Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance - 7900-1979 - Annexation of Land^� 7900 mr: J 'LGB:hta ORDINANCE N0. 3N ORDINANCE ANNEXING AN AREA OF LAND TO THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, WHICH AREA 1S DESCRIBED HEREIN AND IS ADJACENT TO AND ABUTS THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS OF I THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR CORRECTION OF CITY MAP TO INCLUDE THIS AP-DITIONAL TERRITORY; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Lubbock and also the best interest of the citizens of the area described hereinbelow, to annex such area to the City of Lubbock; NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: SECTION 1. THAT the area of land described herein, which abuts and is adjacent to the existing corporate limits of the City of Lubbock, Texas, BE and the same is hereby annexed to and included within the corporate limits of the City of Lubbock, Texas. Such area is described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present City Limits line, as estab- lished by City of Lubbock Ordinance No. 6201, said point being 660 feet south and 660 feet east of the Northwest corner of Section 10, Block E; THENCE south approximately 5280 feet to a point 660 feet south and 660 feet east of the Northwest corner of Section 15, Block E; THENCE west approximately 6600 feet to a point 660 feet south and 660 feet west of the Northeast corner of Section 22, Block E-2; THENCE north approximately 3300 feet to a point in the existing City Limits line, as described by Ordinance No. 7557, said point being 2640 feet south and 660 feet west of the Northeast corner of Section 18, Block E-2; THENCE east approximately 1320 feet along the existing City Limits boundary to a point 660 feet east and 2640 feet south of the north- west corner of Section 19, Block E-2; THENCE north approximately 1980 feet along the present City limits line, as described by ordinance No. 7557, to a point being 660 feet south and 660 feet east of the northwest corner of Section 19, Block E-2; THENCE east approximately 5280 feet along the existing City Limits line, to the point of beginning. Contains 740 acres, more or less. SECTION 2. THAT the City Engineer is hereby directed to immediately correct the map of the City of Lubbock by adding thereto the additional ter- ritory annexed by this ordinance, indicating on the map the date of annexation and the number of this Ordinance. The City Secretary -Treasurer and the City Engineer shall each keep in their respectipe offices an official map of the City of Lubbock showing the boundaries of the municipal corporation including this annexation. SECTION 3. THAT should any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason the remainder of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective upon passage at second reading. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Passed by the City Council on first reading this__g_tday of August 1979. Passed by the City Council on second reading this 23rd day of August , 1979. ATTEST: Evelyn Gaffga, ity SecZe r Treasurer APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: am, Director of Planning APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leon Bean, Asst. City Attorney 5 TO: CITY OF LUBBOCK MEMO All Division Directors and All Departments FROM: Susan M. Tom, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Approved and Final Annexations DATE: December 3, 1980 It has been brought to my attention that some departments may not have been made aware of recent approvals by the Justice Department of City annexations. Four annexations have been approved since April, 1980. The -* .RaLer Ad4ition.i en's Home of Lubbock the North Ida ou i wannexa- tion tion have all been apRroved by the Jus t- ment_and are now officially_ within the Citv limits and elicible for Maps indicating the location of each of these areas are attached for reference. SMT:bs Attachments Susan M. Tom 0� 0 � 1980 LIiV SEC1EiARY `� RSrH ST WW b S' 1• 031 RD i� ST ly Yi x 3 •► > 0•1171 ST e5nl , Nt I , .1 •► Sr �1►11P; ST t'Sn1 01 It x 45TH Si '1 a ecrH ,. ST 'TM r iz� W10 86TH ST•OMI ST 5 OISr ST OBTH Sr OR V > 0()iH }1 r () 0 1 Z V 0 09h sT a � � 89TH � cT a , x 9uTH o �' ST w r �; 9onr sr z i 90rH ST n `91ST ST f ti g15T 51 91ST ST e '193to o ST r ,U 92No x ST 3RD ` ST Q 93R0 ST pN� 5T 94TH 94TH 3 ST 97 93RD 1 f•L 95r1t ST 94 nt �i �4 TII 94TI1 ST ?•Irll ST 9Gr11 ST �j 95rot ST , •>I VT y~ i Sr > 97f1t Sr 96T11 STD 7�fIH p 4 :i S �► —1 �. tg `, 'i �i 1— 97TII ST .r •�i t, •>t o w a >< a_ w 98 tit ii x } crS��4 • t 111 1/ t l t 111111 t x1xlX�tirkrX R i A. _ air y' iC:�:�' !a:%t�•�r a�_? _r,; ' :'..tA. 'Sy, ?fir *•. ' 111t11 I11111Y1Y IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllill Y 'I'tl�ll'I11 Irlil'i ' 1( :f1;..HS� '• it �I���1 � ���11•� I I i �f �� � �jyy�LJ �n•ri�A� ��IR��+•�•�`�►1 � LLI / � r �%I� 11111111I111 ��+�1Vf • •� l 1 1 �/ �`•IINT:.��j`� ' C /i� Lki z a_ Y a REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 28, 1979 35,000 square feet and forced a "C-3" zone case. The Legal Department is a little anxious about handling it in this manner to the exclusion of allowing discount and family centers. Councilwoman Jordan queried whether or not the referenced zone case with respect to the Safeway store could be retracted placing the matter back in a "C-2" zone, to which Mr. Bertram responded that it would require a multi -step process. City Attorney John Ross indicated he questioned that the matter could be handled in that manner inasmuch as the proponent had already made committments based on the Council's decision with vested rights. There being no further discussion, the hearing was closed. Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Henry, seconded by Councilwoman Jordan to pass said ordinance on first reading. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. J�(20) Setting a date and time to hold a public hearing to consider the request of Norton Baker and Leroy Elmore to annex a tract of land to the City of Lubbock located between Indiana Avenue and Universit Street from 107th Street to 114th Street. This annexation request was made over a year ago, but before the Planning Commission could act upon it, a subcommittee was appointed and directed to study the need to annex any more land into a set policy on how future annexation would be handled. The subcommittee defined four study areas as being active growth areas and directed the staff to prepare an annexation studywhich was reviewed in February, 1979. The Committee also deliberated the effect of our existing and proposed water supply on projected population as one element attributable to the cause and effect relationship of annexation procedures. This summary data is on file in the City Secretary's Office. The subcommittee recognized that the City would continue to annex additional land to accommodate the projected optimum population for Lubbock as based on the City's ability to provide domestic water resources, and adopted the following annexation policy: An area to be considered for annexation must be within the adopted long-range policy corridor (study areas as shown in the attached map) and meet one of the following criteria: I. Area requested for annexation is substantially developed. 2. Area requested for annexation is in the process of developing. This criteria shall also include any strip commercial development that is within or outside the policy corridor area. 10 3. Area requested for annexation should have imme- diate potential for development. If Lubbock does not obtain its third water source, any additional annexation would be questionable. However, the Planning Commission felt that since this request fell within their outer corridor limits for urban growth, they remained optimistic about the third -water -source and decided to proceed with additional annexation pending a decision on the third water source. The two primary concerns on this annexation are sewer service and the question of a future fire station needed at 106th Street and Avenue U. The 98th Street sewer line would have to be served with a lift station and lines to take the sewage back to the 82nd Street line. This area would remain outside of a 5-minute response time for our existing fire station; the feasibility of building a station at 106th Street and Avenue U in the foreseeable future is highly questionable. The primary purpose of this item is to set up a time and place for a public hearing regarding the above matter. Motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Councilman Aderton to hold a public hearing on the above matter at 1:30 p.m. on July 26, 1979. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting yea; none voting Nay. (21) Resolution No. 189 A resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a Funding Agreement between the City and the Urban Renewal Agency for the 1979-80 Community Development Block Grant Program. The funding agreement with the Urban Renewal Agency will come under the Neighborhood Revitalization activities in the City's 1979-80 Community Development annual application. The Urban Renewal Agency will receive $2,389,462 for the 1979-80 entitlement to perform rehabilitation and redevelopment activities in seven neighborhood areas: Arnett Benson $ 643,877 Phyllis Wheatley 524,000 Meadowbrook Villa 116,969 Eliston 306,238 Bean School 371,294 Posey East 256,450 Stubbs 170.634 TOTAL $2,389.462 Of the total funding 9% ($217,749) will be used for administrative costs. 11 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 26, 1979 into their back yard, and in his opinion the property was not suitable for single-family residences. Appearing: Mr. Buddy Barron, Realtor Mr. Barron appeared as a character reference for Mr. Gilliam, indicating he was a reputable businessman; that the highway on Slide Road presently under construction was detrimental for single-family residences; and that the proposed landscaping would be aesthetically beneficial. Opponent: Mr. Bill Cox, 5210 70th Street (Lot 5, Ranch Acres) Mr. Cox represented himself as a homeowner in the area; that he had appeared on the previous zone request in opposition to the property becoming rezoned; that to approve the request would be a "leak in the dyke" and would be detrimental to the entire Ranch Acres development; that Mr. Gilliam knew at the time he bought the property that it was zoned for a single-family residence; that there were other alternatives for developing the property which Mr. Gilliam apparently had not considered or wished to pursue. Councilwoman Jordan asked if he would share with them the alternatives he had in mind, to which Mr. Cox replied that by relocating the car- port and erecting a screening fence that the ingress and egress could be relocated off of Slide Road. Opponent: Mrs. J. W. Conover, 6804 Slide Road Ms. Conover indicated their property was adjacent to the referenced site; that they enjoyed their property and the Slide Road traffic and commercial area were not detrimental to a family life style. Opponent: Thomas J. Giffith, Attorney, on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Jerry Gailey (Lot 1, Ranch Acres) Mr. Griffith indicated that his clients had invested in their property as residential; that inasmuch as Mr. Gilliam had received interim financing, that no doubt permanent financing was available; and that the identifying signs connected with his business would be distasteful to his clients who live in the Ranch Acres Addition. The following discussion reflected rebuttal by Mr. Fouts, response by Mr. Cox, comments by Mr. Jim Bertram, Director of Planning, as to the zone request of the California developers and its relationship to this site. Following all discussion, the hearing was declared closed. The motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Henry, seconded by Councilwoman Jordan to uphold P & Z and DENY the above request. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan and Councilman McAlister voting Yea; Councilman Aderton voting Nay. (14) Hold a public hearin City of Lubbock loca from 107th Street to Street. i a tract of versitp Avenue 9 In accordance with Notice of Public Hearing published July 11, 1979, in the Lubbock Avalanche -Journal, a public hearing was held at 1:30 p.m. on the above matter. Proponent: Norton Baker, applicant for the requested annexation Mr. Baker indicated that the request for annexation was located between Indiana and University Avenues and from 107th Street to 114th Street; that the requested portion to be annexed was suitable for residential development. The Planning and Zoning Commission, before acting on this request directed that a subcommittee be established to determine if the City needed to annexed any more land and to set policies on how future land annexation would be handled. The subcommittee defined four study areas as being active growth areas and directed the Staff to prepare an annexation study, said study being delivered January, 1979. The subcommittee also deliberated upon the effect of our existing and proposed water supply on projected population, and the subcommittee recognized that the City would need to continue to annexed additional land to accommodate the optimum population for Lubbock as based on the City's ability to provide domestic water sources. Pursuant to the subcommittee's report, the Planning and Zoning Commission adopted the following annexation policy: "An area to be considered for annexation must be within an adopted long-range policy corridor (the study areas as shown on the enclosed map), and meet one of the following criteria: 1. The area requested for annexation should be substantially developed. 2. The area requested for annexation should be in the process of development. This criteria also includes any strip commercial development that is within our outside of the policy corridor area. 3. The area requested for annexation should have an immediate potential for development." It was pointed out to the Planning Commission that this request falls outside of the 5-minute response line and fire stations would respond if this area is annexed, but not within a 5-minute period until the projected station is built at 106th Street and Avenue U. Sam Wahl, Director of Water and Utilities, pointed out that inclusion of any developed area in this annexed area could create a financial problem for the City in terms of sewer service; that the sewer service to this area is scheduled to be from a trunk sewer in 98th Street which will not be constructed until bonds are voted for this project. This would require the developer to construct a lift station and force main at his own total 10 cost without any reason. If the developed areas are annexed and request sewer service, then we would have no option except to connect these customers into the developer's system within three years. At the time this happens, the system then becomes a refund situation since we are using the facilities that he provided. Therefore, it would be more simple to annex only the undeveloped land which involves about 3/4 of the section rather than the entire section. It was recommended to the Council that they give further consideration in regard to annexation of this case and future cases by changing our pro rats ordinance and place more capital expenditures on developers with the City having minimal developmental cost, and they should also give consideration to the requirement that developers begin paying for garbage containers rather than these being provided by the City. A third consideration would be the possibility of tying any future annexation to our securing a third major water supply. Appearing: Mr. Jack Geddes, Developer, Builder Mr. Geddes appeared in favor of annexation, in general; that for the good of the growth of Lubbock, a sound annexation policy was necessary; that any development was 98% risk on the part of the developer, of which the developer is entirely aware, and to deny this request and all future requests with respect to annexation would be detrimental to the community. Appearing: Cecil Jennings, Developer, Builder Mr. Jennings indicated that it was impossible to develop the vacant land located in the east and northeast area for the simple reason that one cannot develop an area if you do not have customers, and the growth pattern for Lubbock is south, southwest, west at this time. Mayor West asked if there were any representatives from the Lubbock Property Owners Association present inasmuch as they spoke to this issue specifically at their appearance before the Council on July 12, 1979, at which time they submitted three petitions requesting charter amendments. No one was present from this organization. Mr. Jim Bertram, Director of Planning, presented the Commission's position with respect to their annexation policy indicating that there was some 20 square miles surrounding the present boundaries which would allow for growth and additional annexation. Mr. Sam Reyes, President of the West Texas Home Builders Association, also appeared and indicated that while the Association did not have time to meet formally to address this situation, those members of the Association that were polled were in support of this request and any future annexation requests; that a "no growth" approach would be detrimental for the City of Lubbock and would eliminate all home building, contractors, suppliers and related industries; that a national report reflects a "no growth approach" kills a community. Appearing: Mr. Brownie Brownlee, Executive Director, Lubbock Board of Realtors 11 Mr. Brownlee indicated there were about 1,000 realtors in the City of Lubbock and that the area of growth is dependent upon developed land; that the consensus of his Board was supportive of any future annexation. There being no further discussion nor additional appearances, the hearing was closed. (15) Resolution No. 211 A joint_ resolution between the City of Lubbock and the County Commissioner' Clements to of the Lubbock Urban Transportation Study group as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The present agreement between the Steering Committee of the Lubbock Urban Transportation Study and the Governor's Planning Office will expire August 31, 1979. The Governor's Office has requested that the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) be redesignated prior to August 1, 1979. Motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Councilman Aderton to execute the joint resolution between the City of Lubbock and the County Commissioner's Court as requested by Governor Clements. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Council- men Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. (16) Consider setting a date and time to hold a public hearing to consider the request of Lubbock Industrial Foundation, Inc., to annex a tract of land to the City of Lubbock. This 1,500 acre tract is located between loth Street (FM 2641) and Ursuline Street, from North Guava Avenue to North Olive Avenue. This tract is currently owned by the City of Lubbock and is marketed by the Industrial Foundation of the Chamber of Commerce for industrial use. This request was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 12, 1979. It is the Staff's position that this request is suitable only for industrial development due to the proximity of the Airport along the railroad on one side of the site in question. Motion was made by Councilman McAlister, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Henry to hold a public hearing on the above oposed annexation on August 9, 1979, at 1:45 p.m. Motion carried Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting May. _ I (17) Consider recommendation from Tech Terrace Neighborhood Committee regarding barricades around the Park. The Tech Terrace Liaison Committee made up of Oscar Crane, Mrs. Bill Marquis, Mrs. Tom Sawyer, Dr. Martin Gunderson, Dr. Carl Anderson and Mrs. J. D. McPherson met on June 25 and July 10, 1979 to discuss alternative solutions to the traffic -related problems around Tech Terrace Park. W REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 9; 1979 (10) Ordinance No. 7893 (Zone Case No. 2245) Request of Emergency Medical Services (for Lubbock County Hospital District) to change Lot 536, Kuykendall Heights Addition, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas from A-2 to AM Zoning District (located at 5012 - 50th St.). (11) Ordinance No. 7894 (Zone Case No. 1979-A) Request of Bill Cox (for Smith, Baker, Field & Clifford, Inc.) for a specific use zone change, from R-1 to AM Specific Use Permit under provisions of Section 22.3-20-3 of the Zoning Ordinance for professional offices on Lots 18, 19 and the West 5 feet of Lot 20, Block 1, Squyres Plana AAAi ti nn ri tv r,f T.,,1%1,nn1r T.,,},l%nnlr rn„nty Tn.r - l9.. +—A AT-- -U conditions: (a) that it be tied to non -medical professional offices; (b) that it be tied to the site plan as shown. (12) Ordinance No. 7895 (Zone Case No. 1811-A) (13) *(16-A) Request of Arnold Maeker (for the First Baptist Church) to change Tract "B," Potomac Park Addition, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, from R-2 to A-2 Zoning District (located at 8315 Indiana Avenue), subject to the following condition: (a) that it be tied to church and related uses. Ordinance No. 7896 An ordinance amending Chapter 4, Article IV, Section 4-18 (f) and (g) regarding impoundment of animals by clarifying the impoundment period for owner -delivered animals. Motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Henry to pass Ordinance No. 7898, No. 7892, No. 7893, No. 7894, No. 7895, and No. 7896 on second and final reading. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. The Council recessed at 11:00 a.m. to reconvene at 11:20 a.m. Ordinance No. 7900 An ordinance annexing a tract of land to the City of Lubbock, generally located between Indiana Avenue and University Avenue, from 98th Street to 114th Street. Proponents requested that this item be placed on the agenda as an emergency measure. The areas of concern reflected in the public hearing of July 26, 1979, concern the third water supply source to those developed areas within the tract should the entire tract be annexed, and the liability 6 (18) (19) involved should the City fail to supply the required services within the three-year period of time as stipulated by law. There was also concern about the proposed change in the pro rata ordinance whereby the proponents assume most of the development cost; that there was no assurance that the new fire station proposed in that area would be the next capital development undertaken; that in the event services could not be supplied to the developed area within the three-year required period of time, the alternative to the residents would be to petition for deannexation; that the Department of Justice has 75 days in which to respond to a newly annexed area. All factors being considered, the motion was made by Councilman McAlister, seconded by Councilwoman Jordan to pass said ordinance on first reading. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. Resolution No. 226• A resolution authorizing time extension for street barricades adjacent to Tech Terrace Park. The Council approved the Tech Terrace Neighborhood Committee's recommendation to extend the trial period through October 15, 1979, to decrease the City's liabilities in the event of an accident involving the barricades. The proposed recommendation is a procedural matter. Motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Councilman McAlister to pass said resolution. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. Consider the price and conditions of sale for Parcel #75010-40-220 in the Community Development Third Action Year area. Developer: David Gonzalez and wife $240 for landscaping and enlarging present property Motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Councilman McAlister to approve referenced sale. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. Consider setting a date and time for performance hearing to be held on a Community Development Block Grant Program. The Community Development regulations require the Council to hold a public hearing to allow citizens the option to comment on the performance of the Community Development Block Grant activities and projects. The Staff recommended holding a hearing some 38 days prior to the commencement of the Neighborhood Planning Meetings. 7 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 23, 1979 in a row. Mr. Anderson indicated an extension of the contract would reflect basically the same terms and conditions with the exception that the referenced hourly rates would be adjusted to reflect the present inflationary factor; that there was a removal clause in the present contract that either party may give notice by May 15 requesting termination of the contract. The motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Henry authorizing the City Manager to begin negotiating procedures for preparation of a five-year extension contract, with particular notice being given to exactly what is expected of the auditors, their recommendations as a result of their audit(s), and the City Manager to submit the recom- mendations to the Council as soon as possible. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. ( 9) Ordinance No. 7902 An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 7556 prohibiting the sale of glue and related chemicals to minors. (10) Ordinance No. 7903 An ordinance annexing a tract of land to the City of Lubbock, generally located between Ursuline Street and Kent Street from Guava Avenue to Olive Avenue. (11) Ordinance No. 7900 An ordinance annexing a tract of land to the City of Lubbock, generally located between Indiana Avenue and University Avenue, from 98th Street to 114th Street. Motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Councilman McAlister to pass Ordinances 7902, 7903, and 7900 on second and final reading. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. (12) Ordinance No. 7901 - Zone Case No. 2244 Request of Mrs. Sidney Kothman (for Lubbock Women's Club, Inc.) to change Lots 15, 16 and 17, Overton Addition, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, from C-2 to C-2 (DH) Zoning District. (Located at In accordance with Public Notice published in the Lubbock Avalanche - Journal on August 7, 1979, a public hearing was held on the above referenced matter. Proponent: Mrs. Joan Smith, on behalf of the Women's Club, Inc. This request is made by the Lubbock Women's Club to designate their building and tract on Broadway as a historic landmark. If approved, ■ June 5, 1980 Office of the Comptroller Capital Station Austin, Texas 78711 Attention: Ad Valorem Tax Section RE: Annexed property into the City.I.imits - Lubbock, Texas Dear Sir: Enclosed herewith to you is a certified copy of Ordinance No. 7900, pith attached plat, approved August, 23,, 1979 by the City Council. Also enclosed is a copy of the letter from the Justice Department, dated April 23, 1980 granting approval Xo this annexed property. If you need additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, EVELYN GAFFGA City Secretary -Treasurer Enclosures _ � L.J. L6Yaa .,..�..• _ „ D SD : J-PIC : Vb'T : gMl ka.kington. AC 20530 DJ 166-012-3 C6267 APR 2 31884 Susan M. Tom, Esq. Assistant City Attorney post Office Box 2000 Lubbock, Texas 79457 Dear Ms. Tom: This is in reference to the annexation Ordinance too. 7900 (1979) for the City of Lubbock, Lub�antCtytonSection "eras, subritted to the Attorney General p 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965► as amended. Your sub - Mission was completed on March 19, 1980- -*re Attorney General does not =_nteraose any objection he feel a responsibility _O the change in Question. However, , Rights ACt ex_A. to point ouL that Section 5 of the Vot'ng .- ly provides that the failure of the F.ttorney General to ob- ject does not io bar any subsequent judicial actn to enjoin the en_orce_ent of such change. in addition, we note that because the po -enti ally dilutive effect of this annexation was judged to be de minims (only .25 percent and the cumulative a?1=hive effect of all annexations since 1972, only .63 ?=rcent), this d=ter.Lination should not be taken to address in any hay issues bearing upon the cons-itutiorality Of the city council members which are at -large system of electing now before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Bones v. C_tv of Lubbock (79-2744). Sincerely, DR--�4 S. DAYS III Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Di visiGa GEFz=D h. JCSt* 19$n Chief, N'ot nq Section J 1111 MRY tj ® ELEM KAlTRK PARK LOOP „ !lL S um } £ n YILLfR Z s O A 44 I E 2 11 F—l* al 111 TN 4T STADIUM r. ST L. 269 I LOOP !!! LOOP TPP II 77 TH JIL .l AO TT n py'�� I 84 TN ufv 3 � f6TM< - 67TH � LT.PARK BBTF I = a SITE �OrN- SITE 90TN�l� I 90Tr1 ST. TL - 1 r ti y G 3 r � 92ND ST. TT ; © D p S TK'P� 194TI1. I�ST.IC � I D E 96T'f PP1M !i � Q Q Q . f.;1 •Ili 1. •. i ,�. •-:: ?�•'- �s- .j 1. ,, i. `�I��., tla::•:e�.�t��ii','r�':• . ,. 'it ��iu4�ir�a�rS;_.-, ,� t;--:_::..it :,.i•' LUBBOCK ANNEXATION POLICY & ANALYSIS Area: Indiana/University & 98th/114th Date: June 20, 1979 I. Municipal Annexation Policies II. A. Lubbock shall exercise protective annexation measures to preclude strips and pockets of urban blight adjacent to the city. Such annexation will avoid enclosure of unincorporated pockets. B. Extension of municipal utilities outside the city shall be prohibited, except in emergencies or when annexation can be completed within 90 days. C. Developers and/or land owners requesting annexation must bear the major costs of public service facilities when existing land within the corporate limits can support anticipated growth for a 10-15 year period. D. Location and amounts of land to be annexed must provide maximum efficiencies of municipal services such as police, fire protection, water, sewer, street maintenance, and solid waste collections. Disproportionate costs to tax revenues shall be discouraged. E. Prior to public hearings on annexation, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall forward an opinion to the City Council, stating the impact of the annexation on long range growth patterns and rate of growth. Existing Conditions A. Acreage of area to be annexed B. Estimated dwelling units C. Estimated population 4 p.d.u. D. Estimated assessed valued on land and improvements (excluding personal property.) E. Estimated ad valorem tax revenue Sales Tax Other Total F. Estimated vacant, unsubdivided, residential, land in city growth areas. G. Estimated vacant, subdivided, residential, land in city growth areas. 740 67 268 1,446,000 $16,000 3.P 300. -0- 19,300 3,500 1,100 ITEM 14 III. (Cont.) C. Municipal Captial Costs 1. Sewage: (Lift station and force main costs to 74th _a Street; will be at developers expense or initial cost refundable; approximately $160,000. 21 000 2. Water: Service at developers expense for 8" line; ' line will be 1 mile of 12". 3. Streets: 1,60 0, 000 3 thoroughfares 1,500,000 2 collector 1003,000 _a 4. Felice: 5.. Fire: $338,000 New Station at Avenue U and 106th Street 6. Parks and Recreation 300,000 100 acres 7. Sanitation 151,400 360 dumpsters @ $265 each = $95,400 1 truck @ $56,000 8. Other (Bldg Insp., Zoning): _a - Total: 2 , 410,, 400 D. Annual Operations and Maintenance Costs 1. Sewage 50 2. Water 510 3. Streets 26 miles streets 38,000 16 miles alleys 4. Police 75)000 3 officers @ $25,000 each 5. Fire Maintenance 6. Parks 7. Sanitation 8. Other Inspector 227,000 15,000 10,000 18,500 Total: 384,060 III. Projected Conditions (Fully developed by 2020 ) A. Land Use 1. Estimated r.o.w. 222 ac 2. Estimated park land 100 ac 3. Estimated schools 10 ac 4. Estimated developable acreage 408 ac a. Estimated low density (units 1440 ) 2.83 p.d.u. 258 ac b. Estimated apartments (units. 2100 ) 2.25 p.d.u. 70 ac c. Estimated commercial 80 ac d. Estimated industrial -0- ac 5. Estimated Ultimate pop. 8,800 B. Estimated Annual Revenues 1. Ad valorem tax ($ 62 M assessed value) 694,400 2. Sales tax 88,500 3. Other -0- Zotal 782,900 IV. Effect on Growth Patterns A. Effect of annexation on creating inefficiencies in municipal services and operations: Primary inefficieny is in capitol and operating costs for new fire station at 106th Street and Avenue U. Approximately 2/3 of response areawill remain rural. B. Effect of annexation on long-range growth patterns: 1. Encourage further lopsided growth to south and southwest. 2. Increase length of home to work automobile trips. 3. Further discourage development of vacant residential land within the city. V. Effect of Full Development Without Annexation A. No. of units 550 @ 1 unit per acrc B. Water (Underground Water District) 11.75 years of available water. VI. School District Opinions: Lubbock Cooper Independent School District will be able to assimilate additional students -as therarea grows. VII. Planning and Zoning Commission Opinion: The Planning and Zoning Commission recannends approval of plan policy area. CITY CIF LUBBOCK Effect of Water Supply on Projected Population February 1979 1. Average daily water consumption for 1978 38.33 M.G.D. 2. Peak water consumption (including Canadian River supply) for 1978 78.8 M.G.D. 3. Maximum possible peak production (existing) 85.0 M.G.D. Existing wells: 43.0 M.G.D. Canadian River: 42.0 M.G.D. 4. Maximum possible peak production (sources fully developed) Fully.developed wells fields: 73 M.G.D. (peak -day), 10 M.G.D. (sustained yield) C;anaciian River: 42 M.G.D. (peak -day), 34 M.G.D. (sustained yield) Justiceburg/Post: 80 M.G.D. (pea.k-day), 29 M.G.D. (sustained yield) 195 M.G.D. 73 M.G.D. 5. Maximum population supportable at 73 M.G.D. sustained yield: 3150000 @ 232 G.P.C. per day 350,000 @ 208 G.P.C. per day 6. Maximum population supportable @ 44 M.G.D. sustained yield: 190,000 @ 232 G.P.C. per day 211,000 @ 200 G.P.C. per day 7. Target year to achieve maximum supportable population (350,000): 2005-2010 8. Projected average land consumption per 100 population @ 350,000 population Residential (5.8 acres/100 people) = 20,300 ac. All other (13.0 acres/100 people)=45,500 7.bta.l =65;800 ac. 9. Available undeveloped residential land in "prime growth areas": 41374 ac. Existing developed residential land in city limits: 9,899'ac. Total potential residential development within existing city limits: 14,273 ac. . 10. Additional residential land required for ultimate population (20,300 - 14,273 ); 6,027 ac. (9.42 sq.mi.) 11. Additional other land uses required for 9.42 sq. mi. of residential:6;690 ac.(10.45 sq.mi.) 12. Total estimated additional land use for population of 350,000: 12,717'ac. (.19.87 sq.mi. ANNMATION BY PLAN POLICY City of Lubbock April 25, 1978 The area of land described herein is adjacent to the existing corporate limits of the City of Lubbock, Texas. Such area is described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present City Limits line, as established by City of Lubbock Ordinance No. 6201, said point being 660 feet south and 660 feet east of the Northwest corner of Section 10, Bloc: E; =CE south approximately 5280 feet to a point 660 feet south and 660 feet east of the Northwest corner of Section 15, Block E; THENCE west approximately 6600 feet to a point 660 feet south and 660 feet west of the North east corner of Section 22, Block E-2; =CE north approximately 3300 feet to a point in the existing City Limits line, as described by Ordinance No. 7557, said point being .2640 feet south and 660 feet west of the Northeast corner of Section 18, Block E-2; =CE east approximately 1320 feet along the existing City Limits boundary to a point 660 feet east and 2640 feet south of the northwest corner of Section 19, Block E-2; THENCE north approximately 1980 feet along the present City Limits line, as described by ordinance No. 7557, to a point being 660 feet south and 660 feet east of the northwest corner of Section 19, Block E-2; THENCE east approximately 5280 feet along the existing City Limits line, to the point of beginning. Contains 740 acres, more or less. CITY OF LUBBOCK MEMO TO: All Division Directors and All Departments FROM: Susan M. Tom, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Approved and Final Annexations DATE: December 3, 1980 It has been brought to my attention that some departments may not have been made aware of recent approvals by the Justice Department of City annexations. Four annexations have been approved since April, 1980. The Leroy Elmore -Norton Baker Addition, the Children's Home of Lubbock, the North Idalou Highway annexa- tion and the Pete Hale annexation have all been approved by the Justice Depart- ment and are now officially within the City limits and eligible for City services. Maps indicating the location of each of these areas are attached for reference. SMT:bs Attachments Susan M. Tom av AEC 11 1980 CIiY StCAETARY �p� •�Wl Dcr ,we= my` lift Cl 1 yx 1P,.i'.K :.i; ! j;7£',� .•�T' ., `+:.r AW 44. :n �1 �(f`C^1�11 11111 Allif , / 1111111 1111111 Xj��F+"{' y 1:. ` o I ? x�• _� 2 111 B6 Q u 1: rq_ mom_ rq r y toll �G l 1S 11196 1S 111LG 1S HIM 3 S ~ IS 111 S6 119 1S 11196 r 1S 1111•i. 1S 11106 06 1S II1S6 r l/ 1 OyfG C 1S Hlf•6 Hlf6 1: 1S 0H£6 L'.Nlf x y 1S < M 1S u 0!!f6 4 GI1L6 p 1S 0N26 1S 1S16 1S 1S16 C '- � 1S16r 4� 1S 11106 is /uoc rn Zi r`n 1S x a ti A r 1a n H16B 2 o 1S < 1 1S 68 tyo° a �sg9 H1BB d �� H1 BB 1S rule �_� m i S 1S 1S H19B �c O HILO L �M ptlp 1 H199 m m y 1S tt -f 14199 • b ~Hll1 15 H1Se K 1LL yp ILLSa t MAPt: H1SB p 1 of 1S ILLI•B JPT ON a 1S 1$ < 1�yi x 1S h n t`. I.11U w �- 'n iS 1. "� _ _1J1 Lij Nq i,. l.:i 'i jj�v�1�i '1.t"•x lrl��t"��}ti�NA - . .1 • ai 'l:grYi�ji�"-.'';.'a�}i•[tlil.r��1'' • iii, , �4�rlj:..,Y.• %,�a.' �.ls• 1�:' i4 . Sirdi!�!�i..fi e�{•1 •,�' , - ' �� �'4'••�':!u•1ti�'j: 1tf �'y}„SI /�•�.14R,+'.f•`111-t ,; 1:: r - rL�i „�.t::;�f,:�.�; �.y....�'�.�• h;.,�••' a �, I f t t'eI.''Ii T 4 .'tt;'1 �•.:.j;: `j. :a:: `,�; •'•'• ' rS . is ;i•'.,+�tf4,It, f f{Z , ,..,,+� �4 . fi'plf • • 1 ?`°iitYi: li •htai('�-' v � • • . . :i •�•I�iy i`"IrYI�•J,� •I NEW., .....'... '. j,f.t�� \�'47�1 i}�•f 1/ j ''�/.' I IattYYM((;dr 4. v a 3Av •�d•• q.,� 1 - �' • .. .� 3Av N3V3d • N Ja J ' 3 ' • �* - � Z � � w � 3nv � ita � a3111J ' La I— J X 82ndS TREE TExt5TIAjo CIT--.ir7 Ir S ' - 0 2 0 - - 2000-0 r22000- 0 - 33 a 32 2 31 ! = 27 - •.� 30 23 (D cc - -- 22 rj Gy'C`-'" Lij 28 29 _ Q Q 85TH STREET (085) • - 21 - 20 19 IS EXHIBIT B ENE C0'1s COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS STATE OF TEXAS A AUSTIN, 78774 gab BULLOCK cormhow August 13, 1980 City of Lubbock P. 0. Box 2000 Lubbock, Texas 79457 Attention: Evelyn Gaffga City Secretary Dear Ms. Gaffga: This office has received ordinance no. 7991, 8025 and 7900 annexing property into the City of Lubbock. A plat has also been received showing the annexed area. Please be advised that the Local Sales and Use Tax will become effective October 1, 1980 in the area indicated on the plat. If you have any questions concerning this matter please contact me in Revenue Accounting Division, P. 0. Box 13528, Austin, Texas, 78711, or call area code 512/475-2414 or Texas toll free 1/800/252-5555, Ext. 144. Very truly yours, Robert L. Daniels Revenue Accounting RLD/cd Division �1 AUG 1 s31980 an equal opportunity employer NOTICE OF ADDED AGENDA ITEM NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF AN ITEM TO BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS ON AUGUST 9, 1979. ITEM TO BE CONSIDERED: 16-A Consider an ordinance annexing a tract of land to the City of Lubbock, generally located between Indiana Avenue and University Avenue, from 98th Street to 114th Street. IT IS AN URGENT PUBLIC NECESSITY THAT THIS MATTER BE CONSIDERED ON THIS DATE IN THE INTEREST OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above NOTICE OF ADDED AGENDA ITEM was posted on the bulletin board at City Hall Tuesday, August 7, 1979 at 12 Noon. e-lc - /)_0 O� 'e. - j (Seri ) EtELYN GA GA City Secretary -Treasurer P. O. Box 6687 Lubbock, Texas 79413 August 71 1979 Mr. Larry J. Cunningham City Manager City of Lubbock P. O. Box 2000 Lubbock, Texas 79408 Re: Annexation request by Leroy Elmore and Norton Baker of the South -Half of Sections 19 and 20, Block E-2, Lubbock County, Texas. Dear Mr. Cunningham: On April 10, 1978 Leroy Elmore and myself, owners of the above des- cribed property, requested that such property be annexed to the City of Lubbock as soon as possible. The annexation request was approved unanimously by the Planning and Zoning Department. Moreover, on July 26, 1979, the City Council held a public hearing on this annexation request. At this City Council meeting five people spoke in favor of the annexation and there was no opposition at this meeting. We respectfully request that the City Council consider an ordinance annexing this property at its regular City Council meeting on August 9, 1979. We feel that the consideration by the Council is urgent because of the entire time that we have been working on the annexation. Every week that this annexation can be expedited is very necessary. Thank you very much for your help and consideration in this matter, as it is very urgent from our standpoint. We want to compliment you on the fine job you are doing as City Manager. We realize the pressure that you and the Council work under every day and we appre- ciate your consideration. Very truly yours, LEROY ELMORE and NORTON BAKER By AAV Norton Baker cc: Mayor Dirk West City Council Members: Ms. Carolyn Jordan Mr. Bill McAlister Mr. M. J. Aderton Mr. Alan Henry L y y %lc—� rem,arAowM ® � �KABIMAN �I 1'�''��'''����•.''llJ}TnnJJ`j((—��yy���'�'ff __���'��*1.r/.R�wwTC( /� '� ; ®�� �� PARK � aUUUI��1� �OOO LOOP E09 LBOP 2" LOOP ... R BILL 0 ANN R ® >< 1 MILLER i tlain. 11 _ R NI. ►ARK I 1 7!TH R r��l rrl r nTN .T 76 TH '• SO s '.► I � t 0 1 77TH �JI Zi - Ilr�jl I�>5� 111 TN _• � TaTN. aS a TTN. I a, as .T 1 1Z:19J TM ®C 0.1 11--- i IS, 3 N a I T B7TH :�.. BBTF —11 zi I PARK 1 • > _ 1 SITE I �9PTH—il I 9UT.i ST. N f2$ ' • Sig ST IS L ... • la " 96TI; I ST. FKOPOIA�-D .ANNEXd1_I47N �G✓S�ll� I `�- �0�� O�T�-I 2022011835 32 PGS ORD ■III 1% 11111111 NilUK 11119 ININ1011I II City Of Lubbock Counter FiCing CITY OF LUBBOCK § COUNTY OF LUBBOCK § STATE OF TEXAS § CERTIFICATE TO COPY OF PUBLIC RECORD I hereby certify, in the performance of the functions of my office, that the attached instrument is a full, true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 7900 as the same appears of record in my office and that said document is an official record from the public office of the City Secretary of the City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, State of Texas, and is kept in said office. The total number of pages within the attached document is 30 pages. I further certify that I am the City Secretary of the City of Lubbock, that I have legal custody of said record, and that I am a lawful possessor and keeper and have legal custody of the records in said office. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said office the 2"d day of March, 2022. Reb cca Garza City Secretary City of Lubbock Lubbock County, State of Texas 4.;3", i.GB:h6 ORDINANCE NO. 7900 f1N ORDINANCE ANNEXING AN AREA OF LAND TO THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, WHICH AREA 1S DE6IBED HEREIN AND IS ADJACENT TO AND ABUTS THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR CORRECTION OF CITY MAP TO INCLUDE THIS AbDITIONAL TERRITORY; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Lubbock and also the best interest of the citizens of the area described hereinbelow, to annex such area to the City of Lubbock; NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: SECTION 1. THAT the area of land described herein, which abuts and is adjacent to the existing corporate limits of the City of Lubbock, Texas, BE and the same is hereby annexed to and included within the corporate limits of the City of Lubbock, Texas. Such area is described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present City Limits line, as estab- lished by City of Lubbock Ordinance No. 6201, said point being 660 feet south and 660 feet east of the Northwest corner of Section 10, Block E; THENCE south approximately 5280 feet to a point 660 feet south and 660 feet east of the Northwest corner of Section 15, Block E; THENCE west approximately 6600 feet to a point 660 feet south and 660 feet west of the Northeast corner of Section 22, Block E-2; THENCE north approximately 3300 feet to a point in the existing City Limits line, as described by Ordinance No. 7557, said point being 2640 feet south and 660 feet west of the Northeast corner of Section 18, Block E-2; THENCE east approximately 1320 feet along the existing City Limits boundary to a point 660 feet east and 2640 feet south of the north- west corner of Section 19, Block E-2; THENCE north approximately 1980 feet along the present City limits line, as described by ordinance No. 7557, to a point being 660 feet south and 660 feet east of the northwest corner of Section 19, Block E-2; THENCE east approximately 5280 feet along the existing City Limits line, to the point of beginning. Contains 740 acres, more or less. SECTION 2. THAT the City Engineer is hereby directed to immediately correct the map of the City of Lubbock by adding thereto the additional ter- ritory annexed by this ordinance, indicating on the map the date of annexation and the number of this Ordinance. The City Secretary -Treasurer and the City Engineer shall each keep in their respective offices an official map of the City of Lubbock showing the boundaries of the municipal corporation including this annexation. SECTION 3. THAT should any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason the remainder of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective upon passage at second reading. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Passed by the City Council on first reading this_qtday of--Auguat 1979. Passed by the City Council on second reading this 23rd day of August , 1979. DI ST, MAYOR ATTEST: Evelyn Gaffga, City Se eOrr r reasurer APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Jim rt am, Director of Planning APPROVED AS TO FORM: 41111� Leon Bean, Asst. City Attorney CITY OF LUBBOCK TO: All Division Directors and All Departments FROM: Susan M. Tom, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Approved and Final Annexations DATE: December 3, 1980 It has been brought to my attention that some departments may not have been made aware of recent approvals by the Justice Department of City annexations. Four annexations have been approved since April, 1980. They E3mnrP-Nnrtnn _Bahr.r Ad I,x on. t . Chi ldren's Home of Lubbock, the North I aloe Highway annpxa- fjj3n And rha Pgro 14 IP annexatign have all been approved b T12cf4ra Dal t- ment and within the C'LX 15=its Maps indicating the location of each of these areas are attached for reference. SPIT : bs Attachments Susan M. Tom 1980 it trt�ii S�Ct�ti�1�Y � iS � Ski -1 �dX k , ND ST w Y, w , �i AlT•r ., ul ST 3 t > O•Inl ST 'l1r1WST4r gSrH p rir o4 nr x 95rH sr SUN ,. $!- f w w 86TH ST a eary ST F K T DIM ST s 0)n+ ST r� �T +lPtH f DR a oorN ST. S do o 89TH cr 86 uJ 09m ST a 1 ` rN 9orm C U '~-" sT W , r_ sr 40fr! ST W o0nf sr s '9rsr ST 4 9rST Ssr 91ST W J9210 Q sr ui 92ND x sr i� J2h"1 RO ` xwx ST ° 93RD ti+ Sr sr 94Trf 94TH t� ST 2 93RD t hl 93111 Sf 94 nr `ii °4 rrl o4m sr 14rff sr '1 Lo H 96T1r sr ^ 95to ST , •>i n 9TTN St 9GTlr STI �41 ~ 9,tnN Q d ST :1 971rf st 3 4i , ' 3 ti 9Trrr sr °? STD i w a_ •LW 98 rff ii M t� rrrrrrr rrrurrr Xutci�irtk }�y • ♦ w\ • • •� •Y ♦ • �OV Ni A,VR "' lt'�t ?,f;1'7 �" a•'!1,•{;�V'.K ;Y'• ^••� 'Y• •. ��i� 'd, y� �iJw- ( 11l111 itllr Yii rrrrrrrruurtrrrrrrrrr 1 'Phlrrrtri lrirt�i .,,,rY .:• r? .1'''j�-V�ll ~1 t,1�•�i�:���j� • � .'r Y.' '�' a1 , ' 11-1� � '�~��•1 . Y. j��j••(/Y 1�11 I nNY/ �l LLI A' r L ' W � Q ✓� y a <r > a M o r i REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 28, 1979 35,000 square feet and forced a "C-3" zone case. The Legal Department is a little anxious about handling it in this manner to the exclusion of allowing discount and family centers. Councilwoman Jordan queried whether or not the referenced zone case with respect to the Safeway store could be retracted placing the matter back in a "C-2" zone, to which Mr. Bertram responded that it would require a multi -step process. City Attorney John Ross indicated he questioned that the matter could be handled in that manner inasmuch as the proponent had already made committments based on the Council's decision with vested rights. There being no further discussion, the hearing was closed. Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Henry, seconded by Councilwoman Jordan to pass said ordinance on first reading. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. (20) Setting a date and time to hold a public hearing to consider the of Norton Baker and Leroy Elmore to annex a tract of land to the of Lubbock located between Indiana Avenue and University Street 107th Street to 114th Street. This annexation request was made over a year ago, but before the Planning Commission could act upon it, a subcommittee was appointed and directed to study the need to annex any more land into a set policy on how future annexation would be handled. The subcommittee defined four study areas as being active growth areas and directed the staff to prepare an annexation study which was reviewed in February, 1979. The Committee also deliberated the effect of our existing and proposed water supply on projected population as one element attributable to the cause and effect relationship of annexation procedures. This summary data is on file in the City Secretary's Office. The subcommittee recognized that the City would continue to annex additional land to accommodate the projected optimum population for Lubbock as based on the City's ability to provide domestic water resources, and adopted the following annexation policy: An area to be considered for annexation must be within the adopted long-range policy corridor (study areas as shown in the attached map) and meet one of the following criteria: 1. Area requested for annexation is substantially developed. 2. Area requested for annexation is in the process of developing. This criteria shall also include any strip commercial development that is within or outside the policy corridor area. 10 M 3. Area requested for annexation should have imme- diate potential for development. If Lubbock does not obtain its third water source, any additional annexation would be questionable. However, the Planning Commission felt that since this request fell within their outer corridor limits for urban growth, they remained optimistic about the third-water-sotwce and decided to proceed with additional annexation pending a decision on the third water source. The two primary concerns on this annexation are sewer service and the question of a future fire station needed at 106th Street and Avenue U. The 98th Street sewer line would have to be served with a lift station and lines to take the sewage back to the 82nd Street line. This area would remain outside of a 5-minute response time for our existing fire station; the feasibility of building a station at 106th Street and Avenue U in the foreseeable future is highly questionable. The primary purpose of this item is to set up a time and place for a public hearing regarding the above matter. Motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Councilman Aderton to hold a public hearing on the above matter at 1:30 p.m. on July 26, 1979. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting yea; none voting Nay. (21) Resolution No. 189 A resolution authorizing the Mavor to 7 Block Grant Program. The funding agreement with the Urban Renewal Agency will come under the Neighborhood Revitalization activities in the City's 1979-80 Community Development annual application. The Urban Renewal Agency will receive $2,389,462 for the 1979-80 entitlement to perform rehabilitation and redevelopment activities in seven neighborhood areas: Arnett Benson $ 643,877 Phyllis Wheatley 524,000 Meadowbrook Villa 116,969 Eliston 306,238 Bean School 371,294 Posey East 256,450 Stubbs 170.634 TOTAL $2,389.462 Of the total funding 9% ($217,749) will be used for administrative costs. 11 REGbLAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 26, 1979 (14) into their back yard, and in his opinion the property was not suitable for single-family residences. Appearing: Mr. Buddy Barron, Realtor Mr. Barron appeared as a character reference for Mr. Gilliam, indicating he was a reputable businessman; that the highway on Slide Road presently under construction was detrimental for single-family residences; and that the proposed landscaping would be aesthetically beneficial. Opponent: Mr. Bill Cox, 5210 70th Street (Lot 5, Ranch Acres) Mr. Cox represented himself as a homeowner in the area; that he had appeared on the previous zone request in opposition to the property becoming rezoned; that to approve the request would be a "leak in the dyke" and would be detrimental to the entire Ranch Acres development; that Mr. Gilliam knew at the time he bought the property that it was zoned for a single-family residence; that there were other alternatives for developing the property which Mr. Gilliam apparently had not considered or wished to pursue. Councilwoman Jordan asked if he would share with them the alternatives he had in mind, to which Mr. Cox replied that by relocating the car- port and erecting a screening fence that the ingress and egress could be relocated off of Slide Road. Opponent: Mrs. J. W. Conover, 6804 Slide Road Ms. Conover indicated their property was adjacent to the referenced site; that they enjoyed their property and the Slide Road traffic and commercial area were not detrimental to a family life style. Opponent: Thomas J. Giffith, Attorney, on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Jerry Gailey (Lot 1, Ranch Acres) Mr. Griffith indicated that his clients had invested in their property as residential; that inasmuch as Mr. Gilliam had received interim financing, that no doubt permanent financing was available; and that the identifying signs connected with his business would be distasteful to his clients who live in the Ranch Acres Addition. The following discussion reflected rebuttal by Mr. Fouts, response by Mr. Cox, comments by Mr. Jim Bertram, Director of Planning, as to the zone request of the California developers and its relationship to this site. Following all discussion, the hearing was declared closed. The motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Henry, seconded by Councilwoman Jordan to uphold P & Z and DENY the above request. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan and Councilman McAlister voting Yea; Councilman Aderton voting Nay. V] In accordance with Notice of Public Hearing published July 11, 1979, in the Lubbock Avalanche -Journal, a public hearing was held at 1:30 p.m. on the above matter. Proponent: Norton Baker, applicant for the requested annexation Mr. Baker indicated that the request for annexation was located between Indiana and University Avenues and from 107th Street to 114th Street; that the requested portion to be annexed was suitable for residential development. The Planning and Zoning Commission, before acting on this request,directed that a subcommittee be established to determine if the City needed to annexed any more land and to set policies on how future land annexation would be handled. The subcommittee defined four study areas as being active growth areas and directed the Staff to prepare an annexation study, said study being delivered January, 1979. The subcommittee also deliberated upon the effect of our existing and proposed water supply on projected population, and the subcommittee recognized that the City would need to continue to annexed additional land to accommodate the optimum population for Lubbock as based on the City's ability to provide domestic water sources. Pursuant to the subcommittee's report, the Planning and Zoning Commission adopted the following annexation policy: "An area to be considered for annexation must be within an adopted long-range policy corridor (the study areas as shown on the enclosed map), and meet one of the following criteria: 1. The area requested for annexation should be substantially developed. 2. The area requested for annexation should be in the process of development. This criteria also includes any strip commercial development that is within our outside of the policy corridor area. 3. The area requested for annexation should have an immediate potential for development." It was pointed out to the Planning Commission that this request falls outside of the 5-minute response line and fire stations would respond if this area is annexed, but not within a 5-minute period until the projected station is built at 106th Street and Avenue U. Sam Wahl, Director of Water and Utilities, pointed out that inclusion of any developed area in this annexed area could create a financial problem for the City in terms of sewer service; that the sewer service to this area is scheduled to be from a trunk sewer in 98th Street which will not be constructed until bonds are voted for this project. This would require the developer to construct a lift station and force main at his own total 10 cost without any reason. If the developed areas are annexed and request sewer service, then we would have no option except to connect these customers into the developer's system within three years. At the time this happens, the system then becomes a refund situation since we are using the facilities that he provided.' Therefore, it would be more simple to annex only the undeveloped land which involves about 3/4 of the section rather than the entire section. It was recommended to the Council that they give further consideration in regard to annexation of this case and future cases by changing our pro rate ordinance and place more capital expenditures on developers with the City having minimal developmental cost, and they should also give consideration to the requirement that developers begin paying for garbage containers rather than these being provided by the City. A third consideration would be the possibility of tying any future annexation to our securing a third major water supply. Appearing: Mr. Jack Geddes, Developer, Builder Mr. Geddes appeared in favor of annexation, in general; that for the good of the growth of Lubbock, a sound annexation policy was necessary; that any development was 98% risk on the part of the developer, of which the developer is entirely aware, and to deny this request and all future requests with respect to annexation would be detrimental to the community. Appearing: Cecil Jennings, Developer, Builder Mr. Jennings indicated that it was impossible to develop the vacant land located in the east and northeast area for the simple reason that one cannot develop an area if you do not have customers, and the growth pattern for Lubbock is south, southwest, west at this time. Mayor West asked if there were any representatives from the Lubbock Property Owners Association present inasmuch as they spoke to this issue specifically at their appearance before the Council on July 12, 1979, at which time they submitted three petitions requesting charter amendments. No one was present from this organization. Mr. Jim Bertram, Director of Planning, presented the Commission's position with respect to their annexation policy indicating that there was some 20 square miles surrounding the present boundaries which would allow for growth and additional annexation. Mr. Sam Reyes, President of the West Texas dome Builders Association, also appeared and indicated that while the Association did not have time to meet formally to address this situation, those members of the Association that were polled were in support of this request and any future annexation requests; that a "no growth" approach would be detrimental for the City of Lubbock and would eliminate all home building, contractors, suppliers and related industries; that a national report reflects a "no growth approach" kills a community. Appearing: Mr. Brownie Brownlee, Executive Director, Lubbock Board of Realtors 11 Mr. Brownlee indicated there were about 1,000 realtors in the City of Lubbock and that the area of growth is dependent upon developed land; that the consensus of his Board was supportive of any future annexation. There being no further discussion nor additional appearances, the hearing was closed. (15) Resolution No. 211 A joint resolution between the City of Lubbock and the County Commissioner• Court requesting Governor Clements to redesignate the Steering Commission of the Lubbock Urban Transportation Study group as the Metropolitan Planing Organization (MPO) . The present agreement between the Steering Committee of the Lubbock Urban Transportation Study and the Governor's Planning Office will expire August 31, 1979. The Governor's Office has requested that the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) be redesignated prior to August 1, 1979. Motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Councilman Aderton to execute the joint resolution between the City of Lubbock and the County Commissioner's Court as requested by Governor Clements. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Council- men Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. (16) Consider setting a date and time to hold a Lubbock Industrial Foundation, Inc. of land to the City of Lubbock. This 1,500 acre tract is located between loth Street (FM 2641) and Ursuline Street, from North Guava Avenue to North Olive Avenue. This tract is currently owned by the City of Lubbock and is marketed by the Industrial Foundation of the Chamber of Commerce for industrial use. This request was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 12, 1979. It is the Staff's position that this request is suitable only for industrial development due to the proximity of the Airport along the railroad on one side of the site In question. Motion was made by Councilman McAlister, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Henry to hold a public hearing on the above oposed annexation on August 9, 1979, at 1:45 p.m. Motion carried Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. .7 (17) Consider recommendation from Tech Terrace Neighborhood Committee regarding barricades around the Park. The Tech Terrace Liaison Committee made up of Oscar Crane, Mrs. Bill Marquis, Mrs. Tom Sawyer, Dr. Martin Gunderson, Dr. Carl Anderson and Mrs. J. D. McPherson met on June 25 and July 10, 1979 to discuss alternative solutions to the traffic -related problems around Tech Terrace Park. 12 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 9. 1979 (10) Ordinance No. 7893 (Zone Case No. 2245) Request of Emergency Medical Services (for Lubbock County Hospital District) to change Lot 536, Kuykendall Heights Addition, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas from A-2 to AM Zoning District (located at 5012 - 50th St.). (11) Ordinance No. 7894 (Zone Case No. 1979-A) Request of Bill Cox (for Smith, Baker, Field & Clifford, Inc.) for a specific use zone change, from R-1 to AM Specific Use Permit under provisions of Section 22.3-20-3 of the Zoning Ordinance for professional offices on Lots 18, 19 and the West 5 feet of Lot 20, Block 1, Squyres Place Addition, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas (located North of 22nd Street and West of Indiana Avenue), subject to the following conditions: (a) that it be tied to non medical professional offices; (b) that it -be tied to the site plan as shown. (12) Ordinance No. 7895 (Zone Case No. 1811-Al Request of Arnold Maeker (for the First Baptist Church) to change Tract "B," Potomac Park Addition, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, from R-2 to A-2 Zoning District (located at 8315 Indiana Avenue), subject to the following condition: (a) that it be tied to church and related uses. (13) Ordinance No. 7896 An ordinance amends *(16-A) :hapter 4, Article IV, Sect tnt of animals by clarifyin period for owner -delivered animals. the 18 (f ) and Motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Henry to pass Ordinance No. 7898, No. 7892, No. 7893, No. 7894, No. 7895, and No. 7896 on second and final reading. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. The Council recessed at 11:00 a.m. to reconvene at 11:20 a.m. Ordinance No. 7900 An ordinance annexing a tract of land to the City of Lubbock, generally located between Indiana Avenue and University Avenue, from 98th Street to 114th Street. Proponents requested that this item be placed on the agenda as an emergency measure. The areas of concern reflected in the public hearing of July 26, 1979, concern the third water supply source to those developed areas within the tract should the entire tract be annexed, and the liability (18) (19) involved should the City fail to supply the required services within the three-year period of time as stipulated by law. There was also concern about the proposed change in the pro rata ordinance whereby the proponents assume most of the development cost; that there was no assurance that the new fire station proposed in that area would be the next capital development undertaken; that in the event services could not be supplied to the developed area within the three-year required period of time, the alternative to the residents would be to petition for deannexation; that the Department of Justice has 75 days in which to respond to a newly annexed area. All factors being considered, the motion was made by Councilman McAlister, seconded by Councilwoman Jordan to pass said ordinance on first reading. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. Resolution No. 226• A resolution authorizing time extension for street barricades adjacent to Tech Terrace Park. The Council approved the Tech Terrace Neighborhood Committee's recommendation to extend the trial period through October 15, 1979, to decrease the City's liabilities in the event of an accident involving the barricades. The proposed recommendation is a procedural matter. Motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Councilman McAlister to pass said resolution. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. Consider the price and conditions of sale for Parcel # 75010-40-220 in the Community Development Third Action Year area. Developer: David Gonzalez and wife $240 for landscaping and enlarging present property Motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Councilman McAlister to approve referenced sale. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. Consider setting a date and time for performance hearing to be held on a Community Development Block Grant Program. The Community Development regulations require the Council to hold a public hearing to allow citizens the option to comment on the performance of the Community Development Block Grant activities and projects. The Staff recommended holding a hearing some 38 days prior to the commencement of the Neighborhood Planning Meetings. 7 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 23, 1979 in a row. Mr. Anderson indicated an extension of the contract would reflect basically the same terms and conditions with the exception that the referenced hourly rates would be adjusted to reflect the present inflationary factor; that there was a removal clause, in the present contract that either party may give notice by May 15 requesting termination of the contract. The motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Henry authorizing the City Manager to begin negotiating procedures for preparation of a five-year extension contract, with particular notice being given to exactly what is expected of the auditors, their recommendations as a result of their audit(s), and the City Manager to submit the recom- mendations to the Council as soon as possible. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. ( 9) Ordinance No. 7902 An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 7556 prohibiting the sale of glue and related chemicals to minors. (10) Ordinance No. 7903 An ordinance annexing a tract of land to the City of Lubbock, generally located between Ursuline Street and Kent Street from Guava Avenue to Olive Avenue. (11) Ordinance No. 7900 An ordinance annexing a tract of land to the City of Lubbock, generally located between Indiana Avenue and University Avenue, from 98th Street to 114th Street. Motion was made by Councilwoman Jordan, seconded by Councilman McAlister to pass Ordinances 7902, 7903, and 7900 on second and final reading. Motion carried: Mayor West, Mayor Pro Tem Henry, Councilwoman Jordan, Councilmen Aderton and McAlister voting Yea; none voting Nay. (12) Ordinance No. 7901 - Zone Case No. 2244 of Mrs. Sidney Kothman (for Lubbock Women's Club, Inc) to Lots 15, 16 and 17, Overton Addition, City of Lubbock, Lubbock Texas, from C-2 to C-2 (DH) Zoning District. (Located at VA In accordance with Public Notice published in the Lubbock Avalanche - Journal on August 7, 1979, a public hearing was held on the above referenced matter. Proponent: Mrs. Joan'Smith, on behalf of the Women's Club, Inc. This request is made by the Lubbock Women's Club to designate their building and tract on Broadway as a historic landmark. If approved, 6 June S, 1980 Office of the Comptroller Capital Station Austin, Texas 78711 Attention: Ad Valorem Tax Section RE: Annexed property. into the City.Limits - Lubbock, Texas Dear Sir: Enclosed herewith to you is a certified zopy of Ordinance No. 7900, with attached plat, approved August, 23,. 1979 by the City Council. Also enclosed is a copy of the letter Xrom the Justice Department, dated April 23, 1980 granting approval to this annexed property. If you need additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, EVELYN CAPPOA City Secretary -Treasurer Enclosures DSD : JMC : VN?T : gal Ra.h nl�toa. D_C 20530 DJ 166-012-3 C6267 APR 2 31980 Susan M. Tom, Esq. Assistant City Attorney post Office Box 2000 Lubbock, Texas 79457 Dear lbs. Tom: Tnis is in reference to the annexation Ordinance No. 7900 (1979) for the City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, submitted to the Attorney General pursuant to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act Of 19650, as amended. Your sub - Mission was completed o The Attorney General does not interpose any objection to the change in question. 3o:cever, we feel a responsights Act bility ress- to point out that Section 5 of the Voting .General to ob- ly provides that the failure of the Attorney ject does not bar any subsequent judicial action to enjoin the enforce=ent of such change. In addition, we note that because ti:e potentially dilutive effect of this annexation was judged to be de minimis (only .25 percent and the cumulative dilutive effect of all annexations since 1972, only .63 percent), this determination should not be taken to address in any hay issues bearing upon the constitutionality of the at -large system of electing city council members which are now before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Jones v. Citv of Lubbock (79-2744). Sincerely, DR7-4 S. DAYS III Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division ByjG Chief, Votinc Section 4i, I-t �O ��Oz �i► I �"1`y`��J: - .Na11.vx�NN� Q��dC��1d� It NltaI tte wee IIf110t1t LUBBOCK ANNEXATION POLICY & ANALYSIS Area:Indiana/University & 98th/114th Date: June 20, 1979 I. Municipal Annexation Policies A. Lubbock shall exercise protective annexation measures to preclude strips and pockets of urban blight adjacent to the city. Such annexation will avoid enclosure of unincorporated pockets. B. Extension of municipal utilities outside the city shall be prohibited, except in emergencies or when annexation can be completed within 90 days. C. Developers and/or land owners requesting annexation must bear the major costs of public service facilities when existing land within the corporate limits can support anticipated growth for a 10-15 year period. D. Location and amounts of land to be annexed must provide maximum efficiencies of municipal services such as police, fire protection, water, sewer, street maintenance, and solid waste collections. Disproportionate costs to tax revenues shall be discouraged. E. Prior to public hearings on annexation, the Planning and Zoning Cotmnission shall forward an opinion to the City Council, stating the impact of the annexation on long range growth patterns and rate of growth. II. Existing (bnditions A. Acreage of area to be annexed B. Estimated dwelling units C. Estimated population 4 p.d.u. D. Estimated assessed valued on land and improvements ( excluding personal property.) E. Estimated ad valorem tax revenue Sales Tax Other Zbtal F. Estimated vacant, unsubdivided, residential, land in city growth areas. G. Estimated vacant, subdivided, residential, land in city growth areas. 740 67 $16,000 34 pw. -0- 19,300 3,500 1,100 rIY GM 14 III. (Cont.) C. ]Municipal Captial Costs 1. Sewage:(fit station and force main costs to 74th -a Street; will be at developers expense or initial cost refundable; approximately $160,000. 2. Water: Service at developers expense for 8" line; 21,000 line will be 1 mile of 12". 3. Streets: 1.,600,000 3 thoroughfares 1,�00,000 2 collector 100.000 -a 4. Police: 5.. Fire: New Station at Avenue U and 106th Street 6. Parks and Recreation 100 acres 7. Sanitation 360 dumpsters @ $265 each = $95,400 1 truck @ $56,000 8. Other (Bldg Insp., Zoning): D. Annual Operations and Maintenance Costs 2. Water 3. Streets 26 miles streets 16 miles alleys 4. Police 3 officers @ $25,000 each 5. Fire Maintenance 6. Parks 7. Sanitation 8. Other Inspector - Zbtal: 300,000 151,400 -0- 2,410,,400 50 . 510 38,000 75,000 227,000 _ M--w. Zbtal: 384,060 a n III. Projected Conditions (Fully developed by 2020 ) A. Land Use 1. Estimated r.o.w. 222 ac 2. Estimated park land 100 ac 3. Estimated schools 10 ac 4. Estimated developable acreage 408 ac a. Estimated low density (units 1440 ) 2.83 p.d.u. 258 ac b. Estimated apartments (units, 2100 ) 2.25 p.d.u. 70 ac c. Estimated cc mmrcial 80 ac d. Estimated industrial -0- ac 5. Estimated Ultimate pop. 8,800 B. Estir ted Annual Revenues 1. Ad valorem tax ($ 62 M assessed value) 694,400 2. Sales tax 88,500 3. Other -0- Zbtal 7821900 IV. Effect on Growth Patterns A. Effect of annexation on creating inefficiencies in municipal services and operations: Primary inefficieny is in capitol and operating costs for new fire station at 106th Street and Avenue U. Approximately 2/3 of response areawill remain rural. B. Effect of annexation on long-range growth patterns: 1. Encourage further lopsided growth to south and southwest. 2. Increase length of home to work automobile trips. 3. Further discourage development of vacant residential land within the city. V. Effect of Full Develonnent Without Annexation A. No. of units 550 @ 1 unit per acre B. Water (Underground Water District) 11.75 years of available water. VI. School District Opinions: Lubbock Cooper Independent School District will be able to assimilate additional' -students -as 'the -area, grows. VII. Planning and Zoning Cmmi.ssion Opinion: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of plan policy area. Effect of Water Supply on Projected Population February 1979 1. Average daily water consumption for 1978 38.33 M.G.D. 2. Peak water consumption (including Canadian River supply) for 1978 78.8 M.G.D. 3. Maximum possible peak production (existing) 85.0 M.G.D. Existing wells: 43.0 M.G.D. Canadian River: 42.0 M.G.D. 4. Maximum possible peak production (sources fully developed) Fully_developed wells fields: 73 M.G.D. (peak -day), 10 M.G.D. (sustained yield) Canadian River: 42 M.G.D. (peak -day), 34 M.G.D. (sustained yield) Justiceburg/Post: 80 M.G.D. (peak -day), 29 M.G.D. (sustained yield) 195 M.G.D. 73 M.G.D. 5. Maximum population supportable at 73 M.G.D. sustained yield: 315,000 @ 232 G.P.C. per day 350,000 @ 208 G.P.C. per day 6. Maximum population supportable @ 44 M.G.D. sustained yield: 190,000 @ 232 G.P.C. per day 211,000 @ 200 G.P.C. per day 7. Target year to achieve ma_Yicmm supportable population (350,000): 2005-2010 8. Projected average land consumption per 100 population @ 350,000 population Residential (5.8 acres/100 people) = 20,300 ac. All other (13.0 acres/100 people) =45,500 Zbtal =65,'800 ac. 9. Available undeveloped residential land in "prime growth areas": 4,374 ac. Existing developed residential land in city limits: 9,899 Ac.. 7bta1 potential residential development within existing city limits: X4,273 ac. 10. Additional residential laud required for ultimate population (20,300-14,273 ) ; 6,027 ac.. (9•' 2 sq.mi.) 11. Additional other land uses required for 9.42 sq. mi. of residential:6,690 ac.(10.45 sq.mi. ) 12. Zbtal estimated additional land use for population of 350,000: 1.2,717'ac. (19.87 sgJA. t AI MMON BY PLAN POLICY i City of Lubbock April 25, 1978 The area of land described herein is adjacent to the existing corporate limits of the City of Lubbock, Texas. Such area is described as follows: BEGIRMG at a point in the present City Limits line, as established by City of Lubbock Ordinance No. 6201, said point being 660 feet south and 660 feet east of the Northwest corner of Section 10, Block E; 11MCE south approximately 5280 feet to a point 660 feet south and 660 feet east of the Northwest corner of Section 15, Block E; TMCE west approximately 6600 feet to a point 660 feet south and 660 feet west of the North-east corner of Section 22, Block E-2; nMCE north approximately 3300 feet to a point in the existing City Limits line, as described by Ordinance No. 7557, said point being .2640 feet south and 660 feet west of the Northeast corner of Section 18, Block E-2; MENcE east approximately 1320 feet along the existing City Limits boundary to a point 660 feet east and 2640 feet south of the northwest corner of Section 19, Block E-2; TM4CE north approximately 1980 feet along the present City Limits line, as described by ordinance No. 7557, to a point being 660 feet south and 660 feet east of the northwest corner of Section 19, Block E-2; TETCE east approximately 5280 feet along the existing City Limits line, to the point of beginning. Contains 740 acres, more or less. 1 CITY OF LUBBOCK TO: All Division Directors and All Departments FROM: Susan M. Tom, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Approved and Final Annexations DATE: December 3, 1980 It has been brought to my attention that some departments may not have been made aware of recent approvals by the Justice Department of City annexations. Four annexations have been approved since April, 1980. The Leroy Elmore -Norton Baker Addition, the Children's Home of Lubbock, the North Idalou Highway annexa- tion and the Pete Hale annexation have all been approved by the Justice Depart- ment and are now officially within the City limits and eligible for City services. Maps indicating the location of each of these areas are attached for reference. SIfT:bs Attachments 45;;r� Susan M. Tom 1 9 pEC`l 1980 CIiY SECAEiARY �0 r 171W/g° (,t ��_ t, , rt ,LI Sr i �Ld P'•W1 ( I' t i y $ I tj Sr TI 1 PlNa i Sr o n g �Y nr,•1 ,+ ai c sr ; a•tn1 sr •�nrt'� sr �• i BSTH 8',tH -+ a n1 84 no ��ixe 95m sr '' v BGTM �� TH 97rH S7 S asr afiTH ST I7n1 d 7 L BNTH u E OR iv i asrH 6 (V► v Sr. c 89n1 n a /9 Sr ' J "no Sr w 90T14 a 'u ST m Z ut 90Ttt ST J4t`S.T ST r 9tSi +T 92N0 ST 9:Iq a Sr w 2hCt IT SRO T 9 R ST 94T11 94TH sr ' 93M 11 ssrtt Sr 94 To'� 4 no sent94 r11 sr sr �, 9en1 sr us rit sr a 97TN sr srtnl Sr ; iy gnat p d St z 97 rH s r yt w ij t a . �i d a j F 97r11 Sr sr C A6 z 4t a k yt 98rtr Tr f�t� �l ►! {.� t t 1 t t t t t i t t t 1 t t�l' �,IT�1�'� of all tiJ •'p: �:1'T''�":}'�":''l: •T•••:i�••,;. C H-1 I It. r,:.� v; • .fit .ti •tl•r 11 11� i1i11 Y+ Ilittitlitlttltttlitt 1 t IF -Niel 1111A ��•-`� .. 'r� W-p11.1 "1 ��n �I�II•i � �N%fr'� �/y t LJ Gr . Cf� � �MA.?��f a } 1ltltliltl/1 �����/ '�, A����•� w Q x 0. w a Q > r.1 e No Text • • s 21 0 2000 - 0 - 2 2000 - 0 33 32 • � 2 � _ 31 _ 27 • � 23 30 CD � v f.a"'' O _�ilft"•...r+`a��.. _r.: ems.. ..: ^- "=• _`-`.�� •ve''•.S�'a"S� Y o rj ii f 4 F-% ARE& i 22 W 28 29 Hai Q 85TH STREET (085) 20 . 19 IS EXHIBIT B ,jNE Cp 09 r� ° COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS )eft STATE OF TEXAS TEXAS AUSTIK 78774 BOB BULLOCK ca rcho ar August 13, 1980 City of Lubbock P. 0. Box 2000 Lubbock, Texas 79457 Attention: Evelyn Gaffga City Secretary Dear Ms. Gaffga: This office has received ordinance no. 7991, 8025 and 7900 annexing property into the City of Lubbock. A plat has also been received showing the annexed area. Please be advised that the Local Sales and Use Tax will become effective October 1, 1980 in the area indicated on the plat. If you have any questions concerning this matter please contact me in Revenue Accounting Division, P. 0. Box 13528, Austin, Texas, 78711, or call area code 512/475-2414 or Texas toll free 1/800/252-5555, Ext. 144. Very truly yours,, `. 5�4A4 Robert L. Daniels Revenue Accounting Division RLD/cd e If D AUG , ��sao an equal opportunity employer ii'G!I NOTICE OF ADDED AGENDA ITEM NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF AN ITEM TO BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS ON AUGUST 9, 1979. ITEM TO BE CONSIDERED: �IqO6 -1 I 16-A Consider an ordinance annexing a tract of �� land to the City of Lubbock, generally located between Indiana Avenue and University Avenue, from 98th Street to 114th Street. IT IS AN URGENT PUBLIC NECESSITY THAT THIS MATTER BE CONSIDERED ON THIS DATE IN THE INTEREST OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above NOTICE OF ADDED AGENDA ITEM was posted on the bulletin board at City Hall Tuesday, August 7, 1979 at 12 Noon. (Serl ) LYN City Secretary -Treasurer P. O. Box 6687 Lubbock, Texas 79413 August 71 1979 Mr. Larry J. Cunningham City Manager City of Lubbock P. O. Box 2000 Lubbock, Texas 79408 Re: Annexation request by Leroy Elmore and Norton Baker of the South -Half of Sections 19 and 20, Block E-2, Lubbock County, Texas. Dear Mr. Cunningham: On April 10, 1978 Leroy Elmore and myself, owners of the above des- cribed property, requested that such property be annexed to the City of Lubbock as soon as possible. The annexation request was approved unanimously by the Planning and Zoning Department. Moreover, on July 26, 1979, the City Council held a public hearing on this annexation request. At this City Council meeting five people spoke in favor of the annexation and there was no opposition at this meeting. We respectfully request that the City Council consider an ordinance annexing this property at its regular City Council meeting on August 9, 1979. We feel that the consideration by the Council is urgent because of the entire time that we have been working on the annexation. Every week that this annexation can be expedited is very necessary. Thank you very much for your help and consideration in this matter, as it is very urgent from our standpoint. We want to compliment you on the fine job you are doing as City Manager. We realize the pressure that you and the Council work under every day and we appre- ciate your consideration. Very truly yours, LEROY ELMORE and NORTON BAKER By A� AAW Norton Baker cc: Mayor Dirk West City Council Members: Ms. Carolyn Jordan Mr. Bill McAlister Mr. M. J. Aderton Mr. Alan Henry y y -74 �'r_14 -0 Na►1�x�Nh1`�" Q��odO�d- p7 l00, �mavu 'l J L _Ii196 V 'ib .Ili6 �is eHz6 — � Cn a f• '15 PS06 I C �{ M106 3LR l� M9v� H469 F i199 y� t s sa • kite �e m rw m w mil®ins ti • i Yittlll Y ills j um \ TO OOOt '^9I Ft1119� C2 U � wfti � � i1M91 FILED AND RECORDED OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS Kelly Pinion County Clerk Lubbock County TEXAS 03/10/2022 ll:15 AM FEE: $146.00 2022 11835