Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 2010-R0133 - Engagement Letter - City Of Lubbock And Utilitech, Inc. Of Atmos Engergy - 03/25/2010Resolution No. 2010-RO133 March 25, 2010 Item No. 5.4 RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the City Council of the City of Lubbock hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor of the City of Lubbock to execute an Engagement Letter by and between the City of Lubbock and Utilitech, Inc. for informal review of the Atmos Engergy Corporation 2010 Rate Review Mechanism Filing and annual rate adjustment, which agreement and any associated documents are attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution for all intents and purposes. Passed by the City Council on _ March 25, 2010 TOM MARTIN, MAYOR ATTEST: ck'J_.'d --e 1:a� Rebec Garza, City Secretary APPROVED AS `IO CONTENT: Andy Burcham. Chief Financial Officer APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sam Medina, Ci vw:ccdocsiRES.Utditech, Inc -Engagement Ltr 2/25/10 UTI LITECH, INC. Resolution No. 2010-RO133 Regulatory and Management Consultants P.O. Box 481934 • Kansas City, MO 64148-1934 - 816-525-5211 •Fax: 816-525-5258 February 19, 2010 The Honorable Tom Martin Mayor City of Lubbock City Hall 1625 13th Street, Suite 201 Lubbock, TX 79401 RE: ENGAGEMENT LETTER FOR INFORMAL REVIEW OF ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION 2010 RRM FILING AND ANNUAL RATE ADJUSTMENT. Dear Mayor Martin: This letter is to serve as our agreement for Utilitech to conduct an informal regulatory analysis on behalf of the City of Lubbock, in connection with the second annual filing under the three year pilot Rate Review Mechanism ("Rider RRM"). Although Atmos is not scheduled to submit its Lubbock RRM filing until April 1, 2010, the Company is expected to seek an overall rate increase to become effective on or after August 1, 2010, which will include a 2009 true -up and a prospective 2010 revenue change. Based upon our recent work involving the Atmos Mid -Tex Division (2007 rate case and two Rider RRM filings) as well as prior West Texas 2009 RRM filings (i.e., both Lubbock and Amarillo). our proposal contemplates a focus upon verification of compliance with the RRM tariff and development of the revenue requirement accounting issues that may result from this filing, including analysis of the accounting adjustments that are made, or needed but not made, by Atmos. We agree to conduct the following work in connection with this engagement: 1. A thorough review of prefiled RRM supporting schedules and workpapers to understand the basis for Atmos' asserted revenue change and the accounting records relied upon to develop such evidence. We will also review the Company's filing for compliance with RRM tariff terms and conditions and to identify potential adjustments required to properly quantify Lubbock earnings and rate adjustments. 2. Preparation and submission of targeted and exploratory discovery to Atmos for information beyond that contained within the filing, as needed for our analysis. 3. On-site interviews and document review at Atmos' offices in Dallas and follow-up teleconferences with Company representatives, as necessary. 4. Analysis of Atmos' 2009 true -up and 2010 prospective earnings and rate base, as allocated to Lubbock, to assess whether reasonable amounts are reflected in the determination of RRM earnings and rate of return, quantifying any adjustments the City may wish to consider in order to correct deficiencies in the Company's filing. 5. Preparation of a report containing earnings and revenue requirement computations to either confirm the Atmos filing amounts, or to calculate alternative rate recommendations for consideration by Lubbock. • Page 2 February 19, 2010February 25, 2010 6. Support and consultation to Lubbock personnel in negotiation with Atmos and/or presentation of recommendations before City authorities. We propose to commence this work in mid to late April with a draft report in late June, scheduled around pre-existing project commitments. Our proposed efforts assume a cooperative and informal working environment with Atmos and do not include any depositions or formal testimony sponsorship by Utilitech personnel. Since this is the second annual filing under the three-year RRM pilot, we do not anticipate any work required to redefine or restructure the terms or conditions of Rider RRM. In the event the RRM filing cannot be resolved informally, Utilitech would negotiate in good faith with Lubbock for any further services that may required of us. Fees for Utilitech services would be billed at our standard hourly rates for our current fiscal year for Messrs. Brosch ($150 per hour) and Carver ($130 per hour). We expect that our administrative personnel would assist in the processing of discovery, development of spreadsheet analyses and/or preparation of draft testimony and exhibits. As needed, these services will be billed at $45 per hour. Our work would be billed on an actual hours and expenses basis and we commit to not exceed a proposed overall project cost estimate of $30,000, unchanged from our estimate for the 2009 RRM filing review, without advanced notification to you and written agreement for such additional work. Utilitech shall serve in the capacity of contractor, and not as employees of the City of Lubbock, and will maintain all required insurance in connection with such services. Qualifications and professional reference materials for Utilitech personnel have previously been provided to you. If any additional references or Utilitech specimen work products are desired, please let me know. I am available to discuss this proposal at your convenience. If you are in agreement with the services and terms set forth herein, please so indicate by signing below and returning an original copy. We appreciate this opportunity to again serve the gas utility ratepayers of Lubbock. Sincerely, Steven C. rye City of Lubbock By:Y Vic resident, Utilitech, Inc. Tom Martin, Mayor Attest By: Rebecca G City Secretary Approved as to Content: BY: Andy Burch , Chief Financial Officer Approved as to F Sam Medina, City Atto y