HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 2004-R0513 - Agreement For Engineering Services For The Northwest Passage Project - 10_11_2004Resolution No. 2004—R051.
October 11, 2004
Item No. 53
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and
directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock, an Agreement between the
City of Lubbock and HNTB Corporation for engineering services related to the
environmental documents for the Northwest Passage Project. Said Agreement is attached
hereto and incorporated in this Resolution as if fully set forth herein and shall be included
in the minutes of the Council.
Passed by the City Council this 11th day of
ATTEST:
Reb cca Garza, ifty Secretary Qs
APPROVED AS TO
City Traffic Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Assistant City Attorney
as/cityatt/John/Resolutions/Agreement-BNTB Corporation
September 28, 2004
Resolution No. 2004—RO513
October 11, 2004
Item No. 53
AGREEMENT
FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, between the City of Lubbock, Texas (hereinafter referred to as Owner) and
HNTB Corporation, with principal offices at 5910 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 200 Plano Texas75093
(hereinafter referred to as Engineer):
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Owner intends to construct the Northwest Passage Project (hereinafter referred to as the
Project); and
WHEREAS, Owner requires certain professional engineering services in connection with the Project
(hereinafter referred to as the Services); and
WHEREAS, Engineer is prepared and has the ability to provide such Services;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
ARTICLE 1 - EFFECTIVE DATE
The effective date of this Agreement shall be upon execution by the Mayor
ARTICLE 2 - SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY ENGINEER
Engineer shall perform the Services described in Attachment A, Scope of Services, which is attached
hereto and incorporated by reference as part of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 3 - COMPENSATION
Owner shall pay Engineer for Services in accordance with Attachment B, Compensation, which is
attached hereto and incorporated by reference as part of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 4 - STANDARD OF CARE
Engineer shall exercise the same degree of care, skill and diligence in the performance of the
Services as is ordinarily provided by a professional engineer under similar circumstances at the same
time and in the same locality.
ARTICLE 5 - LIMITATIONS OF RESPONSIBILITY
Engineer shall not be responsible for (a) actual means, methods, techniques, sequences, procedures or
safety precautions and programs used in connection with the Project by others, or (b) the failure of
any other Project participant to fulfill contractual or other responsibilities to Owner or to comply with
federal, state and local laws, ordinances, regulations, rules, codes, orders, criteria and standards.
ARTICLE 6 - OPINIONS OF COST AND SCHEDULE
Since Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by
others, or over contractors', subcontractors' or vendors' methods of determining prices, or over
competitive bidding or market conditions, Engineer's opinion of cost shall be made on the basis of
qualifications and experience as a professional engineer.
Since Engineer has no control over the resources provided by others to meet contract schedules,
Engineer's forecast schedules shall be made on the basis of qualifications and experience as a
professional engineer. Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual Project
costs will not vary from his opinions of cost or that actual schedules will not vary from his forecast
schedules.
ARTICLE 7 - LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION
7.1 General. Having considered the risks and potential liabilities that may exist during the
performance of the Services and in consideration of the promises included herein, Owner and
Engineer agree to allocate such liabilities in accordance with this Article 7. Words and phrases used
in this Article shall be interpreted in accordance with customary insurance industry usage and
practice.
7.2 Indemnification. Engineer agrees to indemnify and hold Owner whole and harmless against all
judgments, losses, damages, costs and expenses of persons or property to the extent they arise out of,
or be occasioned by, or from; any negligent act, error or omission of Engineer; or any agent, servant
or employee of Engineer in the execution or performance of Services under this Agreement. In the
event judgments, losses, damages, costs or expenses are caused by the joint or concurrent
negligence of Engineer and Owner, they shall be borne by each party in proportion to its own
negligence.
7.3 Employee Claims. Engineer shall indemnify Owner against legal liability for damages arising
out of claims by Engineer's employees.
7.4 Limitations of Liability. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Engineer's total liability to
Owner for any and all injuries, claims, losses, expenses or damages arising out of or in any way
related to the Project or this Agreement from any cause or causes, including but not limited to
Engineer's negligence, errors, omissions, strict liability, or breach of contract, shall not exceed the
minimum insurance limits required by Article 10 of this Agreement.
7.5 Other Project Indemnities. Indemnity provisions shall be incorporated into all Project
contractual arrangements entered into by Owner and shall protect Owner and Engineer to the same
extent.
7.6 Survival. Upon completion of all Services, obligations and duties provided for in this
Agreement, or in the event of termination of this Agreement for any reason, the terms and conditions
of this Article shall survive.
ARTICLE 8 - INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Engineer undertakes performance of the Services as an independent contractor and shall be wholly
responsible for the methods of its own performance and that of its subcontractors, agents and
employees. Owner shall have no right to supervise the methods used, but Owner shall have the right
2
to observe such performance. Engineer shall work closely with Owner in performing Services under
this Agreement.
ARTICLE 9 - COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
In performance of the Services, Engineer will comply with applicable regulatory requirements,
including federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations, orders, codes, criteria and standards.
Engineer shall possess the licenses necessary to allow Engineer to perform the Services. Engineer
shall not be responsible for procuring permits, certificates and licenses required for any construction
unless such responsibilities are specifically assigned to Engineer in Attachment A, Scope of Services.
ARTICLE 10 - INSURANCE
Prior to the time Engineer is entitled to commence any part of the Services under this Agreement,
Engineer shall procure, pay for, and maintain the following insurance written by companies licensed
in the State of Texas or meeting surplus lines requirements of Texas law and acceptable to Owner.
The insurance shall be evidenced by delivery to Owner of one (1) certificate of insurance, executed
by the insurer, listing coverage and limits, expiration date and term of policy, and certifying that the
insurer is licensed to do business in Texas or meets the surplus lines requirements of Texas law. The
insurance requirements shall remain in effect throughout the term of this Agreement.
A. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance
Engineer shall have Comprehensive General Liability Insurance with limits of
$1,000,000 combined single limit to include:
Premises and Operations
Explosion and Collapse Hazard
Underground Damage Hazard
Products and Completed Operations Hazard
Contractual Liability
Independent Contractors Coverage
Personal Injury
Owner is to be named as an additional insured on this policy for this specific Project by
blanket endorsement or otherwise.
B. Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance
Engineer shall have Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance with limits of not
less than:
Bodily Injury $250,000/$500,000
Property Damage $100,000
to include all owned and non -owned cars including:
Employers Non -ownership Liability
Hired and Non -owned vehicles
Owner is to be named as an additional insured on this policy for this specific Project by
blanket endorsement or otherwise.
C. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance
Engineer shall obtain Worker's Compensation coverage pursuant to Section 406.002 of
the Texas Labor Code. Further, Engineer shall maintain said coverage throughout the
term of this Agreement and shall comply with all applicable provisions of Title 5 of the
3
Texas Labor Code to ensure that Engineer maintains said coverage. Any termination of
Worker's Compensation insurance coverage by Engineer or any cancellation or
nonrenewal of Worker's Compensation insurance coverage for Engineer shall be a
material breach of this Agreement. Engineer shall maintain Employer's Liability
coverage of at least $500,000. The Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability
coverage shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation.
D. Professional Liability Insurance (including errors and omissions) with minimum limits
of $1,000,000 per claim.
Engineer shall furnish Owner certificates of insurance which shall include a provision that such
insurance shall not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to Owner.
ARTICLE 11 - OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
Owner shall be responsible for all matters described in Attachment C, Owner's Responsibilities,
which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as part of this Agreement. For purposes of
this Agreement, Owner may act through its governing body or through administrative officials.
ARTICLE 12 - REUSE OF DOCUMENTS
All documents, including drawings, specifications and computer software, prepared by Engineer
pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service in respect to this Project. They are not intended
or represented to be suitable for reuse by Owner or others on extensions of this Project or on any
other project. Any reuse without written verification or adaptation by Engineer for the specific
purpose intended will be at Owner's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Engineer.
Except as otherwise provided herein, documents, drawings, and specifications prepared by
Engineer and furnished to Owner as part of the Services shall become the property of Owner;
provided, however, that Engineer shall have the unrestricted right to their use. Engineer shall
retain its copyright and ownership rights in its design, drawing details, specifications, data bases,
computer software, and other proprietary property. Intellectual property developed, utilized, or
modified in the performance of the Services shall remain the property of Engineer.
ARTICLE 13 - AMENDMENT, TERMINATION AND STOP ORDERS
This Agreement may be altered or amended only by mutual written consent of both parties hereto
and may be terminated by Owner at any time by written notice to Engineer. Upon receipt of such
notice, Engineer shall, unless the notice directs otherwise, immediately discontinue all Services in
connection with the performance of this Agreement and shall proceed to cancel promptly all existing
orders insofar as such orders are chargeable to this Agreement. Engineer shall submit a statement
showing in detail the Services performed under this Agreement to the date of termination. Owner
shall then pay Engineer promptly that proportion of the prescribed fee which applies to the Services
actually performed under this Agreement, less all payments that have been previously made.
Thereupon, copies of all completed Services accomplished under this Agreement shall be delivered
to Owner.
This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon written notice in the event of substantial
failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; provided,
however, the nonperforming party shall have 14 calendar days from the receipt of the
termination notice to cure or to submit a plan for cure acceptable to the other party.
4
Owner may issue a Stop Work Order to Engineer at any time. Upon receipt of such order, Engineer is
to discontinue all Services under this Agreement and cancel all orders pursuant to this Agreement,
unless the order otherwise directs. If Owner does not issue a Restart Order within 60 days after
receipt by Engineer of the Stop Work Order, Engineer shall regard this Agreement terminated in
accordance with the foregoing provisions. Upon issuance of a Restart Order, an equitable
adjustment shall be made to Engineer's compensation and schedule.
ARTICLE 14 - NONDISCLOSURE OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Engineer shall consider all information provided by Owner to be proprietary unless such information
is available from public sources. Engineer shall not publish or disclose proprietary information for
any purpose other than the performance of the Services without the prior written authorization of
Owner or in response to legal process.
ARTICLE 15 - NOTICE
Any notice, demand or request required by or made pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed
properly made if personally delivered in writing or deposited in the United States mail, postage
prepaid, to the address specified below.
To Engineer: HNTB Corporation
ATTN: Floyd A. Martinez, P.E.
5910 W. Plano Parkway
Suite 200
Plano, Texas 75093
To Owner: City of Lubbock
ATTN: Larry Hertel, P.E.
P.O. Box 2000
Lubbock, Texas 79457-0001
Nothing contained in this Article shall be construed to restrict the transmission of routine
communications between representatives of Engineer and Owner.
ARTICLE 16 - UNCONTROLLABLE FORCES
Neither Owner nor Engineer shall be considered to be in default of this Agreement if delays in or
failure of performance shall be due to uncontrollable forces the effect of which, by the exercise of
reasonable diligence, the nonperforming party could not avoid. The term "uncontrollable forces"
shall mean any event which results in the prevention or delay of performance by a party of its
obligations under this Agreement and which is beyond the control of the nonperforming party. It
includes, but is not limited to, fire, flood, earthquakes, storms, lightning, epidemic, war, riot, civil
disturbance, sabotage, construction Contractor default or abandonment, failure on the part of the
construction Contractor to otherwise pursue construction of the Project, legislative actions, Owner -
directed changes to design criteria or scope of Services once criteria and scope have been agreed
upon, Owner -directed changes to plans after plans have been reviewed and approved (including
partial submittal progress reviews), inability to procure permits, licenses or authorizations from any
state, local or federal agency or person for any of the supplies, materials, accesses or services
required to be provided by either Owner or Engineer under this Agreement.
5
Neither party shall, however, be excused from performance if nonperformance is due to forces which
are removable or remediable and which the nonperforming party could have, with the exercise of
reasonable diligence, removed or remedied with reasonable dispatch. The provisions of this Article
shall not be interpreted or construed to require Engineer or Owner to prevent, settle or otherwise
avoid a strike, work slowdown or other labor action. The nonperforming party shall, within a
reasonable time of being prevented or delayed from performance by an uncontrollable force, give
written notice to the other party describing the circumstances and uncontrollable force preventing
continued performance of the obligations of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 17 - GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. Any suit brought to enforce any
provision of this Agreement or for construction of any provision thereof shall be brought in Lubbock
County, Texas.
ARTICLE 18 - MISCELLANEOUS
18.1 Nonwaiver. A waiver by either Owner or Engineer of any breach of this Agreement shall not
be binding upon the waiving party unless such waiver is in writing. In the event of a written waiver,
such a waiver shall not affect the waiving parry's rights with respect to any other or further breach.
18.2 Severability. The invalidity, illegality or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement,
or the occurrence of any event rendering any portion or provision of this Agreement void, shall in no
way affect the validity or enforceability of any other portion or provision of this Agreement. Any
void provision shall be deemed severed from this Agreement and the balance of this Agreement shall
be construed and enforced as if this Agreement did not contain the particular portion or provision
held to be void. The parties further agree to reform this Agreement to replace any stricken provision
with a valid provision that comes as close as possible to the intent of the stricken provision.
The provisions of this Article shall not prevent the entire Agreement from being void should a
provision which is of the essence of this Agreement be determined to be void.
ARTICLE 19 - INTEGRATION AND MODIFICATION
This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parties and supersedes all
prior negotiations, representations and agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be
amended only by a written instrument signed by each of the parties.
ARTICLE 20 - SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
Owner and Engineer each binds itself and its directors, officers, partners, successors, executors,
administrators, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the
partners, successors, executors, administrators, assigns and legal representatives of such other party,
in respect to all covenants, agreements and obligations of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 21 - ASSIGNMENT
Neither Owner nor Engineer shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or interest in (including,
but without limitation, monies that may become due or monies that are due) this Agreement without
the written consent of the other, except to the extent that the effect of this limitation may be restricted
by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no
assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this
Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent Engineer from employing such
0
independent consultants, associates and subcontractors as he may deem appropriate to assist him in
the performance of the Services hereunder.
ARTICLE 22 - SUBCONTRACTORS
No Services herein called for by Engineer shall be subcontracted to a subcontractor who is not
acceptable to Owner or assigned without prior written approval of Owner. Engineer shall require
subcontracts to conform to the applicable terms of this Agreement and include provisions which
require subcontractor compliance with Owner's Rules.
ARTICLE 23 - THIRD PARTY RIGHTS
Nothing herein shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than Owner and
Engineer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agree. nent.
CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
V A
%64—�
Larry ertel, P.E. Marc McDougal, Mayor
City Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ohn M. Knight
Assistant City At rney
(all
Benj J. Biller,
Vice President, Cen ivision
HNTB Corporation
Attest
Rebecca Garza
City Secretary
L
Attest L�go�:�
Diane Long
Notary Public
DIANE S. LONG
'y MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
. November 5, 2005
7
Resolution No. 2004-RO513
ATTACHMENT A
TO
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
Owner: City of Lubbock, Texas
Project: Northwest Passage
A DESCRIPTION OF SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of Services for this Project is as follows: Services will not proceed until Owner has
authorized Engineer in writing to proceed.
I. SERVICES
A. Services as defined by the tasks and man-hours in Exhibit A-1.
H. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
A. At the request of Owner, Engineer will provide Additional Services upon agreement
between Owner and Engineer defining the extent of such Additional Services and the
amount and manner in which Engineer will be compensated for such Additional Services.
B. Additional services may be authorized by a notice -to -proceed in writing from the City
Engineer and addressed to Engineer.
A-1
Resolution No. 2004-RO513
ATTACHMENT B
TO
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
Owner: City of Lubbock, Texas
Project: Northwest Passage
COMPENSATION
BASIC AND SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES
For Services covered by this Agreement, Owner agrees to pay Engineer as follows:
A. GENERAL
1. Engineer will be paid on a lump sum basis shown in Table B-1 and subcontract
personnel services will be billed at cost. Engineer reimbursable expenses not
including subcontractor cost and reimbursable expenses will be billed at cost plus
15 percent surcharge. Suncontractor reimbursable expenses will be billed at cost
plus 15 percent surcharge. Reimbursable expenses are shown in Table B-1.
2. Engineer agrees to use its best efforts to perform Services as defined herein
within the billing limits stated below.
3. It is understood and agreed that the maximum billings of each of the items listed
below are based on the start of Services being authorized not later than November
1, 2004. If start of Basic Services is not authorized by date given, it is understood
and agreed that the upper billing limit will be adjusted accordingly by a
supplement to this Agreement.
4. Monthly payments shall be made to Engineer by Owner based on Engineer's
statement. The statement shall be itemized to indicate the amount of Services
performed and the associated reimbursable expenses and subcontract costs.
5. The uncontested amount of each statement shall be due and payable upon receipt
by Owner. Carrying charges of 1-1/2 percent per month from the billing date
shall be due for accounts that are not paid within 60 days after the billing date.
6. Engineer shall keep records on the basis of generally accepted accounting
practices of costs and expenses and which records shall be available for
inspection by Owner during normal business hours.
7. Engineer shall provide adequate resources to complete the Services described
herein within 12 months of the date of Owner's notice -to -proceed to Engineer.
B. SERVICES
1. The maximum amount billed for Services including personnel services and
reimbursable expenses for Engineer is shown as follows:
Personnel
Reimbursable
Services
Expenses
Lump Sum Basis, as proposed in Table B-1. $750,812.32
$49.136.31
TOTAL SERVICES NOT TO EXCEED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION
$799,948.63
C. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Additional Services must be authorized in writing by Owner.
1. The maximum amount billed for Additional Services will be determined by
mutual consent before the Additional Services are authorized by Owner.
2. Engineer shall start the performance of the authorized Additional Services within
ten (10) days of the receipt of notice to proceed and will complete the Additional
Services within the time period determined by mutual consent before the
Additional Services are authorized by Owner.
IM
TABLE B-1
PERSONNEL SERVICES RATES
TO
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
Owner: City of Lubbock, Texas
Project: Northwest Passage
COMPENSATION RATES
Raw labor rates used for determination of Cost of Services are valid until January 1, 2006. Any
extensions in schedule beyond that date will warrant consideration of fee increase to compensate for
future rate escalations.
B. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
The following expenses are reimbursable:
1. Travel, subsistence and incidental costs.
2. Use of motor vehicles on a monthly basis for assigned vehicles and on a current
mileage basis or rental cost basis for vehicles used for short periods.
3. Long distance telephone costs and Project "onsite telephone costs.
4. Reproduction of reports, drawings and specifications.
5. Postage and shipping charges for Project -related materials.
6. Computer time charges, including program use charges.
7. Rental charges for use of equipment.
8. Cost of acquiring any other materials or services specifically for and applicable to
only this Project.
IM
Resolution No. 2004-RO513
ATTACHMENT C
TO
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
Owner: City of Lubbock, Texas
Project: Northwest Passage
OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
Owner will furnish, as required by the Services and not at the expense of Engineer, the following
items:
1. Access to all maps, drawings, reports, records, audits, annual reports and other data that
are available in the files of Owner and which may be useful in the Services involved
under this Agreement.
2. Secure permission to enter upon public and private property when required in
performance of Engineer's Services.
3. Access to existing property, boundary, easement, right-of-way, utility surveys and
property descriptions.
4. Full disclosure regarding the Project.
5. A Project Manager fully acquainted with the Project who has authority to approve
changes in the Project within the delegated authority of the Project Manager, render
decisions promptly, and furnish information in a reasonable time frame. It is recognized
that certain changes or decisions will require City Manager and/or City Council
approval.
6. Pay all costs for advertising and reproduction incident to advertising public meetings
except for those public meetings advertisements which Engineer is obligated to perform
under Basic or authorized Additional Services.
7. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals and other
documents presented by Engineer, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor
and other consultants as Owner deems appropriate for such examination, and render in
writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the
Services of Engineer.
8. Provide such legal accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling
services as may be required for the Project and such auditing services as Owner may
require to ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the monies paid
to him under the construction contract.
9. Give prompt written notice to Engineer whenever Owner observes or otherwise
becomes aware of any defect in the Project.
C-1
10. Cooperate with Engineer in securing preliminary approvals and consensus from the
governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and
consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the Project.
11. Furnish, or direct Engineer to provide, necessary Additional Services as stipulated in
Attachment A of this Agreement or other services as required.
12. Furnish construction materials testing services.
13. Give prompt written notice to Engineer whenever Owner observes or otherwise
becomes aware of a hazardous environmental condition or of any other development
that affects the scope or time of performance of Engineer's Services, or any defect or
nonconformance in Engineer's Services or in the work of any Contractor.
14. If Owner designates a construction manager or an individual or entity other than, or in
addition to, Engineer to represent Owner at the Site, define the duties, responsibilities,
and limitations of authority of such other party and the relation thereof to the duties,
responsibilities, and authority of Engineer.
15. Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this Attachment C.
C-2
ATTACHMENT D
ENGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
Engineer's responsibilities under this Agreement are shown in Exhibit A-1 for Services.
D-1
EXHIBIT A-1
SERVICES
TASKING, MAN-HOURS, REIMBURSABLES, AND SUBCONTRACTORS
Resolution No. 2004-RO513
"Northwest Passage"
Frankford Avenue (FM 2528) to Clovis Road (US 84)
City of Lubbock
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The work to be performed by the Consultant under this contract will generally consist of the
public involvement, route studies (including alternatives analysis), preparation of design
schematics, environmental assessments, preliminary cost estimates, and analysis of adjacent
property owners' share of the cost of paving improvements to Loop 289, 4`h Street, Erskine Street,
Slide Road and the Loop 289/Erskine Street/Quaker Avenue/TT Parkway Interchange for the City
of Lubbock (hereinafter referred to as the City).
Specifically, the improvements consist of:
• Loop 289 main lane widening to the inside of the freeway (from four lanes to six lanes)
from Frankford Avenue (FM 2528) to Clovis Road (US 84).
• Widening of 4h Street (FM 2255) grade separation at Loop 289 to a six (6) lane arterial with
left -turn lanes.
• Widening of Erskine Street from Frankford Avenue (FM 2528) to the Loop 289/Quaker
Avenue Interchange. The section of Erskine Street from Frankford Avenue to Slide Road
will be a seven (7)4ane arterial, and the number of lanes (five (5) lanes or seven (7)
lanes) on Erskine Street from Slide Road to Loop 289/Quaker Avenue interchange will
be determined in this study.
• Slide Road from 4"' Street (FM 2255) to Clovis Road (US 84). Slide Road will be widened
to a five (5)-lane arterial from 4`h Street to Loop 289, and constructed as a seven (7)-lane
arterial from Loop 289 to US 84. The Slide Road grade separation will be a six (6) lane
arterial with left -turn lanes. Slide Road south of Loop 289 will be widened approaching
the Loop to accommodate six (6) through lanes under the Loop w/ turn lanes.
• New grade separation for Slide Road at Loop 289.
• Redesign of the Loop 289/Erskine Street/Quaker Avenue/TT Parkway Interchange.
The number of lanes required on Loop 289, 4 h Street, Erskine Street, and Slide Road will be
confirmed through the TransCAD analysis, included in this scope of services.
The specific tasks required for this project (hereinafter referred to as the Northwest Passage) are
detailed in the following Scope of Services. Tasks shall be performed in accordance with all City
and TxDOT standards and procedures. In case of conflicting City and TxDOT standards, the City
and TxDOT (hereinafter referred to as the State) will make decisions necessary to resolve those
conflicts. Under this contract, the Consultant will develop a schematic and Environmental
Assessment (EA) for the improvements to Loop 289, 4's Street, Erskine Street, Slide Road, and
the Loop 289/Erskine Street/Quaker Avenue/TT Parkway interchange, described above.
Project Schedule
The City has expressed the desire to accelerate the project to a one-year time frame from the date
Notice to Proceed is issued. The tasks outlined in the Scope of Services will be performed by the
Consultant in a timely manner, with continuous communication and project meetings throughout
the process with the City and State. A detailed schedule will be developed and submitted for
approval by the City and the State not later than one week after the Notice to Proceed has been
issued. The detailed schedule will include not only anticipated tirneframes for the Consultant to
1of18
perform the work but also anticipated timeframes for City and State reviews, in order to ensure
the one-year schedule can be met. The Consultant will also plan for agency meetings to
accelerate and streamline the schedule as needed.
Task 1 - Project Management & Quality Assurance
The Consultant's Project Manager and Task Leaders will be responsible for project oversight
and the daily management of this project. Frequent and appropriate communications will be
maintained between the Consultant and the City in an effort to expedite completion of the
project. The following items are included in the project management tasks:
• Coordinate the daily activities of the project;
• Coordinate, attend, and prepare meeting minutes for progress meetings with the City/
State and summarize the meetings (Estimated at six (6) meetings, which includes a
project kickoff meeting. Five (5) of these monthly project meetings will occur in
Lubbock, and one (1) will occur in Dallas);
• Coordinate, attend, and prepare meeting minutes for general purpose meetings with
the City/State and Federal/State Agencies as required to accelerate and streamline the
schedule (Estimated at three (3) meetings). The location of these meetings is
anticipated to be in Austin, Texas;
• Prepare a project schedule graphic indicating tasks, critical dates, and deliverables;
• Provide monthly status reports to the City in conjunction with monthly invoices;
• Manage invoices and organize and manage project billings and filings;
• Provide quality assurance/quality control throughout the duration of the project; and
• Subconsultant management.
Task 2 - Public Involvement
Public involvement will be utilized on this project to inform the public about the Northwest
Passage project and to gain consensus on the project recommendations. All of the public
involvement tools will be prepared in English. Spanish translation of public involvement tools is
not included in this Scope of Services. The City will print the mailing labels for all mailings,
including project newsletters and right -of -entry letters. The Consultant will mail all newsletters,
and right -of -entry letters. The specific public involvement tools that will be utilized on this
project are described in this section.
Public Involvement Plan - The Consultant shall develop a public involvement plan for the
project, which specifically outlines the tools and activities that will be performed on the
Northwest Passage Project.
Project Database - The Consultant shall compile, maintain, and update a database of
neighborhood associations, adjacent property owners, elected officials, local, state, and federal
agencies, media, agencies and organizations interested in the Project. The database will serve as
the project mailing list for the Northwest Passage project.
Elected Officials Notification - The Consultant shall develop a Public Official's letter to be
distributed prior to the dissemination of information to the public. The letter will provide an
overview of the project and offer opportunities for a briefing.
Media Relations - The Consultant will provide three (3) media packet updates with up to three
media releases to be used on the project. The media packet will consist of a news release, a
project map, project contact points, a comment form and a newsletter.
2 of 18
Project Newsletter - The Consultant shall develop and distribute three (3) editions of the project
newsletter for the project mailing list. Each edition of the newsletter will consist of 1-11"x17"
sheet double sided in full color. The newsletter shall be developed and mailed in conjunction
with the public meetings and hearing to allow additional opportunities for the public to be
informed of the meetings. Up to 250 newsletters will be prepared per meeting.
Open House/Public Meetings — The Consultant will coordinate, schedule, organize, advertise
and attend two (2) open house/public meetings for the project. This effort will include:
■ Securing the site of the meetings
■ Set-up and conduct planning meetings for the two (2) open house/public meetings.
(These meetings will be in coordination with the monthly project meetings.)
■ Set-up and conduct rehearsal and `de -brief meetings for the two (2) open house/public
meetings. (The rehearsal meetings will occur the day of the public meeting, and may
include 1 or 2 council members, if desired. The de -brief meetings will occur the morning
after the public meeting )
■ Mailing notice to Texas Parks and Wildlife Department or other agencies with
jurisdiction owner project affected park ,recreational refuge, historic, or scientific lands
■ Preparing and mailing meeting notices to property owners
■ Preparing public meeting notices (30 and 10 day notices), sign -in sheets, and agendas,
project specific information such as background, description of alternatives, impacts, and
cost analysis. The notices will be in English with a Spanish statement at the bottom of
the notice providing a contact to receive project information in Spanish.
■ Up to five (5) exhibits for each open house/public meeting. The exhibits will consist of
schematic rolls of each roadway (plan & profile) plus one overview board showing the
location of each project in reference to the overall Northwest Passage project.
■ Preparing meeting minutes.
■ Preparing Public Meeting Summaries/Comment & Response Reports
The Consultant will cover costs such as facility rental, postage for Public Meeting invitations
and newsletters, as well as public meeting notices (2).
Open House/Public Hearing — The Consultant will coordinate, schedule, organize, advertise and
attend one (1) Open House/Public Hearing for the project. This effort will include:
■ Securing the site of the hearing
■ Set-up and conduct planning meetings for the one (1) open house/public hearing. (This
meeting will be in coordination with the monthly project meeting.)
■ Set-up and conduct a rehearsal meeting and `de -brief meeting for the one (1) open
house/public hearing. (The rehearsal meeting will occur the day of the public meeting,
and may include 1 or 2 council members, if desired. The de -brief meeting will occur the
morning after the public hearing.)
■ Mailing notice to Texas Parks and Wildlife Department or other agencies with
jurisdiction owner project affected park, recreational refuge, historic, or scientific lands
■ Preparing and mailing hearing notices to property owners
■ Preparing public hearing notices (30 and 10 day notice), sign -in sheets, and agendas,
project specific information. The notices will be in English with a Spanish statement at
the bottom of the notice providing a contact to receive project information in Spanish.
■ Up to five (5) exhibits
■ Securing transcription services
■ Preparing Public Hearing Summary/Comment & Response Report and FHWA
certification following the Hearing.
3of18
The Consultant will cover costs such as facility rental, postage for Public Hearing invitations and
newsletter, as well as public hearing notices (2), and transcription services.
The Consultant will prepare for two revisions of all public involvement materials submitted to
the City and State for review and comment and shall not distribute project deliverables without
prior approval by the City.
Deliverables:
• Public Involvement Plan
• Project Database
• Elected Official Notification
• Media Relations
• Three (3) full color editions of the Northwest Passage Newsletters (250 copies each
edition)
• Public Meeting Summary/Comment & Response Report for two (2) public meetings
• Public Hearing Summary/Comment & Response Report for one (1) public hearing
Meetings:
Two (2) Open House/ Public Meetings
One (1) Open House/Public Hearing
Task 3 - Right -of -Entry Letters
The Consultant will obtain right -of -entry for properties located within the areas of proposed
right-of-way (ROW) in order to accomplish preliminary environmental planning, document
preparation activities, historic, archeological and other necessary field investigations. The
Consultant will determine which properties require right -of entry.
The Consultant shall prepare letters or other materials for seeking right of entry. Additionally,
the Consultant will develop and maintain a database for purposes of tracking right of entry
status. Letters or other materials seeking right of entry shall not be distributed without prior
approval from the City. Right of entry permission shall be written and signed by the land owner.
Letters or other materials seeking right of entry shall contain explicit reference to the kinds of
activities for which right of entry is requested, a map showing approximate locations and duration
of activities and an indication of the impacts (if any) that will result from performance of
environmental services. The Consultant will prepare and send up to two (2) letters to property
owners requesting right -of -entry, if necessary.
Task 4 - Data Collection
The City/State will provide the following information:
• As -built plans for Loop 289 from Frankford Avenue (FM 2528) to Clovis Road (US
84), 4 h Street (at Loop 289), Erskine Street (from Frankford Avenue to the Loop
289/Quaker Avenue Interchange), Slide Road (from 4`h Street to Loop 289), and the
Loop 289/Erskine Avenue/Quaker Avenue interchange (including the proposed
Texas Tech Parkway).
• Existing right-of-way (ROW) plans.
• Existing utility information in the study area, including storm water, sewer, water and
electric.
4 of 18
• Applicable City of Lubbock and TxDOT-Lubbock District design criteria and typical
sections.
• Applicable previous studies within the project area, including alternatives analysis for
Slide Road and the Loop 289/Erskine Avenue/Quaker Avenue interchange.
• Topographic and DTM files of the study area (electronic format).
• Thoroughfare plans.
• City's Master Drainage Plan and Ordinance.
• Proposed developments and zoning.
• Adjacent property ownership in GIS format.
• Base TransCAD calibrated traffic model of the study area.
• Existing daily traffic counts and 2030 traffic projections within the study area.
• Accident Data for study area (for Design Exception Questionnaire).
• Cultural Resources —Historic Structures: Historic Resource Studies (See separate
scope)
The data collection phase and site reconnaissance visits within the existing ROW will begin upon
notice to proceed; however, field investigations within the proposed ROW areas will begin
pending secured Right -of -Entry to those properties. The data collection task associated with this
project will include the following:
The Consultant will obtain publicly available information including:
• Locations of public buildings, schools, churches, parks, etc.;
• Digital aerial photos
• Color Infrared photography, if available;
• Historical site listings;
• National Wetland Inventory Maps;
• County Soil Survey Maps;
• Hazardous Materials Database Information;
• Demographic Maps/Census Information;
• FEMA 100-year floodplains;
• Vegetation Information and
• Threatened and Endangered Species Information.
As part of Task 4, (Data Collection), the Consultant shall perform a field reconnaissance survey
to determine if jurisdictional waters of the United States and potential jurisdictional wetlands
(playa lakes) are within the project limits. It is not anticipated that jurisdictional waters or
wetlands would be impacted by the proposed project, nor is it anticipated that a Section 404
Nationwide permit (NWP) will be required; therefore, a Section 404 Nationwide permit (NWP)
or Individual Permit is not included in this Scope of Services. This task will be conducted to
verify and confirm for project records that jurisdictional waters/wetlands are not present in the
project ROW. If it is determined that jurisdictional waters/wetlands are present and a Nationwide
or Individual Permit requiring coordination with the United State Army Corps of Engineers is
needed, the City will be notified immediately.
Task 5 - Constraints Mapping
The Consultant will develop constraints mapping identifying the environmental constraints and
developments (existing and proposed) that should be avoided within the study area. The
Consultant will overlay data obtained above as appropriate for alternatives comparison onto
digital aerial photography. Any GIS data used will be combined with desktop interpretations and
coordinated with design engineers to result in the most detailed information available and
5of18
necessary in the preliminary planning phase of this project. This data will be prepared in exhibit
format for use in the documents and public involvement tasks.
Deliverables:
• One Environmental Constraints Map Exhibit (And one update.)
Task 6 — Develop Design Criteria
A set of roadway, hydraulic, and bridge design criteria will be established at the beginning of the
project and these criteria will form the basis for the design. The City and State will assist by
providing their specific criteria, and providing input for review and concurrence by all parties. A
Design Concept Conference will be scheduled by the Consultant to discuss the various aspects of
the project with affected parties, including the City and State. A Design Summary Report will be
completed to document the final design criteria and assumptions/constraints identified during the
Design Concept Conference.
Deliverables:
• Design Criteria Form
• Design Summary Report
Task 7 — Develop Evaluation Criteria/Technical Methodology Plan
Before the route studies/alternatives analysis can be developed, a set of criteria will be developed
to assist in the evaluation of each alternative/alignment, so that an unbiased evaluation can be
made. The evaluation criteria may include the categories of engineering, safety, cost and
economic impacts, environmental impacts, and public/technical input.
A technical memorandum (technical methodology plan) will also be prepared summarizing how
the evaluation criteria will be evaluated including source of the data and qualitative/quantitative
evaluation.
Deliverables:
• Draft Evaluation Criteria (Matrix) and Technical Methodology Plan (Tech memo) for
review (up to 10 hardcopies).
• Final Evaluation Criteria (Matrix) and Technical Methodology Plan (Tech memo) (up
to 10 hardcopies and electronic files)
Task 8 — Route Studies (Alternatives Analysis)
(Loop 289/Erskine Street/Quaker Avenue/TT Parkway interchange only)
An alternatives analysis must be conducted for the Loop 289/Erskine Street/Quaker Avenue/TT
Parkway interchange, because the configuration for this section is not finalized. Previously
developed alternatives for the Loop 289/Erskine Avenue/Quaker Avenue/TT Parkway
interchange will be reviewed and documented. Up to three (3) alternatives will be developed for
the Loop 289/Erskine Street/Quaker Avenue/TT Parkway. The alternatives developed will
minimize impacts to environmental constraints and developments (existing and proposed) and
will take into account property boundaries. The development of the alternatives will consist of
horizontal alignments. Vertical alignments will be developed at critical locations to verify
acceptable vertical clearances.
Evaluation of Alternatives — Each alternative identified above will be analyzed utilizing the
evaluation matrix and technical methodology plan develop in Task 7, to compare the advantages
and disadvantages.
6 of 18
Traffic Analysis (TransCAD Modeling) - It is assumed that the base year and 2030 TransCAD
models provided by the Lubbock MPO have been calibrated according to the satisfaction of the
MPO and national standards such as NCBRP 365. The ability of the model to replicate base year
observed volumes for links within the study area will be checked as part of the initial task work.
In addition, the number of lanes in the TransCAD model will be compared with the number of
lanes in the City of Lubbock thoroughfare plan. Any discrepancies in number of lanes will be
documented, and provided to the City and State for direction. All parameters of the MPO
models will be utilized as part of this alternatives analysis. All land use forecasts for both
existing and 2030 horizons will be maintained as part of this alternatives analysis. No traffic
forecasts will be generated from this project for areas outside of the study area. The TransCAD
modeling analysis will be a system analysis to confirm the number of lanes on each of the
facilities and improvement limits, described in the project limits in the introduction. Traffic
alternatives will include modifying the 2030 data to include the proposed widening of 4`h & Loop
289, widening alternatives for Erskine from Slide to Loop 289, and widening of Slide Road from
south of Loop 289 to Clovis Rd. Traffic Impacts of not building the proposed improvements at
any of the roadways and interchanges within the Northwest Passage will be identified.
The Loop 289/Erskine Street/Quaker Avenue interchange alternatives will be modeled in
TransCAD to determine the traffic operations resulting from the various alternatives. The
existing TransCAD model along with existing traffic counts and 2030 traffic projections will be
provided by the City (from the Lubbock Metropolitan Planning Organization). For each of the
alternatives, the traffic projections will be modified to reflect the proposed geometry.
Deliverables:
• Colorized plan view exhibits of each alternative for the Loop 289/Erskine
Street/Quaker Avenue/TT Parkway interchange) (Up to 5 copies and electronic files)
• Draft Technical memorandum documenting selection of preferred alternative (up to
10 hardcopies)
• Final Technical memorandum documenting selection of preferred alternative for the
Loop 289/Erskine Street/Quaker AvenuefTT Parkway interchange (up to 10
hardcopies and electronic file).
• Evaluation matrix for the Loop 289/Erskine Street/Quaker Avenue/TT Parkway
interchange alternatives (Up to 10 copies and electronic files).
Task 9 — Preparation of Design Schematic
The Consultant will prepare a detailed/colorized design schematic for the selected alternative on
Loop 289, 4 h Street, Erskine Street, Slide Road and the Loop 289/Erskine Street/Quaker Avenue/
TT Parkway Interchange (limits previously defined in this scope). Note: The Schematic design
will be developed to the appropriate level that is available based on topographic information
provided by the City and/or State.
The provision of a new -grade separation at Slide Road will require a verification that adequate
spacing between the Loop 289 frontage road -ramp gores and frontage road intersections will be
provided. In addition, the Scope of Services will include ramping changes on Loop 289 between
Frankford Road and Clovis Road, which will be coordinated with the State. The Loop 289
ramping improvements between Frankford Road and 46' Street have already been determined,
while the ramping improvements between 4t' Street and Clovis Road will be determined through
this study. A Loop 289 signing schematic will be prepared to reflect the revised Loop 289
ramping. Turn around lanes will be provided on the south side of 4d' Street and the east side of
Slide Road at Loop 289.
7of18
All geometric designs shall be in conformance with the City and TxDOT's Design Division,
Operations and Procedures Manual except where variances are permitted in writing by the City,
State and/or the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The schematic layout shall include
the basic information necessary for proper review, evaluation, and ultimate approval.
Upon approval of the schematic layout by the City, State, and FHWA, it shall thereby be the
basis for an exhibit at the Open House/Public Hearing. Any warranted, post -Open House/Public
Hearing schematic revisions will require an additional five (5) revised schematic copies for re-
submittal/re-approval.
The Design Schematic will comply with the TxDOT Schematic Checklist and will
include/involve:
• Horizontal and Vertical Alignment at a scale of 1"=200' (horizontal) and 1"=10'
(vertical) in Geopak software. The horizontal alignment of critical areas (Slide Road
from 4 h Street to Loop 289) and the Loop 289/Erskine Street/Quaker Avenue
interchange) will be prepared at a scale of 1"=100' (horizontal).
• Proposed typical sections. (City/State to provide pavement structure section.)
• Locations of interchanges, freeway travel lanes, grade separations, arterial streets,
collector distributor roads, frontage roads and ramps.
• Developed vertical and horizontal alignments of freeway travel lanes, grade
separations, arterial streets, collector -distributor roads, frontage roads and ramps. The
degree of horizontal curve and vertical curve data, including "K" values will be
shown.
• Existing and proposed right-of-way (ROW) limits.
• Geometrics (pavement cross -slopes, lane and shoulder widths, slope rates for
cuts/fills) of the typical sections for the proposed freeway travel lanes, arterial streets,
frontage roads, collector -distributor roads and ramps. Cross -sections will only be
prepared at the Loop 289 interchange with 4`h Street and the Loop 289/Erskine
Street/Quaker Avenue interchange at approximately 100-foot intervals (and at
drainage structures) to determine retaining wall limits. These cross sections will be
"working" cross sections without annotation.
• Existing major utilities, including dimensions to verify clearances.
• Current and projected traffic volumes, as provided by the City and State.
• Direction of traffic flow (via arrows) on all roadways/typical sections.
• Location and width of median openings and turn -lanes for non -access control
roadways.
• Sidewalks and ADA ramps at intersections
• Geometrics of speed change (acceleration, deceleration, auxiliary) travel lanes.
Schematics will be submitted at the 60 percent, 95 percent and 100 percent milestones, in order to
provide the City and the State an opportunity for review and submittal prior to the final
submittal. The 95 percent and 100 percent submittals will include preliminary cost estimates, as
defined below.
It is anticipated that a design exception for horizontal curvature will be required at the Slide Road
intersection with a Street; therefore, the completion of one (1) Design Exception Justification
questionnaire is included in this Scope of Services.
Preliminary Drainage Analysis — The City's Master Drainage Plan will be utilized to determine
approximate drainage areas, which will be utilized to confirm hydraulic structures and outfalls.
8 of 18
Traffic Analysis — The traffic analysis will consist of level of service (LOS) determination on
Loop 289 mainlanes from Frankford Avenue to Clovis Road, based on the recommended ramping
configuration and 2030 traffic projections. The Loop 289 mainlane LOS will be determined for
basic freeway sections, weave sections, and merge/diverge sections with Highway Capacity
Software (HCS). LOS determination for Erskine Street, 4`b Street, and Slide Road is not included
in this Scope of Services. In addition, LOS determination will not be conducted for the existing
Loop 289 ramping configuration or the existing traffic counts. The results of the Loop 289
mainlane LOS analysis will be summarized in a technical memorandum.
The second component of the traffic analysis will consists of intersection analysis. For the Loop
289 frontage road intersections with arterial streets, the 2030 traffic projections will be analyzed
to determine the intersection footprint, includiN number of lanes, lane assignments and number
and length of turn bays. The intersection of 4 Street and Slide Road will also be analyzed to
determine any additional turn lanes needed and their length. There are no additional traffic
counts or turning movement counts data collection included in this Scope of Services for the
traffic analysis. The frontage road intersection analysis does not include any signal modeling or
determination of signal timings.
The proposed geometry of the arterial street — arterial street intersections (number of lanes, lane
assignments, number of turn bays, length of turn bays) will be based on City standards, and not
traffic analysis except at the intersection of 4`h Street and Slide Road.
Preliminary Cost Estimates — For the 95 percent and 100 percent submittals, preliminary cost
estimates will be prepared. The preliminary cost estimates will be determined from estimated
quantities and unit costs of major construction items, including preparing ROW, pavement,
earthwork, major drainage structures, utility relocation, ROW acquisition, retaining walls and
structures. The unit costs will be obtained from the bid tabs for similar projects of scope and
complexity and/or the TxDOT District average low bid. A contingency will be added to the
preliminary cost estimate to account for items not listed in the cost estimate.
Cost Sharing — The Consultant will determine the portions of the project that will utilize funds
shared by the adjacent property owners and the City. The Consultant will develop a property
owner map of the project from available information. In lieu of actual right-of-way surveys,
available information may include existing roadway construction plans, plat and pre -plat
drawings, and individual property surveys. The Consultant will prepare Opinion of Probable
Costs Spreadsheets that break out the share of costs that will be considered the responsibility of
the City and adjacent property owners. The costs will be calculated using the following method:
The pavement costs are calculated using the City's thoroughfare pavement platting fee procedure.
For major thoroughfares, adjacent property owners are assessed a fee for construction of the
pavement based on a square yard unit price. The property owner's financial requirement depends
on whether the property is zoned for residential or non-residential development. If the frontage is
zoned for residential development, the pavement area is determined by multiplying 161/z feet of
pavement width by the length of frontage and converted to square yards. If the frontage is
planned for non-residential development, the required width is increased to 271/7 feet. The
remaining width of pavement is paid for by the City. The unit price will be based on the most
recent low bid unit price received on a City project for pavement. Therefore, the actual cost of
pavement could change from project to project and the exact cost allocation will not be known
until bids are received for each project. All curb and gutter is paid for by the adjacent owners
using actual construction costs.
9 of 18
The costs for any drainage structures to be constructed with the roadway are also shared.
Depending on the planned zoning for the frontage, the owners will be required to pay for their
frontage width of each structure (161/2' or 27'/2' under the pavement) plus any additional length
on their property to daylight the structure. The middle remainder of each structure is paid for by
the City. In addition, depending on the extent of infrastructure development, any new utilities
such as water mains and sewer lines required by the city will be paid for by adjacent owners using
actual construction costs.
The Consultant will hold up to twelve (12) stakeholder meetings to work out specifics related to
each property and the costs associated with each property owner. Three (3) of these meetings, are
anticipated will coincide with the monthly project review meetings and has been used as a basisi
for determining level of effort. Stakeholder meetings will involve City officials as necessary. It
will be the goal of these meetings to assist the City as the City develops funding agreements with
each property owner.
Construction Phasing — It will be necessary to construct the Northwest Passage project in phases
to utilize available funding, and provide alternate routes during construction. Up to three (3)
color coded maps will be prepared to depict the order in which the roadways (Slide Road, Erskine
Street, 4"' Street, and Loop 289) will be constructed. In addition, the TransCAD traffic model will
be utilized to evaluate up to three (3) alternative construction phasing plans and recommend a
preferred phasing plan. One year 2030 traffic forecast will be generated for each of the three
selected construction phasing options. The analysis will require the projected traffic to be
redistributed to roadways that are in operation to determine the most desirable use of the existing
roadway capacity for alternate routes. The construction phasing will take into account the
emergency response needs of the fire station and hospitals located within the study area. The
results of the construction phasing analysis will be documented in a technical memorandum.
Deliverables:
• Three (3) submitted hardcopies of the colorized design schematic for each review.
• Three (3) submitted hardcopies of the colorized Loop 289 signing schematic for the 95% and
100% review.
• Two (2) submitted hardcopies of the approved colorized design schematic for each open
house/public hearing display
• Five (5) submitted hardcopies of the (post -public hearing) revised (if necessary) of the
colorized design schematic for TxDOT-Design Division/FHWA review.
• One (1) computer disc graphics file containing the FHWA-approved design schematic (with
post -public hearing revisions, if necessary), compatible with City and State software/
equipment (Geopak).
• Electronic files of "working" cross sections at the Loop 289 interchange with 4t' Street and
the Loop 289/Erskine Street/Quaker Avenue interchange detailing the preliminary earthwork
and retaining wall limits.
• Technical memorandum documenting Loop 289 LOS analysis (Up to five (5) hardcopies and
electronic files)
• Preliminary cost estimate
• Cost sharing plan.
• Technical memorandum documenting the results of the construction phasing analysis. (Up to
five (5) hardcopies and electronic files.)
10 of 18
Task 10 - Environmental Document Preparation (EA)
The Consultant will prepare an Environmental Assessment document based upon alternatives
developed as describe in Task 9 (Development of Design Schematic) and will follow these
documents to a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). However, should it be determined
that there is a potential for significant environmental impacts at the recommended
highway/roadway route as a result of project implementation, then the EA should conclude that a
Draft Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared and circulated for comment. The City
and TxDOT would be notified immediately if it were determined that significant impacts would
occur. The preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement would require a supplemental
agreement.
All environmental documentation shall be prepared in accordance with 43 Texas Administrative
Code, Chapter 2, Subchapter C, TxDOT's Environmental Manual, Title 23, Part 771, 772,
FHWA's Technical Advisory T6640.8A, TxDOT's 1996 Noise Guidelines (as amended), and
TxDOT 1998 Air Guidelines. All work on the projects shall conform to TxDOT Manuals and
environmental document outlines (updated or revised).
Exhibits will be prepared to adequately address environmental issues. Exhibits shall include:
vicinity map, USGS quadrangle map, FEMA floodplain map, existing and proposed typical
sections, schematic or proposed design layout showing noise and air receptor locations, and
wetlands. Exhibits in the document will be limited in size to no larger than I I" x 17" for ease of
reproduction. The Consultant will also furnish the City and State with the document and
illustrations in an agreed upon electronic format.
Document Format and Contents
The document shall identify alternatives that were considered, but eliminated from detailed study.
The document shall discuss all reasonable alternatives being considered, not to exceed three (3),
to the proposed project, plus the no -build alternative. The EA outline to be followed is listed
below (from htlp://www.dot.state.tx.us/env/pdf/resources/EAoutline.pdf):
Introduction
Chapter 1: Purpose & Need for the Project
A. Purpose of the Proposed Project
B. Need for the Project
C. Objectives of the Proposed Project
D. Focus of this Environmental Analysis
D.1 Planning Process
D.2 Related Studies and Relevant Documents
D.3 Issues Studied in Detail
DA Issues Eliminated from Further Study
E. Applicable Regulatory Requirements and Required Coordination
Chapter 2: Description of Alternatives
A. Process Used to Develop the Project Alternatives
B. Requirements for and Benefits of Alternatives
B.1 Principal Design Requirements
B.2 Desired Design Benefit
B.3 Environmental Protection and Enhancement Requirements
C. Alternatives Eliminated from Detailed Study
11of18
D. Detailed Description of Reasonable Alternatives
D.1 Alternative A: No Build
D.2 Alternative B: Build Alternative #1
E. Description of Other Relevant Actions
Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences
A. Name of Issue #1
A.1 Existing Conditions
A.2 Environmental Consequences of Implementing Alternative A (No Build)
A.3 Environmental Consequences of Implementing Alternative A (Build)
B. Name of Issue #2
B.1 Existing Conditions
B.2 Environmental Consequences of Implementing Alternative A (No Build)
B.3 Environmental Consequences of Implementing Alternative A (Build)
Chapter 4: Recommendation of the Preferred Alternative
A. Identification and Rationale for the Preferred Alternative
The EA document shall define the project purpose, project need, objectives of the project, and
focus of the environmental analysis as described in the manual Environmental Document
Preparation (Environmental Affairs Division training Module 10).
The EA document shall also include the following information:
► Land Use Impacts The effects of proposed project improvements shall be characterized in light
of land use trends, plans, and policies within the study area. This effort shall entail coordination
with city officials and shall include an analysis of potential project impacts on land use and
economics in the project area, as well as the secondary and cumulative impacts of the proposed
improvements. Where appropriate the assessment shall address the potential economic effects to
economic output, employment, the area's tax base, and other appropriate economic topics. In
addition, the EA shall examine the proposed project's potential impacts upon adjacent and area
businesses from traffic diversions during and after construction.
► Social Impacts and Environmental Justice Impacts. As applicable, this task shall address
potential changes to local neighborhoods or communities, effects on community cohesion
relating to travel patterns, access, and public safety, particularly as those changes may
differentially affect various social groups and minorities. The assessment shall conform to
FHWA guidance for compliance with Executive Order 12898, Environmental Justice.
► Noise (TNM, version 2.5). The project noise assessment shall inventory potential noise
receptors and establish the project area's existing noise level range through computer modeling
and, if appropriate, with field recordings of traffic noise levels. In accordance with TxDOT noise
assessment guidelines, the preferred roadway alignment for the build year and 20-year design
year shall be computer simulated, and future noise levels shall be predicted at each of the
receptors using the FHWA/TxDOT approved traffic noise model. Should traffic projected noise
impacts occur as a result of the proposed implementation of a highway build alternative; the
Consultant shall evaluate appropriate mitigation alternatives. The noise study shall include all
areas within the project's logical limits and will be based upon the ultimate roadway design. If it
is determined that noise abatement is feasible and reasonable, a noise workshop will be held in
conjunction with the final Public Meeting or Hearing as appropriate.
12 of 18
► Air Quality: The Consultant shall prepare a build year and 20-year design year air quality
assessment for this project in accordance with the state's air quality guidelines.
► Geology, Soils and Prime/Unique Farmlands. This task includes a characterization of the
geophysical environment of the project, including an understanding of the project area bedrock
geology and subsurface strata, soils, terrain units, and surface processes which may affect or be
affected by the proposed project. The Consultant shall coordinate with the Natural Resources
Conservation Service in order to identify the proposed project impacts to soils in the area that are
considered to be prime or otherwise important farmlands. Texas Tech University range land/farm
land that may be impacted will also be addressed.
P Cultural Resources —Historic Structures: Historic Resource Studies —
Not Included in this scope of services, because it will be performed by City Staff.
Cultural Resources Archaeology: The project archeologists shall conduct cultural
resource investigations which consist of:
(1) Preliminary Background Study: Preliminary background research for important
archaeological resources in the project area; record searches at the Texas Archeological
Research Laboratory (TARL) and the Texas Historical Commission (prehistoric); and the
preparation of an archaeological appendix (if appropriate) to the EA and the
archaeological resources section of the EA.
(2) Survey: A pedestrian survey and/or other additional investigations, documentation
and/or testing for cultural resources required as a result of initial coordination; TxDOT
Environmental Affairs Division (TxDOT-ENV) coordination; including participating in
coordination between the TxDOT ENV and the Texas Historical Commission; and the
preparation of an archaeological appendix (if appropriate) to the EA and the
archaeological resources section of the EA. This scope assumes that TxDOT will handle
all Section 106 (of the Historic Preservation Act of 1966) coordination with the State
Historic Preservation Officer.
► Floodplains and Drainage Patterns. The EA shall identify floodplains as delineated by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or as defined through observation; it shall
identify surface drainage patterns. The EA shall also identify impacts to floodplains and surface
drainage patterns from the construction of this proposed project or the implementation of the No -
Build Alternative.
► Water Quality. The EA shall define the extent of required storm water pollution prevention
planning and include an overview of a plan for implementation of a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan.
► Waters of the United States. The EA shall locate all broad study area waters of the United
States and define the limits of potential impacts to the project study waters from highway
construction. The Consultant will identify the need for any Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
permits in the EA document. It is not anticipated that any Nationwide Permits required under
Section 404 would be required for this project and the acquisition of this type of permit (if
required) shall be performed under a separate Scope of Services and budget.
13 of 18
► Ecological Resources. The Consultant shall perform a characterization of project area
ecological resources, including vegetation and wildlife habitat characteristics. Ecologically
sensitive resources, including protected species and critical habitat areas, shall be identified to
assess potential effects of project construction and operation. This task shall also identify the need
or absence of need for consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Texas
Parks and Wildlife Department. Any presence or absence surveys for protected species and
endangered and threatened species of wildlife shall be conducted under a separate Scope of
Services and budget.
► Hazardous Materials. The Consultant shall perform a data base search for hazardous materials
impact in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 1528.93
(Transaction Screen Process). Should it be determined that a Phase 1 Site Assessment is required
it shall be done under a separate Scope of Services and budget
► Section 4() Determination The Consultant shall identify Section 4(f) properties in a study area
in accord with 49 USC 303. The properties identified shall include all property types listed in 23
C.F.R. 771.135 (49 USC 303). The Consultant shall use existing engineering data and
archeological and historical studies to determine whether 4(f) properties may be present. If in the
Consultant's opinion there is insufficient archeological, historic or engineering data upon which
to base a determination of 4(f) status, the Consultant shall contact the City and State to obtain
further direction on how to proceed. A Section 4(f) document will not be coordinated and
developed as part of this Scope of Services. If it is determined a Section 4(f) property will be
impacted, the City will be notified immediately.
► The document shall also list environmental permits, issues, and commitments that must be
carried forward to the Environmental Permits, Issues, and Commitments (EPIC) sheet and project
construction.
► The Consultant shall prepare a Project Chronology document that includes the event date,
event name, and notes describing the event. The Chronology of Project Events document shall
accompany each draft EA submission to the City, and a final Project Chronology document is to
be delivered to the City following approval of the EA by the FHWA and TxDOT's
Environmental Affairs Division.
Deliverables:
The Consultant, in consultation with the City/State, shall deliver and perform environmental
document tasks including the following tasks:
Early Environmental Assessment Document Submissions to the City and State:
• two bound copies each of the draft EA for review and comment by the Lubbock District
and the City This first draft EA shall be submitted in conjunction with the submittal of
the schematics or diagrammatic drawings.
• two bound copies each of the first revised draft EA for review and comment by the
Lubbock District and the City
• two bound copies each of the second revised draft EA for review and comment by the
Lubbock District and the City
Environmental Assessment Document Submissions to TxDOT's Environmental Affairs Division
• thirteen bound copies of the EA for review and comment by TxDOT's Environmental
14 of 18
Affairs Division
• seven bound copies of the first revised EA for review and comment by TxDOT's
Environmental Affairs Division
• seven bound copies of the second revised EA for review and comment by TxDOT's
Environmental Affairs Division
Environmental Assessment Document Submissions to Federal Highway Administration
• five bound copies of the EA for review and comment by Federal Highway
Administration
• five bound copies of the first revised EA for review and comment by Federal Highway
Administration
• five bound copies of the second revised EA for review and comment Federal Highway
Administration
Environmental Assessment Documents for the Public Hearing
• ten bound copies of the EA for the public hearing
Public Hearing Evidence and Summary and Analysis
• one bound copy of the draft public hearing evidence and summary and analysis
document
• one bound copy of the first revision draft of the public hearing evidence and summary
and analysis document
• one bound copy of the second revision draft of the public hearing evidence and
summary and analysis document
• five bound copies of the final public hearing evidence and summary and analysis
document
Final Environmental Assessment Documents
• one bound copy of the draft final EA for review and comment by the Lubbock District
• one bound copy of the first revised draft final EA for review and comment by the
Lubbock District
• seven bound copies of the final EA
Task 11. Surveying — Additional Services
The State will provide all necessary surveying for Loop 289, while the necessary survey
information on the arterial streets (Slide Road, 4t' Street, and Erskine Street) will be obtained
from available data from the City. Therefore, no surveying is included in this scope of services.
References
The work will be performed in accordance with, but not limited to, the following manuals and
standards:
1. Standard Specifications for Construction of Highways, Streets, and Bridges - TxDOT.
2. Bridges and Structures Operation and Planning Manual - TxDOT.
3. Bridges and Structures Hydraulic Manual - TxDOT.
15 of 18
4. Bridges and Structures Design Examples - TxDOT.
5. Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges - AASHTO.
6. Highway Design Operations and Procedures Manual - TxDOT.
7. Highway Design Operations and Procedures Manual Part HB - Environmental and Public
Involvement Procedures During Project - Specific Planning and Development - TxDOT.
8. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2001 AASHTO.
9. Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 209 - Texas Research Board (TRB)
10. Technical Advisory T6640.8A - FHWA.
11. Noise Guidelines - TxDOT.
12. Air Quality Guidelines - TxDOT.
13. Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices - TxDOT.
14. Standard Highway Sign Designs for Texas - TxDOT.
15. Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaries and
Traffic Signals - AASHTO.
16. Utility Accommodation Policy - TxDOT.
17. Utility Manual - TxDOT.
18. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23 - "Highway" - Federal Register.
19. Administrative Order No. 5-89 - Signing, Sealing and Dating of Engineering Documents.
- TxDOT.
20. Administrative Circular No. 26-91 - Minimum Signing, Sealing and Dating Procedures
for Department Engineering Documents - TxDOT.
21. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, 1991 - AASHTO.
22. Metrication Guide - TxDOT.
23. Guide for the Design of High Occupancy Vehicle Facilities, 1991 - AASHTO.
24. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49 - "Transportation" - Federal Register.
25. Right -of -Way Manual - TxDOT.
NOTES: (1) All designs shall be in accordance with the above references, except where
variances are permitted in writing by the State or the FHWA.
(2) The Consultant is responsible for purchasing all reference items/manuals
required to complete the Project's Tasks.
16 of 18
Cultural Resources —Historic Structures: Historic Resource Studies —
(To be performed by City Staff.)
Further Defined
The City shall perform historic resource studies. Identification, evaluation and documentation
tasks shall be completed in accordance with the provisions of the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for the Identification, Evaluation and Documentation (48 FR Parts 4471642). Historic
studies shall be performed and documented at sufficient levels to satisfy THC requirements for
determining the presence of historically significant properties in the Area of Potential Effects
(APE) in accordance with 36 C.F.R. 60 and 13 TAC 26. Performance of historic studies shall
include the following tasks.
The City shall determine the APE and the limits of the survey area in consultation with the ENV.
ENV will coordinate with THC if necessary. The City shall conduct a literature review to
establish appropriate historical and cultural contexts for the project area, determine information
requirements and direct the survey effort. The City shall conduct a reconnaissance survey. Each
historic resource (defined in accordance with 36 C.F.R. 60 as a building, structure, object, historic
district or non -archeological site at least 50 years old at the time of letting) in the APE shall be
documented in the following manner:
The City shall provide photographic documentation for each historic resource. At a minimum this
shall include an oblique view of the primary fagade and a side elevation for each resource, with
the subject filling the frame. All photographs shall be 3.5"x5" color representations printed on
matte finish photographic paper. All photographs shall be well focused and clearly depict
architectural and other details relevant to an evaluation of the resource's character -defining
features. Four copies of each image shall be provided. Photographs shall be attached to separately
labeled pages that clearly identify project name, address of resource and project ID number.
The City shall produce an inventory of all resources, provided in a table form that details their
project ID numbers, locations, property type and subtype classifications, stylistic influences,
construction dates, integrity issues and preliminary eligibility recommendations.
The City shall prepare a letter report detailing the results of the reconnaissance survey. This
report shall not exceed five pages, excluding photographs, maps and other documentation. The
letter report shall describe the findings of the reconnaissance survey and make recommendations
to the City and State for the need, if any, to conduct intensive survey efforts. The letter report
shall have sufficient detail and clarity to provide THC with a basis for making determinations of
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility without requiring submission of
additional documentation or for making recommendations concerning the scope of the intensive
survey. At a minimum, it shall include the following information:
A brief overview of the results of the reconnaissance survey, including an inventory of historic
resources requiring no additional survey efforts in order to finalize determinations of NRHP
eligibility in accordance with 36 C.F.R. 60. Maps showing the location of each historic resource
labeled with its appropriate project ID number, running as consecutively as possible from the top
left hand corner to the bottom right hand corner of the map. Outbuildings and landscape features
shall be reported as subsets of the main project ID number for a property, for example, a garage
associated with Site No. 100 could be labeled Site No. 100a. The APE shall be clearly indicated
on the map. Major street names and other directional landmarks shall be clearly indicated on the
map. Maps shall be based on aerial photographs or USGS 7.5' topographic maps.
17 of 18
The City shall revise the letter report to address comments by the State and the THC. The City
shall prepare four copies of the letter report to the City and State.
The Historic Resource Study for this is project is based on an estimated APE of 500'.
18 of 18
Resolution No. 2004-RO513
"Northwest Passage"
Frankford Avenue (FM 2528) to Clovis Road (US 64)
City of Lubbock
Cost of Services
'Raw Ralo'
toadod Rato'
HNTB
Co ratan
Principal
Stq.00
Project
Marxper
S5500
DPL
PM
2,00
PI
Manager
0.00
Sr. Erg.
Planner
00
Erg!
Planner
00
4r PI
$20.00
EITI
O
Em Scri
6.00
Clam"
PM
Admk1
5111DO
SMGOI$i6D5OI
S122.84
S116.801
$125.50
$96,36
$58.40
$75.92
$52.56
A, hknft Project Meet 8
i AltaMlocs
43
43
43
43
2 PrapareMeoti Minulaa
6
4
_
2
a Pr aro Pmlaa Schadufa
4
2
2
2
. is
2
C Prepare Mon' Statue PpA and) -.a
18
12
24
D CAQC
1. DAn]C Rmis. Toam
4._
120
32
a
8
6
2 Mori IHemal Review Maeli
12
12
12
E Stbmreulari Mast nt
1
12 1
12
8
4
F A M.offts
24
24
Task i PM OA1t2C Subtotal HoursCasts
1s
239
105
33
a5
22
0
0
48
Oftettatt
.�
A. Prbrc tnwNanmf l Plan
2
-48
4-
2
B Prc4so Database co se. molrtnur, a la
4
..
.. 8
C ElaclodOfficials Nplf'=tnn
1. Pr re and dulrk7uts Prblro Onicnra tailor
t
5
2
D Media Relations
1 Prepare readspackets 3
2MO
9
2
2
E Project Wormalk Packot and Swe 250 m
1 Dov tl and M
2. Diatrbrla packet ardswe
3. Analyze rea9m
_
F P ed Newsletter (3 odsiorss - 250 w me owh
3
20
a
60
72
9
a Project Webrklo
1 flogwarnertucwhermV
2 Design
3 Webs aka Development Pmceum lRavww-PSC
4 trtVarr,,antainn
5 Wabals tor:'Mary smart
6 3D ViswGzation
H Open HousdPL6c Mott/ 2 momay.)
1 Sawa Ptbsc Moll SAG 12 mesl s)
2
2 Publb Moat Pl nN 2 rot
18
18
is
18
3 PrbrG tikU� Ret amml Msel' (2 mi
Included 1n
Task H7
3A Prbik Mast Do-Bnaf 2 ml a)
4 14
1 4
1 4
4 Mal r0iom m aoona8s and pmp*ny ownom
4.
5 Proparalm for Pubsc , n-in, ate 2 rmasi
16
4
16
4
8
4
6 PtbCs Meat Edrb4a Boards to 10 total
4
2
24-.
4-
80
7 Public Most' Panic' ten 2 msaT .
18
16
18
16
a Pr re meeting.Mkaaez
2
49 Public Mssa Survna Ccmman t a Raw- 1 2 mt s
2
12
1 an HouWPrbft Hearing 1 meet
1 Secw%PrbhDHw6 Sio(tmati )
1
2 Public Hea' Ptand Meat 1 mu
8
a
8
8
a
3 Public Han : Rshmrsal Meoli 1 mi •)
Iretessd In
Task 17
3A. Pubho Hoafi DeBriN 1 rot)
4
4
4
4
4 Mal notices 10 a -C.3 and property mnors
6.
5 PrepamtIon for Prblk Hear -notc - kti etc trot
a.
2
4
4
6 Prblc Hear Edhbas Boards to 5 rctal
2
1
12
2
40
7 PubrcHsaPanic' anon I ,eof
a
e
a
-a
8 SecurN tmrwc do service 0 m"i
2
9 P.N. Has" Summary Commas a AGWorse Rpt 1 rot
1
12
H MAPQWMiacslfa oo moatmmnp to mt s
1 Pr amlien
2 Altardama
3 Name M..Ikv Minces
EH
Task 2Pl SufHotal Hours/Costa
4
at 1 89 1 239 1 74
/2
80
2M
21
rw,r.
HNTB
PaNd Srnkh
Cooper
Sus W h M
Mom
l3ao4Aaran
Hlph-Tech
lan&WS
SuwyOn
To1a1 QM
wo eD
SS 500.00
S26100.50
$1.669,28
$2.458,00
$401529
$3,01928
$912,00
$393128
$5,623,92
$6,496,00
$11,110.92
S0.00
528,280.00
$7,440,00
333720.00
15,181.12
SS 1.12
54,819.80
$4 113.60
$6.867.84
ss.ei7.s4
S78,50400
S2i Me.00
$96,308.00
$6,330 40
36 334.40
$762.56
S1,856.00
$2,638.66
$849.72
568400
$1.731.72
$1.61256
$3.506.00
$5078.56
$0.00
$0.00
$0 00
$11M
$0.00
$0.00
$13,750,28
S7,002.00
12075224
$0,00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$D.00
$0.00
woo
$0.00
$0.00
$040
5233.60
t%$ 00
B
$601.60
Sa.409 W
U76.00
$9,0a5.60
$0.00
$876.00
$676.00
$2.102.40
5226.00
$2,330.40
967.20
547600
1 3943.20
56,505.76
S1840.00
$0.345.16
$10,28872
$8,71zoo
$16970.72
$8,409.rr0
$2,704.00
$11,113.60
$321.20
$2.764 00
$3 08610
$1,722.80
$3,240.00
S4 942eo
$116.00
3284.00
$00.80
$4.073,00
$199 Q0
58,272.60
$0.00
$199.00
$19940
$2,102A0
$218,00
$2.330.40
$664,00
523800
$822.00
$1,87464
$92000
S2,724144
55,13336
$3.356.00
$0489.36
S4,204.80
Sf,362.00
$e,556.1110
$23360
$11400
$347.60
S7.582.20
$198000
$352210
$000
$0.00
$0 00
$0.00
$00Q
40.00
$0.00
$0.00
$83,555.60
$42,040.00
$125,S8S.a0
9124104
Pape 1 Of 4
"Northwest Passage"
Frankford Avenue (FM 2528) to Clovis Road (US 54)
City of Lubbock
Coat of Services
I P ka.tlMaroa.rl °Plow IMaHol PM
mawl Planmr I Pla � JrP1 IE Pgertl Admfn i
'Raw
A. Pr re, DiOrbW, and Track Mghlb?-Er*y Le6ere
0 •
0
70..
21
22
Task J ROE Subtotal HouraWCOpla
a
a
0
0
10
24
0
0
22
aaK4
A E Data ColWon
2
2
16
9 Enwonmortal Data CoUdbn
1
8
44
C F,ald Ra "issanca S - Judadxibnal Waters
1
2
24
Task 4 DC Subtoal Houm Costa
0
a
2
0
694
0
0
0
TM " �
',...
<
: -�.'
•
.K 'sW
•':.
A. Pr ro Coradas Ma GIS fomut Ravww PSC
1
2
4 `
30:
12
2>
aak8 MSubtoksl Houra.Costs
0
1
2
0
4
30
0
12
2
A O"ciop madwa , tyftulic. 3rdb' r Aam Rwiaw-PSG
4
-
12MM
4
B. Pmpqro Design uwmq Roport Review-PSC
- 2
2
1 1
20
4
C FrtipareforaM MteM D ' n Conc Codwo-
2
4
D Prepara MWaV Minrlea for Dat. n Concgpl GOMweree
2
2
Task 6Os a Crt Subtotal HouraCoaM
0
a
10
0
1 0
32
0.
0
10
a.:. ,
., ,'':,'s,\r:
-.. i
y 18
A. Dawbe Evalwwn Maim2
4
B P re Draft Tmh�l kWhodob Plan Tech Mauro
0
2
7
: 32
28
4
C I rate R4+new Commwt. Wo Mstnx aM Toch Marm
/
8
4
2
D. Raview twaluaticncriteria andlecNxal methodolo memo
Task1EviWroch Suarotai Hour&cosis
0
3
1
0
7
54
0
a2
6
�; ,5
.�. ,;. .
7- ,cal.
'>. _
A Covelop Lip to 3 Aka fw Loop 288IEnk#WQW%kor kaercha-
4
18
3e -
80
8 Tmfrc Mudd.. ramCAD of up to 3 Ahwnatrva IriarcM os
_
8
16
164
80
C EvakeOon Matnx fw Loop 284ErskinarOuakor lalan:lu a Review PSC
4
32
24
D Noparo Omit Agaaativea Ann aw Toctvkcat Meng Rau'saw-PSC
0
2
2
32
'32
4
E. Incorporate Review Commms in Mum livoa T4dw al Mauro
0
-
4
4
2
Taak f We Sfdka AS Aml pis Subtotal Houm aefs
0
10
26
0
16
270
0
200
6
�Y?"A4.. >.�))
�'��,�
� .:...
N•e x:
A L 289 klaibw Widwti FmrMard to US 84
1 L 289 aro as
4
a
16
2 Pr re typical wdforn
2
4
16
3 Pr ro achemala (len aM rolilo dtaela
8
24
28
-
180
3A Cwo harimntal 8 varlcal e - a ovama rood
28
40
38. Dove k ate e, pellam 6 crtana ti4a
2
46
60
3. Reline Gee k e, Own & cdoaa fha
0
10
14
4. Pr aro rischematic
2
40
5 Pr re cram"dioro
2 -
8
&.
100
6 1r rote rev,ew comm0rxa 60".: aM 95%
2
4
20
21
8 41h Strout Widenir (at L-p 269
1 Pr are Wicalsad;on
12.r
1.
:�.; ..
, :. r'
•,., .,7
777=.
��
, v
,. _= r
3 Ineo rote review cammonta OOSb aM �°6
R
7
-» a; , , .
C Erskine .1.Wid Fmnkford Avenua•Lx Z89/Ouakw
1 Praprolypkalwfon
2. Pr re achamslic (plan and prohla alxnols
Patkha
Sue
HW.TWJI
HNTO
Sma11
Wkaon
Maliro
LanWWO
Nouns
COGW
M."
Surm/M
�m
HHTH
P4*M SMAh
CeoPer�
Sue W aeon
(3ao•kYdrre
HIit.Taoh
Lar rYGPa
M
TOW Coet
s4,n4 so
3472436
31,724.56
0
f4,724.6f
32,t0a24
$4,632.00
$6740.24
55 153.60
35153.80
52.563.76
$2 563J*
$9,825.80 I
$4.632.00
511,157A0
$4.916.06
$458.00
SS 71.W
34p15.08
3456.ao
is 1.06
$2.176.32
uboo0
$2 654.32
$2.703.92
1 SB40.00
$3,043.92
$811.78
3164900
$2459.76
3428.32
$04,32
302032
32.8e8.00
$4,766.32
$2.353,52
$6.619.64
34619.64
1 147 58
1
1
31 14756
=000
-
52i6A0
10,120.72
322800
$10,348.72
V
310.821.52
$10821.52
324.80672
324 .72
$5.54800
$454.00
$6 002.00
36,289. t18
346400
$6743.66
$794.24
1
$754.24
348,320.18
$we.00
$49 6.16
$2.626 00
$2 624.00
$1, 44
316/5A4
$20,591,84
$20 591."
$8.058.08
36,056.06
$9,501 98
39 501.64
$2,026.48
$2, 226,44
34.099.as
34 o99.es
$15.051.36
315051.0f
30 1.04
N tA4
$321,20
31 .00
$2,283.20
31,05704
$10,344,00
311401.04
3642.40
32.86a.00
33 610A0
$M120
$1 932 00
$225a.20
3105T.04
32063600
I
I
I 321693.04
9124104
Pape 2 of 4
r
P W
N.p.
Z;rx
n
NgzTpb
f--2o
L
R
T
W
N r
z
ImOnm>'.
np
R
-
6
by
V 3
g D
N �D
T y
T Mill.?
N�
s
3tC
Q
ay�
W a
5
a
&ZZDRq
a
s�6�
n�
nbn
i�'
3'>-
a
=
y
�
�O
d
(6�
fC
6�ir
d
6
mNm
onw
.a0
b
4 r
g
Cj
m
va
ffi
•�
Pir
�
_4
�ro
33YY'
fa
o'sa
tim
=
6
C
y
a y
33
•
o
m"
3
�Y
7C�
�'O
p d
N#55.
tl p�
[$Aq$
�4
u+a�
1,�
il_ i�
a
�.
Qab
RN�H
(b4i[.4
it
Nf'N
tl 8
•
E
3
a
a•
-gall
t
a
��'
o
a
q
me'
%
ni 9
NN
•
N
Spe'
Y
9JN
NNIJ
N
IJ NN
N
IJN
NN
N
N
i
P
O
T1
!!
YAY
p
N
OY YN
N
W,
,;, p
M � V
� as 2.
NYN
N
N
l��
O
PWN
Y
�.^
N
Y
YY
P
NN
P
`�♦H;�
N
O m
o S
Y
Y W
0O
N
N
,q
4
Ps
tbn H a
r m
ffi g
m i
O
N m
Y
6
N
N A
► N
O
i
,
N S
P
1
m
m•
m H
S Y
8 S
0 YN
O
•�NNi.{I
�{
00
N
J
1N
A
#
A
O+N
J�
p N
� i
Ea:ryH�
aII���IN111
9111��I�Itl
��ilA�l�'�A�
NI9111
���E�
91EWI9EEI��
I
RIgIAI
Q
NNN
NNr
r
Pp.
S
NPN
Mx
r"
41
tFN
t3
l5
ti
aN
M
Oo
ON
O PHN•1O
YdPPP
S
SOS
�T
OSS
$
H$
$
Sa
gS'
N
S!d'
Y
=
$
9
$
8
888
88
11
8
8
Hg8
8
5
�
aS
p
H
aa
a
0
r-
o
u
x=��
.I.
y
0•
�ttrx
u
��
c
xxt
y
tun
t•
Sit$S$
sxr�
N
y
xG
rxx
x
x Mat
='"
{�
I
itkI
R
w
$$w
$$S
LS$$
$
$T
SL$
9
N
"Northwest Passage"
Frank/ord Avenue (FM 2528) to Clovis Road (US 84)
City of Lubbock
Cost of Services
'Raw halo'
'Loaded Wle'
HNTe
Corporation
Prknoal
$0000
Project
Mare0a
00
DWLAy
PM
200
PI
klarrper
00
St, Enp.
Pkrnnm
43.00
Erq.l
Pldm
.00
Jr PI
$20.00
ER/
(3rapHW
Erw Scrd
00
Cladcar
PM
Adminn
18.00
60
$160.601
$122.64
We 60
f12556
SW38
$56.40
$75.82
2.56
5 Final EA Daemon
2
4
8
18
Task 10 EA Subtotal HoursiCosis
4
40
14
0
171
i$$
0
$$4
$1
TOTAL BASIC SERVICES HOURS and COSA $2
I $77
1 390
1 292 1 sas 1 17"
1 90 1 1$7e
220
EXPENSES
TOTAL
HNT13
PaMN
SrMh
Co"o,
Sw
Wkaon
Mora
0410.
Marine
Hqh-Toth
Larwops
Suvaypm
T OW
Haws
30
$0
1553
1 0
0
300
0
1$S3
omdaar��
FVJTB
Par" Sm$h
Doopar
Sw Wktlon
Mom
Ciao-mvi"
6L&nd1GPS
Tom CoalSz,0e4
S8
# .0$
$ta3.26104
$O.OD
f1881932SIG
21W.$$
n6$ •a7A10
1 $177 uw"
$o is
1$1D 97$ $2
30.W 1
6730 12.a2
$$2740.1$
$137M.$$
tpAO
$262737
$0.00
$481$e.71
3$$$737.1$
1L1fi$M.$6
$0.00
1 $21 .66 1
30.00
1 $7$$----
9241W
Pepk 4 of 4
"Northwest Passage"
Frankford Avenue (FM 2528) to Clovis Road (US 84)
City of Lubbock
August 19 2004
Hours
Hourly Rate
Billing Rate
Parkhill
Smith and
Cooper
Prin.1n
Charge
$44.36
$13900
Proj.
Mgt.
$36,38
$114.00
Sr. Prof.
Engr.
$31.28
$98.00
Prof.
Engr.
$27.13
$8500
EIT
$21.70
$76.00
Sr. Tech
$20.43
$68.00
CADD /
Tech
$19.47
$64.00
CADD /
Drafter
$18.28
$61.00
Clerical
$9.89
$31.00
Task 1. Project Management and Quality Assurance
A. Monthly Project Meetings 5 meetings at 4 hours per meeting)
1. Attendance
1
20
20
20
2. Prepare Meeting Minutes
5"
PU
6
B, Prepare Project Schedule
8
C. Prepare Monthly Status Report and Invoice
36
12
12
D. QA/QC
24
36
E. Subconsultant Management
Task 1 Subtotal Hours/Costs
24 1
105
0
52
20
0
0
0
18
Task 2. Public Involvement
A. Public Involvement Plan
B. Project Database cam lie, maintain, & update)
1.6
16
C. Elected Officials Notification and Media Relations
1. Distribute Public Official's letter
6
12
D. Media Relations
1. Prepare and distribute media packets 3
3
16
32
8
E. Project Information Packet and Survey 250 copies)
1. Develop packet and survey
0
0
0
0
2. Distribute packet and survey
0
0
0
3. Analyze survey results
0
0
0
0
F. Project Newsletter 3 editions - 500 copies each
2
1 12
12
so
16
G. Project Website
1. Develop website.- Review
0
0
2. Website maintainance
3. Website updates
H. Open House/Public Meetings 2 meetings)
1. Secure Public Meeting Site 2 meetings)
2
4
2. Public Meeting Planning Meeting 2 mt s
2
2
2
3. Public Meeting Rehearsal Meeting 2 mt s
2
2
2
3A. Public Meeting Debrief Meetings 2 mt s
2
4. Mail notices to agencies andproperty owners
2
8
5. Preparation for Public Meetings -notices, etc 2 mt s
8
8
8
6. Public Meeting Exhibits Boards (up to 6 total
8
8
80
7. Public Meeting Participation 2 meetings)
8
8
8
8. Prepare Meeting Minutes 2 meetings)
2
24
i6
9. Public Meeting Summary Comment & Response R t 2 mt s
4
24
24
Costs
I. Open House/Public Hearin 1 meeting)
1. Secure Public Hearing' Site 1 meeting)
1
2
2. Public Hearing Planning Meeting 1 mt
1
1
3. Public Hearing Rehearsal Meeting 1 mt s
1
1
3A. Public Hearin Debrief Meeting1 mt s
2
4. Mail notices to agencies and property owners
1
4
5. Preparation for Public Hearing -notices, etc 1 mt
4
1
4
1
4
6. Public Hearing Exhibits Boards (up to 3 total
4
4
40
7. Public Hearing Participation 1 meeting)
4
4
4
8. Securing transcription service 1 meeting)
1
9. Public Hearing Summary Comment & Response R t 1 mt
2
16
12
H. MAPOs/Miscellaneous Meetings
1. Preparation
2. Attendance 6 mtgs. @ 2 hrs./mtg.)
3. Prepare Meeting Minutes
Task 2 Subtotal Hours/Costs
18
76
0
146
0
0
196
32
128
Task 3. Right -of -Entry Letters
A. Prepare, Distribute, and Track Right -of -Entry Letters
Task 3 Subtotal Hours/Costs
Task 4. Data Collection
A. Engineering Data Collection- Arterial Streets
B. Environmental Data Collection
C. Field Reconnaissance Survey - Jurisdictional Waters
Task 4 Subtotal Hours/Costs
8
8
40
0
a
0
1 8
40
0
0
0
0
Task S. Constraints Mapping
A. Review Constraints Map
Task 5 Subtotal Hours/Costs
4
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
Task 6. Develop Design Criteria
A. Review roadway, hydraulic, and bridge design criteria
B. Review Design Summary Report
C. Prepare for and Attend Design Concept Conference
D. Prepare Meeting Minutes for Design Concept Conference
Task 6 Subtotal Hours(Costs
8
4
4
8
8
0
4
0
20
0
0
a
0
0
Task 7. Develop Evaluation Criteria/Technical Methodology
A. Develop Evaluation Matrix
B. Prepare Draft Technical Methodology Plan Tech Memo
C. Review evaluation criteria and technical methodoigy plan memo
Task 7 Subtotal Hours/Costs
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Task B. Route Studies (Alternatives Analysis)
A. Develop up to 5 Alts for Loop 289/Erskine/Quaker Interchange
B. Traffic Modeling (TransCAD) of up to 5 Alternative Interchanges
C. ReviewEvaluation Matrix for Loop 289/Erskine/Quaker Interchange
D. Review Draft Alternatives Analysis Technical Memo
E. Incorporate Review Comments in Alternatives Technical Memo
Task 8 Subtotal Hours/Costs
1
4
1
4
0
2
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
Task 9. Preparation of Design Schematic
A. Loop 289 Mainlane Widening (Frankford to US 84)
1. Loop 289 ramping analysis
2. Prepare typical sections
3. Prepare schematic (plan and profile sheets)
4. Prepare signing schematic
5. Prepare cross sections
6. Incorporate review comments (60% and 95%)
B. 4th Street Widening (at Loop 289)
1. Prepare typical section
2. Prepare schematic (plan and profile sheet)
3, incorporate review comments (60% and 95%)
C. Erskine Street Widening (Frankford Avenue -Loop 289/Quaker)
1. Prepare typical section
2. Prepare schematic (plan and profile sheets)
3. Incorporate review comments (60% and 95%)
D. Slide Road Widening/New Alignment
1. Prepare typical sections
2. Prepare schematic (plan and profile sheets)
3. Incorporate review comments (60% and 95%)
E. Slide Road at Loop 289 - New Grade Separation
Note: Included in Loop 289 Mainlane Widening (Task 9A)
F. Redesign of the Loop 289/Erskine/Quaker Interchange
1. Prepare typical sections
2. Prepare schematic (plan and profile sheets)
3. Cross sections (included in Task 9A5)
4. incorporte review comments (60% and 95%)
G. Prepare Design Exception
1. Slide Road (Horizontal Alignment)
H. Preliminary Drainage Analysis
1. Determine preliminary drainage areas
2. Loop 289 drainage structures analysis
3. Erskine St and Slide Rd drainage structures analysis
1. Loop 289 Level of Service (LOS)
1. Highway Capacity Software (HCS) Analysis
2. Prepare Loop 289 LOS technical memorandum
J. Loop 289 frontage road intersection analysis
1. Review number of lanes, lane assignments 8 turn bays
2
8
16
16
40
80
2
16
20
2
8
16
24
so
200
8
40
2
B
16
24
60
200.
16
40
4
24
4
80
8
40
K. Preliminary Cost Estimate
1. Loop 289 - 95 percent submittal
2. Loop 289 - 100 percent submittal
3. Erskine St. and Slide Road - 95 percent submittal
4. Erskine St and Slide Road - 100 percent submittal
L. Cost Sharing
1. Prepare property owner map
2. Develop cost sharing plan
3. Stakeholder meetings (Anticipate 12 meetings)
M. Construction Phasing
1. Develop three alternatives
2. TransCAD evaluation
3. Review construction phasing tech memo
Task 9 Subtotal HoursJCosts
8
60
4
24
4
8
8
16
1
40
12
24
24
4
8
12
172
0
508
0
0
636
0
0
Task 10. Environmental Document Preparation (EA)
A. Land Use Impacts
B. Social Impacts and Environmental Justice Impacts
C. Noise Analysis
D. Air Quality Analysis
E. Geology. Soils and Prime/Unique Farmlands
F. Cultural Resources Investigation
1. Historic -Standing Structures Survey
2. Archeological Background Study
3. Archeological Survey
G. Floodplains and Drainage Patterns
H. Water Quality
I. Waters of the United States
J. Ecological Resources
K. Hazardous Materials
L. Section 4(f) Determination
M. Project Chronology Document
N. Deliverable
1, Early EA Document Submittal to City/State (5 copies)
2. EA Document Submittal to TxDOT Env (27 copies)
3. EA Document Submittal to FHWA (15 copies)
4. EA Document Submittal for Public Hearing (10 copies)
5. Public Hearing Evidence, Summary and Analysis (8 copies)
6. Final EA Document (9 copies)
Task 10 Subtotal Houra(Costs
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL BASIC SERVICES HOURS 54 1 373 0 742 60 0 840 1 32 1 146 r 5177,896.00
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Task 11. Surveying
A. Establish Primary Control Monuments
B. Provide Control Point Data Sheets
C. Existing ROW
D. Topographic Surveys
E. Existing Drainage Structures
F. Existing Utilities
G. Soil Core Hoies
Task 11 Subtotal Hours/Costs
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL ADDITIONAL SERVICES HOURS
PSC TOTAL BASIC SERVICES FEE 2247 $177,896.00
PSC EXPENSES 13,768.95
PSC TOTAL FEE 191;664:95
"Northwest Passage"
Frankford Avenue (FM 2528) to Clovis Road (US 84)
City of Lubbock
August 2004
PSC Expenses
Units
Rate
Total
Facility Rental
3
$120.00
$360.00
Mileage
400
$0.37
$148.00
Court Reporter
1
$600.00
$600.00
Public Notice Legal Ad
6
$340.00
$2,040.00
Public Notice 1/4 Pg Print Ad
0
$1,424.00
$0.00
Transcript Copies
4
$12.00
$48.00
8.5 x 11 black & white printing
1000
$0.10
$100.00
11 x 17 color prints
500
$0.35
$175.00
36" x 96" color schematics
140
$48.00
$6,720.00
Newsletter (Prints)
750
$0.45
$337.50
Newsletter (LabeVEnvelope)
750
$0.10
$75.00
Newsletter (Postage)
750
$0.37
$277.50
Inform. Packet - Printed Folders
0
$2.10
$0.00
Inform. Pack. - 4 pg color inserts
0
$0.65
$0.00
Plastic Bag Door Hangers
0
$0.08
$0.00
Phone Calls
200
$2.00
$400.00
FAX
100
$1.00
$100.00
Overnight Schematic Shipping
4
$100.00
$400.00
Postage
24
$8.00
$192.00
W
PSC Total Expenses $1'3,768.95
"Northwest Passage"
Frank/ord Avenue (FM 2525) to Clovis Road (US 64)
City of Lubbock
Cost of Services
Unit
Amount Contract Rate Coat
Amount
Contract Rats
Cost
Amount Contract Rate
Cost
Amount
Contract Rate
Cost
Amount
Contract Rate
Cost
Printing
Report copies: 8.5 X 11 BEW
Ea.
2,000
0.15
$300.00
1000
0.10
100.00
Report Co iess8.5 X 11 Color
Ea.
500
$0.46
$226.00
Report Copies: I I X 17 B&W
Ea.
600
0.20
$120.00
Report Co ies:1 IX 17 Color
Ea.
135
$0.68
91.80
600
$0.35
5175.00
Roll Plots Color
L.F.
2,300
$3.00
$8 900.00
140
.00
$6 720.00
Foam Core Board
Ea.
6
$50,00
S300.00
PrintinotDraft
Pages
320
$0.12
$38,40
PrinGn Final
Pages
585
$0.19
$111.15
Newsletter Prints
Ea.
750
$0.45
$337.50
Newsletter LabeVEnvelo a
Ea.
750
$0.10
$75.00
Newsletter (Postage
Ea.
750
$0.37
$277.50
info. Packet -Printed folders
Ea.
0
$2.10
50.00
into. Packet-4 Pa color inserts
Ea.
0
$0.85
$0.00
Film & Rolf Development • Actual expense Wit be cost'
24 E
S?0.00
$0.00
0
50.00
SO.00
Su
1
$7,938.30
$149.55
$0.00
$7,665.00
Field Expenses
Equip mant Rental (GPS Unit
Ea
1
$0
$0.00
GPS Usea a
Da
5
$25.00
$125 00
0
$0.00
$0.00
Field Su plies
Lot
1
s50.00
$50.00
0
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal
50.00
$175.00
$0.00
SO.tlo
i0.00
Travel
Wealle
Is
1 000
$0.375
$376.00
0
SO*00
S0.00
400
$0.37
$148.00
0
$0.00
SO.00
Tolls
Ea.
69
$1.00
$69.00
Parking
Day
1 69
$10.00
5690.00
Airtravel' Actual expense will be cost'.
Round Taill
52
200.00
1'0 400.00
Rental Car +tax)
Da
24
$75
$1,800.00
8
$65.00
$390.00
Hotel +tax
Da
17
$75
$1,275.DO
10
$55.00
$550.00
0
s0.00
$0.00
Meals
Da
52
$25.00
$1,300.00
10
$30.00
$300.00
0
s0.00
$0.00
Meals ovemi ht stay
Da
117
35.00
$596.00
Subtotal
516 504.00
$1,240.00
110.00
$145.00
$0.00
Delivery
Ex ress Mai Lette
Ea.
20
$16.00
$320.00
Overnight Packa Actual expense will be'at coat'.Ea.
12
S1o0.1H1
$1200.00
4
s100.00
S400.00
Ponta a
Ea.
24
$0.37
$8.88
24
S8.00
$192,00
Shi in
PKG.
5
i500
$75.00
Subtotal
$1,526.86
$75.00
$0.00
$592.00
$0.00
Miscellaneous
Public MeetingtPublic Hearin Advertisements (Legal Ad
Ea.
$2,000
$0.00
1
6
$340.00
$2.040.00
Public Notice 1/4 Pa a Print Ad
0
$1,424.00
$0.00
Court Reporter
Hour
$150
$0.00
1
1
5600.00
$600.00
Public Meeting Room Rental
Ea.
$500
$0.00
1
3
$120.00
$360.00
Hazmat Records Search, NWI Maps& Misc. Data
-Ti5fial
Ea.
1 1
$2,500
$2 500.00
Camera
Day
1
5
$25.00
$125.00
Site Form Re istration
Each
4
$22.50
$90.00
CUratan/ConservationatTARL
Drawer
0.3
$1,200.00
$350.00
Tad Search
Hour
2
$35.00
$70.00
Transcript Copies
Plastic BagDoor Hangers
Ea.
4
$12.00
$48.00
Ea.
0
$0.08
$0.00
Phone Calls
Ea.
200
$2.00
$400.00
FAX
Ea
'100
$1.00
$100.00
Reproduction Media Copies
Ea.
0
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal
$2,500.00
$646.00
$5.00
,648.00
50.00
Ex ones Total
$28,469.88
$2,284.55
$0.00
S119'13.00
50.00
15%Surcharge
$4,270.45
$342.68
$0.
$1,795.95
SO.00
Expenses Total
$32740.13
$2,627.23
$0.00
$13,796.96
i0.00
Subtotal for all Consultants
2,7 77.23
Total 16%Surcha a � $6,409.08
Ex rases Total for sli Consultants 549138.31
a24ro4 Page I of 2
Resolution No. 2004-RO513
Geo-Marine, Inc,
RATES
PROJECT: NW Passage Lubbock Archeological Survey
NEGOTIATED: DATE: 24-Se2-04
Labor
UNIT
UNIT
LABOR CATEGORY
QUANTITY MEASURE
PRICE
AMOUNT
Program Director
2
HR
163.60
327.20
PI - Historic Archeology
HR
83.36
0.00
PI - Prehistoric Archeology
38
HR
87.77
3,335.26
Historian
HR
69.08
0.00
PI - Osteologist
HR
64.20
0.00
Project Archeologist
108
HR
61.28
6,618.24
Historian If
HR
54.89
0.00
Field Supervisor
HR
53.46
0.00
Crew Member
48
HR
44.45
2,133.60
Laboratory Supervisor
24
HR
48.73
1,169.52
GIS Specialist
4
HR
64.97
259.88
Report Production
14
HR
50.03
700.42
Editor
16
HR
57.67
922.72
Graphics Tech
12
HR
51.38
616.56
LABOR TOTALS
16,083.40
SUBCONTRACTORS
Geoarcheologist
0.00
Trackhoe
0.00
0.00
TOTAL SUBCONTRACTING COSTS
0.00
TRAVEL
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
BATE
TOTALS
LOCAL MILEAGE
MILES
0.375
0.00
PER DIEM - LODGING
DAY
10
55.00
550.00
PER DIEM - MEALS
DAY
10
30.00
300.00
PARKING
DAY
10.00
0.00
AUTO RENTAL
DAY
6
65.00
390.00
AIR FARE
RT
260.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
1,240.00
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
DESCRIPTION
UIM QUANTITY
RATE
TOTALS
GPS Useage
Day
5
$25.00
125.00
Digital Camera
Day
5
25.00
125.00
Field Supplies
Lot
1
50.00
50.00
Site Form Registration
Each
4
22.50
90.00
Curation/Conservation at TARL
Drawer
0.3
1,200.00
360.00
Shipping
PKG.
5
15.00
75.00
Tart Search
Hour
1
35.00
35.00
Printing/Draft
Pages
275
0.12
33.00
Printing/Final
Pages
500
0.19
95.00
SUBTOTAL OTHER DIRECT
COSTS
988.00
G&A ON SUBCONTRACTORS, TRAVEL & OTHER DIRECT COSTS $334.20
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $18,645.60
Geo-Marine, Inc,
RATES
PROJECT: NW Passage Lubbock Archeological Background Assessment
NEGOTIATED: DATE: 24-Sep704
Labor -�
LABOR CATEGORY
UNIT
QUANTITY MEASURE
UNIT
PRICE
AMOUNT
Program Director
HR
163.60
0.00
PI - Historic Archeology
HR
83.36
0.00
PI - Prehistoric Archeology
30 HR
87.77
2,633.10
Historian
HR
69.08
0.00
PI - Osteologist
HR
64.20
0.00
Project Archeologist
HR
61.28
0.00
Historian II
HR
54.89
0.00
Field Supervisor
HR
53.46
0.00
Crew Member
HR
44.45
0.00
Laboratory Supervisor
HR
48.73
OAO
GIS Specialist
HR
64.97
0.00
Report Production
2 HR
50.03
100.06
Editor
HR
57.67
0.00
Graphics Tech
2 HR
51.38
102.76
LABOR TOTALS
2,835.92
SUBCONTRACTORS
Geoarcheologist
0.00
Trackhoe
0.00
0.00
TOTAL SUBCONTRACTING COSTS 0.00
TRAVEL
DESCRIPTION
l�M QUANTITY
RATE TOTALS
LOCAL MILEAGE
MILES
0.375
0.00
PER DIEM - LODGING
DAY
55.00
0.00
PER DIEM - MEALS
DAY
30.00
0.00
PARKING
DAY
10.00
0.00
AUTO RENTAL
DAY
65.00
0.00
AIR FARE
FIT
260.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
0.00
DESCRIPTION Q1M QUANTITY
RATE
TOTALS
GPS Useage Day
$25.00
0.00
Digital Camera Day
25.00
0.00
Field Supplies Lot
50.00
0.00
Site Form Registration Each
22.50
0.00
Curation/Conservation at TARL Drawer
1,200.00
0.00
Shipping PKG.
15.00
0.00
Tart Search Hour 1
35.00
35.00
Printing/Draft Pages 45
0.12
5.40
Printing/Final Pages 85
0.19
16.15
SUBTOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
56.55
G&A ON SUBCONTRACTORS, TRAVEL & OTHER DIRECT COSTS
$8.48
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
$2,900.95
A CORD DATE (MWDDNYYY)
nr CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 9/30/2004
PRODUCER Liberty Mutual Insurance Company THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
Financial Plaza II HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
6800 College Boulevard, Suite 700 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Overland Park, KS 66211-1547
INSURED
HNTB Corporation
5910 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 200
Plano, TX 75093
CAVFRAGFS
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURERA, Liberty Mutual Fire Insur
INSURER C:
INSURER 0:
pany
NAIC #
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR ADD'
TRTYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFFECTIVE
DATE IMWDD/YYI
POLICY EXPIRATION
LIMITS
Al
ENERALLIABILITY
_I COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CLAIMS MADE �OCCUR
TB2-141-433035-213
1211/03
1211/04
EACHOCCURRENCE
1000000
$ ' '
DAMAGE To RENTED
PREMISES Eaoccurence)
l'um;OU0 --�
$
MED EXP (Anyoneperson)
$ 5,000
PERSONAL& ADV INJURY
$ 1,000,000
ttt
GENERAL AGGREGATE
$ 2,000,000
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
PRODUCTS-COMP/OPAGG
$ 2,000,000
I
POLICY X PRO- - JECT LOC
A
I
AUTOMOBILE
X
LIABILITY
ANYAUTO
AS2-141-433035-233
12/1/03
1211/04
ED aaaccidB)INGLELIMIT
(Ea
$
1,000,000
BODILY INJURY
(Per person)
$
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY
(Peraccident)
$
HIRED AUTOS
NON-OWNEDAUTOS
PROPERTYOAMAGE
(Per accident)
$
GARAGE LIABILITY
AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT
$
OTHERTHAN EAACC
$
ANYAUTO
$
AUTO ONLY: AGG
E_XCESSIUMBRELLA LIABILITY
EACH OCCURRENCE
$
OCCUR �] CLAIMS MADE
AGGREGATE
$
$
DEDUCTIBLE
$
RETENTION $
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
WC STATU- OTH-
A
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
ANYPROPRIMBEA EXCLUDE/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
It es, describe under
SPECIAL PROVISIONS below
WA Policy deductible endorserr
occurrence/daims (disease) WI
will (may) advance payment of
ent with $250,000
the provision that
a deductible amount
deductible per
Liberty Mutual
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
$ 500,000
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
$ '
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
,
$
OTHER
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/ LOCATIONS I VEHICLES f EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS
HNTB Job 40432 ; Northwest Passage Project Additional Insured: City of Lubbock, Texas as respects general liability and automobile
liability, subject to the terms and conditions of the policies. Waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Lubbock, Texas as respects
workers' compensation, subject to the terms and conditions of the policies.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
City of Lubbock, Texas
Attn: Larry Hertel, P.E.
P.O. Box 2000
Lubbock, TX 79457-0001
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL FXQEJY1ft1A MAIL .SIL DAYS WRII TEN
NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, WXMKMWN OWK X IOY
3n�eemE>I�wsoa�>us�oecuaQoocnc>I��aTs�aa�ar �xneaoawo�e� IasUacr+aas�x
AUTHORIZED
O
ACORD 25 (2DO1108) / 0ACORD CORPORATION 1988
ACORD. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
DATE (MMIDNYYN
9/30/2004
pgOD�pt
Lockton Companies
444 W. 47"' Street, Suite 900
Kansas City, MO 64112-1906
(816) 960-9000
THIS CERTIFICATE 1S ISSUED AS A NATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COYERME AFFOR120 8 THE POLICIES BELOW.
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
1NS"D HNTB Corporation
5910 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 200
Plano, TX 75093
'"SURIE"A` CONIfNENTAL CASUALTY
RER : R C
INSURER ,
INSURER 0'
INSMER S'
rnvr-RAr.Fs PC
--------- THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS
EiSRTYPM%rA
LTRE
p NUMBER
POLICY EFFE
POL Y AM
GENERAL LIABLITV
COMMERCL,LGEHERALLIABERY
CLANS MADE 7 OCCUR
NOTAPPLICABLE
EACH OCCURRENCEXXXX=
FIRE DAMAGE am in
MED EXP om wa
X
PERSONAL d ADV INJURY
S X
AGGREGATEXXXXXXX
GENIAGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
J
PRODW_" - COMPIOP AGO
S XXXXXXX
AUTOMOBILE
LIABILTTY
ANY AWO
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
HIRED AUTOS
NON -OWNED ALTOS
NOT APPLICABLE
COMBINED SINGLE LIAR
(E•.waw,q
= XXXXXXX
BODILY WJiIRY
(Par parim)
S XXXXXXX
BODILY INJURY
(Por ecdc!a"IN
S XXXXXXX
PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Par aceldard)
S XXXXXXX
GARAGE LIABU Y
ANY AUTO
NOT APPLICABLE
AUTO ONLY • EA ACCIDENT
S XXXX
OTHER THAN
AUTO ONLY
EXCESS LIABILITY
OCCUR ❑ cLAIMs MADE
Q
DEDUCTIBLE FORMELLAx,_X)LXXXXX
RETENTION$
NOT APPLICABLE
EACH OCCURRENCE
S XXXXXXX
AGGREGATE
—XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
WORMRS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS'LUIBILITY
NOT APPLICABLEi�08Y
LILITMIT F
LEACH ACCIDENT
..—
$ XXXXXXX
EL DISEASE • POUCY LIMIT
S
A
OTHER
PROFESSIONAL UABIL My
EXN 008213985
511104
511/05
$1,000,000 per claim & the annual
aggregate for all projects
DESCRMTWNOFOPERATmSROCATIONSWJWLESIEXCLUSIONSADDED BYENDORSEMENTISPECWLPRO M0149
HNTB Job 40432 ; Northwest Passage Project
SHOULD ANY OFTHE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL SWEAVGR410- MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN
City of Lubbock, Texas NOTICETOTHECERTWrATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,81i�FNWRF�ODO a0ii1AII
Attn: Larry Hertel, P.E. IMP PONS11 R
P.O. Box 2000 REPRESENTATIVES,
Lubbock, TX 79457-0001 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
m ACORD CbRPORATIEN 1088
m_vm I AQ-0 LIfa#I