HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 040871G - Agreement - Simpson & Curtin Inc - Mass Transit Study - 04_08_1971oy0�9/6
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock be and is hereby authorized
and directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock an agree-
ment between the City of Lubbock and Simpson & Curtin, Inc., covering a
mass transit study, attached herewith which shall be spread upon the min-
utes of the Council and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall con
stitute and be a part of this Resolution as if fully copied herein in detail.
Passed by the City Council this 8th 1
ATTEST:
i
La nia Lowe, ty Secretary -Treasurer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
d O. Senter, Jr., Ci
SIMPSON S. CURTIN
I d 05 LdCUST STR EET,ADE LPHIA, PA. 19102 215 KI 5-8000
//
April 19, 1971
Mr. Wayne Sherrell
Director of Traffic
City of Lubbock
Box 2000
Lubbock, Texas 79408
Dear Wayne:
Enclosed please find three copies of the Agreement
between the City of Lubbock, Texas and Simpson & Curtin,
executed by us on this date.
In accordance with your letter of April 14th, we
will expect to receive one copy of the contract when it
has been fully executed.
very truly yours,
i I;tb
MICHAEL G. FERRERI
MGF/sac
Enc.
s
r
SIMPSON & CURTIN, INC.
STANDARD PROVISIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Effective November 1, 1970
Provisions for engineering services and expenses have been developed in accordance with
"Charges for Consulting Engineering Services specified by the American Society of Civil Engi-
neers in its standard manual — ASCE No. 45, April, 1964.
Services
The following rates will apply to actual time devoted by professional and staff employees
to each engagement, computed to the nearest half hour:
Officers — $40.00 to $45.00 per hour
Senior Engineers/
Transit Consultants — $23.00 to $35.00 per hour
Assistant Engineers/
Transit Analysts — $19.00 to $25.00 "per hour
Junior Engineers/
Transit Assistants — $15.00 to $20.00 , per hour
Engineering Aides — $ 8.00 to $16.00 per hour
Clerks and
Stenographers — $ 7.00 to $11.00 per hour
Field Checkers — $ .5.00 to $ 9.00 per hour
Simpson & Curtin, Inc. reserves the right to make adjustments for individuals within these
classifications as may be desirable, in its opinion, by reason of promotion or demotion or change
in wage rates generally. Such adjustments will be limited to the manner in which charges are com-
puted and billed and will not, unless so stated in writing, affect other terms of an agreement such
as total estimated project cost.
—1—
SBIPSON & CURTIN, INC.
The foregoing rate classifications embrace all employees of Simpson & Curtin, Inc., part-
time and temporary as well as permanent employees.
Expenses
Actual living expenses will be billed to the client for Simpson & Curtin personnel assigned
to a project while away from their home office.
All transportation expenses incurred by Simpson & Curtin personnel while engaged on a
project and away from home office will be billed to the client at cost. Transportation charges in-
curred by use of personal automobile will be billed at 100 per mile traveled plus storage, parking
and toll charges.
All other costs, such as materials, purchased items, long distance telephone, reproductions
and other expenses applicable to the project, together with sales and use taxes thereon, will be
charged to the client at cost.
—2—
LUBBOCK TRANSIT
TECIINICAL STUDY
P R O J E C T
B U D G E T
Consulting
Services
Local
Services
Phase
Man -Days Cost
Other
Cost Total
Man -Days
Cost
Other
Cost
Total
1
18
52;480
$700 33,1S0
170
S9,500
$750
119,250
2
25
3,440
— 3,440
l0
S00
—.
S00
3
15
2,040
400 2,440
S
250
250
4
30
4,08.0
800 4,880
I
20
1,000
—
1,000
28
3,81¢
600 4,410
10
S00
—
300
6
_ 22
3,160?
— 3,160
10
S00
—
S00
7
12
1,630
— 1,630
10
Soo
—
S00
8
24
3,420
400 3,820
15
750
—
750
9
36
5,140
400 S,S40
25
1,250
. —
1250
210
$29,200
$3,300 $3Z500.
2T
S13,750
$750
S15,500
• Includes eoudtict of rrinsit origindestination sun•ey and mail oter, kotne iatcrricu• stuJr einr will entnplctc studies a"i code resttlts
.In order.to determine what policy and service changes
may be necessary to revitalize,Lubbock Bus Company, the'•city must
undertake a study to: (1) determine -the severity of the current
transit problem in order to assure continued transit service
(2) map out a program de'signed`to upgrade the.level of service
offered; (3) assess the need for public assistance and the form
most suited for the Lubbock area; and (4)_explore areas of finan-
cial assistance under the federal mass transit program.A nine -
phase program is necessary,to fully realize these study objec=
tives, as follows:
Phase 1 - Adequacy of Transit Service
Phase 2 - Program of Transit Service Improvements
Phase 3 - Financial Analysis of Transit System
Phase 4 - Public Participation
...Phase 5 - Appraisal of Transit System
Phase 6 - Capital.Improvement Program
Phase 7.- Public Relations Program
Phase 8 - Evaluation 'of Alternatives
Phase 9 - Program for Implementation.
.These nine work items will.be explained in more detail
in succeeding sections of this proposal.
SIMPSON & CURTIN TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
.Data Required
The Lubbock area transportation study developed a data
bank for highway and land use plans which will be useful in assessing-
transit's present and prospective role.in the community.. These
data and analyses included origins and destinations of travel, de-
velopment of simulation models for predicting future travel demand
and projections of population growth, land use.and economic de-
velopment for the metropolitan area. All prior data will be exam
ined for relevance to this review of transit services. However,
because of the relatively small segment of the population which
uses transit, an areawide destination survey is of limited use-
fulness in developing and testing detailed transit improvements.
To overcome this common shortcoming, we have developed a relatively
economical and effective technique for developing an on -board transit
origin -destination survey. This can be conducted with the assis-
tance of the bus company for data collection and help from the "city
.on coding and compilation of results.
The on -board O-D survey provides comprehensive information
on current transit users - - it does not relate data for non -transit
riders who could be diverted to an improved. service. Normally this
is accomplished by conducting a home interview survey to obtain'
travel and related data on a random sample basis. In Lubbock this
expensive home interview technique can be shortcut by cooperation"
of the city in distributing questionnaires through utility bills
mailed by the city -owned electric company. Reasonable response'
-rates can be anticipated if the questionnaire is kept relatively
< straightforward.
Aside from the aforementioned data collection, it is
assumed that information which has already been collected, or is
readily obtainable from other agencies,`will remain available -for
our analysis. We will perform necessary field checks and inspec-
tions to validate and update transit company information, but we
do not contemplate collecting any data which>will,duplicate work
which has -already been done.
SIMPSON & CURTIN TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
personnel) this study will reveal travel.habits of present transit
riders, including such information as trip.purpose, age and'.eco
nomic status of the tripmaker, and the availability of automobiles
for tripmaking.. The results of this survey will yield a compre-
hensive picture of both transit trip distribution patterns and the
characteristics of the transit rider. This will provide input
data for the balance of Phase l - - an assessment of present transit
service.
-.Theadequacy of present transit service will be deter-
mined by evaluating the following elements in terms of reasonable
and commonly accepted standards.
A. Availability
.How far do people have to walk to reach transit
service? How completely does the service cover
the community?
B. Frequency
How long do people have to wait for a transit.
vehicle'on transit'lines,'and why?
C. Loading Standards
What measures of passenger loading are used in
rush and non -rush hours in developing transit'
schedules?
D. Dependability
How much of the scheduled transit service is
actually operated each day? What is the system
record for 'on -time' performance?
1E. Speed of Operation ,
How long does it take to reach a -particular
destination? Is the service fast and 'direct?
F. Direct Service
Do present lines provide direct service for the
main flow of travel? Is there need for additional
SIMPSON & CURTIN TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
-direct service, such as new routes bringing present
feeder line passengers directly to the downtown
area?
G. Accommodation Service
What low -patronage accommodation service does.the
system provide? Should promotional services be
added to stimulate transit interest even when they
are'not self-liquidating? What amenities (shelters,
information systems, etc.) are provided for the
rider?
H. Rate of Fare
now does the fare structure compare.with that in
other like communities? Is the 'cost of service'
distributed equitably among -various classes of
riders?
On the basis of these field observations, together with
data from planning and regulatory,sources,.a critique of existing
operations will be developed. .
Phase 2 - Program of Transit Service Improvements
A program will be developed to remedy indicated defi-
ciencies in the existing system and to achieve a plan gor more
attractive service. This will consist of detailedanalysisof
each route and a summary of recommended changes, including:
(1) Routing for better area coverage or more
effective operation;
(2) Improved running time and speed of delivery;
(3) Better headways to accommodate passenger loads
and provide more economical operations
(4) Reassignment of vehicles for improved headways'
and operating speeds;
SIMPSON & CURTIN TRAMPOETATion ENGINEEEs PHILADELPHIA, PA.
(5) Traffic controls to expedite present transit
operations;
(6) Improved transit information program
i
Consideration will be given also -to promotional fares,
including discounts for shoppers,`senior citizens, etc., and -
other marketing techniques for stimulating riding.
.Prospects for instituting express -bus service from the
suburbs will be explored and any opportunities for serving trans-
portation -intensive commercial or industrial,,activities with
special transit service.will be considered- -The possibility of
qualifying special services of this nature (minibuses, "club" buses
or peripheral park -and -ride ' shuttle) for federal DOT demonstra-
tion projects will be pursued.
The experience of other cities in promoting transit ser-
vice will be reviewed in assessing the -foregoing proposals, and
any possibility of using programs for transit=`improvement as DOT
Demonstration or Technical Grant projects will be explored.
Phase 3 - Financial Analvsis of Transit Svstem
A detailed evaluation will be made of present and pro-
spective operations of Lubbock Bus Company Tdith short-range pro-
jections of riding as a -result of fare changes, reductions in
service and other operating =changes affecting passenger volume..
Operating costs will also be estimated for modifications to the
transit system, including:
Transportation - Drivers' wages, fuel, tires, etc.
Maintenance - Mechanics, repair parts, grease and
oil,•etc.
Accident
Prevention Insurance, claims, safety, etc.._'
Administrative - Accounting, telephone,.utilities,
- L-
taxes, etc. -
Management - Supervision.
- 7 -
SIMPSON & CURTIN TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS 'fHILADEL_P_HIA, PA._
%fhe relationship of these will determine the financial
capacity of the private operating Company for calendar year
1970-71. This will afford a measure of the Company's ability.to
absorb prospective increases in operating expenses and maintain
the current level of service.
This analysis will also,provide the basis for costing
future transit service improvements as developed under succeeding
Items.
I.Phase 4 - Public Participation
The prospects of satisfying the public interest and
meeting growth requirements of the Lubbock area with continued
private ownership and subsidy arrangements will be"explored - with and without public assistance from -federal and local funds
to provide improved transit facilities.
The prospects of public ownership in light of develop -
in other metropolitan areas and public assistance under
the Federal Mass Transportation Act will be `analyzed. This in-
quiry into public ownership will include.alternative methods of
public participation, including acquiring the transit systems - -
'by negotiation or eminent domain - - together with a review of the
forms of public management available for -operating the system.The
latter will include staff management, professional management team,
leaseback to private management, and other forms of managerial
control under public ownership.
This analysis of public participation will also encom-
pass development of the most suitable boundaries of jurisdiction
and internal structure for providing -transit assistance. Internal
structure usually varies with the complexity of numbers of politi-
cal entities within the present, and.project_ed service area. A so-
lution which has worked well in situations similar to the one in
Lubbock (the city is practically coterminous with the transit area)
has been to establish a city department.of transportation, placing
traffic parking and transit under common management. This can be
advantageous inasmuch as the fate of transit is interrelated with
the relative ease or lack thereof of traffic movement and the'availa-
bility and cost of convenient parking space.` This study phase will
also contain a review of.any economies resulting from public owner-
ship including tax reductions, financing charges, etc. Recognition
will.also be given to possible` operatingdisadvantages_ under public
operation.
MAPSON b CURTIN TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS PHILADELPHIA. I
.'Phase 5 - Appraisal of Transit System
An inventory and appraisal of Lubbock Bus Company opera-
'tions will be made among the following classifications to deter-
mine their adequacy in fulfilling" projected physical requirements:
1. Motor coaches
2. Service cars and equipment
3. Land and buildings used in garage service
4. Fare boxes and other coach equipment .
5. Shop and garage equipment
- 6. Furniture and office equipment
7. Miscellaneous equipment
B.. Materials and supplies
9. Intangible items of property
This inventory will be based primarily upon Company prop-
erty records, supplemented by field inspection of various -property
accounts. A reasonable sample of property in each classification
will be examined in.sufficient detail to provide present fair value
for guidance on public acquisition.
In developing this program, consideration will be given
to availability of federal funds for new buses and other capital
grants:under the Mass Transportation Act, together with the sys- r
tem's ability to generate depreciation funds. -
Phase 6 - Capital Improvement Program
A five-year capital improvement.program will be out
lined, including plans for vehicle purchase and retirement to
1976 and improvements to maintenance and garage. facilities. This
program will include a schedule of.priorities regarding improve-
aents,'estimated annual cost of this renewal program for each of
the five years, and recommendations on means of financing•these
capital improvements.
Phase 7 - Public Relations Program
A promotional program to improve the transit.image in
Lubbock will be outlined for the various route changes, fare ex-
periments and service innovations developed in previous work items.
--SIMPSON & CURTIN TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS PHILADELPHIA,'PA:
-These will consist of special schedules,- direct mail pieces, out-
door displays and other local and community -wide promotions to
stimulate public interest in the proposed changes.
This public relations activity will be tailored to
specific groups - - shoppers, students, senior citizens and the
like - - in coordination with the particular fare or service ex-
periment being conducted. The cooperation of bus drivers and
other employee groups with direct public contact.will be enlisted
in this effort.
Phase 8 - Evaluation of Alternatives
Cost/benefit.analyses of relevant costs and benefits
will be developed, both direct and indirect, financial and non-.
financial. These analyses will be prepared for consideration by
municipal, State and Federal officials in evaluating alternative
solutions to Lubbock's transportation problems.
These officials will be in a better position to -deter-
mine how much the community can afford to preserve transit service
and to retain or improve other .value's dependent upon it.
If the community decision is to begin a publicly owned
transit system, the steps for acquisition of vehicles and other
facilities and for continued operation of service will be set
forth. -
This program will take into account the financial re-
sources and capabilities of the local, government together with
prospects ofcontinuing and increased federal aid.
Phase 9 - Program for Implementation
Based upon the. conclusions and recommendations to be
derived from the foregoing five items of this technical study, a
follow-up program will be provided to.promote publicunderstanding
and to 'initiate the action necessary to implement these recommenda
tions.'This may involve follow-up meetings with local and federal
officials, to check the availability of assistance from'those
sources and to coordinate this transit improvement program with
similar activities of other public planning agencies.
10
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered by and between THE CITY
OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, a municipal corporation and political sub-
division of the State of Texas, hereinafter called "CITY,
and SIMPSON & CURTIN, a corporation of transportation engineers
with offices at 1405 Locust Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
hereinafter called "FIRM;"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the CITY has determined a need for a technical
study for improvement of transit operations within the City of
Lubbock and surrounding area, and
WHEREAS, the FIRM has prepared a Proposed Work Program
designed to meet the needs of the CITY and satisfy the require-
ments of the Federal Department of Transportation for financial
assistance, and
WHEREAS, the FIRM has specialized in the study of local
transit systems, and
WHEREAS, the CITY has chosen the FIRM to perform said
Work Program;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually understood and agreed
as follows:
1. DEFINITIONS The term "DOT" as used herein shall mean the United
States Department of Transportation, or as the context may re-
quire, the Secretary of the Department of Transportation, or
other person who may at the time be acting in the capacity of
the Secretary or authorized representative, or any other person:;.
- 1 -
authorized to perform the functions to be performed hereunder by
DOT as that term is used in this Agreement.
The term "GOVERNMENT" as used herein shall mean the
United States of America.
2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE FIRM,
The FIRM is retained as an indepepdent contractor to
utilize its professional skills and best efforts during the term
of this Agreement for the performance of the work required by
-this Agreement. The FIRM will provide all professional engineer-
ing, economic and 'other services necessary to complete the Work
Program set.forth at pages 3 to 10 inclusive in its Proposal to
City .of Lubbock, Texas for Mass Transit Technical Study, dated
February 9, 1971, hereinafter called "WORK PROGRAM, attached
hereto and made a part hereof as though set forth in full herein.
.The FIRM has and retains the right to exercise full
control and supervision of the services and full control over
the employment 'and direct compensation and discharge of all
.persons assisting in the performance of its services hereunder.
The FIRM agrees to be solely responsible for all matters re-
lating to payment of employees, including compliance with
social security, withholding and all other"regulations govern-
ing such matters. The FIRM agrees to be responsible for its
own acts and those of its subordinates, employees and sub-
contractors during the life of this Agreement.
3. WORK SCHEDULE
The FIRM shall commence within two weeks of the date
an executed copy of this Agreement is delivered to it and will
2
endeavor to complete the performance of services hereunder in
--six months from said date.
The CITY may at any time, upon written order, make
changes of work items to be performed under this Agreement.
If such change causes an increase in the time required for
performance of this Agreement, the parties agree to negotiate
a mutual agreement in respect thereto.
4. • REPORTS
Upon completion of the studies, the FIRM will prepare
a final report setting forth the results of its examination of
each task, summaries of alternatives considered, together with
its conclusions and recommendations.
One hundred (100) copies of this report will be
delivered to the CITY.
5. COST ESTIMATES
The cost of work hereunder shall not exceed $48,000.00
This amount shall include charges for the time of engineers
and other personnel of the FIRM, together with travel and other
expenses paid by the FIRM in performing this study.
6. BASIS FOR CALCULATING COSTS
The cost of the FIRM's services shall be based upon
the scale of fees for actual time spent by assigned personnel
of the FIRM to this engagement as set forth by the FIRM's
"STANDARD PROVISIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES," effective
November 1, 1970, attached hereto and made a part hereof as
though set forth in full herein.
In addition to these fees, expenses for travel and
other costs applicable to this study will be billed at actual
3 - .
cost in accordance with the attached "STANDARD PROVISIONS FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES."
7. STATEMENTS -.PAYMENTS - AUDIT & INSPECTION OF RECORDS
At the end of each month, the FIRM will submit to
the CITY a'statement of its charges and expenses related to
services performed hereunder for that month'and for prior
months not previously billed. The FIRM will file such state
meats to be processed for payment promptly.
The FIRM shall permit the authorized representatives
of DOT and the Comptroller General of the United States to
inspect and audit.all data and records of the FIRM relating
to carrying out this Agreement.
B. RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATIONS
Equal Employment Opportunity.
In connection with the execution of. this contract, the
FIRM shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant
for employment because ofrace, religion, color, sex, or national
origin. The FIRM shall take affirmative actions to insure that
applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during
their employment, without regard to their race, religion, color,
sex, or national origin. Such actions shall include, but not be
limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or,
transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or
termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and
selection for training, including apprenticeship.
Fair Employment Practice.
The FIRM and every subcontractor performing part of
the work hereof shall not discriminate•.against any employee or
applicant for" employment,' to' be employed in -the `performance bf ~ Y =
- 4 -
this contract, with respect to his hire, tenure, terms, conditions,
or privileges of employment, or any matter directly or indirectly
related to employment because of his age, except where based
on a bona fide occupational qualification, or his racL+, color,
religion, national origin, or ancestry. Breach of this convenant
may be regarded as a material breach of this contract.
Prohibited Interests. ,
The FIRM agrees that it presently has no interest
and shall not acquire any interest direct or indirect which
would conflict in any manner.or degree with the performance
of its services hereunder. The FIRM further agrees that in .
the performance of this Agreement no person having any such
interest shall be employed.
No officer or employee of the CITY during his tenure
or for one year thereafter shall have any interest, direct or
indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds hereof.
.Interest of Members of or Delegates to Congress.
No member of or delegate to the Congress of the
United States shall be admitted to any share or part of this
Agreement or to any benefit arising herefrom.
9. GENERAL PROVISIONS
-(a) Services required by the FIRM under this Agree-
ment shall be performed in a diligent and competent manner
.___._.._and shall be subject to review and inspection by the CITY
through its designated agents at all reasonable times.
(b) All reports, drawings, designs, and specifications
prepared by the FIRM in the performance of this Agreement shall
become the property of the CITY upon payment for the services
5 -
performed as specified in this Agreement, or upon any termination
thereof. Any risk of loss, destruction or damage of or to said
reports, drawings, designs, and specifications shall be borne by
the'FIRM prior to the time when the same are received by the
CITY, and any such loss, destruction or damage shall not excuse
performance of the FIRM under this Agreement,.
(c) Any patentable result arising out of this
Agreement, as well as all information, designs, specifications,
know-how, data, and findings, shall be made available to the
GOVERNMENT for public use, unless DOT shall in a specific.
case, where it is legally permissible, determine that it is
in the public interest that it not be so made available.
(d) Any reports, designs,.information, data, etc., .
given to or prepared or assembled by the FIRM'under this
Agreement, which the CITY requests to be kept•as confidential
shall not be made available to any individual or organization
by the FIRM without the prior written approval of the CITY.
(e) •This Agreement and any modification hereof may
be terminated by the CITY in its absolute discretion when it
determines its convenience requires such termination. Upon
any such termination, the FIRM shall be paid the reasonable
value of any completed work in any stage of .this Agreement
which has been satisfactorily performed, and the compensation
for which has not already been paid hereunder, as determined,
jointly by the FIRM and the CITY. Upon any such termination,
the FIRM shall render a final terminal report based upon its
work performed up to the date of such termination.
- 6 -
(f) All delays in or failure of performance by
either party•under this Agreement shall not constitute default
hereunder, or give rise to any claims for damages when such
delays or failures are caused by circumstances beyond the
control of the party concerned, including, but not limited
to, decrees of GOVERNMENT, acts of God, strikes or other
concerted actions of workmen, fires, flood, explosions, acts
of the military and sabotage, or by any act or failure to
act of GOVERNMENT or of any governmental agency, provided,
however, that, as herein elsewhere provided, the FIRM shall
assume all risk of loss and be responsible for the replace-
ment of plans, specifications, drawings, reports and other
documents when.the same are in its custody before presenta-
tion, upon completion, to the CITY.
(g) The failure of the CITY at any to insist
upon a strict performance of any of the terms, conditions
and covenants herein contained shall not be deemed a waiver
of any subsequent breach or default in said terms, conditions
and covenants.
(h) No reports, maps, or other documents produced
in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be the subject
of an application for copyright by or on behalf of the FIRM.
10. ASSIGNMENT
The FIRM shall not assign or transfer any interest
in this Agreement or delegate its performance of duties
except upon prior written approval of the CITY.
11. DELEGATION OF POWER
It is. agreed that the City Manager of the CITY may dele-
„� -gate any -of the CITY' s powers or functions hekeinl/ ,or- other=
5W=
wise, which are legally delegable, to any authorized person, and the CITY
agrees to notify the FIRM thereof in writing.
12. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement may be modified upon prior written approval of the CITY.
13. TIME
Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
14. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT
The performance of services described herein and the payment for such
services shall be contingent upon the Oty of Lubbock receiving a grant, covering
the transit study described herein, from the Department of Transportation or other
federal agency or department.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement
to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives, as of the dates
below indicated.
Executed by the FIRM on the day of 1971.
ATTEST: SIMPSON & CURTIN, a corporation
BY BY
TITLE TITLE
SEAL
Executed by the CITY on the day of 1971.
ATTEST: CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, a
municipal corporation
BY: BY
Lavenie Lowe, City Secretary -Treasurer J. H. GRANBERRY, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Fred O. Senter, Jr., City Attorney
-8-