Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 5408 - Joint Application, Lamesa-Texas, Office Of The Governor,CJD-Grant Funding SPRNTF - 01_23_1997RESOLUTION NO. 5408 Item #29 January 23, 1997 RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the Mayor Protempore of the City of Lubbock be and is hereby authorized and directed to execute for and on behalf of the City a joint application with the City of Lamesa for grant funding and related documents for the State of Texas, Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division for State and federal assistance for operation of the South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force to combat narcotics and illegal substances trafficking. The City Council hereby agrees to a cash match of $ 91,815.00 from the City to fund 25% of the Project, as required by the State of Texas in order to be eligible to receive such State and federal assistance. Passed by the City Council this 23rdday of January , 1997. Alex "Ty" C ok, ayo empore A t: aythi' arnell, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Ken A. Walker, Chief of Police AS Dan .7 . Se luri, Asst. City Attorney DS:v:r. January 13. 1997 i RESOUMON NO. 5408 It era #29 APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDING January 23, 1997 CRIMINAL JUSTICE DwION, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 1. COG Application Idenbrler(ap0cam imm wa* 3. Date Received by COG!CJO oppscart imm watiQ 2. COG to which application is subcrttted: 4. Is Vft appilcation shared whin another COG? owicaM warm wvik� .a. Legal name of agency applying: C. Division or unit Wirt appkcert organtzati0n to admkdster grant: b. Address (give street err P. 0.8ox, ed'y, stall, and sip Code) d. Name, address, telephone. and fax number of the person who can answer questions concerning Nib application (give area code). P.O. Box 2000 Lt. Randy Franklin Lubbock, Texas 79457 P. 0. Box 200D Lubbock, Te:tas 79457 6. State Payee Identification Number (806) 767-2974 Fax (806) 767 9071 8.a Type of Application O New ® Continuation 6.b. If confinuation, complete the following: Year of futdatg for this application Imo* ar): O Year 2 O Yew 3 O Year 4 O Year 50 Year 9 Ingn .;4_ a: _ 10. Application far: O State Criminal Justice Planning Fund pate) O Crime Stoppers Assistance Fund (sties) O Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Ad owomD cFDA•io.s4o O We V Delinquency Prevention Fund fo"mO CFDA-16.5a O Victims of Crime Ad Fund pworso cm&i&srs ® Texas Narcotics Control Program tradenan cFoA-ts.5n O Safe and Drug -Free Schools and Commtmities Act p do* cFDA-u.tae O Violence Against Women Act Veftm) CFDA-re.5w O Otha 7. Type of Applicant Jd4c n wo box a,*) O State Apmxy 0 Start COUP or uni Waky 0 county O Prhrate Coaepe or Unkwxky N y '0 kd o Tribe O Town* O NonlimMOManmtion O Spwwalhtiet 0 RepionatC=mw1dGavemne W t 0 Educs&YW service Center 0 Other fteeajr): O WkwerdentSdicotDidrict Office d to Governor, Crt has Jtratice Division P. O. Box 12428 Austb%Terms 73711 11 a. Geographic Mess of Project Activ tes (Cbes and Counties) Counties: Bailey, Crosby, Dawson, Dickens, Floyd, Hale, Hockley, Laab, Lubbock, Lynn Cities: Abernathy, Amherst, Crosbyton, Floydada, Lamesa, LEvelland, Littlefield, Lockney, Lorenzo 11 b. County where project is bewid: 13. ProposedPnoject a. Start Date: b. Ending Date: 12. Title of Project 14. Are the actiY ies proposed in this application 100% juvenile -related? 15. Requested Fuming: a. Federal Grant Furls (CJD) = 310,525 b. Stda Grant Finds (CJD) $ c. Cash Match i 103,509 d.ln-Idnd coca wwi. ate. vw,e $ e.TOTAL 9 414,034 O Yes a NO Force 16. If project Is statewide, an what data was a copy of the application submitted for 00 TRACS reviewv? .00 (dale) If project is local, submisslors of application to regioriat council of pmnnerds 00 satisfies the nequirernert for TRACS review. 17. Is the applicant delinquent on any federal debt? .00 O Yes If 'Yes: attach an arplanation ® No OR COG USE ONLY to *kwt won mm k; FOR CJD USE ONLY tappkart bars tbNO .00 CPTN: Region ft: , Priority 6 RBE Q in O Out I Unique t# 18. To the beet of my knowledge and belief, an data in this application is true and correct. The document Nos bean defy authorised by the ga mTiing body or the applicant and the applicant will comply with the attached assurances V •he assistance Is awarded. a. Typed Name of Authorized Official b. TWO c. Telephone Number d e)f Authorized Otiiaal = e. We Signed CJ1D-1 Issued 7/96 ll.a. Geographic Areas of Project Activities (cities) Muleshoe, O1ton, Petersburg, Plainview, Ralls, Sundown, Shallowater, Slaton, Spur, Tahoka. CJD-la COMMUNITY PLAN ELIGIBILITY FORM Be sure to reference the name of each relevant community plan when answering the questions below. 1. Name the plan(s) under which the applicant is submitting this application. "Community Plan 1996" A regional plan for the Counties of: Bailey, Cochran, Crosby, Dickens, Floyd, Garza, Hockley, King, Lamb, Lubbock, Lynn, Motley, Terry, Yoakum 2. List the cities, counties, or part thereof covered by each plan referenced under question one above? Counties: Bailey, Crosby, Dawson, Dickens, Floyd, Hale, Hockley, Lamb, Lubbock, Lynn 3 4. 5. Cities: Abernathy, Amherst, Crosbyton, Floydada, Lamesa, Levelland, Littlefield, Lockney, Lorenzo, Muleshoe, Olton, Petersburg, Plainview, Ralls, Sundown, Shallowater, Slaton, Spur, Tahoka. For each community plan, state the problem(s) listed that this application would impact The trafficking of Narcotics and Illegal substances. If a continuation application, quote the reference in each plan that mentions the focus of this application as a priority. #3 Narcotics and Illegal substances * Trafficking ffa new application, list the gap(s) in services listed in each plan that this application would help to fill. FOR COG USE ONLY Oppb—*bars bWr*) CPTN: Note: This form must accompany all applications for local or regional grants. CJD-2 h9jed 7/96 DESIGNATION OF GRANT OFFICIALS CJD rules require that three persons be designated to the positions of Authorized Official, Project Director, and Financial Officer for the purposes of administering a grant. The Project Director and the Financial Officer may not be the same person but, under extenuating circumstances, one person may otherwise fill two positions. In accordance with the criteria and definition of responsibilities set forth in the Govenwes Crfminal Justice Plan for Texas governing submission of this application, the following designations are made: APPLICANT: Ci ry of T.uhhnrk PROJECT TITLE: South Plains Regional Narcotics Tack Force ® Mr. O Ms. Project Director (Type or P" Cap rain T.iibhnrk PnT1ra nPpartmpnt Me and AGency P_O. Box 2000 Organization'fs Business Address (Street or P. O. Box) 1.11hhnr1C 79457 City Zip (806) 767-2868 Telephone Number O Mr. ® Ms. 1R$XtC,3E Riley Officer (Type orPrint) Finances Manager rfrg of lmhhnek Tiffe and Agency P.O. Box 2000 Organization's Su.kww Address (Street or P. O. Box) Lubbock 79457 city Zip (806) 767-2161 Telephone Number (806) 767-9071 (806) 749-7211 Fax Number Fax Number M Mr. O Ms. Bob Case Authorized Micial (Type or Pdnt) Title and Agency P.O. Box 2000 Organizabon's Business Address (Street or P. O. Box) Lubbock 79457 city Zip (906) 767-2001 Telephone Number Fax Number CJD-3 kwed 7i% PROJECT NARRATIVE FOCUS AND ACTIVITY SUMMARY The South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force is entering it's ninth year of funding through the Texas Narcotics Control Program. The S.P.R.N.T.F. will continue a regional effort, among rural and urban law enforcement agencies, to enhance area law enforcement capabilities in curbing narcotics trafficking in the ten county region of the South Plains which the S.P.R.N.T.F. serves. The South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force will provide assistance to those area law enforcement agencies which are without the fiscal means, manpower, expertise or technical ability to conduct investigations of narcotics trafficking affecting their communities. The South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force will continue to devote manpower and resources toward the interdiction of street and mid -level narcotics trafficking in this region to compliment the efforts supplied by state and federal agencies. The S.P.R.N.T.F. will continue to assist the Drug Enforcement Administration and Department of Public Safety Narcotics Service in joint investigations which become manpower intensive, as well as coordinating our efforts with both agencies for optimum drug enforcement for this area of the state. CJD-4a PROJECT NARRATIVE 1. What is the specific problem to be addressed by this application? The most significant problem addressed by the South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force remains the inability of this area's primarily rural town's and counties law enforcement agencies to effectively combat the drug problems within their own jurisdictions. These small towns and sparsely populated counties do not have the fiscal means, manpower, or expertise to adequately handle the growing narcotics problem in their areas. The funding provided by the Texas Narcotics Control Program enables these communities to battle their drug problems by utilizing the SPRNTF. The Task Force, through funding from T.N.C.P., is able to provide monetary support for the purchase of evidence, the payment of informants, and necessary personnel for covert operations that are often impossible for local agencies. The Task Force is also able to supply these smaller agencies with training opportunities which is made possible by our affiliation with the Texas Narcotics Control Program. 2. Explain the nature and extent of the problem using verifiable statistics. The South Plains Regional. Narcotics Task Force serves a ten county area of the South Plains. The combined population of this ten county region is in excess of 300,060 people, and ' covers an area approaching 10,000 square miles. The City of Lubbock has a population of approximately 200,000 people. Drug traffickers based in Lubbock supply the many rural communities on the South Plains with narcotics, thus creating numerous problems for these communities. Local law enforcement is then turned to, to provide a solution to problems which they are ill equipped to address. Of the numerous city and county law enforcement agencies encompassed within this ten county area, only five agencies have more manpower than the Task Force, two of which are the City of Lubbock and Lubbock County. This shortage of available personnel, joined with a lack of funds and knowledge of narcotics investigation techniques, makes the South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force an invaluable commodity in this region of the state. 3. What resources are currently being used in the applicant's geographic area to address this problem and how do those resources work together? This area of the South Plains is also covered by the Drug Enforcement Administration. The DEA typically targets the larger drug trafficking organizations which are normally seen located in urban areas. DEA.'s geographic area of CDJ-4b responsibility is twice the size of that covered by the South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force, with less manpower available to them. The SPRNTF enjoys an excellent working relationship with DEA, with both entities assisting the other when called upon whether the requirement be for additional personnel, or in assistance in cases involving larger quantities of controlled substances. The Department of Public Safety Narcotics Service also serves an area of the South Plains notably larger than that covered by the South Plains Regional Narcotics Task Force. DPS, like the Drug Enforcement Administration, serves this area with fewer personnel than that of the SPRNTF. DPS targets the mid -level and street -level narcotic trafficker much like the SPRNTF. The Task Force and DPS's duties and responsibilities often over -lap, but through continued communication, efforts are not duplicated. The agencies are constantly assisting the other in investigations, and exchanging information to bring to a successful end joint investigations of this regions narcotics traffickers. The SPRNTF utilizes such resources as available manpower and computer facilities to aid in the enforcement effort. The Task Force serves as a central repository for intelligence information gathered on this areas traffickers. The Task Force is able to maintain and update this information where smaller agencies do not have the ability to maintain such a data base. 4. Identify the gap in available resources or services that makes this application necessary. As enumerated previously, the SPRNTF seeks to fill the void in narcotics law enforcement which is present in smaller communities on the South Plains. This gap exists due to a lack of personnel, equipment, training, and budgetary constraints which dictate an agencies investigative options. While this area of the state is covered by state and federal law enforcement agencies, they too are limited in their ability to fulfill all the requests of their services by surrounding communities. Whether this ability is restricted by organizational priorities, fiscal constraints, or a severe drain of manpower and time requirements for the investigation into narcotics trafficking, a lack of needed attention will be realized without the SPRNTF. 5. If funded, how would the proposed project work with the community and with other agencies toward impacting the problems stated above? The SPRNTF will continue to respond to each community's different needs. Some communities will need less enforcement action and more drug education programs that the Task Force could supply through community presentations. CJD-4c Whatever the particular community identifies as it's primary need, the Task Force coordinates our efforts with the local enforcement officials to obtain the greatest benefit for that community. This cooperative effort would be maintained from inception of an investigation, until prosecution of the offender was completed. Should the Task Force be made aware of problems in a community, we would notify the affected parties and develop a course of action to best combat the problem. 6. What are the specific activities proposed for this project? The SPRNTF hosted several training opportunities this past year covering a wide array of narcotics law enforcement. The Task Force anticipates continuing these in-service training seminars at little or no cost to attendees, in an effort to alleviate a portion of the problem faced by some agencies on the South Plains. The Task Force will also work closely with other agencies requesting our assistance. The Task Force will involve the requesting agency with case initiation, case development, targeting of offenders, the recruitment and usage of informants, use of surveillance tactics, monitoring equipment and all other aspects of a narcotics investigation. This will ensure the requesting agency has an active role in the resolution of their problem, as well as giving them insight into conducting a successful narcotic related investigation. 7. Explain how the proposed project activities will address the stated problem. Through problem specific training, local communities will be more adept at recognizing their problems, and perhaps provide a greater and more innovative solution to their problems at a local level. With a more active role in the investigation on the local level, a better return may be seen from time invested by the Task Force. This will also provide the local officials with information needed to approach their parent agencies with current local requirements to assist in arresting their problems. 8. List the measures that the project will use to determine the effectiveness of the project and its impact on the stated problem. The true impact of the SPRNTF would be measured by the satisfaction of those communities it serves, and the positive impact the Task Force has on the community. While statistical comparisons of cases initiated, arrests, drug and asset seizures would yield data with regard to CJD-4d performance objectives, it may not supply a reliable effectiveness measure due to the level of traffickers being targeted in these smaller communities. The continued cooperation with the different agencies in effecting solutions to their community problems and resulting satisfaction is a better measure of project effectiveness. 9. Provide all available current information for each of the effectiveness measures listed above. Statistically, from November 1995 to November 1996, the SPRNTF has initiated or assisted in 322 cases, and filed 780 narcotics related charges. The Task Force has initiated or assisted in the seizure of approximately $5,818,937 of illicit narcotics, and $437,055 of U.S. currency during this same time frame. The drugs of choice in this region are Marijuana, Cocaine and particularly "Crack" Cocaine. The Task Force continues to work closely with the Zoning Department within the City of Lubbock, to assist in our effort to combat drug related crimes and activity. This relationship with the Zoning Department has been instrumental in having known trafficking locations condemned or demolished. This effort has often prevented traffickers from becoming established, as well as aiding to rid certain neighborhoods of drug sales and related criminal activity. 10. What are the project's goals for each effectiveness measure by the end of the grant year? The SPRNTF is dedicated to assisting the various agencies on the South Plains in their needs of narcotic law enforcement, whether those needs be in the area of expertise in investigations, fiscal resources or manpower. The SPRNTF will attempt to fill the void in narcotics law enforcement felt by this areas rural communities, and carry out the mission of the T.N.C.P.. The SPRNTF through the expansion of the unit, wants to show an increase of fifteen percent or more in cases initiated, arrests and quantities of narcotics removed from our communities. This goal is attainable only through adequate funding and continued support from the Texas Narcotics Control Program. CJD-4e BUDGET INFORMATION Section A —Budget Summary L s ��) (�) (3) (4) n : Budget Categories CJD Funds Cash Match In-tdnd Match Total V* rocs ww a wr. v CAW 1. Personnel (Salaries) $ 155,555 $ 51,853 = $207,408 L Personnel (Fringe Benefits) 62,933 20,976 83,909 3. B Contractual 4. C. Travel and Training 5,426 1,811 7,237 s. o Equipment 6. Renovation/Retrofit T. F Supplies & Direct 86,611 28,869 115,480 a. Total Direct Charges 310,525 103,509 414,034 (Sum of 1-7) 9. G. Indirect Costs 10. Totals $310,525 SL03,509 i $414,034 (5und8-� 11• Program Income $237,000 Section 0--Cash Match* Section C—Program Income F•separatelyeach eotaw of tUrWs and the amounts Total must agree vW% Lane 11, Cokom 4 above. Total must agree edh Lke 10, Cokann 2 above. Source Amount Source Amount 57% Asset Program Tnc-omf- Forfeitures/Auction 135,090 11% Interest on ccounts 26,070 31% Asset Sharing 73,470 1% Restitution 2,370 -,Pw— fees 0--ax vie axrw a mn mo= ■ and. An Cain mm= must oe worn arrant wurm. na anBE"= FROM or program r=me. 1 have read and agree to the accufwy of pages CJDS throWh CJD 13 of this application and have initialed each page, Bets Typed Name and Signature of Financial OfIker as on Page CJD-& bx,ed 7M Criminal Justice Division, Office of the Governor (Refer to page 21 of the 1998 Plan.) SCHEDULE A PERSONNEL • . ay.•.va valGas aG0 (1) (2) (3) (4) Title or Position' % of Time= CJD Funds Cash Match In -kind Match TOTAL' (A) garori109466 $ 3 i 40-671 tB) (G} (D) (E) Inv (F) Invests (G) (H) TOTAL Direct Salaries $155,555 $51,853 $ $ 207,408 2. Fringe Benefits % or $ Rate CJD Funds Cash Match In -kind Match TOTAL FICA & Medicare 17,65$ 11,900 $ Retirement Insurance (Lffe &Health) 2,855 ilYOriaBi'S'Conlpeftsation i, Unemployment Insurance Other (Explain) See Cont. TOTAL Fringe Benefits i62,933 $ 2Q-976$ i TOTAL PERSONNEL BUDGET : t 72,929 $ S ` Include only one position per fine. Attach a description of the duties or responsibilities of each position. 2. Express as a percent of total time. Must beat least 25°%. (40 hours per week equals 100°%) 3. Should reflect employee's gross salary attributable to the project. If applying for continuation funding, justify any salary increase over the previous year. t Financial Officer hAals CX),a used 7/96 Fringe Benefits CJD MATCH Longivity/Stability Pay $2,549 $ 850 Education Incentive Pay 61750 2,250 Clothing Allowance 2,700 900 TOTALS 11, 999 4,000 CJD- 6a Total $3, 399 9,000 3,600 15,999 Criminal Justice Division, Office of the Governor (Refer to page 22 of the 1998 Plan.) SCHEDULE B PROFESSIONAL AND CONTRACTUAL SERVICES (�) (2) (3) (4) Description of Service CJD Funds Cash Match In4dnd Match TOTAL (A) i $ i $ (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) TOTAL PROFESSIONAL AND CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $ $ $ $ REQUIRED BUDGET NARRATIVE: Briefly describe and Justify any anticipated contractual arrangement and work Products expected. Describe basis for arriving at the cost of each One item. Professional services (such as consultants, trainers, counselors, eta) should be described by type of service, number of hours, rate per hour, and travel costs. If any. Use additional pages as needed. b%jed 7/% TRAVEL AND TRAINING 1. Local Travel Criminal Justice Dlvlslon, Office of the Governor (Refer to page 27 of the 1998 Plan.) SCHEDULE C (1) 1 (2) Cj) (4) Title or Position Miles Traveled CJD Funds Cash Match In -kind TOTAL AnnuaW$Rate Match (A) i (B) (C) (D) (E) LOCAL TRAVEL TOTAL i i i i x. un�zare i raver (5peary =mmy ana use conunuauon pages a necessary; PurposeEnCJD Funds Cash Match In -kind TOTAL i i i i7 sin INSTATE TRAVEL = 3,953 i 2,22 3. OutTravel (Specify dearly and use continuation pages if necessary) Purpose Destination CJD Funds Cash Match In -kind TOTAL i i i i 1,815 01.rT-017-STATE TOTAL i i s. a raining r umons ana Fees (spec ry aeany ana use eannrurauon pages a necessary) Purpose Training CJD Funds Cash Match In4dnd TOTAL s s s s TRAINING TOTAL i i i i TOTAL TRAVEL BUDGET i 5,426 TS 11 811 i i 7,237 tarosE: whey penso a tr aMRwhen agency or ceased vehicles amuse e+e vehicle apetaboviinitftem, costs shonid be shown an Schedule F. 'Sapphs and Died Operating Expenses.' REQUIRED BUDGET NARRATIVE: Briefly describe the applicants travel policy (i.e. mileage rates and per diem rates). Specify purposes for each item of travel. Break out costs of each in -state and each out- of-state trip to separately show the specific costs of transportation and of per diem. 9:b Fu axial Officer Iru6als CJD-8 tcs,ed71% SCHEDULE C (Continued) Training and Travel: 2. In -State Travel: Basic Narcotics Investigator's Schools: Travel- est. 760 mi. X $0.25/mi. X 1 vehicle $ 190.00 Lodging - est. $65/day X 12 days X 2 officers $1,560.00 Meals - $30/day X 13 days X 2 officers $ 780.00 Total $2,530.00 CJD- $1,897 Match- $633 TNCP Annual Conference: (San Antonio) Travel- est. 850 mi. X $0.25/mi. X 1 vehicle $ 212.00 Lodging- est. $65/day X 4 days X 4 officers $1,040.00 Meals- $30/day X 4 days X 4 officers $ 480.00 Total $1,732.00 CJD- $1,299 Match- $433 TNCP Commander's Meetings: Travel- est. 1,000 mi. X $0.25/mi $ 250.00 Lodging- est. $65/day X 2 days X 4 meetings $ 520.00 Meals- $30/day X 2 days X 4 meetings $ 240.00 Total $1,010.00 CJD- $757 Match- $253 3. Out -of -State Travel: D.E.A. Basic or Advanced Narcotics Investigator's School Travel- est. 760 mi. X $0.25/mi.X 1 vehicle $ 190.00 Lodging- est. $65/day X 13 days X 2 officers $ 845.00 Meals- $30/day X 13 days X 2 officers $ 780.00 Total $1,815.00 CJD-$1,361 Match-$454 4.Training Tuitions and Fees A.TNCP Annual Conference Registration Fee $25/per officer X 4 officers $ 100.00 CJD-$75 Match-$25 B.DEA Basic or Advanced Narcotic/Investigations School 50.00 Registration Fee $25/per officer X 2 officers CJD $37 CJD-8 a Match $13 Criminal Justice Division, Office of the Governor (Refer to pop 28 of the 1998 Plan.) SCHEDULE D EQUIPMENT PURCHASES ) 4) Equipment Name or Description and Quantity (Do Not List Brand Nam") CJD Funds Cash Match "nd Match TOTAL i tB) (C) (D) t� (F) t�? tM TOTAL. EQUIPMENT PURCHASES i i i i REQUIRED BUDGET NARRATIVE: Describe the basis for arriving at the coat of each One item. Provide justification mW explanation of use. Use additional pages as needed. (il Financial officer Wdals ruw 7A6 Criminal Justice Division, Office of the Governor (Refer to page 29 of the 1998 Plan.) SCHEDULE E RENOVATION AND RETROFIT FOR JUVENILE DETENTION FACILITIES This schedule apples only to Fund 421 and may only be used for projects that renovate or rabo6t edstinq hwAfies to be used for juvenile detention in order to comply with the federal hwsanift he&4� dMa 1laiww..wwr, d.,....,..K— A.d 1) R) (3) (4) Itemized Costs of RanovationMetrofrt CJD Funds Cash Match In-Und Match TOTAL (A) s i $ $ (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (1) (J) (L) (M) (0) (P) Ct 8 TOTAL Is Is $ : REQUIRED BUDGET NARRATIVE: Attach as many pages as necessary to describe the basis for ,arriving at the cost of each line item. Provide justification and explanation of use. t.J 00 WL*d 7Ra Criminal Justice Division, Office of the Governor (Refer to page 29 of the 1998 Plan.) SCHEDULE F SUPPLIES AND DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES (1) (2) (3) (4) Directly Charged Supplies and Other Operating Expenses CJD Funds Cash Match ln-kind Match TOTAL (A) i i11-8519 $ i 47-414 (c) (D) (E) (F) (G) 2,016 672 2.688 (H) {.) K (L) TOTAL SUPPLIES AND DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES $ 86,611 $ 28 , 869 : $115 , 480 REQUIRED BUDGET NARRATIVE: Describe the basis for arriving at the cost of each line item and justifica- tion for requesting each item. Use additional pages as needed. Financial Officer Irtilials CA-1 I 6xied 7/96 This budget is based on six lease vehicles on (95/96) expenditures. A. Vehicle Expenses: Fuel- 6 vehicles X est. $1.18/gal.X (12,000 mi./15 mpg./gal) Veh. Maintenance- 6 veh. X est. $0.15 /mile X est. 12,000 mi Window Tinting-6 veh x $120 Adminstrative charge by City of Lubbock for keeping maintenance records on 5 vehicles X $50/ car lease vehicles 5 vehicles X $500/vehicle X 12 months Total CJD- $35,576 Match- $11, 858 B. Confidential Funds: Based on historical costs and anticipated needs CJD- $33,000 Match- $11,000 C.Office Supplies: Based on past needs and anticipated requirements CJD-$8 63 Match- $287 $ 5,664 $10, 800 $ 720 $ 250 $30,000 $47, 434 $44,000 $ 1,150 D.Narcotic Test Kits: Based on past need and anticipated increase in case load.$2.00 is an average cost of the different types of test kits) 500 kits $2.00 kit $ 1,000 CJD- $750 Match- $250 E. Audio Cassette Tapes: (vendor supplied costs) 90% of all investigations are taped recorded and used as evidence. Quanity required is based on historical usage, and anticipated need is 400 tapes X $2.00 per tape CJD- $ 600 Match-$200 F. Video Tapes: (vendor supplied cost estimate) 60 VHS tapes X $2.25 per tape 60 VHS-C tapes X $3.50 per tape CJD- $259 Match- $86 Total G. Batteries: All covert audio equipment runs on batteries. Body transmitters require AA, AAA, 9- volt bateries. The repeaters for the body transmitters require 8 D-cell batteries each time it is used. Need is based on past requirements and anticipated need. Costs are supplied by City of Lubbock purchasing CDJ-ila $ 800 $ 135 $ 210 $ 345 D-cell- $0.56@ X 24 cases X $41.00/case AA- $0.23@ X 6 cases X $34.00/case AAA- $0.23@ X6 cases X $34.00/case 9-volt- $1.00@ X 18 cases X $72.00/case CJD-$2, 016 Match- $672 $ 984 $ 204 $ 204 $ 1,296 Total $ 2,688 H. Communication Expenses: (vendor supplied costs) Pager rental- 6 pagers X $15.95/mo. X 12 mo. $ 1,148 Cel phone - 6 phones X $35.00/mo. X 12 mo. $ 2,520 Equip Maintenance- est. repairs on radios, phones, pagers $ 600 Office phones 6 phones X $35/month x 12 months $ 2,520 Long distance service 6 phones X $50/month X 12 months $ 3,600 Total $ 10,388 CJD-$7, 791 Match-$2, 597 I.Officer Drug Testing: (City of Lubbock, Human Resources) random drug testing 2 test/quarter X $25/test S 200 CJD-$150 Match-$50 J. Annaul Drug-Trak Software Maintenance Contract: Provides on-line support and service advice. New versions are supplied to us as they come available $ 200 CJD-$150 Match-$50 K. Texas Narcotic Information System: Service Line $ 6,000 Charge $500/month X 12 months CJD-$4,500 Match-$1, 500 L. Professional Services: Vendor supplied cost: Use of laboratory and chemist to analyze quantitatively & Qualitatively) drugs used for reversals. $85/per hour X 3 hours per case X est. 5 cases $ 1,275 CJD-$956 Match- $319 CJD-llb Criminal Justice Division, Office of the Governor (Refer to page 30 of the 1998 Plan.) SCHEDULE G INDIRECT COSTS The maximum amount of indirect costs that may be applied for is not to exceed a total of two - Percent of the total direct costs provided by CJD, unless the applicant has an approved cost allocation plan. Indirect Costs CJD Funds t (M Total MV0 Costs ON* 8qM ~ c llfka 8. cciumn 1) 1 $ I I (B) Total kwfjrea Costs I $ I Q Applicant is using the CJD two percent rule to determine the amount of indirect cost. O Applicant is using an approved cost allocation plan to determine indirect cost. bfo� Financial Officer Initials CJD-12 twed 71% TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET a Yes 0 No This Project is completely supported by CJD grant dollars and grantee match. There are no other local, state, federal, or foundation grant dollars assisting this program. If 'Yes", the financial officer should sign below and may disregard the rest of this form. If *now, please indicate below the amounts, sources, and purposes of other funding. 1- Amount of Funding: a PurposelUse of Funding: Source of Funding: 2. Amount of Funding: Purpose/Use of Funding: Source of Funding: 3. Amount of Funding: i Purpose/Use of Funding: Source of Funding: 4- Amount of Funding:' i PurposW" of Funding: Source of Funding: (Use addidk=1 pages as needed.) Total grant dollars excluding this CJD grantlappticatiom i CJD funding and grantee match represents _ % of the total funding of this project. Financial Officer heals W-13 bsued 7M CERTIFIED ASSURANCES The applicant hereby assures and certifies that the project will comply with the regulation, policies, guidelines and requirements including OMB Circulars No. A-122, A-110, A-102, and A-87, as they relate to the application, accep- tance and use of funds for this project. Also the applicant assures and certifies to the grant that: 1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant; that a resolution, motion a similar action has been duly adopted a passed as an offiaal act of the applkant's g x body, authorizing the tf log of the application including all under- standings and assurances contamed therein, g authorizing person identified as the otfaal reprZOILatIve of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such ad&onal infatuation as may be required. 2. Federal funds made available under this formula grant will not be used to supplant state or local hinds, but will be used to u=mse the amotmts of such funds that would, m the absence of federal f mds, be made available for law enfo =znt activities. 3. Matching fimds required to PW the non-federal portion of the cost of each p and prnj*o for which grant fimds an made: available, shall be in additim to fi zeds that would dhawise be made program for law afircement by the rccipicats of grant fmds. 4. It well amply with nequir rneds of the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistwx and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (P. L. 91.646) which provides for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced as a result of float and federally assisted pub. S. It will amply with the minimum wage and maw hours provisions oft federal Fair Labor Standards Act, as they apply to hospital and educational i nstjitutian employers of State and local governments.. 6. It will establish safeguards to prohibit "loyces firm using their positions for a purpose dual is or gives the of being motivated by a desire for private gam fa' themselves a others, p ay those with whom they hava� bps, or other ties. 7. Fed accounting monitoring, and such evaluation, ocedurrs as may be necessary to keep such records as CID or the Cornptroila General shall prescribe, shall be pro tto assua a fiscal 000trd, proper maruagement, and effiaiwt disbuasemaot of f mds received under the gent 8. h shall maintain such data and infarnnadiron and submit such reports, in such fora, at nick times, and containing such information as CJD may require. 9. The pruprams contained in its am icon meet all , that all the information is correct, that there has been appropriate caadination with affected agencies, andU ft applicant will comply with all provisions of the groat and aIl other applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and guidelines. 10. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the Federal sponsoring agency concerning special requirements of law, program requrmxats, and other administrative requirements. 11. Pursuant to Sections 223(axi8) and 296 of the JJDP Act, t Grantee assures that procedures have been established to a>,suat that ngrams fimdcad undo the JJDP Act shall not disclose records can tai MO t identity of individual xvmiles_ ow to this ' (a) authorization by law; (b consent of either the �tv� a his autho- rized representative; a (c) = that othccwise t functions of this title cannot be;erformodlo Under no �amt- suuxxs may pubes project � a contain names of actual juvenile service rxrpeirentrs. 12. It will insure that the f unities under its cvmership, lease or supaviske which shall be uffn ed in the acoom�lishment of the project art not listed an fire Fnviro� Protections A,gracy'a (1ZA) list of V Fac�ities and tl� t will notify due Feda�ai gmntoc of de receipt of any coumn ion from the Director of tie 'A Offoc of Federal Acivities indicating that a� to be a9od m idue pit is under consideration for listing by due FAA 13. h will comply with the flood msurmrt purchase requirements of § 102 (a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93-234, 87 Stat 97rov 5, apped Doec�ba 31,1976. Section 102 (a) requires, , and after March 2,1975, the purdhase of flood insurance in des what such insurance: is available- as a condition fat receipt of any Federal asdstance for construction or acqumitim purposes for use in any area than has been identified by the Secretary of die Department of Housing and Urban Development as an area having special flood haauds. 14. It will assist tine grantor AWmyn � its �p with' 106 oft National listoric Pneseivation Act of 1966 as amended (16 U. S. C. 470 d Fxmm Order 11593, !tire Archeological and Historic Pcesavation Act of 1966 (16 U S. C. 469a-1 et seq.) by (a) consulting with the State Historic Preservation Officer an the conduct of investigations as nxessary, to identify listed is or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of lfistork: Places that are ukjed to adverse effeaxs (see 36CFR Part 800.8) by the activity, and notifying the grantor agent of the existence of any mxh properties, and by (b) eompbW with all requirements established by the grantor agency to avoid or mmgaic adverse eflocts upon such properties. is. It will arooply with t Lbuform Grant and ContractMcmagements Standards (UGCMS) developed under the directives of the Uniform Grant and Contract Management Act, Chapter 183, Texas Government Code` GD-14 Issued 7/96 CERTIFIED ASSURANCES (Continued) 16. It, if a county, has taken or will take all action necessary to provide the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and the Deparunast of Public Safety any criminal history ponds maintaiood by the county in the manna specified for the pia - poses of those departments. 17. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000d (prohibiting discrinriinatiort an dic basis of race, color, or national acig* I Section 504 of the Rehab tation Act of 1964,42 U.S.C., 794 (prdubiting discrimination the basis o handicap), the Age Act 5, 2, U.S.C. 101, et seq, and the Department of Justice Regulations, 28 CFR, Part 42, Subparts C, D, and G. 18. It will, in the event a federal or state court or federal or state a&nmistrative agency makes a f urmg of discrimination after a due process hearing, on the ground of race, color, religi- national origin, sex. age, or handicap against the project, forward a copy of the finding to the Criminal Justice. on (CJD). 19. it will comply with Subtitle A, Title II of the Americans With Disabu s Ad (ADA), 42 U.S.0 12131-12134, and Department of Justice impicmcating emulation, 28 CFR Part 35, whereas state and bcml governments may not refuse to allow a person with a disability to part a pate in a service, program, err activity simply because the per�Gas a disability. 20. It will comply with the following sections of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, U.S.C. 5671(c) (1). 21. (a) (12) M regarding removal of status offeaders firm soc= faclrties. 22. (a) (13), regarding sig)nt-aa"ound separation of juvmrles from adults when detained in de same sect facility. 23. (a) (14), regarding rennoval of jav=-ks from adult jails and lodngm 24. (a) (23), ring reduction of the disproportionate eon5neaerit of racial and ethnic minorities in secure facilities. 2S. It will comply with the provisions of true Hatch Act which hmd the political activity of employees. 26. It will comply, and assure the compliance of all its contractors, with the applicable��rrovisM of Twe I of the Omnibus Crime Codrd and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, the Juvenile Justxx and Dd'*pency Preventim Act, err the Vactmis of Crime Act, as flee provisions of the aureat editim of the Offrx of Justice Programs Financial Guide and all other laves, cinculms, or regulations. 27. It will comply with the provisions of 28 CFR applicable to grants and a Part 19, Adminis- trative Review humdurc; Part 20, Criminal Justice bkraxation Systems; Part 222, if Research and Statistical Infacmation, Part 23, Criminal hntdligeace Systems Operating Policies; Pact 30, huter`� Review of Department of iustice Programs and Activities; Part 42, N )A) P and Procedures; Pan 16 , Procedures for 11mmggleme�ng the National Fm*wmmW Policy Act; Part 63, Fbo � Management and edand Protection Procedures; and federal laws or regulates applicable: to Etdcral assistance pry 28. h will comply, and all its contractors will coa Ivy, with the nondisc imioation r iaots of the Om ibus Crime and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S. C. 3789(d,� the Juv a Justice and Ddinggr q Preveation Act, er the Victhzis of Crime Act (as - ); Tile VI of the Civil Rugfgs Act of 1964, as wncn&d; Section YX of the Rrhabiliration Act of 1973, as Arid II of the Americans with Disabilities Art of IM, Title 0X of the Education Amend- ments of 1972, tiro Age Discrimination Ad of 1975; Department of Justice Nan-Disc:imo. . 2 Regulations, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C. D. E, and G; and the Department of Justice ngulat km c n disabr'Irt' y diiscrionmatim. 28 CFR Part 35 and Part 39. 29. It will provide an Equal Opportunity Program if requited to maintain and when the gVfication is for SS00,000 Cr more 30. It will comp with the of the Coital Barrier Resources Ad (PJL 97-348) dated October 19,1992 (16 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.), which pcdAks the expenditure of most new federal hinds within the urritr of the Coastal Barrier Resources System -- - SWnatureoftkAuthoriaed OtTicial CJD-15 b&jGd 7/% Form RA t CERTIFICATION OF DRUG TESTING The applicant assures that all grant funded personnel and those assigned to the project full-time will be randomly tested quarterly for illegal narcotics according to applicant policies. if policies are not already adopted to allow for random drug testing, then such policies will be adopted. This criteria is designed to further provide a drug -fee work environment and maintain the integrity of the project. Cn�s Authorized Official f Iq I Date South P1ainS Rpginnal Warnntine Taek Farce Title of project S CM Forms Pact, =wised 7/96 Form RA 3 CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING Instructions• Prior to the release of federal fiinds by the Criminal Justice Division (CJD), the authorized official for grantees that receive $ 100,000 or more must complete and return this certification, including the CJD grant number to which the certification applies, if an award has been made. (Note: The grant number is stated on the Statement of Grant Award.) Ctr "cation• Each grantee shall file the most aurent edition of this certification and disclosure form, if applicable, with each submission that initiates agency consideration for an award of a federal contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of $100,000 or more. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for matoag or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1592, Title 31, U.S.C. Any person who fads to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for ea& such failure. The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belie, that: 1. no federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the malting of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, contirniation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; 2. if any non-federal funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employe of any agency, a member of Congress,, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with iIu federal enact, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall check hen and complete and submit standard fium # "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and 3. the undue shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub -awards at an tiers and that all sub -recipients shall certify accordingly. s ofAndwdzed 0TxW Daft City of Lubbock Grantee (rant Number 7 CID Forms Packet, revised 7/'96 Form RA 0 CONFIDENTIAL F uNDs CERTIFICATION TO: Criminal Justice Division Office of the Governor Attn.: Texas Narcotics Control Program Post Office Box 12428 Austin, Texas 78711 FROM: Name: Rill Tnon 1 ait Title: Grantee: City of T.»hhnrk PnlirP ffi— artmpnr GrantTrtle: Smith Plaine Rpginnal Narrntire Tack Fnrcp Location: Box 20M T,ahhnck - Tpxns 79457 Grant Numbw. SUBJECT: Disbursement of Funds for Confidential Expenditures This is to certify that I have read, understand, and agree to abide by all of the conditions for confidential funds as set forth in this special condition. f SIGNATURE: DATE: 14 CID Forms PadoM revised 7196 Form RA 10 DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION By signing this application or grant agreement, the grantee is providing the certification see out below. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed with the agency determined to award the grant. If it is later determined that the grantee knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, the agency, in addition to any other remedies available to the federal government, may take available action. I. The granter certifies that it will provide a drug -five workplace by: A. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the umlawfal mammfactlrrv, distribution, dispensing, - possession, or use of a controlled substance is prdh tided in the grantee's Rakplacc and specifying the actions that will be tanned against employees for violation of such prohibit m B. Establishing a drug -'roe awareness program to irlSorm employees about: 1. the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; 2. the grantee's policy oI'maintainiag a drug -five workplace; 3. any available drag counseling, rehMitation, and mpioya assistance programs; and 4. the penalties that may be imposed upon employers for drug abuse viobitioos. C. Malang it a requirernent that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy ofthe statweat required by paragraph (A). D. Notifying the employee is the statement required by paragraph (A) that, as a condition of employment ondcr the grant, the employee Will: 1. abide by the terms of the statement, and 2. notify the employer of my criminal drug statate cmvic tan for a violation occurring in the workplace not later than five days after such conviction. E. Notifying the agency within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (DX2) from an employee or otherwise receiving amoral notice of such conviction. F. Taking one of the following actions with respect to any employee who is so convicted: 1. taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination; or 2. requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a federal, state, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency. G. Mating a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug -free workplace thnwo the implementation of paragraphs (A), (B). (Q. ft (E), and (F)- M Ile grantee shah insert m the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of wade done in connection with the spocific grant. Place of Pedbirmaaoe: ,y, of Lubbock Pelicp nepartnenr Bill Townley Captain 23 CID Farms Packet revised 7196 Form RA I I EQUAL EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM CERTIFICATION I, , certify that: This agency employs fewer than 50 people; therefore, the (G=tWApptiCWA p+8eacy) is not required to file an equal employment opportunity program in accordance with 28 CFR 42.301 g1 M,., Subpart E. or This agency employs 50 or more people and has received or applied to the Criminal Justice Division, Office of the Governor for total fiords in excess of $25,000; therefore, the r i r., n f I.,,,,,,,,,, k has formulated an equal employment opportunity (GraatedAppliaat away) program in accordance with 28 CFR 42.301 tt seq., Subpart E and that it is on file in the office of Bob Cass (Namc) Box 2000 Lubbock, Tx 79457 City Manager () for review or audit by an official of the Criminal Justice Division, Office of tke Governor as required by relevant laws and regulations. PROJECT TITLE: Authwc Official Npature) Date Date City of Lubbock Grantee Gnmt Numbs 24 Cm Fame Packet, Mvised 7/96 Form RA 14a U.S. DEPARTNEENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER Certification Regarding Debarment Suspension, Indigibittty sad Voluntary Exclusion Lawn Tier Covered Transacrims (Sub-Roapr;W) This certification is acquired by the replatiew impkmentin8 Executive Order 12549, Debarmeat and SuspensiM 28 CFR Part 67, Section 67.510, Par ic:4w ts' responsibRities. lU regulations werti published as Put VU of the May 26. 1988 Federal Register (pages 19160-19211). (BEFORE CONTLE71NO CERTIFICATION READ INSTRUCTIONS ON FOLLOWING TWO PAGES, FORMS RA 16b AND RA 16c) (1) The pr+oVective lawyer tier participant citifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals are ply debarred, asl. proposed for dam• declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any £aderal departmcat or agency. (2) Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statments in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Bob Cans City ManagQr Name sad 1Uk of Andwrined Official 27 CID Forma Pado%4 revised 7/% Form RA 14b NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION SYSTEM CERTIFICATION P6w to the release of Amdr by GD 16r f &n ptdr, your agcocy =A review, sign and return to M the anachad OR Farm 4M l/l—Catifiabon Repard'asg Debarmaut. Suapm icier loe6p'bility, amd Vchmtary Exclusm Lows Tier Comm Tmmadma,l The farm meat be aigoed by me Auftrized Official desigi=W in the pad The U.S. Attormey Oenaal Order No. 1271-88. Published in the FedvW ftsz , Volume 53. Na 102. May 26,19tt. atoouoced the adoption of a SoMaames-wide mifarm system ce Naoprocvrmat Debarment and Suspm m that will be applicable to 6e aooproaaemeal aaistaooc adivitim d>be of tea. 6trraara. and *vuwm dthe Dquft eat dhntice which have park -making au6arity.2 AN agerscies/acpaiiaoa waiving hdera1 A" Rom CID m the amount of S2S.000 ar mere mm complete OR Fam 4061/1(943) which certifies that addiet the seencylagu izatim ar its of cos are NO - p pet, err we vobourily excluded from remvmg federal imds, before elan sto a financial apeemert (s.s, panb sod ocnau s}3 Ion adifitwo. any a mizubm contacting for goods and/or swvwm of S23.000 err mere (fadacal 1") slat awn the same califiatic a from the Prospective oodradar. The latter maim must accompany dw eontrad which, by requirement, and to CID for approval. Agxociea/ac�aiatiaos am bsae their cati5atian span a review d the me amly publiaeiiin %bb d Patties E=bsded fmm Federal Procvarment err Ptamprowsamad propame tad the weddy aeppiemasb to that isme pRwW by the U.s. Gmeal Services AdmW1 t dia % to eomfam that the agearykeyseisatian err its admen are mot belizWe Attached is an im6oumstian shed that cWtama the'Lhb dPutiea_' sod bow to obtain h. INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION 1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective boas tier participant is providing the eardficatian ad out below. 2. The ce tificsition is this clause is a mataial representation e(W upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined $at the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered as erroneous catifiafm in addition, m other remedies avatable to fhe Federal Governmen4 the department or agency with which this transaction originated may ptasue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment 3. The p mqx cdvee lower tier pertichma t chalk Tr od& immediate wiittm notice to the person to which this proposal is n*mitted if st any time the prospective lower tier participant bearers that its cutdication wu erroneous when sutmitted or has became aanoeous by v eascn of eheagedcircurnstances. d. The tams 'cover transactiMe •debarred,• •suspended,• •ineligible,''loweer tier covered ttmvactim,•'participant,• *person,' 'primary covered transaction.' 'principal,' 'proposal,' and `whmtarily occluded,' as used in this clause, have the meanings art out is the Defmitiaas and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549. S. Time prospective: lower tur participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposal covered transactia be entered into, it shaI1 not lmowmgly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is delxwn% , suspended, declared hwlgpbk or voluntarily occluded from participatim in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated. G. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by mAmitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled 'Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion -Lower Tier Covered Tatasactions,' without modification, is all lower tier coveted transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. 7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a pus; - mive participant is a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily aochided from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the oatif lion nt is erroneous. A participamay decide the method and firequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may che& the Noopcoai e:ment Iist 8 Hodiing contained is the fmcgoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of, ds in order to reader in good fift the eati€ication required by this clause The laowladge and information of a participant is net required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person is the ordinary c=xe of basioas dealings 9- Eeoept for transactim authorized nodes paragraph S of these ins, if a participant in a covered transaction kcaoariagly enters into a lower tier covered won with a person wbo is uspeoded, debam4 ineligible, or voluntary aoelnded from I it, d potion in this tansactia. is addition to other remedies available to the federal govemment, the department or agency with which ch this Uansaction ariginated may purse available remedies, iochtdmgsuspension and/or debarment 1Loww Taw Covered Tra =c iome maybe idapreted as my grad ar ooaataara muds dS23.000 arnore at the sons: ar lower level. 2Nageaooaemed maybe btap dW as toy form dead err eomtrad linkst o Pri x4iat puq= etas sister ice adivi . rams mm fs &n p mri mat aotioaa. 3Agracy/aysobatim may be itaprded err the unity m abase name ens pssit is awarded Ofi'iom done sgmcy w oismoa may be he aprsred u my ofdw 6atlowriiag txcaaes who wy� bava litial ioBueaoe m err aubsttativa eainxtd ear mat tramadion (u. pad err oaatradk membm efgovamieg bonds, d'irocsmev. once a>>ployeee. cad oaossrItaars. Pattiapatim m>!da ttimfdiaq o addition b once remedies avas7abie to me Faded tlova:mmt,,, me /epsetmeat err SVMCY wlgh wo& this tansacbm w%Vn red may puma a avaeilabie remedies, kWh sding mWeetim and/or deharmal 28 CJD Forms Packet, revised 7/96 LISTS OF PARTIES EXCLUDED FROM FEDERAL PROCUREMENT OR NONPROCUREMENT PROGRAMS The Lists of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement or Naaprocurenumt Programs, issued monthly. identifier those parties cxcl ded throughout the U.S. Government (unless otherwise noted) fi+am receiving Federal contracts or federally approved subcontrub and hum certam types of Federal financial and nonf naaezal assistance and benefits. The Lists of Patties Eul ded fiam Federal Proctaranent or Nmpeocc>:rmmt Phcog<ams supersedes the Consolidated List of Debarred, Suspended, and faeliga'ble CootracUm The new Lists of Parties incorporates all the listings of Me auperaoded Consolidated List ad has a new, additiaaal section, Parties Exchad1ed from Nmproc nement Programs. It is maintained by the U.S. GCmeral Services Adminishatim (GSA) for the use of Federal agencies and other= involved in federal programs and acbvitieer. The Lab of Parties is structured in accordance with a a ' mme:adatian from the interagency Cocaminee on Debarmexat and Suspension. Purpose of Lists of Parties The functions of the two sections of doe Lists of Parties are distinct and we explained below. The Grad sectim, Parties Exchaded from Procuretneat Programs, lists contractors that are e:aocluded government wide. unless otherwise noted, firm Federal procurement and/or sales programs. Such an exclum m may be based on the admmistratm debarment or auap=on of a contractor by an agency in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 9.4, Federal Property Maeaagement Regulations WPM) 101-45.6, Government Printiog Office (GPO) Instructions 110.1 IA. or U.S. Postal Service (PS) Publication 41. An exclusion may also be the result of action by a Federal agency uaaada the authority of a statue, executive order, of regulation aWymg to procurement program The second section, Patties Excluded from NmproctutttmenI PmFumk lusts persons (individuals and Cmtities) excluded gowa mment-werW wmkss otherwise noted, fmm certain types of Federal Gnsacial and naefrmamaal easistaaee and benefits. An cXclusion may be based an an adminisdrativ+e debarment or su wmsion by any Federal agency or the rahmtary exclusion of a person render agency regulations implementing Executive Osier 12549. Parties Excluded from Nmpcocaerneat Programs also includes actions ®der doe authority of a ostu te; aaodur ere cutm order, or a regulation applying to PnWams. Fcr eiffies section. the treatment to be acoexded to a party listed depends an the type of cmdu ionuy action and the artbardy under which the action was uim. The Cause for the eaochis6Cn and the treatment of the party excluded are noted by a code in the hstimg. These Codes are explained wider the heordiag VGwsve and Treatment Codes' for the Parties Excluded from Procumrannt Programs and for the Parties Excluded from Nooprocurement Programs. A usa of the Lists of Parties should refer to the appropriate cause and treatment nt code ezptanation before determining a listed patty's status. How To Obtain Copies Federal agencies may purchaser armrest balk subscriptions to the Lists of Parties at Coat fievm the U.S. Government Printing OHioc. Agamies should strange for their own internal distnbution. The gcnq contracts wider the lfadit;g WFor Additional Information- are aware of the procedures hoc pumhasing and distric stibscription copies. Nonfederal persa s or arpn2ations interested in obtaining su' , .1. lions In the Liars of Parties should contact the Superintendent of D=teab, U.S. Govermuent Printing Office, Washington, DC 204M. The telephone ammber is (202Yn3-3= on commercial limes or 783-3= an the FTS (Federal Terms System} Electronic Supplement A weekly supplement to the Lists of Parties is available an GSAie Information Resources Service Centex electronic bulletin board Whm wed with the latest issue of the publieafm, the electronic supplement will provide up4Aate in5ormation on excluded pasties. To use lie electronic bulletin board, you must have access to an asynchrawus. ASCII terminal (e.g., a ward processor or a miav prta) equipped with wmmtmicatioms software and a 'modem' a -Coupler.- A modem is a device that permits signals from the terminal to be sent across the Lrlephaoe lines. Users Can amess the bulletin boated using AUPOVON, FTS, or oermmacial lines. The telephone mambas ate: FIB 300 bad 333-Ml 1200 bad 333-7661 24W Wad 736W 14 AtJ1e0 VON 300 bad 294-0324 1200 bad 2%4"21 COMMCUL 300 bane 3SiM 1200 baadR0TjM5-7M1 2400 baud(2 Wfn6 9014 For feud= infarmitian an how to access the electronic bulletin board, all Mrs. Jam L Smith at TTSo2 A23.4M- Telephone Inquiry Servix A telcphonoa-imgM arise+ nq service is available in GSA's Office of Acquisition Policy for general questions about entries in the Lists of Furies. The number to Carl Cuba during or after normal business boars b (F7IW !)796.06N. Your call will be recorded and answered either the same day or the following wort img drry. 29 CID Foua>.s Packet, revised 7/96 Form RA 16 SINGLE AUDIT ACT CERTIFIED ASSURANCE The grantee hereby assures compliance by itself and its applicable sub -recipients (contractors) with the Single Audit Act of 1984, PL 98-502 (ACT) and, particularly, with the requirements of OMB Circular A-128 as follows (check one): Y Grant funds of $ 100,000 or over - An annual audit by an independent auditor made in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A•128. 2. Grant funds of $25,000 to $I00,000 - An annual audit made in accordance with OMB Circular A-128 or in accordance with federal laws and regulations governing the program. 3. Grant funds of less than 525,000 - MW._ •��„. Dde Exempt from the Act but governed by audit requirements presaind by state or local law or regulation. / .3 o 19 '7 Date Onnt If items I or 2 above are checked, the grantee should, within 60 days following the date of the grant award, furnish the following information: 1. 2. 3. The identity of the organization conducting the audit Approximate time audit will be conducted Audit coverage to be provided 31 CID Forms Pew. revised 7/96 COMMUNITY PLAN 1996 A REGIONAL PLAN FOR THE COUNTIES OF: BAILEY, COCHRAN, CROSBY, DICKENS, FLOYD, GARZA, HOCKELY, KING, LAMB, LUBBOCK, LYNN, MOTLEY, TERRY, YOAKUM Updating the Community Plan for the above listed counties was a two -phased process this year. The first phase of the process was initiated on September 18, 1996, when planners met to initiate the planning process and ensure that the evaluation from the Governor's Office on last year's plan was addressed in this year's planning process. At this first meeting, planners discussed methods of more clearly identifying and categorizing the community problems and means of updating the resources list to ensure comprehensiveness. Planners also discussed the need to increase participation and ensure that planners are representative of the 14 counties that comprise the community. Several planners at the meeting agreed to call and/or write contacts that they have in the 14 county area and encourage them to participate in the next phase. This contact would be in addition to the general mail out to those listed on the resource list. The Planners also discussed an appropriate Facilitator for the meeting. Many suggested Facilitators were eliminated as they were viewed as having a vested interest or a conflict of interest. A local attorney was selected as the Facilitator for the next phase of the process. Meeting times and an appropriate facility were also discussed and agreed upon. After a mail out to the entities/people on the updated resource list, the second phase of the planning process took place on November 7, 1996. The Planners in attendance were provided with the agenda for the meeting which is attached to this updated plan. Planners first addressed re -defining our community, as Hale county is developing their own community plan. It was the consensus of the group that our community be defined as the fourteen counties listed above. The group next addressed the problems facing our community. The categories of problems listed in last year's plan were reviewed and it was determined that they may not clearly represent the problems we are experiencing. The group next brainstormed what they felt were the existing problems without attempting to categorize any of the problems at this point. With the help of an overhead projector, all the problems were listed so that the entire group could view them. Community Plan 1996 Page 2 of 3 This lengthy list of problems was then evaluated as to appropriate ways of grouping the issues. After much discussion the following categories of problems and problems were agreed upon [not presented in a prioritized fashion]: 1. CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS/PROPERTY 2. 3. 4. * crimes against * crimes against * family abuse * sexual assault * homicide * hate crimes * substance abuse * robbery * DWI the elderly children HIGH RISK CHILDREN/YOUTH AND CHILDREN'S ISSUES * teen pregnancy * substance abuse * runaways * school dropouts * gangs/gang issues * sexual/physical abuse * inappropriate parental * juvenile offenders and neglect supervision and support NARCOTICS AND ILLEGAL SUBSTANCES * trafficking * tobacco abuse by minors * alcohol abuse * drug abuse COMMUNITY ISSUES * illiteracy * unemployment * children's advocacy * elderly advocacy * homeless persons * inadequate health care * inadequate parenting skills * lack of recreation resources The next step of this phase involved reviewing and updating the resources in the community. The resource list from last year was reviewed by the planners with many resources added and some deleted. This updated resource list is on file with the community plan. Community Plan 1996 Page 3 of 3 The meeting Facilitator then questioned the group regarding three areas: how agencies could work together to be more effective, resources of the agencies that address the identified problems, and ways that organizations can work together to address the problems listed. It was announced that an innovative result of last year's planning process was the formulation of the South Plains Coalition for Victims of Violence, a coalition of six non-profit agencies that provide services for victims of violence. The mission of the coalition is to work cooperatively to prevent duplication of services, enhance the quality of services for victims, promote public awareness and enhance the support of victims by law enforcement officials. The coalition has already had a joint training session for all of their volunteers and board members. In response to the questions presented to the group, the group identified a much needed project that they felt would enhance the ability of agencies to work together to address the listed problems. This project involves creating a directory of services for the entire 14-county area. Lubbock currently has a directory of services and it was discussed that it needs to be expanded to include all 14 counties. It was suggested that organizations' directors and their titles needed to be included, along with addresses, phone numbers and fax numbers. The group decided that representatives of the 14 county area need to address the feasibility of this project. The group also noted that several agencies and entities that have out -reach programs or multiple county contracts enable the 14-county area to collectively and cooperatively address many of the existing problems. Upon completion of the meeting, several planners reviewed this year's process to evaluate and critique the process utilized. It was noted that more planners were involved in the process this year and that the planners were a more representative sample of the 14 counties in our community. It was felt that the reorganization and expansion of the identified problems more accurately reflected the opinions of the planners as to existing problems. As a result of this year's planning, the resource list is more extensive and more accurate. It was also noted that the planning process in and of itself offers an invaluable opportunity for agencies in the 14 counties to share concerns and discuss ideas. The most positive outcome of the process this year was the recommended project concerning a resource book for the 14 county area.