HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance - 8299-1982 - Amending Zoning Ordinance 7084. Zone Case 2318-A - 02/28/1982SMH:mck ORDINANCE NO. 8299
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 7084 AND THE OFFICIAL MAP
OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: ZONE CASE
N0.2318-A; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 1-5 OF THE
CITY CODE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
WHEREAS, the proposed changes in zoning as hereinafter made have been
duly presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its recommendation
which was received by the City Council and, after due consideration, the City
Council finds that due to changed conditions, it would be expedient and in the
interest of the public health, morals, and general welfare to make those
proposed changes in zoning; and
WHEREAS, all conditions precedent required by law for a valid amendment
to the Zoning Ordinance and Map have been fully complied with, as well as
giving notices in compliance with Section 26 of Ordinance No. 7084, as well as
notices provided by Article lOllf, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, amended
in 1961, and notice was duly published in the Lubbock Morning Avalanche-
Journal more than fifteen (15) days prior to the date of the public hearing
before the City Council on such proposed amendment, and the public hearing
according to said notice was duly held in the City Council Room on the second
floor of the City Hall, Lubbock, Texas, at which time persons appeared in
support of the proposal; and, after said hearing, it was by the City Council I
determined that it would be in the public interest, due to changed conditions,
that the Zoning Ordinance and the Zoning Map be amended in the manner here-,
inafter set forth in the body of this Ordinance and this Ordinance having been!
introduced prior to first reading hereof; NOW THEREFORE: ~
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
ZONE CASE NO. 2318-A
SECTION 1. THAT Ordinance No. 7084 and the Official Zoning Map Be
and the same are hereby amended as follows, to-wit:
Change a tract of land out of Section 29, Block A-K, City of Lubbock,
Lubbock County, Texas, from R-1 to R-2, C-2 and A-1 Zoning Districts.
Change a tract located in Section 29, Block A-K, Lubbock County,
Texas, from R-1 to C-2, being further described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point which bears N. 89°59' W., 466.68 feet from the
Northeast corner of Section 29, Block A-K, Lubbock County, Texas;
THENCE S. 00°01'43" W. an approximate distance of 466.68 feet;
THENCE N. 89°59' W. an approximate distance of 193.32 feet;
THENCE N. 00°01'43" E. an approximate distance of 466.68 feet;
THENCE S. 89°59' E. an approximate distance of 193.22 feet to the
Point of Beginning.
CONTAINS: 2 acres, more or less.
AND
Change a tract of land located in Section 29, Block A-K, Lubbock
County, Texas, from R-1 to A-1, being further described in metes and
bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a point which bearsS. 00°01'43" W. a distance of 466.68
feet and N. 89°59' W. a distance of 508.5 feet from the Northeast
corner of Section 29, Block A-K, Lubbock County, Texas;
THENCE N. 89°59' W. an approximate distance of 621.5 feet;
THENCE S. 00°01'43" W. an approximate distance of 451.4 feet to a
point of curvature;
THENCE Southeasterly around a curve to the left, said curve having a
radius of 15.00 feet;
THENCE S. 89°59' E. an approximate distance of 606.5 feet;
THENCE N. 00°01'4311 E. an approximate distance of 466.4 feet to the
Point of Beginning.
AND
BEGINNING at a point which bears N. 89°59' W., 660.00 feet from the
Northeast corner of Section 29, Block A-K, Lubbock County, Texas;
THENCE S. 00°01'4311 w. an approximate distance of 466.68 feet;
THENCE N. 89°59' W. an approximate distance of 470.00 feet;
THENCE N. 00°01'43" E. an approximate distance of 466.68 feet;
THENCE s. 89°59' E. an approximate distance of 470.00 feet to the
Point of Beginning.
CONTAINS: 5 acres, more or less.
AND
Change a tract of land located in Section 29, Block A-K, Lubbock
County, Texas from R-1 to A-1 restricted to Townhouses, being further
described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a point which bears s. 00°01'43" W. a distance of 466.68
feet and N. 89°59' W. a distance of 55.00 feet from the Northeast
corner of Section 29, Block A-K, Lubbock County, Texas;
THENCE N. 89°59' W. an approximate distance of 453.5 feet;
THENCE S. 00°01'43" W. an approximate distance of 466.4 feet;
THENCE s. 89°59' E. an approximate distance of 438.5 feet to a point
of curvature;
..
•J
' .
THENCE Northeasterly around a curve to the left, said curve having a
radius of 15.00 feet;
THENCE N. 00°01'43" E. an approximate distance of 451.4 feet to the
Point of Beginning.
AND
Change a tract of land located in Section 29, Block A-K, Lubbock
County, Texas from R-1 to R-2, being further described by metes and
bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a point which bears N. 89°59 1 W. a distance of 1320.00
feet and S. 00°01'43" W. a distance of 32.00 feet from the Northeast
corner of Section 29, Block A-K, Lubbock County, Texas;
THENCE S. 00°01'43" w. an approximate distance of 901.08 feet;
THENCE S. 89°59' E. an approximate distance of 115.00 feet to a point
of curvature;
THENCE Northeasterly around a curve to the left, said curve having a
radius of 15.00 feet;
THENCE N. 00°01'43" E. an approximate distance of 871.08 feet to a
point of curvature;
THENCE Northwesterly around a curve to the left, said curve having a
radius of 15.00 feet;
THENCE N. 89°59' W. an approximate distance of 115.00 feet to the
Point of Beginning.
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
a. The R-2 tract as requested.
b. The C-2 tract will be from 660 feet west of the Frankford
Avenue right-of-way line.
c. The east 450 feet of the A-1 tract will be limited to townhouses
only. The remainder of the tract will be A-1.
SECTION 2. THAT violation of any provisions of this Ordinance
shall be deemed a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed two
hundred dollars as provided in Section 1-5 of the City Code.
SECTION 3. THAT should any paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or
word of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any
reason, the remainder of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby.
SECTION 4. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized to cause
publication of the descriptive caption of this Ordinance as an alternative
method provided by law.
.. 1 •
•)
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Passed by the City Council on first reading this . 25th day of February,
1982.
Passed by the City Council on
198 3.
second reading this 28th day of Apri 1
BILL~
ATTEST:.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Northcutt, Administrator
and Environmental Control
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~ '111-t/.J;w
Susan M. Horton, Assistant City Attorney
'
-~--__ h p, F l\ I. Z.lZ.IL
. . /"""\ .___ _____ _
•' . .
\,1ct~
•
•
. .
-. ·. ""
..
5
1.1<&4 <lllllllli----+------+-----1!>.3c..ll
Z1
llUP .•. .
1\,l~l------~~-----+--~ 1,152.
frJI-//, ·/Q~
.
CJJE < WA'(
2.,G:,CX::
DAYiVF 'h"EEK ·-·. · \t.J€D ~$DAY \\-\1-AZ, ~--· ----------, ' .
I I ... DIR S:B m I ·.TOTAL . I . ";'"" -1-:"B I rt)rAl. .. . . -~>·
•' I I I DATE . .
. t f
.. WEATHER . .
. I. t . .
HOUR A.M. · .
12 -1 .
1 - 2 2 .. 3 I I
3 ... 4
4 .. 5 .. -.
Ci ... 6
6 -· 7 ' I
7 .. 8 ~ 41£ .. ~~ f55 Z.4G\ L --A'
8-9 \2.~ 274 .. '2.A1 114 ~ l. ~?~~~
' 9 .. 10 '1n J "1 p, 7l,.,'f'l J51 ZD.4 ~~£,..,-,
10 .; 11 1q qz. li I 1&!0 lM :..A .A
11 ... 121 l~h q2. I Zz.& 170 'f.l I I 3P,I . I t I p.M.
12 - 1 lbi ..r:l I d-'4 ~~ ~-t .z.ta5. .c r-\Z "' , ... 2 1-=;p.. ,.. 12.S ?J!:J5 l~. ?_£,'5 (:! I'(')~~
2 -3 1~4-I( 115 24'1 r4-0 2.1 I l. ,., ~ .
3 -t.. ?4~ )( f4q ~z I rlb4-. ~o'Z. 4V,t,.., ,0:1
4 .. 5 512. " lb'Z. 4"14 LB9. , AM-1-d...::l... 7
~ ... 6 ~·· I ,:;p, I ;~q I I 153. I _::'U)4_ ~q.,,.
6 - 7 1 I .
7 - 8 f
g -9
9 ... 10. I '
10·-11
·11·-12 I . t ..
· TOTAL zoqz; \,'loCo 4.00'L L1ffi '3 SC, \ StSO
R~~RKS-=---------------------------------------------~-------.• .. " ~ .. DIAGRAH OF COUI\'TERS
..
--·-·· ·----. ----·----------------
"'"· -~.···
,,
. ·VEHICLE··· VOLUME·-·
OC!T!ON: FK.to.t.J~Foi<t:> Ave. cl-SPUR E,'Z"J DATE: H-11-6'2. WEATHERs c..c...EA.R.
c:--~--s I -.. I ; .......... _ M<A\-Jt!For<.t.:> ('!>C.) t=kAl'J~ Cw-s) 6Pu1t sz., (we:.) ~9l)~ ~'l1(~
·ME Sl.:..f\iS: FROM .THE NORTH FROM THE SOUTH FROM TH £ EAST FROM THE WEST HALF ~oo A.,-o G,.:ooc: ' HOU1i
iiME·=tNISHEO L S R L s R L I s R L I s I R TOTAl
; I I .
. .
7~00 -' 7:30 A\1 ·Z IZ Olrl 2. q, 131 (\ \0 le>b ~~ 0 S1 0 -~ B1l
7:30 -8:00 A\1 -, S4-o(t']· :, 2.2.'5 54~ 34 tos '23'\i 0 cte lo''
8_:_00 -': 8:30 A\1 4-' 1Pl 0 -~ t 142_ 4b~ 15'2. ,q ~~,be 0 'i5 1 .'N 82.-':
R·30 -' 6-oo _)~~ fD 5S o~v I 40 _MfV' 2.5 70 tsctl I ~~ o<..\.
9:00 -': 9:30 A~ s ~ o,...., 0 G:>1 . 5\ .0' $ GR 10 ~ ' l..A I ~"-t,Z.ct
9:30 -: 10:00 AJ.S s ~ ,~ I ~ St..a<..' 'ZS 51 Jot\Y .. 0 PA z~
LO:OO .;..'!10:.30 A"1 z '?,7. 0,... I 5t 14 '2.4 49 B.w 0 (2 0 ("\ 515
L0:30 -::11:00 A).f 4-_ 4l o" 3 zs JPJ~ 5(o lt:/l 5~ I __ {Ju, l ,v
ll:OO -' 11:30 A~ 3 s; I \n 1 2:1 '2.1 1\ 51 bo e, 0 PrJ 0 C"\ _b_oq
l1:30 -!12:00 At.! 3 "1S I'' 0 teet ~ Z1 54 '55 31\/' 0 fJ.L, 14 ., ,-
L2:00 -1!12:30 EM 7 100 0 1\ t '31 ~ .G.. (d5 G::O 13 .~ I IPD4" 14l::
~2:30 -: 1:00 PM 7 1S o~· 0 45 Sj~_ 45 to1 JZ~ I sq 2. '\X
1:00 -" 1 ·~0 PM p, 1f O.cn 4 51 H.o u, 5-:; lk It:) &: I S5 2-"" ~~
1:30 -1 2:00 PM 8 II o(J 0 31 11{\.'. ~ ~ srtr o I ~·lo~
2:00 -:: 2:30 PM 10 51 0 ht I S4 z.; ,,. 42 ~ ~ ·' 0 ~~ I ~~ ld..oc
2:30 -: 3:00 PM 5 51 I {'T 2... ~ t9~j A~ _fit '31V' c I irE> .5"" 3:00 -1i ~:30 PM 14 ll\ 0 ~.l.h 2 _:;q 24~ -,;, i\ '5>..l\.. 0 lo I \x ~s~
3:30 ~ L 4:00 PM 5 \fS on:t D g.e 4-~-fol 1;5 .,, ' lio z\w
4:00 -i1 4:30 PM 12.. \'2..1 on 2. ~ SBtlJ . eo 110 lo ,b 0 ~ ' _().. I • I 1'1
4:30 -'' 5:00 PM IS ICDfo o"7· ' .2!1 '54-~ JZ3 rr~ ,~~/ 0 to:;, I z ~
5:00 -i: 5:30 liM. P'l ?J,\ I.~ 0 ~ 49.rr 12.4o r% q ~ 0 lo2 J .no, \ ,(/')'-!:;L
5:30 -'' 6:00 PM \0 &>1 04/T J ~ sz¥J '~~ reo fd't' Of ~·IZ~"
6:00 -1' 6i30 PM
6:30 -'i 7:00 :EM '
. ..
' I
~ I I
_., .. .:.,._,"""" I ~""'RAW~ FORt:> \'::>t:>) I""R.t\~~ L~li!>J ;:>Pc.)ft ~C.. I L W~) 0\-'0R ::Illl~)
·1ME ST~'"F.7S: FROM THE NORl"'"\ FROM THE SOUTH FROM TH~AST FROM THE WEST HALF
z:oo A..Tc G:.:ooP. HOUR • L S R L I s H L I s R L IS I R TJf..~E =-J,t.:'!SH£0 TOTAL ,. I I . -I I
I
. I .
7·00 -7:30 At-1 z lZ 0 2. q, 1 51 \0 it:>~ 1 0 51 0 2M
7:30 -8:00 AJ-1 I 54 0 ~ 2.2.'5 54 '54-105 '21 0 qr; 0 551
8:00 -8:30 AM 4 1f> 0 ' 147_ 4b t;'2. ,q ~~ o I Gs I seq
~-~n -·q.nn )).M Ia 55 0 I 40 44 2.5 '70 IS I ;q 0 '5\b
9:00 -9:30 At-1 s ~ 0 0 G:>l· 3\ $ Gfi 10 ' (J1 I 33\
9:30 -10:00 AM 5 :so 1 1 ~ Sto 'Z'3 51 lo 0 Pd. z zqe
10:00 -1(}:30 AM 2. 32. 0 I 51 14 '2.4-4C1 & Ol/210 2.~3
10:30 -11:00 AJ-1 4 4\ 0 31 zs If; &.a fn'l 5 I I PM II ZP,z
11:00 -11:30 AJ-1 ~ 93 ' 1 . Z1 Z.( 5( taO 8 0 Pf':JO ZPE
11:30 -12:00 AJ-1 3 "JS l 0 lfe. Z1 54 55 :, 0 ~14 32.4
12:00 -12:30 PM 7 100 0 f 31 '3i (d5 ~ ·~ .J.IPD14 c4oo
12:30 -liOO PM 7 . 7S 0 0 4S ~1 45 ~· 12. ' sq 2. ~4~
1• 00 -1 ~ 30 PM 8 1f 0 4 Sl liD S3 fL1.e. It":') . I S5 2. 3~.,
1:30-2:00 PM 8 II 0 0 31. 11 ~ ~ s 01252..·0 ~
2:00 -2:30PM to 91 0 I '34 ~ 42 ~ ~ 0 ~~I I 334
2:30 -3:00 PM s 5'1 I 2-?J.t., tct 4~ p.). q 0 ~ 5 ?:fZ1t:,
3:00 -·3:30 PM 14 \ l \ 0 z :;q 24 73 .,, s 0 IO I A\0
3:30-4:00PM s \I&; 0 D 47.. 42. ft,l At::.. '1 ' '1D z .~
4:00 -4·:30 PM 12-\'2..1 0 z SB ~ . e5 110 to 0 ~~ \ l=il')~.,
4:30 -5:00PM IS llDfl, 0 1 2.'1 ~ 123 I\~ ·~ 0 1C(j l ~\4
5:00 -5:30PM 8J 2.lol l ·0 5o ~ 2-40 f4-in l1 0 lo'2 I I £41
5:30-6:00PM \0 '001 0 J % S'l \~~ reo b 0 AAIZ IAA
6:00 -6:30PM I
6:30 -7:00PM '
I
.
. '
.
SOB:-'JD'D'L (4£? 1~%1 s Z1 l.\1 \ 700 1,5€>5 1.1~ 2JZ. 7 ll.152l3o
1'0TAL Z,09f> l ,q Ot.o 3,3(&, \ 1,1B9 ~,JS'
-. . ··-··--· I 10 HOUR
TIME "FINISHED L s R.,-1 L s R L S J::R L s R TOTAL .. . . . .
'
'
:co-c:rs Ar~t I lo D I ?z:; 14 (r: z_~ z b 1_0 0 1'03
:1 J; -· 7:'2,c; AM ,. ~ 0 \ u, 7,~ 4-~<7,· J5; 0 '51 0 IR 1-
-~·-·7:at; Ai~i I 10 D "2. I ito 1-5 I 5(~ 14 0 5~ {) ?~
:45-X". (.C A /It·\ f,~ '2.4 0 i \09 'L<t 77 l&l ,.::::; () / -.:.r-' e;. ~(~
~(.'C -fCI~ At'l-i <..J.. 3"1 .0 I i ~~ ?_'1 ?£, 5i. 4 (I . -.~( [) ;01
:t-5-~:~--AM CJ 4\ 0 0 '/1:1 ,c, ?_Z. 45 ~; 0 ... 4'2. I ?..o~
-~ ... ,-~.'f?A-\11 z. 'Z-~ C• \ ?\.! Z-::5 i~
... _
,:'"',~ f ' \ 4-z (.) IS/-7
: '1.=; -'£. ~· A M 4 l"2-0 0 i·/ 1'1 ·q --4-0 ?12 (.) lZ1 ~
. . .
. .. ' .
. I)[) -.;: I z; P.f\\ X (dL {) "Z.. 11 '2:2. ~ q,.._ <;? c 4c b ·z~)f
.It:; -4:5(-p t\i 4 R-) 0 D Z.i l """ .. 4? ~ 2 () 4&·. i 7~4.:S I
.:;;;._ ...... -4 .'1/5.-A "' 4 7~ h 0 -z.$1 r5 5d.. ~ lb 0 ~{/) I -zc; 4 I
.~-~:co P.ro ~ '1\ () i z.w l(o £,fi (A) ~ o· .. &l I ~?D'
·co -~. ,.r.; P.l\l "Z.. I S.C. 0 0 i9 1'1 CiJ t-;..t 3 0 ftA, 0 ~<15
4i~-1;::2.~ .PlY\ (o 1:3 i I r.J ~ i I 14'1 -A l,~ (') ~ I 4:;"2..!
::::::.....-._.-~-46 Pm 0 IL,-5 0 \ I it_., ?,_'3 'i4· /1 5 c _# I 4~·2-
·4J,:--(.7: cc .c::m 4 1'?>\.0 0 0 \lr~ ~z. -:J, ~-9 4..~ I 0 44-I ~57 I I
< I . ' I
I
. .
. .
• . ...
.
. .
. . ....
. .
. . (
'.
Z!De, '2.t,t, . .
I . ..
! .
. .
....
..
, .
~;,~·~ . AI~ ..
. ' .. : . . . . ~ . ...: . · .. ~ .. . .... .• ..
lb I"'
·Jqo I"
.
fi-j(/:,
~
' .
'
•
I'
'.. ~ . ..
. •.
. .--. . :. -.~
\ \
\
FRANKFORD AVENUE SOUTH LOOP 2H9 TO 82ND
. $ 823,200
+ 49,400
872 ,6oo
22,000
-139,600
$ 711,000
$1,452,000
Construction
6% Engineering
Total Cost
Prepaid
Possible Assessment
City Cost in 1982
City Cost in 86-87 when scheduled
15% Inflation Per Year
West Side: North of 66th unplatted; south of 66th a
couple of churches have platted only 2 small sections
(bas i ca l1 y un p 1 at ted)
NAHB's Board of Directors. ad~p.ts .. 1982 Policy Statement
Follou•ing is the fullte:d of the association'S 1982 State-
ment of Policy, which was adopted by the Board of Directors
at its meeting in Las Vegas, Nev .• on jon. 23·25,1982. The
document will be printed as a pamphlet and distributed
shortly.
Housing-A Priority To Preserve the American Dream
The political, social. and economic framework that has
shaped the nation's housing policy since the 1930s and reached
fruition in the decades following World Warn has come to an
historic turning point in the 1980s.
With housing production at depression levels and housing
costs and mortgage financing rates at record highs. this nation
now confronts a fundamental question that holds in the bal-
ance the future of the housing industry and, more importantly,
thefateofthedrearrisandaspirationsofmillionsof Americans.
We must not retreat from our national commitment that
decent housing be attainable for all Americans and we must
reaffirm that commitment arid dedicate our national resources
and energies to preserve the American dream of owning a
home.
In the past. the goal of home ownership enjoyed broad and
deeply-rooted support among America's leaders and citizens as
the opportunity that best enabled full participation in a free
and democratic society. Now is the time for all Americans to
voice their support for a strong national housing policy that
will help lead America out of recession. create jobs for millions
of unemployed, generate billions of dollars of tax revenue, and
produce desperately needed, affordable housing for America's
growing adult population.
stron'g support of those government programs that have tradi-
tionally eased the burden of home ownership for moderate-
income families but that today are under attack: the regaining
of access to stores of affordable credit for construction and
mortgage loans; the forging of a political consensus in the local
community; the expediting of the more efficient construction
of lower-cost, higher density housing; and the defining of a
national housing policy that will re-establish a major national
priority for housing.
Since 1946, more than 55 million new homes have been built
in the United States; almost 70%of the nation's families live in
homes they own. That record is the legacy of the combined
effort of home builders. the financial community. and govern·
ment to lay a foundation supporting housing opportunity for
all Americans.
The fate of housing is inextricably entwined with the fate of
the economy. The time has come for the industry to alert the
public that. unless deliberate actions are taken by the Presi-
dent. the Congress. and the Federal Reserve d to remedy
the deepening housing deqression. we. as a 'sk com-
promising basic rights and opportuniti to
define the American way of life. Unless
economic growth, we risk prolonging inde the FfjJ':.
an economy tom between inflation and recessiqfi',(; ~
'/(!_ .2 -3-lfl} · .tZ IT< s ~ .
Housing Atfordablllty · ?{JJti. ~8<'
A h . ff d b")' • • of . ' ~~ ~ ousmg a or a 1 tty cns1s maJor propo
driven a wedge between one generation. that saw ha·..;!ljr.MJ~
rewarded by home ownership, upward mobility, and pros r·
ity, and the next generation. that faces the possibility of eco-
nomic hardship, frustration, and alienation from the main-
From the 1950s through the 1970s, in any given year.consid·
A Housing Depression-The Impending Collapse erably more than 20'Jf• of America's households, typically headed by one wage earner, were able to afford the median-
The industry that supplies the nation's shelter is in a priced new home with 25% of their income.
depression at a time when the demand and need for housing is In 1955, 23o/.. of America's families qualified for the $77
atthe highest levelin the nation's history.led by the41 mi11ion monthly pa}'ments buying a $13.400 median-priced home at
Americans who will turn thirty in the 1980s. Housing starts the going mortgage rate of 4.8%. In 1965.26% qualified for $130
and sales are at their lowest ebb since World War II. By the end monthly payments on a 5.25%mortgage to buy a$20,000home.
of 1981, almost one million construction workers-J{)IY.. of the In 1975. ~;!'!1, could afford 9% mortgages and $333 monthly
~ation's total jobless-were standing in the unemployment payment~ on a mt·dian·priced new home selling for $39,000.1n
hne, with their numbers growing. At year's end. construction 1982. w1th interest rates as high as 18'1i•. less than 5% of all
unemployment was more that 18%. American households could afford to buy today's median
The plummeting production of new housing-expected to priced new home. At 18%, the monthly mortgage payments are
average 1.2 million units annually during the first three years $904 on a $60.000 loan, requiring an annual income of more
of the decade compared to an optimal annual rate of more than than $50.000 to qualify for that loan.
1.8 million-portends serious housing shortages in the imme· 1·-~~""'~M~Iftfi~!IJ!ILIIPI!Plll!!!IIIIIJII!IIl!IPI!!!PM'""IIf!IIMIIIIIIJIII!II!III ...
diate future. where gains can be made in the fight to restore housing afford·
Housing production in 1981 averaged an estimated 4.77 ability, the ballooning costs of land, land development, and
units per one thousand of population-the lowest rate since building materials will remain significant obstacles to that
J 945. By comparison, that ratio averaged 8.31 in the 1970s. 7.49 goal until builders and leaders in the local community form an
in the 1960s. and 9.16 in the 1950s. alliance to encourage the construction of higher-density, cost-
In last year's final quarter, when housing production was effective. and energy-efficient housing.
running at an average annual rate below 900.000. permanent . More than three years of under production in the housing
losses from the inventory of homes due to fire, demolition, and mdustry has set the stage for renewed housing inflation by
other causes were at an average annual rate of 500,000. That reducing the productive capacity of the various support indus·
left net new annual production at fewer than 400,000 homes. tries that belong to the housing infrastructure.
To save one of the nation's most vital and productive indus· . The upward trend in housing costs has taken an especially
tries from chronic depression, a·nd to prevent the impending h1gh toll on the young who are starting careers with incomes
collapse of the home delivery system-with a potential for on the lov.er end of the pay scale. Yet it is this segment of the
social disruption-federal, state. and local governments must market · 41 million "baby-boom" children who will reach their
make the necessary adjustments in regulations and policies thirtieth birthdays in this decade-that increasingly will domi-
that will make housing more affordable, particularly for the natt· demand for housing in the coming years.
millions of first-time buyers just now entering the marketplace.
The goal of restoring affordability to housing requires the (Continued on paxe 6. col. 1)
FEBIU!\RY 8. 1982 5
~puR ~2. '7 ;,IVb FRAIJI{FO~D Al/c, .(_ \....OOKI~G 6f\"';;i J:"f<,_Df.l\ SIC€ oF 'SPWR3Z.))
f't+oTOS 'tAI(..t?~ IT\ 5: 3d p.M. 2-.. 'ltf.-E'Z-
~~.,-.@HW[Erm
.FEB 2 5 1982 WJ
CiTY SECREiliRY
~ ~3/f /}-
TOW~HOUS€5
7 3 "d. S7 R € CT I ~ b s L , D t. R cl, .
I SIO~Y' '
1 y s o -1 ·s s o .s 4' f+ ·
3lf' WIDt
$ $67, s-oo +o bCJ,>OO
I I . I
TowN Hou.SES
3 3 rcl o.h d. AveNue X
2 -C:,TDR '(
B t L-L-Co X:-A r-e H , -rT c_(
.I
FARRAR. WEST APAR1McNT.S
51 ~0 6 ft,-rH t;:TReeT
WOOl> ~IDI#JG {J.)fTtt BICIC[( TRIM
C..otJ'\ PO S ITt D ~ RO 0 t=
-~ ------~-· -+
/'VIA ~ ~ + Q_it= . -AI~ L5 . 7 .
-·-i·-~·-----... --~----"·-~--~--·----
:6'4' __ lfft? /1!:[C:_tt_~--!
1 ' ' ~ '
--j
LJ)_~.tY-~~~5-.... b?L sT RIE 711:::.--J) 7lf k'.
_; ________ --~~----~-·------~ 5_/?_t;Cit@f -~'::)/ (;-_ p LA7V rJ-8t
-------· --,--------·~------·--.. --
'
. -.
!
. .. ;r -PR c-~ e-x, TL~ IY ~
¢>~~. --:-. _=--=-:;::~p~-----···-=· ~~~~'::--·. ~~~~...:.....:___~_.:__
:fl-. . }../0:,.}) ...... /?J. ~ /'hJl]l.,t'£' tJUJ-A./6-""JiLJ .. ~50c.._
rz:> f1 '(i?~~
.;:. -·
I}!Ji!eK AVALANCHE-JOU*NA1.4oturtloyMorning/febnJOry'6;.rt9~2~5
.....______. ~--.. -""rv-<Yh·•P.vJ.•>:y...-,A-)!>-.n A·.:,_;--_-~--"~--:~~::.;.::<:~:~:..:>',._.,_:·~.: . :.i ... ,,, ·~-, ~ ~" ,,;,. -~·"'
,..,_,_.,.,.,. ..
r· ~ ~\-l+'ol ' ..... T'IIMPIPWZ -unt'l''"'"' ,. . . . .... ~ Zoning Board.Divides.Decisroiis ·
!. Arter unanimously denying a zone ~ents at the coni.mi:>~10n meet~g. ·. . . . .
ehange tbat W()tdd have allowed a 76-1 . Much O( the opposiUon fe>cused «m
·unit :eol'ldominium projeet ··on 22nd · . how the residential j'Jrojeet would add
. Street near . Slide }tqad,. lhe Planning traffic· congestion during rush hOIJr to·
' ~nd Zonil'lg COmmiSsion Jote Thursday.. an already congested Frankford Ave-
• okayed. anothe\ .controversial request. nue. . · .. · . ·• .
' ~mltting an. undisclosed-number ot · Tbe commJ~slon did decide'(() ad· ~ apartments and 66 townhouse units to • . vise the tlty :CQilneil, Which will make
' be built neat the southWf!St eorner of ,.the flnal Gecl$ion on the tequest. of the
66th Street.ahd J."rl!nkford Avenue. • · ··~reported trClffiC problem on Frankford ..
. Approval of,the 66tlund f'tanktord Avenue. . . · . . ' .
pr!>jeet. eame despite 31 Jetters from The proposed residential develop:
:J'esident$ opposing. the _ebange arid the ' .. ment,. planned t~> be built. by Craft. El~
1 Pr;es~nee ~fIll!»'~ than ,a do~~.~ppo· liot and f'lelds, ls fronted onlhe west k~ ·. · , ~ , · .. i. . · ·· .. . : lly residential develQpment · and on
·~··"··--~ parts· or. ttte norlh and norlheast by l, commereial·i<med laneS. The ~ommiS·
.. ·Sion did .not 8ee .th~ proposal as being .
! too far out of line With land use in the • area. .. . · · . ·· · N~.action 'was ta~enat .the rn~eting ·
on a proposed new subdivision 6rdi-
nance because provisions in the draft j
concerning ·a;jdewalks will have 1o · be $tudi~ by the city's building board of
appeals. . . • .. · · · .
~ · Some Other zoning , matte~ also
' wete left unresolved and will be eonsi-
. f dered eluting a flPectal commission
.i \:-ti1E~~~~,u~·;: . , .
~.._ ... _,_->t.ioillt.t~~,..t-·~'--..... :...~ .. .-.._:_ _ __.....L,.. .... ~
Lubbock Avalanche· Journal ·
Friday Evening, .february 5, '1982
:I;nside this section . . ~ .
Truman tapes revealed ,
· · · Pag~5
eor~~r Patrol gets tough.·. •
··:.: · · Pas:Je6
Arge~tin~ intervention · ;''" .... _, · · · ·:Pave:J
,~ ,~, . . .•.. . .·. •·.. . . . . . . . . '"''" ,. ''" ,., , "'':•·•· lf ··:· ·. •. . .. · .. ·· , .... , .. < . . . . . . . . . •. . . ·£~~Elet·.·derii~~:-~2.!!!!5.g,~~~~ge ...•.. fgr:lRtQP9.s~4::
... ,., .. -~, -. . r··· . . . . , .. ..., ..... ··.·~ ....... ~., ............. ~. ..... .. . ........ . , ""';..-'•''"'f•-"'·""'' ,~r·-"'"'"""'"_.~ ...... ,~!'!"'""''"l!'l''''"''f \J'T!""'f"",~"'# ... •'il ,... , I ' ' By LARRY SUTJIERLAND ' . ' ' aradshaW' encountered h~\7 ~po-· ' ' ' ' d . . ' '
I' aUmTbe~~~~~ :!.~~;.$~~~: ·. !£Q!'(_Qm.Jrii.~
cfeby a zone cfuinge that would allow a here to make money; irm here tO save , • 7~nit condominium project to be buUt my home,'' Law said. ·. . ., . > ·: . · [fi~qini·req~ei\: ~the b)!iUiiiij~n·unan{· ·
orr22ndStreetnearSlideRoad ..... ·. . ·; Headde~that"Everypersonw,hose. [' ,.,;,' ,~.$eeJ!4NBLi'8gelO, ; .· " ...• ,
. However, the commission 'did ap. · · ptrroperty. ~~ti~hest .. ~t ,; PfOPerty IS, in' _ _>::: i:: 1 I : . :·! .. · ; _ _::~. j:,
Ee .anoth.er oont.rov. ersiafzoning r~: ~.s: ongoppc;l! on 01, :r · > 1•• • • · est that would permit an undisclosed · .• : Law· cited . possible 'tl:affi¢ • cong~s· ,
ber or, apartments and. ·66 :,own· _ti()n_ .in tJ'Ie neigbborbo04 ca.u~ by the ; '
bouse units to be built near the s6Qth· hisft:de:t~ffi!@lldimt~~·apg ~9~· , .
1
'41leSt corner of 66th Street and Frailk" · · _., · ., -~ 1;,;. ·•·· •• .:: ~' ~ ,.,,. •• • · rcmt Avenue. · · er '<ipP<m~t sald. :•·tra· goln~. ~o ;n!J~e: ·
. Arguing for. the condominium. plan, . 'tbe vatue Of our home$ go 4o'rn ~~!· · ,ferry Bradshaw, spi>kesman for. the derably.'': · .• · .· . . . , .. ,; r
.
· (l.tO.P.O. sed. p .. rojec.t's buUde. rs, Ron s. te .. ele . City.PlaMing Pi~r J~~~s f?er~
• dftel Theodore Sisco, said, "We haven't tram said the <:olldomiriium Pf9Ject . C
· a true condominium in Lubbock, · proposed f.or the l~d :would, , be m~r,e from lcrateh." · · ; ; .dense than, regular smgle·f~ily rest4·
.. · Bradshaw said the project woUJd ' ences bUilt on the tract. He ~id that
have 1,000-:square-foot units, 5ellingfor . ~-the propoiled condominium :W~uld:~en•
. . aetween $50.000. and $75.000 per Wlit. •
1
~~ ... ~L-.P t~o ._ ~~~av~s~e.~~.t.::~t·l·~. ~"'~~ ...... !!o_ ~. · aruf WOUJd be owner-occupied. . ! • w.w<.OIJ Wlli.&B•HIIW ..,....t ~~·"' ~~~ IU._."' ~ tf:~r::::t f~~eR~~~fJit~~~~ ·, ~"~l. :~~; .• ~. :.~f;~~~~~~~~f. ·. <Wi.te.d --beca\,ISe or the 'fel3ti\'e 'hig)l ; · ft!SJdentla ~ . ; ; '' · ; Iii · · · i i ,.deftsttyofth~condominiumproject. .· i ~ner· ~1([~~~: tett.h~~~ of tbei
~·"'""'-' ~·---, • .~~~·;:-,.,.,;·;.;,:,·,.:; .... .,,.,,.., .• -_ .. ,__.,,.~_,,~-~f~IJIIf.''""f"~-~u.,..{<'·p~e .. .,..,.,...,..,.,.._ •lit'f~',-'".,.ot '"~-~'''!'"-"' -~~10 ,,..,,_'""!)"1"'''11 ""~""!"''"'~ l'
'1 .. Panel deniesrequeS't ferz·oning:change · .
. :. tctnti~niedFtomPageOne). ' . ·ultt~ately will'deCjde.' the. zoning ·re-··RonGivenstor a zone change at ~t.·
· mously disapproved it. Several persons · ques.t, of the traffic problem on Frank· Fourth Street and Yucca Avenue to ae-·
· . in, the audience loudly applauded the ford Avepue. • ·. . , , : . commodate an butsi4e roner-s~ating
• commission's decision. . . · jThe proposed residentialdevelop-, rink. The request met with some oppo-. ·
•. . i Approval ·of the· prc>ject ~t · 66th ment, which will be built, by Craft, El· sition from the· City's ·Urban Renewal ~ Street and Frankford A vepue came de· liot and Fields, is fronted to the ¥~est by 'Agency, ana 'Bertram said It" eoufil' . ~·spite 37 letters from nearbt 'tesidents :residential development and to partS or bring too many traffic problems .to tile 1 opposing the change, and also in the the 1portband northeast by commer-. area. ·· · . . ·· · ·. . .. · . ·' '.
•· face or more than a dozen ·people. who , ~ial~t(lned land. The commission .did. ; No action. was :taken at,the meetJJ\g':·: ~attended the corn mission meeting.' • . • notSee the proposal' as being 'too .out-of--: on. a proi>osed new subdiviSiot(o~· ::
;, tMuch of the opposition foci.tsed on line'withlandosesinth~area .. : . ·: nance beca\lre·provi!)ions.in ~e ~aft
1 bow the residential. project ~ould add •· In other actiori1 the 'ronUrtis$ioners . 'concerning sidewalks will have tO be . ,
i; traffic congestion to·an alr~dy eor,tg-approved a day care tiursery)o be op-· ,studied by the city's building board Of ·
-:-ested Frankford A venue during :rush . :erated ey Edward and Val~rie ,RaCkley :appeals. " · · ' . . . ·· . . · '. 1 ·· · hour periods. The commission dit! de-at6413Ave.P.: .. · .: •. ·.: . • · ·. . .·· other· zoning matters were also lefl'
, dde to 'advise the ·city council; which '· ·'the commi~loh 4'(enied a ~~t by . unresolved and will be considered dur· · .
... ;, .... --: '""'' ,.,.,,.~~'"''><·•~• ... TLL*--1' > C .... ·.--··:··iPt!cW·.~ .. • • '. '.··. '• .~. ·. ' ·:.Del.· 't· · ;&tsda)"atfP.m.· 1 ···:: •: • -: • "'1~L--,, .. t,Jd;~-li1;.,t·l::{:i,~,~-;~·~;l~~ :.;,_..,.;,;,, l, ,.:!-. ~
MAP IN FILE
SEE
ORDINANCE
-... -~-. .. .
... ~-
1 .
. -'.THE STATE OF TEXAS
; COUNTY OF LUBBOCK
Before me , Bonnie McKee a Notary Public in and for Lubbock County, Texas on this day
personally appeared Twi I a Aufi I I ' A ceo unt Manal:'!e r of the Southwestern Newspa-
pers Corporation, publishers of the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal Morning. Evening and Sunday, who
being by me duly sworn did depose and say that said newsP.ajir ~as~et1 ~ublii¥£ contin~o~~rr n¥e
than fifty-two weeks prior to the first insertiQILQf this L E!a o e-wo r s
word-$102.60 No, 6 77917 at Lubbock County. Texas and the attached print-
ed copy of the N ° t 1 c e is a true COP.Y of the origjnal cmd Wil.S .Pdnted in the Lubbock
Avalanche-Journal on the following dates: IUU( APril 30 & MaY 7 • 19".3 •
L-1889
'ACCOUnt Man;;;
LUBBOCK AVALANCHE-JOURNAL
Southwestern Newspapers Corporation
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of __ M_a_Y ___ , 19 83
FORM58-10
JP) li@IUW~lfll n~ MAY 1 0 1983 WJ
CITY SECRETARY
No Text