HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 3320 - Grant Application - HUD - 1990-91 CDBG Program - 02_22_1990Resolution # 3320
February 22, 1990
Item 18
RP:dw
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and
directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock a Community
Development Block Grant Application of 1990-91 for the year 1990 and related
documents, which Application shall be spread upon the minutes of the Council
and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall constitute and be a
part of this Resolution as if fully copied herein in detail.
Passed by the City Council this
22nd day of February , 1990.
B . C . Mc I NI , MAYOR
to Boyd, City Secrettary
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Sandy Oglet ee�)
Community Tevelopment Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
t� j
Rosanne Piatt, Assistant City
Attorney
1<���� OMB Ap
proval No.0348-0043
C
C
APPLICATIUN I -UK
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
2."msusunmD
Applicant Identifier
I. TV" Of SUBMISS101t
2. DATE RECEIVED BY STATE
State Application identifier
Application Preapplicatlon
❑ Construction ❑ Construction
4. DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY
Federal Identifier
Non -Construct— ; . ❑ Non -Construction
S. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Legal Name: — —
Organizatlonef Unit:
City of Lubbock
Commmity Development Department
Address (give City, county, state. and rip code):
Name and telephone number of the person to be contacted on matters involving
P. 0. BOX 2000
this application (give area code)
Sandy Ogletree
Lubbock
Cixlmmity Development Administrator
Lubbock County
(806) 767-2290
Texas 79457
S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 4EiN1:
7. TYPE OF APPLICANT: (enter appropriate letter in box)
T 1 T—
A Stab H Independent School Dist.
County L* State Controlled Institution of Higher Lesmnq
.8
C. Municipal - J. Private University
L TYPE OF APPLICATIOlt
D. Township K. Indian Tribe
®{ New ❑ Continuation ❑ Revision
E. Interstate ' L. Individual
F Intermunicipel M Profit Organization
It Revision. enter appropriate letteir(s) in box(es): ❑ ❑
G Special District N. Other (Specify).
A. Increase Award B. Decrease Award C. Increase Duration
D. Decrease Duration Other (specify):
S. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
10. CATALOG 0'9 FEDERAL DOMESTIC 1 1 4 2 1 8
11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT:
ASSISTANCE NUMBER: e
1990-91 CDBG Entitlement Program
TITLE: C Tmmity Development Block Grant
(A complete listing of projects and project
descriptions are attached).
12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT (Cities. counties, states. etc.):
City of Lubbock
13. PROPOSED PROJECT:
14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF:
Start Date
Ending Date
a. Applicant = b. Protect
6/1/90
5/31/91
19th 19th
15. ESTIMATED FUNDING.-
ia. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS?
s YES THIS PREAPPLICATIONIAPPLICATION WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO THE
a Federal
3 2,177,000 W
STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON
DATE
b NO IQ PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E.O. 12372
❑ OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW
b. Acipiicant
3 •00
C State
= .00
d Local
= .00
e Other
3 .00
1 Program Income
$ 00
17. 13 THE APPLICANT DELINOUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT?
❑ Yes H 'Yes.' attach an explanation No
g TOTAL
3 .00
2,177,000
IS. TO THE BEST Of MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.:>.LL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION.PREAPPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY
AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED
a Typed Name of Authorized Representative
b Title
C Telephone number
B. C. McMinn
Mayor
767-3000
'd Signature of Authorized Representative
a Oaie Signed
X �. _e
2-22-90
APPROVED As 0 CONTENT APROVED AS, TO FORM
4 J-
--SianCard 4�-orm 424 QEV .361
P,P%CrdW_C ov OMB n IC
I
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF 424
This is a standard form used by applicants as a required facesheet for preapplications and applications submitted
for Federal assistance. It will be used by Federal agencies to obtain applicant certification that States which have
established a review and comment procedure in response to Executive Order 12372 and have selected the program
to be included in their process, have been given an opportunity to review the applicant's submission.
Item: Errtrv: Item: Entrv:
1.
2.
3.
4.
61
7.
8
�l
10.
11
Self-explanatory.
Date application submitted to Federal agency (or
State if applicable) & applicant's control number
(if applicable).
State use only (if applicable).
If this application is to continue or revise an
existing award, enter present Federal identifier
number. If for a new project, leave blank.
Legal name of applicant, name of primary
organizational unit which will undertake the
assistance activity, complete address of the
applicant, and name and telephone number of the
person to contact on matters related to this
application.
Enter Employer Identification Number (EIN) as
assigned by the Internal Revenue Service.
Enter the appropriate letter in the space
provided.
Check appropriate box and enter appropriate
letter(s) in the space(s) provided:
— "New" means a new assistance award.
— "Continuation" means an extension for an
additional funding/budget period for a project
with a projected completion date.
-- "Revision" means any change in the Federal
Government's financial obligation or
contingent liability from an existing
obligation.
Name of Federal agency from which assistance is
being requested with this application.
Use the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
number and title of the program under which
assistance is requested.
Enter a brief descriptive title of the project. if
more than one program is involved, you should
append an explanation on a separate sheet. If
appropriate (e.g., construction or real property
projects), attach a map showing project location.
For preapplications, use a separate sheet to
provide a summary description of this project.
12. List only the largest political entities affected
(e.g., State, counties, cities).
13. Self-explanatory.
14. List the applicant's Congressional District and
any District(s) affected by the program or project.
15. Amount requested or to be contributed during
the first funding/budget period by each
contributor. Value of in -kind contributions
should be included on appropriate lines as
applicable. If the action will result in a dollar
change to an existing award, indicate only the
amount of the change. For decreases, enclose the
amounts in parentheses. If both basic and
supplemental amounts are included, show
breakdown on an attached sheet. For multiple
program funding, use totals and show breakdown
using same categories as item 15.
16. Applicants should contact the State Single Point
of Contact (SPOC) for Federal Executive Order
12372 to determine whether the application is
subject to the State intergovernmental review
process.
17. This question applies to the applicant organi-
zation, not the person who signs as the
authorized representative. Categories of debt
include delinquent audit disallowances, loans
and taxes.
18. To be signed by the authorized representative of
the applicant. A copy of the governing body's
authorization for you to sign this application as
official representative must be on file in the
applicant's office. (Certain Federal agencies may
require that this authorization be submitted as
part of the application.)
$F :2d Pw 1.88. Back
FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
FOR THE
CITY OF LUBBOCK
JUNE 1, 1990 - MAY 31, 1991
The City of Lubbock, through the receipt of $2,177,000 in Community
Development Block Grant funds from the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, proposes to implement its Community Development Program
which has been developed so as to give maximum feasible priority to:
1. Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight.
2. Principally benefit persons of low and moderate income.
In order to implement this program, the Lubbock City Council has approved
the following programs:
A. Concentrated Code Enforcement ................ ...$ 208,635
Code Enforcement .......................208,635
B. Neighborhood Redevelopment... ..... 1,415,100
Arnett Benson Redevelopment ............ 147,400
Chatman Hill Redevelopment............ 73,700
Sidewalks/Arnett Benson .............,....: 51,000
Sidewalks/North Overton ................ 50,000
Homestead Property Management.......... 5,000
Land Disposition ....................... 5,000
Residential Rehabilitation .............600,000
Project Helping Hand .. ................175,000
Paint -Up Program ....................... 25,000
Home Security Program ................. 30,000
Field Services.........................253,000
C. Park Improvements.. ..................... 60,500
Carlisle Park Development .............. 34,000
Ballfield Bleacher Replacement......... 26,500
D. Public Facilities... • 47,000
Guadalupe NeighborhoodSign............ 22,000
Guadalupe -Parkway Neighborhood Center.. 25,000
E. Public Services ....................... ... ..... 79,400
Butler Park Outreach Program.......... 16,300
Butler Park Outreach Program -Phase II.. 25,500
Summer Satellite Program.. 17,000
Summer Satellite Program -Phase II...... 20,600
Final Statement June 1, 1990-May 31, 1991
Page 2
F. Administrative Costs.. ..... 276,000
Program Management .....................172,000
Indirect Costs . ................. ...100,000
Planning Documents.... 4,000
G. Continaencv Fund ................................. 90.365
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM ...... $2,177,000
2332_6
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
GRANTEE CERTIFICATIONS
In accordance with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as
amended, and with 24 CFR 570.303 of the Community Development Block Grant
regulations, the grantee certifies that:
(a) It possesses legal authority to make a grant submission and to execute a
community development and housing program;
(b) Its governing body has duly adopted or passed as an official act a
resolution, motion or similar action authorizing the person identified
as the official representative of the grantee to submit the final
statement and amendments thereto and all understandings and assurances
contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified
as the official representative of the grantee to act in connection with
the submission of the final statement and to provide such additional
information as may be required;
(c) Prior to submission of its final statement to HUD, the grantee has:
1. Met the citizen participation requirements of §570.301(b);
2. Prepared its final statement of community -development objectives
and projected use of funds in accordance with §570.301(c) and made
the final statement available to the public;
(d) It is following a detailed citizen participation plan which:
1. Provides for and encourages citizen participation, with particular
emphasis on participation by persons of low and moderate income
who are residents of slum and blighted areas and of areas in which
funds are proposed to be used, and provides for participation of
residents in low and moderate income neighborhoods as defined by
the local jurisdiction;
2. Provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to local
meetings, information, and records relating to the grantee's
proposed use of funds, as required by the regulations of the
Secretary, and relating to the actual use of funds under the Act;
3. Provides for technical assistance to groups representative of
persons of low and moderate income that request such assistance in
developing proposals with the level and type of assistance to be
determined by the grantee;
1
4. Provides for public hearings to obtain citizen views and to
respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the community
development program, including at least the development of needs,
the review of proposed activities, and review of program
performance, which hearings shall be held after adequate notice,
at times and locations convenient to potential or actual
beneficiaries, and with accommodation for the handicapped;
5. Provides for a timely.written answer to written complaints and
grievances, within 15 working days where practicable; and
6. Identifies how the needs of non-English speaking residents will be
met in the case of public hearings where a significant number of
non-English speaking residents can be reasonably expected to
participate;
(e) The grant will be conducted and administered in compliance with:
1. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352; 42
U.S.C. §2000d et seg.); and
2. The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-20);
(f) It will affirmatively further fair housing;
(g) It has developed its final statement of projected use of funds so as to
give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and
moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of
slums or blight; (the final statement of projected use of funds may also
include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet
other community development needs having a particular urgency because
existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or
welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not
available); except that the aggregate use of CDBG funds received under
section 106 of the Act, and if applicable, under section 108 of the Act,
during the 1988-89, 1989-90, and 1990-91 program years shall principally
benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that
not less than 60 percent of such funds are used for activities that
benefit such persons during such period;
(h) It has developed a community development plan, for the period specified
in paragraph (g) above, that identifies community development and
housing needs and specifies both short and long-term community
development objectives that have been developed in accordance with the
primary objective and requirements of the Act;
(i) It is following a current housing assistance plan which has been
approved by HUD;
2
(j) It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements
assisted in whole or in part with funds provided under section 106 of
the Act or with amounts resulting from a guarantee under section 108 of
the Act by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by
persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or
assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public
improvements, unless;
1. Funds received under section 106 of the Act are used to pay the
proportion of such fee or assessment that relates to the capital
costs of such public improvements that are financed from revenue
sources other than under Title I of the Act; or
2. For purposes of assessing any amount against properties owned and
occupied by persons of moderate income, the grantee certifies to
the Secretary that it lacks sufficient funds received under
section 106 of the Act to comply with the requirements of
subparagraph (1) above;
(k) Its notification, inspection, testing and abatement procedures
concerning lead -based paint will comply with §570.608;
(1) It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970 as required under §570.606(a) and Federal implementing
regulations; the requirements in §570.606(b) governing the residential
antidisplacement and relocation assistance plan under section 104(d) of
the Act (including a certification that the grantee is following such a
plan); the relocation requirements of §570.606(c) governing displacement
subject to section 104(k) of the Act; and the relocation requirements of
§570.606(d) governing optional relocation assistance under section
105(a)(11) of the Act; and
(m) It will comply with the other provisions of the Act and with other
applicable laws.
(n) In accordance with Section 519 of Public Law 101-140, (the 1980 HUD
Appropriations Act), the City of Lubbock certifies that it has adopted
and is enforcing a policy of prohibiting the use of excessive force by
law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals
engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations.
3
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS
The certification set out below is a material representation
upon which reliance is placed by the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development in awarding the grant. If it
is later determined that the grantee knowingly rendered a
false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements
of the Drug -Free Workplace Act, the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, in addition to any other
remedies available to the Federal Government, may take
action authorized under the Drug -Free Workplace Act.
CERTIFICATION
A. The grantee certifies that it will provide a drug -free
workplace by:
(a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the
unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing,
possession or use of a controlled substance is
prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying
the actions that will be taken against employees for
violation of such prohibition;
(b) Establishing a drug -free awareness program to inform
employees about -
(1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
(2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug -free
workplace;
(3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation,
and employee assistance programs; and
(4). The penalties that may be imposed upon employees
for drug abuse violations occurring in the work-
place.
(c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be
engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy
of the statement required by paragraph (a);
(d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by
paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under
the grant, the employee will -
(1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and
(2) Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute
conviction for a violation occurring`in the work-
place no later than five days after such convic-
tion.
(e) Notifying the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development within ten days after receiving notice
under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise
receiving actual notice of such conviction;
(f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of
receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with
respect to any employee who is so convicted -
(1) Taking appropriate personnel action against
- such an employee, up to and including termination;
or
(2) Requiring such employee to participate satis-
factorily in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes
by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforce-
ment, or other appropriate agency;
(g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a
drug -free workplace through implementation of
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f).
B. The grantee shall insert in the space provided on the
attached "Place of Performance" form the site(s) for the
performance of work to be carried out with the grant funds
(including street address, city, county, state, zip code and
total estimated number of employees). The grantee further
certifies that, if it is subsequently determined that
additional sites will be used for the performance of work
under the grant, it shall notify the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development immediately upon the decision
to use such additional sites by submitting a revised "Place
of Performance" form.
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
FOR CERTIFICAITON REGARDING DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS
Name of Grantee: City of Lubbock
Grant Program Name: Community Development Block Grant
Grant Number: B-90-MC-48-0022
Date: February 22, 1990
The grantee shall insert in the space provided below the
site(s) expected to be used for the performance of work under the
grant covered by the certification:
Place of Performance (include street address, city, county,
state, zip code for each site):
Citv of Lubbock - Community Development
Municipal Building
1625 13th St.
Lubbock, Texas 79401
Total estimated number of employees expected to be engaged in the
performance.of the grant at the site(s) noted above: 11
ATTACHMENT A
The grantee certifies that it is following a detailed citizen
participation plan in accordance with Section 104(a) of the Housing
and Community Development Act as amended:
(A) Grantee provides for and encourages citizen participation, with
particular emphasis on participation by persons of low and
moderate income who are residents of slum and blight areas and
areas in which section 106 funds are to be used by:
1) Publishing notices of neighborhood meetings in English and
Spanish in a local newspaper of general circulation and a
local Hispanic newspaper, and
2) holding three evening neighborhood meetings in sites within
the CDBG target area to allow residents the opportunity to
participate.
(B) Grantee provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to
local meetings, information, and records relating to the
grantee's proposed use of funds, as required by regulations of
the Secretary, and.relating to the actual use of funds under this
title by:
1) publishing notices of a public hearing 10 days in advance in
a local newspaper of general circulation and a local
Hispanic newspaper. Notice also includes a Projected Use of
Funds and a summary of funds allocated for previous two
program years, and indicates that additional information may
be reviewed in the City Secretary's Office or the Community
Development Department;
2) holding a public hearing of the City Council which allows
citizens the opportunity to comment on the Statement of
Community Development Objectives and projected use of funds
and CDBG program performance. This public hearing is held
in the early evening;
3) publishing a Notice of the availability of the Grantee's
Performance Report and placing that report on file with
local libraries, the City Secretary's Office and the
Community Development Department.
(C) Grantee provides technical assistance to groups representative of
persons of low and moderate income that request such assistance
in developing proposals by:
1) distributing an application package to groups interested in
requesting funds which has been developed to assist such
groups in submitting all necessary information;
2) produced a video presentation which includes description of
the types of projects funded by the CDBG funds and updates
the progress of projects.
(D) Grantee provides for public hearings to obtain citizen views and
to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the
community development program including:
1) three neighborhood meetings held in the evenings in three
different locations in the CDBG Target Area as part of the
development of needs (all locations are handicap
accessible);
2) a public hearing held by the City Council in the evening to
review proposed activities and program performance (location
is handicap accessible);
3) a review of the Grantee Performance Report by the City
Council at a public meeting, including a video of program
performance. This video is also shown at the three.
neighborhood meetings discussed in (D)(1).
(E) Grantee provides for a timely written answer to written
complaints and grievances, within 15 working days where
practicable; and
M Grantee provides a bilingual interpreter at all meetings where a
significant number of non-English speaking residents is expected
to participate. Notices of neighborhood meetings are advertised
in English and Spanish.
Grantee Performance Report andUrba Development
meet Housing
P end Urban Development �
Community Development
Block Grant Program
OMB Approval No. 2506-0077 (exp. 3/31/90)
6. This reportconsists of thefollowing forms showing progress achieved through (date) : 5 / 31 / 89
a. Activity Summary, form HUD-4949.2.
b. Status of Funds - Part I and Part II, form HUD-4949.3.
c. Low / Mod Benefit Worksheet, form HUD-4949.3a.
d. Status of Funds - Part III, form 4949.4.
e. Direct Benefit Activities, form HUD-4949.5.
I. Actions to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing, form HUD-4949.6.
g. Displacement, form HUD-4949.7.
See HUD handbook 6510.2, 'Entitlement Grantee Performance Report Instructions' for guidance on completing the GPR.
7. This reportalso contains:
a. Assessments by the grantee of the relationship of the use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to:
(1) locally identified community development objectives;
(2) the National Objectives which require that each CDBG assisted activity must either benefit low and moderate income persons, aid in the prevention or
elimination of slums or blight, or meet community needs having a particular urgency; and
(3) the Primary Objective which requires that in the aggregate at least 60 percent of all CDBG funds expended during the one, two or three consecutive
program years specified by the grantee in its certification will be for activities which benefit low and moderate income persons;
b. Descriptions of:
(1) the nature of and reasons for changes in the grantee's program objectives; and
(2) how the grantee would change its program as a result of its experiences;
c. Summary of any comments received by the grantee on its program from citizens in its jurisdiction.
8. The gran tee's authorized Offlclal Representative certifies that:
a. This report contains all items identified in items 6 and 7 above.
b. To the best of his / her knowledge and belief the data in this report is true and correct as of the date in item 6.
c. Federal assistance made available under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program has not been utilized to reduce substantially the
amount of local financial support for community development activities below the level of such support prior to the start of the most recently completed
CDBG program year.
Warning: Section 1001ofTitle 18dithe United StatesCode(Crlmina/Code andCrlminalProcedure) shall applytothe foregoing certification. Title
18 provides,among other things, that whoever, knowingly andwillfu Ily makes or uses a document or wr ItIng containing any false, fictitious,or
fraudulent statement oren",Inany matterwithinthe jurisdlctionofanydepartmentoragencyoftheUnited States, shalIbefined not more than
$10,000 or Imprisoned not more than fiveyears, or both.
9. Typed Name and Title of Authorized Otflcial Representative
B. C. McMinn, Mayor
10. Sgnalure
Retain this record for 3 years
Previous edition is obsolete
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Sandy OgletreeyJCommunity
Dev't Admin.
0
/,F ?
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
S(Z� ✓ litJ '
Teresa J. Wright, Asst. Trial
Attorney form H UD-4949.1 (4/88)
ref. handbook 6510.2
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
PAGE 1 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas.
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT NUMBER
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
B-88-MC-48-0022 (14TH YEAR )
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
ACTIVITY
LOCATION ACTIVITY NAME
M
B
R
ACT -
NUMBER
AND'DESCRIPTIbN
ACT-
N
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
IVITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS
IVITY
THIS
EXPENDED
LIQUID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
TO DATE
ATED
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
EJFJ
G
H
I
J
K
L
1.
ACQUISTION
1.1.1-86
ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY
86/06
h
6890
127765
0
30235
B
Project Complete
Phyllis Wheatly (6106-08)
1 Demolition
From E. 34th & E. 35th Streets on
1 Relocation
the S. & Railroad Ave. on the W. to
Ute Ave. E. (C.T.12.02) (LM% 65.6)
# of Units to be Rehab: 0
# of Low -Mod Units: 0
1.1.2-86
ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY
86/06
h
17383
136176
0
9824
B
Project Complete
Arnett Benson (6109-13)(12th Year)
1 Demolition
Bounded by University on the E.,
1 Relocation
Clovis Rd. N., 4th street S. and
1 Household Assisted
Indiana Ave. W. (C.T. 3) (LM% 65.9)
# of Units to be Rehab: 0
# of Low -Mod Units: 0
1.2.1-87
ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY
87/06
h
79095
161831
0
48169
A
Charges still being made.
Arnett Benson (13th Year)
3 Demolitions
Bounded by Univ. Ave. on the E.,
3 Relocations
Clovis Rd on the N., 4th St. on the
3 Households assisted
S. and Indiana on W.(C.T.3,LM% 65.9
# of Units to be Rehab: 0
# of Low -Mod Units:" 0
gagge
103368
0
i'ctals
425772
88228
FORM HUD-4949.2 (4-8
ref. Handbook 6510
Report date: 8/18/198
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
PAGE 2 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT NUMBER
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
B-88-MC-48-0022 (14TH YEAR )
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
ACTIVITY
NUMBER
LOCATION ACTIVITY NAME,
AND'DESCRIPTIdN
ACT-
M
B
N
ACT -
IVITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
IVITY
THIS
EXPENDED
LIQUID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
TO DATE
AIED
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
1.3.1-88
ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY
88/06
h
78479
78479
0
60321
A
Expenditures still being madE
Arnett Benson (14th Year)
4 Acquistions
Bounded by University Ave. on the
4 Demolitions
E., Clovis Rd. on the N., 4th on
2 Relocations
the S. (C.T. 3) (LM% 65.9)
2 Households Assisted
# of Units to be Rehab: 0
# of Low -Mod Units: 0
11.3.2-88
ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY
88/06
h
39055
39055
0
28345
A
Active Project
Chatman Hill (14th Year)
2 Acquistions
i
Bounded by Ave. A on the W., South
0 Demolitions
east on the E., 19th to the N. and
0 Relocations
34th St. S. (C.T. 12.02) (LM% 65.6)
# of Units to be Rehab: 0
# of Low -Mod Units: 0
j2.
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMROV.
12.1.1-86
--------------------
PUB FACIL-PARKS RECREAT. FACIL
87/03
a
16409
18226
0
6774
A
Final Phase of Project
Greenfair (6117)
underway. To be completed
Install landscaping in the Green-
6/30/89.
fair Manor complex located at 2803
Weber.
i
i
j-
(C.T. 12.02) (LM% 65.6)
gg
133943
0
otals
135760
95440
FORM HUD-4949.2 4
ref. Handbook 51(
Report date: 8/18/19,'
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
PAGE 3 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT NUMBER
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
B-88-MC-48-0022 (14TH YEAR )
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
aNUMBERY
LOCATAND'DESCRIPTIbNNAME,
ACT-
M
B
N
IVITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
IVITY
THIS
EXPENDED
LI?UID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
TO DATE
A ED
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
2.2.1-87
PUB FACIL-PARKS RECREAT. FACIL
87/06
a
34585
36258
0
1842
B
Project Complete
Lake #2 & #6 (710l)
Installation of Additional trees at
Lakes #2 and #6.
(C.T. 2.01,12.02) (LM% 62, 65
2.2.2-87
PUB FACIL-PARKS,RECREAT. FACIL
87/06
a
27184
31880
0
4120
B
Project Complete
Park Lighting/Mackenzie (7102)
Provide new lighting and renovate
existing lighting for security at
Mackenzie park, E. Broadway and Ave
A.
(C.T. 8) (LM% 62.2).
2.2.3-87
PUB FACIL-PARKS,RECREAT. FACIL
87/06
a
16702
18338
0
14362
B
Project Complete
Stubbs Playground Renov. (7104)
Upgrade existing pplayground
equipment at Stubbs Park, 36th and
Ave. N.
(C.T. 24) (LM% 58.6)
2.2.4-87
PUB FACIL-NEIGHBORHOOD FACIL
87/10
a
21930
21973
0
30727
A
Project under construction
Neighborhood Entrance (7116)
Construction of an entrance
treatment at 23rd and Ash.
(C.T. 12.02) (LM% 65.6).
Pa e
100401.
0
To als
1
108449
51051
FORM HUD-4949.2 (4-8
ref. Handbook 6510
Report date: 8/18/198
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
PAGE 4 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT NUMBER
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
B-88-MC-48-0022 (14TH YEAR )
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
ACTIVITY
LOCATION, ACTIVITY NAME,
M
B
NUMBER
AND DESCRIPTIbN
ACT-
N
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
IVITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS
IVITY
THIS
EXPENDED
LIQUID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
TO DATE
ATED
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
2.2.5-87
PUB FACIL-PARKS,RECREAT. FACIL
87/10
a
2253
2352
0
65648
A
Project currently under
Hamilton Park Irr; (7117)
construction. To be completes
Install a new irriggation system at
July 1989.
Hamilton Park, 22nd and X.
(C.T. 14) (LM% 58).
2,2.6-87
PUB FACIL-SIDEWALKS
87/06
a
47343
47830
0
2170
B
Project Complete
Overton Sidewalks (8710)
Installation of sidewalks, curb and
gutter in the South Overton
neighborhood.
(C.T. 6.01) (LM% 82).
2.2.7-87
PUB FACIL-BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS
87/10
a
119838
299838
0
0
B
Project Complete
E. 26TH St. Bridge(7118)
Matching funds for the construction
of the bridge at E. 26th Street.
(C.T. 12.02) (LM% 65.6).
2.2.8-87
PUB FACIL-DAYCARE CENTERS
87/10
a
35060
35060
0
340
B
Project Complete
Early Learning Centers
720�Renovation
of Erskine rskine
A14
Carver (2509 Elm) ananda (1301
Vanda) Early Learning Centers.
(C.T. 3,12.02,10)(LM% 66,65.6,69.3)
Totals
204494
385080
0
68158
FORM HUD-4949.2 (4-8
ref. Handbook 6510
Report date: 8/18/198
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
PAGE 5 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT NUMBER
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
B-88-MC-48-0022 (14TH YEAR )
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
ANUMBERY
LOCATAND'DESCRIPTIbNNAME,
M
B
N
ACT-
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
IVITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS
IVITY
THIS
EXPENDED
LIQQUID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
TO DATE
ATED
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
2.3.1-88
PUB FACIL-PARKS,RECREAT. FACIL
88/06
a
617
617
0
21183
A
Project Under Development
Burns Playground Regnopv. (8101)
Upgradeat
e(23rdtand
Ave. K)und
(C.T. 13) (LM% 70).
2.3.2-88
PUB FACIL-PARKS IRECREAT. FACIL
88/06
a
1724
1724
0
68276
A
Project Under Construction
Stubbs Park/Irrigation (8104}"
Install a new irrigation system at
Stubbs Park. (36th and N)
(C.T. 24) (LM% 58.6).
2.3.3-88
PUB FACIL-PARKS,RECREAT. FACIL
88/06
a
27326
27326
0
45674
A
Phase II under construction.
Park Lighting/Mackenzie (8105)
Install new lighting and uppgrade
the lot in the Joyland
parking
Area.
(C.T. 9) (LM% 52.6)
2.3.4-88
PUB FACIL-SIDEWALKS
88/06
a
46950
46950
0
13990
B
Project complete.
Arnett Benson (8612)
Installation of sidewalks in the
2600-2700 blocks of Dartmouth and
Duke.
(C.T. 3) (LM% 65.9).
76617
0
Totals
76617
149123
FORM HUD-4949.2 �4-E
ref. Handbook 51C
Report date: 8/18/19E
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
PAGE 6 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT NUMBER
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
B-88-MC-48-0022 (14TH YEAR )
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
ACTIVITY
LOCATION, ACTIVITY NAME,
M
B
N
ACT -
STATUS
NUMBER
AND DESCRIPTIbN
ACT-
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
IVITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS /
IVITY
THIS
EXPENDED
LI?UID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
Tn DATF
A FD
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
2.3.5-88
PUB FACIL-PARKS RECREAT. FACIL
88/09
a
3577
3577
0
26423
A
Project under construction
Hodges Park Improv. (8118)
lighting
Install new in Hod es Park
(N. University and Marshal
(C.T. 2.01) (LM% 62).
2.3.6-88
PUB FACIL-PARKS RECREAT. FACIL
89/02
a
0
0
0
67000
A
Design work initiated.
Carlisle Park Annex (8121)
Development of a new park in the
Carlisle neighborhood. The area to
be developed is at the corner of
19th St. and Urbana Plaza.
(C.T. 104 BGroup 1) (LM% 55).
2.3.7-88
PUB FACIL-NEIGHBORHOOD FACIL
88/06
a
1376
1376
0
111624
A
Design work initiated.
Parkway Center (8611)
Construction of a multi -purpose
building on an existing concrete
slab, 405 N. Quirt Ave.
(C.T. 9) (LM% 52.6)
2.3.8-88
PUB FACIL-SIGNAL UPGRADE
88/09
a
0
0
0
35000
A
Project under development.
Signal Upgrade (8717)
Replace substandard traffic signal
equipment at the intersection of
University and Auburn.
(C.T. 3,2.02) (LM% 65.9,71.8).
Totals
4953
4953
0
240047
FORM HUD-4949.2 (4-8
ref. Handbook 6510
Report date: 8/18/198
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
PAGE 7 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT MBE0022
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
MNUMBER
(14TH YEAR )
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
,ACTIVITY
NUMBER
LOCATION ACTIVITY NAME
M
B
R
ACT -
AND'DESCRIPTI6N
ACT-
N
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
IVITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS
IVITY
THIS
EXPENDED
LI?UID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
TO DATE
AED
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
3
ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS
3.1.1-86
REMOVAL OF ARCHITRL BARRIERS
86/07
a
1724
32727
0
18173
B
Project Complete
Handicap Accessibility (6112)
Provide handicap access to rest -
rooms at a number of city parks and
community centers.
C.T. 14,12.02,6.02)(LM% 58.1,,65.6
�4.8)
3.2.1-87
REMOVAL OF ARCHITRL BARRIERS
87/10
a
39654
41751
0
1249
B
Project Complete
Barrier Free Park (7118)
Provide handicap accessibile play
equipment at Maxey Park, 24th and
Nashville.
C.T. 16.01 BGroup 1 LM% 56.7)
C.T. 16.02 BGroup 5) ILM% 56)
3.3.1-88
REMOVAL OF ARCHITRL BARRIERS
88/06
a
19164
19164
0
3736
A
Project under construction.
Wagner Park/Handicap Access (8103)
Renovation of the restrooms at
Wagner Park to make them handicap
accessible. (26th and Elgin)
(C.T. 15 BGroup 1,2 ) (LM% 55,69))
60542
0
io als
93642
23158
FORM HUD-4949.2 (4-8
ref. Handbook 6510
Report date: 8/18/198
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
PAGE 8 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89-
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
BR88TMCU48E0022 (14TH YEAR )
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
ANUMBERY
LOCATAND'DESCRIPTIaNNAME,
ACT-
M
B
N
IVITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
IVITY
THIS -
EXPENDED
LI?UID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
TO DATE
AILED
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
3.3.2-88
REMOVAL OF ARCHITRL BARRIERS
88/09
a
2340
2340
0
1620
A
Expenditures still being made
Handicap Access/Mahon (8916)
to project.
Provide Handicap access to the City
i
Library, 1309 9th street.
(C.T. 7 ) (LM% 80.6).
i
}4.
-----------------------------------
PUBLIC SERVICE
i4.2.1-87
PUB SUS -HOUSING SERVICES -
88/06
a
4844
9845
0
155
B
Project Complete.
Lubbock Heritage Society (7621)
Funding of "How to" workshops for
various self-help programs.
(Citywide).
4.3.1-88
PUB SUS -YOUTH SERVICES
88/06
c
7779
7779
0
221
B
Project Complete.
Butler Park/Outreach Program (8102)
Provide organized recreation
programs for the youth at Butler
Park, E. 4th St. and Zenith.
(C.T. 10) (LM% 69).
14963
0
Totals
19964
1996
FORM HUD-4949.2 �4-f
ref. Handbook 51(
Report date: 8/18/19E
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
PAGE 9 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT NUMBER
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
8-88-MC-48-0022 (14TH YEAR )
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
ACTIVITY
LOCATION, ACTIVITY NAME,
M
B
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
NUMBER
AND DESCRIPTION
ACT-
N
IVITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS
IVITY
THIS
EXPENDED
LIQUID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
TO DATE
AIED
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
5.
-----------------------------------
REHABILITATION
5.2.1-87
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL -
87/06
h
89796
604056
0
0
B
Project Complete.
Rehab 13th yyear
Three Households assisted thi
Assistance to qualified households
period.
to correct substandard conditions.
Citywide)
of Units to be Rehab: 60
# of Low -Mod Units: 60'
5.3.1-88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
88/06
h
482236
482236
0
117764
A
48 Households Assisted this
Rehab. 14th year
period.
Assistance to qualified households
to correct substandard conditions.
(citywide)
# of Units to be Rehab: 60
# of Low -Mod Units: 60
5.3.2--88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
88/06
h
50.186
50186
0
0
B
Protect Complete
Emergency Repair (8607)
45 Households Assisted.
Provide repairs to low income
households where dangerous health
hazards exist. (Citywide)
# of Units to be Rehab: 45
# of Low -Mod Units: 45
Page
Totals
622218
1136478
0
117764
FORM HUD-4949.2 �4-8
ref. Handbook 510
Report date: 8/18/198
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
PAGE 10 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT NUMBER
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89,
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
B-88-MC-48-0022 (14TH YEAR j
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
aNUMBER�r
LOCATAND'DESCRIPTI6NNAME,
M
B
N
ACT-
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
IUITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS
IVITY
THIS
EXPENDED
LIQUID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
TO DATE
AIED
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
5.3.3-88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
88/06
h
20540
20540
0
0
B
Project Complete
Paint -up Pro ram (8610)
228 Houses Painted
Provide pain and supplies for low
income persons to paint their homes
(CDBG Target Area
# of Units to be ehab: 228
# of Low -Mod Units: 228
5.3.4-88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL.
88/06
h
75034
75034
0
0
B
ProJect Complete
Weatherization (8603)
52 Homes Weatherized
Aid to low income persons to
weatherize their homes (storm
windows and insulation). (Citywide)
# of Units to be Rehab: 52
4 of Low -Mod Units: 52
5.3.5-88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
88/06
h
27518
27518
0
2482
B
Pro ect Complete
Home Security/Elderly (8815
82 gomes secured.
Provide and install deadbol locks
& other security devices for low in
come elderly homeowners (Cityywide)
# of Units to be Rehab: 8Z
# of Low -Mod Units: 82
D.3.6-88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
88/06
h
236731
236731
0
11069
B
Project year complete.
Field Services (4415)
Staff and overhead costs of Rehab.
Pro ram.
# Units to be Rehab: 48
# of Low -Mod Units: 48
359823
0
Totals
359823
13551
FORM HUD-4949.2 (4-&
ref. Handbook 6510
Report date: 8/18/198
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
_ PAGE 11 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT NUMBER
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
B-88-MC-48-0022 (14TH YEAR )
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
ACTIVITY
LOCATION, ACTIVITY NAME,
M
B
R
ACT -
NUMBER
AND DESCRIPTIbN
ACT-
N
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
IVITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS
IVITY
THIS
EXPENDED
LI UID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
TO DATE
A ED
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
5.3.7-88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
88/06
h
0
0
0
75000
A
On going Project.
On -Site Redevelopment (4413)
Purpose of pproject is to clear
severely dilapidated structures not
feasible for rehabilitation.
# of Units to be Rehab: 0
# of Low -Mod Units: 0
5.3.8-88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
88/06
h
0
0
0
10000
A
Project under development.
Homestead Property M mt. (8608)
Inspection and main?enance of
homestead properties.
# of Units to be Rehab: 0
# of Low -Mod Units: 0
6.
-----------------------------------
CODE ENFORCEMENT
6.3.1-88
CODE ENFORCEMENT
88/06
a
234704
234704
0
0
B
Project Complete.
Conc. Code Enforcement (8406)
Elimination of slum and blight by
No. of Inspections 19,874
No. of Violations 111321
enforcement of minimum housing
No. of Compliances 9,979
standards.
(CDBG Target Area)
ToEals
234704
0
234704
85000
FORM HUD-4949.2 ((4-8
ref. Handbook 6510
Report date: 8/18/198
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
PAGE 12 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT NUMBER
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
B-88-MC-48-0022 (14TH YEAR )
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
ACTIVITY
LOCATION, ACTIVITY NAME,
M
B
N
NUMBER
AND DESCRIPTIbN
ACT-
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
IVITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS
IVITY
THIS
EXPENDED
LIQUID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
TO DATE
AIED
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
5.3.2-88
CODE ENFORCEMENT
88/10
a
25021
25021
0
28979
A
Expenditures still being made
Alley Debris Program (8419)
to project.
Enforcement of weed and junk
vehicle codes.
(CDBG Target Area)
7.
-----------------------------------
DIRECT ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE
7.2.1-87
DED ASSISTANCE TO FOR -PROFIT
7.2.1-87
--- -- -
Economic Incentive Fund
87/10
j
0
0
100000
200000
A
Funds for project not yet
HUB,City Economic Dev. Corpp Econ.
expended.
Economic Incentive Fund (8620)
Provides local match requirement
for the SPAG reloving loan fund.
# of Expected Jobs: 0
# of Low -Mod Jobs: 0
?.
-----------------------------------
PLANNING
).1.1-86
-----------------------------------
PLANNING
87/01
0
4896
0
3604
B
Project Complete
Chatman/Coronado Study J6615)
Preservation planning s udy of
Chatman Hospital and surrounding
neighborhood. Focused on adaptive
uses of the hospital.
gagge
25021
100000
Fo a
1
29917
1
232583
FORM HUD-4949.2 (4-8,
ref. Handbook 6510
Report date: 8/18/198:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT �~
NAME OF GRANTEE -
PAGE 13 OF 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT NUMBER
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
B-88-MC-48-0022 (14TH YEAR )
YEAR/
MO
L
S
U
CDBG AMOUNT
ACTIVITY
LOCATION, ACTIVITY NAME,
M
B
NUMBER
AND DESCRIPTION
ACT-
N
EXPENDED
TOTAL
UN-
UN-
IVITY
ACCOMPLISHMENTS / STATUS
IVITY
THIS
EXPENDED
LIQUID-
OBLIGA-
CODES
FUND-
REPORT-
TO DATE
A ED
TED
ED
ING
OBLIGA-
BALANCE
PERIOD
TIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
3.1.2-86
PLANNING
87/05
0
26775
0
61225
A
Expenditures still being made
Prof. Services Coronado 86618)
as of June 1989.
Appraisal and market ana ysis of
Coronado area related to proposed
buyout of HUD land inventory.
9.2.1-87
PLANNING
88/10
54733
75000
0
0
B
Project Complete.
CBD Redevelopment Plan J87622}
Development of a redeve opmentt plan
for downtown Lubbock.
9.3.1-88
PLANNING
88/06
111
111
0
3889
A
Ongoing Project.
Planning Documents �8614)
Reprint of Lubbock opulation and
Economic Report, Census booklets
and other planning documents.
10.
-----------------------------------
PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
10.3.1-8
PGM ADM-GEN MGMT OVRSGHT,&COOR -
88/06
160927
160927
0
5693
B
Program Year Complete.
Administration (4411)
10.3.2-8
PGM ADM -INDIRECT COSTS
88/06
111616
111616
0
0
B
Program Year Complete.
Indirect Costs (8609)
ii._
UNPROGRAMMED FUNDS
11.3.1-8
===--------------------------------
UNPROGRAMMED FUNDS
88/06
0
0
0
82307
A
Funds remaining to be
Contengency Fund
allocated
3273$7
0
To
374429
153114
Grand
2268434
100000
Totals
1
3385588
1
1319213
FORM HUD-4949.2 4-8
ref. Handbook 6510
Report date: 8/18/198
Grantee Performance Report
Statusof Funds
Parts I and 11
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development
Community Devopment
Block Grant Program
OMB Approval No. 2506-0077 (exp. 3/31/90)
None of Grantee
Grant Number
Period Covered
City of Lubbock
B-88—MC-48-0022
From
6-1-88 To5-31-i
PartCSummaryofResourcesandExpenditures
CDBG Funds
1. Unexpended CDBG funds at end of previous reporting period
$
2,437,000
2. Additional CDBG funds received
$
a. Entitlement Grant (HUD-7082, line 8b)
2,198,000
b. Surplus from Urban Renewal / NDP Settlement (HUD-7082, line 10b)
$
0
c. Loans guaranteed under Section 108
$
-
0
d. Program income received during the program year (as shown in Status of Funds Part III. column f)
$
14,217
e. Return of grant funds
$
3. Total CDBG funds available for use during this reporting period (sum of lines 1 thru 2e)
$
4. Total CDBG funds expended during this reporting period
$
a. Amount shown on Activity Summary forms, coumn g
2,268,433
b. CDBG funds used for Section 108 payments
$
0
S. Unexpended balance of CDBG funds at the end of this reporting period (line 3 minus lines 4a and 4b)
$
2,390,784
Partu: uverau Nrogram uenertt toLow anoMooerateincome Persons
A. Low/Mod Benefit During this Reporting Period
E
6. a. Total CDBG funds expended (from line 4a above), except for Sec. 108 payments
$
2,268,433
b. Less: Planning and program administration costs (as shown in Activity Summary forms, column g)
$
127,1,97
c. Net expenditures subject to program benefit calculation (line 6a minus line 6b)
$ 1,941,046
7. Expenditures benefitting low and moderate income persons (as shown in Low/Mod Benefit Worksheet
Part IV)
$ 1,681,322
8. Percent benefit to low and moderate income persons (line 7 as a percent of line 6c)
%
86.6
36-8 —9
9. Program year(s) covered in certification PY Y 87-8 PY�
nn......,
;».
:....
B. Low/Mod BenefItfor Multl-Year Certification a (completeonlylfcertification period exceedsoneyear)
10.a. Cumulative net expenditures subject to program benefit calculation
$ 6,
6,91,14 6
b. Cumulative expenditures benefitting low and moderate income persons
$ 5
, $27 , 751
c. Percent cumulative benefit to low and moderate income persons (line 10b as a percent of line 10a)
%
87.12
form HUD•4949.3 (4-88)
Retain this record for 3 years ref. 24 CFR part 570 and handbook 6510.2
Previous editions are obsolete
Grantee Performance Re ort
pp
Low/ Mod Benefit Work%eet
o ment ng
a Development
and Urban
and Urben Development
Community Development
Block Grant Program
41 r
OMB Approval No. 2506-0077 (exp. 3131/90)
Naar o{ Grants*
Grant Number
Period Covered
City of Lubbock
B-88-MC-48-0022
From 6-1-88
To 5-31-89
Part 1: Direct Expenditures for the Acquisition, Construction or
Rehabilitation of Property for Housing
Activity Activity Name
Number
%of total
units to be Total Max
occupied cost low / mod
by low/mod credit
households I
CDBG Reduction
share of ratio
cost
CDBG
expenditures Low/mod
this credit this
reporting reporting
period period
a
b
c
d
e
Ig
mum ar utrecr =apenauures
Part If: CDBG Expenditures Used Only for Staff and Overhead to Assist In the Acquisition, Construction or Rehabllitatlon of Property forHouaing ff
% of units
in program Total admin Low I mod
Activity Number Activity Name to be cost this credit this
Name of Program Assisted occupied reporting period reporting period
by low/mod
households
a b c d e
Grantee Performance Report U.S. Departmentof Housing
and Urban Development A
Status of Funds Community Devopment -a r
Part III Block Grant Program
OMB Approval No. 2506-0077 (exp. 3131/90)
City of Lubbock
Program Incomsand 5tatusof LumpSum Accoums
Activity
Number
Activity Name and Nature of Income
a
b
11.3.1
Demolition Income
11.3.1
Sale of Land acquired under Urban Renewal
(CD Parcel 54310-3-36)
11.3.1
Sale of Land acquired under Urban Renewal
(CD Parcel 54310-3-2)
11.3.1
Sale of Land acquired under Urban Renewal
(CD Parcel 34310-2-11)
11.3.1
Urban Homestead Application Fees
11.3.1
Bid Retainage
11.3.1
Program Income: Urban Renewal
Gr&M Number
Pura Covueo
B-38-MC-48-0022
I
From6-1-88 .-To 5-131-8!
Rer;d Revolv, Lump Program Income
by Sub- ing Sum Received
recipient Fund .
c
d
e
f
10,615
100
100
100
225
3,025
52
Atta
ch narrat
ive '> To
tal s2 (see 14 1 $ 7
1
Retain this record for 3 years Page of pages form HUD-4949.4(4-88)
Previous edition is obsolete ref. 24 CFR part 570 and handbook 6510.2
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NAME OF GRANTEE
PAGE 1 OF 1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
City of Lubbock, Texas
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
GRANT NUMBER
PERIOD COVERED 06/01/88 TO 05/31/89
DIRECT BENEFIT ACTIVITIES
B-88-MC-48-0022 (14TH YEAR )
TOTAL
PERCENT OF TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS/PERSONS ASSISTED(Column c)WHO ARE:
NUMBER OF
LOW
WHITE
BLACK
AMERICAN
ASIAN
FEMALE
ACTIVITY
ACTIVITY NAME
HOUSEHOLDS/
NUMBER
PERSONS
AND
LOW
NOT
NOT
INDIAN OR
HISPANIC
OR
HEAD OF
ASSISTED
MODERATE-
INCOME.
HISPANIC
HISPANIC
ALASKAN
PACIFIC
HOUSE -
INCOME
ORIGIN
ORIGIN
NATIVE
ISLANDER
HOLD
1.
------------------------------
ACQUISTION
1.1.1-86
ACQUISITION -OF REAL PROPERTY
1(H)
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1.1.2-86
ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY
1(H)
100°%
100%
100%
0%
0°%
0%
0%
100%
1.2.1-87
ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY
3(H)
100°%
100%
33%
0%
0%
67%
0%
33%
1.3.1-88
ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY
4(H)
100%
100°%
25%
0%
0%
75%
0%
25%
1.3.2-88
ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY
2(H)
100%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
50%
4.
PUBLIC SERVICE
- --------------------------
--= -
4.3.1-88
----------------------------
-
PUB SVS-YOUTH SERVICES
400(P)
0 0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5.
REHABILITATION
5.2.1-87
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
3(H)
100%
67°%
67%
0%
0%
33%
0°%
67%
5.3.1-88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
48(H)
100%
52%
27%
25%
0%
48°%
0%
52°%
5.3.2-88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
45(H)
100%
100%
20°%
33%
0°%
47%
0%
62%
5.3.3-88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
228(H)
100%
98%
13%
34%
0°%
53%
0%
28%
5.3.4-88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
52(H)
100%
100°%
19%
31%
0%
50°%
0%
62%
5.3.5-88
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
82(H)
100%
100°%
41%
26%
0%
33%
0%
65%
5.3.6-86
REHAB -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTL
48(H)
100%
52%
27%
25%
0%
48%
0%
52%
FORM HUD-4949.5 �4-88�
ref. Handbook 510.2
Report date: 8/3/1989
4
Attachment for HUD-4949.5
Narrative for Limited Clientele, Direct Benefit Actives
(without personal records or presumptive benefit
4.3.1-88 Public Services -Youth Services: Butler Park
Outreach Program.
The Butler Park Outreach'Program provides organized
recreation activities in the Butler Park neighborhood. Low
and moderate income persons comprise 690 of the Butler Park
area residents.
The recreation program is attended by elementary age
children and teens residing in the area. Informal athletic
leagues and tournaments are promoted in basketball,
volleyball, and tennis.
Grantee Performance Report
Actionsto AffirmativelyFurther
FairHousing
U.5. Department o1 Housing
and Urban Development
Community Devopment
Block Grant Program
61 r
OMB ADDroval No. 2506-0077 texm 3/31/901
Name Of Grantee
Grant Nutrber
Period Covered
City of Lubbock
IB-88-MC-48-0022
From 6-1-88 To 5-31-99
Actions Taken
Results
a
b
-Counseling:
Community Development Department's Relocation Counselor
With resources provided through the Relocation
assists displaced persons in contacting builders, real
Assistance, displaced low -moderate families and
estate brokers and rental offices. Counselor is charged
individuals have the opportunity to move to any
with the responsibility of insuring clients are not
location in Lubbock or the United States.
discriminated against in seeking housing. Clients are
familiarized with all housing resources suited to their
needs and of procedures for securing housing.
Fair Housing Resolution - December 1971:
Action by the Lubbock City Council to support and promot3
Directs any question or complaint regarding fair
the rights of each individual to live in a home of their
housing to Human Relations Officer.
choice.
Human Relations Commission:
The purpose of the commission is to promote the rights of
The Human Relations Commission has established a
minorities in Lubbock and to investigate complaints of
Housing Committee to review complaints or to under -
discrimination.
take special studies related to fair housing or
housing opportunities.
Lubbock Fair Housing Strategy - October 9, 1980:
Action by the Lubbock City Council to define a specific
Establishes a strategy that will promote Fair
strategy to -affirmatively further fair housing. -The
Housing through education assistance of minorities
strategy closely parallels the components of the New
and local initiatives.
Horizons Program.
Retain this record for 3 years
Previous editions are obsolete
page of pages
formHUD-4949.E 4-&U
ref, 24 CFR oart 570 and handbook 6510.2
l:
J
Grantee Performance Report U.S. Departmentof Housing
Displacement and Urban Development
Community Development air
Block Grant Program
Attach narrative (see instructions) OMB Approval No. 2506-0077 (exp. 3/31/90)
Name of Grantee Grant Number Period Covered
City of Lubbock B-88-MC-48-0022 From 6-1-88 To 5-31-8
Households residing in this census tract
Households remaining in this census tract
Displaced households relocated to this census tract
who were displaced
after displacement
from another census tract
Census
White
Black
American
Asian or
White
Black
American
Asian or
White
Black
American
Asian or
Tract
Not
Not
Indian or
Hispanic
Pacific
Not
Not
Indian or
Hispanic
Pacific
Not
Not
Indian or
Hispanic
Pacific
Hispanic
Hispanic
Alaskan
Islander
Hispanic
Hispanic
Alaskan
Islander
Hispanic
Hispanic
Alaskan
Islander
Origin
Origin
Native
Origin
Origin
Native
Origin
Origin
Native
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
J
k
I
m
n
o
p
3
3
5
3
5
12.02
2
2
Totals
3
2
5
3
2
5
/-WLIIIn.
AAAe rA 001
Retain this record for 3 years
Previous editions are obsolete
page of pages
ref. 24 CFR part 570 and handbook 6510.2
ATTACHMENT TO GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
Displacement: HUD - 4949.7 (3-83)
Narrative Identifying Displacement Areas and
Action Taken to Mitigate Adverse Effects of Displacement
Urban Renewal acquisition and relocation activities have caused dis-
placement in the following neighborhoods:
# of # of # of owner -
Neighborhood Businesses Tenants ..Occupants
Phyllis Wheately 1
0 0
# of L & M
Income
Households
9
Arnett Benson 0 0 8 8
Chatman Hill 0 0 2 2
# Female
Headed
..Households_
0
3
1
Actions taken by the City through the Community Development Department
to assist low and moderate income persons to remain in their neighbor-
hoods when they prefer and to mitigate adverse effects of displacement
include, but are not limited to the following:
1. Owner occupant displacees have the option, with the excep-
tion of the Phyllis Wheatley Neighborhood which is a total
clearance area, of redeveloping on their original lot with
funds derived from the purchase of their property and from
payments made under the Uniform Relocation Act. Approxi-
mately five to ten owner occupants are displaced each year.
2. The Community Development Department, which carries out
relocation activities under the Lubbock CDBG Program,
adheres to a policy of maximum flexibility in the displace-
ment of families and individuals. The 1190 Days Notice to
Vacate" is never issued until the displacee has secured
suitable replacement resources. In special cases several
months may elapse between time of purchase and issuance of
the 1190 Day Notice".
3. The 1190 Day Notice to Vacate" is never issued until the dis-
placee has been referred to at least three potential
resources outside of impacted areas for housing. Both the
Relocation Counselor and the displacee participate in the
search for suitable rehousing. Where special problems
exist, the Relocation Counselor will assume most of the re-
sponsibility, and where necessary, will transport the dis-
placee to potential resources for inspection.
4. The relocation staff consists of 1 full-time person who is
Black. The counselor has approximately 19 years of reloca-
tion experience, and is thoroughly familiar with housing
resources in .Lubbock.
5. The Relocation Counselor maintains close contract with
social.service and human resource agencies in Lubbock, and
where special services, other than housing, are required,
appropriate referrals are made. Assistance with social ser-
vices in some cases involves transporting displacees to
local agencies and institutions.
6. Guidelines have been adopted for replacement housing pay-
ments to be made in excess of the statutory limits where the
circumstances require such additional assistance. Such pay-
ments in excess of the statutory limits are made only where
hardship conditions are present. (Last Resort Housing
Assistance Payments.)
7. Although the situation has not occurred, the Relocation
Counselor would take immediate action if he felt that a dis-
placee was facing racial or other discrimination in their
search for replacement housing.
8. Before the property is acquired, the Relocation Counselor
carefully counsels with and reviews each family to be sure
that displacement will not give rise to adverse effects
which cannot be mitigated. Should such a situation appear,
the case is returned to the administrative level of the
Community Development Department for consideration of alter-
natives.
9. Displacees are counseled fully on matters relating to relo-
cation which include information on family budgeting, local
taxes, housing maintenance, insurance, and other matters.
10. The cooperation of several local lending institutions has
been received in the relocation of families and individuals.
one institution has made special arrangements to make small
loans to low income displacees who might otherwise not meet
normal conventional lending criteria. Such loans, where
necessary, are used to finance any residual mortgages which
may result from rehousing owner occupants. The Relocation
Counselor maintains on -going contact with staff members in
several local lending institutions.
City of Lubbock
B-89-MC-48-0022
6/1/88 - 5/31/89
7. a. 1)
ASSESSMENT
The Amended Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and
Projected Use of Funds for the City of Lubbock for the period of June
1, 1988 through May 31, 1989 was as follows:
The City of Lubbock through the receipt of $2,198,000 in Community
Development Block Grants funds from the Department of Housing and
Urban Development proposes to implement its Community Development Pro-
gram which has been developed so as to give maximum feasible priority
to:
1.
Aid to the prevention or elimination of
slums and blight
2.
Principally benefit persons of low and moderate incomes
In order to implement this program, the Lubbock City Council has ap-
proved
the following programs:
A)
Concentrated Code Enforcement
$ 273,833 (a)
B)
Neighborhood Redevelopment
1,374,940 (b)
C)
Community Facilities
113,000
D)
Public Facilities
38,960 (c)
E)
Park Improvements
284,700 (d)
F)
Public Services
8,000
G)
Planning Activities
4,000
H)
Program Management
166,620
I)
Indirect Costs
100,000
J)
Contingency Funds
82,307
Community Development Entitlement Program
$2,446,360
Page 2
Since this Statement of Objectives and Projected Use
of Funds was sub-
mitted
to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, funds ex-
pended
towards these objectives have been:
A)
Concentrated Code Enforcement $
259,725
B)
Neighborhood Redevelopment
1,056,728
C)
Community Facilities
1,376
D)
Public Facilities
2,340
E)
Park Improvements
52,408.
F)
Public Services
7,779
G)
Planning Activities
111
H)
Program Management
160,927
I)
Indirect Costs
111,616
J)
Contingency Funds
0
Community Development Entitlement Program
$1,653,010
All of
these programs (Program Management and Indirect Costs excluded)
have either
aided in the prevention or elimination of
slums or blight
or have
benefited persons of low and moderate incomes
(see Activity
Summary
for breakdown of National Objectives) .
(a) Amendment to original statement of objectives funded with $34,000
from previous years' Contingency Fund.
(b) Amendment to original statement of objectives funded with $67,400
from previous years' Contingency Fund.
(c) Includes amendments to original statement of objectives funded
with $38,960 from previous years' Contingency Fund.
(d) Includes amendments to original statement of objectives funded
with $108,000 from previous years' Contingency Fund.
City of Lubbock
B-88-MC-48-0022
6/1/88 - 5/31/89
7.a. 2) & 3)
LOW AND MODERATE INCOME BENEFIT
In accordance with the changes made to the Community Development Block
Grant program by the enactment of the Housing and Urban -Rural Recovery
Act of 1983, the following information shows the amount of Community
Development funds for 1988-89 that were used for activities benefiting
low and moderate income persons.
In determining activities benefiting low and moderate income
individuals, the activity and the geographical areas benefiting from
each activity were examined. The service areas for each of the
projects were reviewed to determine the percentage of low and moderate
income persons served. Census tract and block group information was
used to determine the percentage of low and moderate income persons
within the defined service areas.
Each activity listed below shows the Service Area in which that
particular activity would have an impact. The residents of the
Service Areas were found to possess low to moderate income
characteristics. Also shown with the activity is the particular
section of 24 CFR 5.70.208 in which that activity is best defined.
EXPENDED THIS
ACTIVITY REPORTING PERIOD
(Thousands of $)
Phyllis Wheatley Project (12th Year) 6,890
Service Area:C.T. 12.02
570.208 (a) (3)
Arnett Benson Project (12th Year) 17,383
Service Area: C.T. 3
570.208 (a) (3)
Arnett Benson Project (13th Year) 79,095
Service Area: C.T. 3
570.208 (a) (3)
Arnett Benson Project (14th Year) 78,479
Service Area: C.T. 3
570.208 (a) (3)
Low/14oct Benetit - Page 2
ACTIVITY
Chatman Hill Project (14th Year)
Service Area: C.T. 3
570.208 (a) (3)
Landscaping Greenfair
Service Area: C.T. 12.02
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Lake #2 & #6 Landscape
Service Area: C.T. 2.01,12.02
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Mackenzie Park Lighting
Service Area: C.T. 8
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Stubbs Playground Renovation
Service Area: C.T. 24
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Overton Sidewalks
Service Area: C.T. 6.01
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Neighborhood Entrance
Service Area: C.T. 12.02
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Irrigation/Hamilton Park
Service Area: C.T. 14
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
E. 26th St. Bridge/Construction
Service Area: C.T. 12.02
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Early Learning Centers
Service Area: C.T. 3,12.02,10
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Burns Playground Renov.
Service Area: C.T. 13
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Stubbs Park/Irrigation
Service Area: C.T. 24
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
EXPENDED THIS
REPORTING PERIOD
(Thousands of $)
39,055
16,409
34,585
27,184
16,702
47,343
21,930
2,253
119,838
35,060
617
1,724
Low/Mod Benefit - Page 3
Park Lighting/Mackenzie
Service Area: C.T. 9
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Arnett Benson Sidewalks
Service Area: C.T. 6.01
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Hodges Park Improvement
Service Area: C.T. 2.01
570.208,(a) (1) (i)
Carlisle Park Annex
Service Area: C.T. 104 Block 1
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Parkway Center
Service Area: C.T. 9
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Signal Upgrade
Service Area: C.T. 3,2.02
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Lubbock Heritage Society
Primarily CD Target Area
570.208 (a) (3)
Butler Park/Outreach Program
Service Area: C.T. 10
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Handicap Accessibility
Service Area: C.T. 14,12.02,6.02
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Handicap Access/Mahon
Service Area: C.T. 7
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Wagner Park Access
Service Area: C.T. 15 Block 1,2
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
Barrier Free Park III
Service Area: C.T. 16.02 Block 5
570.208 (a) (1) (i)
EXPENDED THIS
REPORTING PERIOD
(Thousands of $)
27,326
46,950
3,577
0
1,376
0
4,844
7,779
1,724
2,340
19,164
39,654
Low/ Mod Benefit - Page 4
ACTIVITY EXPENDED THIS
REPORTING PERIOD
( Thousands of $ )
Residential Rehabilitation -City Wide (13th Year) 89,796
Based on individual application -
primarily CD Target Area
570.208 (a) (3)
Residential Rehabilitation -City Wide (14th Year)
Based on individual application -
primarily CD Target Area
570.208 (a) (3)
Home Security for the Elderly (14th Year)
Based on individual application -
primarily CD Target Area
570.208 (a) (3)
Emergency Repair
Based on individual application -
primarily CD Target Area
570.208 (a) (3)
Paint -Up Program
Based on individual application -
primarily CD Target Area
570.208 (a) (3)
Weatherization
Based on individual application -
primarily CD Target Area
570.208 (a) (3)
On -Site Redevelopment
Based on individual application -
primarily CD Target Area
570.208 (a) (3)
Homestead Property Mgmt.
Based on individual application -
primarily CD Target Area
570.208 (a) (3)
Field Services
Primarily CD Target Area
570.901 (c)
Total Low & Moderate Benefit
of Total Funds Expended This
Reporting Period
482,236
27,518
50,186
20,540
75,034
0
0
236,731
$ 1,681,322
74.13
Low/ i,'!od Benefit - Page D
ACTIVITY
Concentrated Code Enforcement
CD Target Area
570.208 (b) (1) (ii)
Alley Debris Program
CD Target Area
570.208 (b) (1) (ii)
Total Slum & Blight
of Total Funds Expended This
Reporting Period
Economic Incentive Fund
Chatman/Coronado Study
Prof. Services/Coronado
Planning Documents
Central Business District Redevelopment Plan
Indirect Cost
C, D. Administration
Total Planning & Administration
of Total Funds Expended This
Reporting Period
TOTAL FUNDS EXPENDED THIS REPORTING PERIOD
EXPENDED THIS
REPORTING PERIOD
(Thousands of $)
234,704
25,021
$ 259,725
11.48
0
0
0
ill
54,733
111,616
160.927
$ 327,387
14.47
$ 2,268,434
City of Lubbock
B-88-MC-48-0022
6/1/88 - 5/31/89
7.b.
1.) CHANGES IN CDBG PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
The City of''Lubbock submitted three amendments to its 1988-89
Statement of Community Development Objectives. Each amendment was
subsequently.approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
The first amendment (September 22, 1988) reflected the allocation of
$142,360 from previous years' Contingency Fund to fund several new
projects, and supplement one existing project.
The new projects funded from Contingency Funds included:
Chatman Hill Redevelopment $ 67,400
Handicap Access/ Mahon Library 3,960
Signal Upgrade 35,000
Hodges Park Improvement 25,000
The existing project supplemented with Contingency Funds included:
Wagner Park/Restroom Renovation $11,000
The second amendment (October 13, 1988) reflected the allocation of
$34,000 from previous years' Contingency Fund to fund one new project.
Alley Debris Program $34,000
The third amendment (February 23, 1988) reflected the allocation of
$67,000 from previous years' Contingency Fund to fund one new project.
Carlisle Annex Park Development $67,000
2.) PROPOSED CHANGES AS A RESULT OF EXPERIENCES
The City of Lubbock does not propose any major changes in its program
as a result of its experiences, and will continue to concentrate its
efforts on housing rehabilitation for low -to -moderate income citizens.
Changes in CDBG Program Objectives
Page 2
7.c. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM CITIZENS
i. Community Development Advisory Committee Neighborhood Meeting,
January 10, 1989.
ii. Community Development Advisory Committee Neighborhood Meeting,
January 12, 1989.
iii. Community Development Advisory Ccmmittee Neighborhood Meeting,
January 17, 1989.
iv. Public Hearing for the 1989-90 Community Development Block
Grant Program, February 23, 1989.
MINUTES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
MAE SIMMONS COMMUNITY CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 10, 1989
7:00 P.M.
CDAC MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE
Jose Montelongo
Augustin Estrada
Roosevelt Carroll
Rev. Kado Lang
E. Hoyse McMurtry
Robert Snell
Betty Carr
Mary Mauldin
Russ Wilkinson
Vonda K. Somerville
Sharon Bennett
A. B. Watkins
Larry Gardner
Paul Nash
CDAC MEMBERS ABSENT
Lisa K. Holdeman-Unexcused
STAFF PRESENT
Sandy Ogletree
Pamela A. Fedler
Claud Turner
Paul Nash, CDAC Chairman called the meeting to order.at 7:05 p.m. He
gave a summary of the CDAC's purpose of considering requests for CDBG
funding, and developing a recommendation regarding the allocation of
CDBG funds to be presented to the City Council. The City Council
makes the final decision regarding the allocation of CDBG funds.
Each CDAC member introduced themself and indicated which Sector of the
City they represented.
A video presentation of CDBG funded projects completed during the
previous year was shown.
Cathy Morton, 4203 68th Street (home address), Room 118 Holden Hall,
TTU (office address), requested $20,000 to assist in the operation of
the Non-profit Management Program. The purpose of the program, which
operates within Texas Tech University's Center for Public Service, is
to improve the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations' management
and operations. The Non-profit Management Program provides direction
and resources to non-profit organizations. The program has been in
operation for less than a year.
Minutes - CDAC Neigh.
Mae Simmons Community
Page 2
Mtg .
Center - 1/10/89
The total 1989-90 budget for the program is $68,066. In addition to
the CDBG funds requested, the program has a three-year grant from the
Meadows Foundation and a three year commitment from Texas Tech
University to supply office space and clerical support.
CDAC Member A. B. Watkins questioned Ms. Morton regarding the size of
the program's staff. The staff consists of the Program Director and a
1/4-time secretary.
CDAC Member Betty Carr asked how agencies were made aware of the
program. A survey has been sent to 289 non-profit agencies in Lubbock _
and the surrounding counties to make them aware of the program and ask
them about their needs.
CDAC Chairman Paul Nash asked if any fees were charged. Ms. Morton
indicated that the program has a fee structure for projects which
require extended commitments.
C. D. Administrator Sandy Ogletree asked what percent of the
organizations using the program would qualify for low/moderate income
designation. Ms. Morton noted that participation in two workshops
which have been held included 43 human service agencies (which would
generally qualify under the low/mod criteria) and 27 arts and cultural
agencies (which typically are more affluent and would not qualify as
benefitting low/mod populations).
C. D. Administrator Sandy asked who would be party to the contract for
funds. Texas Tech University.
C. D. Administrator Sandy Ogletree asked if there would be any problem
of including in the contract a provision requiring certification that
51% of the assistance be made to low/mod income qualifying agencies.
Ms. Morton indicated that she could verify the percentage of
assistance, and that there would be no problem in including that
provision.
C. D. Administrator Sandy Ogletree asked what would happen if a non-
profit couldn't afford the fee. Ms. Morton indicated that the
program's advisory committee felt very strongly about the fee
schedule. However, she added that if an agency did not have the
funds, they would find it. She suggested that if such an agency would
be considered to be eligible for CDBG funding, then the CDBG funds
received by the program would be assumed to be used for that agency.
C. D. Administrator Sandy Ogletree noted that the City Council
philosophically has not funded operations, and asked if this would be
a one-time request. Ms. Morton indicated that the program has a
commitment from the Meadows Foundation and Texas Tech. She noted that
�Zinutes - CDAC Neigh. Mtg.
Mae Simmons Community Center - 1/10/89
Page 3
if the program doesn't prove its own worth, it won't go. She said
that the request for CDBG funding was to help the program get through
the next year as a one-time start-up request to get the program on its
feet and allow it time to develop its services and base of volunteers.
CDAC Member Sharon Bennett asked if all of the agencies using the
program are local. Only 2 of the agencies which have attended the
seminars were from outside of Lubbock.
No one else requested to address the CDAC. The meeting was adjourned
at 7:45 p.m.
MINUTES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
RODGERS COMMUNITY CENTER
THURSDAY, JANUARY 12, 1989
7:00 P.M.
CDAC MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE
Jose Montelongo
Augustin Estrada
Roosevelt Carroll
E. Hoyse McMurtry
Robert Snell
Mary Mauldin
Betty Carr
Vonda K. Somerville
Sharon Bennett
A. B. Watkins
Larry Gardner
Paul Nash
CDAC MEMBERS ABSENT
Lisa K. Holdeman- Excused
Rev. Kado Lang -Excused
Russ Wilkinson-Unexcused
STAFF PRESENT
Sandy Ogletree
Pamela A. Fedler
Tony Reyes
Paul Nash, CDAC Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Each CDAC member introduced themself and indicated which Sector of the
City they represented.
A video presentation of the CDBG funded projects completed during the
previous year was shown.
Chairman Paul Nash gave a summary of the CDAC's purpose of considering
requests for CDBG funding, and developing a recommendation regarding
the allocation of CDBG funds to be presented to the City Council. The
City Council makes the final decision regarding the allocation of CDBG
funds. The City anticipates receiving $2,285,000 in CDBG funds for
1989-90.
Paul Trevino, 3315 Harvard; and President of the Northwest Little
League Association, indicated that the City's Parks & Rec-Department
had submitted a request for CDBG funding to renovate the concession
stand near the Little League Fields at Helen Hodges Park. The
Northwest Little League Association requested the following additional
projects at Hodges Park:
1. Renovate lights in major field
$30,000
According to Mr. Trevino, the current lights are dangerous.
When they get damp, they shatter and break.
'Minutes - CDAC Neigh. Mtg.
Rodgers Community Center - 1/12/89
Page 2
°2. Fence renovation $20,000
The fields are 15 feet short of standard size. Mr. Trevino
said that it is difficult for the children to adjust when
they play at the other fields in the City which are larger.
3. Parking lot $30,000
Mr. Trevino indicated that there is a lot of traffic
congestion, and that the area is dangerous for the children.
4. Landscaping $20,000
Mr. Trevino indicated that Hodges is one of the oldest
parks, and it is in need of trees and new fencing.
5. Restrooms $66,000
Portable restrooms are currently being used.
6. Irrigation System $100,000
This would help support the landscaping.
7. Water Fountains $ 3,000
Mr. Trevino indicated that there is a drainage problem which
causes molding problems. _
8. Bleachers
$ 8,000
Mr. Trevino indicated that the current bleachers are very
old and made of wood. There is also a shortage of seating.
Approximately 20 adults and children attending the meeting were in
support of the Northwest Little League request.
CDAC Member Larry Gardner asked if the projects had been listed in
order of preference. They were.
CDAC Member Robert Snell asked for the source of the cost estimates.
Some of the estimates had been developed by the City's Parks & Rec
Department, others had been developed by talking to other people.
CDAC Member Sharon Bennett asked if any off-street parking was
currently available. All parking is currently on the street. She
asked if there was any room for off-street parking. Mr. Trevino
indicated that there was room on Marshall. A woman in the audience
added that since parking is not allowed on University, everyone has to
park along Marshall.
Minutes - CDAC Neigh. Mtg.
Rodgers Community Center - 1/12/89
Page 3
CDAC,Member A.B. Watkins asked how many children were involved in the
Northwest Little League program. There are currently more than 700
children involved. This number may increase to over 1,000 since the
League is being expanded to include New Deal this year.
CDAC Member Betty Carr asked if the ballfield was located near the
Camp Fire Office, and if that facility's parking lot could be used.
Mr. Trevino noted that this parking lot is nearby, but that it is not
very large.
CDAC Member A.B. Watkins asked if 30 to 40 parking spaces would help
the parking problem very much. Mr. Trevino indicated that it would
help.
CDAC Member A.B. Watkins asked if there was any irrigation system
currently at the park. There is a quick -coupler system that does not
cover the whole area.
CDAC Member Sharon Bennett asked for an explanation of the fence
request. Mr. Trevino indicated that the current distance from home -
plate to the fence at the end of center field is 185 feet. The
standard distance is 200 feet.
C.D. Administrator Sandy Ogletree noted that the City Council had
recently allocated $301000 for lights for a ballfield at Hodges Park.
She asked if there are two ballfields. Yes. The current request is
for the major field. The remaining requests proposed by the Northwest
Little League Association include costs to accommodate both
ballf fields .
C.D. Administrator Sandy Ogletree indicated that the City's Parks
Department had submitted a request to renovate the concession stand.
She asked if this was the Northwest Little League Association's #1
priority. Mr. Trevino indicated that they would prefer to have the
new lights at the major field first. The concession stand renovation
would be their second priority.
CDAC Member Roosevelt Carroll asked if all new poles for the lights
would be installed. Mr. Trevino noted that the current poles are very,.
old and twisted, and need to be replaced.
Lance Murphy, 2206 30th, Treasurer of the Lubbock Jaycees. The
Jaycees are requesting $75,852.75 in CDBG funds to acquire and
renovate a structure in Overton to be used as their headquarters.
Approximately 6 other people attending the meeting were therein
support the the Jaycees' request.
Minutes - CDAC Neigh. Mtg.
Rodgers Community Center - 1/12/89
Page 4
CDAC,Chairman Paul Nash asked if zoning had been considered. The
proposed site is currently a residential zone. Mr. Murphy indicated
that he had been in contact with City staff, and they didn't foresee
any problems with a zone change if the neighborhood was in support of
it.
CDAC Chairman Paul Nash asked if the Jaycees were currently
headquartered at another site. Mr. Murphy noted that they do not have
a headquarters. They currently meet at the Lubbock Board of Realtors'
facility.
CDAC Chairman Paul Nash noted that a large portion of the Jaycees
budget was related to a children's film festival, and asked for an
explanation of that project. Mr. Murphy indicated that a promoter and
15 to 18 people are hired to make phone solicitations. This is for
children to attend films who might not otherwise be able to go, such
as residents of MHMR and Lubbock Children's Home.
CDAC Member Larry Gardner asked if they had considered historic
funding sources. Mr. Murphy noted that he is trying to find out more
about this from Betty Morris and Mrs. Vines.
CDAC Member Betty Carr asked if the existing structure would be
restored or torn down. One structure will be renovated. The two-
story structure and some other structures will be torn down.
CDAC Chairman Paul Nash asked if the Jaycees had requested funds from
the Heritage Society. Mr. Murphy indicated that they will pursue that
option.
CDAC Member A.B. Watkins asked about the demolition cost. Mr. Murphy
indicated that the two-story structure is in poor condition and will
be demolished if the Heritage Society can't help with a grant to
restore it.
CDAC Member Robert Snell asked if the headquarters would be open
during the day. Mr. Murphy indicated that the Jaycees would like to
hire a secretary to keep the office open during the day.
CDAC Member Robert Snell questioned how the facility would help
Overton. Mr. Murphy indicated that the renovation would help upgrade
the area. The residents could also use the facility.
CDAC Member Augustin Estrada asked if other Jaycee organizations
typically buy their headquarter facilities. Mr. Murphy replied that
they usually receive donated facilities.
Minutes - CDAC Neigh. Mtg.
Rodgers Community Center - 1/12/89
Page 5
CDAC. Member Sharon Bennett asked if the Jaycees had the required 250
matching funds committed. Mr. Murphy noted that the Jaycees have some
of their own funds, and are looking at other sources, but that they
were waiting to see if they had any hope of getting the CDBG funds.
CDAC Member E. Hoyse McMurtry asked what the value of the property
would be after it was rehabilitated. Mr. Murphy did not know.
CDAC Chairman Paul Nash asked if the property had been appraised. A
1982 appraisal listed the value of the property at that time at
$67,000.
CDAC Chairman Paul Nash asked if the property was vacant. It has been
vacant since 1982.
Dora Molinar, 2624 Colgate, requested assistance in repairing her
house. C.D. Administrator Sandy Ogletree asked Mrs. Molinar to meet
with her following the meeting, and she would put Mrs. Molinar in
touch with the people she needed.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m.
MINUTES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
CENTRAL SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER
TUESDAY, JANUARY 17, 1989
7:00 P.M.
CDAC MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE CDAC MEMBERS ABSENT
Jose Montelongo Lisa K. Holdeman- Excused
Augustin Estrada Rev. Kado Lang -Excused
Roosevelt Carroll
E. Hoyse McMurtry
Russ Wilkinson
Robert Snell STAFF PRESENT
Mary Mauldin
Betty Carr Sandy Ogletree
Vonda K. Somerville Tony Reyes
Sharon Bennett Rob Allison
A. B. Watkins
Larry Gardner
Paul Nash
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Paul Nash at 7:00 p.m. and
the C.D. video was presented. After the video the committee members
introduced themselves and the Chairman called on Dr. Sam Spikes who
had requested to speak on behalf of the Overton South Neighborhood
Association.
Dr. Spikes gave a presentation on a proposal for CDBG funding prepared
by the Housing Renovation Board of the Overton South Association. The
proposal was a request for $150,000 of Community Development Block
Grant money. The total project cost of $200,000 is for the purchase
and renovation of four houses in the Overton South Neighborhood. The
project would operate as a revolving fund with the sales proceeds
returning to the fund for additional renovations. The organization is,
currently investigating sources of matching funds. Dr. Spikes stated
that he might request the City Council to provide the $50,000 in
matching funds. The request for CDBG funds is $150,000. Dr. Spikes.,
reiterated that the project is similar to the Heritage House project
which was recently completed by the Lubbock Heritage Society. Paul
Nash asked Dr. Spikes about other sources of funding which they have
investigated and Dr. Spikes said that they had identified a group
called "Neighbor Works" as a promising resource.
Minutes-CDAC Neighborhood Mtg. 1/17/89
Central Senior Citizens Center
..Page, 2
Larry Gardner asked about the criteria which would be utilized in the C
neighborhood properties. Dr. Spikes responded that it would be the
major responsibility of the Housing Renovation Board and would have to
operate within their budget. It would have to be a property which
would break-even given the extent of renovation which would be needed
to make the property more marketable.
There was a question concerning the demand for properties within the
area and Dr. Spikes responded that the Heritage House sold in one day.
Dr. Spikes reiterated that the strength of his board is definitely one
of the strong points that he has to offer this project and he also
said that initially they would intend to do two homes which would be
targeted to low and moderate income populations and two showcase.
homes.
After Dr. Spikes completed making his presentation and answering the
panel's questions, there was no other person requesting to be heard
and the Chairman adjourned the meeting at approximately 8:05 p.m.
The Resolution authorizes the Mayor to execute on
behalf of the City the first of these Contracts of Sale
with the owners who are party to the Memorandum of
Agreement. Contract of Sale is with Mr. Billy
Huddleston, owner of property at the eastern edge of
the project, and is needed to continue pre -construction
activities.
City is securing 1,838.22 acres in fee simple from Mr.
Huddleston at the $800-per-acre price approved in the
Memorandum of Agreement. One -quarter of the total
consideration for fee simple property will be due at
the time of execution of this Contract of Sale. The
sum now due is $367,644. The Huddleston Contract of
Sale substantially complies with the form approved by
the owners and the City previously.
Since all subsequent Contracts of Sale with the other
parties to the Memorandum of Agreement will be
substantially the same as the Huddleston's Contract and
that form provided in the Memorandum of Agreement, this
Resolution further authorizes the Mayor to sign
subsequent Contracts of Sale as presented without
repeated consideration by the Council of virtually
identical instruments.
Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Baker, seconded by
Councilman Maloy to authorize Resolution #3050 as
recommended by Staff and further authorizing those
subsequent Contracts of Sale as presented without
repeated consideration by Council of virtually
identical instruments. Motion carried: 6 Yeas; 0
Nays. Councilwoman Trejo absent from chambers..
(15.) Hold a public hearing for the 1989-90 Community Devel-
opment Block Grant Program.
(16.) Consider Resolution #3051 which authorizes the Mayor to
execute and submit the Community Development Block
Grant Application and all related documents.
RESOLUTION 93051
Mayor McMinn convened the Public Hearing at 5:05 P.M.
and set out the procedure for the Hearing. Paul Nash,
Chair of the Community Development Advisory Committee,
presented CDAC recommendations and reported that $4.4
million in requests were received by CDAC, and that
they have held 3 public hearings and 2 work sessions to
formulate their recommendations.
Three public meetings were held during January, 1989 to
receive citizen input for use in developing the Annual
Statement of Objectives, and were held at Mae Simmons
Community Center, Rodgers Community Center and the
Central Senior Citizens Center. In addition to citizen
input the City departments submitted their requests and
back-up material for funding City projects.
Mr. Plash advised that from the proposed
projects and
activities, the Community Development
Advisory
Committee recommends Council funding
the following
projects:
Concentrated Code Enforcement
$ 182,985
South Overton Park Acquisition Phase
I 245,503
Arnett Benson Redevelopment
138,800
Arnett Benson Sidewalks
60,000
On -Site Redevelopment
75,000
Residential Rehab
600,000
Emergency Repair
75,000
Weatherization
50,000
Paint -Up
20,000
Administration
169,000.
Field Services
244,000
Indirect Costs
100,000
Home Security Program
30,000
Health Department Expansion
32,550
Butler Park Outreach Program
8,000
Burns Parks Improvements
17,400
Helen Hodges Ballfield
8,500
Park Lighting
40,120
Mackenzie Park Lighting
92,600
Summer Recreation Satellite Program
19,000
Contingency Fund
76,542
$2,285,000 ,
The total Community Development Block Grant Program is
for $2,285,000, approximately a 4% increase from the
1988-89 funding level.
The City of Lubbock's Community Development Program is
administered in accordance with the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974 as amended and with
24 CFR 570.303 of the Community Development Block Grant
Regulations. The Statement of Objectives has been
prepared as stipulated in those regulations. A
preliminary Statement of Objectives was published in
the Lubbock Avalanche Journal on February 15 and the
Statement of Objectives has been on file with the City
Secretary for review by any interested parties.
Following submission of the Statement of Objectives,
the Community Development staff will begin preparation
of the environmental assessments and other planning
activities to start the CD Fiscal Year on June 1, 1989.
Lynda Jenkins, Chair of Urban Renewal Board and
Neighborhood Redevelopment Commission conveyed that
Board's support of the CDAC recommended projects.
Cecil Puryear opposed money allocated for Code
enforcement and favors spending money to provide for
low income housing and for lowering the standards for
Code Enforcement. ,
Dwight Pierce, representingGreenfair Manor, requested
playground equipment for parkland directly behind
_ Greenfair Manor. He stated that a petition containing
more than 100 signatures has been turned in to the
City. Councilman Carpenter asked if equipment is
somewhere where it is not being used and could be moved
to this area. Assistant City Manager Harmon replied
that there is no equipment not being used. Councilman
Patterson stated that he would like to have known of
this request earlier. Mayor McMinn asked if these
representatives attended hearings and Mr. Pierce
replied that they did not, because they were not aware
any were being held.
Paul Trevino, representing Northwest Little League,
expressed appreciation for past Council funding and
requested allotments for a new concession stand, new
lighting on one field, landscaping, irrigation, parking
lot and restroom improvements for this site. He stated
that their main concern is concession stand. Mr.
Trevino advised that they did attend the Public
Hearing. Councilman Maloy expressed his support for
the Little League program and his hope is that the
entire list can be taken care of in the next few years.
Mayor Pro Tem Baker asked Mr. Nash for the CDAC
justification of placement of Mackenzie Park lighting
and Councilman Nash stated this will finish up a
project which has been going on for the past few years.
The Reverend David Cruz, representing residents of
Carlisle, presented a request for development of a
playground at a cost of $67,000. Reverend Cruz stated
that due to a missed message this was not presented at
CDAC Hearing.
Charles Hunter spoke in favor of fully funding Phases
I, II, and III of the Overton Park acquisition. He
stated City would benefit from completion of the park
at one time.
There being no others to speak, Mayor McMinn closed the
Public Hearing at 5:45 P.M.
Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Baker, seconded by
Councilwoman Trejo to approve Resolution #3051 as
recommended by CDAC and stipulating further the funding
of the Carlisle Park Project for $67,000 out of
existing contingency funds, and the motion further
charged City Staff to come back with additional
information regarding needs, plans and estimates for
Lusk Park development near Greenfair.
Councilman Carpenter asked what the balance of
Contingency Fund would be with this expenditure. Mrs.
Ogletree stated $230,000, less $67,000, plus $79,000 =
$242,000.
Councilman Carpenter spoke in favor of the Carlisle and
Lusk Park projects and asked for community assistance
in providing cleanup, play programs, etc. Councilman
Maloy asked that the Lusk Park matter be on the next
Council Meeting.
Discussion followed of getting word out regarding the
Community Hearings. Councilman Carpenter advised that
presently, the needs of children, families and
neighborhoods need to have priority. Mayor Pro Tem
Baker pointed out the number of park requests Council
had addressed and concurred with comments that human
needs must be met. Councilman Phillips expressed his
concern over cost being 20% of the allocation and
advised they should be held as low as possible to
provide funds for meeting human needs.
Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Baker, seconded by
Councilwoman Trejo to authorize Resolution #3051 as
recommended by Staff. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays.
There being no further business to come before the Council, motion was made
by Mayor Pro Tem Baker, seconded by Councilman Patterson to adjourn the
meeting at 6:05 P.M. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays.
CITY OF LUBBOCK
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Lubbock City Council will conduct the final Public Hearing to
allow citizens the opportunity to comment on the 1990-91 Statement of
Community Development Objectives and projected use of funds as
recommended by the Community Development Advisory Committee, and CDBG
program_ performance
February 22, 1990 5:00 P.M.
City Council Chambers
Municipal Building
1625 13th Street
The_,City of Lubbock participates in the Community Development Block
Grant Program to help develop and maintain a desirable living
environment for the citizens of Lubbock. The Community Development
program provides the City with financial resources to undertake
otherwise unavailable or limited public improvements. Consistent with
the Community Development and Housing Act of 1974, the City directs
over 600 of its CDBG activities to the low and moderate income
residents.
1990-91 Projected Use of CDBG Funds
Concentrated Code Enforcement .......................
Neighborhood Redevelopment
Arnett Benson Redevelopment... ...............
Chatman Hill Redevelopment ........................
Sidewalks/Arnett Benson... ....................... o
Sidewalks/North Overton ...........................
Homestead Property Management .....................
LandDisposition ....... ........ ................
Residential Rehabilitation .........................
Project Helping Hand ..............................
Paint -Up Program ..................................
HomeSecurity Program .............................
FieldServices ....................................
Park Improvements
Carlisle Park Development .........................
Ballfield Bleacher Replacement .....................
Public Facilities
Guadalupe Neighborhood Sign... ..... o ... o ..... o .....
Guadalupe -Parkway Neighborhood Center... ..... o
Public Services
Butler Park Outreach Program ......................
Butler Park Outreach Program -Phase II .............
Summer Satellite Program.. .......................
Summer Satellite Program -Phase II .................
Program Management ..................................
Planning Documents ..................................
IndirectCost .......................................
Contingency Fund.................4..................
$208,635
147,400
73,700
51,000
50,000
5,000
5,000
600,000
175,000
25,000
30,000
253,000
34,000
26,500
22,000
25,000
16,300
25,500
17,000
20,600
172,000
4,000
100,000
95,540
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM..... $2,182,175
CDBG - Notice of Public Hearing
Page 2
How Community Development Funds Have Been Used
Code Enforcement
$ 182,985
Neighborhood Redevelopment
1,538,303
Park Improvements
178,620
Community Facilities
32,550
Public Services
47,000
Public Facilities
41,000
Program Management
274,000
Economic Development
0
Removal/Architectural Barriers
0
Contingency
76,542
$2,371,000*
* Includes $86,000 allocation from previous years' contingency fund.
Information regarding the proposed amount of Community Development
Block Grant Funds to be used, together with information on the City of
Lubbock's plan for minimizing the displacement of and an assistance
plan for those who are actually displaced by Community Development
Block Grant activities, is on file at the City Secretary's Office and
the Community Development Office at 1625 13th Street.
Written comments may be directed to the Community Development
Administrator, P. O. Box 2000, Lubbock, TX. 79457. For more
information call 767-2296. -
9
APPLICATION FOR 3. DATE SUBMITTED
FEDERAL ASSISUNCE
I. TYPE Of SUBMISSION: 2. DATE RECEIVED B
Appilicaiion PrWolication
❑ Construction ❑ Construction
4. DATE RECEIVED B
[ Non -Construction ❑ Non -Construction
S. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Legal Name: — —
City of Lubbock
Address {give city, county, state, and zip code)-
P. 0. Box 2000
Lubbock
Lubbock County
Texas 79457
•. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IEINr
IL TYPE OF APPLICATION:
a New ❑ Continuation O Revision
IN Revision, enter appropriate letter(sI in box(es):
A. Increase Award B. Decrease Award C. Increase Duration
O. Decrease Duration Other (specify):
0M8 Approval No. 0348-00-43
Applicant Identifier
Y STATE State Application Idenhlw
Y FEDERAL AGENCY Federal Identifier
Organizatiortal Urmt:
Commnity Development Department
Name and telephone number of the person to be contacted on matters involving
this application (give area code)
Sandy Ogletree
Calmunity Development Administrator
(806) 767-2290
7. TYPE OF APPLICANT: (enter appropnate letter in box)
A State N Independent School Dist.
.8 County U State Controlled Institution of Higher Learning
C. Municipal - J. Private University
0. Township 1C Indian Tribe
E. interstate ' L. Individual
F Intermunicipal M Profit Organization
G Special District N. Other (Specify).
S. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
10. CATALOG 0= FEDERAL DOMESTIC 1 4 2 1 8 11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANTS PROJECT:
ASSISTANCE NUMBER ` 1990-91 CDBG Entitlement Program
TITLE: Catmunity Development Block Grant (A complete listing of projects and project
descriptions are attached).
12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT (cities. counties, stares, etc.):
City of Lubbock
13. PROPOSED PROJECT:
14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF:
Start Date
6/1/90
Ending Date
5/31/91
a. Applicant b Protect
19th 19th
15. ESTIMATED FUNDING:
ta. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12312 PROCESS?
a• YES THIS PREAPPLICATIOWAPPLICATION WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO THE
STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON.
DATE
b NO )Q PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E.O. 12372
OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW
a Federal
S 2,182,175 .00
b. Aopticant
S .00
c State
= .00
d Local
= ,00
e Omer
S .00
It Program income
S DO
17. 15 THE APPLICANT OELINOUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT?
Yes It -Yes.' attach an explanation No
g TOTAL S .00
2,182,175
13. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. %LL DATA IN THIS APPLICATIORPREAPPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY
AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED
c Telephone number
a Typed Name of Authorized Representative b Title
B. C. McMinn Mayor 6-767 3000
d Signature of Authorized Representative a Date Signed
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
(G.?,Wn. 'P--v I t Admin.
A PROVED A TO FORM Iandara�Orm aaa ;QEV .1 88;
P'Bsc"bed by OM@ c :ar A-i02
ASSt. C i t v Atty.
I
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF 424
This is a standard form used by applicants as a required facesheet for preapplications and applications submitted
for Federal assistance. It will be used by Federal agencies to obtain applicant certification that States which have
established a review and comment procedure in response to Executive Order 12372 and have selected the program
to be included in their process, have been given an opportunity to review the applicant's submission.
Item: Errtrv:
Item:
Entrv:
1.
Self-explanatory.
12.
List only the largest political entities affected
2.
Date application submitted to Federal agency (or
(e.g., State, counties, cities).
State if applicable) & applicant's control number
13.
Self-explanatory.
(if applicable).
3.
State use only (if applicable).
14.
List the applicant's Congressional District and
4.
If this application is to continue or revise an
any District(s) affected by the program or project.
existing award, enter present Federal identifier
15.
Amount requested or to be contributed during
number. if for a new project, leave blank.
the first funding/budget period by each
5.
Legal name of applicant, name of primary
contributor. Value of in -kind contributions
organizational unit which will undertake the
should be included on appropriate lines as
assistance activity, complete address of the
applicable. If the action will result in a dollar
applicant, and name and telephone number of the
change to an existing award, indicate only the
person to contact on matters related to this
amount of the change. For decreases, enclose the
application.
amounts in parentheses. If both basic and
6.
Enter Employer Identification Number (EII`) as
supplemental amounts are included, show
assigned by the Internal Revenue Service.
breakdown on an attached sheet. For multiple
program funding, use totals and show breakdown
7.
Enter the appropriate letter in the space
using same categories as item 15.
provided.
B.
Check appropriate box and enter appropriate
16.
Applicants should contact the State Single Point
letter(s) in the space(s) provided:
of Contact (S. OC) for Federal Executive Order
12372 to determine whether the application is
—"New" means a new assistance award.
subject to the State intergovernmental review
— "Continuation" means an extension for an
process.
additional funding/budget period for a project
with a projected completion date.
17.
This question applies to the applicant organi-
-"Revision" means any change in the Federal
zation, not the person who signs as the
Government's financial obligation or
authorized representative. Categories of debt
contingent liability from an existing
include delinquent audit disallowances, loans
obligation.
and taxes.
9.
dame of Federal agency from which assistance is
18.
To be signed by the authorized representative of
being requested with this application.
the applicant. A copy of the governing body's
10.
Use the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
authorization for you to sign this application as -
number and title of the program under which
official representative must be on file in the
assistance is requested.
applicant's office. (Certain Federal agencies may
11.
Enter a brief descriptive title of the project. if
require that this authorization be submitted as
more than one program is involved, you should
part of the application.)
append an explanation on a separate sheet. If
appropriate (e.g., construction or real property
projects), attach a map showing project location.
For preapplications, use a separate sheet to
provide a summary description of this project.
SF 124 'REV 4-88. Back
y
FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
FOR THE
CITY OF LUBBOCK
JUNE 1, 1990 - MAY 31, 1991
The City of Lubbock, through the receipt of $2,182,175 in Community
Development Block Grant funds from the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, proposes to implement its Community Development Program
which has been developed so as to give maximum feasible priority to:
1. Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight.
2. Principally benefit persons of low and moderate income.
In order to implement this program, the Lubbock City Council has approved
the following programs:
A. Concentrated Code Enforcement ....................$ 208,635
Code Enforcement .......................208,635
B. Neighborhood Redevelopment..... .......... ... ... 1,415,100
Arnett Benson Redevelopment ............ 147,400
Chatman Hill Redevelopment ............. 73,700
Sidewalks/Arnett Benson ................ 51,000
Sidewalks/North Overton ................ 50,000
Homestead Property Management.......... 5,000
Land Disposition .. .... ............... 5,000
Residential Rehabilitation .............600,000
Project Helping Hand...................175,000
Paint -Up Program..... ......... ........ 25,000
Home Security Program .................. 30,000
Field Services.........................253,000
C. Park Improvements ................................. 60,500
Carlisle Park Development .............. 34,000
Ballfield Bleacher Replacement......... 26,500
D. Public Facilities ......... .................... ... 47,000
Guadalupe Neighborhood Sign............ 22,000
Guadalupe -Parkway Neighborhood Center.. 25,000
E. Public Services..... ........ �
......... ....... 79,400
Butler Park Outreach Program ........... 16,300
Butler Park Outreach Program -Phase II.. 25,500
Summer Satellite.Program............... 17,000
Summer Satellite Program -Phase II...... 20,600
Final Statement June 1, 1990-May 31, 1991
Page 2
F. Administrative Costs ............................... 276,000
Program Management .....................172,000
Indirect Costs.........................100,000
Planning Documents.,_ .................. 4,000 -
G. Contingency Fund ................................. 95,540
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM ...... $2,182,175
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
GRANTEE CERTIFICATIONS
In accordance with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as
amended, and with 24 CFR 570.303 of the Community Development Block Grant
regulations, the grantee certifies that:
(a) It possesses legal authority to make a grant submission and to execute a
community development and housing program;
(b) Its governing body has duly adopted or passed as an official act a
resolution, motion or similar action authorizing the person identified
as the official representative of the grantee to submit the final
statement and amendments thereto and all understandings and assurances
contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified
as the official representative of the grantee to act in connection with
the submission of the final statement and to provide such additional
information as may be required;
(c) Prior to submission of its final statement to HUD, the grantee has:
1. Met the citizen participation requirements of §570.301(b);
2. Prepared its final statement of community development objectives
and projected use of funds in accordance with §570.301(c) and made
the final statement available to the public;
(d) It is following a detailed citizen participation plan which:
1. Provides for and encourages citizen participation, with particular
emphasis on participation by persons of low and moderate income
who are residents of slum and blighted areas and of areas in which
funds are proposed to be used, and provides for participation of
residents in low and moderate income neighborhoods as defined by
the local jurisdiction;
2. Provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to local
meetings, information, and records relating to the grantee's
proposed use of funds, as required by the regulations of the
Secretary, and relating to the actual use of funds under the Act;
3. Provides for technical assistance to groups representative of
persons of low and moderate income that request such assistance in
developing proposals with the level and type of assistance to be
determined by the grantee;
1
4. Provides for public hearings to obtain citizen views and to
respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the community
development program, including at least the development of needs,
the review of proposed activities, and review of program
performance, which hearings shall be held after adequate notice,
at times and locations convenient to potential or actual
beneficiaries, and with accommodation for the handicapped;
5. Provides for a timely written answer to written complaints and
grievances, within 15 working days where practicable; and
6. Identifies how the needs of non-English speaking residents will be
met in the case of public hearings where a significant number of
non-English speaking residents can be reasonably expected to
participate;
(e) The grant will be conducted and administered in compliance with:
1. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352; 42
U.S.C. §2000d et seg.); and
2. The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-20);
(f) It will affirmatively further fair housing;
(g) It has developed its final statement of projected use of funds so as to
give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and
moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of
slums or blight; (the final statement of projected use of funds may also
include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet
other community development needs having a particular urgency because
existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or
welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not
available); except that the aggregate use of CDBG funds received under
section 106 of the Act, and if applicable, under section 108 of the Act,
during the 1988-89, 1989-90, and 1990-91 program years shall principally
benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that
not less than 60 percent of such funds are used for activities that
benefit such persons during such period;
(h) It has developed a community development plan, for the period specified
in paragraph (g) above, that identifies community development and
housing needs and specifies both short and long-term community
development objectives that have been developed in accordance with the
primary objective and requirements of the Act;
(i) It is following a current housing assistance plan which has been
approved by HUD;
2
(j) It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements
assisted in whole or in part with funds provided under section 106 of
the Act or with amounts resulting from a guarantee under section 108 of
the Act by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by
persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or
assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public
improvements, unless;
1. Funds received under section 106 of the Act are used to pay the
proportion of such fee or assessment that relates to the capital
costs of such public improvements that are financed from revenue
sources other than under Title I of the Act; or
2. For purposes of assessing any amount against properties owned and
occupied by persons of moderate income, the grantee certifies to
the Secretary that it lacks sufficient funds received under
section 106 of the Act to comply with the requirements of
subparagraph (1) above;
(k) Its notification, inspection, testing and abatement procedures
concerning lead -based paint will comply with §570.608;
(1) It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970 as required under §570.606(a) and Federal implementing
regulations; the requirements in §570.606(b) governing the residential
antidisplacement and relocation assistance plan under section 104(d) of
the Act (including a certification that the grantee is following such a
plan); the relocation requirements of §570.606(c) governing displacement
subject to section 104(k) of the Act; and the relocation requirements of
§570.606(d) governing optional relocation assistance under section
105(a)(11) of the Act; and
(m) It will comply with the other provisions of the Act and with other
applicable laws.
(n) In accordance with Section 519 of Public Law 101-140, (the 1980 HUD
Appropriations Act), the City of Lubbock certifies that it has adopted
and is enforcing a policy of prohibiting the use of excessive force by
law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals
engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations.
3
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS
The certification set out below is a material representation
upon which reliance is placed by the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development in awarding the grant. If it
is later determined that the grantee knowingly rendered a
false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements
of the Drug -Free Workplace Act, the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, in addition to any other
remedies available to the Federal Government, may take
action authorized under the Drug -Free Workplace Act.
CERTIFICATION
A. The grantee certifies that it will provide a drug -free
workplace by:
(a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the
unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing,
possession or use of a controlled substance is
prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying
the actions that will be taken against employees for
violation of such prohibition;
(b) Establishing a drug -free awareness program to inform
employees about =
(1)
The
dangers of
drug abuse in the workplace-;
(2)
The
grantee's
policy of maintaining a drug -free
workplace;
(3)
Any
available
drug counseling, rehabilitation,
and
employee assistance programs; and
(4)
The
penalties
that may be imposed upon employees
for
drug abuse
violations occurring in the work-
place.
(c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be
engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy
of the statement required by paragraph (a);
(d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by
paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under
the grant, the employee will -
(1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and
(2) Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute
conviction for a violation occurring_`in the work-
place no later than five days after such convic-
tion.
(e) Notifying the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development within ten days after receiving notice
under.subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise
receiving actual notice of such conviction;
.(f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of
receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with
respect to any employee who is so convicted -
(1) Taking appropriate personnel action against
such an employee, up to and including termination;
or
(2) Requiring such employee to participate satis-
factorily in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes
by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforce-
ment, or other appropriate agency;
(g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a
drug -free workplace through implementation of
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f).
B. The grantee shall insert in the space provided on the
attached "Place of Performance" form the site(s) for the
performance of work to be carried out with the grant funds
(including street address, city, county, state, zip code and
total estimated number of employees). The grantee further
certifies that, if it is subsequently determined that
additional sites will be used for the performance of work
under the grant, it shall notify the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development immediately upon the decision
to use such additional sites by submitting a revised "Place
of Performance" form.
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
FOR CERTIFICAITON REGARDING DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS
Name of Grantee: City of Lubbock
Grant Program Name: Community Development Block Grant
Grant Number: B-90-MC-48-0022
Date: February 22, 1990
The grantee shall insert in the space provided below the
site(s) expected to be used for the performance of work under the
grant covered by the certification:
Place of Performance (include street address, city, county,
state, zip code for each site):
City of Lubbock Community Development
Municipal Building
1625 13th St.
Lubbock, Texas 79401
Total estimated number of employees expected to be engaged in the
performance of the grant at the site(s) noted above: 11
ATTACHMENT A
The grantee certifies that it is following a detailed citizen
participation plan in accordance with Section 104(a) of the Housing
and Community Development Act as amended:
(A) Grantee provides for and encourages citizen participation, with
particular emphasis on participation by persons of low and
moderate income who are residents of slum and blight areas and
areas in which section 106 funds are to be used by:
1) Publishing notices of neighborhood meetings in English and
Spanish in a local newspaper of general circulation and a
local Hispanic newspaper, and
2) holding three evening neighborhood meetings in sites within
the CDBG target area to allow residents the opportunity to
participate.
(B) Grantee provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to
local meetings, information, and records relating to the
grantee's proposed use of funds, as required by regulations of
the Secretary, and relating to the actual use of funds under this
title by:
1) publishing notices of a public hearing 10 days in advance in
a local newspaper of general circulation and a local
Hispanic newspaper. Notice also includes a Projected Use of
Funds and a summary of funds allocated for previous two
program years, and indicates that additional information may
be reviewed in the City Secretary's Office or the Community
Development Department;
2) holding a public hearing of the City Council which allows
citizens the opportunity to comment on the Statement of.
Community Development Objectives and projected use of funds
and CDBG program performance. This public hearing is held
in the early evening;
3) publishing a Notice of the availability of the Grantee's
Performance Report and placing that report on file with
local libraries, the City Secretary's Office and the
Community Development Department.
(C) Grantee provides technical assistance to groups representative of
persons of low and moderate income that request such assistance
in developing proposals by:
1) distributing an application package to groups interested in
requesting funds which has been developed to assist such
groups in submitting all necessary information;
2) produced a video presentation which includes description of
the types of projects funded by the CDBG funds and updates
the progress of projects.
(D) Grantee provides for public hearings to obtain citizen views and
to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the
community development program including:
1) three neighborhood meetings held in the evenings in three
different locations in the CDBG Target Area as part of the
development of needs (all locations are handicap
.accessible);
2) a public hearing held by the City Council in the evening to
review proposed activities and program performance (location
is handicap accessible);
3) a review of the Grantee Performance Report by the City
Council at a public meeting, including a video of program
performance. This video is also shown at the three
neighborhood meetings discussed in (D)(1).
(E) Grantee provides for a timely written answer to written
complaints and grievances, within 15 working days where
practicable; and
M Grantee provides a bilingual interpreter at all meetings where a
significant number of non-English speaking residents is expected
to participate. Notices of neighborhood meetings are advertised
in English and Spanish.
January 23, 1990
CDBG 1990-91
PROPOSED PROJECTS
Code Enforcement $208,635
This project is designed to ensure the protection of health, safety,
and general welfare of citizens in the CDBG target areas and to arrest
and prevent slums and blighted conditions by eliminating the
uncontrolled growth of weeds, the accumulation of rubbish, and the
unsightliness caused by junk vehicles visible from right-of-ways.
Enforcement of weed, rubbish, zoning and junk vehicle codes in the
Community Development areas will enhance the quality of life in these
areas.
The primary goal of this code enforcement program is to prevent the
growth of slums and blighting influences by the early detection and
prevention of deterioration in neighborhoods by identifying and
correcting violations of City Codes. This program will help stabilize
neighborhoods and improve living conditions in the CDBG target areas.
Community Development - Arnett Benson Redevelopment $147,400
This is an ongoing redevelopment project which has a primary purpose
of clearing the severely dilapidated structures from the Arnett Benson
area. The proposed activity will include acquisition, demolition, and
relocation/redevelopment of 4 properties located in the 2800 block of
Colgate Street. Owner -occupants are encouraged to redevelop on -site
and in these cases only the structure is acquired and cleared.
In addition, this project is used to leverage our Affordable Housing
Program by requiring participating contractors to build speculative
affordable homes in the designated Affordable Housing Joint Venture
Target Areas. This linkage between redevelopment and speculative
construction was established with the Chatman Hill Affordable Housing
project. In that project 2 houses were financed by public funds and 2
houses were financed privately. The speculative homes are anticipated
to be built in the Guadalupe area.
Community Development - Chatman Hill Redevelopment $73,700
This project has a primary purpose of clearing severely dilapidated
structures not feasible for rehabilitation. This proposal includes
CDBG 1990-91 PROPOSED PROJECTS
Page 2
January 23, 1990
the acquisition, demolition, and relocation/redevelopment of at least
two properties found to be infeasible for rehabilitation located in
the eastern neighborhoods of the C.D. Target Area.
Community Development - South Overton Park
Acquisition/Phase II $74,600
This is the second phase of a multi -phase project to acquire land for
the expansion of the existing park in South Overton. Phase #2 will
include the acquisition, relocation of one homeowner, and demolition
of one structure at 2010 15th Street.
The existing South Overton Park is located between Avenues V and T on
the South side of 14th Street. This project would expand the park to
the North side of 15th Street, making it one full city block in size.
Community Development - South Overton Park
Acquisition/Phase III $214,645
This is the third phase of a four phase project proposed to acquire
land for the expansion of the existing park in South Overton. Phase
#3 will include the acquisition, relocation of homeowners/tenants, and
demolition of three structures from 2012 to 2016 15th Street.
Community Development - South Overton Park
Acquisition/Phase IV $274,995
This is the final phase of a four phase project proposed to acquire
land for the expansion of the existing park in South Overton. Phase
#4 will include the acquisition, relocation of homeowners/tenants, and
demolition of four structures from 2018 to 2024 15th Street.
Community Development - Project Helping Hand $250,000
This program is the consolidation of the emergency repair and
weatherization programs which have been funded in the past. The new
program, Helping Hands is a direct benefit program that is designed to -
make housing repairs for the elderly a priority.
This program will help the very elderly, handicapped, poor and
destitute of our community who are living in owner -occupied homes
which are in need of repair. Those assisted through this program do
not have the means to get into better living conditions, but through
this program, we will be able to alleviate some of their major
CDBG 1990-91 PROPOSED PROJECTS January 23, 1990
Page 3
problems and make the home more liveable and comfortable. It is
anticipated that the program will assist approximately 125 households
at an average cost per household of $2,000.
Community Development - Residential Rehabilitation $600,000
To rehabilitate approximately 50 structures to qualifying applicants
in targeted areas as well as on a city-wide basis. Rehabilitation of
owner occupied single family dwellings will be done under the No
Interest Deferred Payment Loan program. The proposed project will
include rehabilitation city-wide, as well as in the following targeted
areas: Arnett Benson, Bozeman-Elliston, Meadowbrook Villa,
Thunderbird, Cherry Point, Lyndale Acres, McCrummen's School,
Coronado, Bean School, East Manhattan Heights and the Posey School
Area.
The primary purpose of this program is to bring properties to the
Minimum Housing Code; which includes, i.e., bringing all heating,
plumbing and electrical systems to code, repairing or replacing roofs,
repairing or replacing windows, weatherizing, replacing sheetrock,
damaged or missing siding, rotted wood, painting interior and
exterior, etc.
For the period June 1988 - May 1989, 50 NIDP Loans were made at an
average of $12,009 each. out of 50, 26 households were very low
income and 24 households were low income. Of these 50 households, we
assisted 10 elderly families, 31 small families and 9 large families;
27 of these were female head of households and 2 were handicapped
persons. The ethnic breakdown included 24% Black, 46% Hispanic, and
30o Anglo.
Also under this program, we work closely with Code Enforcement in
encouraging neighborhood clean-up. Therefore, Environmental Control
Inspections are made on all properties considered for this program.
94 Environmental Control Inspections were done under this program for
the period ending May, 1989.
Residential rehabilitation is done on a competitive bidding basis with
independent contractors, which have been cleared by HUD and meet all
the local requirements for contracting. Contractors are allowed an
average of forty-five days to complete the work.
Community Development — Paint -Up $25,000
This program provides exterior paint and supplies to neighborhood area
residents of low to moderate income. The program is utilized in
conjunction with other C.D. housing programs to enhance community
restoration and redevelopment.
CDBG 1990-91 PROPOSED PROJECTS January 23, 1990
Page 4
Community Development - Land Disposition $5,000
This project would provide for all site preparation work necessary on
marketed parcels of land in the C.D. inventory. The site work would
include dirt excavation, fill dirt and levelling of the property in
order to make it construction ready. This project will strengthen our
land marketing efforts and promote affordable housing.
Community Development - Homestead Property Management $5,000
This project proposal is for funding to assist with the direct
administrative expenses of the Urban Homesteading Program. These
expenses include the application processing expenses of credit
reports, tax certificates, program advertising, and photo supplies and
processing. This project will be utilized to issue the properties
during interim ownership. These funds will also be utilized to
secure, clean, and maintain the property prior to deeding and
rehabilitation. These expenses are not allowable under the Urban
Homesteading Program.
Community Development - Sidewalks/Arnett Benson $51,000
This is the continuation of an ongoing effort in the Arnett Benson
Neighborhood to arrest neighborhood blight and decline by the
installation of necessary infrastructure improvements. Sidewalks were
not initially constructed in this area. The construction of sidewalks
has enhanced the redevelopment of the area, especially with the
density of the population. Approximately 3,000 L.F. of sidewalk is
proposed in the 2800 block of Dartmouth and Duke Streets.
The blocks require voluntary easements and 900 of the owners have
signed.
Also, included in this project is a proposal to construct 1,000 LF of
4' sidewalk on Birch Avenue in the Chatman Hill Neighborhood. The
construction of new sidewalk will enhance the ongoing efforts of the
Joint Venture for Affordable Housing. This project will compliment
the five newly constructed houses on Birch Avenue. This will have a
direct effect on approximately 20 homeowners.
Community Development - Sidewalks/North Overton $50,000
This is a continuation of an ongoing effort in the Overton Area to
upgrade sidewalks for low/moderate income homeowners.
CDBG 1990-91 PROPOSED PROJECTS January 23, 1990
Page 5
Community Development - Administration $172,000
This project is for the administration of the Community Development
Program. The Administration section includes the C.D. Administrator,
Administrative Assistant, Secretary and Bookkeeper. Support services
for the Administration and Field Services sections are budgeted in the
Administration budget. The staff administers the Emergency Shelter,
Urban Homesteading, Urban Renewal and Section 312 programs which do
not allow any administrative funding.
Community Development - Field Services $253,000
This project is the budget for the field services personnel which work
with the Community Development projects. The staff primarily works
with the rehabilitation and redevelopment activities. This budget
includes the Rehabilitation & Redevelopment Coordinator, 3
Rehabilitation Inspectors, a Loan Specialist, a Relocation Specialist
and a Real Estate Specialist. The programs which are operated by this
staff include paint -up, rehabilitation, commercial and residential 312
loans, relocation, acquisition, rental rehab, real estate marketing,
weatherization, emergency repair and urban homesteading. The Section
312 program and Urban Homesteading programs operate from a separate
source of funds but these programs do not allow administrative
expenses as an eligible cost.
Community Development - Indirect Costs $100,000
As part of the cost of implementing the Community Development Block
Grant Program, the City of Lubbock is eligible to receive indirect
costs in relation to various departments and support services provided
to the Community Development Block Grant Program. These costs are
determined in accordance with accounting procedures approved by HUD.
The indirect cost allocation plan must be preliminarily approved each
year by HUD prior to its implementation.
Community Services - Home Security Program $40,000
This program offers devices to protect homes from intruders and fire.•
The Home Security program is offered to elderly homeowners and to
citizens who are handicapped. The devices offered are deadbolt locks,
smoke detectors, peepholes, solid core doors, if needed, and outdoor
sensory light controls.
CDBG 1990-91 PROPOSED PROJECTS
Page 6
January 23, 1990
Street Engineering - Paving/E. 38th Street $164,400
This project would provide a link between Southeast Drive and Quirt
Avenue to serve as a clover leaf traffic pattern to accent the new E.
34th and Quirt Avenue overpass. Street paving construction to City
Standard industrial width (52 feet of paving on a 75 foot right-of-
way.
Street Engineering - Carlisle Area $413,524
This project will provide for the construction of standard City of
Lubbock residential paving including concrete curbs and gutters in the
Carlisle area.
Water Utilities - Water System Improvements $355,820
This project would provide for the upgrading of water pressure in the
Overton Area. The project will increase water flow and pressure to
provide adequate fire protection. The proposal is divided into two
separate phases.
Phase I would provide for the installation of a 12" water line in
Avenue U between 4th Street and 17th Street, an 8" water line in 9th
Street between University Avenue and Avenue W and a 8" water line in
13th Street between University Avenue and Avenue W. The total cost of
Phase I is $212,740.
Phase II would provide for the installation of a 12" water line in 9th
Street between Avenue O and Avenue W. The total cost of Phase II of
the project is $143,080.
Planning - Planning Documents $4,000
Each year the Planning Department publishes public information as data
is gathered and formalized. The impending 1990 Census will create a
large body of information for public distribution. The projects
scheduled for the request period include: 1) the Lubbock Population
and Economics Report; 2) census information documents, and 3) other
planning documents which benefit the general public. The requested
funds are for materials and printing only.
CDBG 1990-91 PROPOSED PROJECTS
Page 7
January 23, 1990
Parks - Ballfield Bleacher Replacement/
Mose Hood & Mackenzie $26,500
This project will replace warped and twisted bleacher boards at five
ballfields (2 at Mose Hood, 23rd & Ave. Q and 3 at Mackenzie Park.)
The new bleachers will be constructed of aluminum which has a longer
life expectancy than wood bleachers.
Butler Park Outreach Program (B-Pop) - Phase I $16,300
B-Pop is a recreational and educational program for youths ages 10
through 19 who live in East Lubbock. The program will be held daily
from June 3-August 19. Mae Simmons Community Center (23rd & Oak) and
two junior high gyms will be used for activities which will include
dances, tournaments, volleyball, basketball, field trips, open
recreation, and special parties.
The Butler Park Outreach Program began in the summer of 1988. The
goals of the program were and continue to be:
1.
2.
3.
4.
to provide a supervised recreational educational
program for boys and girls ages 10-16 in East Lubbock;
to identify role models within the East Lubbock
Community to lead the young people;
to involve the entire East Lubbock Community in the
program; and
to eliminate youth
adults involved in
participation in gangs and with
crime.
Activities included dances, table games, field trips, volleyball,
basketball, tournaments, and special parties. The activities were
held at Mae Simmons Community Center and Alderson and Struggs Gyms.
In 1988 over 7,600 youths and over 13,000 youths in 1989 were served
by this program. The average nightly attendance for basketball during
1989 was 93 youths.
Parks - Butler Outreach Program - Phase II $25,500
The intent of this program is to operate a program similar to B-Pop in
two other areas of the City. This project is to expand the existing
Butler Outreach program to the Rodgers (3200 Amherst) and Rawlings
(40th & B) Community Center neighborhoods. The program will be held
daily from June 3-August 19, 1990. B-Pop is a recreational program
for youths ages 10 through 19 who live in the Rodgers Community Center
(4th Street, Clovis Highway, Ave. Q, Indiana) neighborhood and
Rawlings Community Center (Ave. Q, Ave. A, 19th Street, 50th Street)
CDBG 1990-91 PROPOSED PROJECTS
Page 8
January 23, 1990
neighborhood. Rodgers will coordinate programs at Matthews Junior
High Gymnasium and Rawlings will coordinate programs at O. L. Slaton.
The program will be at the junior high gyms Thursday, Friday, and
Sunday nights and at the community centers on Monday, Tuesday,
Wednesday and Saturday nights. Activities will include tournaments,
basketball, volleyball, open recreation, dances, and special parties.
The goals of the B-Pop program are:
1. to provide a supervised recreational program for boys and
girls ages 10-19 in targeted neighborhoods.
2. to identify role models within the programs and
neighborhoods to lead the young people.
3. to develop neighborhood involvement in the program.
Parks - Carlisle Annex Park Development -Phase II/
7337 22nd $60,000
This project will develop a 2 acre park at 7337 22nd Street in the
Carlisle area. Development will include an automatic irrigation
system, playground, landscaping, lighting and picnic units. There
currently is no developed park in the Carlisle area.
Parks - Lake 6 - Grass Seeding $19,000
This project will introduce additional plant material into the Lake 6
area to prevent erosion and make the area more appealing to the
public.
Parks - O. D. Hollins Park Playground/
1st St. & Temple $43,800
This project would replace the existing playground equipment at O.D.
Hollins Park (1st Street & Temple). The park shelter will also be re -
roofed and concrete sidewalks will be upgraded.
Parks - Lake 6 Fishing Pier Renovation $112,500
This project will renovate the fishing piers at Lake 6. This will
provide safer facilities for park users. The existing piers, which
are approximately 12 years old, are warped and buckled. The estimated
number of fishermen per year is approximately 15,000. The two piers
will be designed for use by disabled persons.
CDBG 1990-91 PROPOSED PROJECTS
Page 9
January 23, 1990
Parks - Mae Simmons Park Ballfield Lighting/
24th & Quirt $42,500
This project would provide for the installation of new ballfield
lighting at Mae Simmons Park (24th & Quirt). The project will include
the replacement of the outdated incandescent lights on wooden poles
with new metal halide fixtures on steel poles.
Parks - Mose Hood Park / Restrooms / 23rd & Ave. Q $55,300
This project would install restrooms at Mose Hood Park (23rd & Ave.
Q). The building will be handicap accessible and have vandal
resistant fixtures with water and sewer hook-ups. This park is
heavily attended by the public and the addition of restrooms would be
a great convenience.
Parks - Quirt Ave. Median Irrigation $83,000
This project would provide an automatic irrigation system along the
median of Quirt Avenue to extend from Regis Street south to Loop 289.
Parks - Stubbs Parking Lot Improvements/
36th & Ave. N $65,700
This project will provide new base material, asphalt and curb and
gutter to Lou Stubbs Park (36th & Ave. N) parking lot. This will
allow better parking facilities for users and will also decrease
maintenance.
Parks - Summer Satellite Program - Phase I $17,000
This is a summer program for low income youth ages 6-17, which will be
provided from June 4 - August 17 at Hollins Park (1st & Temple),
Yellowhouse Canyon (Clovis Rd. & N. Loop 289), Pioneer Park and Burns
Park (6th & T) neighborhoods of Lubbock. This free program provides
supervised tournaments, table games, athletics, crafts, and special
events from 1:00-5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. In addition,
weekly user fee field trips will be scheduled to include roller
skating, swimming, going to movies, and other recreational activities.
CDBG 1990-91 PROPOSED PROJECTS
Page 10
January 23, 1990
Parks - Summer Satellite Program - Phase II $20,600
A summer program for low income youth ages 6-17, will be provided from
June 4 - August 17 at Chatman Park (E. 29th & Juniper), Mahon
Elementary (2010 Cornell), Carlisle (28th & Ave. X), and Clayton
Carter (Globe & N. Loop 289). This free program will provide
tournaments, table games, athletics, crafts and special events from
1:00 - 5:00 p.m., Monday -Friday. In addition, weekly user -fee field
trips will be scheduled to include roller skating, swimming and other
recreational activities.
CD - Guadalupe Neighborhood Entrance Sign $22,000
This project includes the construction and landscaping of an entrance
marker in the Guadalupe Neighborhood. This project is proposed to
compliment the execution of the Joint Venture for Affordable Housing
for the Guadalupe Area..
CD - Guadalupe Parkway Neighborhood Center $126,185
The Board of Directors of the Guadalupe -Parkway Neighborhood Center
are requesting additional funding to construct a multi -purpose
facility adjacent to the existing Parkway facility located at 405 N.
Quirt Avenue.
Contingency Fund $125,000
The contingency fund is allocated by City Council action as needed to
fund additional projects or overruns for existing projects.
Engineering -. Street Paving Chapel Hill $320,200
Provide the necessary R.O.W. and the construction of standard.City of
Lubbock residential paving including concrete curbs and gutters.
Area *1 - between E. Loop 289 and Olive Avenue and between Idalou Road
and East 4th Street.
CDBG 1990-91 PROPOSED PROJECTS January 23, 1990
Page 11
Helen Hodges Ballfield Improvements $4;000
The Northwest Little League requested several improvements to the --
Helen Hodges Ballfield (Marshall and N. University). These include:
1. Fencing along Marshall Street - $4,000
2. Renovation of lights on the major field
3. Renovation of bleachers
4. Expansion of West field
February 1989
CITY OF LUBBOCK
RELOCATION POLICY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This relocation policy is the City of Lubbock's and
states that benefits which will be provided to
displacees who are not covered by the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act
of 1970.
The City of Lubbock will minimize displacement of
persons from their homes and neighborhoods. It is the
intent of the City of Lubbock to limit displacement to
cases which provide a threat to life and health. It is
the further intent of the City to provide reasonable
benefits to any displaced person.
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS
"Displacement" means the involuntary movement, except
temporary relocation, of a household from a dwelling
unit resulting from its acquisition, rehabilitation, or
demolition when: 1) Funded in whole or in part with
CDBG funds; or 2) funded with non-CDBG funds where the
acquisition, rehabilitation, or demolition is a pre
requisite for an activity carried out with CDBG funds
(e.g. acquisition of land with local funds for a
neighborhood facility to be constructed with CDBG
funds.) "Displacement" also means the involuntary
movement, except temporary relocation, of a household
from a dwelling unit necessitated by CDBG assisted code
enforcement.
SECTION 3. ELIGIBILITY
All residents legally occupying the property at the
time of the commencement of the Community Development
funded activity are eligible for relocation benefits
should displacement occur. Any owner occupant must
have owned and occupied his dwelling for not less than
180 days prior to the initiation to acquire his
dwelling to be eligible for a Replacement Housing
Payment.
Tenant - Must have been in legal occupancy for not less
than 90 days prior to the Notice to Acquire to the
owner to receive a Replacement Housing Payment for
Tenants.
Business Occupant - Must be in operation for not less
than one (1) year to be eligible for Business
Relocation Assistance.
Absentee landlords or outdoor advertising display will
not be considered displaced under this policy.
SECTION 4. RELOCATION PAYMENT LIMITS
An eligible displaced homeowner may qualify for a
replacement housing payment not to exceed $15,000 to
include incidental expenses. Tenants, $4,000
supplemented for 4 years. An eligible business
occupant may qualify for a fixed moving expense payment
not to exceed $2,500 if the business will take
responsibility for his move. In order to qualify for
this payment income tax or certified financial
statements must be provided. Any business will qualify
for actual moving expenses.
SECTION 5. ADVISORY SERVICES
Information and counseling shall be provided fo
familiarize residents to be displaced with:
(a) Opportunities to select replacement dwellings
from a full range of neighborhoods within
the total housing market;
(b) Individual rights under the Federal Fair Housing
Law; and
(c) How to search for suitable replacement housing.
These services shall be provided by the City of
Lubbock.
SECTION 6. MOVING EXPENSES
The displacee shall be reimbursed for the reasonable
cost of his/her moving and related expenses. This
moving expense payment will either be a fixed payment
of up to $500 or the actual documented expenses of
moving, whichever is less.
Actual Moving Expenses
This payment may include the cost of:
a) Moving household goods, including necessary
insurance on the household goods while in
transit.
b) Disconnecting and reconnecting household
appliances, telephone, and/or utilities.
This does not include cable television.
City staff will explain these and any other moving
costs. The displacee must provide documentation for
any costs incurred. Adequate documentation shall
include, but not be limited to, signed and dated
receipts on the letterhead of the service provider.
SECTION 7. FUNDING SOURCES
The determination of the source of funding shall rest
with the City. The owner shall be requested to bear as
much of the expenses as the City deems feasible. All
relocation actions either funded by the owner or the
City shall be paid in accordance with the schedule of
benefits provided in this policy.
Information, counseling, referrals and other relocation
services will be provided to displacees regardless of
their race, color, religion, sex, age, handicap, or
national origin.