Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 2004-R0356 - Resolution To Submit An Application To Impose Passenger Facility Charge - 07_15_2004Resolution No. 2004-R0356 July 15, 2004 Item No. 41 RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized to direct the Directdr of Aviation on behalf of the City of Lubbock, to submit an application and all related documents to the Federal Aviation Administration to impose and use a Passenger Facility Charge to fund certain capital projects at the Lubbock International Airport. Said application is attached hereto and incorporated in this resolution as if fully set forth herein and shall be included in the minutes of the City Council. Passed by the City Council this 15th day of AL, MA Y UK ATTEST: Rebecca Garza, City Secretary VED AS TO /C►ONTENT: K Loomis, :)r of Aviation APPROVED AS TO FORM: , �': �-' -, -, � --, (::: ---- -� - t Linda L. Chamales, Supervising Attorney Office Practice Section Sh/cityatt/Linda&ccdocs/Res-Passenger Facility Chg Application July 1, 2004 Resolution No. 2004 RO356 OMB ADoroved 2120-0557 QPASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE (PFC) APPLICATION U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 1. Application Type (Check all that apply)low: FAA USE ONLY ® a. Impose PFC Charges Date Received PFC Number ® b. Use PFC Revenue ❑ c. Amend PFC No. 11 PART 1 2. Public Agency Name, Address, and Contact Person 3. Airport(s) to Use 4. Consultation Dates a. Date of Written Notice to Air Carriers: Agency Name City of Lubbock, Texas Lubbock 5/14/2004 Address Route 3 Box 389 International 5401 N. Martin Luther King Blvd. Airport b. Date of Consultation Meeting with Air Carriers: City, State, ZIP Lubbock. Texas 79401 6/15/2004 Contact Person Kell Cam bell PART II 5. Charges a. Airport to Impose b. Level c. Total Estimated PFC d. Proposed Effective e. Estimated Expiration Lubbock International Revenue by Level Date: Date: Impose $4,027,686 Airport [1 $1.00 0$2.00 ❑ $3.00 February 1, 2005 March 1, 2009 Use $4,027,686 (previous impose Impose ❑ $4.00 ❑ $4.50 application approval) Use PART III 6. Attachments Check all that A l Attached Submitted with Application Number Document a. ® ❑ _ Airport Capital Improvement Plan b. ® ❑ Project Information (Attachment B) C. ® ❑ Air Carrier Consultation Information d. ® ❑ _ Request to Exclude Class(es) of Carriers e. ❑ ❑ _ Alternative Uses/Projects f. ❑ ❑ Competition Plan/Update g. ® ❑ ALP/Airspace/Environmental h. ❑ ❑ PART IV 7. With respect to this PFC application I hereby certify as follows: To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application are true and correct; This application has been duly authorized by the governing body of the public agency; The public agency will comply with the attached assurances if the application is approved; For those projects for which approval to use PFC revenue is requested, all applicable ALP approvals, airspace determinations, and environmental reviews required by the National Environmental Policy Act have been completed. If required, the public agency has submitted a competition plan in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 47106(f); and If required by 49 U.S.C. 40117(d)(4), adequate provision for financing the airside needs, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and gates, has been made by the public agency. a. Typed Name of Authorized Representative b. Title c. Telephone Number 806-775-2044 James W. Loomis Director of Aviation d. Fax Number 806-775-3133 e. Sig lure f Authorized Representative f. Date Signed July 15, 2004 aperw k Reduction Act Statement: This form is the FAA's primary source for collecting information for the authority to collect PFC revenue for airport velopment. This information is used to determine the eligibility and justification of airport development projects regarding safety, security, or ca city of the national air transportation system; or which reduce noise or mitigate noise impacts resulting from an airport; or famish unities for enhanced competition between or among air carriers. It is estimated that it will take approximately "0 hours to fill out the application depending on the complexity. The use of the form is required to obtain FAA approval of authority to collect PFC revenue (49 U.S.C. 40117(c)). No assurance of confidentiality is necessary or provided. It should be noted that an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number associated with this collection of information is 2120-0557. FAA Form 5500-1 (8-00) Supersedes Previous Edition Resolution No. 2004-R0356 ATTACHMENT A AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Attached is the Airport Capital Improvement Plan for the Lubbock International Airport. Capital Improvement ��U ~����"��" "00��������00��""~ Plan 03 Security Project $ 937,371 * 104,152 $ 1,041,523 04 Extend nwLima North * 5,566,219 $ 618,469 * 6.184.688 bound mTwySierra 05 eARamp Improvements * 5.227.200 * 580.800 $ 5.808.000 (Multi -year grant Grants 28 &29) 06 Baggage Screening * 1.726.800 $ 191.867 $ 1.918.087 Improvements 07 Construct TwyPapa (future Lima) * 2.080.880 $ 232.320 n 2.323.200 wofSierra tonmy 17n Construct rnyvv1mnwyo'uo * 548.460 $ 60.940 $ 608.400 o""mmct Twymmme°v8-z $ 489.9e0 $ 54.440 $ 544.400 Environmental Survey for mwyuo $ 225.000 $ 25.000 $ 250.000 08 Construct Terminal Apron uTwae * 1.e35,670 $ 170,e30 * 1J06,300 Land mcqumuu"1ruomR * 1.138.500 * 126.500 $ 1,265.000 Construct Apron xTaxiway, Cargo $ 877,500 $ 97,500 * 975,000 Relocate/Encase nrvammn (Multiyear) $ 3,279,430 $ 364380 $ 3,643.800 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 5-1, PFC Administrative Fees 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Administrative Fees associated with the implementation of the PFC Program. This includes application preparation, audit fees, postage, etc. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters ___, gates __, and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters ___, gates __, and baggage facilities ____, to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters ___, gates and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[X] $3.00[ ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The PFC Program requires specific and detailed reporting of the PFC Funds. Revised 10/2/00 This project will utilize PFC Funds to pay for these required reports and application preparations. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. ! Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _ CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date _ _ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The PFC Program will allow the airport to implement the projects specified in this application that enhance the safety and security for the airport and the traveling passenger. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph __ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph __ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the Revised 1012100 following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or { ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 5/1/04 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 1/1/05 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO( ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Planet Airways, Sun Country Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southwest Airlines, Inc. (These Air Carriers were notified in writing of the Consultation Meeting. None of the Air Carriers responded in writing or attended the meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Revised 1012/00 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOP YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ) NO [ l c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES [ ] NO [ ] Revised 10/2/00 d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES( ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ j No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve[ ] Partially Approve[ ] Disapprove[ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 Resolution No. 2004-R ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 5-2, Extend Taxiway L 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The existing pavement on Taxiway A located west of Runway 17R/35L has deteriorated and reached the end of its design life. This taxiway will be removed. The partial Taxiway L located west of Runway 17R/35L will be extended to serve Runway 17R/35L. Approximately 38,000 square yards of new 14" PCC pavement will be constructed to serve air carrier aircraft. This project will include removal of existing asphalt and concrete pavement, removal and installation of taxiway lighting, modifications to the existing electrical vault, new PCC pavement, new asphalt pavement, drainage improvements, excavation and embankment. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters _—_, gates and baggage facilities ——. 2. Number of ticket counters —_, gates and baggage facilities y to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters _—_, gates —__, and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate j ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* Revised 1012/00 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ j $2.00[X] $3.00[ ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The separation distance between existing Taxiway A and Runway 17R/35L does not meet the FAA requirements for the current designated category D-IV runway. The existing partial Taxiway L does meet the required separation distance. This project will extend Taxiway L to replace Taxiway A, improving the safety of the Airport and air carrier users of Runway 17R/35L. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date — Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ J Other (explain) — Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated[ J LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ J Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The removal of Taxiway A will eliminate the improper separation distance between the taxiway and Runway 17R/35L, enhancing the safety of the airport. The extension of Taxiway L to replace Taxiway A will enhance the capacity of the airport. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] — Security, Preserve[ J Enhance[ ] — Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport — Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* Revised 10/2/00 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _.__ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ^ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings _ ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 7/1/04 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 7/1/06 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO [ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Planet Airways, Sun Country Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southwest Airlines, Inc. (These Air Carriers were notified in writing of the Consultation Meeting. None of the Air Carriers responded in writing or attended the meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: Revised 1012100 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. Revised 1012/00 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support YES [ l NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ l c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ l d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ l NO( l Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes[ l No( ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve( ] Partially Approve( ] Disapprove[ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 Resolution No. 2004—R ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, if Appropriate): Item 5-3, Acquire Airside Equipment 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will include the purchase of two (2) new snowplows and associated equipment, two (2) new Security Vehicles and associated equipment and one (1) vehicle for airfield safety inspection/perimeter security inspection and associated equipment. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters gates , and baggage facilities -- 2. Number of ticket counters __, gates and baggage facilities __ to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters gates —_, and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[X] $3.00[ ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* Revised 10/2/00 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing snowplows are over 20 years old. They have reached the end of their intended useful life. In order to insure that the airport pavements can remain open during winter time snow storms, new snow plows need to be purchased to insure safety and maintain capacity at the airport. The airport is required to provide airside law enforcement officer response. This includes the daily airside security patrols, SIDA monitoring and incident response. This law enforcement officer response requires the use of vehicles equipped properly for law enforcement operations. The airport is also required to perform regular airfield pavement inspections to insure that objects or other hazards do not exist that would affect the safety of the aircraft. The airport is also required to insure that access to the airport is controlled and the inspection of the perimeter of the airport is necessary to insure this security is maintained. The airside vehicle will be used for performing these inspections. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ J Date _ Competition. Competition Plan [ J Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE - for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The new snowplows will allow the airport to clear the airfield runways and taxiways during snow or icy conditions, enhancing the safety and capacity of the airport during winter weather. Revised 10/2/00 The security vehicles will allow the airport to maintain the required security control for the airside of the airport, enhancing the security of the airport. The airside vehicle will be used to inspect the airside runways and taxiways for debris or other hazards to aircraft, enhancing the safety of the airport. The vehicle will also be used to patrol the perimeter of the airport, enhancing the security of the airport. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. — Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Security, Preserve[ J Enhance[ J _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ J Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order 5100.38_ or PGL [ J Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph — of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ J Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ J; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ J Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier — percentage of annual boardings ___); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 3/1/05 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 2/1/07 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO ( ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** Revised 1012/00 a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Planet Airways, Sun Country Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southwest Airlines, Inc. (These Air Carriers were notified in writing of the Consultation Meeting. None of the Air Carriers responded in writing or attended the meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ Revised 10/2/00 ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ) NO [ c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes[ ] No[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve[ ] Partially Approve[ ] Disapprove[ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Revised 10/2100 Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 5-4, Upgrade Perimeter Security Access Control 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will improve the access control and security along the perimeter of the Airport. Vehicle entrance gates will be upgraded with new access control equipment to control access and to prevent unauthorized entrance to the airport. This will include replacing vehicle sliding gates with box frame sliding gates, automatic gate operators, access control readers and associated equipment, installation of fiber optic cable, drainage improvements at vehicle gate areas, vehicle inspection guard facilities along with radio communications and construction of a law enforcement center. The existing exit doors from the secure area of the Terminal area will be modified to enhance the security of the airport. This will involve modifications to the existing revolving exit doors. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters __, gates __, and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters gates —, and baggage facilities — to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates __, and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO[ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: Revised 10/2/00 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[X] $3.00[ ] (go to 6) $4.00[ j $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The current vehicle gates and operators are outdated and are reaching the end of their useful life. The new gates along with the access control equipment will improve the access security of the airport. The fiber optic cable will connect these vehicle gates to the existing access control system allowing the control required by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to be implemented by the airport. The existing revolving door exits from the secure area of the Terminal has the potential to allow a security breach. This project will modify these doors to enhance the security of the Terminal and Aircraft. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date _ — Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The new vehicle gates and associated equipment will provide the airport the ability to control vehicle access and immediately deny access as the situation arises, enhancing the security of the airport. The modification of the revolving doors in the terminal will enhance the security to the aircraft and traveling passenger. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _.._ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Revised 10/2/00 — Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] — Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)********************"*********""""'""***'"****"*"*" a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph __ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings _); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 1211/04 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 9/1/05 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Planet Airways, Sun Country Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southwest Airlines, Inc. (These Air Carriers were notified in writing of the Revised 10/2/00 Consultation Meeting. None of the Air Carriers responded in writing or attended the meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE****************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. Revised 10/2/00 c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE***********«********************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ ) c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO( ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes[ ] No[ ). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve[ ] Partially Approve[ ] Disapprove[ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 5-5, Upgrade Access Control/CCTV 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The existing airport Access Control/CCTV System was installed in the early 1990's. This project will upgrade the system to current technology, replacing components that are outdated and have reached their useful life. This project will include access control software, computers, cabling, badging system, CCTV cameras, display monitors and control center modifications. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters gates __, and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters gates and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters ___, gates __, and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO ( ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[X] $3.00[ ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* Revised 10000 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: In the early 1990's, the FAA implemented requirements for airports to be able to control access to the secured areas of the airport. Lubbock International Airport installed a computerized access control system in certain areas of the terminal and adjacent area. The existing system has surpassed its useful life and does not provide the necessary access control required under the current regulations. The software has become outdated and obsolete preventing ability to modify to meet current needs at the airport for security. This upgrade will improve the security and safety of the airport and its passengers. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _---�—�_ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date — Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date — Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) — Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated( ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The upgraded access control system will allow the airport to control access to the secure areas of the airport. The CCTV system will allow the airport to monitor security situations that arise. The system will allow the ability to immediately deny access to individual(s) if a security issue arises, enhancing the security of the airport. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance( ] _ Security, Preserve( ] Enhance[ ] Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ) _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport ___. Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Revised 1012100 b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)*****************'`*""**'`************************** a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ____ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph —_ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); ( ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 5/1/05 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 5/1/06 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO [ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO( ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Planet Airways, Sun Country Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southwest Airlines, Inc. (These Air Carriers were notified in writing of the Consultation Meeting. None of the Air Carriers responded in writing or attended the meeting.) Revised 10/2/00 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] Revised 10/2100 d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES [ ] NO [ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve[ ] Partially Approve( ] Disapprove[ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 1012100 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 5-6, Rehabilitate Airside Asphalt Pavement 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The existing asphalt pavement on the Aprons, Taxiways and Runway Shoulders will be rehabilitated to extend their useful life. Several areas of the existing pavement will be repaired. This project will include the application of asphalt pavement seal, sealing of cracks in the asphalt surface and the application of runway and taxiway marking and reflectors. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters ___, gates _N, and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters ___, gates __, and baggage facilities — to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters —, gates __, and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO[ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[X] $3.00[ ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* Revised 10/2/00 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The majority of the airports aprons, taxiways and runway shoulders that are constructed of asphaltic surfacing have begun to oxidize and crack due to age. Some areas are producing debris on the runways and taxiways that could damage aircraft. This project will rehabilitate the asphalt surfacing to extend its useful life and seal the surfacing. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ j No [ ] Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ j Other (explain) _ CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date _ _ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ j Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The rehabilitation of the airside asphalt pavement will reduce the potential for debris from deteriorating asphalt pavement that may damage aircraft, enhancing the safety of the airport. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] — Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. Revised 1012100 [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ^ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph — of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier , percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 10/1/05 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 9/1/06 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO [ J. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Planet Airways, Sun Country Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southwest Airlines, Inc. (These Air Carriers were notified in writing of the Consultation Meeting. None of the Air Carriers responded in writing or attended the meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** Revised 10/2/00 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] NIA [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOP YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: Revised 10/2/00 b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES [ ] NO [ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 5-7, Replace Airfield Pavement Surface Sensor System 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The airport currently has a system in place that monitors the runway pavements for surface conditions. This data collected enables the airport to determine the proper time to apply agents to the pavement to prevent freezing of moisture on the pavement surface. This system was installed over 10 years ago. The electronics and sensor of the system have reached their intended life. This project will replace this aging equipment with new, current technology equipment. This project will include the installation of cable, pavement sensors, radio communication equipment and electrical equipment. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters ___, gates ___, and baggage facilities __. 2. Number of ticket counters , gates _—, and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ j NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* Revised 10/2/00 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[X] $3.00[ ] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: During the winter, moisture on the pavement can begin to freeze rapidly if certain conditions exist in the atmosphere and pavement surface. If proper treatment of the pavement surface with deicing agent does not occur prior to the freezing of the pavement, the runway may have to be closed until the ice can be removed. This project will provide the airport with the equipment and data to help prevent icing of runways and possible closures, reducing the capacity and safety of the airport. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. A Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _ CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date — Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution" rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The airfield pavement surface condition sensor system will allow the airport to apply agents to the runways and taxiways to prevent icy conditions occurring. This will reduce the potential for runway closures due to icy conditions, enhancing the capacity and safety of the airport. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] — Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Revised 10/2/00 b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph , of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph — of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ J Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ J Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 10/1/05 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 9/1/06 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ J c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Planet Airways, Sun Country Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southwest Airlines, Inc. (These Air Carriers were notified in writing of the Consultation Meeting. None of the Air Carriers responded in writing or attended the meeting.) Revised 10/2/00 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ J b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] Revised 10/2/00 d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ ] c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES [ ] NO [ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes[ ] No[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve[ ] Partially Approve[ ] Disapprove[ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (if appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 5-8, Replace Airfield Guidance Signage Panels and Upgrade Electrical Vault 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The existing airfield signage panels have begun to fade from the sun. The faded panels will be replaced with new panels. The existing equipment in the electrical vault that provides power to the airfield lighting and signage will be upgraded. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters _!, gates and baggage facilities _.__. 2. Number of ticket counters ___, gates ___, and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters gates and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. if the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[X] $3.00[ ] (go to s) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* Revised 1012/00 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The airfield guidance signage is extremely important to the safe movement of aircraft on the airfield. The existing sign panels have faded and do not provide the needed visibility for pilots. The recent FAA Certification Inspection noted that these sign panels need to be replaced. The replacement of the sign panels will improve their visibility and decrease potential of runway incursions. The existing emergency generator in the electrical vault serving the airfield lighting and signage has reached its useful life and is not dependable to operate when power is lost to the electrical vault. This project will include modifications to the electrical vault building and the replacement of the emergency generator and associated equipment to improve the safety for aircraft on the airfield and while landing. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date — Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No( ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) — Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) —_— _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The replacement of the airfield guidance signage panels will increase the signage visibility to pilots reducing the potential for runway incursions and enhancing the safety of the airport. The upgrade of the electrical vault will provide the ability to maintain power to the airfield lighting during stormy conditions or other times when power company service is lost, enhancing the safety of the airport. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] — Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] — Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Revised 10/2/00 _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport — Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph — of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph — of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 10/1/05 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 9/1/06 *****FOR FAA USE*********************************«*********************************** a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO [ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Planet Airways, Sun Country Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southwest Airlines, Inc. (These Air Carriers were notified in writing of the Revised 10/2/00 Consultation Meeting. None of the Air Carriers responded in writing or attended the meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 'PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. Revised 10/2/00 c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support, YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES [ ] NO [ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] NIA [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ J. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve[ ] Partially Approve[ ] Disapprove[ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 1012100 New Application - Table B-1 Proiect Funding Summary Public Agency: City of Lubbock Use Airport(s): Lubbock International Application No: 04-05-C-00-LBB Date: 4/23/2004 All? PFC Other Total Protect NumberITItle Pa Go Bond Capital Fin. & Int. Total Capital Fin. & Int, Capital Fin. & Int. Grand Total Item 5-1 PFC Adminstrative Fees $ - $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 Item 5-2 Extend Taxiway L $ 5,875,446 $ 309,234 $ 309,234 $ 6,184,680 $ - $ 6,184,680 Item 5-3 Acquire Airside Equipment $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 11000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 Item 5-4 Upgrade Perimiter Security Access Control $ 1,561,068 $ 173,452 $ 173,452 $ 1,734,520 $ - $ 1,734,520 Item 5-5 Upgrade Access Control/CCTV $ - $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 Item 5-6 Rehabilitate Airside Asphalt Pavement $ - $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 Item 5-7 Replace Airfield Pavement Surface Condition Sensor System $ - $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ - $ 55,000 Item 5-8 Replace Airfield Guidance Signage Panel and Upgrade Electrical Vault $ - $ 915,000 $ 915,000 $ 915,000 $ $ 915,000 Totals $ 7,436,514 $ 4,027,686 $ - $ - $ 4,027,686 $ - $ - $ 11,464,200 $ $ 11,464,200 ATTACHMENT C AIR CARRIER CONSULTATION INFORMATION A Letter of notice for the consultation meeting was sent to air carriers on May 14, 2004. None of the air carriers submitted a written acknowledgement or attended the consultation meeting held on June 15, 2004. The following pages contain the letter of notice for the consultation meeting and the list of air carriers notified of the consultation meeting. Mr./Ms.---------- Dear-------- In accordance with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 158 (Passenger Facility Charges), the City of Lubbock, Texas, as Owner and operator of Lubbock International Airport, has previously imposed a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) as specified in 14 CFR Part 158, per the Federal Aviation Administration's Record of Decision dated June 2002. Pursuant to Part 158.25, the City of Lubbock, Texas has scheduled a meeting for Tuesday June 15, 2004, at 2:00 P.M. The meeting will be held in Lubbock International Airport's Conference Room located on the second floor of the Terminal Building. The following actions will be discussed: ACTION A. In accordance with 14 CFR Part 158 section 158.25, the City of Lubbock, Texas will be requesting authorization to amend the existing FAA approved impose and use PFC Application No. 02-04-C-00-LBB for the following projects: Item 3-10, Construct Taxiway B-1 Amend access Taxiway designation to Taxiway V and final constructed location of the new access Taxiway along Runway Item 3-11, Acquire ADA Aircraft Access Delete project from PFC application Item 4-7, Construct Blast Wall Amend scope to only include Blast Wall Analysis This amendment will result in a net reduction in PFC collection amount for this application. See attached Amendment Table B-1. In accordance with 14 CFR Part 158 section 158.23, the City of Lubbock is hereby providing written notice to all class of carriers who operate at Lubbock International Airport filing RSPA Form T-100 of the requested amendment. ACTION B. In accordance with 14 CFR Part 158 section 158.25, the City of Lubbock, Texas will be requesting authorization to impose and use PFC funds for the following projects: Requested PFC Amount Item 5-1, PFC Administrative Fees $ 25,000 Item 5-2, Extend Taxiway L $ 309,234 Item 5-3, Acquire Airside Equipment $1,000,000 Item 5-4, Upgrade Perimeter Security Access Control $ 173,452 Item 5-5, Upgrade Access Control/CCTV $ 650,000 Item 5-6, Rehabilitate Airside Asphalt Pavement $ 900,000 Item 5-7, Replace Airfield Pavement Surface Condition Sensor System $ 55,000 Item 5-8, Replace Airfield Guidance Signage Panels and Upgrade Electrical Vault $ 915,000 Total Requested PFC $4,027,686 All of the above projects are proposed at the reduced collection rate (level) of $2.00. The estimated Charge Effective Date for this application is February 1, 2005. The estimated Charge Expiration Date for this application is March 1, 2009. In accordance with part 158.11, the City of Lubbock has requested that collection of PFC's under the new application not be required for the following classes of carriers operating at the Lubbock International Airport (See Carrier Exclusion Attachment): 1. Part 135 AT/CO non-scheduled/on demand carriers filing FAA form 1800-31 2. Commuters and Small Air Carriers filing DOT form 298C T1 or E1 for unscheduled enplanements 3. Large Certificated Route Air Carriers filing RSPA form T-100 for unscheduled enplanements If you have any questions regarding the information listed, as well as the scheduled meeting, please contact me at (806) 775-2044. A supporting data package for Action A and Action B is available by request and will be available at the consultation meeting. It is requested that if you do not anticipate attending the consultation meeting, please complete the attached response form and return by mail or fax to the Airport at the address on the form. Sincerely, James W. Loomis Director of Aviation mc: CARRIER EXCLUSION MM�L EI�A►11IE'I' ' 1. Abilene Aero, Inc. 20 2. Aero Charter, Inc. 2 3. Florida Jet Service, Inc. 16 4. Covenant Health System 9 5. Air America Jet Charter, Inc. 1 6. Ozark Air Lines, Inc. 90 7. Eagle Canyon Airlines, Inc. 157 8. Alle iant Air 128 9. Planet Airways 579 10. Southwest Airlines, Co. 915 11. Southeast Airlines, Inc. 21 12. Continental Airlines, Inc. 141 TOTAL 2,079 * Based on CY 2002 FAA ACAIS dated 4/26/2004 The above listed Carriers are for UNSCHEDULED enplanements only In accordance with part 158.11, the City of Lubbock has requested that collection of PFC's under the new application not be required for the following classes of carriers operating at the Lubbock International Airport: 1. Part 135 AT/CO non-scheduled/on demand carriers filing FAA form 1800-31 2. Commuters and Small Air Carriers filing DOT form 298C Tl or El for unscheduled enplanements 3. Large Certificated Route Air Carriers filing RSPA form T-100 for unscheduled enplanements The above Carrier Unscheduled Enplanements do not constitute more than one percent (1 %) of the total number of passengers enplaned annually at Lubbock International Airport. The administrative costs associated with the collection and accounting of these enplanements is not considered cost effective. LUBBOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PFC FUNDING APPLICATION CONSULTATION MEETING This form acknowledges that the below Carrier has received notification of a PFC Consultation Meeting at Lubbock International Airport for June 15, 2004 at 2:00 PM. This further acknowledges that the below Carrier, by submission of this form, does not intend to attend the Consultation Meeting. Carrier Name: Signature: Title: Date: Return to: Lubbock International Airport Route 3 Box 389 5401 N. Martin Luther King Blvd. Lubbock, Texas 79401 Fax: 806-775-3133 List of Airlines to Receive Notification Letter Planet Airways Sun Country Airlines Southwest Airlines, Co. T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc. ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. American Eagle Airlines, Inc. Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Resolution No. 2004—RO356 ATTACHMENT D In accordance with part 158.11, the City of Lubbock has requested that collection of PFC's under the new application not be required for the following classes of carriers operating at the Lubbock International Airport: 1. Part 135 AT/CO non-scheduled/on demand carriers filing FAA form 1800-31 2. Commuters and Small Air Carriers filing DOT form 298C T1 or E1 for unscheduled enplanements 3. Large Certificated Route Air Carriers filing RSPA form. T-100 for unscheduled enplanements The above Carrier Unscheduled Enplanements do not constitute more than one percent (1%) of the total number of passengers enplaned annually at Lubbock International Airport. The administrative costs associated with the collection and accounting of these enplanements is not considered cost effective. The names and estimated number of unscheduled enplanements annually by each carrier known to operate at Lubbock International Airport, under the above defmition are: 1. Abilene Aero, Inc. 20 2. Aero Charter, Inc. 2 3. Florida Jet Service, Inc. 16 4. Covenant Health System 9 5. Air America Jet Charter, Inc. 1 6. Ozark Air Lines, Inc. 90 7. Eagle Canyon Airlines, Inc. 157 8. Alle iant Air 128 9. Planet Airways 579 10. Southwest Airlines, Co. 915 11. Southeast Airlines, Inc. 21 12. Continental Airlines, Inc. 141 TOTAL 2,079 * Based on CY 2002 FAA ACAIS dated 4/26/2004 The above listed Carriers are for UNSCHEDULED enplanements only Resolution No. 2004-R0356 ATTACHMENT G ALP/AIRSPACE/ENVIRONMENTAL Attached are the air space determinations for the two projects that require submission of FAA Form 7460 for air space study.