The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOrdinance - 2023-O0132 - Unified Development Code, Planning And Zoning Commission's Final Report - 10/10/2023First Reading September 26, 2023 Item No. 6.17 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-00132 Second Reading October 10, 2023 Item No. 6.5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AND ZONING MAP (ORDINANCE NO. 2023-00054) LIMITED TO AS FOLLOWS: SECTIONS 39.02.006.a.3 & 39.02.006.b.3, RELATED TO LOT DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS, 39.03.021.a.2, RELATED TO SIGNS EXEMPT FROM REGULATIONS, 39.02.014, RELATED TO THE REDUCTION OVERLAY (RO) DISTRICT, ARTICLE 39.04, RELATEll TO SUBDIVISION STANDARDS, ARTICLE 39.07, RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES, 39.07.007(a), RELATED TO PUBLIC NOTICE, 39.02.016, RELATED TO THE LAND USE MATRIX, TABLE 39.02.016-1, RELATED TO PERMITTED USES BY DISTRICT, TABLE 39.02.006.e-1 RELATED TO IP PERMITTED USES, TABLE 39.02.006.f-1, RELATED TO LI PERMITTED USES, TABLE 39.02.006.g-1 RELATED TO GI PERMITTED USES, 39.02.020.b(4)(F)(A)(iii) AND 39.02.020.b(4)(F)(B)(ii), RELATED TO RESIDENTIAL CARPORT OR PORTE-COCHERE LOCATIONS, 39.04.005-1 RELATED TO MINIMUM CONNECTION SPACING BY STREET CLASSIFICATION, 39.02.00S.d.3 & 39.02.018.c.7 AND TABLES 39.02.003-1 & 3902.016-1 RELATED TO BASE MIXED USE DISTRICTS AND ZONING MAP, AND OTHER INFORMATION THE MUNICIPALITY REQUI1tES TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A PLAT APPLICATION, PURSUANT TO STATE LAW; PROVIDING FOR THE PRINTING OF, AND DISPLAY FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION, AN AMENDED ZONING MAP; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; 1'ROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. WHEREAS, all conditions precedent requircd by law for a valid amendment to the City of Lubbock Code of Ordinances, including zoning ordinances and a zoning map, have been fully complied with, including giving notice of a joint public hearing as required by the Texas Local Government Code Sec. 211.007(d), and in accordance with the type of notice passed by the City Council of the City of Lubbock (City Council) by at least a two-thirds vote on July 25, 2023 by Resolution No. 2023-R0372; and WHEREAS, a joint public hearing of thc Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) and the City of Council was held on August 30, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. to consider amendments to the Unified Development Code (tIDC) and Zoning Map, Ordinance No. 2023-00054; and WHEREAS, the P7C met on September 7, 2023 to consider the proposed amendments to the UDC and Zoning Map and herein present the final repert of the P"LC for the City Council consideration; and WHEREAS, after duc consideration, the City Council finds that it would be expedient and in the interest of the public health, safety and general welfare to make the following proposed ordinance amendmcnts to the UDC and Z,oning Map, Ordinance No. 2023-00054; and WHEREAS, notice of the joint public hearing was duly published in the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal more tha�i fifteen (15) days prior to the date of the joint public hearing before the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission on such proposed amendments and in accordance with the hearing notice schedule as adopted by Resolution No. 2023-R0372, and the joint public hearing according to said notice, was held in the City Council Chamber of Citizens Tower in Lubbock, Texas, at which time persons appeared and had the opportunity to participate in the joint public hearing; and after said hearing, it was by the City Council determined that it would be in the public interest that the City of Lubbock Code of Ordinances, including the zoning ordinance and the zoning map, be amended in the manner hereinafter set forth in the body of this Ordinance and this Ordinance having been introduced prior to first reading hereof; NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: SECTION 1. THAT an ordinance amending the Unified Development Code and zoning map (Ordinance No. 2023-00054) limited to as follows: Sections 39.02.006.a.3 & 39.02.006.b.3, related to Lot Density and Dimensions, 39.03.021.a.2, related to Signs Exempt from Regulations, 39.02.014, related to the Reduction Overlay (RO) District, Article 39.04, related to Subdivision Standards, Article 39.07, relatcd to Development Review Procedures, 39.07.007(a), related to Public Notice, 39.02.016, related to the Land Use Matrix, Table 39.02.016-1, related to Permitted Uses by District, Table 39.02.006.e-1 related to IP Permitted Uses, Table 39.02.006.f-1, related to LI Permitted Uses, Table 39.02.006.g-1 related to GI Permitted Uses, 39.02.020.b(4)(F)(A)(iii) and 39.02.020.b(4)(F)(B)(ii), related to Residential Carport or Porte-Cochere Locations, 39.04.005-1 related to Minimum Connection Spacing by Street Classification, 39.02.00S.d.3 & 39.02.018.c.7 and tables 39.02.003-1 & 3902.016-1 related to Base Mixed Use Districts and 7,oning Map, and other information the municipality requires to be submitted with a plat application, pursuant to state law. SECTION 2. THA'I' the UDC amcndments set forth in "�xhibit A" and the amended zoning map as set forth as "�xhibit B", attached hereto and incorporated herein, are hereby adopted by the City Council of the City of Lubbock. SECTION 3. THAT thc UDC and zoning map as amended herein shall have an effective date of October 30, 2023. SECTION 4. THAT the City Manager is hereby directed to provide two (2) identical maps of the amcnded -r.oning map adopted herein and place one in the office of the City Engineer and one in the office of the City Secretary at a place immediately accessible to any person desiring information rcflected thercby, in accordance with City of Lubbock Code of Ordinances Sec. 2.01.001. SECTION 5. THAT this Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances dealing with the same subject, and any provision of any ordinance in direct conflict with any provision of this Ordinance is hereby repealed, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall supersede any provisions in conflict herewith. All provisions of any other ordinance not in conflict herewith shall remain in full force and effect. Page 2 of 3 SECTION 6. THAT a violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall be deemed a misdemeanor punishable in accordance with state law and Section 1.01.004 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Lubbock. SECTION 7. THA'T should any paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, the remainder of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby. SECTION 8. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized to cause publication of the descriptive caption of this Ordinance as an alternative method provided by law. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Passed by the City Council on first reading on September 26, 2023 Passed by the City Council on second reading on October 10�2023 A EST: C ney Paz, City Sec ary APPROVED TO CON'1'1:NT: sten Sager, Direc of Ylanning A PROVED AS TO FORM: r ] i Leisure, �eniar Assistant City Attorney Ccdocs:llPZC RBC Ordinance Amending UDC and r.oning map_l 9.11.23 TRAY �YN�, £�'AYOR Page 3 of 3 �0 � ,L .� 3 �C � C �L �..+ 0 � U O � N N � " � _ ' � � 3 �N� V � �� A ° �� ° _ A �' � U G Q (,�7 aN� '� � I� i,y s� � � C � �� a � � �� L 3 �, � -� = 2 � �� L � 7 � � � rn J w :�+ C N � N � � � N "� � � � � � �-+ � > �� _ � � � � �p � U O � '� m C7 U � �0 .� C 0 U � 0 0 L L 0 � V p1 Zo �� .� � � �, � � � N � � 0 J � d 0 �6 6 i N �� ■ � O N '� � 6 .1 �,n `�e � '�aysa� - � � � �' / : � �► d �Atl�. aa a anv � N A�_S17 � i'ir , � �Z , � , < ■ � I�iN� _ ,� nv�awal"N � Atl 37d� 3i , � a �� N �� nv 3a�vnn N Av 947tlAf1 < S ,o�y o , < z E _N NONM3A N � AY ONN3A C n �r AY �VM N AY OJtlM I � y� _ ��, O � N � �< � nv Aa�snanwn H y , ,� 1�'I,I t��y�. „■ � � _ <" s s _ � , � F+ F I � I , 1 � � � 93Atl = = � cri i � AV5 i 1 9 AY J 3Atl � ■ ■ - _ � '� � ■. ■. r an� a.+ N O LL 0 0 0 � 0 0 .. 0 � 0 x�a�a I , . �� W �o� U� �� a � x r. ' V �HSV �� , , ] 3 AY -_� Atl S13)IJINJ AY A770H AQQl19 Atl SYX31 � � ■■ ■■ � � � N 3AV � .■ '� � �� AVit -- � _ _ 1"1 P �� ■ � � W �"" 1111 �' r N 3Atl "'�� O HAtl � II II �� , N < y V~i 3 V~i V~i N V~i '' . z o m� � � „'', ,��, F ,��, aa atwa m a3AV ■ _ ■ �� ' � sa�r ■ � fi ^� F 1 I�y F � f �l � -'�1.� �� „ .: �� y y�� N m �i'i.�d y , ? ai"�N N � � � � A 3AY F ' N ! 0° M 3Atl ! V '< O X 3Atl V e`�, �' Z � . �.. Z � �rr '�� F Atl AlISN3AINf1 � y � .� � � �` �� On September 7, 2023 the Planning and Zoning Commission Recommended APPROVAL of the following amendments: 1. Section 39.02.006.a.3 — Lot Density and Dimensions b. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: Lot Density and Dimensions. All developments in the NC district shall be in accordance with Table 39.02.006.a-2, NC Lot Intensity and Dimensions. Maximum building heights and minimum setbacks are for principal structures. For multi-lot developments with common parking areas or party-wall styled construction, Ist si�e��,,;�s+��se*��s�:.� ;r r��'�,�^�' �.'��• t^ �'�� '��-��*^- ^� minimum lot width shall be 20 feet and minimum lot area shall be 1,000 square feet. c. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: Make this same change to Section 39.02.006.b.3 2. Section 39.02.020.e.1.A.ii — Accessory Dwelling Unit, Applicability, Previously Existing Accessory Dwelling Units b. Mont McClendon/Te�ry Holeman: Make no change to the current language: 3. Section 39.03.021.a.2 — Signs Exempt From Regulation, Generally a. City Staff: Signs erected by the Citv, state (including its political subdivisions), a school district, or the United States government, or otherwise required by federal, state, or local laws. T, ;;�-�.;,�;e�► �� 4. Section 39.02.014 — Reduction Overlay (RO) a. City Staff: See attached redline (pages 5 to 7) c. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: Reinsert Section 39.02.014.c to read, "The Reduction Overlay District may prohibit billboards, even if allowed in the base zoning district." And renumber the balance of the section 5. Section 39.04 — Subdivision Standards and Section 39.07 — Development Review Procedures a. City Staff: See attached redline and new Plat Checklists (pages 8 to 31) b. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: Amend Table 39.07.012-1 to provide for appeals on plat items to PZC. c. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: Amend Section 39.07.040.c.1 to read, "Completed Plat Application, signed by current property owner." Make similar changes to the Checklists. d. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: Amend Section 39.07.040.c.5 to read, "Application fee as established by the City Council." Amend Section 39.07.041.4 to read, "Application fee as established by the City Council." Make similar changes to the Checklists. e. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: Amend Section 39.07.040.4 to read, "Water and schematic layouts sufficient to demonstrate how the proposed lots will be served by public water and sewer." Make similar changes to the Checklists. f. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: Amend Section 39.07.040 Document Requirements 2 to read, "Drawn to standard engineering scales ranging from 1"=10' to 1"=100'. 1"=200' scale is allowed for plats larger than 100 acres only when all information illustrated on the plat is clearly legible on the printed full-size plat" Amend Section 39.07.041.5 Document Requirements 6 to read, "Drawn to standard engineering scales ranging from 1"=10' to 1"=100'. 1"=200' scale is allowed for plats larger than 100 acres only when all information illustrated on the plat is clearly legible on the printed full-size plat" Make similar changes to the Checklists. g. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: Amend Section 39.07.040 Document Requirements 8 to read, "The Preliminary Plat must be tied by survey to a section corner of the section in which the plat is located, or when the proposed subdivision ..." Amend Section 39.07.041.c.8 to read, "Control for a Final Plat shall be established by one of the following methods. (1) The Final Plat may be tied by survey to a section corner of the section in which the plat is located; or (2) When the approved subdivision abuts ..." Make similar changes to the Checklists. h. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: Amend Section 39.07.040 Document Requirements 12 to read, "...If the abutting land has a current approved Preliminary Plat, it shall be shown on the proposed Preliminary Plat to the extent such information is available on City GIS;" Make similar changes to the Checklists. i. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: A requirement for an approval signature block should be added to the preplat requirements to align with this final plat requirement. Make the same adjustment to the preplat checklist. j. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: Amend Section 39.07.041 Document Requirements 25 to read, 'The following surveyor's certificate shall be placed on every Final Plat. Final Plats presented for recording shall be signed and sealed by the surveyor." 6. Notification Boundary — 39.07.007(a) Public Notice a. City Staff: TLGC Reference. Public notice of any development review request shall be in accordance with Texas Local Government Code Chapters 211 and 212, with the exception that when written notice of a public hearing is required to be sent to each owner within 200 feet of the property on which the change is proposed, written notice must instead be sent to each owner within 400 feet of the property on which the change is proposed. 7. Definition of "Famil�i' — 39.10.002 Definitions c. City Staff: Make no change to the current language: 8. Section 39.02.016 — Land Use Matrix, Table 39.02.016-1— Permitted Uses by District, Table 39.02.006.e-1— IP Permitted Uses, Table 39.02.006.f-1— LI Permitted Uses, and Table 39.02.006.g-1 GI Permitted Uses a. City Staff: Regarding the Use Category "Transportation, Utility, and Communication", the use "Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution (includes large solar collectors and windmills)". Amend from a Permitted Use (P) to a Specific Use (5) in all three districts. 9. Section 39.02.020.b (4) (F) (A) (iii) and 39.02.020.b (4) (F) (B) (ii) and - Residential Carport or Porte- Cochere Location. a. City Staff: (iii) Length and Width. Carports and porte-cocheres shall have dimensions no greater than �8 24 feet in length by 20 feet in width; (ii) Length and Width. Carports and porte-cocheres shall have dimensions no greater than �&24 feet in length by 20 feet in width; 10. Section 39.02.004.e - High Density Residential (HDR), Table 39.02.003-1— Zoning Districts, Section 39.02.00S.a General Mixed Use Standards, and Section 39.02.004.e (4) — Lot Density and Dimensions, Zoning Map a. City Staff: no proposed amendments. 11. Section 39.03.016— Bufferyard Landscaping a. City Staff: no proposed amendments. 12. Table 39.04.005-1— Minimum Connection Spacing by Street Classification b. Mont McClendon/Terry Holeman: Amend the table to read, "Measured between nearest edges of driveway throats." Or, provide a graphic similar to what is included in the TxDOT Access Management Manual. This removes any ambiguity. 14. Section 39.02.005 Base Mixed Use Districts and Zoning Map a. Mont McClendon: See attached proposals (pages 32 to 36) On September 7, 2023 the Planning and Zoning Commission Recommended DENIAL of the following amendments: 13. Tables 39.02.004.d-3; 39.02.004.e-3; and 39.03.009-1— Parking Requirements a. Mary Crites/Jane Henry: Amend the parking requirement for "Apartments" and "Vertical Mixed Use": • Apartments: • 1 per efficiency unit • 1.5 per DU with 1 bedroom •�2 per DU with 2 bedrooms •�2.5 per DU with 3+ bedrooms; and • 1 additional space for every 4 DUs in the development • Vertical Mixed Use: �� • 1 per efficiency unit • 1.5 per DU with 1 bedroom • 2 per DU with 2 bedrooms • 2.5 per DU with 3+ bedrooms; and • 1 additional space for every 4 DUs in the development 15. Nonconforming Uses and Zoning Map a. Dora Cortez: • Amend the abandonment ordinance for non-conforming uses be revised from 12 months to 6 months. • Rezone abandoned and blighted structures on industrial land. • Downzone currently vacant, abandoned, or non-operational LI and GI on the Zoning Map that is within 500 yards of residential development. • Downzone LI and GI tracts on the Zoning Map that not identified as industrial on the 2040 Future Land Use Map. b. Adam Hernandez: • Downzone all heavy industrial zoning that is currently or will be non-conforming after passage of the UDC or are currently located in close proximity to single-family and multi-family residential to `?ransitional" c. Joshua Shankles: • Create and outline an appropriate set of policies to allow amortization of enterprises deemed a conflicting use. • Downzone existing, conflicting zoning. • Create any other policy that would facilitate the same. 16. Residential Neighborhoods a. Gretchen Scott: • Remove the "transporting goods and services" statement • If a vehicle or trailer has a business name on it, it must be considered a commercial vehicle and only one commercial vehicle is allowed per residence. • Regulate the placement of group homes so each district has an equal number. • Prohibit short-term rentals in residentially zoned districts. 17. Zoning Map — Please note, Ms. Vines has requested this proposed amendment be withdrawn a. Mary Vines: • Show U.N.I.T (University, 19`h, Indiana, 34`h Street) neighborhood as R-1 except for R-2 near 34t'' Street and Commercial/Apartment between University and Boston Avenue and 26th & Boston. 7/923, 1 42 PM Document vewer � Unified Development Code Section 39.02.014 Reduction Overlav 1R01 a. Purpose. �The#+e purposes of the Reduction Overlay District _(ROJ�st+tF�are: is to allow development that dewates from the standards of the underlvinR base zoninR district, bv reducinR or restrictin� these standards and removina aermitted or accessory uses. It also �rovides regulatory flexibility in the following manner: 1. Regu/atory Flexi6ility. It is intended to permit regulatory flexibility to: A. Achieve development that is in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan; B. Achieve economy and efficiency in the use of land, natural resources, energy, and in the provision of public services and utilities; and/or C. Provide appropriate development to satisfy the needs of residents of the Ci�t of Lubbock. 2. Land Use Compatibility. It is further intended that development permitted pursuant to this Section allow uses, buildings, and site improvements to relate to each other and to adjoining existing uses and to the yublic realm in such a way that they will be compatible. 3. Redevelopment. It is further intended that these regulations bring about reuse and/or redevelopment of sites where an orderly change of use is determined to be desirable, especially where reuse is restricted because of existing nonconformities. physical development, or the constraints of conventional zoning standards. 4. Purpose Not /ntended. The Reduction Overlay shall not be used for the sole purpose of securing an agreement between an applicant and the City to receive zoning approval. b. Applicability. 1. General/y. Consideration of a proposed development pursuant to this Section may occur only if the proposed development site is at least two acres in total area where located within the area enclosed by Loop 289 and at least seven acres elsewhere. 2. Land Area Reduction. However, in the interest of making use of the Reduction Overlay as a tool to implement the Comprehensive Plan, the City Council, on -------.�,r-a�•'-- receivinQ a final reoort from the Plannin� and Zonink, Commission, may permit a 50 percent reduction ofia these minimum area requirements if it finds that: A. The project has unique charaderistia and benefits; or B. The parcel in question has unique characteristics that significantly impact development, such as, unusual shape or proportions, unusual topography, or potentially incompatible land uses on surrounding property. 3. Zoning Designation. The Reduction Overlay is applied to property in conjunction with a base zoning district. r......a _� e......:.....� � ...a � . c._...:c� � �..._ :...�... �.__.. . .. a:...:.. r-0. Development Standards. A. Generally. The following �� reductions are •h� �-�� -�d� �xamnles that mav be reauested as aart of fe�-a Reduction Overlay District, ttn ensure�ka� the physical and operational characteristics of proposed buildings and uses are compatible� when considered in the context of the surrounding area. g, ""�a...�la:rReduction of Stondards. i. A�fl,h�ants must_«arlX _st�te t_heir requested reductio_ ns in writing� when submitting their a�ylication for the Reduction OverlaV District� Formatted: Font color: Auta, Not Expanded by / tiii,�,""�a"�..,w..,e,..e.�T��:--. Reduction of •� •.o-, :�,��-� the standards in a base zonin¢ district may be approved by the Condensed by City Council, on receiving a final reoortrecs+�weadaEierr from the Planning and Zoning Commission, and on making the determination that s��the reduction of the standards would be more appropriate because of the particular design and orientation of buildings and uses, provided that any such modified standards shall be consistent with the purpose of the Reduction Overlay as stated in Subsection a., Purpose, above. .5.�11 ....F .......:�.. � .�! ..l �4... ]'....:.... o ��A..f wJ:�..�..,.....� &C_Height. Bver3ayr-B�uildings and structures may be restricted to a lesser hei�ht than the hltps.//online.encodeplus.com/regsAubbock-bddoo-v�ewer.aspxpsecid-1849 Trt 7/923. 1 42 PM Document Vewer � Unified Developmenl Code maximum height allowed in the base zoning district set forth in Division 2.2, Zoning Districts ond Standords. �D. Co/ Ports. e, ,�.. 01.,�:..,.. �� ,� _,....i:., ,1,.. ...,.a � � � : .,4 �� n�....::., The Reduction Overlav Distnct may prohibit carports, even if allowed in the base zoning district. ht�sl/online.encodeplus.com/regsllubbock-bddouviewer,asp�dlsecid-1849 7.l2 7/923. 1 42 PM Document vevrer � Unified Development Code �F_.. arc�€essocy Dwelliny�Units. ^,,:-z�•`�� -.�-�.,��•:er�_c+i��1�-applic�^'o..r-�-..,�"� Nrwe-r,r..•`.�-t,- --�----. ,�The Reduction Overlav District ' may prohibit Accessory Dwelling Units, even if allowed in the base zoning district. �. , Related Provisions. 1. Article 39.02. Zonina Dlstricts and Land Uses; 2. Article 39.03. Buildinp and Site Deslon: A. Drvision 3.2. Buildino Tvnes ond Desian; B. Division 3.3, Parkinq, Loadinq, Stockinq, and Access; C. Division 3.4. Trees, Landscapina, ond Bufferina: D. Division 3.5. Siuns: and E. Division 3.6, Outdoor Liqhtino. 3. Article 39.04, Subdroision Standards: and 4. Article 39.05, Environmental Manaaement. d. Procedures. See Section 39.07.030. Zone ChanQe. � Ef�Nre.30/�}h7923 Formatted: Left, Indent: Left 0.52", No bullets or numbering hitpsJ/online.encodeplus.com/regsllubbock-bddoo-viewer.asp�dlsecid-1849 812 � r"_"` �1J5" � 6tyof �� Lubbock ,�: �,_,� ��-_ ... �.,� 5� - S25,Q�� 1��% SZs,000 oi-Sso,aoo �s% Sso,000 oi - S�s,000 sosc S�s,000 oi - Slao,000 zssc Sioo,000 oi - Si,000,000 za% Si,000,000.oi - Ss,000,000 10% (minimum 5200,000� Ss,000,000.oi or more Ssoo,000 Section 39.04.023 Reauired Notices o� Final Plats and Certificates Final Plats and certlfi�a�g� shall tontam all of khe,noLige inFormation_required in Sec. 39.07.OaI of the UDC. VA�� lAi A�T�A� b��FLC� IS�SC�k�� A...�:n..od 11�:� ,� .�L .�_ l....15... nL .... .i 7....:.... r........:�:.-.�Tf �1.�� .tis.��v�err 1R.TT.'1'�STili1:T.'EI':1�! _ y �.iTa n f R�'�'l.��iSA7T�1iT}7LT7T!*'RSL7.7E77'R�f.�}�xt11 � � � �� ' ' '1e.._. _.. . A!TT7T.T.IR[!!T.� - =1�s� - I Formatted: No bullets or numbering E(fective 10/Oi/2023 33G - � �L�bbock «�,� ��.. �� u 1.�l.s..-.�L r..a....in..J:..�..�.,. i• ' . . � Ir T�I�L� l�l�ti-1 i Section 39.04.024 Required Notice for Final Plats Containing Lake or Flood Risk Areas a. when any portion of a proposed plat contains a lake or other flood risk area identified on the Federal Emergency Management Agency flood hazard maps, the following notice shall be printed on the face of the final plat: "Either all or a portion of this surveyed property lies within a'Special Flood Hazard 8edadar�yArea.' These boundaries are established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, not this surveyor. Flood hazard maps are on file at City Hall, Lubbock, 7exas and are open for public inspection:' b. If any portion of a lake area is included in a proposed final plat, such areas shall be designated as a stormwater drainage and impoundment easement. Section 39.04.025 Required Notice for Plats Approved by Director of Planning .. ..... . . E - � � � � � : �L�bbock ,�„� b. Forms and Fees. Every development application required by this UDC shall be submitted in a format and in numbers established in the City's Development Guidebook and shall include the corresponding application fee that is established by the City Council. c. Authorization to Initiate an Application. Table 39.07.003-2, Application Authorizotion, denotes those who are authorized to initiate each of the application types. ♦ Endly may initlate an appliwtlon Administratrve Applications legislative Appllcadons Appeals of Administretive Dec�stons All Other Quast•ludicial Applications Subdivision Applications d. Refunds. Fees for a denied, expired, voided, or revoked application are not refundable. e. Deadlines. The Director of Planning may establish application submittal deadlines. f. Continuing Review Process. Application submittals shall subsequently undergo a completeness application review established in Section 39.07.004, Application Completeness Review, before being deemed as submitted to the City. Section 39.07.004 Application Completeness Review a. All Appiications. Table 39.07.003-1, Review Steps, denotes that all development applications are required to undergo completeness revlew. b. Director of Planning Responsibility. The Director of Planning shall review all development application submittals for completeness. c. Meaning of Complete Submittal. The Director of Planning shall deem complete an application that contains: 1. Alllnformotion. All of the application information required in the application form; 2. Certifications. Documents or drewings that are prepared and certified by qualified professionals (where such certifications are required); and 3. Fee. The application fee. d. Notification to Applicant. If and when the application is deemed complete, the Director of Planning shall notify the applicant in writing. e. Timeline for Review. The completeness review required in Subsection b., Director of Planning Responsibility, above, shall be accomplished no later than five business days aker an applicant submits a potential application. f. Plat Filing. A Final Plat, Preliminary Plat, or Replat is considered "filed" when the Director of Planning deems it complete in accordance with Subsection c., Meaning of Complete Submittol, above, when the Director of Planning completes the review process and finds that there are no more corrections to be made, 1. Timing. Plats shall be eeasi�erc�reviewed within 30 days after the date the plat is "filed". Fffective 10/O1/2023 359 ` �Lubbock r,,., 2. Final Decision. Plats shall be approved, conditionally approved, or disapproved within the timeframe established in Chapter 212 of the Texas Local Government Code, unless the applicant requests ��o-o.,r;�, :�an extension not to exceed 30_ days ��•��:�:�in accordance with Texas Local Government Code § 212.009(b-2), and the irector of PlanninQ approves the request in wri[inR• �3_Extension. If the applicant requests extension of a hearing or decision relating to plat approval, and an extension as authorized above is not approved, the applicant shall abide by the decision rendered without the granting of an extension or withdraw and resubmit the application. g. Incomplete Applications. 1. Director of Planning Duties. If the Director of Planning determines that a submittal is not complete, the Director of Planning shall: A. Notify the applicant in writing with a list of all missing or incomplete items; and B. Provide a maximum of 45 calendar days from receipt for the applicant to resubmit the missing or incomplete items. 2. Rejection. If the missing or incomplete items are not submitted within the 45-day period, then the Director of Planning shall deem the application rejected, shall not accept the application for filing, and shall make the submittal available to the applicant for retrieval. After the Director of Planning rejects an application, a new application and fee shall be required if the applicant wishes to apply again. 3. Not Considered Submitted. Incomplete or rejected applications are not considered "submitted" or "filed" for the purposes of Texas Local Government Code Chapter 212, Chapter 245, or for any other purpose. Complete applications are considered submitted on the date that the Director of Planning deems them complete. 4. Submittal of Corrections. Corrected and submitted applications are not considered complete and submitted until , a:..o.� E ... ..........Eo..��.� s�...:.� �..�;�,�� .. .. a. �,�= tn�ll of the missin� or imcomplete items have been orovided to the Ciri and/or corrected and provided to the Citv as set forth in the notice from the Dire{tor qF Plannlne. or desiRnee bv ar hefore the deadline sYated in the nokiee. h. Continuing Review Process. Complete applications shall subsequently undergo the processes established in Section 39.07.005, Staff Review and Distribution. Section 39.07.005 Staff Review and Distribution a. Applications Requiring Staff Review and Distribution. Table 39.07.003-1, Review Steps, denotes that all development applications are required to undergo staff review and distribution. b. Final Decision or Distribution. After completeness determination, the appropriate administrative body shall, according to the review responsibilities of Section 39.07.012, Development Review Summary Table: 1. Review ond Comment. Review the Administretive application and provide comments to the applicant, which may include required revisions based on the requirements of this UDC and other adopted requirements and standards; 2. Review and Decide. Review and make a final decision on the Administrative application; or I Effective 10/O1/2023 3G0 � Cityof Lubbock ��.� e. Decisions. All official decision actions shall require the affirmative vote of the number of inembers as specified in the City Charter and City of Lubbock Code of Ordinances. f. Continuing Review Process. Requests receiving approval at a public meeting or hearing may subsequently undergo the processes established in Section 39.07.009, Post-Approval Provisions. g. Successive Applications. The Oirector of Planning shall not accept any application that was recommended for denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission and denied by the City Council 12 months prior if the Director determines there have been no substantive changes in circumstances related to an application or no substantive changes to the application submittal itself. Section 39.07.009 Post-Approval Provisions a. Requests Subject to Post-Approval Provisions. Table 39.07.003-1, Review Steps, denotes the development requests that are subject to post-approval provisions. �U- tb�Modification of an Approved Application. Except as provided in Subsection d., Correction of Errors in Approved but Unrecorded P/ats, below, modifications to approved applications or requests shall be done in accordance with Section 39.07.028, Minor Modlfication of an Approved Application, or, if the change does not meet the criteria for a minor modification, the application shall be resubmitted as a new application_ g-c_Revocation of Approval. An administrative, legislative, or quasi-judicial body may revoke any permit or approval it has issued where there has been a violation of the provisions of this UDC or a deliberate misrepresentation of fact on the application or in the public meeting or hearing. I�d_Approvals Run with Land. Permits or approvals authorizing a particular land use or structure shall run with the land and transfer with the subsequent ownership of the land and structures. �e. Recordation of Plat. 1. Submittals for Recording. The applicant shall provide the following to the Oirector of Planning after approval of a Minor or Amending Plat, Conveyance Plat, Final Plat, or Replat, where applicable: A. 7ax certificate(s) from the Lubbock Central Appraisal District stating that no taxes are delinquent against the property; and B. Three dureble copies of the plat, reproducible true to industry-standard engineering scales on standard AN51 or Architectural sheet sizes sufficient to legibly illustrate the proposed layout and required information. However, the dimension of the plat sheet may not exceed 24 inches by 36 inches. , � �� N'� �� 'f/ 6tyof Lubbock ��„� . �:.�.�� - -� .- -�_�- - - - �.:.� ..�� - - P2C=PIanning and 2oning Commission � CC= Clty Coundl � ZBA=Zoning Board of Adjustment � UDHPC= Urban Design and HlstoAc Pre servation Commission � DRC = Development Revlew Committee � SUP = Speciflc Use Permit � COA = CertHicate of Appropr�ateness Preliminary Plat Prior to Final Plat (39.07.040) submittal Following app�oval of a Final Plat Preliminary Plat and (39.07.041) receipt offinafdra�nage plan per Sec. 39.04.021 Replat Prior to changing the number of lots on a (39.07.092) recorded pkat Pr1or to removing the Va�ating Plat force of a recorded p{a[ (39.07.043) covering a property or propertles 2 years; See Section 39.o7.OqI for renewal of a Sst: DRC multi•phase �: �� Direcror of Preliminary Plat �� Plannina A26 as each phase recelves Flnal Plat approval 2 years; None after recordation W aiver of Improvements Concurrentwlth (39.07.044) submittal of a When associated Delayof PreliminaryPlat,Flnal platexpires Improvements Plat, or Replat (39.07.045) Oirector of �� Pfamm�x7�6 ZBA Article 39.04 pireLtor pf Plamm�aRE6 lst: DRC qdmm�strative �ei bodythat A7a.wr+w@ approved the onginal Minor, Amending, Replat, or Fnal Plat Ciry Englneer CC Sections 39.04.005, 39.04.012, and 39.04.013 Division 7.2 Administrative Review Procedures Section 39.07.013 Site Development Plan a. Generelly. In addition to the required procedures in Division 7.1, Purpose, Applicability, and Common Review Procedures, the following procedures shall apply to Site Development Plans. f Effective 10/O1/2023 36,8 Within 30 days aher a Appeal of final decision by the Administrative Director of Planning, ZBA Decision Building Inspector, or (39.07.039) City Engineer on a matter addressed in this UDC �L�bbock .:.� .. �„�, a. Generelly. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Division 7.1, Purpose, Applicobility, and Common Review Procedures, the following shall apply to Appeals of Administrative Decisions. b. Purpose. The purpose of an Appeal of Administretive Decision is to provide a vehicle for appeal of any final decision of the Director of Planning, Building Official, City Engineer, or Floodplain Administrator on any applications set out in Division 7.2, Administrative Review Grocedures. c. Notice of Appeal. Within 20 days after the date of a final written administrative decision, an appeal may be submitted to the Director of Planning, in writing, by any person aggrieved by the decision or by any official or department of the City affected by the decision. In the notice, the appellant shall set out all grounds for the appeal. d. Transmission of Records. The staff person whose decision is under appeal shall transmit to the ZBA all of the documents constituting the record of the appealed action. e. Effett of Appeal. The filing of an Appeal of Administrative Decision stays all proceedings in furtherance of the final decision appealed, unless the administrative official from whom the appeal is taken certifies in writing to the ZBA that, by reason of facts stated, a stay would, in their opinion, cause imminent peril to life or property. In such case, proceedings shall not be stayed except by a restraining order that may be granted by a court of competent jurisdiction. f. Specific Decision Criteria. In determining whether to affirm or reverse, in whole or in part, or modify the appealed decision, the applicable review bodies shall consider, and the 28A shall make findings on the following: 1. Record and Evidence. The administrative decision was appropriate considering the written record of the case and the evidence presented. 2. UDCRequirements. 7he decision reflects the requirements contained in this UDC. g. Effect of Decision. In exercising its authority under this Section, the ZBA shall have the final decision-making powers of the administrative official from whom the appeal is taken. Division 7.5 Subdivision Review Procedures Section 39.07.040 Preliminary Plat a. Generelly. In addition to the applicable required pro�edures in Division 7.1, Purpose, Applicability, and Common Review Procedures, the following shall apply to Preliminary Plats. b. Purpose. The purpose of a Preliminary Plat is to provide sufficient information to evaluate and review the general design of a proposed subdivision to ensure compliance with the Master Development Plan, if applicable, and the requirementsof this UDC priorto submittal of a Final Plat. If a Final Plat that includesall of an applicant's contiguous ownership is submitted to the City for approval, the Director of Planning shall have the option to not require a Preliminary Plat for the property. c. Applicant Responsibilities. Preliminary Plats shall not be �'��' �� '�� '��:-�� -�-"��'�� --�-�^:-�.�� '� onsidered filed uwles�until the plat and other required documents as set forth herein are received by the Director of Planning ��a t� �:� f:� ��d��n�, comply with Section 39.07.004, Application Completeness Review, and meet all of the following requirements: 1. Comoleted Plat AflnlicatiQn. sirtned �� he current ❑roaertv owner as refletted on the Lubhoek Central A�oraisal District or current deed; 2. Preliminar,y Plat dOCument,[,pdf}, plat Sheet SizeS Shall be drawn at indu5�ry•Stand�d en�tineerinQ SCales On standard ANSI or Architectural sheet sizes sufficient to le¢Iblv illustrate the oroqosed lavout and reauired information. A minimum sheet size of 11" x 17" is reauired. however, the sheet is not to exceed 36" on anv 51� Formatted: Font (Default) +gody (Calibn), 11 pt rFormatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibn), 11 pt � Formatted: Font, 11 pt Effective 10/O1/2023 391 '� 6ty ot �' � ��' Lubbock , � . . � ;:�:: r,,,� 3. Preaared br a Survevor. A Preliminary Plat shall be Qreoared bv a Professional land Survevor rertistered in the State of Texas;. 4. �1 oreliminary draina¢e analvsis and map (.qdfl that meets the requirements of the Dreina¢e Criteria Manual of the Citv: 5. (�pplicaUon fee egual to,�150 for the first acre with an additional $35 per acre thereafter, not to exceed 57.000.00; and 6. Wa�er 3nd sewer schem�tis�Y¢�tts;, Document Requirements: - 1. The followine notice shall be orinted on the face of each Preliminary Plat submitted: "Preliminary Plat — for insne�tion �uroases onl� and in no wav offitial or aooraved for recorciinp flur�oses": 2. Drawn to the following scale oer azreaQe wilhin the olat boundarv: 1"=50' for <i acre: 1"=1D(}' for <160 acres: 1"=100' or 1"=200' for >160 acres': 3. 1411 unsubdivided conti¢uous land under si�ale or common ownershio shall be included in the Preliminary Plat. H w v r if r v h Dir t r of Planrnn n r o mi al h limit f a Pr limin r Pla m include a oortion of the owner's contisuous land and extend to known identifiable limits such as collector streets. Plava Lakes, or other well-defined development barrlers� 4. LOCati011 1'Tlap, 12QibIV illUStfatlfl� th2 Refl2fal pOSiti011 Of thE? pfOp2rtV EClative t0 at IE?a5t Iw0 illt2fS2Ctif1R GtV of Lubbock arterial streets nr Staie hiQhways and the location of thQ si[e with resoecl to the Citv is��east. northwest, etc.l:. 5. �Scale, north arrow, date, exact acrea¢e, qroqosed subdivision name, and other pertinent site-speafic descri�tive information; 6. Prouertv owner's name. address. and teleahone number, includin¢ the record owner and warrantv deed recordine information of the or000sed subdivision:. 7. �.Iccurate one-foot interval contours a�cardin� to NAD831NAVD88 datum or subsenuent established united States Geodetic Survev data adooted bv the Citv. The face of the Preliminary Plat must indicate the source, datum, and date of creation for the contour data;. 8; he Preliminary Plat must be tied bv survev to abuttin� section corners, or when the qroAosed subdivision abuts_or i a utYingan existinp recorded,�lat, the Preliminar� Plat may„be tied by survey,to such existingplat. Boundarx lines for the,ar000sed subdivision shall be indicated by heavy lines. Boundaries for�ots,andlor tracts within the olat boundary shall be shown in solid lines. ExistinQ cross streets shall be shown for reference at the arooertv boundarv;, 9. Where applicable, apqroximate location of anv Citv limit lines includine labels for inside and outside Citv limits:. 10. Boundary lines. bearinas, and distances sufficient to locate the exact area or000sed for subdivlsion;. � 11. The name and location of all abuttinx subdivisions shall be drawn to the same scale and shown in dashed lines abuttin¢ the tract oroposed for subdivision in sufficient detail to show accuratelv the existin¢ streets and allevs and other features that mav infl�ence the lavout and develooment of the nrooased suhdivision. AhuttinP unolatted land shall show oroqertv Ilnes and owners of record. If the abuttine land has a current aoproved Preliminary Plat, it shall be shown on the proqosed Preliminary Plat: 12. Tha followine adioinina and abuttin� nrooert� information shall 6e shown on all orooertv adioinin�t and abuttin¢ the nlat boundarv: Formatted Formatted _ �Formatted �Formatted i Formatted ;Formaned � Formatted i Formatted }Fortnatted � Fortnatted I Fortnatted ! Formatted � Formatted � Formatted IFortnatted � Formatted � Fortnatted Formatted � Formatted Formatted r l Fortnatted Farmatted , Fortnatted � Formatted ; Field Code Changed ;Fartnatted ' Farmatted �Fortnatted � Farmatted � Fartnatted � Formatted ;Farmatted Formatted Fortnatted � Field Code Changed IFormatted A. �ubdivision name. Lot p.�lociyll. an¢ re�ardin� information iif the orooertv is olat[ed)� ' � Formatted 8. Name of ownershitr with deed and re�ordinu information [if the �roaertv is not nlattedl: and � C. An recorded easements known to the surve or at the time of submittal with recordin information• . Formatted Formatted 1 1 1 ' � � �`�- , rI� � +�i.�9� 'V a or � - � �� Lubbock ,,,,� 13. � he location, name, and width of all streets, allevs, oublic and qrivate easements, and nahts-of-wav existmQ- or ur000sed within the subdivision limits, alonR with the or000sed names of streets:� 14. A restriction rohibitin the fencin ar obstruction of an easement shall be tated on the face of the lat unless otherwise nrovided bv ahis code or aoaroved bv the affected_user of_th� easemen[,� 15. 7he location of ro osed closures of existin streets alle s easements and ri hts-of-wa •� 16. The known location of all existms aroaertv lines within the area nroaosed for subdivis�on;� 17. Proaosed arraneement of lots. Prooertv for residential use shall be olatted as lots and shall be numbered consecutroelv from one (11 to the total number of lots in the subdivision. Prooertv olatted for commercial use, ublic u e r nva e street use shall be latted as tracts and shall 6e leitered in al habetical order• 18. The title of the aroaosed subdivision. the name of the owner(sl with sufficient data to show ownershia, and the proponent of the Preliminary Plat and current landowner(s) at time of submittal (if different than ro onent . T ro sed t hall n t c nflict wi[h an revious subdivisi n name• 4. Pla a Lak Ar a if an shall conform t h r ir m n f Ar i I .0 Divisian 53 Plo o eke Develonment and Ownershia;_ 20. Sites ar000sed for stormwater draina¢e and imqoundment easements. oarks or other aronertv owned bv the Ci r n th r v rmm �tal nlit shall contain no blan t r ifi ili m n until a roved b the Citv Enctineer or authorized reoresentative of other aovernmental entities�� 21. A statement reRardinQ maintenance of anv installed detention/retention basins shall be stated on the face of the plat; and 22. All soellina on the alat shall be correct. _ pR] T . �17�H'R'!�'eT_'Ra r:�....R [,.4�L...�L �.+.-..:�1 ��.....�� ... C�-.�.. i.i..M...��.r_ ....J:.... ...i......��. ..R �L... .........�...J �..1..l:....:.... ' � Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri). 11 pt Formatted: Outline numbered + Level 2+ Numberii Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at. 1+ Alignment Left + Aligned at: 0.44' + Tab after 0.74' + Indent at: 0.7� Fortnatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibn), 11 pt Fortnatted: Font: (Default) +Body (CalibrQ. 11 pt Fortnatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibn), 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) +gady (Calibn). 11 pt Fortnatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibn), 11 pt Fortnatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibn), 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibn), 11 pt Fortnatted: Font (Oefault) +gady (Calibn), 11 pt Field Code Changed Farmatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibn), 11 pt Formatted: Font (Default) +Body (Calibn), 11 pt Farmatted: Font. (Default) +gady (Calibn), 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibn), 11 pt Effective 10/O1/2023 3�3 �L�bbock f�� 1.��- + �...�ri fl�ol:m� �illL! �lt6�Fl 1... �l..-...... .-. •1... [f...l:.�.:..�... nl�� TF..�.. C.-.l.l.....:�.n �.�:�.:.� .� �e�.�1 �a4u.!li�a - �e.: Y"'cPv.'i7 �I"'�'^:'Sv..a �L...FF:.... �1..-. ..1�� i........1-....- ■1-.....-..-.(.....va��A:.�....:�_1�.iuoe�.�e�.�ieac�ore�lioe�'..L...��ic�al'{FL....�.......� ..InF�...Jl. �...3 ..�i TL.. w ..�I �:�1.. �I...II .. y.Cl:�e � :�L. �. ..F.A:...�:c.w w�awo � 84Y-H'EJ�SIi'Y' • . ' �"`� i...... ..t �1... ..1..� �Tar f�d. Specific Decision Criteria. Review and Decision. In determining whether to approve or deny a Preliminary Plat, the review bodies shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Section 39.07.006, Common Decision Criteria, and the following: A. Standards and Specifications. The proposed development conforms to the design and improvement standards contained In the City's Engineering Minimum Design Standards and Specifications. � Effective 10/O1/2023 34n - _ , �L�bbock - � «r: �r�.� B. Other Review Bodies. If applicable, approval from any public school district sharing territory with the City of Lubbock, Lubbock County Commissioners Court, and any legislative-created districts. 2. Required Approval. If the Director or PlanninQ, or desi�nee, finds that a Preliminary Plat complies with all the re uirements of this Section and the applicable decision criteria, then � •�-�-� �� -��-��•� �� a� -•the Preliminary Plat shall be a�proved. gge_Approval Procedures. Action by the Dirertar of Planning, a� desiynee• �a�aaissieRThe Director of Plannine, or desiQnee, shall approve, aoorove with conditions-eF, or disapprove the application. If the application is conditionallv apqroved or disapproved, the 6ewuaissiewDirector of Plannin�, or desisnee, shall provide a written statement to the applicant in accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 212.0091. Applicant Response to Conditional Approval or Disapprovol. 7he applicant may submit a response to the Oirector of Plannine in accordance with 7exas Local Government Code Section 212.0093. , 3. Consideration of Response by a��m �� n� r��r�the Director of Planninq. The Director of Planning shall approve or disapprove a response submitted in accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 212.0093 within 15 days after the date the res o�nse was submitted. If the response is disapproved, the Director of Plannina shall provide a written statement to the applicant in accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 212.0091. k�.f. Revisions and Reapplication. If an owner proposes changes to a Preliminary Plat that do not substantially comply with the application that was approved by the a��^:^� �� T.�Qr�;«��irector of Plannins, or desi�nee, the applicant shall prepare a revised Preliminary Plat. The revised Preliminary Plat must be approved by the Director of Plannine, or desi�neeo,�-•� -•- �'m�r��°�r� before the applicant submits a Final Plat. i�.�6em�aiseie�Final Decision. 1. Action. The Director of Plannin or desi nee�'��:�� _��"��:�� mT'��'�� shall make a final decision on the Preliminary Plat within 30 days of the date the Plat aaalication is filed. This deadline may be extended an additional 30 days if the applicant requests �,iar+-the Dlrector of Planrnng, or desi,�nee approval, and the Director of Planning, or designee, agrees to a 30 dav extensipn in wri[in�. 3-2^After Decision. After the Director of Plannin¢. or desi¢nee �xi�e��auaroves the Preliminary Plat, the applicant may then submit a Final Plat Application. A Preliminary Plat and a Final Plat shall not be submitted at the same The Final Plat shall nat he filed before reeeivin� aaoroval of the Prelimmary Plat. kJFh, No Public Dedication. Approval of the Preliminary Plat shall not constitute any real property grant or dedication or the acceptance of any public improvements. Section 39.07.041 Final Piat 1. Generelly. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Division 7.1, Purpose, Applicability, and Common Review Procedures, the following shall apply to Final Plats. - � � � . � � �{ �„�, r��i�j11S: '�/ CSbof � • � Lubbock ;:..:�' .,.�, 2. Purpose. The purpose of a Final Plat is to serve as the official recorded map of the property to be developed, showing the boundaries, lots, public streets, easements, and other significant facilities and features that are necessary to serve the development. The Final Plat shall conform to the approved Preliminary Plat, if any, and may constitute only a portion of the Preliminary Plat provided that such portions conform to all applicable requirements of this UDC. 3. Improvements. The Final Plat shall contain dedication for all internal and perimeter streets and alleys and other improvements within the portion proposed for Final Plat as shown on the approved Preliminary Plat. 4. Land Not to be Excluded. 1. Avoidance. A Final Plat shall not exclude land that should otherwise be included for the purpose of avoiding requirements of this UDC, including, but not limited to, the requirement to improve existing perimeter streets or to dedicate a street designated on the current City of Lubbock Master Thoroughfare Plan. 2. Remainder Tracts. In no case shall a Final Plat exclude land so as to leave a remainder of such size, shape, or location as not to be developable in substantial compliance with the requirements of this UDC. 5. Applicant Responsibilities. The Final Plat shall incorporate all a•,, ��— �Prelimina Plat information and conditions approved by the ir r f PI nnin and shall meet all of the following reauirements: 1. �n approved Prelimman• Plat ( odfl of the uropertv, si ne ed bv the Director of Plannmg or their desie,nee, 2:,,_�re�ared bv a Surve�or A F�nal Plat shall be �renared b} a Professional Land Surveyor regislered m the State of Texas 3. Final_Plai dorupyc�it_{pdf] P}�i shee! s�us_�hall he dra�vn at industn -standard engoneenng scsles fln standar�f ANSI or Architectural sheet sizes sufficient to leaiblv dlustrate ihe ar000sed lavout and reawred information A mmimum sheet size of' I I" x 17" �s re�uired. ho��ever. tli� sheet is nQt to exceed 36' on miv side. 4. Applicat�on fee of$3�0 f�r the first �re w�th $55 for each addiUonal acre thereafter_ n�� ex_�eeci $S.D00.00. — — — — 5. An� sunalementary� materials required for a��xoval, 6_ DedicaUonU br se�arate mstrument {as mdicated on the face ofthe final plat to be recordedl, �fap�hcable. 7.l Easement or n ht-of-��a closure ordman e �f ih abl and 8. Streel isl:�nd ardinunce. i€s�pfecahic I7oeu m,r�t_Reau�rements 1 '�iust �onfo�m Eo Ihe a�rorc� ass��tated i'relqnmarJ _�'la;. and ma�_c_onstitute _onll _a_ �or�wn of the• Prelimmary Plat. 2. ShalE cor�ta�t� ngh�-o1=�vay dcd�calEan for all inlern�l and p�nmctcr stre�ts and all��v� h� [h� �on pronosed fo� i•inal �ka{ as sha�tii un �he �pprnvcd Pre{iminar! PI�; 3 Thc Final Plal dimensional control shall be m unrts of U S surve� feet lo the nearrst one-hundrrd�h af a foot Direetional �,ontrol shall b� shown as beann,gs Io t_he nearestare second__The descnption of the methoclalogy used and the source. datum, and date of creation of the relevant uomts must be �ncluded on the face of the nla�. 4 Control for a Final Plat shall be estabhshed bv one of the followine methods. ( I 1 The Final plat mav be ued b� surve� to adiacent section comers and Imes. or i21 When the a�proved subdrvision abuts or is adjacent to ,�n exisUn recor zKi la� af the 'u � of Lu6bock or Lubbock Count the Final Plat ma • be � s ry o�ch exisUna alat. 5 The Emal Plat shall mclude honzontal coordmates on at least two of the boundary corners relatrve to the Texas Coordmate System of 1983. North Central Zone �jum as descnhed m Texas Natural Resources Code. T�de 2 t'ha ter s a r e I lm .[ od ti • S ry • data ado t� h �I C t �' Lubbock 6. Drawn to the followina scale ner acreaee wrthm the ulat boundary I'"=50' for { I acre, I"=100' for �l acre, Fortnatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 2+ Numben Style: i, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment Left + Al;gned at: 0.44' + 7ab after. 0.74" + Indent at: 0.7� Pormatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: Indent: fust line: 0.44" Formatted: Indent: Hanging: 0.01', Outline number� + Level: 1+ Numbenng Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at 1 Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.22' + Tab after 0.51 + Indent at: 0.51", Tab stops: 0.5", Left + Not at 0.5 E�Iective 10/O1/2023 356 �___� . I� _ _ .��;�,:�� ►G ��„ot r��-, � �� Lubbock � �, ��:�� 7. The mcornoration ofall Prelimma� Plat mformaUon �nd candnions apuroved b� admmistratrve review. 8 The qlat boundary and the eract acreaee included in that boundarv. 9 Trtle or name of the ��lat If a lot or tract is replatted� II land in the ongmal lot[s} or tract;sl shall be replatted m order to retam thc on mal lat name. A re lat cannol "o han" art of a reviousl subdivided lot or tract 10 The ma calc honzontal datum north arrow an te 11. Rcl'cren�c b� namc to recarsJed nlaas ai adiacen[ n uhuttin�ro�erUes� !2 Bourrdary I�nes afall lo�s. t[ae�s_ and uarrels wi�h,y�curate�imensions b�r��,s_ r:xlik_ churJ cfislanccs_ �nd centrel angles of all cyrve segriients, for all total cunes. 5e�ch Sines shali 6e shuwn in the same manner as required for Prcl�m2r�ar,� P1a4s m 4c�l�on 39 07 0�$,c 4, Cott�err+s. 13 Numbrrs and letters to idenU(r each lot or tract 14 Lots shall be numbered consecutrvelv from one (I) to the total number of lots m the subdrv�sion Tracts shall be lettered in alphabeUcal order Such desiQnaUon will be contmuous m the order that Pmal Plats of portions of an auoroved Prelimmary Plat are recorded ��dh the Countv Clerk. IS Reglatted lots wdl be desig�ated alnhanumzncally� (e.g Lot I-A�, and further sulxirvision wdl alternate_ numbers and letters (e g Lot I-A-I. Lot I-A-I-AI The same alternauna method wdl be used for tracts (e.g Tract A-I. Tract A-I-A, Tract A-1-A-Il. 16 Pnvate 5tr ets and common o en s ace and uihrr common areas shall be latted as se arate tract and names mus be roved b the Crtv of Lubbock Chan es to existm nvate street names re wre a}roval of the C�� of Lubbock Bu�IdinY Or7ic�a1 when ihe �h:�n cs�: wdl atlect exissing r��_i�#�A}�_ 17 All street and alle�• nQhls-ot=wa� and easements shall be clearl� sho�wi on the Final PIa� snd �hc pu��r .se und restnctions of use of such easement mcfi4a;esl_ 18 Accurate Incation� dunens�ons, bean�s. radn. chord disiances. and eentral an�les of all curve segmen�s, for all toEal curves, shall be provided to readil�„establish loratiun of nehts-of-wav and easements Location ofpoinSs of mtersection and omts of t:�n cnc ❑f street mtersechons other than n ht an le mt rse tions shall be mdicated 19 Beanne. distances, and t�es to the_p_to�erh boundary_Uncludin� med�ansl shall be mdicated. 20. A keti of abbreviations for easement tk}�es. such as uUlities_ cross-access_ tree_preservatEon�, r�tr shull be mcluded on the Final Plat 21. Leeal references shall be orovided for all urevious dedications and easements abutUne lhe aropert�• shall be mdicated. 22 Name of each street and µidlh nf streets. alle,ys, and other n�hts-of war shall be indicased 23 A t n m s h 11 6 shown fir f I �ccd an hi �4a d i nation and numb i arentheses if a licable For e�am le "19th Street L�S G2 " Directional refixes such as "East" or "North" ar • reuuired [o_he sho�m�w�erz applicahle. 24 All I tted lo s tr •t r v3�4 • f r•alle •lion of arba c�onsi •� w I 22 0 f his •od unless altemaU�es �re a�}rrovtd h4 the C�h Enameer. 25. The followmg survevor's certificate shall be �lacrd on �Yer� Final Plat and signed bY the surve4ror nrior �o submission to the D�rector of Plannma KNOW ALL ME1V [3Y THGSE PRESENTS. I h.�t I. , . do herebv rertifk Ihai�r�ua[ed s!ti[s p10i frUm an �ztual �nr� as�:t�rate surccy�i f il�az��l� ihr corncr mnnumsnss ;and nc nthei cnutcnl sha�+n thcrcon ��zre prouerh placed wider Rtti perso�zal suocrv�s�nn, m accnrdancc ��nh �he Subdrvis�cm Reeulatnrns nf ihr C�t� af I.ubbnck. Texas [ffective 10/O1/2023 39� , L�bbock ,,,,, 26 The follo�vm certiticate of a roval b� he Dueetor of Plamm� or their desi nee shall bc Ix�d on cve Final• . Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Plat and siened urror to recordine, of the plat dceuments at the courthouse Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: t+ Numberii Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment Left + A}�l�rrved this da of 2� Aligned at: 0.22' + Tab after. 0.51" + Indent at: 0.5' bF ilie Direqor nf �lamm��. or des�inee. oElltc Cil� t�f l.uE��acl;. [cras. Director of Plannmc; The tollowmg noticcs shall be stated on the face ot�v_er,y_plat - I "Heavv lines indicate olat Ifmits ". • 2 "All strccls_ aq��s. and cascrrtes]�wiihin s�l� t limits arc hercin dedieatcd uniess natr.�i ashenvisc". • 3 "No bmldin� ermit shall he sss�ed a anF sunev certificate that is not in c•o w' a oved- Fuial Plat and infrastructure and final dramaee anah sis acceatance bv the Lubbock Code of Ordmances". -1 "All ut�htv service shall be m accordanse wi�h th� Unde[ground Utihues Polick St_atement by the_Plamm�r�• and Zomna Commission of the Crt� of Lubbock. Texas and the orovis�ons of Article 37 01 of the Lubbock Code of Ordinances'. 5 "All w in or ro osed uulit� serviccs to and an traets indicated b thEs i S shaq 6e eantai��ed �n sh - pubhc nght-of-wa� and public nr pnvate utiht4 easements Utditk service installat�on rc,_„3s uested at a futurr date and not ��nhin sn rasement mdicated bv this olaL shall be w�thm aproner uul�n easement g,ranted ba the o«mer ofsaid nroiicrcp hv se�rate recorded mstrument �+,nor �n,�he Rrovision of such service. Such easements shall b� at �he eruense of the entitv requesUng such installation"; 6 "All easements herem •ranted shall rnutle the Cit or the uUEi com an usm s h e s m•n s o th ri ht- to remove re au or re lace an hne i s eondurts or oles wrthm such easemen s as ma det rmm b� the cin or uhhh compan� wrthou� �he citv or utiht� companv bemg respons�ble nr I�able fnr the re�cement of imnrovements. pavm . or surfacmaofthe easement nec,°ssdated b� such rePair� removal or replacement Easements des� ated ar mtended for �ehicularpassa e� [utt�iZ� and emer,genc1or Redestnan access shall not be_fenced or otherti ise obstnicted'": and 7 "Miniiuwn Floor elevations shall conform to the requirements of the Lubbock Drainage Criteria �tanual, as• t b Ord 10022 n • d 5•cu n 2 09 I 31 Sechon 2 4 n 3 73 of h Lubbock Code of Ordinances." Th�, fo;lo«� atr�es s ��;�Fed on Ihe face of �#�e pEat when ther :s�al,� w �ha� parucular plat I Anv notices required m Umfied Develonment C_ n„�j�_Seci�on 39 �i4 El2a. ReQtnre�l l�'once lc�1' F�nrrl Plars Contau�mr Lnke or Flood Risk Arens, for lake or tlood hazard areas. 2 "Anr cascmcnts ar ri�h4s-at=wa� sho��n as `to bc dcdicatcd b� sc�ara�� insirumcnP are sho��n on thc olat for- mformation �ruoses onl}� This plat does not dedicate said easement�. Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: Normal, Indent: Lek: 0 25', No bullets o numbering Formatted: Indent: Lek: 0.44', First line 0.06'. Numbered + Level: 4+ Numbering Style: 1, 2. 3. ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1 75" + Indent at: 2" Fo►matted: Indent: Lek: 0.44', First line: 0.06', Numbered + Level: 4+ Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment Left + Aligned at: 1.75" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Indent: Lek: 0.44', First line: 0.06', Numbered + Level: 4+ Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.75" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Indent: Lek: 0.44', First line: 0.06', Numbered + Level: 4+ Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment Left + Aligned at: 1.75" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Indent: Lek: 0.44', first line: 0.06', Numbered + Level: 4+ Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment: Left + A�igned at: 1.75" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.44', First line: 0.06', Numbered + Level: 4+ Numbering Sryle: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignmenr Left + Aligned at: 1.75" + Indent at: 2" FormaKed: Indent: Leh: 0.44", First line: 0.06', Numbered + Level: 4+ Numbering Sryle: 1, 2, 3, ,,, + Start at: 1+ Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.75" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: 0.25", No bullets a Fortnatted: Font (Default) Times New Roman Fortnatted: Indent: Leh 0,88', No bullets or Formatted Fortnatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Farmatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: First line: 0" Effective 10/01/2023 . 398 �L�bbock _ «,., 3 "Blanket sohd ��aste collection easement as reauued for sernce f�� rthm the �lat hmits or msert soecific lot• pormatted: Numbered + �eveL i+ Numbenng 5tyle or tract desig,nauonl �s herem �ranted". �, 2, 3, ... + Start at. t+ Ahgnment Left + Aligned at 0.5" + Indent at 0.88" 4 Blankel msert 'under round' if a hcable utilrt easemenl as r uire for rvi •�� rthm th lat hmits• Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1+ Numbenng Style or �nsert sneatic lot or tract designauonl is herem,g,ranted �o Linsert name ofnuhli�� nnvate or franchise utility_ 1, 2, 3, .. + Start at. 1+ qhgnment: Left + qhgned at. or certificated ser�ice„prov�,der of {cteco�nnoun�ca4it�n�' _ and o.s' + Indent at: 0.88' 5 'I'ublic pedeslnan a�c�ss easement is herein �.��ed fnr persuns truversing alon� �he au6iic parkwa� and• Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1+ Numbering Sryle nee��ng �Q, rnSgr onjo nP vate pro�e�t� !ar �he puraosr �f crvss�ng a einvrw�y. The c.isrmcn� is hmilcd �o � t, 2, 3, ..- + Start at: t+ Alignment: Left + qligned at: those portions of the as-constructed dnvewass and walks which ma� extend outside }�ublic naht-ot=wav onto 0.5' + Indent at: 0.88" �nvate ro ert � and are constructed for the contmuance of the accessible routes across the back of the drrvew��. This easemenl aoalies lo exiSUna and um fulure dnve enlrances as construcleJ " .�rrr.++r.n� . r.�esaa��+�raer�r.r.�wsr.rr.rr.+aaa��s+ae ..�r.n.. iq#eFn+2Fier� �i _T.rilTFriSG[!'.!!�Rl1�`JIR[�T'!r Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 2+ Numberi Sryle: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment Left + Aligned at: 0.51' + 7ab after. 0.8" + Indent at: 0.8" Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 3+ Numben Sryle: q e. C, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment: Lek + Aligned at: 0.8" + Tab aker, 1.09" + Indent at. 1.09' Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 4+ Numben Style: i, ii, iu, ... + Start at 1+ Alignment Leh + Align at_ 1.09" + Tab aker 138" + Indent at: 138' Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 2+ Numberi Style: 1, 2. 3, ... + Start at. 1+ Alignment Lek + Aligned at: 0.51' + Tab aher. 0.8" + Indent at. 0 8" Fo►matted: Outline numbered + Level: 3+ Numben Style: A, B. C, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment: Leh + Aligned at: 0.8' + Tab aker. 1.09" + Indent at: 1.09 Fo►matted: Outline numbered + Level: 4+ Numben Style i, ii, in, ... + Start at. 1+ Alignment: Lek + Align at: 1.09" + 7ab aker, 1,38" + Indent at: 1.38' Fortnatted: Outline numbered + Level: 3+ Numben , Style: q B. C, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment Lek + , , , Aligned at: 0.8" + Tab aher, 1.09" + Indent at: 1.09 �h., r,e....( �..i,i�.��L [ffecUve 10/O1/2023 399 , L�bbock .�,.� . . . . .. .. . .�rr . .. . . . . . . . . .. �r.r�rr.+ranrs+�a+r�+�x�c�s�en. . . .. .. ..... . •••• • • •• • •• ••..... . . •• • •• •• • - w��,,.,,,�aMk�....,. �.�y.:a.�,..r � m��. �uo..�_ �..,3...we...;..�..«.� ...�..-. �.,� nTl� . �aW:�►�s.�L3-: _.�;??i+�rrm�saJ 4&6. Specific Decision Criteria. Review and Decision. In determining whether to approve or deny a Final Plat, the applicable review bodies• shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Section 39.07.006, Common Decision Criteria, and conformance to applicable portions of the approved Preliminary Plat. Required Approval. If the Director of Plannin¢, or desienee finds that a Final Plat complies with all orovisions of this Section and applicable decision criteria, then =zu ��-��-�-� �--�^.�� t�+e-�JaF.the Final Plat shall be aoproved. 41,7. Final Decision. Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 2+ Numben Style 1. 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.51' + Tab after. 0.8" + Indent at: 0.8" Formatted: putline numbered + Level: 3+ Numben Style: A, B. C, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment: Left + Aligned at 0.8" + Tab after. 1.09" + Indent at: 1.09' �Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 2+ Numben Sryle: 1, 2. 3, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment Leh + Aligned at: 0.51' + Tab aher. 0.8" + Indent at: 0.8" Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 3+ Numben Style q e, C, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment: Lek + Aligned at: 0.8" + Tab aker. 1.09" + Indent at: 1.09' IFormatted: Outline numbered + Level: 2+ Numberi I Style: 1, 2. 3, ... + Start at. 1+ Alignment Leh + L Aligned at 0.51' + Tab after: 0.8" + Indent at: 0.8" Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 1+ Numben Style: i, 2, 3, ... + Start at. 6+ Alignment: Lek + Aligned at: 0.22' + Tab after. 0.51" + Indent at: 0.5 Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 2+ Numberi Style; 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment Lek + Aligned at: 0.51' + Tab after. 0.8" + Indent at: 0.8" Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 1+ Numben Style 7, 2, 3, ... + Start at. 6+ Alignment Leh + Aligned at: 0.22' + Tab after. 0.51" + Indent at: 0.5 `ETlective 10/O1/2023. 40a. �L�bbock ,,.,� 1. Action. The ��-��'�� -�h 7�� m--�:�•��D�rector of Plamm�Q, or desi�nee shall make a final decision on• Formaned• ou[Ime numbered + Level: 2+ Numben the Final Plat within 30 days of the date the plat is filed, as defined in Subsectio� 39.07.004.f, Plat Filing. The Style: i, 2, 3, ... + Start ar �+ Al�gnment: Lefc + deadline may be extended an additional 30 days if the applicant requests n��:�� n�g� t�mm:.-;�an A6gned at: o.5t• + rab after. o.s' + Indent at: o.s extension and the Direcror of Plannine a�e+�DarQves the req,uest in writing. ....r �1,a :.i�� r�.�11.� d..........a r..li�,.a 1,00,i �,�..rl,,.o.i 43r8. Illegal Subdivision. Where an applicant seeks approval of a Final Plat for land that was subdivided in- violation of this UDC, state law, or a�y prior Ordinance, and the development cannot comply with this UDC because of the unlawful subdivision, the Director of Planning may deny the plat, taking into account requirements related to lot area, lot width, and the ability to configure the proposed use on the lot. 44-9. No Acceptance of Public Improvements. Approval of the Final Plat shall not constitute the acceptance of any public improvements unless, and until, the City Engineer specifically agrees to such acceptance in accordance with Section 39.04.022, Acceptance and Maintenance. 4Sr10. Recording. Within 10 days of receipt and approval of the above documents, the Director of Planning shall record the approved Final Plat with the lubbock County Clerk. After the plat has been recorded, the Director of Planning shall issue to the subdivider the necessary copies of the approved and signed Final Plat along with the Lubbock County filing number. Impact fees are determined in accordance with Section 41.03.003 of the Lubbock Code of Ordinances. 46-11. Preliminary Plat Renewal. 1. Phasing. For a development to be constructed in phases, the Final Plat may include only a portion of the land • included in the Preliminary Plat. 2. Two-Year Period. Where only a portion of an approved Preliminary Plat is submitted for final Plat approval, a Final Plat of the remaining area p�a�shall be submitted at any time within two years of the date of Preliminary Plat approval. 3. Renewal ond Expiration. If a Final Plat of the remaining area has not been submitted within the two-year time period, the portion of the Preliminary Plat for which no Final Plat has been submitted shall be deemed null and void. However, if at least one phase of the Preliminary Plat has received Final Plat approval, its public improvements have been completed, and it has been recorded with the Lubbock County Clerk, an extension to the two-year time limit shall be automatically granted for all phases. 47-12" Street Closure. Any streets, alleys, or easements dedicated to the public within the proposed Final Plat- boundaries that are proposed for closure shall be closed by ordinance before the Final Plat can be recorded. These closures shall not be indicated on the Final Plat. The procedure for right-of-way closure is as follows: 1. Application for closure; 2. Preparation of Final Plat or Replat and indicating closed right-of-way; 3. Council approval of closure; 4. File closure ordinance; and 5. Final Plat recorded. Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 1+ Numben Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at. 6+ Alignment: Leh + Aligned at: 0.22' + Tab after. 0.51" + Indent at: 0.5 fFormatted: Outline numbered + Level: 2+ Numben. I Style. 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at. 1+ Alignment Left + `Aligned at: 0.51' + Tab after. 0.8" + Indent at 0,8" Formatted: Outlme numbered + Level: 1+ Numberi Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at 6+ Alignment Lek + Alianed at: 0.22' + Tab after. 0.51" + Indent at: 0.5 Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 2+ Numben Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1+ Alignment Leh + Aligned at: 0.51' + Tab after. 0.8' + Indent at 0.8" Section 39.07.042 Reptat a. Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Division 7.1, Purpose, Applicability, and Common Review Procedures, the following shall apply to Replats. � � i � � �L�bbock ,,,,� b. Purpose. The purpose of a Replat is to allow a property owner to add additional lots or public rights-of-way to a recorded plat without prior vacation, or to reconfigure lots within a recorded subdivision. The purpose of the replat shall be stated in the general notes on the face of the plat. c. Applicant Responsibilities. Except as provided in this Subsection, applicant responsibilities shall be the same as those for a Final Plat. Refer to Subsection 39.07.041.d, Applicant Responsibilities. d. Replatting Without Vacating Preceding Plat. In accordance with Texas Local Government Code Sections 212.014, 212.0145, and 212.015, a Replat of a subdivision or part of a subdivision may be recorded and is controlling over the preceding plat without vacation of that plat if the Replat: 1. Is signed and acknowledged by only the owners of the property being replatted; 2. Is approved, after a public hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission on the matter, if required by Texas Local Government Code Section 212.015; and 3. Does not attempt to amend or remove any covenants or restrictions. e. Utilities. The relocation, modification, or abandonment of any utilities shall be the responsibility of the subdivider and shall be provided for concurrently with the Replat. The cost of any such relocation or abandonment shall be borne by the subdivider. f. Specific Decision Criteria. 1. Review ond Decision. In determining whether to approve or deny a Replat, the applicable review bodies shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Section 39.07.006, Common Decision Criteria. 2. Required Approval. If the applicable review body finds that a Replat complies with all applicable deasion criteria, then it is required to approve the Replat. g. Final Decision. 1. Action. The applicable review body shall make a final decision on the Replat within 30 days of the date the Plat is flled. The deadline may be extended an additional 30 days if the applicant submits a requests �- ��.r-�.;x:.�it in writing to the Director of Plannini¢, and the Director of Planning ao�roves the extension. Section 39.07.043 Vacating Plat a. Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Division 7.1, Purpose, Applicability, and Common Review Procedures, the following shall apply to Vacating Plats. b. Purpose. The purpose of a Vacating Plat is to eliminate the subdivision of property reflected by a prior recorded plat, whereby the subdivided land wauld return to a single unit of property. c. Vacation of Plat. A recorded plat may be vacated in accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 212.013 d. Review and Decision. In determining whether to approve or deny a Vacating Plat, the review body shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Section 39.07.006, Common Decision Criteria. e. Utilities. The relocation, modification, or abandonment of any utilities or easement preparetion shall be the responsibility of the subdivider and shall be provided concurrently with the Vacating Plat. The cost of any such relocation or abandonment shall be borne by the subdivider. Section 39.07.044 Waiver of Improvements a. Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Division 7.1, Purpose, Applicability, and Common Review Procedures, the followi�g shall apply to Waivers. .. �- �� ►� c��y of Lubbock TEl{Ai Preliminary Plat Submission Checklist I certify that all items checked have been provided. I understand that not providing all of this information will result in an incomplete application and delay the consideration of this application for approval. Signature Date Preliminary Plats may be submitted online through the Citizen Self-Service portal on the City of Lubbock website at wvvw.mylubbock.us Submission Requirements: ❑ Completed Plat Application, signed by the current property owner as reflected on the Lubbock Central Appraisal District or current deed. ❑ Preliminary Plat document (.pd fl. Plat sheet sizes shall be drawn at industry-standard engineering scales on standard ANSI or Architectural sheet sizes sufficient to legibly illustrate the proposed layout and required information. A minimum sheet size of 11" x 17" is required, however, the sheet is not to exceed 36" on any side. ❑ Prepared by a Surveyor. A Preliminary Plat shall be prepared by a Professional Land Surveyor registered in the State of Texas. ❑ A preliminary drainage analysis and map (.pd� that meets the requirements of the Drainage Criteria Manual of the City. ❑ Application fee equal to $150 for the first acre with an additional $35 per acre thereafter, not to exceed $7,000.00. ❑ Water and sewer schematic layouts. Document Requirements: ❑ The following notice shall be printed on the face of each Preliminary Plat submitted: "Preliminary Plat — for inspection purposes only and in no way official or approved for recording purposes." ❑ Drawn to the following scale per acreage within the plat boundary: 1"=50' for �1 acre; 1"=100' for � 160 acres; 1"=100' or 1"=200' for � 160 acres. ❑ All unsubdivided contiguous land under single or common ownership shall be included in the Preliminary Plat. However, if approved by the Director of Planning prior to submittal, the limits of a Preliminary Plat may include a portion of the owner's contiguous land and extend to known identifiable limits such as collector streets, Playa Lakes, or other well- defned development barriers. ❑ Location map, legibly illustrating the general position of the property relative to at least two intersecting City of Lubbock arterial streets or State highways and the location of the site with respect to the City (southeast, northwest, etc.). ❑ Scale, north arrow, date, exact acreage, proposed subdivision name, and other pertinent site-specific descriptive information. ❑ Property owner's name, address, and telephone number, including the record owner and warranty deed recording information of the proposed subdivision. ❑ Accurate one-foot interval contours according to NAD83/NAVD88 datum or subsequent established United States Geodetic Survey data adopted by the City. The face of the Preliminary Plat must indicate the source, datum, and date of creation for the contour data. ❑ The Preliminary Plat must be tied by survey to abutting section corners, or when the proposed subdivision abuts or is abutting an existing recorded plat, the Preliminary Plat may be tied by survey to such existing plat. Boundary lines for the proposed subdivision shall be indicated by heavy lines. Boundaries for lots and/or tracts within the plat boundary shall be shown in solid lines. Existing cross streets shall be shown for reference at the property boundary. ❑ Where applicable, approximate location of any City limit lines including labels for inside and outside City limits. ❑ Boundary lines, bearings, and distances sufficient to locate the exact area proposed for subdivision. ❑ The name and location of all abutting subdivisions shall be drawn to the same scale and shown in dashed lines abutting the tract proposed for subdivision in sufficient detail to show accurately the existing streets and alleys and other features that may influence the layout and development of the proposed subdivision. Abutting unplatted land shall show property lines and owners of record. If the abutting land has a current approved Preliminary Plat, it shall be shown on the proposed Preliminary Plat. ❑ The following adjoining and abutting property information shall be shown on a(1 property adjoining and abutting the plat boundary: Subdivision name, Lot #, Block #, and recording information (if the property is platted); ii. Name of ownership with deed and recording information (if the property is not platted); and iii. Any recorded easements known to the surveyor at the time of submittal with recording information. ❑ The location, name, and width of all streets, alleys, public and private easements, and rights-of-way existing or proposed within the subdivision limits, along with the proposed names of streets. ❑ A restriction prohibiting the fencing or obstruction of any easement shall be stated on the face of the plat, unless otherwise provided by this code or approved by the affected user of the easement. ❑ The location of proposed closures of existing streets, alleys, easements, and rights-of-way. ❑ The known location of all existing property lines within the area proposed for subdivision. ❑ Proposed arrangement of lots. Property for residential use shall be platted as lots and shall be numbered consecutively from one (1) to the total number of lots in the subdivision. Property platted for commercial use, public use, or private street use shall be platted as tracts and shall be lettered in alphabetical order. ❑ The title of the proposed subdivision, the name of the owner(s) with sufficient data to show ownership, and the proponent of the Preliminary Plat and current landowner(s) at time of submittal (if different than proponent). The proposed title shall not conflict with any previous subdivision name. ❑ Playa Lake Areas, if any, shall conform to the requirements of Article 39.05, Division 5.3, Plava Lakes Development and Ownership. ❑ Sites proposed for stormwater drainage and impoundment easements, parks or other property owned by the City or any other governmental entity shall contain no blanket or specific utility easement until approved by the City Engineer or authorized representative of other governmental entities. ❑ A statement regarding maintenance of any installed detention/retention basins shall be stated on the face of the plat. ❑ All spelling on the plat shal( be correct. r►� c�ty of Lubbock T[NAf Final Plat Submission Checklist 1 certify that all items checked have been provided. I understand that not providing all of this information, as well as submitting drainage and construction plans at or immediately after the date of this submittal, will result in an incomplete application and delay the consideration and scheduling of this application for approval. Signature Date Final Plats may be submitted online through the Citizen Self-Service portal on the City of Lubbock website at www.mylubbock.us Submission Reyuirements: ❑ An approved Preliminary Plat (.pd� of the property, signed by the Director of Planning or their designee. ❑ Prepared by a Surveyor. A Final Plat shall be prepared by a Professional Land Surveyor registered in the State of Texas. ❑ Final Plat document (.pd fl. Plat sheet sizes shall be drawn at industry-standard engineering scales on standard ANS( or Architectural sheet sizes sufficient to legibly illustrate the proposed layout and required information. A minimum sheet size of 11" x 17" is required, however, the sheet is not to exceed 36" on any side. ❑ Application fee of $350 for the frst acre with $55 for each additional acre thereafter, not to exceed $5,000.00. ❑ Any supplementary materials required for approval. ❑ Dedication(s) by separate instrument (as indicated on the face of the final plat to be recorded), if applicable. ❑ Easement or right-of-way closure ordinance, if applicable. ❑ Street island ordinance, if applicable. Document Requirements: ❑ Must conform to the approved associated Preliminary Plat, and may constitute only a portion of the Preliminary Plat. ❑ Shall contain right-of-way dedication for all internal and perimeter streets and alleys within the portion proposed for Final Plat as shown on the approved Preliminary Plat. ❑ The Final Plat dimensional control shall be in units of U.S. survey feet to the nearest one-hundredth of a foot. Directional control shall be shown as bearings to the nearest are second. The description of the methodology used and the source, datum, and date of creation of the relevant points must be included on the face of the plat. ❑ Control for a Final Plat shall be established by one of the following methods. (1) The Final Plat may be tied by survey to adjacent section corners and lines; or (2) When the approved subdivision abuts or is adjacent to an existing recorded plat of the City of Lubbock or Lubbock County, the Final Plat may be tied by survey to such existing plat. ❑ The Final Plat shall include horizontal coordinates on at least two of the boundary corners relative to the Texas Coordinate System of 1983, North Central Zone datum as described in Texas Natural Resources Code, Title 2, Chapter 21, as amended, or subsequently established United States Geodetic Survey data adopted by the City of Lubbock. ❑ Drawn to the following scale per acreage within the plat boundary: l"=50' for �1 acre; 1"=100' for �1 acre. ❑ The incorporation of all Preliminary Plat information and conditions approved by administrative review. ❑ The plat boundary and the exact acreage included in that boundary. ❑ Title or name of the plat. If a lot or tract is replatted, all land in the original lot(s) or tract(s) shall be replatted in order to retain the original plat name. A replat cannot "orphan" a part of a previously subdivided lot or tract. ❑ The map scale, horizontal datum, north arrow and date. ❑ Reference by name to recorded plats of adjacent and abutting properties. ❑ Boundary lines of all lots, tracts, and parcels with accurate dimensions, bearings, radii, chord distances, and central angles of all curve segments, for all total curves. Such lines shall be shown in the same manner as required for Preliminary Plats in Section 39.07.038.c.4, Contents. ❑ Numbers and letters to identify each lot or tract. ❑ Lots shall be numbered consecutively from one (1) to the total number of lots in the subdivision. Tracts shall be lettered in alphabetical order. Such designation will be continuous in the order that Final Plats of portions of an approved Preliminary Plat are recorded with the County Clerk. ❑ Replatted lots will be designated alphanumerically (e.g. Lot 1-A), and further subdivision will alternate numbers and letters (e.g. Lot 1-A-1, Lot 1-A-1-A). The same alternating method will be used for tracts (e.g. Tract A-1, Tract A-1-A, Tract A-1-A-1). ❑ Private Streets and common open space and other common areas shall be platted as separate tracts and names must be approved by the City of Lubbock. Changes to existing private street names require approval of the City of Lubbock Building Official when the changes will affect existing residents. ❑ All street and alley rights-of-way and easements shall be clearly shown on the Final Plat and the purpose and restrictions of use of such easement indicated. ❑ Accurate location, dimensions, bearings, radii, chord distances, and central angles of all curve segments, for all total curves, shall be provided to readily establish location of rights-of-way and easements. Location of points of intersection and points of tangency of street intersections, other than right angle intersections, shall be indicated. ❑ Bearing, distances, and ties to the property boundary (including medians) shall be indicated. ❑ A key of abbreviations for easement types, such as utilities, cross-access, tree preservations, etc., shall be included on the Final Plat. ❑ Legal references shall be provided for all previous dedications and easements abutting the property shall be indicated. ❑ Name of each street and width of streets, alleys, and other rights-of-way shall be indicated. ❑ Approved City Street names shall be shown first followed by any highway designation and numbering in parentheses if applicable. For example, "19th Street (US 62)". Directional prefixes such as "East" or "North" are required to be shown, where applicable. ❑ All platted lots and tracts shall provide for collection of garbage consistent with Article 22.06 of this code unless alternatives are approved by the City Engineer. ❑ The following surveyor's certifcate shall be placed on every Final Plat and signed by the surveyor prior to submission to the Director of Planning: KNOW ALL MEN BY TI-�SE PRESENTS: That I, , do hereby certify that I prepared this plat from an actual and accurate survey of the land and that the corner monuments and/or other control shown thereon were properly placed under my personal supervision, in accordance with the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lubbock, Texas. ❑ The following certificate of approval by the Director of Planning or their designee shall be placed on every Final Plat and signed prior to recording of the plat documents at the courthouse: Approved this day of , 20 by the Director of Planning, or designee, of the City of Lubbock, Texas. � Director of Planning ❑ The following notices shall be stated on the face of every plat: (1) "Heavy lines indicate plat limits." (2) "All streets, alleys, and easements within plat limits are herein dedicated unless noted otherwise." (3) "No building permit shall be issued on any survey certificate that is not in accordance with an approved Final Plat and infrastructure and final drainage analysis acceptance by the Lubbock Code of Ordinances." (4) "All utility service shall be in accordance with the Underground Utilities Policy Statement by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Lubbock, Texas and the provisions of Article 37.01 of the Lubbock Code of Ordinances." (5) "All existing or proposed utility services to and on tracts indicated by this plat shali be contained in the public right-of-way and public or private utility easements. Utility service installation requested at a future date and not within an easement indicated by this plat, shall be within a proper utility easement granted by the owner of said property by separate recorded instrument prior to the provision of such service. Such easements shall be at the expense of the entity requesting such installation." (6) "All easements herein granted shall entitle the City or the utility company using such easements to the right to remove, repair or replace any lines, pipes, conduits, or poles within such easements as may be determined by the city or utility company without the city or utility company being responsible or liable for the replacement of improvements, paving, or surfacing of the easement necessitated by such repair, removal, or replacement. Easements designated or intended for vehicular passage (utility and emergency) or pedestrian access shali not be fenced or otherwise obstructed." (7) "Minimum floor elevations shall conform to the requirements of the Lubbock Drainage Criteria Manual, as adopted by Ord. 10022, as amended, and Section 28.09.131, Section 28.14.004, and Section 30.03.073 of the Lubbock Code of Ordinances." ❑ The following notices shall be stated on the face of the plat when they apply to that particular plat: (1) Any notices required in Unified Development Code Section 39.04.024, Reguired Notice for Final P[ats Containing Lake or Flood Risk Areas, for lake or flood hazard areas. (2) "Any easements or rights-of-way shown as `to be dedicated by separate instrument' are shown on the plat for information purposes only. This plat does not dedicate said easements." (3) "Blanket solid waste collection easement as required for service [within the plat limits or insert specific lot or tract designation] is herein granted." (4) "Blanket [insert `underground' if applicable] utility easement as required for service [within the plat limits or insert specific lot or tract designation] is herein granted to [insert name of public, private or franchise utility or certificated service provider of telecommunications]." (5) "Public pedestrian access easement is herein granted for persons traversing along the public parkway and needing to enter onto private property for the purpose of crossing a driveway. The easement is limited to those portions of the as-constructed driveways and walks which may extend outside public right-of-way onto private property and are constructed for the continuance of the accessible routes across the back of the driveway. This easement applies to existing and any future drive entrances as constructed." Addressing Remaining Issues with Downtown Zoning The adoption of the UDC set the stage for addressing some persistent zoning issues inside the Central Business District TIF. The shift from use-based to form-based zoning changes the paradigm in much of the CBD TIF, but not in all of it. Moreover, despite stakeholder input during the UDC creation process, the zoning classifications in the new MU districts are overly complex - a vestige of "CB- " district zoning. This is a proposal to address the following issues: • MU districts that create distinctions without meaningful districts • Areas in an MU district that might best be served in another MU district • Areas of the CBD TIF that were not in "CB- " districts, and thus are not in MU districts MU DISTRICTS AS ADOPTED The UDC, as adopted, establishes new MU districts follow the boundaries of the "CB- " districts. Relevant to the CBD TIF, CB-2 became MU-2, CB-3 became MU-3, CB-4 became MU-4, CB-5 became MU-5, and CB-6 became MU-6.' i •_ .'• �� I � �i '�'.. iA��ff � L . 1J '. ��' � � � � . . . , I '� _{ � r .. . .. . . .. .� _.." =—��"f=i� �1��{ ul!l�;�� , - ' :,; •,ris+!°'4^-. � - '� '�Ul�s r ... � , t_�L' , ... -. �;.,:�_, •: ,,,, �;...f - � � f,� � j* , -.�"•;-_�'; ;�:i'�`-' : �r,�� !!� Y T -�,� `� .{' • _ � � f �� Ar� '� _ }- ��, r f � :� � .v. . � MU-5 f' �,� `� 1 `��.� ,f �f. rllf% � _ . . . ��• � `� �_ '� �_,�.r-u ��fj�•�� r � � � ��I i! /� � f f� '� w � �' !<f l.J; �L',m— � I =., � .. _� .M� � +�� _ �: _ �; � �_.- �� :a � �. ��i�. �. _ �, w W'� 5 f~:� ='.� �� i i � � �.r; �:�,, � � :.�N..�...� _ y� ��; . � . -�:...., � �� . ;�, � i,. ;:� : _ ,��. � �+ - ��, ��k= ' ,a�� y ... • �-:,, : . ... �;:ir�;�:::•.. ... � , _ . „ Y_ r�-, . ";t- , '� �r �: , ,_ �.- �, , � �r �, _ ;;�� ;� �.:� . -- �.. �,. � ��"� . �ai":'�'i" �� t�- - � �Y'� �' :�r �� :�;� ,� ::��; •�'+.� - :L.� �� .•� � -.7� �� j' {-[ C .. : I�,.,.f� �;M,e- �.� �T e r l _��.; i ::J.:l k ...�.M +_. _'. . .��. �:i*�::._ r'{�.b._.. o'{ J1 k.�~aw�-R:. � 'sv�h'.� .' .�_ v-n•,�-,�._. __ . :_ � I�y'% + I �— - --• , � :.:� } _ `r . ' l : � �. .s- r-a:4� �� .� s.�.,; _ •.o � � �-' � ... -.r - � s � i ! �� ;i .. ��,i��=- .-�--'� i i � . � �� I'r '!�I' ''�• . .� � t � _ � � �ry� �. .F' . � ��^ � . � .. ... !r . { � � . ..7� .��. �... � = ;,n,r .,4' a � .� ��;�� '�:.-�� . _. � .. • s.:.:: '�;�.;,:- �{ - - - - -- �� f� ;{ � �� a� i Y•`� � Through the UDC process, I made multiple attempts to encourage a simplification of the districts. My primary motivations to do so were i) a read of the proposed MU districts creating differences without distinctions, ii) a feeling that the physical fabric of DT was not so broadly different to justify the additional complexity, and iii) a belief, recognized during the Downtown Master Plan Update process, that the "district" mindset was sometimes a hindrance. An example of how the UDC presents the physical parameters of the MU Districts in the CBD TIF is attached are Exhibit "A".'' I inventoried the physical parameters of the MU districts in the CBD TIF: MU-1 West Broadway MU-2 Broadway MU-3 General MU•4 Aru MU-S Civic MU-6 Oepot 2. Buildin Form 2 Stories, not ' None None None ' None None '• Max Building Height ezceeding 45' E ; E �....._.�......._ _...._.�..._...._...__ ........ .................••.........�.........._........___.... .........-..•-•......................._......�...�....... , . -�--------- ---------_ .._._._.._....._.......... i 20' in depth, after • i Building Height Setback : 4th Story or 40' ' Building Height Stepback Min. Ground Floor Elevati� . ...................................... Min. Ground Floor Elevati� ......................................... Min. Ground Finish Floor ( ........................................ Min. Ground Finish Floor 3. euilding Placement Setbacks _ Minimum Front Setback Minimum Side Street Setl . ...................................... Minimum Front Build•to-2 Maximum Front Build-to-; Minimum Side Build-to-2< . ...................................... Maximum Side Build-to-Z Minimum Side Setback Minimum Rear Setback Frontaee Build-out Minimum Front 5[reet Frc Minimum Side Street Fror Block Standards � ................. n.,,...... ........... Maximum BlockPerimete Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth �Minimum Lot Area � Mazimum lot Coverage .. ...................................... 5. Parkin� Locations Minimum Front Setback Minimum Side Setback Minimum Side Street Sett Minimum Rear Setback (L ........................................ Minimum RearSetback P ._._ W._._._.--------- Minimum Rear Setback (S 6. Allowed Encroachments .................. �............................ 4th story or '• After 4th story or 40' 40' 12' . 12' 2S ........... 17'�---�-•----- �- � ' -�-�-�-�-� ......................--...----...-----......e................. 0' 0' 0' � 10' 25' 10 ' �� ................. �. ` �� ............................:.......................... .............�................. • 10' 10' 10 _ �.�_�_____ s� o� --�� o� � o� 5':20'forearaees' 0' 0' . 0' 0' 0' ,uuu unear reec ; e,vuu unear ree[ �,uuu imear reec : e,wu unear reec t .� .�._W_______._._�� _____�____---__�.____..._.__.__.__..__ ----•----___.W_ ;�i' : 25' 25' i 25' __...�...�.._.....�.;--•-•-•_•..-•_--••-..--•-•_ -• --•_-..--••-••.__.__...____._..�_.�_. __----•--_-•..... ..........................4.._�...... 30 ..._..._ ......_... 30�._...__... ? ..�..Y._. 30....__......._�_-_.___._..._. None �� None None i None None - � --- 100%; 5096 for 100% 100% 10096 100°.fi esidential uses i '• ..........................,............................... ..............................:..............................�.................... .__.____ ...............................•••..•-_•-•-•- ................-•_-•.____..................v..__.._.. ................._ 25' 30' 30' 30' 30' ..... . . ..... 4th story or 40' 12' ...9 ............. .. �..... io� OW 0' 60%� 30% �linear 25'� 30'� None 100% 30' � -- 0' ; 30� 30' E 30�� 30' 30' ..._._._..�._.._._._._._._..._.- -- _.W._._.._._.__•--T-- -- � - -..� .... ................__._._._.. 5' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 5' for single s[ory; : 5' S' S' i 5' S' 10 for two story i .t ..............................€.............................. ............................. ............................. :.............................. ............................. : 0' 0' : 0' E 0' 0' _.._.._._..__._..._...-' f ............................ ......_......_....-•..••..................._...............�................. ...._..._.. ._._._.._...__._---_._ 30 30' 30' 30' 30' Porch, 7errace, ; Forecourt, Stoop, Forecourt, P�r�ii, ; Forecourt, �'c�r«, Forecourt, Stoop, Forecourt, Po�rh, Stoop, Shopfront, i Shopfront, Gallery Stoop, Shopfront, : Stoop, Shopfront, Shopfrant, Gallery Stoop, Shopfront, Gallery & Arcade, ;& Arcade, Awning, Gallery & Arcade, ; Gallery & Arcade, & Arcade, Awning, Gallery & Arcade, Awning, Canopy, ; Awning, Canopy, Awning, Canopy, Awning, Canopy ; Canopy, Marquee ; Canopy, Marquee • Marquee : Marquee Marquee . . . . . . .....:. ........ ;.. . . .. .............................. . . ....... eay window, i Pedestrian Street Pedestrian Street ; Pedestrian Street Pedestrian Street Pedestrian Street Chimneys, Outdoor i Lights, Projecting Lights, Projecting ; Lights, Projec[ing E` Lights, Projecting lights, Projecting D1ning, Pedestrlan : Wall Signs, Wall Signs, Wall Slgns, � Wall Slgns, Wall Slgns, Street lights, i Outdoor Dining, Outdoor Dining, ; Outdoor Oining, Outdoor Dining, Outdaor Dining, Planters . Planters Planters Planters Planters Planters F MU-4 and MU-6 are identical. MU-3 varies by a single parameter. As a general concept, uses are less restricted in a form-based environment. Form-based equates to a primary concern with the look, or form, of the district, rather than a focus on uses. Nonetheless, uses in the UDC are generally outlined in the Land Use Matrix, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "B".`'' This is true of the MU districts in the CBD TIF. There are well over 100 use types in the UDC. Differences exist between MU-3, MU-4, and MU-6 in only thirteen of those use types. DOWNTOWN AMENDMENT 1A: 1) Redesignate anything zoned MU-4 and MU-6 as MU-3 a) In Table 39.02.003-1 Change the "Former Zoning District" Column cell for MU-3 to read, "CB-3, CB-4/MU-4, CB-6/MU-6"; AND b) In Table 39.02.003-1, Delete the rows for "Depot (MU-4)" and "Arts (MU-6)"; AND c) Replace the contents of Subsection 39.02.005.e and Subsection 39.02.005.g with "Reserved". 2) Change Subsection 39.02.005.d.3 such that the Maximum Front Built-to-Zone in MU-3 shall be 10'. 3) In Table 39.02.016-1 make the Single-Family Detached Dwelling use L in MU-3, and add L criteria (to Subsection 39.02.018.c.7 to state: "7. General (MU-3) a) Only Single-Family Detached Dwelling is allowed on a blockface developed for Single-Family Detached Dwellings; and b) Notwithstanding Subsection 39.02.005.d.3, the Maximum Front Build-to-Zone for a Single-Family Detached Dwelling use is 25'." 4) In Table 39.02.016-1 delete the columns for MU-4 and MU-6 5) In Table 39.02.016-1 change the P to L for Alcoholic Beverages, Off-Site Consumption (Package Store) and add an L criteria (to Subsection 39.02.018.h.4 to state: "4. General (MU-3) the Package Store shall meet all state and other separation requirements and be located a minimum of 300 feet, measured from property line to property line, from any property from any Single-Family Detached Dwelling in existence at the time of the zone change." 3 MU AREAS /N THE CBD TIF THAT WOULD BE BETTER SERVED IN OTHER MU DISTR/CTS MU-2 was drafted to describe and encompass a particularly dense environment. The Downtown Master Plan Update describes similar features on Ave J north of Broadway and on Buddy Holly south of Broadway. However, the former CB-2 district enveloped a larger area. DOWNTOWN AMENDMENT 1 B: Redesignate anything zoned MU-2 north of 10th St. as MU-3. 1) In Table 39.02.003-1 add to the "Former Zoning District" Column cell for MU-3 to read, "CB-2/MU-2 located north of 10�h Street" Redesignate anything zoned MU-2 south of 13`h St. and west of Texas Ave. as MU-3. 2) In Table 39.02.003-1 add to the "Former Zoning District" Column cell for MU-3 to read, "CB-2/MU-2 located south of 13'h and west of Texas Avenue" NON-MU AREAS /N THE CBD TIF There exists a vestige of HC (Heavy Commercial) on the eastern edge of the CBD TIF. DOWNTOWN AMENDMENT 1 C: Redesignate anything zoned HC inside the CBD TIF as MU-3 1) In Table 39.02.003-1 add to the "Former Zoning District" Column cell for MU-3 to read, "HC located within the CBD TIF" (Note, "grandfathering" of existing uses is handled in Subsection 39.01.010.) As a result of the above, the final version of "Former Zoning District" Column cell for MU-3 should read: "CB-2/MU-2 located north of 10'h Street, CB-2/MU-2 located south of 13'h and west of Texas Avenue, CB-3, CB-4/MU-4, CB-6/MU-6, HC located within the CBD TIF" ' See Section 39.02.003 Zoning District Establishment '' See Subsection 39.02.005.d General (MU-3) „' See Section 39.02.16 ►� Exh i bit "A" �� ty�f � -� Lubbock rEi�s CHAPTER 39 - UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) Division 2.2 Zoning Districts and Standards Section 39.02.005 Base Mixed-Use Districts Subsection 39.02.005.e Depot (MU-4) . � ,.. M Example of restaurant with outdoor dining in MU-4 Depot district The MU-4 Depot district is a unique and diverse area of downtown lubbock which primarily serves as an entertainment district with art galleries as well as artisan or micromanufacturing. Priority is placed on optimizing the physical characteristics of the built environment for increased walkability and a vibrant center building upon the historic character of Lubbock's neighborhood main streets. To maximize vibrancy and walkability, this district permits an intensity and mix of uses that are already in existence along Buddy Holly Avenue. This district supports the small-scale fine-grained character of the historic neighborhoods with a mix of attached and detached mixed-use buildings on small lots. Buildings are close to the sidewalk and off-street parking is screened from public spaces. :?. _.� Example of commercial storefronts in MU-4 Depot district � � , • .<,� -�� ,• _ - ' ' � ._ , a -,:'�y ,x.. - ..: � �:� .r - :.5+��;�:' 4 i.�.�s�'' . =.':��-�'t�:. • - -�""�`k"'':r_ m,.. Example of outdoor dining and farmers' market in MU-4 Depot district Recommendations on the Proposed UDC Amendments August 30, 2023 1. Section 39.02.006.a.3 — Lot Density and Dimensions Explanation: The intent of the UDC language was to create a path to zero-lot line garden office projects. The issue is not with those projects, but with undefined discretion for the Planning Director in the language. Let's remove discretion and replace it with objecfive criteria. : Amend Section 39.02.006.a.3 to read: "Lot Density and Dimensions. All developments in the NC district shall be in accordance with Table 39.02.006.a-2, NC Lot Intensity and Dimensions. Maximum building heights and minimum setbacks are for principal structures. For multi-lot developments with common parking areas or party-wall styled construcfion, minimum lot width shall be 20 feet and minimum lot area shall be 1,000 square feet." Make this same change to Section39.02.006.b.3 2. Section 39.02.020.e.1.A.ii — Accessory Dwelling Unit, Applicability, Previously Existing Accessory Dwelling Units Explanation: Under the current language, if one has an existing ADU -(a) if it's "registered" under prior code, it's legal non-conforming/grandfathered; (b) if it meets the design criteria of the UDC, it's legal; to (c) if neither a or b, then it's not legal. : Make no change to the current language. 3. Section 39.03.021.a.2 —Signs Exempt From Regulation, Generally. [No comments] 4. Section 39.02.014 — Reduction Overlay (RO) Explanation: Most of the changes are clarifications/clean-up. There are two minor tweaks — i) we should clarify/codify that ROs are not matters for ZBA, and ii) we should allow a parcel owners to prohibit even the Specific Use possibility of billboards. Reinsert Section 39.02.014.b.4.iii to read, "Approval of a Reduction Overlay shall not require approval of the Zoning Board of Adjustment." Reinsert Section 39.02.014.c to read, "The Reduction Overlay District may prohibit billboards, even if allowed in the base zoning district." And renumber the balance of the section 5. Section 39.04 — Subdivision Standards and Section 39.07 — Development Review Procedures Explanation: There are several "categories" of tweaks/clean up items. a. Explanation: (PDF Page 368) Traditionally, PZC has been the board responsible for plats : Amend Table 39.07.012-1 to provide for appeals on plat items to PZC. b. Explanation: (PDF Page 391) LCAD records are not dispositive for legal ownership. They are very often delayed. current property owner:' Amend Section 39.07.040.c.1 to read, "Completed Plat Applicafion, signed by Make similar changes to the Checklists. c. Explanation: (PDF Page 392) Hard-coding fee amounts in the UDC creates future issues. Amend Section 39.07.040.c.5 to read, "Application fee as established by the City Council." Amend Section 39.07.041.4 to read, "Application fee as established by the City Council." Make similar changes to the Checklists. d. Explanation: (PDF Page 392) The language is vague. : Amend Section 39.07.040.4 to read, "Water and schematic layouts sufFicient to demonstrate how the proposed lots will be served by public water and sewer." Make similar changes to the Checklists. e. Explanation: (PDF Page 392) For small lots, scale could be any standard engineering scale ranging from 1"=10' to 1"=60'. Amend Section 39.07.040 Document Requirements 2 to read, "Drawn to standard engineering scales ranging from 1"=10' to 1"=100'. 1"=200' scale is allowed for plats larger than 100 acres only when all information illustrated on the plat is clearly legible on the printed full-size plat" Amend Section 39.07.041.5 Document Requirements 6 to read, "Drawn to standard engineering scales ranging from 1"=10' to 1"=100'. 1"=200' scale is allowed for plats larger than 100 acres only when all information illustrated on the plat is clearly legible on the printed full-size plat" Make similar changes to the Checklists. f. Explonation: (PDF Page 392) The language is vague. Amend Section 39.07.040 Document Requirements 8 to read, "The Preliminary Plat must be tied by survey to a section corner of the section in which the plat is located, or when the proposed subdivision ..." Amend Section 39.07.041.c.8 to read, "Control for a Final Plat shall be established by one of the following methods. (1) The Final Plat may be tied by survey to a section corner of the section in which the plat is located; or (2) When the approved subdivision abuts ..." Make similar changes to the Checklists. g. Explanation: (PDF Page 392) Good idea, but applicants need a public source of data. Amend Section 39.07.040 Document Requirements 12 to read, "...If the abutting land has a current approved Preliminary Plat, it shall be shown on the proposed Preliminary Plat to the extent such information is available on City GIS;" Make similar changes to the Checklists. h. Explanation: (PDF Page 396) item 5.1 - This references a preliminary plat "...signed by the Director of Planning....". : This section does not need to be reworded, but a requi�ement for an approval signature block should be added to the preplat requirements to align with this final plat requirement. Make the same adjustment to the preplat checklist. i. Explanation: (PDF Page 397) Item 25 — This requires a plat to be signed by a surveyor prior to submission. A plat must have been surveyed in accordance with the sub-regs before a surveyor can sign the plat. That means there is no ability for a review a draft copy of the plat prior to spending large amounts of money to survey a residential plat. We need to have a review before we've expended that much time and money. Amend Section 39.07.041 Document Requirements 25 to read, "The following surveyor's certificate shall be placed on every Final Plat. Final Plats presented for recording shall be signed and sealed by the surveyor" � 6. Notification Boundary — 39.07.007(a) Public Notice Explanation: The Texas Local Government Code (211.006.d.2 & 211.007.c) does not say "at least 200 feet", it says 200 feet. 1 think HB 2127 (Texas Regulatory Consistency Act) probably pre-empts the proposed amendment. The amendment language exposes the entire process to litigation. : Make no change to the current language. 7. Definition of "Family" — 39.10.002 Definitions Explanation: Current language reflects the recommendation of staff and the UDC consultant. Reducing the number treats people differently based on marital and family status. People with different circumstances have different access to housing. ThaYs unseemly. : Make no change to the current language. 8. Section 39.02.016 — Land Use Matrix, Table 39.02.016-1 — Permitted Uses by District, Table 39.02.006.e-1— IP Permitted Uses, Table 39.02.006.f-1— LI Permitted Uses, and Table 39.02.006.g-1 GI Permitted Uses Explanation: We ought not to be making these projects more difficult. Infrastructure is a need, not a want. If design concerns are driving this, make L criteria on design. : Make no change to the current language. 9. Section 39.02.020.b (4) (F) (A) (iii) and 39.02.020.b (4) (F) (B) (ii) and - Residential Carport or Porte- Cochere Location. [No comments] 10. Section 39.02.004.e - High Density Residential (HDR), Table 39.02.003-1 — Zoning Districts, Section 39.02.005.a General Mixed Use Standards, and Section 39.02.004.e (4) — Lot Density and Dimensions, Zoning Map Explanation: No proposal made by staff Make no change to the current language. 11. Section 39.03.016 — Bufferyard Landscaping Explanation: No proposal made by staff Make no change to the current language. Q 12. Table 39.04.005-1— Minimum Connection Spacing by Street Classification Explanation: The proposed language is vague. Let's copy the TxDOT language. : Amend the table to read, "Measured between nearest edges of driveway throats." Or, provide a graphic similar to what is included in the TxDOT Access Management Manual. This removes any ambiguity. TO: Members of the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Cyndi Pratas, Alastair Hamilton, and Richard Murphy DATE: August 21, 2023 RE: Proposed UDC Amendments, Item 10, Discussion of HDR District: Proposal to limit application of Vertical Mixed-Use standard of HDR District to avoid authorizing 75' buildings in residential neighborhoods This proposal ensures that the UDC does not, due to one problematic standard of the new High Density Residential (HDR) zone, authorize construction of 75' tall buildings in lots formerly zoned as A-2/R-3 (High Density Apt.). A quick glance at Lubbock's current zoning map shows the radical nature of this shift. As currently written, the UDC would authorize 75' tall buildings on every lot color-coded light green. Many of these lots are in residential neighborhoods. The HDR zone includes three subdivision types—Conventional, Village, and Mixed-Use. Subsection 39.02.004.e. Each of these subdivisions provides two or more standards to regulate various types of buildings. In particular, the Mixed-Use subdivision contains three standards for: (a) Single-Family Detached, Cottage, or Garden Home; (b) Live-Work; and (c) Vertical Mixed-Use. Id. With one exception, the standards applicable in the HDR zone authorize heights that are broadly consistent with the A-2/R-3 zone of the old code. See, e.g., Table 39.02.004.e-2 (authorizing 45' apt. buildings in the Village subdivision). Compare § 40.03.681 (imposing 40' height limit in A-2 zone). By contrast, the Vertical Mixed-Use standard of the Mixed-Use subdivision sets a default limit of 75'. Table 39.02.004.e-2. In addition, whereas a 40% lot coverage limit has applied in the A-2/R-3 zone, the Vertical Mixed- Use standard imposes no such limit at all. ld. It also bears emphasis that the Mixed-Use subdivision of the HDR zone falls into a regulatory gap. The UDC divides districts into Base Mixed-Use and Base Residential categories. The UDC imposes extensive regulations on Mixed- Uses in Base Mixed-Use districts. See Subsection 39.02.00S.a (General Mixed-Use Standards). For instance, specific regulations govern setbacks and height for infill development in such districts. Subsection 39.02.00S.a.4.A- B. These regulations do not apply to the Mixed-Use standard of the HDR zone as it is a Base Residential district. Mixed-Use in the HDR zone is essentially undefined. In sum, application of the Vertical Mixed-Use standard of the HDR zone to lots formerly zoned as A-2/R-3 would nearly double the height of authorized buildings, massively expand permissible footprints, and avoid regulations applicable to other types of Mixed-Use. We respectfully propose addressing this problem by barring application of the Vertical Mixed-Use standard of the Mixed-Use subdivision of the HDR zone on any block that is zoned to include single-family residential housing. This provision would simply be saying that a lot owner may not, without obtaining special permission from the City, build a 75' tall building dominating a residential neighborhood. More specifically, we propose amending 39.02.004.e 4., governing lot density and dimensions in the HDR zone, to add the underlined, highlighted language: 4. Lot Density and Dimensions [in HDR zone] A. Residential. All residential and mixed-use developments in the HDR district shall be in accordance with Table 39.02.004.e-2, HDR Lot Density and Dimensions, based on subdivision and building type. Maximum building heights and minimum setbacks are for principal structures. Where a minimum front setback is less than 20 feet, a front-loaded garage shall have a minimum setback of 20 feet and the remainder of the building may meet the minimum setback that is less than 20 feet. 1. Limit on Vertical Mixed-Use in Residential Neighborhoods. The standard for Vertical Mixed-Use in the Mixed-Use_subdivision shall_not apply_ on a_block containin�one or_more lots zoned for RE�SF-l. or SF-2. m N O N � t]D 7 0 M � � C N � "a C G1 � f0 C.J 0 � Y u O � 7 J 0 � U .--� O 00 u1 � O O 00 N 'C � lD � a-�-1 � N .-M-I ^ � � � O Q C � tJ O � Y = u �' � n� � L � o 0 v� � �' Ua ° o- ` � � � O i� Q: � � L L �C f0 i a o O a E'° �� c o (� OL � �" � c (0 7 � a 0 r-1 Z O�p � Ut�O � � � .-N-� V�1 � N l�1 G! � �--1 � � � C p � L O � Z 0 N� E v � V � � � � � � � aC� 0' C N � � L. L L � C m y d @J -a .n � � ao � � ,� � v °' N -n -a � � � a m a� m�� m m Y � 3 a f0 Q L O a Q�(�j �@j Z Q a oaC N t0 l�0 � 0�0 � l�0 n M M (�i � J c-I c-I � N Q Z � o a � 0 � •7 �+ oC N j� �`p Y a' a��l Q a► +J � -o w � � 1 VI � L L � Q(aj ci ��,,�._� n ao � +' � � t C C L � U �"� � M 7 � Y Gl � o. (aj N (aj d' � �O � � � � a N U.--I a--1 N N c-i 0�p 7 � � � � � o N m o � � 'O rl .--1 N .--I 1� 'O X m .Q N ' o 0 c� � Y dL �--I O� V1 l0 l0 N � l� �t 1� M V1 N C1 Y � � N � � � � .� O O � � � � N � N i� �VI W L � a v � O � � L L L L L � � _ '8 "8 'C '6 'C 'C � d0 � ~ a-' � � � � .a � b0 J � N Z � a-i N M�t 111 � � Q � � = 4J i � � N c Q O N O j-+ � � C Y m � n � L � � 3 � O � � � N � L � � 0 ' u .'n � � t � •� � O ca � � � � � � a L n � U VI O � � C� — ` J � � C 7 a! . � � y � N C � 41 N C.7 � � � � N a� N � c � � � o 3'�— ra - +� " 3 L � � � C .� � � L � N L 3 m ao ,"i� � � � i o v "O � N C � Y ai � c a � � � N N OA •- a c � O � � O�p L � C ` ` � N > � 'O O 3 � � � (O � � U � � w � c� .Q Q Y U � � O '� � �-1 OA O � � � � � N C � O � a° �� v C � N � > p_ 3 �' �a�,3 � .--I N M � c � a�'i � o = a� � v � O • c � � � L C V y.� C � � C N � 'L Y � 7 � U t -p 3 �' °' o "' � � O 0 � � u � � �a 3 � aX, -° � °' O aC � � C C �' �u O � � � � C Q a�. � u Y t m v � a �� 3 Y +' � � � � Q N � d •i O � Q N C � H m c � r =�' 3 �° cao 'a � m � v s � � C � �, o � � � � C � u � � f0 a J � � � ° c v c GJ L 4% - c0 00 .Q Q � � `� t � � � C �0 � o s � c o 3 N � � � •i C i 3 `—° `° T 7 � co u � t' O O Q- E � C � J N � � � O � � � Q O � � y'� � (�6 c *' � v u' � C � � � U '^ � � Y � � � v rci E ,�.., C NC C n. 0 N > N � t � 0 Z C .O O � W L +. '� c CcJ G Q N oC 'O C � Q Q c � co . O � C +-' O � N (�0 � 7 � N Q � � O � C � O � •N O '� a � � a f0 7 � N � � O N �= C � O�D O N � L Q a-� N v�i �d 3 C O 7 L � � c � N � � O 7 � O 7 �O N >+' O � � .� O +��+ `� O >. L �L � N C � � Q � "6 ro � a � � 'j C O � i � y O � � � � � L N N � � N � 3 C � OD N C � .>_ �n — tv i -a U L � 3 Y .� N 00 � C � > "O C �7 7 � O ro � � C N N O � u Z� � O -C .i�+ IA i � O � N � v c °�° v °n � � z � ° o O � L v F- •� � � z h0 y � LL "p c0 � 0 � a� N 'a O y � L �C v +-' C � L � � � � �t � � r � L O 3 � o L i c� � � C � � �n � f6 C Gl O � �'' 'O � a=� t�4 7 vf - �- � � � � L � C � u � ro t � a�i a� � N +L�+ 7 � i�+ +�+ O L _ (D t O � � � C � � � O a.+ 7 'j � � V � � � � � � � � 7 0- � � C m � � c U � � O N •� f�0 �+ L � w O "� � -�p -o v � �, a�i ~ 'u � X � � V � � � '- O `- O � 0 .� N Q. � � C L � C G1 � �,d L Gi c L O C � � pp W C � L Gl H � ; � Y J rp Y p U C � O � LaL c p � �n Q U' L H Z Gl �n c.�.i � N fl- � O � �. C O O� � � O ; w f0 � f- L O ,n N Z � y m i�'i+ p j ++ L N � �n 7 00 3 � i � C � N � o �c •� w � uf � L Q cp � i �� C OC � � � a vi �. N N w 7 0 7 � � a � > � � � v v � � N O Z s � � � c m t 10 E 3 v � l7 `p a> > O Z N N y� O� C N a"C-+ T .N O � � �' ` 't7 U � � � � � � O 3 W O al N� �n Q � +_ � GJ � � u 'U O 7 L H c! N y a'�° � c � v � a, •- �,n,o-a � c � � 'C � � V � •�O- �' 'C j ,C � C L hG _ ,F C � C � � �6 GJ C 7 O � � �^ a-�� Z � H O1 O �- � � tJ � � — ._ � «� u � � � N O > = C Q � � � H � � . a� Z ,,, � � W � � O 0 N C C � � N � � ._ �% V N O v� G1 y+' w � � 0 += u � F- }' � J .� Q O � Y � U � C .� a (0 tip L � � .n � � � � O � d � � p U "O z � � C V f0 � � O � N N C +�n+ O fl. L C L f0 N� a� •'^ C �. v+ � Z � 3 O � � � W � � � t .i � vi C i L Y G! in pp �� , 'n n � C �"' N (p � � � C "O w a � 0 � � � H � � � O � � i � � v � � � � .� ? _ � � Q a L H � N"a V yNJ V i � � U L � O 0 � � � � 'C +J �n -� a� � � L U p �o � Z � O � O � O Z � � � � j j Q O � � O � � i � Z � -� � '� � � w � y O C � � � L N .� Y "O �p C � � � � C v�i -n � � � � .OD � � Z v� a�i � Y vi VE C � -p '� L v � m E ,,, � .o � _ ° c�o ao � v s � o_ c ~ O � � v�i N �a.�+ W � � '� N Y ` G �•�� _ Y �� L O � to L vf L a � u � � ri 01 O O M O Q1 M a� � �o a+ N .; a OC �i I move to amend the following provisions of the UDC ordinance before us regarding parking requirements for apartments. Currently, tables 39.02.004.d-3; 39.02.004.e-3; and 39.03.009-1 state the following for the "Number of Required Parking Spaces" for an Apartment and Vertical Mixed Use: Apartment: (on a113 tables) 1 per DU (dwelling unit) with 1 bedroom or per efficiency unit 1.25 per DU with 2 bedrooms 2 per DU with 3+ bedrooms Vertical Mixed Use: (on tables 39.02.004.e-3 and 39.03.009-1) 0.5 per DU I move to amend said requirements to the following: 1 per each efficiency DU, 1.5 per DU with 1 bedroom, 2 per DU with 2 bedrooms, 2.5 per DU with 3+ bedrooms, and 1 additional space for every 4 DUs in the development. No Text \� Good afternoon, my name is Dora Cortez I live at 217 N. Ave. O and I also represent the North and East Lubbock Coalition. I am here this afternoon proposing that changes be made to the already approved UDC and the zoning map. �We are proposing that the abandonment ordinance for nonconforming use wh�ch was approved for 12 months be reconsidered and changed to 6 months. These buildings located in our neighborhoods are unsafe and unsightly. We also recommend that the city set aside sufficient � funding to improve or remove abandoned and blighted structures on the industrial land and that the city rezones it to something suitable for our communities. Also, downzone currently vacant, abandoned, or � nonoperational light industrial and general industrial in the � C zoning map within 500 yards of residential development. One of these pi�tures shows PYCO located on 34th and Avenue A. The picture was taken in front of the Carver Child Care Center located on 26th and Elm. The second picture is a concrete batch company that borders my neighborhood. It has been cited by TCEQ for emitting too much pollution. This facility is not the only plant that is next to our neighborhood. As I typed my speech I could hear the trucks at Bedrock Crushing moving around, something we hear every day. We also recommend that you downzone tracts that are zoned light industrial and general industrial in the UDC zoning map that are NOT identified as industrial in the 2040 FLUM. For example Wilbert Funeral Services located across the street from Cavazos Middle School is not industrial in the 2040 FLUM, but is zoned industrial in the UDC zoning map. Further, we recommend that you allocate sufficient funding ' to comply with SB 929 which says how a city might � � terminate a nonconforming use We want to make sure that nonconforming or grandfathered industrial structures and/or facilities could be eventually terminated and removed from our neighborhoods. All these things are possible. How do I know #his, because The 2040 Plan recommended downzoning a considerable portion of M-1 zoning to commercial in South Lubbock around the vicinity of the newly constructed McAlister Park. This area has been zoned M-1 for decades, yet that parcel of land has never had the same kind of heavy industry that is next #o our neighborhoods. And now the city has allocated $1.5 million in American Rescue Plan funds to build a$1.8 million pickle ball park in McAlister Park. The 2040 Plan called to disallow the expansion of industrial zoning in North and East Lubbock. Yet when LEDA asked the council to annex and rezone to M-2 zoning a11 those acres of land in East Lubbock for the Leprino Cheese Factory, the council unanimousiy voted for the zoning change even though it contradicted the 2040 Plan. North and East Lubbock residents feel that broken promises is what they get instead of Do what you say. My famify has called North Lubbock home for six generations. My grandmother had no education and my mother only had a third grade education. They were busy raising a family and didn't have the toois, the power, or the time to fight the decisions that were being made about their neighborhoods. That responsibility now falls on us and we need each one of you to champion our neighborhoods. Do the right thing. � 1�� z� r �*-/r�c�C� <� S � 7��coS � GcJ!-w � iu-r� ��-- � -C�> �,� � �-. Thank you. ``�` `�� U �� r � v :�; �, ` �� j � J � �� ,, �n . � ^ _� J 1 .,1 � � � � ..� � � 0 � \ � � �� t �, � � � >� � o �... --� � � � -� � 3 s :� � � �� --� j . " ,^ _ ____ , � � J � -�. `� �, � }- n � � ; �� .� - � � .J � � J v � �, � ;il � �t � _� _, �� j `;� _,,,. � � �� 3 � � j � � -� � v J �` � '' '� v • " � � � �.. � � \� ---� . �' , � V � � � � ,_� v 1� � .� � � _� J � `v 1, � _ -` � N '' � � _� � J •� I 7 v � ,� . J , � � v �`i-' Q 1� � � �" c ' �� `� , � S C, � ( � � t �� e�t � n�� - ti � � � �� r� G� 1 rv�-e t� rt� �✓t C R'� � j . � Lln �1�',�I �r, �ln q 4�/�G l � • � � ��k p Jc i�� c. � fc � �-� �l c� �' �t �� . z-, ��/� � � �\ �-c , p r � S-�,5 � . � � �'l ft� Cc C �� ✓l , < < /l� �'l 5—�.� �` c.:J ri Z�v (�-�,_ f'X�� J� 1\ �c�� ; � n :�� c � 1�, �� ' �Y � � a r �.� � l1 , 1 1�' G1 r.� f�� ,(, �� s �� r'� ' u r�� ; � `�4,��!�� U � � � �0��,\ C�" >� u I am here to ay to ask for revisions to the residential codes regarding R1 zoned single family residences. The UDC documeni does not substantially alter the exisfing Article 40.01 of the current codes. When these codes were enacted there was no internet, no food trucks and trailers, no short term rentals and no federally mandated group homes. However, times have changed and those codes have not addressed these issues critical to residenfial neighborhoods. According to Chapter 40.01 customary home occupations there can be no exterior storage of materials, equipment or supplies allowed on the premises. The way around this is to load your products on a trailer and store it that way. Mr. Walker has assured me during my visits with him that this is "transporting goods and services" and is allowed. There was an oversized trailer parked at a residence in my neighborhood that did not move for over a year, but still considered "transporting goods and services". Right now in my neighborhood at 380168ch street there is an Hawaiian ice food truck parked in front, at 3803 68t" there are 2 trailers full of bouncy houses and at 3805 68th there is hamburger food truck. At 3403 53� there is a concrete business operating with heavy equipment stored on trailers and parked in the drive. What started as one business operafing illegally has now turned into 3, which has always been my concern. Those trailers parked in the street are all over the size limit stated in the codes but are exempt because they are "transporting goods and services". This loop hole in the codes needs to be removed. Afl trailers are designed to transport things. Giving a pass to businesses to allow them to iliegally operate in residenfial neighborhoods is not in the spirit of the law. Please remove the "transporting goods and services" stateme�t from the UDC. According to code only one commercial vehicle is allowed per residence. According to Mr. Walker if the vehicle does not have a phone number or web site or something linking it directly to the address it is not a commercial vehicle. According to section 153 any trailer or vehicle whose basic purpose is to advertise whether located on or off premise is considered advertising a business. There is a residence in my neighborhood that has two large vehicles that have the wrap type advertising on them and should not be allowed. This needs to be made clear in the UDC that if a vehicle or trailer has a Business name on it, it must be considered a commercial vehicle and only one allowed per residence, including street parking. Mr. Walker brought up the use of government vehicles. These are not commercial vehicles and would not be included in the revision of this code. Another area of conce�n is the location of group homes. These appear to be federally mandated. I would like city ordinances to regulate the placement of these businesses so that each district has an equal number of these businesses. There is a distance limit on these businesses, but not on the number and distribufion of them. A group home has appeared on my block much to the dismay of all my neighbors. There was no nofice given and no input asked for when this business was allowed. A certificate of occupancy is not required. When a variance was requested by the business to increase the number of occupants but not increase the parking spaces we all received a notice of the hearing. Then the city attorney pulled the request from the P&Z hearing with no notice or reason given to us. We are all concerned as to the effect this business will have on our property values. Short term rentals have been area of contention in Lubbock. The city of Dallas recently passed an ordinance prohibiting the establishment of these businesses in residenfial zoned districts in the city. If this could be done in Dallas I am hoping it can done in Lubbock. A home is the largest investment most people make. It is i�cumbent on the City of Lubbock and this council to protect this investment. Property tax is the biggest source of revenue for the city. The value of homes in R1 zoned areas needs to be protected by changes to the residential codes and strict enforcement of these revised codes. Recent events have highlighted cidzens concerns for protecting their reside�fial neighborhoods. As elected officials you are sworn to represent the cifizens of Lubbock, the majority of cifizens, not a very few developers and businesses. It is my hope that you will enact these changes to the UDC to protect Lubbock's existing residential neighbochoods. , � � 4 f � i � R� nt C I �- �� r I F, � Y {� : �' �- 1 �' � !� � t � �� f�. �: F F- Fi L �. � r � � 1 � � � ` � � � � v � �� L lL � �� W` `�� t �. � .� :� � � . �� , �� . � � � 5 � : � ,, uF . ! ., i` � • R .� �t, �a% t �.�+ ' �. ;; d `�,.� : ' -� t +. : a ;'` q 's.�: ; ��` �' � �� . S F ` 4� , � � . . . � `� � "l : � �� i �� w ti t i�� . �� ti �� =� � t��-. �� ._� ,t � _� ��! j ' �� q.�t • �, � �; � � �,�,� ° ,� � �;� � �� .� �, � ' �._ � � � \ , � 4 w i � 4 f � � �� y * ` � f . J � � �