HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 2000-R0101 - Amenedment #4 To Agreement-Delta Airport Consultants Inc-Engineering Agreement - 04_06_2000Resolution No. 2000-ROIOI
April 6, 2000
Item No. 26
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK
THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and
directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock, an Amendment No. Four (4)
to the May 22, 1997 Engineering Agreement, by and between the City of Lubbock and
Delta Airport Consultants, Inc, and related documents. Said agreement is attached hereto
and incorporated in this resolution as if fully set forth herein and shall be included in the
minutes of the City Council.
Passed by the City Council this 6th day of April 2000.
urrim.-.�
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
of Aviation
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William de Haas
Competition and Contracts Manager/Attorney
Ccdocs/dh/Delta Airport Consultants.res
March 8, 2000
Resolution No. 2000-R0'101
April 6, 2000
Item No. 26
AMENDMENT NO. FOUR (4)
TO THE
ENGINEERING AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS
the OWNER
AND
DELTA AIRPORT CONSULTANTS, INC.
the ENGINEER
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2000
DELTA PROJECT NO. TX 00103
TASK 4 - Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Training Facility (Design Phase)
4009
Resolution No. 2000 RO101
April 6, 2000
Item No. 26
AMENDMENT NO. FOUR (4)
TO THE ENGINEERING AGREEMENT
BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FEBRUARY 14, 2000
TASK 4 Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Training Facility (Design Phase)
This AMENDMENT NO. FOUR (4), dated February 14, 2000, is made a part of the Engineering
Agreement dated May 22, 1997, between the City of Lubbock, Texas, the OWNER, and Delta
Airport Consultants, Inc., the ENGINEER, for work at Lubbock International Airport, Lubbock,
Texas.
The following revisions and/or additions are made to the original Engineering Agreement:
ADD the following paragraphs to Article 6:
6.5 Task 4 - Preliminary Design Phase - It is understood that the ENGINEER will proceed with
Task 4 Preliminary Design Phase Services after a Notice -to -Proceed from the Owner. The schedule
for completion of the final review Phase I Preliminary Report is 60 days from the Notice -to -Proceed.
6.6 Task 4 - Final Design Phase - It is understood that the ENGINEER will proceed with Task
4 Final Design Phase Services after a Notice -to -Proceed from the Owner. The schedule for
completion of the final review design and contract documents is 180 days from the Notice -to -
Proceed.
ADD the following paragraphs to Article 7:
7.14 Task 4 - Preliminary Design Phase Services - Compensation for preliminary design phase
services be a lump sum fee of $36,430. The lump sum fee includes the items detailed under Phase
I - Preliminary Design, in the Work Program which is included with this agreement as Attachment
AMD 4-1. The lump sum fee does not include subcontracted services, final design, bidding phase
services, construction phase services, or direct reimbursables.
1
AMENDMENT NO. FOUR (4)
7.15 Task 4 - Preliminary Design Phase Reimbursables - Direct reimbursable expenses and
subcontracted design ground surveys, design geotechnical services, and preliminary facility design
will be compensated on a unit price plus fixed fee basis. Compensation for these services shall be
limited to an initial budget amount of $§1701 unless written authorization has been received from
the Owner. The budget amount is based upon an estimated cost of $55,300 and a fixed fee of $5,402.
7.16 Task 4 - Final Design Phase Services - Compensation for Final design phase services will be
a lump sum fee of $91,700. The lump sum fee includes the items detailed under Phase II - Final
Design, in the Work Program which is included with this agreement as Attachment AMD 4-1. The
lump sum fee does not include subcontracted services, construction phase services, or direct
reimbursables.
7.17 Task 4 - Final Design Phase Reimbursables - Direct reimbursable expenses and subcontracted
mechanical and architectural design will be compensated on a unit price plus fixed fee basis.
Compensation for these services shall be limited to an initial budget amount of $2 -Z,290 unless
written authorization has been received from the Owner. The budget amount is based upon an
estimated cost of $235,414 and a fixed fee of $21,876.
The following attachments are made part of this Amendment:
Attachment "AMD 4-1 ":
Attachment "AMD 4-2":
Attachment "AMD 4-3":
Work Program
Workhour & Fee Summaries
Subconsultant RFPs & Proposals
2
AMENDMENT NO. FOUR (4)
All other provisions of the original Agreement remain unchanged.
OWNER --
City of Lubbock
1625 13th Street, Suite L-04
Lubbock, Texas 79401
Windy Sitton
Mayor
Date: April 6, 2000
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
ENGINEER:
Delta Airport Consultants, Inc.
500 W. 7th Street, Suite 501
Ft. Worth, Texas 76102
Susan E. Winslow, P.E.
Vice President
Date:
x'
RICHARD A. ELLIS
Notary Public, State of Texas
Notary:
Nota
iy�'• :��5
My Commission Expires
J ;E+�r
I1111N,
November 05, 2003
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Director of Aviation 6ompetition and Contracts Manager
01034009.04 3
r f
i
ATTACHMENT "AMD 4-1"
WORK PROGRAM
Resolution No. 2000-R0101
April 6, 2000
Item No. 26
Resolution No. 2000-RO101
April 6, 2000
f Item No. 26
WORK PROGRAM
AIRCRAFT RESCUE AND FIREFIGHTING TRAINING FACH.ITY
LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
LUBBOCK,TEXAS
INTRODUCTION
Delta Airport Consultants proposes to provide the City of Lubbock with Phase I - Preliminary and
Phase II - Final Design and Bidding Phase services for a new Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting
Training Facility located at the Lubbock International Airport. Phase III - Construction Phase
Services will be negotiated once final design has progressed to a point where construction time
and testing requirements can been identified. Phase III services will be incorporated in this
contract with a uture amendment.
Understanding that this type of project involves several specialties, Delta has formed the following
specialized team:
Delta Airport Consultants will be the prime consultant responsible for overall
management of the project. Delta will complete site evaluations, site investigations,
identify permitting requirements and complete civil site design.
C112M-Hill is a national engineering firm with expertise in fire training facility design.
C112M-Hill will be responsible for investigating the fire training facility components, liner
types, delivery systems, and the control center.
Raba-Kistner is a regional geotechnical firm and will perform on -site geotechnical
investigation for the purpose of foundation design.
High -Tech is a surveying firm located in Lubbock and will complete ground topographic
and utility surveys for the project.
PHASE I - PRELIMINARY DESIGN
In general, two types of training facilities are available, fossil fuel based and propane based. Initial
indications are that a fossil fuel facility is desired from Lubbock. It is believed that a fossil fuel
system provides a more realistic training environment and is less costly to construct and operate
than propane training systems. To ensure that the fossil fuel system is appropriate, the initial task
of the preliminary engineering will be to investigate existing fossil fuel and propane systems to
determine:
TX00103C007.PRO
• Initial construction costs
• Operating costs
• Opinions of realistic training.
The final product of this initial effort will be a letter report highlighting and summarizing the data
collected.
Unless some significant information is discovered during the fossil f iel/propane investigation, it is
anticipated that a fossil fuel system will be developed. As such, the remainder of this Work
Program focuses on fossil fuel. Should the initial investigation redirect the project towards
propane, then a new Work Program will be developed.
To ensure that all issues are identified and addressed, a preliminary engineering report will be
developed for the new facility utilizing the guidance of FAA's Advisory Circular 150/5226-17A
"Design Standards for Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Training Facility" as well as the team's
experiences at other similar facilities. Specific elements and issues that will be addressed include:
• Design to FAR Part 139 ARFF Index C standards.
• Fuel storage and recovery
• Fuel piping systern(s) designed to deliver fuels in zones to simulate different types of
incidents (i.e. fuselage and wing engine fires, wheel well fires and fully involved).
• Line (hand) training capabilities
• Interior smoke/fire training capabilities
• EPA and other environmental requirements.
• Identification of local authority and zoning requirements.
• Proposed site investigation including FAR Part 77, TER.P's and future development
impacts
• Layout alternatives (up to three layouts will be developed).
• A long-term consideration for a support building with a classroom, rest rooms,
decontamination facility, shower(s) and small offices.
• A control center and observation area to observe the training exercises.
• Airside/landside access
• Drainage to isolate and trap fuels and AFFF agent
• Power and other utilities.
• Engineer's Opinions of Engineering and Construction Costs.
The final product will be a report that will present the information developed during the study
process . A preliminary outline of the report follows:
Introduction
• Background
• Project Purpose and Objectives
2 Tx00103C007.PRO
Chapter 1 - Site Layout Alternatives Analysis
• General Site Conditions
Site Utilities
Site Access
Site Drainage
• Site Location and Site Parameters
• Fire Pit and Ancillary Facilities
• Alternatives Development
• Alternatives Analysis
• Recommended Layouts
Chapter 2 - Fire Training Facility Components
• Fire Pit Liner
• Fire Zones
+ Mockup
• Fuel Systems
• Ignition System
Water Handling and Waste Treatment
• Mechanical Systems
• Electrical Systems
• Structural Systems
• Control Center
Chapter 3 - Permitting and Environmental Considerations
• City of Lubbock Permitting Requirements
Environmental
Construction
• State and Federal Permitting Requirements
• Best Management Practices
Chapter 4 - Conclusions and Recommendations
Appendices
A - Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs
B - Schematic Plans (11 x 17)
Cover sheet
General Project Layout
Site Layout and Nominal Dimensions
Mechanical Systems Layout (Schematic)
Electrical Systems Layout (Schematic)
Details (Cross section of fire training pit, liner, other misc. details).
C - Correspondence
3
TX00103C007.PRO
PHASE H -FINAL DESIGN
Final design services will be completed for the project based on the recommendations of the
Phase I Preliminary Engineering Report as approved by the City of Lubbock and FAA. In
general, design phase services will include:
1. Project initiation meeting (1); project status meetings (3); and agency coordination
meetings (3) are anticipated with Airport Staff, FAA, permitting and other agencies.
These meetings are anticipated throughout the project.
2. Planning, procuring and preparing necessary field investigations for:
a Ground surveys which will be provided by High -Tech.
b. Geotechnical investigations for foundation design (pavement and building),
which will be provided by Raba-Kistner Consultants
3. Final design of the facility including design of the site, utilities, trainer, fuel delivery
systems, control systems and all other requirements for a complete training facility.
4. Preparation of a Final Design Report summarizing the design processes. The report
will also identify any deviations from FAA standards.
5. Bidding Phase services.
A more detailed listing of anticipated final plan sheets and design items are provided in the Work
Hours and Fee Schedules.
4 TX00103C007.PRo
Resolution No. 2000-RO101
April 6, 2000
Item No. 26
ATTACHMENT "A" 4-2"
WURKHUUR & FEE SUMMARIES
r ATTACHMENT "AMD 4 -1"
Estimated Workhours - Article 7.14
Task 4 - ARFF Training Facility - Preliminary Design Phase Services
Lubbock International Airport
Lubbock, Texas
AIP Project No. 3-48-0138-pending
Delta Project No. TX 00103
Date: February 14, 2000
SR PM
PM
PE
TECH
CLER
Description
No.
(hr)
(hr)
(hr)
(hr)
(hr)
Scoping Meeting
1
12
12
0
2
0
Data Collection/Review
2
8
20
0
0
Propane vs. Fossil Fuel Evaluation
4
8
16
0
4
Site Selection Analysis
4
8
24
32
0
Alternatives Analysis
8
16
24
0
4
Fire Training Facility Components (CH2MHill)
0
0
0
0
0
Permit and Environmental Requirements
0
8
12
0
0
Architectural Considerations
0
0
8
0
0
Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost
4
8
24
0
0
Schematic Layouts
3
4
8
24
40
0
Preliminary Design Report
8
24
16
12
12
Subconsultant Coordination
2
8
0
0
0
Coordination Meetings/Site Visits
1
4
16
12
0
2
Other Facility Visits
2
0
24
0
0
0
Manhours Subtotal:
52
148
180
86
22
FILE: 0103FE01.WK4
ATTACHMENT "AMD 4 -1"
' Summary of Fees - Articles 7.14 & 7.15
Task 4 - ARFF Training Facility - Preliminary Design Phase Services
Lubbock international Airport
Lubbock, Texas
AIP Project No. 3-48-0138-pending
Delta Project No. TX 00103
Date: February 14, 2000
Description
Est
hrs
rate
Est
Cost
Fired
Fee Totals
1) Work Hour Cost (w/Overhead)
Senior Project Manager
52
$107
5,564
835
Project Manager
148
$81
11,988
1,798
Project Engineer
180
$54
9,720
1,458
Technician
86
$41
3,526
529
Clerical
22
$40
880
132
Subtotal: 488 31,678 $4,752 $36,430
15%
Article 7.14 Lump Sum Fee: $36,430
1) Direct Nonsalary Expenses
Travel to LBB, meals, misc.
3,500
525
Travel to other facilities
3,000
450
Printing
1,000
150
7,500
$1,125 $8,625
15%
2) Subconsultant Services
Design Ground Surveys (High Tech) DBE
16,790
1,679
Design Geotechnical (Raba-Klstner) DBE
8,400
840
Prel. Fire Training Facility Components (CH2M-Hitt)
17,583
1,758
42,773
$4,277 $47,050
10%
3) Estimate Cost & Fixed Fee
4) Cost Allowance
10%
$50,273 $5,402 $55,675
$5,027 $0 $5,027
TOTALS $55,300 $5,402 $60,702
Article 7.15 Budget Amount: $60,702
FILE: 0103FE01.WK4
ATTACHMENT"AMD4-1"
Estimated Workhours -Article 7.16
Task 4 - ARFF Training Facil'dy - Design Phase Services
Lubbock International Airport
Lubbock, Texas
A1P Project No. 3AEWI38-pending
Delta Project No. TX 00103
Date: February 14, 2000
Description
No
SR PM
(hr)
PM PE
(bur) (hr)
TECH CLER
(brr) (br)
PLANS
Cover Sheet
1
0
1 4
8 0
Quantity Sheet
1
0
2 4
12 2
General Layout & Notes
2
4
8 24
40 4
Phasing Layout & Notes
1
2
4 20
32 4
Geometric Layer
1
2
8 16
40 0
Grading & Drainage
2
8
24 40
72 0
Erosion & Sediment Control Notes and Details
2
0
4 8
24 2
Pavement Details & Typical Sections
1
2
8 12
24 0
Site Electrical Layout
1
4
4 8
24 0
Site Electrical Details
1
0
4 8
24 0
Drainage & Utility Details
2
0
8 16
24 0
Drainage & Utility Profiles
1
0
2 4
20 0
Miscellaneous Details
1
0
2 4
16 0
Cross Sections
2
0
2 4
24 0
Bum Pit Plan
1
by CH2M Hill
Bum Pit Liner Plan and Sections
1
by CH2M Hill
Burn Pit Concrete Pad Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Bum Pit Outlet Weir Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Bum Pit Mechanical Details
2
by CH2M Hill
Bum Pit Fuel Piping, Natural Gas Piping & Elec. Plan
1
by CH2M Hill
Bum Pit Fuel Piping and Nat. Gas Piping Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Ignitor Details
1
by CH2M HUI
Bum Pit Zone Fire Piping and Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Spot Fire Piping and Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Aircraft Mockup Structural Plan
1
by CH2M Hill
Aircraft Mockup Structural Sections & Details
5
by CH2M Hill
Wheel Plan, Sections and Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Process Area Mechanical Plan
1
by CH2M Hill
Fuel Containment Mechanical Plan & Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Fuel Distribution & Header Plan & Details
2
by CH2M HUI
Water Recycling Tank Mech. Plan & Details
2
by CH2M Hill
Process Yard Piping Plan
1
by CH2M Hill
Wastewater Recycling Tank Structural Plan
1
by CH2M Hill
Wastewater Recycling Tank Sections & Details
2
by CH2M Hill
Process Area Structural Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Fuel Containment Structural tural Plan & Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Fuel Distribution Structural Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Miscellaneous Structural Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Process & Instrumentation Legend
2
by CH2M Hill
Process & Instrumentation Diagram
2
by CH2M Hill
Electrical Power One -Line Diagram & Elevation
1
by CH2M Hill
Process Yard Electrical Plan
1
by CH2M HUI
Process Area Electrical Plan
1
by CH2M HUI
Fuel Containment Electrical Plan & Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Fuel Distribution Header Elec. Plan & Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Water Recycling Tank Electrical Plan & Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Control Building Electrical Plan & Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Fire System I&C Panel Plan & Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Electrical Motor Control Diagrams & Details
2
by CH2M Hill
Electrical Details
3
by CH2M Hill
FILE: 0103FE01.WK4
•ATTACHMENT "AMD 4 -1"
Estimated Workhours -Article 7.16 (conl)
Task 4 - ARFF Training Facility - Design Phase Services
Lubbock International Airport
Lubbock, Te)ms
AIP Project No. 3-48-0138-pending
Delta Project No. TX 00103
Date: February 14, 2000
SR PM PM PE TECH CLER
PLANS (contlnued)
General Notes / Material Designations
1
by CH2M Hill
First Floor Plans Schedules
1
by CH2M Hilt
Roof Plans Control Tower
1
by CH2M HUI
Reflected Ceiling Plans Misc. Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Building Elevations
1
by CH2M Hill
Building Sections / Section Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Miscellaneous Details
1
by CH2M Hilt
Electrical Schedules
1
by CH2M Hill
Electrical Lighting Floor Plans
1
by CH2M Hill
Electrical Power Floor Plans
1
by CH2M Hill
Mechanical Legend & Notes
1
by CH2M Hill
Mechanical HVAC Floor Plans & Details
1
by CH2M Hill
Plumbing Legend. Schedule & Notes
1
by CH2M Hill
Plumbing Floor and Roof Plan
1
by CH2M Hill
Plumbing Riser Diagrams
1
by CH2M Hill
Structural General Notes & Specifications
1
by CH2M Hill
Structural Legends, Foundation & Fram. Plans
1
by CH2M Hill
Structural Sections & Details
2
by CH2M Hill
87
DESIGN
Predesign Meeting
1
12 12
0
0
4
Design Correspondence
6 8
12
0
12
Grading Design
2 8
24
8
0
Pavement Design
2 4
8
0
0
Site Electrical Design
2 6
12
0
0
Drainage & Utility Design
2 12
24
0
0
Subconsultant Coordination
2 8
12
0
8
Site Visits
1
12 12
12
0
0
Quantities & Estimates
2 8
20
4
0
Specifications
2 16
8
0
16
Final Design Report
2 16
8
8
12
Quality Control Review
8 8
0
0
0
BIDDING PHASE SERVICES
Bid Prep. Advertisement, and DWrlo.
2 8
12
8
20
Pre -Bid Meeting
1
0 16
8
0
4
Bidders Questions & Addendum
4 20
8
4
16
Bid Opening
1
0 12
0
0
0
Bid Tabulation & Recom.
_ 2 8
__ 16
0
8
130a Basic Service Hours Subtotal: 84 263 356 416 112
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
City Coordination
FAA Coordination
SWP3 Construction Plan
FAA Pay Request/Budget Summary
Coordinate Contract Award
Project Application
Delta AddRionai Service Hours Subtotal:
4
8
8
0 4
2
4
0
0 2
4
8
24
0 4
4
12
20
0 8
0
0
8
4
4
8
0 4
0 4
14 44 64 0 26
FILE: 0103FE01.WK4
ATTACHMENT "AMD 4 -1"
• Summary of Fees - Articles 7.16 & 7.17
Task 4 - ARFF Training Facility - Design Phase Services
Lubbock International Airport
Lubbock, Texas
AIP Project No. 3-48-0138-pending
Delta Project No. TX 00103
Date: February 14, 2000
Description
Est
hrs
rate
Est
Cost
Fixed
Fee Totals
1) Work Hour Cost (w/Overhead)
a) Basic Services
Senior Project Manager
84
$107
8,988
1,348
Project Manager
263
$81
21,303
3,195
Project Engineer
356
$54
19.224
2,884
Technician
416
$41
17,056
2,558
Clerical
112
$40
4,480
672
Subtotal:
1231
71,051
$10,657 $81,708
15%
b) Additional Services
Senior Project Manager
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Technician
Clerical
Subtotal:
2) Direct Nonsalary Exoenses
Travel, Meals, Misc.
Printing (incl. bidding)
Bid Advertisement
14
$107
1,498
225
44
$81
3,564
535
64
$54
3,456
518
0
$41
0
0
26
$40
1-040
156
148
9,558
$1,434 $10,992
15%
Article 7.16 Lump Sum Fee: $92,700
3) Subconsultant Services
Mechanical & Architectural Design (CH2M Hal)
4) Estimate Cost 8. Fixed Fee
5) Cost Allowance 10%
3,500
525
6,000
900
by Owner
0
$9,500
$1,425 $10,925
15%
204,513
20,451
204,513
$20,451 $224,964
10%
$214,013 $21,876 $235,889
TOTALS $235,414 $21.876 $257,290
Article 7.17 Budget Amount: $257,290
FILE: 0103FE01.WK4
Resolution No. 2000-RO101
April 6, 2000
Item No. 26
ATTACHMENT "AMID 4-3"
SUBCONSULTANT RFPs & PROPOSALS
ACRE- .JRT CONSUB rAmrs, imc.
engineers - planners
Charlotte, NC Fort Worth, TX Harrisburg, PA Richmond, VA
January 5, 2000
Miss Melissa Watkins
High -Tech Land and GPS Surveys, Inc.
3330 70th Street
Lubbock, Texas 79413
RE: Ground Surveys
ARFF Training Facility
Lubbock International Airport
Lubbock, Texas
AIP Project No. 3-48-0138-pending
Delta Project No. TX 00103
Dear Ms. Watkins:
Delta Airport Consultants, Inc. is preparing a contract for the design of an Aircraft Rescue and
Firefighting (ARFF) Training Facility at Lubbock International Airport in Lubbock, Texas. The
proposed project site is shown on the enclosed sketch. We are requesting that your firm provide
a cost proposal for the following ground survey services.
SCOPE:
1. A marked layout of the airport is enclosed. It is requested that design surveys be based
upon the project limits marked in red.
2. Vertical control shall be based on U.S. Coastal and Geodetic Datum. Spot elevations shall
be given to f 0.01 feet for paved sections and t0.1 feet for turfed sections.
3. Establish a Baseline "R1" along the centerline of Runway 8-26. The baseline shall be set
with its intersection with Runway 17R-35L centerline being Station 10+00. Baseline "R1"
shall extend eastward from 10+00, to the visible end of pavement of the runway
(approximate Station 89+25). Locations of all permanent items within the project limits
shall be provided by station and offset to Baseline "R 1" (horizontal control f 0.5 `).
4. Survey the entire area outlined in red for topographic and planimetric information, .as well
as all existing utilities (underground and above). All information shall be referenced off
Baseline "R1" station and offset. Locations of all drainage structures shall be given with top
elevations, inverts, inside pipe diameters, pipe and manhole construction materials, etc.
Any drainage or outfall lines existing within the project limits shall be traced to the next
junction point outside the project limits. All utilities, lights, etc. shall be given with
elevation at base of utility.
CELEBRATING AVIATION EXCELLENCE SINCE 1978
500 West Seventh Street, Suite 501 Telephone (817) 348-8301
Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Fax (817) 348-8304
Homepage: http://www.deltaairport.com E-mail: delta@deltaairport.com
Miss Melissa Watkins
January 5, 2000
Page 2
5. Set a permanent concrete benchmark with brass disk at the following locations:
Benchmark ( #7 ) Sta 60+00.00, 2,000.00' Right BL "R1"
Benchmark ( #8 ) Sta 70+00.00, 1,050.00' Right BL "R1"
Benchmark ( #9 ) Sta 70+00.00, 2,000.00' Right BL "R1"
These benchmarks will be used to establish a construction baseline, therefore they shall be
placed to the accuracy noted (0.01' accuracy). Please advise our office if, based on your site
investigation, you find that there are conflicts with placing benchmarks at these locations.
6. Provide a map in ACAD showing all features located within the project limits, including 1-
foot contours, spot elevations, planimetric features, utilities, and other items requested in
tasks 3 and 4 above. All information shall be referenced off Baseline "R1".
7. A complete -set of reduced and checked field notes or raw data file in hard copy should be
provided at the completion of the work.
8. Provide AutoCAD drawing files (Release 14) of all features located within the project limits
including all spot elevations. It is requested that three (3) files be submitted for our use
containing the following information:
File 1 - AutoCAD.DWG - Planimetrics only file
File 2 - AutoCAD.DWG - Contours only file
File 3 - AutoCAD.DWG - Planimetrics and contours file
All spots shall be on a separate layer and be attributed nodes, with attributes for coordinates,
elevation, and point description. All contours shall be polylines set to their contour
elevation. Intermediate and index contours shall be on separate layers (5-foot index
contours). All files shall be oriented with stationing increasing from west to east and south
to north.
All text.. in the drawing files shall be standard (simplex font), sized to match "Leroy"
standard templates (80, 100,120, etc.). All AutoCAD drawing files shall be organized in
accordance with the attached layer listing. Drawing entities shall have color and linetype
set "BYLAYER". If any additional layers are needed or if your software generates its own
layer names to organize the drawing, provide a layer list with a description of the items on
each layer, layer colors, and linetypes associated with each layer. If any non-standard
linetypes or symbols are used in the drawing, a copy of the necessary source code required
to load and edit the drawing must be submitted.
Miss Melissa Watkins
January 5, 2000
Page 3
9. Provide an ASCII text point file, comma delimited in the format: point number, northing,
easting, elevation, description (P,N,E,Z,D). A points file corresponding to Texas State
Grid Coordinates and the same file translated to Baseline "Rl" station and offset coordinates
is desired.
10. All computer files (drawing files and ASCII points files) shall be submitted on 3.5" high
density diskettes or CD.
11. Include five (5) days of additional time for a survey crew and associated office work in your
proposal for additional work to be identified at a later date.
GENERAL
12. If accepted, your proposal shall serve as a basis for a not -to -exceed contract directly with
Delta Airport Consultants, Inc. The proposal should include a fee schedule, estimated
workhours, and anticipated non -salary cost. A copy of Delta's subconsultant contract has
been attached for your review.
13. As soon as your services are complete, your firm should invoice Delta Airport Consultants,
Inc. All invoices shall be received by Delta by the 25th of each month. Your invoice will
then be included with the next Delta invoice. Payment for your services will be forwarded
within fourteen (14) days upon receipt of payment from the Owner.
14. Sine this project is funded by the Federal Government, please confirm that your firm is in
compliance with the attached Title VI Assurances.
15. Companies whose employees perform work on the airport shall have General Liability
Insurance with a minimum coverage of $3,000,000.
16. All crews working in the active aircraft operational areas shall have aviation band radios and
coordinate directly with the air traffic control tower (ATCT) ground control frequency
(121.9 M) at all times work is being completed on the active airfield. All activities on the
airfield shall be coordinated with the Owner and the Engineer. It is anticipated that required
work within the runway safety areas will be accomplished without closing the runways. The
work crews shall be prepared to clear the runway and taxiway safety areas during aircraft
operations.
17. If your firm is a disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE), provide a copy(s) of current
certification by a State or Federal agency(s), preferably where the project is located.
Miss Melissa Watkins
January 5, 2000
Page 4
Delta is requesting your proposal on or before January 19, 1999. It is anticipated that a notice -to -
proceed for your work will be given during March 2000. Upon receipt of the notice -to -proceed,
it is requested that all deliverables be forwarded to our office within thirty (30) days.
If you should have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Sincerely,
Susan E. Winslow, P.E.
SEW:hmm
Enclosure
cc: John McGinley, Deputy Director for Operations and Safety w/encl
John Longnaker, Delta - Richmond w/encl
0103002.doc
LAYER LIST
0 (zero)
Blank
BLDG
Buildings on Airport property
BLDGOUT
Buildings off Airport property
DRAINAGE
Drop inlets, manholes, end sections, etc.
EP
Edge of pavement for runways, taxiways, aprons, etc.
FENCE
Fences (do not break line for "X")
GRAIL.
Guardrails and other barriers
GRID
Reference grid
HBLDG
Hatch for buildings on Airport property
HBLDGOUT
Hatch for buildings off Airport property
HWATER
Hatch for water areas
INDEX
Index contours
INTER
Intermediate contours
LPOLE
Light poles
MARK
Any painted markings
NAVAIDS
Navigation aids
PL
Airport property line
PPOLE
Power poles
RDSIGNS
Road signs
ROADS
Paved roads and driveways
RR
Railroad
RWLTS
Runway and taxiway lights and airfield signs
SIDEWLK
Sidewalks
SPOT
Ground elevations
TXTCON'T
Text for contours (insertion point of MC - middle center)
TXTELEV
Text for ground. spots
TXTMISC
Descriptive test, i.e., Dense foliage, wall, etc.
TPOLE
Telephone poles
TREE
Individual trees and treelines (use continuous line, not arcs)
UROAD
Unpaved roads, gravel, dirt
WALL
Walls
WATER
Streams, rivers, ponds, lakes, etc.
0103c002.doc
I
MALSR
,L I
J
RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE
(1,000 x 1.750 x 2,500)
GLIDE SLOPE
I i
I
I
I
I
I
ANTENNA
I
I
I
I
I
I
TIN K�
Y
ui
I
}I
I
} z
INI
I
I
I
I
I
fOpl�l
AY PROTECTION ZONE
x 450' x 1.000') I
INI
1 3
z
IIr
i
TRAFFIC
1TROL TOWER
25
I
50'
PART 77 APPROACH SURFACE
(1,000 x 16,000 x 50.000)
50:1 PRECISION APPROACH
CITY OF WEISOCK
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
• w w �xA�.�
►prox .51a • 1
:•raa, Rrtz App�ooX. Rr
07 � ■■
O PEACH
N. ASPEN
ARFF
TRAINING
p,u' oe� 1,• • ^
�
0
AREA
nO
� '
N
c O
N. TULSA
rt
W
ARFF
N. WALNUT
=
a
o
O
AIRPORT
MAINTENANCE
Q
w
■
n
RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE
(250' x 450' x 1,000')
Q
now
_
RUNWAYSAETYA
RUNWAY 77L - 35R 5
i
i
PART 77 AF
(250' x 1,2`
)n• t VICI IAI
DELTA AIRPORT CONSULTANTS, INC.
500 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 501
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102
RE: LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
GROUND SURVEYS/ARFF TRAINING FACILITY
AIP PROJECT NO. 3-48-0138-pending
DELTA PROJECT NO. TX 00103
ATTN: SUSAN E. WINSLOW, P.E.
Dear Ms. Winslow,
Resolution No. 2000—RO101
April 6, 2000
Item No. 26
JANUARY 12, 2000
RECEIVED
JAN 19 2000
DELTA AIRPORT
CONSULTANTS-DFW
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this proposal to Delta Airport Consultants, Inc. for the
surveying services for the design of an Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Training Facility
at the Lubbock International Airport in Lubbock, Texas. Our proposed estimated fee for this project
is $16,790.00 as per your general scope of services dated January 5, 2000. All billing will be as per
our attached rate schedule according to actual time spent. Please note our invoicing has a term of
net 30 days.
The following is our estimated workhours for this project:
3-Man Field Party 135 Hours
Mileage 1,000 Miles
Office 56 Hours
R.P.L.S.
Monuments
16 Hours
3 Monuments
We anticipate starting this survey within four (4) weeks of when written notice to proceed is
received.
It is a pleasure to provide this proposal to Delta Airport Consultants, Inc. and if any further
information is needed or if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at the phone
number and address below.
Respectfully Submitted,
f Melissa K. Watkins, B.B.A.
IPresident
TxDOT Certified Woman -Owned DBE
State of Texas Certified Historically Underutilized Business
HIGH-TECH LAND & GPS SURVEYORS, INC.
3330 70th St, Suite 202 • Lubbock, Texas 79413
(806)788-0020 • Fax (806) 792-1646
DELTA AIRPORT CONSULTANTS, INC. JANUARY 12, 2000
500 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 501
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102
ATTN: SUSAN E. WINSLOW, P.E.
Dear Ms. Winslow,
We propose to furnish surveying parties, as listed below, equipped with all the necessary surveying
equipment and transportation at the following rates:
Two (2) Man Field Party @ $ 80.00 Per Hour
Three (3) Man Field Party @ $ 90.00 Per Hour
Four (4) Man Field Party @ $ 100.00 Per Hour
G.P.S. Trimble 4000 S.S.E. & S.S.i. @ $ 200.00 Per Day
Satellite Surveyor
We propose to furnish office work, including all machines and materials at the following
rates:
Drafting
@
$
40.00 Per Hour
Computations
@
$
45.00 Per Hour
Secretarial
@
$
20.00 Per Hour
R.P.L.S.
@
$
70.00 Per Hour
Lathes
@
$
0.50 Each
Stakes
@
$
0.50 Each
Mileage
@
$
0.40 Per Mile
Monuments
@
$
200.00 Each
Travel expenses for when the crew must spend the night away from home will be as
follows:
Lodging @ $ Actual Cost
Meals @ $ Actual Cost
We understand that Delta Airport Consultants, Inc. and High -Tech Land and GPS Surveyors, Inc.
will mutually determine the size party required and the office services desired.
Respectfully submitted,
Melissa K. Watkins, B.B.A.
President
TxDOT Certified Woman -Owned DBE
State of Texas Certified Historically Underutilized Business
HIGH-TECH LAND & GPS SURVEYORS, INC.
3330 70th St., Suite 202 • Lubbock, Texas 79413
(806) 788-W20 • Fax (806) 792-1646
Texas Department of Transportation
DEWITT G. GREER STATE HIGHWAY BLDG, • M.E. 11TH STREET • AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701-2483 • (512) 463-8585
June 1, 1999
Ray Mason
(512) 703-5841
VN: 4329
Ms. Melissa K. Watkins, President
High -Tech Land & GPS Surveyors, Inc.
3330 70th Street, Ste 202
Lubbock, TX 79413
Dear Ms. Watkins:
This refers to the renewal application that 'you . submitted for this Department's Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise (DBE) Program. Your firm is now approved as a DBE through June 2002 to
bid on all Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) contracts in the following work function(s):
Professional Services: Surveying
TxDOTs certification allows you the opportunity to bid on federally -assisted contracts as a DBE.
Your firm will be included in this Department's next DBE Directory which is listed on TxDOTs
INTERNET web page located at www.dot.stateAx.us.
We will contact you with instructions for recertification before your expiration date. If we can be
of further assistance regarding the DBE Program, please feel free to contact Jerry Jackson at the
telephone number listed above.
rjm
Sincerely,
R. D. Brown, Manager
Certification and Audit Branch
Business Opportunity Programs Section
An Equal Opportunity Employer
State, of Texas
Historically Underutilized Business Certification Program
The General Services Commission hereby certifies that as of September 24,1998
HIGH-TECH LAND & GPS SURVEYORS INC
has successfully met the requirements as established by
the State of Texas as a MinorityfWoman Owned Business
Certiticate/VID Number: 1752457312200
Expiration Date: September 18, 2000
w x
♦ .�,.� Robert L. Hall, Program Manager
General Services Commission
512-463-5872
(This certificate is VOID upon extension of certification, determination of ineligibility, transfer of ownership, business closure, etc.)
4 printed on racycted paper
r
AIR13PO 4T CONSULTANTS, INC.
engineers - planners
Charlotte, NC Fort Worth, TX Harrisburg, PA Richmond, VA
January 4, 2000
Gerardo A. Licon, P.E.
Raba-Kistner Consultants (SW), Inc.
7002 Commerce
El Paso, Texas 79915
Dear Mr. Licon:
RE: Subsurface Investigation
ARFF Training Facility
Lubbock International Airport
Lubbock, Texas
AIP Project No. 3-48-0138-pending
Delta Project No. TX 00103
Delta Airport Consultants, Inc. is preparing a contract for the design of an Aircraft Rescue and
Firefighting (ARFF) Training Facility at Lubbock International Airport in Lubbock, Texas. The
proposed project site is shown on the enclosed sketch. We are requesting that your firm provide
a cost proposal for the following geotechnical services.
1. Twelve (12) borings shall be taken in the proposed training facility area. The boring
locations may be adjusted in the field as required to avoid existing utilities, structures, etc.,
and as recommended by the on -site geotechnical engineer. The approximate locations for
borings 13-1 through B-10 are shown on the attached sketch. Borings B-11 and 13-12 shall
be placed in the surrounding work area at the discretion of the geotechnical engineer, if
warranted. All borings shall be taken to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet. Deeper borings
shall be taken if warranted by the on -site geotechnical engineer.
For all borings, classification and depth of each soil group by the Unified Classification
System (visual method) shall be recorded. The approximate depth of water table should be
reported. If it appears to be below ten feet, then at least one boring shall be taken to the
necessary depth beyond ten feet to determine the water table.
Liquid limit, plastic limit, in -place moisture content, and sieve analysis of the existing soil
materials shall be obtained in accordance with normal procedure as necessary to determine
suitability for structural fill. The bearing capacity or correlation between blow count and
bearing capacity should be reported, as this project will include construction of a small
building. Bag samples shall be obtained as necessary to run laboratory CBR's at optimum
moisture and standard proctor for each soil type. The material shall be analyzed for
suitability as borrow and for ease of excavation.
CELEBRATING AVIATION EXCELLENCE SINCE 1978
500 West Seventh Street, Suite 501 Telephone (817) 348-8301
Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Fax (817) 348-8304
Homepage: http://www.deltaairport.com E-mail: delta@deltaairport.com
Gerardo A. Licon, P.E.
January 4, 2000
Page 2
The depth of existing topsoil should be reported. Samples of the existing topsoil and subsoil
shall be obtained and a basic soil fertility test completed on each. One (1) composite sample
may represent up to fifteen (15) acres of the same type of ground cover (i.e., forest,
pasture, etc.). The composite sample shall include a small sample from each acre.
2. The geotechnical report should include all test data, recommendations concerning the
quantity and quality of rock (if any), the suitability of the soil material for the embankment,
description/recommendations on the condition of the existing pavement structure, design
CBR recommendations, equivalency factors for existing pavements versus new pavements,
as well as any other pertinent recommendations. The report should be sealed by a registered
professional engineer in the state of Texas.
3. Standard sieve analysis with the FAA's normal screens shall be run on bag samples of any
the existing_ base and/or subbase stone material encountered in the borings. Bag samples
shall be obtained to run soaked laboratory CBR's at optimum moisture and
standard/modified proctor compaction for the base, subbase, and subgrade materials, if
encountered.
4. All borings shall be refilled and firmly compacted at the completion of the field work each
day. The field crew shall not leave the site until all borings have been checked to assure
satisfactory backfill and no settlement.
5. All boring locations shall be clearly marked with a stake which shall bear the appropriate
boring number. These stakes will be used by our surveyor in order to survey each boring
location. However, your report should include general location data for each boring (i.e.
rough location from fence or other permanent fixture).
GENERAL
6. It should be noted that directly adjacent to the proposed project site is an old bum pit. This
abandoned bum pit is currently being surveyed and monitored by the Owner for
environmental compliance issues. Your scope of work does not include an environmental
evaluation of this area of the site.
7. If accepted, your proposal shall serve as a basis for a not -to -exceed contract directly with
Delta Airport Consultants, Inc. The proposal should include a fee schedule, estimated
workhours, and anticipated non -salary cost. A copy of Delta's subconsultant contract has
been attached for your review.
Gerardo A. Licon, P.E.
January 4, 2000
Page 3
8. As soon as your services are complete, your firm should invoice Delta Airport Consultants,
Inc. Your invoice will then be included with the next Delta invoice. Payment for your
services will be forwarded within fourteen (14) days upon receipt of payment from the
Owner.
9. Since this project is funded by the Federal Government, please confirm that your firm is in
compliance with the attached Title VI Assurances.
10. Companies whose employees perform work on the airport shall have General Liability
Insurance with a minimum coverage of $3,000,000.
11. All crews working in the active aircraft operational areas shall have aviation band radios and
coordinate directly with the air traffic control tower (ATCT) ground control frequency
(121.9 M) at all times work is being completed on the active airfield. All activities on the
airfield shall be coordinated with the Owner and the Engineer.
12. Sine your firm is a disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE), provide a copy(s) of current
certification by a State or Federal agency(s), preferably where the project is located.
Delta is requesting your proposal on or before January 19, 2000. It is anticipated that a notice -to -
proceed for your work will be given during March 2000. Upon receipt of the notice -to -proceed,
it is requested that the final geotechnical report be forwarded to our office within thirty (30) days.
If you should have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Sincerely,
d4ffa, 6-ANXV&�--
Susan'E. Winslow, P.E.
Enclosure
cc: John McGinley, Deputy Director for Operations and Safety w/encl
John Longnaker, Delta - Richmond w/encl
0103c001.doc
II
PART 77 APPROACH SURFACE
(1,000 x 16.000 x 50.000)
50:1 PRECISION APPROACH
■
tWINl�-
TRAINING
AREA
way
e�
• - N. ASPEN
Resolution No. 2000=R0101
t.
O O N. TULSA
il'BueA
AWN 1 Nfr
low
N. WALNUT
s AIRPORT
MAINTENANCE
CITY OF LUBBOCK
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ni
I
■
0
■■■
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA
RUNWAY 17L _35R 2869 x 75
1.
I
I
i
I
I
TW *P
L,LjI
I
I
I
I
I�
1
I
I
1
IxI
o
I
I
I
I
-o
I-
O
I
I00
I
I
I
N
�
I
I
I
I
a
Z
I
�
m
I
1
I
I
��
---I
I
Trim
I
LL
U
0
W
Z
N. ASPEN
oIm 01 B3O O B4' N. iULSA
• OK
IF`-
1,67 *� 010 qh
N. WALNUT
• AIRPORT
MAINTENANCE
III
m
m
0.
I
A
MEN ip/"OUVO.
®® M o0�03
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA
— — — — QiINweY i7l _ 3.5R 2869 x 75#3
i
■
a
Resolution No. 2000-Roioi
Engineers, Geologists, Hygienists and Environmental Scientists
Proposal No: PEAOO-012-00
January 14, 2000
Delta Airport Consultants, Inc.
500 West Seventh Street
Suite 501
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
Attn.: Ms. Susan E. Winslow, P.E
Dear Ms. Winslow:
Raba
WsWer
Raba-Kistner Consultants (SW), Inc.
7002 Commerce, El Paso, TX 79915
(915)778-5233 • FAX (915)779-8301
e-mail:rkcisw 0 aol.com
www.rkci.com
RECEIVED
JAN 2 1 2000
DELTA AIRPORT
CONSULTANTS-DFW
Proposal for a Soil and Foundation Study
ARFF Training Facility All? 3-48-0138
Lubbock International Airport
Lubbock. Texas El Paso, El Paso County, Texas
Thank you for selecting Raba-Kistner to provide geotechnical engineering services to
Delta Airport Consultants, (Client) on this important public facility. The broad objectives of
our study will be to determine soil conditions at the site and to develop information to
guide design and construction of safe and economical foundations for the structure and
pavements associated with this development. Described in this letter are the following
items:
• our understanding of pertinent project characteristics
• our proposed scope for field and laboratory study
• our proposed scope for engineering evaluation and reporting
• our tentative project schedule
• our estimated study fee
• special conditions relative to our services
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The new facility to be considered in this study will be constructed on a tract of land located
north of Independence Street, south of Taxiway J and adjacent to the existing/abandoned
training facility. Facilities proposed include a single story structure and either rehabilitation
or replacement of existing pavement. The new structure is expected to create relatively
light loads to be carried by the foundation systems. Floor systems consisting of slabs on
fill or at grade are expected to be preferred, provided soil -related potential vertical
movements will not cause structural performance problems. Pavements for both light and
Page 1 of 4
Raba
Kistner
6 [ S C E
Austin • Brownsville • El Paso 9 Laredo • Las Cruces, NM • McAllen 9 Mexico • San Antonio 9 6 8
Proposal No: PEA00-012-00
Delta Airport Consultants, Inc.
January 25, 2000
heavy duty traffic conditions are associated with this development.
FIELD STUDY
To explore soil conditions at the site, we have been requested to drill a total of 12 borings
throughout the proposed facility area. Borings will extend to a maximum depth of 10 feet
each, below existing surface elevation. Samples will be taken using conventional Shelby
tube and/or split -spoon sampling techniques. Representative portions of all samples
obtained will be sealed and packaged for transportation to our laboratory. An evaluation
of the current condition of pavement structures will be made.
LABORATORY STUDY
Upon completion of the field subsurface exploration, a testing program will be developed
to define the strength, classification and expansion characteristics of the foundation soils.
The testing program will include grain size analysis, natural moisture content, and
Atterberg limits {plasticity) tests, and other tests at the direction of the geotechnical
engineer.
In addition to the above described testing program, up to two representative specimens to
be obtained from the pavement areas will be subjected to California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
testing. The CBR testing will provide information regarding inundated strength and swell
characteristics of the surficial subgrade soils for direct use in pavement design analyses.
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND REPORT
The results of the field and laboratory phases of the study will be analyzed by our staff of
engineers and geologists. The results of these analyses, together with the supporting field
and laboratory data, will be presented in a written engineering report. Included therein will
be specific recommendations to guide foundation design and construction. Estimates of
the swell potential of the near surface soils will also be provided.
The evaluation of the current condition of pavement structures will be documented by
photographs and discussed in the report text.
Also included in the report will be general guidelines for construction of pavements for the
project. These guidelines will be based on the results of CBR and classification testing
completed on specimens from the pavement areas and on our experience with similar
soils. Final site grading plans and definitive projections of anticipated traffic loadings and
frequencies and required pavement design life will be critical information required from the
Client in the completion of comprehensive pavement design calculations. The final report
will be reproduced in five spirally bound copies.
Page 2 of 4
Raba-Kistner
Proposal No: PEA00-012-00
Delta Airport Consultants, Inc.
January 25, 2000
ESTIMATED FEE
We estimate that the total fee for the study scope outlined herein will be a lump sum fee of
$8,400.00, plus tax where applicable. Should unusual soil conditions be encountered in
the field that indicate the desirability of significantly broadening the scope of the study, we
will contact you before proceeding with any additional services. Our fee estimate is not
applicable after March 30, 2000, and does not include costs incurred to provide access to
sites which are inaccessible to our truck mounted drill rigs and support vehicles. It also
does not include costs incurred due to delays caused by inclement weather.
The cost of reproducing the standard five copies of the final report is included in the fee
estimate given above. Additional report copies requested after transmittal of the first five
copies will be beyond the scope covered by the fee estimate above and will be charged at
the additional rate of $50.00 per copy.
It should be noted that our study scope (and estimated fee) does not include plan review
or earthwork and foundation excavation observations during the construction of the
project. However, plan review and construction observation costs should be included in
the project budget.
SCHEDULE
We understand from the Client that notice to proceed will be issued in March 2000. We
look forward to beginning services at that time. Although our project backlog for March
has not been fully defined, we anticipate completing the final report within the required
thirty days.
ACCEPTANCE
We appreciate the opportunity of submitting this proposal and look forward to working with
you in the development of this project. We have reviewed the subconsultant agreement
provided by Delta Airport Consultants and take no exceptions to the draft document.
Upon written notice to proceed, our services will be carried out in accordance with the
provisions of the Subconsultant agreement, this letter, and the following attachments:
Attachment Description
I Schedule of Fees for Professional Services
II Standard Terms and Conditions
Page 3of4
Raba-Kistner
Proposal No: PEA00-012-00
Delta Airport Consultants, Inc.
January 14, 2000
Raba-Kistner considers the data and - information contained in this proposal to be
proprietary. This document and any information contained herein shall not be disclosed
and shall not be duplicated or used in whole or in part for any purpose other than to
evaluate this proposal.
Our invoices will be submitted monthly for services in progress in our standard format.
Our invoices are due and payable upon receipt at 7002 Commerce, El Paso, Texas
79915. All parties hereby agree that this contract upon acceptance will be performable in
El Paso County, Texas. Past due invoices may be subject to late charges at an annual
rate of eighteen (18) percent on any balances unpaid after thirty (30) days from issue. In
the event that the State of Texas legislates a sales tax on professional services, the
amount of tax applicable will be added to the appropriate service rate charged by Raba-
Kistner.
Please return one signed copy of this letter to provide written authorization for our firm to
commence the services outlined herein and unless otherwise noted or modified, the
attached Terms and Conditions will apply. Again, we appreciate the opportunity to be of
service to you and look forward to beginning work on this project.
Very truly yours, ACCEPTED BY:
RABA-KISTNER CONSULTANTS (SM, INC.
f� It
Arvel L. Williams, P.E.
Manager,
Buildi g and onstruction Services
Far o A. L on, P.E.
President
Enclosures: Attachments I and II
Copies Submitted: Above (2)
Ic%H:1)ATA%P RO\P EA99%PA99-N E W. DO C
(Authorized Signature)
(Typed or Printed Name)
(Title)
(Date)
Page 4of4
Raba-Kistner
Resolution No. 2000-ROIOI
ATTACHMENTI
RABA-KISTNER CONSULTANTS, INC.
SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PERSONNEL: Principal..................................................................$90 to $150/hour
Professional............................................................$35 to $110/hour
TechnicaVClerical/Administrative ............................$20 to $45/hour
The specific hourly rate within each classification listed above depends on the
experience, special training, and qualifications of the personnel needed for the project
For projects requiring work at any hazardous waste site, there will be a $10 per hour
surcharge added to the normal billing rate for all personnel. Consultants to Raba-Kistner
Consultants, Inc. (R-KCI), will be charged according to their professional classification.
EXPENSES: Use of computer hardware and software (additional charge)
Computer -aided drafting......................................................................$15/hour
Computerized word processing, database
and spreadsheet management, and modeling...................................$15/hour
Use of company automobiles will be charged at $0.40 per mile. Automobiles and light
trucks assigned to field sites will be charged at $30.00 per day, plus $0.40 per mile over
50 miles per day.
Other project -specific charges for use of R-KCI equipment or for R-KCI testing will be in
accordance with established fee schedules. All other project -specific, third -party costs
will be charged at cost plus 15 percent.
PAYMENT: Invoices will be submitted monthly for work in progress in our standard format. They are
due and payable upon receipt and become past due 30 days after the billing date. Past
due invoices may be subject to late charges at the rate of 1-1/2 percent per month (18
percent per annum). In the event that the State of Texas legislates a sales tax on
Professional Services, the amount of the tax will be added to the appropriate service rate
charged.
Preparation of non-standard invoice will be charged on a time and materials basis in
accordance with the rates in this fee schedule.
CONDITIONS: Services will be performed in accordance with our Standard Terms and Conditions.
The proposal to which this schedule is attached is valid for 90 days from the date of the
proposal.
Page 1 of 1
01/92
I2a6a-Kistner
AIRPORT CONSULTANTS, INC_
engineers - planners
Richmond Fort Worth Charlotte
January 7, 2000
Mr. Dean L. Rue, P. E.
CH2M - Hill - Rocky Mountain Region
P. O. Box 241325
Denver, CO 80224-9325
RE: Request for Price Proposal
Fire Rescue Training Area Improvements
Lubbock International Airport
Lubbock, Texas
Delta Project No. TX 00103
Dear Mr. Rue:
Thank you for your attmidance and input during our December 15, 1999 meeting at Lubbock International.
The meeting went very well and the Airport has asked us to proceed with developing a proposal for a brief
preliminary study and final plans and specifications. As such, Delta Airport Consultants requests separate
Preliminary and Final Design Not -to -Exceed price proposals for the Scopes of _Work outlined below. A
Work Program developed for the airport is also included.
Preliminary Engineering Scope
1. Provide a construction and operation cost comparison between fossil fuel and propane ARFF
training facilities. The evaluation should also include evaluation of the quality of training provided
by each. The final product should be a short white paper or letter report outlining the findings. The
purpose of this effort should be to confirm the impression that fossil fuel is the better system for
Lubbock International.
2. Provide preliminary engineering including data collection, investigation, alternatives analysis and
evaluation, and provide recommendations for the following components of a new Fire Rescue and
Training Area (FAR Part 130 Index C) at Lubbock International Airport:
A. Fire pit liner system.
B. Fossil fuel storage and delivery system.
C. Mechanical system requirements.
D. Waste treatment/process systems.
E. Electrical system requirements.
F. Mock-up requirements
G. Architectural requirements for a simple control center
Develop written and graphical presentations to be incorporated into a Preliminary Engineer's Report.
A copy of a Draft Report Outline is included in the attached Work Program.
7333 Whitepine Road Telephone (804) 275-8301
Richmond, Virginia 23237 Fax (804) 275-8371
Homepage: http://www.deltaairport.com E-mail: delta CC deltaairport.com
Mr. Dean L. Rue
January 7, 2000
Page 2
4. Provide Engineer's Opinions of Probable Cost for the components of the Fire Training Facility for
which C112M-Hill is responsible for investigating.
S. Provide final written material in WordPerfect or compatible format.
6. Provide final graphics material in AutoCAD Release 14 or 2000 compatible format.
7. Attend a site visit to the ARFF training facilities in either Casper, Wyoming or Boise, Idaho.
It is anticipated that the final product of the Preliminary Engineering will be similar to the preliminary report
completed for the Norfolk International Airport ARFF Training Facility project.
Einal Design Scope of Work
1. Provide mechanical, electrical and architectural design services in order to produce a set of sealed
plans and technical specifications for the proposed aircraft rescue and firefighting training facility:
The design shall be coordinated with the site design to be completed by Delta Airport Consultants.
Elements to be completed by your firm include (ARFF Index Q:
A. Four fire zones
B. Aircraft mock-up design including:
(1). A low wing engine fire to simulate B-737/Airbus 320
(2). A fuselage engine fire similar to the MD-80 series aircraft
(3). Engine wheel fire
(4). Interior smoke/fires.
C. Fuel storage and recovery system
D. Fire ignition system
E. Water recycling, recovery and waster treatment system
F. Mechanical systems
G. Electrical systems
H. Structural systems
I. Control systems
J. Architectural components
K.. Any other ancillary features necessary to provide the Airport with a full working training
facility.
Mr. Dean L. Rue
January 7, 2000
Page 3
2. Other design elements include:
A. Attendance at a predesign meeting and up to three status meeting with the Airport.
B. Quantity take -off and construction cost estimates for the facilities C112M-Hill designs
including the architectural components.
C. Written design Engineer's's Report for the purpose of submitting to the Airport and FAA
providing specific design information
D. Delivery of materials in WordPerfect or compatible format and delivery of plans on 24" x
36" sheets in AutoCAD Release 14 or compatible format.
E. You should anticipate submittal of plans at the 30%, 90% and 1001/o complete stages of the
Project.
3. Should any work be required on the active airfield side of the airport, you and/or your subconsultants
shall have General Liability Insurance with a minimum coverage of $3,000,000. It is anticipated
however, that no work will be required on the active airfield for the design phase of the project.
4. Since this project is anticipated to be federally funded, your firm shall abide by the Title VI
Assurances attached.
5. If accepted, your proposal shall serve as a basis for a Not -to -Emceed contract directly with Delta
Airport Consultants. A copy of the subcontract agreement based on our Norfolk International
Airport contract is attached for your review.
6. As soon as a percentage of your services is complete, your firm should invoice Delta Airport
Consultants for the percentage complete. All invoices shall be received by Delta by the 25" of each
month. You invoice will then be included with the next Delta invoice. Payment for your services
will be forwarded within fourteen (14) days upon receipt of payment from the owner.
Delta is requesting your proposal on or before January 28, 2000. It is anticipated that a Notice -to -Proceed
for the preliminary engineering work will be given this winter with final design occurring in late spring early
summer.
Should you have any questions, please give Susan Winslow or me a call. We look forward to working with
CH2M-Hill on this project.
Sincerely,
fhn Lon e , P.E.
JCL:blg
Enclosure
TX 00103 C009
CH2MHILL
February 8, 2000
Mr. John Longnaker
Delta Airport Consultants
7333 Whitepine Road
Richmond, VA 23237
CH2M HILL
100 Inverness Terrace East
Englewood, CO
801125313
P.O. Box 241325
Denver, CO
80224-9325
Tel 303.771.0900
Fax 303.764.0199
Proud Spmsor of
National Engineers Week 2000
Subject: Lubbock International Airport, Airport Rescue Firefighting Training Facility
Dear Mr. Longnaker:
Attached is our fee proposal for the Lubbock International Airport, Airport Rescue
Firefighting Training Facility as a subconsultant to your firm. The fee proposal is in
separate proposals for the Prel =dmry Design and the Final Design. The fee proposals are
based on the Scope of Work shown m your JanuaiT 7, 2000 letter to us.
Our fee proposal is based on a Lamp Sum contract that will be with with Delta Airport
Consultants.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact tree.
Sincerely,
CH HILL
Dean L. Rue
Senior Airport Engineer
Document2
c: Randy Peterson/BOI
r
CLIENT : LUDDOCK intern
Joe No : 156638.C1.AP
FILE: LubARFF.xis
Year 2000
1
..
Dean Rue ................
Projectenor. En iee
__...
.............::'.
133.00
2
i ndy-Nfiirsvri ::':'::':':::
'AR :f'�ocess: Design l onager;
.....
...:` ::..:.: <
......
105.00
3
o' s '`. `aor ':::':::: «::
CW E Irfla ............
::::::: Rro`e t:Fn itie«:':::::::::::':::':::'
........... 1........9.........................
::::':::'....:.:.
I ......
9000
...................................................................
. ........
...................................................................................
...
..I.............
...
4
... ... ... ... .. .........
...................................................................................
...............................................................I...................
..
..................................................................................
...........................I..............................
Gra iaimUch 'Ibi�in ::'::
. i .............
..... .. .. ...
... . .... ... ..
>?:'::':':':':'::':':':':':::::::':':':'>......... - :.':'......:'::':'.......
....................
.. . ... .
... .. .. ..
.................
72.00
...................................................................................
.......................................................I...........................
6
............................
..........
.......................................................
7
....................... .....
..................................................................................
......................................
...I.............
0.00
8
..............
..... .
...... ..:.:.,
.
0.00
9
..
0.00
.:.....:....:.::. ...:::
.........................I.............10.....
...........
0.00
11
0.00
......
....... . ..
.........................................
......... .... .
0.00
13
............................
..............I.....................I..
.................
0.00
14
.. .....
0.00
15
0.00
ansert:aridiifio
►al': ►s:ab(' #ere:::..................................''''''''' :::.....:::
0.00
02/09/2000 Page 3 of 6 WRKPLNLubbockARFFPreEngl.xls,EMloyees
02/09/2000 Page 4 of 6 WRKPLNLubbockARFFPreEngl.xls,Tasks
. ...... . . ...
�x,
CLIENT:
LUMOCK Intemational Airport Office:
Denver
JOB NO:
156638.C1.AP FILE:
LubARFF.)ds
PROJECT:
ARFF Preliminary Engineering Report Year.
2000
Compare Fossil
Preliminary
Prepare Draft
Construction Cost
Final report
Site VISA
Fuel and Propane
Engheedng of
Report
Estimate
AfternaWes
ARFF
LABOR HOURS
Compo.nents
TOTAL
(Labor Period = Hours)
TASK 1
TASK 2
TASK 3
TASK 4
TASK 5
TASKS
Dean Rue
..........
.I.......
.......... ..............
...
................. .
.....
............... ......
26
RanPeteon
..
..............................
.. ...
..............................
.............-.,:.::I...:.
............. ......
...................................
......
84.....
Cost Estimator
.........................
.. ............................
........
...............
...............
....... - ..............
..
............
...... .....
...
... ................
......
8
Graphics Technician
............
........
...................
. .....
22
Office
. .......................
. ......... .
.....
..
.... .........
..............
. ..
......
....
....
........ -.2
.........
...
..........
8
. . ..........
...............
M.
. . . . . . . . 7 7 7 7
......... .....
............ - .
. . . . . . . .
1 7
........
..............
. . . . .
1.7 7 7 7 . . . ... .
...... I.— ................
............... ..............
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
........... w.
.
. .
. . . . . . .
Wr
148
V,
z
x
Dean Rue 133.00
1,064
1,596
399
266
133
-
-
3,458
Randy Peterson 105.00
1,680
4,200
630
210
420
1,680
-
8,820
Cost Estimator 90.00
-
-
-
720
-
-
-
720
Graphics Technic 72.00
1,152
288
-
144
-
1,584
Office 48.00
96
-
192
98
-
384
14,966
; m..-.Fpm
02/09/2000 Page 5 of 6 WRKPLNLubbockARFFPreEngl.xls,Labor
CLIENT: LUMOCK Internaw
,JOB NO: I 156638.C1.AP
PROJECT: ARFF Preliminary
512 General Expenses 10%dlabwCad $284 $695 $151 1 $120 $79 $168
........... ...........I ........................................................
Airfare: No. of Trips >> _::: • • • • : .1M.
... ... .. .
Round Trips 0 IiD;Q4: $500
........... ............ ................I.... ...I.... ..........................
Lodging: No. of Days » `< 2 00: .. .......'. ........ ...........
Lodging Days <; ; :.•`.$250;Q0. $500
.ar Rent 2 Days* 60 120
Other I ...... .... .......'" ...� ...........I..... ... I .:. ..:(.........` :':.L :':....'" . .
FILE: I LubARFF.xds
Yeat:2000 I
02/09/2000 Page 6 of 6 WRKPLNLubbockARFFPreEngl.xls,Expenses
02/08/2000 Page 4 of 6 WRKPLNLubbockARFFDesignl.xls,Tasks
..... ....... .......... ...................
........................
.............................. ... ........
CLIENT: Lubbock International Airport Office:
Denver
JOB NO: 156638.'Cl.AP FILE:
LubARFFjds
PROJECT: ARFF Design Year.
2000
Project Meetings
Field
Final Design
Final design mW
Bidding
and C;oordnWon
Investigations. -
LA WR HOURS
TOTAL
(Labor Period • Hours)
TASK I
TASK 2
TASK 3
TASK :
TASK 5
Dean Rue
........... .
..........
4
Randy Peterson
.......
.......
...........
4.
.. ..
..
..
...............
....
.........
......... ...
... ....... ...
.... ......
..........
..........
..... ....
440
Design Engineers
...............
... .........
..........
...
............................ ...........
....
...—...
................
......................
600
Design Technician.....
.
.
.. .. .... ........
..
........... .......
.......................
........... ...
....
750
Office
......
.
...............
.....
........
...
........ .
....... .......
. .
...
68
Architect/Structural
.......
. . . . .... ..
7 7
. .
. . . . .. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
150
4
2,056
12
Dean Rue 133.00
3,192
—
2,660
266
268
36,384.00
Randy Peterson 105.00
6,300
420
37,800
840
840
—
$46,200.00
Design Engineert 90.00
—
64,000
—
—
—
$54,000.00
Design Teftftla 7200
—
54,000
—
$54,000.00
Office 48.00
384
2,880
—
—
$3,264.00
ArchitectlStructur 120.00
960
1516M
980
480
—
$18,000.00
Nit
no848.00
. .....
� m
111 �111'11`1'11
02/08/2000 Page 5 of 6 WRKPLNLubbockARFFDesignl.xls,Labor
J
i
CUENT: LUDDOCK intern
Jos NO : 156638.C1.AP
'ROJECT: ARFF Design
512 General Expenses 10%of kbor cost $1,084 $42 $16,694 $207 1 $159
........... ............ ............................... .................:.......
.
. — r. : i.::. {{� :T.{:..
::::.:::::. ::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:....: :.:..:...::.:.. ;:...:.w...:.:. .........................• . .
mice: uenver
FlLE: LubARFF.xls
rear. 2000 I
513
Afrtare: No. of Trips >y
.. 00:
........
Round Trips 0 ... ....... .............
$2,000
Lodging: No. of Days»
.....
..........
............
8.�0::::::::._:;:::::.:
. .. .
.....................
........
:::.
..........................
:::::.. :.- ::::=:::.::EK:-:
Lodging Days ®`•::;:;::: $250.1M.
$2,000
Car Rent 8 Days@ 60
$480
514
.:.:
IOther
.......:....
..................
........
....
..........;....
...........
.................:
.....................
........I..............
02/08/2000 Page 6 of 6 WRKPLNLubbockARFFDesignl.xls,Expenses
It
CLIENT : LUMOCK Intern
Jos NO: I 156638.C1.AP
PROJECT: ARFF Desian
Wice: Denver
FILE: LubARFF.)ds
Year. 2000
1
............................
Dean:Rue::.: . . ..:.:..:....:..
......................................
Prg ec_t:Mana � /$Oe O:Enginee
.................
:::::.:: ;':..:':':::.:.:
133.00
2
....-.-....
Ran' '; Petecsan , , ..: , .
.........
,fFi=_f!roces`. Design.iVFana er..
;' '
105.00
_.
...................................................................................
..................................................................................
.... .. ...... ..... ..
...................................................................................
:.
.. .. .... .. .. ..... ...
... .... ..
3
...................................................................................
_. .........
..................................................................
............ .... .....
.
Desi "ri i'n'ill6ers ::::::.:::::::::.:::i?tpject:Engineer::::::::::::::::::
..... .. .. ....... ... .....
... ..... .... . . ... ..
......
. .... ..
................
. ..... ......
...............
......... ....
_::::::::::::::::::::'::::::::::
90.00
....................................................................................
.. . ...... ...
...................................................................................
............................
.....
.......................................................
4
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
Dean ,:Tectiniai:::.:::.::::::.:.:.:.:.:::::.:::Desigrtel':::.:.:.:.:.:.:::.:.:::;:.:':::':.:.:::.:
.....
.......
72.00
5
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
... .. ..
cel:: >:>.':: >::':'::: <':::::::..o
. I tiolti :Pra�cessor:'
:: >:'::':':':'::::':
48.00
6
.........:..................:...........................................I...........
...................................................................................
120.00
7
..
0.00
8
0.00
9
.........
.... ,
;..: ..
0.00
10
... •::.
.:......
..... .....
.•..
..._....
0.00
11
..
....
0.00
12
..........
. .......
......
0.00
13
...:.................................I.......•...:..........
_
....
0.00
14
0.00
15
0.00
:':::in$ert:addit!gnal:rQws:above:f ere:::':::'....' :'
:::: »::':':::' :
0.00
02/08/2000 Page 3 of 6 WRKPLNLubbockARFFDesignl.xls,Employees