HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 2004-R0302 - Resolution Approving Consolidated Plan - Community Development Serv. Board - 06_29_2004Resolution No. 2004-RO302
June 29, 2004
Item No. 46
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the City Council of the City of Lubbock does hereby approve the City of Lubbock
2004-2009 Consolidated Plan as recommended by the Community Development Service
Board to be submitted to Housing and Urban Development. Said Plan is attached hereto
and incorporated in this resolution as if fully set forth herein and shall be included in the
minutes of the City Council.
Passed by the City Council this 29th
ATTEST:
Rebe ca Garza, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
�11
Ik
Nancy Han
e
Communit velopme Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
gs/ccdocs/Res.COL2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
June 16, 2004
day of June , 2004.
4o6,y_4o3oa,
CITY OF LUBBOCK
CONSOLIDATED PLAN
.FY 2 004-2 009
u�
� y�v
r _ Say,p�''
P p
Y+ +h
"
4�
162513th Street, Room 107
P.O. Box 2000
Lubbock, Texas 79457
806-775-2301
CITY OF LUBBOCK - CONSOLIDATED PLAN
FY 2004 - 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
CHAPTER 1: CONSULTATION AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
LeadAgency..................................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Resources............................ ............................................................................................................................... 1-1
Effective Date............................................................................................................ ..... .. 1-1
.... ........................
Consultation and Coordination...........:.............................................................................................................. 1-1
Institutional Structure......................................................................................................... ..... 1-2
...........................
Overview of Citizen Participation Plan............................................................................................................. 1-5
FY 2000-2003 Consolidated Plan Timeline...................................................................................................... 1-8
CHAPTER 2: HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS
Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................
2-1
Areas with Concentrations of Low -Income Households..................................................... I.............................
2-1
Areas with Concentrations of Minority Populations........................................................................................
2-2
Housing for Special Needs Individuals.............................................................................................................
2-2
HousingAvailability .........................................................................................................................................
2-3
HousingAffordability .......................................................................................................................................
2-5
HousingAdequacy.............................................................................................................................. ...
2-9
......................
Housing Accessibility .............................................................................................................. .
2-10
Publicand Assisted Housing...........................................................................................................................
2-11
Lossof Affordable Housing............................................................................................................................
2-11
Barriers to Community Development and Housing........................................................................................
2-11
General Overview of City Policies and Procedures........................................................................................
2-12
CHAPTER 3: HOUSING AND HOMELESS NEEDS ASSESSMENT
HousingNeeds Assessment.............................................................................................................................. 3-1
Extremely -Low Income Category .......................................... ........... .... ............................................................ 3-1
Low -Income Category ...................................................................................................................................... 3-4
Moderate -Income Category ................................................................................................................................3-5
Overall Housing Stock Condition..................................................................................................................... 3-6
Incidents of Lead Poisoning in Children........................................................................................................... 3-7
Lead -Based Paint Hazards................................................................................................................................ 3-9
Public and Assisted Housing Needs................................................................................................................ 3-10
Summary of Extremely -Low, Low, and Moderate Income Needs.................................................................. 3-11
HomelessNeeds Assessment.......................................................................................................................... 3-12
Sub-Populations.............................................................................................................................................. 3-17
OtherSpecial Needs Populations.................................................................................................................... 3-18
J CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC HOUSING
LubbockHousing Authority .............................................................................................................................. 4-1
Managementand Operation.............................................................................................................................. 4-1
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
i
Capital Fund Program ...................... .................... 4-4
.............................................................................................
CHAPTER 5: NON -HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
Non -Housing Inventory .................................................................................................................................... 5-1
Economic Development and Small Business Development.............................................................................. 5-2
Healthand Human Services.............................................................................................................................. 5-3
Transportation................................................................................................................................................... 5-4
CHAPTER 6: STRATEGIC PLAN
MissionStatement............................................................................................................................................. 6-1
PriorityNeed Assessments................................................................................................................................ 6-1
PriorityNeeds Definitions ................................................................................................................................. 6-1
AffordableHousing........................................................................................................................................... 6-3
Homeless and Other Special Needs Non-Homeless.......................................................................................... 6-7
Non -Housing Community Development Plan ................................................................................................. 6-11
Barriersto Affordable Housing....................................................................................................................... 6-19
Lead -Based Paint Hazards.............................................................................................................................. 6-19
Anti -Poverty Strategy...................................................................................................................................... 6-20
Institutional Structure and Coordination......................................................................................................... 6-21
Public Housing Resident Initiatives................................................................................................................ 6-22
Monitoring...................................................................................................................................................... 6-22
Appendix
Appendix A SPHC Point -In -Time Homeless Survey............................................................................................A-1
Appendix B Housing Assistance Needs of Low and Moderate Income Households.............................................A-4
Charts
Chart 1.1 City of Lubbock Community Development Department.................................................................... 1-3
Chart 1.2 Policy and Allocation Decision -Making Flow Chart .......................................................................... 1-4
Chart 6.1 FY 2000-03 Priority Needs............................................................................................................... 6-11
Maps
Map 2.1 Areas with Concentrations of Low -Income Households.................................................................... 2-1
Map 2.2 Areas with Concentrations of Minority Populations........................................................................... 2-2
Map6.1 Targeting 2004-2009........................................................................................................................... 6-2
Tables
Table 2.1
Ethnic Groups as a Percent of Total Population . . . .
. 2-2
Table 2.2
Housing Indicators. •.....•.....•....•.•.............•.••....•...•..............................
. 2-3
Table 2.3
Apartment Occupancy Survey by Quadrant -June 2003....................................................
2-3
Table 2.4
Apartment Occupancy Survey by Quadrant- June 2003.....................................................................
2-4
Table 2.5
Trends in Housing Occupancy- 1980-2000........................................................................................
2-4
Table 2.6
Percent Housing Occupancy by Ethnicity- 1980-2000.......................................................................
2-5
Table 2.7
..................................................
Housing Size - 1980-2000............................................. ...................
2-5
Table 2.8
Annual and Monthly Income for Housing Costs................................................................................
2-6
Table 2.9
Affordability Gap for Rental Housing ................................... .......
.......................................................
2-7
Table 2.10
Home Purchase Affordability .............................................................................................................
2-8
Table 2.11
Structural Standard Survey 1998- City of Lubbock EIS.....................................................................
2-9
Table 2.12
Housing Units by Housing Type and Ethnicity 1980-2000..............................................................
2-10
Table 2.13
Lubbock Housing Authority Units and Condition............................................................................
2-11
Table 3.1
Households Below Poverty Level 1990-1999.....................................................................................
3-2
Table 3.2
Household Composition by % Median Family Income and Ethnicity ................................................
3-2
Table 3.3
Percent Incidence of Overcrowding by % Family Income 2000........................................................
3-3
Table 3.4
Average Rents 1999-2003...................................................................................................................
34
Table 3.5
Percent Large Families by % Family Income 2000............................................................................
3-5
Table 3.6
Households by Type and Age 2000....................................................................................................
3-6
L
City of Lubbock —FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
ii
Table 3.7
Percent Housing Problems by % Family Income 2000....................................................................... 3-7
Table 3.8
City of Lubbock- Reported Lead Level by Year.................................................................................
3-7
...
Table 3.9
3-Year Summary of Reported Lead Levels- Lubbock, Texas............................................................. 3-9
Table3.10
Pre-1979 Housing...............................................................................................................................
3-9
Table 3.11
Housing Units by Age and Household Income 2000.......................................................................... 3-9
-
Table 3.12
Rental Housing Needs of Families in the Jurisdiction by Family Type ............................................
3-10
Table 3.13
Housing Needs of Families on Public Housing Waiting Lists-2003.................................................
3-10
Table 3.14
Housing Needs of Families on Section 8 Waiting Lists -Fall 1999...................................................
3-11
Table 3.15
Homeless Persons ............................................... .........
3-13
.._!
Table 3.16
Inventory of Facilities and Programs 2004....................................................:..................................
3-14
Table 3.17
Individuals with HIV/AIDS- Lubbock..............................................................................................
3-18
Table 3.18
Inventory of Facilities for the Elderly- 2004.....................................................................................
3-20
Table 3.19
Disabilities by Type- 2000................................................................................................................
3-21
Table 4.1
Capital Fund Program Projects...........................................................................................................
4-4
--
Table 5.1
Fall 2002 Enrollment Figures for Educational Institutions................................................................. 5-1
Table 5.2
.................
Inventory of Health Care Services — 2002............................................ ........
5-3
Table 6.1
Priorities Presented to CDSB- November 2003..................................................................................
6-1
HUD Table 2A Five -Year Priority Housing Needs.......................................................................................... 6-5
HUD Table 2C-1 Summary of Specific Housing Objectives...............................................................................
6-6
-
HUD Table
HUD Table
IA Continuum of Care — Individuals/Persons in Families with Children ..................................... 6-9
1C Summary of Specific Homeless & Special Needs Non -Homeless Objectives ...................... 6-10
!!!
HUD Table
2B Non -Housing Community Development Needs....................................................................
6-12
HUD Table 2C-2 Summary of Specific Non -Housing Community Development Objectives ..........................
6-16
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
iii
CHAPTER 1
CONSULTATION AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
LEAD AGENCY
The lead agency for overseeing the development of the Consolidated Plan and the administration of
programs covered in the Consolidated Plan is the City of Lubbock Community Development Department.
The City Council has appointed the Community Development and Services Board (CDSB) to make
recommendations to the Council regarding policies and funding. Some projects will be done in-house,
while others will be contracted out to other agencies that have expertise in those particular areas. These
agencies might include but are not limited to non-profit organizations, for -profit organizations, faith based
)R organizations, other City departments, other public agencies, and homeless and housing consortia.
Because the City uses a competitive application process, the specific agencies will not be known until
each year's applications are evaluated and approved.
RESOURCES
The City of Lubbock is a participating jurisdiction and receives entitlement grants from the Department of
Housing and Urban Development. These resources will enable the City to achieve the objectives outlined
in the Consolidated Plan.
• Community Development Block Grant: This formula -based program is designed to provide for the
needs of low -to -moderate income families with programs in housing, public services, health services,
economic development, youth, seniors, crime awareness, public facilities, and infrastructure.
HOME Investment Partnership Program: This formula -based program is used to address the housing
needs of low -to -moderate income families.
Emergency Shelter Grant: This formula -based program provides assistance to homeless shelters
and their clients for operations, essential services, homeless prevention, and rehabilitation of
facilities.
EFFECTIVE DATE
The FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan will be effective for a five-year time period beginning on October 1,
2004, and terminating on September 30, 2009. This Consolidated Plan incorporated information from the
recent 2000 US Census. This information reshaped our eligible areas and redirected our strategies and
priorities for citizens in the community. Basing the Consolidated Plan on the most current information
enables our efforts to best serve the citizens in the community.
CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION
In order to obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included consultation with the citizens and coordination of efforts of civic
leaders. Input provided by neighborhood associations and the work of the Community Development and
Services Board (CDSB) created a base for the Consolidated Plan. Additional assessments are
continually conducted by the Community Development Department to identify community needs.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
1-1
Neighborhood Needs Assessments
The City of Lubbock began the Consolidated Plan process in the fall of 2003 when it met with
neighborhood associations from CDBG-eligible areas. Needs assessments were conducted at each
neighborhood meeting. Areas where meetings were held are listed with their corresponding CDBG
eligible block groups.
Neighborhoods
Dunbar Manhattan
Bayless/Atkins
Heart of Lubbock
Maedgen
West End
Tech Terrace/UNIT
Parkway/Cherry Point
Block Groups
12-7, 12-5
22.04-2, 22.044
14-1, 14-2, 14-5, 14-6, 14-7
19.01-4
4.04-9
15.02-2
9-1, 9-4, 9-5, 9-9
Results of these meetings were compiled to identify overall needs and priorities for funding within the
community.
Community Development and Services Board
A key source of consultation for the process is the Community Development and Services Board. This
board is comprised of 17 members, all of whom are resident citizens of the county. One-third of these
members represent citizens with incomes below the poverty level. The Consolidated Plan Subcommittee
,l of the CDSB Board had great input into the Consolidated Plan process. The subcommittee took a tour of
11 CD eligible areas in the city to identify target areas for funding. An additional responsibility of the
subcommittee included prioritizing non -housing needs and their relative degree of need for funding.
Community and Homeless Needs Assessments
The City of Lubbock will continue to monitor the needs of the community through its participation in the
Lubbock Housing Consortium and the Lubbock Homeless Consortium. Needs assessment shall continue
on a periodic basis.
INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE
The City of Lubbock will implement the Consolidated Plan by using the Community Development
Department as the lead agency with three basic responsibilities — administration, financial responsibility,
and field services. The Community Development Department's mission statement is as follows:
"To create positive change for the citizens of Lubbock
by promoting self-sufficiency through partnerships in
economic development, quality housing, and neighborhood reinvestment."
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
1-2
Chart 1.1
City of Lubbock Community Development Department
City Manager
Director Planning and Transport-.
Director
Community Development
llField Service Coordinator Accounts Analyst
'..i I Senior Housing Inspector Loan Specialist
3.5
Housing Inspector
Office Assistant
Administrative Assistant
2
Rehab Loan Specialists
Real Estate Specialist
Community Development -Administration
I Bookkeeper
2
ECU Student Workers
Pd By LCU
I Assistant Director
Senior Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Community Development
Program Specialist '
CD/KLB
TTU Intern
Administrative Assistant
The administrative staff is responsible for the development and monitoring of the Consolidated Plan, the
Annual Action Plan, and the end of year Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER)
report. The administrative staff oversees all technical assistance workshops, the annual allocation
process, the contract approval process, the IDIS reporting process, and sub -recipient compliance
monitoring. This area provides staff support to the Community Development and Services Board and
implements the City Council approval process.
Community Development -Financial
The financial staff is responsible for the IDIS process including project setup, draws, updates, and
closeouts. The financial staff oversees the reimbursement process and the internal financial system
process. Staff works with the internal and external auditors to assure that all financial requirements for
both city and federal governments are being met. They oversee the mortgage loan servicer, loan
servicing, collection of past due accounts, and assist with credit counseling for delinquent clients.
City of Lubbock - FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
1-3
Community Development Field -Services
The field service staff is responsible for the in-house affordable housing programs, including the
rehabilitation, reconstruction, critical repair, and barrier free programs. Staff oversees the development of
homeowner program guidelines, intake and approval of applicants, initial inspections, work write-ups,
- procurement procedures, inspection of work, reimbursement, loan setup and closing, client follow-up,
loan servicing, and collection of past due accounts. In addition, the inspectors also provide assistance to
sub -recipients using CD funds for rehabilitation or construction and perform inspections for compliance
with HUD and local building standards and codes.
Community Development and Services Board and City Council
The Community Development and Services Board is a 17-member board appointed by the City Council
for three-year terms. Board make-up is as follows:
1. Two members from each of the six City Council Districts that live or work in that district
(12 members).
2. Five members shall be elected public officials, their representatives, or other such
officials as may be available to serve.
3. One third of the members shall represent citizens with incomes below the poverty level.
The Community Development and Services Board meets monthly. Responsibilities of the CDSB include
policy recommendations, review of applications for funding, annual allocation recommendations to City
Council for CDBG, ESG, and HOME funds, final determination of the allocation of State of Texas
Community Services Block Grant funds, recommend amendments to the Consolidated Plan, and
participation in the Consolidated Plan process.
Chart 1.2
Policy and Allocation Decision -Making Flow Chart
I Citizens of Lubbock
-{ City Council I
City Manager []Community Development and Services Board
Director of Strategic Planning
I Community Development Staff
Advisory Capacity
Supervisory Capacity
Non -Profit, For -Profit, Faith Based Organizations, and Public Agencies
The Community Development Department works with non -profits, for -profits, faith based organizations,
and public agencies to achieve the Consolidated Plan's established goals. The two key roles these
outside agencies serve are:
1. They receive funds through the competitive allocation process to serve low-income and homeless
l families throughout the community.
11 2. They provide a resource for needs assessments, networking and communication of services to low-
income or homeless clients.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
11-4
_l
Many of these groups participate in the Lubbock Homeless Consortium and the Lubbock Housing
Consortium. The .Homeless Consortium's membership consists of emergency shelter facilities, MHMR,
drug/alcohol abuse rehabilitation facilities, health organizations, the local housing authority, churches,
advocacy groups, AIDS organizations, and social service agencies. The Housing Consortium's
membership consists of affordable housing agencies, realtors, banks, mortgage companies, local HUD
- staff, advocacy groups, and the local housing finance corporation. These organizations meet on a
monthly basis to share information, ask advice, identify needs and resources, and provide the public
information on affordable housing and homeless issues through events during the year. Community
Development staff has representatives on both consortia and is an active participant in their activities.
The Community Development Department also draws on public agencies as resources or partners for
housing and economic development programs and to better serve the low-income community. These
partnering agencies include local schools and universities, state agencies, and the local housing
authority.
Public Housing Authority
The local housing authority for Lubbock is set up as a separate entity from the City. The Mayor appoints
a five -member Board of Commissioners for two-year terms. This is the extent of the City's role in
oversight. The Lubbock Housing Authority (LHA) acts as an independent agency and their decisions as
to hiring, contracting, procurement, and planning do not have to be approved by the City Council nor do
they provide reports to the City. The governing board of LHA oversees such decisions. While the LHA is
a separate agency, it participates in both the Lubbock Housing Consortium and the Lubbock Homeless
Consortium.
The Lubbock Housing Authority consults with the City in preparing their five-year plan for HUD. LHA
looks to the current Consolidated Plan for the development of this plan. In addition, LHA is able to
request funding for programs through the City's annual allocation process and it has received funding in
the past.
Summary and Gaps
The strengths of this system include allowing for competition and having a concentrated effort in identified
areas referred to as target areas. The majority of housing funds are spent in these target areas in order
to make a visible impact. By using request for proposals for specific needs there is better control in
reaching the goals of the plan. Through the combination of both the private sector and public sector use
we are able to reach our goals, assist small business contractors, and be cost effective.
Gaps in the delivery system for the institutional structure outlined above include a need for better
coordination to avoid duplication of efforts and a continued emphasis on communication with other
organizations.
OVERVIEW OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
J The City of Lubbock goes to every effort to gain citizens' input on both the Consolidated Plan and the
Annual Action Plan. The City Council appoints an advisory board called the Community Development
and Services Board made up of representatives from each district representing low-income areas, the
public sector, the business sector, and the disabled. The CDSB meets once a month and advises the City
Council on policy, funding, and needs.
To better inform the CDSB and Council, staff meets with neighborhood associations in low -to -moderate
income areas. A strategic planning session is conducted with citizens to identify needs and priorities for
their area as well as citywide. This is done periodically in target areas for the Action Plan and for the
Consolidated Plan process.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2004 Consolidated Plan
1-5
The results of these meetings are presented to the CDSB. From this information the CDSB identifies
high, medium, and low priorities as well as target areas. These recommendations are presented to the
City Council for consideration.
To better publicize these decisions, the City produces a Citizen's Guide that relates information about the
process, grants, priorities, and policies. This guide is available to all citizens and is distributed to the
CDSB, non-profit agencies, and the media.
Access to Information
Each year during the allocation process, the City takes applications for ESG, HOME, and CDBG funding
requests. The Community Development and Services Board reviews the submissions and makes
recommendations to the City Council. These recommendations are published in both the local paper and
minority papers, and a public hearing is held to allow for comments. The published recommendations
include funds expected to be made available through grants and program income.
At mid -year, the reallocation of program income and unused funds from the previous year occurs. The
Board makes a recommendation to City Council and a Public Hearing is held to take comments and
amend the annual action plan.
I For the Consolidated Plan, the Community Development and Services Board reviews the draft and holds
J a public hearing for comments. The CDSB then recommends the document to the City Council who
reviews it, holds a second public hearing to take comments, and approves the final Consolidated Plan.
Anti -displacement
The City of Lubbock follows all acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Act and
Section 104(d), and will minimize or alleviate displacement of residents and businesses whenever
possible.
Publishing the Plan
A draft summary of the Consolidated Plan is presented to the Community Development and Services
Board, which then holds a public hearing to allow for citizens' comments. After being reviewed, changes
are made and the CDSB makes a recommendation to the City Council to accept the Consolidated Plan.
Prior to a final public hearing, a listing will be published in local papers and copies will be made available
at City Hall and the municipal libraries. Copies will also be made available to citizens at their request.
The City Council then holds an additional public hearing to allow citizens the opportunity for comments.
Comments are considered and the final version is approved by City Council.
Public Hearings
i Two City Council hearings concerning the allocation of funds are held each year, one for the allocation in
June and one for the reallocation at the beginning of each calendar year. The City Council holds a special
public hearing in June during the evening to allow for better citizen participation In addition, the
Community Development and Services Board conducts meetings at which additional information is made
available and hearings are set as needed. The CDSB meets the second Wednesday of each month at
6:00 p.m. All meetings are open to the public and accommodations are made for people with special
needs. There is a Spanish-speaking interpreter available if required.
Notice of Public Hearings
Notices of public hearings are published in the paper at least ten days prior to the hearing. Notices are
placed in the daily paper as well as weekly minority papers. The notices are placed as special notices in
the regular sections of the paper not in the legal section.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
1-6
Access to Meetings/Records
The City of Lubbock complies with the American with Disabilities Act as well as the Texas Open Meetings
Act for all of its meetings. Meeting notices are posted outside City Hall seventy-two hours before the
meeting and access is available to the public for these meetings. The City also complies with the Texas
Open Records Act when dealing with requests for information.
Citizen Comments
The City allows 30 days for citizens' comments prior to sending the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action
Plan into HUD. Each comment is considered prior to the final submission.
Substantial Amendments
The City considers a substantial amendment to be the following:
1. A change of 25% of the annual allocation for the Grant; or
2. Changes in priorities or use of CDBG funds from one activity to another.
In the event of an amendment, a public hearing will be held and comments will be taken following the
same procedures as the annual allocation process.
Performance Reports
The Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) is produced each year by the City of
Lubbock for the public and HUD. There is a fifteen -day comment and review period for the public.
Copies are made available in the Community Development office and local library branches. Any
comments received are made part of the CAPER and are forwarded to HUD. In addition, staff also
provides the Community Development and Services Board with periodic updates on sub -grantees
performance. This allows CDSB to stay informed on how the funds are spent and if goals are being
1 reached.
Technical Assistance
The City of Lubbock continually offers technical assistance on an individual and group basis. Assistance
includes general overviews on the application process, City Council policies, construction requirements,
and other topics as needed. Assistance is also offered to any agency or individual wishing to request our
funds. Staff meets one on one with agencies to answer questions related to the allocation process and to
discuss issues pertaining to their specific projects.
Complaints
Citizen complaints are addressed by the appropriate person within the Community Development
Department. The Director of Strategic Planning can appeal any decision. Written responses are given to
all written requests and responses will be provided within a 15-day period when practical. If citizens are
still not satisfied, they are referred to the Regional HUD Office in Fort Worth.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
1-7
FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan Timeline
Neighborhood Meetings....................................................................................................... Fall -Winter 2003
CDSB Sub Committee Meeting -Work Session to Determine Priority Needs Tables ........
November 5, 2003
CDSB Meeting -Approval of Targeting & Priorities Needs ...............................................
November 12, 2003
City Council Approval of Targeting & Priorities Needs ....................................................
December 18, 2003
FY 2004 Technical Assistance Workshop — Release Applications ....................................
February 3, 2004
Advertise Public Hearing on 3/9/04...................................................................................
February 23, 2004
CDSB Meeting -Public Hearing -Consolidated Plan Draft..........................................................March
9, 2004
FY 2004 Applications Due to City...........................................................................................March
26, 2004
CDSB Evaluates Applications................................................................................. March 29 — April 9, 2004
CDSB Meeting.........................................................................................................................
April 14, 2004
CDSB Meeting -Finalize Recommendation for Action Plan Projects .........................................May
12, 2004
CDSB Meeting -Citizens' Comments -Consolidated Plan Draft..................................................May
12, 2004
Advertise Public Hearing for Action Plan/Consolidated Plan ....................................................
May 23, 2004
30-Day Comment Period Begins...............................................................................................May
24, 2004
City Council Public Hearing- Action Plan/Consolidated Plan .....................................................June
9, 2004
30-Day Comment Period Ends.................................................................................................June
22, 2004
City Council -Approve Final Version of Consolidated Plan .......................................................June
29, 2004
Submit FY 2004 Action Plan and FY 2004-09 Consolidated Plan to HUD ..........................
August 13, 2004
City of Lubbock—FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
1-8
CHAPTER 2
HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
This chapter focuses on the housing characteristics within the 115 square mile area of Lubbock, Texas.
In addition to 1980, 1990 and 2000 US Bureau of Census statistics, information from the Lubbock
Apartment Association, Lubbock Association of Realtors, City of Lubbock Planning and Building
Inspection Departments, Lubbock Housing Finance Corporation, Market Lubbock, Inc., Texas
Department of Health, and the 2003 Blosser Report were used to develop the following tables and
narratives. From compilation of information in this chapter, a housing needs assessment will be
developed and addressed in the next chapter.
AREAS WITH CONCENTRATIONS OF LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
Areas with a high concentration of low-income households are defined as block groups with 51 % or more
of the population falling below 80% of the area median family income. Using 2000 Census information,
the majority of block groups in the northeast and southeast quadrants of the city are considered to have
high levels of low-income families as evidenced on Map 2.1. Newly eligible areas are located in the
central region of the city, as well as several areas spreading towards the West.
Map 2.1
Areas with Concentrations of Low -Income Households
Source: 2000 US Census
LOO
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-1
AREAS WITH CONCENTRATIONS OF MINORITY POPULATIONS
i Areas of the city with higher concentrations of low-income households typically tend to be the areas with
the greatest concentration of minority populations. Using 2000 Census information, this can be seen in
Map 2.2. The overall growth of the minority population over the last two decades can be seen in Table
2.1.
Map 2.2
Areas with Concentrations of Minority Populations
® 25-50% Minority
M 50-75% Minority
ED 75-100%Minority
Source: 2000 US Census
Table 2.1
Ethnic Grouos as a Percent of Total Ponulation
Ethnicity
1980
1990
2000
White
72.0%
68.5%
62.5%
Hispanic
19.5%
22.7%
27.5%
Black
7.2%
7.3%
1 7.5%
Other Races
1 19.5%
1 22.7%
1 27.5%
Source: SOCDS Census Data, 2000.
J HOUSING FOR SPECIAL NEEDS INDIVIDUALS
Although some group housing is available for individuals with mental illness, substance abuse recovery,
1 and domestic violence, there is a limited availability of housing specifically designated for disabled or
J handicapped individuals. Apartment complexes constructed since 1996 are required to make a
percentage of units handicap accessible. However, most of these new units are not considered
affordable to low -to -moderate income families. The City has a barrier -free living program designed to
j City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-2
enable low-income homeowners the opportunity to add ramps, widen doorways, and make other changes
in order to increase the accessibility of the home. This program has assisted approximately 25
} homeowners in 2003, making over $160,000 in renovations.
HOUSING AVAILABILITY
Due to low interest rates and increased migration into the community for economic opportunities, Lubbock
is experiencing a residential building boom. The Housing Industry within the city has set new growth
records for the past three years, building a large number of single family and multifamily units. Another
factor that has increased the ability of families to purchase a home is the issuance of single-family bonds
by Lubbock Housing Finance Corporation. In 2000, a total amount of $20 million in single-family bonds
was released. Additional bonds are expected for release in 2004.
Table 2.2
Housing Indicators 1998-2002
Year
New
Apartment Units
New
House Permits
MLS
House Sales
Average
House Price
1998
120
664
2,541
$93,789
1999
100
747
2,484
$97,817
2000
28
819
2,592
$97,579
2001
541
941
2,631
$101,223
2002
470
1,246
2,892
$107,891
Source: The Blosser Report, February 2003
Lubbock continues to see an overall increase in the number of apartment complexes built. Current
development projects should maintain this trend for the next several years. Vacancy has reached
11.07% according to Table 2.1 as of June 2003. The overall influx of new units could, over the next few
years, mean an easing of rents in the lower -end range because of the higher vacancy rate.
Table 2.3
Apartment Occupancy Survey —June 2003
Unit
Size
Units
Surveyed
Units
Occupied
Units
Vacant
Occupancy
Factor
Efficiency Units
721
667
54
92.51 %
1 Bedroom Units
6,757
6,058
699
89.66%
2 Bedroom Units
6,828
6,036
792
88.40%
3 Bedroom Units
966
841
125
87.06%
4 Bedroom Units
271
220
1 51
81.18%
Total
15,543
13,822
1 1,721
88.93%
Source: Lubbock Apartment Association
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-3
Table 2.4 shows that the occupancy rates are similar across all Quadrants of the city. A large number of
vacancies can be attributed to construction and development activities in all areas of the city. However,
the southwest is generally upper income residential development, while the activity in the northeast is
predominately low-income development.
Table 2.4
Apartment Occupancy Survey by Quadrant —June 2003
Unit
Size
Units
Surveyed
Units
Occupied
Units
Vacant
Occupancy
Factor
Southwest
6,124
5,401
723
88.19%
Southeast
1,854
1,670
184
90.08%
Northeast
2,512
2,229
283
88.73%
Northwest
5,053
4,522
531
89.49%
Source: Lubbock Apartment Association
From the last three census counts as seen in Table 2.5, the total number of housing units has significantly
increased resulting in an increase in both the number of owner -occupied units and rental -occupied units.
Despite this increase, the percentage of owner -occupied units and rental units remain at relatively the
same level in 2000 as in 1980.
Table 2.5
Trends in Housing Occupancv 1980-2000
1980
1990
2000
TOTAL UNITS
66,914
77,802
92,806
Occupied Units:
Owner -Occupied
Renter -Occupied
60,783
35,653
25,130
69,094
38,150
30,944
85,506
49,467
36,039
• Owner Occupancy
58.7%
55.2%
57.9%
• Renter Occupancy
41.3%
44.8%
42.1 %
Vacant Units
6,131
8,708
7,300
For Sale
740
1,094
810
For Rent
4,049
5,780
4,046
Other
1,342
1,834
2,444
Vacancy Rate
9.2%
11.2%
7.9%
Source: 198U, 1990, and 2000 US Gensus
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-4
As indicated in Table 2.6, an increase or consistency in homeownership occurred across most ethnic
groups during the past two decades. An exception is the slight decrease seen in African American home
ownership and relative stability of Native American homeowners. However, these changes must be taken
into account with the growing minority population seen in Table 2.1.
Table 2.6
% Housina Occuoancv by Ethnicity 1980-2000
Ethnicity
11980
1990 2000
Own
Rent
Own
Rent
Own
Rent
nglo
60%
40%
58%
42%
66%
44%
Black
48%
52%
44%
56%
44%
56%
Hispanic
51 %
49%
49%
51 %
54%
46%
Native American
54%
46%
52%
48%
54%
46%
Asian
41%
1 59%
18%
1 82%
1 47%
1 53%
Source: 1980-2000 US Census
To further illustrate the housing trends in Lubbock, Table 2.7 indicates decreasing household size from
2.86 down to 2.5 in 2000.
Table 2.7
Household Size 1990-2000
Year
Number of
Households
Average
Household Size
1980
60,783
2.86
1990
69,084
2.65
2000
85,506
2.5
Source: 1970-2000 US Census
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
According to HUD's definition, a family's housing cost plus utilities should be no more than 30% of their
monthly gross income. The housing affordability gap is the difference between 30% of a household's
annual income and the cost of both utilities and mortgage payments/rent. When families pay between
30% and 50% of their monthly income on housing, they are considered rent burdened. Lubbock families
with gross family incomes in both the 0% to 30% and 31 % to 50% range may already be rent burdened or
unable to purchase a home because of their income status. Table 2.8 relates the amount, according to
HUD definitions, that families can afford to pay for housing.
City of Lubbock— FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-5
Table 2.8
Annual and Monthly Income for Housing Costs
30% MFI Households - Extremel -Low Income
Family Size
2003 Lubbock
Median Family
Income
30% of Median
Family Income
30% of Annual
Income For
Housing
30% of Monthly
Income for
Housing
1
$32,700
$9,800
$2,940
$245
2
$37,400
$11,200
$3,360
$280
3
$42,000
$12,600
$3,780
$315
4
$46,700
$14,000
$4,200
$350
5
$50,400
$15,150
$4,545
$379
6
$54,200
$16,250
$4,875
$406
7
$57,900
$17,350
$5,205
$434
8
$61,600
$18,488
$5,550
$463
50% MFI Households - Low Income
Family Size
2003 Lubbock
Median Family
Income
50% of Median
Family Income
30% of Annual
Income For
Housing
30% of Monthly
Income for
Housing
1
$32,700
$16,350
$4,905
$409
2
$37,400
$18,700
$5,610
$468
3
$42,000
$21,000
$6,300
$525
4
$46,700
$23,350
$7,005
$584
5
$50,400
$25,200
$7,560
$630
6
$54,200
$27,100
$8,130
$678
7
$57,900
$28,950
$8,685
$724
8
$61,600
$30,800
$9,240
$770
80% MFI Households - Moderate Income
Family Size
2003 Lubbock
Median family
Income
80% of Median
Family Income
30% of Annual
Income For
Housing
30% of Monthly
Income for
Housing
1
$32,700
$26,150
$7,845
$654
2
$37,400
$29,900
$8,970
$748
3
$42,000
$33,600
$10,080
$840
4
$46,700
$37,350
$11,205
$934
5
$50,400
$40,350
$12,105
$1,009
6
$54,200
$43,350
$13,005
$1,084
7
$57,900
$46,350
$13,905
$1,159
8
$61,600
$49,300
$14,790
$1,233
Source: 2003 HUD Median Family Income for Lubbock
City of Lubbock - FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-6
Affordability -Rental Housing
Table 2.9 shows the affordability gaps for extremely low (30% MFI) and low income (50% MFI) families.
Families at 80% of the median family income did not show an affordability gap at either 30% or 50% of
income for housing costs. Therefore, the chart for 80% MFI is not included.
Table 2.9
Affordability Gap for Rental Housing
30% MFI Households — Extremely -Low Income
Family
Size
Unit Size
2003
Average
Monthly
Rent*
Affordability Standard
Rent Burdened
Housing at
30% of
Monthly
Income
Affordability
Gap
Shortfall
Housing at
50% of
Monthly
Income
Affordability
Gap -
Shortfall
1
1B
$480
$245
$235
$408
$72
2
1B
213
$480
$604
$280
$280
$200
$324
$467
$467
$13
$137
3
213
313+
$604
$821
$315
$315
$289
$506
$525
$525
$79
$296
4
213
313+
$604
$821
$350
$350
$254
$471
$583
$583
$21
$238
5
313+
$821
$379
$442
$631
$190
6
313+
$821
$406
$415
$677
$144
7
313+
$821
$434
$387
$723
$98
8
36+
$821
$463
$358
$770
$51
*Rent Source: 2003 Blosser Report
50% MFI Households - Low Income
Family
Size
Suitable
Unit Size
2003
Average
Monthly
Rent*
Affordability Standard
Rent Burdened
Housing at
30% of
Monthly
Income
Affordability
Gap
Shortfall
Housing at
50% of
Monthly
Income
Affordability
Gap -
Shortfall
1
1B
$480
$409
$71
$681
--
2
113
213
$480
$604
$468
$468
$12
$136
$779
$779
--
—
3
213
36+
$604
$821
$525
$525
$79
$296
$875
$875
--
--
4
213
313+
$604
$821
$584
$584
$20
$237
$973
$973
--
--
5
313+
$821
$630
$191
$1,050
--
6
36+
$821
$678
$143
$1,129
--
7
313+
$821
$724
$97
$1,206
--
8
313+
$821
$770
$51
$1,283
--
I*Rent Source: 2003 Blosser Report
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-7
Affordability — Homeownership Opportunities
According to figures from the Lubbock Association of Realtors, the 2003 average sale price of a home in
Lubbock was $117,305, at $65 per square foot this equates to a 1,800 square foot home. However, a
modest 1,200 square foot, three -bedroom, two -bath home can be purchased in Lubbock for $78,000
based on $65 per square foot. The chart listed below shows the monthly cost and both the down
payment and closing cost needed to purchase each example home. In Example 1, few if any families
below 80% MFI would be able to purchase a home in this price range in accordance with their amount
available for housing shown in Table 2.7. However, in Example 2, many families in the 51 % to 80%
range could afford to purchase this home with some down payment and closing cost assistance. To a
lesser extent, families in the upper end of the 31 % to 50% range could purchase a new home if they have
down payment and closing cost assistance available to them. Households in the 0% to 30% range would
be unable to purchase either home.
Table 2.10
Home Purchase Affordability
Example 1: Average Sale Price — Lubbock 2003 (Lubbock Association of Realtors)
1,800 square foot House @ $65/sq. ft. (Estimate)
3 Bedroom, 2 Bath, 2-Car Garage, All Brick
Costs
House Plus Lot $117,305
Less 5% Down Payment $5,865
Loan Amount $111,440
Loan Terms
6%, 30 years
6.5%, 30 years
7%, 30 years
Loan Amount
$111,440
$111,440
$111,440
Annual Debt
Service
$8,018
$8,453
$8,897
Monthly Debt
Service
$668.14
$704.38
$741.41
Example 2: Affordable Home — Lubbock 2003 (Estimate)
1,200 square foot House @ $65/sq. ft.
3 Bedroom, 2 Bath, 1-Car Garage, All Brick
1 Costs
11 House Plus Lot $78,000
Less 5% Down Payment $3,900
Loan Amount $74,100
Loan Terms
6%, 30 years
6.5%, 30 years
7%, 30 years
Loan Amount
$74,100
$74,100
$74,100
Annual Debt
Service
$5,331
$5,620
$5,916
Monthly Debt
Service
$444.27
$468.36
$492.99
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-8
HOUSING ADEQUACY
For our purpose, the City of Lubbock determines housing conditions according to availability,
completeness of plumbing, function, and other physical conditions of the house such as electrical and
structural soundness. The City of Lubbock has differentiated housing units into four groups:
1. Standard and Decent - This type of housing complies with the required minimum building
codes and zoning ordinances.
2. Substandard but Feasible for Rehabilitation - Houses that need rehabilitation not exceeding
50% of the appraised value of the unit after rehabilitation.
3. Substandard but Not Feasible for Rehabilitation - Houses that are at a standard lower than
required by law and necessary rehabilitation to bring them into compliance exceeds 50% of
the appraised value after rehabilitation.
4. Dilapidated and Deteriorated - Houses that have no remaining economic value and
rehabilitation costs to bring them up to code standard would exceed the costs of new
construction.
Table 2.11 shows results of the 2000 City of Lubbock Environmental Services Department survey of the
condition of approximately 53,500 single-family residences and duplexes in Lubbock. During a drive -by
inspection for exterior violations of each unit in their district, code inspectors determined the occupancy of
the property and whether the property was deteriorating or possibly substandard. Overall, housing in the
enforcement districts with large numbers of low income eligible areas of Lubbock shower a greater
incident of substandard or deteriorated homes than districts with few or no CDBG eligible areas.
Table 2.11
Structural Standard Survey 1998-City of Lubbock EIS
Primarily CDBG Eligible Areas
Code Inspection
District
Occupied -
Substandard
Occupied - Starting
Deterioration
Not Occupied -
Substandard
Not Occupied -
Starting Deterioration
District A02
32
41
17
3
District A03
13
32
2
7
District A04
7
148
7
6
District B05
62
162
30
7
District B06
5
73
1
3
District C10
2
25
13
1
District C11
1
3
3
0
District C12
14
18
7
1
Sub -Total
136
502
80
28
Prim By Non-CDBG Eli ibie Areas
Code Inspection
District
Occupied -
Substandard
Occupied - Starting
Deterioration
Not Occupied -
Substandard
Not Occupied -
Starting Deterioration
District A01
0
4
1
2
District B07
0
0
0
0
District B08
0
6
1
0
District C09
1
0
0
0
Sub -Total
1
10
2
2
All Areas
Total
137
512
82
30
Housing condition is important because inadequate upkeep of property can diminish the aesthetic value
of the neighborhood, reduce property values, decrease willingness to invest in the community by
residents and businesses, reduce property -tax income, and may generally be a precursor to more serious
problems of abandonment and demolition. Examination of the age of housing is a reasonable indicator of
City of Lubbock - FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-9
the extent of deterioration. The older the home becomes, the more repairs must be made to keep the
property in good condition. Low-income families living in older homes are unable to keep up the repairs
{ on their homes due to lack of funds. The number of older houses is decreasing due to redevelopment
efforts across the city, but remain an issue to adequate housing.
HOUSING ACCESSIBIITY
Lubbock currently shows about an 8% vacancy rate for rental units. There are units available and
affordable for the 50% and 80% median income families. The tables show very little if any gap in
affordability making housing accessible to these groups, unlike for the 30% median income family. There
are affordability gaps in this income category that makes accessibility an issue. Section 8 vouchers from
the Lubbock Housing Authority eases this problem for those that are able to receive them. There is a
waiting list for vouchers at this time. Access to affordable housing for the lower income groups is also
hampered by competition for units from students attending the four universities/colleges within the area.
The predominate reason some neighborhoods may be inaccessible to the low -to -moderate income
household is finances. Growth in new units is in the higher rent category. However, in homeownership
we see the mixing of more affordable housing with higher cost housing in the private sector. Lubbock
publicizes information on fair housing throughout the year in many different outlets. The City has a fair
housing officer to assist and refer claims if and when they arise.
The pattern of housing tenure follows the demographic distribution of the City with Anglos being the
largest homeowner and renter group. In 2000, Anglo homeowners comprised 80% of the total
homeowner -occupied units, and 71.9% of the total renter -occupied units. Other racial categories can
further be shown in Table 2.12. Home ownership rates are increasing at a greater rate than population
growth in all racial categories. Significant changes are seen in Hispanic, Native Americans, and other
race populations. In addition, the number of vacant units decreased by 23.2% between 1990 and 2000.
Table 2.12
Housing Units by Housing Type and Ethnicity 1990-2000
OWNER -OCCUPIED
Ethnicity
1990
2000
% Change
1990-2000
n to
36,904
40,986
11.1 %
Black
2,277
2,585
13.5%
Hispanic
6,330
9,110
43.9%
Native American
138
261
89.1 %
Asian/Other
270
424
57.0%
TOTAL
45,919
53,366
16.2%
RENTER
-OCCUPIED
Ethnicity
1990
2000
% Change
1990-2000
n to
25,458
25,935
1.9%
Black
2,950
3,464
17.4%
Hispanic
6,206
8,977
44.7%
Native American
111
258
132.4%
Asian/Other
673
748
11.1 %
TOTAL
35,398
39,382
11.20/
VACANT UNITS
TOTALI 9,5101 7,300
Source: 1990 and 2000 US Census
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-10
PUBLIC AND ASSISTED HOUSING
The Lubbock Housing Authority provides Section 8 vouchers and public housing for Lubbock. They
currently receive 853 Section 8 Vouchers. Information regarding the Housing Authority's housing units is
listed below:
Table 2.13
Lubbock Housing Authority Units and Condition
Number of Public Housing Units ( 461
Units in Need of Demolition 128
(Green Fair Manor)
Units in Satisfactory Condition (PHAS) , 333
Source: Lubbock Housing Authority
Section 504 Requirements
Five percent of the Housing Authority's public housing units are handicapped accessible as required by
the Section 504 Needs Assessment.
Condition of Public Housing Units
As noted in Table 2.13, the Lubbock Housing Authority has 128 housing units in need of demolition and
333 units in satisfactory condition per their PHAS.
LOSS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Assisted Units
The Housing Authority has 128 units of public housing located in the Green Fair Manor Apartment
Complex in need of demolition. The City of Lubbock is not aware of any other assisted housing units that
will be lost in the future.
Non -Assisted Units
A private developer is purchasing housing and apartments in the North Overton area in order to demolish
them and build predominantly single-family homes in the $125,000 to $175,000 range. According to the
2000 US Census, there were approximately 3,216 housing units in the North Overton area with 1,049
vacant units. Of the 2,167 units occupied in 2000, only about 10% of the residents in this area were
homeowners with more than 89% of all residents falling below 80% of the median family income. The
purchase and demolition of single-family and multi -family properties is nearly concluded. The City of
Lubbock provided funds to help relocate low-income tenants to other housing. While no inventory
currently exists on affordable housing, the City is exploring ways to develop one.
BARRIERS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING
Slow Economic Development
A barrier that prevents Lubbock residents from accessing safe, decent, sanitary, and affordable housing
in Lubbock is slow economic development. Overall, economic development has been slow across the
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-11
_I
state, with Texas seeing only a 5.4% increase in jobs from 1999-2002, while Lubbock has experienced a
slightly lower increase of 3.8%. The City of Lubbock plans to place a continued emphasis on economic
j development in the CD eligible area during the next five years. One of the objectives is to target the
northeast area of the City for economic development opportunities. This increase will increase job
opportunities and create better access to affordable housing for the families helped.
High Student Population
The City of Lubbock is proud to be the site of four college/university campuses. The presence of these
institutions of higher learning results in a larger than normal young adult renter population. The presence
of these students also tends to artificially inflate rents in Lubbock. The high rents make it difficult for low -
to -moderate income families to locate affordable rental units. The occupancy rate for apartment rental
?� units in Lubbock averages 95.5%. In addition to impacting occupancy and rental rates, the high student
population also adds to the housing market with the purchase of homes by students or their parents, as
many families believe it is more cost effective than paying rent. This results in a lower number of
moderately priced affordable homes available on the market.
Private Development
An additional factor affecting availability of affordable housing in Lubbock is a local neighborhood
development project entitled "The Centre". This project is a private development that is in the process of
redeveloping a predominately low-income neighborhood. The developer is using private financing to
acquire all the properties in an approximate 300-acre area between downtown Lubbock and Texas Tech
University. The majority of the acquisition and demolition is complete, but several residents must still be
relocated. Nearly 3,200 housing units have been destroyed to date. This demolition has increased the
numbers of families searching for affordable housing. The City continues to offer an optional relocation
policy for these families. New development will include a 240 unit student -oriented apartment complex
and a 274 unit luxury apartment complex. Other development will include single family and multifamily
units. The new units will be in the mid $100,000s. Although moderately priced, the new development will
not be affordable for the extremely low-income population.
GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The City has a Comprehensive Land Use Plan, subdivision regulations, zoning, and building codes. No
zoning exists in Lubbock County. The City has subdivision review and approval within the extra -territorial
jurisdiction (ETJ), which is five (5) miles beyond the corporate limits. This process provides an
opportunity for better design of subdivisions on land that may be annexed in the future. The City does not
have growth control ordinances that affect the supply of housing or add to housing costs. The City adopts
and solely enforces land use and development related ordinances within the City limits. Therefore, the
development process does not involve redundant and time-consuming steps.
Zoning
The City neither practices exclusionary zoning nor promotes inclusionary zoning. In fact, Lubbock has no
growth control measures. This does not mean that the jurisdiction does not care about distribution of land
uses. Instead, through the adoption of a Comprehensive Land Use Plan in 1975 and subsequent
revisions, the City has encouraged compatible physical development within the city limits. Any
non -conforming use structures are allowed until such structures are either abandoned, destroyed by fire,
or the use of the structure lapses for more than a year. Variances for zoning standards are subject to
approval by the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Developers are not required to provide low -and -moderate income housing through linkages or impact
fees. Developers are also not given incentives through point systems or density bonuses for providing a
range of housing types, including low-income housing. In. the end, there is neither a positive or negative
impact that affects the supply of affordable housing as a result of the zoning code in Lubbock.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-12
Subdivision Regulations
I Like zoning, the primary objective of subdivision regulations is to ensure that the process for subdividing
land creates an asset to the community and contributes to the health and safety of the residents. The
platting process promotes orderly growth and assures that adequate public facilities are provided. In turn,
the jurisdiction can be assured, through subdivision regulations, that streets, alleys, water, and sewer
lines are in good shape when these are dedicated to the City.
Subdivision ordinances do not regulate physical or design characteristics of new housing, but rather the
widths of rights -of -way, location of alleys and streets, easements, lot configuration, lot size and
subdivision design. Subdivision approval has been delegated to the Planning and Zoning Commission
and includes a process that allows all necessary City departments and local utility companies to review
the plat. The Commission and City departments have taken efforts to streamline the approval process to
cut down unnecessary delays and costs to developers.
Building Codes
The City of Lubbock has adopted the Uniform Building Code (UBC) for construction regulations pertinent
to construction, rehabilitation, or demolition of buildings. The International Residential Code governs the
same issues as they relate to one and two family dwellings not exceeding 3 stories in height. Local
amendments to both documents have been adopted to address unique local problems or conditions. The
Building Board of Appeals was created for the purpose of periodically reviewing regulations, making
recommendations to the City Council regarding adoption of regulations that are beneficial and necessary,
and considering specific requests to vary the standards.
Existing structures that are unsafe or otherwise unfit for habitation or use due to lack of maintenance,
abandonment, exposure to the elements, damage, and other conditions, are required to be abated by
repair, rehabilitation, demolition, or removal. The owner is afforded options for abatement and advised
that if no actions are taken within a specified time period, then a public hearing may be held to declare the
structure a public nuisance and require removal. Abatement of structures by repair or rehabilitation does
not mean that a building must be made to comply with standards for newly -constructed buildings. It is
only necessary to make these structures safe, sanitary, and functional (electrical, heating, plumbing and
fire safety protection).
Land Use
The Comprehensive Land Use Plan is used as a guide for future developments. The underlying concept
for a land use plan is to promote the stability of existing land uses, compatible future uses, and to protect
residents from inharmonious influences and harmful intrusions. Therefore, aspects such as drainage, fire
hazard, traffic, overcrowding, and preservation are involved in the evaluation of land use.
Impact Fees
The City of Lubbock has no impact fee system. On site fees for water and sewer and construction of
internal and adjacent streets are required.
HOME Guidelines for Presumption of Affordability, Recapture or Resale
The City of Lubbock follows the regulations for this requirement. The City chooses to prioritize these
options based on market conditions and type of program. Priority #1 is the use of the presumption of
affordability. The City is currently completing a presumption of affordability study to determine the period
of affordability for resale. The City will use this option for all programs upon approval from HUD. Priority
#2 is recapture. The City administers this program and places a recapture clause in the loan agreements.
These loans are serviced in house. The recapture amount will be based on the net proceeds available
from the sale up to but not exceeding the entire amount of the HOME investment. Priority #3 is resale.
This is accomplished through a homeowner's agreement signed at the time of closing and filed at the
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
2-13
count courthouse with the other documents. The City will use resale only if the other two options are not
Y Y Y P
applicable.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2004 Consolidated Plan
2-14
CHAPTER 3
HOUSING AND HOMELESS NEEDS ASSESSMENT
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
The Consolidated Plan requires that population needs for affordable housing be addressed for a five-
year time period. A specific area of concern is population needs in different income categories. The
three income categories examined here are:
Extremely -Low Income — 0% to 30% of the Median Family Income (HUD)
Low Income — 31 % to 50% of the Median Family Income (HUD)
Moderate Income — 51 % to 80% of the Median Family Income (HUD)
All income categories are based on median family income (MFI) for the Lubbock area as determined
annually by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). According to the 2000 Census,
the MFI for the City of Lubbock is $42,900. The current MFI for 2004 is $46,700 for a family of four.
EXTREMELY -LOW INCOME CATEGORY
Extremely -low income households are those with incomes below 30% of the MFI. The 2000 Census
states that the City of Lubbock has 11,066 households in this income category constituting 14.5% of the
total households. This total is significantly lower than the 18,719 extremely low income households in
1990. However, the number of renters in this category has increased. This income category can be
partially broken down into 8,447 renters and 2,619 homeowners. Important groups to be examined in
this and all income categories include single parent families, the elderly, and the disabled.
In 2000, 18.2% (38,883) of the total population was considered below the poverty level, with a large
number in the extremely -low income category. Of the total 15,862 households that had an income
below the poverty level in 2000, about 3.7% were female -headed households (See Table 3.1).
Elderly households in 2000 totaled 7,355 and represented 7.9% of the total population. The percentage
of low- and extremely -low income elderly homeowners decreased from 15.3% in 1990 to 12.9% in 2000.
The 2000 Census also reported that 2,620 elderly households are homeowners (1,497 renters) and
have incomes below 51% of Lubbock's MFI. Although precise details are lacking, it is generally
believed that the elderly will continue to be a growing group in this income category. This is believed to
be true because the elderly are often dependent upon fixed incomes and are faced with ever increasing
medical expenses. Further, the growth of this group, in this and every income category, is expected to
grow steadily. Small growth is seen in this age group from 9.7% of the population to 11.0% in 2000 and
a greater increase expected in the next few years.
The best information regarding people with disabilities includes other individuals identified as a "special
population." Special population households include disabled persons, victims of domestic violence,
homeless persons, persons with AIDS; persons in drug abuselalcohol treatment programs, and persons
with mental health issues and mental retardation. Real income data for households with special needs
are not available for Lubbock. However, because of the nature of their physical condition, it is known
that their income often falls in the extremely -low category. These households often rely heavily on
welfare benefits such as social security, supplemental income, and TANF. With Texas ranking very low
in the nation in relation to welfare benefit distribution, it is likely that households with special needs
cannot sufficiently support themselves.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-1
Table 3.1
Households Below Poverty Level 1990-1999
Percent
% 1999
1990
1999
Change
Total
Median
Household Income
$24,130
$32,198
33.4%
Total Households
69,084
85,652
24%
Number of Households Below
Poverty Level:
Married Couples
2,926
2,280
-22.1 %
2.7%
Female -Headed
2,179
3,203
47%
3.7%
Male -Headed
332
695
109.3%
0.8%
Others
5,938
7,785
31.1%
9.1%
Over 65
2,045
1,899
-7.1 %
2.2%
Total Households Below
Poverty Level
13,420
15,862
18.2%
18.5%
Source: 2000 US Census
Race and Disproportionate Need
Comparing income by race in 2000, 26.7% of all African -Americans, 16.9% of all Hispanics, 12.3% of all
Anglos, and 19.1 % of all other race households are in the extremely -low income category. According to
HUD, a disproportionately greater need exists when the percentage of persons in a category of need who
are members of a particular racial or ethnic group is at least ten percentage points higher than the
percentage of persons in the category as a whole. The racial/ethnic group showing a disproportionately
greater need specifically in the extremely low-income category is African -Americans. Table 3.2 reveals
the ethnic breakdown of households.
Table 3.2
Household Composition by % Median Family Income and Ethnicity
Extrern ly Low
Low
Moderate
All Others
House-
House-
House-
House-
holds
holds
holds
holds
Ethnicity
0-30%
%
31-50%
%
51-80%
%
>81 %
%
6,489
12.3%
5,228
9.9%
8,161
15.5%
32,910
62.3%
White
African-
1,538
26.7%
1,192%
20.7%
1,074
18.6%
1,964
34.0%
American
2,770
16.9%
2,617
16.1%
3,801
23.3%
7,113
43.7%
Hispanic
Other
269
19.1 %
170
12.1 %
267
19.0%
701
49.8%
TOTAL
11,066
14.5%
9,209
12.1 %
13,303
17.4%
42,688
56%
Source: 2000 Census - SOCDS CHAS Data
City of Lubbock - FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-2
I
Housing Overcrowding
The City of Lubbock shows a clear trend of decreasing family size mirroring the trend found at the state
and national level. Reasons for such a trend include the increase in females entering the job market, the
increasing delay of the onset of child bearing, and the increasing cost burden of child rearing. While this
trend generally extends across the City, the incidence of overcrowding remains prevalent especially
among large, extremely -low and low-income families and among large minority families. An overcrowded
household is defined as a household with more than one person per room. In 2000, 6.1% of all occupied
housing units were overcrowded. Incidence of overcrowding occurs among both renters and owners but
is most prevalent among low-income families as shown below in Table 3.3.
Table 3.3
Percent Incidence of Overcrowding by % Family Income 2000
INCOME
(°10)
OWNER
N
RENTER
(%)
Below poverty level
12.3%
10.2%
At or above poverty level
3.5%
7.7%
Source: US Census, 2000
Housing Affordability
Housing affordability is based on a standard established by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD). The HUD standard states that a family should spend no more than 30% of its gross
annual income for housing costs plus utilities. The housing affordability gap is the difference between
30% of a family's annual income and the combined costs of utilities, mortgage payment/rent, taxes, and
insurance on a home annually.
Income is one determining factor of housing affordability and choice. With a median family income of
$46,700 in the City of Lubbock in 2004, and an average home value of $69,500 in 2000, it is apparent
that some families below 80% and most below 50% of the median income may not be able to afford to
buy a home in Lubbock. (See Table 2.8)
Rental rates in the City depend on the type of housing (i.e. duplex, apartment, etc.) and location within the
city. Maintenance of units also effects affordability. The most affordable units for extremely -low income
households tend to be potentially substandard and concentrated in the north and northeastern parts of
Lubbock. Rents for all size units have increased every year since 2000 (See Table 3.4) making it more
difficult for extremely -low income households to obtain affordable housing. Although new rental units are
being built, most are in the high rent range. New units coming into the market could help to keep the
average rental rates elevated.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-3
Table 3.4
Average Rents 1999-2003*
Year
Average Rent
Average Per S.F.
% Change
M
($)
1-Bedroom Apartment
1999
$427
$0.63
+1.67%
2000
$438
$0.65
+2.57%
2001
$444
$0.65
+1.37%
2002
$458
$0.68
+3.15%
2003
$480
$0.71
+4.80%
1999-2003
--
--
+12.07%
2-Bedroom Apartment
1999
$540
$0.55
+2.27%
2000
$553
$0.57
+2.41 %
2001
$560
$0.57
+1.27%
2002
$579
$0.59
+3.39%
2003
$604
$0.62
+4.32%
1999-2003
'-
--
+11.85%
3-Bedroom Apartment
1999
$737
$0.62
+2.50%
2000
$736
$0.57
+0.13%
2001
$753
$0.58
+2.30%
2002
$783
$0.61
+3.98%
2003
$821
$0.63
+4.85%
1999-2003
"-
-'
+11.40%
Source: Blosser Report, February 2003
* Does not include utilities
The large numbers of applicants looking for rental housing units who are turned down because their gross
income does not meet the income criterion at twice the amount of the rent exemplifies the need for
affordable housing for the extremely -low income category. This is problematic because this category of
households is the most unlikely to be able to afford to buy a home and therefore depends upon affordable
rental units and public housing to obtain decent and safe living units. It is believed that the affordability gap
will continue to expand while expenditures escalate and incomes remain constant in current economic
conditions.
LOW-INCOME CATEGORY
Low-income households are those households having incomes between 31 % to 50% of the MFI. In the
2000 Census, there were a total of 9,209 households in this category with approximately 5,849 (63.5%)
being renters and 3,360 (36.5%) being homeowners. Recent trends in this category show a slight increase
in total numbers (from 8,154 households in 1990) as well as a decrease in homeownership (from 39% in
1990). The low-income households represent 12% of the total households in the City.
As mentioned in the previous section, the extremely -low and low-income populations contain a significant
number of female -headed households. In 1999, figures show a large percentage (20.2%) of those below
the poverty level in 1999 to be female head -of -households. Table 3.1 distinctly shows female -headed
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
34
households as a fast growing low income population. However, male -headed households are increasing at
a larger rate.
The information regarding the elderly and disabled populations discussed under the extremely -low income
category applies to the low-income category as well.
Race
The racial breakdown of this group can be seen in Table 3.2. In 2000, 16.1 % of all Hispanics, 20.7% of all
African -Americans, 9.9% of all Anglos, and 12.1 % of all other race households are in this income category.
African -American households are the only race in this category to increase since 1990.
Housing Overcrowding
As discussed before, housing overcrowding is prevalent among large, extremely -low and low-income, and
large minority families. Table 3.3 shows that 12.3% of owners and 10.2% of renters below the poverty level
face overcrowding problems. Table 3.5 indicates renters in this income category encounter more
overcrowding problems than renters in either the extremely -low or moderate -income categories.
Table 3.5
Percent Large Families by % Family Income 2000
Household Type
OWNER
(%j
RENTER
N
Extremely Low Income
8.8%
5.6%
Low Income
10.3%
9.0%
Moderate Income
11.4%
8.9%
Source: US Census, 2000
Low-income Hispanic households have the most housing overcrowding at 17.6% of Hispanic occupied
units. From the 2000 Census data, it is estimated that a high percentage of African -American households
(12.1 %) also suffer from housing overcrowding.
Housing Affordability
With the median income for an individual Lubbock resident is at $32,700 and the fair market rent at $538
(2 bedroom), persons in this income category will have to spend more than 30% of their monthly gross
income for rent. Market value for two -bedroom apartments currently averages $604, excluding utilities,
such as light and gas.
MODERATE -INCOME CATEGORY
Moderate -income households are those with an income that falls between 51%-80% of the MFI. In 2000,
there were approximately 13,303 moderate -income households, of which 7,260 (54.6%) were renters and
6,043 (45.4%) homeowners. This number is larger than in previous years indicating a trend towards
lower poverty levels making headway. in their financial status. Also seen is a slight increase of
homeownership in the category. As examined earlier, a large percentage of those falling below the
poverty level are female -headed households, the elderly, and the disabled.
While discussion about the disabled population has been limited up to this point, some general notions
should be established. Despite the increase in units specifically designed in accordance with the
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-5
American Disabilities Act ADA there are still a relative) smallproportion of barrier -free
( ), y housing
environments available.
Race
Comparing race to income, one finds from Table 3.2 that this income category is comprised of 18.6% of
all African -Americans, 23% of all Hispanics, 15.5% of all Anglos, and 19.9% of other race households.
Housing Overcrowding
As evident in Table 3.3, overcrowding in below poverty level families occurs most often among owners.
The highest percentage of large -family homeowners falls in the moderate -income category.
Overcrowding seems to be more common for those in this income category than for either the extremely -
low or low-income categories.
Housing Affordability
Though households in this category have considerably higher incomes than those in the other two groups
discussed here, affordability is still a problem especially among those at the lower end of the range.
Evidently, not every household in this category can afford rents, and correspondingly, cannot freely move
to housing units of their choice.
Some general information about Lubbock renters and owners is helpful in understanding affordability of
housing in the City. One can see from Table 3.6 below that there are a large number of renters in the
City. The large numbers are augmented by the fact that 19% of the total population is made up of
students. The college student population, estimated at 41,131 in 2003, greatly increases competition for
=� affordable rental housing as they drive up demand. This fact combined with a low affordable housing
supply is expected to continue increasing rents in the City for years to come. All in all, approximately
42% of the total population is renters.
Table 3.6
Households by Type and Age 2000
Age
Homeowners
%
Renters
%
Total
<25
1,337
10.9%
10,878
89.1 %
12,215
25-64
35,252
61.4%
22,141
38.6%
57,393
65+
12,859
80.9%
3,039
19.1 %
15,898
Total
49,448
57.8%%
36,058
42.1 %
85,506
Source: 2000 US Census
OVERALL HOUSING STOCK CONDITION
Adequate housing is a problem for many families below the poverty level. Housing problems often
include affordability, overcrowding, lack of adequate plumbing, etc. Table 3.7 shows the percentage of
households in each category that have some type of housing problem. Those households in the
moderate -income category do have some problems, particularly those households that rent. However,
these problems are not as extensive as those in the low and extremely low income categories.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-6
Table 3.7
Percent Housing Problems by % Family Income 2000
Household Type
OWNER
N
RENTER
N
Extremely Low Income
72.2%
80.2%
Low Income
53.2%
80.9%
Moderate Income
34.7%
47.7%
Source: US Census, 2000
INCIDENTS OF LEAD POISONING IN CHILDREN
Since legislation in 1996, the Texas Department of Health has been required to keep a registry of children
who have elevated lead levels in their blood. The information in Tables 3.8 and 3.9 show the number of
children reported in the City of Lubbock with any blood level of lead for the years 2000-2002. Where city
health departments have funds to participate, contact is made with the parents of the children at lower
levels to provide education about lead poisoning and follow-up testing. The City of Lubbock Health
Department does not participate with the State in this program. Levels between 10 and 20 mcg/dL should
receive education and follow-up testing. The Regional Texas Department of Health staff will do
environmental follow-up for those children with 20 mcg/dL venous results only.
Table 3.8
City of Lubbock — Reported Lead Level by Year
Texas Department of Health Texas Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program
Texas Child Lead Registry — Lubbock Reported Lead Levels 2002
Hispanic
Lead Level
(jig/dL)<1
years
Ito 2 years
2 to 4 years
4 to 6 years
6 to 14 years
Total
<10
164
255
284
2889
269
1,261
10 to <20
1
6
5
4
2
18
20 to <45
0
1
1
0
0
2
Total
165
262
180
293
271
1,281
Non -Hispanic
Lead Level
(pg/dL)<1
years
Ito 2 years
2 to 4 years
4 to 6 years
6 to 14 years
Total
<10
119
194
197
162
173
845
10 to < 20
5
4
8
4
1
22
20 to < 45
0
3
2
0
0
5
Total
124
201
207
166
174
872
City of Lubbock— FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-7
Table 3.8 (Continued)
City of Lubbock — Reported Lead Level by Year
Texas Department of Health — Texas Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program
Texas Child Lead Reaistry — Lubbock Reported Lead Levels 2001
Hispanic
Lead Level
(pg/dL)<1
years
1 to 2 years
2 to 4 years
4 to 6 years
6 to 14 years
Total
<10
109
230
247
245
222
1,053
10 to <20
2
7
2
2
1
14
20 to <45
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
111
237
249
247
223
1,067
Non -Hispanic
Lead Level
(pg/dL)<1
years
1 to 2 Vears
2 to 4 years
4 to 6 vears
6 to 14 years
Total
<10
75
139
134
165
197
710
10 to <20
0
3
2
2
0
7
20 to <45
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
75
142
136
167
197
717
Texas Child Lead Reaistry — Lubbock Reoorted Lead Levels 2000
Hispanic
Lead Level
N /dL
<1 years
1 to 2 years
2 to 4 years
4 to 6 years
6 to 14 years
Total
<10
227
229
242
265
274
1,237
10 to <20
0
5
5
4
0
14
20 to <45
1
0
0
0
0
1
Total
T 228
234
247
269
274
1,252
Non -His anic
Lead Level
N /dL)
<1 years
1 to 2 years
2 to 4 ears
4 to 6 years
6 to 14 years
Total
<10
121
151
158
152
261
843
1
10 to <20
0
3
2
5
4
14
20 to <45
0
0
0
1 1
1 1
2
Total
121
154
1 160
1 158
1 266
1 859
City of Ubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-8
Table 3.9
3-Year Summary of Reported Lead Levels — Lubbock, Texas
Lead Level
2000
2001
2002
3-Year Total
<10
2,080
1,763
2,106
5,949
10 to <20
28
21
40
89
20 to <45
3
0
7
10
Total Reported
2,111
1,784
2,153
6,048
The incidence of reported lead levels continued a decreasing trend until 2002, when there was a slight
increase in reports of lead levels. Overall, the Hispanic population has a higher incidence of occurrence
than non -Hispanics.
LEAD -BASED PAINT HAZARDS
Housing built prior to 1979 has the potential for lead -based paint. Table 3.10 shows the number of
homes citywide that were built prior to 1979. Of the 92,806 housing units in Lubbock in 2000, 63,623
were constructed prior to 1979. This equates to 69% of the housing stock that could have a problem with
lead -based paint. Through increased development of new housing projects and demolitions of older
homes for redevelopment projects, this percentage is decreasing, but still remains a significant portion of
the overall housing stock.
Table 3.10
Pre-1979 Housing
Age
Housing Units
1939 or earlier
2,823
1940-1949
5,228
1950-1959
14,540
1960-1969
19,732
1970-1979
21,300
Total Pre-1979
63,623
Total Housing Units
92,806
Source: 2000 US Census
Table 3.11 shows the percent of households living in houses built before 1970 broken down by the three
low income categories, extremely low, low, and moderate income.
Table 3.11
Housing Units by Age and Household Income 2000
Household Type'
OWN
RENT
Extremely low
NA
57.3%
Low
71.5%
56.6%
Moderate
42.0%
34.8%
Source: HUD Data Table, 2000.
City of Lubbock— FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan.
3-9
PUBLIC AND ASSISTED HOUSING NEEDS
The Lubbock Housing Authority maintains 461 public housing units and as of February 2004 receives 853
Section 8 vouchers. They have waiting lists for both programs as noted in Tables 3.13 and 3.14.
However, the Authority does not currently expect to receive any additional Section 8 vouchers.
Table 3.12
Rental Housing Needs of Families in the Jurisdiction by Family Type
Scale: 1=No Impact to 5=Severe Impact
Family Type
Overall
Affordability
Supply
Quality
Accessibility
Size
Location
Income < 30% of
7,816
4
5
4
4
3
3
adjusted monthly
income
Income>31%to
4,972
4
5
4
4
3
3
<-50% of ad) -
monthly income
Income >50% to
6,405
4
5
4
4
3
3
— 80% of the adj.
monthly income
Elderly
2,006
4
5
4
4
3
3
Families with
Disabilities
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
African American
1,451
4
5
4
4
3
3
Hispanic
3,163
4
5
4
4
3
3
Other
5,067
4
5
4
4
3
3
Source: PHA Plan for the Housing Authority of the City of Lubbock FY 2000-2004
Table 3.13
Housing Needs of Families on Public Housing Waiting Lists-2003
Family Type
Number of Families
% of Total Families
Waiting List Total
738
100%
Income < 30% of adjusted
monthly income
Income >31 %to <=50% of
ad'. monthly income
Income >50% to <= 80% of
the adj. monthly income
Families with Children
543
73.6%
Elderly Families
32
4,34%
Families with Disabilities
161
21.82%
Caucasian/ Hispanic
501
67.89%
African American
233
31.57%
American Indian
Alaskan Native
1
0.14%
Asian Pacific Islander
3
0.41 %
source: Annual Plan for the Housing Authority of the City of Lubbock FY 2UU3
*Data not currently maintained in system
City of Lubbock— FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-10
Table 3.14
Housing Needs of Families on Section 8 Waiting Lists -Fall 1999
Family Type
Number of Families
% of Total Families
Waiting List Total
86
Income < 30% of adjusted
monthly income
Income >31 %to <=50% of
ad'. monthly income
Income >50% to <= 80% of
the ad'. monthly income
Families with Children
65
75.58%
Elderly Families
3
3.49%
Families with Disabilities
21
24.42%
Caucasian/ Hispanic
42
48.84%
African American
43
50%
American Indian
Alaskan Native
0
0
Asian Pacific Islander
1
1.16%
Source: Annual Plan for the Housing Authority of the City of Lubbock FY 2003
*Data not currently maintained in system
SUMMARY OF EXTREMELY -LOW, LOW, & MODERATE INCOME NEEDS
As more and more people fall under the poverty level, threats of homelessness rise. The recent
economic situation has led to lethargic household incomes while market rents have continued to rise.
These facts affect the extremely -low to moderate -income populations most heavily.
• Increased attention to the problems of minorities is important as low-income households are
unevenly distributed in each racial category. The African -American population has the highest
number of extremely -low income households at 27%, followed by other races at 19.1 % and
Hispanics at 16.9% (see Table 3.2). This fact severely restricts the housing choices of these
groups.
• A focus on the problems of female -headed households is necessary as these households
comprise a substantial portion of the below poverty level population and their numbers continue
to increase.
• More concentration on the problems of the elderly is needed as this population continues to rise.
This population, dependent upon fixed incomes and faced with high medical expenses, is often
incapable of maintaining their housing units.
• Attention to the housing problems of the disabled is important as their incomes most often fall in
the extremely -low and low-income categories.
• An increased supply of housing that is affordable and meets the size demands for households in
all income categories is needed.
• Although incomes continue to rise and fewer numbers are in the extremely -low and low-income
categories, attention should continue in providing low income housing assistance to these groups.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-11
HOMELESS NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Homeless Needs
Homelessness knows no boundaries and affects all types of people, female or male, no matter the age,
race or ethnicity. The homeless are not just the stereotypical hobo or bum, but often the working poor,
single parents, victims of domestic violence, and uneducated persons. There are many different factors
that contribute to homelessness, such as loss of work, shortage of jobs, lack of affordable housing, and
health related reasons such as mental illness and substance abuse. Family break-ups, people with
physical disabilities, and children with absent parents are also seen in the streets.
Definitions of Homelessness
Homelessness can be defined as follows:
Homelessness- an individual or family who does not have a fixed regular and adequate
nighttime residence, or has a primary nighttime residence that is: 1) publicly or privately
operated and designed to provide temporary shelter (including transitional housing for the
mentally ill, victims of domestic violence, runaway youth, etc.), or 2) a public or private
place not designed for, or ordinarily used for regular sleeping accommodation for human
beings (i.e. parks, vehicles, sidewalks, underneath bridges).
w Homelessness can also be broken down further into three more specific groups:
Literally Homeless - those who truly have no place to live and may be staying in
shelters, public places, cars, cardboard boxes, under bridges, and abandoned buildings.
Marginally Homeless - those who live doubled -up in a residence with family or friends
that they do not own or rent and report a high level of precariousness regarding their
living arrangement (i.e. that it is temporary/less than one year, that they have no
prospects for a similar or better arrangement).
At -risk - those who live in a residence they own or rent but their income is below the
poverty level and many rely on rental assistance to preserve their housing status.
` Lubbock's Homeless Population
Historically, it has been difficult to obtain an accurate count of Lubbock's homeless population. The
J consensus among local service providers is that the U.S. Census count numbers are routinely surprisingly
low, failing to reflect the true extent of homelessness (both literal and marginal) in the community. The
2000 Census estimated a homeless population of less than 100 within the city. In order to gain a more
accurate count of the homeless population in the city, the Homeless Consortium conducted a point in time
survey in 2003. The study reported a shelter count of 267 (literally and marginally homeless) and a street
count of 55. The results of this study are shown in Table 3.15. The City is currently working on a ten-year
1 plan to end chronic homelessness. A subcommittee has been formed and the plan is expected for
y completion during the fiscal year 2004-2005.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-12
Table 3.15
Homeless Persons
Emergency Housing
Men
Only
Women
Only
Unknown
Men
Women
Family
with
Kids
Divorced
w1kids
Kids
Total
Carpenter's Church
3
3
Children's Home of Lubbock
16
16
Cleansing Springs Ministry
2
1
3
Interfaith Samaritan House/LIHN
10
10
SP Community Action Assc
2
2
Salvation Army
15
3
18
South Plains Children's Shelter
14
14
Women's Protective Service
84
84
Transitional Housing
Alcohol Recovery Center
14
14
ASK House
11
12
11
Children's Home of Lubbock
4
2
16
Cleansing Springs Ministry
12
14
IMANI House Inside/Outside
6
3
9
Link Ministries
7
7
Lonnie Gary House
15
15
Lubbock Faith Center
31
31
Shelter Sub Total
57
19
0
48
11
88
44
267
Streets
35
7
4
0
9
55
Total Homeless Individuals
92
26
4
48
11
88
53
322.
Source: SPHC PIT Homeless Survey, Lubbock, Texas, January 27, 2003
Homelessness is growing within the community as demonstrated by the increased demand for local
shelters and services. The group most in need is the marginally homeless whose numbers are
continually rising for many reasons. Reasons for marginal homelessness often include: job -related
issues, income -related issues, family -related issues, rent/housing-related issues, health -related issues,
personal issues, crowded or substandard housing, customary (non -problematic reasons), and other
reasons. As defined above, the sheltered or marginal homeless live in a residence they do not own or
rent, usually living with a relative or friend. They report a high level of precariousness about their living
arrangement because they believe it to be temporary and they know it will likely last no more than one
year. In addition, they have no prospects for a similar or better arrangement.
In accordance with the new requirement of the McKinney-Vento Act (42 USC 11362), the City will develop
and implement, to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, policies and protocols for the
discharge of persons from publicly funded institutions or systems of care (such as health care facilities,
foster care or other youth facilities, or correction programs and institutions) in order to prevent such
discharge from immediately resulting in homelessness for such persons.
Homeless Facilities and Services
In response to this growing problem, many new programs and services are developing. The Salvation
Army opened a new facility in 2003 to provide new and improved emergency housing. Table 3.16 shows
the results of a Spring 2004 survey of facilities and programs that provide services to the homeless.
City of Lubbock— FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-13
Included are agencies that provide outreach intake assessment and also emergency shelters, g p g y
transitional housing and permanent supportive housing. Also included are unmet needs or gaps from the
respondents as follows:
Table 3.16
Inventory of Facilities and Programs- 2004
# Served
Organization
Type Of Program
Population Served Or
Gaps And/Or
Month /
Or Agency
Or Services
Support Service
Unmet Needs
Units
Name
Available
Alcoholic
Outreach, Intake,
Homeless alcoholic drug
Funding gaps
10
Recovery
Assessment,
abuse, recovery meetings, AA
served/vari
Center
shelter
meetings, basic skills
es
18 bed
capacity
A S K House
Outreach, intake,
Alcoholic and drug addicted
Financial assistance
15 served
assessment,
women
60 capacity
shelter
Catholic Family
Outreach, Intake,
Homeless, migrants, non-
Lack of shelter
400-500
Services
Assessment
residents, single parents;
served
emergency services, food
Children's
Intake,
Abused children; case review,
Lack of referrals
75-80
Advocacy
Assessment
family support, counseling
served
Center of
services
Lubbock
Children's
Outreach, intake,
Homeless and abused children,
Availability of low
1000
Protective
assessment
counseling,
income housing
served
Services TDHS
Community
Outreach
Literal and marginal homeless,
Housing rehabilitation
200 served
Housing
low income
assistance, emergency
Resource Board
shelter, handicapped
accessibility
City of Lubbock
Intake,
Low to mod income
Varying
Community
Assessment
homeowners, rehab,
Development
reconstruction, emergency
repair, barrier free
The Children's
Intake,
Abused and homeless children;
Assistance for children
130
Home of
Assessment,
parenting, counseling
with mental and
children
Lubbock
shelter
psychological
served
disabilities
Community
Outreach, Intake,
Homeless, migrant; referrals,
Education, funding,
4000-5000
Health Center
Assessment
clothing, rx, eye glasses &
mental health services,
served
of Lubbock
exams, dental
dental services,
transportation, and
substance abuse
services
Contact
Assessment
All populations, referrals
Transportation, medical
2000
Lubbock Inc.
assistance, rent
served
assistance, and utility
assistance
Covenant
Outreach
Indigent population,
Medical assistance
200 served
Community
Prescription assistance,
Health Outreach
diabetes screening
Family
Intake,
Victims of violence, homeless,
Housing,
400 served
Counseling
assessment
substance abuse, mental
transportation, and
Services
health, migrants, counseling,
prescription assistance
referrals
Family
Outreach, intake,
Children under 12 abuse &
Childcare and
300 served
Outreach
assessment
neglect, one on one casework
transportation
Center of
City of Lubbock- FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-14
Lubbock
I
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-15
Table 3.16 (Continued)
Inventory of Facilities and Programs- 2004
# Served
Organization
Type Of Program
Population Served Or,
Gaps And/Or
Month /
Or Agency
Or Services
Support Service
Unmet Needs
Units
Name
Available
First United
Outreach
Homeless; provide food, soup
Housing
1800 meals
Methodist-
kitchen, clothing, vouchers
Second Helping
Kitchen
Guadalupe
Outreach, intake,
Migrant families, low income,
Rental assistance,
2300
Economic
assessment
homeless, first time homebuyer,
prescription and utility
served
Services
CEAP, Weatherization
assistance
Habitat for
Self help new
Low income, homebuyer
Credit counseling
25 served
Humanity
construction and
education
assistance
rehab of homes
Homeless
Does not provide
Homeless families only,
Enhance
Consortium
direct services
provides network of
communication,
communication for programs
improve services
and services
Inside/Out
Outreach,
Homeless, provides food and
Limited resources to
700 families
Community
assessment
clothing, alcohol/drug abuse
provide adequate food
served
Outreach
counseling, halfway house
Life Run Center
Outreach, intake,
Persons with disabilities, core
Referral assistance
50-100
for Independent
assessment
services, peer support, case
served
Living
Mgt
Lubbock County
Outreach
Rental assistance, utility
Prescription assistance
40-50
Outreach
assistance
families
General
Assistance
served
Lubbock
Outreach, Intake,
Homeless, violence victims,
Varying
Housing
assessment,
GED classes, training skills
Authority
shelter
Lubbock
Intake,
Homeless; provide referral,
Utility assistance
3-5 families
Interfaith
assessment,
transportation, meals
served
Hospitality
shelter
Lubbock
Outreach, intake,
Substance abuse clients;
Regional
assessment
provides assessment, referral,
Council Alcohol
education
Drug Abuse
Lubbock
Intake,
Mentally ill, retardation,
Transportation,
Varying
Regional
assessment
substance abuse, alcoholics,
housing, medication
MHMR
Counseling,
service coordination,
assistance
diagnosis,
evaluation,
referrals, shelter
Lubbock
Outreach,
Violence victims and mental
Shelter availability,
10 served
Veterans
assessment
health homeless; provide food
medical assistance
Center
and gas, counseling, referral
Lutheran Social
Outreach, intake,
Low income, homeless, rent
Housing and
350
Services
assessment
and utility assistance, referrals
transportation needs
households
served
Neighborhood
Intake,
Low income, homeless, utilities,
Donations for meal
100-150
House
assessment
food voucher, prescriptions
assistance
served
City of Lubbock - FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-16
Table 3.16 (Continued)
Inventory of Facilities and Programs- 2004
# Served
Organization
Type Of Program
Population Served Or
Gaps And/Or
Month /
Or Agency
Or Services
Support Service
Unmet Needs
Units
Name
Available
Prevent
Outreach
Homeless, children, STD,
Volunteer assistance
Varying
Blindness
substance abuse, mental
Texas
health, migrants
Salvation Army
Outreach, intake,
All homeless, provide rent,
Meal and utility
400-500
assessment,
utility, food, rx
assistance
5000 meals
shelter
50 beds
South Plains
Outreach, intake,
HIV and AIDS infected
Hot meals, clinics
100 served
AIDS Resource
assessment
homeless, utility assistance,
Center
counseling, transportation
assistance
South Plains
Assessment,
Abused children, school tutor,
Housing for single
125 served
Children's
shelter
life skills, clothing
young moms
per year
Shelter
South Plains
Intake
Single pregnant women, assist
30 served
College
with child care, books,
per
Lubbock First
counseling, transportation
semester
Step Program
South Plains
Direct service from
All population in need of food
Referral and
150,000
Food Bank
referrals
and hygiene products, nutrition
transportation
meals
training, market garden
assistance, better
7,000
access to facility
families
Saint John's
Outreach(in
Homeless families, counseling,
Varying
United
partnership with
transportation, job location,
Methodist
other programs
legal services, food vouchers,
Church
listed here
TX Department
Intake,
All populations, transitional
Varying
of Human
assessment
medical services, food stamps,
Services
Medicaid, referral to TWC
Texas Boys
Intake,
Children (boys) taken out of the
Limited resources
20 served
Ranch
assessment,
home by the State
shelter
Texas Migrant
Intake,
Migrant homeless families and
Lack of emergency
Varying
Council
assessment
children, parent training and
shelter availability for
child development
families
Trinity Christian
Intake,
All families, child abuse
Transportation,
120-150
Church
assessment
prevention, parenting,
referrals
served
counseling, clothing
Vandelia
Outreach
Marginally homeless, utility and
Bus passes, lower
160 served
Church
rent assistance
income housing, utility
and rent assistance
Walker Houses
Assessment,
Substance abuse, alcohol and
Remodeling
30 served
Inc.
shelter
drug services, counseling
assistance, home
furnishing needs, food
West Texas
Outreach,
Legal services to lower income
Varying
Legal Services
assessment
individuals
West Texas
Intake,
Victims of violence, children,
Grant assistance
100 served
Counseling
assessment
marginally homeless, therapy
Services
services and referrals
Women's
Outreach, intake,
Battered and abuse women
467 served
Protective
shelter
and men, domestic violence,
Services
supportive services, community
referrals
Note: Inventory as of May 2004.
City of Lubbock - FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-17
SUB -POPULATIONS
While special sub -populations of homeless have been referred to in this section, a more focused look
at these groups is necessary.
Severely Mentally III
Mental illness is defined here as a temporary or persistent inability to cope effectively with life's
challenges and changes. Some behavior and emotional changes associated with mental illness
according to Lubbock Regional MHMR include: poor concentration, depression, extreme mood
changes, anxiety, withdrawal from society, delusions, hallucinations, and behavior which may be
harmful to self or others. Mental illness often causes individuals to experience difficulties interacting
socially, obtaining/keeping employment, and obtaining housing. Homeless shelter officials indicate
that a sizable number in the homeless population have mental and emotional problems. However, no
detailed number is known.
Lubbock's Regional MHMR professionals serve approximately 4,500 individuals with mental
retardation, mental illness, and/or chemical dependency each year. Of the individuals served,
approximately 56% are male, 44% are female, 51% are Anglo, 30% are Hispanic, 17% are African
American, 0.3% are Asian, and 0.1 % are Native Americans. Fees for services are based on level of
^1 income. However, the center does not deny services to any individual because of the inability to pay.
J Approximately 38% of the individuals served receive Medicaid benefits.
Extreme poverty combined with the difficulty in obtaining/maintaining work makes decent, safe, and
affordable housing an important need for this population.
Persons with Alcohol/Drug Addiction
During 2002, 1,149 adults and 93 youths in the Lubbock area were served in residential treatment
facilities at Lubbock Regional MHMR for substance abuse. Of those adults served an estimated 6
percent were homeless at the time of admission.
National homeless studies indicate that 35-40% of the homeless have at least one indicator of
alcohol/drug abuse. While no comprehensive date on the number of local homeless suffering from
alcohol/drug abuse is available it is presumed to mirror the national trend. The National Coalition for
the Homeless (NCH) reports that substance abuse increases the risk of the marginally homeless and
substance abuse can impair the literally homeless from finding permanent housing. The NCH also
reports that homelessness creates other barriers for substance abusers looking for treatment,
including very limited healthcare availability, transportation, waiting lists, and an overall lack of
support services. Because of these barriers, it is expected that our community will continue to see a
significant number of persons needing substance abuse treatment with limited treatment resources.
This situation indicates a continuing presence of homeless with alcohol/drug abuse problems in the
Lubbock community.
Victims of Domestic Violence
Women's Protective Services, Inc. (WPS) is the main service provider for those suffering from
domestic violence in the Lubbock area. From October 2002 to September 2003, WPS served 3,105
persons in its 12-county service area. A breakdown of the clients served by WPS in the same period
shows that this service included: residential shelter services to 775 adult victims of family violence
and their 1,168 dependent children; non-residential services to 1,118 adult victims and their 44
dependent children; and, additional crisis intervention and/or referral services through its 24-hour,
toll -free hotline. Breakdown of ethnicity of residential clients served included 21 % African American,
33% Anglo, 35% Hispanic, and 11% other. The average adult client is unemployed, has limited work
skills and experience, has left home without personal belongings, has made several attempts to leave
the violent situation, and has exhausted family resources.
City of Lubbock— FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-18
Youth
This category refers to unaccompanied youth and includes runaways, parentless children, abused
children, and children in related situations. The City of Lubbock does not have comprehensive data
on youth in the homeless population. The Salvation Army reported 257 homeless children in 2003,
with a majority under the age of 10. The alarming proportion of children in all types of homeless
make it necessary not to preclude youth in the housing needs assessment.
Persons with HIV/AIDS
Persons infected with Auto -Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) are increasing in numbers
nationally and are expected to continue increasing in the years to come. in 2002, the Health
Department of the City of Lubbock reported the following newly diagnosed cases: 17 HIV positive
individuals and 10 individuals with AIDS. In Lubbock County, the HIV rate of 6.5 cases per 100,000
population is much lower than the state rate of 14.1 cases per 100,000 population. South Plains
AIDS Resource Center (SPARC), a local nonprofit agency, reports that as of January 2003 they have
served 136 clients within the target groups of children, men, and women that are identified as HIV
positive or advanced to AIDS status. SPARC has approximately 128 indigent clients living within
Lubbock. The ethnicity and gender of their clients are broken down in the table below.
Table 3.17
Individuals with HIV/AIDS - Lubbock
Ethnicity
HIV/AIDS Individuals
Percent
An lo, Non -Hispanic
65
47.8%
An lo, Hispanic
46
33.8%
African American
25
18.4%
Other
0
0
Total
136
100%
Gender
Gender
HIV/AIDS Individuals
Percent
Female
29
21.3%
Male
107
78.7%
Total Male
136
100%
Source: SPARC, 2003
There are no estimates available concerning the prevalence of AIDS and related diseases among the
local homeless population. The total number of SPARC clients in need of housing is 17% (23 of 136).
It is assumed that without this housing these individuals would be literally or marginally homeless.
OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS
The populations discussed in this section are not homeless but are in need of supportive housing.
Supportive housing is defined as affordable housing that includes necessary social services for
residents.
Elderly and Frail Elderly
The Census, which is the source of information for the statistics presented here, defines the elderly
as those 65 years of age and older. The elderly population has continued to increase in Lubbock at a
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-19
rate proportional to the overall population growth from approximately 18,058(approximately 10/of
the total population) in 1990 to 26,744 (approximately 11 % of the total population) in 2000. The
increase in the elderly in the area is due to longevity as well as the availability of medical resources in
the area. The elderly population is composed mainly of females (60%), as they tend to outlive their
male counterparts. In 2000, the number of elderly living alone increased from 5,572 in 1990 to 7,355,
a growth rate of approximately 32%.
The frail elderly are defined as elderly that have one or more limitations to "activities of daily living."
The frail elderly need assistance to perform routine activities such as eating, bathing, and household
maintenance. Local data is insufficient to classify the elderly by their physical dependency and it is
difficult to obtain data to fully describe living arrangements of the entire elderly population. In 2000,
there were 996 elderly persons institutionalized and 435 living in other group quarters.
Table 3.18 offers an inventory of the facilities available to the elderly in Lubbock. The number of
facilities continues to increase in Lubbock. Only ten of the facilities listed are subsidized, with the
other facilities being private pay only. Even this is not a comprehensive list of facilities, as there are
an increasing number of small in -home facilities serving only one or two residents. However, these
facilities are mainly private pay. Another increase seen in private pay facilities is the number of
retirement and independent living facilities. Most of these homes do not accept subsidies and are not
affordable to low -moderate income residents.
The average annual cost for long-term care is over $41,000 per year. In 2000, TDHS reported 785
elderly were recipients of nursing facility care funds and another 1,311 received services from
Community Care for the Aged and Disabled. In most instances, elderly persons who require nursing
care prefer to stay in their own homes, often making community -based, in -home service programs
more preferable and cost-effective.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-20
Table 3.18
Inventory of Facilities for the Elderly 2004
FACILITY
# of beds/units
# Occupied
(As of 1/2004)
TYPE
Abundant Care
13
12
Assisted living
Atria Cottage Village
56
49
Assisted living, Independent living
Bender Terrace
120
116
Personal Care
Carillon
406
366
Assisted living, Independent living
Compassionate Care for the Elderly
2
2
Assisted living
Corene's Elderly Care
3
1
Assisted living
Cornerstone Court
90
65
Independent living, Retirement
Elmbrook Estates
100
82
Assisted living
Garden of Eden
16
10
Assisted living
Garrison Care Center
120
95
Personal Care
Golden Age Nursing Home
42
28
Personal Care
Goldenspur Care Home
3
2
Assisted living
Grace House
48
40
Assisted living
Grand Court
140
138
Retirement
Greenbriar Apartments
57
52
Independent living
Heartland House
18
16
Assisted living, Independent living
Heritage Oaks
159
150
Personal Care
Home Sweet Home Elder Care
10
8
Assisted living
Homestead Retirement
100
98
Retirement
Lutheran Home of West Texas
122
86
Personal Care
Mackenzie House
58
44
Assisted living
Manna Acres
13
11
Assisted living
Mi Casita
82
71
Personal Care
Parkview Place Apartments
72
72
Independent Living
Phoenix House
14
10
Assisted living
Quail Ridge Alzheimer Center
56
54
Assisted living
Sisters Loving Arms
14
14
Assisted living
Southhaven
32
21
Assisted living
The Marretta
13
9
Assisted living
The Sherick
30
24
Independent living, Retirement
Ventura Place
160
125
Independent living
Wedgewood South
49
36
Assisted living
TOTAL
2,218
1,907
source: Nnone Survey, ,lanuary 1uv4
*Facilities in bold accept subsidies, all other facilities are private pay
Severely Mentally III
See discussion under homeless section. The facts presented in the homeless section combined with
the identification of a gap in the provision of permanent housing with supportive services for those
with mental health problems makes housing needs for this population clear.
Physically/Developmentally Disabled
The total number of physically disabled individuals living in Lubbock is not available because a survey
has not been conducted and because facilities available to the disabled are limited. The 2000
Census showed 9,171 persons ages 16-64 had a physical disability, 4,929 of this same age group
had mental disabilities and 2,437 had self -care disabilities. The number of go -outside -home
City of Lubbock - FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-21
disabilities and mental disabilities were similar across both groups. age However, the g g p o elderly
population had a greater percentage of physical (35.5%) and self -care (12.0%) disabilities.
Table 3.19
Disabilities by Type 2000
Limitation
Ages
16-64
%
Ages
65 Over
%
Sensory disability
3,363
7.5%
3,927
17.9%
Physical disability
9,171
20.4%
7,792
35.5%
Mental disability
4,929
11.0%
2,606
11.9%
Self -care disability
2,437
5.4%
2,650
12.0%
Go -outside -home
disability
8,203
18.3%
4,999
22.7%
Employment disability
16,806
37.4%
---
---
TOTAL
44,909
100%
21,974
100%
Source: 2000 US Census
According to the HUD definition, a mobility limitation is any physical impairment or health condition
that lasts six or more months and makes it difficult for an individual to go outside his/her home alone.
Persons are identified as having self -care limitations if they have a health condition that lasts six or
more months which makes it difficult for them to maintain their own personal care, requiring
assistance from someone to perform daily activities such as dressing, bathing, or getting around the
home. The Census defines persons with go -outside -home disabilities as those having difficulties
going outside the home alone for regular activities such as shopping or doctor appointments. The
degree of severity of impairment is not significant here. Lack of data makes it impossible to
distinguish temporary from permanent disabilities.
The physically disabled often want to live independently but are unable to successfully do so because
of barriers in their housing situation. Independent living often requires modifications such as ramps,
expanded doorways, accessible kitchens, and accessible bathrooms. Because their physical
disability often limits their income, this population cannot always afford decent and accessible
housing.
The developmentally disabled are defined as persons with severe, chronic mental and/or physical
impairments, which are likely to continue indefinitely and cause serious problems in language,
learning, mobility, and capacity for independent living. This group often needs assisted living/working
conditions, life skills training, and transportation.
Local estimates for the number of developmentally disabled persons are not available. However,
national estimates show that one to three percent of the population is developmentally disabled
(Association for Retarded Citizens). Clearly, individuals in this population often have difficulties in
obtaining affordable decent housing and necessary supportive services to help them stay in housing.
Persons with Alcohol/Drug Addiction
See the discussion under the homeless section. This discussion makes this population's need for
supportive housing evident.
Persons with HIV+/AIDS
See the discussion under the homeless section. This population includes anyone diagnosed with
AIDS or as HIV -positive (AIDS -related complex). Generally, affordable housing that offers the
appropriate supportive services is difficult for individuals with HIV and AIDS to obtain because of the
high unemployment rate and high medical costs associated with treatment.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-22
Large Families
i HUD defines large families as being a family unit comprised of five or more persons. The housing
needs of large families are numerous. Large families that fall in the low and extremely -low income
categories have difficulty finding affordable housing. In 2000, 10.2% of low-income renters as
1 compared to approximately 12.3% of homeowners had problems with overcrowding. Homeowners in
l the moderate -income category experience a higher incidence of overcrowding than in either the low -
or extremely low income categories.
1 Additionally, the lack of affordable rental units with three or more bedrooms makes overcrowding a
problem for this group. An overcrowded household is defined as a household with more than one
person per room. Incidence of overcrowding occurs among both renters and owners. It is important
to note that low-income and moderate -income large family renters have more of a difficulty with
overcrowding.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
3-23
CHAPTER 4
PUBLIC AND ASSISTED HOUSING
LUBBOCK HOUSING AUTHORITY
The Lubbock Housing Authority (LHA) operates the local housing authority and is a separate entity from
the City of Lubbock. The only oversight the City of Lubbock has with regard to LHA is the seating of a
five member Board of Commissioners by the Mayor of Lubbock. See Chapter 2 under Institutional
Structure for more information,
Mission
The Housing Authority's mission is to serve the needs of low-income, very low-income, and
extremely -low income families in the PHA's jurisdiction and to (1) increase the availability of
decent, safe, and affordable housing in its communities; (2) ensure equal opportunity in housing;
(3) promote self-sufficiency and asset development of families and individuals; and (4) improve
community quality of life and economic viability.
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION
■ Local housing authorities are required to prepare a public housing authority plan that outlines the goals
and objectives for the next five years. The Lubbock Housing Authority's current plan is effective October
1, 2000 thru September 30, 2004. Any significant changes in the plan will be incorporated into the City of
Lubbock's housing strategies as needed. LHA is responsible for reporting their annual accomplishments
to their monitor in the regional office of HUD. The following are strategies, goals and objectives listed in
their five-year plan:
HUD Strategic Goal: Increase the availability of decent, safe and affordable housing.
PHA Goal: Expand the supply of assisted housing.
Objectives: Apply for additional rental vouchers
PHA Goal: Improve the quality of assisted housing.
Objectives: Improve public housing management.
Improve voucher management.
Increase customer satisfaction.
PHA Goal: Increase assisted housing choices.
Objectives: Provide voucher mobility counseling.
Conduct outreach efforts to potential voucher landlords, as needed.
Increase voucher payment standards.
HUD Strategic Goal: Improve community quality of life and economic viability.
PHA Goal: Provide an improved living environment.
Objectives: Implement measures to de -concentrate poverty by bringing higher
income public housing households into lower income developments.
Implement measures to promote income mixing in public housing by
assuring access for lower income families into higher income
developments.
Implement public housing security improvements.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
4-1
HUD Strategic Goal Ensure Equal Opportunity in Housing for all Americans.
PHA Goal: Ensure equal opportunity and affirmatively further fair housing.
Objectives: Undertake affirmative measures to ensure access to assisted housing
regardless of race, color, religion national origin, sex, familial status
and disability.
Undertake affirmative measures to provide a suitable
living environment for families living in assisted
housing, regardless of race, color, religion national
origin, sex, familial status and disability.
Undertake affirmative measures to ensure accessible housing to
persons with all varieties of disabilities regardless of unit size required.
Other PHA Goals and Objectives
PHA Strategic Goal: Planning and Administration
PHA Goal: Knowledge of new laws and changes in housing issues.
Objectives: Make staff and board members knowledgeable as needed regarding
the new housing requirements of the Quality Housing and Work
Responsibility Act of 1998; and any other laws and changes as they
occur regarding housing, community, and economic development.
PHA Goal: Partnerships
Objectives: To develop and expand partnerships and funding sources.
The PHA may identify resources to obtain materials and data relative
to housing, community, and economic development.
PHA Strategic Goal: Housing Management Services
PHA Goal: Continue operation and administration of housing units.
Objectives: To provide for the continued administration of housing units developed
under the 1937 Housing Act according to policies and procedures.
The PHA will provide staffing, equipment, insurance, training, facilities
and related costs associated with the administration and operation of
housing previously development under the 1937 Housing Act.
PHA Strategic Goal: Modernization
PHA Goal: Continuation of modernization activities.
Objectives: To continue the modernization activities as previously awarded
according to existing agreements, budgets and timelines and provide
additional assistance using HUD funds.
The PHA will proceed with the modernization existing units as planned
in the modernization program schedule and budget and provide
additional units with assistance under the funding allocation provided
for the agency.
The PHA will continue to identify future needs for the development of
future plans.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
4-2
PHA Strategic Goal: Community Service and Self -Sufficiency
PHA Goal: Promotion of resident services.
Objectives: To maintain activities and services that promote homeownership, self-
sufficiency, resident organizations and community development.
Examples:
• Provide resident training relative to homeownership and rental
units.
• Provide counseling regarding household budgeting, delinquency,
tenant rights, conflict resolution, housekeeping and regulatory and
policy requirements training.
• Conducting needs assessments.
• Social service referrals.
• Promote resident and resident organization activities in the areas
of resource development, resident organizations, health, and
crime prevention.
PHA Goal: Safety, security and crime prevention.
Objectives: The PHA shall provide for the provision of PHA security services, the
provision of crime prevention and safety services/activities of PHA
properties in accordance with identified needs, budgets and in
consultation with local law enforcement.
The PHA shall provide for officers patrolling of housing areas, security
services, crime prevention, and safety activities according to job
descriptions, policies and procedures.
The PHA shall provide drug elimination programs and assistance to
participants through the HUD Drug Elimination grant program.
The PHA will continue resident training in drug elimination programs
and expand youth activities.
PHA Strategic Goal: Public Housing Assessment System (PHAS)
PHA Goal: Indicator #1 (30 points) Physical Condition
Objectives: To improve the following areas by at least 10% per year until above
goal is reached.
• Site (approx. 4.5 pts.) plus 1 pt. for physical condition and
neighborhood environment.
• Building Exterior (approx. 4.5 pts.) plus 1 pt. for physical condition
and neighborhood environment.
• Dwelling Units (approx. 10.5 pts.)
• Common Areas (approx. 4.5 pts.) plus 1 pt for physical condition
and neighborhood environment. (in addition, health and safety
deficiencies will result in reductions to the total physical inspection
score which takes into account the five areas above with their
approximate relative weight/points.)
PHA Goal: Indicator #4 (10 points) Resident Service and Satisfaction
Objectives: To improve the following areas by at least 10% per year until above
goal is reached.
• Survey results (approx. 5 pts.)
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
4-3
—�I
1
CAPITAL FUND PROGRAM
The Housing Authority receives funds under the Capital Fund Program for all of its public housing
projects. In FY 2003, they received $977,765 from this program. These funds provided for over 650
repairs. The projects receiving funds from these programs are listed below.
Table 4.1
Capital Fund Program Projects
Project Name
Type of Housing
CGP Year
Behner Place I
Duplexes/Single-Family
TX21 P018 708 001
Green Fair Manor
Multi -Family
TX21 P018 708 002
Cherry Point Homes
Single -Family Homes
TX21 P018 708 004
96 West — 36 South
Duplexes
TX21 P018 708 005
Cherry Point Homes
Single -Family Homes
TX21 P018 708 006
Mary Meyers Senior Complex
Quadra lexes
TX21 P018 708 007
Behner Place II
Duplexes/Multi-Family
TX21 P018 708 010
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
4-4
CHAPTER 5
NON- HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NON -HOUSING INVENTORY
There are non -housing elements that provide a diverse quality of life. These non -housing elements
include an open/green space concept, recreational facilities, human services, education, technical
training, and economic development.
Open Space and Recreational Facilities
Many cities stress the open/green space concept, which eliminates the clutter of restricted large cities that
face boundary limitations. The City of Lubbock has emphasized this concept by creating public parks in
numerous neighborhoods. Currently, the City of Lubbock Parks and Recreation Department maintains
over seventy parks containing playground equipment, playa lakes, walking tracks, picnic tables, shelters,
and restrooms. Public parks, neighborhood beautification, and tree planting have all stimulated
neighborhood association involvement in monitoring and planting neighborhood gardens. The City has
also created programs that provide supervised recreational activities in the parks directed toward children
under the age of eighteen.
Job Training and Employment Programs
Lubbock houses several institutions that offer job training and education to help individuals obtain viable
tools needed for today's job market. Over 46 percent of area residents over age 25 have completed at
least one year of college. Texas Tech University offers more than 152 graduate and post -graduate
degree programs. South Plains College is also able to develop custom courses to meet the training
needs of the local business community. The following enrollment figures reflect levels for the Fall 2002
semester.
Table 5.1
Fall 2002 Enrollment Figures for Educational Institutions
Institution
Enrollment
Lubbock Independent School District
28,997
Texas Tech University
27,569
TfU Health Sciences Center
1,972
Lubbock Christian University
1,851
South Plains College All
9,034
Wayland Baptist University Lubbock Campus)
705
Source: Survey, October 2003
Job training opportunities exist at South Plains College, Lubbock Christian University, Wayland Baptist
University, Texas Tech University, American Commercial College, International Business College, and
the Byron Martin Advanced Technology Center. These institutions provide some of the educational
resources that enhance job training for Lubbock.
Another program serving the citizens of Lubbock is the Welfare -To -Work program offered through the
Texas Workforce Commission. This program is targeted toward low-income individuals that find
themselves at a disadvantage because of a lack of education and skills. This program will pay the wages
of the employee for a three-month period. The employer must be willing to teach the necessary skills that
pertain to that particular job. The hope is that the employer will add the employee to their payroll after the
three months have passed.
City of Lubbock— FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
5-1
The Byron Martin Advanced Technology Center offers area students the very best in technology
l education. Through a partnership between Lubbock Independent School District and South Plains
College, students are introduced to electronics, automotive technology, computer information systems,
multimedia design, desktop publishing, machinist trades, metalworking, welding, and home building. The
Center provides these technical education programs to support the development of a highly skilled
technical workforce in the region.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
The general definition of economic development is to enhance one's way of life. This general terminology
causes considerable debate and argument regarding 'specific meanings of economic development, i.e.,
economic development versus industrial development. This area of development covers a wide range of
activities from creating jobs, turning dollars, creating micro -enterprises, educating entities through
technical assistance, rehabilitating privately -owned buildings, improving residential property to be used as
a place of business, and training individuals for technical/skilled job opportunities. These elements
continue to expand the definition and meaning of economic development. Utilizing Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds in the area of economic development is a priority for the City of
Lubbock. A primary objective in this area is the creation or retention of jobs. HUD requires that 1 job is
either retained or created for every $35,000 of CDBG funds used for a project.
Two programs have been implemented by the City of Lubbock to assist small business owners in
increasing jobs and economic opportunities. These two programs are the Micro -Enterprise Loan Program
and the Economic Development Fund Program. Both have been funded through CDBG fund allocation.
The Micro -Enterprise Loan Program is designed to create jobs and small victories in the business world.
This program serves companies with five or fewer employees, including the owner. This program does
not and cannot take the place of private funding. This program is targeted toward those entrepreneurs
that are unable to obtain financial assistance through more traditional means. An applicant must be
declined credit by a local lending establishment before the loan application can be reviewed. The
applicant must be of low -to -moderate income to enter the application process. The maximum loan under
the Micro -Enterprise Loan Program was $24,000. The recovered dollars will be placed in a revolving fund
to facilitate economic development activities. This program remains a high priority but is currently out of
funds for the 2004-2005 fiscal year.
The Economic Development Fund Program provides larger loans to business owners. The applicant is
not required to be of low -to -moderate income to apply or to have been denied credit by a local lending
establishment. These applicants are considered a lower risk than their counterparts under the Micro -
Enterprise Loan Program. Since the applicant is not required to meet income guidelines, he or she must
show the propensity to retain or create one job for every $35,000 borrowed. The recovered dollars will be
placed in a revolving fund to facilitate economic development activities.
The Business Development section of the City of Lubbock was created to provide support services for the
community's economic development efforts. This department serves as a liaison between municipal
government and the business community. The staff has proven to be valuable to businesses needing
assistance with permitting requirements and has been a source for ongoing technical assistance in the
community. Another primary task is to respond to inquiries from businesses, other government agencies,
and economic development organizations. One individual is housed at Market Lubbock, Inc. and reports
to the Community Development director, providing continuity in citywide economic development efforts.
Market Lubbock, Inc. is a non-profit organization created by the City Council to take a leadership role in
economic development for the city of Lubbock. The corporation receives its funding through the annual
economic development portion of the property tax. Their responsibilities include promoting, assisting, and
enhancing economic development within and around the city. In addition to Market Lubbock's efforts, a
4A corporation is in the process of being formed to collect and use a one eighth cent sales tax for
economic development activities. This corporation is scheduled to begin work in October 2004.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
5-2
Other economic development activities in the areas of technical assistance include the Texas Tech
University Small Business Development Center (SBDC). This organization focuses on the preparation of
business plans for both start-up companies and those wishing to expand their operations. The
counselors also offer ongoing technical assistance in the areas of financial analysis, market research,
customer service, and on -going management issues. The SBDC offers a Procurement Center that aids
businesses in bidding and obtaining government contracts. Other services offered through the center
include technical assistance regarding technology issues, international trade, and manufacturing.
In 2003 the City of Lubbock began a North and East Lubbock initiative to promote the area for housing
and economic growth. The City pledged $250,000/year for four years to assist in the project. A non-profit
organization was formed and a director selected. A master plan is in the process of being developed to
-� guide the development of the target areas. This initiative has the support of the African American,
Hispanic, and Lubbock Chambers, as well as Market Lubbock. The non-profit organization is beginning
some development plans and is currently seeking funding sources for those projects.
y The economy of Lubbock continues to grow steadily due to new opportunities in service and construction
related industries. New development and tenants at the Reese Technology Center have played a large
role in area economic development. After the closing of Reese Air Force Base, the Reese Center was
formed using the facilities that were abandoned as a result of the closure. Through a joint effort with
Texas Tech University, the Reese Center has become a focal point for research as well as a home for
organizations offering continuing education. Eight of Texas Tech's departments/colleges are currently
engaged in some aspect of research at Reese and South Plains College operates one of their campuses
at Reese. Evening classes are offered for approximately 2,000 students through the South Plains Reese
Center campus. In addition to providing educational opportunities, the Reese Technology Center
continues to add tenants, bringing new jobs and opportunities to the Lubbock economy.
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
The entire identified inventory and needs apply to all low -mod persons through the city, particularly the
homeless. In assessing resources and setting goals, homeless persons are taken into account.
Health Care
Lubbock is the medical center for the entire West Texas and Eastern New Mexico region, offering the
most comprehensive health care services between Dallas and Phoenix. The health care sector is a vital
component of the Lubbock economy. It employs approximately 15,000 people, whose payroll ($498
million) and related contributions provide more than a $755 million impact to the Lubbock area.
Table 5.2
Inventory of Health Care Services - 2002
Clinics
102
Hospitals
4
Hospital Beds
1,817
Doctors and Dentists
798
RNs and LVNs
Retirement Homes
4,524 .
36
Source: Market Lubbock, Inc.
The Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC) houses schools of Medicine, Allied Health,
and Nursing. Regional campuses are maintained in El Paso, Amarillo, and Odessa. The TTUHSC holds
City of Lubbock— FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
5-3
a national reputation for excellence in teaching and research.
Lubbock provides resources and facilities that assist persons/households needing emergency services,
HIV/AIDS information, and drug abuse/alcohol addiction counseling. Many of these services are
concentrated in the city, but most facilities do service the surrounding county. The operation of these
medical facilities is dependent on some public funding and private donations. As medical facilities
increase costs for services, certain low -to -moderate income individuals will not be able to afford the price
of services. There is a gap in available dollars to assist low-income persons with prescriptions. Adults
without insurance and without Medicaid also call attention to a gap in the availability of dental care. The
City coordinates agencies through dissemination of information by means of the Lubbock Human
Services Directory, or "Red Book", which is a resource tool that lists all available assistance throughout
the community.
TRANSPORTATION
Lubbock offers more than adequate transportation infrastructure. Interstate-27 connects the city with two
major east -west interstate systems, Interstate-20 and Interstate-40. Two of the nation's largest railway
systems, Santa -Fe and Burlington Northern Railroads, link the city to the metropolitan areas of the central
and western United States. Lubbock International Airport provides connections throughout the world.
Public Transit: Citibus offers three types of services in the city of Lubbock. The fixed route
service covers much of the city with thirteen routes. The demand response service provides
specialized equipment for persons with disabilities, including wheelchair lift equipped vans.
Finally, Citibus offers a shuttle service operating buses on the Texas Tech campus.
Bus Service: Lubbock is the home office for TNM&O Coaches, Inc. The bus line operates a
fleet of 76 buses over routes in 5 states. These states include Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
Colorado, and Kansas. TNM&O also offers connecting routes with both Kerrville/Coach U.S.A.
and Greyhound. In addition, a charter service is available for any destination in the continental
United States.
Rail: One of the nation's largest railway systems, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad,
links the city to metropolitan areas of the central and western United States.
Air Travel: Lubbock International Airport (LIA) has sixty inbound and outbound flights per day
with 513,096 enplaned passengers in 1998. FedlEx, Airborne Express, UPS, and several smaller
airfreight companies offer services at LIA. The airport has 22,000 square feet of terminal space
with nine gates, a restaurant, a lounge, a gift shop, and several auto rental desks. LIA is easily
accessible throughout the city. Drive time is ten minutes from the downtown district, including the
Texas Tech campus. The airport is within twenty minutes from virtually any point in Lubbock.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
5-4
CHAPTER 6
STRATEGIC PLAN
MISSION STATEMENT
The mission statement of the City of Lubbock Community Development Department provides a basis for
the Consolidated plan.
Our Mission
"To create positive change for the citizens of Lubbock by promoting self-sufficiency through
partnerships in economic development, quality housing, and neighborhood reinvestment."
PRIORITY NEED ASSESSMENTS
In preparation of the five-year Consolidated Plan, staff attended several neighborhood association
meetings in the Fall of 2003. At the meetings, citizens identified neighborhood needs and priorities. The
results were narrowed to ten areas. (See appendix for more detail.) The priorities from these resources
are listed in the table below. In October of 2003, the Community Development and Services Board
Consolidated Plan Subcommittee met to determine significant needs within the communities. Needs
were prioritized and specific needs identified. In addition to the priority needs, the subcommittee
recognized economic development and property maintenance as important areas to emphasize within the
next five years.
Table 6.1
Priorities Presented to CDSB — November 2003
Seven CDBG Neighborhood
Meetings - Fall 2003
Codes Enforcement 7 *
Housing 6
Economic Development 4
Nei hborhood Youth Programs 4
Infrastructure 4
Park Improvements 3
Crime/Safety 3
Landscaping/Beautification 2
*The numbers identify the number of neighborhoods
that listed this issue as a priority.
PRIORITY NEEDS DEFINITIONS
All of the information that was gathered from the neighborhood associations and the Consolidated Plan
Subcommittee was presented to the Community Development and Services Board. In order to focus
federal funds where they are most needed, a determination of importance was made with regard to
funding. The following are the definitions used by the Board to determine the priorities in the HUD priority
needs tables:
High Needs are documented and are considered essential. Appropriate federal grant funds
will be provided to approved projects when funds are available.
City of Lubbock— FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-1
Medium Needs are documented and are considered important. Appropriate
federal grant funds may be provided to approved projects should funds
become available. Projects funded from other sources will be supported.
Low Needs are documented. Appropriate federal grant funds are not
expected to be available. Projects funded from other sources will be
supported.
The Board voted on a recommendation to be presented to the City Council for priorities for the years
2004-2009. City Council approved these priorities as listed in this document (see Consolidated Plan
timeline in Chapter One for approval dates).
Funding Levels and Units Served
Dollar amounts used for the high priority needs were estimated by taking the City's most recent formula
allocation for the Community Development Block Grant, the Emergency Shelter Grant, and the HOME
Investment Partnership Program, and projecting these funds out over the next five years. We did not
anticipate any increases in the formula allocation. Types of programs and the cost per unit served were
taken into account for computing both dollar amounts.
Targeting
In addition to these priorities, certain areas within CDBG eligible areas were selected as targeted areas
for the years 2004-2009. These areas are shown on Map 6.1. Target areas are numbered 1 through 9.
By staying with a targeting concept, federal resources will have a greater potential to make a visible
impact in the selected areas. This could translate into an increase in economic development and
revitalization activities in those neighborhoods.
Map 6.1
Targeting 2004-2009
City of Lubbock— FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-2
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Basis for Assigning Priority
As evidenced from the information gathered through the Consolidated Plan process, affordable housing is
a high priority by all the groups assessed in that it helps create a suitable living environment for the
citizens of Lubbock. Housing experts believe that neighborhoods with high levels of homeownership tend
to be more stable when compared with neighborhoods that have a significant amount of rental housing.
By increasing homeownership opportunities for the purchase of a home or through rehabilitation
programs for homeowners, neighborhoods in decline, due to the age of housing and the income level of
its residents, begin to see an upward turn in the appearance of their neighborhood. It has a ripple effect
in the area as other residents begin to take pride in their property and participate in available programs.
The last step of this process occurs when private businesses come into the area to take over where
federal funds have left off. This evidence supports the concept of targeting funds and of homeowner
projects. Therefore, the City of Lubbock has chosen to place a high priority on owner -occupied affordable
housing in all income categories.
There is inadequate federal funding available to adequately serve both renter and owner housing issues.
Citizens, the Community Development Services Board, and the City Council place a higher priority on
owner -occupied projects. Rental needs were addressed through an emphasis on property maintenance
throughout the city. By encouraging a high standard of rental property maintenance and overall property
conditions, the overall quality of the neighborhood and community will increase. The Lubbock Housing
Authority also serves the needs of tenants through their Section 8 and public housing programs. With
regard to elderly tenants in all income categories, only limited subsidized housing is available. There is a
documented need for additional affordable housing for the elderly as that population continues to
increase.
American Dream Downpayment Initiative (ADDI)
ADDI funds will be used for a homebuyer assistance program to be administered by the City of Lubbock
for first time low -to -moderate income homebuyers. We will conduct targeted outreach to residents and
tenants of public housing and those assisted by public housing agencies through the Section 8
homeownership program. We will be partnering with other non-profit organizations in the community,
including Habitat for Humanity and other housing providers for low -to -moderate income homebuyers. All
persons receiving ADDI funds will be required to attend first time homebuyer's counseling through either
the City of Lubbock Housing Department or the Lubbock Housing Finance Corporation.
Section 108 Loan Program
In 2003, the City of Lubbock was approved for a Section 108 loan. The loan is worth one million dollars
and a bond issue will take place in June 2004. The City of Lubbock is using the funds to help meet its
goal of providing affordable housing in the community. Some differences of the Section 108 program with
regards to other City of Lubbock programs are that funds can be used citywide and they have a 100
percent payback. The program is in its beginning phases and the City of Lubbock is currently accepting
applications.
Obstacles to Meeting Underserved Needs
The City of Lubbock's formula allocation for CDBG has decreased slightly over the past few years. This
lack of funds is an obstacle in serving the affordable housing needs of the community.
The Lubbock Housing Authority has a waiting list for both Section 8 certificates and public housing.
Additional vouchers are not currently being released. This makes it difficult for the Housing Authority to
keep up with the demand. Additional funding for these programs is needed to overcome this obstacle.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-3
Use of Funds
The housing market in Lubbock influenced the affordable housing objectives in the following manner:
Rental Assistance: Table 2.8 shows the affordability gap for tenants, indicating the need for
assistance for low and extremely -low income households. However, as
stated above, the City does not plan to put any CDBG or HOME funds
into this area. The City recognizes the need and supports the efforts of
the Lubbock Housing Authority in this matter.
New Units: Several new low-income housing tax credits have been constructed in
the past few years for rental housing. In addition, the affordable housing
market has taken off with the recent low -interest rates for mortgages.
However, the need for additional down payment and closing cost
assistance is still needed as indicated by Objective H-3.
°j Rehab of Old Units: Table 3.9 indicates that 69% of the housing in 2000 was built prior to
1979. Table 3.10 shows that low and extremely low-income families live
in the majority of older homes in Lubbock. The need for rehabilitation of
these units is clear and is evidenced in Objectives H-1 and H-2. In order
to facilitate the owner occupied rehab or reconstruction, refinancing of
mortgage debt will be allowed where appropriate. Also addressed is the
need to make homes handicapped accessible for individuals needing this
type of housing.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-4
HUD Table 2A
Five -Year Priority Housing Needs
PRIORITY HOUSING NEEDS (households)
Priority Need
Level
High, Medium,
Low
Estimated
Units
Renter
Small Related
0-30% of MFI
Low
31-50% of MFI
Low
51-80%of MFI
Low
Large Related
0-30% of MFI
Low
31-50% of MFl
Low
51-80% of MFI
Low
Elderly
0-30% of MFI
Low
31-50%of MFI
Low
51-80%of MFI
Low
All Other
0-30% of MFI
Low
31-50%of MFI
Low
51-80% of MFI
Low
Owner
0-30% of MFI
High
275
31-50% of MFI
High
300
51-80%of MFI
High
75
City of Lubbock— FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-5
HUD Table 2C-1
Summary of Specific Housing Objectives
Priority Need Category
Housing
Specific Objective
Number H-1 Owners -New Construction and Rehab
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG and HOME funds to rehabilitate, construct, or reconstruct owner -
occupied single-family housing for 100 families by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 20 households (including 12 minority households).
Specific Objective
Number H-2 Owners -Limited Rehab
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds for limited rehabilitation of owner -occupied housing due to life
safety, health, or accessibility requirements for 250 extremely low and 250 low
income households by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 50 extremely low and 50 low income households.
Specific Objective
Number H-3 Owners -Assistance for Home Buyers
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds for down payment/closing cost assistance for 50 moderate
income households by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 10 moderate income households per year (including 6 minority households)
Specific Objective
Number H-4 New Home Construction
Five -Year Goal: Use HOME funds to build 20 homes for low -to -moderate income households by
September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 4 new homes per year.
Refinancing is an eligible activity for all housing activities, if necessary, to achieve the ultimate goal of
providing decent, safe and sanitary housing.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-6
HOMELESS AND OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS NON -HOMELESS
Because of the limited amount of funding available, the funding sources and the similar types of projects,
the City of Lubbock has combined the Homeless and Other Special Needs Non -Homeless sections of this
plan.
Basis for Assigning Priority
The City of Lubbock receives a formula allocation from the Emergency Shelter Grant each year. Funds
can be used to serve the homeless and other special needs populations. These funds are regulated with
the following caps:
30% Homeless Prevention
30% Essential Services
10% Operation
5% Administration
Rehabilitation of Shelters -No Cap
All of the areas listed above were assigned a high priority in Table 2C. The practice in past allocations
has been to fund projects up to the caps with the remaining funds allocated to rehab projects. The City
will continue to fund projects in this manner.
Homeless Prevention Strategy The City of Lubbock shall use funds from the Emergency Shelter
Grant for homeless prevention projects to aid people who are at -
risk of becoming homeless. (Objective HS-3)
The City allocates funds up to the 30 percent cap for homeless prevention through ESG funds received
from the federal government. Other funds received by the City include Community Services Block Grant
funds with a large portion of these funds going to self-sufficiency programs. These programs are able to
provide emergency assistance to clients to enable them to stay in their homes and to continue working or
going to school. CSBG funds also provide energy assistance to the elderly, disabled, and homes with
small children through the Comprehensive Energy Assistance Program. Also funded with CSBG funds is
an information and referral hotline that provides support service information to those in need. Support is
given to agencies applying for state ESG funds or from other funding sources when their goals meet the
objectives stated in the Consolidated Plan.
Outreach/Assessment Strategy The City of Lubbock shall use funds from the Emergency Shelter
Grant for essential service projects to provide assessment and
support services for the homeless or special needs non -
homeless populations. (Objective HS-2)
Up to 30 percent of Emergency Shelter Grants may be spent on Essential Service, and the City has
traditionally allocated funds up to this cap. Support is given to agencies applying for state ESG funds or
from other funding sources when their goals meet the objectives stated in the Consolidated Plan.
The Lubbock Homeless Consortium is a group of agencies that serve the homeless and special needs
non -homeless that partners to better serve individuals and families in need. They are part of the
continuum of care process and share information in order to better reach and assess the homeless. The
City will continue to be a member of the Consortium and participate in their educational and continuum of
care activities.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-7
Emergency Shelter and The City of Lubbock shall use funds from the Emergency Shelter
Transitional Housing Strategy Grant and Community Development Block Grant (public
facilities) to rehabilitate or construct homeless or special needs
non -homeless population facilities and ESG funds for operational
expenses. (Objective HS-1 and HS-2)
Funds available under ESG or CDBG can be used to address the needs of emergency shelters and
transitional facilities. These funds provide local agencies the opportunity to upgrade or expand their
current facilities. Support is given to agencies applying for state ESG and HOME funds or from other
funding sources when their goals meet the objectives stated in the Consolidated Plan.
Permanent Housing Strategy The City of Lubbock shall use funds from the Emergency Shelter
Grant, Community Development Block Grant and HOME
Investment Partnership Program to encourage homeownership
opportunities for low -to -moderate income families including
former homeless individuals or families transitioning to
permanent housing and independent living.
Down payment and closing cost programs (Objective H-3) and housing rehabilitation or construction
(including a lease -purchase program, Objective H-1) shall address the need Whelp the homeless to
move into permanent housing when they are ready to take that step. In addition, the City offers
homeownership opportunities through its ongoing HOPE Program Income Project. Support is given to
agencies applying for state ESG and HOME funds or from other funding sources when their goals meet
the objectives stated in the Consolidated Plan.
Obstacles to Meeting Underserved Needs
The limited amount of funding available is an obstacle to serving the needs of the homeless in Lubbock.
The Lubbock Homeless Consortium is planning to apply for Continuum of Care funding in order to bring in
more money to address homeless issues in our area.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-8
HUD Table 1A
Continuum of Care - Individuals
Estimated Current Unmet Relative
Need I Inventory I Need/Gan I Priority
Beds / Units
Emergency Shelter
223
78
145
High
Transitional Housing
44
118
74
High
1
Permanent Housing
0
0
0
Medium
Total
267
196
71
--
Estimated
Supportive
Services
Slots
Job Training
75
70
5
High
Case Management
250
245
5
Medium
Substance Abuse Treatment
150
148
2
High
Mental Health Care
42
40
2
Medium
Housing Placement
113
100
13
Medium
Life Skills Training
150
135
15
Medium
Estimated
Sub-
Populations
Chronic Substance Abusers
80
69
11
High
Seriously Mentally 111
18
17
1
Medium
Dually - Diagnosed
11
10
1
Medium
Veterans
22
25
3
Medium
Persons with HIV/AIDS
6
2
4
Medium
Victims of Domestic Violence
100
122
22
Medium
Youth
44
44
10
Medium
Continuum of Care - Persons in Families with Children
Estimated Current Unmet Relative
Need I Inventory I Need/Gan I Prioritv
Beds / Units
Emergency Shelter
99
140
41
High
Transitional Housing
40
34
6
High
Permanent Housing
33
30
3
Medium
Total
172
204
32)
--
Estimated
Supportive
Services
Slots
Job Training
33
30
3
High
Case Management
100
105
(5)
Medium
Child Care
36
30
6
High
Substance Abuse Treatment
16
15
1
High
Mental Health Care
11
10
1
Medium
Housing Placement
38
40
2
Medium
Life Skills Training
72
65
7
Medium
Estimated
Sub-
Populations
Chronic Substance Abusers
12
11
1
High
Seriously Mentally III
3
2
1
Medium
Dually - Diagnosed
0
0
0
Medium
Veterans
0
0
0
Medium
Persons with HIVIAIDS
0
0
0
Medium
Victims of Domestic Violence
129
122
7
Medium
Other
0
0
0
Medium
See Table 3.15 in Chapter 3 for the available information on homeless populations in Lubbock.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-9
HUD Table 1 C
Summary of Specific Homeless and Other Special Needs Non -Homeless Objectives
Priority Need Category
Homeless and Sub -Populations
--� Specific Objective
Number HS-1 Shelter Operations
Five -Year Goal: Use ESG to fund operational costs for shelters in order to serve 1,250 homeless
individuals by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 250 homeless individuals.
Specific Objective
Number HS-2 Essential Services
Five -Year Goal: Use ESG funds to provide support services and essential needs for 750
homeless or special need non -homeless individuals by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 150 homeless or special need non -homeless individuals.
Specific Objective
Number HS-3 Homeless Prevention
Five -Year Goal: Use ESG funds to provide rent and/or mortgage assistance to 500 individuals at
risk of being homeless by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 100 individuals at -risk of becoming homeless.
Specific Objective
Number HS-4 Facilities Rehab
Five -Year Goal: Use ESG to upgrade 5 shelters for homeless individuals by September 30,
2009.
Annual Goal: 1 shelter per year.
City of U ibbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-10
NON -HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Because federal grant funds have stayed the same or diminished, the City of Lubbock intends to
strategically utilize available resources for the highest priority needs.
Basis for Assigning Priorities
The Community Development and Services Board (CDSB) based their priorities for non -housing
community development on the information from the neighborhood input and from the Consolidated Plan
Sub Committee.
Economic Development Activities
In May 2000, Texas Tech University conducted a survey of local businesses for the Lubbock Chamber of
Commerce. This survey found that a majority of businesses felt the City of Lubbock was not helpful to
small, existing businesses. By directing CDBG funds towards small businesses the City will be
responding to a need identified in this survey.
The targeting concept adopted by City Council for the next five years will encourage and support new
businesses in the north and east portion of the city. A micro -enterprise program will continue to assist
small businesses with loans from $500 to $24,000. The Economic Development Fund program will
continue to assist by offering larger business loans and creating opportunities for new jobs. Coupled with
the housing projects in these same areas, the City hopes to increase the flow of residents and businesses
back into these areas.
Self-sufficiency is an important aspect of economic development. The City of Lubbock uses its CSBG
funds in self-sufficiency projects provided by local non -profits. These funds can pay for job training,
tuition and books, rent and utility assistance, and unforeseen expenses (car repairs, prescriptions, etc.).
Childcare services were designated a high need because of the long waiting lists associated with area
childcare programs. CDBG funds will be used to provide additional childcare services, which will enable
single -parent and two -parent households to stay in school or hold down a job. Youth services are also a
high need and will enable families to access after school and summer youth programs. Both childcare
and youth issues are important aspects of any self-sufficiency program. The City also supports the
Lubbock Housing Authority in their efforts to make housing authority residents self-sufficient.
Suitable Living Environments
Creating a suitable living environment through programs addressing crime awareness, improvements to
public facilities, health services, and infrastructure is an important part of the City's targeting plan. The
City of Lubbock is committed to making neighborhoods safe, attractive, and inviting to residents and
businesses. Through the use of CDBG funds for the non -housing community objectives, the City will be
able to foster revitalization and reduce the isolation of low-income families.
The primary purpose of the affordable housing goal is to provide safe, decent, sanitary, and affordable
housing to low -to -moderate income households. However, it also intends to strengthen neighborhoods
through education and support programs for job training, fostering humane and healthy environments,
developing economic strength and full employment for all populations, and providing positive youth
services that create responsible adults. All of these interrelated goals are necessary to reinforce other
community development objectives to increase responsible homeownership and viable neighborhoods.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-11
HUD Table 2B
Non -Housing Community Development Needs
Need
Need Level
Units
Anti -Crime Programs
Overall
Med
0
Sub -Categories
Crime Awareness 051
Med
0
Economic Development
Overall
High
36
Sub -Categories
Rehab; Publicly or Privately -Owned Commercial 14E
High
1
Cl Land Acq uisition/Dis position 17A
Low
0
CI Infrastructure Development 17B
Med
0
Cl Building Acquisition, Construction, Re 17C
Low
0
Other Commercial/Industrial Improvements 17D
Low
0
ED Direct Financial Assistance to For -Profit 18A
High
0
ED Technical Assistance 18B
Med
0
Micro -Enterprise Assistance 18C
High
35
Infrastructure
Overall
High
85
Sub -Categories
Flood Drain Improvements 031
Low
0
Water/Sewer Improvements 03J
Med
0
Street Improvements 03K
High
35
Sidewalks 03L
High
50
Tree Planting 03N
Low
0
Removal of Architectural Barriers 10
Med
0
Privately Owned Utilities 11 -
Low
0
Planning & Administration
Overall
High
0
Sub -Categories
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
b-12
Monitoring and Oversight
High
0
Need
Need Level
Units
Public Facilities
Overall
Med
0
Sub -Categories
Public Facilities and Improvements General 03
Med
0
Handicapped Centers- New Construction
Med
0
Handicapped Centers - Renovation
Med
0
Handicapped Centers - Equipment
Med
0
Neighborhood Facilities - New Construction
Med
0
Neighborhood Facilities -Renovation
Med
0
Handicapped Centers -Equipment
Med
0
Parks - Development
Low
0
Parks- New Construction
Low
0
Parks - Equipment
Med
0
Parking Facilities 03G
Low
0
Solid Waste Disposal Improvements 03H
Low
0
Fire Stations/Equipment 030
Low
0
Health Facilities -New Construction
Low
0
Health Facilities - Renovation
Low
0
Asbestos Removal 03R
Low
0
Clean-up of Contaminated Sites 04A
Low
0
Interim Assistance 06
Low
0
Non -Residential Historic Preservation 16B
Low
0
Public Services
Overall
High
2,390
Sub -Categories
Public Service General 05
Low
0
Handicapped Services - Accessibility
Med
0
Handicapped Services - Job Training
High
150
Handicapped Services - Recreation
High
150
Handicapped Services - Transportation
Med
0
Le al Services 05C
Low
0
Trans ortation Services 05E
Hi h
1,000
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-13
Substance Abuse Services - Rehabilitation
High
120
Substance Abuse Services - Shelter
High
60
Need
Need Level
Units
Substance Abuse Services — Job Training
High
30
Employment Training - Computer Skills
High
125
Employment Training - Job Readiness
High
125
Employment Training - Reading Skills
High
125
Health Services - General
Med
0
Health Services - Child
High
500
Health Services - Elderly
Med
0
Health Services - Educational
Low
0
Health Services - Prevention
Low
0
Health Services - Specific
Low
0
Mental Health Services - Child
Med
0
Mental Health Services - Youth
Med
0
Mental Health Services - Adult
Med
0
Mental Health Services - Elderly
Med
0
Mental Health Services - Facilities
High
5
Screening for Lead -Based Paint/Lead Hazard 05P
Low
0
Senior Programs
Overall
Med
0
Sub -Categories
Senior Centers - New Construction
Low
0
Senior Centers - Renovation
Med
0
Senior Services - Education
Med
0
Senior Services - Recreation
Med
0
Youth Programs
Overall
High
2,085
Sub -Cate ories
Youth Centers - Education
Med
0
Youth Centers - Recreation
Med
0
Child Care Centers - Education Programs
Med
0
Child Care Centers - Subsidized care
High
10
Child Care Centers - Health
Med
0
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-14
Abused Children Facilities - New Construction
Low
0
Abused Children Facilities -Renovation
Med
0
Youth Services - Education
High
250
Need
Need Level
Units
Youth Services - Job Training
High
250
Youth Services - Mentoring
High
250
Youth Services - Recreation
Med
0
Child Care Services - After school programs
High
250
Child Care Services - Care subsidies
High
500
Child Care Services - Summer Programs
High
250
Abused & Neglected Children - Short-term care
High
25
Abused & Neglected Children - Mental Health Services
High
150
Abused & Neglected Children - Mentoring
High
150
Other
Overall
Med
250
Sub -Categories
Urban Renewal Completion 07
Low
0
Relocation 08
Low
0
Code Enforcement 15
High
250
CDBG Non-profit Organization Capacity Building 19C
Low
0
CDBG Assistance to Institutes of Higher Ed 19D
Low
0
Repayments of Section 108 Loan Principal 19F
High
0
Unprogrammed Funds 22
0
City of Lubbock — FY 20N-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-t5
HUD Table 2C-2
Summary of Specific Non -Housing Community Development Objectives
Priority Need Category
Non -Housing Community Development
Specific Objective
Number CD-1 ED-Direct Assistance to For -Profit
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to create or retain 35 jobs for low -to -moderate income
individuals through economic development activities by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: Create or retain 7 jobs.
Specific Objective
Number CD-2 ED- Micro -Enterprise Assistance
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to assist 30 low income families by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 6 low income families per year.
Specific Objective
Number CD-3 Infrastructure — Street improvements and sidewalks
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to improve neighborhood infrastructure by paving 35 street
blocks and installing or replacing 250 sidewalks by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 7 street blocks and 50 sidewalks.
Specific Objective
Number CD-4 Handicapped Services for Job Training and Recreation
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to provide job training and recreation services to 150 disabled
individuals by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 30 disabled individuals.
Specific Objective
Number CD-5 Substance Abuse Services
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to provide substance abuse outpatient services for 120 low -to -
moderate income individuals, in -patient services to 60 low to moderate income
individuals, and job training to 30 low to moderate income individuals by
September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: Outpatient services to 24 low- to- moderate income individuals, in patient
services to 12 low- to -moderate income individuals, and job training to 6 low -to -
moderate income individuals.
City of Lubbock— FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-16
HUD Table 2C-2 (Continued)
Summary of Specific Non -Housing Community Development Objectives
Specific Objective
Number CD-6 Employment Training
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to provide computer skills to 125 low -to -moderate income
individuals, job readiness skills to 125 low -to -moderate income individuals, and
reading skills to 125 low -to -moderate income individuals by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: Computer skills to 25 low -to -moderate income individuals, job readiness skills to
25 low -to -moderate income individuals, and reading skills to 25 low -to -moderate
income individuals.
Specific Objective
Number CD-7 Health Services for Children
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to provide health services to 500 low- to -moderate income
children by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 100 low -to -moderate income children.
Specific Objective.
Number CD-8 Mental Health Facilities for Operations
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to assist in operational costs for 5 mental health facilities
serving low -to -moderate income individuals by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: Assist 1 facility.
Specific Objective
Number CD-9 Child Care Centers for Subsidized Care
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to subsidize care costs at 10 child care centers serving low to
moderate income households by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: Subsidize 2 centers.
Specific Objective
Number CD-10 Youth Services
Five -Year Goal: Use CBG funds to provide education services to 250 low -to -moderate income
youth, job training skills to 250 low -to -moderate income youth, and mentoring
services to 250 low -to -moderate income youth by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: Education services to 50, job training skills to 50, and mentoring services to 50
low -to -moderate income youth.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-17
f
HUD Table 2C-2 (Continued)
Summary of Specific Non -Housing Community Development Objectives
Specific Objective
Number CD-11 Child Care Services
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to provide child care services to 250 low -to -moderate income
households for after school care, care subsidies for 500 low -to -moderate income
households, and summer programs for 250 low -to -moderate income households
by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: After school care to 50, care subsidies to 100, and summer programs for 50 low -
to -moderate income households.
Specific Objective
Number CD-12 Abused & Neglected Children
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to assist abused and neglected children by providing short term
care to 25 low -to -moderate income children, mental health services to 150 low -
to -moderate income children, and mentoring to 150 low -to -moderate income
children by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: Short-term care to 5 abused and neglected low -to -moderate income children,
mental health services to 30 abused and neglected low -to -moderate income
children, and mentoring to 30 abused and neglected low -to -moderate income
children.
Specific Objective
Number CD-13 Code Enforcement (Property Maintenance)
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to reduce deterioration of neighborhoods through code
enforcement emphasizing property maintenance at 250 substandard housing
units by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 50 substandard housing units.
Specific Objective
Number CD-14 Transportation Services
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG funds to provide public transportation for the handicap and elderly for
1000 continuing passengers by September 30, 2009.
Annual Goal: 1000 passengers.
Specific Objective
Number CD-15 Planning & Administration — Oversight & Monitoring
Five -Year Goal: Use CDBG, HOME and ESG funds, coordinate, monitor and implement the
Consolidated Plan objectives according to HUD requirements by September 30,
2009,
Annual Goal: Coordinate the annual allocation and reporting process in a timely manner.
Monitor sub -recipients use of funds and adherence to regulations.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-18
BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Because federal grant funds are likely to diminish in the near future, the City of Lubbock intends to
strategically utilize available resources for the highest priority needs, affordable housing being one of
those needs. The City is committed to providing safe, decent, and affordable housing to low -to -moderate
income people in Lubbock.
Education Strategy: Support housing and homebuyer education to low -to -moderate income
families through staff participation in community programs.
The Community Development staff is committed to continued participation in the Lubbock Housing
Consortium and helps with events such as homebuyers fairs, homebuyer classes, and distribution of fair
housing and affordable housing information. Staff also conducts homebuyer education classes at least
twice annually in conjunction with the HOPE Program Income Project.
Homeownership Strategy: Support and/or fund programs that encourage homeownership
opportunities and safe, decent, and affordable housing for low -to -
moderate income families. (Objective H-1, H-2, and H-3)
A source for inexpensive lots for the construction of affordable housing is available through the Urban
Renewal Agency of the City of Lubbock. These lots are located in several low-income neighborhoods of
Lubbock where revitalization is needed.
Rental Strategy: Support programs that encourage the development or maintenance of
affordable rental housing including CHDO projects, Low Income Housing
Tax Credit housing developments, and Lubbock Housing Authority
programs.
Because of limited funding, the City is unable to provide a significant amount of dollars to rental projects.
However, the City is committed to supporting other public and private organizations in their endeavors to
serve low -to -moderate income renters.
LEAD -BASED PAINT HAZARDS
Lead -based paint was banned from use on residential units beginning in 1978. According to the 2000 US
Census, 69% of the housing in Lubbock was constructed prior to 1979, meaning these units are at risk for
lead -based paint. The federal rule covering lead -based paint went into effect after September 15, 2000.
The City of Lubbock has been proactive in implementation of the final rule. In January 2003, the City paid
for and hosted Lead Certification Training with instructors from Texas A & M University. The City plans to
continue to offer these training sessions as needed. In addition to Community Development staff, local
non -profits and institutions, CHDO's, public housing agencies, and contractors were invited to attend.
The purchase of an XRF machine has greatly expedited the testing of samples for the presence of lead
and improved the effectiveness of the city's abatement program. Since 2002, twelve lead abatement
projects have been completed.
Lead -Based Paint Strategy: Implement the lead -based paint final rule with procedures for re-
certification of staff, education for clients, relocation of clients during
abatement, risk assessment, safe work practices, and reduction of lead -
based paint.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-19
ANTI -POVERTY STRATEGY
An anti -poverty strategy is an economic development plan aimed at increasing the income and job
opportunities for extremely -low income families. Housing is a key component of any anti -poverty plan as
a secure affordable residence is a necessity for maintaining a steady income and job.
Anti -Poverty Strategy: Support and/or fund programs that reach out to extremely -low income
families to assist them with housing, economic development
opportunities, and support services.
Programs
CDBG, ESG, and HOME funds are instrumental in the successful implementation of the anti -poverty
strategy.
CDBG funds may be used for a variety of activities. Activities funded in the past that
have impacted extremely -low income families include the following: literacy programs,
job training, housing rehabilitation, critical repair of homes, youth and day care services,
crime awareness, infrastructure, and parenting programs.
HOME funds enable the City to undertake housing reconstruction, housing rehabilitation,
new construction, elderly housing programs, and lease -purchase programs.
ESG funds make it possible for the City to alleviate some of the needs of the marginal
and literal homeless in the community by providing rent and utility assistance, emergency
housing, counseling, and food vouchers.
Programs funded with Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) funds include the following:
In -House Case Management — The Community Development Department has a full-
time case manager that is able to coordinate services for families receiving help through
the City's housing programs. Referrals may be made to other housing programs,
employment programs, and social services.
Self -Sufficiency Program — The current provider of this program is Catholic Family
Services. They provide help with tuition, rent and utilities, emergency funding, and
childcare vouchers for single -parent households who are in school and/or participating in
a job -training program. During 2003, they transitioned ninety individuals out of poverty.
Informational and Referral Hotline — This 24-hour hotline provides information on social
service and housing programs for the citizens of Lubbock.
Comprehensive Energy Assistance Program — This program assists low-income
persons with energy assistance, specifically the elderly, disabled, and homes with small
children. The city contracts with several non-profit agencies to administer this program.
Programs supported but not funded through the City of Lubbock include the following:
Welfare to Work -Texas Department of Human Services
Workforce Development Initiatives -South Plains Regional Workforce Development Board
Resident Initiatives -Lubbock Housing Authority
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-20
Anti -Poverty Policy 1: Efficient use of all sources of funding available in order to maximize the
impact of those funds.
The City of Lubbock uses a competitive allocation process so that funds may be targeted to programs
and areas with the greatest need. Funding decisions are based on priority needs, targeted areas, clients
served, availability of other funding sources, and duplication of services. The same seventeen member
citizen's board (Community Development and Services Board) oversees and makes funding
recommendations for the use of CDBG, ESG, HOME, and CSBG funds. This consistency helps the City
meet needs without duplicating services.
The City has implemented a Return of Investment policy mandated by City Council. Projects funded with
CDBG (excluding public service) and all HOME projects must pay back a portion of the total amount
funded. These funds can be returned into similar programs thereby increasing the amount of funds
available for housing, economic development, and other eligible programs. In addition, agencies
receiving CDBG and HOME funds are required to match 25 percent of the funds provided from these
sources. ESG requires a 100 percent match by federal regulations and are not required to pay back any
of these funds.
Anti -Poverty Policy 2: Network, support, and partner with non -profits, public entities, and
private businesses through participation in the Lubbock Housing
Consortium, the Lubbock Homeless Consortium, and the Lubbock
Housing Authority.
The City of Lubbock will continue to participate in the Housing and Homeless Consortia, initiate needs
assessments, and support organizations working on behalf of the low -to -moderate citizens of Lubbock.
Community Development staff has also been involved in the development of a Planning Model through
the United Way of Lubbock. In addition, staff serves on United Ways Emergency Food and Shelter
National Board Program. This program distributes grant funds to non-profit agency to provide assistance
to low-income individuals.
Impact on the Reduction of Poverty Level Families
The City of Lubbock alone cannot reduce the number of poverty level families living in Lubbock. It is
unrealistic to suppose that the programs funded by the City through its federal entitlement grants will
show a significant reduction on the numbers of families residing in poverty. However, when spent in an
efficient manner and with the cooperation of other service providers, these funds can reduce the impact of
poverty in the lives of low-income families in Lubbock. Through our cooperative efforts with Catholic
Family Services, ninety individuals in 2003 have been able to go from welfare -to -work and stay off federal
assistance programs for at least ninety days. The City of Lubbock will continue to keep the reduction of
poverty in the forefront of its programs.
INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND COORDINATION
See Chapter 1 for a discussion of the internal and external organizations that the City of Lubbock
participates with in the community and a description of the local public housing authority structure.
Institutional Structure and Enhance coordination with local agencies to avoid duplication of
Coordination Strategy efforts through networking and communication so that the City
can be responsive to the needs of the low -to -moderate income
families of Lubbock.
As noted under the Anti -Poverty Strategy 2, the City will initiate needs assessments and participate in
both local consortia and local nonprofit organizations in an effort to keep abreast of community
development activities and needs in the community.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-21
Technical assistance workshops are offered by the City each year to educate citizens and agencies about
the type of entitlement grants available, their eligible uses, local and federal policies associated with the
funds, and the application process. These workshops are open to the public. Each workshop provides
breakout sessions where more individualized information is provided and questions are answered.
PUBLIC HOUSING RESIDENT INITIATIVES
One of the many strategies of the Lubbock Housing Authority is to address the social needs as well as
the housing needs of low-income families. The primary goal of resident initiative programs is to provide
guidance and direction to Housing Authority residents in obtaining information and organizing programs
that are essential. in upgrading their quality of life, enhancing self-esteem, and maintaining a healthy
growth environment. The focus is to assist residents in using any and all skills they might have in being
more productive in their lives. To achieve this goal, the Lubbock Housing Authority has implemented the
following programs:
Family Self Sufficiency Program (F.S.S.)
This program coordinates plans and programs for Section 8 Certificate and Voucher holders and Public
Housing residents with public and private resources to enable these families to achieve economic
JI independence and self-sufficiency, with housing as a stabilizing force. FSS permits the families to invest
their energy in other efforts including employment, education, and job training that are necessary to
achieve self-sufficiency. The Program offers a financial incentive to families through the establishment of
an escrow account, which becomes available to the family upon successful completion of a 5-year
contract of participation.
Family Unification Program (F.U.P.)
This program is designed to keep families united. Children sometimes have to be placed in foster homes
due to inadequate housing, homelessness, and/or domestic violence. LHA has formed a partnership with
Children's Protective Services to help prevent these separations from occurring.
Training Workshops
Training workshops are scheduled semi-monthly to meet the needs of LHA residents that need training in
specific areas. Workshops consist of budgeting, parenting, job preparedness, counseling, literacy, GED
classes, and life skills.
Resident Councils
Resident councils have been formed since 1992. The Technical Assistance grant that was received in
September of 1993 helped to establish this office. The program is designed to empower the residents of
public housing with a range of economic self-help and self -management opportunities that help break the
cycle of poverty and homelessness. The council has its own office that residents can contact with their
y� concerns. The council has several activities during the year to promote togetherness among each
development including an annual Mr. & Mrs. LHA Pageant.
MONITORING
To ensure appropriate use of public dollars and to maintain consistency with Federal program
requirements and regulations, the City of Lubbock Community Development staff will plan, implement,
and enforce a comprehensive monitoring plan for each project. In addition, this monitoring plan will
ensure satisfactory progress toward the Consolidated Plan goals, promote program accountability, further
fair housing compliance with residential displacement and relocation assistance plans, and demonstrate
compliance with Federal requirements.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-22
Two monitoring methods are utilized by the City of Lubbock. Method one involves monitoring projects
directly administered by the City of Lubbock. Monitoring in this category consists of evaluating the project
goals, objectives, and levels of accomplishments. Monitoring of the activities will further ensure goal
achievement and regulation compliance. Method two involves monitoring of other agencies,
�} organizations, and recipients of federal funds through the City of Lubbock. This monitoring method is
utilized to ensure agency accountability, compliance, and consistency with project goals and
accomplishments.
The Community Development staff will conduct on -site monitoring of sub -recipient agencies periodically.
As stated in each contract, payment is made by reimbursement only. Monthly reports and an end -of -year
performance report are also required for each project. Staff also works with the sub -recipients on a
regular basis as a resource for technical assistance in planning, implementation, project evaluation, and
capacity building.
The Community Development staff will work to ensure long-term compliance with housing codes through
on site inspections. At least on an annual basis, and more often should the need arise. Follow-up
inspections will be performed as necessary to ensure compliance.
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
6-23
SPHC PIT Homeless Survey
January 27, 2003
Street Count
Simple head counts from individual survevs.
Interviewed
Will Sleep
Male
Female
Unsure
Male <18
Female <18
Unsure <18
Totals
Laundromat
Outdoors
4
2
1
7
Outdoors
Outdoors
19
3
2
24
Apartment
Eviction
2
2
4
4
12
Apartment
Abandoned building
1
1
Bus Station
Outdoors
1
1
Library
Outdoors
5
1
6
Outdoors
Church
2
2
_Carpenters
Whatabur er
jOutdoors
2
2
Subtotals 1
351
71
41
4
4
11
55
Pnniilatinn lnfnrmatinn frnm inrlivirival survpvs.
Disabilit /Characteristic
Male
Female
Totals
Veteran
0
Mental illness
2
2
Employed
0
Unemployed
6
41
10
Underemployed
0
Medical problems
2
1
3
Substance abuse
1
1
Parolee/probationer
0
Disabled
0
Domestic violence victim
1
1
HIV/AIDS
0
High school/GED
31
3
City of Lubbock - FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
A-1
200LA - OW2,
SPHC PIT Homeless Survey
January 27, 2003
Agency Count
Emeraencv
Agency
M
W
M/W
Fam/Kids
DV wlkids
u/Ne 5-17
Teens
Total
Carpenters
Church
3
3
Cleansing
Springs
21
1
3
Hale County
Crisis Center
24
24
Interfaith/LIHN
10
10
SP Community
Action
2
2
Salvation Army
15
3
18
Salvation Army -
Post
0
SP Children's
Shelter
1
14
14
PS
84
84
Yellow House
Canyon
0
Children's Home
of Lubbock
16
16
Subtotals
18
5
2
11
108
14
16
174
Transitional
Agency
M
M/sub
/sub
Recovery
MHMR
DV w/kids
Kids
M/Rel
Total
Alcohol
Recovery Center
14
14
ASK House
11
11
Children's Home
of Lubbock
4
12
16
Cleansing
Springs
12
2
14
IMANI
House/Inside-
Out
6
3
9
Link Ministries
7
7
Lonnie Gary
House
15
15
Lubbock Faith
Center
31
31
MASH (Managed
Care)
0
Walker House
0
Subtotals
12
20
14
31
15
4
14
7
117
otal Served
291
City of Lubbock — FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
A-2
2-ooa - (-0302.
SPHC PIT Homeless Survey
January 27, 2003
Capacities
Fmernenry
Agency
M
W
M/W
Fam/Kids
DV w/kids
u/Neg 5-17
Teens
Total
Carpenters
Church
3
3
Hale County
Crisis Center
30
30
Interfaith/LIHN
14
14
SP Community
Action
0
Salvation Army
32
10
8
50
Salvation Army -
Post
0
SP Children's
Shelter
16
16
W PS
204
204
Yellow House
Canyon
0
Children's Home
of Lubbock
16
16
Subtotalsj
1
351
101
0
22
234
16
16
333
Tran-,itinnal
Agency
M
M/sub
/sub
Recovery
MHMR
DV w/kids
Kids
M/Rel
Total
Alcohol Recovery
Center
18
18
ASK House
15
15
Children's Home
of Lubbock
4
12
16
IMAN I
House/Inside-Out
6
4
10
Link Ministries
61
6
Lonnie Gary
House
1
16
16
Lubbock Faith
Center
40
40
MASH (Managed
Care)
8
10
Walker House
1 6
1
6
Subtotals
0
251
26
40
161
4
201
6
137
Total Beds
470
City of Lubbock - FY 2004-2009 Consolidated Plan
A-3
n
0
M
li
0
C>
N
O
n
9
0
w
a
�d
Name of Jurisdiction.
Lubbock city, Texas
Source of Data:
CIIA, Data Book
Data Current as of:
2000
Renters [ Owners
=�7771eriy
Household by Type, Income, S
Housing Problem
(I l 2
members)
Small Related
(2 to 4
members)
Large Related
(5 or more
members)
Ali
Other
Total
Renters
,lely
(1 & 2
members)
SmaN Rel ted
(2 to 4
members)
Large Related
($ or more
members)
All
Other
Total
Owners
T
Ilouscholds
1
(�) (B) tC) I (n) (I.) (l) (��) (tf) IF (()
1. household Income- 50'%
A1F1
i,563 3,949 1,052 8,000 14.G24 2,752 1,R04 G30
I_!07
G?93
20,917
2. Household Income -30"/°
N1 F1
859 2.005 509 5.280 8,G53 l.OR2 7R4 255
(i78
2.799
1 1.452
3. %with any housing problems
80.3 79.G (i9.0 79.0 C! RG.? G3.1 72 0
77J
4. % Cost Burden >30'%
66.R 75.8 �. 77.6 7R.9 7G.9 G8.7 73.2 72.5 62.5 GR.B
74.9
5. % Cost Burden >50%
47.1 63.3 - 4.32 75.1 67.7 14.5 55.E Lr - 56.9 48.7 49.8
63.3
6. Household Income >30 to
-50% A1F1
7. % with any housing problems
8. % Cost Burden >30%"
704 1,944 543 2.780 5.971 LG70 1,020 ;75 429 3.494
(i3.1 75.6 91.0 R7.1 80.R 42.5 59.8 82.7 61.5 54.2
(i3.1 70.2 52.3 85.6 74.9 42.5 5(i.9 �- 53.3 h I.5 50.2
9,465
71.0
65.8
9. % Cost Burden >M%
2R.3 17.7 9 (11 DE= 18.3 27.9 9.3 38.5 22.G
27.0
10. Household Income >50 to
<=80% AM
59O 2 �)50 665 3.170La2.210 2.3G4
720EdG.229
13.G04
I L% with any housing problems
53.4 449 6G.9 45.4 47.8 2(L8 41.0
l44.4 4G.0 35.0
41.9
12.% Cost Burden >30%
13. % Cost Burden >50%
1F 5.14 32.9 15.0 45.0 38.1 20.8 38.5 15.3 46.0 30.G
22.9 1.7 F0.(1 5.2 4.7 5.4 7.G �- 2.RF128 F 7.(1
34.7
5.8
14. Household Income>80% N1F1 864 5,7G4 95+ d•G31 12.21517,315 2.874 3.455 30,712
42927
15.% with anv housing problems
32.9 1 1.5 .14.9 7.5 14.1 4.7 27.)JEI 9.G
10.9
16.% Cost Burden >30"/°
3(1.G 4,4 O.8 4.7 G.I 4.7 5.8 3.8 12.G
17. % Cost Burden >50%
9.R Q3 C 0.0 0.3 F 0 9 0.6 O.5 0.1 I.(])0.6
(1.7
18. Total households
JL= 3.017 12.663 2.670 I S,RG4 34.214 12.(13U 21,4R3 �_ _ 4,224 5.497 43.234
77.448
19. % with any housing problems 53.9 39.7G9.7 53.3 49.6 18.7 I(i.(i 3,5 D9 20.9
33.6
20. % Cost Burden >30
52.9 32.4 29.5 51.6 42.9 18.G 14.3 14.3 28.3 17.3
28.6
21. % Cost Burden >50
27.3 13.3 10� 33.5 23.6 7.9 4.G 4.R 12.2 G.5
14.1
a
N