliest stages of planning to guide development of the
actual survey design. In planning the survey, it may be feasible to define the
contexts only in broad, general terms; sufficient flexibility should always be
maintained to allow changes to take place as the survey progresses. In this
manner, historic contexts are almost always refined, modified, or expanded as the
survey proceeds.
An outline of statewide historic contexts is available from the National Register
Programs office of the THC. These are considered a guide for surveys,
registration, and documentation that will eventually lead to the establishment of
fully developed contexts or help to focus on specific property or resource types
with defined protection strategies.
How are survey goals and priorities established?
A great deal of preparation is necessary before beginning any survey effort..
During the initial stages of research, survey goals should be established based
on the developed historic contexts. This will provide information crucial for
determining the scope and focus of the proposed work. For example, suppose that
a community (a) was the probable location of a prehistoric Indian village near
the confluence of two streams; (b) was a port during the early 19th century; and
(c) experienced growth in the middle to late 19th century as rural Blacks
established neighborhoods of shotgun houses near urban centers and merchants
built opulent houses in another related neighborhood. Goals for the first -stage
reconnaissance -level survey effort might be (a) to determine whether soil strata
that might contain the archeological remains of the Indian village still exist
under the modern streets and houses that overlay the old stream confluence; (b)
to determine the boundaries of the early 19th century port., identify major
buildings from the period, identify buildings requiring further study to
determine whether. they represent repeatedly modernized 19th -century buildings,
and determine locations of likely archeological interest; (c) to identify
historic neighborhoods that retain their architectural and cultural integrity.
The means to achieving these goals can then be assigned priorities based on such
factors as work already conducted, available funding, planning and development
constraints, and survey opportunities.
How is the survey conducted?
The first step is to determine the boundaries of the survey area. This usually is
determined by the funding agency or organization and follows an established
political boundary. If dealing with standing structures in densely populated
M
urban areas, however, other boundaries might be considered. In most archeological
studies, boundaries may follow topographic or environmental zones, such as valley
floors, or river basins.
Regardless of the boundaries, a survey consists of two major components: archival
research and field work and recording of information. Although archival research
begins before field work, and much information is recorded as the result of field
work, both normally will be simultaneous activities. Those conducting them
should interact and provide each other with advice and suggestions.
1) Performing archival research — archival research should examine factors such
as the area's historical or prehistoric development, political boundaries,
settlement patterns, and geographic features. Good sources of historic
information include back issues of newspapers and periodicals, city directories,
census records, old maps and photographs, Sanborn Insurance maps, county
histories, tax rolls, and deed records. Local libraries and county courthouses
often have many of these and other historical records. Prehistoric background
information can be found in published and unpublished studies, theses, and
dissertations.
The Texas State Library and Archives in Austin, the Barker Texas History Center
at the University of Texas, the Southwest Collection at Texas Tech, the Institute
of Texan Cultures in San Antonio, the THC libraries and other State and local
archives are useful resource centers for both historic and prehistoric reference
materials.
Locally collected information is vital in any survey effort. Displays and
collections at libraries, schools, or museums, articles in local newspapers,
guided tours of historic homes, meetings with local groups or clubs, and oral
history projects can all help gather information and local support for a survey.
Local historians, genealogists, and other knowledgeable individuals also should
be enlisted in the effort.
2) Field Work and Recording Procedures — field work usually may be categorized as
reconnaissance or intensive surveys. A reconnaissance survey should document:
a) The boundaries of the area surveyed;
b) Major properties of 50 years of age or more;
c) The method of survey, including the extent of survey coverage;
d) Comment on the kinds of historic properties present in the survey area;
e) Specific properties that were identified, and the categories of
information collected
f) Areas examined that did not yield historic properties.
An intensive survey should document:
a) The boundaries of the area surveyed;
b) All properties of 50 years of age or more;
C) The method of survey, including an estimate of the extent of coverage;
d) A record of the precise location of all properties identified;
e) Information on the appearance, significance, integrity, and boundaries
of each property sufficient to permit an evaluation of its significance
f) Comment on and estimates of areas where resources have been lost.
7
Sometimes both types are conducted as related parts of the same survey project;
in other cases, reconnaissance is used to plan and focus later intensive survey.
In general, the THC now funds only intensive surveys.
The field work generally consists of identifying, photographing, recording basic
site data, and plotting on a field map all properties which appear to be of
historical, architectural, or archeological significance. In a survey of
above -ground resources, this process entails driving or walking every street in a
community, and evaluating every site and structure individually on the basis of
the established criteria. The information gained through this process can then
be cross-referenced with the archival findings. A Historic Sites Inventory Form
or an approved equivalent is completed for every property deemed to be of
cultural or historical value at that point. These forms are then keyed to a map
of the survey area, so that the general patterns of chronology, growth, and
concentration can easily be identified (See Appendices A and C). In
archeological surveys, standard predictive survey methods are employed, and sites
are recorded on State of Texas Archeological Site Data Forms (see Appendix D).
All archeological sites should be plotted on the largest scale USGS topographic
sheets available (7.5 minute scale is preferred). [Please refer to National
Register Bulletin 24, Guidelines For Local Surveys: A Basis For Preservation
Planning by the National Register of Historic Places Interagency Resources,
National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior for more information on
survey and planning techniques. Copies are available from the National Register
Programs office, THC.]
PART III: HOW TO APPLY FOR SURVEY AND PLANNING GRANTS
Survey and planning grants are allocated annually by the THC in accordance with
the State Historic Preservation Plan to assist in preservation planning projects
and compilation of an inventory of the State's historic resources. These grants
are allocated from the Historic Preservation Fund awarded to the THC of the State
of Texas by the U.S. Department of the Interior.
As with other grants awarded through the THC, survey and planning grants must_ be
matched on a 50-50 basis. Since the funding is federal in origin, only
non-federal monies may be used as a match, with the exception of General Revenue
Sharing and Community Development Block Grant monies. The match can consist of
cash or in-kind contributions. Cash contributions are the grant recipient's cash
outlay of money from non-federal sources, except for General Revenue or Community
Development funds. In-kind contributions are the value of non-cash contributions
provided by the grant recipient or non-federal third parties.
Application Procedures
A signed Survey and Planning Grant Preliminary Application Form must be submitted
to the THC in order for a nonprofit organization or governmental entity to be
eligible for a survey and planning grant. The Preliminary Application Form
should describe the proposed work, objectives, scope, and anticipated sources of
funding for the project.
The deadline for submittal of a Preliminary Application Form to the THC is
5:00 p.m. on 30 December 1988.
r]
Following submission of the Preliminary Application Form, an evaluation of the
proposals will be provided by the staff of the THC. In conjunction with a site
visit, staff will consult with applicants to determine the scope of the project
and a preliminary estimation of cost. Following notification of eligibility,
applicants will be required to submit a formal Request for Funding by 3 April 1989.
Grant Allocations
Announcement of grant allocations will be made by the THC as early as possible in
each fiscal year, but as the actual date of receipt of federal monies may vary,
some flexibility in scheduling projects is necessary.
Funds will be awarded to eligible applicants on a competitive basis, giving
priority to those conforming to the goals of the State Historic Preservation
Officer and State Historic Preservation Plan. Such priorities may be subject to
change as a result of alterations in federal historic preservation programs. The
review of applications will focus on, but not be limited to, the continuation of
survey work already underway, initiation of survey work in urban and rural areas
identified as priorities, and the preparation of multiple property National
Register nominations. The THC prefers that Project Proposals phase proposed work
to separate survey activities from National Register nomination preparation.
Project Proposal
Once the award is made, a detailed description of what is to be accomplished with
the grant monies must be submitted for the approval of the Texas Historical
Commission prior to project implementation. This Project Proposal should
include:
1) a description of the existing circumstances prompting the need for this
survey
2) a description of the proposed scope of work ---what can be expected to be
accomplished
3) a list of proposed project personnel and their professional qualifications
4) documentation indicating the competitive process used to select_ the
project professionals
5) a budget summary and detailed budget breakdown and narrative. (A budget
narrative must be submitted with the proposed budget to explain
expenditures by item. Calculations justifying all entries should
be shown. Identify all sources of matching funds.)
6) proposed project start and end dates
7) an outline of anticipated future phases of work
8) plans for utilization of data gathered in this phase.
Note: Costs associated with activities carried out to influence legislation
pending before Congress, commonly referred to as "lobbying," are unallowable as
charges to the National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund. These grants
must conform to provisions of 18 USC 1913: "No part of the money appropriated by
any enactment of Congress, may be used directly or indirectly to pay for any
personal service, advertisement., telegram, telephone, letter, printed or written
matter, or other device, intended or designed to influence in any manner a Member
of Congress, to favor or oppose, by vote or otherwise, any legislation or
appropriation by Congress, whether before or after the introduction of any bill
9
t s.
or resolution proposing such legislation or appropriation; but this shall not
prevent officers or employees of the United States or its departments or agencies
from communicating to Members of Congress on the request of any Member, or to
Congress through proper official channels, requests for legislation or
appropriation which they deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the public
business."
Procurement of Project Professional
The grant_ recipient must perform competitive procurement procedures to obtain the
project professional. The grant recipient must contact at least three qualified
professionals for written bids, usually through the issuance of Request for
Proposals (THC has samples of such requests if needed). In addition, the grant
recipient may want to advertise for written bids in such broad market
publications as the "Commerce Business Daily", newspapers, professional journals,
etc. The THC has resumes of interested and qualified parties on file that grant
recipients should use for contacts. This file contains resumes for minority
business enterprises as well, and every effort should be made to contact these
minority businesses. The THC does not endorse any party; these resumes are for
informational purposes only.
The invitation to bid (Request for Proposals), proposals received, statement
explaining selection process must be submitted to the THC as part of the Project
Proposal.
Standards for Professional Qualifications
To insure that appropriate historical, architectural, archeological and cultural
properties are identified for the public benefit through grants-in-aid
assistance, the following minimal professional standards for historical,
architectural, and archeological documentation have been established by
Preservation Assistance Division, National Park Service Personnel. Those persons
supervising the surveys must be professionally qualified in accordance with 36
CFR 61 as follows:
Professional Requirements
"In the following definitions, a year of full-time professional experience need
not consist of a continuous year of full-time'work but may be made up of
discontinuous periods of full-time or part-time work adding up to the equivalent
of a year of full-time experience.
History. The minimum professional qualifications in history are a graduate
degree in history or closely related field; or a bachelor's degree in history or
a related field plus one of the following: a) at least two years of full-time
experience in research, writing, teaching, interpretation, or other demonstrable
professional activity with an academic institution, historical organization or
agency, museum, or other professional institution; or b) substantial contribution
through research and publication to the body of scholarly knowledge in the field
of history.
10
Id
Archeology. The minimum professional qualifications in archeology are:
a a graduate degree in archeology, anthropology, or closely related field,
or equivalent training accepted for accreditation purposes by the Society of
Professional Archeologists, b) demonstrated ability to carry research to
completion of theses, research reports, or similar documents, and c) at least 16
months of professional experience and/or specialized training in archeological
field, laboratory, or library research, administration, or management, including
at least. 4 months experience in archeological field research and at least one
year of experience and/or specialized training in the kind of activity the
individual proposes to practice. For example, persons supervising field
archeology should have at least 1 year or its equivalent in field experience
an/or specialized field training, including at least six months in a supervisory
role. Persons engaged to do archival or documentary.research should have had at
least 1 year experience and/or specialized training in such work. Archeologists
engaged in regional or agency planning or compliance with historic preservation
procedures should have had at least 1 year of experience in work directly
pertinent to planning, compliance actions, etc. and/or specialized historic
preservation or cultural resource management training. A practitioner of
prehistoric archeology should have had at least 1 year of experience or
specialized training in research concerning archeological resources of the
prehistoric period. A practitioner of historic archeology should have had at
least 1 year of experience in research concerning archeological resources of the
historic period. Experience in archeological research in the region where the
project will be undertaken is usually desirable.
Architectural History. The minimum professional qualifications in architectural
history are a graduate degree in architectural history, historic preservation, or
closely related field, with course work in American architectural history; or a
bachelor's degree in architectural history, with a concentration in American
architecture; or a bachelor's degree in architectural history, historic
preservation, or closely related field plus one of the following: a) at least two
years full-time experience in research, writing, or teaching in American history
or restoration architecture with an academic institution, historical organization
or agency, museum, or other professional institution; or b) substantial
contribution through research and publication to the body of scholarly knowledge
in the field of American architectural history.
Historical Architecture. The minimum professional qualifications in historical
architecture are a professional degree in architecture or a state license to
practice architecture, plus one of the following: a) at least 1 year of graduate
study in architectural preservation, American history, preservation planning, or
closely related field and at least 1 year of full-time professional experience on
preservation and restoration projects; or b) at least 2 years of full-time
professional experience on preservation and restoration projects. Experience on
preservation and restoration projects shall include detailed investigations of
historic structures, preparation of historic structures research reports, and
preparation of plans and specifications for preservation projects."
Regulations of the U. S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful
discrimination in federally -assisted programs on the basis of race, color and/or
national origin.
11
t
Orientation Meeting
A meeting with the staff of the THC will be required for all grant recipients
shortly after the grant award is announced. The project supervisor, project
professional, and the grant recipient's fiscal officer will be required to
attend. The purpose of the meeting is to establish survey priorities and a
timetable for completion, and to formalize the budget and reimbursement
procedures.
A time and date for the meeting will be arranged following submittal of the
Request for Funding, approval of the grants by the THC, and issuance of award
letters.
No work should begin prior to the orientation meeting and receipt by the Texas
Historical Commission of a signed written contract.
Project Implementation
Project Contract - a contractual agreement (approved by the State Attorney
General) specifying the approximate scope of work, a timetable for completion and
budgetary concerns will be prepared by the THC on the basis of the Project
Proposal and the subsequent consultations with the grant recipient. The
agreement must be signed by the parties involved prior to commencement of work.
Reimbursement. - all payments to the grant recipient will be strictly on a
reimbursement basis, and all payments will be on a one-to-one match. Invoices and
cancelled checks for total payment to the project professional(s) should be
submitted by the grant recipient; one-half of these totals will then be
reimbursed to the grant recipient.(See "assurances," p. 13)
Reimbursement can be requested monthly, quarterly, or as a lump sum at the
completion of the project. The following project_ documentation must be submitted
to the THC in order for reimbursement to be considered:
1) Procurement documents (invitation to bid, proposals received, statement
explaining selection of project professional).
2) Signed contractual agreement (contract signed by the parties involved
after the Project Proposal has been approved).
3) Assurances.- each request for reimbursement submitted to the THC must
.contain:
a) a letter requesting reimbursement which lists the number of the
request (first, second, third, etc.), time period in which costs
were incurred, and costs currently listed.
b) verification of each cost currently claimed. This will include
copies of statements, and if in-kind contributions are made,
copies of timesheets signed by both the employee (or volunteer)
and supervisor.
c) verification of each corresponding payment. (copies of cancelled
checks).
4) Monthly progress reports, due to the Commission by the 10th day of the
following month.
The Commission will then reimburse the grant recipient for one-half
of the documented allowable expenditures made during the project
period covered by the request.
12
Note: The Commission will not process requests for reimbursement of
expenses incurred prior to the project start date.
Project Review - a periodic review will be made by the THC, National Register
Programs staff, to monitor project progress and to assist with any difficulties
encountered. The grant recipient is responsible for informing the Commission, in
writing, of significant problems, delays, and/or adverse conditions that
materially affect planned performance. Additional reviews may be requested by
either party at any time. Following review, the contract may be amended if
necessary. Amendments may be necessary if the project is proceeding more rapidly
or slowly than anticipated, and survey work may be added to, or deleted from, the
contract.
Revisions to proposed work/costs - all revisions to the Project Proposal must be
requested in writing prior to implementation. The Commission will grant approval
or denial in written form. Only when written approval has been granted may the
proposed work be implemented.
Project Certification and Final Report - twenty-five percent (25X) of the grant
awards will be retained by the Commission and paid upon receipt and certification
of the completed survey material and two copies of a detailed, documented Final
Report. All survey material will be reviewed within twenty-one days of submission
to the THC, National Register Programs office. Survey material may be returned
if it is determined that the submitted data are incomplete. Corrected or amended
survey data should.be returned to the Commission within 30 days for certification
and final payment.
Final products that do not meet the terms of the grant agreement and/or that do
not comply with the appropriate Secretary of Interior Standards and the terms of
the National Register Programs Guidelines - NPS 49 will not be reimbursed.
The completed survey forms, contact sheets, label sheets, photographic negatives,
slides, and final reports generated by the work of the project professional shall
all be the property of the Commission.
Fiscal Records - it will be the responsibility of the grant recipient to maintain
all financial records (receipts, invoices, and timetables) in accordance with
Federal Management Circular A.87 and OMB A 102 (revised) for a period of three
years beyond the Project End Date.
It will be the responsibility of the grant recipient_ (if state or local
government) to acquire an independent audit, in accordance with OMB A-128, if the
grant award is between $25,000 and $100,000 a year. However, all grant
recipients, including non -profits, are encouraged to acquire an independent
audit.
13
TEXAS HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY FORM —TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION (rev. &82) APPENDIX AI
1. County Bosgue BOS 5. USGS Quad No. 3197-342 - Site No. 12
City/Rural Norse Community UTM Sector 14/676c)20/ ;1S77R
2. Name Joseph and Anna Olson Farm 6. Date: Factual 1872 Est.
Address Off of FM 182. 5 miles southeast 7. Architect/Builder. Joseph and Jacob Olson
of Clifton Contractor
3. Owner R. E. Henderson / D. M. McTaggart 8. Style/Type Pioneer Norwegian Vernacular
Address7224 Westover, Waco TX 76710 9. Original Use Re i den e
4. Block/Lot Present Use Vacant
10. Description 2 -story stone and wood frame house. Ground -floor is limestone masonry with wood -
frame attic Single door entrance with double -hung six over six lights. One story
-porch extends full length of front (south) facade. Lintel over doorway engraved 111872".
_Detached stone smokehouse with stone lean-to and cellar stands east of main house.
11. Present Condition Poor - presently abandoned with broken windows but stable roof.
12. Significance Good example of pioneer. stone Norwudan farm house Joseph and Anna Olson arrived
in Bosaue County, in 18S8. This nombination of ctnn and wood ccnnstr»rtion is uniglIn in
the rminty }hnt not rnnrnmman in Nnrwa)r Once ceruerl ac _Tarnh nisants 11mtse11MI,
13. Relationship to Site: Moved Date or Original Site (describe)
14. Bibliography Jacob Olson Memoirs in Bosgue 15. Informant R Radde and Ray Buford,
County Museum 16. Recorder DH/DM Date 7-79
DESIGNATIONS
PHOTO DATA
TNRIS No. Old THC Code S&W 4x5s Slides
❑ RTHL ❑ HASS (no.) TEX• 35mm Negs.
NR: ❑ Individual ❑Historic.District YEAR DRWR ROLL FRME ROLL FRME
®Thematic ❑Multiple -Resource 01 01 to
NR File Name Norwegian Settlement Them. to
Other to
NAM:
ADDRESS: Off FM IN. S M11eS se
c0�� Brix �.
CITY LOT MC VM UZ _ 1
VIEW:'. SW Q bt ra �e
RECORDED BY: C%Fi
DATE: 't-'Iq
TEXAS HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY 35mm PHOTO INDEX
TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
YEAR RWR ROLL
01
CO QUAD NO.
jF�RME CITY SITE NO.
I 01 3197-342-12
FILM TYPE Plus -x
SURVEYTITLEIlarweEian Settlement ;n Bosn o n y
PHOTOGRAPHER K -H DATE 7-12-79
NAME/ADDRESS
t of Clifton
VIEW
SW OBLIQUE
_ . \ h
\\ tl 60CI.
800
974.-
% 974. N `
'
G ] o\ ! • y`� / SIT1= jN0 PJ ier84 \ /
•`�'�
825 �— �\\ I (l., 7721819
coo V v.
517E No. 3 0 \ ; 824 844
838
I u _
774
a, �.. `J
`71TE 1.10.1 I on
812
\\
�` I\
Our .n'iors ITE 14o,
Ch
0006,
1030
856
/ C
4 1031 ' - Caliche
_. Pits
977\ a�\\ . ` 1 _ \ .900
i Nor., \\
0 • 979
0
90
p B• a
i889 "J
r `
c
No se
Gold Mlne =%I S �E No. iZ ..
.JOO a� .-- {:. — __ 847
az--.
Sugarl
�d 9OO SoMountain ° \�..d
/ O ` @4 I \
I! 1 800
023 624 1HURST SPR/NG! '25 40 •2]
OW If NW
SCALE 1:24 000
2 0 1 MILE
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
1 .5 0 1 KILOMETER
Q'T .
\ ^—i TEXAS �\
CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
r State of Texas
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE DATA FORM
APPENDIX D
Instructions: Answer all questions. Be specific in distinguishing between "none" and "none observed" or "unknown"; if in doubt,
enter "unknown." Where question is followed by (Yes)(No). simply circle answer. Enter measurements in metric. Attachments
maybe used to complete any question: at question, write "See Attachment "and number attachments consecutively. List all
attachments at end of this form.
GENERAL INFORMATION
RECORDING INFORMATION
Temporary Site No.
Name of Recorder
Permanent Site No.
Site Name
Institutional Affiliation, if any
i
i
Project Name
i
Date
Project Funding Source(s)
LOCATIONAL INFORMATION
County
Owner and Address
USGS Map Name & No.
Elevation
Informant and Address
UTM: Zone
Easting
Northing
Latitude — _/
Additional Sources of Information
Longitude
Description of Location (include nearby USGS topographic
landmarks as well as on-site references; note mileages,
distances, etc.)
Previous Investigations
Who
What
When
Why
Name of Original Recorder of Site
1
Ar
Permanent Site No.
WORK PERFORMED BY FIELD PERSONNEL
Survey (Yes) (No)
Testing (Yes) (No)
Method
Excavation (Yes) (No)
Method
Notes (Yes) (No)
Where Housed
Photographs
Slides—Color
Black & White
Prints—Color
Black & White
Where Housed
(Yes) (No)
(Yes) (No)
(Yes) (No)
(Yes) (No)
Collections (Yes) (No)
Where Housed
Collection Techniques (e.g., controlled. noncontrolled, se-
lect, random, arbitrary; describe)
Kinds of Materials Collected
Special Samples (e.g.. carbon. archeomagnetic, plant; list
and describe)
How Collected
a
ENVIRONMENTAL LOCATION
Nearest Natural Water Source
Distance
Drainage Basin
Drainage Type (e.g., riverine, playa, marine)
Soil Origins (may be multiple)
Colluvial (Yes) (No) Alluvial (Yes) (No)
Eolian (Yes) (No) Marine (Yes) (No)
Soil Type (e.g., clay loam, sand)
Vegetation (list dominant, others if known)
Ground Surface Visibility
Environmental Setting of Site (include pertinent landforms,
slope, visible landmarks, etc.)
Additional Comments
Permanent Site No.
CULTURAL MANIFESTATIONS
Site Size (estimate if necessary)
At Present
At Original Occupation
Basis for Determination
Circumstances of Observation
Depth of Cultural Deposit
Basis for Determination
Time Periods of Occupation (e.g.. Prehistoric -Early Archaic;
may be multiple)
Components (refers to discreet occupations)
Single (Yes) (No) Multiple (Yes) (No)
Unknown (Yes) (No) .
Basis for Determination
Site Type (e.g.. open campsite. military post. rockshelter)
Cultural Features (If present. describe. e.g.. burned rock
midden. hearth. structural remains; how do they relate to
components. time periods. physiography; how many are
there. spatial distribution. size. contents. etc.)
3
Artifactual Materials Present (kinds of materials. distribu-
tion across site. relationship to features. etc.)
Discussion of Site (comments. observations. impressions)
Additional Comments
s
Permanent Site No.
SITE CONDITION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Current Registration
Approximate percentage of site remaining intact State Archeological Landmark (Yes) (No)
Natural Impacts (include erosion, spalling, sloughing, etc.) National Register of Historic Places (Yes) (No)
Other
Recommended Actions (regional and project specific re-
search, management, preservation)
Artificial Impacts (include construction, plowing, etc.)
Known or Perceived Future Impacts
Potential for State Archeological Landmark
(Yes) (No)
Potential for National Register of Historic Places
(Yes) (No)
Submitted? -
Uncertain/ Unknown?
LIST ALL ATTACHMENTS (Where applicable, refer to question that is being supplemented)
1. 9
2. 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
b. 14.
7. 15.
8• Other (give numbers)
4
` Permanent Site No.
SKETCH MAP OF SITE AND SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES (include North arrow and scale; note if map
was not made on site). Attach photocopy of topographic map showing site location.
No Text
w
CURTIS TUNNELL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
TEXAS HISTORICAL
P.O. BOX 12276 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711
Mayor B.C. "Peck" McMinn
City of Lubbock
P.O. Box 2000
Lubbock, Texas 79457
Dear Mayor McMinn:
ATTACHMENT III
COMM I S S I ON
(512)463-6100
We are pleased to announce on behalf of the Texas Historical
Commission that a grant of $3,500 has been allocated for the City
of Lubbock in conjunction with their participation in the Certified
Local Government program. Funding for this grant has been provided
by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service,
under the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act of
1966.
To remain eligible for this grant allocation, it is necessary for
the project coordinator and the project professional, if
applicable, to jointly participate in a grant orientation session.
These sessions will be held with the Commission staff members who
will be working with you on this project, and are designed to
familiarize you with the granting process.
If not already approved, a Project Proposal will also need to be
prepared and submitted to the Commission before final grant
approval can be made. Please note that no work should begin prior
to your grant orientation session and approval from the Texas
Historical Commission of your Project Proposal. This approval will
be in the form of a written contract between you and the Texas
Historical Commission.
Failure to participate in an orientation session and to submit a
Project Proposal before commencement of work on this project will
be cause for this grant allocation to revert to the Texas
Historical Commission for reallocation to another project. It is,
therefore, important that upon receipt of this letter you contact
Dwayne Jones at (512) 463-6094 to arrange the necessary grant
orientation session.
�/ie CVlak G9�forL lau�.��ea�uralto�
We look forward to assisting you in this most worthwhile
preservation endeavor.
Sincerely
T.R. Fehrenbach
Chairman
xc: Hon. Lloyd Bentsen
Hon. Phil Gramm
Hon. Larry Combest
Hon. John Montford
Hon. Nolan Robnett
Hon. Delwin Jones
Hon. Warren Chisum
Dr. Donald Abbe
Curtis Tunnell
Executive Director
T.R. FEHRENBACH, SAN ANTONIO
CHAIRMAN
MRS. H.L. LONG, KILGORE
VICE-CHAIRMAN
DR. DAN A. WILLIS, FORT WORTH
SECRETARY
MRS. LUNELLE A. ANDERSON, SAN MARCOS
JOHN M. SENNETT, SAN ANTONIO
CARRIELU B. CHRISTENSEN, AUSTIN
GEORGE CHRISTIAN, AUSTIN
CURTIS TUNNELL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
TEXAS HISTORICAL
P.O. SOX 12276 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711
- _ March 3, 1989 -
Sally Abbe
Assistant Planner
City of Lubbock
P.O. Box 2000
Lubbock, T% 79457
RE: FY 1989 Certified Local Government Grant
Dear Sally:
RICHARD H. COLLINS, DALLAS
HAROLD D. COURSON, PERRYTON
MARTHA J. CROWLEY, RICHARDSON
MAXINE E. FLOURNOY. ALICE
BETTY E. HANNA, BRECKENRIDGE
SUZANNE W. HARRIS, SAN ANTONIO
KARL A. KOMATSU. FORT WORTH
JAMES S. NABORS, LAKE JACKSON
MARY ANN PERRYMAN, ATHENS
GAY RATLIFF. AUSTIN
EVANGELINE L WHORTON,
GALVESTON ISLAND
COMMISSION
(512)463-6100
We would like to extend a preliminary offer to the City of Lubbock
Certified Local Government for a FY 1989 grant-in-aid in the amount of
$3,500. This grant is for the following local preservation projects as
outlined in your preliminary proposal and budget:
(1) Travel for commissioners and staff to the annual CLG Conference in
Austin;
(2) Assistance in funding a symposium on the preservaton of religious
structures in the Southwest.
Please check with Dwayne Jones, CLG Coordinator, or Nancy ging, Grants
Administrator, regarding any proposed changes to the above projects.
Your budget and proposal will soon be forwarded to the National Park
Service. A formal award letter and contracts will be forwarded as soon as
this is approved.
We also have enclosed a list of all.grants awarded for FY 1989, a
statistical overview of CLG grants for the past four years, and a number of
copies of the 1989 CLG Conference brochure for your commissioners.
�/ze �'fafe G9✓��zcyfoiL �1�.��euerwafiorL
Ms. Abbe
March 3, 1989
Page 2
Thank you for your work on this project. We hope these projects help in
furthering preservation work already underway in Lubbock.
Sincerely,
mes W. Steely
Deputy
tate Historic Preservation Officer
JWS/WDJ -
Enclosures