HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 4679 - Agreement - TDOT - Surface Transportation, & Transportation Enhancement Programs - 12_08_1994PiiEPf',;FL-D BYStreet/Drainage Engr.
' -
December 4.4_.Lity Co
Meeting
Resolution No. 4679
Item #22
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and directed to
execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock an Agreement with the State of Texas, acting by
and through the Texas Department of Transportation, attached hereto, which shall be spread upon
the minutes of the Council and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall constitute and be a
part of this Resolution as if fully copied herein in detail.
Passed by the City Council this
ATTEST:
&-�' tt "�'
]Betty City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
T Bert Director of Strategic Planning
APPR D AS TO FORM:
Harold Wiffiarid,Assistant City Attorney
HW:js/A TDOT.RES
ocdocs/Novemba 15, 1994
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TRAVIS
Resolution No. 4679
December 8, 1994
Item #22
Lubbock County
CSJ: 0905-06-026
Broadway Streetscape
From: University Avenue
To: Dr. Martin Luther Ring
Boulevard
A G R E E M E N T
(SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM)
THIS AGREEMENT, is made by and between the State of Texas, acting by and through
the Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "State", and the
Lubbock Urban Transportation Study, a Metropolitan Planning Organization,
chartered under the laws of the State of Texas, acting by and through the City
of Lubbock, Texas, hereinafter called the "City".
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, ("ISTEA")
codified under Title 23 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq., establishes the National
Intermodal Transportation System that is economically efficient and
environmentally sound, provides the foundation for the nation to compete in the
global economy, and will move people and goods in an energy efficient manner; and
WHEREAS, Title 23 U.S.C. Section 133 establishes a Surface Transportation Program
(STP) whereby 10% of the program funds are for transportation enhancement
activities to be implemented by the States' Transportation Agencies; and
WHEREAS, Title 23 U.S.C. Section 134 establishes that Metropolitan Planning
Organizations ("MPO's") and the States' Transportation Agencies develop
11/04/94 Page 1 of 10
transportation plans and programs for urbanized areas of the State; and
WHEREAS, the State and the City desire the improvements to the Broadway
Streetscape, as shown in the attached "Exhibit A", to be hereinafter identified
as the "Project"; and
WHEREAS, Title 23 U.S.C. Section 120 establishes that the Federal share of
funding for STP will not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the cost of the Project
or the approved Federal Share of $ 1,625,704.00; and
WHEREAS, the City has offered to participate in the development and construction
of the Project by providing funding, preparing the design documentation,
acquiring the necessary right-of-way, accomplishing utility adjustments and other
necessary items required by the State; and
WHEREAS, on the 14th day of October, 1993, the Lubbock City Council passed
Resolution No. 4280, attached hereto and identified as "Exhibit B", authorizing
the City's participation in the development of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the State will secure the federal cost share, let the construction
contract, provide the construction inspection, provide other items as required
and
WHEREAS, on the 28th day of April, 1994, the Texas Transportation Commission
passed Minute Order 103709, attached hereto and identified as "Exhibit C",
authorizing the Project through the State Transportation Improvement Program;
A G R E E M E N T
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and
agreements of the parties hereto, to be by them respectively kept and performed
as hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows:
1. CONTRACT PERIOD
This agreement becomes effective upon final execution by the State and shall
terminate upon final completion of the Project or unless terminated or modified
as hereinafter provided.
2. SCOPE OF PROJECT
11/04/94 Page 2 of 10
A. The State and the City agree that the scope of the Project shall be limited
to the scope authorized by the Texas Transportation Commission.
B. The Project will be designated as a METROPOLITAN HIGHWAY for the limited
purpose of constructing the roadway facility; however, any existing city street
within the limits of the Project will not be designated or incorporated therein
prior to the State's award of the construction contract.
C. The City will continue to provide maintenance for all city roads within the
limits of the Project until the State's award of the construction contract.
3. UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS/RELOCATIONS
If the required right-of-way encroaches upon existing utilities and the proposed
highway construction requires the adjustment, removal or relocation of such
utility facilities, the City will establish the necessary utility work. Unless
otherwise provided by the owners of the utility facilities, the City shall be
responsible for all eligible costs associated with the adjustment, removal or
relocation of such utility facilities, and such adjustment, removal or relocation
shall be in accordance with applicable State law, local ordinances, franchise
agreements, regulations, policies and procedures. In the event additional
utilities are required to be adjusted, removed or relocated during the
construction of the Project, the City will be responsible for all costs
associated with the additional utility work, unless this work is provided by the
owners of the utility facilities.
4. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
A. The City will be responsible for the mitigation and remediation of any
environmental problems associated with the development and construction of the
Project. Should environmental problems be discovered upon completion of the
environmental assessment, the City shall provide to the State written
certification from the appropriate regulatory agency(s) that the environmental
problems have been remedied. The State will not let the construction contract
until all environmental problems have been remediated by the City.
B. All costs associated with the remediation of the environmental problems shall
be the responsibility of the City and/or the property owner (s). These costs will
11/04/94 Page 3 of 10
not be credited to the City's financial share towards the Project.
5. CERTIFICATION
The City shall provide to the State forty-five (45) days prior to the
construction contract let date, a certification that all right-of-way has been
acquired, all relocation assistance has been provided, no encroachments are in
the right-of-way or have been absolved in accordance with applicable laws, all
known environmental problems have been remediated, and all conflicting utilities
have been adjusted to clear the proposed construction.
6. ENGINEERING SERVICES
A. The City will prepare or cause to be prepared the preliminary engineering
necessary for the development of plans, specifications and estimates (P.S. &
E.). Development of the preliminary engineering shall include environmental
assessment and holding of a public meeting and public hearing.
B. The P.S.& E. shall be developed by the City or its consultant in accordance
with the State's latest Standard Specifications For Construction Of Highways,
Streets And Bridges or its currently approved revisions. The City must comply
with applicable State and Federal rules and procedures in the selection of a
consultant. The selection procedures to be utilized by the City must have prior
approval by the State.
C. The City shall submit the completed P.S.& E. to the State for review and
approval. Should the State determine that revisions are required to the P.S.& E.,
the City shall make the necessary revisions. The State will not let the
construction contract until the P.S.& E. have been approved by the State.
I
f
D. The City will submit to the State all documentation relating to actual costs j
incurred and associated with the development of the preliminary engineering and
�� Duerr �C*4' F/Wv f Fre-c e"n i
the P.S.& E. Reasonable costs incurred by the City after f 26 w 411 e � 7r-F
eligible for reimbursement at an amount not to exceed eighty percen (80$) of
wm
actual cost.
7. CONSTRUCTION FUNDING
A. The total design and construction costs for the Project is estimated at
i
$2,032,130 j
11/04/94 Page 4 of 10
B. The State will be responsible to secure the federal share of the funding
required for the development and construction of the Project. An amount not to
exceed $ 1, 625, 704.00, or 80% of the total cost to complete the project whichever
cost is less. The City will be responsible for any non-federal participation
costs associated with the Project.
C. Upon execution of this agreement, the City will remit a check or warrant made
payable to the "Texas Department of Transportation" in the amount of
$64,000.00 This amount is based on twenty percent (20%) of the estimated
engineering costs and State administrative costs. The funds will be utilized by
the State to review the engineering documentation and other incidental costs.
D. Sixty (60) days prior to the date set for receipt of the construction bids,
the State will notify the City that its financial share for the construction is
required. The City shall remit a check or warrant in the amount established by
the State within thirty (30) days from receipt of the State's written
notification to the address provided herein.
E. In the event the State determines that additional funding is required by the
City at any time during the development of the Project, the State will notify the
City in writing of the additional amount. The City will make payment to the
State within (30) days from receipt of the State's notification. Upon completion
of the Project, the State will perform an audit of the costs and any funds due
the City will be promptly returned.
8. CONSTRUCTION RESPONSIBILITIES
A. The State shall advertise for construction bids, issue bid proposals, receive
and tabulate the bids and award a contract for construction of the Project in
accordance with existing procedures and applicable laws. Any field changes,
supplemental agreements or additional work orders which may become necessary
subsequent to the award of the construction contract shall be the responsibility
of the City and subject to the approval of the State.
B. The State will supervise and inspect all work performed by the construction
contractor and will provide such engineering, inspection and testing services as
may be required to ensure that the construction of the Project is accomplished
11/04/94 Page 5 of 10
in accordance with the approved P.S.& E.
C. Upon completion of the Project, the State will issue to the City a
"Notification of Completion" acknowledging that the Project has been completed.
Upon the City's receipt of the "Notification of Completion", the roadway will be
removed from the State Highway System and will revert under the jurisdiction of
the City.
9. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
Upon completion of the Project, the City will assume responsibility for
maintenance of the completed facility.
10. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Upon completion or termination of this agreement, all documents prepared by the
City shall remain the property of the City. All documents prepared by the State
shall remain the property of the State. All,data prepared under this agreement
shall be made available to the State and to the City without restriction or
limitation on their further use.
11. TERMINATION
A. This agreement may be terminated by any of the following conditions:
(1) By mutual written agreement and consent of both parties.
(2) By either party, upon the failure of the other party to fulfill the
obligations as set forth herein.
B. The termination of this agreement shall extinguish all rights, duties,
obligations and liabilities of the State and the City under this agreement. If
the potential termination of this agreement is due to the failure of the City or
the State to fulfill its contractual obligations as set forth herein, the City
or the State will notify the other party that possible breach of contract has
occurred. The City or the State should make every effort to remedy the breach as
outlined by the other party within a period mutually agreed upon by both parties.
C. Upon termination of this agreement, any funds paid in advance by the City and
not expended by the State shall be returned to the City as promptly as possible.
12. INDEMNIFICATION
To the extent permitted by law, the City shall indemnify and save harmless the
11/04/94 Page 6 of 10
State, its officers, employees, agents and contractors from all claims and
liabilities due to the activities of the City and its officers, employees, agents
and contractors performed under this agreement and which result from an error,
omission or negligent acts of the City and its officers, employees, agents or
contractors. Additionally, to the extent permitted by law, the City shall save
harmless the State, its officers, employees, agents and contractors from any and
all expenses, including attorneys fees and court costs which may be incurred by
the State in litigation or otherwise resisting said claim or liabilities which
might be imposed on the State as the result of such activities by the City and
its officers, employees, agents or contractors.
13. AMENDMENTS
Any changes in the time frame, character, agreement, provisions or obligations
of the parties hereto shall be enacted by written amendment executed by both the
City and the State.
14. LEGAL CONSTRUCTION
In case one or more of the provisions contained in this agreement shall for any
reason be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity,
illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions hereof and
this agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable
provisions had never been contained herein.
15. NOTICES
All notices to either party by the other required under this agreement shall be
delivered personally or sent by certified or U.S. mail, postage prepaid, addressed
to such party at the following respective addresses:
State: Texas Department of Transportation
135 Slaton Highway
P.O. Box 771
Lubbock, Texas 79408-0771
11/04/94 Page 7 of 10
City: The City of Lubbock, Texas
P.O. Box 2000
Lubbock, Texas 79457
Attn: Ms. Marsha H. Allen, P.E.
Transportation Planner
All notices shall be deemed given on the date so delivered or so deposited in the
mail, unless otherwise provided herein. Either party hereto may change the above
address by sending written notice of such change to the other in the manner
provided herein.
16. SOLE AGREEMENT
This agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement between the parties hereto
and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements respecting
the within subject matter.
17. REMEDIES
Violation or breach of contract terms by the City shall be grounds for
termination of the agreement, and any increased cost arising from the City's
default, breach of contract, or violation of terms shall be paid by the City.
This agreement shall not be considered as specifying the exclusive remedy for any
default, but all remedies existing at law and in equity may be availed of by
either party and shall be cumulative.
18. INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS
The State will, for purpose of termination of the agreement prior to completion,
examine the books and records of the City for the purpose of checking the amount
of the work performed by the City at the time of contract termination. The City
shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records and other
documentation relating to costs incurred under this agreement and shall make such
materials available to the State, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or their
authorized representatives for review and inspection at its office during the
contract period and for three (3) years from the date of completion of work
defined under this contract or until impending litigation is resolved.
11/04/94 Page 8 of 10
Additionally, the State, FHWA and their duly authorized representatives shall
have access to all records of the City which are directly applicable to this
agreement for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts and
transcriptions.
19. OMB AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
The City shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L.
98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated
in paragraphs 6, 8 and 9 of OMB Circular No. A-128.
20. PROCUREMENT AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
The City shall adhere to the procurement standards established in Title 49 CFR
Part 18.36 and the property management standards established in Title 49 CFR Part
18.32.
21. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The City shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, statutes,
ordinances, rules and regulations, and the orders and decrees of any court,
administrative bodies, or tribunals in any matter affecting the performance of
the agreement.
22. CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE
The City shall comply with regulations of the Department of Transportation as
they relate to nondiscrimination (49 CFR 21 and 23 CFR 710.405 (B)); also
Executive Order 11246 titled "Equal Employment Opportunity", as amended by
Executive Order 11375 and as supplemented in the Department of Labor regulations
(41 CFR 60).
23. MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
The City shall comply with the "Minority Business Enterprise Program
Requirements" established in 49 CFR Part 23, Subpart D.
24. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATIONS
The City is prohibited from making any award at any tier to any party which is
debarred or suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation
in federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, Debarment and
Suspension. The City shall require any party to a subcontract or purchase order
11/04/94 Page 9 of 10
awarded under this contract as specified in Title 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulation, Part 29 (Debarment and Suspension) to certify its eligibility to
receive federal funds and, when requested by the State, to furnish a copy of the
certification.
IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed
in duple ate 707
T ITY O�Lu
By
S.
, TEXAS
avid R. La s on, Mayo
December 8, T994
Date
ATTEST:
BeItty M. ohnso , City Secretary
APPROVED AS CONTENT:
Z Al l,�i Wl_.
Ji Ber ram, Director of
i,�te Stg' c Planning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
arold Willard, Asst. City Attorney
11/04/94 Page 10 of 10
THE STATE OF TEXAS
Executed for the Executive
Director and approved by the
Texas Transportation Commission
under the authority of Minute
Order No. 100002 and Adminis-
trative Circular 26-93, for the
purpose and effect of activating
and carrying out the orders,
established policies or work
programs heretofore approved
by the Texas Transportation
Commissi
By:
Robert Cuellar, P.E.
Deputy Executive Director,
Transportation, Planning and
Development
Z —/? --fr
Date
Project
Limits
Resolution No. 4280
October 14, 1993
r ;t Item #33
a
11
I
I
A
M
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Lubbock, Texas, desires to nominate the Broadway
Streetscape as a project for the Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program
provided for by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA);
and
WHEREAS, such nomination requires a Resolution as documentary evidence
of a commitment by the City of Lubbock to provide a local match of funds; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lubbock highly recommends
that the candidate project submitted by the City of Lubbock be considered for
enhancement funding; and
WHEREAS, this project is consistent with the long range transportation
plan for the area, the Lubbock Urban Transportation Plan; NOW THEREFORE:
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the City of Lubbock hereby documents its commitment to provide
$672,000 in local match for the Broadway Streetscape nomination as a project
for the Statewide Enhancement Program provided for by the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act in the event such project is selected by the
Texas Transportation Commission; and
THAT the City Council of the City of Lubbock hereby highly recommends
the selection of the Broadway Streetscape project for funding and certifies
that the project is consistent with the long range transportation plan of the
City of Lubbock, and
THAT a copy of this Resolution be forwarded to the Texas Department of
Transportation as "ATTACHMENT 3
Passed by the City Council this
ATTEST:
etty M. o nson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO C`ONTTEENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
7im er ram, Assistant City Manager o G. Vaniver, First Assistant
Deve m nt Services City Attorney
DGV-Js/IS?EA.RES
DI-Agenda/September 16, 1993
a
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COHHI:.-ZON
VARIOUS County
District VARIOUS
MINUTE ORDER
,
Page 1 of 4 Page
WHEREAS, Title 23, United states Code, Section 133(d)(2), and
Section 160(e)(2), and Section 1015(d)(2) of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) require that ten percent
of certain funds apportioned to a state pursuant to Title 23, United
States Code, Section 104(b)(3) be used for transportation enhancement
activities; and
WHEREAS, the Texas Transportation Commission (the Commission)
by Minute Order 102922, dated November 30, 1993, established Category
4B, Texas Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program, of the Project
Development Plan to be developed, monitored, and approved by the
Commission; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 43, Texas Administrative Code (TAC),
Section 11.203 , a 90 day call for nominations of candidate projects
Was published in the Texas Register August 6, 1993; and
WHEREAS, a total of 339 nominations were received by the Texas
y`. Department of Transportation (the Department) and were evaluated for
eligibility and technical standards pursuant to Title 43, Texas
Administrative Code, Section 11.200 - 11.205; and
WHEREAS, each project determined eligible was scored by the
Transportation Enhancement Project Evaluation Committee (TEPEC); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 43, Texas Administrative Code,
Section 11.204, Department staff recommends to the commission a program
of 108 candidate projects shown in Exhibit A, each project being
recommended for selection based on:
(A) the list of all eligible candidate projects and scores
provided by TEPEC, together With any comments or
recommendations included in TEPEC's resolution;
(8) other issues relevant to consideration of any candidate
project for funding, including:
J
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
VARIOUS County M 2?= ORDER Page 2 of _ 4 pages
District VARIOUS
(i) policy matters;
(ii) consistency of the candidate project with the statewid
long-range transportation plans;
(iii) the candidate project's benefit -cost ratio, calculated
dividing the project score by the project's estimated
cost;
(iv) the priority ranking assigned the candidate project by
the nominating entity;
(v) evidence of public support for the candidate project;
(vi) evidence of the commitment of project sponsors to prow
more than the minimum required non-federal share of
allowable project costs and their ability to do so;
(vii) an evaluation of proposed projects indicating the exte
to which each project will meet accepted standards as
established by applicable law and by accepted
professional practice; and
(viii) the views, comments, and certifications, if any, of a
Metropolitan Planning organization or a governing body
a city or county;
(C) the potential benefit to the state of the candidate project;
(D) the impact of the candidate project on the economies of each
county and/or municipalities in which the project in to be
located.
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISbION
J
VARIOUS county
District VARIOUS
MINUTE ORDER
Page 3 of 4 Pages
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that, based upon the rationale
for selection of each project as shown in Exhibit B. the Executive
Director is hereby authorized to proceed in the most feasible and
economical manner with any necessary agreements required for the
development and construction of the projects shown in Exhibit A, with
programming in Category 4B of the 1994 Project Development Plan at the
estimated amounts shown on Exhibit A; and
IT IS, HOWEVER, UNDERSTOOD THAT
1. only the items and their associated cost determined
eligible for the Transportation Enhancement Program
funds as identified by the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 and Title 43,
Texas Administrative Code , sections 11.200 - 12.205,
and verified by project development will be eligible
for the Transportation Enhancement Program.
2. Prior to authorizing any funds or the performance of
any work for projects selected that all appropriate
local agreements identifying responsibilities and
escrow amounts must be executed between the Department
and the appropriate local entity.
3. The Department will administer the development,
contracting, construction, and management of projects
approved by this action in accordance with applicable
contracting statutes and Title 43, Texas Administrative
Code, Section 11.205. Approved projects will be
developed to encourage public input and involvement
consistent with the Department's established public
involvement procedure.
4. All administration, development, engineering and
contingencies, design, and construction costs incurred
by the Department will be charged to each respective
project.
J
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMISSION
VARIOUS county MINUTE ORDER
District VARIOUS
tted by:
r,
Page 4 of 4 Page
5_ For each project shown in Exhibit A acid verified as elig.
by project development that the federal funds shown in
Exhibit A must be matched by a minimum of 20% by local
dollars. Any expense incurred over and above the federa_
funds shown in Exhibit A for administration, development
engineering and contingencies, design, and construction
be paid by the project sponsor.
6. Prior to authorizing any funds or the performance of any
work for projects selected by the Commission the project
must be added to the Transportation Improvement Plan by
respective Metropolitan Planning Office and added to the
State Transportation Improvement Plan by the Department.
7. If the project sponsor or nominator withdraws support fo.
approved project the federal funds committed by the
Commission for that project will revert back to subseque:
enhancement program calls.
ironmental Affairs
and recommended?bv:
irectob
Minute Number
Date Passed
Executive Director
APR 28 94
j
PROJECT
PROJECT NAME
TOTAL
LOCAL
FEDERAL
FILE
PROJECT`
MATCH
FUNDS
NUMBER
COST
($)
AUTHORIZED
806.HO.HR.0154
BAYTOWN GOOSE
1404500
280900
1123600
CREEK STREAM
ENH
806.HO.HR.0166
BATTLEGROUND
125000
25000
100000
AT DEER PARK
806.HO.MQ.0152
MAGNOLIA
154700
32000
122700
STATION
806.LF.NA.0257
FREDONIA
212875
42575
170300
STREET
REHABILITATION
806.LF.PK.0261
POLK COUNTY
200000
40000
160000
COURTHOUSE &
ANNEX
r
806.LU.LU.0017
BROADWAY
3360000
672000
1625704
�%,
STREETSCAPE
806.MP.MP.0091
REG. RSCH.
134696
26940
107756
PREHIST. ARCH.
806.PH.HG.0122
PRESERVATION
60000
12000
48000
OF SHARY BLDG
806.WA.ML.0127
UNIVERSITY
950000
190000
760000
PARKS TRAIL
806.WF.WC.0112
HOLLIDAY
240396
48080
192316
CREEK PEDBIXE
TRAIL
806.PH.CF.0265
ACQIRESTORA
300000
60000
240000
CHAMPION
BUILDING
806.YK.CD.0203
COLORADO
250000
50000
200000
RIVER INTERPRE.
SITES
TOTAL COSTS
165978046
39927843
$94714632
April 28, 1994
Page 8
EXHIBIT A
w . .
r
--� Broadway Streetscaoe (LU.LU.0017)
This project involves developing Broadway Street in Lubbock to a visual corridor
linking the central business district of Lubbock with Texas Tech University on the
west and the Canyon Lakes and East Lubbock on the east. Plans would enhance the
corridor with landscaping and beautification, park benches, an entrance to MacKenzie
Park, as well as a sidewalk to connect with an existing system of hike and bike trails.
Regional Archaeological Research - South Texas (MP.MP.0091)
This project involves the development of an integrated approach to the management
of prehistoric archaeological sites as encountered by transportation related projects.
The research design would provide an excellent framework for determining the
eligibility of prehistoric sites for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places.
The project would assess prehistoric sites in TxDOT's Corpus Christi, Laredo, Pharr,
San Antonio and Yoakum Districts.
Preservation of the Shary Building (PH.HG.0122)
This project will renovate the Shary Building (built in 1938), used for numerous
commercial enterprises integral to the City of Mission. Currently, the building is used
by Mission for civic functions. After renovation, the building will be used to provide
a center for walking tours of Mission. The Shary Building is eligible for -the National
Register of Historic Places, and its renovation will enhance the appreciation of the
travelling public and increase tourism potential.
University Parks Trail (WA.ML.0127)
The project provides for a pedestrian and bicycle trail which will connect the Waco
Riverwalk and downtown Waco to Cameron Park and the Cameron Park Zoo: The trail
will be surfaced and lighted for evening use, and will form an important part of an
alternate transportation system and providing a viable alternative to vehicular
transportation.
Holiday Creek Pedestrian & Bicycle Trail (WF.WC.0112)
The project provides for a 1.42 mile long, 12' wide, pedestrian and bicycle trail
providing access from FM 369 (Southwest Parkway) to MH 7 (Midwestern Parkway)
adjacent to Holiday Creek in Wichita Falls. The project connects two major traffic
Exhibit "B"
Page 24'of 25