HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 165 - Addendum To Agreement - ATC - Lease Management, Transit Programs - 05/24/1979Z � DGV:hw RESO #165 - 5/24/79
-w
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and
directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock an Addendum to
a Lease Management Agreement executed between American Transit Corporation
and the City of Lubbock November 18, 1976, attached herewith which shall be
spread upon the minutes of the Council and as spread upon the minutes of this
Council shall constitute and be a part of this Resolution as if fully copied
herein in detail.
Passed by the City Council this 24th day of May ,1979.
bft%#T I
DIRK WEST, MAYOR
ATTEST:
elyn Gaf ga,' City Se r -Treasurer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
d r
Donald G.'Vandiver, First Asst. City'Attorney
P P
DENZEL FE:1101YULL, Dir, ctor, Public Services
TIED TO KESO #165 - 5/24/79
ADDENDUM
This Addendum made this 24th day of May , 1979, by and
through the Lubbock Transit Division of American Transit Corporation, acting by
and through its President, hereinafter called the "Contractor", and the City of
Lubbock, County of Lubbock, Texas, hereinafter called the "City";
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, on November 18, 1976, an agreement was entered into by and be-
tween the above mentioned parties, which agreement provided for services re-
lative to the City's transit programs, and;
WHEREAS, the contractor desires to clarify the aforesaid agreement to
further signify and reaffirm its intent under such agreement;
NOW THEREFORE: It is hereby agreed that the Lubbock Transit Division of
American Transit Corporation hereby acknowledges and agrees that it shall
comply with all terms and conditions of Urban Mass Transportation Adminis-
tration grant contracts between the United States and the City of Lubbock,
Texas, the City's applications, assurances, and all other applicable laws and
regulations which may apply in carrying out the accomplishment of the programs.
This Addendum, together with the Lease Management Agreement, contains all
the agreements of the parties.
In witness whereof, the Lubbock Transit Division of American Transit
Corporation and the City of Lubbock, Texas, have caused these presents to be
executed this 24th day of May , 1979.
LUBBOCK DIVISION OF
AMERICAN TRANSIT CORPORATION
President
CITY OF LUBBOCK
?)*_bApfw�_
DI WEST, MAYOR
ATTEST:
4yn(vGaffga, City Secret y- r urer
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
ad h. g% -
n Wilson, Transit Coordinator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Donald G. Vandiver, First Asst.
City Attorney
CITY OF LUBBOCK
MEMO
TO: Larry J. Cunningham, City Manager
FROM: Denzel Percifull, Director of Public Services May 21, 1979
SUBJECT: Committee Recommendation on Transit Management Firm Proposals
Following your instructions, a committee comprised of Jim Blagg, Sterling
Miller, Jim Bertram, John Wilson and myself carefully reviewed the proposals
submitted by ATC (current trans i t management firm), and ATE. The proposals
were reviewed in a similar fashion to the reviews done on architectural' pro-
posals (necessarily based on specific criteria relating to proper management
of transit,systems).
Criteria used in reviewing and rating the two (2) proposals were personnel
qualifications (experience and background, resource personnel available, general
personnel experience); the experience of the firm (being with local municipalities,
effectiveness of management of current properties, current properties under
contract, planning support, knowledge UMTA requirements); and methodology (under-
standing of concept of job to be performed, willingness to work with Transit
Department, proposal compliance with set criteria for operation, and plan of
approach). Based on this rating outline, the five members of the committee
rated ATE at 94.43, and ATC at 77.33•
The committee feels ATE best fits the City's needs because they are offering
on-site budgeting the financial accounting, whereas ATC is presently using and
proposing this function to continue to be done in St. Louis. The proposal sub-
mitted by ATE was definitely more positive and oriented toward making the
transit system successful (meeting the demand at the lowest possible cost)
rather than just providing management. ATE with their proposal (one man manage-
ment) would provide the City with the capability to be in the position to make
an easy transition into the complete management of the transit system, were
the Council to decide in the future that this route would be in the best interests
of the City.
Besides the very positive approach of ATE's entire proposal, a representative
of ATE visited Lubbock and assessed the present system of operation. As a
result of this visit, ATE made the decision that one (1) top quality transit
manager, with the necessary financial and clerical support as well as the support
which ATE would provide, could perform the work of management of the transit
system. The representative based this decision on his feeling that'John Wilson
and the Transit staff were doing much of the work which the existing management
firm should be doing.
f
r s Larry J. Cunningham, City Manager
May 21, 1979
Page 2
The committee also feels that with the Transit System potentially undergoing
changes in citizen attitude, etc., the ATE proposal, with their large, home
office planning staff, as well as a permanent office in Washington D.C., would
be in a position to provide much additional expertise in the necessary dealings
with UMTA. In addition, there are seven (7) present ATE properties that are
involved in a new facility construction project very similar to what the City
plans with respect to the acquired Ford Building northeast of City Hall. ATE
also has six (fl other properites that have received grant approval concern-
ing the design stage of new facilities.
Staff contacts with properties managed by ATE have brought many positive state-
ments by the cities contacted. These contacts have definitely impressed the
committee as to explaining why ATE is the only transit management firm that is
steadily increasing the number of properties they manage. The committee you
appointed definitely believes that the additional $2,300 amount to contract with
ATE versus ATC, would be extremely worth while, in that we feel the firm can
provide more management, planning, and research expertise.
/icDenzel"PercifulDirector of Pub Services
DP/cr
E
L
N
W
co
ao
O
L!1
m
Co
--
o
4
•
ra
d
fJl
.— u
u
M
O
4).2
c
c
Q
M
M
co
O
•LL
O--
O
F -
N
0
s
O
a)i
41
~
3
ad
X
0
-
•L
a
w
�
�
V
w
Q
M
-�'I
C,
CD
Lrl
M
M
Ul
N
V
co
-T
-T
Q
N
M
t\
4-
•u
L
y
U1
O
Lr%
CL
C11
N
U1
n
W
F-
M
CO
�O
Q
M
O1
UN
U\
LnL[1
u
f�
N
C9
Q
M
%0
Z
H
m
U1
O
O
U\
t\
O
Ul
N
NN
-
W
cm
U\
M
00
Q
N
S
co
U-
N
f-
L
Z
a)
Lf1
Ln
w
++
O
Lf►
f�
M
W
1=
Cil
U\
N
fl.
O
Q
N
co
Q
E
Z
fp
L
41
L
~
Ca
N
Ln
in
w
(
Q
Q
M
-'r
C'N
H
L11
U1
U
F-
<
M
M
00
L
d
- I
cn
a
M
Ln
a%
E
L
N
W
c
O
-
o
4
ra
d
fJl
.— u
u
o
4).2
c
•L
•LL
O--
O
F -
N m
0
s
O
a)i
41
~
4J
ad
X
0
-
•L
a
w
V