HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 5486 - Supplemental Agreement #3 To Agreement - HDR Enginnering Inc - E-W FRRP - 05_08_1997RESOLUTION NO. 5486
Item #38
May 8, 1997
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and
directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock a Supplemental
Agreement No. 3 to the Agreement dated July 8, 1991 between the City of
Lubbock and HDR Engineering, Inc., for professional services for the
Railroad Relocation of the East-West Freeway in Lubbock, and all related
documents. Said Agreement is attached hereto and incorporated in this
Resolution as if fully set forth herein and shall be included in the minutes of the
Council.
Passed by the City Council this
ATTEST:
8th day of May - , 1997.
16.flu" &4'� -
Kayt#e Darnell, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Mildred Cox, Director of Transportation
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office Practice Section
LLC:dk/.RES
eastwest.res.ccdocs/,April 30, 1997
a
RESOLUTION NO.5486
Item #38
May 8, 1997
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO.3
TO THE
AGREEMENT DATED JULY 8,1991
BETWEEN
CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS
OWNER
AND
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
ENGINEER
FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR THE
RAILROAD RELOCATION FOR EAST -WEST FREEWAY IN LUBBOCK
PROJECT
MAY 8,1997
a
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO.3
TO THE
AGREEMENT DATED JULY 8,1991
BETWEEN
CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS
AND
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR THE RAILROAD RELOCATION FOR EAST -WEST FREEWAY
THIS IS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 3 made as of May 8, 1997 between the City of
Lubbock, Texas and HDR Engineering, Inc. for modifications to the AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS AND HDR ENGINEERING, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES dated July 8, 1991.
OWNER and ENGINEER, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, agree to
modifications to the Agreement as follows:
1. Change the Agreement Section 5.2.1 to read:
5.2.1 For Basic Services as described in Section 1 and further defined in Appendix,
Exhibit A, payment shall be on the basis of Cost Plus Fixed Fee. The Fixed Fee
shall be Seventy -Six Thousand Three Hundred One Dollars ($76,301).
The maximum amount payable for Basic Services as described in Section 1 and
Appendix, Exhibit A, is Eight Hundred Thirty -Two Thousand, Five Hundred Forty -
Five Dollars ($832,545). Estimated Costs are itemized in the Appendix, Exhibit D.
The maximum amount payable will be revised in the event of change in scope,
increased cost, complexity of character of PROJECT or periods of service which
exceed those periods defined in Section 4 as mutually agreed in writing by OWNER
and ENGINEER.
2. Change the Agreement Section 5.4.1 to read:
5.4.1 For Other Additional Services as described in Paragraph 2.2 and Appendix, Exhibit
A, payment shall be on the basis of Cost Plus Fixed Fee. The Fixed Fee shall be
Twenty -Six Thousand, Two Hundred Sixty -One Dollars ($26,261).
The maximum amount payable for Other Additional Services as described in
Paragraph 2.2 and Appendix, Exhibit A, is Eight Hundred Fifty -Four Thousand,
Sixty Dollars ($854,060). The maximum amount payable will be revised in the
event of change of scope, increased cost or complexity or character of PROJECT or
periods of service which exceed those periods defined in Section 4 as mutually
agreed in writing by OWNER AND ENGINEER.
-2-
i
3. Change Agreement Section 5.5.2 as follows:
Revise the Provisional Overhead Rate Factor to 164.07% for Phases 2 and 3.
-3-
4. Delete APPENDIX, EXHIBIT A, DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES and replace with the
following:
-4-
5. APPENDIX, EXHIBIT B, is hereby expanded to include the OWNER RESOLUTIONS
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS NO.1,
NO.2, AND NO.3.
-5-
I
EXHIBIT B
OWNER RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
APPENDIX
EXHIBIT A
DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES
This exhibit expands the Scope of Services described in SECTION 1 - BASIC SERVICES and
SECTION 2 - ADDITIONAL SERVICES and OTHER ADDITIONAL SERVICES of the
Agreement for the PROJECT known as Railroad Relocation for East-West Freeway in Lubbock.
The proposed PROJECT is further described as follows:
The Proposed East-West Freeway will require the relocation of the West Texas & Lubbock
Railroad (WT&LR) tracks, formerly the Seagraves, Whiteface & Lubbock Railroad
(SW&LR), presently located along the East-West Freeway corridor, to a point between
West Loop 289 and Reese Air Force Base. The relocated railroad must connect the existing
tracks along the freeway corridor to the existing Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)
Railway tracks along Clovis Road, in addition to other connections which may be required.
Special consideration must be given to the additional trackage required for the interchange
of rail cars between the two different rail lines at the track intersection along Clovis Road.
Appropriate revisions must also be made to the signals along the main line of the BNSF
Railway.
I. SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. ROUTE LOCATION ANALYSIS (Additional Services, TxDOT Function
Code 110)
1. Route Location Studies and Report
a. Four alternative routes shall be evaluated
b. The evaluation of each alternative will include an evaluation of
Engineering, Environmental and Economic parameters.
C. Each alternative route shall include:
(1) Relocated railroad alignment which will provide for a
smooth, uninterrupted connection between the trackage and
facilities on the new right-of-way, and the railroad's existing
track on its right-of-way southwest of Loop 289, also
including switches, allowing a smooth interchange at the
intersection of the new right-of-way and the railroad's
existing tracks on its Whiteface line (new rails, ties, tie
plates, spikes, switches, gates, lights, trackage and
appurtenances as are necessary and appropriate for the
operation of the railroad on, over and across the new right-of-
way).
(2) BNSF Railway interchange trackage layout, including
switches providing smooth access with the BNSF tracks at a
point northwest of Loop 289 where the new right-of-way will
intersect with the BNSF tracks.
Page 1 5/97
(3) Interchange railcar yard layout, located at approximately the
location where the new right-of-way will intersect with the
BNSF tracks, containing track capable of storing at least
eighty (80) railcars.
(4) Switch connection location on the new right-of-way
proximally east of Reese Air Force Base, so as to allow for
future service to Reese Air Force Base.
(5) Yard location and layout, located along the railroad's
Whiteface line and having access to a public road, suitable
for the loading and unloading of aggregate and other
commodities comparable to the yard presently being used by
the railroad at the approximate location of the intersection of
U.S. Highway 82 and S.W. Loop 289 and having yard tracks
capable of storing at least eighty (80) railcars.
(6) Recommendations regarding the location for a low volume
"piggy back" facility (less than 100 lifts per day).
(7) Recommendations regarding the location for a parking lot for
an excursion train. The West Texas and Lubbock Railroad
Company shall provide excursion train and parking lot
design criteria consisting of maximum train length, number
of parking spaces and sizes of proposed structures.
(8) Recommendations regarding the location for a possible
maintenance facility for the railroad. The West Texas and
Lubbock Railroad Company shall provide design criteria for
the maintenance facility.
2. Traffic Evaluations and Projections - An evaluation of existing and proposed
automobile and train traffic shall be conducted for each potential public at -
grade crossing, including recommendations for type of crossing protection
or needs for grade separation for each crossing. Vehicle traffic data shall be
provided by TxDOT. Train traffic data shall be provided by the West Texas
and Lubbock Railroad Company.
3. Develop Design Criteria - Railway and roadway design criteria shall be
developed for use in the development of alternatives and right-of-way.
4. Preliminary Cost Estimates - Preliminary Construction cost estimates shall
be developed for each alternative alignment. ROW cost data shall be
provided by TxDOT.
5. Design Schematic - A design schematic shall be prepared for the preferred
alignment as described in the section titled Design Controls (Function Code
160). (This schematic shall serve as the Right -of -Way Schematic to be
furnished to the Railroad. Scale: 1" = 200').
6. Preliminary Right -of -Way Requirements - The preliminary right-of-way
requirements shall be indicated on the design schematic.
7. Design Concept Conference - A design concept conference shall be held to
review the preferred alternative.
Page 2 5/97
B. ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT (Additional
Services, TxDOT Function Code 120)
1. Environmental Reports
a. An Environmental Assessment Coordination Document containing
the following shall be prepared, anticipating the need for a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement.
1. Description of the Proposed Project - Describe the location,
length, termini and proposed improvements.
2. Need - Identify and describe the problem which the proposed
project is designed to correct.
3. Alternatives Considered - Discuss all reasonable alternatives
to the proposed actions which were considered.
4. Impacts - Discuss the social, economic and environmental
impacts of the alternatives considered and describe whether
or not impacts are considered to be significant.
5. Comments and Coordination - Describe coordination efforts
and comments received from government agencies and the
public: Formal coordination and communication with
government agencies and the public shall be provided by
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT).
If it is believed that the proposed project requires a Section
4(f) evaluation, the ENGINEER shall notify the OWNER.
The ENGINEER shall proceed with development of
technical data for a Section 4(f) evaluation after agreement
between the OWNER and ENGINEER on additional scope
and additional compensation and after receipt of written
notice to proceed from OWNER.
6. Appendices (if any) - Include only analytical information that
substantiates an analysis which is important to the document.
Other information should be incorporated by reference only.
b. A Draft Environmental Statement (DEIS) containing the following
shall be prepared in accordance with applicable TxDOT, Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), Interstate Commerce
Commission (ICC) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
requirements.
1. Title Page
2. EIS Identification Number
3. Summary
4. Table of Contents
5. Purpose and Need for Action
6. Discussion of Alternatives including the preferred
alternative, all reasonable alternatives and other alternatives
considered but dropped from detailed study
7. Affected Environment
Page 3 5/97
8. Environmental Consequences as identified in the Texas DOT
(TxDOT) Operations and Procedures Manual, Part II-B,
Environmental and Public Involvement Procedures During
Project Specific Planning and Development
9. List of Preparers
10. List of Agencies, Organizations and Persons to Whom
Copies of the Statement are Sent
11. Comments and Coordination
12. Index
13. Appendices
C.
A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) shall be prepared
after appropriate interagency review within time limits prescribed by
the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23, Part 771. One draft and
one final FEIS will be prepared.
2. Public
Involvement
a.
All public involvement procedures shall be in accordance with
TxDOT Administrative Order 23-82.
b.
Three public involvement meetings and one public hearing held in
conjunction with TxDOT's East-West Freeway public hearing shall
be scheduled, coordinated and conducted.
C.
Technical assistance, meeting/hearing preparation, maintenance of
contact lists, minutes of meeting(s), and exhibit preparation shall be
provided by the ENGINEER. The TxDOT shall conduct the public
hearing.
d.
Public Relations - TxDOT shall provide any required fact sheets and
public relations or public notifications.
3. Hazardous Materials Investigations - the ENGINEER shall perform a Level
1 Hazardous Materials Investigation for the old and new railroad right-of-
way.
a.
Task 1: A record search to determine past ownership and historical
uses of "high risk" properties located within the project corridor.
b.
Task 2: Conduct a "windshield" survey to investigate sites for
potential environmental contamination or hazardous materials
storage violations.
C.
Task 3: A review of applicable local, state and federal records to
determine possible permit violation or clean-up requirements within
the project corridor.
d.
Task 4: An analysis of historical aerial photographs to determine
prior land uses in the project vicinity.
e.
Task 5: A written Hazardous Materials Evaluation Report
summarizing the results of the Investigation. Recommendations for
a Level 2 Investigation will be made based on findings of the
preliminary study.
4. Archeological Survey
a.
Conduct an archeological survey of the preferred alternative.
b.
Prepare a report documenting the results of the archeological survey.
Page 4 5/97
5. Ambient Noise Monitoring
Conduct ambiant noise monitoring along or near the preferred rail alignment
alternative and present results in the Environmental Impact Statement.
6. General Guidelines for Preparation of Environmental Documents
a. The environmental documents prepared shall be provided on paper
and on a 3 1/2" IBM 1.44 MB diskette(s).
b. Fifteen draft copies and fifteen final copies of the Environmental
Documents shall be provided. One copy with camera-ready artwork
shall be provided for TxDOT's use for attachment to the East-West
Freeway environmental document, to be prepared by TxDOT.
C. The environmental documents shall be prepared in accordance with
the content and format of FHWA Technical Advisory T6640.8A.
d. Exhibits in the environmental document shall be limited to II" by
17" where possible.
e. Three submittals of the DEIS and two submittals of the FEIS
documents will be required.
C. RIGHT-OF-WAY (Other Additional Services, TxDOT Function Code 130)
1. No work involving right-of-way (ROW) data shall be performed
until the OWNER has given the ENGINEER written approval of the
location of the proposed ROW lines.
2. Ownership Data - Ownership Information shall be determined be the
OWNER
3. Right-of-way Map
a. A ROW map including only plan sheets and ownership
sheets shall be prepared and furnished.
b. ROW map and field notes shall be revised as required due to
changes in railroad design, ownership changes or revised
parcel numbering.
4. Utility Adjustments
a. A copy of the Right -of -Way Schematic will be provided to
each utility entity (I I estimated). Each entity will indicate
their utility lines within proposed Right -of -Way.
All utility information provided by the utility entities will be
posted on the Right -of -Way Schematic.
Prepare 11 "x 17" location sketch with requirements for
crossing railroad for each utility crossing (40 estimated).
Request utility entity to respond with a construction cost
estimate for adjustment of their utilities.
Review adjustment cost information from each entity.
Request and receive revisions as necessary. Meet with utility
entities concerning adjustment plans and costs. Provide
Page 5 5/97
TxDOT with adjustment cost information for their review
and opinion.
Prepare utility agreements for all crossings with that entity.
Provide originals to OWNER for execution. After OWNER
execution, OWNER will send to utility entity for final
execution.
Respond to questions from utility entities concerning
adjustments. Meet with entities and/or the surveyor in the
field for questions or locations.
Make progress site visits to review adjustment construction
activities (1 site visit for each crossing).
Document final elevations and locations of adjusted utilities
based on survey information.
b.
Utilities on Private Property (irrigation and/or gas line
adjustments) are not included in this contract. These will be
adjusted by the OWNER as part of the appraisal process.
5. Field Notes
a.
Prepare Field Notes for all Parcels using TxDOT format and
language, referenced to the Texas State Plane Coordinate
System
b.
Prepare Computation Sheets for Survey closure and Area for
Each Parcel
C.
Survey and Prepare Field Notes and Plats on Individual
Parcels
6. General Guidelines for Preparation of Right -of -Way Map
a.
All procedures involving ROW map, surveys and field notes
shall be in conformance with the TxDOT Right -of -Way
Division Right-of-Wgy Manual, Book I and Book H, except
as provided herein.
b.
ROW Map plan sheets and Ownership sheets shall be
prepared for inclusion in TxDOT East-West Freeway ROW
plans.
C.
Minimum mathematical calculations relative to field note
data are:
(1) Area of taking, if expressed in acres, will be carried
to three decimal places or, if expressed in square feet,
will be rounded to the square foot
(2) Distances will be given to the nearest hundredth of a
foot
(3) Bearings will be carried to the nearest second.
Page 6 5/97
d. Data contained in the field notes and shown on the map shall
be identical.
e. Calls within the body of the field notes shall be written to
identify property lines and the existing and proposed ROW
lines.
f. Project base line shall be drawn and stationed on the ROW
map.
g. Minimum size lettering shall be 5/32" height for hand
lettering and 140 for lettering by computer -aided design and
drafting (CADD).
h. As soon as property lines and parent tracts can be
determined, the ENGINEER shall submit a preliminary map
for review of parcel numbers.
i. Zip -a -tone or similar products shall not be used on map
sheets.
j. All field notes shall be signed, dated and sealed by a
Registered Professional Land Surveyor or Licensed State
Land Surveyor.
k. The ROW map sheets shall be ink on Mylar type tracing film
or as otherwise authorized by the OWNER.
1. Field note data for all parcels shall be prepared utilizing
Microsoft Word 7.0 and furnished in both hard copy and
diskette formats.
M. Prepare right-of-way map in dual units (English and
Metric).
D. FIELD SURVEYING (Other Additional Services, TxDOT Function Code
150)
1. Field Surveying
a. Primary Project Control
(1) 3 to 5 mile spacing
(2) Precision shall be 1 part in 20,000 or better.
(3) Horizontal control points shall be established by
ENGINEER.
(4) Vertical control points shall be established by ENGINEER.
b. Secondary Project Control
(1) Field survey for topographic and cross-section ground
control shall be tied to the State Plane Coordinate system,
adjusted to surface.
(2) No traverse shall exceed 25 angle points.
(3) The unadjusted angular error shall not exceed 2 seconds per
angle, plus 14 seconds.
(4) The unadjusted ratio of precision shall be one part in 10,000
or better. (The ratio of precision is the total length of the
traverse divided by the total error.)
Page 7 5/97
(5)
The unadjusted vertical error shall not exceed 0.03 foot per
mile of traverse.
(6)
Project control base lines shall be established by
ENGINEER.
(7)
Horizontal control shall be established by ENGINEER.
(8)
Vertical control points shall be established by ENGINEER. .
C. Other
Field Surveying
(1)
Stake and profile center line
(2)
The project base line shall be coincidental with, or parallel
to, the stationed "Design Center Line."
(3)
Base line control points shall be established using 5/8-inch
iron rods, 36 inches long, at P.C.'s, P.I.'s and P.T.'s of
horizontal curves and at 1000' maximum intervals on
tangents.
(4)
Establish bench mark circuit throughout the project.
(5)
Provide cross sections at a maximum of 100-foot intervals
extended left and right to the proposed right-of-way lines.
Locate topographic features within the proposed right-of-
way. Profile top of rail elevations at connections to existing
track. Profile and cross section intersecting streets for tie
into project.
(6)
Cross section drainage channels.
(7)
Tie to exposed underground and overhead public utilities
(location and elevation)
(8)
Stake ROW one (1) time using 5/8-inch iron rods, 36-inches
long, marking P.C.'s, P.T.'s and property corners. All right-
of-way staking work shall be approved by the OWNER prior
to beginning work.
(9)
Stake soil core holes
(10)
Determine type of existing material, pavements, etc.
(11)
Profile existing drainage facilities.
(12)
Obtain elevations of manholes and valves of utilities within
proposed ROW.
2. Base Mapping shall be prepared as follows:
a. Mapping
(1)
One (1) set of verification plots on bond paper at a nominal
scale of V = 100', 1' Contour
(2)
Planimetric and topographic graphics files, scaled to 1" _
100' in a Micro Station format compatible with Texas
Department of Transportation computer hardware and
software.
(3)
Digital Terrain Model files in a Micro Station format
compatible with Texas Department of Transportation
computer hardware and software.
Page 8 5/97
E. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DESIGN (Basic Services and Other Additional
Services, TxDOT Function Code 160)
1. Geometric Design
a. Develop Horizontal and Vertical Alignment
b. Schematic Layout shall include:
(1) The location of main tracks, turnouts, yard tracks, and
loading and unloading facilities, as follows:
(a) Relocated railroad alignment which will provide for a
smooth, uninterrupted connection between the
trackage and facilities on the new right-of-way, and
the railroads' existing track on its right-of-way
southwest of Loop 289, also including switches,
allowing a smooth interchange at the intersection of
the new right-of-way and the railroad's existing tracks
on its Whiteface line (new rails, ties, tie plates,
spikes, switches, gates, lights, trackage and
appurtenances as are necessary and appropriate for
the operation of the railroad on, over and across the
new right-of-way).
(b) Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway
(formerly the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe (AT&SF)
Railway company) interchange trackage layout,
including switches providing smooth access with the
BNSF tracks at a point northwest of Loop 289 where
the new right-of-way will intersect with the BNSF
tracks
(c) Interchange railcar yard layout, located at
approximately the location where the new right-of-
way will intersect with the BNSF tracks, containing
track capable of storing at least eighty (80) railcars
(d) Switch connection location on the new right-of-way
proximally east of Reese Air Force Base, so as to
allow for future service to Reese Air Force Base
(e) Yard location and layout, located along the railroad's
Whiteface line and having access to a public road,
suitable for the loading and unloading of aggregate
and other commodities comparable to the yard
presently being used by the railroad at the
approximate location of the intersection of U.S.
Highway 82 and S.W. Loop 289 and having yard
tracks capable of storing at least eighty (80) cars
(2) Vertical and horizontal alignment of all tracks and
intersected cross roads in sufficient detail to determine ROW
needs.
(3) Provide a complete explanation of the sequence and methods
of stage construction.
Page 9 5/97
(4) The tentative ROW limits
(5) The geometrics (pavement cross slopes, lane and shoulder
widths, slope rates for fills and cuts) of the typical sections of
cross roads. Typical sections of existing roadways will be
provided to the ENGINEER by the OWNER and TxDOT.
(6) The current and year 2010 projected traffic volumes for
intersected cross roads shall be provided by the TxDOT.
(7) Direction of traffic flow on all roadways.
2. General Guidelines for Project Development
a.
Prior to preparing detailed plans, a preliminary schematic layout
shall be prepared on an uncontrolled aerial mosaic which indicates
the general geometric features and location requirements.
(1) Twelve copies of the schematic layout shall be submitted to
the OWNER for approval and subsequent coordination with
TxDOT and the WT&LR.
(2) No geometric design shall be performed until the OWNER
has given the ENGINEER written approval of the schematic
layout.
b.
All Preliminary and Final Geometric Design shall be in conformance
with the American Railway Engineering Association Manual for
Railway Engineering and BNSF design criteria as applicable for
track work and the TxDOT Hi hway Design Division Operations
and Procedures Manual for Roadway, except where variances are
permitted in writing by the OWNER.
C.
The schematic layout shall include basic information including the
items listed above in the checklist for Schematic Layout.
d.
Handling of traffic during construction shall be a consideration in the
development of the schematic layout.
e.
Upon approval of the schematic layout by the OWNER, the
schematic layout shall be the basis for an exhibit, to be provided by
the ENGINEER, at the public hearing prior to final development of
the project.
(1) If there are any changes to the schematic after OWNER
approval and before the public hearing, twelve copies of the
revised schematic, as displayed at the hearing, shall be
submitted either prior to or accompanying the public hearing
data.
(2) If there are no changes in the schematic as displayed at the
hearing, only photographs of the schematic and other
displays shall be submitted with the public hearing data.
3. Grading Design
a.
Based upon the approved schematic layout, refine the horizontal and
vertical alignment of cross roads and tracks.
b.
Develop Typical Sections
C.
Develop Design Cross Sections using field survey data.
d.
Determine Cut and Fill Quantities
Page 10 5/97
4. Track Structure Design
a. Prior to initiating detailed plan preparations for the project, a
preliminary investigation shall be made to determine the
approximate section to be used for track structure.
b. Typical sections of the proposed track structure design shall be
furnished by the ENGINEER to the OWNER for approval.
(1) No detailed preparation of the plans, specifications and
estimates (PS&E) shall be performed by the ENGINEER
until the OWNER has given written approval of the
preliminary track structure design.
(2) Development of these sections shall be in consultation with
the OWNER.
C. Embankment and Subgrade (Other Additional Services)
(1) Soil Core Hole Survey. The location and minimum number
of soil core holes required for this project are as follows:
Along project center line, two borings per mile. The soil
core holes will be supplemented with existing soil data to be
provided by the OWNER.
(2) Prepare three (3) copies of a report identifying, interpreting,
and summarizing geologic features that affect engineering
design.
(3) Modulus of Elasticity of Subgrade Materials.
d. Track Details - Develop detail design of track, special track work
(turnouts and crossings), road crossings and other track
appurtenances.
F. DRAINAGE (Basic Services, TxDOT Function Code 161)
1. Preliminary hydraulic design of all drainage structures (culverts, storm
sewers, channels, pump stations etc.) shall be submitted to the OWNER for
review.
2. Preliminary submission shall include the overall drainage plan, structure
layout, and hydraulic computations.
3. No detailed design of drainage structures shall be performed, until the
OWNER has given the ENGINEER written approval of the preliminary
hydraulic design.
4. All hydraulic design shall be in accordance with the TxDOT Bridge
Division HYDRAULICS MANUAL and OWNER's playa lake ordinance.
5. Hydrologic Studies, Discharges
a. Drainage area maps shall be prepared showing existing conditions
and proposed improvements.
b. Hydrologic data/discharge shall be determined
6. Hydraulic Design and Documentation
a. Hydraulic computations shall be provided for design of:
(1) Culverts
(2) Channels
Page 11 5/97
b. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodway
requirements shall be identified
7. Layout, Structural Design and Detailing of Drainage Features including:
a. Culverts
(1) New culverts
(2) Culvert widening and/or lengthening
(3) Culvert replacements
b. Outfall channel(s) within the ROW
C. Outfall channel(s) outside the ROW
d. Deleted
e. Deleted
f. Typical detail for subsurface drainage at road crossings.
8. ENGINEER and OWNER agree that open channels are usually the most
economical means of carrying water either to the ROW, away from the
ROW, or along the ROW, therefore no design of closed storm drainage
facilities has been planned for.
9. Prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention (SW3P) Plan.
G. SIGNING. MARKINGS AND SIGNALIZATION (Basic Services, TxDOT
Function Code 162)
1. Signing and Markings Layout
a. Requirements include separate layouts for:
(1) Railway and Roadway
(2) Center line with station numbering
(3) ROW lines
(4) Culverts and other structures that present a hazard to traffic
(5) Location of utilities, if not shown on plan and profile
(6) Existing signs (illustrated and numbered) to remain, to be
removed, to be relocated
(7) Proposed markings (illustrated and quantified) which include
railroad and pavement markings, object markings and
delineation
(8) Quantities of existing markings to be removed
(9) Proposed signs (illustrated and numbered)
(10) Proposed delineators and object markers
2. Summary of small signs tabulation
3. Sign Detail Sheets
H. MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY (Basic Services and Other Additional
Services, TxDOT Function Code 163)
1. Traffic Control Plan (TCP), Detours and Sequence of Construction (Basic
Services)
A detailed TCP shall be developed when traffic handling during
construction involves complications for which a feasible solution is not
covered by the Texas MUTCD or the current Barricade and Construction
(BC) Standards. Traffic Control Plan Layouts shall include:
Page 12 5/97
i 1 1
a. The sequence of construction and method of handling traffic during
each phase.
b. The existing and proposed traffic control devices that will be
used to handle traffic during each construction sequence, including
signals, regulatory signs, warning signs, construction warning signs,
guide signs, route markers, construction pavement markings,
channelizing devices, portable changeable message signs, flashing
arrow boards, barricades, barriers, etc.
C. The proposed traffic control devices (stop signs, signals, flagperson,
etc.) at grade intersection during each construction sequence.
d. Where detours are provided, typical cross sections shall be shown.
e. Road construction work hours shall be developed after an
investigation of the traffic volumes has been performed.
2. Illumination (Basic Services)
The ENGINEER shall provide illumination design services for security
lighting at the rail yard along with the Whiteface line.
a. Preliminary Roadway and Railroad Illumination Layout and
Electrical Circuit Layout - Lettering shall be a minimum size of
5/32" height for hand lettering and 140 for lettering by computer -
aided design and drafting (CARD).
b. Final Roadway and Railroad Illumination and Electrical Circuit
Layouts
(1) Roadway and railroad layout showing pavement edges and
shoulders, curbs, retaining walls, etc.
(2) Center line with station numbering.
(3) ROW lines.
(4) Symbol legend.
(5) Culverts and other structures that present a hazard to traffic.
(6) Location of underground utilities, if not shown on plan
profile.
(7) Location of overhead electrical lines, both crossing and
parallel to ROW.
(8) Existing service poles, electrical circuits, ground boxes, etc.
(9) Contact electric utility for service pole locations, voltage
characteristics.
(10) Location of proposed sign lighting circuits and roadway and
railway illumination.
(11) Proposed electrical circuits.
(12) Tabulation of all quantities including proposed, existing to be
relocated, and existing to be removed.
C. General Guidelines for Illumination - The ENGINEER shall submit,
in advance of PS&E due date, the illumination electrical circuit
layout sheets for review by the OWNER.
3. Miscellaneous Drafting/Standards (Basic Services)
4. Compute and Tabulate Quantities (Basic Services)
5. Special Utility Details: Water, Sanitary, Sewer, etc. (Basic Services)
Page 13 5/97
6. Miscellaneous Structures
a. Type of Structure
(1) Conventional Illumination Poles
(2) Railroad Crossing Warning Signal Supports
7. Agreements (Other Additional Services)
a. Utility Agreements - See Section C. Right -of -Way
b. Exhibits for Utility Agreements - See Section C. Right -of -Way
C. Railroad Agreements
d. Railroad Exhibits
(1) Railroad Grade Crossing (Pre -Cast Concrete, Rubberized or
Wood Planking)
(2) Railroad Grade Crossing Warning Systems (Signals)
(3) Other Miscellaneous Sketches for Railroad
8. Estimate of Construction Cost (Basic Services)
9. Specifications and General Notes (Basic Services)
10. Bridge Design - No railroad or roadway bridge design has been included as
part of this project. ENGINEER shall provide bridge design services as
directed by the OWNER, upon agreement between ENGINEER and
OWNER of additional scope and compensation and receipt of written
authorization to proceed.
11. Bidding Phase Services (Basic Services)
The ENGINEER shall perform the following bidding phase services:
a. Coordinate a program for bidding and contract awarding procedures
with the OWNER.
b. Assist the OWNER in advertising and obtaining proposals for
construction and trackwork procurement contracts.
C. Conduct pre -bid conferences.
d. Respond to Contractor's questions during bidding and issue addenda
as appropriate.
e. Attend the bid opening, tabulate bids and assist the OWNER in
evaluating bids or proposals.
I. CONSTRUCTION PHASE Administration of the Construction Contract
(Basic and Other Additional Services)
1. Project Supervision (Basic Services, TxDOT Function Code 310) - Project
Management and project engineering services shall be provided by the
ENGINEER. Field office facilities will be furnished by the Contractor. The
ENGINEER shall conduct the pre -construction meeting.
2. Inspection (Other Additional Services, TxDOT Function Code 320)
a. Resident field inspection
b. Pay quantities and daily reporting of work completed, including
accounting practices required by the USDOT Surface Transportation
Board.
C. Maintenance of Project Records including progress and final
estimates
d. Final inspection
Page 14 5/97
e. Recommendations to OWNER for acceptance of work
3. Materials Testing (Other Additional Services, TxDOT Function Code 330) -
The ENGINEER will provide materials testing services required during
construction, consisting of the following:
a. Compaction tests (One per 500 feet)
b. Moisture density relationships (Proctor) (One per mile)
C. Aggregate analysis for subballast (Four per mile)
d. Asphalt samples (Three per road crossing)
e. Ballast analysis: Gradation, clay lumps and friable particles,
absorption, wear, soundness, and thin elongated particles (15
samples).
4. Project Control Surveys (Other Additional Services, TxDOT Function Code
340) - All construction staking will be performed by the contractor. The
ENGINEER will provide references to project control points established
during design. The resident project representative shall review field survey
notes provided by the Contractor for conformance with the Contract
Documents.
5. Design Verification, Changes and Alterations (Basic Services, TxDOT,
Function Code 351)
a. Shop Drawing Review
b. Field Change Orders
C. Supplemental Agreements
6. Final Plan Preparation (Other Additional Services, TxDOT Function Code
352)
a. Reproducible records prints of Drawings showing changes made
during the Construction process, based on the marked -up prints,
drawings and other data furnished by the Contractor to ENGINEER
b. Certified American Land Title Association (A.L.T.A.) survey or
equivalent of the new right-of-way, prepared by a registered Texas
land surveyor showing all improvements, the new facilities, lot lines,
utility easements, roads, and showing no encroachments.
II. EASEMENTS, LETTERS OF PERMISSION, PERMITS, ETC.
A. EASEMENTS AND LETTERS OF PERMISSION (Other Additional
Services)
The ENGINEER shall be responsible for delineating all easements for purposes of
proposed construction. The OWNER shall be responsible for securing the necessary
legal instruments.
B. PERMITS (Other Additional Services)
ENGINEER will be responsible for preparation and coordination for obtaining all
permits required for the project. The OWNER will be responsible for all permit
application fees. The following permit applications will be prepared and
coordinated with the appropriate agencies:
Page 15 5/97
1. U.S. Department of Transportation Surface Transportation Board (formerly
the Interstate Commerce Commission)
2. Texas Railroad Commission
3. 404 Permit (U.S. Corps of Engineers)
4. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater
(Environmental Protection Agency)
III. COORDINATION OF UTILITIES (Other Additional Services)
The ENGINEER shall distribute prints of the project layout to various utility companies to
determine which utilities are in the limits of the project. These shall be preliminary and are
not for platting purposes. Upon completion of the preliminary drainage plans, the
ENGINEER shall distribute prints to the various utility companies and request a review of
possible conflicts. Upon return of these prints, a meeting will be scheduled by the
ENGINEER involving the OWNER, TxDOT, the Railroad, and the various utility
companies to discuss potential conflicts and conformance with the TxDOT Utility
Accommodation Policy. The ENGINEER shall be responsible for coordination with the
various utility companies for exposing potential conflicts and field ties to uncovered utilities
in potential conflict areas.
IV. SPECIFICATIONS, SPECIAL PROVISIONS, SPECIAL SPECIFICATIONS (Basic
Services)
Specifications will be prepared in conformance with the sixteen division format for the
Construction Specification Institute and based on ENGINEER's Standard Specifications and
General Conditions: Wherever possible, TxDOT Standard Specifications and/or previously
approved special provisions and/or special specifications shall be used. Specifications for
railway work shall be prepared in accordance with the AREA Manual for Railway
Engineering.
V. MEETINGS
The ENGINEER will conduct monthly progress review meetings with the OWNER. Two
project coordination meetings will be held with the following:
Federal Highway Administration
Texas Department of Transportation
USDOT Surface Transportation Board
West Texas and Lubbock Railroad
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Environmental Protection Agency
Lubbock County
Page 16 5/97
CERTIFICATE
The undersigned hereby certifies that she is the Assistant Secretary of HDR Engineering,
Inc., a Nebraska corporation, and that, as such, has custody of the minute books of the
Corporation, and that, by Consent and Agreement of the Board of Directors dated May 15, 1996,
the following resolution was unanimously adopted:
"RESOLVED, that effective immediately and until June 20, 1997, or until
termination of said individual from the Corporation, or until recision by the Corporation's
Board of Directors, whichever occurs first, the following individuals are hereby granted the
nondelegable authority to execute or approve on behalf of the Corporation, contracts for
engineering services and architectural services incidental to engineering services to be
rendered by the Corporation, ... , or releases of claim or lien in connection with such
services, such contracts *or releases so executed or approved shall- be binding upon the
Corporation:
... William R. Hindman - Senior Vice President ..."
The undersigned further certifies that the foregoing resolution has been spread in full upon
the minute books of the Corporation and is in full force and effect.
DATED 1996.
(CORPORATE SEAL)
Bonnie J. Kudron, sst. Secretary
6. APPENDIX, EXHIBIT C, is hereby expanded to include the current ENGINEER
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT.
.Ton
7. Delete APPENDIX, EXHIBIT D, SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION and replace with
the following:
-7-
EXHIBIT D
SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION
This exhibit expands the Basis and Amount of Compensation described in SECTION 5 -
PAYMENTS OF ENGINEER of the Agreement for the PROJECT known as Railroad Relocation
for East-West Freeway in Lubbock.
EXHIBIT D
SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION
RAILROAD RELOCATION FOR EAST -WEST FREEWAY
May 8,1997
BASIC SERVICES (Phases 2 and 3)
Function Code
Fixed Fee
Maximum Amount
160
$ 24,902
$ 257,665
161
1,587
98,756
162
2,070
17,372
163
31,639
265,925
180
16,103
192,827
Total Basic Services
$ 76,301
$ 832,545
ADDITIONAL SERVICES (Phase 1)
Function Code
Fixed Fee
Maximum Amount
110
$ 19,284
$ 198,457
120
25,503
566,136
Total Additional Services
$ 44,787
$ 764,593
OTHER ADDITIONAL SERVICES (Phases 2 and 3)
Function Code
Fixed Fee
Maximum Amount
130
$1,649
$ 227,419
150
1,268
145,318
160
0
26,250
163
6,017
92,401
180
17.327
362,672
Total Other Additional Services
$ 26,261
$ 854,060
Fixed Fee
Maximum Amount
TOTAL PROJECT
$147,349
$ 2,451,198
Report HDR Engineering, Inc. 5/8/97
MANHOURS
(Labor Rates)
A
1 ".
DIRECT
DIRECT
Phase 2 - �:$:..
53 # ;.
$ 44 46 ,.
$ 3114
,,,< $ 22.81; �.;,
$ .1� 36
,15,55 ::
TOTAL
LABOR
LAB, OH
Work Description Phase 3 - 73
57.76
. $ ..48109;
-:.$ �35.84
24.67
$, 20.94.
$ �;16.82"
HRS
COSTS
& PROFII
FC 130 Right -of -Way Data - Phase 2
24
48
0
0
0
48
120
$4,162
$12,639
FC 150 Field Surveying - Phase 2
6
48
0
0
0
48
102
$3,201
$9,720
FC 160 Roadway Design Controls - Phase 2
8
212
584
576
1,060
0
2,440
$62,867
$190,914
FC 161 Drainage Design- Phase 2
4
32
64
0
0
16
116
$4,006
$12,166
FC 162 Signs, Markings, Signals- Phase 2
2
16
56
44
80
0
198
$5,226
$15,872
FC163 Miscellaneous (Roadway)- Phase 2
109
774
816
296
600
606
3,201
$95,066
$288.697
FC 180 Construction Services - Phase 3
98
444
588
896
280
496
2,802
$84,397
$256,296
TOTAL HDR DIRECT LABOR COST
251
1,574
2,108
1,812
2,020
1,214
8,979
$258,925
$786,304
% of Total Hours by Labor Classification ,',
2, 80'Ro
17.53%
23 48%
' 20.1890
22 50%
13.5296 -'i:
HDR - TOTAL LABOR COST W/ OH $78,304
HDR ENGR. - TOTAL PROJECT DIRECT COSTS
Printing and Reproduction
$11,350
Travel
$55,350
CADD & Computer
$37,400
Telephone, Fax, & Misc.
$7,050
Photos & Miscellaneous
$3,050
TOTAL HDR DIRECT COSTS ...
$11206
SUBCONTRACTS - TOTAL PROJECT
Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc.
$346,178
Wilson Surveying Company, Inc.
$357,505
Terra Engineers
$57,418
ICC Permit Attorney
$25,000
TOTAL SUBCONTRACT COST '"'..
$ aq1
"Labor Categories"
A = Principal
B = Project Manager
C = Design Engineer
D = Design Tech
E = CADD/Drafting
F = Clerical
Page I
Report HDR Engineering, Inc. 5/8/97
FC 130 Right -of -Way Data - Phase 2
MANHOURS
DIRECT
DIRECT
Sheet Other Additional Services .,
B C O .. ' E.. F ;
TOTAL LABOR
LAB, OH
...
T A Count Work DescriPtinn (Labor Rates)
, _
44.46- =` V-33 4 22.ft 14 36. $ �_15 55
HRS COSTS
1ti PROFIT
l QC/QA Review & Subconsultant Management (6 months) 24
48 0 0 0 48
120 $4,162
$12,639
0 TOTAL HDR DIRECT LABOR
HDR ENGINEERING - FUNCTION 130 DIRECT COSTS
Printing and Reproduction
Travel
Computer & CADD
Telephone, Fax & Misc Communications
Photos & Miscellaneous
TOTAL HDR DIRECT COSTS
SUBCONTRACTS - FUNCTION 130
$500
$500
$0
$150
$100
$1,250
Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc. $34,033
Wilson Surveying Company, Inc. $179,497
Terra Engineers $0
ICC Permit Attorney $0
TOTAL SUBCONTRACT COST m $21
TOTAL COSTS FOR FUNCTION CODE 130 $227,4,19,',
24 48 0 0 0 48
120 $4,162 ' $12,639' ``
A = Principal
B = Project Manager
C = Design Engineer
D = Design Tech
E = CADD/Drafting
F = Clerical
Page 2
Report HDR Engineering, Inc. 5/8/97
FC 150 Field Surveying - Phase 2 114ANHOURS
Sheet Other Additional Services A • U - IG
Ti c! CountWork Description (labor Rates) � $ 53:Ab `', 4 :46 „ $�33.14 , $ - 22 81 ?: $ ,,.19 36 $ 13
QC/QA Review & Subconsultant Management (6 months) 6 48 0 0 0 48
0 TOTAL HDR DIRECT LABOR
6 48
HDR ENGINEERING - FUNCTION 150 DIRECT COSTS
Printing and Reproduction
$500
Travel
$750
Computer & CADD
$0
Telephone, Fax & Misc Communications
$150
Photos & Miscellaneous
$100
TOTAL HDR DIRECT COSTS
SUBCONTRACTS - FUNCTION 150
Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc. $0
Wilson Surveying Company, Inc. $134,098
Terra Engineers $0
ICC Permit Attorney $0
TOTAL SUBCONTRACT COST
TOTAL COSTS FOR FUNCTION CODE 150 $145,31.8;
DIRECT
DIRECT
TOTAL LABOR
LAB, OH
HRS COSTS
& PROF17
102 $3,201
$9,720
0 0 0 48 102 $3,201 9,720
"Labor Categories"
A = Principal
B = Project Manager
C = Design Engineer
D = Design Tech
E = CADD/Drafting
F = Clerical
Page 3
Report HDR Engineering, Inc. 5/8/97
FC 160 Roadway Design Controls - Phase
2
MANHOURS
DIRECT
DIRECT
Sheet
Basic and Other Additional Services
7 B .I
C ;..,
F- • , ,
TOTAL
LABOR
LAB, OH
Task Cr)unt
Work Descj tion
p
LaborRates $:=3 40_,:
( )
.$,;_44.46-
'
� 3��I4
$ �2.SL . � $
I036
5 °
HRS
COSTS
&PROFIT
l
Geometric Design
1
Title Sheet
0
0
8
0
16
0
24
$575
$1,746
30
Develop Plan/Profile Sheets
8
120
360
360
720
0
1,568
$39,844
$120,997
3
Develop Yard Layout Sheets
0
8
24
24
60
0
116
$2,860
$8,686
l
Prepare Track Detail Sheets
0
4
12
12
32
0
60
$1,469
$4,460
1
Prepare Turnout Detail Sheet
0
4
12
12
32
0
60
$1,469
$4,460
2
Grading Design
5
Develop Typical Section Sheets
0
40
60
60
100
0
260
$7,071
$21,474
65
Develop Cross Section Sheets
0
16
60
60
60
0
196
$5,230
$15,882
3
Pavement Design
0
Establish Loading/Unloading Areas
0
4
16
16
0
0
36
$1,073
$3,259
2
Prepare Roadway Crossing Detail Sheets
0
16
32
32
40
0
120
$3,276
$9,949
108 TOTAL HDR DIRECT LABOR
HDR ENGINEERING - FUNCTION 160 DIRECT COSTS
Printing and Reproduction
Travel
Computer & CADD
Telephone, Fax & Misc Communications
Photos & Miscellaneous
TOTAL HDR DIRECT COSTS
$4,000
$3,000
$15,000
$1,500
$500
SUBCONTRACTS- FUNCTION 160
Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc. $42,751
Wilson Surveying Company, Inc. $0
Terra Engineers $26,250
ICC Permit Attorney
TOTAL SUBCONTRACT COST $d4,001
8 212 584 576 1,060 0 2,440 $62,867I90,�4
• ' Other Additional Services
A = Principal
B = Project Manager
C = Design Engineer
D = Design Tech
E = CADD/Drafting
F = Clerical
Page 4
Report HDR Engineering, Inc. 5/8/97
Sheet
Tank. Cr M
0
FC 161 Drainage Design- Phale 2
Basic Services
Work Description
QC1QA Review & Subconsultant Management
TOTAL HDR DIRECT LABOR
HDR ENGINEERING - FUNCTION 161 DIRECT COSTS
Printing and Reproduction
Travel
Computer & CADD
Telephone, Fax & Misc Communications
Photos & Miscellaneous
TOTAL HDR DIRECT COSTS
SUBCONTRACTS - FUNCTION 161
MANHOURS
DIRECT
DIRECT
A.
TOTAL
LABOR
LAB, OH
(Labor Rates) , $ - 53.40'','
$ 34 `, 23.81; 19 36 -
$ 15. - HRS
COSTS
&PROFIT
4 32
64 0 0
16 116
$4,006
$12,166
$250
$1,000
$200
$700
$300
Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc. $84,140
Wilson Surveying Company, Inc. $0
Terra Engineers $0
[CC Permit Attorney
TOTAL SUBCONTRACT COST 04i'l40
4 32 64
Page 5
0 0 16 116 $4,006 $IZ,166
A = Principal
B = Project Manager
C = Design Engineer
D = Design Tech
E = CADD/Drafting
F = Clerical
Report HDR Engineering, Inc. 5/8/97
FC 162 Signs, Markings, Signals- Phase 2
MANHOURS
DIRECT
DIRECT
Sheet
Basic Services
d .
.,»1
E
F-�,, TOTAL
LABOR
LAB, OH
! cam
Work Description (Labor Rates)
. ' AO
'�, 44.E .','+#
,. W .
2'2.$�
., ,I� .e 19 �6
$ 1555_- FIRS
COSTS
& PROFIT
1 2
Prepare Signing & Marking Detail Sheets
2
8
40
20
40
110
$3,019
$9,I67
2 1
Prepare Railroad Sign Detail Sheet
0
4
8
24
20
56
$1,378
$4,184
3 5
TxDOT Sign Standard Drawings (Signing, Markers,
0
4
8
0
20
32
$830
$2,521
Striping Sheets)
8 TOTAL HDR DIRECT LABOR
HDR ENGINEERING - FUNCTION 162 DIRECT COSTS
Printing and Reproduction
$100
Travel
$100
Computer & CADD
$1,200
Telephone, Fax & Misc Communications
$50
Photos & Miscellaneous
$50
TOTAL HDR DIRECT COSTS
S1,SOU_
SUBCONTRACTS - FUNCTION 162
Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc.
$0
Wilson Surveying Company, Inc.
$0
Terra Engineers
$0
ICC Permit Attorney
$0
TOTAL SUBCONTRACT COST
$0
TOTAL COSTS FOR FUNCTION CODE 162 17,377
2 16 56 44
80 0 198 $5,22615,87
"Labor Categories"
A = Principal
B = Project Manager
C = Design Engineer
D = Design Tech
E = CADD/Drafting
F = Clerical
Page 6
Report HDR Engineering, Inc. 5/8/97
FC163 Miscellaneous (Roadway)- Phase 2
Sheet
Basic and Other Additional Services
Task
r
Work Description (Labor Rates)
I
Design Project Management (26 months)
2
2
General Note Sheets
3
2
Estimate & Quantity Sheets
4
4
Traffic Control Plans
5
1
Detour Typical Section Sheet
6
2
Lighting Detail Sheets
7
12
Standard Drawings: Guard Fence, Wire Fence, Barricades, etc.
8
Quantity Calculations
9
14
Railroad Exhibit Drawings & Agreements
10
ICC Permit Applications
11
Crossing Signal Diagnostic Field Review
12
Construction Cost Estimate
13
Specifications (TxDOT AREA Stds, in CSI format)
14
Contract Documents
15
Project Schedule & Constructibility Review
16
Preliminary Plans QC (30%)
17
Final Plans QC (70% & 100%)
18
Bidding Services (Adv, Pre -Bid, Response,)
19
Bidding Services (Addenda, Bid Open, Evaluation & Tab)
20
Trackwork Procurement Package
37
TOTAL HDR DIRECT LABOR
HDR ENGINEERING - FUNCTION 163 DIRECT COSTS
Printing and Reproduction $2,000
Travel $10,000
Computer & CADD $12,000
Telephone, Fax & Misc Communications $1,500
Photos & Miscellaneous $1,000
a3 4(►
44A6
MANHOURS
C = b
$ 33.42.81
E
. '=, ._19 36
.1555
TOTAL
HRS
DIRECT
LABOR
COSTS
DIRECT
LAB, OH
&PROFIT
24
360
0
0
0
216
600
$20,646
$62,698
2
8
16
16
32
8
82
$2,102
$6,382
1
8
24
24
24
8
89
$2,341
$7,109
1
16
64
64
64
0
209
$5,585
$16,959
0
8
16
16
16
0
56
$1,561
$4,739
0
8
40
40
80
0
168
$4,142
$12,580
1
8
0
20
0
0
29
$865
$2,628
2
8
40
40
0
16
106
$2,949
$8,956
8
56
40
36
224
16
380
$9,649
$29,303
8
24
80
0
40
40
192
$5,542
$16,829
4
24
40
40
0
8
116
$3,643
$11,063
2
16
80
0
0
20
118
$3,780
$11,480
8
20
80
0
0
40
148
$4,590
$13,938
8
20
40
0
0
40
108
$3,264
$9,912
6
22
16
0
0
26
70
$2,233
$6,781
2
8
24
0
0
8
42
$1,382
$4,198
2
8
40
0
0
8
58
$1,912
$5,808
14
80
40
0
0
64
198
$6,625
$20,119
8
32
56
0
40
48
184
$5,227
$15,872
8
40
80
0
80
40
248
$7,028
$21.341
109
774
816
296
600
606
3,201
$95,066
„$288,697, '
TOTAL HDR DIRECT COSTS `' 526;§(')1l':'�
SUBCONTRACTS - FUNCTION 163
Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc.
$18,129
Wilson Surveying Company, Inc.
$0
Terra Engineers
$0
ICC Permit Attorney
$25,000
TOTAL SUBCONTRACT COST $43429
TOTAL COSTS FOR FUNCTION CODE 163 $358,320
($1750 Basic) ($250 Other)
($5,000 Basic) ($5,000 Other)
($8,000 Basic) ($4,000 Other)
($750 Basic) ($750 Other)
($500 Basic) $500 Other)
($7360 Basic) ($10,769 Other)
NOTE: * Indicates Other Additional Services
A = Principal
B = Project Manager
C = Design Engineer
D = Design Tech
E = CADD/Drafting
F = Clerical
Page 7
Report HDR Engineering, Inc. 5/8/97
FC 180 Construction Services - Phase 3
Sheet Basic and Other Additional Services
LML cmalWork Deecation
I Project Management (12 months)
2 Track Project Representative (4 months)
3 Signal Project Representative
4 Track Project Engineer (4 months)
5 Pre -Construction Conference
6 Shop Drawing Review
7 ICC Accounting
8 Final Inspection
9 Recommendation for Acceptance
10 100 As -Built Drawings
l l Provide Project Scheduling Services
12 Change Orders
100 TOTAL HDR DIRECT LABOR
HDR ENGINEERING - FUNCTION 180 DIRECT COSTS
Printing and Reproduction
** Travel
Computer & CADD
Telephone, Fax & Misc Communications
Photos & Miscellaneous
TOTAL HDR DIRECT COSTS
MANHOURS
DIRECT
. A
'`l. _
C . , :.
E
. _ :...F,
TOTAL
LABOR
(Labor Rates) : $ 57.76
:: $ d8.Q9.; :
$ . 35,fs4 ':. $ -' 24.67
$ 20.94 :::
$ 16.82
HRS
COSTS
48
192
0 0
0
96
336
$13,620
* 0
0
0 640
0
0
640
$15,789
* 0
0
154 0
0
0
154
$5,519
0
0
128 0
0
0
128
$4,588
8
24
16 24
0
16
88
$3,051
8
40
80 0
0
40
168
$5,926
* 8
48
80 232
0
232
600
$15,263
8
24
0 0
0
16
48
$1,885
2
8
0 0
0
8
18
$635
* 4
20
50 0
200
0
274
$7,173
4
48
0 0
48
100
$3,347
8
40
80 0
80
40
248
$7,601
$4,000
$40,000
$9,000
$3,000
$1,000
$57;000'
SUBCONTRACTS - FUNCTION 180
Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc. $167,125
Wilson Surveying Company, Inc. $43,910
Terra Engineers $31,168
ICC Permit Attorney $0
TOTAL SUBCONTRACT COST _m$242,203
TOTAL COSTS FOR FUNCTION CODE 180 555 45►9,'
98
444 588 896 280 496
($2000 Basic) ($2000 Other)
($10,000 Basic) ($30,000 Other)
($2,000 Basic) ($7,000 Other)
($1500 Basic) ($1500 Other)
($500 Basic) ($500 Other)
** Includes Subsistence for Project Representative
($53,375 Basic) ( $113,750 Other Additional)
* Indicates Other Additional Services
DIRECT
LAB, OH
& PROFIT
$41,363
$47,948
$16,761
$13,931
$9,265
$17,995
$46,352
$5,725
$1,928
$21,783
$10,163
$23,082
2,802 $84,397$236,296
"Labor Categories"
A = Principal
B = Project Manager
C = Design Engineer
D = Design Tech
E = CADD/Drafting
F = Clerical
Page 8
a
8. Delete APPENDIX, EXHIBIT E, PROJECT SCHEDULE and replace with the following:
In
Railroad Relocation For EXHIBIT E
East-West Freeway
Proposed Project Schedule
May 8, 1997
1 9 9 7 1 1 9 9 8 1 1 9 9 9 1 2 0 0 0
Task and Description MIJ I.
PRLLETH & Bmriall'
Project Mgmt & Administration
NTP - Preliminary Design Phase >
A. Field Surveying
B. Coordinate: Geotech & Surveyor
C. Prelim. Design, Plans & Cost Estimates
D. Review by City, TxDOT & WT&LR
E. Incorporate Review Comments
Final Design Phase
A. Right -of -Way Acquisition & Utility Relocation
B. Prepare Plans, Specifications & Estimates
C. Review by City, TxDOT & WT&LR
D. Incorporate Review Comments
E. Track Materials Procurement
Bidding Phase
ON$TR1,0,1. �'iCIN I" BASK AD�NIS�"RA
Construction Engineering & Inspections/Project Mgmt
Shop Drawing Review
Final Inspection
Acceptance by Railroad
As -Built Drawings
ICC Accounting/Pay Estimates
Demolition and Salvage (by Railroad)
Railroad ROW Clear for Frwy Construction
1 9 9 7 1 1 9 9 8 1 1 9 9 9 1 2 0 0 0 1
> Key Date (Milestone)
Except as modified herein, all other provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Supplemental Agreement as of the day
and year first written above.
Approved As To Content:
By: rGL. Qart
Name: Mildred Cox
Title: Director of Transportation
Approved As To Form:
Name: Linda L. Chamales
Title: Supervising Attorney
Approved•
Name: William R. Hindman, P.E.
Title: Senior Vice President
"OWNER"
CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS
By: 4z ,
Name:
Title: —Mayor--
Address: 1625 13th Street
Lubbock, Texas 79457
Attest:
By:
Name: Kaythie Darnell
Title: City Secretary
"ENGINEER"
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
Name: William B. IYagood, P.E.
Title: Senior Vice President
Address: 12700 Hillcrest Road
Suite 125
Dallas, Texas 75230-2096
0