HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 2009-R0209 - Amendment To Lubbock 2008 Action Plan - HUD - 05/28/2009Resolution No. 2009-RO209
May 28, 2009
Item No. 5.15
RESOLUTION
E IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the City Manager of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and
ected to submit on behalf of the City of Lubbock a Second Substantial Amendment to
U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the City of
bbock's 2008 Action Plan. Said Amendment is attached hereto and incorporated in
s resolution as if fully set forth herein and shall be included in the minutes of the City
�uncil.
by the City Council this 28th day of may , 2009.
, - /-� ///.- i � -
TOM VARTIN, MAYOR
TTEST:
x
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Bill Howerton, Jr.
Community Development Director.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Amy Sims ssi ant a orney
it
-IUD-Second Substantial Amend -2008 -Action Plan.res
19.09
Resolution No. 2009-RO209
CERTIFICATIONS
(1) Affirmatively furthering fair housing. The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing,
which means that it will conduct an analysis to identify impediments to fair housing choice within the
jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that
analysis, and maintain records reflecting the analysis and actions in this regard.
(2) Anti -displacement and relocation plan. The jurisdiction will comply with the acquisition and
relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4601), and implementing regulations at 49 CFR part 24; and it has in
effect and is following a residential anti -displacement and relocation assistance plan required under
section 104(d) of the housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, in connection with
any activity assisted with funding under CDBG-R.
(3) Drug Free Workplace. The jurisdiction will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by:
1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution,
dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace
and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition;
2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about —
(a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
(b) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
(c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and
(d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations
occurring in the workplace;
3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be
given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1;
4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 that, as a condition of
employment under the grant, the employee will -
(a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and
(b) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal
drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such
conviction;
5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under
subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction.
Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant
officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the
Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include
the identification number(s) of each affected grant;
6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under
subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted:
(a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including
termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; or
(b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health,
law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
7. Malting a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through
implementation of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
(4) Anti -lobbying. To the best of the jurisdiction's knowledge and belief:
1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member
of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the
making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension,
continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement;
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person
for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and
submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its
instructions; and
3. It will require that the language of paragraph 1 and 2 of this anti -lobbying certification be
included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants,
and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall
certify and disclose accordingly.
(5) Authority of Jurisdiction. The jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs
for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations and other program
requirements.
(6) Consistency with Plan. The housing activities to be undertaken with CDBG-R funds are consistent
with its consolidated plan.
(7) Section 3. The jurisdiction will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act
of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u), and implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 135.
(8) Community development plan. The jurisdiction certifies that the consolidated housing and
community development plan identifies housing and community development needs and specifies both
short-term and long-term community development objectives that have been developed in accordance
with the primary objective of the statute authorizing the CDBG program.
(9) )Following a plan. The jurisdiction is following a current consolidated pian that has been approved
by HUD.
(10) Use of funds. The jurisdiction has developed activities so as to give the maximum feasible priority
to activities that will benefit low- and moderate -income families or aid in the prevention of slums or
blight. Additional activities may be included that are designed to meet other community development
needs having particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the
health or welfare of the community where other financial resources are not available to meet such needs
It has complied with the following criteria:
2
1. Maximum Feasible Priority. With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG-R
funds, it certifies that it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible priority to
activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination
of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include activities which the grantee certifies are
designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because
existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community,
and other financial resources are not available);
2. Special Assessments. The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public
improvements assisted with CDBG-R funds by assessing any amount against properties owned
and occupied by persons of low- and moderate -income, including any fee charged or assessment
made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if CDBG-R
funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of
public improvements (assisted in part with CDBG-R funds) financed from other revenue sources,
an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public
improvements financed by a source other than CDBG-R funds. The jurisdiction will not attempt
to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG-R funds, unless CDBG-
R funds are used to pay the proportion of fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of
public improvements financed from other revenue sources. In this case, an assessment or charge
may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source
other than CDBG-R funds. In addition, with respect to properties owned and occupied by
moderate -income (but not low-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against
the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG-R
funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG-R or CDBG funds to cover the assessment.
(11) Excessive Force. The jurisdiction certifies that it has adopted and is enforcing: (1) a policy
prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any
individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and (2) a policy of enforcing applicable
State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location that is the
subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction.
(12) Compliance with anti -discrimination laws. The CDBG-R grant will be conducted and
administered in conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2040d), the Fair
Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-3619), and implementing regulations.
(13) Compliance with lead-based paint procedures. The activities concerning lead-based paint will
comply with the requirements of part 35, subparts A, B, J, K, and R of this title.
(14) Compliance with laws. The jurisdiction will comply with applicable laws.
(15) Compliance with ARRA. The jurisdiction will comply with Title XII of Division A of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
(16) Project selection. The jurisdiction will select projects to be funded, by giving priority to projects
that can award contracts based on bids within 120 days from the date the funds are made available to the
recipient, and that will ensure maximum job creation and economic benefit.
(17) Timeliness of infrastructure investments. When the jurisdiction uses CDBG-R funds for
infrastructure investments, the grantee will give preference to quick -start and finish activities, including a
goal to use at least 50 percent of the funds for activities within 120 days of enactment of the Recovery
Act.
3
(18) Buy American provision. The jurisdiction will ensure that all iron, steel and manufactured goods
used in construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance of a public building or public work project assisted
with CDBG-R funds under the Recovery Act must be produced in the United States unless the Secretary
finds that: (1) the requirement is inconsistent with public interest; (2) those goods are not reasonably
available or produced in sufficient quantity in the U.S.; (3) or the use of the goods will increase the
project cost by more than 25 percent.
(19) Appropriate use of funds for infrastructure investments. The Governor, mayor, or other chief
executive, as appropriate certifies, that any infrastructure investments have received the full review and
vetting required by law and that the chief executive accepts responsibility that the infrastructure
investment is an appropriate use of taxpayer dollars. Alternatively, a grantee's chief elected official
certifies that infrastructure investments will receive the full review and vetting required by law and that
the chief executive accepts responsibility that the infrastructure investment is an appropriate use of
taxpayer dollars.
(20) 70% of CDBGR for LMI. The aggregate use of CDBG-R funds shall principally benefit persons
of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the grant is expended for
activities that benefit such persons over the life of the CDBG-R grant.
ZZe' f �ss�%11.� May 28, 2009
Signature/Authorized Oficial Date
Mayor
Title
ATTEST:
Q ap.,e�
Rebe ca Garza, City Secretary
4
OPTIONAL CERTIFICATION
CDBG-R
Resolution No. 2009-R0209
Submit the following certification only when one or more of the activities in the action plan are designed
to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency as specified in 24 CFR
570.208(c):
Where the urgent need is the current economic conditions, the grantee certifies that the activity is
alleviating current economic conditions which pose a threat to the economic welfare of the
community in which the activity is being carried out, the recipient is unable to finance the activity on
its own, and other sources of funding are not available.
Signature/Authorized Official
Mayor
Title
ATTEST:
Retie ca Garza, City Secretary
May 28, 2009
Date
5
OMB Number. 4040-0004
Resolution No. 2009-80209 Expiration Date: 01/31/2009
Application for Federal Assistance SF -424 Version 02
*1. Type of Submission:
*2. Type of Application If Revision, select appropriate letter(s)
❑ Preapplication
® New
Z Application
❑ Continuation *Other (Specify)
❑ Changed/Corrected Application
❑ Revision
3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier:
5a. Federal Entity Identifier:
*5b. Federal Award Identifier:
State Use Only:
6. Date Received by State:
7. State Application Identifier:
8. APPLICANT INFORMATION:
.a. Legal Name: City of Lubbock
*b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EINITIN):
*c. Organizational DUNS:
75-6000590
075-152-968
d. Address:
*Street 1: 1625 13" Street
Street 2: P.O. Box 2000
*City: Lubbock
County: Lubbock
*State: Texas
Province:
*Country: United States of America
*Zip 1 Postal Code 79457
e. Organizational Unit:
Department Name:
Division Name:
Community Development (CD)
f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application:
Prefix: Mr. *First Name: Bill
Middle Name:
*Last Name: Howerton
Suffix:
Title: CD Director
Organizational Affiliation:
*Telephone dumber: 806-775-2300 Fax Number: 806-775-3917
*Email: bhowerton@mylubbock.us mylubbock.us
OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 01/31/2009
Application for Federal Assistance SF -424 Version 02
*9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type:
C. City or Township Government
Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type:
Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type:
*Other (Specify)
*10 Name of Federal Agency:
11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:
14.253
CFDA Title:
*12 Funding Opportunity Number:
'Title:
13. Competition Identification Number:
Title:
14, Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.):
City of Lubbock
*15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project:
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Community Development Block Grant -Recover (CDBG-R):
East Lubbock aPaving Project $400,000.00
Parkway Place Strip Center 100,000.00
Mousing Rehab/Recon 57,602.20
CD Administration 61,955.80
OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 01/31/2009
Application for Federal Assistance SF -424 Version 02
16. Congressional Districts Of:
*a. Applicant: 19th *b. Program/Project: 19th
17. Proposed Project:
*a. Start Date: 06/0112008 *b. End Date: 09/30/2012
18. Estimated Funding ($):
*a. Federal 619,558
*b. Applicant
*c. State
*d. Local
*e. Other
*f. Program Income
*g. TOTAL 619,558
*19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process?
❑ a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on
❑ b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review.
E G. Program is not covered by E. O. 12372
*20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes", provide explanation.)
❑ Yes ® No
21. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications"* and (2) that the statements
herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances** and agree to comply
with any resulting terms if i accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject
me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U. S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001)
**I AGREE
®
** The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or
agency specific instructions
Authorized Representative:
Prefix: Mr. *First Name: Tom
Middle Name:
*Last Name: Martin
Suffix:
*Title: Mayor ATTEST: Rebecca Garza, City Secretary
*Telephone Number: 806-775-3000
Fax Number: 806-775-3335
* Email: tmartin@mylubbock.us
*Signature of Authorized Representative:,
*Date Signed: May 28, 2009
Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Farm 424 (Revised 10/2005)
Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102
OMB Number: 4040-0004
Resolution No, 2009—RO209 Expiration Date: 01/31/2009
Application for Federal Assistance SF -424 Version 02
*Applicant Federal Debt Delinquency Explanation
The following should contain an explanation if the Applicant organization is delinquent of any Federal Debt.