Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance - 9458-1991 - Amending Section 8-4 Subsections (B) And (C) Code Of Ordinaces - 07/11/1991DGV:da First Reading July 11, 1991 Item #18 Second Reading July 25, 1991 Item #8 ORDINANCE NO. 9458 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8-4, SUBSECTIONS (b) AND (c) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, WITH REGARD TO ESTABLISH- MENT OF DISTRICTS FOR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS BASED UPON THE 1990 FEDERAL CENSUS; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lubbock, Texas, has received the results of the 1990 federal census and has studied such results with regard to City Council Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lubbock has determined that it would be in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Lubbock to require that the following changes be made to such Districts, which changes are in keeping with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, and the judgment in Jones v. City of lubbock, No. 79-2744, North- ern District of Texas; NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: SECTION 1. THAT Subsection 8-4(b) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Lubbock, Texas, be amended to read as follows: (b) The voting precincts set out in this section are hereby divided into six (6) City Council voting districts with each district to contain the following named voting precincts: Council District No. 1--Precinct Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 17, 18, 63, 79, and 80. Council District No. 2--Precinct Nos. 6, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 40, and 70. Council District No. 3--Precinct Nos. 11, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28, and 49. Council District No. 4--Precinct Nos. 12, 30, 48, 52, 54, 60, 61, 67, 74, and 75. Council District No. 5--Precinct Nos. 27, 53; 55, 57, 62, 66, 73, and 78. Council District No. 6--Precinct Nos. 7, 9, 13, 47, 50, 58, 59, 71, 72, and 76. SECTION 2. THAT Subsection 8-4(c) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Lubbock, Texas, be amended to read as follows: (c) The voting district, voting precincts and voting places set out in this section are hereby delineated on the map denominated "C;ty of Lubbock Voting Precincts/Districts, effective January 1, 1992/0fficial Map." A copy of said map 1s attached to and made a part of this section as if fully copied herein in detail. A copy of the original of such map shall be kept in the office of the city secretary and shall be available for public inspection, and at each special and general city election, a true copy of said map shall be furnished by the city secretary to each of the presiding judges of the voting precincts for such special or general city election. SECTION 2. THAT should any section, paragraph, sentence, phrase, clause or word of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, the remainder of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby. SECTION 3. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to provide for publication of this Ordinance in its entirety following final passage by the City Council. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Passed by the City Council on first reading this 11th day of July , 1991. Passed by the City Council on second reading this 25th day of July , 1991. ---- · __ APP.RO-VfD AS TO CONTENT: City Manager - 2 - CITY OF LUBBOCK § COUNTY OF LUBBOCK § STATE OF TEXAS § AFFIDAVIT -Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Ranette Boyd, who, being by me duly sworn, deposed as follows: · My name is Ranette Boyd, I am of sound mind, capable of making this affidavit, and personally acquainted with the facts herein stated: I am the custodian of the records of the City Secretary's Office for the City of Lubbock, Texas. Attached hereto is a transcript of testimony given at the Public Hearing on Redistricting during the July 11, 1991 City Council Meeting. These records are kept by me as City Secretary in the regular course of business, and it was in the regular course of business of the City Secretary of the City of Lubbock, Texas or an employee or representatives of the City Secretary of the City of Lubbock, Texas, with knowledge of the act, event, condition, opinion, or diagnosis, recorded to make the record or to transmit information thereof to be included in such record; and the record was made at or near the time or reasonably soon thereafter. The records attached hereto are the original or exact duplicates of the original. BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for said County, Texas, on this day personally appeared Ranette Boyd, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this 24th day of July, 1991. PUBLIC TESTIMONY GIVEN AT PUBLIC HEARING HELD THURSDAY, JULY 11, 1991 AT 10:45 A.M. BY THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF lUBBOCK, TEXAS REGARDING REO I STRICTI NG. ClYDE MYRES: ·Mayor, City Councilmen, City Manager, My name is Clyde Myres. I live at 2606 Ridge Road. I just want to quote an article in the paper this morning that says that Councilmembers are seeking to balance the population levels of six Council Districts, maintaining two predominantly minority districts. Mr. Mayor, Councilmen--that's just what I object to. I object to anything that would cause me to have to live in a segregated district. I think it's unfair to my family; I think it's unfair as an American and if we're going to--1 understand--it's the Court--the Supreme Court must talk with a forked tongue, because we've been bussing our grandchildren and children now for about 30 years to integrate, Right? And I've always felt that if I could help integrate the district I live in, prejudice would cease because the Justice Department wouldn't have any reason or any excuse to tell me I've got to bus my grandchildren. And all these things are breaking us. We should only consider one thing and that's the handicapped. I just want to give a few reasons as a businessman. I've been in business 35 years and I do a lot of thinking about what's good for my survival and one thing--we. can't dilute two districts because of a cultural group who have special interests and they have, through political clout, went to the Supreme Court and they say--1 guess they're saying they want us to stay segregated and I'm trying to integrate and we've spent a lot of money for it. But let me tell you what it will come to--right now you're saying you can't dilute these areas. Ok. Councilwoman Trejo--she's a good representative, I think out there in that district, but if her political backers, and T.J. Patterson--if his political backers get behind him and the Chamber of Commerce--what, their budget's about $700,000 and they come up with a development out here and we'll begin it in North lubbock. But we're going to need about 2,000 homes out there, but if we fill those 2,000 homes we may dilute that area, so we can't have that. This place is going to have to go somewhere else. He may have to go to some other town to get land that he can afford. If we dilute our area, we'll become segregated and we can't have that. I'll get on with my point, but the real disappointment of this government census is they said they wouldn't use it against me; then here they've got so many Hispanics, so many Whites, so many Blacks, so many Other1 and we talk about deviation? I didn't think we had any deviation in America. We're all straight liners--main liners, aren't we? This really had me confused, so I come down to one of the City Managers--City Administrators-- 1'11 say this, he's a highly sincere young man--he really means well. He explained to me that if we diluted those areas to where they couldn't have one of their culture representing these people--we got so many poor people, so many single mothers--that if they're not represented properly by someone of their culture, they'll just be devastated. And I guess they're telling me that Bill Maloy doesn't have the compassion to administer to the poor Black families. And I guess they're telling me that Ms. Trejo doesn't have the compassion to administer to a poor White family. Where do we start? I mean where do we stop this thing? . :; ' ·If we keep breaking everything down into race and political things like that, we'll be destroyed. We'll--the groups that come to us and planned this I think are mostly political and I'll tell you why. Out here in District #5 we have 24,547 Whites and we have 3,332 Hispanics. Those people must think Mr. Phillips there must be doing a good job. They bought a home out there in his district. But you're saying that we can't let the people--we can't balance these districts where someone from Southwest Lubbock can say I want to come out of District 1. That's a strictly professionalized culture out there and they don't really want us out there because we're not of that culture • That's what we're saying and I can't buy that and what we're.really saying · when we came in here while ago in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag--one nation, under God--1 lost my chain of thought--indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. But what we going to have to do if we keep listening to the Justice Department--we're going to have to say, with the exception of a few culture--a few selected cultural groups who may preferential privileges and change the Constitution to suite their cultural needs. That's what we saying. So, are we going to change that Pledge of Allegiance to the flag or are we going to sit up there as Councilmen? I paid $8,000 worth of school and city taxes last year. No one's ever-- people don't realize--people aren't interested in your problems, but I had rather see that whole $8,000 go for a suit against the Justice Department to allow Lubbock, Texas to be indivisible and one group, and get to where we don't have to live in a segregated district. I don't like to be segregated in this and I hear the Hispanics--I'm going--1 said cultures--1 meant different cultures, and they'll say I don't want to lose my identity. Well, I don't want to lose my identity either. My folks came from Alsas Lorraine years ago--a little country between Germany and France. They spoke two or three different languages--! only speak the one. That's all I need in this country is one language. But I have not lost my identity. My name is Clyde Myres--I'm an individual and I don't think that by being a main line American I've lost anything. HAROLD CHATMAN: Mr. Mayor, Councilpersons, City Officials: My name is Harold Chatman. I am the representative of District 2, but I am here as an individual. At the last meeting of District 2 the residents of that area asked this Councilperson to vote for number 3--0ption 3. Now, my--1 support Option 3 and I will tell you why I support Option 3. One, I understand the Councilperson's position and why he or she'wants to vote for this particular area or that particular area, but I and others feels that what is best for our District went back to 1980 when the Census were taken and the counts accepted was a -5.06 deviation. And we lived with it and you made plan 2--plan 2 will only be at a +3.21 deviation, and · it looks good to those really not involved. But let's look at plan by plan. Option 1 will have a total of 72% minority with a -3.40 deviation. Option 2 will have a total of 69% minority with a +3.21% deviation. Option 3 will have a total of 74% minority with a negative deviation of 4.13. With our present percentage of 82.32, as was taken, and with a -23.69 deviation, to be changed from the 82.32% deviation of the minority, in Plan 1 we would have a difference of a negative 10.44 deviation. We would reduce the minority that much in that area under Plan 1. In Plan 2, from the 82% to the 69%, we would reduce the minorities there 12.54%. Under Plan 3, which we support, we would be reducing the minorities only 7.87%. The North and South Freeway is blamed for the present loss, plus the massive movement to the Southwest lubbock •. If this trend continues, I would prefer Option 3 because the East-West Freeway is going to do the same thing and we will be a desolate area then. I would much rather start with the higher percent of minorities and drop down to possibly a more--about 50%, than start with the lower percent and drop below 50% because of the input of the East-West Freeway to come down. We would like to ask your consideration of Option 3. I know most of the Council has expressed to favor 2, but this is our reasons. We hope that with your consideration that you will look at all the options we have here. I'd be glad to answer any questions. JOAN ERVIN: Thank you Mr. Mayor and Councilpersons. I'm Joan Ervin, a taxpaying, viable, healthy citizen of Precinct 2, represented by Mayor Pro Tem Patterson. Based on readings from news media I have noticed that our elected officials are supporting Plan 2, maybe with some defections. Let me applaud your supporting 2. I agree this is not a racial issue. Mr. Chatman said he was speaking for constituents of 2--l'm speaking for Joan Ervin and there are other persons in the confines of District 2 that are supporting Plan 2, so Mr. Patterson, you're going to have fun and you need to know that both sides are looking at you and wanting your support. We strongly support Plan #2 simply because, Mr. Mayor, we have long since recognized the fact that we do not need racial battles within our City. Seemingly we have eradicated those things. If you guys support ~lan 3, you will create a problem with racial tension. We're talking about Precinct 5 being moved over into-District 2. We're talking about taking qualified voters from Councilwoman Trejo and putting in Councilman--Mayor Pro Tem Patterson's District. We are talking about putting two viable voting precincts and groups of people--1 could care less red, white, black, or . blue--together. Where there's unity there's strength. Where there is division we will all fail. Councilman Patterson, I implore you, Sir, that you join other Councilpersons in supporting Plan #2, since my understanding is we will be in compliance with the Justice Department, and whether we like it or not, that's what we're living by. I ask of you, Sir, to join other Councilpersons and support Plan.#2, and for God's sake let us not begin fighting with anybody of any racial tension--but you can see what's going to happen, and until you and Councilman Trejo can viably represent minority candidates and support Plan 3, you will be asking for trouble. let me join my friend and brother Harold Chatman by saying to you Councilmen--support #3 and you '11 st 111 hear something from constituents of #2. CECIL PURYEAR: I'm Cecil Puryear and right now I'm in Maggie's district over there. We have Black, White, Indian--you just name it and we've got them over there. I really can't understand--I'm--1 guess I'm of an old-- we've all been one people in Texas. I'm just wondering if we was to send a letter back to Washington to the Justice Department that we want to be one group here in Lubbock--we don't need segregation down here. You can get all segregated and if you're an African American, you're still an African American. If you're an Anglo, you're an Anglo. If you're Hispanic, you're Hispanic. So why are we fighting these dern things. Why are we shipping our kids back and forth over across town when, man, it's unreal the money we are spending. . The LISD is coming home to $130,000,000 trying to operate a school here that's failing and jacking these numbers back and forth is what's causing a lot of that. We can't give anybody a decent representation because we're worried about where was this Spanish and this Black--Good God people, we're Americans. More important, we're Texans and until we start acting like Texans--it's just like I told them at the County Commission--they said well the Justice Department said we had to do so and so at the jail or they would put us in jail. Well, you built a good one so go on to jail. As long as we're trying to satisfy every half-wit that happens to become a Federal Judge, seems like--I think Judge Blalack is just about ready to be a Federal Judge. I think we're working ourselves to death. We can't do anything because we trying to have so much special interest that we can't do anything. Ya'll can't get together--we can't get together--especially you can't satisfy me. · Anyways, what I think I'm trying to say is we've got to the time--and ya'll talking about one Chamber of Commerce--Yeah, that's right, we need one. We also need one people. We need one people in lubbock and the ones that used to care about each other or that had compassion about each other and the ones that didn't try to take over the lives of everybody ••••• All I'm trying to say is·that at some point in time we're going to have to buck up against the system. If we keep jacking around like this we're never going to get anywhere. This country is in one big shambles right now because we're playing on each other. Well, I'm sure that things will straighten out a little bit in maybe 5 or 10 years because I think I'll die ••• but anyway I would just 1 ike for one thing to happen. For ya'll to one time--or somebody in any government--the City or the State or the County--to say to the Federal Government--Hey, we could break away into individual states if we wanted to down here and be one of our own, but certainly somewhere in time I hope that some group gets together--some study group gets together and says well, all these things we're doing are costing us too much money. We're going to have to quit doing these things the way the Federal Government wants to and try to do it the way our taxpayers wants us to. This all boils down to one thing--Do we have the money or do we not have the money and we don't have the money. And this is what you'd all better start thinking about and start looking at. We do not have the money. Thank you. · THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF LUBBOCK R•861 Before me Tonra Henry a Notary Public in and for Lubbock County, Texas on this day personallyap~eared .T.J. Auflll• Account Hanacter oftheSouthwesternNewspa- pers Co~porabon, publishers of t~e Lubbock Avalanche-Jou~nal -Morning, and Sunday, who being by me duly sworn did depose and say that said newspaper has been published continuously for more than fifty-two weeks pri- or to the first insertion of this -+l-ee-ea!"l!IHic-fAl-tG~t~ll'C"e-------------------­ -------------1'10. 8233U at Lubbock County, Texas and the attached print- ed copy of the I eifel not 1 ce •s a true copy of the original and was printed in the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal on the following dates:_,J,..uw.l vr~-2~8 ... ,~1~9~9J.1ll.---------------- 1303 WD a53 = 690,59 Account Menee:cr LUBBOCK AVALANCHE-JOURNAL Southwestern Newspaper Corporation TONYA HENRY Notaty Public STATE OF TEXAS Subscribed and sworn to before me thi~:~..s_.=2=-.:9:..._ __ __uday of._-=-~r.,.~~~~..,My•Co,...mm •. •Es,..p~.,..9;o')1.,.994w· ,_ __ 111e citY ot Lllflbock, rU'.~. 11o emenclld to ruc1 a tonows: . · '·"'' ~"!!~!. !etlfttl ..-.clnet$ ... ; ., :~tDtiD . ' •. ·, . · --aEADtffO:.ORDtNANCt;S: · · ' ORDINANCE NO .... '-----IAN ORDUIAfiiCE ADOPTING ,. CITY OF LUBBOCK W4tEJl CONSEilVATt.ON ANDDROUGtl'r' CONTlNGENCY PLAN; AU• THORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF WATER UTJLITIES TO ADMIN IS. TER tHE1PLAN; ~ROVIDING A PENALTY 'OF NOT LESS THAN 110;00 PER DAY NOR MORE THAN C200.00 PER DAY FOR EJICH, OAY OF _NON.COMPLI· ANCE WITH' THE PROVISIONS THEREOF; DECLARING A PUB- LIC NEED 'OF, AN EMERGENCY NATURE •f'OR THE ADOPTION HERE9F·0N ONE READING; PROVIDING. FOR PUBLICATION At.ID ORDAII!I'IN'G OTHI!:R f.Mt. · TERS REL.ATED TO THE FORE· GOING: • · · . • · ' . ., ~ ,:- R4! .. .. : .. ,·; oR.oENANZA folliM~RO N5a. · . ·aNA.· ,-ORDENANZA ENMENOANDO SECCION 1·4, SU8SECCIONES' 18) Y CC) DEL . CODIGO OE ORDENANZASOE: LA C·tUDAD DE LUBBOCl(;·' TEJAS, CON RESPECTO A.' ESTABLECIMIENTO DE · DISTRITD$ PARA MIEMBROS . ~;s'Agg::~t~::.~~~~'irtrt . AL DE !990: CONTENlENDO 'UNA·· CLAUSU'LA DE SALVAGUARDIAI Y PROVEER. PAIUI PU.BUCACION. . . ' ' .,.. ~ • j '"' " MIEN.TR,U QUE, el Conselo Municipal de Ia Cludad da Lub-· bock, ·Telas •. tla reclbldo loa. resuttos: del Cell$0 Federal cJe 1990 ., 1111 esludltdll tel rnullos con res..ecto • dlstrlm para mllll'llllnis ·del ~to Municipal;.,. '/. MIENTRAS QUE. el (GnHio Municipal de Ia Ctuclactde l.llbboCk lit deternlll!edo ca.,. 1era en et· < meior lnteres de "" dlidllda~ da i ~';:-~:los· ':!! i .-n a tal Dbrrttos. -tal ell ' es1an ep _., !»~ttOI . : ilel Acto .... OeractiDt . I. de.tt6J, como enmellele ,OPfnlon.ei'l J-s en eon :ud·dt LUIIIIOCk. N-. f Dlstrtto Nonenolll Tilles. ----' CONIIOUUINTl!: · : .: ouE seA oRDENA.oo PaR n :! CONSEJQ ft'\UNIC!PAI. DE L.A ;, CIUDAD DE UIIBOCJt: · . ~U:Cc•o-..... i~ ."otJ.If ·•• CINI...,.~ ~~erreto. ~. ••-IO!Io ct-1• • .,.._._ .,. •att' OPdllfllflln 11fllttt &er' dtclaredo •lnconalltuctoriet • llwalldo POr cytlllllllert raJon. tl • mto da'esta Ordenanu dellert no ier •!«C'* ... el~: ' ~ : .. :. :.: '' l . . . ' Clll iiis· reclntoa electorates sentedol en esta secclon aan tcaul · ·, SEttJ.QN. a• OUE;;I• Secretarle Mulilcloat "•caul eutorlzada , .,!lrlllda .,.,. .,_ , diYidldos en sels en: rec:lntoa .. i electorelt de. It elUded concede ! dlstrlto -t-en 1o1· shlulflltes · I'ICintoa.electorakll: . · · c .,,,. o.ulttlceclon 'Clt •••• oreileneni1 ell su totelldad '" IIIIUklll paule flniiiPOr tl COIIMIO ~Jpel ... CJudtd, . • . • . Olstrlto 11• Votaclon .Nu. '1 ;... ' Reclntoa Nus. t, 2. J. 4 s. e. 10. p, 11.63. "· ""'· Olstrlto de vot•tto .. Nu, ·, •• ~~1l,_" Nus. ~ 19, 20, 25, 26.. ~. Dlst;lto de Vlltaclon N~. a •• , Reclntol Nus. 1!, 14 IS. ·ta. 2\, D. 23. 24. 21. ., 49. Dlatrlto de \iotnlon N.-; 4 ·~~ Reclntos Nus. 12. a e. 52; s.. a 61, 67, 74 OS. · Dlatrlto dt Yoteclon' Nu, s· •• :._eclntos Nu .. l7.13. UoS7, 62. M., Dlltrlto da 'votaclon. Nu. I .~ · Reclntos Nus. 7,.9, IJ. ~ •• so. 11. S9, · 7J,J2..76; . . '' .. : · se~rdN a.' QUE SlillseCC~:. y.es AQUI ORDENAOO. ;. .-. .... lt-JoMun~l en III'IINI' Jelda este once dlt Ill ~ ""-""· '··' ~,~;·:·,.. , •.... ··.-... cOn.eio~ · . · 1eldl estt WJne.'Clliclo• -· . ""'"' '"'· . .. . . •' . . . &.~~-... ~ .. ~.·-,:. :--?~ ... -~(-:-.: Al'lf'JGUAI . ; .· .' ', .~ •• .-', lll~tliovd .. ::.ne11e "Q\'d,.Sectef~rJ:'~Ic:J.o A~ROBA~ OE CONTENIDO:· ·: tat Jlm''eertr•ni. G~relite AIISfante · · •. · · ·· ' ile!aCI ... d, , , ; : APROB,Aq<) DE .FOR"\A: ~ C.CI ~~ Cocllvo Ill Or1lellanzaa de Ia Ctuclad lit· L.ullllOcll, Telai. .,., 'Dotield G. Vandiver see enmendade.oere Que .. .,, ~~::'~~;.~.:diver, .AIIOoad~ ~·~-~~~~.: ',· ~; (:~ ::·•''_; j . · : Ccl Lol nctntos eleciorales , lOs allloa de 'votaclon ant-.en · : ORDitiANCE NO. f.4SI eite II!CCltn 1t0n equl Clellnelldos .en · · el "'' ... dtlnomlnado "Ciudad Clli ',.;N olu)(NANC:E AMEND) LUIIIIoi:.k · · . •R·BCf.ftl.041 .. INGSECTIQN,-4. SUBSECTtOIII$1 Electorelei/Dlstrltos, .elective el.• Cbl, AND Ccl OF THE (OI)E OF: Pflll!llr dla da En!lro, 19?2/MIPa . . ORDINANCES OF THE CitY OF i Ofl~lai .... Una COPJe Cit tal m11118 es :LUBBOCK, TEXAS, WITH RE~ eoul etado Y.llecllo p8m .de est• GARD TO ESTABLISHMENT '6F llecCion como. 11 tOUI doPiacio•en ' DISTRICTS FOR CITY COUNCIL -lletalle.Une-ladetorllllnal' fi.EMBERS BASED U~ON THE de tal 'mna lere 41tfeniCIO en Ia ' 1t90 FE:OERAL CENSUS; CON· oflclnalllltsecretaf:lt"""!ICipal)''i TAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; sere dl-lbllt NrtlniNCCion i>u;, AND PROVIl)ING FOR PUBLICA· I llllca. Y en elida aleccton de It Clu-. TtON. . , ' 1 dadCIUitHaespec:lelo-raLona . ' • C'Opte. ftnlaftrt ll't til ..... , . ' ' WHI!'REA$,' 11M Cit'· ci.matl ~-trW~~--.· tl .·~· of .lhlt.clb'cof..t.ublloc:JI, le•as..•t • ~ .,... , received IN teSillts of.tfle 1990tecf. • laa't'tCinlol · erat ~:~~qsn and has studied IVCfl' ~ :..:~---.• , ,_viis ll!l'lt!t!'llltrd to Clflr Cauncil cJ..-··: ' L .. ~. :: .:.:...: --~·.~~~:. . , MAP IN FILE SEE ORDINANCE # CJJ/58 Ill £o ~Ptflrtt ·~·· ·--~---~-·----A:r. __ ~---Pvh0t~---... J~EAQ.tt00~--~---·--------· =~ t~~~rl\ ... ··-~.~-----~--~~~-· .. ,, ··--·----.. i -.:._.l~_..:..~~,_.tL\-:.....;·<:.--::::::::;..............;.. --------........................ -.............. ~------.. J9 ... ~D_.J2.. ____ ... ,_ .. i! ,.. __ ,~ ·-·-···-. -·-·~---~~~--·~·~ --·-·--. _ Jl.--~"'-~ J~i3cb~r..!l ........ ~6P~lf'-4r !?.f. !:.6J.. · r7~"4-~ '71'?-./~1? ... ...t 8/~ A~ .... ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JULY 11, 1991 C.\~x..-. f\ e. l L-1'2.. E:=Q\ s lYZ t cr no~ SIGN-UP SHEET PUBLIC HEARl NG s. 30. 6. 31 . 7. 32. 8. 33. 9. 34. 10. 35. 11 • 36. 12. 37. 13. 38. 14. 39. 15. 40. 16. 41. 17. 42. 18. 43. 19. 44. 20. 45. 21 • 46. 22. 47, 23. 48. 24. 49. 25. so.