HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance - 1520-1954 - Amending Zoning Ordinance No. 661 - 01/28/1954No Text
iri€teen (15�,, Thirty'-l� our (14), Thirty -Five (35), Thirty -Six (36) and
Lots; eV (7) throuSh EI-**(1.1),, Block TMrty-Threp ( 3)", �s
' ehty (.2 t -agh:Twenty�Ffght (Z8), Blocky Thirty-tlirOe (��, is
'
i eventeon �i7) thrdagh- Thirty-Tw4' (3 .� Sl ck.3ixte.en, (16j,, Lots Nine-
teen' (1,9)Ah-ro. _ Thi:rtyw ix (3,6), Block Nine (9), a�� A ition;' all
lath ire l,lock � �e C3 , Lots Twenty -Six, (26) through 'l:Thirty, lFive 35),
Bloch T�vo (� � 'l�`welve (12,, $lock One (1), Max" P'ark.,A"A Lion
b.. Tlw folly wing deserilmd property be changed from its Present
zo tg tothe "436" Zaning bistrict: ;North Qnet Half (1*1 1./2) of Lit ;Forty
(40), Arnett -den:* Addition,
C. Tlzs foils clsrijecl property be changegl from:, its present
to the 4,1t n3 a ;Distri6tz X.arth One -11a1f (N 1/2) of Lots
(] s.`nd lie—rewto-A (,17 A.rnet4r Aensoi3.AAtion;
to T% rte e4 (13) t (a) 14 r t 0w;
to Nijwete'ev. 19 T tp 2 le k Thirty- &i ci 3 �aX
± .l p
SuUelfvi.*iO Of t ' �. ber'ts �.n .� z$b te..r . ,44i.tion; ots nt .(1 thr, gh
'thirty (3A), .l c1C, tY"'�W-10 (4 .), �.l� .Lots e {��� t�ix�ugh. '%fen (15�
leek , nze 61 n .Y 1orweao 1 Cu is A .oft Re bextss, a44..l��'hoxtex
►tiditiov; that por of w*ck T'lft,x -Three (3.3' y taxit S of
the R. l xt� an wW,,h ter:.1 ,� i 'i >g th a %..the �cn cdl
�a � 124xiyO pahy. riht-W�y's
4t the north e c�r�,r
TyY t fret to a paint; ':�'���, I`�e�rtk. 1.32� 5i feet w a.
TL1C) st; ;k� fWrt apt; F rm€tI 13.« feet. t tht
1hf ,de,eri,prorty he: cbxng d fry its pre;s;�e t
s ome 't r u ing Diastrict: B 41II NIN at the ew of, i 4orwe;eti. .
of atl est ri$ t.-o -ova<y, 7,i i of the Clorvis R anal the Last right-
Of'-*axy R e of hi�a .�"Ime; '�'HENC th�asterly 1+�i�.g Abe out�a�rest
right-10f.-way liAi*. of the, C1 s R ►the i:ritcr°seed of t1ie± th^t est
3 ht-vf#-va-y Li*-.e of the Clovis` Aoa t* the ce ti-rl ne of Mike +` trt-4
s.# 41 g t� c to l i . 'a duke t' e 't 0 c te,±4n e` of
1,*s'rt .Akron .d ue; TR6iC- , s ] rtk alow #f N orih ,Arkron
4ven%ae to tom,, centerline 4K l mery. trceptl vRXNGEwest along the c.lwrtte.r
lige of l;jMX#*') et t6 the coAterl g r v-et of Om ahoy e" t w# .
S. C*J* M., an A itiol;. T ,ZNNCX North a: he,� , 4terlhle of
said alley to the e+etderlin of the Est -west ally n
J url s s ►rn 41 tti ; TI EI"'f e t along the coute�rlt of sai l
alley to the West right-*f'-wary lire of aato'n Aygntse; TIM1f _VNO-rth
along the Vest right -of -may line ,of BDstQa Aveime .�rolorted to a paint
125 feet North .of the centerlln0 of Ers d t e�:t; ' kItJ4CI.. hest and
parail�1 to the centerline of X.*s4ne Street tQ- the ceAt;�rljn"$. of the alley
Wiest of,:. tOne(I) of, Black T (�, iut1wwoti-�� xn htp .BOA tit ;
TNX'I77,1V.rtl al®gieYe��
g tbe"fai.alley to tle o� erof the
alley in Ipok
'1'lll'West lo thenierlinef gad ay.te:tl .est i? ®acted
of Lot Serra (7) lock Two (Z), Ouxles4� s
North, aloar, i let *e, t t1i e�j*. rl c of '` dh cet;.' �,
Wiest along the eet�r'.`r Street t�► tho oett.re'.1aoe'e'
of the Xe +,sIt-ISM.* .4, y iu-ock one., O b a les,* --O n
Heigh tsrA ,itis ; TjIX*C1t1 r t steely also the c+ t rli f tie
alley in Black Ove (t), l url a rr~ s.bo:rn t -: to- t o aonttrli of
Detr-qt Av-,enue -I'M C>✓ 'North a1an9 t1te, cent rl*te of .Deceit .,l vonuea t
No Text
i
On motion of Commissioner
Thomas
seconded by
Commissioner Morris
the foregoing Ordinance was passed
on first reading this 1' tip day of
Januaxp 19s
by the fo21-
ing votdt
Commissioners veting IYEAN
Morris, Carpenter,, Davis,
Thomas and
Mayor Tripp
Commissioners voting *NATw:
None
On motion of Commissioner
Thomas
seconded by
Commissioner Carpenter
the foregoing Ordinance was passed on
second reading this 2�._ day of
January,..,�.: 1954t by
the following
vote:
Comuissioners voting "YEA"t
Carpenter, Davis, Thomas
and Mayor Tripp
Commissioners voting *NAY*:
None ;
,x.
Tit
ATTEST:
IAvirnia Lowe, G&ty Se retary-Treasurer
CAM' pc
1-18-54
MAP IN FILE
SEE
ORDINANCE
J S. MA%Er
PARKSOTH
C3 �,T���
r "� �34TH _I L
f=76 TM �sr_
?7 1
I O Pla,k
� �43RD�CST
44TH J LLrS�
- F4STR r 5T
J
nyrJ00L:C ❑LA
L__d r
STI` _JI.
ST"�"��(t(�''����jalw�
_J
moo
- -- a]�"'a�JI Field
¢47 fit,,.,
School
Pork
C®®�w
lop
1,130THJ—1 Park
:`�
j
45THIr � t _� T
u V
��
No Text
No Text
No Text
No Text
GOPY
CITY OF LUBBOCK
/TO:
MEMORANDUM. Inter Office
lenTurner Date' January 15 . 1954
Maynard
FROM
SUBJECT:34th Street Right-of-way
With reference to Zoning Case. No. 458, 34th Street, the following
described property has not provided the necessary right-ofpway.
The east 215 feet of the west 495 feet of Lot 1, Block 3,
Alta VistaACres Addition.
Lots 5 through 8, Block 11, Highland Park Addition
Lots'll through 20, Block 12, Highland Park Addition.
Signed: J.A. ;::Maynard
Mrs'. Lowe:
The ±mom foregoing is the property to be. ecckepted from.,
zone change to 11?19 District in Case No 5�.
i (`signed Glen R. Turner
Mr. James,R. Robinson appeared before the City Commission and protested the alley
paving abutting the East one-half of Lots 10, 9 and g. Block 10, Overton Addition
to the City of Lubbock. It was found by the City Commission that the paving of
the alley abutting this property was instituted by commercial property owners on
Avenue 'r '" to handle heavy commercial traffic in the alley, . and Mr.- Robinsont s
propertq was, found to be residential. Therefore it was ruled by the City Commis—
sion that`such'assessment contImplated'by this ordinance against East one-half of
Lots ,, 9 and 8lock 10- Overton Addition, would not especially benefit said
Lots _ut, B
ting property, therefore, <no assessment shall be made against said East
one—half of Lois 10, 9 and 8, Block '10, Overton Addition to the City of Lubbock,,
Texas, and the City Engineer is hereby directed to correct; his assessment roll
consistent with this finding.
y This being the date set for hearing in regard to paving various and sundry
residential -city streets and one alley'the contract for said paving having been
let to Kerr and Middleton under General Work Order Number 835 of the City of
Lubbock Texas, said hearing was held, Approximately fifty (50) persons appeared
for the hearing and the following objections were made to the proposed paving,;
Paving.on,37th Street, fro*.Avenue "A" to Avenue"E" was protested by Mr, W. A.
Keelin, Mr. R. J. Maloney and Mr.'W. D'�, Dye, by reason of the fact that their
houses from on 38th Street and the property extends thru to 37th Street and they
would prefer to spend this rudney for paving the street in front of their residences
instead of the vacant lots to the North of their property.
Mr.`H. F. Sidwell appeared protesting the paving'of 37th Street from Louisville
Avenue to Knoxville Avenue. Mr. R. A. Sowder, representingMr. M. 0. Owens,, pro.
tested the paving of Avenue L ffom 34th Street to 30th'Street,
Mrs, Alma Andrews,, nee Alma Lwellen, appeared in protest of the paving on 45th
Street from Avenue "Ir", to Avenue "HIt. Mrs. J. E. Bain appeared in protest of the
paving of dtica Avenue from 19th Street to 15th Street,
form
Protest was also received in letter/from 0. B. Ratliff,, protesting paving of
Utica Avenue from 15th Street to 19th Street,, Mrs. Susie Poarch Ogle protested
the pavipg of,' Sa1eni Avenue from 34th 'Street`to33rd Street
Letter .;of' protest, dated January '15, l954, was received from Mrs. Emilie Nblte,
protesting the paving of 45th Street from Avenue "H" to Avenue "L",
All of the above protests were fully 'consid eyed by the City; Commission and it was
found that none of the above 'mentioned `property owners:protesting the paving of
the streets antained in this paving project stated- that 'the" assessments were in
excess of the benefits which`would.be-derived from the'street'paving, therefore,
all of the above protests and objections were overruled
Mr. James R. Robinson appeared before the City Commission and protested the alley
paving abutting' the East one-half of Lots 10, 9 and 8, Block 10, Overton Addition
to the City of Lubbock. It was found by the City Commission that the paving of
the alley; abutting this property was instituted by commercial property owners on
Avenue "Q" to handle heady commercial traffic in the alley., and Mr. Robinsonts
property was found to be- residential.' Therefore it was ruled by the City Commis-
sion that such assessment cont plated by this ordinance against Eastone-half of
Lots fi'j 9 and 8, Block 10b.. Overton Addition) would not especially benefit said
Lotsutting 'property, therefore, no assessment shall- be made against said East
one-half of Lots 10, 9 and 8., Block 10, Overton Addition to the City of Lubbock,,
Texas, and t'he,City Engineer is Whereby directed: to correct his :assessment roll
consistent with this finding.'
r�
_ rl