HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 5079 - Grant Application - GO CJD - SPRNTF, LPD - 01_25_1996Resolution No. 5079
January 25, 1996
Item #13
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and directed to
execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock a Grant Application and related documents for
State and Federal Assistance for the South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force and that the
City Council hereby agrees to a cash match of $123,991.00 from the City to fund 25% of the
Project as required by the State of Texas in order to be eligible to receive such State and Federal
A SSi Stance.
Passed by the City Council this
ATTEST:
Betty . John on, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
en A. Walker, Chief of Police
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
A"'v
War—old Willard, Assistant City At orney
H W :da/ccdocs/a-sprntfres
January 8, 1996
APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDING
CRIMINAL .JUSTICE Dmsm, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
1. Dab Srbetitted
3. Date Receivd by COG/'CJD op~ tew mv4
2 COG to wNch appfication is submitted:
4. COG Applicsbon Identifier favowrt reeve bra
5. Applicant Information
a. Legal name of agency applying:
c_ Division or unit within applicant organization to administer grant:
b. Address (give sweat or P. O. Box, city, state, and zip code)
d. Name, telephone, and fax number of the person who can answer
P.O. Box 2000
Wiestons 00rvemiN this aPpilication (9r`* area code) -
Lubbock, Texas 79457
Lt. Pat Nesbitt (806) 767--2974
Fax (806) 744-1677
6. State Payee Identification Number
7. Type of Applicant (enter the appropriate letter rt box)
17560005906000
1 J
A Stare Agency N. State College or Universdy
a- County I. Pomde Co"" or University
8.a. Type of A nAcabon.
O New �e t;Ontinuation _ _ _ _
C. IU4micKway J. hulianTnbe
D. TwwwNp lC Nonpn& Clrganitation
E. Special D4rid L Regional Council ofGoremmen
S.b. H Cofdkowation, complete the following:
Year Of furtdrng for this application (deck arra):
F. Educ2 oral Service Center M. Ottaer (specify):
G. Independent School District
O Year 2 O Year 3 Q Year 4 ❑ Year 5 51 Year 7
9. Name of Grantor Agency..
Current Giant 8 � R -()5 - B02 �,g' if,
Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division
P. O. Box 12428
10. Appfitation for.
Austin. Tams 78711
O State Crirnwv9 Justice Planning Fund (iv4)
11 a, Geographic Areas of Project Activities (Cites and Counties)
O Crime Stoppers Assistance Fund f�)
Counties: Bailey, Crosby, Dickens,
O Juvervle Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act owwwy CFDA-t e. s e
Garza, Hale, Hock 1 e y , Lamb,
❑ Tolle V Delinquency Prevention Fund #edwao cFDA.i s.w
Lubbock, Lynn, Motley,
0VictimsofChmeAct Fund R.derarlcmxie.s75
Agencies: (See Continuation)
® Tess Narcotics Control Program ped..q cFoA-1e.5n
11 b, County where project is based:
O High Intenst7y Drug Trafficking Area Program p.d..�rl CFDA-te.A.w
❑ Safe and Drug -Free Schools and Corrununities Act ned«ao cFD".iw
13. Proposed PnpKt
O Viiotence Against Women Act le.e.ra+l CFDA-t&5"
a. Start Date: i b. Ending Date:
1 5-31-97
D Other
12- Title of Project:
14. Are the activities proposed in this application 100% juvenile -related?
South Plains Regional
Narcotics Task Force
Q Yes 2 No
15. Requested Funding:
16. If project is statewide, on what date was a copy of the application submitted for TRAC
review?
a. Federal Grant $3 71, 9 7 2 .00
Funds (C.JD)
3
(date)
b. State Grant ( $ .00
Funds(CJD) j
c. Cash Match $12 3 , 991 .00
If project is local, submission of application to regional counca7 of governments
s
satisfies the requirement for TRACS review.
d.ln4rind r $ DO
17. Is the applicant delinquent on any federal debt?
(VOCA a rye vary) I
e. TOTAL :$ 4 9 5, 9 6 3 DO
❑ YES If "Yes,' attach an explanation Z NO
1 S. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application is true and correct. The document has been duty authorized by the governing
body of the applicant and the applicant wiJ✓ comply with the attached assurances if the assistance is awarded.
_._ _....... _.........._ _...........
a. Typed Name of Authorized Official 3 b, Idlet c �Teieptwne Number
3
Bob Cass City Manager (806)767-2001
d. Signature of Authorized OfFwAW e. Date Signed
j 4�n January 25, 1996
CJD- I Issued i C/95
Continuation Page CJD #1:
#11 A encies Bailey County Sheriff's Office, Crosby County Sheriff's
Office, Dickens County Sheriff's Office, Garza County
Sheriff's Office, Hale County Sheriff's Office, Hockley
County Sheriff's Office, King County Sheriff's Office,
Lynn County Sheriff's Office, Motley County Sheriff's
Office, Abernathy Police Department, Levelland Police
Department, Lockney Police Department, Lorenzo Police
Department, Muleshoe Police Department, New Home Police
Department, Olton Police Department, Petersburg Police
Department, Plainview Police Department, Ralls Police
Department, Shallowater Police Department, Slaton Police
Department, Spur Police Department, Sundown Police
Department, Tahoka Police Department. Lamesa Police
Department, Dawson County.
C TT)- 1
DESIGNATION OF GRANT OFFICIALS
CJD rules require that three persons be designated to the positions of Authorized Official, Project Director,
and Financial Officer for the purposes of administering a grant. The Project Director and the Financial
Officer may not be the same person but, under extenuating circumstances, one person may otherwise fill
two positions. In accordance with the criteria and definition of responsibilities set forth in the Governor's
Criminal Justice Plan for Texas governing submission of this application, the following designations are
made:
APPLICANT: City of Lubbock
PROJECT TITLE: South Plains Rr-innnl Nar orir-�, T;Gk Forra
Q Mr. O Ms. B ; 11 Tawnlpv
Project Director (Type orPrint)
Capra i n, t.IIbI
Tale and Agency
P.O. Box 2
Organization's Business Address (Street or P. O. Box)
Lubbock, Texas 79457
City Zip
(806) 767-2S63
Telephone Number
(806) 744-1677 -
Fax Number
0 Mr. D Ms. Jimny godr-gg 7
Financial Officer (Type or Print)
��rtinc- 7reac+1rar,Sjt4 of L"hhnrk
Title and Agency
_- P.Q. $n-r 2000
Organization's Business Address (Street or P. O. Box)
Lubbock. Texas 79457
City Zip
53 Mr. O Ms. Bob Cass
Authorized Official (Type or Print)
Telephone Number
(20b) 767-?n51
Fax Number
City M?nagor_ rite of l.�Jhhncl-
Trtie and Agency
P.O. Box 2000
Organizabon's Business Address (Street or P. O. Box)
Lubbock, Texas 79457
City Zip
(806) 767-2001
Telephone Number
(806) 767-2051
Fax Number
CJD•2 tvsued 10195
Project narrative
The South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force is in it's
eighth year of funding. The Task Force is currently funded
for one sergeant, one corporal and four investigators. Last
year two "non -grant" funded investigators were added to the
Task Force. In this up -coming grant year one sergeant, one
corporal and two more investigators will be added as "non -
grant" funded officers. This year the Task Force seeks to
add one additional grant funded investigator from an outside
agency. This officer along with the additional 6 non -grant
funded officers brings the Task Force total to 13 officers.
This is done to better serve the eleven county region
assigned to the Task Force.
The most significant problems addressed by the Task Force is
the inability of rural towns and counties to effectively
combat the drug problems within their own jurisdictions.
The Task Force serves a largely rural area made up of small
towns and cities. These small counties and cities do not
have the fiscal means, manpower, or expertise to adequately
handle the growing narcotics problems in their areas. With
small departments, budgets are proportionally small. Most
have no money to devote to the purchase of drugs or to pay
informants for information. The funding provided by the
T.N.C.P. enables these communities to battle their drug
problems by utilizing the South Plains Regional Narcotics
Task Force. The Task Force provides not only monetary
support, but training and manpower for covert operations
that are often impossible for local agencies in small towns
where everyone knows the law enforcement officers.
The South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force serves eleven
counties in the South Plains Region. These counties have a
combined population of approximately 350,000 people and
covers over 10,200 square miles. Within these counties
there are approximately 50 separate law enforcement
agencies. The City of Lubbock itself has a population
exceeding 200,000 people. Drug traffickers fan out from
Lubbock and supply the many rural communities in the South
Plains. With the exception of the cities of Lubbock,
Levelland (19), Plainview(33), Lubbock and Hale counties no
single law enforcement agency is larger than the Task Force
(12). Therefore, it is easy to see that the Task Force is
the only entity in this region capable of filling this "gap"
in drug enforcement.
Lubbock County accounts for over 66% of the total population
of this region. The city of Lubbock accounts for 87% of
that total. In our eleven county region for the last two
years over 200 investigations have been conducted.
CJD-3A
In 1995 training was conducted by the South Plains Regional
Narcotics Task Force and over twenty rural town and county
law enforcement officers attended. This training was well
received and will continue in the future.
The South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force utilizes
local resources such as manpower and intelligence data from
the communities we serve. The Task Force serves as a
central reporting for intelligence information regarding
drug traffickers in our region. The Task Force has the
computer facilities necessary to maintain and update this
information the rural communities do not.
The South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force enjoys an
excellent working relationship with Drug Enforcement
Administration and the Texas Department of Public Safety in
our region. DEA targets the larger drug traffickers, which
for the most part are located in the urban cities. DEA will
assist the Task Force whenever asked and will become
directly involved when larger quantities of drugs are
involved. With new mandates from Washington, DEA is now
becoming more involved with violent drug activities even at
the "street level".
The Texas Department of Public Safety and the South Plains
Regional Narcotics Task Force target "mid -level." and
"street -level" narcotic traffickers. For the most part DPS
and the Task Force are the only organizations targeting the
smaller "street level" dealers in our region. The Task
Force and DPS'S duties and responsibilities often over -lap.
However, through constant communication we don't duplicate
efforts. We constantly are assisting each other in their
investigations often exchanging intelligence information and
combining manpower to bring a successful end to these joint
investigations.
If funded the South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force
will continue to respond to each communities different
needs. Some communities need less enforcement action and
more drug education that the Task Force supplies through
lectures and presentations. Some communities require
constant enforcement efforts; others just need sporadic
attention. If we become aware of problems in the
communities that the local law enforcement agency is
unaware, we notify them.
CJD-3B
Training local area law enforcement personnel has emerged as
a widely needed goal. In 95-96 the South Plains Regional
Narcotics Task Force in association with other task forces
and local prosecutors will try to hold formal training
seminars in our region. Perhaps, "on-the-job" training for
officers in the rural counties and cities. Classes
consisting of recruitment, usage of informants, search
warrant preparation, case preparation and legal updates will
be presented.
Through better training and awareness the local communities
are better able to recognize their community problems and
perhaps provide a greater community impact on the drug
problems in their own area. They are better able to
recognize their own limitations and make more effective use
of Task Force resources.
Measuring the effectiveness of any law enforcement entity is
difficult at best. The true impact of any project is
measured by the satisfaction of the people served. However,
statistical comparisons as to cases initiated, arrests, drug
seizures and asset forfeitures do yield data with regard to
performance. The teamwork exhibited between the Task Force,
DPS, DEA and local law enforcement agencies has had a
positive impact on our communities. If the Task Force were
to cease to exist, there is no other existing agency capable
of taking up the drug enforcement effort in this part of the
state.
Statistically, from June, 1994 to January 1996, the South
Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force has initiated 284
cases, made 317 arrests for drug and drug related offenses.
During that period approximately $950,000.00 of illicit
narcotics and drugs have been removed from the streets of
our communities. Marijuana, cocaine, and especially "crack"
cocaine are the major drugs of choice in our region.
Methamphetamine is on the increase in this region. The Task
Force, DPS and DEA are conducting a joint OCEDTF case
regarding this resurgence.
Within the City of Lubbock, the South Plains Regional
Narcotics Task Force works with the zoning department in
efforts to have "crack houses" condemned or demolished.
This relationship with the Zoning Department has resulted in
entire apartment complexes being closed because of the drug
trafficking.
CJD-3C
During 1994/1995 we targeted forty-one apartment complexes
and homes. Thirty of the forty-one have evicted the drug
dealers and law suits are being prepared for presentation to
the Attorney General to seize the other properties. The
Task Force works with the Housing and Urban Development
office to help eliminate drug trafficking in public housing
projects.
The South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force through the
expansion of the size of the unit wants to show an increase
of 20% or more in cases initiated, arrests and quantities of
narcotics removed from our communities. This goal is
incumbent on adequate funding from the Texas Narcotics
Control Program. Any reductions in service capabilities
through budgetary restraints impacts goal attainment.
The South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force is dedicated
to the task of filling the gap in drug enforcement by
providing the expertise, manpower and fiscal resources
needed to carry out the mission of the Texas Narcotics
Control Program, multi-jursdictional, multi -agency drug
enforcement in those areas of the state unable to provide
for themselves.
CJD-3D
BUDGET INFORMATION
Section A, --Budget Summary
L
s
'
e
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
dBudget
Categories
a
CJD Funds
Cash Match
In -Kind Match
Total
I
(F« voca ■ rw v u.. 0*)
f
1.
A.
Personnel `Salaries)
$183,814
$ 61,271
$
$ 245,085
2.
A
Personnel (Fringe Benefits)
71,028
23,676
94,704
3.
S.
Contractual
-a-
-a-
-0-
4.
C.
Travel and Training
5,066
1,689
6,755
5.
D.
Equipment
3,517
1,173
4,690
6.
F.
Renovation/Retrofit
-0-
-0-
-0-
7.
F.
SuOperappliiess&Drect
108,547
36,182
144,729
rtses
8.
Total Direct Charges
367,472
122,491
489,963
(sum or 1-7)
9.
G.
Indirect Costs
—0—
—0—
—0-
10.
Totals
$
$
S
$
(sum ofa-9)
371,972
123,991
495,963
11
Program Income
$
184,293.42
Section B—Cash Match'
Section C--Program Income
Enter separately each source of matcNng funds and the amounts. i
Total must agree with Line 11, Column 4 above.
Total must agree with Line 10, Column 2 above.
Source
Amount
Source
Amount
7-%'�,Asset
Pro ram Income
1
u e uc ion
J05,047,25
�i
11 % Interest on
�+
31% Asset Sharing
57,130.97
1% Restitution
1,842.94
APPOCant must acs WM um source ow casn mamn it any.
I have read and agree to the accuracy of pages CJD-4 through CJD 12 of this application and have initialed each page.
.Tim= Rn r giioz
Typed Name and Signature of Financial Officer as designated on Page CJD-2-
CJD-4 lsajed 1G
Office of the Govemor
Criminal Justice Division
SCHEDULE A
PERSONNEL
1. Direct Salaries
(�)
(2)
(3)
Title or Position'
% of
Time'
CJD Funds
Cash Match
TOTAL'
(A)
$ Q
inS
i
(B)
(C)
(D) Inv s i
(E)
(F)
(G)
(H)
TOTAL Direct Salaries
; 1,,-7—S
;245 085
2. Fringe Benefits
% or
$ Rate
FICA & Medicare
�?
;
$
$
Retirement
a
Insurance(Life BHealth)
13,688
4 62
18,251
YVorlaer5' Compensation
@� 27.0
Unemployment Insurance
@
Other (Explain) See Continuation
TOTAL Fringe Benefits
$
$
TOTAL PERSONNEL BUDGET
i
i IA7;
Include only one position per line. Attach a description of the duties or responsibilities of each position.
Express as a percent of total time. (40 hours per week equals 100%)
Should reflect employee's gross salary attributable to the project. If applying for continuation funding, justify
any salary increase over the previous year.
Financial Officer Initials
CJD-5
(Continuation) CJD-5
JOB DUTIES:
Sergeant/Investigator: Acts as the first -line supervisor of the unit, coordinates
investigations, confidential informants, and dispenses funds.
Supervises eleven investigators, a secretary, and intelligence
analyst, and carries his own case load. The sergeant also
coordinates intelligence gathering and is the liaison between
the unit and other agencies. The sergeant collects and dis-
seminates intelligence information concerning gang activity
as it relates to drug activity.
Corporal/Investigator: Conducts the same duties as the other investigators in the
unit. In addition to those duties, the corporal assumes
the duties of the sergeant, in the sergeant's absence.
Investigators: Conducts investigations, gathers intelligence, supervises
informants, works undercover, and dispenses funds in the
procurement of evidence and the payment of informants.
(Fringe Benefits, continuation)
2. Fringe Benefits:
CJD
MATCH
TOTAL
other (Explain
Longivity/Stability
Pay $3,150
$1,050
$4,200
Educational Incentive Pay $7,875
$2,625
$10,500
Clothing Allowance
$3,150
$1,050
$4,200
Totals
$14,175
$4,725
$18,900
The direct salaries and
benefits package increase
is due to
the addition of one
investigator from an outside agency. This
investigator will
work with the
existing Task Force and
through the Lubbock
Police Department chain of command
even though the person
is employed by another
agency. We feel
the increase is
necessary to assist the
SPRNTF to become more
closely associated
with the
surrounding communities
outside the City of
Lubbock thereby
giving the Task
Force a better understanding of the concerns
of the smaller
cities, towns and
communities with which we work.
Olfiice of the Govemor
Criminal Justice Division
SCHEDULE B
PROFESSIONAL AND CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
(1)
(2)
(3)
Description of Service
CJD Funds
Cash Match
TOTAL
(A)
$
$
$
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
(H)
TOTAL PROFESSIONAL AND
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
$
$
S
REQUIRED BUDGET NARRATIVE: Briefly describe and justify any anticipated contractual arrangement and
work products expected. Describe basis for arriving at the cost of each line item_ Professional services (such
as consultants, trainers, counselors, etc.) should be described by type of service, number of hours, rate per hour.
and travel costs, if any. Use additional pages as needed.
Financial Officer Initials CJD-6 wed TIE
Office of the Govemor
Criminal Justice Division
SCHEDULE C
TRAVEL AND TRAINING
1. Local Travel
(1)
(2)
(3)
Title or Position
Miles Traveled
Annually/$Rate
CJD Funds
Cash Match
TOTAL
(A)
S
$
$
A
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
LOCAL TRAVEL TOTAL
;
;
;
2. In -State Travel (Specify clearly and use continuation pages if necessary)
Purpose
Destination
CJD Funds
Cash Match
TOTAL
Basic Narc. Inv. School
TRA
= 971
f324
$ 95
TNCP Annual Conference
TNCP Cornnander's Meetin s
'IBA
IN -STATE TRAVEL TOTAL
$
;1,227=
4 9
3. Out -of -State Travel (Specify clearly and use continuation panes if necessary)
Purpose
Destination
CJD Funds
Cash Match
TOTAL
i
$
$
OUT-OF-STATE TOTAL
5 Is
I
S
4. Training Tuitions and Fees (Specify clearly and use continuation pages if necessary)
Purpose
Training
CJD Funds
Cash Match
TOTAL
i
k
See Continuation
TRAINING TOTAL
$
124
$
41
$
165
TOTAL TRAVEL BUDGET $5 , 066 $1 , 689 $ 6,755
NOTE; When personally owned vehicles are used for travel, transportation costs are shown on Schedule C. When agency
or leased vehicles are used, the vehicle operation/maintenance costs should be shown on Schedule F,'Supphes and
Direct Operating Expenses.'
Financial Officer Initials CJD-7 kss� 1C105
Office of the Governor
Criminal Justice Division
SCHEDULE C (Continued)
REQUIRED BUDGET NARRATIVE: Briefly describe the applicant's travel policy (i.e. mileage rates and
per diem rates). Specify purposes for each item of travel. Break out costs of each in -state and each out-
of-state trip to separately show the specific costs of transportation and of per diem.
City of Lubbock Travel Policy:
The City of Lubbock's travel policy states that a maximum of $25.00 per day, per
person will be allowed for meals. All expenses require documentation. Other
expenses such as lodging is based on actual cost.
Trainin and Travel:
The unit through transfers and promotions has three new investigators that are
in need of additional training. It is this training need that accounts for the
increased training and travel budget.
2. In -State Travel:
Basic Narcotics Investigator's Schools:
Travel-est. 760 mi. X $0.25 mi. X 1 officer - $ 190.00
Lodging-est. $65/day X 12 days X 1 officer = $ 780.00
Meals-est, $25/day X 13 days X 1 officer = $ 325.00
TOTAL $1,245.00
CJD- $971 Match- $324
TNCP Annual Conference:
Travel-est. 1,200 mi. X $0.25/mi. X 4 officers = $1,200.00
Lodging-est. $65/day X 4 days X 4 officers - $1,040.00
Meals- est. $25/day X 4 days X 4 officers $ 400.00
TOTAL $2,640.00
CJD- $1,980 Match- $660
TNCP Commander's Meetings:
Travel-est. 1,000/mi. X $0.25/ni. _ $ 250.00
Lodging-est. $65/day X 2 days X 4 meetings = $ 520.00
Meals-est. $25/day X 2 days X 4 meetings = $ 200.00
TOTAL $ 970.00
CJD- $727 Match-5243
3. Out -of -State Travel:
D.E.A. Basic or Advanced Narcotics Investigator's School- Albuquerque, N.M.
Travel-est. 760 mi. X 0.25/mi. X 2 officers = $ 190.00
Lodging-est. $65/day X 13 days X 2 officers = $ 845.00
Meals-est. $25/day X 13 days X 2 officers = $ 650.00
TOTAL $1,685.00
Financial Officer Initials
CJD- $1264 Match- $421
CJD-8
tweed 1CM
Office of the Governor
Criminal Justice Division
SCHEDULE C (Continued)
REQUIRED BUDGET NARRATIVE: Briefly describe the applicants travel policy (i.e. mileage rates and
per diem rates). Specify purposes for each item of travel. Break out costs of each in -state and each out-
of-state trip to separately show the specific costs of transportation and of per diem.
4. Training Titution and Fees:
Basic Narcotics Investigator's School Location to be announced
Tuition $25/per officer Y I officer
TNCP Annual Conference Tuition 525/per officer :. 4 officers
TNCP Connanders rieetincs, S10/per officer x 4 neetings
CJD- 5124
Match- t41
$ 25.00
5100.00
S 40.00
TOTAL $165.00
Financial Officer Initials CJD-8 hajed 10!95
Office of the Governor
Criminal Justice Division
SCHEDULE D
EQUIPMENT PURCHASES
(1)
(2)
(3)
Equipment Name or Description and Quantity
(Do Not List Brand Names)
CJD Funds
Cash Match
TOTAL
(A) (Hardwire)
;
f 749
; 2.995
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
(H)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASES
$
3,517
$
1,173
$
4,690
REQUIRED BUDGET NARRATIVE: Describe the basis for arriving at the cost of each line item. Provide
justification and explanation of use. Use additional pages as needed.
The South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force Conducts a multitude of investigations
in surreptitious and covert locations. Because of the secrecy of the location that
is dictated in these investigations, such as motel rooms or other similar locations,
it is imperative that the investigation be monitored at all times and in every way
possible. The most important concern when operating under these conditions is that
of officer safety, especially when dealing with the violent criminal element involved
in illegal drug trafficking,. With the use of this covert camera not only will the
officer safety issue be eased, but it will have an added value of enhancing the officers
credibility as well as other facts in the investigation. By monitoring and recording
these drug transactions the overall investigation can be greatly intensified. The
only way we can properly tract and monitor these types of transactions as they occurr
is to use high tech equipment such as disguised transmitters and hardwired camera
equipment.
The price of the camera is furnished by Vendor. (Aspect Technology and Equipment, Inc.)
The price of the numeric pager transmitter is furnished by Vendor. (AID)
Financial Officer Initials CJd-9 issued 10/95
Office of the Governor
Criminal .Justice Division
SCHEDULE E
RENOVATION AND RETROFIT FOR JUVENILE DETENTION FACILITIES
This schedule applies only to Fund 421 and may ony be used
for projects that renovate or retrofk exasting faciftes to be
used for juvenie detention in order to comply with the federal
li w. 2- I..r1:.+n anal r) 1.inn— Drsainnlinn Ar4
Itemized Costs of Renovation/Retrofit
CJD Funds
Cash Match
TOTAL
(A)
$
S
S
(a)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(0)
(H)
(1)
(J)
(K)
(L)
(M)
(N)
(0)
(P)
(a)
(R)
(S)
m
(U)
M
TOTAL
;
$
;
REQUIRED BUDGET NARRATIVE: Attach as many pages as necessary to describe the basis for
arriving at the cost of each line item. Provide justification and explanation of use.
Financial Officer Initials
CJD-10
Office of the Governor
Criminal Justice Division
SCHEDULE F
SUPPLIES AND DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES
(� }
(2)
(3)
Directly Charged Supplies and
Other Operating Expenses
CJD Funds
Cash Match
TOTAL
(A)Vehicle Exppnspg
$ 52.741
$ 17,581
$ 70-329
(B)
50 .000
(C)
(D)
250
(E)
(F)
(G)
(H) Bat i
(I)
(J) Dr _
(K) Officer D
(L) Communication
TOTAL SUPPLIES AND DIRECT
OPERATING EXPENSES
$
108,547
$
36,182
$
144,729
REQUIRED BUDGET NARRATIVE: Describe the basis for arriving at the cost of each line item and justifica-
tion for requesting each item. Use additional pages as needed.
A. Vehicle Expenses:
Fuel— 7 Vehicles X est. $1.13/gal. X 12,000 mi./10 mi./gal $ 9,492
Veh. Maintenance— 7 Vehicles X est. X $0.11 mi. X est. 12,000 mi. 9,240
Window Tinting— 7 Vehicles X $120.00 840
Administrative Charge by City of Lubbock for keeping maintenance 350
records on vehicles— 7 Vehicles x $50 per car
Lease Vehicles— 7 Vehicles x 600/veh. X 12 months. 50,400
70,322
CJD— 52,741 Match— 17,581
The prior budget was based on six lease vehicles whereas this package includes
one additional lease vehicle and the cumulative cost based on the (93/94)
expenditures.
Financial Officer Initials GD-I I hRied i0/45
Continuation CJD-11: Supplies and Direct Operating Expenses
B. _Confidential Funds: Based on historical costs and anticipated need $50,000
due to additional non -grant funded investigators. (5) �^
CJD- 37,500 Match- 12,500
C. Office Supplies: Based on past needs and anticipated requirements $ 1,150
CJD- 863 Match- 287
D. Narcotic Test Kits: Based on past needs and anticipated increase in $ 1,000
Case load ($2.00 is average cost of the different types of test
kits) 500 kits X $2.00/ per kit.
CJD- 750 Match- 250
E. Audio _Cassette Tapes: (Vendor cost supplied) $ 300
90% or more of all investigations are tape recorded and used as
evidence. Quanity required is based on historical usage and
anticipated need 300 tapes X $1.00/tape
CJD- 225 Match- 75
F. Vi_deo__Tapes: (Vendor cost supplied)
$
180
60 VHS tapes X $3.00 per tape. 60 VHS-C tapes X
6.87 per tape
$
412
$
592
CJD- 444
Match- 148
C. Instant Camera: (Vendor supplied cost)
$
30
Camera to be used for in search warrants, mug shots and photos
for informant files and when photos are required
to expedite
identification
CJD- 23
Match- 7
H. Batteries: All covert audio equipment runs on batteries. Body
transmittors require AA, AAA, 9-volt and flat-pak batteries.
The repeaters for the body transmittors require (8) D-Cell
batteries each time it is used. Need as based on past
requirements and anticipated need. Cost are supplied by City
of Lubbock Purchasing.
D-Cell 0.57 each - 24 cases X 41.00/case $ 984
AA 0.28 each - 6 cases X 40.00/case $ 240
AAA 0.29 each - 6 cases X 42.00/case $ 252
9-Volt 1.09 each - 18 cases X 79.00/case $1,422
Flat Pak 4.85 each - 25 batteries $ 121
$3,019
CJD-2,264 Match 755
CJD-11
Continuation CJD-11: Supplies and Direct Operating Expenses
I. Professional Services:
Vendor supplied Gost: Use of laboratory and chemist to analyze
(quantitatively & qualitatively) drugs used for reversals.
$85/per hour X 3 hours per case X est. 5 cases
CJD- 956 Match- 319
J. Annual Drug-Trak _Software Maintenance Contract: Provides on-line
support and service advise.- New versions are supplied to us as
they come available
CJD- 150
Match- 50
K. Officer Drug_ Testing: (City of Lubbock Human Resources)
Random drug test @ 7 test X $23.00 per test
CJD- 121 Match- 40
L. Communication Expenses:_ (Vendor Supplied cost)
Pager rental 7 pages X 25.00/mo. X 12/mo.
Cellular Phones 7 phones X 35.00/mo. X 12/mo.
Equipment Maintenance est. repairs on radios, phones, pagers
Office Phones 7 phones X 35.00/mo. X 12/mo.
Long Dist. Service 7 phones X 25/mo. X 12/mo.
CJD- 8,010
Match- 2,670
M. Texas Narcotics Information: Service Line Charge $500/Mo X 12 Mo.
CJD- 4,500
Match- 1,500
$1,275
$ 200
$ 161
1�2.100
$2,940
$ 600
$2,940
$2,100
$10,680
$6,000
CJD- 11
Office of the Governor
Criminal Justice Division
SCHEDULE G
INDIRECT COSTS
The maximum amount of indirect costs that may be applied for is not to exceed a total of two -
percent of the total direct costs provided by CJD, unless the applicant has an approved cost
allocation plan.
Indirect Costs
(A) Total Direct Costs (must equal page wo-4. Ire 8, cdumn 1) 1 $
CJD Funds
(B) Total Indirect Costs I $ I
❑ Applicant is using the CJD two percent rule to determine the amount of indirect cost.
❑ Applicant is Using an approved cost allocation plan to determine indirect cost.
Financial Officer Initials Go-12 Issued Sobs