HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance - 9367-1990 - Amending Zoning Ordinance 7084 And The Official Zoning Map Of The City Of Lubboc - 07/25/1990ORDINANCE #9367
July 26,. 1990
Page 551
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 7084 AND THE OFFICIAL MAP
OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK MAKING THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: ZONE CASE NO. 2650; A
ZONING CHANGE FROM R-1 TO C-Z ZONING ON LOTS 1-6 AND 76-80, BACON HEIGHTS
ADDITION, LUBBOCK, TEXAS; SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS; PROVIDING A PENALTY;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
David Goyette appeared on behalf of John Abney to request approval of the first zoning increment following a Comprehensive Land Use Plan change approved
by the P&Z Co11111ission and City Council in June, 1990.
Additionally, Mr. Goyette requested that Council postpone second reading of this Ordinance until
proponent has submitted a written request in order re-
evaluation of existing property. According to Mr.
Goyette, a commitment from Council was necessary for
them to proceed.
City Attorney John Ross stated that after first reading
of an ordinance, Council may consider it for second
reading at any time in the future, but that it's not
final until then.
Councilman Maloy asked how long the proponent wanted to
wait, and Hr. Goyette replied that they have set an 18-
month deadline for permanent improvements on the entire
project.
Councilman Maloy stated he was concerned about zoning
of existing residential area, and proponent John Abney
replied that the present homeowners are under contract
until January, 1991. He explained that the area is
commercially zoned until they find permanent buyers and
also stated that they are concerned that taxes might
change, but that they have agreed to purchase affected
homes.
No one appeared in opposition. Mayor McMinn closed the
hearing at 10:53 a.m.
Assistant City Manager Jim Bertram gave the adjacent
land use relationships as follows:
North -comercial
South -residential East -residential
West -commercial
Mr. Bertram stated that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and went on to say that
at a previous meeting the Planning and Zoning Conunission considered and found the following two items
acceptable:
1. The phased approach with a possibility of two stages in Phase I (example: the six lots on the
north being developed while the five lots on the
south would have homes on them until a development
is proposed).
2. A temporary street blockade and turn around (in
lieu of a cul-de-sac) would be appropriate for an
initial 18 month period. That closure would also
be subject to City Council approval.
Mr. Bertram stated that the P&Z Cormnfssfon recommended the zone request with the following conditions:
July 26, 1990
Page 552
I. No new curb cuts will be allowed on Slide Road.
The street entrance on 52nd and the north alley
return day remain. All residential curb cuts on
52nd shall be rebuilt when a commercial project is
approved. Any new comerc1al drive on 52nd Street
shall be 100' or more east of Slide Road.
2. A 7' (7' above any proposed final parking lot ; i
grade) cinder b 1 ock fence with a br1 ck. 1 edge on i · .)
each side of the footing shall be constructed on
the south boundary. That fence shall be
constructed prior to the removal for homes on the
south 5 lots. The east fence shall be a standard
7' wood fence.
3. The east end of the development shall have a 30'
building setback.
4. Contiguous lots on each side of the street shall be
included in any staged redevelopment scheme.
5. A temporary turn around and fence may be used on
52nd Street at the east end of the development. An initial review regarding installation of brick facing on one or both sides of the cinder block
fence and installation of a permanent brick fence
on the east end, as well as the status of the
temporary turn around and construction of the cul-
de-sac. shall be on the Planning and Zoning Commission •other Business• agenda during February
1992. The Commission shall issue a decision to
brick the south fence and/or install the cul-de-sac
and permanent east fence or defer action for one-
year time periods. Any permanent brick fence shall
confonn to the standards outlined in the Slide Road Development Plan (January 26, 1984).
6. That a Site Plan, including building elevations
showing materials, color and texture shall be
submitted and approved ~Y the Planning and Zoning
Commission prior to the Issuance of a Building
Permit.
Additional matters to be detailed by the Planning and
Zoning Commission when the property is proposed for replat:
1. Design of the proposed temporary turn around.
2. Escrow of funds to ensure the cul-de-sac and brick fence facing.
3. Location of the temporary wood fence on the east
end.
According to Mr. Bertram, Staff supports the .recOffllllendation of the Planning and Zoning Co11111isslon,
with conditions 1-6 noted above and Staff does not
oppose proponent's request to postpone second reading.
Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tern Baker, seconded by
Councilwoman Trejo to authorize Ordinance 19367 with
Conditions 1-6 recommended by P&Z and City Staff and
additionally, to hold this item for second reading until a written request is submitted. Motion carried:
7 Yeas; O Nays.
• I • I ·· .. ·!
·,
9"'1~~/f/9/}
ORDINANCE
FIRST READING
ONLY
NO FINAL
PASSAGE