The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution - 2006-R0189 - Apply To FAA To Use Passenger Facility Charge To Fund Capital Projects At LBB - 04_26_2006Resolution No. 2006-RO189 April 26, 2006 Item No. 5.10 RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized to direct the Director of Aviation on behalf of the City of Lubbock, to submit an application and all related documents to the Federal Aviation Administration to impose and use a Passenger Facility Charge to fund certain capital projects at the Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport. Said application is attached hereto and incorporated in this resolution as if fully set forth herein and shall be included in the minutes of the City Council. Passed by the City Council this 26th day of C McWUGAL, MAYOR ATTEST: Rebbcca Garza, City Secretary AS TO CONTENT: of Aviation APPROVED AS TO FORM: Linda L. Chamales, Senior Attorney/ Office Practice Section as/cityatt/Linda&ccdocs/Res-Passenger Facility Chg Applicationil3 April 13, 2006 Resolution No. 2006—RO189 MAR Ann l—A 911M_n9c17 PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE (PFC) APPLICATION . Department of Transportation rFederal Aviation Administration Application Type (Check all that apply) ® a. Impose PFC Charges Date Received PFC Number ® b. Use PFC Revenue ❑ c. Amend PFC No. PART 2. Public Agency Name, Address, and Contact Person 3. Airport(s) to Use 4. Consultation Dates a. Date of Written Notice to Air Carriers: Agency Name City of Lubbock. Texas Lubbock Preston 2/1312006 Address Route 3 Box 389 Smith International 5401 N. Martin Luther Kino Blvd. Airport b. Date of Consultation Meeting with Air Carriers: City, State, ZIP Lubbock. Texas 79401 3/2112006 Contact Person Kelly m ell PART II Charges [a. Airport to Impose b. Level c. Total Estimated PFC d. Proposed Effective e. Estimated Expiration ubbock Preston Revenue b Level Date: Date: mith International February 1, 2007 March 1, 2013 ❑ $1.00 ❑ $2.00 ® $3.00 Impose $9,731,125 Airport Use $9,731,125 Impose (previous impose ❑ $4.00 ❑ $4.50 application approval) Use PART III 6. Attachments Check all that Apply) Attached Submitted with Application Number Document a. ® ❑ Airport Capital Improvement Plan b, ® ❑----_—__---___--- Project Information (Attachment B) C. ® ❑---__----__—_-- Air Carrier Consultation Information d. ® ❑—_____----__—_—___ _ Request to Exclude Class(es) of Carriers e. ❑ ❑ _—__-- —_—___ _ Alternative Uses/Projects f. ❑ ❑--__—_—__—____--_—_-- Competition Plan/Update g. ® ❑----_—__----_—_ ALP/Airspace/Environmental h. ❑ ❑ ------ ------ -- -- PART IV T. With respect to this PFC application 1 hereby certify as follows: To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application are true and correct; This application has been duly authorized by the governing body of the public agency; The public agency will comply with the attached assurances if the application is approved; For those projects for which approval to use PFC revenue is requested, all applicable ALP approvals, airspace determinations, and environmental reviews required by the National Environmental Policy Act have been completed, If required, the public agency has submitted a competition plan in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 47106(f); and If required by 49 U.S.C. 40117(d)(4), adequate provision for financing the airside needs, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and gates, has been made by the public agency. a. Typed Name of Authorized Representative b. Title c. Telephone Number 806-775-2044 James - Loomis Director of Aviation d. Fax Number 806-775-3133 e. Sign tur of Authorized Represents ive f. Date Signed /-//V., ��= ' - aperw rk Reduction Act Statement: This fornk is the FAA's primary source for collecting information for the authority to collect PFC revenue for irportevelopment. This information is used to determine the eligibility and justification of airport development projects regarding safety, security, Ncap,Acity of the national air transportation system; or which reduce noise or mitigate noise impacts resulting from an airport; or furnish op unities for enhanced competition between or among air carriers. It is estimated that it will take approximately 5-80 hours to fill out the application depending on the complexity. The use of the form is required to obtain FAA approval of authority to collect PFC revenue (49 U.S.C. 40117(c)). No assurance of confidentiality is necessary or provided. It should be noted that an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number associated with this collection of information is 2120-0557. FAA Form 5500-1 (8-00) Supersedes Previous Edition ATTACHMENT A AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Attached is the Airport Capital Improvement Plan for the Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport. 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan 06 Design & Engineering only Phase 11 GA Ramp Imprvmnts (E $ 371,308 $ 19,542 390,850 *Carry Over 573,808 to'07 07 Construction: Phase It GA Ramp Imprvmnts (East Side) $ 2,340,943 $ 123,207 $ 2,464,150 Terminal Bldg Imprvmnts: (Design & Construction) $ 1,775,865 $ 2,994,135 $ 4,770,000 *Carryover (573,808 ('06) + 3,400,000 ('07) + 143,000 ('07 cargo) = 4,116,808 08 Design & Engineering Only: Rehabilitate/Extend Rwy 8126 8 $ 1,999,750 $ 105,250 $ 2,105,000 72" Waterline .(3,400,000-143,000 = 3,543,000 -1,999,750 = 1,543,250 carryover) M2 09 Construction: Rehabilitate/Extend Rwy 8/26 & Bridge $ 5,086,250 $ 6,214,000 $ 594,750 $ 11,895,000 72" Waterline 1,543,250 carryover + 3,543,000 entitlements = 5,086,250 10 Design & Engineering Only: Rehabilitate Runway 17R/35L $ 2,142,250 $ 112,750 $ 2,255,000 *(3,543,000 - 2,142,250) = $1,400,750 Carryover fix,K"M, g M',7"Vi h-, '-g 11 Construction: Rehabilitate Runway 17R/35L 4,943,750 $ 7,164,000 $ 6379250 12,745,000 *1,400,750 carryover + 3,543,000 = 4,943,750 Averages $ 3,657,762 $ 2,675,600 $ 913,468 $ $ 7,246,830 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 6-1, PFC Administrative Fees 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Administrative Fees associated with the implementation of the PFC Program. This includes application preparation, audit fees, postage, etc. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters gates __, and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates ^, and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO[ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[X] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The PFC Program requires specific and detailed reporting of the PFC Funds. Revised 10/2/00 This project will utilize PFC Funds to pay for these required reports and application preparations. *****FOR FAA USE**,►**************************,►************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _y _ Certification Inspector concur, Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) +_ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated[ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) N Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The PFC Program will allow the airport to implement the projects specified in this application that enhance the safety and security for the airport and the traveling passenger. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Fumish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)****** r******* r********************************** a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph — of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph __._ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the Revised 10/2/00 following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier _ percentage of annual boardings _); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 5/05 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 9/06 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Continental Airlines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc. (Southwest Airlines, Co. and Continental Airlines, Inc. attended the Air Carrier Meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: N/A Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: 14. FINANCING PLAN: Revised 1012/00 SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ J OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOP YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ I Revised 10/2/00 c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest; pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 6-2, GA Ramp Improvements Phase II 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A) The project is the second phase of the rehabilitation and replacement of the general aviation ramp pavement. It consists of the rehabilitation of existing general aviation ramp pavement to the east side of Runway 17L/35R. The project will rehabilitate approximately 115,000 square yards of existing bituminous surface course pavement. The project will also include incidental marking, lighting, site grading, drainage and geotechnical investigations. B) The project will include the grading of the Runway 17L safety area beyond the end of the runway. This will include extension of the storm sewer culvert across the safety area of Runway 17L. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities _—. 2. Number of ticket counters gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates __, and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: Revised 10/2/00 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[X] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: A) This project will enhance the safety of the general aviation ramp on the east side by reducing the potential for loose pavement material or aggregate. The loose material can damage aircraft engines and propellers. The rehabilitation of the apron pavement will reduce the number of cracks in the oxidized flexible pavement and reduce the potential for surface water to penetrate the subsurface which in turn could allow an aircraft wheel gear to push through the pavement section. The rehabilitation will also improve the movement patterns of aircraft from Runway 17L/34R. B) The work associated with the 17L Runway Safety Area (RSA) will include extension of a storm water culvert across the full width of the safety area and re -grading the RSA which will bring this RSA into compliance with current FAA standards. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE*****************************************#************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date _ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated[ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The project will preserve and enhance safety and capacity of the national air transportation system. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** Revised 10/2/00 a. Safety, Preserve[ J Enhance( J T Security, Preserve( ] Enhance[ ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ) Fumish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10}************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph __ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL __,__); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph —_ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier — percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 3/07 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 9/07 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ J NO [ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE*******************************************,►************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Revised 10/2/00 Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Continental Airlines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc. (Southwest Airlines, Co. and Continental Airlines, Inc. attended the Air Carrier Meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: N/A Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. Comments: 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] Revised 10/2/00 b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] NIA [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Revised 10/2/00 Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10I2I00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE#**#**#**#********#*****************#**#****#*****#*********#*#*# PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 6-3, Terminal Building Improvements 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will provide improvements to the existing terminal building. A) The improvements will include repair and replacement of HVAC equipment (air handlers, chillers, ductwork, system controls), B) The replacement of carpet in the passenger area of the concourse (sterile area) and C) The modifications to existing restrooms to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters _._, gates and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ J (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO[ J. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[X] (go to s) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) Revised 10/2/00 ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: A) Many portions of the existing HVAC system are reaching 30 years old. In 1994, a portion of the HVAC system was renovated to repair failed components. The system has become unreliable in maintaining the terminal environment properly for passengers and employees of the airlines/airport. This project is Phase 1 of a two phase improvement. Phase 2 will occur in 5 to 10 years after Phase 1. Portions of the HVAC system will be repaired as appropriate and new equipment installed to improve the ability to condition the terminal building, enhancing the safety of both the traveling passenger and the employees at the airport. B) The carpet in the passenger areas of the concourse is exhibiting excessive wear from normal passenger use. Areas of the carpet and seams are potential safety hazards to the passengers. Replacement of the carpet will enhance the safety of the airport terminal building. C) The existing restrooms in the terminal building do not meet the current requirements of the ADA. Modifications to the restrooms will provide proper facilities and allow access by all passengers utilizing the airport. These improvements will also enhance the safety and capacity of the airport to passengers. *****FOR FAA USE***********************************************************,►**,►***** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current( ] or Anticipated( ] LOI [ ] FAA SCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: Revised 10/2/00 A) The HVAC improvements will enhance efficiency of the systems, reducing the utility cost for the Terminal Building. This will in turn reduce the amount of costs to the airlines from the increasing energy costs. This will also allow the airport to dependably and adequately condition the air in the terminal building, enhancing the safety of the airport. B) The replacement of the carpet in the passenger areas of the concourse will provide increased safety for the passengers utilizing the airport. C) The modifications to the existing restrooms will provide proper access to all users of the airport, enhancing the safety and capacity of the airport to passengers. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] — Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _, of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph __ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ,_); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 2/07 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 3/08 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] Revised 10/2/00 c. Comments: 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE*************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Continental Airlines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc. (Southwest Airlines, Co. and Continental Airlines, Inc. attended the Air Carrier Meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: 12N13Lr Recap of Disagreements: N/A Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: NIA *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 Revised 10/2/00 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: Revised 10/2/00 *****FOR FAA USE*########***#*#*##*####*******##*##*##*###****##*#*#*#****##****#*#*** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 6-4, Upgrade Flight Information Display System 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The existing airport Flight Information Display System (FIDS) will be upgraded to current technology. The computers, displays, cable, power supply, power conditioning and associated equipment will be replaced. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters ___-, gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters gates __, and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ j (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ j NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[) $2.00[) $3.00[X] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Revised 10/2/00 The existing FIDS system is approximately 6 years old. The system utilizes video and computer components that typically have a lifespan of 6 years. Most of the displays monitors have either failed or are not legible for passengers to obtain flight information. Current technology has improved the user interface for airlines to enter flight data and improved the display monitors to provide better readability and comprehension of the flight data by passengers. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES [ J NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date — Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ J Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ) No[ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated[ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) — Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The upgraded FIDS will improve the ability for airlines to enter their flight information and improve the visual dissemination of the airline's flight data to passengers. This project will enhance the competition between airports and enhance efficiency of passenger movement. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. Revised 10/2/00 [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph — of Order 5100.38_ or PGL __); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ,^); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier , percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 6/07 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 6/08 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Continental Airlines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc. (Southwest Airlines, Co. and Continental Airlines, Inc. attended the Air Carrier Meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: N/A Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: N/A Revised 10/2/00 *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Comments: 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** Revised 1012100 a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ) Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE*,►*,►**,►*******,►.*************************#************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock Preston Smith international Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 6-5, Airfield Pavement Analysis 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will prepare an in-depth pavement analysis of the entire airfield pavement. This analysis will include identifying pavement sections, age of pavement surfacing, aircraft weight capacity and existing condition. Geotechnical testing may be required to obtain data necessary to develop the airfield pavement analysis. The analysis will present a rating for the entire airfield pavement to be used as a guide for maintenance or rehabilitation actions to extend the life of the pavement. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [) not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO[ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[X] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) Revised 10/2/00 ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The airport is required as part of their Grant Assurances to perform an airfield pavement analysis. The airport must update the pavement analysis regularly to track the pavement condition and to utilize the pavement condition to schedule maintenance or rehabilitation to maximize the life of the pavement. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO( ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date _ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) y Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The airfield pavement analysis will be used by the airport to schedule maintenance and rehabilitation actions to extend the life of the pavement and reduce the potential for hazardous debris from deteriorating pavement surface material. This project will enhance the safety and capacity of the airport by keeping the airfield pavement open to aircraft. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance( ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)*******,t*,t*****,t********************************* Revised 10/2/00 a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph — of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 1/07 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 6/07 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Continental Airlines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc. (Southwest Airlines, Co. and Continental Airlines, Inc. attended the Air Carrier Meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: N/A Revised 10/2/00 Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. Revised 10/2/00 *****FOR FAA USE**************,►,******,►**,►*****************,►************************* a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ J NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE*************#********************#*#**********#******************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 6-6, HVAC & Roof Renovation 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In 1994, the existing HVAC system in the terminal building was partially renovated to replace portions of the HVAC equipment that was inoperative and to adjust the overall operation of the HVAC system. The roof of the terminal building over the concourse for passenger gates 3 thru 6 was renovated to repair areas of the roofing that leaked and were failing to perform properly due to age. Bonds were sold to finance the improvements. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. if the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO[ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[X] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) Revised 10/2/00 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The HVAC system was not providing satisfactory conditioned air for the passengers. The system was not able to maintain a temperature for passengers that was satisfactory. The system did not equally condition all areas of the Terminal. Certain airlines were effected more than other airlines. Due to the age of the HVAC equipment, portions of the system were replaced while other elements of the HVAC system were adjusted to allow the system to supply adequate conditioned air for the passengers. The roof of the terminal building in the area of gates 3 thru 6 was leaking rain water into the concourse area, damaging the facility and creating a safety hazard for passengers.. The roof was renovated to repair the leaks and replace aged components. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) — Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated[ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The renovation of the HVAC system serving the terminal building will provide proper conditioned air for the passengers. The system did not equally condition the terminal, unfairly affecting certain airlines over other airlines in the Terminal. This project enhances the competition between airlines. The roof of the terminal building in the area of gates 3 thru 6 was leaking rain water into the concourse area. The roof was renovated to repair the leaks and replace aged components. The leaks unfairly affected the airlines that utilized Revised 10/2/00 gates 3 thru 6. This project enhanced the safety of the passengers and enhanced the competition between airlines. The use of PFC funds will be used to pay off the remaining debt on this project. This will reduce finance costs and reduce rates & fees to the airlines. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. , Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ j _ Security, Preserve [ J Enhance[ J Capacity, Preserve[ J Enhance[ ] _ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ J Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph __ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL [ J Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph __ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL }; [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ J; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ___); or [ J Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 6/1994 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 3/1997 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO [ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** Revised 10/2/00 a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Continental Airlines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc. (Southwest Airlines, Co. and Continental Airlines, Inc. attended the Air Carrier Meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: N/A Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Revised 1012/00 *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 'PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE***************,.******,►*************,►*****,►*********,►***************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ) If YES, does the Region support YES [ ) NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ l c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES [ l NO [ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ l Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ) NO [ J N/A [ } e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ l No [ J. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ J Disapprove [ l Revised 10/2/00 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USEN USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 6-7, Airfield Drainage and Safety Mitigation Improvements 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An area located north of Runway 8/26 across from Taxiway G retains storm water runoff in a basin. This basin is capable of holding considerable volume of water. Currently, the only way for storm water to leave this basin is by way of evaporation. This basin attracts wildlife which has become a hazard to aircraft. This project will improve the overall drainage of this area, which includes the access to the Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT), and install a pump station and pipe conveyance systems to allow removal of stored storm water from the basin. Excavation, storm sewer piping, pumping systems and other associated work will be involved in this project. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ) N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* Revised 10/2/00 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[X] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The storm water basin is located within the airport property and adjacent to Runway 8/26. During periods when the basin contains storm water, the basin will attract wildlife such as birds. Aircraft using runway 8/26 startle these birds and bird strikes in this area of the airport have been an issue. In addition, the entrance road from the County Road to the FAA ATCT is in the flood plane. On a small (more frequent) 5 year storm event, the entrance road will be under water making it impassable. During times of significant rainfall FAA ATCT personnel are "shuttled" to work by parking along tower road and riding in a FAA owned 4x4 vehicle. On larger 50 and 100 year events, the entrance road is almost completely inundated for a significant amount of time. This project will improve the overall drainage in this area by increasing the storage capacity of this detention basin and concentrating the inundated area and provide a method for removal of storm water from the basin to reduce the potential for attracting wildlife. *****FOR FAA USE*************#****************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. ` Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _ CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date — Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) _ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain),— _ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE —for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The airfield drainage improvements will improve the drainage of storm water in the area north of Runway 8/26. It will reduce the potential for attracting wildlife to the storage basin. It will help mitigate potential flooding problems along taxiway M and the access road to the FAA ATCT during times of significant rainfall and Revised 10/2/00 will enhance the safety of the airport by reducing the potential for wildlife strikes by aircraft. *****FOR FAA USE*«**«*«*****«***«***«**«******************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph __ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL __); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph __ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ J Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; ( ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ J; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); ( ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 1/08 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 1/09 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ J c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE***********«********************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: Revised 10/2100 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Continental Airlines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc. (Southwest Airlines, Co. and Continental Airlines, Inc. attended the Air Carrier Meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: N/A Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: N/A *****FOR FAA USE**************#******************************************************* a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ Revised 1012/00 ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOl? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve ( ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Revised 10/2/00 Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE*********************************************************,►**,►***,►**,► PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, if Appropriate): Item 6-8, Entrance Road Repaving and Informational Signage Improvements 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The portion of Martin Luther King Boulevard north of Regis Street is commonly referred to as Terminal Drive. This roadway, which provides exclusive access to the airport, is in need of rehabilitation and repair. Also, the way finding signs, located on airport property, that direct the airport users and the flying public around the perimeter of the airport have become faded from exposure to the sun. This project will rehabilitate both the airport Terminal Building entrance road and the signage. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters __, gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [) not adequate [ ) (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO[ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[X] (go to 6) Revised 10/2/00 $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The airport Terminal Building entrance road is steadily deteriorating from the elements and in some cases pot -holes have started to form. The informational signs located on airport property are several years old have faded and are becoming difficult to read. Some signs are worn from the effects of the wind and require maintenance. This project will enhance the safety of the airport by providing clear legible signage and a smooth, safe driving surface for persons using the airport. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date — Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ J Other (explain) _,__ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated[ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The modifications to the existing entrance road and way finding signage included under this project will provide a clear, understandable entrance to the airport and a repaved entrance road. Completion of this project will enhance the safety of the airport. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] — Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport _ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Revised 10/2/00 b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)********* r*************************************** a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _, of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ) Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ) Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ) Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: 10, ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 6/07 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 6/08 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Continental Airlines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc. (Southwest Airlines, Co. and Continental Airlines, Inc. attended the Air Carrier Meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: Revised 10/2/00 None Recap of Disagreements: N/A Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. Revised 10/2/00 c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ l NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ l c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES[ ] NO[ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ l N/A [ l e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ j. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE*******************►*********************************************** PFC Application number. 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 6-9, Environmental Assessment for the Extension of Runway 8/26 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Both the current and past Master Plans for the airport call for the extension of Runway 8/26 to the east. The property required for the extension of this runway is already owned by the airport. However, the environmental assessment required for this extension has not yet been initiated. This project will include preliminary engineering and an environmental assessment (EA) of the runway extension. The EA will include the preparation of the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) if the assessment determines that no impact on the environment would occur with the runway extension. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters ,_, gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE************************************,►**********,►**,►**************** a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A I ] d. Comments: 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00(X] (go to s) Revised 10/2/00 $4.00[ J $4.50( J (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The Master Plan calls for Runway 8/26 to be extended to the east and for the threshold to Runway 8 to be relocated. The threshold of Runway 8 creates a runway incursion hazard with Runway 17R/35L and Taxiway M. Extending this runway to the east will help mitigate the dangers experienced with intersecting runways. The forecasted aircraft fleet using the airport will benefit from the additional length. Completing the environmental assessment is the first step to completing this runway extension. This project will enhance the safety of the airport by mitigating the risk associated with intersecting runways as well as enhance the capacity of the airport. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes ( ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No( ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated[ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA ( ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) _ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: Completing the environmental assessment in a timely manner will allow the airport to pursue extending Runway 8/26 east to reduce the potential for runway incursion. Completion of this project will enhance the capacity and safety of the airport. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] _ Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Revised 10/2/00 _ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport — Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)******************************************'`***'`*'` a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ! of Order 5100.38_ or PGL J_); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order 5100.38_ or PGL [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings __^); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 1/07 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 1/08 *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************* a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO [ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Continental Airlines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc. (Southwest Airlines, Co. and Continental Airlines, Inc. attended the Air Carrier Meeting.) Revised 10/2/00 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: NIA Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: NIA *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ]. Revised 10/2/00 c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES [ ] NO [ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** PFC Application number: ****************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): Item 6-10, Acquire ARFF Vehicle 4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will include the purchase of one (1) new 1500 gallon ARFF vehicle and associated equipment and tools. b. If applicable for terminal projects, 1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters __, gates , and baggage facilities 2. Number of ticket counters __, gates , and baggage facilities __ to be constructed or rehabilitated. 3. Net change in ticket counters gates , and baggage facilities *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************* a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below) b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ] NO [ ]. c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[X] (go to 6) $4.00[ ] $4.50[ ] (public agencies of medium and large hub airports go to 7, all others go to 6) ******************************************************************************************* 6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The new ARFF vehicle will replace an existing vehicle that is reaching 20 years old and has reached its maximum useful service life. The new vehicle and Revised 10/2/00 equipment will satisfy the requirement of FAR Part 139 for certificated airports. Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport is certificated under Part 139 and requires this vehicle and equipment to maintain the ARFF index and continue to meet the response requirements of Part 139. *****FOR FAA USE***************,►***,►,►*,►******************,►***,►********************** a. Is justification adequate? YES [ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION: N/A *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) __�____ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to 6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The new ARFF vehicle and equipment will allow the airport to meet the FAR Part 139 requirements for certificated airports. The ARFF vehicle and equipment will enhance the safety of the airport and the air carriers that use the airport. *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] _ Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to 10)************************************************* a. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph __ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ^ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ); [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d); Revised 10/2/00 [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; ( ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or, project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study: ( ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier percentage of annual boardings _ ); or [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************* 10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 6/08 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 6/09 *****FOR FAA a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day approval date? YES I ] NO [ ] b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ] c. Comments: 11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: Southwest Airlines, Co., T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Continental Airlines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc. (Southwest Airlines, Co. and Continental Airlines, Inc. attended the Air Carrier Meeting.) 13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: None Recap of Disagreements: N/A Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** Revised 10/2/00 14. FINANCING PLAN: SEE ATTACHED TABLE B-1 PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ EXISTING AIP FUNDS: *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ ***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50: a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES [ ] NO [ ] b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ ] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level[ ]. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] d. Comments. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOl? YES [ ] NO [ } If YES, does the Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: Revised 10/2/00 b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [ c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES [ ] NO [ ] d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. YES[ ] NO[ ] Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A [ ] e. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: N/A *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes[ ] No[ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve[ ] Partially Approve[ ] Disapprove[ ] ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Revised 10/2/00 New Application - Table B-1 Project Funding Summary Public Agency: City of Lubbock Use Airport(s): Lubbock Preston Smith International Application No: 06-06-C-0O-LBB Date: 4/13/2006 A1P Existing Future Future PFC LOCAL TWO Proied Numbed id Grants Entitlement Discretionary Total PayGo Bond Capital Fin. & Int. Total FUNDS Capital Fin. & Int. Grand Total Item 6-1 PFC Adminstrative Fee: $ 0 $ 0 $ .0 S 0 S 25,000 S 0 $ 0 S 25,000 $ 0 $ 25,000 $ 0 S 25,000 Item 6-2 GA Ramp Improvements Phase I $ 0 $ 2,712,250 $ 0 $ 2,712,250 $ 142,750 $ 0 $ 0 S 142,750 $ 0 $ 2,855,000 S 0 S 2,855,000 Item 6-3 Terminal Building Improvement $ 0 $ 1,775,865 S 0 S 1,775,865 $ 2,576,035 $ 0 $ 0 S 2,576,035 S 418,100 $ 4,770,000 $ 0 S 4,770,000 Item 6-4 Updgrade Flight Information Display Syste $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 S 0 $ 225,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 225,000 S 0 $ 225,000 S 0 Item 6-5 Airfield Pavement Analysi S 0$ 0$ 0 S 0 $ 91,000 S 0$ 0 S 91,000 S 0 $ 91,000 S 0 S 91,000 Item 6-6 HVAC & Roof Renovation $ 0$ 0$ 0 S 0 S 1,406,340 S 0$ 0 S 1,406,340 S 2,537,857 S 3,944,197 S 0 S 3,944,197 Item 6-7 Airfield Drainage and Safety Mitigation Improvements $ 0 S 0$ 0 S 0 S 1,940,000 $ 0$ 0 S 1,940,000 S 0 $ 1,940,000 S 0 S 1,940,000 Item 6-8 Entrance Road Repaving and Informational Signage Improvement S 0$ 0$ 0 S 0 $ 2,125,000 $ 0$ 0 S 2,125,000 S 0 $ 2,125,000 S 0 S 2,125,000 Item 6-9 Environmental Survey for Extension of Runway 8/2( S 0$ 0$ 0 S 0 $ 500,000 $ 0$ 0 S 500,000 S 0 $ 500,000 $ 0 S 500,000 Item 6-10 Acquire ARFF Vehicle $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 S 0 $ 700,000 $ 0 $ 0 S 700,000 S 0 $ 700,000 S 0 S 700,000 Totals $ 0 $ 4,488,115 $ 0 S 4,488,115 S 9,731,125 S 0 $ 0 $ 9,731,125 S 2,955,957 $ 17,175,197 $ 0 S 17,175,197 ATTACHMENT C AIR CARRIER CONSULTATION INFORMATION A Letter of notice for the consultation meeting was sent to air carriers on February 13, 2006. The following air carriers attended the consultation meeting: Southwest Airlines, Co. Continental Airlines, Inc. None of the Air Carriers expressed or submitted certification of disagreement with the projects in the PFC Application. The following pages contain the letter of notice for the consultation meeting and the list of air carriers notified of the consultation meeting. Mr./Ms. Dear In accordance with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 158 (Passenger Facility Charges), the City of Lubbock, Texas, as Owner and operator of Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport, has previously imposed a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) as specified in 14 CFR Part 158, per the Federal Aviation Administration's Record of Decision dated October 2004. Pursuant to Part 158.25, the City of Lubbock, Texas has scheduled a meeting for Tuesday, March 21 , at 10:00 am . The meeting will be held in Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport's Conference Room located on the second floor of the Terminal Building. The following actions will be discussed: ACTION A. In accordance with 14 CFR Part 158 section 158.25, the City of Lubbock, Texas will be requesting authorization to close the existing FAA approved impose and use PFC Application by amending PFC Application No. 94-02-U-01-LBB. See attached Amendment A Table B-1. In accordance with 14 CFR Part 158 section 158.23, the City of Lubbock is hereby providing written notice to all class of carriers who operate at Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport filing RSPA Form T-100 of the requested amendment. The Charge Expiration Date is August 1, 1999 to reflect the actual & final activity for the application. See attached PFC Summary. ACTION B. In accordance with 14 CFR Part 158 section 158.25, the City of Lubbock, Texas will be requesting authorization to amend the existing FAA approved impose and use PFC Application No. 04-05-C-00-LBB for the following project: Item 5-2, Extend Taxiway L - Amend PFC collection amount due to increase in construction material costs Justification — During design, it was determined that the extent of excavation and embankment to provide proper grades and drainage was more than initially anticipated for the PFC Application. The cost of relocating the existing playa and modifying the drainage structures to accommodate Taxiway L extension, along with construction inflation above normal, raised the cost of the project. Original PFC Amount Revised PFC Amount $309,324 $1,144,940 The original application Record of Decision Date is October 21, 2004. The current Charge Expiration Date for this application is November 1, 2006. The amended estimated Charge Expiration Date is February 1, 2007. This date reflects the Action A accelerated collection and increase in enplanements. This amendment will result in a net increase in PFC collection amount for this application. See attached Amendment B Table B-1. In accordance with 14 CFR Part 158 section 158.23, the City of Lubbock is hereby providing written notice to all class of carriers who operate at Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport filing RSPA Form T-100 of the requested amendment. 1 1 /6/06 ACTION C. In accordance with 14 CFR Part 158 section 158.25, the City of Lubbock, Texas will be requesting authorization to impose and use PFC funds for the following projects: Requested PFC Amount Item 6-1, PFC Administration Fees $25,000 Item 6-2, GA Ramp Improvements Phase I1 $142,750 Item 6-3, Terminal Building Improvements $2,576,035 Item 6-4, Upgrade Flight Information Display $225,000 System Item 6-5, Airfield Pavement Analysis $91,000 Item 6-6, HVAC & Roof Renovation $1,406,340 Item 6-7, Airfield Drainage and Safety $1,940,000 Mitigation Improvements Item 6-8, Entrance Road Repaving and $2,125,000 Informational Signage Improvements Item 6-9, Environmental Assessment for Extension $500,000 of Runway 8/26 Item 6-10, Acquire ARFF Vehicle $700,000 Total Requested PFC $9,731,125 See attached New Application Table B-1 All of the above projects are proposed at the collection rate (level) of $3.00. The estimated Charge Effective Date for this application is February 1, 2007. The estimated Charge Expiration Date for this application is March 1, 2013. In accordance with part 158.11, the City of Lubbock has requested that collection of PFC's under the new application not be required for the following classes of carriers operating at the Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport (See Carrier Exclusion Attachment): 1. Part 135 AT/CO non-scheduled/on demand carriers filing FAA form 1800-31 2. Commuters and Small Air Carriers filing DOT form 298C T 1 or E 1 for unscheduled enplanements 3. Large Certificated Route Air Carriers filing RSPA form T-100 for unscheduled enplanements 2 1/6/06 If you have any questions regarding the information listed, as well as the scheduled meeting, please contact me at (806) 775-3126. A supporting data package for Action B and Action C is available by request and will be available at the consultation meeting. It is requested that if you do not anticipate attending the consultation meeting, please complete the attached response form and return by mail or fax to the Airport at the address on the form. Sincerely, James W. Loomis Director of Aviation mc: 3 1/6/06 CARRIER EXCLUSION In accordance with part 158.11, the City of Lubbock has requested that collection of PFC's under the new application not be required for the following classes of carriers operating at the Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport: 1. Part 135 AT/CO non-scheduled/on demand carriers filing FAA form 1800-31 2. Commuters and Small Certificated Air Carriers filing form T-100 for non-scheduled enplanements 3. Large Certificated Route Air Carriers filing RSPA form T-100 for non-scheduled enplanements The above Carrier Unscheduled Enplanements do not constitute more than one percent (1%) of the total number of passengers enplaned annually at Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport. The administrative costs associated with the collection and accounting of these enplanements is not considered cost effective. Part 135 AT/CO Non-Scheduled/On Demand Carriers Filing FAA Form 1800-31 1. Fli htworks, Inc. 4 2. Hutcherson Air Service, Inc. 127 3. Sandall, Anne 5 TOTAL 136 * Based on CY 2004 FAA ACAIS dated 12/28/2005 The above listed Carriers are for UNSCHEDULED enplanements only Commuter and Small Certificated Air Carriers Filing Form T-100 for Non -Scheduled Ennlanements '/ ky .+N�xs .�� d�,,.7 x 5 'c ., `�1 s� t t s yyry ckk .�r Yi ". �`' 4 3 a 26 WWI 1. Skyway Airlines, Inc. 19 TOTAL 19 * Based on CY 2004 FAA ACAIS dated 12/28/2005 The above listed Carriers are for UNSCHEDULED enplanements only 4 1/6/06 Large Certificated Air Carriers Filing Form T-100 for Non -Scheduled Enplanements ukase MKS .......... fa 1. Alle 'ant Air LLC 972 2. Comair, Inc. 26 3. Continental Airlines, Inc. 155 4. Express Jet Airlines, Inc. 200 5. Falcon Air Express 125 6. Grand Holdings, Inc. 316 7. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 157 8. Southeast Airlines, Inc. 5 9. Southwest Airlines, Co. 1531 TOTAL 3,487 * Based on CY 2004 FAA ACAIS dated 12/28/2005 The above listed Carriers are for NON-SCHEDULED enplanements only 5 1 /6/06 LUBBOCK PRESTON SMITH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PFC FUNDING APPLICATION CONSULTATION MEETING This form acknowledges that the below Carrier has received notification of a PFC Consultation Meeting at Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport for Tuesday March 21, 2006 at 10:00 am. This further acknowledges that the below Carrier, by submission of this form, does not intend to attend the Consultation Meeting. Carrier Name: Signature: — Title: Date: Return to: Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport Route 3 Box 389 5401 N. Martin Luther King Blvd. Lubbock, Texas 79401 Fax: 806-775-3133 6 1 /6/06 List of Airlines to Receive Notification Letter American Airlines, Inc. American Eagle Airlines, Inc. Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Continental Airlines, Inc. Delta Airlines, Inc. ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. Southwest Airlines, Co. T.E.M. Enterprises, Inc. 1 /6/06 ATTACHMENT D In accordance with part 158.11, the City of Lubbock has requested that collection of PFC's under the new application not be required for the following classes of carriers operating at the Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport: 1. Part 135 AT/CO non-scheduled/on demand carriers filing FAA form 1800-31 2. Commuters and Small Certificated Air Carriers filing form T-100 for non- scheduled enplanements 3. Large Certificated Route Air Carriers filing RSPA form T-100 for non- scheduled enplanements The above Carrier Unscheduled Enplanements do not constitute more than one percent (1%) of the total number of passengers enplaned annually at Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport. The administrative costs associated with the collection and accounting of these enplanements is not considered cost effective. Part 135 AT/CO Non-Scheduled/On Demand Carriers Filing FAA Form 1800-31 ' i a 1. Fli htworks, Inc. 4 2. Hutcherson Air Service, Inc. 127 3. Sandall, Anne 5 11 TOTAL 136 * Based on CY 2004 FAA ACAIS dated 12/28/2005 The above listed Carriers are for UNSCHEDULED enplanements only Commuter and Small Certificated Air Carriers Filing Form T-100 for Non - Scheduled Enplanements Seim 1. S a Airlines, Inc. 19 TOTAL 19 * Based on CY 2004 FAA ACAIS dated 12/28/2005 The above listed Carriers are for UNSCHEDULED enplanements only Lar a Certificated Air Carriers Filing Form T-100 for Non -Scheduled Ennlanements � 1. Alle iant Air LLC 972 2. Comair, Inc. 26 3. Continental Airlines, Inc. 155 4. Express Jet Airlines, Inc. 200 5. Falcon Air Express 125 6. Grand Holdings, Inc. 316 7. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 157 8. Southeast Airlines Inc. 5 9. Southwest Airlines, Co. 1531 TOTAL 3,487 * Based on CY 2004 FAA ACAIS dated 12/28/2005 The above listed Carriers are for NON-SCHEDULED enplanements only Resolution No. 2006-RO189 April 26, 2006 Item No. 5.10 ATTACHMENT G: AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN (ALP), AIRSPACE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS ALL PROJECTS FOR WHICH IMPOSE AND USE OR USE AUTHORITY IS REQUESTED IN THE APPLICATION MUST BE LISTED UNDER EACH TYPE OF FINDING BELOW. *****FOR FAA PFC Application Number: ALP Findings 1. Current ALP approval date: 10/22/99 List proposed project(s) shown on this ALP: Item 6-2 GA Ramp Improvements Item 6-7 Airfield Drainage and Safety Mitigation Improvements Item 6-9 Environmental Assessment of Extension of Runway 8/26 2. List proposed project(s) not required to be shown on an ALP: Item 6-1 PFC Administrative Fees Item 6-3 Terminal Building Improvements Item 6-4 Upgrade Flight Information Display System Item 6-5 Airfield Pavement Analysis Item 6-6 HVAC & Roof Renovation Item 6-8 Entrance Road Repair and Informational Signage Improvements Item 6-10 Acquire ARFF Vehicle *****FOR FAA Public agency information confirmed? YES [ ] PARTIALLY [ ] NO [ ] For each project which the ADO/RO disagrees with the public agency's finding, discuss the reason(s) for the FAA's nonconcurrance below. II. Airspace Findings i. FAA Airspace finding date: March 31. 2006 (repeat as necessary) List proposed project(s) covered by this finding: Item 6-2 GA Ramp Improvements Phase II 2. FAA Airspace finding date: _March 31 2006 (repeat as necessary) List proposed project(s) covered by this finding: Item 6-7 Airfield Drainage and Safety Mitigation Improvements 3. FAA Airspace finding date: _March 31. 2006 (repeat as necessary) List proposed project(s) covered by this finding: Item 6-8 Entrance Road Repaving and Informational Signage Improvements 4. List proposed project(s) not required to have an airspace determination Item 6-1 PFC Administrative Fees Item 6-3 Terminal Building Improvements Item 6-4 Upgrade Flight Information Display System Item 6-5 Airfield Pavement Analysis Item 6-6 HVAC & Roof Renovation Item 6-9 Environmental Assessment for Extension of Runway 8/26 Item 6-10 Acquire ARFF Vehicle *****FOR FAA Public agency information confirmed? YES [ ] PARTIALLY [ ] NO [ ] For each project which the ADO/RO disagrees with the public agency's finding, discuss the reason(s) for the FAA's nonconcurrance below. ***********w**#********f*f*****r*****#****f***********r****#ff*fr**r***r****r**r*r#f*****r*r*r***r**********rr***rr 111. Environmental Findings 1. List proposed project(s) which are categorically excluded from the requirement for formal environmental review: Item 6-1 PFC Administrative Fees Item 6-2 GA Ramp Improvements Phase II Item 6-3 Terminal Building Improvements Item 6-4 Upgrade Flight Information Display System Item 6-5 Airfield Pavement Analysis Item 6-6 HVAC & Roof Renovation Item 6-7 Airfield Drainage and Safety Mitigation Improvements Item 6-8 Entrance Road Repaving and Informational Signage Improvements Item 6-10 Acquire ARFF Vehicle 2. Date of FAA Finding of No Significant Impact: — N/A (repeat as necessary) List proposed project(s) covered by this finding: 3. Date of FAA environmental record of decision: N/A (repeat as necessary) List proposed project(s) covered by this finding: —"'FOR FAA USEf*Wwfff**fffff*#fff****f**ifffffff***f#**f*f*f***Wfffif**f***#*fff*f***•#*ff**f***fiffffffff* Public agency information confirmed? YES [ ] PARTIALLY [ ] NO [ ] For each project which the ADO/RO disagrees with the public agency's finding, discuss the reason(s) for the FAA's nonconcurrance below. f*f#*fffw*ff**#ff*f**fff**#ffffffff***ff*fffffff*#*fffW**fff****fff****#fff*ff*f*f*#ff*f*fff*f#ff*ff*ffif*ff*ffff** Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date