Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 2001-R0321 - Application To Impose And Collect A Passenger Facility Charge At Lubbock Airport - 08/30/2001Resolution No. 2001-RO321 August 30, 2001 Item No. 33 RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized to direct the Director of Aviation on behalf of the City of Lubbock, to submit an application to the Federal Aviation Administration to impose and collect a Passenger Facility Charge to fund certain capital projects at the Lubbock International Airport, and related documents. Said Agreement is attached hereto and incorporated in this resolution as if fully set forth herein and shall be included in the minutes of the City Council. Passed by the City Council this 30th day of August , 2001. ATTEST: R ecca Garza Cit, Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Mar Carle Aviion Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: William de Haas Contract Manager/Attorney Dh/Cedoes/PassengerFacil ityCharge.res August 20, 2001 f r Resolution No. 2001-RO321 FAA Form 5500-1 (8-00) Supersedes Previous Edition PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE (PFC) APPLICATION U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 1. Application Type (Check all that apply) FAA USE ONLY ® a. Impose PFC Charges Date Received PFC Number ® b. Use PFC Revenue ❑ c. Amend PFC No. 1. PART 1 2. Public Agency Name, Address, and Contact Person 3. Airport(s) to Use 4. Consultation Dates a. Date of Written Notice to Air Carriers: Agency Name City of Lubbock, Texas Lubbock International Airport Address Route 3 Box 389 b. Date of Consultation Meeting with Air City, State, ZIP Lubbock, Texas 79403 Carriers: Contact Person Mark N. Earle PART II 5. Charges a. Airport to Impose b. Level c. Total Estimated PFC d. Proposed Effective e. Estimated Expiration Revenue by Level Date: Date: Lubbock International Airport Impose $3,162,220 ❑ $1.00 ❑ $2.00 ® $3.00 01 May 02 01 February 06 Use $1,916,867 Impose ❑ $4.00 ❑ $4.50 Use PART 111 6. Attachments (Check all that Apply) Attached Submitted with Application Number Document a. ® ❑ Airport Capital Improvement Plan b. ® ❑ Project Information (Attachment B) C. ® ❑ Air Carrier Consultation Information d. ® ❑ Request to Exclude Class(es) of Carriers e. ® ❑ Alternative Uses/Projects f. ❑ ❑ Competition Plan/Update g. ® ❑ ALP/Airspace/Environmental h. ❑ ❑ PART IV 7. With respect to this PFC application I hereby certify as follows: To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application are true and correct; This application has been duly authorized by the governing body of the public agency; The public agency will comply with the attached assurances if the application is approved; For those projects for which approval to use PFC revenue is requested, all applicable ALP approvals, airspace determinations, and environmental reviews required by the National Environmental Policy Act have been completed. If required, the public agency has submitted a competition plan in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 47106(f); and If required by 49 U.S.C. 40117(d)(4), adequate provision for financing the airside needs, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and gates, has been made by the public agency. a. Typed Name of Authorized Representative b. Title c. Telephone Number (806) 775-3126 Mark N. Earle Director of Aviation d. Fax Number (806) 775-3133 e. Signature ut o ized Representative f. Date Signed ��%rV Pape Reduction Act Statement: This form is the FAA's primary source for collecting information forth authority to collect PFC revenue for airy rt development. This information is used to determine the eligibility and justification of airport development projects regarding safety, security, or capacity of the national air transportation system; or which reduce noise or mitigate noise impacts resulting from an airport; or furnish opportunities for enhanced competition between or among air carriers. It is estimated that it will take approximately 5-80 hours to fill out the application depending on the complexity. The use of the form is required to obtain FAA approval of authority to collect PFC revenue (49 U.S.C. 40117(c)). No assurance of confidentiality is necessary or provided. It should be noted that an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number associated with this collection of information is 2120-0557. FAA Form 5500-1 (8-00) Supersedes Previous Edition ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): PFC Project No. 1, ARFF Training Area 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PFC Project No. 1 consists of constructing an aircraft rescue and firefighting training area on airport property. The training area (2.9 acres) will contain a burn pit with piping, a recycle water pump station, wastewater recycling tank, fuel distribution and collection system with associated storage facility. The site will also contain restroom and shower facilities for decontamination and a control center to operate the facility and. a full perimeter security fence. Design, construction, related geotechnical investigation and drainage considerations are included and shall be in accordance with FAR Part 139 ARFF Index C standards, applicable EPA standards, applicable FAR Part 77 Standards, and design standards written in AC 150-5220-17A and AC 150-5300-13. The proposed location is shown on the attached map. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ J N/A [ J d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[ X ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ]. _ Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ) _ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)*********************************�************ a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph — of Order 5100.38_ or PGL [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described :in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): March 2000 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): September 2001 *****FOR FAA a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES [ ] NO( ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA a. Comments: 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $608,295 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $608,295 EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant ##22 . Grant Funds in Project $3,146,448 *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $3,146,448 ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $ OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $ *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $3,754,743 ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] c. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOP YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ ] c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date LUBBOCK INTItFlkATICSNAL AIRPORT I I i I I 1 I I I 1I AIRCRAFT RESCUE & FIREFIGHTING I TRAINING ,FACILITY I I I I i I I I ' I I ' ---- 'ROIL ZONE .750 x 2.500) GLIDE SLOPE ANTENNA W AREA ' BELLOW NOTE 2'4 PILE AREA. )ASL ) 8 'Ar CTION ZONE 1.000') SURFACE 00') CH WER jr 50:1 PRECISION APPROACH ..,■omp CONSTRUCT AFF TRAINING FACILITY a son ■ RUNWAY SAFETY AREA ._. . RUNWAY 17L _35R 2889 I I \ � saw i ItIV � TULSA N. LSA rCr HAUL ROUTE - SEE HAUL ROUTE NOTES ARFF BM -2 N. WALNUT tAIRPORT MAINTENANCE son ■ RUNWAY SAFETY AREA ._. . RUNWAY 17L _35R 2889 I ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): PFC Project No. 2, Install Runway/Taxiway Guidance Signs 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PFC Project No. 2 consists of demolition, new construction, and/or relocation of certain airfield signs, circuits and transformer vault improvements. Approximately 22 new internally lighted legend panels and 7 new miscellaneous sign panels will be repaired. To this end, 15 existing signs will be demolished and 2 will be relocated including a wind cone. Demolition activities include concrete, conduit and circuitry. New construction includes incidental marking, lighting and necessary geotechnical investigation. In order to accommodate the increased electrical load needed by the additional signs the project includes 3 new transformers and relocated circuitry in 2 other transformers. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ) N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[ X ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project will upgrade the guidance sign and electrical vault in order for the Airport to continue to meet FAA Certification standards and other requirements of Part 139 for airfield operations, to enhance aircraft safety during taxi operations and ensure continued reliability of the runway and taxiway electrical lighting system through improvements made in the airfield electrical vault. *****FOR FAA USE***********************************************************,�*** a. Is justification adequate? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: Since LIA is a small -hub airport, this section is not applicable. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [) Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes( ] No[ ] Date _ Competition. Competition Plan[ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Noise'. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: This project will preserve and enhance safety and capacity of the national air transportation system. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************'� a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ) [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; ( ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan ( ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or ( ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): May 2001 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): August 2001 *****FOR FAA USE****************************************************************** a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $15,531 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $15,531 No Text EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant #22 Grant Funds in Project $139,785 *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $139,785 ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $ OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $ *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $155,316 ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] c. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ ] c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ J. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve[ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date o e o` a. •'/ %main 1"C W a Z ?yx 0 O J 0 044-' a cr �a w W W Q y 2W Nay O �xr W y W ,O O ;M I I LU Y 0 3 0 w U Z w crw U. w J Q cc w Z w :1 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE***************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[ X ] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): PFC Project No. 3, Acquire ARFF Truck and Equipment 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PFC Project No. 3 consists of the acquisition of one Airport Rescue Firefighting vehicle with capabilities of 1,500 gallons of water, 205 gallons of ARFF concentrate and 450 pounds of dry chemical. A high -reach extendable/articulating turret shall be installed on the truck to allow for rapid effective extinguishment of interior fires. Also, a forward looking infrared (FIR) camera (with VCR) will be attached to the turret to provide enhanced visibility for low light or smoky conditions. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[ X ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This vehicle will replace a 1973 ARFF vehicle which has reached its maximum useful service life. The proposed vehicle and equipment will satisfy the requirement of FAR Part 139 for certificated airports. Lubbock International Airport is certificated under Part 139 and requires this vehicle and equipment to maintain the ARFF Index and meet the response requirements of Part 139. The high -reach extendable/articulating turret and the forward looking infrared camera will enhance the rescue and firefighting capabilities of the truck and therefore enhance the airport's responsibility of meeting its requirements of the ARFF index and preserving the safety and security of the airport and the air carriers that use it. *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************* a. Is justification adequate? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: Since LIA is a small -hub airport, this section is not applicable. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes ( ] No [ J Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) . CASFO concur. Yes[ ) No [ ] Date — Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE – for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: This project will preserve and enhance the safety, security and capacity of the national air transportation system. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ J _ Security, Preserve( ] Enhance[ ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph — of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph_ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ J; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): October 2001 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): September 2002 *****FOR FAA USE***************************************************************** a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ J c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO( ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $570,000 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ **� SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $570,000 EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS. $ OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $ *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $570,000 ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] c. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ J NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ ] c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE****************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************* PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[ X ] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): PFC Project No. 4, New Airport Master Plan 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PFC Project No. 4 consists of a Master Plan Study to assist the airport in making long term decisions. The master plan will examine existing facilities, forecast growth and future requirements and present a plan to implement those requirements. The plan will also address infrastructure, airport layout and locations for supporting industry and service. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES I ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[ X ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project addresses the required planning component for certificated 139 airports and acknowledges the airport's responsibility to conduct long term planning to be able to justify using limited development resources more effectively. The last update of the master plan was written in 1992, hence this project coincides with the accepted 10 year planning cycle. *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: Since LIA is a small -hub airport, this section is not applicable. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date _ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current( ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE - for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The purpose of a master planning project is to identify and justify projects on the airport that will enhance or otherwise preserve the integrity of the airport and its efficiency, capacity, safety and security affecting the national air transportation system. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ j Enhance[ ] _ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to.10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); ( ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ J Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier , percentage of annual boardings )• or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): October 2001 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): September 2002 *****FOR FAA a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ]NO[ ] c. Comments: 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $50,000 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $50,000 EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: 01/02 Entitlement $450,000 Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $450,000 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $ *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $500,000 ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] c. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ J NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ ] c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes I ] No [ J. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve ( ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE*************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): PFC Project No. 5, Reconstruct and Expand the General Aviation Ramp between TWY F & L across TWY C. 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PFC Project No. 5 consists of demolishing existing taxiway and expanding and reconfiguring the general aviation ramp adjacent to the old passenger terminal building. The project will demolish 15,000 square yards (135,000 square feet) of concrete taxiway and provide 35,000 square yards (315,000 square feet) of new general aviation apron. The project will also include incidental marking, lighting, site grading, drainage, and geotechnical investigation. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ J. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[ X ] (go to s) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project will enhance the efficiency and capacity of the general aviation ramp on the west side by providing additional room to marshal and/or maneuver in order to access one of three FBO's adjacent to the ramp. The additional room will also enhance aircraft safety during taxi operations. *****FOR FAA USE a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: Since LIA is a small -hub airport, this section is not applicable. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes( ] No[ ] Date _ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan ( ] Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: This project will preserve and enhance safety and capacity of the national air transportation system. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance( ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance( ] _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ J Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in -an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ J Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): October 2002 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): September 2003 *****FOR FAA USES*************************************************************** a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES( ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $580,800 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $580,800 EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: 02/03 Entitlement $5,227,200 Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $5,227,200 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $ *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $5,808,000 ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] c. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ ] c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES[ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Y n I 1 � I 1 _ 1 3 REC INSTRUCT & EXPAND GENI 4L AVIATION RAMP a BETWEEN TWY F & L. ACROSS TWY C ' � a i It I I I n — — —- --- --- —- ♦ ' t t— t t tai i i ..�.. §�I I— - --- - -- — --- J-- F I E ■ , s: I LJ I t I r 1 I 1 ell .I I I I I , —--------------- 4- ------------ — ---- LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT i i RECONSTRUCT &-EXPAND GENERAL AVIATION RAMP BETWEEN TWY F & L, ACROSS.TWY C EXTENDED TAXIWAY & _ LL PAVEMENT REMOVAL .Wiz: FXpPJN=E-6$-A-Pq=�C",t-- 1�1 r - ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE***************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ X ] IMPOSE AND USE[ ] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): PFC Project No. 6, Land Acquisition North of Runway 8 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PFC Project No. 6 consists of acquiring 253 acres of land north of Runway 8. This land area is the site selected in the 1992 master plan to build a 5,100 foot runway parallel to Runway 17U35R with connecting taxiways, new connecting ARFF access road, and incidental lighting, marking, signage, drainage, and geotechnical investigation. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ J $2.00[ ] $3.00[ X ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project can be justified in several ways. One is that as development continues around the airport, especially the Interport Trade Center, the potential of development begins to gain momentum and drives the value of and ultimate cost of adjacent land up artificially so as to be unreasonable. To acquire the land now will insure a reasonable price. Secondly, the proposed runway improvement is presented in the 1992 master plan which evidences our commitment to plan for future growth. A third justification is found in the precedent already established at the airport when the FAA allowed the use of PFC funds to acquire land east of Runway 26 for future development and protection of runway 17U35R in the 1993(d) PFC amended plan. Lastly, the AIP Handbook in Chapter 6, Section 1 provides that the acquisition of or any interest in land is eligible when it is necessary for airport purposes provided the land was acquired after the date of enactment of the Federal Airport Act, May 13, 1946. The handbook also states that such land acquisition shall be encouraged. *****FOR FAA USE****************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES (J NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: Since LIA is a small -hub airport, this section is not applicable. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No( ] Date _ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated( ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: This project will insure that appropriate land will be available to construct a future runway contemplated at this location and otherwise enhance the safety and capacity of the national air transportation system. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ J Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ J Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ J Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ J Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): October 2001 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): September 2002 *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ j b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $1,337,594 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $1,337,594 EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant ## Grant Funds in Project $ *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $ OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $ *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $1,337,594 ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] c. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ) If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ ] c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO[ ] NIA [ ] e. Comments. 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[ X ] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): PFC Project No. 3, Entrance Road and Canopy Improvements (Application 99 -03- C -00 -LBB) 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PFC Project No. 3 (Application 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) previously approved as impose and use consisted of constructing a canopy to cover the area in front of the terminal building. The project also contemplated reconstructing and reconfiguring the drive in front of the terminal to physically separate public access transportation from the arriving and departing passenger traffic and provide islands for passenger staging to improve passenger safety. An additional benefit of the canopy would be to provide cover for the public access transportation as well as arriving and departing passengers to help prevent slip and fall accidents. The amendment proposed in this application presents a material change in the scope of the original project thereby requiring, this Type B application for amendment. The proposed revised project contemplates the relocation of the public access transportation staging area away from the terminal achieving the original objective of separating passengers and pedestrians from the mix of high volume traffic in front of the terminal. The project eliminates the need for the proposed canopy and enhances even further the passenger safety objective of the original project. This project proposes to build a new staging facility consisting of a restroom facility 30' X 10' (300 square feet) masonry construction with plumbing, staging access lane 25'X 500' (12,500 square feet), incidental signage, lighting, drainage, and geotechnical investigation. The project also includes the demolition of existing circuitry and relocation of existing flight monitors used by public access transportation service providers along with new conduit, circuitry, and geotechnical investigation (2,000 linear feet). b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE****************************************************************** a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or 'modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[ X ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project will improve passenger safety and pedestrian flow in front of and within the terminal building by remoting all public access transportation to a centralized staging area away from the terminal building. This will allow on -demand service to the front of the terminal building thereby eliminating the congestion of vehicles to achieve improved vehicular flow and passenger safety with added passenger capacity at curb side. This project will also enhance competitiveness among service providers as they will all be staged in the same remote facility. *****FOR FAA USE****************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ J. b. Comments: 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: Since LIA is a small -hub airport, this section is not applicable. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes( ] No[ ] Date _ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: This project enhances the safety, security and capacity of the airport by providing an integrated public transportation staging area remote from the terminal building. *****FOR FAA USE****************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve( ] Enhance[ ] _ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] _ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ J _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph — of Order 5100.38 or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38 or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); ( ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ J Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): October 2001 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): September 2002 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES [ ] NO( ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $40,334 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $40,334 EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: 01/02 Entitlement $363,006 Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $363,006 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $ *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $403,340 ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] c. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ J. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ ] c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve[ ] Partially Approve[ ] Disapprove[ J ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENTRANCE ROAD AND CANOPY IMPROVEMENTS / I � I I � —`- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -! ------------- •"'�':: j i f r # irisNNUL � 111111;� G !, �, p \I ❑ I R a� if fr ,/ 11 I Il 11 1 11 II a l II I I it li 1 `{ It I I R 1 'II 11 'll I I 11{ / 11 1 I It If � ,1 I 1 11 II � 11 111 1 j'I Itl jl 1 1j1 1 I 1 11 jl� 1 1 11 1 l 1 11 I' 1 Il 1 } l 1 1 si I ( II it I 111 11 11 \1 1\ It 1 It 1 1 I 11 I 11 1\ 11 1 1 11 1 \ 1 • • 11 \ \ 1 1 \ I I II 1' 11 1 \ 1 \ 1 1 I II II 111 111 \\ \\\\\ 1 ll \ \ Q O I I 1 II jll `1 y.G b� I If it it ltII !lJJ 66 LL Q 1 cyyt 1 1 I I P \11k I I it I I �+L----- ----- San -- 3an 7 �• I i II II gQ4$ b Z Q x III jj It 11 b ii O �1 I 11 I I SII Ij 11 li I I III II I I I I� illi II i I 1 II " I1 I II II � I Ln 3 u n (n I i wLLI I Q I I 1 II II ' Q _ 1 / 11 cr -- o' u i I --- _JL 1-73 --- — M ---y - 0 M —} T ti -- -- -- M - I I / I ; a p Lj II / VCO I . cr II Q Q Sl \ I I li 1 ; 11 p II Li. it III I 1 II a1 p Ii I 11 II I I 11 1 I II 1 II II 11 I 1 II p II f 11 II M WfI['!M' • Y•1 F•C•1 14%/1Z/1 (\iY4Y1 MIWJ\YOIO1gUPtlIZUW[\►»•\il iJ M•V ' I1 //// 11 // all33 ��11113 // it 11 II I n ' I1 //// 11 // 11 it I 11 11 1 It // it 11 II I n // 11 // // 11 It d /�I /� It It ii I II I 11 If 11 t ll It / / I I Ir II 11 It 1 1 11 11 1 1 , 11 11 1 I ,1 11 I 1 11 11 11 1 I It /ll 11 11 +� -, It l F , , 11 11 11'• 11 � It , It It II + II l;, ,1 Il 11 II 7t ` p t' ; 111 1 + II 11 ;j It It 1 n i tt 1, 1, Il I + II n 11 k u ,I 11 1 + Ib ( n. I w t I 1 n 4 ❑ 6 I a It , I, ■� .� ,1 „ u 11 11 I 11 ii 11 II 11 I, j; 11 It 11 C 11 II II 11 I, II � Il � 11 11 II 11 11 11 I, I I I I I u u I' E � / u -lr-u--- .m /i/ ( 4/ A-0ii' ;; I' � '• " 1 11 -T-4A-I11 1, -T-} UU j1 It ,j jI 11+ + 11 •, 11 11 I + 111 0 it ,, , • 1 p ;, � ; 11 �;j 11 II 11 I 11 I II lYllMIVW ro.►it axal IIAt/Ij(t U.1IUII1)M'S41UWV11'JuE'A[tUaoi s+4Vti Ir., 07-20-2001 15:07 From-PARKHILL SMITH COOPER tea— T-072 P.006/007 F-473 111111, Qa S QCN e i M - �.. 691 Yn t� _ n s7 7, a+c.w�rA !>�u.-W-1- il., ;, I num Pa a tea— T-072 P.006/007 F-473 111111, Qa S QCN e i M - �.. 691 Yn t� _ n s7 7, a+c.w�rA L IG56 tea— T-072 P.006/007 F-473 111111, Qa S QCN e i M - �.. 691 Yn t� _ n s7 7, a+c.w�rA 07-20-2001 15:06 From-PARKHILL SMITH COOPER a ar-„ -3ir 1.11 ve T-072 P.002/007 F-473 07-20-2001 15:07 From-PARKHILL SMITH COOPER T-072 P.007/007 F-473 :7 .f1 fa °'' lililla� Zf z ig IQ 0 c C o Q M 4 i `Qy P i 'r s ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* PFC Application number: 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[ ] USE[ X ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): PFC Project No. 8, Westport Apron and Taxiway Expansion — South (Application 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PFC Project No. 8 (PFC Application 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) originally consisted of constructing an extension to the south (approximately 22,350 square yards or 201,150 square feet) of the air cargo apron and taxiway system previously constructed under an AIP and PFC funded project. The amendment proposed in this application presents a material change in the scope of the original project thereby requiring this Type B application for amendment. This amendment requests a larger extension 785'X 360' (approximately 282,600 total square feet) including the extension of the connecting taxiway system that will tie the proposed expansion into Taxiway S. One leg of the taxiway will be extended 90' X 360' (32,400 square feet), and a connecting shorter stub will be extended 75' X 1,280' (96,000 square feet). The demolition, removal and reconstruction of 48,750 square feet (25' X 1,950') of ARFF access road is also included in this project as well as all incidental marking, lighting, and drainage and necessary geotechnical investigation. In addition to the work described above, this project will include the removal of approximately 4,202 linear feet of 6 -inch runway hold markings on all runways at the airport and painting approximately 8,235 linear feet of new 12 -inch mandatory hold markings to comply with current FAA regulations. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE a. Description adequate [ J not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. C. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ J $2.00[ ] $3.00[ X J (go to 6) $4.00[ J $4.50[ J (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project will expand the existing west side ramp that primarily serves air cargo carriers but is available for commercial carriers and general aviation. The existing ramp is inadequate to meet forecasted demand by current air cargo tenants. This project will also enhance the capacity for Runway 17R/35L by allowing easier and improved exit from the runway and access to air freight operations. The City has been advised by existing air cargo carriers that forecasts show increased frequency in the number of flights and larger aircraft up to and including the Airbus A300-600. The additional removal and restriping of all hold lines on the airport is required in order to comply with new FAA certification requirements. *****FOR FAA USE a. Is justification adequate? YES [ ] NO [ ], b. Comments: 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: Since LIA is a small -hub airport, this section is not applicable. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date _ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ J Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: This project will enhance capacity and safety of the national air transportation system. A project that enhances or supports the efficiency for one category of user potentially enhances and supports the efficiency of operations for the entire airport. General aviation and air cargo are integral parts of the air transportation system from which paying passengers benefit. This project will also enhance competition for air freight users at the airport by providing ample space to expand or add additional carriers. *****FOR FAA USE****************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Security, Preserve j ] Enhance [ ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38 or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL _) [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): July 2001 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): March 2002 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $1,589,545 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $1,589,545 EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year:00/01 Entitlement $3,099,085 Discretionary $ Total $ 00/02 Entitlement $1,623,919 *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $4,723,004 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $ *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $6,312,549 ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] c. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ ] c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES[ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT I I RT APRON AND TAXIWAY EXPANSION - SOUTH �f I a ars t I I - --------------- 4------------ _—..���r�_ww.•+.�w� T�!r'T��rw�lw���►T �t�.+\ V�!v411'�1 two r•.:`. �. y .i�..:� �..♦ i • •i • ! r— � _ � -. _ � —� .. ; ;fit MIN" -- :�f II3 �iii�� r � •y 'se s:•--�-�Eei �4: I r U. U. Z P co X W W O W Q zCc {xi U r 0 N i z 0 N z a X W } 3 z a z 0 (z a 0 a W r IQ $ s 100 CL z - R 8 zCc {xi U r 0 N i z 0 N z a X W } 3 z a z 0 (z a 0 a W 100 CL - :.aw �r 0 c LL LL a U� W a a� zCc {xi U r 0 N i z 0 N z a X W } 3 z a z 0 (z a 0 a W ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE***************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[ ] USE[ X ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): PFC Project No. 10, Construct High Speed Taxiway 131 (Application 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PFC Project No. 10 (PFC Application 99 -03 -C -00 - LBB) consists of constructing a high-speed exit taxiway serving Runway 17R -35L and connecting to Taxiway M for southbound traffic, just north of Runway 8-26. Taxiway is proposed to be 90'X 850' (76,500 square feet) with incidental signage, markings, lighting and drainage and geotechnical investigation. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ) (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ). c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ J N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[ X ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This amendment is requesting Use authority for Project 10, application 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB previously approved as Impose Only. As stated in the 1992 Airport Master Plan, this project will increase the capacity on 17R/35L as well as enhance overall Airfield Safety. The project will serve traffic landing from the north and allow quicker exit from the runway, thus enhancing runway safety and capacity. ATCT will be able to fully utilize land and hold short operations (LASHO). Closer minimums between aircraft landing on Runway 17R when required to hold short of Runway 26 will be available by exiting Runway 17R to Taxiway M and holding short of Runway 26 at that point. Runway 26 will be available for full utility and operations. *****FOR FAA USE***************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: Since LIA is a small -hub airport, this section is not applicable. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ j No [ ] Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date _ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated[ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA I ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: This project will enhance safety and capacity of the national air transportation system. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance[ J _ Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph_ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph_ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): October 2001 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): September 2002 *****FOR FAA USE****************************************************************** a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES [ ] NO [ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $136,988 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $136,988 EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: 01/02 Entitlement $1,232,892 Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $1,232,892 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $ *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $1,369,880 ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] c. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ ] c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: *****FOR FAA USE***************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1pi� 1 I 1 I � 1 � I i I 1 1 i I 1 11 I I 1 1 HIGH SPEED TMOWAY B-1 I 1 _ �..—� .......... T-�:'rTrl.e-r+�t.�.T�.�....�v..-.Yf«v ..•,r•. ...: sal..:.. .».-:�> i.. .,s.�.-r �_��. _7.:...�.. :c�•^a.. - +'s't ( I ( I LUBBOCK INTERNA �ONAL A I I I I I EXISTING RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE 250'x 1000'x450' VISUAL APPROACH 20:1 �I TOWER RD. 3 _ I I 8 CONTROL TOWER FLOOR 4 0't300 EL. a 3347.00 MB � I EXISTING I I 75' TRANSFORMER I I I 7! VAULT _ I I CONSTRUCT HIGH SPEED TAXIWAY B-1 EL.= 3253.11 EL. - 3337 Y� QYY�Z M"L.=3255.67 . �� r •Tt�[Ei� ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[ ] USE[ X ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): PFC Project No. 11, ADA Aircraft Access (Application 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PFC Project No. 11 (PFC Application 99 -03 -C -00 - LBB) consists of providing commercial commuter aircraft access equipment to allow all weather access to commuter aircraft by physically challenged passengers. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate (] not adequate I ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ J N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[ X ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This amendment is requesting use authority for Project 11, application 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB previously approved as Impose Only. The access equipment will enhance the City's ability to maintain compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act requirements and aircraft accessibility by all passengers. It will also ensure back up capability in case of mechanical failure of the jetbridges and provide direct access to those aircraft that cannot be accommodated by the jetbridges. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: Since LIA is a small -hub airport, this section is not applicable. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [) Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date _ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: This project will enhance and preserve the safety, security and capacity of the national air transportation system as well as provide an opportunity for enhanced airline competition and increase customer service between and among air carriers. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ J _ Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. ( ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; ( ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): October 2001 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): September 2002 *****FOR FAA USE****************************************************************** a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $150,000 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $150,000 EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $ OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $ *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $150,000 ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the, airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] c. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ j If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ ] c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE****************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Lubbock International Airport Application Number. 01 -01 -C -00 -LBB 1 ARFF TRAINING AREA (BURN PIT) Summary Financial Plan FY 99100 FY 00/01 FY 01102 FY 02103 FY 03/04 Impose and Use AIP-Entitlement 3,146,448 AIP-Discretionary PFC-Financing Costs PFC-Capital Costs 608,295 fr: Total $ 3,754,743 $ - $ $ - $ - 2 INSTALL RUNWAYITAXIWAY GUIDANCE SIGNS FY 99100 FY 00101 FY 01102 FY 02103 FY 03/04 Impose and Use AIP-Entitlement 136,665 3,120 AIP-Discretionary PFC-Financing Costs PFC-Capital Costs 15,531 Total $ 152,196 $ 3,120 $ - $ - $ - 3 ARFF TRUCK (SNOZZLE & INFARED) FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 01102 FY 02103 FY 03/04 Impose and Use AIP-Entitlement AIP-Discretionary PFC-Financing Costs PFC-Capital Costs 570,000 Total $ - $ ' $ 570,000 $ - $ - 4 NEW AIRPORT MASTER PLAN FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 01102 FY 02/03 FY 03104 Impose and Use AIP-Entitlement 450,000 AIP-Discretionary PFC-Financing Costs PFC-Capital Costs 50,000 Total $ $ $ 500,000 $ $ 5 RECONSTRUCT & EXPAND GENERAL AVIATION RWY BETWEEN TWY F&L, ACROSS TWY C Impose and Use FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 02103 FY 03/04 AIP-Entitlement - 3,400,000 1,827,200 AIP-Discretionary - PFC-Financing Costs - PFC-Capital Costs - 580,800 Total $ - - $ - $ 3,980,800 $ 1,827,200 6 LAND ACQUISITION NORTH OF RWY 8126 Impose Only FY 99/00 FY 00101 FY 01/02 FY 02/03 FY 03/04 AIP-Entitlement - AIP-Discretionary - PFC-Financing Costs - PFC-Capital Costs - 1,337,594 Total $ - - $ 1,337,594 $ $ - s 3 (APPLICATION 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) ENTRANCE ROAD AND CANOPY IMPROVEMENTS Use Only FY 99/00 FY 00101 FY 01/02 FY 02103 FY 03/04 AIP-Entitlement 363,006 AIP-Discretionary PFC-Financing Costs PFC-Capital Costs 40,334 Total $ $ 403,340 $ - $ - $ - 8 (APPLICATION 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) WESTPORT APRON AND TAXIWAY EXPANSION -SOUTH Use Only FY 99100 FY 00/01 FY 01102 FY 02103 FY 03/04 AIP-Entitlement 3,099,085 1,623,919 AIP-Discretionary PFC-Financing Costs PFC-Capital Costs 1,589,545 Total $ - $ 4,688,630 $ 1,623,919 $ - $ - 10 (APPLICATION 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) CONSTRUCT HIGH SPEED TAXIWAY B-1 FY 99/00 FY 00101 FY 01102 FY 02/03 FY 03104 Use Only AIP-Entitlement 1,232,892 AIP-Discretionary PFC-Financing Costs PFC-Capital Costs 136,988 Total $ - $ - $ 1,369,880 $ - $ - 11 (APPLICATION 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) ADA AIRCRAFT ACCESS FY 99/00 FY 00101 FY 01/02 FY 02103 FY 03104 Use Only AIP-Entitlement AIP-Discretionary PFC-Financing Costs PFC-Capital Costs 150,000 Total $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - TOTALS OF ABOVE PROJECTS FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 01102 FY 02103 FY 03/04 TOTALS AIP-Entitlement 3,283,113 3,465,211 3,306,811 3,400,000 1,827,200 15,282,335 AIP-Discretionary - - - - - - PFC-Financing Costs - - - - _ PFC-Capital Costs 623,826 1,629,879 2,244,582 580,800 - 5,079,087 Total 3,906,939 5,095,090 5,551,393 3,980,800 $ 1,627,200 20,361,422 ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS: Construct Twy Papa (future Lima) North of Sierra to Rwy 17R 2,323,200 Extend Taxiway Lima Northbound to Twy Sierra 3,484,800 8/16/01 LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2000 PFC APPLICATION PROJECT NO. 1 ARFF TRAINING AREA Description: PFC Project No. 1 consists of constructing an aircraft rescue and firefighting training area on airport property. The training area (2.9 acres) will contain a burn pit with piping, a recycle water pump station, wastewater recycling tank, fuel distribution and collection system with associated storage facility. The site will also contain restroom and shower facilities for decontamination and a control center to. operate the facility and a full perimeter security fence. Design, construction, related geotechnical investigation and drainage considerations are included and shall be in accordance with FAR Part 139 ARFF Index C standards, applicable EPA standards, applicable FAR Part 77 Standards, and design standards written in AC 150-5220-17A and AC 150-5300-13. Justification: The airport does not currently have facilities for adequate training of firefighting personnel on site. ARFF training is essential, vital and required by Part 139 to provide for air carrier safety. Part 139 requires a three-minute response time in the event of an alarm. If personnel are sent to off site locations for training, the resulting reduction in manpower could jeopardize required response times and procedures. On site training is necessary to carry out the required training without a reduction in emergency response or procedures. In addition, the City of Lubbock believes that a significant cost savings will be experienced with on site training along with improved and more frequent training due to availability of training facilities. This project is also recommended in the 1992 Airport Master Plan. The recommendation recognizes the contribution this project will have on enhancing the airport's safety and preparedness regarding requirements of Part 139. Certifications: This project involves constructing a firefighting training area. It does not significantly expand upon existing airfield facilities. Appropriate certifications and approvals will be secured during design and before the time of project implementation. Project Schedule: Implementation of these improvements is planned for FY 2000-2001. LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2000 PFC APPLICATION PROJECT NO.2 INSTALL RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY GUIDANCE SIGNS Description: PFC Project No. 2 consists of demolition, new construction and/or relocation of certain airfield signs, circuits and transformer vault improvements. Approximately 22 new internally lighted legend panels and 7 new miscellaneous sign panels will be repaired. To this end, 15 existing signs will be demolished and 2 will be relocated including a wind cone. Demolition activities include concrete, conduit and circuitry. New construction includes incidental marking, lighting and necessary geotechnical investigation. In order to accommodate the increased electrical load needed by the additional signs the project includes 3 new transformers and relocated circuitry in 2 other transformers. Justification: This project will upgrade the guidance sign and electrical vault in order for the Airport to continue to meet FAA Certification standards and other requirements of Part 139 for airfield operations, to enhance aircraft safety during taxi operations and ensure continued reliability of the runway and taxiway electrical lighting system through improvements made in the airfield electrical vault. Certifications: This project involves upgrading the airfield guidance signage and electrical vault. No special certifications are expected to be required for this project beyond those normally required at the time of the project implementation. Project Schedule: Implementation of this project is scheduled for FY 2000-2001. LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2000 PFC APPLICATION PROJECT NO.3 ARFF TRUCK Description: PFC Project No. 3 consists of the acquisition of one Airport Rescue Firefighting vehicle with capabilities of 1,500 gallons of water, 205 gallons of ARFF concentrate and 450 pounds of dry chemical. A high -reach extendable/articulating turret shall be installed on the truck to allow for rapid effective extinguishment of interior fires. Also, a forward looking infrared (FIR) camera (with VCR) will be attached to the turret to provide enhanced visibility for low light or smoky conditions. Justification: This vehicle will replace a 1973 ARFF vehicle which has reached its maximum useful service life. The proposed vehicle and equipment will satisfy the requirement of FAR Part 139 for certificated airports. Lubbock International Airport is certificated under Part 139 and requires this vehicle and equipment to maintain the ARFF Index and meet the response requirements of Part 139. The high -reach extendable/articulating turret and the forward looking infrared camera will enhance the rescue and firefighting capabilities of the truck and therefore enhance the airport's responsibility of meeting its requirements of the ARFF index and preserving the safety and security of the airport and the air carriers that use it. Certifications: This project does not expand upon existing airfield facilities. No special certifications are required for this project beyond those normally required at the time of project implementation. Project Schedule: Implementation of this project is scheduled for FY 2001-2002. LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2000 PFC APPLICATION PROJECT NO. 4 NEW AIRPORT MASTER PLAN Description: PFC Project No. 4 consists of a Master Plan Study to assist the airport in making long term decisions. The master plan will examine existing facilities, forecast growth and future requirements and present a plan to implement those requirements. The plan will also address infrastructure, airport layout and locations for supporting industry and service. Justification: This project addresses the required planning component for certificated 139 airports and acknowledges the airport's responsibility to conduct long term planning to be able to justify using limited development resources more effectively. The last update of the master plan was written in 1992, hence this project coincides with the accepted 10 year planning cycle. Certifications: This project does not directly involve the development of airfield facilities at the Airport. No special certifications are required for this project. Project Schedule: Implementation of this project is scheduled for FY 2001-2002. LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2000 PFC APPLICATION PROJECT NO. 5 RECONTRUCT AND EXPAND GENERAL AVIATION RAMP BETWEEN TWY F & L, ACROSS TWY C Description: PFC Project No. 5 consists of demolishing existing taxiway and expanding and reconfiguring the general aviation ramp adjacent to the old passenger terminal building. The project will demolish 15,000 square yards (135,000 square feet) of concrete taxiway and provide 35,000 square yards (315,000 square feet) of new general aviation apron. The project will also include incidental marking, lighting, site grading, drainage, and geotechnical investigation. Justification: This project will enhance the efficiency and capacity of the general aviation ramp on the west side by providing additional room to marshal and/or maneuver in order to access one of three FBO's adjacent to the ramp. The additional room will also enhance aircraft safety during taxi operations. Certifications: This project does not expand upon existing airfield facilities. No special certifications are required for this project beyond those normally required at the time of project implementation. Project Schedule: Implementation of this project is scheduled for FY 2002-2003. LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2000 PFC APPLICATION PROJECT NO.6 LAND ACQUISITION NORTH OF RUNWAY 8 Description: PFC Project No. 6 consists of acquiring 253 acres of land north of Runway 8. This land area is the site selected in the 1992 master plan to build a 5,100 foot runway parallel to Runway 17L/35R with connecting taxiways, new connecting ARFF access road, and incidental lighting, marking, signage, drainage, and geotechnical investigation Justification: This project can be justified in several ways. One is that as development continues around the airport, especially the Interport Trade Center, the potential of development begins to gain momentum and drives the value of and ultimate cost of adjacent land up artificially so as to be unreasonable. To acquire the land now will insure a reasonable price. Secondly, the proposed runway improvement is presented in the 1992 master plan which evidences our commitment to plan for future growth. A third justification is found in the precedent already established at the airport when the FAA allowed the use of PFC funds to acquire land east of Runway 8 for future development and protection of runway 17L/35R in the 1993(d) PFC amended plan. Lastly, the AIP Handbook in Chapter 6, Section 1 provides that the acquisition of or any interest in land is eligible when it is necessary for airport purposes provided the land was acquired after the date of enactment of the Federal Airport Act, May 13, 1946. The handbook also states that such land acquisition shall be encouraged. Certifications: This project does not expand upon existing airfield facilities. No special certifications are required for this project beyond those normally required at the time of project implementation. Project Schedule: Implementation of this project is scheduled for FY 2001-2002. LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2000 PFC APPLICATION PROJECT NO.3 (APPLICATION 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) ENTRANCE ROAD AND CANOPY IMPROVEMENTS Description: PFC Project No. 3 (Application 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) previously approved as impose and use consisted of constructing a canopy to cover the area in front of the terminal building. The project also contemplated reconstructing and reconfiguring the drive in front of the terminal to physically separate public access transportation from the arriving and departing passenger traffic and provide islands for passenger staging to improve passenger safety. An additional benefit of the canopy would be to provide cover for the public access transportation as well as arriving and departing passengers to help prevent slip and fall accidents. The amendment proposed in this application presents a material change in the scope of the original project thereby requiring this Type B application for amendment. The proposed revised project contemplates the relocation of the public access transportation staging area away from the terminal achieving the original objective of separating passengers and pedestrians from the mix of high volume traffic in front of the terminal. The project eliminates the need for the proposed canopy and enhances even further the passenger safety objective of the original project. This project proposes to build a new staging facility consisting of a restroom facility 30' X 10' (300 square feet) masonry construction with plumbing, staging access lane 25' X 500' (12,500 square feet), incidental signage, lighting, drainage, and geotechnical investigation. The project also includes the demolition of existing circuitry and relocation of existing flight monitors used by public access transportation service providers along with new conduit, circuitry, and geotechnical investigation (2,000 linear feet). Justification: This project will improve passenger safety and pedestrian flow in front of and within the terminal building by remoting all public access transportation to a centralized staging area away from the terminal building. This will allow on - demand service to the front of the terminal building thereby eliminating the congestion of vehicles to achieve improved vehicular flow and passenger safety with added passenger capacity at curb side. This project will also enhance competitiveness among service providers as they will all be staged in the same remote facility. Certifications: This project does not expand upon existing airfield facilities. No special certifications are required for this project beyond those normally required at the time of project implementation. Project Schedule: Implementation of this project is scheduled for FY 2000-2001. LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2000 PFC APPLICATION PROJECT NO.8 (APPLICATION 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) WESTPORT APRON AND TAXIWAY EXPANSION -SOUTH Description: PFC Project No. 8 (PFC Application 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) originally consisted of constructing an extension to the south (approximately 22,350 square yards or 201,150 square feet) of the air cargo apron and taxiway system previously constructed under an AIP and PFC funded project. The amendment proposed in this application presents a material change in the scope of the original project thereby requiring this Type B application for amendment. This amendment requests a larger extension 785' X 360' (approximately 282,600 total square feet) including the extension of the connecting taxiway system that will tie the proposed expansion into Taxiway S. One leg of the taxiway will be extended 90' X 360' (32,400 square feet), and a connecting shorter stub will be extended 75' X 1,280' (96,000 square feet). The demolition, removal and reconstruction of 48,750 square feet (25' X 1,950') of ARFF access road is also included in this project as well as all incidental marking, lighting, and drainage and necessary geotechnical investigation. In addition to the work described above, this project will include the removal of approximately 4,202 linear feet of 6 -inch runway hold markings on all runways at the airport and painting approximately 8,235 linear feet of new 12 -inch mandatory hold markings to comply with current FAA regulations. Justification: This project will expand the existing west side ramp that primarily serves air cargo carriers but is available for commercial carriers and general aviation. The existing ramp is inadequate to meet forecasted demand by current air cargo tenants. This project will also enhance the capacity for Runway 17R/35L by allowing easier and improved exit from the runway and access to air freight operations. The City has been advised by existing air cargo carriers that forecasts show increased frequency in the number of flights and larger aircraft up to and including the Airbus A300-600. The additional removal and restriping of all hold lines on the airport is required in order to comply with new FAA certification requirements. Certifications: This project involves constructing additional paved areas inside the airport operations area. No special certifications are expected to be required for this project beyond those normally required at the time of project implementation Project Schedule: Implementation of this project is scheduled for FY 2000-2001 LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2000 PFC APPLICATION PROJECT NO. 10 (APPLICATION 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) CONSTRUCT HIGH SPEED TAXIWAY B1 Description: PFC Project No. 10 (PFC Application 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) consists of constructing a high-speed exit taxiway serving Runway 17R -35L and connecting to Taxiway M for southbound traffic, just north of Runway 8-26. Taxiway is proposed to be 90' X 850' (76,500 square feet) with incidental signage, markings, lighting and drainage and geotechnical investigation. Justification: This amendment is requesting Use authority for Project 10, application 99 -03 -C- 00 -LBB previously approved as Impose Only. As stated in the 1992 Airport Master Plan, this project will increase the capacity on 17R/35L as well as enhance overall Airfield Safety. The project will serve traffic landing from the north and allow quicker exit from the runway, thus enhancing runway safety and capacity. ATCT will be able to fully utilize land and hold short operations (LASHO). Closer minimums between aircraft landing on Runway 17R when required to hold short of Runway 26 will be available by exiting Runway 17R to Taxiway M and holding short of Runway 26 at that point. Runway 26 will be available for full utility and operations. Certifications: This project involves constructing additional paved areas inside the airport operations area. No special certifications are expected to be required for this project beyond those normally required at the time of project implementation. Project Schedule: Implementation of this project is scheduled for FY 2001-2002. LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2000 PFC APPLICATION PROJECT NO. 11 (APPLICATION 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) ADA AIRCRAFT ACCESS Description: PFC Project No. 11 (PFC Application 99 -03 -C -00 -LBB) consists of providing commercial commuter aircraft access equipment to allow all weather access to commuter aircraft by physically challenged passengers. Justification: This amendment is requesting use authority for Project 11, application 99 -03 -C- 00 -LBB previously approved as Impose Only. The access equipment will enhance the City's ability to maintain compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act requirements and aircraft accessibility by all passengers. It will also ensure back up capability in case of mechanical failure of the jetbridges and provide direct access to those aircraft that cannot be accommodated by the jetbridges. Certifications: This project involves constructing additional paved areas inside the airport operations area. No special certifications are expected to be required for this project beyond those normally required at the time of project implementation. Project Schedule: Implementation of this project is scheduled for FY 2001-2002. ATTACHMENT G: AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN (ALP), AIRSPACE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS ALL PROJECTS FOR WHICH IMPOSE AND USE OR USE AUTHORITY IS REQUESTED IN THE APPLICATION MUST BE LISTED UNDER EACH TYPE OF FINDING BELOW. *****FOR FAA PFC Application Number: ******************************************************************************************************************* I. ALP Findings 1. Current ALP approval date: 11-15-99 List proposed project(s) shown on this ALP: Westport Apron and Taxiway Expansion — South Construct High Speed Taxiway B-1 Land Acquisition North of RWY 26 2. List proposed project(s) not required to be shown on an ALP: ARFF Truck Master Plan ADA Aircraft Access *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************************************** Public agency information confirmed? YES [ ] PARTIALLY [ ] NO [ ] For each project which the ADO/RO disagrees with the public agency's finding, discuss the reason(s) for the FAA's nonconcurrance below. II. Airspace Findings 1. FAA Airspace finding date: (repeat as necessary) List proposed project(s) covered by this finding: ARFF Training Facility — 08/02/00 Westport Apron and Taxiway Expansion — South — 03/19/01 Reconstruct and Expand the General Aviation Ramp between TWY F & L, across TWY C will be airspaced by FAA upon receipt of this application. Entrance Road and Canopy Improvements will be airspaced by FAA upon receipt of this application. (#01 -ASW -5127 -NRA) Construct High Speed Taxiway B-1 will be airspaced by FAA upon receipt of this application. (#01 -ASW -5127 -NRA) Land Acquisition North of RWY 26 will be airspaced by FAA upon receipt of this application. 2. List proposed project(s) not required to have an airspace determination Install Runway/Taxiway Guidance Signs is not required to be airspaced because the project is replacing existing guidance signs. ARFF Truck r Master Plan ADA Aircraft Access *****FOR FAA USE#######*###*##########*****#***#****###*##*###*#######*#####*###########*****#*#*###**#***#### Public agency information confirmed? YES [ ] PARTIALLY [ ] NO [ ] For each project which the ADO/RO disagrees with the public agency's finding, discuss the reason(s) for the FAA's nonconcurrence below. ******************************************************************************************************************* III. Environmental Findings 1. List proposed project(s) which are categorically excluded from the requirement for formal environmental review: Typically these projects are categorically excluded however, the FAA will make the final determination upon receipt of the application. ARFF.Training Facility Install Runway/Taxiway Guidance Signs ARFF Truck Master Plan Reconstruct and Expand General Aviation Ramp between TWY F & L, across TWY C Entrance Road and Canopy Improvements Westport Apron and Taxiway Expansion — South Construct High Speed Taxiway B-1 Land Acquisition North of RWY 26 ADA Aircraft Access 2. Date of FAA Finding of No Significant Impact: NA (repeat as necessary) List proposed project(s) covered by this finding: 3. Date of FAA environmental record of decision: NA (repeat as necessary) List proposed project(s) covered by this finding: *****FOR FAA USE#*#####*###########*############***###***####*#########*##########*#*###*#################### Public agency information confirmed? YES [ ] PARTIALLY [ ] NO [ ] For each project which the ADO/RO disagrees with the public agency's finding, discuss the reason(s) for the FAA's nonconcurrance below. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date