Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolution - 2020-R0187 - Adopting the Updated Downtown Master Plan
Resolution No. 2020-RO187 Item No. 8.3 June 9, 2020 RESOLUTION f=3ava0W- 61IL►►IN0111ra0 10]01:1MEW MwasimRI11 0141:4 THAT the Updated Downtown Master flan approved and adopted by the Central Business District Tax Increment Financing 1Wrivestmcnt Zone (CBDTIF) Board of Directors at its regularly scheduled meeting on January 15, 2020 is hereby approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lubbock. Silid plan update is attached hereto and incorporated in this Resolution as if fully scat forth Herein and shall be included in the minutes ofthe Council. Passed by the City Council on--- — - June 9 DANIEL M. POPE, MAYOR ATTEST: d,u, , )� Rebec •a Garza, City Sec °tar Al' OVED AS TO COT", CAL GffY�fY�.� Brianna Gerardi, Business De'v-._IopnAnt Director APPKOVED AS TO DORM: K Ili I.eisure, Assistant City Attorney C'cdu�sllHcs �'Ip��n�rslnAdc�pticsnl)vwnlu�rnhi}'lpJ;itr 11�.I�.Zl1 III 1 AM A — DIl 952 Sol] 3 R ® 29E3 -1-6 Him __ is 47 El 3 El 300 • r t_= H 33 fl 9 H 213 f _ - _ f Jf K I low L� 1:7A LORM POW ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CITY OF LUBBOCK Mayor Dan Pope Mayor Pro Tern Jeff Griffith Councilman Juan A Chadis Councilwoman Shelia Patterson Harris Councilman Steve Massengale Councilman Randy Christian Councilwoman Latrelle Joy City Manager Jarrett Atkinson CBD TIF BOARD Robert Taylor, Chair Jeff Dane, Vice Chair David Alderson Dan Williams Kade Wilcox C. Brett McDowell Suzanne Blake Jason Coleman Honorable Curtis Parrish DOWNTOWN MASTER DEVELOPER Delbert McDougal Marc McDougal Mont McClendon Tyler McDougal 1r� City of Ubbock iEMAS PARTICIPANTS Robert Taylor David Alderson Dan Williams Kade Wilcox John Osborne Jorge Quirino Mayor Dan Pope Mayor Pro Tern Jeff Griffith Councilwoman Latrelle Joy City Manager Jarrett Atkinson Assistant City Manager Brooke Witcher Assistant City Manager Jesica McEachern Marc McDougal Mont McClendon Tyler McDougal Brianna Gerardi Bryan Isham Kristen Sager Ivan Gonzalez Steve O'Neal Wood Franklin Mike Keenum Bridget Faulkenberry Nicholas Bergfeld Larry Simmons CONSULTANT TEAM OVERLAND PARTNERS WGI TBG PARTNERS SEVENTH GENERATION DESIGN LANDWISE GABRIEL'S HORN TOWN BUILDERS HUGO REED & ASSOCIATES, INC. A special thank you to Downtown business owners and non-profit organizations, members of the community, and other stakeholders who provided meaningful input to guide this work. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PURPOSE............................................................................................2 VISION.................................................................................................4 KEY ZONES BROADWAY.........................................................................................8 ARTS DISTRICT.................................................................................16 DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD........................................................20 MASTER PLAN FRAMEWORK PHASING THE MASTER PLAN.........................................................26 UTILITIES + INFRASTRUCTURE......................................................30 DOWNTOWN STREET SECTIONS.....................................................31 PARKING + TRANSIT........................................................................32 CONNECTIVITY + ACCESSIBILITY....................................................33 PROPOSED PLAN FOR BRICK STREETS.........................................34 PARKING APPROACH.......................................................................36 PARKING RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................37 PARKING PLAN COMPONENTS.......................................................38 PARKS +OPEN SPACE DOWNTOWN PARKS + OPEN SPACE NETWORK ............................42 PLACEMAKING ELEMENTS.............................................................45 NEW CIVIC PLAZA............................................................................46 STREETSCAPES B ROADWAY....................................................................................... 50 AVENUEJ..........................................................................................54 AVENUEK.........................................................................................56 TEXAS AVENUE.................................................................................58 BUDDY HOLLY...................................................................................60 AVENUEQ.........................................................................................62 HISTORIC RESOURCES HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY......................................................71 RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................76 OPTIONS FOR PURSUING AN HISTORIC DISTRICT ........................77 IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................83 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS PLANS.........................................................87 MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX....................................88 iqLLL __ '•�� a _ .fir f illb e llL iAll r-� -- r it 9L "•1 r {ow •. IL PI : 71 .. k VIEW OF DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK, TOWARDS SOUTHEAST, PHOTO CREDIT: PRIMITIVE SOCIAL/TONY PHAN INTRODUCTION . • "We for a ,ftto re -ate n idrentity for downto U Jb t nnecrv?ty -�p F V Incentivize businesses to in'g manag en tratlegy" Orr I m prove C eed w�lkability, tiva , and connectivity brantbowntown. We have too many cars." 4ro r'e downtown" —� "More trees!" f.J' e a main civic gathering space..`� f '� Extend v_ "Downtown needs more density with a variety of housing types'_.-,- "Make4,h�e development process-,-, A, i I & Trolley" rx i C� f n rrn skin g Minimums " PURPOSE The Downtown Master Plan Update builds upon previous plans for the revitalization of Downtown Lubbock including the 2008 Revitalization Action Plan, Imagine Lubbock Together, and the AIA Sustainable Design Assessment Team Report by bringing forth ideas and recommendations still relevant today. While the Master Plan Update absorbs familiar concepts from those plans, today's plan takes a different approach to the revitalization of Downtown. With the objective of making the city "development ready", the Master Plan focuses on catalyzing transformation through investing in the public realm, upgrading utilities and infrastructure to support ongoing development, and formalizing a strategy for shared parking that unlocks development potential for housing growth and other uses to energize the city. This document outlines a phased approach to implementation with the goal of achieving impact through actionable steps to reach and surpass a tipping point in revitalization. Towards that end, the Master Plan Update focuses specifically on: • DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL • UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE • TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND CONNECTIVITY • PARKING MANAGEMENT • PARKS + OPEN SPACE • STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS • HISTORIC RESOURCES The Master Plan Update is also intended to impact the frameworks that regulate the built environment of Downtown including the Design Standards for the Central Business District, the Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards, and zoning ordinances for the CBD by bringing them into alignment with the Master Plan Vision. Finally, the Master Plan Update is expected to influence the forthcoming Unified Development Code and Downtown Form -Based Code by recommending changes to existing regulations and proposing new tools to advance Downtown towards becoming a more walkable urban environment such as relaxing parking requirements, encouraging a mix of uses, and setting in motion standards of care for existing buildings - all in the interest of stimulating growth and vitality in Downtown Lubbock. Create a task -force that takes a leadership role in carrying out revitalization efforts. PEOPLE PROCESS Customize regulatory tools to encourage desired development. PLACE Focus investment with a targeted approach to maximize impact. The Implementation Matrix at the end of the document describes key recommendations through the lenses of People -Focused Initiatives, Process -Focused Initiatives, and Place -Based Initiatives. It is intended to serve as a road map for prioritizing goals and to underline the importance of coordination and collaboration needed to implement the Master Plan Update. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 3 � l .-• � Wit. "+- � . �' s - � 3 0» I 1� I J o A lop IF � 4 W a J 5 q4 k Ic �°r Sit a r • f£ D VISION Create an open space network with a new heart. The Vision is to reposition Downtown as the urban center of Lubbock with Broadway reawakened as a dynamic spine that connects Texas Tech to the Canyon Lakes. The desired outcome of the Master Plan Update is to accelerate Downtown revitalization by focusing energy and investment to specific areas of the city that build upon the strengths of existing assets and leverage the energy building around current catalysts such as the Pioneer Hotel and Buddy Holly Hall. The Master Plan Framework is structured around strengthening the three "key zones" of Broadway, Arts, and the Depot Districts with infill development, targeted infrastructure upgrades, and open space enhancements to stimulate growth outward. A central component to the Framework is a new civic park to bring more people to Downtown Lubbock - creating a central gathering space at the heart of the city. BROADWAY Build on the momentum of current catalysts. °y BROADWAY � J C J O 00 2 Strengthen Broadway and reinforce key districts. fill in the block i .24 activate streets -° {-� for people; create a civic heart Ak DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 5 F A1 yg n"• NS � � aT �� 4=Y re - �t i � ai•, s :.�.. nr. e s=, W A' W04�. CL �, a _, O �. • j/A; _' ' � y IV- ' �► 0 r a a y; : kit; °' . y"''� r ` R `` �• m yy No, WRIf x -L ;. .. �..• r � l,�i .�' T 7T'j{�1 �*'� �• ', a "'x'✓: f � if • � .�L�� c^.i' \ +r'A IN Li '$ Y . f r. ..:: O , Y i ■ .1 l y LAir LU OFLu [ ^,, � . L uj sts AW Lu Ln LU uj Lu �,q�, y/yam•- A ••� -'t' .. �• �, � /�� r I I � .�, 1 ,�. .�' a r ''.elle � `✓ � � ... �.'g-✓ .fit '• �ry Z' ��.•.''r''�' 7 Ark W •5 c['• % .,�s,}':y./� :t�.•. cc LLJ CZb Ai-4U) ''•. ! W `� ... t .. 1.3 '.Y•' �, , NW 44 r ; � f JAI r , '_ i• 'eaJ; � \''.. ,{ '.i5• 11 a Q .. - � 1 � �... .. , W r. r ' WA, 1tl ,} I e � 1: �. � � v 1 �] F :' '�� � i � F. R� r J (� .r��,�e .�, �•.. �• " ` {� o ca 4 ;. '• +� V �= ,:ems, .. � , . �OVV 3 i 1 rr,/.-'. Yi. � ���r' �p1' '.•�. • - aT• '� Via' � is ' - ��'��XA\\ r � .iRn '< P, a .�P1 �, �' '.��•. �� r.,` �:5'� !� •i� .ti '�+ �'� ::.3 � .l b v `y����.. �.. °�,- �••.., is KEY ZONES DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE r �,; � �° �` 1. t ' . ` �6 �^ :.� �� ��/v; e �� � �+► ell10 cc Ljj Ilk JJJ... { �I r;l � ,r v ' _i • l -'� N ; ��Fa� (. � � � �\''. — _ __ / � , ' :, a� , � �i `;i � � - • ,� , r ff O t.,N LLJ CO ca LU � �'� e �I Jam• A � e � � ii\ 1 ;•1 ,s. \ --- Y - �'.� f i.> it ,� /� , a + 4 L4f m ., W AA p 1 • WK r t s < SFr 'lR' '� ,r?/ ' '.�.f ''�'. .\'f. �' ` ./r•4 i }qti 'r cc P � r ° „� , , � a ,'fit 0. y 4, -(CZb , �40 1p 11 Aq va In �d, ' A _ J• ill` �', �, r� b� � _ � ` �� ��� �� `I PF � �� �o�. � .a�� /, ��A � a°oQ a �s ✓ �, ,1/9 1 ,� 'L� a �S SAS . •1 R �' i �, t ,, , w S_ Kc Z J�,r, �,: , •=L Ivy At y fir t �;1 � , R:: , N �r�} I �' •�`.�.! / •{�. . / y.� '�,. �: �. .\\ ,, � k. � 00� BROADWAY KEY ZONE OBSERVATIONS: BROADWAY STRENGTHS: • Broadway as connector to Texas Tech and Canyon Lakes area • Energy from the Pioneer Hotel, The Coffee Shop & The West Table • Historic buildings (Pioneer, Kress, old Post Office) • Forthcoming energy from Cotton Court Hotel • Walking distance to Civic Center/ Buddy Holly Hall/ Citizen's Tower • Recent and forthcoming housing (Courthouse + Jailhouse Lofts, graduate student housing, NTS renovation) • First United Methodist Church • County Courthouse Lawn and Gazebo CHALLENGES: • Discontinuous street fabric • High degree of vacancy mid -district • Lack of neighborhood -centric services • Need for district parking OPPORTUNITIES: • Reconstruct Broadway as a demonstration "hybrid street" • Redevelop LP&L/ City owned parcel • Relocate/ Redevelop Citibus Transfer Center • Infill development (large and small scale) LEGEND: 0 PROPOSED CIVIC PARK/ PLAZA 0 PROPOSED MIXED USE (HOUSING, RETAIL) 0 PROPOSED GROCERY STORE 0 PROPOSED SMALL SCALE RETAIL © RENOVATED STREETSCAPE 0 PROPOSED FOOD TRUCK PLAZA 0 ACTIVATED OPEN SPACE 0 CAFE SEATING 0 LANDSCAPE BUFFER 0 IMPROVED FACADE 9TH STREET LOTH STREET I/ CC �:1), C 0 Ll J w w > > z z w w Q Q STREET ------ I I, I I I I. BROADWAY IL J I �0 :I I I 13TH STREET — — — — — J T-1 14TH STREET 15TH STREET O C 0 0C w z NMI Z w Q X w H w Q w Y U 0 0 DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 9 LL , 1 �. i N N �. f. LLI 000 V Lj O O C3 co L6 L WLL-N�N��T LL a �. �. Q / W LJJ ti to w rQ a p \' _ F L1J O sabi / it � ♦\L - �;,�y, ® y'� .^:I //Air. , v y� �i� •y ,1 l It y� �� � �i _�, �..,� � !' - F � �• j _ ��+ � it -� .k;,� J �t , + j ' T :RJ / / � t' _ _ `� ♦ .,.may' �\ � ,[JVVr Off �, � 117=kg `1` •/f Y S}`� J� '1r ! � /� � ., y .V� ��`/.k � r". WIL !'Q `, r ,rs ✓v LU Fy O W vA 1, , ,iAl, 1 �� � �.. ,�P� � fir. n�raA � � i ���`ai i ��' d@e '^• - �� its mv 17 'Y j BROADWAY CHALLENGE: GROUND FLOOR VACANCY Nearly 20% of Downtown's ground floor capacity is vacant space which is a challenge to the economic and social vitality of Lubbock's CBD. (Healthy downtown's have less than 5% storefront vacancy.) BROADWAY OPPORTUNITY: STRATEGIC INFILL 27% of Downtown's vacancy is concentrated at Broadway and Avenue J. Revitalizing this key corner will have a greater impact than trying to create a center of activity around the Courthouse as previous plans have proposed. or � CURRENT VACANT ❑ ❑ 4 ❑� RETAIL SPACE CURRENT UNMET ❑ RETAIL DEMAND (ALL CATEGORIES) ❑ j l e 27% of all vacancies �68,600 SF � El El■no ❑ 1 111 1 III SF ❑ .■®B ■ O U C L� ❑2 CURRENT VACANCY AND UNMET DEMAND I SOURCE: LAN DWISE ADAPTIVE REUSE WITH INFILL I SOURCE: DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS `•` D ,.:. % , 9TH STREET; •ti Y d = --- � Y BROADWAY Y r 1 1 NRETAIL rLLj - z W ... .. -4 > ¢ 1� � Z:1177�R J J W ¢ 2 * N } m 1 I '`��,y�„'."• a fi it BROADWAY � W� � �I W , cnr. W • i- ` z f 1 ,V 11 � Y'l x I ` JAIL HOUSE LOFTS- � W 1 '+ COURT I : " • it HOUSE „LOFTS ICI. Ell! - = Lam.-�.�'i' I li _13TH STREET - yl 1, � _- �..� -- . ;' �- � '� � I�„ _:.�• 4 � '� ''�' LEGEND: r . ° 'I ■ RETAIL/ FOOD + BEVERAGE i '' �� x •�'� COMMERCIAL 14TH STREET -- - r = - OPEN SPACE ok e FACADE IMPROVEMENTS ,4 LANDSCAPE BUFFER ^ { e: } _ n MAJOR CORRIDORS 15TH STREET PUBLIC ART/ MURALS ' vv ^•r CONTRIBUTIN G/ POTENTIALLY CONTRIBUTING�.16 4. STRUCTURE urrur —49'•'-'t. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 11 S°.. d°w;s* �+ 4;sr i a fyy 3„ '�' w� s_. era - •�+c,-�. � : ^ ;�■ i _ . � - ,S • V`• _ - - _ '�ab''f-- --ice' - _nM' f �, _ :-�'-� - _.. -- r{ r �i. F•"E��; �-`1 �`- Y r -_ eJ'1e`" - •�,Y e� ey, �1r .` ?g- -1•. BROADWAY y... {� Or; - ��'.•. r, K:r� _ - .. �.. � :. �� `- _ . �s- ..err _.� . �., � ._ � 1 � - �� � fi i-p � ■ ���.':c. --� ::..' f.� -', .`2-'� - ,�i '%� .. . - - xt-z J'r :.'��• it R R r'al `R �r it `R" I - _ '� ��PS _. - ':°{-i' •�� .. .. j "'ti. .. _ "'iffy kYy R�� �� A �., .�.. ,r -� ` '•� ' � •.sr• . ^�' {,.-��`�Y° `"!�.;'. s � •-,i�� : Ise "c� _ 'INI + - .�. l��R.�o a � � sic -P e • :,� ..�_^ Y 's� �.�;r� `y' -__ � s � ■ ' - BUDDY HOLLY R- ti FOOD HALL •._. .:cr.`- - ,:»�;. -_ !,.y n. .sae.. R;.j.F. �:✓'. .� - �sr.. ilk - am. p "1 W 1' 1 TEXAS AVE _ r _•� r (j + 141,1* tip IL 1, NON -'NON T HQ. �%-. �, �� ..��i 'I• ■ _ °�' -.�5`rR 5• `~ -r:yv' ._ _ �i"--�_t_• .�If � - .c..: -�• �' � �.� � - Y 1 ■ - . - � ���_- / q 'lam � �y� • _:: x�' -' - MUSICIAN LOFTS' .s+ -r- �!. • � -�e� .��r �; 4 .. �, r-sue_ :P- F � '� .• - �f � . ':� - ..'''- ;•:�� Tom. i� Y J -•��, w I-' --- f � i� _,a �� . � -x z • RECORDING STUDIO Rr - t POCKETPARK �� . DEPOT ALLEY --__ � _+ 16TH STREET . ry 4 *. {. ^■ >i Poll " - .�•��� .. - � ; -t • "z. ..�- ..� '. x';•_. +� �_. ;;''fir r- �: s f. CACTUS THEATER _ -- CRICKETS TORNADO GALLERY INCUBATOR OFFICE BUDDY HOLLY CENTER - f y�./ .. . • _ �}yy� ���.'� k ;sue r�';�i '"�..;.a V �' - ;��` _ .. .-�G+J-�• =�``'�' � �� r to ys, - S'i;: i7 - � 19TH STREET' 1 Via. f vF DEPOT DISTRICT KEY ZONE OBSERVATIONS: DEPOT DISTRICT STRENGTHS: • Identity as a downtown destination for bars/ restaurants/ entertainment/ shops • Cultural anchor of Buddy Holly Center • Buddy and Maria Elena Holly Plaza • Cactus Theater • Tornado Gallery and Alley • The Garden • Existing energy from local retail/ F&B/ entertainment • Farmer's Market • FFAT trolley • Interesting warehouse building stock CHALLENGES: • Discontinuous street fabric • High degree of vacancy mid -district • Concentrated governmental uses near Broadway • Lack of daytime energy/ activity • Need for district parking OPPORTUNITIES: • Reconstruct Buddy Holly streetscape (Texas and Crickets at later phases) • Activate Buddy and Maria Elena Holly Plaza year round • Adaptive reuse/ infill development (retail, housing, creative office space) • Mark gateway at 19th Street LEGEND: 0 ACTIVATED PARK/ OPEN SPACE 0 NEW F&B/ LOCAL RETAIL/ LOFTS 0 NON-PROFIT HQ 0 RENOVATED STREETSCAPE © CREATIVE OFFICE 0 FOOD TRUCK PLAZA 0 GATEWAY 0 MIXED USE (HOUSING, RETAIL, DISTRICT PARKING) 0 LANDSCAPE BUFFER 0 IMPROVED FACADE Uj w LLJ w Z¢f J o J - - - - - - - ¢ w N o❑❑14 z: >¢ 0 o 0 ❑❑ �00 000 000 0 0 000 000 000 BROADWAY 0 0 0 000 0 0 ❑00 ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ El D 13TH STREET o Ll — 14TH STREET .- 15TH STR EETI f--- I ❑ I ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ 16TH CTRFFT I ET I I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . ____ - -.W ' ©I I Q © I I o� 0 0 0 ( I ❑ El ❑ ❑ I I 0 17TH STREET j 0 ❑❑ ❑ I ❑ ❑ I ❑ � I ❑ I I u8TH STREET � i ❑ O �-•-•- I O 19TH STREET Ho ❑ ❑ Q f DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 13 - .a.e '�- _� �• „Y mr,�. �r'S°.. ` dw. �:sr'.� ,' _ ... . (i'T .fir+ .. 4;sr _ _ _ __ i__ a -l'�` - ;.fy x jo BROADWAY low •'f:' '' .. - ,;ti:..at.,,� i• s f�' f; s Ti MIXED USE, _ y �. r ��___ Y: �: _ WRAP ............ : ., .... { AP .. w .:. / �r y �. a d :► `- PARKING _ ,� _ BUDDY HOLLY - - f t• , 44 i At" -to - - ev - .._. -TEXAS it _ 7� mod: E MIXED USE LOFTS'00,. 1 - �_ -_ ,- - t 16TH STREET �. �. z-.... f. _ !_ 4 �i.! .�. - .r _�'y - =army,• - .1 el7W4*.,F.� •-.3 - - _ _ %• ,3. _ -? -�,,,,_ r i-__�-------- CRICKETS - tom/ ADAPTIVE; DEPOT DISTRICT - REUSE/ .....'..:.�:f ............. ,,k_ PROPOSED PROGRAM: f S �• � CREATIVE MIXED USE: 190,000 GSF OFFICE � < - RETAIL: 75,000 GSF HOUSING: 150 UNITS _711-l' alr W 19TH STREET do DEPOT DISTRICT CHALLENGE: SPACE FOR GROWING EMPLOYMENT SECTORS 10% of all employees in Lubbockwork Downtown. Top employment sectors include educational and professional services, banking, and public administration. Growing industries include management of companies and enterprises including start-ups and professional services. Office space for these growing industries presents a challenge. Formalized office space is in short supply in Downtown, much of which is City owned. OPPORTUNITY: CO -WORKING + CREATIVE OFFICE SPACE Much of this growth could be accommodated within existing building stock through adaptive reuse and potentially leveraging Historic Tax Credits. The Depot District illuminates an opportunity for converted warehouse space into more creative office. With this adaptive reuse, downtown may maintain its momentum as one of the top places for employers in the city. ADAPTIVE REUSE OF FORMER PLUMBING WAREHOUSE BUILDING I SOURCE: OVERLAND it --- !� 14TH STREET �l 15TH STREET r"� I 6r -�•. i 1 M. MAD. HATTER GAMES —. �' `�, fl- Irk : ,� _^ r-_-��"-rJ�._e�"!. ,s ,:, � •�`t 16TH STREET .�, 1 y MCPHE77 RSBN - 10EDARS 117TH STREET LEGEND: IUXTAPCSH & j '�+a, ARRBw I I ■ RETAIL/ FOOD + BEVERAGE L T A _11 +i y' _ a a „• Lt, E, COMMERCIAL i =�`< <, = oM M rM I + I F _ � ate_ # '` Irwrk I ■ ��+ �• d OPEN SPACE ~ +a 18TH STREET i.�r..,�•.�� ; A rF�-?s� 'ILA,. e FACADE IMPROVEMENTS 1'4 EI �'" L Buoors auoov • •� ��, _• TRIPLET MARIA ELENA XBLLY + a, �, + -t_i $ 4, CHOPHOUSE XBLLY PLAZA CENTER } II ''•_ �, LANDSCAPE BUFFER •r,`� " _ _ R 1�w 4 } + ' - GALLALERY T' ` •L TBRNABB U MAJOR CORRIDORS ��_ri F �S4 F � •�µ�16_. •� GALLERY L 19TH STREET PUBLIC ART/ MURALS CONTRIBUTING/ POTENTIALLY CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE 1 •ti DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 15 ` h... •�..:... } - LHUCA ARTIST LIVE/ WORK " ak.GALLE `4� `a �• `�' r � s k e .j �� ".4 Ilk CASP •Y _ y � x. N.j 04 V. - 1 4 � _ RAIL SPUR PARKic. Y oi w i 4W- - - tor a w g cap 00 R. may, frrml " ',rr_ A D _ ISTRICT GARAGE - - :^-- y MULTI -FAMILY RTS SUPPORT > 4b 4. ' . MAKER SPACEf jo C _�':: ' �,. ���°°�"• �' S�3C � _ yr. r►_. may;. � - � ` -� �.s �:� . '� •" �"`- � ��' � � � ''F �'� { • / v r� �; � ��: ��� .ate, "�, ; : •�:;.� :_ _ F.�. •_ X - AV_E N U E J . ..:K.. �' � '� �' � •g; �`�- -� `J% a , i fry%I n AVENUE K BROADWAY Yy .. .` � ate• \, ib� � ,•*� `L ell pe ml Wv fs\c' .r tin_ ARTS DISTRICT _KEY ZONE OBSERVATIONS: ARTS DISTRICT STRENGTHS: • Identity as a center for the Arts in Lubbock • LHUCA CASP • Buddy Holly Hall • Existing energy from FFAT • FFAT trolley • Two Docs Brewing • Forthcoming Rail Spur Park • Civic Center as major draw • New Civic Center Hotel • High quantity of contributing and potentially contributing building stock (interesting warehouse buildings) CHALLENGES: • Discontinuous street fabric • Vast, large scale spaces (disruption of original urban grid) • Existing active rail line creates barrier to the east • Marsha Sharp creates barrier to the north OPPORTUNITIES: • Expand housing options • Establish creative office/ maker space district that is synergistic with the Arts District • Redevelop Municipal Square/ create terminus to the Rail Spur Park with an anchor catalyst program • Redevelop current Citibus storage site (housing, district parking) LEGEND: O ACTIVATED PARK/ OPEN SPACE © NEW F&B/ LOCAL RETAIL © IMPROVED FACADE O RENOVATED STREETSCAPE © MIXED USE/ HOUSING 0 ART GALLERY/ CAFE O INNOVATION/ MAKER SPACE Q ARTS SUPPORT SPACE O HOUSING + PARKING POTENTIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (-7i 777 _._ Q . Q A MAC DAVIS LANE a�l~�l6��9�11 I � 1 I "I 0 I I I I I I : W, 1 I 1 - I 9TH STREET -- - 1 EL Q LOTH STREET I 0 I o � QQ� QQ�Qm MAIN STREET Q F'] o o o o o 0 000 000 0®® o00 0 0 00o e•eeee BROADWAY oo'r000 000000 000 0l�000a w w w _ �z QzE z QQ m DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 17 MAO- y - *ks IL bob- .. ... ....: HOUSING/ RAIL ' MIXED USE ilk ll� : SPUR WRAP/ F PARK = PARKING TEXAS AVE' ISCO-WORKING/ y t, x ..i .3•. ... - ..., ASP • " ..P'•' , _ - _ �..• =f_., ��::,;:, .. _ _ ` SPACE Aw 2•% ART HOTEL ........... ARTIST ! ......... ... LIVE/WORK _ _ L - •.� - - ;- �"'Er': p.006 .. - _ Ty"`y�-+�, '+ f1� 'Y •'r„zn ,� p! jrr jf ♦ _� 0- v. r �� w `►� =} BROADWAY STATION �, `}�� �.`�`�� ARTS DISTRICT V R ••••••••'" `' $` PROPOSED PROGRAM: S .1. 1 4: SPECIAL USE: 200,000 GSF RETAIL: 75,000 GSF !•:, . -i` HOUSING: 185 UNITS 1 y ' 4 1 ,� .r . sue' �^• �� � .'a„ .. .�. �5. i. - .. . a. _ f/` ARTS DISTRICT CHALLENGE: NEED FOR EXPANDED HOUSING CHOICES Housing has been identified as a priority for Downtown revitalization with needs spanning a range of housing types and price points. The precedent has been set for housing for artists -in - residence near LHUCA and CASP. With the forthcoming Rail Spur Park, there is an opportunity to expand upon this by including other supportive housing types in the Arts District to welcome a diversity of demographics. OPPORTUNITY: UNLOCK HOUSING FUNDING With a number of developable properties and potentially contributing buildings, the Arts District displays an opportunity to leverage multiple stacked sources of funding such as Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Historic Tax Credits, local improvement grants, on top of Downtown being within an Opportunity Zone. DOWNTOWN CAPTURES 2.5% DOWNTOWN CAPTURES 5% OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET Low Growth Scenario High Growth Scenario Annual 5-Year Annual 5-Year Multifamily - Rental 79 units 395 units 160 units 800 units Townhome - For -Sale 22 units 110 units 45 units 225 units Small Lot Single -Family 26 homes 130 homes 51 homes 255 homes RAIL SPUR PARK SITE ALLEY TRANSFORMATION I SOURCE: DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS n - �} •jam „�, MAC DAVIS LANE 9TH STREET AALLI LOTH STREET �.,. ie r -{ URBAN TECH .W MAIN STREET BROADWAY J Y w w w w f. a CI a. a, y , 8El t T. i_IL „mow» tjm AR S f 77 _ f} IATM e LEGEND: .� ,, �� ■ RETAIL/ FOOD + BEVERAGE ■ COMMERCIAL 64 ■ OPEN SPACE A 1 e FACADE IMPROVEMENTS rk.` ❑1 ` LANDSCAPE BUFFER UMAJOR CORRIDORS w :: � PUBLIC ART/ MURALS >LLJ .- w z < #! CONTRIBUTING/ LLJ*_*_. Q •,� �. POTENTIALLY CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE 3 DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 19 40.j4k�-O� � � ��.. .�•�... .,�... .��� .: '�� �.:� � , �'���... �'- . � � .g •F ��' �' i 1'�� . i� ip� .y: � t �•r� � .L. .'C . � �Y �1 • _•.r.. �r� F, ff av- 7-1 �' - y• .V. 'r ,� S,Jua„ GYM. r , CL 2 LLJ w". r� rA 11-4 4' r rY� L 4 Cc ;. to Af Z QC N. _Uj Z / �• , .. Y : � i fir'. _ f , '•� -_ �1 �^�` � x r : � � ' t - ` F�_ .ar�1_ �, 3!?, .� -=_ice •s%k �. ^� A ._ .rn -_ _'� : i � �' .'�' �, •- * ,��. W *� � 19,,h. v'If`' � � sou rCy`' {�• �' :`�i '•! .� $ -`•,. ti' .';{'�` � r' � � rye �. m -000" crft Bye, •fl :-�:3•. �. � �-- ti' ;.,' fie' •.a ;■ •�. �.L 711 LLJ LU i. •; O q �/'` ..g •7'.1 �41..'..r. � ,r'�ti is ^' v �•- .e� 04 s: : w W Z►� 'S. ;�� �y �� � it .�' '�T- - 1 • 3.• -n DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD _HOUSING CONCENTRATIONS: DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD PROPOSED APPROACH TO DENSITY: Y \ a 4 > >,. �' �, •pY • v� r e '_. � '81 ,��!.��- •.� L�� .� � �� "121 - R _\_ . !Ip ➢liljl ➢i➢p A V i'a 3J 1� - a i p �p J 90 07 Il • •] 1 :'I .. 'I3� �1 k �. A' ulj u ! ➢�' � � � � � _ __ _ _ :..,. �_ �..r� -Z�'�'- -^., p.ram^„ k.ZI :1 E� ] f1 :1 a a 7 � � � � j . :J.e.. ,] E - ��_77 pp_��y-��{ �- 9fl-•- = p� __— �� LI VEILUDRCMUL.TIPLE>c TOWNHOUSE ARD t3UNGALOWcOURTr oUPIEx tRIPLEx APARTMENTGDURT PETAGHEP 51NGLE-FAMILY FOURPLE)< �—� THE "MISSING MIDDLE" I SOURCE: OPTICOS in w I'm ■!� ■■E m — — �JRR'BAN U I CANTER UR$ CORE # BONE PRECEDENT EXAMLPE: URBAN TRANSECT ZONES C9 d O z m X Yd W W W W W W W W a z z z z z z z z a DENSITY DIAGRAM: DOWNTOWN NORTH/SOUTH STREETS a z a x x x x x x x DENSITY DIAGRAM: DOWNTOWN EAST/WEST STREETS LEGEND: DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY (LOW TO MEDIUM DENSITY) ■ "MISSING MIDDLE" HOUSING (MEDIUM DENSITY) ■ MIXED -USE MULTIFAMILY (HIGH DENSITY) mTRACES OF OLD NEIGHBORHOOD PATTERN POTENTIALLY CONTRIBUTING PROPERTY DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 21 �Y F f i'T � �� _� :sad i•,, �,,:, � - �I� b� i � ;.�"... diw W. Mtn l-Li.i x S Ll W r. > IN M LL to FF �: .• i• yr` � �� �' _ •i�� °r. i Lu r/ I r _ LLJ LLJ Lu 1 -.r, i''� a •� s i., ..► �;� % �•. s. !1i . - Kr12 s`:s ■ f1 n L 4 NZ AR a � RY , ' � _ . W' ` • y �� . . p :ram � ;,� ' ` 'T r y 9 ! 3' 1. 333111 .3 CD i. LLJ tn W I- p - �:r 1;• Y 4i j4C i , 11 L 3 ' a' LLJ f A. Af ¢..•., -. � _ iJ i - .ram �'_.— - r__ _ 9-. - L- __'N :L d _.. ��i s.-rt �� — — - .1 �•� DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD _PROPOSAL AND KEY OBSERVATIONS: DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD PROPOSED HOUSING TYPES: TOWNHOMES: 66 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS (AVG. 3,500 GSF UNITS) MULTI -FAMILY: 154 UNITS (AVG. 1,250 GSF) CHALLENGE: DOWNTOWN HOUSING SUPPLY Currently, only 1 % of the city's current population lives Downtown. Vibrant downtowns typically house a range of 5%-10% of the city's population. The Lubbock CBD currently shows a major deficit in housing. OPPORTUNITY: CREATE AN IDENTIFIABLE DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD There is an opportunity to grow housing capacity in Downtown. The demographics and residential market show growth potential in the condo/townhome type in the low and middle tiers of pricing. The growth of a residential community would spark further downtown development - however, additional retail offerings will be needed Downtown to support growth in the residential space. PROJECTED 5-YEAR DEMAND For Sale Rental LOW CAPTURE SCENARIO (DOWNTOWN CAPTURING 5% OF LUBBOCK'S HOUSING MARKET) For Sale Rental HIGH CAPTURE SCENARIO (DOWNTOWN CAPTURING 10% OF LUBBOCK'S HOUSING MARKET) Distribution of Home Price Rental Units 18 60 50 51 13 50 46 8 r 40 6 = w 30 c 0 0 0 20 13 o°° o°° o°° o°° 10 ■ 00 00 00 00° 00° ' 20-24 25-34 35-54 55+ O O O O O• Age Groups Source: Landwise 2019 Downtown Lubbock Market Analysis Multifamily - Rental A RANGE OF SUPPORTABLE HOUSING TYPES PRECEDENT MULTI -FAMILY UNIT Multifamily For -Sale (Townhome) f-�7 DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 23 � jK j j U7 I CIE DRIVE n'm 9 IDUY MASTER PLAN FRAMEWORK PHASING THE MASTER PLAN PHASE 1 (1-5 YEARS) A concentrated series of improvements focused on the Broadway corridor aim to catalyze redevelopment at the heart of downtown. Key opportunity PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: sites include the LP&L property and the current Citibus transfer center. A large park for central civic gatherings occurs on the vacant LP&L property, RETAIL: 45,000 GSF bringing both economic and social vitality to the city center. A potential COMMERCIAL: 155,000 GSF relocation of the transfer center provides redevelopment opportunity for a HOUSING: 139 UNITS food hall. Additional food and beverage sites are provided within 27,000 sf of vacancies along Broadway. Revitalized buildings, such as the Kress building and the JC Penney building breathe new life to the downtown and tell of Lubbock's history. PHASE 2 15-10 YEARS) Key corridor improvements are expanded from Broadway to Avenue J (the PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Arts District) and Buddy Holly Avenue (the Depot district), stitching a RETAIL: 205,000 GSF vibrant downtown. Housing for artists and musicians along these corridors COMMERCIAL: 196,400 GSF is accommodated for on currently vacant lots. Adaptive reuse opportunities are imagined in both districts. A maker space takes the place of the vacant HOUSING: 595 UNITS police headquarters. The many warehouses in the depot district are SPECIAL PROGRAMS: 200,000 GSF renovated for creative office space. PHASE 3 (10+ YEARS) The energy from the connected corridors catalyzes further development in the downtown and supports a "downtown neighborhood." Street improvements continue on ancillary corridors, unifying the streetscapes of downtown. Additional creative office spaces and multi -family projects are PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: built, as citizens embrace a downtown lifestyle. Innovative light industry RETAIL: 450,000 GSF is brought to the northeast, continuing to diversify downtown's program COMMERCIAL: 850,000 GSF offerings. HOUSING: 1,280 UNITS SPECIAL PROGRAMS: 200,000 GSF PHASE 1 TOTAL: 373,750 GSF PHASE 2 TOTAL: 1,345,150 GSF 26 PHASE 1 (1-5 YEARS) LEGEND: O BUDDY HOLLY HALL © CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL © GRADUATE STUDENT HOUSING O COTTON COURT HOTEL © METRO TOWER O PIONEER HOTEL O SOUTH PLAINS COMMUNITY COLLEGE Q CITIZEN'S TOWER + POLICE HQ O KRESS BUILDING 0 NEW RESTAURANT + BREWERY COURTHOUSE + JAILHOUSE LOFTS ® PROPOSED GROCERY STORE ® PROPOSED CIVIC PARK/ PLAZA PROPOSED FOOD TRUCK PLAZA ® POTENTIAL TRANSFER STATION (LOCATION TBD) 0 IMPROVED CONNECTION + ART INSTALLATION existing proposed 1 - f MARSHA SHARP L_ F 4TH STREET 5TH STREET k•w"HySrt 4pi f ,,: �un.� �.k �', Q�-- , MAC DAVIS LANE i 7TH STREET GLENNA GOJODACRE 9TH STREET a LOTH STREET: _, MAIN STREET ------- • CF 13TH STREETI -- I 14TH STREET • - Q 15TH STREET 16TH STREET , t y 17TH STREET 18TH STREET 7 W1. •- r 4 v fhh 9° '- mv�: fir• � � � � .� � �f. k 0.19TH STREET rr 7� JO LLI w w w w w w w _ w > > > > > > Q Z w Z w Z w Z Z Z w w w Z w X>-� U - a Q Q Q ¢ Q QLLI m 0 DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 27 PHASE 2 (5-10 YEARS) LEGEND: O BUDDY HOLLY HALL © CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL © GRADUATE STUDENT HOUSING O COTTON COURT HOTEL © METRO TOWER O PIONEER HOTEL O SOUTH PLAINS COMMUNITY COLLEGE Q CITIZEN'S TOWER + POLICE HQ O KRESS BUILDING 0 NEW RESTAURANT + BREWERY COURTHOUSE + JAI LHOUSE LOFTS ® PROPOSED GROCERY STORE ® PROPOSED CIVIC PARK/ PLAZA PROPOSED FOOD TRUCK PLAZA ® POTENTIAL TRANSFER STATION (LOCATION TBD) IMPROVED CONNECTION +ART INSTALLATION CREATIVE CO -WORKING/ INNOVATIVE MAKER SPACE 0 CREATIVE LIVE/WORK HOUSING CREATIVE OFFICE MIXED USE/ PARKING phase 1 phase 2 00, MARSHA SHARP ;tr • 7�' s - 4TH STREET - :I .I . •I 5TH STREET MAC DAVIS LANE - !fit Mli - 7TH STREET •,��I v iI v - \ GLENNA GOODACRE / a �� 9TH STREET - � r I r / alp 114 LOTH STREET / / I -_: MAIN STREET!. i - i i I ------I.. •- ,. - I, I -- I: Ali ; t I ------------ 1 BROADWAY ❑ 0 t� 13TH STREETI� :: `-J - •• -J v+yq,x 14TH STREET z=0— - 15TH STREET V _ -- isN i 16TH STREET777 � • • • • • / A 1 17TH STREET \ 18TH STREET ��' I •••••• •Y'••" / �.. 12i//��1 I I Ln I / 19TH STREET �/k� ------ }--- , ---- >— 0 cn w U m w w w w w w w ¢ = w w w w D D D CO } Y Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Q 0 U Z Z Z w W Ld w ui w Ld X — Ld w w Q Q Q Q Q Q Q H m 0 Q Q Q Q PHASE 3 (10+ YEARS) LEGEND: O BUDDY HOLLY HALL © CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL © GRADUATE STUDENT HOUSING O COTTON COURT HOTEL © METRO TOWER O PIONEER HOTEL O SOUTH PLAINS COMMUNITY COLLEGE Q CITIZEN'S TOWER + POLICE HQ O KRESS BUILDING NEW RESTAURANT + BREWERY COURTHOUSE + JAI LHOUSE LOFTS existing ® PROPOSED GROCERY STORE proposed ® PROPOSED CIVIC PARK/ PLAZA PROPOSED FOOD TRUCK PLAZA ® POTENTIAL TRANSFER STATION (LOCATION TBD) 0 IMPROVED CONNECTION + ART INSTALLATION phase 1 m CREATIVE CO -WORKING/ INNOVATIVE MAKER SPACE phase 2 0 CREATIVE LIVE/WORK HOUSING CREATIVE OFFICE MIXED USE/ PARKING phase 2 ® HOUSING phase 3 ® INNOVATIVE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ok �. n + MARSHA SHARP' 4TH STREET :I I �1 .I I - of 5TH STREET ►' MAC DAVIS LANE 7TH STREET P ti I � • I p GLENNA GOODACRE / '� /� I❑� i RFD ��❑O 9TH STREET / .,.• ..:.i....,, .. X LOTH (STREET / 0 ..... :::: . --- '::::... I - MAIN STREETI - ........ C........ ;.... ...;.... ---------- � I I: � �. H, I .I. C G L � •� I I I 111111 .... =10- ... - ........"""' i' ��' 0 _0 +•,�.�., _ _ - _ •_ .........----------- .. ........ BROADWAY - i ..� ...�....� i �. • m ❑❑::-91 m m ' m 13TH STREETI --- ...... - :- I� • � � •• .. III I �I� I �1� 14TH STREET =Q •••• �•°°• •i• ( 0 15TH STREET _ �� "'. "':::::' ::❑ --°I°°.~ / Ll 16TH STREET • :❑ ❑�:.-.:::❑❑❑❑• ........ I � ❑; .... - / :❑ ❑ — ❑ o ❑ 17TH STREET ®I °E El I I❑ ! ❑ ❑ 18TH STREET I � I : --- 19TH STREET , cn LL. ¢ w w w w w w w ¢ = w w w w w D D D N } Y D Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ¢ U Z Z Z Z w w w w w w w X — w w w w > > > > > > > w > > > > ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ m U ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 1®-1 DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 29 UTILITIES + INFRASTRUCTURE PROPOSED UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS + RELOCATIONS: WATER SANITARY SEWER ELECTRIC/ GAS TELECOM I'ul'ul4Q/_N111:1111Iz1944z1-4_►_III _I[$12100CE11_1*119 • Address reconnects with burying utilties • Replace outdated water lines for improved services to development along North/South Corridors • Downtown sewer project (CIP Phase I — 2020-2021) & (CIP Phase 11 — 2021-2023) • Conversion of electrical and telecom from overhead to underground at designated alleys • Confirmation of costs to convert underground and feasibility with LP&L • Identify potential corridors for utility relocations along main and secondary streets AVAILABLE FUNDING: Utility Infrastructure Improvements Duct System Improvements for Downtown Redevelopment Downtown Sanitary Sewer Replacement (2020-2023) FUTURE PHASED IMPLEMENTATION (3+YEARS): • Designate utility corridors for main and secondary streets • Future conversion of electrical and telecom from overhead • to underground at designated alleys • Alignment of potential projects to be reflected in downtown street sections AVAILABLE FUNDING: Duct System Improvements for Downtown Redevelopment Street Maintenance Program LEGEND: SANITARY SEWER (2020-2023) PROPOSED UTILITY LINES TO BURY (2020-2030) POTENTIAL UTILITY RELOCATION CORRIDOR - - 4TH STREET •,i, �- - - - --- - - - - - - t � �. ' 5TH STREET 7 n rm � MAC DAVIS LANE 1 7TH STREET �x Fi GLENNA GOODACRE;I 1- e. _ 19TH STREET '1 . —7PUDI — 1 MAINSTREEET A N -a "''�. * ,J=��� ♦a� "i'�.. k, $:_.�s, -- •••JJJJ "" ..v" j �a..,ss: FICA BROADWAY ee 13TH STREETkaw Y •�.'>. ZA 111\1* Al 14TH STREETtyq . .x 15TH STREET _ - i e..r 1 I .� " # n, r!7- irk LIJ Ld -- v'UJ „ r F �I • i3 ��. LL w LLJ sJ w LJ > >,:h . ' p _ k' all PROPOSED STREET UPGRADES: MAIN & SECONDARY CORRIDORS DRAINAGE & STORMWATER UPGRADES ONE-WAY STREETS ANGLED PARKING CONVERSION IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION (0-3 YEARS): • Overlap CIP improvements to maximize cost for utility, storm, and street upgrades for priority corridors: Broadway, Avenue J Buddy Holly Texas DOWNTOWN RTREET SECTIONR _ r _ �•—�^-'. —.. � _ ��•-�,�.-yam_- � t_ ,-j - - — - - - _7 4TH STREET < - fm, `� I • Improved stormwater lines and surface collection system for �y ' �'' _ 4 �r �4 j- Broadwayupgrades W , • • Designate utility corridors for main and secondary streets r"%V w•� _ ® �r • Focus improvements in conjunction with improved parking1 'ili �. rg 11 s strategy 1"� • Improved wayfinding signage and striping for bike lanes and 4`•` ' improved mobility+ , 1 • Update bike master plan for future routes through downtown ` w.; ; ► �' �_ corridors , 6''- 1 AVAILABLE FUNDING: E MAIN STREET Alib — • Stormwater Repairs or Replacement in Downtown i ,,Ina• • Utility Infrastructure Improvements • Duct system improvements BROADwAY N ..........................................t- .. h O • Street Maintenance Program --- - 77 13TH STREET FUTURE PHASED IMPLEMENTATION (3+YEARS): • Utilize street maintenance program to effectively and .� y s^ �. strategically rehabilitate secondary corridors in future years • Establish a strategy for street surface materials ,•.: 1 m= :- a !e i _. • Input from public/private stakeholders to promote development without jeopardizing safety 4 16TH STREET •_ - �� —r- AVAILABLE FUNDING:i,�- • Civic Center Parking Lot Repairs • Street Maintenance Programf' iy LEGEND: -- W t..� } � ..,tea � , -�•� �,. G J 1 MAIN CORRIDORS (2020-2023) GATEWAYS 19TH STREET.w l i.i+• i—� Ui S rrv.: a -O c_ t ... J Y j U,1 LJ LIJ SECONDARY CORRIDORS �, z i = z z z WAYFINDING z J xLLJ 71 m BIKE LANES WITH IMPROVED WAYFINDING 40 i DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 31 PARKING + TRANSIT PROPOSED STREET UPGRADES: MAIN & SECONDARY CORRIDORS ONE-WAY STREETS ANGLED PARKING CONVERSION IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION (0-3 YEARS): • Eliminate angle parking stalls and convert to parallel parking stalls. Eliminate angle parking in conjunction with safety improvements for multi -modal users. • Convert one-way streets to two-way streets for all of downtown • Focus improvements in conjunction with improved parking strategy • Perform study for potential elimination of one-way streets for safety and enhanced property access, improved circulation downtown, Civic Center accessibility, and surrounding courthouse area. Focus on Ave J, Texas Ave and Buddy Holly AVAILABLE FUNDING: • Street Maintenance Program FUTURE PHASED IMPLEMENTATION (3+YEARS): • Utilize street maintenance program to strategically and effectively rehabilitate secondary corridors in future years • Establish a strategy for street surface materials • Input from public/private stakeholders to promote development without jeopardizing safety • Continue to convert one-way streets to two-way streets for all of downtown AVAILABLE FUNDING: Civic Center Parking Lot Repairs Street Maintenance Program LEGEND: CATALYSTS - NEW AND PROPOSED PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ■ CONSOLIDATED PARKING - PROPOSED 1-1 POTENTIAL TRANSIT CENTER LOCATIONS n CONVERSION OF ANGLED TO PARALLEL PARKING 1/4 MILE PEDESTRIAN WALKING SHED 11 — A 4TH STREET- -^ , mar .__1.► __— __. - -- ,�- - --:--- -_ 1 — � '_ — . � � A a\ ^, rNis.. ♦ "mac/ �r-7i r - l ------------ n n GLENNA GOODACRE -' - - IN Aft moor - - LOTH STREET x ----- r MAIN STREET } BROADWAY S ', 13TH STREET 14TH STREET It LLJ 1 , -; 19TH STREET r ` � t f Ur `♦ Yr ��• LiW.'} w ,w �w ` w wl w w w s w w x t:t� CONNECTIVITY + ACCESSIBILITY PROPOSED STREET UPGRADES: ADA RAMPS SIDEWALK STRATEGY BIKE MASTER PLAN IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION (0-3 YEARS): • Improved ADA ramps along Broadway corridor • Adding bulb -outs at all pedestrian crossings • Improved crosswalk striping and visibility, along with wayfinding signage for bicycle lanes to provide access points to the Canyon Lakes system • Update bike master plan for future routes through Downtown corridors • Utilize ADA ramp fund to improve key corridor intersections such as Broadway & Ave J and other high pedestrian volume crossings • Improve intersection function for multi -modal users for new Civic Park AVAILABLE FUNDING: • Gateway Construction and Green Spaces • Pedestrian and Cyclist Enhancements • ADA Ramp and Sidewalk • Street Maintenance Program FUTURE PHASED IMPLEMENTATION (3+YEARS): • Improved sidewalks and ADA upgrades at alley crossings • Connectivity to Ave Q and 19th Street for Gateway locations • Upgrades to other intersections along Ave Q and 19th Street as future downtown corridors are developed • Establish/Implement downtown sidewalk strategy for brick paver reuse and consistency for downtown ADA upgrades AVAILABLE FUNDING: • Gateway Construction and Green Spaces in CBD • Pedestrian and Cyclist Enhancements LEGEND: RECONSTRUCTED BRICK STREETS RECONSTRUCTED "ENHANCED" STREETS RECONSTRUCTED STREETS (NON -BRICK) ❑ CROSSWALKS / ADA RAMPS Fol BULB OUTS ❑ GATEWAYS OH HAWK SYSTEM 4TH STREET A MAC DAVIS LANE e GLENNAYGOODACRE e F� AMR177 LOTH STREET DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 33 PROPOSED PLAN FOR BRICK STREETS: The Master Plan Update includes a revised plan for brick streets in Downtown. Building upon the recommendations made by the UDHPC to the EDAW planning team in 2007, the Master Plan includes the consideration of reconstructing key brick street corridors with a "hybrid" approach to the street section. This includes repurposing vintage brick within the center portions of the street right-of-way (ROW) as well as the parallel parking and sidewalk amenity zones. The remaining lanes of the street ROW are proposed as concrete (and/ or asphalt where it may be appropriate) with additional brick details and finish treatments such as scoring or coloring occurring at crosswalks, intersections, and walking zones of the sidewalks. PROPOSED HYBRID BRICK STREETS: • Broadway from Avenue Q to Avenue E (Priority Corridor) • Buddy Holly from 7th St. to 19th St. • Avenue J from 9th St. to 16th St. • Texas Avenue from 7th St. to 19th St. • Crickets Avenue from Broadway to 19th St. PROPOSED ENHANCED STREETS: • Broadway from Avenue E to Avenue A • Avenue Q from 4th St./ Marsha Sharp to 19th St. • Mac Davis from Avenue Q to Texas Avenue • Avenue J from 9th St. to LHUCA • Avenue J from 16th St. to 19th St. • Texas Avenue from 7th St. to Mac Davis NOTES: 1. All proposed street upgrades are intended to coincide with significant utilities and infrastructure projects in order to maximize resources and minimize disruption. 2. See hybrid street section concepts in the Streetscapes section of the Master Plan Update. 3. Technical drawings have not yet been developed forstreet reconstruction (concepts only). 2007 LIDHPC RECOMMENDATIONS FO BRICK LEGEND: UPHDC Recommendations to EDAW Street Conditions Repair Existing Brick Very Poor ■■■■■ New Brick Poor o Special Street Treatment Fair Main St Brick Treatment Good ■ ■ ■ ®■ Main St. Brick Removal Very Good ■ ■ ■ ■ Water Line Replacement ONEWEA CBD Study Area 34 PROPOSED PLAN FOR BRICK STREETS LEGEND: RECONSTRUCTED BRICK STREETS (HYBRID BRICK + CONCRETE) RECONSTRUCTED "ENHANCED" STREETS (UPGRADED MATERIALS, SECTION TBD) IMPROVED NON -BRICK STREETS UPGRADED TREES LIGHTING, STREET FURNITURE) !� ..® a _ . • - - ter.- � : �- - azo - - .... � � _ - • ..w,r+. r .•A..., s+ _ R u. m J .>f: , x ate ." �;"- .a.-•rv'- � 1 ♦ .�. ..� � , I - �'• F a �- _ `� g��,� � 's a kAl 1' F : -- 1 MARSHA SHARP ' 4TH STREET - _ - - - - - _ - r ` LHUCA .. _. 5TH STREET BUDDY HOLLY ` .� -- HALL— aI'I, , MAC DAVIS _. 1 7TH STREET - ♦ 1 �b 4! 7TH, STREET., _ TORNADO e .0 1 i +" r j f �' '♦ 1 MEMORIAL rye t raat?al, feie� _'tit6'�e l,,t#i i -1 GLENNA GOODACRE r� ♦♦ 1 rd ,�� sue%'. R �e ■ �� *lp -1 ♦ I — moo S }a■®�� �" y���°� y..�9®TH STREET S 4 �, ,♦ ; a a , ,+�y(�l � � b.ea- - 't '• —',s• ^� !. �3 .� �' - �r 1 �+� - - FF 1, STREET 1 a —_ . —.LLI ` .MAIN STREET: I. �� • -• '�4 y �Is y 1 1i.. '`'��� - W ` ram► � '�, J �+ q r� < .,� " �-i - Q _ BROADWAYwo - AI fir t ® tee. R •.1 F - :^J&*' 1 T.T STREETT- o_a J• �. S#•".: y F� �® .� w �, P5, 9T44 _ r - e= t C r y vY r�,#�,'•,��.' '�t.�., � 3 '�,�I�.l� T�-+�-w� � — efi ", r (" ._' - , � t +> + 1 �ra • *_ - e "14THSTREET� +�`, _� 1 is a A CITIZEN'S I � �. TOWER .a, 15TH STREET 1� �1 _ �r ■ 16TH STREET IIy�RRgf Y o-, Ir ve .v 7TH STREETram 1p . d.�r"ti?tiy -�,x ,.: Y•yt ' �n , .� ;. i..".. h o ! __ I��>y W W ,. W _ , 18TN STREET j t - �'7 .. � r ^. Yam• �y BUDDY HOLLY A' ,� i • CENTER. S' -• . _• „ � . s � �.: — g 4. a `�_ _ � _. � � � _-�. r `�: >,, . s --- •. '6$ 19TH STREET a a op =W _ 1 a,LLJ we .e«•Sn;--•..*r- 1'Yi•:'?-^-'� •.i:• W 5 iv alwr'a ' W w �At._,.- .,.. -."^ y ,-' y R . ♦1 , W �► w a , i�'. *" ,::,' -' -�'. la '..; W tea. - - 1 '`I ,° _ ^ t, ,-a , �� '.` • > g' x,-'�- .rsr'-`: v .:r r+' " .'£` � le. w - ': ` D r_', Q .-�".- _ `Pfi1� ,k`"'^ e't¢ -• Q .c``. It '• t!Y .' -r.+.� r. .i#-, `'l.. r¢ .,r*�� : LM +i��;* g ✓ ' �tl DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 35 PARKING APPROACH OVERVIEW: A well -managed parking system is vital to the economic success of Downtown. The goal is to develop an efficient, cost-effective, and customer -focused parking management plan that will leverage Downtown's parking assets to support continued growth and development. Counter to the perception that there is "not enough parking" in Downtown, initial analysis of the CBD shows there are roughly 145 acres of parking with an assumed supply of over 15,000 parking spaces (in surface lots, on streets, and in parking garages). This equates to about 30% of the current land use! Much of the current supply is underutilized with a few pockets in high demand Based on initial observations, it is assumed that the existing parking supply can accommodate the demand of the proposed development within the Master Plan by adjusting parking ratios to be more efficient (to be further explored with data collection). RECOMMENDATIONS: See Implementation Matrix for more detail The recommended tasks related to parking are organized into four categories: TASK FORCE Task Force items focus on tasks that will encourage communication amongst Downtown stakeholders. Establishing a clear and open line of communication will ensure stakeholder buy -in and further push the parking agenda out to Lubbock citizens. 2. PARKING MANAGEMENT Parking Management items focus on tasks the City should complete to create a parking system that is understood by all, built to encourage Downtown development and flexible to evolve as Downtown evolves. Data management and defining a current parking baseline will be key to the success of these items. 3. PARKING POLICY Parking Policy items focus on tasks related to parking ordinances, parking rate structures and shared -use policies. These recommendations will define the parking system within Downtown. The ultimate goal of these recommendations is to build a system that is managed, self-sufficient and centralized. 4. CUSTOMER SERVICE Customer Service items focus on developing a friendly parking environment and establishing clear communication of parking. The focus is on strategies to make parking more user-friendly such as marketing, technology and wayfinding. — — + - — — — I� 4TH STREET J - -..- "-�'���.. - __. _ _ -..:, -_ _ _- - - _ _ •`o JN A•': j. /// 5TH STREET ' 1 a �r MAC DAVIS LANE 7H STREET. r / � . -...H STREET 4 GOODACRE/ 8T 1 own 9/ ' H STREET -�10TH STREET r — MAIN STREET 3 � / -� - _ / —T��. BROADWAY 9 13THSTREET ow, 14TH STREET - 15TH STREET \ \ \ \ / / /��.+-•�- —. , 1 f w ;.: \ 1 i 16TH STREET 17TH STREET \mn / 18TH STREET r f LEGEND: ❑ SURFACE PARKING LOTS e ON -STREET PARKING PARKING GARAGES 1/4 MILE PEDESTRIAN WALKING SHED 36 PARKING RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations are shown in Short -Term (1-3 years), Mid -Term (3-5 years) and Long -Term timeframes (5-10 years). Once a parking plan is in place and operational, recommendations can be re -prioritized as needed. SHORT TERM TASKS: • City collaboration (planning, traffic, police, finance, marketing) • Create a Downtown parking task force committee: • Monthly meetings to discuss policies and practices • Management decisions to balance parking system • Review data analytic trends • Revenue evaluation • Marketing, education, and branding discussions • Identify downtown parking stakeholders: • City • Community Organizations • Start collecting parking data now: • Manual data collection • GIS/database updates • Technology • Stakeholder surveys • Develop a Parking Master Plan • Create organizational structure for parking decisions • Define downtown parking boundary • Committee to divide downtown boundary into parking sheds • City to develop parking ratio within downtown boundary • Committee to work with City to develop process for parking variances within boundary: • Consider small-scale, pedestrian friendly developments (less than 3,500-6,500 SF) • Mixed -use developments • Create flexible parking and mobility program • Document parking inventory of both on- and off- street parking • Document inventory of current building programming/zoning (occupied and unoccupied buildings/ lots) • Develop enforcement policies • Investigate current shared parking agreements within downtown boundary • City to develop Parking KPI's (key performance indicators) • Leverage transit center ridership • City to take parking occupancy counts • City to create and manage parking inventory/management tool (GIS, database) • Develop temporary parking ratios for current conditions • City to develop current effective parking ratio of downtown boundary (both occupied/ unoccupied, shared/unshared, and current/future) • City to hold stakeholder meetings to discuss parking in effort to generate buy -in (in -person, surveys) • Define current parking perceptions • City to encourage and potentially incentivize public parking within private facilities MID TERM TASKS: • Consolidation of Parking Management - Create Parking division (in -source, out -source) • Establish parking time limits • Enhance parking wayfinding and messaging • Investigate parking technology to leverage and make informed decisions • Appropriate technology — baseline or advanced • Low utilization of technology, if not understood by public • Marketing roll out • City to review and update on -street parking layout/configuration • City to develop walking distance parking corridors • City to develop daily parking and event parking operations • Committee to work with City to develop shared parking definitions/ordinance. Aim to reduce variances through defined exemptions, shared parking, parking reductions • Committee to work with City on parking marketing (banners, apps, signage) • Committee to work on Customer Experience marketing to relay information/communicating via social media, emails, etc. • City to monitor parking ratio annually to make any updates and adjustments • City to investigate parking management systems for on -street parking • City to develop parking rate structure for on -street spaces LONG TERM TASKS: • Develop an integrated parking and mobility program within the City • Develop parking investment strategy • Parking self sufficient • Establish parking budget • Right -sized parking - Develop codes designed to capture utilization of area rather than applying blanket codes to entire area regardless of context. • Reduces development barriers • Encourage alternative modes of transportation • City to require no parking requirements only market based parking requirements • City to investigate and implement centralized parking strategies • Location • Demand mitigation • Multiple User groups • Revenue generation potential • Balance walking distance and mobility • City to define and develop management for on -curb demand (TNC, transit, etc.) The following pages describe the various components of a holistic parking management plan which is rooted in a shared parking methodology. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 37 SHARED PARKING ------------------------ - - - - - - p p ------------------------------- A:/_144 Q,10:9 Not all stakeholders will participate in shared parking. Those willing should be encouraged and engaged. APPROACH: • Partner with developers to encourage shared parking or access to parking. • Encourage different land uses to share parking during non -peak hours resulting in less parking built. • Reduce inefficiencies, reduce congestion, and encourage smarter development. • Reliable & timely parking data critical. • Cost effective way to manage parking demand. TAKE -AWAY: Shared parking benefits all; patrons have easy access to multiple parking options and land owners can recognize more return on investment of developed space. WALKABILITY ------------------------------- ------------------------------ la:r_144:11,ICIA Addressing other modes of movement and connectivity Downtown such as walking will be difficult given the prevailing preference for people in Lubbock to drive to the front door of their destination. Downtown will need to continue to actively plan for and promote walkable corridors. APPROACH: • Walkability is a tool for allocating parking supply and managing parking demand in Downtown - reduced parking ratios in urban areas include an assumption that patrons will walk certain distances and/ or visit more than one destination by walking to/ from events/ venues. • Meet with stakeholders regularly and consistently to encourage "walkable" events to help change the mindset. • Encourage utilization of multi -modal options to connect parking facilities. TAKE -AWAY: Investment in a walkable downtown environment will allow the parking system to be successful over time. PARKING MANAGEMENT ------------------------ - - - - - - O ------------------------------- Consistently monitoring and managing a parking area the size of the Downtown Lubbock CBD will require dedicated staff or third party entity. APPROACH: • Encourage a holistic Downtown parking system. • Invest in additional staff to coordinate parking and recommend policy updates. • Focus on event and evening parking management. • Continue to encourage off-street parking throughout Downtown. • Monitor parking through a database of public and mixed facilities. • Monitor enforcement and occupancy rates when appropriate. TAKE -AWAY: Progressive and active parking management can maximize parking efficiency and actually reduce the amount of parking inventory needed. 38 PARKING PLAN COMPONENTS STAKEHOLDER COMMUNICATION -------------------- - ----——————— — — — — —— 1QUARR4,1*9 Implementing parking solutions across multiple stakeholder groups with individual agendas will not be an easy task. APPROACH: • Establish formal communications with stakeholders associated with parking Downtown. • Encourage stakeholders to participate in shared parking program. • Meet with stakeholders regularly and consistently. • Develop metrics to highlight parking improvements. • Communicate in advance any Downtown policy changes to parking, marketing or branding. TAKE -AWAY: Regular and active communication with stakeholders to discuss parking needs throughout downtown will promote a well rounded parking system. PARKING BRANDING ------------------------ - - - - - - ------------------------------- la:FAgg4z1*9 Creating a universal parking branding program with full stakeholder consensus regarding cost, design standards, and consistency can be labor intensive. APPROACH: • Downtown should invest in and demonstrate the benefits of parking brand program. • Align parking branding with holistic Downtown branding. • Develop Downtown signage guidelines for parking. • Encourage existing parking facilities to participate in Downtown parking brand program. • Coordinate all signage throughout Downtown with public, private and mixed use/ owned parking. • Create normal operations and event operations signage brand. TAKE -AWAY: Parking is part of the downtown experience. As such, parking branding should be consistent in terms of signage and messaging. MARKETING ------------------------------- I % A:FA 444lkIC14 Coordination with multiple stakeholders to provide real time information on parking availability, Location, and pricing. APPROACH: • Develop a compelling marketing campaign across media platforms that is customer - service focused to deliver a well -received parking system. • Create separate shared parking campaigns for normal and special event operations. • Actively promote the availability of parking within Downtown. • Increase communication through online parking information. • Market multi -modal options for Downtown. TAKE -AWAY: Accurate and up-to-date information is key to establishing and maintaining a quality parking system that informs patrons about parking availability before they depart for Downtown, making for a positive parking experience overall. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 39 L .3 Mall: I Jr - rpil P" 72 OF ---------- vd. 1A. J., l k I k-l-k k L 4 dL Ilk V, ;L 3- P, .d 4 P, 97 MEMO PARKS + OPEN SPACE • PLANT LECTURES • SCHOOL FIELD TRIPS • MOVIES ON THE LAWN • SOCIAL SATURDAY • FARMERS MARKET • LUNCH CARTS • WIFI • FIRST FRIDAY ATTRACTION • ART FESTIVALS • HOWL-O-WEEN COSTUME • DOGGY BIRTHDAYS • FOOD TRUCKS • BLUES ON THE GREEN • WEEKEND BANDS • BATTLE OF THE BANDS 4TH STREET 1 ` - • • - _ - - • , M • 1 ♦ 00 5TH STREET • • 1 '1' 4ACDAVIS:NE 1 TORNADO 1 �1 1 MEMORIAL 7TH STREET -:. 1 , 1 y; RE/ 8TH STREET 9TH STREET _ 1 � 1 1 � 10TH STREET i; 1 , MAIN STREET + BROADWAY 1 1 13TH STREET 1 1 1FOOD AND 14TH STREET 1 n 1 , 15TH STREET 1 1 � 1 / 16TH STREET 1 � 1 / 1 1 17TH STREET BANDSHELL 18TH STREET , G 1 � 19TH STREET > > Z Z Z m w m Z Z Z > > > x w V 42 DOWNTOWN PARKS + OPEN SPACE NETWORK PARKS + OPEN SPACE APPROACH: Lubbock is home to a great number parks and green spaces - however, Downtown has fewer parks and open spaces for civic gathering. Considering future parks such as the Rail Spur Park proposed for the Arts District, and an urban plaza to be built adjacent to the new City Hall at Citizen's Tower along with existing assets such as Buddy and Maria Elena Holly Plaza, the LHUCA courtyard, and the Gazebo and Lawn at the Courthouse, there is an opportunity to define a legible network of interconnected open spaces - each with their own identity and use that helps contribute to Downtown becoming a more livable environment. To this network, the Master Plan Update introduces a new, civic -scaled park space to serve as a multi -functional "living room" for all of Lubbock - filling a great need for an iconic and vibrant hub of activity in the heart of the city. A well -designed Civic Park will encourage people from all walks of life to gather throughout the year. Robust, intentional programming is key to the success of the park. By bringing more frequent activity to downtown, the park will change people's perception of Lubbock's urban core and invite more investment opportunities. Possible Elements for the Civic Park include: • Multipurpose Open Lawn / Event Space • Public Art • Tree -lined streetscapes • Variety of seating (fixed benches, movable tables and chairs, seat walls, etc.) • Interactive fountains or splashpad • Small building with Restrooms, Storage and Coffee Kiosk. • Stage or performance area with electricity for events and holiday lighting • Ample shade in the form of trees, trellis and shade structures • Functional and decorative lighting • Drinking fountains • Accommodate food trucks or farmer's market -style vendors A key component to creating a successful network will be to transform streetscapes to become more pedestrian and bike friendly with reduced space dedicated to vehicular circulation. Proposed design changes include widening sidewalks to encourage walking and allow more space for outdoor cafe and restaurant seating, adding street trees for increased shade and pedestrian comfort, upgrading lighting to improve safety and illumination quality, incorporating new signage and wayfinding for an improved Downtown experience. Developing this network is critical to linking the Downtown districts to one another and to linking Downtown to the larger park network of the city with improved pedestrian and cycling connections to Mackenzie Park and the Canyon Lakes just east of Downtown. PARKS + OPEN SPACE RECOMMENDATIONS: NOW (20201 • Support the development of the Rail Spur Park. • Activate Buddy and Maria Elena Holly Plaza and surrounding streetscapes. Immediate strategies include installing lighting at tree wells, removal of the plaza fencing, and partnering with Buddy Holly Center and local businesses to host regular music and food themed events. • Improve the connection from downtown to East Lubbock and Mackenzie Park at the Broadway underpass through lighting upgrades, public art installation, and improved signage and wayfinding. • Recommend that the City of Lubbock move forward with the Civic Park idea including full demolition of the LP&L building, including any necessary environmental remediation, and retain the property for future development as a park. Existing trees should be retained, site graded smooth and seeded with grass. • Once the civic park site has been cleared, it is recommended that City immediately begin facilitating events and "pop-up" programming at the future Park (whether that be thru the Parks Department or a non-profit entity). Simultaneously, the City should investigate the possibility of partnering with a non-profit entity that can begin fundraising for the Park. SHORT TERM (0-3 YEARS): • Issue an RFP to select consultants to design the Civic Park, and begin the process of soliciting feedback from stakeholders via public meetings and steering committee. Continue with pop-up programming and fundraising activities. Construction of the Park could feasibly begin as early as 2022, with opening in 2023 or 2024. • Create a map or app which promotes the network of park destinations in downtown Lubbock. • Buddy and Maria Elena Holly Plaza - continue regular programming and events at the plaza, and move forward with adding a shade structure and/or permanent stage and improved lighting in the district to foster a sense of safety and security. LONG TERM (3+ YEARS): • Continue to evaluate city -owned properties for potential as future parks or green spaces. As more residents move to downtown, demand for other green spaces (such as a dog park) may arise. • Once the Civic Park is open, a continued partnership with a non-profit "friends -of" organization is recommended in order to provide an array of programming and fill funding gaps in order to allow the Park to operate with an elevated level of maintenance and services. The following pages describe elements to consider in the creation of a larger open space network for Downtown Lubbock. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 43 rA 4p Tat I IL er 9)ML L A jfr i� 0 up, w !E —10 MCI r P. was 11 04 0 log lop 9 lie rip. 111p, I lt� 41LAff Ag tit WHAT IS A CIVIC PLAZA? Imagine a safe, inviting, and vibrant civic space in downtown specifically designed to host a wide range of community activities, from concerts, to yoga, office workers on lunch break, and movies on the green. LUBBOCK'S'LIVING ROOM' Vibrant 21st century downtowns have spaces that appeal to a wide variety of people with inviting features and programming to encourage locals and tourists alike to visit, which supports a thriving mix of retail, residential and institutional uses. SYMBOLIC HEART OF THE CITY The civic plaza is for everyone in Lubbock to enjoy - young, old, and somewhere in-between! Whether you live in downtown or are just visiting, the plaza is a place to visit for special city-wide events, but also a spot for parents to enjoy a cup of coffee while their kids splash in the fountain. WHAT WOULD IT LOOK LIKE? The design of the civic plaza will incorporate community and stakeholder feedback before being finalized; these preliminary visualizations are to help demonstrate potential ideas and uses with opportunities for the landscape palette to reflect the unique culture and vernacular of Lubbock, creating a unique identity for the civic plaza. AN INVESTMENT IN OUR FUTURE Preliminary construction costs for the plaza (using data from comparable projects in other cities) range from an estimated $4.7 million to $6.5 million. Data shows that urban parks can generate significant reinvestment and additional tax revenue for their downtowns, with conservative estimates showing 5:1 R01. P/ozo VIEW 1: A BIRD'S EYE VIEW OF THE PLAZA (LOOKING FROM BROADWAY TOWARD FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH) MOVIE AND CONCERT NIGHTS FARMER'S MARKET YOGA RECHARGE O PUBLIC ART O BROADWAY 1.'y1 JW VERNACULAR DESIGN ELEMENTS 46 NEW CIVIC PLAZA WHERE COULD THE CIVIC PLAZA BE LOCATED? A potential site is the 1300 block of Broadway. The city -owned land is located in close proximity to churches, hotels, businesses and Citizen's Tower. •c iaF'. JO � r a y — 1500 _ f � �'.tf a:, t , , PIONEEI BROADWAY s j. HOTEL L �.. ��� • �� VIEW1 • ! " 1 FIRST UNITED S > METHODIST i CHURCH A -- ---" _.. . Ak. 41 11) F• ag VIEW 2: EVENT LAWN PICTURED FROM SE CORNER OF THE PARK/PLAZA POTENTIAL PROJECT TIMELINE 2020 r 2021 ren 2022 Am Alk Aft A& DOWNTOWN SITE IS RFP ISSUED PUBLIC INPUT + GROUNDBREAKING MASTERPLAN CLEARED DESIGN UPDATE PHASE COMPLETE POP-UP PARK ACTIVATIONS FUNDRAISING VIEW 3: COFFEE AND RESTROOM KIOSK DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 47 l �rf - - �r ;-ItlT! { t K+*•#�1' ` i' � � '• .k� � k� I + Vic.^ y' �r �• f- i�-W;�.'I+ •��,� _ �� 1 ''•, . tr f F,4 � irk I�� y '1'•. r ,� Y ,r _ �•r.r ! !I '"k All jIN IMP IA Ali I oa OIL' Milan AP Aft 00 04 w e { r — z — ;� _ ak 1. , . _ �•:'" � Y � � ,,,. �. �� . � r �j9.r• `. '::ti::. °:III} '='"`� Y - � �• ' 4 s 3 ,� � _ AI . �.'. L� ,fir` � �. a��: � "«:� 'r•:: ..� €. t �. "' °L . } STREETSCAPES 4v*, 4, MPS 6 w am 41 9 1 BROADWAY Broadway is a significant cultural axis in Lubbock, linking together Texas Tech University and the North Overton and South Overton neighborhoods to MacKenzie Park and the Canyon Lakes recreational area - with Downtown at the center of the corridor. Today, Broadway (classified as a 'street for people' in the 2008 Revitalization Action Plan) offers three lanes of travel and a bike Lane in each direction within the existing public right-of-way. The Master Plan Update emphasizes the importance of this key corridor and recommends strengthening the vitality of Broadway by enhancing the character of this pedestrian -oriented street. Reconstructing Broadway calls for reducing the width of travel lanes and increasing the sidewalk zones to make room for a generous walking path, dedicated amenity zone for street lights, trees and furnishings along with a 'flex' zone at the curb that incorporates parallel parking, ride -share drop-offs, parklets, and restaurant/ cafe seating areas to accommodate a variety of activities for a more vibrant Downtown. A hybrid approach to the material palette honors the identity of the historic brick streets with vintage brick incorporated into center turn lanes, curb -side flex zones, and sidewalk amenity zones combined with other materials such as concrete and asphalt, used for their effectiveness in maintaining underground utilities and providing a smooth experience for rubber tire modes of mobility. MIXE o user OFFICE) HOUSING THE DRESS BUILDING BROADWAY PROPOSED PLAN CURRENT CONDITION: BROADWAYATTHE KRESS BUILDING (LOOKING WEST) n W N G J W X G J Q H m 2 DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 51 MATERIAL LEGEND: BRICK SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE BIKE LANE BROADWAY EXISTING SECTION o ZZ 5 loft zoe _ 52 BROADWAY MATERIAL LEGEND: BROADWAY PROPOSED SECTION 5 loft loft _ZZ DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 53 MATERIAL LEGEND: BRICK SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE BIKE LANE AVENUE J EXISTING SECTION 0 5 loft 20ft 54 AVENUE J MATERIAL LEGEND: BRICK SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE BIKE LANE i 1 01 1 Jul ui Jul uI r hf 1 L I 11 IN 117-677 6' I _ 9' I _ 11' I . 11' I . 9' I . 6' SIDEWALK/ FRONTAGE MFM DRIVE LANE 7 5' AVENUE J PROPOSED SECTION 117-6" SIDEWALK/ FRONTAGE 0 5 loft 20 ft _ZZ DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 55 MATERIAL LEGEND: BRICK SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE BIKE LANE AVENUE K EXISTING SECTION QIDEWALKPARKING 11' 11' 75' 11' 14' a SIDEWALK 0 5 10 ft 20 ft _ZZ 56 AVENUE K MATERIAL LEGEND: BRICK SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE BIKE LANE •�6111 1111111111�6111 11111111111101 �01 6'-6 5' 9' 11' 12' 11' SIDEWALK AMENITZONEY PARKING LANE DRIVE LANE TURN LANE DRIVE LANE AVENUE K PROPOSED SECTION 9'J, 5' J, 6'-6" PARKING LANE AMENITY SIDEWALK ZONE 0 5 loft 20 ft _ZZ DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 57 MATERIAL LEGEND: BRICK SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE BIKE LANE 15' SIDEWALK TEXAS AVENUE EXISTING SECTION 16' _ 1. 19' 19' .1. 16' 100' DRIVE LANE 15' SIDEWALK ZONE 0 5 loft 20ft _Z 0 TEXAS AVENUE MATERIAL LEGEND: BRICK SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE .c v 8' SIDEWALK TEXAS AVENUE PROPOSED SECTION ASPHALT SURFACE BIKE LANE ri ►�m mmmm In, I ■� TURN LANE PARKING LANE AMENITY k 100, 0 5 loft 20 ft _ZZ DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 59 MATERIAL LEGEND: BUDDY HOLLY AVENUE EXISTING SECTION o s loft zoe .1 BUDDY HOLLY AVENUE MATERIAL LEGEND: BUDDY HOLLY AVENUE PROPOSED SECTION 0 5 loft 20 ft _ZZ DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 61 .1 a I - IV 4 62 AVENUE Q Avenue Q serves as an important north -south corridor in Lubbock, linking several commercial areas and serving as a key connector between the Canyon Lakes trail system and Downtown. Today, Avenue Q offers seven lanes of travel within the public right-of-way. During the master planning effort, it was determined that Avenue Q could benefit from a "road diet" - eliminating one lane of travel in each direction without affecting its current throughput capacity. Following preliminary guidelines issued by TxDOT, the master plan update proposes options for Avenue Q to be transformed into a multi -modal corridor with a boulevard -like character. The preferred option (5-lanes) offers wider sidewalks for improved walkability, a dedicated amenity zone, a two-way protected bike lane, two travel lanes in each direction and a planted median/dedicated turn lane. The use of special planting, public art, signage and wayfinding at key intersections along Avenue Q such as Glenna Goodacre, Broadway and16th Street accentuate the gateways into Downtown while a combination of materials reduces the scale of the streetscape and creates a layered experience for pedestrians, cyclists, and people driving in their cars while optimizing maintenance and operations for underground utilities. AVENUE Q PROPOSED PLAN: SECTI( (19th to 14th) CURRENT CONDITION: AVENUE Q AT BROADWAY (LOOKING NORTH) SECTION 2 (13th to 9th) ,I . p e SECTION 3 (Glenna Goodacre to Marsha Sharp Freeway) DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 63 AVENUE Q IMPLEMENTATION IMMEDIATE PHASED IMPLEMENTATION (0-5 YEARS) • CoL and TxDOT agreement on 5-lane section • Agreement with CoL and TxDOT for placement of bike lanes within section • Potential elimination of signalized intersections • Design considerations for intercepting drainage impacting the northern part of Downtown • Agreement on right turn lane access near Marsha Sharp and on -going developments • Gateway locations to be identified for infrastructure upgrades in conjunction with Ave 0 reconstruction and CBD TIF AVAILABLE FUNDING • TXDOT • Gateway Construction and Green Spaces in CBD • Pedestrian and Cyclist Enhancements 64 04 n 9' 46' 4" 11' 10' b' 10' 10' 11' PREFERRED OPTION - PAIRED BIKE LANE - BUFFERED ' 1 10' 4' 6' 6' 2' 11' 10' 6' 17 10' 11' AVENUE Q STUDY - PAIRED BIKE LANE - NO BUFFER M M As '10' 11' AVENUE Q STUDY - BIKE LANES ON BOTH SIDES - BUFFERED 4.0 - 0 -I-1 1 1 4' 4' S' 2' 11' 10' 6' 10' 10' 11' 2' s' AVENUE Q STUDY - BIKE LANES ON BOTH SIDES - NO BUFFER 9' AVENUE Q IMPLEMENTATION .tlguE G iLa-&I� A+ Eoiu�a — rim ilrl iwEBelE q �••4y • • I f� I AVENUE Q SECTION 1 (19th to 14th) r !11 LJ Z rIn C NENUE Q. J5- : A AVENUE Q SECTION 2 (13th to 9th) -TVv a hVEIAIE 8 iuS�4} u�lnl�lnr I All AVENUE Q SECTION 3 (Glenna Goodacre to Marsha Sharp Freeway) NVEMM 4 tuaea) A'�NUE O �L 6 Mi 11111111 !!! � AVHttE Q N&N} r � . -- n _ _ r z m '. AYS EO IJS-e^41 I _ ' W -, - � I A'.'ENUEON S4i Lufa �1 _ • 1. - 5TH STREET AJENUEO NE-9ti � hVBiEO il��} Irvin, �Irrl� naEnueoiuses> MARSHA SHARP FREEWAY DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 65 MATERIAL LEGEND: BRICK SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE BIKE LANE SIDEWALK DRIVE LANE AVENUE Q EXISTING SECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11' 11' 12' DRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE TURN LANE DRIVE LANE 100' 11' SIDEWALK 0 5 loft 20ft _ZZ .. AVENUE Q MATERIAL LEGEND: BRICK SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE BIKE LANE i r 0 0 0 0 0 0FIEI� -7T, py 8' 5' 6' 6' 4' 11' 10' 6' 10' 10' 11' 5' 8' SIDEWALK KE BIKE RAISED DRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE MEDIAN TURN LANE DRIVE LANE SIDEWALK ZONE LANE LANE BUFFER 100' AVENUE Q PROPOSED SECTION 0 5 loft 20 ft _ZZ DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 67 aa. °e 7d 1-1 77 saes 76 aa.a 7e, 3a..r 79 �:.< 73 3aa.e� 72 aaea" 7/ IN OR T ER ,°� 49 JO J/ d2 J3 Sy /00 area' 70 a:e 69 .:e. 68 s:ea 67 a:e. 66 saes 60- a es 69 aae 63 � R BE TS JJ J6 d7 Sd r9 fo 6/ 63 48 47 46 4s 44, 43 42 4/ 40 39 96 36 /7 I /8 1 /9 1 20 I 2/ 1 29 1 23 1 24 /6 1 /S I /4 1 /3 1 /2 1 // 1 /o 1 9 170/v 2S Y6 27 2B 29 30 3L ■�■ �_ i■ ■ice ��� ■�■ 0 TOWN OF L(Jr-B7BOCK TEXAS AND ADDITIONS SCALE: / Aoo' /DMETGALFE 9 NOS RTH .SETT TT 0 NORTH �I�� /vv TH T T T T P NORTH n,'I�'� T T T uU E, V) In 11 f) hh�4) In rr rr �■ �r v� �r rrr rr r■ ■■ r■ �■ ■■ ■ II� ■KII, ■ ■ III I� � � IIII� I■ IIII� � IIII� I■ IIII� � Illl�,l� I�.� I�,ll� 11111 �■ ■� �■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■� ■■W■ r■ T T T T T T [E T a] T SOUTH FOURTH Sr In',j{��'�� SOUTH F/FTH IIr�`j��,"�I� ST T T T T / 7 / 8 / 9 T T 2 2 T SOUTH S/XTH 57 141 T T 141 1+1 T T T T T T LJ LJ SOUTH SEVENTH Sr T IF T IF T If] If] T If] T T T T 98 97 I 8 .7 / -,.. y �J 7 6 S 9 3 z / _ U E 99 96 io 6ie hie" a 32 >M •reEm p /00 95 A Y ti L Q uu Uu �lJ �� 99 H a e e S w e vt HISTORICAL MAP OF DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK BLOCK STRUCTURE, 1920-1935, CREDIT: Texas State Library and Archives, University of Texas Perry-Castaneda Library Map Collection N 4 4- ,8 CC DE] DE DE TH MF/N sT HISTORIC RESOURCES DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 69 NOTEWORTHY CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES f Lubbock County Adult Probation LP&L Power Plant Workshops Oficewise Furniture & Supply (Formerly The Watson Building 701 Main Street 411 Avenue J 602-606 Texas Avenue The Baker Companies Office Products) 1109 13' Street 1301 13th Street ■ ..Mrt0 .10 SERVICE Jim Kimmel Center Community Health Center of Lubbock McWhortor's Tire & Auto Lubbock Co. Warehouse (South) Lubbock Co. Warehouse (North) 1212 Main Street 1318 Broadway Street 1008 Texas Avenue 801 15th Street 801 151h Street �I ��Illllili�il Lubbock Police Department Building City Service Station Retail/ Office Building Lubbock Co. Workshop J C Penney Department Store 916 Texas Avenue 902 Buddy Holly Avenue 701 Broadway Street 1010 Avenue G (Formerly Abernathy Building) 1102 Broadway Street HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY PURPOSE OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY: As part of the larger master planning effort led by Overland, Seventh Generation Design (SGD) conducted a preliminary historic resources survey of the study area. The purpose of the survey was to create a baseline tool for identifying, documenting, and evaluating historic properties and placing them within their local, state and/or national historic context and level of significance. A fundamental motivation behind conducting the survey was to determine the potential viability of forming a National Register Historic District in the study area. If a district is viable, individual private property owners may be eligible to receive various state and federal financial incentives for historic rehabilitation of their qualifying properties. These incentives include state franchise tax credits, federal income tax credits, and grants and loans from historic preservation organizations. The historic resources survey sought to identify a period or periods of historic significance for the study area based upon the prevalent dates of construction of existing buildings. This is an essential first step in defining and validating a future proposed historic district. The historic resources survey also sought to characterize the general condition and historic integrity of individual properties to determine their status as contributing or non-contributing within a future proposed historic district. This characterization of physical condition was also intended to identify potential areas for catalyzing downtown revitalization through the rehabilitation of historic buildings rich with architectural character, local materials, and human scale. The survey included approximately450 individual properties within the CBD studyarea, with a general evaluation of existing structures' approximate date of construction, architectural style, general physical condition, and likelihood of being an individually listed, contributing, or non-contributing property within a future historic district. Survey data was recorded in a straight -forward Microsoft Excel spreadsheet that may be incorporated into a future GIS database. To our knowledge, no previous systematic survey of Downtown Lubbock's existing and historic building resources has been conducted to -date. It is our hope that the findings of this survey may form the basis of more detailed future studies and revitalization projects. RESEARCH AND PREPARATION: In preparation for the project kickoff, SGD reviewed the provided documents from previous planning efforts. We took particular note of comments regarding the existing building stock and architectural character in the Downtown area. It was observed that the Downtown Revitalization Action Plan (2008) appears to value the architectural merit of buildings built prior to the 1950s. (See Chapter 2, page 13). Since buildings built as recently as 1969 may be considered eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places, we advocate a more objective approach to evaluating the existing building stock in the downtown district. Additionally, growing interest and appreciation of the Mid -Century Modern Style may favor Lubbock's chances of forming one of the first downtown historic districts featuring this significant period of urban development in our nation after World War II. Fortunately, the more recent planning documents take a more favorable view of the Downtown District's existing building stock, seeing the potential for revitalization independent of stylistic bias. The current formulation of the Unified Development Code (UDC) promises to have a significant impact on how the Downtown revitalization gets implemented by synthesizing standards and guidelinesfrom multiple regulatory documents. Streamlining regulatory processes and encouraging redevelopment, while offering some degree of protection to the historic character and individual historic properties, should be important goals of this effort. Existing local incentives for redevelopment and historic rehabilitation include (1) Market Lubbock Incorporated (MLI); (2) Downtown Grant Program for reimbursements for building renovations, facade improvements, and streetscape improvements; and (3) City of Lubbock and Lubbock County tax abatements. These programs are similar to local incentives found in other communities. SGD obtained from the City of Lubbock Planning Department's online portal a list of all historically designated properties in the Downtown District. This includes properties listed as local landmarks, Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks (RTHL), and on the National Register of Historic Places (NR). We are creating an historic overlay to the team's base map to identify these properties and their levels of significance. SGD obtained from the National Park Service the nomination applications for each of the properties in the Downtown District that are currently individually listed on the National Register. These include statements of periods of historical significance which may be useful in the future formulation of a National Register district(s). DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 71 BUILT BEFORE 1939 [PRE WW111 BUILT BETWEEN [POST WW111 1970-PRESENT 24% "1960- 1 969 16% 1950-1959 30% BEFORE1920 A % 1920-1929 11% 1930-1939 8% 1940-1 11% FINDINGS OF THE PRELIMINARY HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY: Out of the approximate 450 properties surveyed in Downtown, only 29% represent surviving properties built prior to 1950. Presumably many buildings from this period were demolished to make room for subsequent development during the mid-20th century. 47% represent surviving properties built between 1950 and 1970, coinciding with an important cultural and economic period in Lubbock's development as a city. Only 24% of the properties were constructed after 1970, beyond the identified period of historical significance, and reflecting a slow down in growth in the city's downtown district. YEAR BUILT _ 1900-1909 F--1 1910-1919 0 1920-1929 0 1930-1939 -------------- ---MARSHASHARP FRWY - 1940-1949 NN 1950-1959 1960-1969 0 1970-Present DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 73 74 NATIONAL REGISTER (NR) 2% NON- CONTRIBUTING (N) 37% POTENTIALLY CONTRIBUTING (PC) Ns' 33% Typically historic resource surveys classify properties into four general categories: • CURRENTLY NATIONAL REGISTER (NR) LISTED • ELIGIBLE OF INDIVIDUAL LISTING • CONTRIBUTING (for properties that do not qualify for individual listing but still have a high degree of historical integrity) • NON-CONTRIBUTING (for properties that were either built after the period of historical significance or have had its features altered to a point that its historical significance has been lost). Out of the approximate 450 properties surveyed in Downtown, only 1.5% (seven properties) are already individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Approximately 28% of the properties were found to possess sufficient historical integrity to be considered contributing to a future proposed National Register Historic District. Approximately 33% of the properties surveyed may be considered potentially contributing, pending further dialogue with the Texas Historical Commission and the National Park Service. And approximately 37% of properties either did not meet the minimum age requirement (built before 1970) or had suffered significant alterations and deteriorations to constitute a loss of historical significance. Our preliminary survey revealed that many buildings in the Downtown have been altered but may still qualify as Contributing if these alterations prove to be reversible. Typical examples of alterations include the removal of historic canopies, the replacement of ground level storefront windows and doors, and the application of stucco finish over historic brick walls. In conclusion, the Preliminary Historic Resources Survey reveals that Downtown Lubbock possesses a significant critical mass of mid-20th century Modern buildings with sufficient levels of historical integrity to suggest the viability of a National Register Historic District. -------------- - --MARSHA SHARP FRWY 11 ❑❑ _ — NAe onviD LH— G 77 17 NTH ST p9.` 7 b > 'El H '0 92r Q _-- TH$T ❑ A ❑, NTH S� �7 7- - I '�V JIMA_ E111D BReADWAY WL=Lll Lill NED" � AFE-1�fiO-m-�LJi'� JU �IJ IL I I 1: �illlll 6=�� � VP 117 lb ❑ �F 1:1i �1' E 11 4j; El Lj [[]L] [T_ E] IF ELIGIBILITY: NATIONAL REGISTER, CONTRIBUTING, AND POTENTIALLY CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS National Register Property ❑ Contributing Property F__] Potentially Contributing Property M Non -Contributing Property ❑TI EL❑ AN li�❑ ■ii_= Is IMF DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 75 RECOMMENDATIONS The recommended tasks and next steps related to historic resources are the following: 1. Recommend Lubbock actively pursue the formation of National Register Historic District with two periods of historic significance: Pre -World War II (1920-1941) and Mid -Century Modern (1941- 1970). The creation of the historic district will make historic properties not otherwise attaining to the level of individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places eligible for vital incentives to overcome the inherent financial challenges of rehabilitating of historic properties. 2. A more detailed survey into the historic and cultural significance of properties identified as Contributing and Potentially Contributing in the survey should be conducted to inform the district application process. This more detailed survey may be conducted using a combination of professional architectural preservation specialists, cultural historians, and volunteers (historical society members, property owners, university students, etc.). 3. The Downtown District's community should explore grass -roots programs like This Place Matters and Legacy Business Program, in conjunction with other marketing campaigns, to help elevate the general public's awareness of and appreciation for the many historical and cultural assets in the downtown area. 4. The City of Lubbock should consider the creation of a Vacant Building Ordinance for its Downtown District to bring dilapidated buildings back to safe condition and productive use. 5. The current on -going formation of a Unified Development Code (UDC) should codify policies and processes for the creation of local -level Neighborhood and Urban Conservation Districts and Historic Districts for future implementation, if desired. 6. The current on -going formation of a Unified Development Code (UDC) should establish a local governmental entity and standard process for the review and approval of modifications to existing structures and construction of new infill development within designated historic and urban conservation districts. A standard review and approval process would assist property owners and developers in anticipating requirements in advance of starting a project, and ensure that the unique circumstances and context of each property is considered. Approvals should be tied to the issuance of demolition and building permits. 7. The current on -going formation of a Unified Development Code (UDC) should establish a local governmental entity and standard process for the review and approval of demolitions of historically significant buildings within a locally established conservation district or historic district. Approvals should be tied to the issuance of building permits. 8. The current on -going formation of a Unified Development Code (UDC) should establish the requirements for baseline documentation of an historic structure, such as scale drawings, high resolution photographs and recordings of oral histories, be prepared prior to granting a permit for demolition. 9. Locally designated conservation and historic districts should formulate district -specific design guidelines to supplement form -based zoning standards and avoid a "one size fits all" through customization. 10. The City of Lubbock's GIS, zoning and permitting databases should integrate additional data fields for historic designations and overlay districts (e.g., Neighborhood Conservation Districts, National Register Historic Districts, Local Historic District, etc.) This will assist property owners and developers to be aware of designations and overlays early in a redevelopment project's planning process. These recommended upgrades to the database will also assist Planning Department staff and historic agency review boards in identifying and recording future historic resources survey efforts. 76 OPTIONS FOR PURSUING AN HISTORIC DISTRICT A SPECTRUM OF OPTIONS: Pursuing an Historic District can take time. There are multiple opportunities for revitalizing building stock that can build towards applying for such a district including: • LEGACY BUSINESS PROGRAM • FAMILY -OWNED BUSINESS AWARDS • THIS PLACE MATTERS PROGRAM • VACANT BUILDING PROGRAM • ADAPTIVE REUSE OF A BUILDING • CONSERVATION DISTRICTS • NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT FOR INCENTIVES • LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS FOR LOCAL INCENTIVES • LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS WITH FORM -BASED ZONING AND GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES • LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS WITH DISTRICT -SPECIFIC DESIGN GUIDELINES The following pages describe these strategies in more detail. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 77 LEGACY BUSINESS PROGRAM THIS PLACE MATTERS VACANT BUILDING PROGRAM • City of San Antonio Office of Historic Preservation Living Heritage Initiative • Businesses eligible for this program have been around for 20 years or more • Businesses contribute to the history, culture, and authentic identity of the city • Anyone can nominate an eligible business • Publicity and window decals to highlight businesses • Businesses become eligible for additional grants to aid in rehabilitation of their historic property • 2008 National Trust for Historic Preservation Campaign • DIY project feel • No long-term political or high -cost agenda • Encourages America to reignite connections to community • Crowd -sourcing people's personal meaning to places that have played a role in their lives • Zero rules! Through the eye of the beholder (Large or small, national or personal) .ray, PLACE MAKERS It / . r,P=`I -` It ,T µ�. 4 /I • Address the root causes of vacancy • Increase public safety • Retain value and quality for surrounding properties • Encourage economic development • Bring dilapidated properties back into productive use • Meet minimum maintenance (standard of care) requirements • Eligibility for redevelopment program funds • Owners work with city staff to find long-term solutions to convert spaces into vibrant places ---------------- _ r ADAPTIVE REUSE • Sustainable approach to redevelopment and revitalization, building upon the embodied energy of the original building • Revalue existing building stock for new life and time • Honor local building character and urban fabric • Balance old and new architectural language • Leverage historic tax credits if applicable NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT • A neighborhood conservation district (NCD) is a land use overlay tool • Offers communities the ability to tailor the management of character to the needs of specific areas and neighborhood residents, as opposed to one -size -fits -all approach of a traditional historic preservation ordinance. • Through the use of architectural design review or planning and zoning controls, NCDs are often used in tandem with historic preservation regulation, but usually are designed to operate apart from a preservation commission's jurisdiction. • NCDs are designed to protect character -defining streetscapes, without a historic significance requirement. • Can be used to stop inappropriate demolition, or regulate neighborhood change by requiring architectural standards, square footage requirements, lot size, or tree conservation. • Regulation for an NCD is designed to be more lenient or flexible than historic preservation regulation. NEW HISTORIC DISTRICT • Districts may be created at the local, state or federal level. • Local districts may require historic agency reviews of proposed modifications or new construction within the district. • Federal district designation imposes no restrictions or protections on privately owned property, but makes qualifying properties eligible for state and federal tax incentives and grants from preservation organizations. • Participation in state and federal incentive programs is completely voluntary, but requires owners to comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation if they wish to receive tax credits. • To be considered eligible, a property must meet at least one of four National Register criteria. This involves examining the property's age, significance, and physical integrity. • The district nomination process usually begins with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), which is part of the Texas Historical Commission. • Nomination may be by property owners, governmental agencies, historical societies, etc. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 79 0-11 roll %L 412 AMor pq � .- VIEW OF COTTON COURT HOTEL CONSTRUCTION, LOOKING WEST PHOTO CREDIT: APARAJITA BHATT IMPLEMENTATION DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 81 DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION ACTION PLAN City of Lubbock, Texas A is fr February 5, 2008 ASP EDAW I DIEVELOPME Design Standardsforthe Central Business District City of Lubbock, Texas June 1999 'kki rVA, City of Lubbock Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards City of Lubbock, Texas February, 2018 Approved by the City Council There have been 7 major plans or design initiatives directly or indirectly involving Downtown. These prior plans collectively are referred to as the "Prior Plans" Lubbock Cultural District Recertification Study December 2017 Performed for: The Lubbock Arts Alliance Funded by: The CH Foundation COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FO R T H E F U T U R E PLAN L U B B C K Parkhill, Smith & Cooper Inc. 4222 85' Street Lubbock, TX 79424 806.473.2200 -Team-PSCcom PSC 82 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS OVERVIEW: The scope of the Master Plan Update included the review of design documents and regulations pertaining to the built environment of Downtown with the intent of consolidating the information and/ or proposing changes to the documents to bring them into alignment with the new Update. The following documents were reviewed through the lens of the Master Plan Update: • Design Standards for the Central Business District, 1999 • Downtown Revitalization Action Plan, 2008 • Comprehensive Plan: Plan Lubbock 2040, 2019 • Downtown Public Improvement Design Standards, 2018 • Imagine Lubbock Together, 2013 • AIA SDAT Report: Lubbock, TX Creating a Vibrant Downtown, 2018 • Lubbock Cultural District Recertification Study, 2017 • City of Lubbock Downtown Zoning A Consolidated Prior Plan Implementation Matrix is included in the attached and incorporated Appendix. To the extent the Prior Plans remain valid, their concepts are either brought forward in that Matrix or are abandoned as City policy. *Ordinances may only be changed as required by law. In any conflict between that Matrix, the Prior Plans, or this Master Plan Update, this Master Plan Update controls. See the Appendix for additional comments and proposed changes. APPROACH: While engaging with Downtown stakeholders, City leadership, and City staff, an overarching theme emerged - that downtown should be a place for all types of people, uses and activities resulting in an economically and culturally vibrant place. This theme is also reflected in decades of planning initiatives that preceded this Master Plan Update. The purpose of this Implementation section is to provide a pathway towards achieving the desired outcome of the Vision. Fulfilling the Vision outlined in this Master Plan Update will not be an easy process. It will require the diligent work of many individuals and organizations. As conceived here, the implementation process is a five layer process: 1. PLANNING: Casting a Vision for the future of Downtown and a path to achieve it 2. REGULATORY: Creating the appropriate rules that guide development MWAI]ZIIZ11-3dIJAd[1]:R Constructing the proper policies to guide development processes 4. ORGANIZATION: Cultivating leadership to ensure effective implementation 5. FUNDING: Leveraging a variety of financing tools when appropriate The following pages describe the implementation process and considerations in more detail. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 83 PLANNING ------------------------ - - - - - - ---------------------------- Previous plans have laid the groundwork for the Master Plan Update to be successful and in part contributed to alignment among key stakeholders. Although there may be an alignment in Vision, the regulatory structure to allow implementation of the Vision is not yet fully in place. The Master Plan Update has made an effort to demonstrate where barriers to implementation may occur, including: • LAND USE REGULATION (Downtown Form -Based Code as part of UDC rewrite will address) • TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE (Phasing public investment to unlock private investment) • UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE (Phasing public investment to unlock private investment) • OPEN SPACE (Providing a public amenity and attracting private investment) • PARKING MANAGEMENT (Enable market -based efficiencies for property owners and patrons) • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY (Create synergy to activate downtown economic activity) There may be many reasons that downtown has not yet reached a tipping point in revitalization such as: mismatched regulatory codes, pinch points in the development administration process, a lack of coordination between policy and investment, and a lack of focus on incremental improvements that can build momentum. Follow-through on the items outlined in the implementation process will allow for the Vision to become realized. REGULATORY ------------------------- - - - - - - ---------------------- - - - - - - The Vision can only be brought to reality if the regulations that are in place allowfor it. Through a coordinated effort, the Master Plan Update can influence the Unified Development Code and Downtown Form -Based Code Update (UDC and FBC) that is in progress; taking advantage of the timely opportunity to imprint the needs of Downtown into the new code and continue to build upon the current momentum. A downtown is the most unique built environment in the city and should be treated as such. Twentieth-century zoning philosophies like separating uses, conventional on -site parking requirements, auto - oriented building design and placement, and one —size -fits -all development and review processes that may be appropriate for other areas of the city are not appropriate for Downtown. Under the existing regulatory environment, Downtown Lubbock is one of the most difficult places in the city to develop due to code and approval processes tailored to suburban development. Given the Vision for a revitalized Downtown, it should be the easiest place in the city to develop. The UDC and specifically the Downtown FBC, are the primary regulatory tools that requires proper calibration for Downtown. It is also recommended that issues with the Building Code and related fire codes be reviewed and calibrated to Downtown. As part of the Master Plan Update, "redline" versions of the existing CBD zoning code and related Downtown Design Guidelines have been provided that identify mismatches between existing regulations and the desired Vision along with a list of items for consideration for the UDC Update. ADMINISTRATION ------------------------ - - - - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- Updated and tailored development regulations are a necessity and need to be administered in a way that is helpful to developers and business owners. The following should be taken into consideration for the UDC Update and/ or revisions to city policy: • Train staff on utilizing the IBC Existing Building Code to the fullest extent for redevelopment and renovations. • Provide an easy check list for all development applications. • Implement a "customer service model" for Development Services. When an applicant is pursuing desired development, work collaboratively to "get to yes". • Provide a predictable process for applicants in all departments including engineering, public works, fire, building inspections, etc. • Ensure that all relevant staff is trained on the updated UDC • Offer opportunities for design and engineering professionals to also be "trained" in the new code. • Ensure that City staff view themselves as implementers of good development, not just as "gatekeepers". • Generally, code enforcement should be business - friendly, with the aim of working collaboratively to address issues. • Fire and Building code needs to be responsive to historic buildings so that developers are not held to new construction standards. The City Manager should set internal policy and/or City Council can pass policy direction to make that objective explicit to provide direction to the Fire Marshall and Building Inspector. 84 ORGANIZATION ------------------------ - - - - - - rr v ---------------------------- Relative to city size, Downtown has had only fledging levels of business and development activity in the last decade. However, there is no lack of active organizations operating in Downtown - a good sign of awareness and civic engagement. Yet there is not a single entity, or "quarterback" to help align the various groups. This may limit the abilityforthe individual organizations to grow their and collective missions. There needs to be better coordination between the disparate stakeholder organizations for downtown to thrive. A Non -Profit Management Organization should be that quarterback. Many peer downtowns have a 501c4 entity that can speak with one voice for all the member organizations, businesses, and residents. Additionally this organization can take on other vital roles that will be required in the near term such as the role of a parking management authority, and shepherding a new civic park into fruition. FUNDING ------------------------- - - - - - - ---------------------------- There are several funding tools currently available including general funds, TIF revenue, grants, and Market Lubbock facade improvement funds. In order to revitalize downtown and spur private investment, public dollars need to be leveraged in a way that makes the biggest impact. Funding sources need to be further explored to creatively support desired investment in Downtown with the following considerations: • General fund CIP projects: utility and infrastructure investment should focused in areas where development is desired and synergistic momentum can be created. • Tax Increment Financing Districts (TIF Or TIRZ) bonds may be used to pay for public improvements associated with development, including but not limited to, parking, infrastructure, land acquisition, and utilities. • PID: the effectiveness of a PID is limited by the fact that there are very few significant revenue generating properties relative to the large geographical area of the CBD and a high number of non-taxable properties. For these reasons, the Master Plan Update recommends not moving forward with the proposed PID at this time. • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENT GRANTS: The facade and improvement grants program has proved to be successful should continue to help small and mid -size projects and even larger projects that rely on blended funding. This program can be used to activate vacant storefronts and support short-term activation strategies that can evolve into permanent businesses. • LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT (LIHTC) PROGRAM: there is an opportunity for Downtown Lubbock to be more attractive for LIHTC funds by Leveraging the Concerted Revitalization Plan (CRP) process to provide much -needed residential units and activity in Downtown. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 85 DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION ACTION PLAN, 2008 The RAP is a detailed plan built with extensive stakeholder input. Much of the data and observations have as much relevance now as in 2008. The lack of tranformative action in downtown over the past decade may be in part due to the plan being overly reliant on large catalytic projects. This approach is often less resilient to changes in the marketplace and public appetite for investment. Some of these projects have come to fruition (principally, Buddy Holly Hall). However, the opportunity to focus on many mid- level developments rather than several large ones, remains. A downtown is revived though dozens of block and building scale investments. (Some of this scale of development is under construction or in the pipeline). These moderate scaled investments can be leveraged through public investments like the "Supporting Elements" that the RAP recommends. A realistic time frame for public investment in utilities, transportation infrastructure, streetscape, etc. would yield an achievable redevelopment expectation, while reflecting many of the desired outcomes in the RAP. V r �.T NA �HE r - ,TH ➢LENNA GOOOACRE I BTH _ y13� O �1 L r 4,, «� .Mg., RPINPIV DOWNTOWN STANDARDS FOR THE CBD, 1999 Much of the content of the Design Standards, although adopted by ordinance, are recommended versus required. This approach can be confusing and not helpful. The preferred method would be to either only include required standards or create incentives for recommended standards so they can be made mandatory. The UDC code rewrite that is underway today provides the opportunity to be more detailed on preferred building placement for facilitating a walkable downtown. There needs to be a distinction between standards for new construction and additions/ renovation to historic buildings. It does a disservice to both when standards are conflated. This is especially applicable to building placement and building materials and methods of construction. Design Standards for the Central Business District City of Lubbock, Texas June 1999 IMAGINE LUBBOCK TOGETHER, 2013 Imagine Lubbock Together is aspirational and was also built on extensive public engagement. It has a detailed implementation matrix with responsible parties identified - calling for a central guiding entity to take responsibility for implementation. Many of these recommendations live on and are incorporated into the Master Plan Update. (� r Broadway MEN E -- 86 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS PLANS LUBBOCK CULTURAL DISTRICT STUDY, 2017 The executive summary, although talking specifically about the Cultural District does document many of the successes in downtown over the past decade. Many of the Future Objectives identified overlap with or are similar to the 2008 RAP Downtown recommendations and 2018 Public Design Standards AIA SDAT REPORT, 2018 The SDAT report contains public and stakeholder outreach that reinforces many of the same opportunities and threats that have been common though all the plans. The plan contains a robust implementation section that has many short, mid, and long term proposed actions. As a recent planning effort, some of the implementation recommendations are particularly relevant, especially related to the systems and financing recommendations, and the call for a central park. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN STANDARDS, 2018 There is tremendous value in a harmonious and quality public realm in a downtown. However, the expense of improving the public space in front of a property can be an impediment especially for small and mid -scale projects. A program should be explored to allow for a partial fee -in - lieu program or cost assistance paid for from TIF (or other funding), or deferral of improvements to allow for whole block scale improvements vs. a piece meal approach. P tLubbock TEXAS Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards City of Lubbock, Texas February, 2018 Approved by the City Council Parkway Pak" Material Property Line »n 1101 ❑_ � Tree Grat 5' soe6 Concrete Amenity ' X-5' S096 50% Brick J Zone �t y mom Street Parking DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 87 MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX FOCUS AREA DESIRED OUTCOME ACTION LEAD PARTNER/ INPUT POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCE YEAR 1: YEAR 2: YEAR 3: YEAR 4: YEAR 5: YEARS 6-10: ONGOING 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025-2029 Create a Non -Profit Task Force dedicated to Downtown Strengthen partnerships across organizations to maximize capacity and empower City of Lubbock, Master City of Lubbock, TIF Board, Master revitalization. advocates to take ownership of cultivating support and funding for key efforts. Developer Developer CBD TIF LEADERSHIP & ADVOCACY Prioritize investment. Develop a funding strategy for key initiatives. City of Lubbock City of Lubbock, TIF Board, Master Varies Developer Develop a strategy for communicating forthcoming Master Plan and UDC initiatives to the f Lubbock, TIF Board, Master public. Launch an educational effort to improve the public's perception of downtown and Non -Profit LEDA, Market Lubbock, CBD TIF, City of Lubbock PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT& Develop and launch a compelling marketing and public instill investor confidence. [Developer, Tech COMMUNICATION engagement campaign for Downtown. Roll -out communicating UDC initiatives to the public. Non -Profit ing Dept., Engineering Dept., City of Lubbock Works Dept. PROGRAMMING Continue hosting pop-up events and plan new activations that Curate a calendar of year-round program and activities. Non -Profit City of Lubbock Parks & Rec, LHUCA, CBD TIF, City of Lubbock Parks & FOCUSED promote Downtown revitalization. Local Business Owners Rec Prepare an Investment Prospectus for Downtown to amplify economic development ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Attract local investment to Downtown. efforts and incentivize local investment that contributes to Downtown's economic LEDA, Market Lubbock TIF Board Market Lubbock sustainability (via an Opportunity Zone Fund, Innovation District, etc.). Create a one -stop -shop with a user-friendly experience that is understandable and flexible City of Lubbock Master Developer, Market Lubbock, N/A to encourage Downtown development. City of Lubbock Development Services DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Streamline the development process. Perform an internal review and update the public realm design guidelines to improve City of Lubbock City of Lubbock Planning Department, N/A clarity. Master Developer POLICY & REGULATORY Update regulatory framework tools to encourage revitalization. Reduce parking ratios, update zoning to encourage mixed -use and higher density City of Lubbock Planning Dept. N/A FRAMEWORKS residential (test adjustments to frameworks in advance of UDC adoption). Pursue and establish an Historic District designation (decide type, develop process, time City of Lubbock Consultant N/A with UDC process and roll -out). Develop, pilot, and implement a vacancy ordinance for the Downtown CBD. City of Lubbock Building Dept., Planning Dept. N/A HISTORIC & Leverage existing assets to encourage revitalization. CULTURAL RESOURCES File for a Concerted Revitalization Plan (CRP) to leverage Low Income Housing Tax Credits City of Lubbock Community Development/ Housing N/A (LIHTC). Division Commission a traffic signal/ traffic flow study for Downtown. Desired results are fewer signalized intersections, two-way streets in general, and the conversion of angled parking City of Lubbock Non -Profit City of Lubbock to parallel where desired on -street parking is to remain. STREETS Transform the public realm into a vibrant, walkable environment. Develop the design and raise funds for the reconstruction of the Broadway corridor as a City of Lubbock, TIF Board Nan -Profit LEDA, CBD TIF, City Bond Issue model "hybrid" street (timed with utilities infrastructure upgrades). Implement pop-up programming for the Civic Park on Broadway to generate awareness City of Lubbock Parks & Rec, TIF and test programming ideas. Non -Profit Board CBD TIF Create a civic gathering place for Downtown. PARKS & City of Lubbock Parks & Rec, TIF CBD TIF, Private Funding, City Bond Develop the design and raise funds for the Civic Park on Broadway. Non -Profit OPEN SPACE Board Issue Develop a cohesive park network for Downtown. Update the Parks & Open Space Master Plan. City of Lubbock Non -Profit City of Lubbock Create a Public Art gateway at Broadway under the rail and highway (timed with lighting City of Lubbock Master Developer CBD TIF, City of Lubbock, LP&L upgrades). PUBLIC ART Create an authentic identity for Downtown. Create a Public Art Master Plan for Downtown (recommend focusing on the territory City of Lubbock Parks & Rec, LHUCA/ within the Cultural District). Non -Profit GASP, Gallery owners CBD TIF, City of Lubbock FOCUS AREA DESIRED OUTCOME ACTION �n LEAD PARTNER/ INPUT POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCE YEAR 1: 2020 YEAR 2: 2021 YEAR 3: 2022ig" 11111116— YEAR 4: MJ YEAR 5: 2024 YEARS 6-10: 2025-2029 ONGOING Free up land Downtown for higher and better uses such as developable parcels and open space. Begin process towards establishing a parking management plan and fully-fledged parking management department. Master Developer Consultant — CBD TIF — PARKING Establish City collaboration Eastablish a Downtown Parking Task Force Identify downtown stakeholders Hold stakeholder meetings (forums, meetings, surveys) Define downtown parking boundary/ parking sheds Inventory current shared parking agreements Inventory current parking supply (on/off street parking) Inventory building program (occupied/unoccupied) Establish parking occupancy Establish baseline current effective parking ratio Data collection Parking master plan Develop parking KPI's for evaluation Develop parking ratios for Parking Sheds Create/develop parking management tool (GIS, database) Monitor and update parking ratio data Parking marketing program Establish enforcement policy Establish parking time limits Develop formal parking variance process Implement parking rates Incentivize public/private facilities Consolidate Parking Management Leverage transit center Establish customer service based marketing Develop walking distance parking criteria Develop shared parking definitions/ordinance Establish on -street parking configuration Establish daily, evening and event parking operations Curb Management Implement parking wayfinding program Implement parking technology Parking rate structure Implement parking management systems Integrated parking and mobility program Parking investment strategy Require market based parking requirements Centralized parking UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE Upgrade systems Downtown to be "development read Pg Y P Y Provide temporary p ry power for year-round programs and events. City of Lubbock LHUCA/GASP, Buddy Holly Center LP&L Provide permanent power in sidewalks and update pedestrian lighting (timed with streetscape improvement projects and/or the reconstruction of sidewalks at development locations). City of Lubbock LHUCA/CASP, Buddy Holly Center LP&L Lift the protection of brick alleys to allow for the conversion to buried utilities and the combining of lots into larger development parcels. City of Lubbock _P&L N/A di Identify corridors for utility relocation. City of Lubbock LP&L N/A Conversion to buried utilities. City of Lubbock _P&L N/A Upgrade sewer lines (Phase 1, Phase 2) to accommodate for increased development Downtown. City of Lubbock City of Lubbock DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE 89 a� v od rl Fintnm nmmm f'l C"1 CrI f�l �I fS! � 2q f7-4 mil 91C11(Ti LLPmmCLI IN mmwm Ilmrnm r-, r l ncl ch r r cTI r7 cm �+ M rnmfficm mnmm I n 0 f71 mmmm f 2 1 I C Ivr 3 `Y �I \ 1 � k�� 1 CITY OF LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE ►_12JU111:i1 DECEMBER 2019 OVERLAND TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSOLIDATED PLAN IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX 3 - 7 UPDATED DIAGRAMS FOR DOWNTOWN PID STANDARDS 8 - 12 REDLINES TO PREVIOUS PLANS + ZONING ORDINANCES 13 - 144 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS PLANS 145 - 190 CONCERTED REVITALIZATINON PLAN (CRP) MEMO 191 - 205 CONSOLIDATED PLAN IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX CONSOLIDATED PLAN IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX: This is a curated and consolidated list of implementation priorities from prior plans viewed through the lens of the Downtown Master Plan Update which are recommended to be brought forward. TASK RESPONSIBLE ENTITY TIME -LINE ORIGINAL PLAN ORIGIN POLICY & LAND USE Incorporate a Master Organization as a legal entity. Identify and solicit membership. Fund and staff the entity with an executive director and an assistant. Identify City I RAP sub -groups of members responsible for: • Public/private communication coordination • Monitoring of development proposals and support those found favorable in front of appropriate approval boards Create an independent leadership entity to coordinate and drive downtown development. DLE; LEDA; City; I ILT Build in a strategy to make the entity fiscally self-sustaining (other than for capital improvements and special projects) after five years. downtown stakeholders Prioritize and promote Broadway and Buddy Holly -facing sites as preferred development infill sites. City; DLE I RAP Increase and diversify Downtown Core housing stock. Identify the most appropriate market segments to initiate residential return to downtown. Categories may City; DLE; I, 11, III RAP, PL include: Senior housing, Empty -nesters, Affordable housing, Multi -family housing, High -density townhomes, Lofts and condominiums, for -rent and for -sale and private sector Student housing. Continue discussions with the County/jail for consolidation of services outside of Downtown Core. City; County 11 RAP Identify potential conflicts between Master Plan uses and social services such as homeless shelters and soup kitchens. If conflicts exist, take early, pro -active City I RAP action to find suitable relocation options. Reevaluate liquor laws within the Downtown Core. Consider allowing package liquor sales to encourage new businesses. DLE; private 1, 11 RAP sector Establish a proactive planning process to mitigate adverse impacts of streetscape improvements upon downtown businesses. DLE I RAP Implement the plan recommendations on physical redevelopment and business development. DLE I ILT • Focus on downtown: Broadway and Avenue J. • Expand and grow the Cultural Arts District. • Expand and grow the Depot Entertainment District. • Renovate the Lubbock Memorial Civic Center. • Actively develop downtown housing. Support existing corridor plans and the development of new plans. Schedule more public events downtown. City; LEDA I PL Streamline and remove onerous requirements and inconsistencies in the Downtown Zoning Districts. City I PL Keep and periodically update an assessment of needed implementation tasks for Downtown. City; DLE I PL Revise the zoning, subdivision, and other related land development ordinances into a Unified Development Code (UDC) to match the planning and engineering City I PL goals of the Plan to an implementation mechanism. Build planning and economic development capacity in City Hall. Enlist more development and design staffing and expertise in City Hall. City; LEDA I SDAT Develop more aggressive public -sector financial incentives to support Downtown development. City; DLE I SDAT Improve City -Texas Tech relationship. City; TTU I SDAT D 70 70 La: X v CC TASK RESPONSIBLE ENTITY TIME -LINE ORIGINAL PLAN ORIGIN URBAN DESIGN Form a special district entity for Downtown Lubbock to assist the public and private sectors in managing Downtown maintenance, security, and marketing. This City; DLE I SDAT entity may require a professional organization that mediates between the public and private sectors, to manage Downtown and at least partially fund Downtown Formulate a brick streets plan, identifying streets to be removed and streets to be renovated. City I RAP Implement an 'active windows' program, where vacant ground -floor storefronts are used for window displays of local interest, activities and attractions. City; DLE; VL I RAP Standardize curb ramps within the Downtown Core. Ensure ADA accessibility, and outline a replacement program for existing ramps as well as new ramps for City I, II, III RAP streets to be rebuilt. Reduce the number of blank walls on buildings, particularly on north/south pedestrian streets that have few doors and lots of sides of buildings, replacing them City; DLE I, II RAP with appropriate enhancements such as art, murals, screens of historic photos of downtown and the community. Require existing private surface lots that do remain in the Downtown Core, particularly those facing Broadway, Buddy Holly and Ave J, to provide appropriate City I, II, III RAP screening from the street, whether with plant materials or low walls. Explore establishment of a Downtown Management Entity that immediately addresses the maintenance of sidewalks, striping, traffic control devices, street and City, DLE I RAP pedestrian lights, and signage. Sustain adequate maintenance of public areas including sidewalk and crosswalk surfaces, street and pedestrian lights, and readability of all Downtown signage. City; DLE I, II, III RAP Maintain adequate lighting for safety and aesthetics. City I, II, III RAP Require an open space component to all new downtown residential construction projects; open space may be aggregated on a multi -phase project, or cash -in -lieu City I, II, III RAP may be paid to fund public open space within the Core. Enhance Courthouse park to better address Broadway. This project is an excellent candidate for collaboration with a Texas Tech landscape architecture studio. City; County II RAP Initiate a comprehensive signage and wayfinding program that makes it easy to find and get around Downtown. Program should begin at the airport and continue City; DLE; COC; VL I RAP into the Downtown Core. Types of signage include: • Gateways • Directional signage • Public parking signage Complete design of new Gateway signage. City; COC; VL 1,11 RAP Amend relevant city ordinances/guidelines to enable building owners and tenants to hang banners, awnings, signage, utilize sandwich boards, and add facade City I RAP lighting and other building embellishments that enliven the Downtown. All of these elements must be carefully worded though to assure a consistent and not overwhelming/chaotic outdoor environment. Evaluate downtown streetscape requirements. Remove present conflicts to encourage vertical mixed -use in the zoning code. City I PL TASK RESPONSIBLE ENTITY TIME -LINE ORIGINAL PLAN ORIGIN INFRASTRUCTURE, TRANSPORTATION & UTILITIES Begin discussions with owners of private surface parking for shared parking and public parking programs. City I RAP • Develop a parking management strategy. Focus on short-term parking and visitor lots. Evaluate existing hourly limits on parking —whether more parking City I RAP should be limited, if time limits are appropriate, etc. Explore shared -parking opportunities with existing churches within and immediate to the Core, as well as existing downtown businesses that have dedicated lots City; churches; private I RAP that are not in use in the evenings. owners Develop a standard public parking identification system that is attractive and easily identifiable by users. This standard signage should be used for all public lots City; DLE 11 RAP and should clearly identify them as public. Once solutions to downtown parking issues have been implemented, coordinate a community outreach campaign to change current perception of 'not enough City; DLE; VL II RAP parking'. Create recreational bike and pedestrian loops that allow non -vehicular access to parks just outside of the Downtown Core. City III RAP Provide adequate bicycle facilities at visitor destinations and public facilities, as well as on -street locations. City; property owners II RAP Provide shuttle connection along Avenue J, between the Arts & Convention District, and between Texas Tech and the Depot Entertainment District. Citibus; City; II RAP DLE Prepare a comprehensive capital -improvements plan and program to anticipate and funding necessary for public infrastructure. Plan should align with phasing City I RAP plan for near term development projects, and cover: • Roadways • Water • Sewer • Electric • Telephone • Parks • Open space and trails • High-speed communication Work with utility companies to remove redundant or decommissioned infrastructure located in alleys. City; DLE I RAP Enhance Transportation & Parking Alternatives. As Lubbock's downtown develops and densifies, it will require having in place more alternative transportation City I, 11, III SDAT options and additional structured parking. TASK RESPONSIBLE ENTITY TIME -LINE ORIGINAL PLAN ORIGIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Initiate direct business outreach to encourage businesses to consider returning to the Downtown Core. Enlist both existing Core businesses and marketing COC; LEDA; I, II, III RAP personnel to make these contacts. City Continue to produce marketing brochures aimed at tourists that indicate, with mapped locations, where festivals and related interest activities take place and VL; DLE I, II, III RAP ways to get there. Make the Downtown Core visitor friendly by updating tourism pamphlets and other information to market the retail streets and local festivals. Update/create VL; City I, II, III RAP tourism, local resident, and employee maps that identify retail and pedestrian streets, public parking, cultural, civic, and entertainment venues. Undertake a community outreach program to build support for and participation in Downtown Revitalization. Promote volunteer positions on revitalization City; DLE I RAP committees, or with downtown -based organizations. Downtown needs a clean approach to public and private improvements. It will be important to revisit these existing requirements to remove inconsistencies, City I PL prepare a new Capital Improvements Plan, and encourage reinvestment in downtown. Embrace Equitable Economic Development. This will enable increases in job opportunities and business creation for current residents as well as help Lubbock City; LEDA I SDAT attract new people and businesses so that the metro economy becomes more diverse and resilient. ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT & CULTURE Establish an "Art in Public Places" program that showcases local and regional artists. City; CAE; IDLE II, III RAP Emphasize, strengthen, and promote visual and performing arts. Develop and grow entertainment venues and opportunities by supporting festivals and arts and CAE; LEPAA; , LHUCA; I, II, III ILT entertainment districts. LAA; VL; City; Education Institutions FUNDING Review and update established economic incentive policies in context with goals for the Downtown Core. Potential areas include: City; DLE I RAP • Building permit and utility fee reductions and deferrals • Historic preservation easements • Relocation assistance • Site clearing/demolition • Property tax abatement • Historic preservation tax incentives Abbreviation Key: City: City of Lubbock CDC: Chambers of Commerce DLE: Downtown Leadership Entity* CAE: Various Cultural and Arts Entities LEDA: Lubbock Economic Development Alliance LAA: Lubbock Arts Alliance LEPAA: Lubbock Entertainment and Performing Arts Association LHUCA: Louise Hopkins Underwood Center for the Arts VL: Visit Lubbock / the Convention and Visitor's Bureau I: Early Phase, 1-3 Years II: Mid Phase, 3-6 Years III: Late Phase, 6-10 Years RAP - Downtown Revitalization Action Plan, 2008 ILT - Imagine Lubbock Together, 2011 PL - Plan Lubbock 2040 Comprehensive Plan, 2018 SDAT - AIA SDAT Report, 2018 * The Downtown Leadership Entity represents the TIF Board and / or a master development entity. (This would ultimately become the Downtown Master Organizing Entity) UPDATED DIAGRAMS D m a X N (D u.1 Brick and Brick FIGURE 4: INTERSECTION PAVING CONCEPTS ❑ ASPHALT ❑ CONCRETE1 ❑ CONCRETE 0 HISTORIC BRICK ❑ NEW BRICK ❑ PAINTED BIKE LANE ■1 -TF- Brick and Non -Brick O PROPERTY LINE/ BUILDING LINE LIDEWALK I' I I I I ■ AMENITY ' PARKING �RIYE LANE FIGURE 6: NON GATEWAY OR CORRIDOR PARKWAY DETAIL ❑ ASPHALT ❑ CONCRETE1 ❑ NEW BRICK PROPERTY LINE/ BUILDING LINE SIDEWALK AMENITYZONE PARKING � i BIKE LANE FIGURE 7: CORRIDOR AND GATEWAY PARKWAY ❑ ASPHALT ❑ CONCRETE1 Fill Mile, HISTORIC BRICK ❑ PAINTED BIKE LANE PARKWAY PARKWAY MATERIAL < 10 > 10 50% OR 5' X-6' Concrete whichever is with Brick greater Inlay 50% OR 4' 16 whichever is A TYPICAL PEDESTRIAN LIGHT SPACING [1111f_,� 3118Z4i4-19_�]Uld �F_TO�7_MI.1�1: Ll:l*llr_,klllljglclikl6l BUILDING/ PROPERTY LI VISIBILITY LII D m a X TYPE 2 ADA W RAMP CURB RADIU DETERMINE[ DESIGN VEHI (25' SHOWN FOR AF a«11:14P]%a0:211_ 4:111111411111,1111A9ll:kraII ❑ RAMPED SURFACE ■ DETECTION STRIP ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL (APS) ZONE REDLINES Design Standardsforthe Central Business District City of Lubbock, Texas June 1999 Appendix Page:15 Design Standards Appendix Page:16 LUBBOCK CITY COUNCIL 1999 Windy Sitton, Mayor Victor Hernandez T.J. Patterson David Nelson Max Ince Marc McDougal Alex K. "Ty" Cooke, Jr. CITY OF LUBBOCK STAFF Sally Still Abbe, Planner Gary W. Smith, AIA, Facilities Manager Bill Boon, Planner Randy Henson, Senior Planner Linda Chamales, Supervising Attorney Jim Bertram, Director of Strategic Planning CONSULTANT Dennis Wilson, J.D. Wilson & Associates, Dallas CREDITS LUBBOCK URBAN DESIGN AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1999 David Miller, Chair Betty Carr, Vice Chair Paul Nash Marsha Jackson Robert Brodkin Grant Hall Michael Peters Jim Shearer FORMER URBAN DESIGN AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEMBERS Jan B. Matthews Mary Crites David Driskill Garry Kelly David Murrah CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AD HOC COMMITTEE John Berry Mackie Bobo Ken Flagg Doris Fletcher Don Kittrell Larry Simmons Abby Quinn 9& JUNE 1999 Appendix Page:17 Page 2 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Background 5 Goal of the Standards 5 Objectives of the Standards 5 Mandated by Zoning Ordinance 6 Improvements Not Required 6 Using the Standards 6 CB-1 West Broadway Site and Building Orientation 7 Building Mass and Scale 7 Proportion and Shape of Elements 8 Building Materials 8 Security 9 Awnings and Canopies 9 Finishes 10 Use of Color 10 Parking Areas 10 Screening 10 Landscape Areas 11 Exterior Lighting 11 Signage 12 Encroachments into Right -of -Way 12 CB-3 General CBD Site and Building Orientation 19 Building Mass and Scale 19 Proportion and Shape of Elements 20 Building Materials 20 Security 21 Awnings and Canopies 21 Finishes 21 Use of Color 21 Parking Areas 22 Screening 22 Landscape Areas 22 Exterior Lighting 23 Signage 23 Encroachments into Right -of -Way 24 Appendix CB-2 Downtown Site and Building Orientation 13 Building Mass and Scale 13 Proportion and Shape of Elements 14 Building Materials 14 Security 15 Awnings and Canopies 15 Finishes 16 Use of Color 16 Parking Areas 16 Screening 17 Landscape Areas 17 Exterior Lighting 17 Signage 18 Encroachments into Right -of -Way 18 CB-4 Depot District Site and Building Orientation 25 Building Mass and Scale 25 Proportion and Shape of Elements 26 Building Materials 26 Security 27 Awnings and Canopies 27 Finishes 28 Use of Color 28 Parking Areas 28 Screening 28 Landscape Areas 29 Exterior Lighting 29 Signage 30 Encroachments into Right -of -Way 30 Community Goals Relating to Urban Design 33 Standards for the Repair and Replacement of Building Materials and Features 35 Appropriate Plant Materials 43 Parkway Planting Standard 45 Definitions 47 Appendix Page: 18 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 3 Appendix Page:19 Page 4 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 Introduction BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES OF THE STANDARDS The need for guidance for projects in downtown Lub- bock was first considered in the 1989 Central Business District Revitalization Plan. As the Urban Design and Historic Preservation Commission set goals for its ac- tivities and made recommendations to the Goals for the 21st Century committee in the early 1990s, the issue of design guidelines in Central Lubbock and accompany- ing zoning ordinance revision resurfaced. The resulting goals relating to urban design standards are included in the appendix of this document. In 1995, the Lubbock City Council autho- rized the Urban Design and Historic Pres- ervation Commission to develop design guidelines and zoning ordinance revisions for the Central Business District and Broad- way Corridor that would address the spe- cific needs of downtown Lubbock. The Commission in- vited interested groups, including the Lubbock AIA, the Lubbock Heritage Society, Lubbock Chamber of Com- merce, Broadway Festivals, Inc., the Committee of Churches, Lubbock Commercial Realtors, the Depot District, CenterCorp, and Overton neighborhood asso- ciations, to join in the process. The group's study included careful review of all appli- cable codes, and resulted in the development of four new zoning districts to specifically address the needs of Central Lubbock. This document, Design Standards for the Central Business District, is incorporated in each of those zoning districts by reference. The standards and ordinances are among the tools for implementation of the community goals concerning downtown Lubbock. GOAL OF THE STANDARDS This document presents design standards for four his- torically significant areas of downtown Lubbock. The standards are not meant to dictate solutions, but rather to provide a common basis for making decisions about design that may affect individual properties and the overall character of these distinctive areas. They are designed to provide a consistent yet flexible approach forthe prepa- ration and review of development and redevelopment plans by defining a range of appropriate responses to a variety of specific design issues. The standards in this document are intended to aid in the preservation of Lubbock's cultural and historic re- sources within the Central Business Districts, and to promote new construction that is compatible with the character of the architecture within the surrounding area. A further intent is to provide information for property own- ers to use in making design decisions about their build- ings. The standards inform the community about the exterior design policies for these districts. They also reflect an approach to design that will help sustain the character of the area and build the Central Business District into a strong, identifiable area which will attract investment and reinvestment in properties. This document provides City staff, the Urban Design and Historic Preservation Commission (UDHPC), the Planning and Zoning Commission, Zoning Board of Adjustment and the City Council with a basis for mak- ing informed, consistent decisions about proposed projects in the central Lubbock area. Specifically, it is the intent of these standards to: • Protect and enhance the sense of time and place conveyed by the historic downtown area by preserving and enhancing its architectural integrity and identity, • Preserve, enhance and reuse significant existing architectural assets in down- town Lubbock, • Encourage new construction that is compatible in design, materials, color and texture with existing historic struc- tures, • Minimize negative impacts on adjacent properties from incompatible develop- ment, thus protecting property values and investments, and • Convey a sense of human scale that will encourage pedestrian activity. Appendix Page:20 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 5 MANDATED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE The standards in this document are incorporated by ref- erence in the City of Lubbock Zoning Ordinance, and are intended to guide development in the CB-1, CB-2, CB-3 and CB-4 zoning districts. The Zoning Ordinance sets out the authority of the Senior Planner to review and approve development plans under the CB zoning districts. The standards address all exterior construction changes in the CB zoning districts. All buildings, structures, ob- jects and sites must go through the design review pro- cess outlined in the Zoning Ordinance for that district before any alteration may be made to the building, struc- ture, object, or site. The review process only applies to exterior additions, renovations, and new construction. IMPROVEMENTS NOT REQUIRED It is important to note that neither the standards in this document nor the Zoning Ordinance requires property owners or tenants to initiate repairs or modifications to existing developments; and there is no deadline by which properties must come into "compliance." The Design Standards are meant to be used when a construction project is initiated by a property owner or tenant, either to alter the exterior of an existing structure or to con- struct a new one. Though the standards are intended as a guide for any development or renovation project, en- forcement by the city will be initiated when a construc- tion permit is required. USING THE STANDARDS Property owners, real estate agents, tenants, contrac- tors and architects should use the standards when plan- ning projects in the CB zoning districts. This will help establish an appropriate direction for the design. All projects with exterior renovations are subject to re- view. Applicants should hold a pre -application confer- ence with the Senior Planner and/or city staff. When an application for a construction permit in one of the CB zones is submitted, it must contain all information re- quired by the CB zoning districts in addition to that re- quired by the construction permit process and other or- dinances. Prior to issuance of a permit, the Senior Plan- ner will determine if the proposed project meets the in- tent of the zoning ordinance and the Design Standards for the Central Business District. If the Senior Planner determines that a proposal con- tains "unique circumstances which cannot be accom- modated" by the standards of a zoning district or the Design Standards for the Central Business District, the plans will be referred to the Urban Design and Historic Preservation Commission (UDHPC). The Commission shall use the CB zoning ordinances and the Design Stan- dards to make recommendations. Upon recommenda- tion by the Commission, the Senior Planner may vary the requirements of the Design Standards so long as the requirements of Section 29-19 of the Zoning Ordi- nance, the CB zoning districts, are not altered. Vari- ances from the requirements of Section 29-19, even if recommended by the UDHPC, must be approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Appendix Page:21 Page 6 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 Cowl West Broadway W stBroadway is historically a residential rea, and many formerly residential uildings have been converted to other land uses over the last 50 years. The residential development pattern and building style provides the district with a distinctive character. New buildings and exterior renovations should apply the form and materials common in the original residential neighborhood. The design standards below reflect some of the essential characteristics of this district —building setback, roof shape and materials, landscaping and window styles. SITE AND BUILDING ORIENTATION The location and orientation of the building, en- trance, parking and landscaping on a lot are important in retaining the overall character of an area, regardless of whether the Landscaped front yards with parking to the side and rear of the main building are an importantfeature of the West Broadway District project is residen- tial, commercial, industrial or mixed use Building Setbacks. West Broadway's many original residential yards maintain a unifying characteristic in spite of changes in land use over the last 50 years. Typi- cally, buildings are oriented parallel to the adjacent streets and set back from the street with a landscaped front yard. New buildings should be set back similarly. Building Entrances. The primary building entrance should be similar in scale to those of neighboring struc- tures. Buildings shall have a front -facing, clearly defined entry in the primary facade, similar to the orientation of neighboring historic structures. Location of Parking. Parking on -site in front of build- ings is undesirable. Off-street parking should be placed adjacent to the alley at the rear of the property, or situ- ated on another property in accordance with the CB-1 District of the City of Lubbock Zoning Ordinance. BUILDING MASS AND SCALE Building mass and scale are affected by such things as height, width, articulation, detailing, setback from property lines, materials used, amount of This new structure is large, but the form is openings, roof articulated like a residential building in form and other terms of form, detail and roof shape. features. Buildings in the West Broadway District should be residential in scale, with walls that are articulated into different planes. New construction should be similar in mass and scale to other structures found in the district, particularly neighboring historic buildings. Building Width. Repeat the historic pattern of building width which has been dictated by lot width. If new build- ings cover more than one or two lots, facade elements Appendix Page:22 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 7 should reduce the visual width of the building. Examples of those elements that give the impression of multiple structures include varying parapet or roof heights, alter- nating projecting and recessed sections of wall and win- dow arrangements. Building Articulation. Divide large buildings horizon- tally and vertically into sections that approximate the scale of existing historic structures within the district. Typical historic features that reduce the mass of large facades include columns or pilasters at regular inter- vals, repetitive patterns of openings and horizontal ma- sonry bands at each floor level. The size, alignment and repetition of facade elements such as windows, window sills, awnings, moldings and cornices should reflect the district's historic buildings — especially any neighboring historic structures. These features need not be exact reproductions of historic ele- ments nor be traditional in execution. Contemporary fa- cades can use similar methods to break up large build- ing faces into smaller units. Building Roofs. Pitched roofs are encouraged, and should be either hipped or gabled. Roofs should have a rise of at least four inches to a run of twelve inches. Flat roofs should be avoided unless they are indicative of a particular style which is common in the district. Single -slope shed roofs and roof styles such as onion domes, mansard or vaulted roofs are inappropriate as they are styles not common to the architecture of the district. PROPORTION AND SHAPE OF ELEMENTS The proportion and shape of building elements help to determine how well a building will relate to existing developments in the District. Different architec- tural styles contain distinctly different propor- tions and shapes. This structure maintains the residential shape of windows and doors, and the "solid -to -void" ratio. Solid to Void Ratio. New construction should approach the same ratio of solid (walls) to void (window and door openings) as neighboring structures. Facades of tradi- tional housing had a relatively small ratio of window and door openings to total wall area (30 to 35%) on both floors. The design and composition of these elements in new and renovated facades should be similar to this pro- portion. Shape of Windows. Historic windows common to this district are vertical inform, rather than horizontal; have rectangular shapes; and have divided glass, rather than large expanses of plate glass. The design of new win- dows should be consistent with these characteristics. Historic upper -story windows are typically vertical in form and have rectangular tops. Exotic Building Styles. Imitation of exotic building styles— i.e. Chinese, Polynesian, Alpine, etc.— is pro- hibited. BUILDING MATERIALS Depending on the type and use of building materi- als, a project can complement existing develop- ment or detract from it. Also, certain matenais like brick, stone Building materials are typically brick and certain types with stone, brick or wood trim. of stucco require little maintenance, while others require a lot of attention to keep the project in a state of good repair. Exterior building materials for new construction must be durable and similar in size, scale, color and finish to historic materials. Materials should be used in a manner consistent with traditional meth- ods of construction. This is of particular importance in the case of an addition to a historic or significant older structure, or a new structure adjacent to an older one. Facade Materials. Materials for primary faces of all new buildings and renovated exteriors shall include one or more of the following materials: unpainted clay or concrete brick, natural stone, cast stone, stucco, wood lap siding. Accent materials may include architectural decorative material (such as copper, bronze, anodized aluminum, stainless steel, porcelain enamel, natural ma- terials, or other similar materials that do not require paint- ing). Traditional brick sizes (3 5/8" x 7 5/8" x 2 5/8" ) and Appendix Page:23 Page 8 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 materials are encouraged as a complement to the ex- isting historic structures. Paneled materials in large sections are out of scale with materials used traditionally in this previously residential neighborhood, and are inappropriate. Corrugated metal siding, plywood, or other composite sheet or panel ma- terials may not be used. In addition, imitation sidings of vinyl, aluminum, steel and other materials are incon- sistent with traditional facades and should not be used. Roofing Materials. Roofing materials exposed to view from the street are limited to unpainted wood shingles, composition shingles in a muted or natural wood color, prefinished metal roofing panels in a muted color, clay, concrete and architectural metal tiles, or architectural decorative materials. Metal clad roofs that are not archi- tecturally decorative or gravel roofs in excess of a pitch ofY2 inch in 12 inches shall not be exposed above the fascia or parapet walls. Trim Materials. Acceptable trim materials include brick, cast stone, natural stone, ceramic tile, wood, concrete or architectural decorative metals. Windows and Doors. Windows and doors should be comprised of wood, glass, painted metal or architec- tural decorative metal appropriate for the style. Metal or vinyl clad wood windows and clear or unfin- ished aluminum windows and storm windows must be finished in a color typical of historic windows or in a color that complements other finished materials. Reflective Glass. Mirrored or reflective glass, dark tinted glass and glass block units are inconsistent with the historic architecture of this District. The maximum al- lowable daylight reflectance of glass used as an exte- rior building material should not exceed fifteen (15) per- cent. Dark tinted glass is any single pane glass that at one -quarter -inch (1/4") thickness has an average day- light transmittance of less than seventy-four (74) per- cent, or any insulated glass with an average daylight transmittance of less than sixty-five (65) percent. Fences. Fencing materials shall be limited to wood pickets (painted or natural), painted wrought iron, smooth to medium coarse stucco over concrete masonry units, clay or concrete brick, and stone. No chain link fencing shall be visible from Broadway. SECURITY Security bars have become a common method of preventing loss of property. However, inappropriate use of them can detract from property values in an area and can even discourage customers. Security Bars. Measures should be taken so that win- dow and door security bars and shutters do not detract from the character of the district. Care should be taken that such security hardware should be compatible with the style of the building. Wrought iron bars placed over the storefront windows are particularly detrimental to the facade's appearance and promote feelings of vulnerability. Wrought iron se- curity grills are acceptable only if installed on the inte- rior of the glass in this district. AWNINGS AND CANOPIES Awnings and canopies provide shelter from wind and sun in pedes- trian areas, protect interior furnish- ings and finishes from fading caused by direct sunlight, Awnings and canopies should be allow reflected consistent with the style and materials light to enter the of the main structure interior without increasing heat load and add architectural interest or historic ambiance to structures. However, the appropriateness of awnings to a building's architec- tural style should be considered before installing them. Location. Awnings and canopies should be placed at the top of openings, but they should not hide important architectural details and elements. Residential Buildings. Awnings should not be con- tinuous along the entire face of the structure. Place indi- vidual awnings over single windows or other openings. Shape. The shape of awnings and canopies should fit the shape of the openings —round or arched awnings over arched openings and rectangular shed awnings over rectangular openings. Odd shapes, bullnose awnings and bubble awnings are inappropriate. Operable Awnings. Operable awnings are encouraged, but rigid frame awnings also may be used. Materials. Acceptable materials are canvas or woven acrylic over painted steel or anodized aluminum frames. Shiny vinyl or plastic fabrics are prohibited, as are pre- fabricated metal awnings. Canopies should be con- structed of a material consistent with the building's style. Appendix Page:24 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 9 Color. The color of awnings and canopies should be compatible with the overall color scheme for the project. (See the section on "Use of Color" for more information.) Lighting. Internally illuminated awnings are prohibited FINISHES Finishes primarily protect materials from deteriora- tion, but can also add charm and character to a structure and a district. The proper use and mainte- nance of finishes is important to the longevity of the building. They should always be of a type and composition that are appropriate for the materials to which they will be applied. In fact, inappropriate finishes can actually harm materials. Matte Finish. Simple finishes are preferred and should be matte, not polished. Masonry. Brick and stone should not be painted. Lap Siding. Lap siding should be finished in a solid color. Stucco. Stucco should be smooth to medium coarse in texture. USE OF COLOR Color can help to coordinate facade elements into an overall composition — one that will high- light features of the facade. Distinctive architectural ele- Colors should reflect the building style and be muted. ments may be ac- cented with a con- trasting color. Any color scheme should be sub- dued, not garish, and in keeping with the character and color schemes of nearby structures. Compatible Colors. Trim colors should be selected that are compatible with other, more permanent building materials on the structure, such as brick, stone or stucco. The natural colors of these primary materials should dominate the color scheme from the street. Limit the number of colors used in the color scheme. If the entire wall surface or "body" of the structure is painted, one base color should be chosen for the majority of the surface. Trim, including horizontal and vertical trim boards, porch framing and columns and window framing, should be painted in a color that compliments the base shade. Window sash, doors and/or shutters may be painted in a third color. Bright Colors. Fluorescent exterior colors are prohib- ited. Extremely bright colors should be used in small amounts and for accent only. An extremely bright or fluorescent color is a color defined by the Munsell Book of Color as having a minimum value or eight (8) and a minimum chroma of ten (10). PARKING AREAS Where off-street parking is neces- sary, parking lots should be unobtru- sive, attractive and secure in order to preserve and enhance the character of the area. Careful location of off- street parking and screening of parking areas from the street lessen the visual impact of parking. Parking areas should be unobtrusive, attractive and secure. Appearance and Security. To improve the appear- ance and comfort of parking areas, planting beds with shade trees and lighting should be utilized throughout the parking lot. These features should also be planned carefully to promote safety and security. Limbs of trees over parking areas should provide at least seven (7) feet of clearance. Shrubs should be low enough to provide a sense of security for the user. See the Exterior Lighting section for information on parking lot lighting. Parking Lot Screen. When parking can not be placed to the rear of the main building, the parking areas shall be screened by a three (3) foot high fence set back at least six (6) feet from the front property line. The re- quired solid fencing should be constructed of brick, stone, wood, stuccoed concrete masonry units or wrought iron. All fencing which is visible from a public area should be architecturally compatible with the pri- mary structure. The area between the fence and prop- erty line must be landscaped. SCREENING Unattractive features of a building should be screened from public view, such as dumpsters, utilities, air conditioner compressors and solar energy devices. Outdoor dining must have low level screening to protect from wind blown trash, yet Appendix Page:25 Page 10 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 preserve visibility. Outdoor Dining. Outdoor dining areas must be com- pletely surrounded by "an architecturally compatible" fence designed to prevent trash from being blown onto adjacent areas. In a front yard, such fencing shall be three (3) feet in height. Screening Material. Screening fences must be con- structed of brick, stone, decorative concrete masonry units, stuccoed concrete masonry units, or metal (wrought iron, steel or aluminum bars). Rooftop Equipment. All roof -mounted mechanical equipment more than three (3) feet in height should be screened from view from any street. Screening materi- als must be architecturally compatible with materials used elsewhere on the structure. Mansard roofs may not be used. (See the "Parking Areas" section for parking screening.) LANDSCAPE AREAS Landscaping helps to soften the harshness of development, and creates attractive areas to view, visit and use. Trees and shrubs help to reduce the amount of wind and dust in an area. Landscaping is especially impor- area. tant for patios, sidewalks and parking areas. Landscaping softens development and reduces wind and dust in the Minimum Required. Landscaping enhances both the pedestrian experience and the historic character of this formerly residential neighborhood. The front yard shall be landscaped according to the standards of the CB-1 zoning district. Highlight Architectural Features. Plant materials should be used to highlight building features. Avoid hid- ing important architectural details and building entrances. Street Trees. Trees located in the parkway shall be single trunked, a minimum of two and one-half inch (2 1/2") caliper, and planted in a manner similar to the diagram in the Appendix. Irrigation. An automatic underground irrigation sys- tem is preferred for all landscaped areas, both on the development tract and in the parkway. (See the "Parking Areas" section for parking lot land- scaping.) EXTERIOR LIGHTING Suitable lighting for different types of uses is important to the ambiance of a district. In addition, lighting provides safety for vehicular and pedestrian traffic, aids in the prevention of crime and provides a sense of security for users. The type of lighting should be appropriate for the intended use of the illumination. Use of Lighting. Lighting may be used to illuminate architectural details, building entries, signage, sidewalks, alleys and parking areas. However, lighting should not dominate a facade or the street. Building lighting should be directed away from neighbor- ing residential structures. Lighting fixture lamps should be shielded to focus light where it is needed. Types of Lighting. Incandescent is "warm" in appear- ance and metal halide is a truly "white" light. Fluores- cent lighting and mercury vapor lighting tend to be blue and high pressure sodium lighting is slightly orange. In- candescent and metal halide lighting yield the most ac- curate and attractive colors for people and merchandise and are therefore preferred in pedestrian and retail ar- eas. Mercury vapor may be used for security lighting of large parking areas. High pressure sodium should be avoided for area lighting, but may be used to floodlight a building. Building Light Fixtures. Choose fixtures, whetherwall- mounted or on poles, that complement the style of the structure and the District. Fully recessed downlights, pole lights and gooseneck lights are encouraged since these are consistent with the historic character of the area. In the West Broadway District, lighting fixtures should be coordinated with plantings, buildings, utilities, and the Broadway Streetscape Plan in terms of their loca- tion, size and height. Parking Lot Fixtures. Lighting in parking areas should be higher in intensity and height above the ground than that intended solely for pedestrians. Lamp heights should be between fifteen (15) and thirty (30) feet, and metal halide and mercury vapor lamps are acceptable. Other Lighting. Landscape and facade lighting is en- couraged. June 1999 Appendix Page:26 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 11 SIGNAGE signage serves two functions —to convey information and to attract attention. The overall facade composi- tion, including orna- mental details, color and materials, should be considered when determining the loca- tion, size and character of signage. ENCROACHMENTS INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY A license must be secured for any use of the public right-of-way. Licenses may be granted for: • Canopies/Awnings • Outdoor dining • Pedestrian street lights • Planters Signage should respect the Trees and other plant materials located in the parkway architecture, materials and (the area between the property line and the curb) shall colors of the main building. not require a license provided they are shown on an approved site plan. Sign Design. Consider both pedestrian and vehicular traffic in selecting and designing signage. Signage and the Building. Signage should be low- key in orderto avoid competition with the architecture of the structure. Materials and design should be compat- ible with the building's materials and style. Locate signs so that they emphasize design elements of the facade, but do not obscure architectural details, windows or other significant features. Signs can also reinforce the horizontal lines of moldings and transoms, and accent architectural details when placed appropri- ately. The design and style of both the lettering and sign should complement the style of the building. Signs for multiple businesses in a single building should be designed with similar materials, backs and lettering styles. Materials. Glass, painted wood, painted metal or ar- chitectural decorative metals such as copper, bronze, brass, aluminum or stainless steel are appropriate sign materials. Unfinished, non -decorative materials, includ- ing unpainted wood and highly reflective materials are discouraged. Plastic is only allowed as individual three dimensional letters applied to a sign or building, orwhere the face of an existing sign is to be replaced with like materials. Sign Lighting. Sign lighting should be indirect, not bright and glaring. Internal illumination of signs is pro- hibited. Neon lighting should be used only in small amounts and where appropriate to the building design. Sign Review. The Urban Design and Historic Preser- vation Commission may determine that there are "unique circumstances" that warrant varying the Design Stan- dards for the Central Business District for signage, and may make recommendations to the Senior Planner for such modification. Appendix Page:27 Page 12 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 CBm2 Downtown owntown Lubbock has always been a busi- ness and government district containing a broad variety of types and styles of develop- ment and will continue largely as an office district. The key objective is compatibility of new construc- tion with adjacent buildings and the district's historic development. SITE AND BUILDING ORIENTATION The location and orientation of the building, entrance, parking and landscaping on a lot are important in retaining the overall character of an area, regard- less of whether the project is residential, commercial, industrial, or mixed use. Buildings should be located adjacent to the sidewalk with clearly identified front facing entries. Building Location and Orientation. New buildings in the Downtown District should be visually and physically compatible in their siting and orientation with their neigh- bors, particularly those that are significant historic struc- tures. Buildings should be set near or on the front prop- erty line to maintain a consistent "street wall." Buildings should be oriented parallel to the adjacent streets, not angled. Building Entrances. The primary building entrance should be similar in scale to those of neighboring struc- tures. Although a building may be large, entries should be scaled to the pedestrian level, thus making the build- ing more appealing and the interior space more inviting. Buildings shall have a front -facing, clearly defined entry in the primary facade, similar to the orientation of his- toric structures. Parking Location. Parking on -site in front of buildings is undesirable. Where large amounts of off-street park- ing is required in the CB-2 District, it should be placed adjacent to the alley at the rear of the property, or simi- larly situated on another property in accordance with the CB-2 Section of the Zoning Code. BUILDING MASS AND SCALE Building mass and scale are affected by such things as y height, width, articulation, r detailing, setback from property lines, materials used, amount of openings, roof Articulation and detail should blend form and other with historic buildings, as in this features. New addition to an existing building. construction should be similar in mass and scale to other structures found in the district— particularly neighboring historic buildings. Building Height and Width. Structures in the Down- town District are usually large —often more than two floors in height —and extend across the width of the lot. Their facades are generally flat and rectangular in form. New buildings should be developed in a similar manner. Repeat the historic pattern of building width which has been dictated by lot width. If new buildings cover more than one or two lots, facade elements should reduce Appendix Page:28 June 1999 Page 13 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD the visual width of the building. Examples of those ele- ments that give the impression of multiple structures include varying parapet heights, alternating projecting and recessed sections of wall and window arrangements. New offices and stores need not match the height of neighboring structures exactly, but should be similar to adjacent building heights at the street facade. Building Articulation. Divide large buildings horizon- tally and vertically into sections that approximate the scale of existing historic structures within the district. Typical historic features that reduce the mass of large facades include columns or pilasters at regular inter- vals, repetitive patterns of openings and horizontal ma- sonry bands at each floor level. These features need not be exact reproductions of historic elements nor be tradi- tional in execution. Contemporary facades can use simi- lar methods to break up large building faces into smaller units. The size, alignment and repetition of facade elements such as windows, window sills, awnings, moldings and cornices should reflect the district's historic buildings, especially any neighboring historic structures. Building Roofs. Most of the historic commercial struc- tures in the downtown area have flat roofs with parapet walls that extend above the roof. This treatment is en- couraged for new structures. A projected cornice at the top of the parapet (a common historic feature), should be considered in the design of new buildings. A cornice serves to screen roofs and mechanical equipment and to provide architectural in- terest and historic character. Single -slope shed roofs, mansard and vaulted roofs, and exotic roofs such as onion domes are inappropriate, since they are styles not common to the architecture of downtown Lubbock. PROPORTION AND SHAPE OF ELEMENTS The proportion and shape of building elements help to determine how well a building will relate to existing developments in the district. Differ- ent architectural Windows at grade make a building styles contain attractive to pedestrians. distinctly different proportions and shapes. Windows. Historically, urban storefront buildings had a large amount of window area on the first floor to appeal to pedestrian traffic. First floor facades generally con- sist of between 80 and 90% glass, usually a series of large windows extending nearly the width of the build- ing. New and renovated facades should attempt to achieve a similar style and amount of ground floor win- dow area. Historic upper story windows in urban areas are vertical in form rather than horizontal, have rectangular tops, and have multi -paned, divided glass. The upperfloorwin- dows of a street -facing facade are smaller proportionally than the first floor windows. Exotic Building Styles. Imitation of exotic building styles— i.e. Chinese, Polynesian, Alpine, etc.— is pro- hibited. BUILDING MATERIALS Depending on the type and use of building materials, a project can complement existing devel- opment or detract from it. Certain materi- als, like brick, stone and Facade materials are mainly brick and stone in the Downtown District. certain types of stucco, require little maintenance, while others require attention to keep the project in a state of good repair. Exterior building materials for new construction should be durable and similar in size, scale, color Appendix Page:29 Page 14 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 and finish to historic materials. Materials should be used in a manner consistent with traditional meth- ods of construction. This is of particular importance in the case of an addition to a historic or significant older structure or a new structure that abuts an older one. Facade Materials. Facade materials for all new build- ings and exterior renovations should include one or more of the following materials —unpainted clay or concrete brick, terra-cotta, natural stone, cast stone, granite, marble, travertine or architectural decorative material (such as copper, bronze, anodized aluminum, stainless steel, porcelain enamel or other similar materials that do not require painting). Paneled materials in large sections are out of scale with materials used traditionally, and are inappropriate in this district. Metal siding, plywood or other composite sheet or panel materials may not be used. In addition, imitation siding comprised of vinyl, alumi- num, steel and other materials, are inconsistent with traditional commercial facades and are not allowed. Trim Materials. Acceptable trim materials include brick, cast stone, natural stone, ceramic tile, wood, concrete or architectural decorative metals. Windows and Doors. Windows and doors should be comprised of wood, glass, painted metal, or architec- tural decorative metal appropriate for the style. Metal or vinyl clad wood windows and clear or unfin- ished aluminum windows and storm windows must be finished in a color typical of historic windows or in a color that complements the colors of other finished ma- terials. Reflective Glass. Mirrored or reflective glass, dark tinted glass and glass block units are inconsistent with the historic architecture of this district. The maximum al- lowable daylight reflectance of glass used as an exte- rior building material should not exceed fifteen (15) per- cent. Dark tinted glass is any single pane glass that at one -quarter inch (1/4") thickness has an average day- light transmittance of less than seventy-four (74) per- cent, or any insulated glass with an average daylight transmittance of less than sixty-five (65) percent. Roof Materials. Roofing materials which are visible from the street are limited to clay, concrete or metal tiles, prefinished metal roofing panels in a muted color, or architectural decorative materials. Metal clad roofs that are not architecturally decorative or gravel roofs in excess of a pitch of '/2 inch in 12 inches shall not be exposed above the fascia or parapet walls. Fences. Fencing materials shall be limited to wood pickets (painted or natural), painted wrought iron, smooth to medium coarse stucco over concrete masonry units, clay or concrete brick, and stone. Chain link fences may not be visible from Broadway. SECURITY Security bars have become a common method of preventing loss of property. However, inappropriate use of them can detract from property values in an area and can even discourage customers. Security Bars. Measures should be taken so that win- dow and door security bars and shutters do not detract from the character of the district. Security hardware should be compatible with the style of the building. Wrought iron bars placed over the storefront windows are particularly detrimental to the facade's appearance and promote feelings of vulnerability. Wrought iron se- curity grills are acceptable only if installed on the inte- rior of the glass in this district. AWNINGS AND CANOPIES Awnings and canopies provide shelter from wind and sun in pedestrian areas, protect interior furnish- ings and finishes from fading caused by direct sunlight, allow re- flected light to enter the interior without increasing heat load and add architectural interest or historic ambiance to structures. However, the appropri- ateness of awnings to a building's architectural style should be consid- ered before installing them. Awnings and canopies should be appropriate for the style and materials of the main building. Location. Awnings and canopies should be placed at the top of openings, but they should not hide important architectural details and elements. Shape. The shape of awnings and canopies should fit the shape of the openings —round or arched awnings over arched openings and rectangular shed awnings over Appendix Page:30 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 15 rectangular openings. Odd shapes, bullnose awnings and bubble awnings are inappropriate. Operable Awnings. Operable awnings are encouraged, but rigid frame awnings also may be considered. Materials. Acceptable awning materials are canvas or woven acrylic over painted steel or anodized aluminum frames. Shiny vinyl or plastic fabrics should be avoided, as should prefabricated metal awnings. Canopies should be constructed of a material consistent with the archi- tecture. Color. The color of awnings and canopies should be compatible with the overall color scheme for the project. (See the "Use of Color" section for more information.) Lighting. Internally illuminated awnings are prohibited. FINISHES Finishes primarily protect materials from deteriora- tion, but can also add charm and character to a structure and a district. The proper use and mainte- nance of finishes is important to the longevity of the building. They should always be of a type and composition that are appropriate for the materials to which they will be applied. In fact, inappropriate finishes can actually harm materials. Matte Finish. Simple finishes are preferred and should be matte, not polished. Masonry. Brick and stone should not be painted. Lap Siding. Lap siding should be finished in a solid color —either paint or prefinished. Stucco. Stucco should be smooth to medium coarse in texture. USE OF COLOR Color can help to coordinate facade elements into an overall composition —one that will highlight features of the facade. Distinctive architectural elements may be dramatized with a contrasting color. Any color scheme should be subdued, not garish, and in keeping with the character and color schemes of nearby structures. Compatible Trim Color. Trim colors should be se- lected that are compatible with other, more permanent building materials on the structure, such as brick, stone or stucco. The natural colors of these primary materials should dominate the color scheme from the street. Limit the number of colors used in the color scheme. If the entire wall surface or "body" of the structure is painted, one base color should be chosen for the majority of the surface. Trim, including horizontal and vertical trim boards, window framing, porch framing and columns should be painted in a color that complements the base shade. Window sashes, doors and/or shutters may be painted in a third color. Bright Colors. Extremely bright or fluorescent exterior colors are discouraged. Bright colors should be used in small amounts, and for accent only. An extremely bright or fluorescent color is a color defined by the Munsell Book of Color as having a minimum value or eight (8) and a minimum chroma often (10). PARKING AREAS Where off- street parking is necessary, parking lots should be unobtrusive, attractive and secure in order to preserve and Screening and landscaping make parking enhance the areas attractive and unobtrusive. character of the area. Careful location of off-street parking and screening of parking areas from the street lessen the visual impact of parking. Appearance and Security. To improve the appear- ance and comfort of parking areas, planting beds with shade trees and lighting should be utilized throughout the parking lot. These features should also be planned carefully to promote safety and security. Limbs of trees over parking areas should provide at least seven (7) feet of clearance. Shrubs should be low enough to provide a sense of security for the user. Curb Cuts. No new curb cuts are allowed on Broad- way. New access shall be from alleys or side streets. Parking Lot Screen. When parking can not be placed to the rear of the main building, the parking areas shall be screened by a two and one-half foot (2 1/2') high fence set at the property line. The required solid fencing should be constructed of brick, stone, wood, stuccoed concrete masonry units, or wrought iron. All fencing which is visible from a public area should be architectur- ally compatible with the primary structure. The area be - Page 16 Appendix Page:31 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 tween the fence and property line must be landscaped. See the "Exterior Lighting" section for parking lot light- ing information.) SCREENING Unattractive features of a building, such as dumpsters, utilities, air conditioner compressors and solar energy devices, shouldbe screened from public view. Outdoor dining should be screened Outdoor dining .from adjacent roadways. must have low level screening to protect from wind blown trash, yet preserve visibility. Outdoor Dining. Outdoor dining areas must be com- pletely surrounded by "an architecturally compatible" fence designed to prevent trash from being blown onto adjacent areas. In a front yard, such fencing shall be three (3) feet in height. Screening Material. Screening fences must be con- structed of brick, stone, decorative concrete masonry units, stuccoed concrete masonry units or metal (wrought iron, steel or aluminum bars). Rooftop Equipment. All roof -mounted mechanical equipment more than three (3) feet in height should be screened from view from any street. Screening materi- als for rooftop equipment must be of a material architec- turally compatible with the materials used elsewhere on the structure. (See the section on Parking Areas for parking screen- ing. ) LANDSCAPE AREAS Landscaping helps to soften the harshness of development and creates attractive areas to view, visit and use. Trees and shrubs help to reduce the amount of wind and dust in an area. Landscaping is especially important for patios, sidewalks and parking areas. Required Landscaping. Though facades placed di- rectly on the front property line are encouraged in this area, any front yard must be landscaped according to the standards of the CB-2 zon- ing district. Landscaping can make pedestrian areas comfortable and make projects attractive. Highlight Architectural Features. Plant materials should be used to highlight building features. Avoid hid- ing important architectural details and building entrances. Street Trees. Trees located in the parkway shall be single trunked, a minimum of two and one-half inch (2 1/2") caliper, and planted in a manner similar to the diagram in the Appendix. Irrigation. An automatic under ground irrigation sys- tem is preferred for all landscaped areas, both on the development tract and in the parkway. (See the "Parking Areas" section for parking lot land- scaping.) EXTERIOR LIGHTING Suitable lighting for different types of uses is important to the ambiance of a district. In addition, lighting provides safety for vehicular and pedestrian traffic, aids in the prevention of crime and provides a sense of security for users. The type of lighting should be appropriate for the intended use of the illumination. Use of Lighting. Lighting may be used to illuminate architectural details, building entries, signage, sidewalks, alleys and parking areas. However, lighting should not dominate a facade or the street. Building lighting should be directed away from neighbor- ing residential structures. Lighting fixture lamps should Appendix Page:32 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 17 be shielded to focus light where it is needed Types of Lighting. Incandescent is "warm" in appear- ance and metal halide is a truly "white" light. Fluores- cent lighting and mercury vapor lighting tend to be blue and high pressure sodium lighting is slightly orange. In- candescent and metal halide lighting yield the most ac- curate and attractive colors for people and merchandise and are therefore preferred in pedestrian and retail ar- eas. Mercury vapor may be used for security lighting of large parking areas. High pressure sodium should be avoided for area lighting, but may be used to floodlight a building. Lighting Fixtures. Choose fixtures, whether wall - mounted or on poles, that complement the style of the structure and the district. Fully recessed downlights, pole lights and gooseneck lights are encouraged since they are consistent with the historic character of the area. In the Downtown District, lighting fixtures should be co- ordinated with plantings, buildings, utilities, and the Broadway Streetscape Plan in terms of location, size and height. Parking Lot Fixtures. Lighting in parking areas should be higher in intensity and height above the ground than that intended solely for pedestrians. Lamp heights should be between fifteen (15) and thirty (30) feet and metal halide and mercury vapor lamps are acceptable. Other Lighting. Lighting of facades and landscaping is encouraged. SIGNAGE Signage serves two func- tions —to convey information and to attract attention. The overall facade composition, including ornamental details, color and materials, should be considered when determining the location, size and character of sig- nage. Sign Design. Consider both pedestrian and vehicular traffic Signage should be in selecting and designing appropriatefor the slgnage. architecture of the Signage and the Building. building. Signage should be low-key to avoid competing with the architecture of the structure. Materials should be compatible with the building's ma- terials and style. Locate signs so that they emphasize design elements of the facade, but do not obscure architectural details, windows or other significant features. Signs can also reinforce the horizontal lines of moldings and transoms and accent architectural details when placed appropri- ately. The design and style of both the lettering and sign should complement the style of the building. Signs for multiple businesses on a single building should be designed with similar materials, backs and lettering styles. Materials. Glass, painted wood, painted metal or ar- chitectural decorative metals such as copper, bronze, brass, aluminum or stainless steel are appropriate sign materials. Unfinished, non -decorative materials, includ- ing unpainted wood and highly reflective materials, are discouraged. Plastic is only allowed as individual three dimensional letters applied to a sign or building. Sign Lighting. Sign lighting should be indirect, not bright and glaring. Internal illumination of signs is pro- hibited. Neon decoration and signs should be used only in small amounts, and where appropriate to the building design. Sign Review. The Urban Design and Historic Preser- vation Commission may determine that there are "unique circumstances" that warrant varying the Design Stan- dards for the Central Business District for signage, and may make recommendations to the Senior Planner for such modification. ENCROACHMENTS INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY A license must be secured for any use of the public right-of-way. Licenses may be granted for — Pedestrian street lights • Projecting wall signs • Canopies/Awnings • Outdoor dining • Planters Trees and other plant materials located in the parkway (the area between the property line and the curb) shall not require a license provided they are shown on an ap- proved site plan. Appendix Page:33 Page 18 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 CO-3 General COD e General CBD (CB-3) District is located south of the Downtown (CB-2) District. This histori- cally residential area has changed considerably over the years —evolving into commercial, industrial, residential, and civic structures. Although the area is diverse in character, new buildings in this District should respect their surroundings by being visually and physically compatible with their neighbors — particularly those that are historic structures. The guidelines for the CB-3 District respect that diversity by giving building owners, developers and architects more freedom in design than other Downtown districts while trying to maintain the ambiance of this historic area of the city. SITE AND BUILDING ORIENTATION The location and orientation of the building, entrance, parking and landscap- ing on a lot are important in retain- ing the overall character of an area, regardless of whether the project is residen- tial, commercial, industrial, or mixed use. Frontfacing buildings with no parking lots in front contribute to the area. Building Location and Orientation. New buildings in the General CBD District should be visually and physi- cally compatible in their siting and orientation with their neighbors. Buildings should be oriented parallel to the adjacent streets, not angled. Building Entrances. The primary building entrance should be similar in scale to those of neighboring struc- tures. Although a building may be large, entries should be scaled to the pedestrian level, thus making the build- ing more appealing and the interior space more inviting. Buildings shall have a front -facing, clearly defined entry in the primary facade, similar to the orientation of his- toric structures. Parking Location. Parking on -site in front of buildings is generally undesirable. However, it may be acceptable if this feature is consistent with neighboring properties. If a large amount of off-street parking is required, con- sider placing it adjacent to the alley at the rear of the property, or on another property according to the stan- dards of the CB-3 Zoning District. BUILDING MASS AND SCALE Building mass and scale are affected by such things as height, width, articulation, detailing, setback from property lines, materials used, amount of Height, mass, materials and detailing openings, roof build on the special character of the form, and other district. features. New construction should be similar in mass and scale to other structures found in the district, particularly neighboring historic buildings. Building Width. Repeat the historic pattern of building width which has been dictated by lot width. If new build- ings cover more than one or two lots, facade elements should reduce the visual width of the building. Examples Appendix Page:34 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CBD Page 19 of those elements that give the impression of multiple structures include varying parapet heights, alternating projecting and recessed sections of wall and window arrangements. Building Articulation. Divide large buildings horizon- tally and vertically into sections that approximate the scale of existing historic structures within the district. Typical historic features that reduce the mass of large facades include columns or pilasters at regular inter- vals, repetitive patterns of openings and horizontal ma- sonry bands at each floor level. These features need not be exact reproductions of historic elements nor be tradi- tional in execution. Contemporary facades can use simi- lar methods to break up large building faces into smaller units. The size, alignment and repetition of facade elements such as windows, window sills, awnings, moldings and cornices should reflect the district's historic buildings — especially any neighboring historic structures. Building Roofs. Single -slope shed roofs, mansard and vaulted roofs and exotic roofs such as onion domes are inappropriate, as they are styles not common to the architecture of downtown Lubbock. PROPORTION AND SHAPE OF ELEMENTS The proportion and shape of building elements help to determine how well a building will relate to existing developments in the district. Differ- ent architectural styles contain distinctly different proportions and shapes. The proportion and shape of buildings are important to blending with existing buildings to create a unified district. Solid to Void Ratios. New construction should ap- proach the same ratio of solid (walls) to void (window and door openings) as neighboring structures. A great amount of variation in the characteristic ratio of wall to window and door openings is inappropriate. Windows. Large storefront windows are inappropriate alongside neighboring buildings with small, vertically shaped single windows. Historic upper -story windows are typically vertical in form and have rectangular tops. Exotic Building Styles. Imitation of exotic building styles— i.e. Chinese, Polynesian, Alpine, etc.— is pro- hibited. BUILDING MATERIALS Depending on the type and use of building materials, a project can complement existing development or detract from it. Also, certain materials like brick, stone and certain types of stucco Building materials are largely brick and stone. require little mainte- nance, while others require of attention to keep the building in good repair. Exterior building materials for new construction should be similar in size, scale, color and finish to historic materials. Materials should be used in a manner consistent with traditional methods of construction. This is of particular importance in the case of an addition to a historic or significant older structure, or a new structure that abuts an older one. Facade Materials. On each wall adjacent to a street, all new buildings and those proposed for exterior reno- vation should have an exterior facade that is predomi- nantly masonry (such as brick, stone, stucco, exposed aggregate, finished concrete or decorative concrete block), wood, glass or architectural decorative material (such as copper, bronze, anodized aluminum, stainless steel, porcelain enamel, natural materials or other simi- lar materials that do not require painting). However, vinyl siding is discouraged for potentially historic buildings. Trim Materials. Acceptable trim materials include brick, cast stone, natural stone, ceramic tile, wood, concrete or architectural decorative metals. Windows and Doors. Windows and doors should be comprised of wood, glass, painted metal, or architec- tural decorative metal appropriate for the style. Metal or vinyl clad wood windows and clear or unfin- ished aluminum windows and storm windows should be finished in a color typical of historic windows or in a color that complements the colors of other finished ma- terials. Roof Materials. Roofing materials which are visible Appendix Page:35 Page 20 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 from the street are limited to wood shingles, prefinished metal roofing panels in a muted color, clay, concrete or metal tiles or architectural decorative materials. Metal clad roofs that are not architecturally decorative or gravel roofs in excess of a pitch of Y2 inch in 12 inches shall not be exposed above the fascia or parapet walls. SECURITY Security bars have become a common method of preventing loss of property. However, inappropriate use of them can detract from property values in an area and can even discourage customers. Security Bars. Measures should be taken so that win- dow and door security bars and shutters do not detract from the character of the district. Care should be taken that such security hardware should be compatible with the style of the building. AWNINGS AND CANOPIES Awnings and cano- pies provide shelter from wind and sun in pedestrian areas, protect interior furnishings and finishes from fading caused by direct sunlight, allow reflected light t0 Awnings and canopies can serve functional purposes as well as enter the interior addingstyle. without increasing heat load and add architectural interest or historic ambiance to structures. However, the appropriateness of aw- nings to a building's architectural style should be considered before installing them. Location. Awnings and canopies should be placed at the top of openings, but they should not hide important architectural details and elements. Shape. The shape of awnings and canopies should fit the shape of the openings —round or arched awnings over arched openings and rectangular shed awnings over rectangular openings. Odd shapes, bullnose awnings and bubble awnings are inappropriate. Operable Awnings. Operable awnings are encouraged, but rigid frame awnings also may be considered. Materials. Acceptable awning materials are canvas or woven acrylic over painted steel or anodized aluminum frames. Shiny vinyl or plastic fabrics should be avoided, as should prefabricated metal awnings. Canopies should be constructed of a material consistent with the archi- tecture. Color. The color of awnings and canopies should be compatible with the overall color scheme for the project. (See the "Use of Color" section for more information.) FINISHES Finishes primarily protect materials from deteriora- tion, but can also add charm and character to a structure and a district. The proper use and mainte- nance of finishes is important to the longevity of the building. They should always be of a type and composition that are appropriate for the materials to which they will be applied. In fact, inappropriate finishes can actually harm materials. Matte Finish. Simple finishes are preferred and should be matte, not polished. Masonry. Brick and stone should not be painted. Lap Siding. Lap siding should be finished in a solid color —either paint or prefinished. Stucco. Stucco should be smooth to medium coarse in texture. USE OF COLOR Color can help to coordinate facade elements into an overall composition —one that will highlight features of the facade. Distinctive architectural elements may be dramatized with a contrasting color. Any color scheme should be subdued, not garish, and in keeping with the character and color schemes of nearby structures. Compatible Trim Color. Trim colors should be se- lected that are compatible with other, more permanent building materials on the structure, such as brick, stone or stucco. The natural colors of these primary materials should dominate the color scheme from the street. Limit the number of colors used in the color scheme. If the entire wall surface or "body" of the structure is painted, one base color should be chosen for the majority of the surface. Trim, including horizontal and vertical trim boards, window framing, porch framing and columns, and should be painted in a color that complements the base shade. Window sash, doors and/or shutters may be painted in a third color. Bright Colors. Extremely bright or fluorescent exterior Appendix Page:36 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 21 colors are discouraged. Bright colors should be used in small amounts and for accent only. An extremely bright or fluorescent color is a color defined by the Munsell Book of Color as having a minimum value or eight (8) and a minimum chroma of ten (10). PARKING AREAS Where off-street parking is necessary, parking lots should be unobtrusive, attractive and secure in order to preserve and enhance the character of the area Careful location of . parking lots can be attractive and off-street parking and safe. screening of parking areas from the street lessen the visual impact of parking. Appearance and Security. To improve the appear- ance and comfort of parking areas, planting beds with shade trees and lighting should be utilized throughout the parking lot. These features should also be planned carefully to promote safety and security. Limbs of trees over parking areas should provide at least seven (7) feet of clearance. Shrubs should be low enough to provide a sense of security for the user. Parking Lot Screen. Although not required, consider screening off-street parking which is located immedi- ately adjacent to any street by a solid fence two and one-half feet (21 /2') in height. Any area between a fence and the property line should be landscaped. Fencing should be architecturally compatible with the primary structure. (See the "Exterior Lighting" section for information on parking lot lighting.) SCREENING Unattractive features of a building, such as dumpsters, utilities, air conditioner compressors and solar energy devices, should be screened from public view. Outdoor dining must have low level screening to protect from wind blown trash, yet preserve visibility. Outdoor Dining. Outdoor dining areas must be com- pletely surrounded by "an architecturally compatible" fence designed to prevent trash from being blown onto adjacent areas. In a front yard, such fencing shall be three (3) feet in height. Screening Material. Screening fences must be con- structed of brick, stone, decorative concrete masonry units, stuccoed concrete masonry units or metal (wrought iron, steel or aluminum bars). Rooftop Equipment. All roof mounted mechanical equip- ment more than three (3) feet in height should be screened from view from any street. Screening materi- als must be architecturally compatible with materials used elsewhere on the structure. (See the "Parking Areas" section for parking screening.) LANDSCAPE AREAS Landscaping helps to soften the harshness of develop- ment, and creates attractive areas to view, visit and use. Trees and shrubs help to reduce the amount of wind and dust in an area. Land- scaping is especially important for patios, sidewalks and parking areas. Required Landscaping. Landscape areas enhance a building's facade, as well as Landscaping contributes the character of the entire dis- to the attractiveness of a project and of an area. trict. Front yards must be land- scaped according to the CB-3 zoning district standards. Highlight Architectural Features. Plant materials should be used to highlight building features; however, avoid hiding important architectural details and building entrances. Street Trees. Trees located in the parkway shall be single trunked, a minimum of two and one-half inch (2 1/2") caliper, and planted in a manner similar to the diagram in the Appendix. Irrigation. An automatic under ground irrigation sys- tem is preferred for all landscaped areas, both on the development tract and in the parkway. (See the "Parking Areas" section for landscape treat- ment of parking lots.) EXTERIOR LIGHTING Suitable lighting for different types of uses is important to the ambiance of a district. In addition, lighting provides safety for vehicular and pedestrian Appendix Page:37 Page 22 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 traffic, aids in the prevention of crime and provides a sense of security for users. The type of lighting should be appropriate for the intended use of the illumination. Use of Lighting. Lighting may be used to illuminate architectural details, building entries, signage, sidewalks, alleys and parking areas. However, lighting should not dominate a facade or the street. Building lighting should be directed away from neighbor- ing residential structures. Lighting fixture lamps should be shielded to focus light where it is needed. Types of Lighting. Incandescent is "warm" in appear- ance and metal halide is a truly "white" light. Fluores- cent lighting and mercury vapor lighting tend to be blue and high pressure sodium lighting is slightly orange. In- candescent and metal halide lighting yield the most ac- curate and attractive colors for people and merchandise and are therefore preferred in pedestrian and retail ar- eas. Mercury vapor may be used for security lighting of large parking areas. High pressure sodium should be avoided for area lighting, but may be used to floodlight a building. Lighting Fixtures. Choose fixtures, whether wall - mounted or on poles, that complement the style of the structure and the district. Fully recessed downlights, pole lights and gooseneck lights are encouraged since they are consistent with the historic character of the area. Parking Lot Fixtures. Lighting in parking areas should be higher in intensity and height above the ground than that intended solely for pedestrians. Lamp heights should be between fifteen (15) and thirty (30) feet, and metal halide and mercury vapor lamps are acceptable. Lighting of Buildings. When it is desired by the prop- erty owner to light their building, it should be accom- plished using a concealed source of lighting which is screened from pedestrian areas and any adjacent resi- dential buildings. SIGNAGE signage serves two functions —to convey informa- tion and to attract attention. The overall facade composition, including ornamental details, color and materials, should be considered when determin- ing the location, size and character of signage. Sign Design. Consider both pedestrian and vehicular traffic in selecting and designing signage. Signage and the Building key to avoid compe- tition with the archi- tecture of the struc- ture. Materials and design should be compatible with the building's materials and style. . Signage should be low- Locate signs so that they emphasize de- Signs shouldprimarily identify the sign elements of the business facade, but do not obscure architectural details, windows or other signifi- cant features. Signs can also reinforce the horizontal lines of moldings and transoms and accent architec- tural details. The design and style of both the lettering and sign should complement the style of the building. Signs for multiple businesses on a single building should be designed with similar materials, backs and lettering styles. Materials. Glass, painted wood, painted metal or ar- chitectural decorative metals such as copper, bronze, brass, aluminum or stainless steel are appropriate sign materials. Unfinished, non -decorative materials, includ- ing unpainted wood and highly reflective materials, are discouraged. Plastic is not recommended, other than as individual three dimensional letters applied to a sign or building orwhere the face of an existing sign is to be replaced with like materials. Sign Lighting. Sign lighting should be indirect, not bright and glaring. Internal illumination of signs is dis- couraged. Neon decoration and signage should be used only in small amounts, and where appropriate to the building design. Sign Review. The Urban Design and Historic Preser- vation Commission may determine that there are "unique circumstances" that warrant varying the Design Stan- dards for the Central Business District for signage, and may make recommendations to the Senior Planner for such modification. ENCROACHMENTS INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY A license must be secured for any use of the public right-of-way. Licenses may be granted for: Pedestrian street lights Projecting wall signs Appendix Page:38 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 23 Canopies and awnings Outdoor dining areas Planters Trees and other plant materials located in the parkway (the area between the property line and the curb) shall not require a license provided they are shown on an ap- proved site plan. Appendix Page:39 Page 24 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 C8 4 Depot District e CB-4 zoning district, which contains a variety of land uses, comprises the southeast portion of the downtown area. Included within its boundary is the Depot District, an entertainment venue enjoying considerable success with the opening of several restaurants, nightclubs, commer- cial businesses, and the reopening of the Cactus Theater. The most significant structure in this area is the Ft. Worth and Denver South Plains Railroad Depot, now known as the Buddy Holly Center. Although this district is diverse in character, new buildings in CB-4 should respect their surroundings by being visually and physically compatible with their mostly small industrial and commercial neighbors, particularly if they are potentially signifi- cant structures. The guidelines for CB-4 are intended to promote that diversity by giving building owners, developers and architects freedom in design, while trying to maintain the ambiance of this historic area of the city. SITE AND BUILDING ORIENTATION The location and orientation of the building, entrance, parking and land- scaping on a lot are important in retain- ing the overall character of an area, regardless of whether the project is residential, commercial, indus- trial or mixed use. Buildings should be adjacent to the sidewalk with a clearly defined entry. Building Location and Orientation. New buildings in the Depot District should be visually and physically com- patible in their siting and orientation with their neigh- bors, particularly those that are significant historic struc- tures. Buildings should be set near or on the front prop- erty line to maintain a consistent "street wall." Build- ings should be oriented parallel to the adjacent streets, not angled. Building Entrances. The primary building entrance should be similar in scale to those of neighboring struc- tures. Entries should be scaled to the pedestrian level, thus making the building more appealing, and the inte- rior space more inviting. Buildings shall have a front -facing, clearly defined entry in the primary facade, similar to the orientation of his- toric structures. Parking Location. Where on -site parking is provided, it should not be located in front of the principal building. BUILDING MASS AND SCALE Building mass and scale are affected by such things as height, width, articulation, detailing, setback from property lines, materials used, �- amount of open- A building s mass and scale can be ings, roof form and modified usingpilasters, parapet other features. New details and changes in materials. construction in the Depot District should be similar in mass and scale to other structures found in the district, particularly neighboring historic buildings. Appendix Page:40 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 25 Building Width. Repeat the historic pattern of building width which has been dictated by lot width. If new build- ings cover more than one or two lots, facade elements should reduce the visual width of the building. Examples of those elements that give the impression of multiple structures include varying parapet heights, alternating projecting and recessed sections of wall and window arrangements. Building Articulation. Divide large buildings horizon- tally and vertically into sections that approximate the scale of existing historic structures within the district. Typical historic features that reduce the mass of large facades include columns or pilasters at regular inter- vals, repetitive patterns of openings and horizontal ma- sonry bands at each floor level. These features need not be exact reproductions of historic elements nor be tradi- tional in execution. Contemporary facades can use simi- lar methods to break up large building faces into smaller units. The size, alignment and repetition of facade elements such as windows, window sills, awnings, moldings and cornices should reflect the District's historic buildings, especially any neighboring historic structures. Building Height. New buildings need not match the height of neighboring structures exactly, but should be similar to adjacent building heights at the street facade. Building Roofs. Roof types in this district are mostly flat, usually with parapets. For this reason, mansard roofs, A -frame structures and steeply pitched or exotic styled roofs are inappropriate. PROPORTION AND SHAPE OF ELEMENTS The proportion and shape of building elements help to determine how well a build- ing will relate to existing developments in the District. Different architectural styles contain distinctly different proportions and shapes. Solid to Void Ratios. New con- struction should approach the same ratio of solid (walls) to void Articulation to parapets (window and door openings) as contribute to the district. neighboring structures. A great amount of variation in the characteristic ratio of wall to window and door openings is inappropriate. Windows. Large, rectangular storefront windows are prevalent in this district, although upper floor windows may be much smaller. Small, vertically shaped single windows, pointed windows, and round windows are in- consistent with the character of these simple structures. Historic upper -story windows are typically vertical in form and have rectangular tops. Exotic Building Styles. Imitation of exotic building styles— i.e. Chinese, Polynesian, Alpine, etc.— is pro- hibited. BUILDING MATERIALS Depending on the type and use of building materials, a project can comple- ment existing devel- opment or detract from it. Also, certain materials like brick, stone and certain Facade materials are primarily types of stucco brick with some stucco facades. require little mainte- nance, while others require attention to keep the project in a state of good repair. Exterior building materials for new construction must be durable and similar in size, scale, color and finish to historic materials. Materials should be used in a manner consistent with traditional meth- ods of construction. This is of particular importance in the case of an addition to a historic or significant older structure or a new structure that abuts an older one. Facade Materials. On each wall adjacent to a street, all new buildings and those proposed for exterior reno- vation shall have an exterior facade of not less than sev- enty-five (75) percent masonry (such as brick, stone, stucco, exposed aggregate, finished concrete or deco- rative concrete block), wood, glass or architectural deco- rative material (such as copper, bronze, anodized alu- minum, stainless steel, porcelain enamel, natural ma- terials or other similar materials that do not require paint- ing). However, vinyl siding is discouraged for potentially historic buildings. Trim Materials. Acceptable trim materials include brick, cast stone, natural stone, ceramic tile, wood, concrete or architectural decorative metals. Windows and Doors. Windows and doors should be comprised of wood, glass, painted metal or architec- Appendix Page:41 Page 26 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 tural decorative metal appropriate for the style. Metal or vinyl clad wood windows and clear or unfin- ished aluminum windows and storm windows should be finished in a color typical of historic windows or in a color that complements the colors of other finished ma- terials. Storm windows should be compatible with the windows they are covering. Reflective Glass. Mirrored or reflective glass, dark tinted glass and glass block units are inconsistent with the historic architecture of this district. The maximum al- lowable daylight reflectance of glass used as an exte- rior building material should not exceed fifteen (15) per- cent. Dark tinted glass is any single pane glass that at one -quarter inch (1/4") thickness has an average day- light transmittance of less than seventy-four (74) per- cent, or any insulated glass with an average daylight transmittance of less than sixty-five (65) percent. Roof Materials. Roofing materials exposed to view from the street shall be limited to clay, concrete or metal tiles; prefinished metal roofing panels in a muted color; or architectural decorative materials. Metal clad roofs that are not architecturally decorative or gravel roofs in excess of a pitch of '/2 inch in 12 inches shall not be exposed above the fascia or parapet walls. Fences. Recommended fencing materials are painted wrought iron, smooth to medium coarse stucco over concrete masonry units, clay or concrete brick, and stone. SECURITY Security bars have become a common method of preventing loss of property. However, inappropriate use can detract from property values in an area and can even discourage customers. Security Bars. Measures should be taken so that win- dow and door security bars and shutters do not detract from the character of the district. Security hardware should be compatible with the style of the building. AWNINGS AND CANOPIES Awnings and canopies provide shelter from wind { and sun in pedes- trian areas, protect - interior furnish- a ings and finishes from fading caused by direct sunlight, W reflected Awnings add shelter for pedestrians allow lightt0 enter the and provide an opportunity for business identification interior without increasing heat load and add architectural interest or historic ambiance to structures. However, the appropriate- ness of awnings to a building's architectural style should be considered before installing them. Location. Awnings and canopies should be placed at the top of openings, but they should not hide important architectural details and elements. Shape. The shape of awnings and canopies should fit the shape of the openings —round or arched awnings over arched openings and rectangular shed awnings over rectangular openings. Odd shapes, bullnose awnings and bubble awnings are inappropriate for residential and historic structures. Operable Awnings. Operable awnings are encouraged, but rigid frame awnings also may be considered. Materials. Acceptable awning materials are canvas or woven acrylic over painted steel or anodized aluminum frames. Shiny vinyl or plastic fabrics should be avoided, as should prefabricated metal awnings. Canopies should be constructed of a material consistent with the archi- tecture. Color. The color of awnings and canopies should be compatible with the overall color scheme for the project. (See the "Use of Color" section for more information.) Lighting. Internally illuminated awnings are discour- aged. Appendix Page:42 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 27 FINISHES Finishes primarily protect materials from deteriora- tion, but can also add charm and character to a structure and a district. The proper use and mainte- nance of finishes is important to the longevity of the building. They should always be of a type and composition that are appropriate for the materials to which they will be applied. In fact, inappropriate finishes can actually harm materials. Matte Finish. Simple finishes are preferred and should be matte, not polished. Masonry. Brick and stone should not be painted. Lap Siding. Lap siding should be finished in a solid color. Stucco. Stucco should be smooth to medium coarse in texture. USE OF COLOR Color can help to coordinate facade elements into an overall composition —one that will highlight features of the facade. Distinctive architectural elements may be dramatized with a contrasting color. Any color scheme should be subdued, not garish, and in keeping with the character and color schemes of nearby structures. Compatible Trim Color. Trim colors should be se- lected that are compatible with other, more permanent building materials on the structure, such as brick, stone or stucco. The natural colors of these primary materials should dominate the color scheme from the street. Limit the number of colors used in the color scheme. If the entire wall surface or "body" of the structure is painted, only one base color should be chosen for the majority of the surface. Trim, including horizontal and vertical trim boards, window framing, porch framing and columns, should be painted in a color that complements the base shade. Window sash, doors and/or shutters may be painted in a third color. Bright Colors. Extremely bright or fluorescent exterior colors are discouraged. Bright colors should be used in small amounts and for accent only. An extremely bright or fluorescent color is a color defined by the Munsell Book of Color as having a minimum value or eight (8) and a minimum chroma of ten (10). PARKING AREAS Where off-street parking is provided, parking lots should be unobtrusive, attractive and secure in order to preserve and enhance the character of the area. Careful location of off-street parking and screening of parking areas from the street lessen the visual impact of parking. Appearance and Safety. To improve the appearance and Trees in a parking lot comfort of parking areas, plant- provide comfort and ing beds with shade trees and Soften the view of cars. lighting should be utilized throughout the parking lot. These features should also be planned carefully to pro- mote safety and security. Limbs of trees over parking areas should provide at least seven (7) feet of clearance. Shrubs should be low enough to provide a sense of se- curity for the user. Parking Lot Screening. Although not required, con- sider screening off-street parking which is located im- mediately adjacent to any street by a solid fence two and one-half feet (2 1/2') in height. Fencing should be architecturally compatible with the primary structure. (See the "Exterior Lighting" section for parking lot light- ing information.) SCREENING Unattractive features of a building, such as dumpsters, utilities, air conditioner compressors and solar energy devices, should be screened from public view. Architecturally compatible Outdoor dining must screening of outdoor dining. have low level screen- ing to protect from wind blown trash, yet preserve visibility. Outdoor Dining. Outdoor dining areas must be com- pletely surrounded by "an architecturally compatible" fence designed to prevent trash from being blown onto adjacent areas. In a front yard, such fencing shall be three (3) feet in height. Appendix Page:43 Page 28 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 Screening Material. Screening fences must be con- structed of brick, stone, decorative concrete masonry units, stuccoed concrete masonry units or metal (wrought iron, steel or aluminum bars). Rooftop Screening. All roof mounted mechanical equip- ment more than three (3) feet in height, should be screened from view from any street. Screening materi- als must be architecturally compatible with the materi- als used elsewhere on the structure. (See the "Parking Areas" section for parking lot screen- ing.) LANDSCAPE AREAS Landscaping helps to soften the harshness of develop- ment and creates attractive areas to view, visit and use. Trees and shrubs help to reduce the amount of wind and dust in an area. Landscaping is especially important for patios, sidewalks and parking areas. Street trees attract pedestrians. Although landscape areas can dramatically enhance a building's appearance, this district never had an abundance of plant materials, particularly in front of the building line. The focus for landscaping in this district should include parking lots, dining patios and courtyards. In addition, street trees should be planted in the public right-of-way along the sidewalk to provide an attractive pedestrian environment. Highlight Architectural Features. Plant materials should be used to highlight building features. Avoid hid- ing important architectural details and building entrances. Street Trees. Trees located in the parkway shall be single trunked, a minimum of two and one-half inch (2 1/2") caliper, and planted in a manner similar to the diagram in the Appendix. Irrigation. An automatic underground irrigation sys- tem is preferred for all landscaped areas, both on the development tract and in the parkway. (See the "Parking Areas" section for landscape treat- ment of parking lots.) EXTERIOR LIGHTING Suitable lighting for different types of uses is important to the ambi- ance of a district. In addition, lighting provides safety for vehicular and pedestrian traffic, aids in the prevention of crime and provides a sense of security for users. The type of lighting should be appropriate for the intended use of the illumination. Neon lighting is compatible Use of Lighting. Lighting with the Depot District. may be used to illuminate ar- chitectural details, building entries, signage, sidewalks, alleys and parking areas. However, lighting should not dominate a facade or the street. Building lighting should be directed away from neighbor- ing residential structures. Lighting fixture lamps should be shielded to focus light where it is needed. Types of Lighting. Incandescent is "warm" in appear- ance and metal halide is a truly "white" light. Fluores- cent lighting and mercury vapor lighting tend to be blue and high pressure sodium lighting is slightly orange. In- candescent and metal halide lighting yield the most ac- curate and attractive colors for people and merchandise and are therefore preferred in pedestrian and retail ar- eas. Mercury vapor may be used for security lighting of large parking areas. High pressure sodium should be avoided for area lighting, but may be used to floodlight a building. Lighting Fixtures. Choose fixtures, whether wall - mounted or on poles, that complement the style of the structure and the District. Fully recessed downlights, pole lights and gooseneck lights are encouraged since they are consistent with the historic character of the area. Parking Lot Fixtures. Lighting in parking areas should be higher in intensity and height above the ground than that intended solely for pedestrians. In the CB-4 Dis- trict, parking area lamps should be between fifteen (15) and thirty (30) feet above the ground, and florescent, metal halide and mercury vapor lamps are acceptable. Parking lighting should be compatible in style with pe- destrian area lighting and parking lot landscape design. Appendix Page:44 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 29 Lighting of Buildings. Lighting of buildings and land- scape areas is encouraged. SIGNAGE In the Depot District, signage serves three functions —to convey information, to attract attention and to add to the ambiance of the entertainment district. The overall facade composition, including ornamental details, color and materials, should be considered when determining the location, size and character of signage. Sign Design. Consider both pedestrian and ve- hicular traffic in selecting and designing signage. appropriate to the building design. Sign Review. The Urban Design and Historic Preser- vation Commission may determine that there are "unique circumstances" that warrant varying the Design Stan- dards for the Central Business District for signage, and may make recommendations to the Senior Planner for such modification. ENCROACHMENTS INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY A license must be secured for any use of the public right-of-way. Licenses may be granted for: • Pedestrian street lights • Projecting wall signs • Canopies and awnings • Outdoor dining areas • Planters Neon signs are compatible with Trees and other plant materials located in the parkway the Depot District. (the area between the property line and the curb), shall not require a license, provided they are shown on an approved site plan. Signage and the Building. Signage should comple- ment, rather than compete with the architecture of the structure. Materials and design should be compatible with the building's materials and style. Locate signs so that they emphasize design elements of the facade, but do not obscure architectural details, windows or other significant features. Signs can also reinforce the horizontal lines of moldings and transoms, and accent architectural details when placed appropri- ately. The design and style of both the lettering and sign should complement the style of the building. Signs for multiple businesses on a single building should be designed with similar materials, backs and lettering styles. Materials. Glass, painted wood, painted metal or ar- chitectural decorative metals such as copper, bronze, brass, aluminum or stainless steel are appropriate sign materials. Unfinished, non -decorative materials, includ- ing unpainted wood and highly reflective materials, are discouraged. Plastic is only allowed as individual three dimensional letters applied to a sign or building. Sign Lighting. Sign lighting should be indirect, not bright and glaring. Internal illumination of signs is dis- couraged. Neon decoration and signage is consistent with the Depot District, but should be used only where Appendix Page:45 Page 30 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 Appendix COMMUNITY GOALS RELATED TO URBAN DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF BUILDING MATERIALS AND FEATURES APPROPRIATE PLANT MATERIALS PARKWAY PLANTING STANDARD DEFINITIONS Appendix Page:46 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Pagc 31 Appendix Page:47 Page 32 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CBD June 1999 Community Goals Relating to Urban Design The following are from Goals for Lubbock: A Vision Into The 21st Century, adopted by the Lubbock City Council in 1995 on the recommendation of a 100 mem- ber citizen committee: • Ensure a high quality visual image and compatible land uses for Lubbock through developmental stan- dards and codes enforcement. (Land Use and Ur- ban Design, Goal 1) • Ensure quality urban design. (Land Use and Urban Design, Goal3) • Promote the preservation and revitalization of older buildings, neighborhoods and commercial areas and the development of vacant land within the current city limits. (Land Use and Urban Design, Goal 4) • Establish a positive identity for downtown Lubbock, including the Central Business District, Broadway Corridor and the Depot District, as the civic, cultural, entertainment, governmental and financial center of the City. (Land Use and Urban Design, Goal 5) • Enhance the visual and architectural character of unique areas of downtown Lubbock by preparing ar- chitectural and landscape design standards that ad- dress restoration, renovation, new construction, traf- fic circulation and pedestrian scale streetscape for each specific area. (Land Use and Urban Design, Objective 5.2) • Recognize, preserve and protect Lubbock's heritage and historic resources. (Land Use and Urban De- sign, Goal 7) • Revitalize Downtown Lubbock as a focal point for entertainment, arts and business. (Recreation, Parks, Entertainment, Cultural Affairs, Goal 1) • Position the visual and performing arts as a vital part of Lubbock's quality of life, to establish the City as a regional center for the arts. (Recreation, Parks, Entertainment, Cultural Affairs, Goal 6) Appendix Page:48 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 33 Appendix Page:49 Page 34 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CBD June 1999 Standards for the Repair and Replacement of Building Materials and Features When existing buildings are being altered, added to, or repaired, the standards set out in this section should be considered. They include standards established by the Secretary of the Interior for repair and replacement of historic building materials and features, but are applicable to most renovation projects. The word historic, when used in this context, does not mean that a building has been listed on the National Register of Historic Places or designated as a Lubbock Historic Landmark. In- stead, it refers to the place of a building in history as a product of the time at which it was built. GENERAL Contemporary Design. Contemporary design for al- terations and additions to existing properties will not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural, or cultural material, or when such design is compatible with the size, color, material, and character of the property, neigh- borhood, or environment. New Additions. New additions should be compatible with the main building, but should be recognized as prod- ucts of their own time and not hinder the ability to inter- pret the design character of the original building. They should not compete with the original structure in detail or size. Whenever possible, new additions or alterations should be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the es- sential form and integrity of the original building, struc- ture, object, or site would be unimpaired. Deteriorated Features. Wherever possible, deterio- rated architectural features, including porches, gutters and downspouts, should be repaired rather than replaced. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should reflect the material being replaced in composi- tion, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features. Their design should be substantiated by historical, physi- cal, or pictorial evidence rather than be based upon con- jectural designs or the availability of different architec- tural elements from other buildings or structures. EXTERIOR BUILDING FEATURES The "CB" districts contain a wealth of architecture re- maining from Lubbock's early years. Such structures are filled with character -defining features that, collec- tively, establish a sense of place, a sense of human scale and add rich detail to the buildings. These ele- ments draw pedestrian activity to the street, making it lively and economically viable. Because of these at- tributes, it is crucial that these important architectural artifacts be preserved and enhanced. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled crafts- manship that characterize a building, structure, object, or site should be kept, protected, and maintained, where possible. The removal or alteration of any historic mate- rial or significant architectural features that would dimin- ish the overall historic character of the building should be avoided. For example, in the CB-1 district, typical residential fea- tures that should be preserved include vertically oriented windows, entrances, decorative architectural detailing, front porches, cornice molding, original glass, and well - kept lawns. In other areas, commercial or retail struc- tures have features such as large first floor display win- dows; smaller, vertically oriented upper windows; clere- story or transom windows; kickplates, base, or bulk- head panels below display windows; original glass; cor- nices; entrances; and sidewalk canopies. The relationship of buildings to each other, setbacks, fence patterns, views, driveways and walkways, and street trees together create the character of a district or neighborhood as much, and sometimes more, than the buildings themselves. The relationship between build- ings and landscape features on a site should be an inte- gral part of planning for every work project. Appendix Page:50 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 35 Building Site Identifying, retaining, and preserving features of the site are important in defining a building's overall historic char- acter. Site features may include circulation systems such as walks, paths or parking; vegetation such as trees, shrubs or herbaceous plant material; furnishings such as lights, fences or benches; and decorative ele- ments such as sculpture, statuary or monuments. Recommended Treatments for Sites Protect and maintain buildings and sites by providing proper drainage to assure that water does not erode foundation walls; drain toward the building; or damage or erode the landscape. Minimize disturbance of terrain around buildings or elsewhere on the site, thus reducing the possibility of destroying or damaging important landscape features. Preserve important landscape features, including ongoing maintenance of historic plant material. Not Recommended for Sites X Altering buildings and their features or site fea- tures which are important in defining the overall historic character of the property so that the character is diminished. X Removing or relocating buildings, landscape features, fencing, or plant material, thus destroying the historic relationship between buildings and the landscape. X Allowing important landscape features to be lost or damaged due to a lack of maintenance. X Using replacement material that does not match the building site feature. Entrances and Porches Entrances and porches are often the focus of historic building, particularly on primary elevations. Along with functional and decorative features such as doors, steps, balustrades, pilasters, and entablatures, entrances can be extremely important in defining the overall character of a building. Recommended Treatments for Entrances and Porches Protect and maintain masonry, wood, and metal components of entrances and porches through appropriate surface treatments such as cleaning, rust and paint removal, and reapplication of paint or other finish. Replace extensively deteriorated or missing parts of repeated entrance and porch features, such as balustrades, cornices, entablatures, columns, side- lights, and stairs, when there are surviving prototypes. The new work should match the old in material, design, color, and texture. Not Recommended for Entrances and Porches X Changing the position, design, and/or proportions of historic entrances and porches and that are visible from public streets and sidewalks. Obscuring features with awnings, coverings or signage. X Altering entrances and porches which are impor- tant in defining the overall historic character of the building so that the character is diminished. X Removing material that could be repaired or using improper repair techniques. Windows The character of a building is strongly affected by the size, shape, proportion and division of panes in its win- dows. Trim colors can further accentuate window char- acter. Mass-produced windows, mail-order distribution, and changing architectural styles made it possible to obtain a wide range of window designs and light patterns in sash. The size, shape and pattern of windows and type of glass contribute greatly to the overall appearance of the building. Recommended Treatments for Windows Retaining historic glass panes, an important historic feature, is encouraged in all cases, except where safety glass or wire glass is required by code. Glass used in windows should appear similar to that use historically. Transparent, clear glass is appropri- ate, while opaque, tinted or mirror glass is not appro- priate. If replacement is necessary, owners are encouraged to use insulated glass due to its perfor- mance qualities. Protect and maintain the wood and architectural metals which comprise the window frame, sash, muntins, and surrounds through appropriate surface treatments such as cleaning, rust removal, limited paint removal, and reapplication of protective coating Appendix Page:51 Page 36 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 systems. Re -caulk and replace or install weather- stripping to improve thermal efficiency. If necessary, repair window frames and sash by patching, piecing -in, or reinforcing. If replacement of deteriorated or missing parts is required, new work should match old in material, design, color, and texture. Not Recommended for Windows X Altering windows or windows features which are important in defining the historic character of the building. X Changing the historic appearance of windows by replacing materials, finishes, or colors which notice- ably change the sash, depth of reveal, and muntin configuration; the reflectivity and color of the glazing; or the appearance of the frame. X Peeling paint, broken glass, stuck sash, and high air infiltration are no indication that windows are beyond repair. Replacing an entire window when limited replacement of deteriorated and missing parts would repair it is inappropriate. Storefronts The storefront is usually the most prominent feature of a historic commercial building, playing a crucial role in a store's advertising and merchandising strategy —particu- larly for pedestrians. The rest of the building is often visually related to the storefront through a unity of form and detail. Thus, window patterns on the upper floors, cornice elements, and other decorative features should be carefully retained. Early storefronts featured bay windows with multiple panes or lights and small display areas. Recessed en- trances provided shelterfor sidewalk patrons and further enlarged the amount of window display. In the 1920s and 1930s, aluminum, colored structural glass, stain- less steel, glass block, neon, and other new materials were introduced. Recommended Treatments for Storefronts Protect and maintain masonry, wood, and metals which comprise storefronts through appropriate treatments such as cleaning, rust removal, limited paint removal, and reapplication of paint or finishes. Replacement of extensively deteriorated or missing parts of storefronts should match the old in materials, design, color, and texture. Install awnings or canopies in original locations when historic evidence demonstrates that an awning or canopy once existed. Not Recommended for Storefronts X Altering storefronts or their features which are important in defining the overall historic character of the building so that the character is diminished. X Stripping storefronts of historic materials such as wood, cast iron, terra cotta, carrara glass, and brick. X Installation of awnings or canopies that are different in basic form from the original awnings or canopies. X Installation of awnings or canopies that cover or damage important architectural details or elements. Roofs The shape of a roof and the size, color and patterning of the roofing material are important design elements of many historic buildings. In addition, a weather tight roof is essential to the long-term preservation of the entire structure. Historic roofing reflects the availability of ma- terials, levels of construction technology, weather con- ditions, and cost. Although wood shingles were the most common roofing materials in early Lubbock, they were rapidly replaced by other materials, particularly for commercial structures. Early Lubbock buildings may include a variety of 20th century building materials, including clay tile, slate, and metal roofing materials such as corrugated metal, gal- vanized metal, tin-plate, copper, lead, and zinc. New roofing materials such as built-up roll roofing, and con- crete, asbestos, and asphalt shingles were developed in the 20th century and are found on many Lubbock buildings. Recommended Treatments for Roofs Repair damaged or deteriorated roofing, flashing, sheathing, and framing to insure structural integrity and waterproofing. Clean gutters and downspouts on a regular basis. Repair storefronts by reinforcing the historic � Where roofs are visible, consider repair and materials and by employing recognized preservation replacement with identical materials, if possible. New methods. materials should match the old in material, design, Appendix Page:52 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 37 color, and texture. Not Recommended for Roofs X Changing the style, color or construction of an existing, historic roof. Altering a roof may destroy the architectural integrity of a structure. X Changing the profile of an existing parapet. X Locating rooftop mechanical and security equip- ment in a conspicuous place and in a way that diminishes the historic character of the building. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS Masonry Masonry building materials, including stone, brick, and terra cotta, are among the more durable materials used in construction. The most common masonry used in the CB districts is brick. Because of the relatively re- cent construction date of Lubbock's brick buildings, their brick quality is very high. This is due to the 20th cen- tury perfection of the extrusion process, which made brick modules uniform and durable. The kinds of stone most commonly encountered on historic buildings in- clude various types of sandstone, limestone, marble, granite, slate and fieldstone. Terra cotta is a kiln -dried clay product popular from the late 19th century until the 1930s. It was used primarily for trim and details, and only one Lubbock facade, the Kress Building, is entirely sheathed in terra cotta. Recommended Methods for the Cleaning and Repair of Masonry Protect and maintain masonry by providing proper drainage so that water does not stand on flat, horizon- tal surfaces or accumulate in curved decorative features. While masonry is extremely durable, it is also very susceptible to damage by improper maintenance or repair techniques and harsh or abrasive cleaning methods. • Seek professional advice before cleaning any masonry material, including mortar. • Clean masonry only when necessary to halt deterioration or remove heavy soiling. • Surface cleaning should be undertaken with the gentlest means possible using preferred techniques such as low pressure water and detergents, and using natural bristle brushes. • Carry out masonry surface cleaning tests in unobtrusive locations after it has been deter- mined that cleaning is appropriate. • Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials should not be used. Repair masonry walls and other masonry features by repointing the mortarjoints where there is evidence of deterioration such as disintegrating mortar, cracks in mortarjoints, loose bricks, damp walls, or damaged plasterwork. • Remove deteriorated mortar by carefully hand -raking the joints to avoid damaging the masonry. • Duplicate old mortar in strength, composi- tion, color and texture. • Replicate the old mortar joints in both width and in profile. Repair stucco by removing the damaged material and patching with new stucco that duplicates the old in strength, composition, color, and texture. Cut damaged concrete back to remove the source of deterioration. The new patch must be applied carefully so it will bond satisfactorily with, and match, the historic concrete. Not Recommended for the Cleaning and Re- pair of Masonry X Altering masonry features which are important in defining the overall historic character of the building so that the character is diminished. X Applying paint, stucco or other coatings to masonry that has been historically unpainted or uncoated. X Removing paint from historically painted masonry. X Removing sound mortar from sound joints, then repointing the entire building for a uniform appearance. X Repointing with mortar of high portland cement content (unless it is the content of the historic mortar). This can result in damage to the historic material as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and the differing porosity of the material and the mortar. Appendix Page:53 Page 38 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 X Repointing with a synthetic caulking compound. X Changing the width or joint profile when repointing X Removing sound stucco; or repairing with new stucco that is stronger than the historic material or does not convey the same visual appearance. X Applying waterproof, water repellent, or non - historic coatings as a substitute for repointing and masonry repairs. Coatings are frequently unneces- sary, expensive, and may change the appearance of masonry as well as accelerate its deterioration. X Replacing an entire masonry feature such as a column or stairway when limited replacement of deteriorated and missing parts is appropriate. X Using replacement material that does not match the historic masonry feature. Wood and Paint Wood has played a central role in American building during every period and in every style, particularly in a region like the South Plains where heavier materials made transportation difficult and expensive until the ar- rival of the railroad in 1907. Whether as structural mem- bers, exterior cladding, roofing, interior finishes, or deco- rative features, wood is frequently an essential compo- nent of historic buildings. Because it can be easily shaped, wood is used for ar- chitectural features such as clapboard siding, cornices, brackets, entablatures, shutters, doors and window sash and frames, columns, and balustrades. These wooden features, both functional and decorative, are often im- portant in defining the character of the building. Recommended Methods for the Cleaning and Repair of Wood Preserve and repair wood features that are important in defining the overall historic character of the building. Apply chemical preservatives to wood features such as beam ends that are exposed to decay hazards and are traditionally unpainted. Retain coatings such as paint that help protect the wood from moisture and ultraviolet light. Inspect painted wood surfaces to determine whether repainting is necessary or if cleaning is all that is required. Paint removal should be considered only where there is paint surface deterioration and as part of an overall maintenance program which involves repainting or the application of other protective coatings. Use compatible paints following proper surface preparation, as some latex paints will not bond well to earlier oil - base paints without an appropriate primer and peeling may occur soon after painting. Evaluate the condition of the wood to determine whether more than protection and maintenance are required, such as repairs or replacement. Always determine the presence of wood rot and termites or other pests and take appropriate action. Repair wood features by patching, piecing -in, consolidating, or otherwise reinforcing the wood using recognized preservation methods. If replacement is necessary, reproduce the original element in material, design, color, texture, and detailing. Not Recommended for the Cleaning and Re- pair of Wood X Altering wood features which are important in defining the overall historic character of the building so that the character is diminished. X Replacing historic wood features instead of repairing or replacing only the deteriorated wood. X Using chemical preservatives such as creosote which, unless they were used historically, can change the appearance of wood features. X Stripping paint or other coatings to reveal bare wood, thus exposing historically coated surfaces to the effects of accelerated weathering. X Using destructive paint removal methods such as thermal devices, torches, sandblasting and waterblast- ing which can irreversibly damage historic woodwork. X Using new colors that are out of character with the historic building or district. X Using replacement material that does not match the historic wood feature. Metal Architectural metal features —such as sheet metal cor- nices, siding, roofs, storefronts, rolled metal doors, win- dow sash, entablatures, and hardware —are often deco- rative and may be important in defining the overall char- acter of historic structures. Metals commonly used in- clude lead, tin, zinc, copper, bronze, brass, iron, steel, and aluminum. Identification is critical to differentiate between metals prior to work as each metal has unique Appendix Page:54 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 39 properties and requires different treatments. Preserve architectural metal features such as columns, roofs, window hoods, storefronts, and smoke stacks. Recommended Methods for the Cleaning and Repair of Metal Use methods appropriate to the particular metal when cleaning architectural metals to remove corro- sion prior to repainting or applying other appropriate protective coatings. Avoid harsh and abrasive cleaning methods when removing paint or rust. Keep joints soldered or caulked, and maintain protective coatings. Apply appropriate paint or other coating systems after cleaning to decrease the material's corrosion rate. Repair architectural metal features by patching, piecing -in, or otherwise reinforcing the metal using recognized preservation methods. Replace deterio- rated metal features with matching elements. If this is not feasible, consider a simplified version that ex- presses the basic lines of the original. Alternative materials may be considered if they convey a texture and finish similar to that of the original metal. Replace corroded flashing around chimneys, vents, dormers, and other projections. Avoid combin- ing metals in roof repairs as this can cause additional corrosion. Not Recommended for the Cleaning and Re- pair of Metal X Altering architectural metal features which are important in defining the overall historic character of the building so that the character is diminished. X Changing the type of finish or its historic color or accent scheme. X Placing incompatible metals together without providing a reliable separation material. Such incom- patibility can result in galvanic corrosion—e.g., copper will corrode cast iron, steel, tin, and aluminum. X Exposing metals which were intended to be protected from the environment. X Applying paint or other coatings to metals such as copper, bronze, or stainless steel that were meant to be exposed. X Using cleaning methods which alter or damage the historic color, texture, and finish of the metal, or cleaning when and with methods that are inappropriate for the metal. X Removing the patina of historic metal. X Cleaning soft metals such as lead, tin, copper, and zinc with grit blasting which will abrade the surface of the metal. X Removing architectural metals that could be repaired or using improper repair techniques. X Using replacement material that does not match the historic metal feature. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Accessibility Standards The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) mandates that all places of public accommodation be accessible to all users. These standards should not prevent or in- hibit compliance with accessibility laws, however, work on a historic property must be carefully planned and undertaken so that it does not result in the loss of char- acter -defining spaces, features, and finishes. The goal is to provide the highest level of access with the lowest level of impact. Note that special provisions for historic buildings exist in the law that allow some alternatives in meeting the ADA standards. Consult the Texas Histori- cal Commission for recommendations. Recommended Treatments for Accessibility Identify the historic building's character -defining spaces, features, and finishes so that accessibility code -required work will not result in their damage or loss. Comply with barrier -free access requirements in such a manner that character -defining spaces, features, and finishes are preserved. Find solutions to meet accessibility requirements that minimize the impact on the historic building and its site, such as compatible ramps, paths, and lifts. Not Recommended for Accessibility X Altering, damaging, or destroying character - defining features in attempting to comply with accessi- bility requirements. X Making modifications for accessibility without considering the impact on the historic building and its site. Appendix Page:55 Page 40 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD June 1999 Energy Efficiency The use of energy conservation methods in building de- sign in encouraged. Prior to retrofitting historic build- ings to make them more energy efficient, identify and evaluate existing historic features to assess their inher- ent energy -conserving potential. These features include shutters, transoms, skylights, canopies, porches, and plantings. Recommended Treatments for Energy Effi- ciency Recommended Treatments for Health and Safety Identify the historic building's character -defining spaces, features, and finishes so that code -required work will not result in their damage or loss. Comply with health and safety codes in such a manner that character -defining spaces, features, and finishes are preserved. Not Recommended for Health and Safety Storm windows should be installed on the X Altering, damaging, or destroying character - interior of windows so that the exterior appearance is defining spaces, features, and finishes while making unchanged. However, if exterior storm windows must modifications to a building or site to comply with be used, they should complement the sash treatment. safety codes. Energy conservation should be compatible with X Removing unhealthful building materials without the historic building. regard to personal and environmental safety. Solar collection devices should not alter roof lines, nor should they detract from or obscure distinctive architectural features. Not Recommended for Energy Efficiency X Removing existing window sashes and glass and replacing with windows of a different design, or partially or entirely closed up with solid materials. X Removing historic shading devices rather than keeping them in an operable condition. X Replacing historic multi -paned sash with new thermal sash utilizing false muntins. X Replacing windows or transoms with fixed thermal glazing or permitting windows and transoms to remain inoperable rather than utilizing them for their energy conserving potential. X Installing interior storm windows that allow mois- ture to accumulate and damage the window. X Installing new exterior storm windows which are incongruous with the existing sash in size or color. X Removing plant materials, trees, and landscape features that perform passive solar energy functions. HEALTH AND SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS Some historic building materials (urea formaldehyde, asbestos, lead paint, etc.) contain toxic substances that are potentially hazardous to building occupants. Fol- lowing careful investigation and analysis, some form of abatement may be required. Appendix Page:56 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 41 Appendix Page:57 Page 42 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CBD June 1999 APPROPRIATE PLANT MATERIALS The following plant materials are suited to Lubbock's climate, and shall be used for all planting required by the CB ordinances. Other materials may be used, but must be part of an approved landscape plan. Trees Carya illinoensis Cercis canadensis Cercocarpus montanus var. Argenteus Chilopsis linearis Gleditsia triacanthos Gleditsia triacanthos `Shademaster' Ilex vomitoria Lagerstroemia indica Leucophyllum frutescens Magnolia grandiflora `Majestic Beauty' Malus Pistacia chinensis Prunus caroliniana Pyracantha Pyrus Calleryana `Bradford' Quercus macrocarpa Quercus shumardii Quercus texana Quercus virginiana Ulmus crassifolia Ulmus parvifolia Ulmus parvifolia `a/lee' Vitex agnus-castus X-cupressocyparis leyland Evergreen Trees Pinus edulis Pinus eldarica Pinus thunbergiana Quercus fusiformis Pecan Texas Redbud Silverleaf Mountain Mahogany Desert Willow Thornless Honey Locust Shademaster Honey Locust Yaupon Holly Crepe Myrtle Texas Sage, Cenizo Magnolia Flowering Crabapple Chinese Pistache Carolina Cherry Laurel Firebush Bradford Pear Bur Oak Shumard Red Oak Texas Red Oak Live Oak Cedar Elm Little Leaf or Chinese Elm Allee Lacebark Elm Chaste Tree Leyland Cypress Pinon Pine Eldarica Pine Japanese Black Pine Live Oak Shrubs Abelia grandiflora `Edward Goucher' Abelia Berberis thunbergii Dwarf Barberry `Crimson Pygmy' Buddleia davidii Butterfly Bush Buxus microphylla asiatica Boxwood Buxus microphylla japonica Japanese Boxwood Cacti Many varieties Cotoneaster glaucophylius Coteneaster Coteneaster horizontalis Rock Coteneaster Elaeagnus angustifolia Russian Olive Euonymus kiautschovica Manhattan Euonymus Fallugia paradoxa Apache Plume Forsythia intermedia Border Forsythia Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca Hibiscus syriacus Rose of Sharon, Althaea Ilex cornuta `Dwarf Burford' Dwarf Burford Holly Ilex vomitoria Yaupon Holly Ilex vomitoria 'Nana' Dwarf Yaupon Holly Ilex `Nellie R. Stevens' Nellie Stevens Holly Juniperus procumbens `Nana' Procumbent Juniper Lagerstromia Crepe Myrtle Leucophyllum frutescens Texas Sage Mahonia aquifolium `Compact' Oregon Grape Nandina domestica Heavenly Bamboo Photinia frazeri Frazer Photinia Raphiolepis indica Indian Hawthorn Rosa Rose, many varieties Spirea vanhouttei Spirea Taxus media `Densiformis' Dense Yew Appendix Page:58 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 43 Vines Clematis Clematis Dolichos lablab Hyacinth Bean Lonicera sempervirens Coral Honeysuckle Wisteria macrostachya Texas Wisteria Ground Covers Euonymous fortunei Wintercreeper Euonymous fortunei `Colorata' Purpleleaf Euonymous Hedera helix English Ivy Juniperus horizontalis Creeper Juniper Juniperus horizontalis `Blue Rug' Blue Rug Juniper Liriope muscari Lilyturf, "Monkeygrass" Lonicera japonica `Hall's Japanese' Honeysuckle Lonicera japonica `Purple -leaf Purple Honeysuckle Parthenocisus quinquefolia Virginia Creeper Vinca major Periwinkle, Vinca Appendix Page:59 Page 44 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CBD June 1999 Parkway Planting Standard The following diagram, produced for the Broadway Streetscape Plan by Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc., is the standard for planting trees in the parkway (the area within the street right-of-way). Appendix Page:60 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 45 Appendix Page:61 Page 46 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CBD June 1999 Definitions Adaptive Use: Converting a building to a use other than that for which it was originally designed. Every reasonable effort should be made to adapt a property in a manner that requires minimal alteration of the build- ing, structure or site and its environment. Building uses that are closely related to the original or a new use that requires minimal changes to the existing structure are preferred and should prove to be more cost effective. Architectural Decorative Material: Materials such as copper, bronze, anodized aluminum, stainless steel, porcelain enamel, natural materials or other simi- lar materials that do not require painting. Articulation: The treatment of a building or other object such that the parts are highlighted three dimen- sionally. Typically, walls are stepped back or forward, windows are inset into the wall, roof lines are changed and entries are highlighted. Awning: Any structure attached to the wall of a build- ing which was built and designed for the purpose of cos- metics or for shading a window, door or sidewalk. Awnings are not integral to the building, are typically triangular or curved in cross section and are generally com- prised of a metal frame and canvas or other fabric. Canopy: Any structure of a permanent fixed nature attached to or independent of the main structure, built and designed for the purpose of shielding from the ele- ments, or a roof -like structure of a permanent nature which is supported by or projects from the wall of a struc- ture. The typical form of a canopy is flat, and in historic architecture, the outer edges are often suspended by chain, metal cable or columns. Mansard Roof: A mainly stylistic treatment, of French derivation, of the top edge of a building. Contemporary mansard roofs typically screen flat roofs by employing modified treatments of a parapet wall. Preservation: Applying measures to sustain the ex- isting form, integrity and material of a building or struc- ture. This treatment requires retention of the greatest amount of historic fabric, along with the building's his- toric form, features and detailing as they have evolved over time. Reconstruction: Reproducing by new construction the exact form and detail of a vanished building, struc- ture or object as it appeared at a specific period of time, primarily for interpretive purposes. Rehabilitation: Returning a property to a state which makes a contemporary use possible, while still preserv- ing those portions or features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural or cultural values. Rehabilitation may include the adaptive use of the build- ing and major or minor additions may also occur. Renovation: Improving by repair. In renovation, the usefulness and appearance of the building is enhanced. The basic character and significant details are respected and preserved, but some sympathetic alterations may occur. Alterations should be reversible so that future owners may restore the building to its original design. Restoration: Reproducing the appearance of a build- ing exactly as it looked at a particular moment in time; reproducing a pure style, either interior or exterior. This process may include removal of later work or the re- placement of missing historic features. Use a restora- tion approach for missing details or features of a historic building when the features have been determined to be particularly significant to the character of the structure and when the original configuration is accurately and adequately documented. Appendix Page:62 June 1999 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COD Page 47 Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards City of Lubbock, Texas February, 2018 Approved by the City Council Lubbity of ock Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: Introduction.......................................................................3 Overview................................................................................................. 3 Using the Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards ...............4 CHAPTER2: Design Concepts...............................................................6 Historic Brick Pavers...............................................................................6 SpecialtyPaving...................................................................................... 8 Specialty Vehicular and Pedestrian Lighting.......................................101 Public Parks, Plazas, and Features......................................................... 12 Public Art and Banners..........................................................................12 StreetSignage........................................................................................12 Utilities..................................................................................................12 Benches..................................................................................................13 Bollards..................................................................................................13 TrashReceptacles..................................................................................13 TreeGrates............................................................................................ 14 BicycleRacks........................................................................................ 15 BusStops...............................................................................................15 CHAPTER 3: Gateway and Corridor Streets.......................................16 Introduction........................................................................................... 16 TrafficImpact........................................................................................16 GatewayStreets..................................................................................... 17 Corridor Streets...................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER4: Landscaping.....................................................................20 GeneralLandscaping............................................................................. 20 Street Tree Framework.......................................................................... 21 Appendix A: Street and Pedestrian Lighting Specification ................27 AppendixB: Plant Materials..................................................................30 1 FIGURES Figure 1: Public Improvements Standards Boundary ...................... 4 Figure 2: Downtown Revitalization Action Plan (CBD Action Plan) 5 Figure 3: UDHPC Recommendations for Historic Brick Streets....... 7 Figure 4: Intersection Paving Concepts .......................................... 10 Figure 5: Gateways and Corridors .................................................. 17 Figure 6: Non Gateway or Cooridor Parkway Detail ..................... 21 Figure 7: Corridor and Gateway Parkway ..................................... 22 Figure 8: Street Tree Framework Plan ........................................... 24 Figure 9: Typical Block Spacing Diagram for Trees and Lights .... 25 Figure 10: View Obstruction Illustration ........................................ 26 Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 2 a CD CD C Q x� v CD CD CHAPTER 1: Introduction Overview In 2008 the City Council of the City of Lubbock (Council) adopted the City of Lubbock Downtown Revitalization Action Plan (CBD Action Plan) to articulate the preferred vision for the revitalization process of the Central Business District (CBD) of the City of Lubbock (see Figure 2). The CBD Action Plan was shaped after extensive citizen input through a collaborative effort between the urban design consulting firm EDAW, Inc. from Denver, Colorado, the economic development firm Development Strategies of St. Louis, Missouri, local design firm Parkhill, Smith, and Cooper, Inc., and the City of Lubbock (City). The City's Planning Department adjusted the boundaries of the CBD Action Plan areas slightly to coordinate with existing and proposed zoning in the CBD. While the CBD Action Plan provides a vision for the CBD, more specific technical guidance is needed for a coherent, unified design in the CBD. This document is just one of several documents needed to guide that design. The primary mechanism for private sector redevelopment is the CBD zoning districts in the City of Lubbock Code of Ordinances (Code). The Council, on the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z), adopted the CBD zoning districts into the Code that provide for the specific needs of different areas of the CBD, including those identified in the CBD Action Plan. Like other sections of the Code, each CBD zoning district includes standards for: height and building orientation; building mass and scale; parking areas; and, landscape areas. Each of the CBD zoning districts fully adopts the Design Standards for the Central Business District (CBD Design Standards) in order to provide more detailed design standards for new construction and rehabilitation projects in the CBD. The CBD Design Standards provide a mechanism for review and approval of construction and remodeling plans within the CBD zoning districts, including an appeals process. This document, the Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards (Public Improvements Standards), serves as the second guide for CBD development. While the CBD zoning districts, and the CBD Design Standards that are incorporated within them, govern private property within the CBD, they also include requirements for parts of the public right-of-way. These Public Improvements Standards do not replicate the requirements of the CBD zoning districts, but set a minimum standard for all right-of-way improvements in the CBD. These Public Improvements Standards provide a basic design concept for right-of-way improvements in the CBD that can be used by the City and by private developers. The public improvements suggested in these Public Improvements Standards will create a desirable environment for downtown life while providing a framework for private development in the CBD. These Public Improvements Standards will apply within the boundaries shown on Figure 1: Public Improvements Standards Boundary. Rebuilding the right-of-way improvements in the CBD will generally follow the pattern of private development. These Public Improvements Standards apply to all projects within the CBD, whether privately funded by developers of adjacent property, or publicly funded by the City or any other governmental entity. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 3 Using the Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards These Public Improvements Standards apply to any project in the CBD that: 1. Affects the favade* of the structure on or in which the project is planned; 2. Requires a building permit; and 3. Is valued at one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or more. The developer of any such project is required to have a building permit pre - application meeting with the City of Lubbock Director of Planning, or his designee, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the project. The Director of Planning, in consultation with the Director of Parks and other City staff members, will determine if the proposed project meets the intent of the CBD Action Plan and these Public Improvements Standards. If the Director of Planning determines that the project satisfies the requirements of the CBD Action Plan and these Public Improvements Standards, then the project can proceed through the City's normal building permit process. The Director of Planning, in consultation with respective members of City Staff, may require that the developer of a project produce documentation that provides evidence as to the value of the project. If a proposed project is in the public right-of-way, or if a proposed project directly affects the public right-of-way, then these Public Improvements Standards shall apply to the project even if the project would have otherwise been exempt from these Public Improvements Standards. If a proposed project is the result of an act of God, a natural disaster, or an event beyond the control of all parties related to the proposed project, then these Public Improvements Standards shall not apply. If the Director of Planning determines that the project does not satisfy the requirements of the CBD Action Plan and these Public Improvements Standards, then the developer of the project has two (2) options: 1. The developer can bring the project into conformance with the CBD Action Plan and these Public Improvements Standards; or, 2. The developer can work with City Planning staff to request that the Urban Design and Historic Preservation Committee (UDHPC) waive certain requirements in the CBD Action Plan and these Public Improvements Standards for the project. The UDHPC may approve the application as submitted, approve the application with conditions, or deny the application. When conditions are attached to a project's approval, the conditions will require modifications to the proposed design that are necessary to ensure the project's conditional compliance with these Public Improvements Standards. The developer of the project may bring to the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) of the City an appeal of the decision of the UDHPC concerning the project. *For the purposes of these Public Improvements Standards, a favade includes the walkway, parking area, landscape, building edge, building signage, and the exterior of any building within the CBD. Exterior painting or changes to the interior of a building that do not affect the exterior of the building are not subject to these Public Improvements Standards. Public projects that undergo a public review or comment process do not require a review by the UDHPC, but still require standard permitting and staff review. Figure 1: Public Improvements Standards Boundary Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards M D a) C d X m U� m 0D QD - ire �. ', �•� � i7QteWOjr r 1i Retail '� • 7 Y� �rQ..:. .� it s9 i DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION ACTION PLAN i �11a 7 �14 0 t Destinat 2 C Retail nr loci 3 big E J Jf traf Business Central Business District District 1 •r" N� J . - I T;ansitian Residential �,,, ••:... -Area District i7epat r ►* K M� R.......................... I x City of Lubbock, Texas February 5, 2008 Figure 2: Downtown Revitalization Action Plan (CBD Action Plan) P referred Primary Districts & Catalytic Projects Legend .ti' ua.•.rno+•n core �o Ney 9YYdNgslPmJetli: EAIY OMv�/E�'d A NKM.I r PedRWY C PitlU0,1CA E U&.y bs.y F Rp1ew HIXW Condo. H County e . Cux[n8u1 a a I ptlnus ttd wex Re J lYveW9 BMld,ng K CaeU�e Theeler i weer cancer M eumi Hdq L'vnGx �- Prvswsed C.Wytic prel.neYc Pdmay9W E.trhr 1 0*Cw.nY. RvrPnpp� S 6yen b 7 PeHym.qArb C«+rr a once Fw. acgacl 5 lAlxeGree ReLdeM{el 6 FeeMd Ptlk i Mdw illeetel B CefegMYe HeA el Feme 9 Nen6 9,pIwANg ENmWs Id Rhs C.eeaw nnro,ewe alenyen a, Gpwey Retw —at Penmg Wngas 13 sna.axea Doke: ]a Co1.v,Non Hobe 15 M•erx,e L9tr1.1 ��-tl Ir�glovemttts ',7y�(�_r-1ii I6 RvatlxAlel Party 18 8ou11gla y. 18 YWk or F—em' PM q- Sufecv dp.r S4-,. 0 Prey n�++vertrYPn �%m,wyreya H611H9 R.rq.. 58l E8 R-Vp INS] .. •• Highway &Idq. MSF RdY d ::......: F.apcasa Se-M Cs .. P<PPHq rlfeel AFTmw{s + ] 9trMli W N'0. ', ' YiAyflndlrg FirteAn. YF ��� Idewnycrc,.,ys N Ad �u mo xc Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards S a C Q x� v CD CD CHAPTER 2: Design Concepts The CBD is distinguished from other parts of Lubbock by the presence of numerous historic buildings sites, the use of time-honored building materials, and the large scale of buildings at the street level. As the CBD returns to a center for living, working, and recreation, a consistent urban character will need to be maintained in the CBD through the use of historical elements and appropriate building scale. Although each of the CBD zoning districts has unique needs and opportunities for redevelopment, the right-of-way elements provided in these Public Improvements Standards will be coordinated throughout the CBD. Street furnishings are a fundamental component to the success of street and neighborhood aesthetic cohesiveness. Street furnishings provide places places for people to sit, deposit trash, and secure bicycles. Beyond the functional benefits, the right street furnishings can attract and engage the public by creating a safe, comfortable, and welcoming environment. Historic Brick Pavers Many of the streets in the CBD are paved with fired clay brick pavers. These bricked streets were built during the 1920's and 1930's primarily by the City's public works programs. Over the years, much of the historic brick removed from CBD streets during reconstruction projects has been stored for future repair, construction, and reuse. If a project in the CBD requires the use of brick pavers, a developer should use such stored historic brick before using new or non -historic brick pavers. Before a property owner or developer completes the design of or begins construction on a CBD project, the property owner or developer should contact the City to verify the available quantity and size of historic brick pavers that are required for the project. In 2006, the Council adopted revisions to the Code that protected most of the existing brick pavers in the CBD. The Code was amended to, among other things: • Provide continued protection of brick streets and alleys by requiring appropriate repairs as outlined in the 1982 resolution and the repair details prepared by Streets Engineering; • Specify that all bricks salvaged from any removal or repair of streets will remain the property of the City; and • Specify a review process for removal that allows an UDHPC determination with appeal to the Council, using the same concept of review and appeal that currently governs Lubbock Historic Landmark Certificates of Appropriateness. Requirements for the repair and maintenance of brick streets are addressed in the Code in Section 36.07.011 Brick Streets, Section 36.08.006 Brick Alleys, and Section 40.03.3224. The UDHPC has made recommendations for continued preservation and improvement of brick streets. See Figure 3: UDHPC Recommendations for Historic Brick Streets. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards Mac Davis Ln Broadway 15th Street 16th Street moo �II�IF- I �I � � 6I�, El IFILI°ff Figure 3: UDHPC Recommendations for Historic Brick Streets Contributing Brick Streets Proposed Reclaimed Brick Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 7 Specialty Paving Sidewalks, and related pavement elements such as crosswalks, direct movement, define space, and provide for pedestrian safety. Enhanced pedestrian crossings at intersections will facilitate pedestrian movement and help slow traffic. Specialty paving adds visual interest and articulates special landscape features. In the CBD, differing patterns and materials will identify and separate the different spaces of the sidewalk environment. However, sidewalk surfaces should present a consistent and unifying element in the district. Sidewalks will be built to existing City construction standards, though the Lubbock Building Board of Appeals can consider alternate styles. • The approved brick pavers for sidewalk and crosswalk 3 enhancement are the Pavestone Holland Stone Parkway Series Q (non -chamfered edges) in the Antique Buff, Antique Red, or Antique Terra Cotta color patterns or equivalent as approved by Director of Planning. Subject to landscape plan review, this series may be used in sidewalk projects encompassing one full block face or more. Selected concrete pavers should comprise at least fifty percent (50%) of the sidewalk surface area. See Figure 7: Corridor and Gateway Parkway The clear pedestrian path of the sidewalks should be at least five feet (5') wide when the total parkway width is less than ten feet (10') wide, with the remaining width serving as the amenity zone. If the total parkway width is ten feet (10') wide or greater, the sidewalk should be fifty percent (50%) of the width of the total parkway, with the remaining width serving as the amenity zone as approved by Director of Planning. Paver patterns should be consistent within sidewalk spaces by block, for example, one pattern for the primary walkway and one pattern for the hardscape apron between tree grates. Sidewalk design and materials will be approved as part of the permit or contract review process. • Approved paving patterns are Harringbone, Parguet, and Runner Bond. Please see the following three (3) examples of each. HERRINGBONE (2) PARQUET (5) Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 8 RUNNER BOND(7) *Please note the Stack pattern is not approved.* D a CD m CL • Specialty paving may be used to extend the sidewalk visually across the street at selected gateway and corridor intersections. All N crosswalks shall be approved concrete pavers with concrete banding. No historic brick surfaces will be disturbed to create intersection paving features. All four (4) sides shall be updated at once. Exposed aggregate concrete is not an approved paving surface for redevelopment in the CBD. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 9 Figure 4: Intersection Paving Concepts Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 10 Specialty Vehicular and Pedestrian Lighting Lighting is important both for the safety and ambiance of a neighborhood. Pedestrian level lighting further reinforces the human scale of the CBD and encourages outdoor activity. In the CBD, specialty lighting fixtures have been selected to provide a unique identity for the area. Two (2) levels of lighting poles have been selected to provide flexibility in the public right-of-way: a medium pedestrian light standard and a tall vehicular or roadway lighting standard. • Specialty vehicular lighting will be restricted to gateway and corridor streets as identified in Chapter 3. Gateway and Corridor Streets. • Street and pedestrian lighting is specified in Appendix A: Vehicular and Pedestrian Lighting Specifications. • Specialty pedestrian lighting is required on all gateway and corridor streets and for any projects encompassing a full block face or more and may be installed for smaller projects if approved in the landscape plan review. • A lighting plan will be submitted to and approved by the City on all projects where lighting is required or proposed in the right-of- way. Pedestrian lighting shall be tied to streetlights for power. The following general conditions will apply in every area where specialty lighting is used. More detailed information is included in Appendix A: Vehicular and Pedestrian Lighting Specifications. • Lighting will include full cutoff or cutoff lighting fixtures as defined by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IES). • All new vehicular and pedestrian lighting shall be LED to provide a white -colored light that is excellent for color clarity. • Pedestrian lighting will be spaced evenly along the block in relationship to each other and to the street centerline. Across the street relationships should also be considered, as well as spacing to provide illumination at alley intersections. • Vehicular lighting will be placed at every intersection, with at least one additional light at mid -block. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 11 Public Parks, Plazas, and Features Several parks and open spaces have been proposed in the CBD Action Plan to serve the public by providing green spaces. These spaces will serve as anchors for the proposed districts. Designs for these public spaces shall conform to these Public Improvements Standards and specific plans will be reviewed under the process outlined in this document. Public Art and Banners Public art is a major component in enhancing a community's visual image. In the CBD, sculpture, architectural trellises, pavilions, and similar symbolic structures will add interest to public parks, plazas, and squares. Many of these elements have already been implemented in various parts of the CBD and new works should complement existing art. In addition, banners from vehicular light standards on gateway and corridor streets will add to the urban ambiance of the CBD. Any proposed artwork or banner in the public right-of-way should be submitted to the City for consideration and approval before the work is installed. Artwork and banners will meet all Code requirements and be approved by the City's Planning Department. Any such artwork or banner may neither have a business name included nor be an artistic expression of the particular type of business on the parcel. Street Signage Street signs, stop signs, parking signs, directional signs, and informational signs will be coordinated to establish a unified appearance within the CBD. Signage should be placed to ensure a clear pedestrian pathway without restricting visibility at intersections • The City shall provide a decorative logo on street sign toppers as recommended by the CBD Tax Increment Financing Board. Signs shall be installed in a visually pleasing manner that coordinates with the rest of the street amenities. However, all devices will be installed in accordance with the latest edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD). Utilities Resolution 2011-R0287, adopted by the City on July 14, 2011, noted that "among the goals and objectives of the Downtown Revitalization Plan were the goals of reducing the fragmentation of blocks caused by bidirectional alleys, [and] working with utilities to consolidate and co - locate physical infrastructure located in these alleys." In adopting this Resolution, the "City Council has determined that it is reasonably necessary for all utilities located overhead in the streets and alleys of the Downtown area to be relocated into an underground duct system as this public improvement is installed by the City of Lubbock" and provided a mechanism for notification of utility relocation. The City's intent is to keep the alleys and pedestrian area of the right- of-way clear of utility obstructions, including poles and control boxes. The pre -application conference with the Director of Planning will include discussion on the requirements for underground utility placement and positioning and the relocation of aboveground obstructions into the City -installed underground duct system. Public and private utility services should be placed to avoid trees and not to disrupt their alignment or spacing. Special attention must be paid to preserving visual access at corners for pedestrians and motorists. Utilities should be placed before any right-of-way improvements are made. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 12 Traffic signal boxes, transformers, telephone switching boxes, or other utilities that cannot be located underground or accommodated by easements on adjacent private property should be located away from building entrances and main views within the right-of-way. Any utility boxes that are visible in the right-of-way shall be flat black or forest green. Benches Benches in the CBD shall be Witt Oakley Standard Collection, Item M6-BCH-ARM-BK, 72 inch slatted metal bench with armrest, powder coated flat black, or equal as approved by Director of Planning. Witt Oakley Standard Collection Item M6-BCH-ARM-BK Bollards Although bollards are not encouraged, they may be needed in some areas for pedestrian safety, and will be approved on a case -by -case basis by the Director of Planning in the landscape plan review. Lighted bollards will not be allowed. Trash Receptacles Trash Receptacles shall be Witt Oakley Standard Collection, thirty- six (36) Gallon Steel Bar Receptacle, Item M3601-FT-BK, powder coated black. Installed at the Southwest Corner of all gateway and corridor intersections. Witt Oakley Standard Collection Item M3601-FT-BK Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 13 Tree Grates The selected tree grates for the CBD shall be East Jordan Iron Works 8655 Nova sixty inch (60") square gray iron or 8656 Nova seventy- two inch (72") square gray iron, or equal as approved by the Director of Planning. 8655 NOVA Tree Grate Set dOr �acnaa 4r BOLI NO SLOTS APO r 2j 8656 NOVA Tree Grate Set Fr .d Nlmiher Wee.102 UIM.IIe TryI G11N am kaF 7Fr-Esel sne cr.IeraFrr�e..egCgaer+bAMnbq ory Iron pLL9lBl AlYpris.e NanTlFlf{ •OperArtl ��, RnreF e zm� FlIdbFld -Jver�prgleawNN.d sun.re CaNfiaGon ANTN AID Caarvn aF Cn➢<a: Fesa Msjcr Cdnparprrtt Wiifi614 FIOBFi536tEpl 0ravr1n9 iiavlelcn 8Na✓2c13 Gugmr. DC 9f1L]Oa] RFuimd Ey: pEF bhclalmor �s�aRar r..e. w. :. �tmp.m.�.w w.n.w......�nxnn.o. .p1r—n—E, w.t�naFlonv. rie Contact �WW6�%1653 36f0 1W1111".R E[C110N �a BOLTINGSLOI� rr ::• ej Frod-N.mher W666 I.M NCO rreamrea ...0 .s aravlmn cLssei Tree Glle RmNveda Gaoler Avsem W Gray honti"La59j NZ'T 0,.Aw 614 w. n hea LLaimg WwlFo.. ' J D�Bruln Matlilnetl arn�o cegrlkalkn ,or ub,or LD—ftdGlen W. Mayor Gomporarrh �I 90B6Afi6160t NvMg Revision Umall GEF aNlIIGI] Redmd By: D6F Clsd�imFr w'yww ��ynnb norhw���YOK 'Rwnue �vnpimix[�ww.i�.m r�Gwp,xu R��...e ON 6i26l E809B51 Ip.mn Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 14 Bicycle Racks Bicycle racks shall be Saris Parking Outdoor Bike Rack, Wave Rack, with capacity of five (5) bikes, Model No. 2163, tube size greater than two inch (2") with a flanged mount, powder coated black, or equal as approved by Director of Planning. 2163 A —A 36.00 11 02-38 36 MINIMUM 48 MINIMUM Bus Stops Bus shelters are only allowed on designated bus routes in the CBD. Bus shelters will include seating and provide for protection from the wind and sun. Bus shelters placed as part of a private redevelopment effort must be reviewed by the City and Citibus. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 15 CHAPTER 3: Gateway and Corridor Streets Introduction During the initial studies of the CBD, a framework for improvements was established by first identifying the main gateway and corridor streets that define the area. Gateway features, specialty paving, landscaping, street furnishings, and banners on light poles will serve as unifying elements and contribute to the ambiance of gateway and corridor streets. See Figure 5: Gateways and Corridors. The gateway streets include the portions of Avenue Q, 19th Street, Broadway Avenue, Buddy Holly Avenue, Mac Davis Lane, Glenna Goodacre Boulevard, and Avenue L shown on Figure 5: Gateways and Corridors. Avenue J, 15th Street, and 161h Street are corridor streets connecting different areas of the CBD. Since 19th Street and Avenue Q are under the jurisdiction of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), any improvements on those streets must be approved by and coordinated with TxDOT's District Office in Lubbock. Certain amenities will be limited to gateway and corridor streets. Street furnishings will be spaced along each block, including three benches, a trash receptacle, and two bicycle racks per block face. Specialty vehicular lighting where banners can be displayed will help define the special nature of these streets. Banner locations will be limited to these streets. Unique pedestrian crossings, including specialty paving, will add to the character of the street by further defining intersections and promoting pedestrian safety. Markers and monuments create a sense of arrival into the CBD as well as transition between CBD zoning districts. Such features give the first impression of a place. The CBD has several identified gateway points that will require a special treatment. Recommended locations of gateway features are indicated on Figure 5: Gateways and Corridors. Traffic Impact Any development that expects to generate high average daily traffic (ADT) or high traffic due to regularly -scheduled events shall be required to conduct and provide the City with results from traffic studies. The traffic studies should show analysis with current street layouts or proposed street modifications. Current and future impacts to the CBD's pedestrian, vehicular, and transit circulation should be considered in the traffic analysis. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards FV Mac Davis Ln lenna Goodacre Blvd Broadway D �0 15th Street m x 15th Street v m m bo 0 19th Street Figure S: Gateway and Corridors ss with Banners Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 17 a C Q x� CD v CD Gateway Streets Gateway streets are the major streets into the CBD and the introduction of the CBD to most travelers. See Figure S: Gateway and Corridors. These streets typically have a higher volume of vehicular traffic. Because of their higher traffic carrying capacity, gateway streets should have less frequent vehicular access points or curb cuts. The size and number of vehicular access points or curb cuts per site development on the Gateway and Corridor streets will be coordinated with the City for staff for approval. Broadway Avenue Broadway Avenue has historically been the spine of the CBD, linking the entrance to Texas Tech University and the CBD. In 1995, improvements on Broadway Avenue between University Avenue and Martin Luther King Boulevard were completed with a major TxDOT grant. Pedestrian and vehicular lighting, street trees, and specialty paving were early efforts to establish an urban design theme for the CBD. Some changes will be needed to unify Broadway Avenue's existing enhancements with those proposed for the rest of the corridor. Any redevelopment of property along the Broadway corridor will be required to match the style and design of the existing corridor as best possible with additional requirements of required site furnishings as per this document. Buddy Holly Avenue Buddy Holly Avenue is already established as the gateway to the Depot District. It also serves as a corridor through the CBD, terminating at IH-27 on both the north and south. The Buddy Holly Avenue right-of-way measures one hundred feet (100') between Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards property lines. This expansive width allows for multiple lanes of vehicular traffic, tree -lined streets, and on -street parking. Mac Davis Lane Mac Davis Lane is a gateway into the Memorial Civic Center and Arts District from Avenue Q. A special treatment is necessary to distinguish arrival into these special zones. Additional trees located on properties adjacent to the right-of-way will create a park -like setting within the Civic Center district. Glenna Goodacre Boulevard During the redevelopment of North Overton, Glenna Goodacre Boulevard was designated as the central spine through that neighborhood. Extending the Glenna Goodacre improvements across Avenue Q to Avenue O will enhance the entry to the Civic Center. 111�1 GfenwGoodareEktersion Current Limit to Glenna Goodaue Improvements _.. _:= Passible Ah Street Closure 18 a m C n x� v 00 N Corridor Streets Corridor streets serve as the crucial links between districts within the CBD. The most important of these is Avenue J, which has been identified as the best link between the Depot District and the Arts District. Similarly, portions of 151h Street and 16th Street will serve as corridors within the Depot District. Special street conditions are necessary for such corridors in order to accommodate pedestrian activity. The identified gateway streets mentioned previously will also serve as corridor streets. Avenue J Avenue J will serve as the link between the Depot District and the Arts District. Avenue J was proposed in the Central Business District Action Plan to become a ground -floor retail corridor. It is important that Avenue J shall be developed as a pedestrian friendly retail corridor with limited parallel parking directly on Avenue J. The Avenue J right-of-way measures seventy-five feet (75') between property lines. This presents a complex design challenge as the corridor must allow for pedestrian and cyclist activities, street amenities and plantings, outdoor dining spaces, and lanes for medium - level vehicular traffic. Avenue J is proposed as the main retail spine between the Depot District and the Arts District. It is important that the right-of-way improvements within this corridor promote a pedestrian -friendly environment. Removal of existing angled parking along Avenue J will provide additional area for pedestrian traffic. An increased level of pedestrian seating will accommodate outdoor activity. Additional trash receptacles will ensure the cleanliness of the corridor and extra bike racks will promote transportation by bicycle. 1 Sth Street & 16th Streets 15th Street and 16th Street between Avenue J and Crickets Avenue are also corridor streets with the Depot District and will receive a similar treatment to Avenue J. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards M Q x v 00 W CHAPTER 4: Landscaping General Landscaping The following general landscaping standards apply to all public right- of-way in the CBD and should be used as a supplement to the existing requirements for right-of-way maintenance in the Code. Lubbock has a semi -arid climate with a limited selection of native plant material that can thrive on the small amount of annual rainfall received. Therefore, it is in the best interest of the City to pursue landscaping enhancements that promote water conservation. When a private developer initiates a project in the CBD, a landscape plan will be submitted as part of a building permit request. During zoning review, the Director of Planning will coordinate review of the landscape and irrigation plan with the Director of Parks. Coordination of any landscaping shall be done as to not interfere with existing pipes and utilities. All plant material planted in the public right-of-way, including trees, will be irrigated. Permanent, automatic irrigation systems will be installed and tested prior to the installation of any plant material. Irrigation systems will utilize drip irrigation, subsurface irrigation, or other water -conserving methods or technologies where possible. • Irrigation shall be maintained and paid by the landowner. • The use of a hose bib for irrigation in the public right-of-way, as allowed elsewhere in the Code, shall not be allowed within the area included in these Public Improvements Standards. • A balance of trees, shrubs, ornamental grasses, and groundcover is encouraged. Climate -adapted plant species should predominate for hardiness in urban conditions and to minimize maintenance. See Appendix B: Plant Materials for a list of selected plant materials for the CBD. Trees, shrubs, ornamental grasses, and groundcovers of the same species should be massed in groupings. Individual plants should only be planted when the intent is to highlight the species due to its unique color or form. Plantings with similar watering patterns will be grouped within the proper irrigation zones. The use of flowering or brightly colored foliage creates color and interest. Seasonal color is encouraged as an accent to permanent bed plantings. The use of raised planters is highly encouraged to make plantings visible and easier to maintain where foot traffic is dense or parkway width is limited. Planting beds shall be dressed with a minimum of one and one- half inches (1.5") of "Jog Blend" limestone screenings mulch from R.E. Janes Gravel Company, Slaton, Texas, or equivalent, or as pre -approved by the Director of Planning, or three inches (Y) of shredded cedar bark mulch to retain soil moisture, establish healthy root systems, and reduce weeds. The use of shade trees is encouraged in and around surface parking lots, streets, and other large areas of paving. Deciduous trees on the south and west sides of buildings and public use areas add shade in the summer and allow filtered light in the winter. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 20 D C a X N CO A • Trees in or adjacent to the right-of-way will be trimmed so that foliage is less than eighty inches (80") above the top of curb of the adjacent street. Plant materials other than trees in the right-of-way may not exceed two to three feet (2'-3') in height as required by the Code, Section 40.03.212. • Turf will only be used in low -density residential parkways, single-family yards, public parks, and open spaces exceeding four hundred square feet (400 sgft) in the CB-3 Zoning District. 1 1 i 1 I Property Line I Street Tree r Parkway Area Figure 6: Non Gateway or Corridor Parkway Detail Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 21 Street Parking Figure 7: Corridor and Gateway Parkway Pa Par �1� [ 10 Material 5, 150% 1 Concrete X_5' 150% 150% Brick Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 22 a CD CD Q x T v Co M Street Tree Framework Street trees are inviting and help define major gateways and corridors in the CBD. They soften the edges where buildings meet the street, offer shade to pedestrians, and help cool the pedestrian environment. In order to establish a consistent design concept for public spaces in the CBD, Figure 9: Street Tree Framework Plan, specifies the specific tree species for each street and at each intersection. Trees will have a minimum four -inch (4") caliper as measured by ANSI standard nursery practices. The following general street tree standards apply to all streets or adjacent properties undergoing improvements and should be used with Figure 9: Street Tree Framework Plan in developing landscape plans. • Street trees are required on all streets or adjacent properties undergoing improvements. Space trees a maximum of sixty feet (60') on center along a street block with allowance for variations in spacing for curb cuts, alleys, and drives. The sixty -foot (60') spacing is derived from the historic block dimension of most CBD blocks being approximately two hundred fifty feet (250') square with twenty -foot (20') alleys in the center for a total block dimension of two hundred seventy feet (270'). One (1) tree per every sixty feet (60) should allow for an approximately forty-five feet (45') of clear zone from the property line corners of each block and five (5) subsequent trees in the midblock zone per historic two hundred seventy feet (270') of block face. See Figure 10: Typical Block Spacing Diagram. • Trees shall be aligned and in straight rows, parallel to the curb. Ideally, trees will be centered in the space in which they are planted but need to line up along the continuous length of the street when possible. Align trees across the street and space them evenly along the block in relationship to each other and to the street centerline where possible. • Adjustments can be made for blocks not having the traditional dimensions, but tree spacing should be kept proportional. Where blocks have been consolidated, this spacing should be maintained as closely as possible to coordinate with spacing throughout the CBD. See Figure 10: Typical Block Spacing Diagram. • Existing trees and their root systems should be protected during construction through the use of barricades and fencing. • Tree grates are required for trees in the right-of-way in all zoning districts except CB-3. Tree grates provide for the required exchange of water and oxygen for tree roots while still providing a navigable surface for pedestrian walking. See Tree Grate Detail, Page 14. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 23 Mac Davis Ln Glenna Goodacre Blvd Broadway 151h Street D 16th Street N CO 19th Street Figure 9: Street Tree Framework Plan away Streets) the Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 24 Tmmumasmaw r I I I f YSILKIlTY NINE J I I I A I II I i PEDESTRIAN LIGHT ----To STREET TREE I VEHK RM LIGHT F�12Y 2W I+ - US �1 TYPICAL BLACK SPACING s • . e . e Figure 10: Typical Block Spacing Diagram for Trees and Lights Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 25 View Obstruction Section 29-30 (i), Lubbock Code of Ordinances Corner Mid -Block pa rkway area Visibility Triangle property line cur 6' mi Figure 11: View Obstruction Illustration max. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 26 Appendix A: Street and Pedestrian Lighting Specification Lighting is important both for safety and for the ambiance of the neighborhood. Pedestrian level lighting further reinforces the human scale of the neighborhood and encourages outdoor activity. Two (2) levels of light standards have been selected to provide flexibility in the public right-of- way: a medium pedestrian light pole and a tall vehicular or roadway lighting pole. In addition, a coordinating wall -mounted fixture is provided for use on private properties adjacent to the right-of-way. All lighting shall include full cutoff and cutoff lighting fixtures as defined by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IES), and all vehicular and pedestrian lighting in the CBD shall be LED to provide a white -colored light that is excellent for color clarity. Vehicular lighting poles on Gateway and Corridor Streets identified in Chapter 4 will include both inserts spun into the standards for banner arms. Approved Pedestrian Lights Poles — American LitePole; Round Tapered Steel; Catalog Number RNS-10-40-11-PT-PCBL Round Non -Tapered Pole, ten feet (10') in height, base diameter of four inches (4"), Gauge 11 wall thickness (0.1196 inches), Anchor Base, Powder Coated in Black. With Decorative Split Base Cover. • Luminaires — Omero MRP LED Area Luminaire; Model MRP LED 1 638350/40K SR2 MVOLT DBLXD 350mA with MultiVolt option in Black OMERQ� Approved Wall Mounted Area Light Some circumstances may call for flush -mount pedestrian or area lighting on building facades. If private property owners wish to coordinate with the streetscape lighting, it must be done with the Director of Planning. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 27 D a m n x' T v to CD A Approved Vehicular Lights • Poles —Valmont Industries, Inc., twenty-five feet (25') above grade, arm length six feet (6'), Breakaway coupling, Black in color; Model DS500-R700A220-8S-FP-BK-V1 • Pole Clamshell Base — Valmont Industries, Inc., Washington series, twenty-four inches (24") in diameter and eighteen inches (18") in height, Steel in material, Black in color; Model WA24AC-BK • Luminaries — King Luminaire Inc., Pendant Series, Solitaire style with sag lens, LED lighting. Model K803-FASA-III- 165-SSL-1600-120-BK WA24A — Handidc Pale cap Arm Attachment Cross Section 0 RouW Handhole Nut Covers IiIJ& Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 28 Pedestrian and Vehicular Lighting Spacing • Vehicular lighting should be placed at every intersection with additional lights the greater of at least one (1) per mid block or one (1) per every one hundred twenty-five feet (125') of continuous block length along each block face. Vehicular lighting at intersections should include two (2) lights per intersection on diagonally opposing corners. Preferably, all intersection lights will be on the southwest and northeast corners of intersections. Each block face should include a minimum of two (2) vehicular lights; one (1) light at an intersection and one (1) light near mid block. Where obstructions at these locations exist, a plan review should be coordinated with the City. • Pedestrian lighting should be spaced every sixty feet (60') on center along each side of a block, centered between street trees. The dimension of sixty feet (60') is derived from the historic block dimension of most CBD blocks being two hundred seventy feet (270') square. One (1) pedestrian light per every sixty feet (60') should allow for five (5) pedestrian or vehicular lights per the historic two hundred seventy feet (270') of each block face. Where vehicular lights are required, they may be substituted for a pedestrian light. Where blocks have been consolidated, this spacing should be maintained as best possible to tie to the spacing throughout the CBD. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards Pedestrian and Vehicular Lighting Exception for Residential The following conditions will apply for residential redevelopment projects encompassing one (1) block face or more with traditional single-family, townhouse, duplex, or similar medium density residential housing. • Pedestrian light poles serving blocks with residential structures should generally be spaced evenly in relationship to the street trees. They should be spaced every one hundred twenty five feet (125') on center along each side of a block. The dimension of one hundred twenty five feet (125') is derived from the historic block dimension of most Downtown blocks being two hundred fifty feet (250') square. One (1) pedestrian light per every one hundred twenty five feet (125') should allow for one (1) pedestrian light per historic two hundred fifty feet (250') of each block face. Where vehicular lights are required, they may be substituted for a pedestrian light. Where blocks have been consolidated, this spacing should be maintained where feasible to tie to the spacing throughout the remaining area. • Light poles will not obstruct a walkway into a residential yard. • Vehicular lighting should be spaced at every intersection with additional lights per every two hundred seventy feet (270') of continuous block length along each side of a block. Vehicular lighting at intersections should include two (2) lights per intersection on diagonally opposing corners. Preferably, all intersection lights will be on the southwest and northeast corners of intersections. 29 Appendix B: Plant Materials Street Trees within the Right -of -Way All street trees, whether in planter pockets or parkways, shall be single-trunked and have a minimum four -inch (4") caliper as measured by ANSI standard nursery practices. Coniferous pines or upright evergreens such as junipers and cedars are not allowed as street trees. Austrian Pine Bur Oak Cedar Elm Chinese Pistache Chitalpa Desert Willow Live Oak Red Oak Texas Red Oak Thornless Honeylocust Thornless Mesquite Japanese Zelkova Vitex Yaupon Holly Pinus nigra Quercus macrocarpa Ulmus crassifolia Pistacia chinensis Chilapsis x catapla Chilopsis linearis Quercus virginiana Quercus shumardii Quercus buckleyii `Texana' Gleditsia triachanthos inermis Prosopis glandulosa `Maverick' Zelkova serrate `Green Vase' Vitex angus-castus Ilex vomitoria Accent Trees Accent trees may only be used in the right-of-way at gateways and special intersections and will have a minimum four -inch (4") caliper as measured by ANSI standard nursery practices. They may not be used to fulfill the street tree requirement. Allee Lacebark Elm Ulmus parvifolia `Allee' Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum Street Shrubs and Low -Height Perennials The following species may be used in the right-of-way planting pockets. Autumn Joy Sedum Autumn Sage Blackfoot Daisy Blanket Flower Brown -Eyed Susan Coreopsis Dianthus Dwarf Mexican Petunia Guara Indian Hawthorn Lantana Siberica Iris Stella de Oro Dwarf Daylily Texas Sage Yarrow Sedum x `Autumn Joy' Salvia greggii Melampodium leucanthum Gaillardia pulchella Rudbeckia hirta Coreopsis spp. Dianthus spp. Ruellia brittoniana Gaura lindheimeri Raphiolepis indica Lantana spp. .Iris sibirica Hemerocallis x `Stella de Oro' Leucophyllum frutescens Achillea spp. Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 30 Other Plant Materials Shrubs and Perennials Artemisia Aster Barberry Butterfly Bush Columbine Forsythia Red Yucca Rose (Multiple Varieties) Russian Sage Sedum Silverberry Spirea Yellow Yucca Vines Coral Honeysuckle Five Leaf Akebia Purple Honeysuckle Texas Wisteria Groundcovers Blue Rug Juniper Dusty Miller Green or Gray Santolina Huntington Carpet Rosemary Ice Plant Lambs Ear Purple leaf Euonymous Verbena Winter creeper Artemisia spp. Aster spp. Barberry spp. Buddleia davidii Aquilegia spp. Forsythia intermedia Hesperaloe parviflora Rosa spp. Perovskia atriplicifolia Sedum spp. Eleagnus ebbingei Spirea vanhouttei Hesperaloe parviflora Lonicera sempervirens Akebia quinata Lonicera japonica 'Purpurea' Wisteria frutescens Juniperus horizontalis 'Wiltonii' Senecio cineraria Santolina vixens Rosmarinus officinalis 'Huntington Carpet' Carpobrotus edulis Stachys spp. Euonymous fortune 'Colorado' Verbena canadensis Euonymous fortune Ornamental Grasses Big Blue Lily Turf Blue Grama Grass Blue Lyme Grass Buffalo Grass Fountain Grass Giant Liriope Hameln Grass Japanese Ribbon Grass Japanese Silvergrass Karl Forester Feather Reed Grass Lindheimer's Muhly Northern Seat Oats Purple Fountain Grass Side Oats Grama Liriope muscari Buchloe gracilis Elymus arenarius .Buchloe dactyloides Pennisetum alopecuroides Liriope muscari 'Gigantea' Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Hamlen ' Phalaris arundinacea Miscanthus sinensis 'Variegata' Calamagrostis acutiflora 'Karl Forester' Muhlenbergia linheimeri Chasmanthium latifolium Pennisetum staceum 'Rubrum' Bouteloua curtipendula Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards 31 Sec. 29-19.1. "CB-2" Central Business District, Broadway/13th/Main. (a) Purpose. The urban core of the Lubbock Central Business District is a unique area of the city with special needs addressed in this ordinance [chapter]. The purpose of this district is to provide realistic, modern standards for new development and encourage renewal and revitalization of existing development. The review process hereby established promotes this purpose. (b) General provisions. (1) All uses within this district shall be of wholesale or retail sales, service, general or professional office, or residential use. (2) All business shall be conducted entirely within a building. Outside storage and/or display of any type is prohibited. Accessory pass -out windows and/or pickup and delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicles shall be prohibited unless specifically allowed by this code. (3) Any residential use within this district, other than freestanding residential structures (apartment buildings, townhomes, garden homes, duplexes or single-family), must meet the provisions of the commercial building code. (4) All structures shall be in keeping with the average value and construction of the existing development in the area. (5) Plan review requirement: No construction permit, unless it is for interior renovation only of an existing structure, shall be issued within the "CB-2" District until a plan review as required by this section has been completed and plans approved. The proponent shall provide any items required for plan review. (6) All warehousing shall be in conjunction with on premise retail and or wholesale sales. All supplemental storage shall be attached to or adjacent to the principal building on this site and be subject to all requirements pertaining to the principal building. (c) Permitted uses. (1) Any use unconditionally permitted in the "CB-1" District. (2) Agriculture implement and tractor sales and services (totally within a building). (3) Ambulance service. (4) Apartments as specified in the "A-2" section. (4a) Arts and crafts store. (4b) Banks, and saving and loan companies, including motor banks and/or accessory pass -out windows. (4c) Bicycle and lawnmower sales and repair shops. (5) Builder's supply. All materials must be in a building. (6) Bus station. Appendix Page:95 (7) Cafe supply dealer, fixtures. (8) Candy plant. (9) Canvas goods shop, tents and awnings (no manufacturing). (10) Cleaning, dyeing or dry cleaning shops. (11) Commercial parking lot or building. No gasoline sales permitted. (12) Commercial private clubs and teenage clubs. (12a) Consignment clothing store. (No outside storage or display.) (12b) Convalescent or sick room supplies. (13) Dairy supply dealer. (14) Dance hall (no mixed alcoholic beverage sales permitted). (15) Department store, discount center, family center. (16) Electrical supply dealer. (17) Feed store with no grinding, packaging, or mixing of feed permitted. (17a) Florist shop. (18) Frozen food lockers. (19) Furniture store, new and used. (All merchandise must be in a building). (20) Game room, pool, billiard and/or domino parlor (no mixed alcoholic beverage sales permitted). (20a) Gift shop. (20b) Grocery store. In areas allowed by state and local laws, permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off - premises consumption as an incidental use as defined in section 29-3(59). (21) Tamale plant. (21 a) Hobby shop. (22) Hotel or motel. (22a) Household appliance sales and repair shop. (23) Janitorial or cleaning service. (24) Job printing and lithographing. Appendix Page:96 (25) Laboratory, chemical, general analysis. (26) Lumber yard, with no mill. All materials must be within a building. (26a) Laundry and dry cleaning not exceeding over five thousand (5,000) square feet of gross floor area. Accessory pass -out windows and/or pickup and delivery of laundry from customers while still in their motor vehicle shall be permitted. (27) Magazine agency. (28) Motorcycle shop, including sales, rentals and service. (Outside display of motorcycles for sale or rent permitted.) (29) Nightclub, bar or lounge. (30) Nonprofit training center with retail sales. (30a) Package store. (31) Paint, tile, carpet, wall covering, and floor covering store. (32) Pest control service. (33) Pet shop - totally within a building. (34) Plumbing service, as defined in section 2.92 [29-3(92)]. (35) Print shop. (36) Private community centers for the recreational and social use of the residents of an addition, subdivision, housing development, or apartment complex which is operated by an association or incorporated group for their use and benefit. Such center may contain a swimming pool, volleyball, tennis and croquet courts, parking lot, playground equipment and other similar recreational facilities. Such use shall be of the nature described above and shall be operated for the benefit and use of the occupants only as a part of the development. (37) Produce market. (Totally within a building.) (38) Quick tune or quick oil change facilities. (39) Radio, stereo, or television repair shops. (40) Rental store (no outside storage or display). (41) Reserved. (42) Restaurants when designed for service and consumption of food inside the building, except that accessory passout windows and outside dining areas/patios shall be permitted as defined in section 29-3(97.1.1) and 29-3(97.1.2) and the yard requirement section of this ordinance at 29-19.1(e). (43) Road machinery sales and service (totally within a building). Appendix Page:97 (44) Secondhand goods store or pawnshop. (44a) Self-service laundry or washateria and dry cleaning pick-up stations. Accessory pass -out windows and/or delivery of laundry from customers while still in their motor vehicle shall be permitted. (45) Sign shops, limited to window lettering, painted wall signs, banners and desk signs. (46) Skating rinks. (46a) Sporting goods store. (47) Store fixtures sales (no manufacturing permitted). (48) Theaters and motion picture shows (includes multiple screens). (49) Tire, battery and accessory stores. (50) Upholstery shops, furniture (No outside storage permitted). (51) Wholesale house, sales office and storage - No cotton storage. (d) Conditional uses. The following uses may be permitted when approved by the zoning board of adjustment as specified in section 25[29-28]. (1) Shared or leased parking within six hundred (600) feet of the property when business circumstances, location of parking spaces and normal hours of use are conductive to both businesses, and such arrangement is demonstrated by a letter of agreement between the two (2) parties. (la) Alcohol sales, in areas allowed by state and local laws, permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off - premises consumption as an incidental use in any business unconditionally permitted in this district, as defined in section 29-3(59). (No accessory pass -out windows and/or delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicles shall be permitted.) (2) Outside dining patios with front setbacks of less than twenty-five (25) feet, unless allowed by the yard requirement section of this ordinance at 29-19. 1 (e)(1). (2a) Permit in any business the use of an accessory pass -out window and/or delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicles. (3) Public utility installations such as, but not limited to, railroad right-of-way and tracks, transformer stations, transmission lines, telephone exchanges, lift stations, pumping stations, but in no event shall this be construed as permitting such uses as garages and shops, railroad yards, loading yards or warehouses. (e) Yard requirements. (1) Front yard. Any lot line adjacent to a dedicated street (not an alley) shall be a front. a. The front yard setback for structures and outdoor dining areas/patios shall be no less than the average setback established by the development on the adjacent lot or lots. Appendix Page:98 b. On corner lots, the front setback shall be no less than zero (0) feet and no greater than the setback established by the development on the adjacent lot. In no event, however, shall any garage have less than a twenty (20) foot front setback. d. Structures and outdoor dining areas/patios must meet the vision clearance requirements of this section. (2) Rear yard. There shall be no rear yard requirement. (3) Side yard. There shall be no side yard requirement. (4) Projections into required yards. a. Bay windows with a gross floor area of less than or equal to twelve (12) square feet, cornices, belt courses, eaves, sills, awnings, canopies, and chimneys may extend two (2) feet into any required yard. b. Unenclosed fire escapes, stairways, porch overhangs and/or balconies, covered or uncovered, may extend four (4) feet into any required yard. (f) Lot width. There shall be no minimum lot width. (g) Lot area. There shall be no lot area requirement. (h) Lot coverage. There shall be no lot coverage requirement. (i) Floor area ratio. There shall be no floor area ratio requirement. 0) Height limit. There shall be no height requirement. (k) Separation. No bar, cocktail lounge, private club, nightclub or dance hall shall be located within six hundred (600) feet of any established bar, lounge, private club, nightclub, or dance hall. This distance shall be measured in a direct line from front door to front door. (1) Off-street parking. (1) Off-street parking requirements. a. Boarding or rooming houses - One space for each occupant. b. Churches and other places of worship - One paved off-street parking space for each eight (8) seats in the auditorium. If pews are used, each twenty (20) inches in length shall equal one seat. c. Convalescent, nursing, maternity and geriatric homes and personal care facilities - Three (3) spaces for each five (5) beds. d. Day nurseries - One space for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area. Funeral home or mortuary - One space for each eight (8) seats in the chapel. f. Game rooms, pool, billiard and/or domino parlors - One space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. Appendix Page:99 g. Hospital - Two (2) spaces for each bed. h. Nightclub, bar, lounge, or dance hall - One space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. i. Residential units - One space for each efficiency unit, one and one-half (1 1/2) spaces for each one bedroom unit, two (2) spaces for each unit with two (2) or more bedrooms, plus one additional space for each four (4) units in the development. Townhomes, garden homes, duplexes and single-family shall comply with the 11R-1" and "R-2" parking standards. j. Restaurants serving or not serving mixed alcoholic beverages - One space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area, except that outside dining areas/patios with fewer than two hundred fifty (250) square feet shall not be included in the gross square footage. Any outside dining areas/patios larger than two hundred fifty (250) square feet shall have the entire area included in the gross square footage. k. Semi-public uses such as YMCA, YWCA, scouts, boys club, etc. - One space for each five hundred (500) square feet in activity areas such as gymnasium or swimming pools plus one space for each two hundred (200) square feet of other building areas. 1. Theaters and motion picture shows (including multiple screens) - One (1) space for each eight (8) seats. in. All permitted uses not listed above - One space for each three hundred (300) square feet of floor area. n. Conditional uses - The required number of spaces shall be set by the zoning board of adjustment, based on the requirements for that use or similar type uses in this or other districts. (2) Off-street parking provisions. a. Required off-street parking may be on -site or on property under common ownership within six hundred (600) feet of the property. b. Shared or leased parking shall be subject to approval by the zoning board of adjustment under section 29- 19.1(d)(1). c. Any lighting of drives or parking areas shall be so designed as not to cause any glare on any other residential or apartment zoned area in the vicinity. d. Off-street parking shall be screened in accordance with section 29-19.1(o)(6). e. Plans for off-street parking areas shall be submitted to be checked and approved as to access, ingress and egress by the city traffic engineer under the terms of this district and the city's driveway regulations. f. No off-street parking areas shall be allowed in front of buildings on Broadway. Parking areas may be installed at the side or at the rear of a structure. If the parking area is on a corner property all curb cuts shall be on the north/south street. g. No overhead or garage doors shall be allowed facing Broadway. h. Recreational vehicles and oversized recreational equipment or trailers may be stored on paved parking lots, but not in any landscaped area. Appendix Page: 100 1. In no event shall storage of recreational vehicles or oversized recreational equipment or trailers be allowed in the right-of-way or parkway. 2. No person shall occupy or use any recreational vehicles as living or sleeping quarters, except as allowed in subsection i. below. Exceptions to recreational vehicle requirements in section 29-19.1(1)(2)h. above: 1. Any recreational vehicle, oversized recreational equipment or trailer parked by its owner who is a Lubbock resident, on his lot, while engaged in active loading or unloading for a period not exceeding forty-eight (48) hours in a five-day period. 2. The recreational vehicle of a non -Lubbock resident on the lot or parcel of a person he is visiting. However, the recreational vehicle shall only be allowed to be parked on the lot for a maximum of fourteen (14) days during a thirty -day period. 3. Recreational vehicles parked on private parking lots of hospitals and/or clinics where parking of such vehicles is allowed. 4. Any pop-up or tent campers stored in the collapsed position. (m) Plan review. Persons developing property within the "CB" districts are strongly encouraged to schedule a pre -application conference with the planning department. Plans submitted under the provisions of this section should convey the exterior design elements of a development and illustrate the property's relationship to its surroundings. A complete set of documents shall include the following information: (1) Completed project application form. (2) Owner or representative's name, address, phone and project title. (3) Photographs illustrating the condition of the property, including all facades of any existing buildings. (4) Site plans, maps and/or elevation drawings of proposed structures. All submissions should be to scale and illustrate: a. All property lines, north arrow and scale. b. All streets, alleys and easements, both existing and proposed. c. Architectural character and use of materials, including mechanical equipment and other visible items associated with the structure or development lot. Illustrations should include: Elevation drawings, photographs and other supporting materials to illustrate the proposed renovation. 2. Specifications for all materials to be used, including samples if necessary for complete understanding. 3. Color specifications with samples preferred. d. Location and dimensions of buildings and structures. Building height and setback from adjacent right-of-way lines. Appendix Page:101 Proposed ingress and egress to property, and traffic flow and control. g. Off-street parking and loading areas, including any additional information required to calculate parking requirements. h. Type, dimension, and character of screening. Location, size and design of signs, existing and proposed. Location, height and design of outdoor lighting. k. Landscape and irrigation plan for the development lot, including specifications for hard -surface landscape materials. (5) Other information that will assist in the evaluation of site development is encouraged, but not required. (n) Plan review process. (1) Prior to issuance of a construction permit, complete plans as described in section 29-19.1(m)(1)--(5) shall be submitted to the planning department. The senior planner or his designated representative shall determine by review of such plans whether the proposed development meets the intent of this section and the "Design Standards for the Central Business District," dated 1999, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated in this ordinance as if fully set forth. Within ten (10) working days of receipt by the planning department, both the proponent and the building official will be informed in writing of the senior planner's decision including the need for review by the urban design and historic preservation commission as described in section 29-19. 1 (n)(2), or any conditions for approval. The senior planner's decision may be appealed in writing to the zoning board of adjustment by the applicant or other interested person within thirty (30) days of the written decision in accordance with section 29-28. (2) If the senior planner determines that the proposal contains unique circumstances which cannot be accommodated by the standards of this zoning district and the "Design Standards for the Central Business District," the senior planner shall notify the proponent in writing and the plans shall be placed on the next available agenda of the urban design and historic preservation commission for recommendations. The commission shall use this section and the design standards to determine whether the development meets the intent of each and to make recommendations. Factors to be considered by the commission in making their recommendation and attaching conditions include: the extent to which the proposal differs from the design standards or the standards of the ordinance, the impact of these modifications on existing and future development in the area, and the public purpose to be served by permitting the requested modifications. (3) Upon recommendation by the commission, the senior planner may vary the requirements of the design standards so long as the requirements of section 29-19.1 are not altered. Variances from the requirements of section 29-19.1, even if recommended by the commission, must be approved by the zoning board of adjustment in accordance with section 29-28. The commission shall provide its recommendations in writing to the applicant and to the zoning board of adjustment. (o) Landscaping requirements. (1) No less than ninety (90) percent of the required front yard excluding paved curb returns or driveways up to a minimum of ten (10) percent of the total development lot area shall be landscaped and permanently maintained, except that: Appendix Page:102 a. Interior courtyards shall not be included in any required landscaping. b. Buildings with zero (0) front and side setback shall not be required to have any on -site landscaping except that when a structure with zero (0) setback has adjacent parking ten (10) percent of that parking area must be landscaped. (2) The parkway areas of adjacent rights -of -way, excluding paved curb cuts and driveways, shall be landscaped and permanently maintained. This shall be in addition to the landscaping required above. Any landscaping placed in the parkway must be in compliance with section 29-30(b)(6)i.3. of the zoning ordinance. (3) All required landscaping must be visible from the public right-of-way and placed for maximum enhancement of the property and the Broadway Corridor. (4) Landscaping shall meet the requirements of section 29-3(62), except that hard surface materials shall include only brick, stone, and modular pavers. Landscaping shall not include the use of smooth, patterned, colored or aggregate poured -in -place concrete or asphalt. (5) Any landscaping placed within the visibility triangle of a corner lot shall be in compliance with the vision clearance standards of this section. (6) Off-street parking of motor vehicles immediately adjacent to any street shall be screened from the street by a two and one-half foot (2 1/2) solid fence. Such fencing shall be placed immediately adjacent to the parking area in accordance with subsection 29-19.1(p)(1) of this section and set back no more than six (6) feet. The area between the fence and the property line, if any, must be landscaped and permanently maintained according to the landscape section of this ordinance. (7) All landscaped areas on the development tract and adjacent parkway shall have immediate availability of water (i.e., a water faucet) or an irrigation system, either system to be capable of sustaining plant materials. Irrigation systems shall meet acceptable industry standards. (8) Irrigation systems adjacent to public streets shall not spray onto adjacent streets or gutters. (9) When seasonal conditions warrant, the building official may issue a temporary certificate of occupancy for sixty (60), ninety (90), or one hundred twenty (120) days pending completion of landscaping. No final certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to completion of landscape requirements. (p) Vision clearance. (1) Front yards. In a front yard, no wall, fence or other structure shall be erected in any part of the front yard that would be higher than a line extending from a point two and one-half (2 1/2) feet above the natural ground level at the front lot line to a point four and one-half (4 1/2) feet above the natural ground level at a depth of twenty-five (25) feet from the front lot line. (2) Corner lots. It shall be unlawful to set out, construct, maintain, or permit or cause to be set out, constructed, or maintained any tree, shrub, plant, sign or structure or any other view obstruction having a height greater than two (2) feet as measured from the top of the curb of the adjacent streets within the intersection visibility triangle. This restriction shall not apply to traffic control signs and signals, street signs or utility poles placed within such area by authority of the city. Intersection visibility triangle shall mean a triangle sight area, at all intersections, which shall include that portion of public right-of-way and any corner lot within a triangle formed by a diagonal line extending through points on the two (2) property lines twenty-five (25) feet from the street corner intersection of the property lines (or that point of intersection of the property lines extended) and intersecting the curb lines. Appendix Page:103 (3) Parkways. It shall be unlawful to set out, construct, maintain, or permit to be maintained, set out or constructed any shrub or plant (excluding trees), sign or structure, or any other view obstruction having a height of greater than three (3) feet, as measured from the top of the curb of the adjacent street, in the parkway area. All trees with a trunk diameter greater than two (2) inches measured three (3) feet above ground level that are within any of the parkway area shall be trimmed so that no foliage is less than six (6) feet above the top of the curb of the adjacent street. No evergreen or coniferous species of tree shall be allowed in the parkway. (4) This section shall not apply to traffic control signs and signals, street signs, mail boxes which are less than two (2) feet long on each side which is perpendicular to the street, or utility poles placed within the parkway. No such tree, shrub or plant, sign or structure (including mailboxes) shall be allowed to interfere with the free passage of vehicles on the street or of pedestrians on the sidewalk or to obscure the view of motor vehicle operators of any traffic control device or street sign or otherwise create a traffic hazard. (Ord. No. 10173, § 2, 6-24-99; Ord. No. 2009-00058, § 7, 7-8-09; Ord. No. 2009-00059, § 9, 7-8-09) Appendix Page:104 Sec. 29-19.2. "CB-3" Central Business District, General. (a) Purpose. The purpose of this district is to provide realistic, modern standards for new development and encourage renewal and revitalization of existing development in the transitional area surrounding the central business core. The review process hereby established promotes this purpose. (b) General provisions. (1) All uses within this district shall be of wholesale and retail sales, service, general or professional office, or residential use. (2) All business shall be conducted entirely within a building. Outside storage and/or display of any type shall be prohibited, except as indicated. Accessory pass -out windows and/or pickup and delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicles shall be prohibited unless specifically allowed by this code. (3) Any residential use within this district, other than freestanding residential structures (apartment buildings, townhomes, garden homes, duplexes or single-family), must meet the provisions of the commercial building code. (4) All structures shall be in keeping with the average value and construction of the existing development in the area. (5) Plan review requirement. No construction permit, unless it is for interior renovation only of an existing structure, shall be issued within the "CB-3" District until a plan review as required by this section has been completed and plans approved. The proponent shall provide any items required for plan review. (6) All warehousing shall be in conjunction with on -premises retail and or wholesale sales. All supplemental storage shall be attached to or adjacent to the principal building on this site and be subject to all requirements pertaining to the principal building. (c) Permitted uses. Any use unconditionally permitted in the "C-3," "IHC," "IHO," "CB-1," or "CB-2" Districts. (d) Conditional uses. The following uses may be permitted when approved by the zoning board of adjustment as specified in section 25[29-28]. (1) Shared or leased parking within six hundred (600) feet of the property when business circumstances, location of parking spaces and normal hours of use are conductive to both businesses, and such arrangement is demonstrated by a letter of agreement between the two (2) parties. (la) Alcohol sales, in areas allowed by state and local laws, permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off - premises consumption as an incidental use in any business unconditionally permitted in this district, as defined in section 29-3(59). (No accessory pass -out windows and/or delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicles shall be permitted.) (2) Outside dining patios with front setbacks of less than twenty-five (25) feet, unless allowed by the yard requirement subsection of this section at 29-19.2(e)(1). (3) Permit in any business the use of an accessory pass -out window and/or delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicle. Appendix Page:105 (e) Yard requirements. (1) Front yard. Any lot line adjacent to a dedicated street (not an alley) shall be a front. a. The front yard setback for structures and outdoor dining areas/patios shall be no less than the average setback established by the development on the adjacent lot or lots. b. On development tracts adjacent to vacant land, the minimum setback shall meet the average established setback in the immediate vicinity. In no event, however, shall any garage have less than a twenty (20) foot front setback. d. Structures and outdoor dining areas/patios must meet the vision clearance requirements of this section. (2) Rear yard. There shall be no rear yard requirement. (3) Side yard. There shall be no side yard requirement. (4) Projections into required yards. a. Bay windows with a gross floor area of less than or equal to twelve (12) square feet, cornices, belt courses, eaves, sills, awnings, canopies, and chimneys may extend two (2) feet into any required yard. b. Unenclosed fire escapes, stairways, porch overhangs and/or balconies, covered or uncovered, may extend four (4) feet into any required yard. (f) Lot width. There shall be no minimum lot width. (g) Lot area. There shall be no lot area requirement. (h) Lot coverage. There shall be no lot coverage requirement. (i) Floor area ratio. There shall be no floor area ratio requirement. 0) Height limit. There shall be no height requirement. (k) Separation. No bar, cocktail lounge, private club, nightclub or dance hall shall be located within six hundred (600) feet of any established bar, lounge, private club, nightclub, or dance hall. This distance shall be measured in a direct line from front door to front door. (1) Off-street parking. (1) Off-street parking requirements. a. Boarding or rooming houses - One space for each occupant. b. Churches and other places of worship - One paved off-street parking space for each eight (8) seats in the auditorium. If pews are used, each twenty (20) inches in length shall equal one seat. c. Convalescent, nursing, maternity and geriatric homes and personal care facilities - Three (3) spaces for each five (5) beds. Appendix Page:106 d. Day nurseries - One space for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area. Funeral home or mortuary - One space for each eight (8) seats in the chapel. f. Game rooms, pool, billiard and/or domino parlors - One space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. g. Hospital - Two (2) spaces for each bed. h. Nightclub, bar, lounge, or dance hall - One space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. i. Residential units - One space for each efficiency unit, one and one-half (1 1/2) spaces for each one bedroom unit, two (2) spaces for each unit with two (2) or more bedrooms, plus one additional space for each four (4) units in the development. Townhomes, garden homes, duplexes and single family shall comply with the 1IR-1" and "R-2" parking standards. j. Restaurants serving or not serving mixed alcoholic beverages - One space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area, except that outside dining areas/patios with fewer than two hundred fifty (250) square feet shall not be included in the gross square footage. Any outside dining areas/patios larger than two hundred fifty (250) square feet shall have the entire area included in the gross square footage. k. Semi-public uses such as YMCA, YWCA, scouts, boys club, etc. - One space for each five hundred (500) square feet in activity areas such as gymnasium or swimming pools plus one space for each two hundred (200) square feet of other building areas. Theaters and motion picture shows (including multiple screens) - One (1) space for each eight (8) seats. in. All permitted uses not listed above - One space for each three hundred (300) square feet of floor area. n. Conditional uses - The required number of spaces shall be set by the zoning board of adjustment, based on the requirements for that use or similar type uses in this or other districts. (2) Off-street parking provisions. a. Required off-street parking may be on -site or on property under common ownership within six hundred (600) feet of the property. b. Shared or leased parking shall be subject to approval by the zoning board of adjustment under section 29- 19.2(d)(1). c. Any lighting of drives or parking areas shall be so designed as not to cause any glare on any other residential or apartment zoned area in the vicinity. d. Plans for off-street parking areas shall be submitted to be checked and approved as to access, ingress and egress by the city traffic engineer under the terms of this district and the city's driveway regulations. e. Recreational vehicles and oversized recreational equipment or trailers may be stored on paved parking lots, but not in any landscaped area. Appendix Page:107 1. In no event shall storage of recreational vehicles or oversized recreational equipment or trailers be allowed in the right-of-way or parkway. 2. No person shall occupy or use any recreational vehicles as living or sleeping quarters, except as allowed in subsection g below. f. Exceptions to recreational vehicle requirements in section 29-19.2(1)(2)e. above: 1. Any recreational vehicle, oversized recreational equipment or trailer parked by its owner who is a Lubbock resident, on his lot, while engaged in active loading or unloading for a period not exceeding forty-eight (48) hours in a five-day period. 2. The recreational vehicle of a non -Lubbock resident on the lot or parcel of a person he is visiting. However, the recreational vehicle shall only be allowed to be parked on the lot for a maximum of fourteen (14) days during a thirty -day period. 3. Recreational vehicles parked on private parking lots of hospitals and/or clinics where parking of such vehicles is allowed. 4. Any pop-up or tent campers stored in the collapsed position. (m) Plan review. Persons developing property within the "CB" districts are strongly encouraged to schedule a pre -application conference with the planning department. Plans submitted under the provisions of this section should convey the exterior design elements of a development and illustrate the property's relationship to its surroundings. A complete set of documents shall include the following information: (1) Completed project application form. (2) Owner or representative's name, address, phone and project title. (3) Photographs illustrating the condition of the property, including all facades of any existing buildings. (4) Site plans, maps and/or elevation drawings of proposed structures. All submissions should be to scale and illustrate: a. All property lines, north arrow and scale. b. All streets, alleys and easements, both existing and proposed. c. Architectural character and use of materials, including mechanical equipment and other visible items associated with the structure or development lot. Illustrations should include: Elevation drawings, photographs and other supporting materials to illustrate the proposed renovation. 2. Specifications for all materials to be used, including samples if necessary for complete understanding. 3. Color specifications with samples preferred. d. Location and dimensions of buildings and structures. Building height and setback from adjacent right-of-way lines. Appendix Page:108 Proposed ingress and egress to property, and traffic flow and control. g. Off-street parking and loading areas, including any additional information required to calculate parking requirements. h. Type, dimension, and character of screening. Location, size and design of signs, existing and proposed. Location, height and design of outdoor lighting. k. Landscape and irrigation plan for the development lot, including specifications for hard -surface landscape materials. (5) Other information, which will assist in the evaluation of site development, is encouraged, but not required. (n) Plan review process. (1) Prior to issuance of a construction permit, complete plans as described in section 29-19.2(m)(1)--(5) shall be submitted to the planning department. The senior planner or his designated representative shall determine by review of such plans whether the proposed development meets the intent of this section and the "Design Standards for the Central Business District," dated 1999, a copy of which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. Within ten (10) working days of receipt by the planning department, both the proponent and the building official will be informed in writing of the senior planner's decision, including the need for review by the urban design and historic preservation commission as described in section 29-19.2(n)(2) below, or any conditions for approval. The senior planner's decision may be appealed in writing to the zoning board of adjustment by the applicant or other interested person within thirty days of the written decision in accordance with 29-28 . (2) If the senior planner determines that the proposal contains unique circumstances which cannot be accommodated by the standards of this zoning district and the "Design Standards for the Central Business District," the senior planner shall notify the proponent in writing and the plans shall be placed on the next available agenda of the urban design and historic preservation commission for recommendations. The commission shall use this section and the design standards to determine whether the development meets the intent of each and to make recommendations. Factors to be considered by the commission in making their recommendation and attaching conditions include: the extent to which the proposal differs from the design standards or the standards of the ordinance, the impact of these modifications on existing and future development in the area, and the public purpose to be served by permitting the requested modifications. (3) Upon recommendation by the commission, the senior planner may vary the requirements of the design standards so long as the requirements of section 29-19.2 are not altered. Variances from the requirements of section 29-19.2, even if recommended by the Commission, must be approved by the zoning board of adjustment in accordance with section 29-28. The commission shall provide its recommendations in writing to the applicant and to the zoning board of adjustment. (o) Landscaping requirements. (1) No less than ninety (90) percent of the required front yard excluding paved curb returns or driveways up to a minimum of five (5) percent of the total development lot area shall be landscaped and permanently maintained, except that: Appendix Page:109 a. Interior courtyards shall not be included in any required landscaping. b. Buildings with zero (0) front and side setback shall not be required to have any on -site landscaping except that when a structure with zero (0) setback has adjacent parking five (5) percent of that parking area must be landscaped. (2) The parkway areas of adjacent rights -of -way, excluding paved curb cuts and driveways shall be landscaped and permanently maintained. This shall be in addition to the landscaping required above. Any landscaping placed in the parkway must be in compliance with section 29-30(b)(6)i.3. of the zoning ordinance. (3) All required landscaping must be visible from the public right-of-way and placed for maximum enhancement of the property. (4) Landscaping shall meet the requirements of section 29-3(62). (5) Any landscaping placed within the visibility triangle of a corner lot shall be in compliance with the vision clearance standards of this section. (6) All landscaped areas on the development tract and adjacent parkway shall have immediate availability of water (i.e., a water faucet) or an irrigation system, either system to be capable of sustaining plant materials. Irrigation systems shall meet acceptable industry standards. (7) Irrigation systems adjacent to public streets shall not spray onto adjacent streets or gutters. (8) When seasonal conditions warrant, the building official may issue a temporary certificate of occupancy for sixty (60), ninety (90), or one hundred twenty (120) days pending completion of landscaping. No final certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to completion of landscape requirements. (p) Vision clearance. (1) Front yards. In a front yard, no wall, fence or other structure shall be erected in any part of the front yard that would be higher than a line extending from a point two and one-half (2 1/2) feet above the natural ground level at the front lot line to a point four and one-half (4 1/2) feet above the natural ground level at a depth of twenty-five (25) feet from the front lot line. (2) Corner lots. It shall be unlawful to set out, construct, maintain, or permit or cause to be set out, constructed, or maintained any tree, shrub, plant, sign or structure or any other view obstruction having a height greater than two (2) feet as measured from the top of the curb of the adjacent streets within the intersection visibility triangle. This restriction shall not apply to traffic control signs and signals, street signs or utility poles placed within such area by authority of the city. Intersection visibility triangle shall mean a triangle sight area, at all intersections, which shall include that portion of public right-of-way and any corner lot within a triangle formed by a diagonal line extending through points on the two (2) property lines twenty-five (25) feet from the street corner intersection of the property lines (or that point of intersection of the property lines extended) and intersecting the curb lines. (3) Parkways. It shall be unlawful to set out, construct, maintain, or permit to be maintained, set out or constructed any shrub or plant (excluding trees), sign or structure, or any other view obstruction having a height of greater than three (3) feet, as measured from the top of the curb of the adjacent street, in the parkway area. All trees with a trunk diameter greater than two (2) inches measured three (3) feet above ground level that are within any of the parkway area shall be trimmed so that no foliage is less than six (6) feet above the top of the curb of the adjacent street. No evergreen or coniferous species of tree shall be allowed in the parkway. Appendix Page:110 (4) This section shall not apply to traffic control signs and signals, street signs, mail boxes which are less than two (2) feet long on each side which is perpendicular to the street, or utility poles placed within the parkway. No such tree, shrub or plant, sign or structure (including mailboxes) shall be allowed to interfere with the free passage of vehicles on the street or of pedestrians on the sidewalk or to obscure the view of motor vehicle operators of any traffic control device or street sign or otherwise create a traffic hazard. (Ord. No. 10173, § 3, 6-24-99; Ord. No. 2009-00058, § 8, 7-8-09; Ord. No. 2009-00059, § 10, 7-8-09) Appendix Page:111 Sec. 29-19.3. "CB-4" Depot District. (a) Purpose. The Depot District is a unique and diverse area of the city with special needs addressed in this section. The purpose of this district is to provide realistic modern standards for new development and encourage renewal and revitalization of existing development. The review process hereby established promotes this purpose. (b) General provisions. (1) All uses within this district shall be of wholesale and retail sales, service, general or professional office, or residential use. (2) All business shall be conducted entirely within a building. Outside storage and/or display of any type shall be prohibited, except as indicated. Accessory pass -out windows and/or pickup and delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicles shall be prohibited unless specifically allowed by this code. (3) Any residential use within this district, other than freestanding residential structures (apartment buildings, townhomes, garden homes, duplexes or single-family), must meet the provisions of the commercial building code. (4) All structures shall be in keeping with the average value and construction of the existing development in the area. (5) Plan review requirement. No construction permit, unless it is for interior renovation only of an existing structure, shall be issued within the "CB-4" District until a plan review as required by this section has been completed and plans approved. The proponent shall provide any items required for plan review. (6) All warehousing shall be in conjunction with on premise retail and or wholesale sales. All supplemental storage shall be attached to or adjacent to the principal building on this site and be subject to all requirements pertaining to the principal building. (7) Nonconforming businesses within the district boundaries existing as of the effective date of this section, shall be allowed to expand within the provisions of this section. (c) Permitted uses. (1) Any use unconditionally permitted in the "C-3," "IHC," "IHO," "CB-1," or "CB-2" Districts. (d) Conditional uses. The following uses may be permitted when approved by the zoning board of adjustment as specified in section 25[29-28]. (la) Alcohol sales, in areas allowed by state and local laws, permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off - premises consumption as an incidental use in any business unconditionally permitted in this district, as defined in section 29-3(59). (No accessory pass -out windows and/or delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicles shall be permitted.) (1) Outside dining patios with front setbacks of less than twenty-five (25) feet, unless allowed by the yard requirement subsection of this section at 29-19.3(e)(1). (2) Outdoor markets, limited to farm products and new merchandise. Appendix Page:112 (3) Permit in any business the use of an accessory pass -out window and/or delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicle. (e) Yard requirements. (1) Front yard. Any lot line adjacent to a dedicated street shall be a front. a. The front yard setback for structures and outdoor dining areas/patios shall be no less than the average setback established by the development on the adjacent lot or lots. b. On corner lots, the front setback shall be no less than zero (0) feet and no greater than the setback established by the development on the adjacent lot. c. On development tracts adjacent to vacant land, the minimum setback shall meet the average established setback in the immediate vicinity. d. In no event, however, shall any garage have less than a twenty (20) foot front setback. Structures and outdoor dining areas/patios must meet the vision clearance requirements of this section. (2) Rear yard. There shall be no rear yard requirement. (3) Side yard. There shall be no side yard requirement. (4) Projections into required yards. a. Bay windows with a gross floor area of less than or equal to twelve (12) square feet, cornices, belt courses, eaves, sills, awnings, canopies, and chimneys may extend two (2) feet into any required yard. b. Unenclosed fire escapes, stairways, porch overhangs and/or balconies, covered or uncovered, may extend four (4) feet into the required front or rear yard. (f) Lot width. There shall be no minimum lot width. (g) Lot area. There shall be no lot area requirement. (h) Lot coverage. There shall be no lot coverage requirement. (i) Floor area ratio. There shall be no floor area ratio requirement. 0) Height limit. There shall be no height requirement. (k) Separation. There shall be no minimum separation requirement for any bar, lounge, private club, nightclub or dance hall. (1) Off-street parking. (1) Off-street parking requirements. Boarding or rooming houses - One space for each occupant. Appendix Page:113 b. Churches and other places of worship - One paved off-street parking space for each eight (8) seats in the auditorium. If pews are used, each twenty (20) inches in length shall equal one seat. c. Convalescent, nursing, maternity and geriatric homes and personal care facilities - Three (3) spaces for each five (5) beds. d. Day nurseries - One space for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area. Funeral home or mortuary - One space for each eight (8) seats in the chapel. f. Game rooms, pool, billiard and/or domino parlors - One space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. g. Hospital - Two (2) spaces for each bed. h. Nightclub, bar, lounge, or dance hall - One space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. i. Residential units - One space for each efficiency unit, one and one-half (1 1/2) spaces for each one bedroom unit, two (2) spaces for each unit with two (2) or more bedrooms, plus one additional space for each four (4) units in the development. Townhomes, garden homes, duplexes and single-family shall comply with the 1IR-1" and "R-2" parking standards. j. Restaurants serving or not serving mixed alcoholic beverages - One space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area, except that outside dining areas/patios with fewer than two hundred fifty (250) square feet shall not be included in the gross square footage. Any outside dining areas/patios larger than two hundred fifty (250) square feet shall have the entire area included in the gross square footage. k. Semi-public uses such as YMCA, YWCA, scouts, boys club, etc. - One space for each five hundred (500) square feet in activity areas such as gymnasium or swimming pools plus one space for each two hundred (200) square feet of other building areas. Theaters and motion picture shows (including multiple screens) - One (1) space for each eight (8) seats. m. All permitted uses not listed above - One space for each three hundred (300) square feet of floor area. n. Conditional uses - The required number of spaces shall be set by the zoning board of adjustment, based on the requirements for that use or similar type uses in this or other districts. (2) Off-street parking provisions. a. Required off-street parking (including shared or leased parking demonstrated by a letter of agreement between the two parties) may be on -site or on property within six hundred (600) feet of the property. b. Any lighting of drives or parking areas shall be so designed as not to cause any glare on any other residential or apartment zoned area in the vicinity. c. Plans for off-street parking areas shall be submitted to be checked and approved as to access, ingress and egress by the city traffic engineer under the terms of this district and the city's driveway regulations. Appendix Page:114 d. Recreational vehicles and oversized recreational equipment or trailers may be stored on paved parking lots, but not in any landscaped area. 1. In no event shall storage of recreational vehicles or oversized recreational equipment or trailers be allowed in the right-of-way or parkway. 2. No person shall occupy or use any recreational vehicles as living or sleeping quarters, except as allowed in subsection e. below. Exceptions to recreational vehicle requirements in section 29-19.2(1)(2)d. above: 1. Any recreational vehicle, oversized recreational equipment or trailer parked by its owner who is a Lubbock resident, on his lot, while engaged in active loading or unloading for a period not exceeding forty-eight (48) hours in a five-day period. 2. The recreational vehicle of a non -Lubbock resident on the lot or parcel of a person he is visiting. However, the recreational vehicle shall only be allowed to be parked on the lot for a maximum of fourteen (14) days during a thirty -day period. 3. Recreational vehicles parked on private parking lots of hospitals and/or clinics where parking of such vehicles is allowed. 4. Any pop-up or tent campers stored in the collapsed position. (m) Plan review. Persons developing property within the "CB" districts are strongly encouraged to schedule a pre -application conference with the planning department. Plans submitted under the provisions of this section should convey the exterior design elements of a development and illustrate the property's relationship to its surroundings. A complete set of documents shall include the following information: (1) Completed project application form. (2) Owner or representative's name, address, phone and project title. (3) Photographs illustrating the condition of the property, including all facades of any existing buildings. (4) Site plans, maps and/or elevation drawings of proposed structures. All submissions should be to scale and illustrate: a. All property lines, north arrow and scale. b. All streets, alleys and easements, both existing and proposed. c. Architectural character and use of materials, including mechanical equipment and other visible items associated with the structure or development lot. Illustrations should include: 1. Elevation drawings, photographs and other supporting materials to illustrate the proposed renovation. 2. Specifications for all materials to be used, including samples if necessary for complete understanding. 3. Color specifications with samples preferred. Appendix Page:115 d. Location and dimensions of buildings and structures. Building height and setback from adjacent right-of-way lines. f. Proposed ingress and egress to property, and traffic flow and control. g. Off-street parking and loading areas, including any additional information required to calculate parking requirements. h. Type, dimension, and character of screening. i. Location, size and design of signs, existing and proposed. j. Location, height and design of outdoor lighting. k. Landscape and irrigation plan for the development lot, including specifications for hard -surface landscape materials. (5) Other information that will assist in the evaluation of site development is encouraged, but not required. (n) Plan review process. (1) Prior to issuance of a construction permit, complete plans as described in section 29-19.3(m)(I)--(5) shall be submitted to the planning department. The senior planner or his designated representative shall determine by review of such plans whether the proposed development meets the intent of this section and the "Design Standards for the Central Business District," dated 1999, a copy of which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. Within ten (10) working days of receipt by the planning department, both the proponent and the building official will be informed in writing of the senior planner's decision, including the need for review by the urban design historic preservation commission, as described in section 29-19.3(n)(2) below, or any conditions for approval. The senior planner's decision may be appealed in writing to the zoning board of adjustment by the applicant or other interested person within thirty (30) days of the written decision in accordance with section 29-28. (2) If the senior planner determines that the proposal contains unique circumstances which cannot be accommodated by the standards of this zoning district and the "Design Standards for the Central Business District," the senior planner shall notify the proponent in writing and the plans shall be placed on the next available agenda of the urban design and historic preservation commission for recommendations. The commission shall use this section and the design standards to determine whether the development meets the intent of each and to make recommendations. Factors to be considered by the commission in making their recommendation and attaching conditions include: the extent to which the proposal differs from the design standards or the standards of the ordinance, the impact of these modifications on existing and future development in the area, and the public purpose to be served by permitting the requested modifications. (3) Upon recommendation by the commission, the senior planner may vary the requirements of the design standards so long as the requirements of section 29-19.3 are not altered. Variances from the requirements of section 29-19.3, even if recommended by the Commission, must be approved by the zoning board of adjustment in accordance with section 29-28. The commission shall provide its recommendations in writing to the applicant and to the zoning board of adjustment. (o) Landscaping requirements. Appendix Page:116 (1) No less than ninety (90) percent of the required front yard excluding paved curb returns or driveways up to a minimum of five (5) percent of the total development lot area shall be landscaped and permanently maintained, except that: a. Interior courtyards shall not be included in any required landscaping. b. Buildings with zero (0) front and side setback shall not be required to have any on -site landscaping except that when a structure with zero (0) setback has adjacent parking five (5) percent of that parking area must be landscaped. (2) The parkway areas of adjacent rights -of -way, excluding paved curb cuts and driveways shall be landscaped and permanently maintained. This shall be in addition to the landscaping required above. Any landscaping placed in the parkway must be in compliance with section 29-30(b)(6)i.3. of the zoning ordinance. (3) All required landscaping must be visible from the public right-of-way and placed for maximum enhancement of the property. (4) Landscaping shall meet the requirements of section 29-3(62). (5) Any landscaping placed within the visibility triangle of a corner lot shall be in compliance with the vision clearance standards of this section. (6) All landscaped areas on the development tract and adjacent parkway shall have immediate availability of water (i.e., a water faucet) or an irrigation system, either system to be capable of sustaining plant materials. Irrigation systems shall meet acceptable industry standards. (7) Irrigation systems adjacent to public streets shall not spray onto adjacent streets or gutters. (8) When seasonal conditions warrant, the building official may issue a temporary certificate of occupancy for sixty (60), ninety (90), or one hundred twenty (120) days pending completion of landscaping. No final certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to completion of landscape requirements. (p) Vision clearance. (1) Front yards. In a front yard, no wall, fence or other structure shall be erected in any part of the front yard that would be higher than a line extending from a point two and one-half (2 1/2) feet above the natural ground level at the front lot line to a point four and one-half (4 1/2) feet above the natural ground level at a depth of twenty-five (25) feet from the front lot line. (2) Corner lots. It shall be unlawful to set out, construct, maintain, or permit or cause to be set out, constructed, or maintained any tree, shrub, plant, sign or structure or any other view obstruction having a height greater than two (2) feet as measured from the top of the curb of the adjacent streets within the intersection visibility triangle. This restriction shall not apply to traffic control signs and signals, street signs or utility poles placed within such area by authority of the city. Intersection visibility triangle shall mean a triangle sight area, at all intersections, which shall include that portion of public right-of-way and any corner lot within a triangle formed by a diagonal line extending through points on the two (2) property lines twenty-five (25) feet from the street corner intersection of the property lines (or that point of intersection of the property lines extended) and intersecting the curb lines. (3) Parkways. It shall be unlawful to set out, construct, maintain, or permit to be maintained, set out or constructed any shrub or plant (excluding trees), sign or structure, or any other view obstruction having a height Appendix Page:117 of greater than three (3) feet, as measured from the top of the curb of the adjacent street, in the parkway area. All trees with a trunk diameter greater than two (2) inches measured three (3) feet above ground level that are within any of the parkway area shall be trimmed so that no foliage is less than six (6) feet above the top of the curb of the adjacent street. No evergreen or coniferous species of tree shall be allowed in the parkway. (4) This section shall not apply to traffic control signs and signals, street signs, mail boxes which are less than two (2) feet long on each side which is perpendicular to the street, or utility poles placed within the parkway. No such tree, shrub or plant, sign or structure (including mailboxes) shall be allowed to interfere with the free passage of vehicles on the street or of pedestrians on the sidewalk or to obscure the view of motor vehicle operators of any traffic control device or street sign or otherwise create a traffic hazard. (Ord. No. 10173, § 4, 6-24-99; Ord. No. 10205, § 1, 10-14-99; Ord. No. 2009-00058, § 9, 7-8-09; Ord. No. 2009-00059, § 11, 7-8-09) Appendix Page:118 Division 19.1 "CB-5" Central Business District, Civic Center Sec.40.03.2151 Purpose The urban core of the Lubbock Central Business District is a unique area of the city with special needs addressed in this division. The purpose of this district is to provide realistic, modern standards for new development and encourage renewal and revitalization of existing development. The review process hereby established promotes this purpose. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec. 40.03.2152 General provisions (a) All uses within this district shall be of retail sales, service, general or professional office, or residential use. (b) All business shall be conducted entirely within a building, except that restaurants shall be permitted outside dining areas/patios as defined insection 40.01.003038). Outside storage and/or display of any type is prohibited. (c) Any residential use within this district must meet the provisions of the commercial building code. (d) All structures shall be in keeping with the average value and construction of the existing development in the area. (e) Plan review requirement: No construction permit, unless it is for interior renovation only of an existing structure, shall be issued within the "CB-5" District until a plan review as required by this section has been completed and plans approved. The proponent shall provide any items required for plan review. (f) All warehousing shall be in conjunction with on -premises retail sales. All supplemental storage shall be attached to or adjacent to the principal building on the site and be subject to all requirements pertaining to the principal building. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec. 40.03.2153 Permitted uses Permitted uses in this district are the following: Appendix Page:119 (1) Accessory buildings are subject to all other requirements of this division (all materials must match primary structure). Temporary construction and/or field sales office provided said structure is approved by the codes administrator. Said structure must be removed within ten days of written notice from the codes administrator. (2) Ambulance service. (3) Antique shop. (4) Art galleries. (5) Arts and crafts store. (6) Bake shop, candy store, delicatessen, donut shop, pie shop. (7) Banks and savings and loan companies. (8) Baseball field/park. (9) Beauty or barber shops. (10) Bicycle sales and repair shops. (11) Book or stationery shops or newsstand. (12) Camera shop. (13) Churches and other places of worship. (14) Civic center, performing arts center. (15) Coin and stamp shops. (16) Coin -operated machines, five (5) or less skill or pleasure coin -operated machines as an incidental use to any permitted use in this district. (17) Commercial parking lot or building. No gasoline sales permitted. (18) Commercial private clubs and teenage clubs. (19) Convalescent, nursing, orphan, maternity and geriatric homes and personal care facilities. (20) Dance hall (no mixed alcoholic beverage sales permitted). Appendix Page:120 (21) Day nurseries. (22) Department store, discount center, family center. (23) Dress shop. (24) Drug store. In areas allowed by state and local laws, permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off -premises consumption as an incidental use. (No accessory pass -out windows and/or delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicles shall be permitted for any product other than prescription medications.) (25) Duplicating/copy service. (26) Fire stations. (27) Florist shop. (28) Funeral home or mortuary. (Ambulance service permitted.) (29) Gift shop. (30) Grocery store with not over three thousand (3,000) square feet of total floor area. In areas allowed by state and local laws, permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off -premises consumption as an incidental use. (No gasoline sales, no accessory pass -out windows and/or delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicles shall be permitted.) (31) Hobby shop. (32) Hospital, clinic or medical office. (33) Hotel or motel. (34) Lodges, sorority and fraternity houses. (35) Loft apartment (conversion and new). (36) Magazine agency. (37) Museum. (38) Music or video shop. (39) Nightclub, bar or lounge. Appendix Page:121 (40) Office supply - no printing operation permitted. (41) Offices, general and professional. (42) Oil and gas wells (subject to conditions of article 8.07, oil and gas drilling, of this code). (43) Package store. (44) Parking areas and/or buildings. (45) Private schools having a curriculum equivalent to that of public schools. (46) Public parks and recreational facilities owned by the city, including party houses and/or community centers. (47) Public schools. (48) Radio studio, with no tower or antenna. (49) Restaurants with sales of mixed alcoholic beverages as an incidental use. Accessory passout windows and outside dining areas/patios shall be permitted as defined in section 40.01.003(137) and 40.01.003(138). (50) Restaurants when designed for service and consumption of food inside the building except that accessory passout windows and outside dining areas/patios shall be permitted as defined in section 40.01.003037) and 40.01.003038). (51) Semi-public uses such as community clubhouses, YMCA, YWCA, boy scouts, girl scouts, boys clubs, and little theaters. (52) Skating rinks. (53) Studios: art, teaching, dance, music, drama, photographic, interior decorating. (54) Tailor shop. (55) Townhouse/condominiums (conversion and new) as defined in the specific use district. Appendix Page:122 (56) Theaters and motion picture shows (includes multiple screens). (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec. 40.03.2154 Conditional uses The following uses may be permitted when approved by the zoning board of adjustment as specified in article 40.02, division 2 of this chapter. (1) Shared or leased parking within six hundred (600) feet of the property when business circumstances, location of parking spaces and normal hours of use are conducive to both businesses, and such arrangement is demonstrated by a letter of agreement between the two (2) parties. (2) Outside dining patios with front setbacks of less than twenty- five (25) feet, unless allowed by the yard requirement section 40.03.2155(a)(1). (3) A bar, cocktail lounge, private club, nightclub, or dance hall with less than six hundred (600) feet of separation from any established bar, cocktail lounge, private club, nightclub, or dance hall. This distance shall be measured in a direct line from front door to front door. (4) Public utility installations such as, but not limited to, railroad right-of-way and tracks, transformer stations, transmission lines, telephone exchanges, lift stations, pumping stations, but in no event shall this be construed as permitting such uses as garages and shops, railroad yards, loading yards or warehouses. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec. 40.03.2155 Yard requirements (a) Front. Any lot line adjacent to a dedicated street (not an alley) shall be a front. (1) The front yard setback for structures and outdoor dining areas/patios shall be no less than the average setback established by the development on the adjacent lot or lots. If there is only a developed lot on one side, then the development shall match the existing setback. If there is no adjacent development, the required minimum setback shall be five (5) feet. Appendix Page:123 (2) However, any lot that fronts on a thoroughfare or expressway shall have a setback of not less than forty-three (43) feet from the property line adjacent to the thoroughfare or expressway. (3) On corner lots, the front setback shall be no less than zero (0) feet and no greater than the setback established by the development on the adjacent lot. (4) In no event, however, shall any garage have less than a twenty (20) foot front setback. (5) Structures and outdoor dining areas/patios must meet the vision clearance requirements of this section. (b) Ream. There shall be no rear yard requirement. (Fire and building codes may dictate differently.) (c) Sided. There shall be no side yard requirement. (Fire and building codes may dictate differently.) (d) Projections into required yards. (1) Bay windows with a gross floor area of less than or equal to twelve (12) square feet, cornices, belt courses, eaves, sills, awnings, canopies, and chimneys may extend two (2) feet into any required yard. (2) Unenclosed fire escapes, stairways, covered doorways, porch overhangs and/or balconies, covered or uncovered, may extend four (4) feet into any required yard. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec. 40.03.2156 Lot width There shall be no minimum lot width. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec. 40.03.2157 Lot area There shall be no lot area requirement. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec. 40.03.2158 Lot coverage There shall be no lot coverage requirement. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Appendix Page:124 Sec. 40.03.2159 Floor area ratio There shall be no floor area ratio requirement. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) See. 40.03.2160 Height limit There shall be no height requirement. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec.40.03.2161 Separation No bar, cocktail lounge, private club, nightclub or dance hall shall be located within six hundred (600) feet of any established bar, lounge, private club, nightclub, or dance hall, unless conditionally allowed under section 40.03.2154(3) of this division. This distance shall be measured in a direct line from front door to front door. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec. 40.03.2162 Off-street parking (a) Off-street parking requirements. (1) Churches and other places of worship. One paved off-street parking space for each eight (8) seats in the auditorium. If pews are used, each twenty (20) inches in length shall equal one seat. (2) Clinic, medical. One space per two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area. (3) Day nurseries. One space for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area. (4) Funeral home or mortuary. One space for each eight (8) seats in the chapel. (5) Hospital. Two (2) spaces for each bed. (6) Loft apartment. One space for each efficiency unit, one and one-half (1- 1/2) spaces for each one bedroom unit, two (2) spaces for each unit with two (2) or more bedrooms, plus one additional space for each four (4) units in the development. (7) Nightclub, bar, lounge, or dance hall. One space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. Appendix Page:125 (8) Performing arts center. 1 space per 4 seats. (9) Restaurants serving or not serving mixed alcoholic beverages. One space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area, except that outside dining areas/patios with fewer than two hundred fifty (250) square feet shall not be included in the gross square footage. Any outside dining areas/patios larger than two hundred fifty (250) square feet shall have the entire area included in the gross square footage. (10) Semi-public uses such as YMCA, YWCA, scouts, boys club, etc. One space for each five hundred (500) square feet in activity areas such as gymnasium or swimming pools plus one space for each two hundred (200) square feet of other building areas. (11) Theaters and motion picture shows (including ultiple screens). One (1) space for each eight (8) seats. (12) Townhomes. Two spaces per unit. (13) All permitted uses not listed above. One space for each three hundred (300) square feet of floor area. (14) Conditional uses. The required number of spaces shall be set by the zoning board of adjustment, based on the requirements for that use or similar type uses in this or other districts. (b) Off-street parking provisions. (1) Required off-street parking may be on site or on property under common ownership within three hundred (300) feet of the property. (2) Shared or leased parking shall be subject to approval by the zoning board of adjustment under section 40.03.2154(1). (3) Any lighting of drives or parking areas shall be so designed as not to cause any glare on any other residential or apartment zoned area in the vicinity. (4) Off-street parking shall be screened in accordance with section 40.03.2165(f). (5) Plans for off-street parking areas shall be submitted to be checked and approved as to access, ingress and egress by the city traffic engineer under the terms of this district and the city's driveway regulations. Appendix Page:126 (6) No off-street parking areas shall be allowed in front of buildings on Mac Davis Lane, Glenna Goodacre Boulevard, or any street bordering the Civic Center. Parking areas may be installed at the side or at the rear of a structure. (7) No overhead or garage doors shall be allowed facing Avenue Q, Mac Davis Lane, Glenna Goodacre Boulevard, Marsha Sharp Freeway, or any street bordering the Civic Center. (8) Recreational vehicles and oversized recreational equipment or trailers may be stored on paved parking lots, but not in any landscaped area. (A) In no event shall storage of recreational vehicles or oversized recreational equipment or trailers be allowed in the right-of-way or parkway. (B) No person shall occupy or use any recreational vehicles as living or sleeping quarters, except as allowed in subsection (9) below. (9) Exceptions to recreational vehicle requirements in subsection (8) above: (A) Any recreational vehicle, oversized recreational equipment or trailer parked by its owner who is a Lubbock resident, on his lot, while engaged in active loading or unloading for a period not exceeding forty-eight (48) hours in a five-day period. (B) The recreational vehicle of a non -Lubbock resident on the lot or parcel of a person he is visiting. However, the recreational vehicle shall only be allowed to be parked on the lot for a maximum of fourteen (14) days during a thirty -day period. (C) Recreational vehicles parked on private parking lots of hospitals and/or clinics where parking of such vehicles is allowed. (D) Recreational vehicles parked on parking lots of the civic center where parking of such vehicles is allowed (subject to any civic center policies and regulations). Appendix Page:127 (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec. 40.03.2163 Plan review Persons developing property within the "CB" districts are strongly encouraged to schedule a pre -application conference with the planning department. Plans submitted under the provisions of this section should convey the exterior design elements of a development and illustrate the property's relationship to its surroundings. A complete set of documents shall include the following information: (1) Completed project application form. (2) Owner or representative's name, address, phone and project title. (3) Photographs illustrating the condition of the property, including all facades of any existing buildings. (4) Site plans, maps and/or elevation drawings of proposed structures. All submissions should be to scale and illustrate: (A) All property lines, north arrow and scale. (B) All streets, alleys and easements, both existing and proposed. (C) Architectural character and use of materials, including mechanical equipment and other visible items associated with the structure or development lot. Illustrations should include: (i) Elevation drawings, photographs and other supporting materials to illustrate the proposed renovation. (ii) Specifications for all materials to be used, including samples if necessary for complete understanding. (iii) Color specifications with samples preferred. (D) Location and dimensions of buildings and structures. (E) Building height and setback from adjacent right-of-way lines. (F) Proposed ingress and egress to property, and traffic flow and control. Appendix Page:128 (G) Off-street parking and loading areas, including any additional information required to calculate parking requirements. (H) Type, dimension, and character of screening. (I) Location, size and design of signs, existing and proposed. (J) Location, height and design of outdoor lighting. (K) Landscape and irrigation plan for the development lot, including specifications for hard -surface landscape materials. (5) Other information that will assist in the evaluation of site development is encouraged, but not required. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec. 40.03.2164 Plan review process (a) Prior to issuance of a construction permit, complete plans as described in section 40.03.2163(1)—(5) shall be submitted to the planning department. The senior planner or his designated representative shall determine by review of such plans whether the proposed development meets the intent of this section and the "Design Standards for the Central Business District," dated 1999, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. Any development within the CB-5 district shall follow the CB-3 guidelines in the "Design Standards for the Central Business District." Within ten (10) working days of receipt by the planning department, both the proponent and the building official will be informed in writing of the senior planner's decision including the need for review by the urban design and historic preservation commission as described in subsection (b), or any conditions for approval. The senior planner's decision may be appealed in writing to the zoning board of adjustment by the applicant or other interested person within thirty (30) days of the written decision in accordance with article 40.02, division 2 of this chapter. (b) If the senior planner determines that the proposal contains unique circumstances which cannot be accommodated by the standards of this zoning district and the "Design Standards for the Central Business District," the senior planner shall notify the proponent in writing and the plans shall be placed on the next available agenda of the urban design and historic preservation commission for recommendations. The commission shall use this section and the design standards to determine whether the development meets the intent of Appendix Page:129 each and to make recommendations. Factors to be considered by the commission in making its recommendation and attaching conditions include: the extent to which the proposal differs from the design standards or the standards of the ordinance, the impact of these modifications on existing and future development in the area, and the public purpose to be served by permitting the requested modifications. (c) Upon recommendation by the commission, the senior planner may vary the requirements of the design standards so long as the requirements of this division are not altered. Variances from the requirements of this division even if recommended by the commission, must be approved by the zoning board of adjustment in accordance with article 40.02, division 2 of this chapter. The commission shall provide its recommendations in writing to the applicant and to the zoning board of adjustment. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec. 40.03.2165 Landscaping requirements (a) No less than ninety (90) percent of the required front yard excluding paved curb returns or driveways up to a minimum of ten (10) percent of the total development lot area shall be landscaped and permanently maintained, except that: (1) Interior courtyards shall not be included in any required landscaping. (2) Buildings with zero (0) front and side setback shall not be required to have any on -site landscaping except that when a structure with zero (0) setback has adjacent parking ten (10) percent of that parking area must be landscaped and visible from the street, either in front or elevated (ex. shrubs and trees visible over vehicles). (b) The parkway areas of adjacent rights -of -way, excluding paved curb cuts and driveways, shall be landscaped and permanently maintained. This shall be in addition to the landscaping required above. Any landscaping placed in the parkway must be in compliance with section 40.02.002(f)(9) of the zoning ordinance and the Downtown Public Improvements Guidelines. (c) All required landscaping must be visible from the public right-of-way and placed for maximum enhancement of the property and the Civic Center Area. (d) Landscaping shall meet the requirements of section 40.01.003(88), except that required landscaping on the development lot may incorporate no more than ten (10) percent hard surface materials within the landscaping. Hard surface Appendix Page:130 materials shall include only brick, stone, and modular pavers. Landscaping shall not include the use of smooth, patterned, colored or aggregate poured -in - place concrete or asphalt. (e) Any landscaping placed within the visibility triangle of a corner lot shall be in compliance with the vision clearance standards of this section. (f) Off-street parking of motor vehicles immediately adjacent to any street shall be screened from the street by a two and one-half foot (2-1/2) solid fence. Such fencing shall be placed immediately adjacent to the parking area in accordance with section 40.03.2166(a) of this divsion and set back no more than six (6) feet. The area between the fence and the property line, if any, must be landscaped and permanently maintained according to the landscape section of this ordinance. (g) All landscaped areas on the development tract and adjacent parkway shall have immediate availability of water (i.e., a water faucet) or an irrigation system, either system to be capable of sustaining plant materials. Irrigation systems shall meet acceptable industry standards. (h) Irrigation systems adjacent to public streets shall not spray onto adjacent streets or gutters. (i) When seasonal conditions warrant, the building official may issue a temporary certificate of occupancy for sixty (60), ninety (90), or one hundred twenty (120) days pending completion of landscaping. No final certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to completion of landscape requirements. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Sec. 40.03.2166 Vision clearance (a) Front yards. In a front yard, no wall, fence or other structure shall be erected in any part of the front yard that would be higher than a line extending from a point two and one-half (2-1/2) feet above the natural ground level at the front lot line to a point four and one-half (4-1/2) feet above the natural ground level at a depth of twenty-five (25) feet from the front lot line. (b) Corner lots. It shall be unlawful to set out, construct, maintain, or permit or cause to be set out, constructed, or maintained any tree, shrub, plant, sign or structure or any other view obstruction having a height greater than two (2) feet as measured from the top of the curb of the adjacent streets within the intersection visibility triangle. This restriction shall not apply to traffic -control signs and signals, street signs or utility poles placed within Appendix Page:131 such area by authority of the city. Intersection visibility triangle shall mean a triangle sight area, at all intersections, which shall include that portion of public right-of-way and any corner lot within a triangle formed by a diagonal line extending through points on the two (2) property lines twenty-five (25) feet from the street corner intersection of the property lines (or that point of intersection of the property lines extended) and intersecting the curblines. (c) Parkways. It shall be unlawful to set out, construct, maintain, or permit to be maintained, set out or constructed any shrub or plant (excluding trees), sign or structure, or any other view obstruction having a height of greater than three (3) feet, as measured from the top of the curb of the adjacent street, in the parkway area. All trees with a trunk diameter greater than two (2) inches measured three (3) feet above ground level that are within any of the parkway area shall be trimmed so that no foliage is less than six (6) feet above the top of the curb of the adjacent street. No evergreen or coniferous species of tree shall be allowed in the parkway. (d) This section shall not apply to traffic -control signs and signals, street signs, mailboxes which are less than two (2) feet long on each side which is perpendicular to the street, or utility poles placed within the parkway. No such tree, shrub or plant, sign or structure (including mailboxes) shall be allowed to interfere with the free passage of vehicles on the street or of pedestrians on the sidewalk or to obscure the view of motor vehicle operators of any traffic control device or street sign or otherwise create a traffic hazard. (Ordinance 2012-00007, sec. 1, adopted 2/9/2012) Secs. 40.03.2167-40.03.2230 Reserved Appendix Page:132 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 40 OF THE CODE OF RDINANCES, CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, ENTITLED, "ZONING" ARTICLE ).03, "DISTRICTS" BY ADDING DIVISION 19.2 ENTITLED "CB-6 CENTRAL USINESS DISTRICT, ARTS" TO ESTABLISH ZONING DISTRICT "CB-6 ENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, ARTS"; PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. WHEREAS, the urban core of the Lubbock Central Business District is a unique area of the city with special zoning needs; and I WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lubbock desires to facilitate renewal :and revitalization of these areas and provide realistic modern standards of development; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes in zoning as hereinafter made have been duly sented to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its recommendation which was eived by the City Council and, after due consideration, the City Council finds that due changed conditions, it would be expedient and in the interest of the public health, ety and general welfare to make those proposed changes in zoning; and WHEREAS, all conditions precedent required by law for a valid amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and Maps have been fully complied with, including giving notices in compliance with 40.01.005 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Lubbock, Texas, and the notices provided by the Texas Local Government Code §211.007 (Vernon, 1997), and notice was duly published in the T.Ahnek Avalanche-Inur„al more than fifteen (15) day5 prior to the date of the public hearing before the City Council on such proposed amendment, and the public hearing according to said notice, was held in the City Council Chamber of the Municipal Building, Lubbock, Texas, at which time persons appeared in support of the proposal; and after said hearing, it was by the City Council determined that it would be in the public interest, due to changed conditions, that the Zoning Ordinance and the Zoning Map be amended in the manner hereinafter set forth in the body of this Ordinance and this Ordinance having been introduced prior to first reading hereof, NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: SECTION 1. THAT Chapter 40, Article 40.03 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Lubbock, Texas, is hereby amended by adding a new division to be numbered 19.2 which said division reads as follows: Appendix Page:133 Division 19.2. "CB-6" Central Business District, Arts. .40.03.2181 Purpose & urban core of the Lubbock Central Business District is a unique area of the city with -cial needs addressed in this division. The purpose of this district is to provide realistic , )dern standards for new development and encourage renewal and revitalization of isting development. The review process hereby established promotes this purpose. 40.03.2182 General provisions. () All uses within this district shall be retail sales, services, general or professional sface Studios (residential or commercial) light industrial type, wholesale or indu tgial 4les as they relate to the arts. Any residential use within this district ,other than freestanding residential -uctures (apartment buildings, townhomes, garden homes, duplexes or single-family) , ust meet the provisions of the commercial building code. No use shall otherwise be permitted which is or would reasonably be injurious to .e occupants of the adjacent premises or area by reason of the emission of dust, smoke , ior, glare, noise, vibration, trash, junk, water spray, or by reason of any condition which ould amount to a public nuisance at common law. When proposed development in this district is adjacent to any residentially zoned strict, on either side or to the rear, even if separated by a street or alley, a six-foot solid reening fence of wood or masonry construction shall be installed and permanently aintained on the development lot along the adjacent property line except that when in e opinion of the planning commission, all or portions of such fence does not ser er the iblic interest, this provision shall not apply. A solid wall of a building when permitted be located on the property line, shall constitute adequate screening. Outside storage of materials and goods shall be screened so as not to be visible Dm any portion of the expressway right-of-way or adjacent thoroughfares. Outside splay in conjunction with the on premises gallery ,sale or rental of art shall be -rmitted, subject to the regulations of this district. Site plan requirement. No construction permit shall be issued within the (3-6 istrict until a site plan as required by this section has been approved. The proponent call provide the site plan. 40.03.2183 Permitted uses uses in this district are the following: Page 2 of 13 Appendix Page:134 (1) Art displays. Art shall be allowed as an outside display. Any art shall comply with the vision clearance of this section. No art shall otherwise be permitted which is or would reasonably be injurious to the neighborhood residents or which would interfere with the reasonable use and enjoyment of their property by reason of the emission of dust, smoke, odor, glare, noise, vibration, trash, junk, water spray, or by reason of any condition which would amount to a public nuisance at common law. (2) Art gallery and/or museum. (3) Bake shop (4) Candle manufacturing. (5) Glassblowing. (6) Greenhouse and plant nursery. (7) Grocery store with not over three thousand (3,000) square feet of total floor area. In areas allowed by state and local laws, permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off -premises consumption as an incidental use. (No gasoline sales, no accessory pass -out windows and/or delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicles shall be permitted.) (8) Hotel or motel. (9) Loft apartment (conversion and new). (10) Offices. (11) Oil and gas wells (subject to conditions of article 8.07, oil and gas drilling, of this code). (12) Ornamental iron works. (13) Outdoor art gallery and/or museum. (14) Package store (No accessory pass -out windows and: or delivery to customers while still in their motor vehicles shall be permitted.) (15) Performing arts centers. (16) Restaurants. (Business permitted outside of building). Page 3 of 13 Appendix Page:135 (17) Restaurants, with the sale of alcoholic beverages as an incidental use, except that no mixed alcoholic beverage sales shall be made or delivered to occupants in motor vehicles. (18) Retail sales. (19) Studios --Art, teaching, dance, music, drama, photographic, interior decorating. (20) Who Iesale Varehouse — intended for the sale and storage of art and or art supplies. (21) Antennas, towers or alternative tower structures other than a radio, television or microwave broadcasting or transmission facilities approved by the planning department pursuant to the standards of administrative review provided by section Sec. 40.02.002(h) herein. However, antennas or towers located on property owned by a federal, state or local government entity shall be exempt from the requirements of this chapter, provided a license, contract or lease authorizing such antenna or tower has been approved by the governing authority of the applicable governmental entity. Sec. 40.03.2184 Conditional uses The following uses may be permitted when approved by the zoning board of adjustment as specified in Article 40.02, division 2 of this Chapter. (1) Shared or leased parking within six hundred (600) feet of the property when business circumstances, location of parking spaces and normal hours of use are conducive to both businesses, and such arrangement is demonstrated by a letter of agreement between the two (2) parties. (2) A bar, cocktail lounge, private club, nightclub, or dance hall with less than six hundred (600) feet of separation from any established bar, cocktail lounge, private club, nightclub, or dance hall. This distance shall be measured in a direct line from front door to front door. (3) Dance hall (no mixed alcoholic beverage sales permitted). (4) Game room, pool, billiard and or domino parlor. (5) Nightclub, bar or lounge. Sec. 40.03.2185 Yard requirements (a) Front yard. Any lot line adjacent to a dedicated street (not an alley) shall be a front. Page 4 of 13 Appendix Page:136 I (1) The front yard setback for structures and outdoor dining areas/patios shall be no less than the average setback established by the development on the adjacent lot or lots. However, any lot that fronts on a thoroughfare or expressway shall have a setback of not less than forty-three (43) feet from the thoroughfare or expressway. (2) On corner lots, the front setback shall be no less than zero (0) feet and no greater than the setback established by the development on the adjacent lot. (3) In no event, however, shall any garage have less than a twenty (20) foot front setback. (4) Structures and outdoor dining areaspatios must meet the vision clearance requirements of this section. I(b) Rear and side yard There shall be no rear or side yard requirement. (c) Projections into required yards. (1) Cornices, eaves, sills, canopies, and chimneys may extend two (2) feet into any required yard. Bay windows are not permitted under this section. (2) Unenclosed fire escapes, stairways, and/or balconies, covered or uncovered, may extend four (4) feet into the required front or rear yard. Sec. 40.03.2186 Lot width 1 There shall be no minimum lot width. Sec. 40.03.2187 Lot area There shall be no lot area requirements. Sec. 40.03.2188 Lot coverage There shall be no lot coverage requirements. Sec. 40.03.2189 Floor area ratio There shall be no floor area ratio requirements. Sec.40.03.2190 Height No building or structure within the CB-6 District shall exceed forty (40) feet in height above existing grade, except that buildings may exceed forty (40) feet when the front, Page 5of13 Appendix Page:137 and rear yards are increased one foot beyond required setbacks for each additional of height such buildings exceed forty (40) feet. (a) Structures permitted above height. Penthouse or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans, or similar equipment required to operate and maintain the building, and fire or parapet walls, skylights, towers, steeples, flagpoles, chimneys, smokestacks, water tanks, silos, grain elevators, or similar structures may be erected above the height limits herein prescribed, but no penthouse or roof structure, or any space above the height limit shall be allowed for the purpose of providing additional floor space. Sec.40.03.2191 Separation Any bar, cocktail lounge, private club, night club or dance hall shall be located a minimum of two hundred (200) feet from any residentially zoned property. (This distance shall be measured in a direct line from the nearest wall of the structure in which the use is located to the residential district line. No bar, cocktail lounge, private club, night club or dance hall shall be located within six hundred (600) feet of any established bar, lounge, private club, night club or dance hall. (This distance shall be measured in a direct line froin front door to front door.) 'See. 40.03.2192 Off-street parking (a) Off-street parking --Required. (1) Hotels and motels —Two (2) spaces for each three (3) units, plus the required spaces for incidental or accessory uses based on the square footage devoted to those uses. (2) Loft apartment. One space for each efficiency unit, one and one-half (1- 112) spaces for each one bedroom unit, two (2) spaces for each unit with two (2) or more bedrooms, plus one additional space for each four (4) units in the development. (3) Performing arts center. 1 space per 4 seats. (4) Restaurants serving or not serving mixed alcoholic beverages. One space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area, except that outside dining areas/patios with fewer than two hundred fifty (250) square feet shall not be included in the gross square footage. Any outside dining areas/patios larger than two hundred fifty (250) square feet shall have the entire area included in the gross square footage. (5) All permitted uses not listed above. One space for each three hundred (300) square feet of floor area. Page 6 of 13 Appendix Page:138 (b) Off-street parking provisions. (1) Required off-street parking may be on site or on property under common ownership within three hundred (300) feet of the property. (2) Shared or leased parking shall be subject to approval by the zoning board of adjustment under section 40.03.2184(1). (3) Any lighting of drives or parking areas shall be so designed as not to cause any glare on any other residential or apartment zoned area in the vicinity. (4) Off-street parking shall be screened in accordance with section 40.03.2195(h)(2). (5) Plans for off-street parking areas shall be submitted to be checked and approved as to access, ingress and egress by the city traffic engineer under the terms of this district and the city's driveway regulations. (6) No off-street parking areas shall be allowed in front of buildings on Mac Davis Lane or Glenna Goodacre Boulevard. Parking areas may be installed at the side or at the rear of a structure. (7) No overhead or garage doors shall be allowed facing Mac Davis Lane. Glenna Goodacre Boulevard, or Marsha Sharp Freeway. (8) Recreational vehicles and oversized recreational equipment or trailers may be stored on paved parking lots, but not in any landscaped area. (a) In no event shall storage of recreational vehicles or oversized recreational equipment or trailers be allowed in the right-of-way or parkway. (b) No person shall occupy or use any recreational vehicles as living or sleeping quarters, except as allowed in subsection (9) below. (9) Exceptions to recreational vehicle requirements in subsection (8) above: (a) Any recreational vehicle, oversized recreational equipment or trailer parked by its owner who is a Lubbock resident, on his lot, while engaged in active loading or unloading for a period not exceeding forty- eight (48) hours in a five-day period. (b) The recreational vehicle of a non -Lubbock resident on the lot or parcel of a person he is visiting. However, the recreational vehicle shall only be allowed to be parked on the lot for a maximum of fourteen (14) days during a thirty -day period. Page 7 of 13 Appendix Page:139 (c) Recreational vehicles parked on private parking lots of hospitals and/or clinics where parking of such vehicles is allowed. ISee. 40.03.2193 Plan review Persons developing property within the "CB" districts are strongly encouraged to schedule a pre -application conference with the planning department. Plans submitted under the provisions of this section should convey the exterior design elements of a development and illustrate the property's relationship to its surroundings. A complete set of documents shall include the following information: (1) Completed project application form. (2) Owner or representative's name, address, phone and project title. (3) Photographs illustrating the condition of the property, including all facades of any existing buildings. (4) Site plans, maps and/or elevation drawings of proposed structures. All submissions should be to scale and illustrate: a. All property lines, north arrow and scale. b. All streets, alleys and easements, both existing and proposed. C. Architectural character and use of materials, including mechanical equipment and other visible items associated with the structure or development lot. Illustrations should include: (i) Elevation drawings, photographs and other supporting materials to illustrate the proposed renovation. (ii) Specifications for all materials to be used, including samples if necessary for complete understanding. (iii) Color specifications with samples preferred. d. Location and dimensions of buildings and structures. e. Building height and setback from adjacent right-of-way lines. f. Proposed ingress and egress to property, and traffic flow and control. g. Off-street parking and loading areas, including any additional information required to calculate parking requirements. Page 8of13 Appendix Page:140 h. Type, dimension, and character of screening. Location, size and design of signs, existing and proposed. j. Location, height and design of outdoor lighting. k. Landscape and irrigation plan for the development lot, including specifications for hard -surface landscape materials. (5) Other information that will assist in the evaluation of site development is encouraged, but not required. ISec. 40.03.2194 Plan review process Prior to issuance of a construction permit, a site plan shall be submitted to the codes administrator which contains each item noted at section 40.03.2193. The codes administrator or designated representative shall determine that the proposed development meets the letter and intent of this section by review of the site plan. Should a difference of opinion about compliance arise between a proponent and codes administration, the site plan shall be placed on the next available agenda of the planning commission as '`other business" for resolution. 40.03.2195 Development standards (a) Ingress/egress. (1) There shall be no less than twenty-five (25) feet between driveway cuts along interstate highway frontage roads, regardless of lot or tract lines and/or ownership. (2) When conditions warrant, the planning and zoning commission may require the proponent to dedicate and construct right-hand turn lanes along interstate highway frontage roads to aid ingress/egress to developing property. (b) Building materials and construction. (1) Each wall or facade of a new or renovated building, or new or renovated portions of buildings, intended as office or public reception areas which are adjacent to a street in the "CB-6" zoning district shall have an exterior composition or facade of not less than seventy-five percent (75%) masonry (such as brick, stone, stucco, exposed aggregate, finished concrete) or decorative material (such as copper, bronze, anodized aluminum, stainless steel, porcelain enamel, natural materials or other similar materials that do not require painting). Any wall or facade or portion of a wall or facade of such new or renovated building not enclosing office or public reception areas may use factory color - Page 9 of 13 Appendix Page:141 coated metal wall panels. Fasteners or exposed bolts'screws shall be painted the same factory color as the metal wall panels. Such panels shall be a minimum of twenty-six (26) gauge. (2) Architectural decorative materials may be allowed on roofs. However, metal clad roofs that are not architecturally decorative (see (1) above) or gravel roofs shall not be exposed above the horizontal line above the fascia or parapet wall in excess of a pitch of 2 in 12. (3) Equipment, if located on the roof and more than three (3) feet in height, shall be screened from view on the horizontal plane. (c) Loading and truck storage areas. No truck loading/unloading facilities shall be located on a building wall fronting on any interstate highway. No truck trailer or tractor parking shall be located between the front building line and the front property line for any lot with frontage along an interstate highway and interstate highway access roads. (d) Utilities. All on -site utilities shall be located underground or be approved by the planning and zoning commission. (e) Outdoor storage. All outside storage areas shall be behind a minimum six-foot screening fence. Materials shall not be stacked or stored to exceed the height of' the screening fence. All storage areas and fencing shall be behind the front building line. (f) Outdoor lighting. Outdoor lighting systems must be designed so as to not cause any glare on adjacent roadways and property. All light fixtures used to illuminate advertising signs or buildings shall be screened from view from the public right-of-way. (g) Microwave and satellite dishes. Microwave dishes outside any building shall be screened. Such dishes shall not be located between the front building line, as that line extends to the side property lines, and the front property line. Nor shall dishes be located on the roof of any building in an CB-6 District wherein any portion of the dish is visible from the main lanes of the interstate highway. (h) Landscaping. (1) No less than ninety (90) percent of the required front yard excluding paved curb returns or driveways up to a minimum of ten (10) percent of the total development lot area shall be landscaped and permanently maintained. Interior courtyards shall not be included in the required landscaping. Buildings with a zero (0) front and side setback shall not be required to have any on -site landscaping except that when a structure with zero (0) setback has adjacent parking ten (10) percent of that parking area must be landscaped and visible from the street, either in front or elevated (ex. Shrubs and trees visible over vehicles). Any landscaping placed within the visibility triangle of a corner lot must be in compliance with section 40.02.002(f)(9)(B) of the Zoning Ordinance. Page 10 of 13 Appendix Page:142 (2) Off-street parking of motor vehicles immediately adjacent to any street shall be screened from the street by a two and one-half foot (2-1/2) solid fence. Such fencing shall be placed immediately adjacent to the parking area in accordance with section 40.03.2196(a) of this division and set back no more than six (6) feet. The area between the fence and the property line, if any, must be landscaped and permanently maintained according to the landscape section of this ordinance. (3) The parkway areas shall be landscaped and permanently maintained. This shall be in addition to the landscaping required above. Any landscaping placed in the parkway must be in compliance with section 40.02.002(t)(9)(C) of the Zoning Ordinance. (4) All landscaped areas on the development tract and adjacent parkway shall have immediate availability of water (i.e., a water faucet) or an irrigation system, either system to be capable of sustaining plant materials. Irrigation systems shall meet acceptable industry standards. Parkway irrigation systems adjacent to public streets shall not spray onto adjacent streets or gutters. (5) When seasonal conditions warrant, the building official may issue a temporary certificate of occupancy for sixty (60), ninety (90), or one hundred twenty (120) days pending completion of landscaping. No final certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to completion of landscape requirements. Sec. 40.03.2196 Vision clearance (a) Front yards. In a required front yard, no wall, fence or other structure shall be erected in any part of the required front yard that would be higher than a line extending from a point two and one-half (2-112) feet above the natural ground level at the front lot line to a point four and one-half (4-112) feet above the natural ground level at the depth of the required front yard. (b) Corner lots. It shall be unlawful to set out, construct, maintain, or permit or cause to be set out, constructed, or maintained any tree, shrub, plant, sign, or structure, or any other view obstruction having a height greater than two (2) feet as measured from the top of the curb of the adjacent streets within the intersection visibility triangle. This restriction shall not apply to traffic control signs and signals, street signs, or utility poles placed within such area by authority of the City Council. Intersection visibility triangle shall mean a triangle sight area, at all intersections, which shall include that portion of public right-of-way and any corner lot within a triangle formed by a diagonal line extending through points on the two (2) property lines twenty- five (25) feet from the street corner intersection of the property lines (or that point of intersection of the property lines extended) and intersecting the curblines. (c) Parkways. It shall be unlawful to set out, construct, maintain or permit to be maintained, set out or constructed any shrub or plant (excluding trees), sign or structure, Page 11 of 13 Appendix Page:143 or any other view obstruction having a height of greater than three (3) feet, as measured from the top of the curb of the adjacent street, in the parkway area. All trees with a trunk diameter greater than two (2) inches measured three (3) feet above ground level that are within any of the parkway area shall be trimmed so that no foliage is less than six (6) feet above the top of the curb of the adjacent street. No evergreen or coniferous species of tree shall be allowed in the parkway. This section shall not apply to traffic control signs and signals, street signs, mail boxes which are less than two (2) feet long on each side which is perpendicular to the street, or utility poles placed within the parkway. No such tree, shrub or plant, sign or structure (including mailboxes) shall be allowed to interfere with the free passage of vehicles on the street or of pedestrians on the sidewalk or to obscure the view of motor vehicle operators of any traffic control device or street sign or otherwise create a traffic hazard. SECTION 2. THAT violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall be deemed a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed Two Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($2,000.00) as provided in 40.01.006 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lubbock. SECTION 3. THAT should any paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, the remainder of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby. SECTION 4. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized to cause publication of the descriptive caption of this Ordinance as an alternative method provided by law. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Passed by the City Council on first reading on Passed by the City Council on second reading on ATTEST: Page 12 of 13 Dendix Page:144 GLEN C. ROBERTSON, MAYOR PROVED AS TO CONTENT: Randy Henson, Director of Planning APPROVED AS TO FORM: Chad Weaver Assistant City Attorney vvvlCityAtt/ChadlZones/OrdPubliclirg CB-6 (June 13, 2012 Page 13 of 13 Appendix Page:145 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS PLANS Lubbock Downtown Master Plan Update Summary of Findings from Previous Planning Initiatives Relevant to the Downtown Master Plan Update Downtown Revitalization Plan, 2008 Study Area: Downtown square mile section and adjacent surrounding influence areas W�ITOWI `a r,' T. N PLAN h° � ' � ;r Scope: Four Phases of work- Assessment, Visioning, Action Plan and Implementation. , Lbboc{�'i " J � The Assessment includes - Existing Conditions, Existing Document Review, Land Use Regulation k "arsnAIMAmvr s,f'r '✓ y .;a Review, Placemaking Inventory, Parking Study, Evaluation of Transportation and Utility wwr :.fie. - Infrastructure and drainage issues. The Scope also includes a Market Analysis which fed into development program and phasing strategy. Planning Team: Consultant lead — EDAW; Guidance and Implementation — Downtown Redevelopment Commission. w, �✓ � f" ' =i Relevant Executive Summary Excerpts: Visioning: �- Over 350 participants in the initial public meeting. General Takeaways "desire for a pedestrian -friendly, beautiful downtown with a mix of uses and architectural styles. The groups supported increasing downtown housing and enhancing the strengths of the existing Febuaw5,2oos Depot Entertainment District and Arts District, as well as a desire to develop additional 'districts' with unique personalities. Desired additions to the Downtown scene centered ^_ around entertainment, dining and shopping. Improvements to the transportation system and EDAW? DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES I PARKHILL,SMITH &COOPER public safety were also noted as necessary to stimulate redevelopment." Catalytic Projects: The redevelopment of downtown is anticipated to be driven by several large projects that would spur additional private investment. "Based on the information gathered during the assessment and visioning phases, the Consultant Team selected six catalytic projects that hold great potential for Downtown redevelopment; these projects included an arena, performing arts center, upscale hotel, movie theater / retail complex, residential development, and civic center renovation / expansion." Preferred Plan: Based on public input to three different planning scenarios a "Preferred Plan" was created that divided "the Downtown area into seven broad land -use districts and disperses catalytic z projects and supporting elements throughout these districts in a manner that best complements key buildings / projects that are existing and on the board." (The Preferred Plan is included at the end of this section) These seven districts are: ■ Arts & Convention District: includes a new park, a new performing arts center, a renovated and expanded civic center, an upscale hotel, parking garages, arts -related offices, and transportation improvements, which build off the energy of the existing Louise Hopkins Underwood Center for the Arts and the Mahon Library. ■ Central Business District: includes new office space, a boutique retail corridor along Avenue J, a new civic building on the site of the existing jail, and a new park at the intersection of Broadway and Buddy Holly, which will support the redevelopment of the Pioneer Hotel into condominiums. ■ Depot Entertainment District: includes a movie theater, a new two block park, a multi -purpose arena, a collegiate hall of fame, a relocated walk of fame, and a boutique hotel, which will complement the existing Cactus Theater and Buddy Holly Center and the upcoming visitor's center. ■ Residential District: includes townhomes and condominiums with ground -floor retail and a new neighborhood park on 15th Street. ■ Gateway Retail District: includes pedestrian -scaled retail shops along Mac Davis Lane east of Avenue Q, which will draw energy from the existing Wal-Mart and surrounding stores further west to the Downtown Core. ■ Destination Retail District: includes large- and mid -box retail centers, as well as the possibility of light industrial, technology research and development, or business campus activities. ■ Transition District: includes a variety of uses on Avenue Q and 19th Street that must be 'good neighbors' to adjacent uses in the Downtown Core Implementation Subtopics: To implement the RAP attention should be given to the following categories: ■ Economic development: Support both existing business and recruit across the state and nationally for new tenants ■ Policy and Land Use: The plan calls for the city to take an active role in plan implementation through the hiring of a position within the city to act as an "Action Plan Liaison" and the hiring of a master developer or entity to implement the plan. "Two entities are recommended as having primary roles in implementing the Action Plan and fostering major revitalization efforts in the downtown area — the City of 3 Lubbock and one of two other parties: (1) an oversight corporation called Downtown Lubbock 2020 or (2) a master land developer to be selected by the City." Additionally, an explicit recommendation to encourage redevelopment is to "re- evaluate the City zoning ordinance, making modifications as appropriate to encourage a denser, more urban pattern of land use. The City should also adopt the proposed CB zone districts, as well as update and expand the existing design standards for these districts. To further encourage private investment, particularly residential development, a land trust should be created to acquire and hold key properties for future development in accordance with the Action Plan." ■ Urban Design: A key implementation recommendation is to modify the Parks and Open Space Master Plan to create a more walkable urban environment. "Modifications to certain streets are also proposed and would include planted parkways, expanded pedestrian walkways and bike lanes." ■ Transportation & Utilities: Lastly, attention is encouraged to the infrastructure systems in downtown. "A true evaluation of public parking needs and availability must be carried out, and a Downtown Parking Management Strategy should be drafted. Bike routes and paths should be improved within the Core and throughout the city. As redevelopment occurs, Citibus should expand public transportation services to include regular shuttle service between Texas Tech and the Depot Entertainment District, and the Depot Entertainment District and the Arts District, along Avenue J. Downtown utilities and services such as water, electric, telecommunications (including fiber optic) should be upgraded and relocated underground throughout the Core to levels that are 'development -ready'." Funding & Phasing Recommendations The RAP outlines several sources of financing including: ■ Tax Increment Financing (TIF) ■ Public/Private Sector Partnerships ■ Public Improvement Districts (PID) ■ Economic Development Corporations ■ Texas Enterprise Fund ■ City/County Venue Tax ■ General Obligation Bond Issue ■ SBA Section 504 Loans ■ Community Development Block Grants ■ EDA Grants and Loans Economic and Fiscal Impacts The plan provides an ambitious and detailed redevelopment impact report showing the total amount of development and the tax and jobs benefits. The full breakdown of values is provided in Appendix H — Phasing Spreadsheets. Excerpts/ Recommendations for Further Consideration: The RAP contains many specific recommendations that may be worth further consideration for the Master Plan Update. These include: Chapter 2: Existing Conditions: ■ Parking: "On -street parking consists of a fairly even mix of 1-hour, 2-hour and unrestricted parking. Of the approximately 1,400 spaces available to the public (there is an additional pool of on -street parking that is restricted to loading, government use, etc.), approximately one-third is 1-hour, one third is 2-hour and one-third is unrestricted." (pg. 27) The On -Street Parking Map shows the location of on -street parking in the Downtown Core. ■ Real Estate Market Potential: "The potential highest and best use for downtown Lubbock is not a single use, but rather the co -location of a variety of complementary uses. For example, retail development potential can be enhanced by the addition of housing units, hotel rooms, office space, and destination entertainment that draws from a regional population base. Likewise, the downtown housing market is bolstered by robust employment opportunities nearby while the hotel occupancy is supported by entertainment and office uses. Nevertheless, each component or use must be evaluated separately to determine market demand, with the understanding that its presence in a mixed -use downtown will contribute to a collective value that is greater than the sum of each component." (pg.62) ■ Real Estate Development Opportunity: There are general comments about opportunities and constraints that still have relevance in 2019 that can be found on pages 91 to 94. Chapter 3: Visioning ■ Visual Preference Survey: Robust participation showed preference generally for more traditional architecture of various styles and pedestrian friendly design. (pg. 101-104) ■ Goals & Objectives: Many of the Goals and Objectives to implement those goals are relevant for Downtown still today. The Goals are broken into five categories (Land Use, Economic Development, Policy, Urban Design, Transportation and Utility Infrastructure) and can be found on pages 112 to 120. D CD m C a X v CD CD VA Chapter 4: Draft Plans The three draft plans were built on a series of scenarios that were driven by large "Catalytic Projects" anchoring many of the districts. These include: a Civic Center Renovation/ Expansion, Upscale Hotel, Arena, Performing Arts Center, Movie Theater and Retail. These major projects were then reinforced through public investments in "Supporting Elements" including; Parks, a Visitors Center, Enhanced Depot District, Enhanced Arts District, New City Hall, Urban Education Campus, Flex Tech Uses, Baseball Stadium/ National Collegiate Hall of Fame, and using Land Banking for future major uses. Chapter 5: Preferred Plan The Preferred Plan reflects some important thinking at a macro scale, the details can be found in the image at the end of this section and on pages 169 to 189. The Preferred Plan also makes some very specific recommendations that are worth remaining in the conversation to carry forward in the Master Plan Update. Streetscape Typology "Streets for People" ■ Mac Davis Lane - Arts District - create pedestrian scale and seasonal accents, including plantings and banners ■ Broadway - Carry existing enhancements from Ave Qto 1-27 underpass ■ 16th Street - Depot District - pedestrian -focused, four -season environment; include special paving enhancements ■ 15th Street - Ave J to Buddy Holly - special paving to link Residential to Depot District ■ Avenue J - Variety of streetscape elements to create a "main street" feel. Pedestrian lighting, benches, and landscaping to promote street -level activity ■ Buddy Holly - Depot District - landscaping between sidewalk and parking lanes. Vehicular Greenways: ■ Close a lane of traffic each way on Avenue Q to allow wider sidewalks and a planted center median ■ Narrow lanes on Texas and Buddy Holly to allow tree plantings and wider sidewalks. ■ Proposed Cross -sections are shown on pages 192 to 195 Brick Streets: Plan recommendation to keep brick on many streets because it "marks the heart of and defines a district". The recommendation is to: ■ Keep Broadway brick ■ Keep Avenue J brick, and extend from 16th to 19th, and from 9th to Mac Davis 5 I: ■ Special pave/enhance streetscapes and intersections on 15th & 16th Between Avenue J and Crickets Ave ■ Brick -pave Crickets and Buddy Holly in the Depot District. ■ Remove Main St. and all other brick so that "the impact of special brick streets in not diluted" (pg. 196) Parking Strategy: ■ Fill existing surface lots on Broadway, Avenue J, and Buddy Holly with buildings ■ No street -facing surface parking on Broadway, Avenue J, and Buddy Holly ■ City -developed parking structures - south of Main, north of 13th St.; east of Avenue K and both sides of Texas; Maybe on Broadway, Avenue J, or Buddy Holly if ground -floor not parking ■ Four (4) Parking Structures identified in draft plans (pg. 199) Bus, Circulator & Bike Routes ■ Add bus circulator routes between Arts District and Depot District, and between Depot District and Texas Tech ■ Add bike lanes to portions of Avenue Q, Avenue O, Texas Ave., Buddy Holly, Glenna Goodacre, 9th St, and 15th St. (pg. 200) Chapter 6, Implementation Action Plan Urban Design - Streetscape ■ Create Street Tree diagram omitted from 1999 CBD Standards; Create a street tree master plan ■ Create a citywide Bike Master Plan; consider connections Downtown ■ Create a Parks & Open Space Master Plan; distributed through Downtown; Chosen by location; Consider open -space dedication or in -lieu -of arrangement; Work with County to convert parking around old courthouse into a public park ■ Create and implement a comprehensive signage package addressing wayfinding and identity (pg. 238) Transportations & Utilities ■ Create a Downtown Parking Management Strategy; consider shared parking, restriping, enforcement, parking reservoirs outside downtown Core ■ Require bike parking facilities in all new projects ■ Upgrade utilities to be "development -ready" (pg. 240) Prioritized Action List: Review for relevant tasks on pages 241-252 Selected Downtown RAP Maps: ■ Historic Landmarks ■ Existing Land Use ■ On -Street Parking Inventory ■ Ownership Map ■ Wet Utility Map ■ Brick Streets Plan ■ Off -Street Parking Plan ■ Transportation Plan ■ TIF District ■ Phasing Plan Observations Relative to 2019 Downtown Master Plan Update: 7 1. The 2008 RAP is a very detailed plan built with extensive community/ stakeholder outreach and oversight. Much of the data and smaller scale recommendations have as much relevance now as in 2008. The lack of action in downtown over the past decade may be a function of a lack of organization until recently but may also be in part to this plan being overly reliant on several large catalytic projects. This approach is often less resilient to changes in the marketplace and public appetite for investment. Although some of these projects have come to fruition in one form or another the opportunity to focus on many mid -level developments rather than several large ones. 2. A downtown should not be reliant on only large influxes of investment but rather dozens of more block and building scale investments, like what is currently being constructed and planned. These more realistic scaled investments can be leveraged through public investment including many of the "Supporting Elements" that the RAP recommends. Interestingly, the approach of catalytic projects and supporting elements, did lay the groundwork for some major movement over the past decade. Although there has been limited spin off development, several of the catalytic projects appear to be moving forward as well as some investment in the "Supporting Elements". This Master Plan Update can serve to improve the effectiveness by adding some specificity filtered through current market dynamics to the ambitious approach from 2008. 3. The Master Plan Update may serve well to rather than showing wholesale redevelopment of a majority of the blocks in downtown — suggest a more fine-grained redevelopment scenario that better reflects, property ownership, a more common incremental approach to redevelopment and a phasing timeline that better reflects market absorption rates. This also paired with a more realistic time frame for public investment in utilities, transportation infrastructure, streetscape, etc. would yield an achievable redevelopment expectation. 4. In addition, to scale and phasing a prioritized list of public investments that would provide some idea of public return on investment would be helpful. For example, there seems to be a reoccurring view that the burying of dry utilities may be a primary factor in encouraging new development. Certainly, attention should be given to this topic in the Master Plan Update, quality utilities with an aesthetic appearance do matter but with so many other fundamental issues at play perhaps investment should be funded relative to the potential positive impact on development. 5. Interestingly, in the appendix of the plan a brief review of a March 1989 Redevelopment Plan for Downtown Lubbock is included and almost all of the same list of downtown problems and liabilities are the same 30 years ago as they were identified 20 years later in the 2008 report and an additional 10 years later in the Master Plan Update. This should tell us that the issues are not insurmountable just that the right approach to overcoming them has not been implemented yet. -o CD m 7 X co m cn tr DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION ACTION PLAN Preferred Primary Districts & Catalytic Projects w�l Legend Downtown Core - 4- .�I �' •yam O Eana use B eo-lda 0 sr*" a'� Ney BU ltlmgs/Proleds: Existing or On -the -Board roar _ `' • A Wal-Man r - B Pad Retail C Pad Retail a r a r •. r r a r r r r,• , ._� �..- ❑ -i '. _ —"I12 - - - - ` - O P oneer Hotel Condos z. J -- G County Courthouse {, 12J �' _ F i - H Federal 13mi ng AGateWay i I Citrbus Transfer Plaza Retail �r 13 D y FR J Needles Baking D `" ! K Call Theater vlsaor center 1 ti not n M Buddy Holly Center & s io , Convention Retail fµ' Yy' ' Proposed Catalyt¢ Proleds 8 - :�i: �-. Pr mary Building Entrees District + i , '- ` , C v c Center Renovation l ..+.e.r+Ta & Ezp 2 Perfo g Am, Center 3 Heritage Park - • t _— -� r 4 Office Flex Project ct f i ■r l ...I� 5 Fediv Park dental - i l• q. �' — - fi Festival Park �r Zrrra� :.C-iLx,•r� 7 Movie Theater r '^ ■ - ir.�._-y k I 8 Collegiate Hell of Fame �r Boutique Retail r g Arena t i �r Sa i Retail � �+ pporting Elements V.. i ,.::' �.�\ ,6 Glenn a Goodacrei 7th Avenue Extension F 11 Gateway Retail 1Park Garages •' a L5 �z� � `' B j 3 = 1Ann-reiated v� 14 Convent Hotel on Hotel _ _ • -� � �_ 15 Avenue L Street f Improvements 1 i O �, I y }+ r l 16 al Park i Central Business - 1 �; - c-� ,7 Bourque Res dentHotel r Central Business ,6 walknfFame District District R `{ Parking -Su ,ace r • L: i $ In Open Space/Plaza 7 Transportation S� Highway Throughways Transition s u- 17 NBrweRampa ® �!_ 1.1 I 1s Residential y wtl ■- 1 I' \� \ r SB (EB Ramps + :Area District 1 r '�"��� 12 • �"-ti" Highway Bridges Deryt�ot J__,__t__�� i Y 7 9 • �� \ T--1--r"T'f BNSF Railroad i � Key Conn District •y.. ' a', i T ` -� \., � e � ectors rr L •^%/�.. ____--__ Proposed Street Closures _ i F , Proposed Street Alignments an 'r air rarra rarrarr t i J��t'. :i rI Streets for People _ = Wayfnding Gateways identity Gateways N City of Lubbock, Texas n February 5,2008 N 0 300 600 1200 A 7�5TH01 MAC DAVIS LANE � 7TH GOODACRE I8TH 2 ti. 9TH 18TH � MAIN BROADWAY - 1 71i 1 a ai r)✓� 15T `k 1 p £ l tl it :t 6TH P F� 6 - •jl tiv + - 17THI 1 kK O 10 Phasing Plan Legend ■ a .. r oowlnown core 1-ransport8t on H ghway Throughways TR'T"f—f BWF Ra1..d _ Early Phase 0 4Years Catalyfic Pr jests 1 Cvc Cener Renovation 2 Heritage Park 3 Office Flea Pmfed t, 4 M;xedose Resdental: 20%of Total 5 Festival Park Phase 1 6 Movie Theater Supporting Efements 7 Artsand Convention Dtdet Street Improvements ........ Proposed St— Cl—are Proposed Street Algnment Streets for People Ij Gateways A. Mid Phase 5 8Years C-1yhc p jeets 8 Cvic Center Expansion g th Park n P I� 9 Perform ng Arts Center w th Parking Garage 10 Mitred use Resdental_ 50% of Total 11 Festival Park Phase 2 Vv 12 Arena wrth Parkng Supporting Elements 13 Upscale Hotelwth L' Parking 14 Glenna Gaodacre Eatenson proposed Stree7 Closure Pmposed Street Alignment Streets for People r Gatoways _ Late Phase 9 - 12 Years Cafalydc Pm/eels 15 Mixed— Restlenlial_ 30% of Total tfi Collegiate Hall of Fame Sopportrng Elements 17 Gateway Reta I 18 Arts related Offices r 19 Resid-fi.l Park 20 13 q- Hotel -�� Streets for People N 11 Comprehensive Plan: Plan Lubbock 2040, 2019 Study Area: City Limits and ETJ ,l Scope: Long-range planning tool for municipal staff, decision -makers, and citizens to direct the growth and physical development of a community for 20 years, or more. Comprehensive Plan consists of Parts: ■ Executive Summary ■ Community Snapshot ■ Vision and Goals ■ Future Land Use _ Transportation ■ Infrastructure - Economic Development ■ Community Livability ■ Parks, Trails, & Open Space ■ Implementation Planning Team: Consultant lead — Freese and Nichols, Inc.; Guidance — Comprehensive Plan COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE FUTURE Advisory Committee (CPAC) PLANLUBB4rwCK �+(�• Relevant Executive Summary Excerpts: [/f/ [/f/ Land Use Overview: The current City limits span 87,018 acres, equivalent to 136 square miles. Approximately 65 percent of land within the City is developed. Of this developed land, 33 percent is composed of residential, specifically low density. Nonresidential uses compose 17 percent of developed land. Public uses account for 21 percent of Lubbock's developed land. Priority Recommendations: (Selection) ■ Development of a well -thought-out impact fee program for the funding of roadway projects. Consideration should be given to including water and wastewater impact fees in the program. ■ Revise the zoning and subdivision ordinances into a Unified Development Code (UDC) to match the planning and engineering goals outlined in this Plan. 12 ■ The Texas Tech University, Broadway, Downtown, and Canyon Lakes areas are some of the most important corridors within Lubbock. The City should formally adopt the Cultural Arts District Corridor concept and extend it to the Canyon Lakes area. The proposed district should be enlarged to include other key destinations and Texas Tech University buildings. Downtown needs a clear approach to public and private improvements. It will be important to revisit these existing requirements to remove inconsistencies, prepare a new Capital Improvements Plan, and encourage reinvestment in Downtown. Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances: • CBD Design Guidelines: Lubbock has multiple sets of regulations that stipulate development standards within the City's core. Each CBD zoning district includes standards for height and building orientation, building mass and scale, parking areas, and landscape areas. These include: 1999 Design Standards for the Central Business District Central Business District - CB-2 (Broadway/13th/Main) Central Business District - CB-3 (General) Central Business District - CB-4 (Depot) Central Business District - CB-5 (Civic Center) Central Business District - CB-6 (Arts) • Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards: "Intended to serve as the implementing arm of the Downtown Revitalization Action Plan for public improvements, this document is designed to work in tandem with the CBD zoning districts. This document is unique because it includes requirements for parts of the public right-of-way. The Downtown Public Improvements Design Standards do not replicate the requirements of the CBD Ordinances, but set a minimum standard for all right-of-way improvements in the area." (pg.12) Previous Plans: Cultural District Recertification Study "The Lubbock Arts Alliance commissioned a study of the Cultural District in 2017 to identify how to further enhance the District as it prepares to seek recertification with the Texas Commission on the Arts in 2019. The Study identified several areas for improvement of the District, many of which are applicable to this Comprehensive Plan. Because the Arts 13 and Cultural District runs through many of Lubbock's most iconic and popular neighborhoods, the recommendations provided within the Recertification Study merit careful consideration and incorporation into City policy as appropriate." (pg. 13) Vision for Lubbock: (Selection) There are many references to the revitalization of Downtown in in the community comments and vision for Lubbock. The core ideas are high-level organization for issues and challenges facing Lubbock. "The core ideas were developed through input from the CPAC, online survey, and public. Each core idea has a goal or statement that will tie directly to specific recommendations, strategies, and actions in this Comprehensive Plan." • Growth Management: Encourage infill development inside of the loop, specifically in north and east Lubbock, Balance Lubbock's southwest growth with other areas of the City, Develop a fiscally balanced Future Land Use Plan. • Major Corridors: Improve certain major corridors by re-examining land use patterns, revitalizing aging sites, and re -purposing deteriorating areas • Downtown: Support downtown revitalization as a vibrant place for businesses, government, visitors, events, housing, arts, entertainment, recreation, and shopping. Connect downtown to Texas Tech University and Canyon Lakes. Create more walkable areas in downtown and reduce the auto -footprint • Special Districts: Create improvement initiatives to enhance existing and potential special districts found throughout Lubbock. Brand special districts with a unique identity. Create connectivity between all special districts • Connectivity With Local Universities: Continue to support the strategic plan priorities for local universities and leverage associated opportunities • Vibrant Neighborhoods and Housing Variety: Protect and strengthen existing neighborhoods and promote a range of housing choices. Develop neighborhood maintenance strategies specific to each neighborhood. Design guidelines for infill development specific to each neighborhood • Parks and Recreation Greenprint: Provide parks and recreational amenities throughout Lubbock to support quality of life, local character, revitalization, and image. Create more connectivity between neighborhoods and park amenities. Provide parkland in areas of new development • Canyon Lakes: Capitalize on the Canyon Lakes amenities as a key asset and defining community character • Gateways and Identity: Enhance the overall visual identity for key portals and major roadways into Lubbock. (pg. 40) 14 Future Land Use Mixed Use is identified as the primary future land use for Downtown. This is fitting, as Downtown is described as "an example of both horizontal and vertical Mixed Use. Downtown was previously established as the Central Business District, though recent planning initiatives have expanded the area to include a vibrant mix of high-rise office, public, retail, and residential uses - a trend that is expected to continue. Downtown will continue to be a destination for visitors, encouraging walkability, and serve as an asset for community events. ■ Industrial and Heavy Commercial uses should not be permitted Downtown. ■ Downtown is intended for a mixture of non-residential and residential land uses. ■ Easy walking access to shopping and dining is an ideal characteristic of Downtown. ■ The mix of uses can be both horizontal and vertical. ■ Future improvements could include enhanced connectivity and residential units such as townhouses, lofts, live -work, and condos. (pg. 59) Existing Infrastructure Water System Rehabilitation/Renewal: Water lines in the oldest part of Downtown have reached their design life and present increased maintenance demands and costs. The Downtown area was evaluated so rehabilitation and replacement efforts could be prioritized. (pg. 118) Economic Development The City of Lubbock does not have an Economic Development department; this role is filled by the Lubbock Economic Development Alliance (LEDA) and Market Lubbock Incorporated (MLI), whose missions are to stimulate the economy by growing high -paying jobs and investing in public improvements and improving the quality of life in the process. LEDA works directly with the business community throughout Texas and the United States to achieve this mission. LEDA and MLI have several economic development initiatives that are applicable to this Comprehensive Plan: ■ Workforce recruitment/retention through design, destinations, and amenities (LEDA) ■ Downtown streetscape improvements (MLI) ■ Downtown maintenance and building codes conducive to vertical mixed use (MLI) ■ Encourage Downtown business growth, activity and enhancement to destination attractions and amenities (MLI) (pg.134) 15 Community Livability: Downtown "While it was traditionally viewed as a Central Business District (CBD), there has been a paradigm shift more recently to introduce a broad range of land uses including residential and retail. This is an important and exciting change for Lubbock because Downtown Lubbock serves as a key connector between Texas Tech and the Canyon Lakes. Moreover, Downtown Lubbock is rich with opportunities including the Arts and Depot Districts, adjacent Overton neighborhoods, iconic architecture, existing infrastructure, and paved brick streets." Current Planning Efforts Downtown's vision and developments are shaped by several overlapping documents, including: • Downtown Revitalization Action Plan (2008) • Arts Lubbock Plan (2018) • CBD Zoning District and Downtown CBD Design Guidelines • Public Improvement Standards Incentives for Development Market Lubbock Incorporated (MLI) offers several incentives aimed at redeveloping Downtown Lubbock: • Downtown Grant Program: Reimbursements for building renovations and facade and streetscape improvements • City of Lubbock and Lubbock County tax abatements Key Conditions Strengths • Utilities • Building inventory • Proximity to TTU and neighborhoods • Location of City offices (i.e., Citizens Tower) Weaknesses • 1-27 as barrier • Energy/activity focused in other areas • Identity • Low amount of housing • Not bike/ped-friendly • Lack of greenspace or plazas 16 Opportunities • Update and streamline plans and regulations • Link to adjacent areas • Support redevelopment • Strengthen identity Challenges • Market demand • Building schematics • Parking availability • Multiple regulatory documents • Outdated/unimplementable plans (pg. 154) Planning Trend - Revitalizing Downtowns Through Innovation "Innovation districts are an emerging trend in planning and community development. Coined by the Brookings Institution, a think tank that has come to specialize in the topic, innovation districts are described as "a place where leading -edge institutions and companies cluster and connect with start-ups, business incubators and accelerators." Brookings goes on to say that the purpose of these districts is to "Spur productive, inclusive, and sustainable economic development by helping companies, entrepreneurs, universities, researchers and investors — across sectors and disciplines —co -invent and co -produce new discoveries for the market." The foundation of an innovation district includes three types of assets, all of which Lubbock has - economic, physical, and networking." Economic: • Firms, institutions and organizations that drive, cultivate or support an innovation -rich environment • Research, medical, and tech institutions/firms/start-ups; creative fields • Incubators, accelerators, shared working spaces and local high schools, job training firms and community colleges • Amenities: medical offices, grocery stores, restaurants, coffee bars, small hotels, local retail Physical: • Public: Designed to be digitally accessible and to encourage networking • Private: Shared work and lab spaces; smaller, affordable areas for start-ups • Micro -housing with smaller apartments that have access to larger public spaces • Removing barriers and replacing them with connectivity and open spaces • Infrastructure investments 17 • Broadband, transit, road improvements, streetscaping, parking Networking: • Workshops and training sessions for specific fields • Industry -specific conferences • Networking events • Summer camps • Choreographed open spaces (pg. 155) Community Livability Recommendations: Conduct a Diagnostic Assessment of Existing Plans and Regulations Conduct diagnostic assessment of existing plans and regulations (i.e., Downtown Action Plan) to identify elements that are applicable or missing elements; consolidate all Downtown planning efforts and policies into one document; and focus on providing stronger analyses and implementation strategies. A comprehensive Downtown strategy should: • Identify the boundary of Downtown and consistently use this boundary for implementation strategies, such as overlay and financing districts. • Update the design standards so that they reflect the needs, conditions, and vision of Downtown as well as to remove existing conflicts. This should include both buildings and the streetscape (landscaping, facades, and screening/buffering, etc.). • Address redevelopment and nonconforming uses with a focus on the highest and best uses to make Downtown a hub for activity; this will also need to include engineering studies of existing building schematics. Land use studies of Downtown should also consider development of urban housing options and should be considered in conjunction with the recommendation to consider an innovation district. • Develop a program to identify and prioritize key parcels and help promote larger -scaled development in key areas of Downtown, including possible funding sources. • Strengthen identity through branding, streetscape enhancements, greenspace, and events; consider ways to enhance the physical connections to adjacent areas while solidifying Downtown as a unique area. This should include prioritizing the bicyclist and pedestrian experience, including safety, connectivity, and desirability. • Review and revise existing parking regulations. If necessary, conduct a parking study to identify different parking options available to the City and the feasibility of each. • Identify, prioritize, and pursue projects that can be funded through grants and public/private partnerships. (pg. 162) 18 Review Plans Upon Further Adoption Upon adoption of any future Downtown or special district plan, the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and other pertinent documents should be reviewed to ensure that they are aligned. Inconsistencies should be removed, and the goals and objectives updated. Attract Destination Amenities to Downtown Continue to attract destination amenities to Downtown Lubbock. Consider internal relocation incentives and encourage locally owned boutique retailers, restaurants, entertainment, and hotels to relocate to Downtown. (pg. 163) Consider an Innovation District Study the concept of an innovation district and consider launching one or incorporating key elements. • Conduct a market study to identify the industry or industries that could support an innovation district in Lubbock (i.e., tech, healthcare, agriculture, or design). • Identify resources within the community that could anchor an innovation district, such as Texas Tech/TTUHSC or major industry employers. • Form an exploratory committee composed of City leadership, educational institutions, industry employers, developers, and community organizers to consider where an innovation district would be the most successful and beneficial to the community. • Identify the initial boundary and create an overlay or special district in the Zoning Ordinance that will permit the necessary development, redevelopment, and use of buildings as well as the use of open space. Determine the desirable balance of land uses in the district and consider the use of a quota system to protect that balance. • Prioritize aesthetic and public improvements in this area and consider the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) or a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) to enhance the streetscape, accommodate multimodal accessibility, create gathering spaces, and implement branding. • Develop a program to identify and prioritize key parcels and help promote larger -scale development in Downtown. • Identify and recruit business incubators and accelerators. Identify buildings that are ideal for flexible workspaces, workshops/studios, and live -work communities. (pg. 164) 19 Implementation Matrix (Selections that are relevant to Downtown) (pg.222) Goal Recommendation Responsible Entity $ Timeline E. Continue 12. Evaluate downtown economic streetscape requirements. LEDA and Cit Priority development Remove present conflicts to Council $ 1-2 initiatives with minor encourage vertical mixed -use. years changes. G. Encourage 19. Develop branding and placemaking in and streetscape enhancements. City Council, around Texas Tech 20. Support existing corridor Planning 2-5 University, plans and the development of Department, and $ years downtown, and the new plans. Schedule more Engineering Canyon Lakes areas. public events downtown. Department J. Continue to 29. Streamline and remove enhance development requirements and LEDA and Planning 5-10 downtown. inconsistencies. Department $ years 30. Prepare a diagnostic report/assessment of needed tasks. Recommended Plan Priories (Selected) "Although all recommendations made throughout the Comprehensive Plan are important to the vision of Lubbock, some should be initiated as soon as possible. The following are deemed the most important policies/actions within this plan" (pg. 225) • Revise the zoning, subdivision, and other related land development ordinances into a Unified Development Code (UDC) to match the planning and engineering goals of the Plan to an implementation mechanism. • The Texas Tech University, Broadway, Downtown, and Canyon Lakes areas are some of the most important corridors within Lubbock. The City should formally adopt the Cultural Arts District Corridor concept and extend it to the Canyon Lakes area. The proposed district should be enlarged to include other key destinations and Texas Tech University buildings. • Downtown needs a clean approach to public and private improvements. It will be important to revisit these existing requirements to remove inconsistencies, prepare a new Capital Improvements Plan, and encourage reinvestment in downtown. 20 Observations Relative to 2019 Downtown Master Plan Update: 1. The Lubbock Plan 2040 is by its nature comprehensive in nature and visionary for the long term. There is some mention and focus of the role of Downtown but as we heard from some stakeholders in the Downtown Master Plan Update, Downtown itself does not hold as large of a role in the mind and heart of the average Lubbock Citizen as it probably could. 2. Predictably given the nature of this plan much of the focus is on the amount of growth that will be absorbed in as of yet undeveloped or un-annexed areas on the outskirts of town. Presumably those areas will be the location of a substantial amount of the growth, but the Downtown Master Plan Update may serve to shift some of that narrative to capturing significant growth in redevelopment areas already served by infrastructure and utilities - in this case downtown. 3. In addition, there is significant focus on economic development. It is stated in the economic development chapter that "There are two kinds of economic development tools: incentives and reimbursements" (pg. 135) While this is true in a certain sense it would be helpful to broaden this viewpoint through work in the Master Plan Update that an understanding is built that having a successful, vibrant, creative downtown that captures the dollars and imagination of Lubbock is a powerful economic development tool in itself. This is true both for local business growth and retention but also, maybe even more so, for business recruitment, being able to point towards the active "Hub" within "Hub Ci D CD m Q o m rn CORE IDEAS: FUTURE LAND USE POLICIES CPAC Input on Focus Areas for the Plan' (June 2017) I Y r -- -1r -- I L- - - - — - - - L _ u J I � L J I I 1 \ r I \ L i \ 1;' .I l � i I LEGEND r --• City Limits J Growth Management r' Major Corridors - J Downtown • Special Districts I Connectivity with I ■ Local Universities �i Vibrant Neighborhoods ■ I -_ Parks and Recreation Greenprint f Canyon Lakes I I J Gateways and Identity 1 1 Eastern and Northern Lubbock Initiatives POTENTIAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 1. Medical 2. Museums 3.Overton 4. Cultural District 5. Depot District 6. Business Park 7. Arboretum 8. South Plains Mall 21 zz Design Standards for the CBD, 1999 Study Area: Downtown — CB Zoned Areas Design Standards for the Central Business District Scope: "This document presents design standards for four historically significant areas of downtown Lubbock. The standards are not meant to dictate solutions, but rather to provide a common basis for making decisions about design that may affect individual properties and the overall character of these distinctive areas. They are designed to provide a consistent yet flexible approach for the preparation and review of development and redevelopment plans by defining a range of appropriate responses to a variety of specific design issues." (pg. 5) Planning Team: Consultant lead — J.D. Wilson & Associates; Guidance and Implementation - -. Lubbock Urban Design and Historic Preservation Commission. ,. Relevant Excerpts: Intent of Design Standards: • Protect and enhance the sense of time and place conveyed by the historic downtown area by preserving and enhancing its architectural integrity and identity, • Preserve, enhance and reuse significant existing architectural assets in downtown Lubbock, • Encourage new construction that is compatible in design, materials, color and texture with existing historic structures, • Minimize negative impacts on adjacent properties from incompatible development, thus City of Lubbock, Texas protecting property values and investments, and June 1999 • Convey a sense of human scale that will encourage pedestrian activity. (pg. 5) Applicability of Design Standards: The design standards are incorporated by reference in the zoning code and are applicable to exterior modifications on when a construction permit is required. "The standards address all exterior construction changes in the CB zoning districts. All buildings, structures, objects and sites must go through the design review process outlined in the Zoning Ordinance for that district before any alteration may be made to the building, structure, object, or site. The review process only applies to exterior additions, renovations, and new construction." (pg.6) 23 "It is important to note that neither the standards in this document nor the Zoning Ordinance requires property owners or tenants to initiate repairs or modifications to existing developments; and there is no deadline by which properties must come into "compliance." The Design Standards are meant to be used when a construction project is initiated by a property owner or tenant, either to alter the exterior of an existing structure or to construct a new one. Though the standards are intended as a guide for any development or renovation project, enforcement by the city will be initiated when a construction permit is required." (pg. 6) There is some accommodation of flexibility built into the standards. "If the Senior Planner determines that a proposal contains "unique circumstances which cannot be accommodated" by the standards of a zoning district or the Design Standards for the Central Business District, the plans will be referred to the Urban Design and Historic Preservation Commission (UDHPC). The Commission shall use the CB zoning ordinances and the Design Standards to make recommendations. Upon recommendation by the Commission, the Senior Planner may vary the requirements of the Design Standards so long as the requirements of Section 29-19 of the Zoning Ordinance, the CB zoning districts, are not altered. Variances from the requirements of Section 29-19, even if recommended by the UDHPC, must be approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustment." (pg. 6) Design Standards Per Zoning District: CB-1 West Broadway Character Summary - "West Broadway is historically a residential area, and many formerly residential buildings have been converted to other land uses over the last 50 years. The residential development pattern and building style provides the district with a distinctive character. New buildings and exterior renovations should apply the form and materials common in the original residential neighborhood." (pg. 7) CB- 2 Downtown Character Summary - "Downtown Lubbock has always been a business and government district containing a broad variety of types and styles of development and will continue largely as an office district. The key objective is compatibility of new construction with adjacent buildings and the district's historic development." (pg. 13) 24 Key Takeaways: Parking Location - Not on street, in front; adjacent to the alley at the rear, or on another property (pg. 13) Parking Areas - plantings, trees, and lighting in lots; No new curb cuts on Broadway (pg. 16) Licenses may be granted for pedestrian streetlights, projecting wall signs, canopies/ awnings, outdoor dining and planters (pg. 18) CB-3 General CBD Character Summary - "The General CBD (CB-3) District is located south of the Downtown (CB-2) District. This historically residential area has changed considerably over the years —evolving into commercial, industrial, residential, and civic structures. Although the area is diverse in character, new buildings in this District should respect their surroundings by being visually and physically compatible with their neighbors— particularly those that are historic structures. The guidelines for the CB-3 District respect that diversity by giving building owners, developers and architects more freedom in design than other Downtown districts while trying to maintain the ambiance of this historic area of the city." (pg. 19) Key Takeaways: • Similar requirements to parking location, screening and landscaping as CB-2 CB-4 Depot District Character Summary - "The CB-4 zoning district, which contains a variety of land uses, comprises the southeast portion of the downtown area. Included within its boundary is the Depot District, an entertainment venue enjoying considerable success with the opening of several restaurants, nightclubs, commercial businesses, and the reopening of the Cactus Theater. The most significant structure in this area is the Ft. Worth and Denver South Plains Railroad Depot, now known as the Buddy Holly Center. Although this district is diverse in character, new buildings in CB-4 should respect their surroundings by being visually and physically compatible with their mostly small industrial and commercial neighbors, particularly if they are potentially significant structures. The guidelines for CB-4 are intended to promote that diversity by giving building owners, developers and architects freedom in design, while trying to maintain the ambiance of this historic area of the city." (pg. 25) Key Takeaways: • Similar requirements to parking location, screening and landscaping as CB-2 25 Community Goals Relating to Urban Design In order to show continuity between plans its worth reviewing a reference in the Design Standards to goals in a previous plan — "Lubbock: A Vision into the 21st Century, adopted by the Lubbock City Council in 1995" • Ensure a high -quality visual image and compatible land uses for Lubbock through developmental standards and codes enforcement. (Land Use and Urban Design, Goal 1) • Ensure quality urban design. (Land Use and Urban Design, Goal 3) • Promote the preservation and revitalization of older buildings, neighborhoods and commercial areas and the development of vacant land within the current city limits. (Land Use and Urban Design, Goal 4) • Establish a positive identity for downtown Lubbock, including the Central Business District, Broadway Corridor and the Depot District, as the civic, cultural, entertainment, governmental and financial center of the City. (Land Use and Urban Design, Goal 5) • Enhance the visual and architectural character of unique areas of downtown Lubbock by preparing architectural and landscape design standards that address restoration, renovation, new construction, traffic circulation and pedestrian scale streetscape for each specific area. (Land Use and Urban Design, Objective 5.2) • Recognize, preserve and protect Lubbock's heritage and historic resources. (Land Use and Urban Design, Goal 7) • Revitalize Downtown Lubbock as a focal point for entertainment, arts and business. (Recreation, Parks, Entertainment, Cultural Affairs, Goal 1) • Position the visual and performing arts as a vital part of Lubbock's quality of life, to establish the City as a regional center for the arts. (Recreation, Parks, Entertainment, Cultural Affairs, Goal 6) (pg. 33) Standards for the Repair and Replacement of Building Materials and Features The Design Standards includes a section with detailed instructions from the Secretary of the Interior on the repair and replacement under a variety of scenarios. It is worth reviewing these standards for compatibility with any detailed zoning update or design recommendations. "When existing buildings are being altered, added to, or repaired, the standards set out in this section should be considered. They include standards established by the Secretary of the Interior for repair and replacement of historic building materials and features but are applicable to most renovation projects. The word historic, when used in this context, does not mean that a building has been listed on the National Register of Historic Places or designated as a Lubbock Historic Landmark. Instead, it refers to the place of a building in history as a product of the time at which it was built." (pg. 35) 26 Observations Relative to 2019 Downtown Master Plan Update: 1. The UDC code rewrite that is underway today provides the opportunity, using some level of form -based codes in the Downtown, to be more detailed on preferred building placement. The existing design standards talk about compatibility with existing buildings and creating a street wall but in many cases where new construction is being built on vacant lots there needs to be more detail provided on where the best building placement is for facilitating a walkable downtown. Much of the 1999 Design Standards should be incorporated into the updated UDC, specifically though the Downtown Form Based Code. This simplified "one -stop" should make application of standards easier. 2. There don't appear to be any design standards tailored for the CBD 5 and CBD 6 Areas that were added later for the Civic Center Area and Arts District Area respectively. This also can be evaluated as part of the UDC rewrite. 3. Much of the content of the Design Standards, although adopted by ordinance, are recommended standards. This approach can be confusing and not helpful. The recommendation would be to either only include required standards or create incentives for recommended standards so they can be made mandatory. 4. There needs to be a distinction between standards for new construction and additions/ renovation to historic buildings. It does a disservice to both with standards are conflated. It may water -down standards for the historic buildings and make development unnecessarily complicated for new construction. Downtown Lubbock isn't any one architectural style so new construction buildings shouldn't be held to the same standards as the historic context, as long as the appropriate urban design standards are enforced. This is especially applicable to building materials and methods of construction. 5. In addition, the 2008 Downtown Revitalization Action Plan includes the following detailed recommendations on updates to the Design Standards that are worth highlighting again as part of this Master Plan Update. "The Design Standards for the Central Business District, incorporated by reference as part of the Zoning Code, prescribe more specific requirements for new development in the CB districts. Neither the Design Standards nor the Zoning Code require existing structures to be brought into compliance with these updated regulations. There are a small number of issues in the Design Standards which could be clarified to make a more complete document: - Rooftop Equipment: Rooftop equipment must be screened, but the document does not specify screened from where — from pedestrian view, or from view in an adjacent structure. - Materials: The document identifies stucco as an allowed material, but does not specify whether synthetic stucco, also known as EIFS (Exterior Insulating and Finish Systems), is also permitted. If EIFS is permitted, it should not be allowed on the first floor of buildings, due to the material's fragile nature. - Dark Skies: The document makes no reference to any requirements regarding partial or full cut-off lighting fixtures. The City may wish to assess its goals regarding lighting and consider including guidance in this area. - Parking Screening: The document discusses screening parking that is visible from the street with a low fence (this screening is required in CB-1 and CB-2 and suggested in CB-3 and CB-4). We would suggest that this fence be required in all districts, and that landscaping be 27 added to the requirement. The optimal condition would be a 2.5- to 3-foot fence set a minimum of 3 feet from the property line, with landscaping between the fence and the public sidewalk. - The City of Lubbock Sign Code contains standard and quantitative requirements for exterior signage. There are certain types of signage, such as projecting blade signs that could improve the scale and texture of downtown that are not allowed by the current code. City staff have told the Team that a draft Sign Code modification, which would expand permitted signage types, has been prepared and is under review. (Summaries of the Zoning Code, Design Standards and Sign Code can be found in Appendix D of the 2008 RAP) Downtown Public Improvement Design Standards, 2018 Study Area: Downtown — Public Improvement Standards Boundary Downtown Public Scope: These standards came out of the 2008 CBD Action Plan in order to provide more specific [mprovements technical guidance for a "coherent, unified design in the CBD." (pg. 3) This document is meant to Design be a second set of design standards to operate alongside the 1999 Design Standards, which Standards operate for areas in the CBD right-of-way. I City ofLubbock, Texas Relevant Excerpts: b ay,Zp18 Applicability. These Public Improvements Standards apply to any project in the CBD that: Approved by the City C.—ii I ,Lubbock • Affects the facade of the structure on or in which the project is planned; (Fagade includes walkways, parking area, landscape, building edge, building signage, or the exterior of any CDB building) • Requires a building permit; and • Is valued at one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or more. (pg.4) The intent is that improvements would be made on a case by case basis following private development (pg.4) Chapter 2: Design Concepts Historic Brick Pavers • 2006 City council decision to protect pavers. All repairs and maintenance must be done to prescribed city standards. (pg.6) • Map depicts UDHPC Recommendation for Historic Brick Streets (pg. 7) • SO% Paver requirement for sidewalks and crosswalks. Three patterns are recommended (pg. 8) 28 Specialty Vehicular and pedestrian lighting Specialty Vehicular and pedestrian lighting for all gateway and corridor streets indicated with specific light standards and spacing provided (pg. 11) Utilities General recommendation to relocate overhead public and private utilities in alleys into underground ducts per a 2011 council directive. (pg. 12) Street Furniture Benches, Trash Receptacles, Tree Grates and Bike Racks standards and spacing provided. (pg. 13-15) Chapter 3: Gateway and Corridor Streets Map showing the Gateway Streets (Avenue Q, 19th, Broadway, Buddy Holly, Mac Davis, Glenna Goodacre, and Avenue L) and the Corridor Streets (Avenue J, 15th, and 16th) (pg. 17) Chapter 4: Landscaping General and Streetscape Landscaping criteria (pg. 20-22) Street Tree Standards and Framework Plan (pg. 23-24) Observations Relative to 2019 Downtown Master Plan Update: 1. There is tremendous value in a harmonious and quality public realm in a downtown. That being said the expense of improving the space in front of a property as part of an overall development or redevelopment can often be a major impediment especially for small and mid -scale projects. A program should be explored to allow for a partial fee -in -lieu program or cost assistance paid for from TIF (or other funding), or deferral of improvements to allow for whole block face improvements vs. a piece meal approach, that can cause undue disruption for businesses and be less efficient from a cost and constructability standpoint. For example, a sliding scale could be applied based on what percentage a developer should pay for out of pocket based on the scale of development project. A block length of streetscape improvements is a much heavier burden for a 100,000 minor remodel than it would be for a multiple million -dollar new construction development. 2. The UDC rewrite should incorporate these standards in the code with provisions that allow for some greater flexibility. Mac Davis Ln lenna Goodacre Blvd �D Broadway -a 15th Street 15th Street 19th Street �a f ., n a = %r Gateway Features � Gateway Streets with Banners � Gateway Streets Corridor Streets ..� Avenue J 29 Figure 5: Gateway and Corridors 30 Imagine Lubbock Together Plan, 2013 Study Area: Lubbock City Limits Scope: "engage the community and develop a vision and strategic plan for the futures." (pg. 1) _ LLLbbock Tog Planning Team: Consultant lead — ACP Visioning + Planning with Dover Kohl & Partners; Guidance • •STR,4TFG1C — Imagine Lubbock Together steering committee VISION & ■LA ■7i Relevant Excerpts: Major Themes (pg.4) Mu,m P"4iup �-- • Imagine Lubbock Together calls for cooperation among local governments, institutions, «�ReLm businesses, and the community • Imagine Lubbock Together advocates making the city a regional center for the arts, entertainment, and shopping. • Imagine Lubbock Together champions development and redevelopment that creates beautiful places • Imagine Lubbock Together demands a revitalized, prosperous, and attractive downtown. • Imagine Lubbock Together establishes the notion that the city is a fundamental economic entity. Goals (pg.5) • The Partnership category includes the following four goals: Water, Community Spirit, Natural Resources, and Government. • The People category includes the following four goals: Education, Safety, Social Equity, and Health. • The Place category includes the following five goals: Downtown, Development Patterns, Roads and Transit, Beautification, and Biking and Walking. (Downtown was selected as the highest priority goal, with a 44% response from participants) Downtown - A revitalized downtown, connected to Texas Tech University, attracts residents, visitors, students and businesses with attractive buildings, housing, vibrant shops, markets, restaurants, and cultural facilities and events. • The Play category includes the following three goals: Attraction and Events, Parks and Recreation, and Arts and Culture. 31 • The Prosperity category includes the following four goals: Economic Development, Jobs and Workforce, Marketing and Image, and Shopping, Restaurants, and Nightlife. What If: A Vision of Place — Design Charrette for Downtown. (pg. 10) "Downtown Lubbock has the advantage of a very complete and well-connected historic street grid. This strong underlying structure will facilitate gradual infill of individual parcels over time as the Downtown increases in vibrancy. Today, Downtown Lubbock has a very large inventory of vacant and underutilized parcels. Cues for the architectural and urban grammar that might be used as these parcels are infilled can be taken from the fragments of excellent urban fabric that exist. The priority for infill should be to create complete places. Investment energy should be focused on one street segment, one block at a time. Once the first segment is transformed, it can form a seed from which additional improvements can grow over time." Downtown Charrette Design concepts (pg. 11-19) 3. Process Through Public Engagement Process - "This chapter describes the public engagement process implemented to create the Imagine Lubbock Together vision. It included four steps: Understanding the City, Generating Ideas from the Public, Writing and Prioritizing Goals, and the Lubbock Design Charrette." (pg. 21) 4. Strategic Implementation Plan "Implementation of Imagine Lubbock Together will require a tremendous amount of collaboration and cooperation among institutions, government, and business. It will require champions and stewards. It will require focus and tenacity. It will require steady community pressure. (pg. 27) Implementation for Downtown - Revitalize the core of downtown. "A thriving downtown is a sign of a healthy community. Having an economically healthy, culturally vibrant downtown offers benefits such as providing activities for younger people... providing opportunities for entrepreneurship and retaining college graduates and other young professionals." (pg. 43) Step 1: Create an independent entity to coordinate and drive downtown development. There is an enormous need for an entity to coordinate and drive downtown development. Without a skilled organization actively driving the downtown development process, downtown Lubbock simply will not become the healthy economic engine and the vibrant cultural hub the city envisioned during Imagine Lubbock Together. The entity should have strong support from 32 both public and private sectors and from a broad range of stakeholders throughout the district and the community. (pg. 43) • SUB -STEP: Build in a strategy to make the entity fiscally self-sustaining (other than for capital improvements and special projects) after five years. Step 2: Implement the charrette's recommendations on physical redevelopment and on business development. (pg. 45) • SUB -STEP: Focus primary attention on Broadway and Avenue J. The area immediately surrounding the intersection of Broadway and Avenue J was downtown's historic 100% commercial center. • SUB -STEP: Expand and grow the Cultural Arts District. Impetus for the growth and expansion of the Cultural Arts District will initially come from the building of a new Performing Arts Center in the district. • SUB -STEP: Expand and grow the Depot Entertainment District. • SUB -STEP: Renovate the Lubbock Memorial Civic Center. • SUB -STEP: Actively develop downtown housing. • SUB -STEP: Develop and grow entertainment venues and opportunities by supporting festivals and arts and entertainment districts. The process of the rediscovery of downtown will require re -imagining it. It will require changing the mind -set of residents and visitors. Step 3: Strengthen downtown's retail and restaurant base. (pg. 47) With more than 6,000 people working within one-half mile of the intersection of Broadway and Avenue J, downtown Lubbock already has a very strong potential market of downtown shoppers. • SUB -STEP: Tap into strong potential downtown retail, office, and residential markets. Who (Responsible Entities for Implementation) (pg. 47) Imagine Lubbock Together recommends that the Lubbock Chamber of Commerce create an independent entity to coordinate downtown development in conjunction with the downtown master developer and planner, Lubbock Downtown Development, Corp. (LDDC), and the Downtown Tax Increment Finance (TIF) committee. To jump-start Implementation, the independent entity should: • Develop a solid strategic plan for its first 3-5 years of operation. • Convene downtown interests and review the vision and charrette recommendations. • Raise operational funds. • Solicit and encourage development and activities in the focus area following the steps and sub -steps included in this chapter. 33 Downtown: The Playbook The Downtown Playbook is an addendum to the description of steps and sub -steps found in the downtown section of this chapter. The Playbook focuses on the sub -steps. For each it outlines several ideas and doable implementation tasks and provides suggestions, guidance, examples, and references. (pg. 58-68) S. Implementation Matrix Imagine Lubbock Together will "outsource" implementation to the community. Doing so will entail handholding, coordination, communication, and management of tasks to ensure that implementation happens and is sustained over time. (pg. 83) Observations Relative to 2019 Downtown Master Plan Update: 1. This plan in another example of great aspirational planning work built on extensive public engagement and input that failed to have lasting traction. It does seem that many of the high-level concepts and goals were carried over to the 2019 Comprehensive Plan but many of the detailed recommendations, especially relevant to downtown were not followed through. Imagine Lubbock Together does have a detailed implementation matrix with responsible parties. Many of these recommendations should continue to live on. With a central guiding entity taking responsibility for implementation. This is reinforced through step one of the downtown implementation plan which is "Create an independent entity to coordinate and drive downtown development." 2. There was follow though and success on many of the Arts and Culture Recommendations which proves things can happen when there is the proper focus and alignment (and funding) 3. The Downtown Playbook addendum is an excellent resource for idea and case studies demonstrating the ideas to implement the sub -steps. Image: Implementation Matrix for Downtown Revitalize the core of downtown. STEPS STEP l: Create an independent entity to coordinate and drive downtown development. STEP 2: Implement the charrette's recommendations on physical redevelopment and on business development. SUB -STEPS • Build in a strategy to make the entity fiscally self- sustaining (other than for capital improvements and special projects) after five years. WHO SHOULD LEAD The Downtown Independent Entity convened by Imagine LubbockTogether and hosted by the Lubbock Chamber of Commerce • Focus on downtown: The Downtown Independent Broadway and Avenue J. Entity • Expand and grow the Cultural Arts District. • Expand and grow the Depot Entertainment District. • Renovate the Lubbock Memorial Civic Center. • Actively develop downtown housing. • Divert the Canyon Lakes water for water features throughout downtown and Canyon Lakes areas. • Develop and grow entertainment venues and opportunities by supporting festivals and arts and entertainment districts. • Tap into a strong potential downtown retail, office, and residential markets. WHAT OTHER ORGANIZATIONS SHOULD BE INVOLVED? Lubbock Downtown Development Corporation, Downtown TIF Board, Lubbock Economic Development Alliance, City of Lubbock, master downtown developer/planner, property owners, not -for - profits and other downtown stakeholders Lubbock Downtown Development Corporation, Downtown TIF Board, Lubbock Economic Development Alliance, City of Lubbock, master downtown developer/ planner, Texas Tech School of Architecture and Urban Design, Civic Lubbock MEASURING SUCCESS The Downtown Independent Entity is organized, funded, and staffed. Long term funding is achieved. The Downtown Independent Entity, working with the city, developers and realtors should identify indicators of success and benchmarks in areas such as: • Ground breakings and open houses for new development or redevelopment projects • Media coverage • Tax base increase • Number of historic or damaged structures renovated • Jobs created TIME -FRAME Immediate 3 to 5 years Ongoing Immediate Ongoing 34 35 AIA SDAT Report: Lubbock, TX Creating a Vibrant Downtown, 2018 Study Area: Downtown with a primary focus on the LHUCA Area. Lubbock,TX:Creating aVibrant Downtown i Scope: "...the downtown is not the bustling, busy and vibrant heart of the community that one would expect given all these assets and positive indicators. The feedback the community provided gar to the SDAT team during our listening sessions and in the public town hall meeting helped us understand some of the reasons. That information helped our team draw on our experience in communities not unlike Lubbock that have transformed their downtowns, and gave us a foundation for Lubbock -appropriate recommendations and strategies for moving Lubbock toward the = downtown that the community visualizes" (pg. 3) Lubbock, TX SDAT Report Planning Team: AIA Sustainable Design Assessment Team (SDAT) Relevant Excerpts: What We Heard- "We heard from community leaders and stakeholders in a series of listening sessions, in tours of the community, and then from the public in a town hall -style meeting at LHUCA's Firehouse Theatre." (pg. 4) The Plan (Key Points) • Strategic Prioritizing "...with the large network of streets in your downtown, you, like most communities, should not attempt to enhance every street at the onset of this strategy to connect your Districts. You must prioritize and focus your resources. This study recommends that you start with improvements along Avenue J between the Arts District and the Broadway Commercial District and along Texas and Buddy Holly Avenues between the Broadway Commercial District and the Depot District. Illustrations of suggested streetscape improvements can be found on page 25 of this report." (pg. 7) • Vibrant Peopled Districts "As we looked at each of the Districts, and the prioritized connections between them, we saw opportunities for creating anchoring public amenities/parks that could become the front yard for destination activities, for new residential development, and for supporting retail/commercial and eateries. These places can host events, that can provide opportunities to play, that can soften downtown and that can give people a pot to come together as community." (pg. 10) 36 • Leveraging Buddy Holly Hall "Lubbock's public/private investment in the new Buddy Holly Hall is an important catalyst that is intended — with its location — to trigger interest in private development in the downtown .... To do this, the area around the BHH needs to become denser and more urban, more mixed in use. This proposal suggests a new "central park" at the center of this new area of mixed -use development. This public park can provide an appropriate front door worthy of the Hall. It can also provide a gathering and celebratory space; a space for educational programming of the Hall." (pg. 11) • Broadway Commercial District "Broadway is one of Lubbock's primary "addresses" as home to numerous legacy religious campuses and as the formal link between Texas Tech and the downtown. An area we are calling the Broadway Commercial District is evolving as a place where there is a concentration of significant private re -investment and small-scale entrepreneurial ventures. The decision to relocate city hall into this center of downtown with the renovation of the old Citizen's tower is an important reinforcement of this momentum and critical mass." (pg.18) • Depot District "Connecting the Depot District to the Broadway Commercial District is illustrated on two north/south corridors: Texas Avenue and Buddy Holly Avenue. The distances here are not far but the lack of a pedestrian oriented route with user-friendly street amenities like plantings, lighting, benches and way -finding makes the walk seem unappealing." (pg. 23) • Enhanced Pedestrian Street Recommendations (pg. 25-31) • Enhanced Gateways (pg. 32-33) Implementation — Systems The vision the community described to the team can only be realized if Lubbock considers changing many of its systems, relationships, and strategies. 1. Building planning and economic development capacity in City Hall. (pg.43) • Enlist more development and design staffing and expertise in City Hall... investing in more development and design staff and consultants is not a drain on the treasury; it will be a good investment with a favorable cost -benefit ratio. In the current environment, more staff and consulting help would mean that more projects would be produced more expeditiously. More projects produced sooner would mean more jobs and tax revenues for the City. • Discontinue or seriously revise the city's "master developer" agreement. Several years ago, may have been the right time for "insiders" to control Downtown. Today 37 is the time to encourage a diversity of developers and development types that reflect the range of citizenry in the Lubbock community. • Develop more aggressive public -sector financial incentives to support Downtown development. The City has taken a conservative approach to financial incentives for development. Such an approach can produce a couple of good projects at a time, but it can't produce the Downtown that you envision. 2. City -Texas Tech relationship. (pg.43) Texas Tech is one of America's great universities, but, other than the Urban Tech program, the university doesn't "play ball" in Downtown. 3. Forming a special district for Downtown Lubbock. (pg.44) To assist the public and private sectors in managing Downtown maintenance, security, marketing, and the like may require a professional organization that mediates between the public and private sectors, which is why the SDAT recommends that the City of Lubbock consider forming a special district to manage Downtown and at least partially fund Downtown improvements. • Develop and implement a public process to involve all stakeholders —City officials, property owners, business owners, merchants, restaurateurs, cultural institutions, and area residents —in creating a Downtown district. Our understanding is that a special district requires the assent of 50 percent of the property owners within the proposed district both by number and by property value. • Weigh the pros and cons of forming a more private -sector -oriented Municipal Management District with those of a more public -sector -oriented Public Improvement District. Discussing the merits of each with Downtown organizations in other Texas cities—e.g., Downtown Austin Alliance, Downtown Dallas Inc., Central Houston Inc., and Centro San Antonio —would be a worthwhile endeavor. • Consider creating a special district that addresses Downtown Lubbock's programmatic needs —maintenance, security, public -space management, marketing and communications, special events, parking and transportation services, homeless services, etc. —as well as Downtown's public project needs. Downtown Lubbock needs both better management and better infrastructure. Implementation- Economic Development 1. Expand alternative funding incentives and their uses to achieve downtown redevelopment goals. (pg. 46-48) 38 The City has used several creative financing sources and partnerships. Our experience in multiple cities including many in Texas, suggests the need to expand your portfolio in order to achieve a vibrant downtown with a durable mix of uses. Adding these tools to projects adds complexity but also increases the viability of desired projects that otherwise might be possible. • Tax Increment Financing (TIF). In Texas TIF can be used to help pay for open spaces, workforce and affordable housing, parking structures, mass transit capital improvements, facade improvement, adaptive re -use of buildings, in addition to more traditional infrastructure projects. • Public Improvement District (PID). PIDs, are geographic areas in which most property owners agree to be assessed in order to help achieve desired improvements. Most frequently they're used to help downtowns and business districts with infrastructure improvements such as streetscapes, street furnishing and lighting, as well as clean and safe programs. They can also, according to Texas statues, be used to assist in workforce development and affordable housing, among other eligible uses on a long list. • Tax Credits — Historic, New Markets, Affordable Housing. There are a variety of tax credits that should be aggressively pursued to help achieve a downtown mix of uses and building types that will bring more residents and businesses into the core area. • Opportunity Zones (OZs). OZs are a new financing instrument crafted by the current federal administration. They enable individuals and institutions to reinvest their capital gains from real estate, stock or other acceptable transactions, to be reinvested in economic development projects located within state designation OZs. • Economic Development and Workforce/Affordable Housing Bonds. Several cities around the country, including some in both Texas and Oklahoma, have issued General Obligation bonds to provide resources to help diversify/expand their economies and/or enable the creation of more workforce or affordable housing to serve area residents. • Parking Bonds. Various cities use funds they collect from meter revenue, parking fines and their parking garages (if they have these), to issue parking bonds. These bonds are paid off with monies from these sources and are used to construct strategically located parking garages that can help stimulate new development as well as redevelopment of existing buildings. • Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT). REITs offer a way for individuals and institutions to invest in various types of real estate without having to deal with construction and management issues. They are essentially a form of stock ownership in real estate. 39 • Philanthropy. Lubbock has a proven track record of philanthropic investments in the arts, educational facilities, parks and other important elements of its constitution. More and more cities are now seeing foundations, trusts and other philanthropic forms making investments in community building, affordable housing and workforce development. • Multi -family property tax exemption programs. Several states offer property tax relief for historic buildings, economic development projects and/or affordable housing. We understand that Texas offers a variety of exemptions for affordable and moderate -income housing. • Public Utility Seed Fund for affordable and workforce housing. 2. Enhance Transportation & Parking Alternatives. (pg.49) As Lubbock's downtown develops and densifies, it will require having in place more alternative transportation options and additional structured parking (which should be constructed in a convertible manner). 3. Embrace Equitable Economic Development. (pg.50) This will enable increases in job opportunities and business creation for current residents as well as help Lubbock attract new people and businesses so that the metro economy becomes more diverse and resilient, and the City, County and school districts realize a stronger tax base. Observations Relative to 2019 Downtown Master Plan Update: 1. The SDAT report contains public and stakeholder outreach that reinforces many of the same opportunities and threats that have been common though all the plans. 2. The plan contains a robust implementation section that has many short, mid and long term proposed actions. As like many of the prior planning efforts there is not an entity that is accountable for leading implementation so there is the risk that good ideas will die due to inaction. 3. As this is the most recent planning efforts some of the implementation recommendations are particularly relevant, especially related to the systems and financing recommendations. 40 Concept/ Connectivity Diagram 41 Illustrative Plan Marsha Sharp 7 -� UT heW - J l/ �dr - JQ �t El l � _ c�iyha�l U P ,� ❑ EIE h p 19� © civic/Public. � Mixed -use oPPar{-unitiey d IL� P.O. Street corri�oYs - Pedes}rign frizndly I��' L l Public (>reeh�{'gr� ❑ ❑Q Yzfnij heW Q p retalil eximml L� 1CSldetl}ial-heW O Yes�entinl-eXistinJr ti7 ■ WihdMill t ❑^ U C' 001 1 42 Vibrant Peopled Districts D Mat Dane � �roodway 14- - --1 maedtAs d Orr*+-n1 fic', p ,ve zoAes p�lw bveu7/pork � >- �j s j � pr,ority wnne�tvty � � o G � 4 oeNgrh W = In Q '9eside�hal/`+vid A. ARTS DISTRICT B. BROADWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT C. DEPOT DISTRICT Downtown Street Plan Overlay GATEWAY FROM NORTHERN GATEWAY MARSHA SHARP FREEWAY GATEWAY FROM GUADALUPE NEIGHBORHOOD/BARRIO - - DISTRICT STRUCTURE — RARKMUBDCSRACE MARSHA SHARP FREEWAY O - DOWNTOWN GATEWAY O CULTURAL O DISTRICT - ENHANCED DOWNTOWN 5 r _ MAC -is _ O GATEWAYFROM NORRTHHORTON-GLENNA GOODACRE O NEIGHBORHOOD 9 1o� GATEWAY RROADwAv FROM TTU O L 13 Is 1 I DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK GATEWAYS AND ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN STREETS N SOUTHERN o GATEWAY BROADWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT F-il O - CENTRALNORTH/SOUTH VEHICULAR GATEWAY FROM 19TH ST. O EASTERNGATEW-FROM CANYON LAKES AREA O GATEWAY FROM NBI-27 DEPOT DISTRICT I.1■ ,rp Ell c7 \ T Y GATEWAY FROM i y SB I-27 43 44 Lubbock Cultural District Recertification Study, 2017 Study Area: Lubbock Cultural District Lubbock Cultural District Scope: "The Lubbock Cultural District was recognized by the Texas Commission on the Arts in Recertification Study 2009... Lubbock has undoubtedly felt a positive impact from its Cultural District designation and wants to keep the designation through the recertification process. Both the qualitative and Mn- iin - ' A quantitative indicators point to successful growth and perception of the District and its benefit as a q p g p p catalyst for Lubbock. As a regional hub to many for education, healthcare, business and cultural activities, Lubbock is both rural in its geographic location and urban in its complexity and cultural offerings for such a wide area of the Texas panhandle and West Texas. The Lubbock Arts ;., Alliance and its many sponsors, donors and allies hope to continue to fulfill their mission to this region with the added designation of the Cultural District and its subsequent benefits for years to come." December2017 Planning Team: Consultant lead — Parkhill, Smith & Cooper Inc.; Funded by: The CH Foundation. Performed for: The Lubbock Arts Alliance Funded by, The CH Foundation Relevant Excerpts: piirkhill, Sinirh &Cooper Inc 1° C� zr,h,r 1,bhock, Tx T9n2a Part One: Future Objectives (selections) e°6473.22°° Objective 2: Wayfinding and visible District demarcation need to be provided. (pg. 13-15) Objective 3: Litter cleanup, receptacles and lighting need attention for the perception of a well - kept and well -lit District. (pg. 19) Objective 4: Parking needs to be quantified and identified for events. (pg. 22-23) Objective 7: Signature pieces of public art are needed at key gateways. Temporary public art is needed on rotation throughout the district to add to its identification and interest. (pg. 30) Objective 8: Identifiable and distinguishable crosswalks and accessible routes need to be included to reinforce the District identity and boundary and give priority to pedestrian accessibility versus cars. (pg. 31) Objective 9: Increasing foot traffic needs to be a priority through special events or awareness campaigns. (pg. 32) Observations Relative to 2019 Downtown Master Plan Update: 1. The executive summary, although talking specifically about the Cultural District does document many of the successes in downtown over the past decade. vi L c ro U 7 � k � 00Cf �!? N _6 00 U LL co LU o ' O N :•'• i[ fr OC Q d J Ll - U 00 r Lij venu`1 c �N :t a v mua v�k m A � 1�y} „3. �'+.' icy'{..v 11r`E4 ;,s.5�i . x.. f": �•. {V v U and I INNS (] O F+ cu 4- U- - _ r v a' sit -`- � 1.4 A LL Appendix Page:191 r � � G TOwnBUILDERS DES.GN . GOVS„ L-NG , DEVELOPMENT 26 October 2019 Samantha Schwarze Overland San Antonio, TX Re: Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update LIHTC Impact This memo serves to provide some background information on the Low -Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program generally and the Concerted Revitalization Plan (CRP) as it applies to Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA) applicants specifically. The applicability of this memo is an understanding of how the Downtown Lubbock Master Plan update can be a foundational document for a CRP application and improve the competitiveness for LIHTC financing for residential projects where there is significant need and opportunity in Downtown Lubbock. The content of this memo is certainly not comprehensive in nature but should assist in "connecting the dots" between the planning and coordination efforts underway in Downtown with the requirements that a LIHTC applicant would have to provide. This will enable the Master Plan Update document to include or be mindful of the requirements so that it can act as a ready resource for interested parties. Background Information The LIHTC program originated through Congressional authority in 1986. Designed to be a market - based, poverty -reducing strategy to increase the supply of affordable housing to households making no more than 30 percent of the area median income (AMI). The subsidies provided by tax credits allow for below -market rents for qualified tenants. Each year state Housing Finance Agencies (HFA) allocate designed credits through a competitive process based on a qualified allocation plan (QAP). Each state has a unique process that is guided by only vague standards in Section 42 of the IRS code. There is a requirement that applicants have a CRP to reduce poverty, but it leaves the interpretation of what a CRP should include to the individual states. The purpose of the CRP approach is that it provides an alternative path to pursuing LIHTC funding for residential development projects. This is a much more nuanced approach than just using the Opportunity Index as a qualifier and allows communities to build on existing and planned revitalization efforts. GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:193 G TOwnBUILDERS DES.GN . GOVS„ L-NG , DEVELOPMENT Texas Specific Standards The Texas CRP Application (included in Appendix A) has been modified in recent years to require more specific information from the applicants. Downtown Lubbock seems to meet many of the application requirements, as the application distinguishes between urban and rural sites and includes urban design standards more specific for urban sites. It allows for, what is called, "distinct areas" — this is not specifically defined but a downtown seems to be an idea "distinct area". In addition, the application asks for a narrative on how that distinct area was "once vital and lapsed into a condition requiring concerted revitalization". The application requires a maximum of two local planning documents to provide a foundation for the revitalization efforts. These plans must be specific to the area, i.e. city-wide comprehensive plans are not sufficient but a Downtown Master Plan for that distinct area would suffice. A TIRZ plan for the area would also qualify. The scoring favors areas that have quality urban design and have enough social resources. The CRP requires that problems in the area are clearly identified through a public participation process and be systematic and ongoing problems such as: • long-term disinvestment, such as significant presence of residential and/or commercial blight, streets infrastructure neglect, and/or sidewalks in significant disrepair; • declining quality of life for area residents, such as high levels of violent crime, property crime, gang activity, or other significant criminal matters such as the manufacture or distribution of illegal substances or overt illegal activities; • lack of a robust economy for that neighborhood area, or, if economic revitalization is already underway, lack of new affordable housing options for long-term residents. Many of these types of problems are prevalent in Downtown Lubbock. In addition, the CRP must provide for how the problems should be addressed and prioritized. The Plan should also include goals that "have a history of sufficient, documented and committed funding to accomplish its purposes on its established timetable. This funding must be flowing in accordance with the plan, such that the problems identified within the plan are currently being or have been sufficiently addressed." Effectiveness A valuable resource that discusses the relative effectiveness of CRP's in Texas and documents the changes to the LIHTC over the past several years is a report from Megan Randall, "Redefining Revitalization: An Analysis of Community Revitalization in Texas' Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program." This report provides an overview of the Treasury and HUD LIHTC program requirements generally and the effectiveness of the Texas Requirements and scoring system specifically. It summarizes that the state requirements are improving and producing better results and more impactful funding over time but there are still opportunities for improvement and clarification. GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:194 G TOwnBUILDERS Randall also provides insight through literature review on the factors that contribute to successful neighborhood revitalization. The report states "many factors contribute to successful neighborhood revitalization, and it is difficult to define a generalizable model across communities with different needs. One trend in the literature on revitalization, however, is clear: investment in subsidized housing alone is insufficient to transform a neighborhood, and comprehensive efforts are necessary to produce sustainable neighborhood change." (p. 8) The author reinforces that the evidence shows LITIC investment is not enough and that "community revitalization plan standards should contain elements beyond housing." (p. 8) The Downtown Lubbock Master Plan will be more comprehensive in nature and will provide the larger context for housing to be a piece of a reemerging downtown. The Author provides strategies that should be part of the larger revitalization context that include: • Institutional and service mechanisms (e.g. childcare and healthcare facilities, anchor institutions, grocery stores, schools and school quality, coordinated human and social service delivery) • Social interactive mechanisms (e.g. collective efficacy, social capital and networks, neighborhood organizing) • Environmental mechanisms (e.g. crime, safety, built environment, density, and walkability) • Geographical mechanisms (e.g. metro and city -level trends, marginalization, access to jobs, disinvestment in neighborhoods due to segregation and sprawl) • Residential mobility (e.g. household instability, churning movers, homelessness prevention) (p 8) Overtime the TDHCA has incorporated some of these types of items into their scoring criteria. Randall provides research showing that as the scoring criteria has been made more detailed the content of applications have increased in quality. "In 2013, TDHCA also newly required developers to submit the actual revitalization plan for TDHCA to review and established loose standards for plan content. This revision represented TDHCA's first step toward upholding the tenet of comprehensiveness in its revitalization plan standards." (p. 15) Scoring Criteria This section summarizes the scoring criteria and will highlight how a potential project in Downtown Lubbock could score in a general sense. The CRP Application has a somewhat complex multi -tiered scoring system. As can be seen by reading through the following criteria, the Downtown Lubbock Master Plan has the potential to be an integral piece of a successful CRP application. GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:195 G TOwnBUILDERS DES.GN . GONS„ L-NG , DEVELOPMENT CRP Application Scoring Criteria: • Applications will receive four (4) points for a letter from the appropriate local official providing documentation of measurable improvements within the revitalization area. • Applications may receive (2) points in addition to those above if the Development is explicitly identified in a resolution by the municipality or county as contributing more than any other to the concerted revitalization efforts of the municipality or county (as applicable). • Applications will receive (1) point if the development is in a location that would score at least 4 points under the following criteria. (Following each criteria, a conjecture, in parenthesis, is made on if a hypothetical project in Downtown Lubbock would qualify. Although this is just an estimate it indicates that likely a project in Downtown Lubbock would easily meet the 4- point threshold) o The Development Site is located on a route, with sidewalks for pedestrians, that is 1/2 mile or less from the entrance to a public park with a playground or from a multiuse hike -bike trail. The entirety of the sidewalk route must consist of smooth hard surfaces, curb ramps, and marked pedestrian crossings when traversing a street. (1 point) (Potentially can be met with proposed park improvements) o The Development Site is located on a route, with sidewalks for pedestrians, that is within a specified distance from the entrance of a public transportation stop or station with a route schedule that provides regular service to employment and basic services. The entirety of the sidewalk route must consist of smooth hard surfaces, curb ramps, and marked pedestrian crossings when traversing a street. Only one of the following may be selected. ■ The Development Site is 1/2 mile or less from the stop or station and the scheduled service is beyond 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., plus weekend service (both Saturday and Sunday). (1 point); or (Yes) ■ The Development Site is 1/2 mile or less from the stop or station and the scheduled service arrives every 15 minutes, on average, between 6 a.m. and 8 p.m., every day of the week. (2 points) (Not likely given the frequency of the existing Citibus system) o The Development Site is located within 1 mile of a full -service grocery store. (1 point) (Yes — The Walmart on Avenue Qwould likely qualify) o The Development Site is located within 1 mile of a pharmacy. (1 point) (Yes — The Walmart on Avenue Q would likely qualify) o The Development Site is located within 3 miles of a health -related facility, such as a full -service hospital, community health center, minor emergency center, emergency room or urgent care facility. Physician offices and physician specialty offices are not considered in this category. (1 point) (Yes — UMC Health) o The Development Site is within 2 miles of a center that is licensed by the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) specifically to provide a school -age program GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:196 G TOwnBUILOERSI or to provide a childcare program for infants, toddlers, and/or pre -kindergarten. The Application must include evidence from DFPS that the center meets the above requirements. (1 point) o The Development Site is in a census tract with a property crime rate of 26 per 1,000 persons or less as defined by neigh borhoodscout.com, or local law enforcement data sources. (1 point) (Further study would be needed to confirm existing crime rate) o The development Site is located within 1 mile of a public library. (1 point) (Yes- Mahon Public Library) o The Development Site is located within 5 miles of an accredited university or community college, as confirmed by the Texas Higher Education Coordination Board (THECB). (1 point) (Yes —Texas Tech and South Plains College) o Development Site is in a census tract where the percentage of adults age 25 and older with an Associate's Degree or higher is 27% or higher as tabulated by the most recent American Community Survey 5-year Estimate. (1 point) (Further study would be needed to confirm) o Development Site is within 1 mile of an indoor recreation facility available to the public. Examples include a gym, health club, a bowling alley, a theater, or a municipal or county community center. (1 point) (Potentially) o Development Site is within 1 mile of an outdoor, dedicated, and permanent recreation facility available to the public. Examples include swimming pools or splash pads, tennis courts, golf courses, softball fields, or basketball courts. (1 point) (Potentially) o Development Site is within 1 mile of community, civic or service organizations that provide regular and recurring substantive services, beyond exclusively congregational or member -affiliated activities, available to the entire community (this could include religious organizations or organizations like the Kiwanis or Rotary Club as long as they make services available without regard to affiliation or membership). (1 point) (Yes — many facilities and organizations operating in Downtown) o Development Site is in the current service area of Meals on Wheels or similar nonprofit service that provides regular visits and meals to individuals in their homes. (1 point) (Potentially) In addition to the criteria above points can be awarded based on a formula to measure poverty, in the census tract relative to the region. A CRP application also requires that a map be prepared that includes the proposed Development Site and location of and distance to the amenities in the criteria above. GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:197 G TQqBUILDERSI Case Study The City of Plano prepared a CRP that uses, in part, a downtown plan as a foundational document for the CRP. The CRP presents the required information in an easy to follow and strait forward manner. It demonstrates need by including data for household income of residents in area - % of households below AM and % of school children that qualify for free or reduced cost lunch through the Nation School Lunch Program. The plan also clearly presents relevant plan priorities, which include: • Preserving Neighborhoods through rehabilitation (restoration) and new construction of mixed income housing types. • Creating Pedestrian -Friendly Streets, which will assist in improved access to DART stations and hike and bike trails that help to improve the quality of life of residents. • Establishing More Variety of Uses that includes mixed housing options, public services and facilities, office, restaurant, retail, personal services, and general apparel and household goods stores. • Cultivating the Arts District for aspiring and current artists to display their art and for City of Plano public -art venues to be accessible to residents. (p. 3) Importantly, the plan also is clear on funding sources and amounts to meet the plan priorities. For example, it states funding comes from "a combination of local and federal funds, and fee waivers. The City's TIF District and NEZ will serve as the primary local funding mechanism for carrying out the bulk of the priorities in the Plan." (p. 3) Potential other sources of funds CDBG and HOME investment Partnership grant funds from HUD. Applicability for the Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update Lessons and applicability have been included throughout this memo but some specific items for consideration include the recommendation to create a robust implementation section that is a ready reference for a future CRP Application. Based on the scoring criteria, Downtown Lubbock is already competitive, and the recommendations and best practices presented in the Downtown Lubbock Master Plan update will only serve to strengthen the competitiveness. A Downtown management non-profit that acts as the coordinating authority for Downtown can be the advocate and speak for local downtown business and residents with a single strong voice and can help organization efforts when the time comes to prepare a CRP application. Downtown Lubbock has the opportunity to buck the trend of LIHTC projects occurring in "high - poverty, low -opportunity neighborhoods" and rather be built in the neighborhood that is shared by all of Lubbock and benefit from being at the center of both physical and social investments. GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:198 1M, lim TOwnBUILDERSI Please let us know if you have any further questions. We hope that this proves to be valuable in the discussion of housing delivery in Downtown and incorporation of some of this content into the Master Plan Update. Regards, Rob Parsons GH Townbuilders 512-565-2321 GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:199 GI 1 .1 ... .1 TOwnBUILDERS DESIGN + CONSULTING + DEVELOPMENT Works Cited: "Redefining Revitalization: An Analysis of Community Revitalization in Texas' Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program". Megan Randall, Graduate Student, Master of Public Affairs & Master of Science in Community and Regional Planning Department of Community and Regional Planning, The University of Texas at Austin School of Architecture. January 2016. http://soa.utexas.edu/sites/default/disk/Redefining%20Revitalization Randall 2016.pdf "Concerted Revitalization Plan - City of Plano, Texas". 2019. https://www.plano.gov/DocumentCenter/View/28854/City-of-Plano-Concerted-Revitalization-Plan?bidld= GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:200 G TOwnBUILDERS DES.GN . GOVS„ L-NG , DEVELOPMENT Appendix A: Concerted Revitalization Plan ("CRP") Application Packet (Applicable Urban Portion of Packet) NoUSING 4 �=�Qe Novo � � c a - w o a a Concerted Revitalization Plan ("CRP") Application Packet The purpose of the packet is to formalize the process by which Concerted Revitalization Plans ("CRP") are described and submitted pursuant to 10 TAC §11.9(d)(7) of the Qualified Allocation Plan ("QAP"). The CRP and all supporting documentation must be uploaded to the Department's ServU system along with this packet, as a separate document from the Application. Refer to the Multifamily Programs Procedures Manual posted at http:Ilwww.tdhca.state.tx.us/multi family lap ply-for-funds.htm for an explanation of the process to set-up a Serv-U Account if needed. Application # Development Name Development City Development County ❑ The Application claims no points under 10 TAC §11.9(c)(4) related to Opportunity Index. My Development Site is located in an area that is: ❑ Urban ❑ Rural (skip to page 4 of the packet) ❑ My Development Site is located in a distinct area known locally as (or named by the CRP as) that is larger than the assisted housing footprint. ❑ This packet includes a description of the area targeted for revitalization, including common attributes and problems, which can be found at (document name, page number(s), etc) ❑ This packet includes a description of how this area was once vital and how it has lapsed into a condition requiring concerted revitalization, which can be found at (document name, page number(s), etc.) GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:201 1M, lim TOwnBUILDERS DESIGN t CCNS, L-NG - �EVELCFMENT ❑ A CRP covering the area mentioned above has been developed and executed. The CRP consists of the following local planning document(s): ❑ The document(s) is included in its entirety. ❑ The document(s) can be found online at _ NOTE: Per the requirements of 10 TAC §11.9(d)(7)(A)(ii), a plan may consist of one or multiple, but complementary, local planning documents that together create a cohesive agenda for the plan's specific area. No more than two (2) local plans may be submitted for each proposed Development. A Consolidated Plan, One-year Action Plan or any other plan prepared to meet HUD requirements will not meet the requirements, unless evidence is presented that additional efforts have been undertaken to meet the requirements in the QAP. The concerted revitalization plan may be a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone ("TIRZ") or Tax Increment Finance ("TIF) or similar plan. A city- or county -wide comprehensive plan, by itself, does not equate to a concerted revitalization plan. GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:202 G TOwnBUILDERS DES.GN . GOVS„ L-NG , DEVELOPMENT The URBAN CRP meets the following criteria as required by 10 TAC &11.9(d) (7) (A).(iiiiRI- IV 1. The concerted revitalization plan, or each of the local planning documents that compose the plan, must have been adopted by the municipality or county in which the Development Site is located. ❑ This packet includes the resolution(s) adopting the plan or local planning documents that compose the plan; or ❑ This packet includes the resolution(s) of delegation and other evidence in the form of certifications by authorized persons confirming the adoption of the plan(s) and budget(s). The problems in the revitalization area must be identified through a process in which affected local residents had an opportunity to express their views on problems facing the area, and how those problems should be addressed and prioritized. A description of eligible problems for a CRP are found at 10 TAC § 11.9 (d) (7) (A) (iii) (I I) (a) through (c). ❑ A description of the process for public input on the problems in the plan can be found at (document name, page number(s), etc) ❑ A description of the problems identified by the process can be found at (document name, page number(s), etc) ❑ A description of how the process determined how the problems should be addressed and prioritized can be found at (document name, page number(s), etc) The goals of the adopted plan must have a history of sufficient, documented and committed funding to accomplish its purposes on its established timetable. This funding must be flowing in accordance with the plan, such that the problems identified within the plan are currently being or have been sufficiently addressed. ❑ A description of the goals of the plan can be found at (document name, page number(s), etc) ❑ A description of the plan's timetable can be found at (document name, page number(s), etc) ❑ A description of sufficient, documented and committed funding for the plan can be found at (document name, page number(s), etc) , which documents at least $ in funding for the plan. ❑ Evidence that the funding has been flowing to address the problems identified in the plan, or that the problems have been sufficiently addressed, can be found at (document name, page number(s), etc) 4. The plan must either be current at the time of Application and must officially continue for a minimum of three years thereafter OR the work to address the items in need of mitigation or rehabilitation has begun and, additionally, the Applicant must include confirmation from a public official who oversees the GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:203 1M, lim TOwnBUILDERSI plan that accomplishment of those objectives is on schedule and there are no budgetary or other obstacles to accomplishing the purposes of the plan. ❑ The plan is current at the time of Application, and the effective period for the plan is and can be found at (document name, page number(s), etc) ; or ❑ Evidence that the work to address problems in the plan has begun can be found at (document name, page number(s), etc) ; AND. ❑ Confirmation from a public official that accomplishment of those objectives is on schedule and there are no budgetary or other obstacles can be found at (document name, page number(s), etc) Provide any comments or additional information in the box below, if applicable. URBAN CRP Requested Scoring. Points may be selected under 1, 2, and 3 below for no more than a total of 7 points. 1. Applications will receive four (4) points for a letter from the appropriate local official providing documentation of measurable improvements within the revitalization area based on the targeted efforts outlined in the plan and in reference to the requirements of 10 TAC §11.9(d)(7)(A)(iii)(HV). The letter must also discuss how the improvements will lead to an appropriate area for the placement of housing. ❑ A letter from a public official is included in this packet (an adopted resolution may be submitted in place of a letter). 2. Applications may receive (2) points in addition to those above if the Development is explicitly identified in a resolution by the municipality or county as contributing more than any other to the concerted revitalization efforts of the municipality or county (as applicable). ❑ An adopted resolution from the city of is included in this packet (a letter MAY NOT be submitted in place of a resolution). GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:204 1M, lim TOwnBUILDERS DESIGN' CCN5'JLTING + DEVELCF TENT ❑ An adopted resolution from county is included in this packet (a letter MAY NOT be submitted in place of a resolution). NOTE: A municipality or county may only identify one Development per CRP area during each Application Round for the additional points under this subclause, unless the concerted revitalization plan includes more than one distinct area within the city or county, in which case a resolution may be provided for each Development in its respective area. The resolution from the Governing Body of the municipality or county that approved the plan is required to be submitted in the Application. If multiple Applications submit resolutions under this subclause from the same Governing Body for the same CRP area, none of the Applications shall be eligible for the additional points, unless the resolutions address the respective and distinct areas described in the plan. 3. Applications will receive (1) point in addition to those under 1. and 2. above if the development is in a location that would score at least 4 points under Opportunity Index, §11.9(c)(4)(B), except forthe criteria found in §11.9(c)(4)(A) and subparagraphs §11.9(c)(4)(A)(i) and §11.9(c)(4)(A)(ii). ❑ Development Site is within the required radius of the eligible amenities and/or services listed below, pursuant to §11.9(c)(4)(B)(i) of the QAP. ❑ A map showing the Development Site, location of and distance to the amenities, and evidence that the amenity meets all requirements of the rule, as applicable, is included. Provicle any comments or aciclitional intormation in the box below, it applicable. GHTownbuilders.com I Austin, TX 1 512.565.2321 1 Rob@GHTownbuilders.com Appendix Page:205 OVERLAND CITY OF LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE APPENDIX 2 DECEMBER 2019 OVERLAND TABLE OF CONTENTS LAND USE ECONOMICS 3 - 143 HISTORIC RESOURCES 145 - 188 PARKS + OPEN SPACE 190 - 218 PARKING TASKS 220 - 250 UTILITIES + INFRASTRUCTURE 251 - 253 LAND USE ECONOMICS Downtown Lubboc . O A \ -- 84 62 ®' 0 1• �� o -o; o - -� �' ° • . • ° °�° oar--i I • �g �aoP O o ° o • � 289 O O ID I- O f oo CO °° ° • ° 0 ° °° CO ��� °�• O ° I o • o ° 0 0 0° ° 82 82 '00 r i = i— �� o 81 oI =-- o - -- 114 p °o oO ° �• I , l © °�A ° ° O ° o ° 0 62 0 • O O O -- ° • ° ° 0°° _ 0 o 0 poor � O. • - - O 0 � 289 ° - p ° O > 289 - �' • ° 00 ° o . 0 620 0 ° 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 ° - /l 0 a 111 0° 0 0 � o � � p0 - ° oo° oo 5 0° • �0 ° • ir•\ f I- ' 1 off O 0 0 -- O O ° ° 0 0 08 00 0 0 ° o .. O 1 11 ° 62 O o ° °°o ° 0 0 0 0° ° •1* O 0 0 11 o S o 0 0° c o ° ° o o ° O ° 289 0 0 1 __ J oO ° ° 84 • 0 o o ° 0 0 Source: L D OnTheMa c 0 0 0 ° o ° o ' O 2017 Employment Nodes / 0 �q c � _ 0 0 0 00 o6)Ooooo ° o0o O0 Oco 11 8°O 080 00 o o ® 0 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 N 0 0o c ° 0 0 00 0 0 p 00 Miles 0 O _O Cn vate • • �I' • • • • ' ' • • '0I �. 84 / �i i I 6J1 nent:— 7 , 1, employees { W employees _82• II= i 82 , - _ _ - -- - _ - 62 G o>P — 289 - � - 289 I --- �84 J v\i i % Number of Employees 289 � �� ! \ / 0 1 b 84 Develop t Allianceomi v - 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 _ � � Miles CD Employment 2018 r • 11 -Agriculture 949 989 40 0.8% 21 - Mining 333 749 416 25.0% 22 - Utilities 884 910 26 0.6% 23 - Construction 6,429 7,936 1,507 4.7% 31-33 - Manufacturing 4,718 4,921 203 0.9% 42 - Wholesale Trade 6,738 7,340 602 1.8% 44-45 - Retail Trade 17,250 18,444 1,194 1.4% 48-49 - Transportation and Warehousing 3,835 4,336 501 2.6% 51 - Information 4,013 2,887 (1,126) -5.6% 52 - Finance and Insurance 5,350 5,780 430 1.6% 53 - Real Estate and Leasing 1,929 2,215 286 3.0% 54 - Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 4,096 5,324 1,228 6.0% 55 - Management of Companies and Enterprises 1,093 1,613 520 9.5% 56 - Administrative, Support, and Waste Services 6,540 6,314 (226) -0.7% 61 - Educational Services 23,94123,709 (232) -0.2% 62 - Health Care and Social Assistance 24,934 26,289 1,355 1.1% 71 - Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 1,507 2,050 543 7.2% 72 - Accommodation and Food Services 15,521 18,020 2,499 3.2% 81 - Other Services (except Public Administration) 4,136 4,725 589 2.8% 92 - Public Administration 4,234 4,365 131 0.6% Total, All Industries 138,430 148,916 10,486 1.5% Source: US Census LED Quarterly Workforce Indicators 0. A Location Quotient ("LQ") is the concentration or density of a specific industry cluster within a city or county relative to the region overall If LQ > 1.2 , indicates a high level degree of specialization If 0.8 > LQ < 1.2 , indicates normal distribution of industry within region If LQ < 0.8, indicates that the city may be underrepresented in this industry CO These LQs represent Lubbock County's level of industry specialization within the state of Texas. NORMAL 1.05 1 An 1.03 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1.13 SPECIALIZED 1-56 21 31-33 54 56 48-49 53 23 52 55 22 42 92 71 44-45 81 51 72 62 11 61 Mining Manufa- Professional, Admin, Transpor- Real Construct- Finance & Mgmt of Utilities Wholesale Public Arts, Retail Other Svcs Information Accomm- Health Care Agriculture Educational cturing Scientific, & Support & tation & Estate & ion Insurance Companies Trade Admin Entertai- Trade odation & & Social Svc Technical Waste Warehou- Leasing & nment, & Food Svcs Assistance Svcs Svcs sing Enterprises Recreation Source: US Census LED Quarterly Workforce Indicators v CD m m Strong but Declining Contains clusters that are more concentrated in the region but o are declining. These clusters typically fall into the lower > quadrant as job losses cause a 0 decline in concentration Cr J 2013-2018 neg. annual growth Weak and Declining Contains clusters that are 0 under -represented in the 3 region and are losing jobs. G Clusters in this region may indicate a gap in the workforce Cr pipeline if local industries J anticipate a future need. .F_ - - - - - Strong and Advancing Contains clusters that are more concentrated in the region and are growing. These clusters are strengths that help a community stand out from the competition. Small, high growth clusters can be expected to become dominant over time. 2013-2018 positive annual growth Weak but Emerging Contains clusters that are under -represented in the region but are growing, often quickly. If growth trends continue, these clusters will eventually move into the top -right quadrant. Clusters in this quadrant are considered "emerging" strengths in the region. Information -10% -5% Source: US Census LED Quarterly Workforce Indicators Education Services Health Care & Social 1.60 Assistance 1.56 Agriculture 1.4 9 Accommodation & Food Services .32 Retail Trade 4 1.2 Arts, Entertainment, & Public Administration 1.13 1.14 Other ervices Recreation 1.03 1.05 Wholesale Utilities 0.92 Trade • :7- 0.83 Construction 0.80 0.80 Management of Companies Finance & \ & Enterprises o.62Administrative, Insurance 0.68 Support, & Waste Real Estate & Leasing Services 0.60 o.sa Transportation & D Warehousing 0.40 Professional, Scientific, & Manufacturing Technical Services levzom 0.00 0% 5% 10% 15% m m -10% -5% 0% Source: US Census LED Quarterly Workforce Indicators Arts, Entertainment, & Recreation 5 YR Employment Change: 543 7.2% Annual Growth Real Estate & is 0.80 5 YR Management of Employment Companies & Enterprises 0.68 Change:286 5 YR Employment 3% Annual Change: 520 Growth16 Transportation & 9.5% Annual Growth Warehousing Professional, Scientific, & 5 YR Employment Technical Services Change: 501 5 YR Employment 2.6% Annual Growth Change: 1,228 6% Annual Growth 5% 10% 15% m cc m E Downtown Employment % of Citywide .. Downtown Industry Employmenj NAICS Code - Industry Employers Employees Employment Downtown 11 - Agriculture 1 2 0.0% 0.5% 21 -Mining 3 42 0.3% 12.4% 22 - Utilities 3 441 3.4% 46.4% 23 - Construction 10 206 1.6% 3.9% 31-33 - Manufacturing 11 158 1.2% 4.1 % 42 - Wholesale Trade 23 519 3.9% 7.8% 44-45 - Retail Trade 19 443 3.4% 2.7% 48-49 - Transportation and Warehousing 5 244 1.9% 6.3% 51 - Information 8 506 3.8% 16.9% 52 - Finance and Insurance 13 504 3.8% 9.2% 53 - Real Estate and Leasing 12 83 0.6% 4.6% 54 - Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 33 583 4.4% 12.8% 55 - Management of Companies and Enterprises 5 81 0.6% 8.9% 56 - Administrative, Support, and Waste Services 11 185 1.4% 3.4% 61 - Educational Services 4 5,124 39.0% 26.7% 62 - Health Care and Social Assistance 15 882 6.7% 3.6% 71 - Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 4 196 1.5% 11.0% 72 - Accommodation and Food Services 24 670 5.1% 4.6% 81 - Other Services (except Public Administration) 26 374 2.8% 9.6% 92 - Public Administration 2 1,910 14.5% 57.2% Total, All Industries 232 13,153 10.4% Source: LEHD OnTheMap, 2077 Employment Nodes 10% of all workers in the city work Downtown m cc m w -Mining 3 42 0.3% 12.4% 121 22 -Utilities 3 441 3.4% 46.4% 51 -Information 8 506 3.8% 16.9% 54 - Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 1 33 583 4.4% 12.8% 61 - Educational Services 1 4 5,124 39.0% 26.7% 71 - Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 1 4 196 1.5% 11.0% 92 - Public Administration Total, All Industries Source: LEHD OnTheMap, 2077 Employment Nodes 2 1,910 14.5%1 57.2% 232 13,153 10.4% Several industries have higher than 10% of the citywide industry workforce located Downtown m cc m A 4 -ttj--L�t Texas Te--ch -� �I 0 Top Employers Downtown Source: Lubbock Economic Development Alliance 1. City of Lubbock— 1,329 12. Lubbock Independent 2. Cisco Systems - 691 School District - 180 3. Prosperity Bancshares, Inc - 644 13. Msc Associates - 170 4. City of Lubbock, Police Dept - 404 14. Citibus - 170 5. Prosperity Bank - 362 15. Lubbock Avalanche Journal - 159 6. Lubbock County Sheriff Dept - 350 16. H Construction Systems - 150 7. City of Lubbock, Power and Light — 269 17. South Plains Electric Cooperative - 141 8. Winco Masonry - 269 18. Lubbock County Adult Probation - 120 9. NTS Communications - 230 19. Bimbo Bakeries - 110 10. Plaines Capital Bank - 230 20. Lubbock, US Post Office - 100 11. Sysco West Texas - 200 21. Lubbock Civic Inc - 100 T w cc m 21 14 4 0 CP NAA*cc ci,® -- ccFF . .... v� ... Number of Employees , • • • I• 101-500 • 51-100 • • • • \ 11-50 • • • • • • • • \ 'Texas v • • Source: LEHD OnTheM p, I • • Broadway st • • • • • • a • 017 Employment Nod_ • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • 1 Bth St • • • • • Cr • . • • \ • y 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 • •I• I \ • --- Miles I ri • • I• • o I I • • m to cu rn • • • • • NAICS SECTOR Administrative,• • Support,i Waste• \ / • Management• \ / • • 1 fumber of Employees 1,000 • Marsha Sharp Freeway • - ,\ • • 501-1,000 • • • I • -- • • I • • • • • 0011-50 I • • \ • ' \ 0-10 Texas 0 0 \ Source: LEHD OnTheM p, I • • • Broadway St • • • • • • • • • • Z077 Employment Nod _ • • • • — ' • • • ' ' 'i� ---- /' • • • ' 0 • • • • • • • • • \ • • a • \ • •0 a a 0 0 0 0\ • 19• St • • ' f • ' ' • • • • \ • y • • • - \ 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 • • \ • I _IJ • • e --- Miles • I ;�/ IF it • • • ' • • m m i I • i c I • / NP V NAICS SECTOR AgricultureNumber / • �. of Em loyees Marsha Sharp Freeway \ • • 000 ' • • ' i I -__ 01-100 • • __ • • • \ \• • JI O • • ��// 'Texas 6111 0 0-10 • ource: EHD OnTheMc P, I • Broadway St ' • • • • 017Emp(oyment Nod • • • • - • • /% • • • • t • • • • • • I I I • 19th St • • • . Cr i • �� • • • • \ • . C • • • I ' \ 0 0.125 025 0.5 0.75 1 • • • • Miles � -- I i ' I ' • • • • • m to m 1 ° 0 O ° I ° NAICS SECTOR ° o \ 0 Arts, Entertainment, o & Recreation ° 0Number Employees l o 1 of 0 0 \ o __ o 1,000 Marsha Sharp Freeway -� - \ ° 0 O O --- - _O- 0 ° ° 000 0 -- o o o --- 0 0 - 0 0 0 to ° ° o 0 00 o I o o \ 0 11 1 0 0 ° O ° ° ° 'Texas 0 o ' ° o 0-10 O 0 ° ° 0 ource: L`EHD OnTheM p, o O 0 Broadway St o ° ° ° ° 0 0 0 0 077 Employment Nod o ° ° ° ° o o 0 ° 0 0 0 0 ° i ° ° o 0 0 0 - T------ 0 0 0 0 D lZ O - -- ° ° O O O ° \ O O O O O ° O O O 0 O O O O O O - ° \ ° 0 O ° O O O I I 0 19th St o O O O - O — o I° - 1 O 0 O O 0 0 0 o o � O 0 o Q ° o o o - ° o ° 0 o - — I 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles ° o l 0 I �� o l 0 o \ 1 0 0 l0 0 0 o ✓ I ® \ o NAICS SECTOR --- Construction fumber of Employees® -J 0 1,000 Marsha Sharp Freeway 0 \ o - o 0 0 --_ 000 o 0 =� t o 1 o 0 0 0 --_ ° o 0 11 I ® o o — ® o ® ° °-10 ` 'Texas ° ° o ° ° �- \ `\\ ® ® ® ® - ° l0 0 0 to ° \ source: LEHD OnTheM p, I ® ® ® Broadway St o —�° L ° ° 0 0 0 �017 Employment Nod— ® 0 0 r�° o 0 0 ® ® 0 'O o 0�— 0O low° ® ° -�--- ° ° 0 0l o o 0 0 0 c - - - ° ° ° \ ° ° o ® 0 0 0 \ 0 0 10 ° ° o to 0 0 0 o ® © 0 ° O 0 ° V o 0 o ® - ® ® I --I o ® ' o I ® 19m St CY 0-� �0 0 ° ® \ -y o Q ® \ 0 0 o 0 0 ® 1 \ 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 o \ Miles o I o _I m m IV O 0 ® SECTOR ---T NAICS \ • Educational Services o Number of Employees ® ® o \ I I o Marsha Sharp Freeway \ ° o T 0 o -__ ° ° 1 0 0 0 l \ o II 1 1 -� - o o f —� \ D ® 0 0 0 0 0 to � 1 ° 0 ° ° o 0 \ 0-10 Texas c „ --� o o ° ° Source: LEHD OnTheMc P, o ® Broadway St o ° ° o ° ° 0 1 0 0 0 2017 Employment Nod_ -- -J-- o ' o a ° o --t1 rt—' o 0 0 0 � ® 1 o I o o ° I ° ° L — � ) -f �— ° \ 0 0 ° ° \ ® ® ® 0 0 0 0 0 ® ® ® o o o o1 0 ° 0 0 ® \ ® ® o I I I /o ® ° ° ° I I ° , 19th St ® ® ® ® o (),0 I o h 0 1 ° o o \ ® ® ® ® z I I o f o 0 e r o ° ° \ 0 0.125 025 0.5 0.75 1 ® ©� o --- Miles f m to cu 1 • o • NAICS SECTOR • • Finance i • / • Insurance •CD Number of Employees 1,000 Marsha Sharp Freeway \ ° • 000 o • • \: • I--_ 0 ® • • -- •51-100 • • 0 • • • -- \ — o o I° 11-50 • ` Texas - 0-10 +--� - - _ v Source: LEHD OnTheM p, • • Broad ® ® ° "� • way St c �077 Employment Nod _ • • -- — I • • • �- • ® U Io i o I ° --- _ ° °� o o o o o � o ° i • --- '- - - • --� � 0 19• St • • I � I • • . °_ J i 0 • a' - • • • li ° I� I • • \\ _ • • I 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 • • \ ---IMiles � • • I • • • • • • • • m m IV N SECTORNAICS • Healthcare = Social Assistance of Employees fumber Marsha Sharp Freeway \ • • • 000 • • PAM 00 a i 00 • • • • • Texas • • • a go \source: LEHD OnTheM p, • . • Broadway St • \ • • • • • • �077 Employment Nod • • • • • • • • • �- 191h St • •41 I • F. • • . a • I, ----- 0 0.125 025 0.5 0.75 1 -- Miles • � • I • • • I I • • • • • • � r NAICS • • • • \ • • Information / • Number of Employees • 000 Marsha Sharp Freeway --- - - \ • • 1 • 000 — • • • • • • �� • • • • • I • i • • 'Texas 0 a e\ v \source: LEHD OnTheM p, • Broadway • • • • • �017Employment Nod . • St • • • • • 1 t IEt • • • + • • • _ • 00 • • • • • • • • • • I \ • • • \ • • • • • • • \ • 0 • • • • l �• � St 19• I • ah 0 a \ ----- 0 0.125 025 0.5 0.75 1 • • I • • • \ ---,Miles II i • • I • • • • • o • pNAICS SECTOR ` • Manufacturing Number of Employees '.1,000 • • ` r Marsha Shar Freewa �'_` O O T -- 0 • o aim II c o IA\ 1 111 • OW • ® I O Ae 1 11 - p O • p O \ 11 • o O [ \ - • • • - L--_ O O�O o lO 1 • o �5 0 Texas • - ° �0 0�— v • • • . �. 1 1 0 1 �O-- O p \ bounce: L�EHD OnTheM p, • • • BroadwaySt _� ° ° 1—° O o p o �017 Employment Nod c • p o --��— _ ® ® • ° p p O J_ c O T o I o �o °t �— --1 - I_ G _ 0 � © O • I O -O ', O O • • T _ O p p - O O C • O O O O 1 p 1 O l 0 • • • • • __ I O 0 19 • • • • O ° �o �- 1� o • p I ° • • -- - C O • a 1 0 0.125 025 0.5 0.75 1 0� Miles st m m IV NAICS SECTOR Management of Companies & ° EnterprisesNumber of Employees 0 0 0 ° 1 ° 0 0 0 0 0 o ` o ° 0 \ O 0 o 0 0 \ o t;P ° ° 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 \ o 0 o 0 r ° O o 0 0 0 0 o 1 'Texas ° ° o ° O O ° ° ° ° 0 \source: LEHD OnTheM p, 0 Broadway o ° ° o 0 o 0 0 St 0 l 0 ° o �017 Employment Nod 0 0 ° o o 1 ° 0 ° + o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 ° 0 _ o ° ° ° o 0 O o o ° \ 0 0 o i- o ° o ° ° ° o 0 o o 0 0 o — o 0 o 0 0 � 0 0 — 0 ° o 0 0 0 ° o l o ° ° ° 0 0 0 o ° \ o o —� - 0 o 19th st 0 0 0 0 ° I l o r--1 0 0 o I ° 0 0 0 0 r ° o 0 0 ° o o ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.125 025 0.5 0.75 1 ---,Miles ° o I ° ° ° ° I0 ° o m to m 0) MiningNAICS SECTOR �- Number of Employees ° j O O ° O O ° \O \ / O o 0 ° ° \ l o 1 11 AM ° ° O O 0 \ �, ,.A ° 11 I O O ° O 1 0 oWE O 0 ° \ 'Texas ° ° O0 0 -1 ° ° ° ° \source: o 0 ° ° ° ° ° \ LI EHD OnTheM P, o o ° °a ° o Broadway st ° o o ° ° o ° �017 Employment Nod 0 ° o ° 0 ° i o o 0 ° 0 0 - O ° ° O ° ° O r---- ° ° ° 0 ° O 0 ° O _ 0 0 0 o ° ° o 0 0 ° ° \ o ° ° 0 0 ° ° ° ° o o o ° o 0 0 ° o 0 0 o io I o o p o I o o ° i 0 191h St ° O o o ° c, 0� o -� 0 0 ° ° O ° O o C �— O o O ° O R i° 0 o 0 y o 0 0 - - — 0 ° - 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles ° ° o o -ro I J \ 0 -- o 0 ° 0 0 0 NAICS SECTOR • • Other Services • • Number of Employees • I 1 1,000 MarshaS har. -� -- Pr _ ee P • — • � i\ 1 111 — • • • • • • 1 11 ia • • 11 • • \ • • • • • \ 'Texas \ 1 1 -- • Source. LEND OnTheMdp, • • • Broadway St • • • • • 2077EmpfoymentNodes .__ • • • • • • • • • • • �• 19th St • • • • a - I• r- ' I • • • F• \ • 0 0.125 025 0.5 0.75 - 1 • I • \ Miles m to m IV 00 NAICS SECTOR Professional, Scientific, & ° Technical ServicesNumber of Employee ° o 0 0 1 0 O ° I 0 0 0 o ` o A o 0 \ / 0 ° ° % ° 00 O I 0 °0 0 0 \ 00 ° ° \ o 0 0 \ 'Texas ° o ° ° 0 v \source: ° 0 ° ° o O 0 = ° O° \ O LEHD OnTheM p, o 0 Broadway st 0° ° 0 �017 Employment Nod ° O 0 o 0 1 0 0 ° O 10 0 o + o 0 0 � 0 ° o 0 o 100 - 1 ° ° 0 0 0 ° o 0 0 o o 0 - o ° ° o 0 � o 0 \ o i 0 ° 0 O 0 O \ 0 ° ° o o 0 0 0l ° o 0 0 \ 0 — D 0 0 19th St 0 0 0 ° ° a L I O --� ° ° ° ° \ O O ° � 1 0 7° d ° 0 ° ° i o o \ o ¢ o \ ° -- o o 0 — \ o o \ 0 0.125 025 0.5 075 1 ° ° o 0 Miles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • NAICS SECTOR • • \ • e • • 'N, / • Administration •• • • • • Number of Employees • ~ - r Marsha Sharp Freeway \ • • 000 --- - • 000 • • i 00 51-100 11-50 • • • • • j 'Texas v \source: LEHD OnTheM p, • . • Broadway St • ' • • • • • • • • \ • �017 Employment Nod • • • • ' is 14 • ' • • • - • a • • • • \ • l �• 19th St • • • • • CY I • r- i F • a • •41 \ a a . ' • • . • ' • I • \ • • a a \ 0 0-125 0-25 0-5 0-75 ----- 1 • • I• • • \ ---,Miles _ � I i ' • • • • • • � m 0 m is 0 NAICS OR • \ • • Real Estate :Leasing \ • • \ • Number of Employees • I I• I ~ 1,000 Marsha Sharp FreewayElm - \ • • sow • • • • • • • • • 101-500 I• • • 0W40051 - 00 • • \ so 1 Texas • • • • I— • • \ ource LEHD OnTheMcip, I • • • Broadway St • • • • • • • • • • 017 Employment NodIk— • • •+ • • • • • •� --- • • • • • • • • • • • • \ I • • i • • 19th St • • i • • ' • 41 c I •I \ 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles • � • • • • \ I - /J/ / I • I • • • • • r m CD m 1 • • • NAICS O. • ° Retail Trade Number of Employees 1,000 • Marsha Sharp Freeway501-1,000 \ ° ® o 0 Q •- 00 • ® - • - \, o 'Texas —+ - o ° - ource. L'EHD OnTheMd , • • , Broadway St - c -�c _° ° � o I o 077 Employment Nod • • • -- • • I ° ° � I 0 -i 42 o O ° ° o o © • : o \ • 0 • • � ` I o ® • I � � •� ° 79� St • • • • of • I ° I° • C • a , \ • • • —L • 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 • _ Miles • ® , ® • , m m is N SECTORNAICS • • \ • Transportation& • \ / • Warehousing _ Number of Employees • 1 1,000 Marsha Sharp Freeway • \ • • 000 • • • • • --_ 0 • • • 00 I • - • • 11-50 • , • - -� \ Texas \ source: LEHD OnTheM p, I • e • Broadway St • ' ' ' • • • • e • �077 Employment Nod _- • • • a • • • • • • • I . I 19--St • • • • • •I {•i. • \ 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 • ' \ Miles ' - I - I • • •• • • m to m is w • • • i - • -- • \ • NAICS SECTOR Utilities Number of Employees • 1 i I I �, ` 1 1,000 Marsha Sharp Freeway • \ • • 000 • • • • i • 101-500 • • • •0 • • \ „ I • • • \ - 1 • • • V • _ • • • • Texas a . • \ • - �'� \ Source: LEHD OnTheM p, I • • • Broadway St ' • • • 1 • • • • • • �017 Employment Nod_ • • • • ' • • - i • • • •� - i • • • • \ •• 0 0\ • •a a 0i • • • • 1 19th St • • • • a - • • a . \ • • • \ ' y \ 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 • • \ Miles • I • I� • m to m is • • • NAICS OR • • Wholesale .•- Number of Employees 1,000 Marsha Sharp Freeway \ • • • c 000 ' • ' :- • W, 101-500 • • - I• • • , ® \ •11-50 • • • • ' • \ 0-10 Texas 0 �� v Source: LEHD OnTheM p, • • • • • Broadway St • • _©_ ° °� ©t o • • • �017 Employment Nod_ • • • - -- ' ��-- • • • 0 0 0 n� • ' • • • • - ' 01c1 00 pj 0 19� St • �� i0 • • • • • r �� \ 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 • \ _ Miles • • �� • • • • • • m to m is r 289 82 d 2019 Population Density Source: ESRI BAO > 10,000 / sqm 5,000 — 10,000 3,000 — 5,000 1,000 — 3,000 < 1,000 Marsha Sharp Freeway -1 St �� II i 2019 Population Density Source: ESRI BAO > 10,000 / sqm 5,000 — 10,000 3,000 — 5,000 1,000 — 3,000 < 1,000 u L �1 1 Vi v cc w V V* 0 M. 2019 Daytime Population Density Source: ESRI BAO > 10,000 / sqm 5,000 — 10,000 3,000 — 5,000 1,000 — 3,000 < 1,000 2019 Daytime Population Density Source: ESRI BAO > 10,000 / sqm 5,000 — 10,000 3,000 — 5,000 1,000 — 3,000 < 1,000 - --- Marsha ShaP Fe e aY+�_r - txas Tech Fall 1i \ 1 F— 2018 ^III I i II— + 1 Broadway St � -- — 1 .• • •• • _ I •11 r - -T-- Ti +� I I gth St v w 2019 Total Businesses by Census Block Group Source: ESRI BAO > 1,000 500 — 1,000 300 — 500 100 — 300 <100 0 9 r" 2019-2024 Population Annual Growth Rate Source: ESRI BAO >5% 3%-5% 1 %-3% 0%-1 % <0% 0 9 �82 2019-2024 Household Annual Growth Rate Source: ESRI BAO >5% 3%-5% 1 %-3% 0%-1 % <0% m m N - — 62' 289 r r i 82 4 r 2019 Median Income Source: ESRI BAO >$100k �bz $80 - $100k 289 $60 - $80k a $40 - $60k $20 - $40k <$20k v W F: -J 289 r i �J r r sz — 114 H • r -- xn5 f - 2019-2024 Median HH Income Annual Growth Rate Source. ESRI BAO >5% z89 3%-5% a4 1 %-3% t i 0%-1 % ri ri VdEl JJ I- 2019 Median Age Source: ESRI BAO >55 years old 45 - 55 35 - 45 25 - 35 <2 5 r 1 � I I 1 �T I III �4 • 2019 Median Home Values Source: ESRI BAO - > $200k $150 - $200k $100 - $150k $50 - $100k <$50k No data T w Market Value Source: Lubbock CAD - > $150 / SF - $100 - $150 $50 - $100 $25 - $50 <$25 v ED 41 Year Built Source: Lubbock CAD - 2011 - 2018 1991 - 2010 1971 - 1990 1951 - 1970 <1951 v 00 Domestic In -Migration 4 r iti Top 10 Counties 1. Tarrant County, TX: 2,048 2. Dallas County, TX: 1,206 3. Hockley County, TX: 1,205 4. Harris County, TX: 1,171 5. Bexar County, TX: 1,030 6. Collin County, TX: 634 7. El Paso County, TX: 583 8. Travis County, TX: 583 9. Hale County, TX: 548 10. Randall County, TX: 515 dw IF Ville % • M" 1 W 110 U N I T E D S T A T E S + am 41 i.* ` �. i r •` Allf ■ 1 7 1Survey 111 •-o• ' 1 111 1 11 Domestic Out -Migration 40r r AL jL Top 10 Counties 1. Tarrant County, TX: 1,386 2. Hale County, TX: 1,074 3. Harris County, TX: 1,038 4. Dallas County, TX: 698 5. Hockley County, TX: 675 6. Bexar County, TX: 520 7. Denton County, TX: 502 8. McLennan County, TX: 445 9. Williamson County, TX: 415 10. Collin County, TX: 407 ■ dip IF I u, : 44-3 �.. r i - ,- .., 46 ■ mom ' . 4 Sw +' k }'► Survey *k.. 0 1 111 1 11 Domestic Net Migration MA" .f � M E D 5 T 'E 5 a 1 L IL '► M ^Olt ak k6 w * 00 w N r) z Q J Downtown Building Inventory Landwise completed a detailed first floor building inventory (covering an estimated 1.3 million square feet of mixed uses) of the following corridors within Downtown Lubbock: • Broadway • Avenue J • Texas Ave • Buddy Holly Ave T v m it W I-- --..- - - -- - - - - ---� l -- n ❑ F-1 0❑ o 1 -J 0 0 �_ ❑ ❑ ❑ J � J 40 ❑ ❑� ❑� /- _AE—F L-1 PL El El L 1 r ❑El ❑❑ �❑ �i u� ❑ ❑ ❑❑ E ❑ n]❑ El � e r E❑ I_I- � El -ii[] ❑ �❑ i❑ ❑❑ ❑I 7 1'E I ] L-i� LIN Q FED C3 ❑ 1EJ o ❑ WvI E — I o oLl LI�-C � 7 �` C. ❑ Q 0 l J oro 0Ll LP o n F—U - ElELI 0 o � o n ❑� �� n 0Bo PL ID � am` � ❑� n1 _ i o F�l n n F o � n —r _ F I�ii CI� -- ❑ �—�—� --..— — — —— — — — — ---� ` =0 Existing n II J a �JI f o o, �;� Ground Floor �- °� - Lj n c I CJ — ; CI -41 ❑ — ,� 0 Art Galleries and Maker Space `JAI M 0 Auto Dealers & Repair Shops `' o � � 0 Church ' 1 Clothing & Accessories 1 E-F— %- L_71 ❑ C ❑ ice❑ U ❑❑ Entertainment and Event Spaces 1 ' ° Hotel LA �i UCo m ❑ ■0 ❑ 4® �� ❑ ® e ❑lam C J n E❑ - Misc, Gifts & Hobbies Office _ r 1 o [A © E N J 11 0i E015 V0 Parking Garage Ely !� L ❑ n� �N �� C-� Personal Care Services (Hair Salons) ij n ?I [ o 11 ]E L r, Residential d �1 o F- J ® �O o C ❑I' Restaurants, Bars & Breweries Ih 6.1� ,o U Undetermined Fj LJ �f a Vacant ❑o Warehouse 1 �]I ❑ L1 n L° ° u -U feu E 7 a ❑�.� ❑ Q f 0 o ❑ n �� �7 ❑ o �- G� �' cr F1 E�:E _ P L Restaurant - Fast Casual, 1% Warehouse, 1' Category SF O �o Restaurant -Full Office 648,900 48% Service, 1% Res Vacant 251,700 19% Arts, 3 Auto 117,700 9% Misc, Gifts & Hobbies, Church 58,700 4% 3% Parking Garage 58,300 4% Restaurant - Bar/Nightclub 40,300 3% Restaurant- Misc, Gifts & Hobbies 36,100 3% Bar/Nightclub, 3% Arts 34,000 3% Residential 29,800 2% Restaurant - Full Service 13,300 1% Warehouse 12,800 1% Restaurant - Fast Casual 10,200 1% Entertainment & Event Space 8,000 1% Personal Care Service 7,000 1% Undetermined 5,600 0% Hotel 3,600 0% Clothinq & Clothinq Accessories 2,300 0% 1,338,300 Personal Care Service, 1 Undetermined, 0% Event e, 1% / Hotel, 0% Clothinq & Clothinq Accessories, Broadway Category % Office 53% Vacant 25% Church 12% Parking Garage 5% Residential 2% Restaurants, Bars & Breweries 2% Hotel 1% Misc, Gifts & Hobbies 1% Undetermined 1% Personal Care Service (Hair Salons) 1% Clothing & Clothing Accessories 0% Misc, Gifts & Undetermined, 1% Hotel, 1 Hobbies, 1 % Personal Care Svcs, Restaure Residentia Parking Garai 5% L k L� ❑ 3 ❑f F `Z i ❑ F ❑ r 7 Z ❑ w_ ^� �❑ t� �❑ :1❑ C 5 I ❑� r� Ll ❑� rl r= �L� - L ❑ �� o U I � u u U ,❑� L F_L r❑ T1 —o= Ft OLIIT ir It LPN low U, Mi& ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ C- I �� — J 71 ❑ � ❑ a ❑ L s : rl � �l n U ❑ i � � Jj r 1 R F] Q I n E C- _ FI ❑ El I Ll — ❑ ❑❑ � ' �Ic _� FT � n C ❑ � v❑ ❑ o I❑ n ❑❑ ❑ [� E ❑ o o ❑'3 � �IL �❑ ❑� C _ C 1 r' I I I I I F- n o r— P I F -F1_ �I Avenue J Category % Office 43% Vacant 19% Art Galleries & Maker Space 9% Residential 7% Auto Dealers & Repair Shops 7% Warehouse 5% Parking Garage 5% Restaurants, Bars & Breweries 2% Entertainment & Event Spaces 2% Undetermined 1 % Misc, Gifts & Hobbies 0% Personal Care Service (Hair Salons) 0% Parking Warehous Auto, 7% Residential, 70/, 6 Restaurants, 2%Event Space, 2% U ndatPrm i ned, ❑ [ ❑ FEll - 1 ��❑ F- ❑ ❑� C� �❑ I ❑F ❑ ❑5-1 U ❑F� ❑LI ❑❑ ❑ ❑ F F— ❑� �� � I L L B- r I ❑� �F�❑❑ i u -i a �❑ �❑ ❑ -E O❑ J O o u ❑ �� � o ❑ ❑ o 1c1 ❑❑�uC LlL- L� � LI o� a L� �o�a �� ` ' [� � `� �❑ ❑� 0❑ �I fJ s ❑ oa❑ h �� 0 Li ��lo ❑ ❑ ® ❑ o� o� n o ❑ _ / l� I� FLIn ❑J � ■ El r U ❑ Q ❑ r Ln E�: �-E n F r�� _ _ — m m 4 Texas Ave Category % Office 59% Auto Dealers & Repair Shops 21% Vacant 9% Restaurants, Bars & Breweries 8% Misc, Gifts & Hobbies 2% Art Galleries & Maker Space 1% Church 0% Misc, 2% Arts, 1 % Restat IF n L l LAy o J o ` � ` Lf o F� F-1 �1 = E � I s FiEI s F � _ CJ _ ®� 1u �❑, / rl' — L u21 u — F �� U ]� L �� ��J �J ❑ L Li 1 J FI ❑Lj �1n E u -C c F_] ❑ E�i LF IL E E: m in 00 Buddy Holly Ave Category % Office 32% Vacant 21% Auto Dealers & Repair Shops 12% Misc, Gifts & Hobbies 11% Restaurants, Bars & Breweries 10% Parking Garage 10% Art Galleries & Maker Space 3% Entertainment & Event Spaces 2% Personal Care Services (Hair Salons) 2% Event Spaces, 2% Personal Care Arts. 3% Svcs, 2% 'ElC-- —_; V---------�-- 1 ❑ �� ❑ F ��❑ is Li ��� a 3� ❑❑ C �E I I — ❑ ��� L 1� ❑ i �. ❑ ,❑ LF—IF - ❑ ❑ ❑❑Ll o �❑ VF-1 ❑ ' ❑ ❑ F I ��� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ICI -� ❑ Fir- J C �❑ ❑❑ �� ❑ J❑ `, r o� � f _ ❑ ❑ ❑ Fn �� ❑ o �o =E� U ❑❑ LD El n f1 r r1 —ti — ❑[=r=— _ ❑❑❑Ej ❑ �❑ ❑ �� Ly � J r1 AIL J - ILI C ❑ o � o F �� n ] ❑_ ❑❑ ❑ �� �� IIB o C1� -- --..- - - -- ---- ---� �-�-� Vacancies ��� �,� �J � �� '� � olr �� 1 El _ ❑ ❑ E� c n — 1 4 o O Ground floor vacancies 1 B -� ` ` — 27% of all are scattered across the - vacancies downtown area, with a �� -68,600 SF El El more concentrated cluster - ' El surrounding the Avenue J „ i� ❑❑;,m ®) 7�:] nE�Broadway intersection. ■� Entire buildings are vacant - i =P IT —o 0 O ❑ 0 ■ j 11 L7 EN along Broadway in this °]y - 1� L ' C nf=� C stretch. �� -�' z__❑ I� E 7 Q� J C3 I �1 ❑ u ilv� L o C a L�uC ❑J �c � 0LI „1❑ Ic _ o 9 ;� o EE ❑�- ❑ Q � o ° �B c ��r p ❑ �I�� L� ❑� ❑� o n- o n F o n — F Office Space Two distinct office corridors were identified along the western section of Broadway and almost the entire length of Texas Ave. 10 CI� -- --..----- ---- ---� �—�—� EJ O Q ❑� —� o❑ — E2 c EJ ' 8 ICI a ❑F ❑ ❑ U ❑ ._ ❑El❑ �� ❑ ❑ II F ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ LD171 m 0❑❑❑E C�D F ❑ - I 1❑�B ❑�� �I ❑ ❑ ❑❑ '❑ ❑ii � L - I o ❑ ❑ �❑ ❑ ❑ Ih—__�� O 6:1 ❑� �f u=ffv�� �o ❑Ll-�Jl-C L1'❑ L� ° ❑ aLl � ❑ Q ❑ ❑o ��� C,�I F1 �7 0 ❑ I' 0 �i��o LP ❑ o F— 0 ❑ 0 g U❑ rcj ❑ice i`o n ❑ o o oB n ^c ❑Lr o ❑ I❑ E F❑ ❑ ❑� oUF n_ o F�Ii T n❑ m cc m rn Resta u ra nts, Bars & Breweries A medium concentration of restaurants and bars exist in the Depot District A smaller concentration is growing around the Pioneer Hotel area. CI� -- --..— — — —— ---- _J E �0 �,❑` s C I / of ❑ ❑ ' LJ J / EJ EL ❑ _ 0El LA �m ❑ ❑ 1:1 e `t ❑❑ ❑ TI❑ � ❑f❑❑ ❑ 9 _�' ❑ ❑ ❑ LIN ❑ �� C L LLJ � D � [ �0-1 OF �7 0 o ❑ �_ ❑�o n��� u�� ��❑� o ❑ `❑ - Fl ❑ �J ❑ ❑� ❑J o ❑ U ten❑ r o o am`' n E17 _ �❑ ❑� 1� '�J ❑� Art Galleries and Maker Space A strong concentration of arts related uses exists in the Arts District on North J A much smaller concentration exists in the Depot District (including the Buddy Holly Museum which does not appear in the inventory) T v m 0) W o F-1 �o 0 o _I —J o❑ n� EEL ❑ ❑ °� ❑ ❑ L J ❑ -C'� - r- I o IT❑ ❑ U d❑❑ 11 U OU❑ [ El L Ll a J I CJ ❑ lv� L ❑❑ .I CI L ❑ u L CAI J J' L �` ❑ Q _ �0 ❑i O F Ju o o n��l �� ❑u�o� `❑ Fl o E3 IE Cam❑ ❑ ;��� C o AIu ❑ n ❑� �- �J ❑ ❑ P ❑ ° �B c ❑fir �� ] L�—, � ❑l n_ o n o n -7 - F �ii Auto Dealers & Repair Shops Two pockets of auto - related businesses exist Downtown. One located just west of the Depot District. The other surrounding the Citibus building. 13 ILL �~� J F F f� ❑� li3O❑ EJ �I o -, �� ❑ — L ❑ El u'm ❑ A El � n ��-1- L❑ ❑❑ �F � �_ El II-0 L ❑ �f=l ❑ ❑❑ ❑ n ?I F— [' 0 —' I' Q Q, J Ll FJ o C, FF � �I C L ���uC o �, Q FIE I 7 �� L7 oLl o 0 o ❑i� �� o 0 n� E�`, ❑ �! J L LP � ❑ o L� m m A Law, Bail Bond, and Federal/ County/City Offices Federal, County, and City uses Law Offices Bail Bond Offices Ell I L — J ❑❑ 1� ❑� ❑ _I ❑ � �I OC o —� o❑ ❑ _ �L / ❑ ❑ LJ J 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ i -C'� L_❑L ❑I LAWEl 1 Ll ul'p ❑ ❑ ❑ [P ❑ n d❑ o A ❑ ❑ J J ❑ ❑ ❑ r Q OU ®❑ IT � 9 1� ❑ i ❑ �❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ rL❑ -�I F— ; D ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ 17 7n �� JJ ❑' 1 —I� - c 1 �A ! � C� � ❑ f o ❑ ❑ u F� E�] ❑ u F E7 TI 1 1 I � ❑0 1 L [ 0 ❑_ �J ❑J ❑ rcL ❑i❑ J - o El ❑ ❑ o c ❑❑Fn❑❑Lr C ❑ ILL L n- o F-7 i n o n F �ii -- Building Quality Count SF % A 5 15,900 1% B 62 511,900 38% C 178 792,600 59% D 6 34,400 3% 251 1,354,800* *The transfer plaza building was included in the quality review but not the retail inventory, resulting in a different total square footage amount. 15 C1� -,--..----- ---- ---� IL _ n o o j F-1 �� Q ❑� �-�-� o ❑� [I❑ _ J El LJ I — ❑ ❑❑ ❑ c J ❑I =I = ❑ ❑ L / B 1 � I� I [—I m ❑❑❑❑E JS ®❑HnTB CCm r I o IT ❑ d ®❑ —❑ U OU❑ EM0 � ❑q f C L ❑ n❑ ❑❑ �, - I ] -�5 C ��i �II ❑ - ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑N6:1 ❑1 ❑ C❑❑ l LJL, L� ���� _ a ❑ '�-� �� ❑ ❑ I` ' J Q C L� ❑❑ D �� o00 oF dDDd ����� G� 7[, C� o � �Oc C ❑� 0 L ❑� ❑-TD oC o ICJ ❑ C_��❑ EP _ � J ❑ ❑� OB o Lam= n_ o F�l il n❑ o n - F ii Building Quality - Vacancies Count SF % q - - 0% B 7 28,500 11 % C 52 188,800 75% D 6 34,400 14% 65 251,700 The vast majority of vacancies are of poorer quality, with 14% having a D rating and in need of significant improvements before occupancy. 1G7 LI� ------- ---- ---� �—�—_ a l -- a ❑I \z CD —z ..� J ❑� of FI 0� of —J ❑❑ . ��❑r - =� � 4 ❑❑� 77 ❑� ❑ � o D LI ❑ ul'm ❑ ❑ ❑❑ E ❑ ®❑ El � eILI o o I d❑ o ❑ ❑ d ❑ ❑ 11 U Do � ❑El El Iff] r n -�I F- r ) �El Q ❑,� �- N C 0 o ❑ 1 o❑ r 5 u �P Wl L I o C,]I ❑ LL L C L I - �`❑ Q 0 ❑ 0 L7 ono O �- Io l ��,❑� ❑ o ❑ ❑ Fl ❑ ❑ ❑� 0 o ❑❑ ���, I ten❑ �'❑ o� � I1 =n A M �❑� o � -, `�n E"F - i - ❑ ❑ ❑ Pa ❑ " °B ` " L Inc ❑ L ❑❑ o ILI P �� o n1 _ i F�l n Tn o � n -7 1 F —i • The downtown has an extremely high level of vacancy (250,000 square feet) in existing ground floor space mostly. • Restaurants of all categories (particularly fast casual and full service) are very underrepresented in the downtown. Existing restaurants are primarily clustered in the Depot District. • The downtown is underserved in personal services and should be able to support a significant quantity of additional space including pharmacy, salons, and other services. • The downtown lacks any type of grocery offering including prepared or specialty food offerings. • Office tenants are the largest users of ground floor space by far. Texas Avenue has a healthy clustering of small office users which is something to build on. • The downtown has an abundance of law firms and bail bonds operations in close proximity to the courthouses. v 00 Entertainment & Personal Services Event Spaces_ 3% (Hair Salons), 3% Category SF % Resta 0 Vacant 151,200 57% Ca Restaurant - Bar/Nightclub 40,300 15% Restaurant 0 Misc, Hobbies & Gifts 35,000 13% Service, 5 Restaurant - Full Service 13,300 5% Restaurant - Fast Casual 10,200 4% 0 Entertainment & Event Spaces 8,000 3% Personal Services (Hair Salons) 7,000 3% Clothinq & Clothinq Accessories 2,300 1% 267,300 The overwhelming majority of existing ground floor retail space in the downtown area is vacant. 1 [I❑ � �' J ❑� 0 F-] F o 1� ❑ � FL C] I Clothing & Accessories ❑I _ �- 1- d-1F ❑� c Entertainment and Event Spaces— Gifts & HobbiesPersonal 4Misc, CL Care Services (Hair Salons) Restaurants, Bars & BreweriesVacant* ❑ — oE F�% 1 ❑ ❑ 8❑❑ * These are vacancies where LAI u',m ❑ri E ®: ®e L❑ - ground floor retail appears to [ I ❑y o ❑ d n EM o be a possibility. All other - vacancies were not included. ] ❑ i—i ]E —E I� 0 U Fr ❑ o7- C ] ❑ �� � �� L� =c ELL Q� Ic uC _ o �� 71:1 ��I❑ C� 111— ❑Io o ❑ ❑ �❑fl 96A of� arc, � L� c P L19 ❑io J ❑ � ❑E❑ _ �- ❑ � ❑ � � ❑ � �B U I❑ ] L =, F 11El n- o F�l il T ❑ - F m m V O w N r) z Q �I Z Q L. 38,209 Texas Tech 2019 Enrollmerr (Source: Texas Tech website, 2,500 2, 092 South Plains Community College Downtown Lubbock Population Arts & Science relocation (Source: Master Plan Workshop) (Source: ESRI) 16, 742 Employees working within a 1-mile radius of Downtown (Source: ESRI) d RWlow . 6,280, 000 Annual Visitors to Lubbock (Source: Visit Lubbock) 21 m m V N RESTAURANT & BARS APPAREL & ACCESS^RIES i "h 1 PEEN GROCERY MISC. (GIFTS & ART) OTHER DISCRETIONARY SPORTING GOODS, BOOKS & H^DRIES VACANT PERSONAL CARE STORES Demand (sf) - Existing Supply (sf) Unmet Demand (s) 160,000 140,000 120,000 y~j 100,000 W LL LU 80,000 a D L 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Restaurant & Bars RETAIL BY CATEGORY e Personal Care Apparel & orting Goods & Other Discretionary Stores Accessories Hobby M�M=Mm= * All grocery demand is being met by Walmart, located just outside of the downtown. ■ W Grocery Personal Care Stores Apparel & Accessories Sporting Goods & Hobby Total 188,000 81,200 119,300 W� Other Discretionary Gifts & Arts 23 UPCOMING RETAIL PROJECTS psi � rs r i J 41 �v All t ii �y I � ii$._ �` i W OPREX COMMERCIAL IfU 006-712-4000 ""XfONSTRUfTION.COM - . N WILLIPM5 I wco= ',OR SALE G (i R InP: 1 11 JJ _1-- 90,000 80,000 76,800 70,000 60,000 LU w LL 50,000 w K j 40,000 Ln 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Restaurant & Bar -7,400 square feet of planned upcoming projects 14,700 11,200 8,000 7,300 0 1,300 i s Grocery Personal Care Stores Apparel & Accessories Sporting Goods & Other Discretionary Gifts & Arts Hobby • Restaurant in the Kress Building (est. 2,700 SF) • Auld Brewery on East Broadway (est. 2,000 SF) • Restaurant near Auld Brewery on East Broadway (est. 2,700 SF) No known plans No known plans No known plans No known plans No known plans No known plans Current Vacant Retail Space Current Unmet Demand 26 • There is unmet demand in every retail category downtown, with a glaring need to expand restaurant and personal services offerings. • Although there are two upcoming restaurants and an additional brewery planned, this will only satisfy 10% of the unmet demand for this category. • There is a strong mix of audiences, which provides Lubbock with ample retail opportunity. • There is more than enough vacant space to accommodate the unmet retail demand downtown. Backfilling these vacant spaces is critical and should be a major focus in creating a healthy and vibrant downtown. m D Z �W� The downtown population currently represents about 1 % of the City of Lubbock's population (though it represents 10% of the City's jobs). 2019 Population Density Source: ESRI BAO > 10,000 / sqm 5,000 — 10,000 3,000 — 5,000 1,000 — 3,000 < 1,000 —+— I7 Marsha Sharp Freeway — — — _ 1 � \ � r 1 I \ 1 - Broadway St Estimatedff 1 Downtown Population: — --- L-- - = 111 r — — , ---T _ 1 F-4 1— i _� r \ v CO 0 th is strongest in uter suburbs of the 'opulation growth ►ected to be very in the downtown o the undersupply w housing. Planned opment in the itown should help elerate growth. 19-2024 Population nual Growth Rate re: ESRI BAO >5% 3%-5% 1 %-3% 0%-1 % <0% 28,000 26,000 24,000 22,000 20,000 18,000 16,000 Source: American Community Survey 7,777 7,229 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Net —Total Inbound —Total Outbound 6,589 2016 12,000 00, 10,000 8,000 7,186 6,000 4,000 2,000 2017 (2,000) 31 m m bo N earners live on thwestern side of outside of the ►p, which is an Dn that new ction in the wn should target price points until ie of the area mproved. Median Income ESRI BAO >$100k >80 — $100k >60 — $80k >40 — $60k >20 — $40k c$20k v W 45% 41% 41% 39% 40% 35% 30% 25% ° 20 /0 19% 16% 16% 0 ° 11% 11% 11% 10% 5% 0% < $35,000 $35,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 45% 40/° ° 39% 38% 35% 30% 24% 25% 20% 0 ° 16% 16% 15% 10% 5% 0% Under 25 25-34 Source: American Community Survey 19% 11% 12% 12% 13% 7% 3% 4% 4% 4% 5% M E 0% $75,000-$99,999 $100,000-$149,999 $150,000-$199,999 $200,000+ 18% 16% 11% 12% 10% 10% 12% 10% 11% 7% 8% M,, 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 5% 6% 6% MEN Over 75 ■ Downtown Lubbock ■ Lubbock, TX ■ Lubbock County, TX The downtown consists mainly of low to middle - income earners and has a noticeably higher concentration of residents between the ages of 25 & 54 years old than the surrounding region. 3; m m 00 3,000 60% 50% 2,500 50% 2,000 7 40% 1,500 30% 25% 261 1,000 20% J 500 10% ° 0 0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Single -Family Permits Multifamily Permits —Percent Multifamily Source: US Census 34 m to m bo M Household Income Home Price <25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ <$35k <$125k 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% $35-$50k $125-$175k 2% 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 2% $50-$75k $175-$260k 3% 2% 5% 1% 0% 5% 4% $75-$100k $260-$340k 1% 3% 6% 2% 0% 3% 2% $100-$150k $340-$500k 2% 6% 11% 5% 3% 5% 4% $150-$200k $500-$700k 1% 3% 5% 3% 2% 2% 1% $200k+ $700k+ 0% 1% 3% 3% 1% 2% 1% 7% 0% 31% 6% 0% 19% 19% ■ Highest Demand High Demand Moderate Demand Lower Demand ■ Lowest Demand The residential demand model for the City of Lubbock indicates that ages groups between 25 and 54 years old making $50k-$150k are the fastest growing part of the market. The younger side of this bracket and households without kids may be attracted to downtown locations if high quality housing stock is available. 35 v 00 M Multifamily Multifamily For -Sale (Loft) 00 Downtown Lubbock Capture of entire city: 5% Multifamily - For -Sale (Loft/Townhome) Distribution of Home Price 9 7 3 3 ■ 30 25 20 15 0 0 0 0 10 °° 5 �,�°° y5°° 0 o°° o°° Potential Phase I plan (years 1-2): Construction of 44 condo and 158 apartment units Rental Units 25 25 20-24 25-34 35-54 55+ Age Groups 37 v to 5R CD CO Multifamily - For -Sale (Loft/Townhome) Multifamily - Rental Distribution of Home Price Rental Units 18 60 50 51 13 50 46 8 40 6 w 30 o 0 0 0 � 20 13 o°° o°° 10 ■ 61 °off ' 20-24 25-34 35-54 55+ Age Groups Potential Phase I plan (years 1-2): Construction of 90 condo and 320 apartment units m v to CD Distribution of Home Price °oo °oo o°o T v CD o°° oo° o°° o°° °°°`'°° o°° Potential Phase I plan (years 1-2): Construction of 52 single-family homes 39 Distribution of Home Price 18 12 13 Potential Phase I plan (years 1-2): Construction of 102 single-family homes 000 000 000 000 000 oo, oo, o00 QQ, 000 000 oo, T v cc m 40 a Southtown neighborhood Under construction 20 townhomes Unit widths 22' — 30' Rear -loaded garages mommmwp,r rr4F 41. A Itiw 42 v m CD w Brackenridge Park neighborhood Currently under construction 43 townhomes Rear -loaded garages Unit width 15' — 25' Central community park PSW David Real Estate r-NERED PARKING STREET PARKIVG COVERED PARKING ____„_____I{{___________________II________ t-21 I----------------------------------------------- .CI 19 119I t� l 15l 15 11G 13 I I: 10, TENDICK STREET STREE- PARKIN - rVA AStI O RECYCLING ❑❑ 44 Small Lot Single -Family Example Project Clay Street Homes in San Antonio Num J SOS'S736W 2f6.%1 7� § AVM NO W� -- AVM3NO f -� NU6vg19'E t7B {Z a Sq Page:97 RECENT DOWNTOWN MULTIFAMILY RENTAL DEVELOPMENTS FrI � aoo RECENT DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENTS 166 /All gal I)JO 1,00 '041 tit i Ll i^- � F 'r f' i�i-I �E1 jr. �'y�..'� �� �� � �'' � ^ � I I I � r.11 I i � Y'. Graduate Student Housing Project 1409 91h St • 220 planned apartment units • One and two -bedroom apartments • McDougal Companies to complete the work • completion date TBD Total market rate apartments: 89 Total graduate student apartments: 220 Upcoming: 309 apartments r -J l uL Q IFS _ i 71 E__ '�� F I--- i - - F Recently Completed: 23 apartments 27condos J ❑ UTl� Broadway hFF_ _ - L f F _ 49 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 T v CD m 5-year Residential Demand & Supply - Rental Only Total Units Annual Absorption Low Capture Scenario ■ High Capture Scenario ■ Future Supply 50 0 Low Growth Scenario High Growth Scenario Annual 5-Year ^ - -lua( 5-Year Multifamily - Rental 79 units 395 units 160 units 800 units Townhome - For -Sale 22 units 110 units 45 units 225 units Small Lot Single -Family 26 homes 130 homes 1 51 homes 255 homes Low Growth Scenario ■ Multifamily For -Sale ■ Single -Family Detached For -Sale ■ Multifamily Rental High Growth Scenario ■ Multifamily For -Sale ■ Single -Family Detached For -Sale ■ Multifamily Rental 52 • With only 1 % of the city's current population living downtown, there is opportunity to grow this share. It will be vital to provide additional retail offerings to support residential growth. • The demographics and residential market suggest that downtown Lubbock would benefit from condo/townhome creation in the low and middle tiers of pricing. The downtown does not appear to support the high -end condo market at this time. • The recently completed and planned residential projects are a positive sign that demonstrates a demand for downtown living but there is additional unmet demand in the market. Case Studies RI lingo I ■ 0 �p Q' I < : e { 0.., .. ..,, _.... Ili , -.> _ 9� _ `Z 4-� � 4_ - '�°-r•: � 7 Population Comparisons 3 0 6 miles 2018 US Census z 2018, ESRI BAO 12017, LED On the Map Lubbock, TX City Population 255,885 Daytime Population Downtown 112 mile radius — 10,200 % of residents that work in City 74% Downtown m m 0 rn Durham, NC City Population 274,291 f Daytime Population r Downtown 1/2 mile radius 17,800 % of residents that work in City 44% Downtown American Tobacco Campus f� 11 acres Adjacent Downtown � i • '1 ♦ Iwo a07 1 Chattanooga, City Population Daytime Populatic 180,557 Downtown 112 mile radius —30,000 Downtown . Innovati 1/4 mile Within +AP Greenville, SC u City Population 68,563 Daytime Population Downtown 1/2 mile radius —21,400 Center City % of residents that work in City RiverWalk — 10 acres 39% Adjacent to Center City Durham Durham Bulls Park opens In 1995 $19M American Tobacco Campus development ------------ Durham Performance Arts Center opens Durham Downtown Master Plan Greenville Fall Park development RiverPlace development ------------------------------ $95M Swamp River Trail opening & extensions Chattanooga Riverfront parks investments Fiber Optic network investments Innovation District formed 2000 $120M 2005 $48M $10.5M $330M 2010 2015 :.-. � 1�• � _.. "� ...... 9Y. .u�, __ __ -.ems �( a �r Ili i �: la^� 1?�15�.8f�1 �� J jr.�C. �:�w _.- _ � _ I"•-� E� wars - ON 'cueyanp Snd VYVD ODDVSOl NVDFd3 VYV AMERICAN TOBACCO CAMPUS, Durham NC ♦` ' • ,r.,15�r�= _# ' 11 acre puke Univ it``�Wn y . ° t�� '��` 13 historic buildings ' ♦ �} �- w " r Developer: Capitol Broadcasting Co. .� ♦ f �. M Y Inc �, ,, ♦♦ �+��•� ,�� .� • � � � .. (Owners for the Durham bullsWV Viol ) �r ♦�aa `' • Site acquired in 2001 :' ♦'' Downtown Durham Project Development: 2003-2006 - ♦ `a�� Project Cost : $200M �� Jl 14 * �`` ,` s •' Program: y _ `♦#� '�, {" 1.2M SF of office 40,000 SF of retail _ 80 apartment units Two parking decks (2,435 spaces) + ♦ F �` � • "' ' " ` ' `♦ „ 134 room hotel (Aloft) V ♦♦ ... YMCA • WUNC-FM broadcasting studios , '� + ` The campus includes two key anchors: the Durham Performance Arts Center and the Durham Bulls Park. The retail establishments provide visitors with dining options. The campus draws 1.5 millions visitors a year American Tobacco Campus 2006 https://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/rea I -estate-news/a rti de 10049147. htm I Restaurant Location Map YRMjewSpex Hill Building NoiNt Pxki oak (P�N) NC RR Io; �hsxr Snm; h 0 a 3 a Y nre, Univxsiry Foid 8 UnrmMRu Qam W� Durham P xNmt �� I 0PAQ Performance WArts Center � MView r...i x ,.. M°w p 2008 hA.M ! Gumond Neu NY ... - 4;. xnm -SULLPE UrdMxpwrol. P Wwn Undo ' 4owe Rddm ' S. 0.6 m' Uuhom Bugs mk °S°ad Durham angj 0 Bulls Park B iIM a ` 1995 Nxnan rmxw / ri m w�nmm UWrxn Freewq/R111 Fm�md AMERICAN �\ TOBACCO AmericanTobaccoCampus.com 0 SIuana JOJ anuan aelndod e si pue s}ueaneisai aoj 6ui}eas @Idwe sapinoid @beds aoopino leAIU@D @qi -aaleayliydwe aoopino OOS'Z e pue aannol aalenn leui6uo aq} 6uipunoaans food (anal -!Ilnw e ui 6uileuiwInD 'auil uieaj pIo ayj jo yjed ayj sung 11 -lu@wdolanap ayj 01 pappe Senn aania lelDlj!lae uy .se y7 r CAMPUS, Durham The Campus is also an employment node. • 3,000 employees • High demand for class A office space located in urban areas • Duke University is the largest tenant v m m American Underground • An accelerator and coworking space located in the basement • 30,000 SF • Serves 250 startups annually • 1,100 employees affiliated with the space 01 L Physical barriers isolate the Campus both on the northern and southern boundaries. The downtown core feels separate to the Campus and people do not move seamlessly between the two areas. Community members are asking the City and Developer to enhance connections between downtown, the Campus and southern neighborhoods and as a result. The Developer is looking at expanding the campus and creating pedestrian bridges will be part of the next phase of development. Railroad tracks (northern border) _ w== `ate Takeaways • The American Tobacco Campus differentiate itself from Downtown as a sports and entertainment hub. • Outdoor recreational amenities are an integral part of the development to attract visitors and host events. • The railroad is a barrier and the north -south connection needs to be improved. The City and developer are currently planning to build a pedestrian bridge. • General consensus is that both the American Tobacco Campus and the downtown would benefit from a stronger physical connection allowing easier flow of pedestrians. v cc No Text Greenville, SC ,W r` Its ♦� - ._ �'� �.; y_ Greenville City Center _ i so *ft -r -,'fIL . 4 C, ;I 'r'r, � •;yie � _ kk y �ar'rgc* i Aged slPJ uoijDnajsuoD �? E aqj @DUIS pauaddeq seq a11inuaaa9 unnoIunnop ui }uauaIsanui Jo %SL— juawdolanap Agaeau ui VV009$ paDuanljul g Iaed aql JO IDedwl DIIAle12D b 'G e� �,-, �, 7-T .A. 00, isann pue Isea uaan��aq uoi�DauuoD - `�"n ueialsapad pue wAolield 6uinnain � }-��1 - �' ��,. 1 sir ��• �' , e 'J@lAew I enSIn e Se S@AA@S 1 J • V VS•V $ • _ a�/.1.1..'� )C� :,-.\ .R!� i � TTII _ �-i+•�nF� '_ •i_a abpuq uoisuadsns rr mr� u anana_si ji asneDaq anblun '�,`-' .. =� ,.,• �, , glBual ui 11 SEE -^` a @bpug Alaagil xy Aenngbiq e Aq paaanoD SeM gD]gM'Ilejaalenn J0 6uuanoDun - IU@WISanui NEB$ - VON ui pauado - „jAed lealuaD„ S,a11inuaaa9 • .Jamb Apaab a4l uo )ped sllej im DS 'ajjindaaaE) dk SS@DoAd lu@wdol@A@p Ae@A 0[ Alqw@sse puel x@IdWOD AID -Q uoileAodAOD ju@wdOl@A@C] s@q5nH ID@(oAd Dllqnd /@IeA'Ad AAOISI q S,@II!AU@@ AE) rs ui lu@wdol@A@p IS@bAel IU@WIS@AUI NS6$ • SWOOA I@Ioq [/Z • ej@� sl!un lu@wlAede VV I!el@A Js000'sZ • @DljjO JSOOO'[2E • weA5OAd Z[OZ ui p@l@ldwOD s5uipl!nq 6 S@ADe 0[ a:)eld.JOAIIJ DS "alllAUaaJE) I J I 1 a Swamp Rabbit Trail • 20 mile trail • Connects major anchors in Greenville — Greenville Technical College, Greenville Zoo, Cleveland Park, RiverPlace, Falls Parks, Furman University • Opened in 2009 and continues to expand T CD • Former rail line • County bought line in 1999, continued rail service until 2004. • A study 2014 study estimated that more than 500,000 people visit annually (25% are tourists) • Economic impact of tourism on local economy $6.7million ro x I .0 Downtown Growth • Significant public/private investment in anchors was key in revitalization of Downtown. • Falls Park, Fluor Park, Performing Arts Center • City has grown significantly in population in the last 5 years. • New residential activity downtown provided much needed supply • It was the 4th fastest growing city in the United States between 2015 and 2016. • There is a thriving restaurant scene with over 70 restaurants — an impressive number for a city of that size. CO_0 O Takeaways • Significant investments in the public realm catalyzed rebirth of Downtown and spurred new development. • Emphasis on creating a critical mass downtown and attracting quality retailers. • Major investments organized along a strong North/South spine (Main Street). Investments are concentrated and connected. • Used pedestrian bridge to create a signature feature. • Trails and linear parks provide seamless connections between key anchors and neighborhoods in the City. • The RiverPlace development is complementary to Downtown. Primarily a residential and office development, it does not detract retail demand from Downtown. a � ' � � � � +� • � .Y � � � /i. r Z /%�' '� 3 � � �I 1 � . + h� � � • � / O r � ,+ - ,Y 1 i � 7O �, �' ` 7 � L i � 'r T A 1]}r` �! 1r� � 1. 'f i 4� � � }� ' •'A a r R ' � �� k- r �., 1 _. . .�;L �w y � � •� � � r r"1 �� " _- s t � � :r. � � ' r. � /. �, � �.' _ „fit ' ` �� , N �,r ,�i� � 'f{'� �f � 'f �.' �,,' '� � � �. � j �a�� 11 I1S •� � � .r • i `f r 1 � . � � � '7t' '' . � �. ` '� t .. o '�'� �iQ ■ �L.��i •fir. �� �� �1 Chattanooga, T A Rois' Landing Park ' Tennessee River 00 as 00 J. rf, w �� ���,. Downtown = ►. ►,�•� Chattanooga } 1 • . A f .- The University of ` ;1 Tennessee at r,. Chattanoogait i i yti i • No Text Gig City — A Catalyst for Growth • The City's public utility, Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, modernized The City's electrical systems by installing smart grid technology, using fiber optics, developing the world's most extensive municipal high- speed internet networks. • 9000 miles of fiber optics throughout 600 square miles • $330M investment • Part of Funding came from federal funds — made available through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. • This investment allowed Chattanooga's network to be known among the fastest broadband communication services available in the world. • City became a destination for startups and technology sector GIG CITY +�'ifi��il�I#L•irrl .0 21 Innovation District • In 2013, Mayor Berke starts plans to create an Innovation District in order to grow the innovation economy in the City. • Goal of the district is to focus investment, increase density and develop a environment that can attract and retain talent • City decided that Downtown was the best place to achieve those goals because: • Walkable • Infill development opportunities • Authentic • Near riverfront parks • Leverage proximity to the University • In 2015, Innovation District was formed. Boundary was designated as a'A mile radius from City Center. sewra..=h DD INNOVATION DISTRICT OF CHATTANOOGA Sri Chattanooga, TN - Iq ALL-J-7 - •- Downtown Investments Downtown does not currently have a --- __ vibrant retail environment and few younger residents and students frequent 3" r-- -- the area. Y min City is focusing efforts to provide more _ residential offerings, enhance retail, tenants, provide more entertainment and recreational options, and better connect the different anchors and cultural institutions • Miller Park (shown here) located at the heart of the Innovation District was renovated in 2018 for $10M. j Demand for new housing Downtown is projected at 900 units annually. 3. - -; $214.8M of development is currently r ;; ~� • -r=-` under way. $144M of which is for - residential projects /�� 565 hotel rooms are under construction Takeaways • Investments in public realm catalyzed further development Downtown. Riverfront parks are seen as key assets in the City. • City chose to locate its Innovate District Downtown because it would provide an authentic and walkable experience. The city is now invested in developing vacant parcels and bringing in more retail and residential development Downtown to support new companies and their employees. • Non-traditional anchors can provide branding opportunity. (ex: "Gig City ") • Strong public and private partnerships CO CO What can Lubbock learn from these case studies? • Embrace Downtown — it is an asset to the City of Lubbock. • Focus on creating a strong North/South spine that connects key projects/nodes. • Focus on filling vacancies Downtown and developing vacant lots. • Differentiate nodes — sports, arts/culture, entertainment. • Invest in high quality pedestrian connections between developments and key nodes. • Work with private sector to invest in catalytic projects. v CO m N 25 PRECEDENT PROJECTS Market Square, Pittsburg PA 1.6 acres I $5M 1 2009 Campus Martius, Detroit MI 1.6 acres I $20M 1 2003 MARKET SQUARE, PITTSBURG PA Market Square Redevelopment 1.6 acres I $5M 12009 Design was inspired by the European Piazza concept and consisted of closing the roads that ran through the historic space Financial contributions from: City of Pittsburgh ($2M), Urban Redevelopment Authority, Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership, Heinz Endowments, Richard King Mellon Foundation, Colcom Foundation and Hillman Foundation v CO cc MARKET SQUARE, PITTSBURG PA Benefits • 116% in pedestrian traffic between 2008 and 2010 • 1 dozen businesses opened in/relocated to the Square in 2010 alone • 100 new condos / apartments planned within a 2 block radius in 2010 • $200+ million on new buildings renovations to historic buildings adjacent / nearby (by 2010) • Downtown office vacancy down to 12% • Increased safety CAMPUS MARTIUS, DETROIT MI - th 16 6L hh ,_� .e ..i lilt, .K _.A Wor 0 a +' 1.6 acres I $20M 1 2003 • $8M Compuware & Ford Motors • $8M Detroit 300 • $4M City of Detroit City of Detroit owns the land, Detroit 300 Conservancy operates it Previous use: parking lot v ,v W W CAMPUS MA-TIUS, DETROIT MI Benefits • Increased activity downtown, approximately 1 million visitors a year • Increased safety • $500M in new buildings and investment since project completion 0 I AL ALABAMA BISCUIT CO. Aa, BUSY CORNER CHEESE CHOIA TAOUIERA ELI'S JERUSALEM GRILL FERO PIZITZ GHION CULTURAL HALL ICHICORO IMOTO '*oop 4PN, LICHITA'S PALETERIA THE LOUIS _ MO:MO: ONO POKE • WELCOME • I REVEAL KITCHEN REVELATOR COFFEE IORDER YOUR FAVORITE Mar THE STANDARD WAFFLE WORKS GRAB A DRINK AT THE BAR WARBY PARKER FIND A SEAT & ENJOY YELLOWHAMMER CREATIVE HOURS MONDAY - THURSDAY 7AM - "I'M / FRIDAY 7AM - 12AM SATURDAY : 8AM - 12AM SUNDAY . 7AM.APM 0linhwi . l A5-1 jjp ► low it oti". PRECEDENT `OJECTS I BOSTON PUBLIC MARKET y T R v w 0 N BOSTON PUBLIC MARKET ■ GAPMW ■ PQQCKXX ■ n �trwoJ�i.i. a fIQM1i .yra H ST4MnMSN.W OWI!®.NMI►0P�9 iP k6 v'Mtw� Yfr i. � 9� � it •f7Rlt■4W� sti■000 4 iOLI4.71,1R�K. ■ 'ipsGuiialv►Fia n aIA.��urf ■MG■IJ[i h 5119fMi180■f/MI • 1)Vq.ClEmJlw f 'l0.u.1V ..!■■Y�r !1 9i4,�L1 ■ i,YQT u■M1 w o�.■n qw.s r ,Iraew,�o a yr4,�Yi e.ar � 9.Wi+ b, m,Mw a.u�+YAn 91~umum ale v wnw�weRs�aywwvMa ■ f6 ��..rw,.w•a�.rwr i7 Mw1di11fIK'h tl �lfi.iMi7f1.![W! $ 1A 110M�IiW.rMuO #' --MAN! i= N ■bNfwM1LY�llll,m6 tw am-m ■ �,urrf:. �• = i a OP ho z— r r t emir:.;.... ,ia-....,. uiia.■... rvh?- PRECEDENT PROJECTS I LENEXA PUBLIC MARKET, MO 100 - WR Im TJ co 1 - I O. a. U ,owl I m +n IL 4� �� k 70 ■ �Imam,- -Moe .�• .�^ � - . �+ _. - �.�r.' ,�`,. +' PINY �C_ _ i � , `�.3. ;yr�' E�^ •` - � 1 ry �� + 'F'I ;r •i. 1 *51ROW SWS y F T I_ n -1 m T\/ '7' �,.. '.._ ". ".. .� !� _ _i ._ _ n .. I_ \ A / _ _i 1 1 _ ._ti _ ._ _I f -r SoWa, Boston MAlow- Yy a ��11► —Orb - a- - — 11EA061 TRUCk �. lip 1� ~ W - -11 i \ 'a • — — - . 011 f4 A )-mom 7 opening day at the WGBH Studio! e 89.rk Iccf Ai 4.1 --4 All F'ROO f z w v m a SNOliVDO] snot vA I SIDWS 41�1'�,.� HISTORIC RESOURCES • As part of the larger master planning effort led by Overland Partners Architects, Seventh Generation Design (SGD) conducted a preliminary historic resources survey of the study area. The purpose of the survey was to create a baseline tool for identifying, documenting, and evaluating historic properties and placing them within their local, state and/or national historic context and Level of significance. • A fundamental motivation behind conducting the survey was to determine the potential viability of forming a National Register Historic District in the study area. If a district is viable, individual private property owners may be eligible to receive various state and federal financial incentives for historic rehabilitation of their qualifying properties. These incentives include state franchise tax credits, federal income tax credits, and grants and loans from historic preservation organizations. • The historic resources survey sought to identify a period or periods of historic significance for the study area based upon the prevalent dates of construction of existing buildings. This is an essential first step in defining and validating a future proposed historic district. • The historic resources survey also sought to characterize the general condition and historic integrity of individual properties to determine their status as contributing or non-contributing within a future proposed historic district. This characterization of physical condition was also intended to identify potential areas for catalyzing downtown revitalization through the rehabilitation of historic buildings rich with architectural character, local materials, and human scale. • The survey included approximately 450 individual properties within the study area, with a general evaluation of existing structures' approximate date of construction, architectural style, general physical condition, and likelihood of being an individually listed, contributing, or non-contributing property within a future historic district. Survey data was recorded in a straight -forward Microsoft Excel spreadsheet that may be incorporated into a future GIS database. • To our knowledge, no previous systematic survey of Lubbock's Downtown District's existing and historic building resources has been conducted to -date. It is our hope and desire that the findings of this survey may form the basis of more detailed future studies and revitalization projects. HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1:7�9�eVi�l:Ie\►U79:7�I�e\:7e\rl[�7►■■�7:71:16�[i1:7[�7:7�YillliH��Y11:19�1 • In preparation for the project kickoff, SGD reviewed the provided documents from previous planning efforts. We took particular note of comments regarding the existing building stock and architectural character in the Downtown area. It was observed that the Downtown Revitalization Action Plan (2008) appears to value the architectural merit of buildings built prior to the 1950s. (See Chapter 2, page 13). Since buildings built as recently as 1969 may be considered eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places, we advocate a more objective approach to evaluating the existing building stock in the downtown district. Additionally, growing interest and appreciation of the Mid -Century Modern Style may favor Lubbock's chances of forming one of the first downtown historic districts featuring this significant period of urban development in our nation after World War II. Fortunately, the more recent planning documents take a more favorable view of the Downtown District's existing building stock, seeing the potential for revitalization independent of stylistic bias. • The current formulation of the Unified Development Code (UDC) promises to have a significant impact on how the Downtown District revitalization gets implemented by synthesizing standards and guidelines from multiple regulatory documents. Streamlining regulatory processes and encouraging redevelopment, while offering some degree of protection to the historic character and individual historic properties, should be important goals of this effort. • Existing local incentives for redevelopment and historic rehabilitation include (1) Market Lubbock Incorporated IMLI); (2) Downtown Grant Program for reimbursements for building renovations, facade improvements, and streetscape improvements; and (3) City of Lubbock and Lubbock County tax abatements. These programs are similar to local incentives found in other communities. • SGD obtained from the City of Lubbock Planning Department's online portal a list of all historically designated properties inthe Downtown District. This includes properties listedas locallandmarks, Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks (RTHL), and on the National Register of Historic Places (NR). We are creating an historic overlay to the team's base map to identify these properties and their levels of significance. • SGD obtained from the National Park Service the nomination applications for each of the properties in the Downtown District that are currently individually listed on the National Register. These include statements of periods of historical significance which may be useful in the future formulation of a National Register district(s). Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update • After the Kickoff Workshop #1, SGD began conducting our preliminary historic resource survey on September 13-15, 2019. The preliminary survey examined the existing buildings on the streets identified as priorities for redevelopment during Workshop #1. We photographed and made a general assessment of the physical condition and architectural style of the exterior of all the buildings located on Broadway, Avenue J, Texas Avenue, and Buddy Holly Avenue within the boundaries of the masterplan study. We noted whether the buildings were in active use or vacant and recorded the names of the current occupants or businesses. We also made a preliminary determination of each property's potential eligibility for inclusion in a National Register district based solely on its architectural merits and physical condition. (Later phased work will consider cultural and historical associations determined through archival research.) Subsequent surveys in late September and early October will focus on warehouse and industrial structures located east of Buddy Holly Avenue as well as buildings along some of the other major streets (e.g., Main Street, 13th Street and Crickets Avenue). After the Kickoff Workshop #2, SGD concluded our downtown walking tour for preliminary historic resource survey on October 3, 2019. This portion of the preliminary survey examined the existing buildings in the Central Business District beyond those located on the streets identified as priorities for redevelopment during Workshop #1. We photographed and made a general assessment of the physical condition and architectural style of the exterior of all the buildings located on Main Street, 13th Street, Crickets Avenue, in the Arts District, and along the far eastern edge of the CBD adjacent to the rail yards and Warehouse District east of Buddy Holly Avenue. We also conducted a reconnaissance in the southwest quadrant, bounded by Avenues K and Q in the east and west respectfully, and Broadway and 19th Streets in the north and south respectfully. Typically historic resource surveys classify properties into four general categories: (1) Currently National Register INR) Listed; (2) Eligible of Individual Listing;13) Contributing (forthose properties that do not qualify for individual listing but still have a high degree of historical integrity); and (4) Non-contributing (for those properties that were either built after the period of historical significance or have had its features altered to a point that its historical significance has been lost). Our preliminary survey revealed that many buildings in the downtown area have been altered but may still qualify as Contributing if these alterations prove to be reversible. Typical examples of alterations include the removal of historic canopies, the replacement of ground level storefront windows and doors, and the application of stucco finish over historic brick walls. HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SGD presented an update on the status and findings of the Historic Resource Survey at Workshop #3, and reviewed them again at Workshop #4. Out of the approximate 450 properties surveyed in the downtown district, only 29% represent surviving properties built prior to 1950. Presumably many buildings from this period were demolished to make room for subsequent development during the mid-20th century. 47% represent surviving properties built between 1950 and 1970, coinciding with an important cultural and economic period in Lubbock's development as a city. Only 24% of the properties were constructed after 1970, beyond the identified period of historical significance, and reflecting a slow down in growth in the city's downtown district. Out of the approximate 450 properties surveyed in the downtown district, only 1.5% (seven properties) are already individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Approximately 28% of the properties were found to possess sufficient historical integrity to be considered contributing to a future proposed National Register Historic District. Approximately 33% of the properties surveyed may be considered potentially contributing, pending further dialogue with the Texas Historical Commission and the National Park Service. And approximately 37% of properties either did not meet the minimum age requirement (built before 1970) or had suffered significant alterations and deteriorations to constitute a loss of historical significance. Preliminary Conclusion: If only half of the potentially contributing structures are accepted by THC and NPS as being contributing to a future proposed National Register Historic District, then between 40 to 50 percent of properties surveyed would In conclusion, the Preliminary Historic Resources Survey reveals that Lubbock's Downtown District possesses a significant critical mass of mid-20th century Modern buildingswith sufficient levels of historical integrity to suggest the viability of a National Register Historic District. Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update HISTORIC RFS0l1RCES SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NEXT STEPS & RECOMMENDATIONS • Lubbock actively pursue the formation of National Register Historic District with two periods • The current on -going formation of a Unified Development Code (UDC) should establish the of historic significance: Pre -World War II 11920-1941) and Mid -Century Modern 11941-1970). requirements for baseline documentation of an historic structure, such as scale drawings, high The creation of the historic district will make historic properties not otherwise attaining to the level of individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places eligible for vital incentives to overcome the inherent financial challenges of rehabilitating of historic properties. SGD may assist the redevelopment team in preliminary discussions with the Texas Historical Commission's staff to determine their concurrence with our findings and recommendations. • A more detailed survey into the historic and cultural significance of properties identified as Contributing and Potentially Contributing in our survey should be conducted to inform the district application process. This more detailed survey may be conducted using a combination of professional architectural preservation specialists, cultural historians, and volunteers (historical society members, property owners, university students, etc.). • The Downtown District's community should explore grass -roots programs like This Place Matters and Legacy Business Program, in conjunction with other marketing campaigns, to help elevate the general public's awareness of and appreciation for the many historical and cultural assets in the downtown area. • The City of Lubbock should consider the creation of a Vacant Building Ordinance for its Downtown District to bring dilapidated buildings back to safe condition and productive use. • The current on -going formation of a Unified Development Code IUDC) should codify policies and processes for the creation of local -level Neighborhood and Urban Conservation Districts and Historic Districts for future implementation, if desired. • The current on -going formation of a Unified Development Code IUDC) should establish a local governmental entity and standard process for the review and approval of modifications to existing structures and construction of new infill development within designated historic districts. Approvals should be tied to the issuance of building permits. • The current on -going formation of a Unified Development Code (UDC) should establish a Local governmental entity and standard process for the review and approval of demolitions of historically significant bui Ldingswithin a locally established conservation district or historic district. Approvals should be tied to the issuance of building permits. resolution photographs and recordings of oral histories, be prepared prior to granting a permit for demolition. • Locally designated conservation and historic districts should formulate district -specific design guidelines to supplement form -based zoning standards and avoid a "one size fits all" through customization. The City of Lubbock's GIS, zoning and permitting databases should integrate additional data fields for historic designations and overlay districts (e.g., Neighborhood Conservation Districts, National Register Historic Districts, Local Historic District, etc.) This wilt assist property owners and developers to be aware of designations and overlays early in a redevelopment project's planning process. These recommended upgrades to the database will also assist Planning Department staff and historic agency review boards in identifying and recording future historic resources survey efforts. Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update HISTORIC RESEARCH SURVEY VACANT AND NON-CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY is Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update HISTORIC RESEARCH SURVEY VACANT, NON-CONTRIBUTING AND ALL HISTORIC HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update N u] (D O CD 1920-1929 11% 1970-PRESENT 24% 1930-1939 8% 1960-1969 16% 1950-1959 31% 1940-1949 10% 1920-1929 11% 1970-PRESENT 24% 1930-1939 8% 1960-1969 16% 1950-1959 31% 1940-1949 10% 1920-1929 11% 1970-PRESENT 24% 1930-1939 8% 1960-1969 16% 1950-1959 31% 1940-1949 10% 1920-1929 11% 1970-PRESENT 24% 1930-1939 8% 1960-1969 16% 1950-1959 31% 1940-1949 10% 1920-1929 11% 1970-PRESENT 24% 1930-1939 8% 1960-1969 16% 1950-1959 31% 1940-1949 10% 1920-1929 11% 1970-PRESENT 24% 1930-1939 8% 1960-1969 16% 1950-1959 31% 1940-1949 10% DATE RANGE OF DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK PROPERTIES BEFORE 1920 HISTORIC RESEARCH SURVEY BUILT BEFORE 1969 Built before 1900 1940-1949 1900-1909 1950-1959 1910-1919 1960-1969 1920-1929 1970-Present 1930-1939 HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update DATE RANGE OF DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK PROPERTIES BEFORE 1920 HISTORIC RESEARCH SURVEY YEAR BUILT Built before 1900 1940-1949 1900-1909 1950-1959 1910-1919 1960-1969 1920-1929 0 1970-Present 1930-1939 HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update 1920-1929 11% 1970-PRESENT 24% 1930-1939 8% 1960-1969 16% 1950-1959 31% 1940-1949 10% 1920-1929 11% 1970-PRESENT 24% 1930-1939 8% 1960-1969 16% 1950-1959 31% 1940-1949 10% (N) 37% POTENTIALLY CONTRIBUTING (PC) 33 % CONTRIBUTING (C) 28% (N) 37% POTENTIALLY CONTRIBUTING (PC) 33 % CONTRIBUTING (C) 28% HISTORIC ELIGIBILITY OF DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK PROPERTIES NATInNA1 RFr,ICTFR ELIGIBILITY POTENTIALLY CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES National Register Property Recorded Texas Historic Landmark Locally Listed Historic Landmark Contributing Property Potentially Contributing Property _ Non -Contributing Property HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update HISTORIC ELIGIBILITY OF DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK PROPERTIES NATInNA1 RFr,ICTFR ELIGIBILITY NON-CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES National Register Property Recorded Texas Historic Landmark Locally Listed Historic Landmark Contributing Property Potentially Contributing Property Non -Contributing Property HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update CASE STUDIES NOT QUITE READY FOR AN HISTORIC DISTRICT YET? A SPECTRUM OF OPTIONS • LEGACY BUSINESS PROGRAM • FAMILY -OWNED BUSINESS AWARDS • THIS PLACE MATTERS PROGRAM • VACANT BUILDING PROGRAM • ADAPTIVE REUSE OF A BUILDING • CONSERVATION DISTRICTS • NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT FOR INCENTIVES • LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS FOR LOCAL INCENTIVES • LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS WITH FORM -BASED ZONING AND GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES • LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS WITH DISTRICT -SPECIFIC DESIGN GUIDELINES Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update 7ON r,,AN ANIO BUSIPI FAN LOY In H L✓ _�AwA CASE STUDIES LEGACY BUSINESS PROGRAM PROGRAM DETAILS • OHP'S LEGACY BUSINESS PROGRAM IS A COMPONENT OF THE LIVING HERITAGE INITIATIVE • BUSINESSES ELIGIBLE FOR THIS PROGRAM HAVE BEEN AROUND FOR 20 YEARS OR MORE • BUSINESSES CONTRIBUTE TO THE HISTORY, CULTURE, AND AUTHENTIC IDENTITY OF THE CITY • ANYONE CAN NOMINATE AN ELIGIBLE BUSINESS • PUBLICITY AND WINDOW DECALS TO HIGHLIGHT BUSINESSES • BUSINESSES BECOME ELIGIBLE FOR ADDITIONAL GRANTS TO AID IN REHABILITATION OF THEIR HISTORIC PROPERTY Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update EFt @ CASE STUDIES THIS PLACE MATTERS PROGRAM CONCEPT • 2008 NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION CAMPAIGN • DIY PROJECT FEEL • NO LONG-TERM POLITICAL OR HIGH -COST AGENDA • ENCOURAGES AMERICA TO REIGNITE CONNECTIONS TO COMMUNITY • CROWDSOURCING PEOPLE'S PERSONAL MEANING TO PLACES THAT HAVE PLAYED A ROLE IN THEIR LIVES • ZERO RULES! THROUGH THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER (LARGE OR SMALL, NATIONAL OR PERSONAL) Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update This Place Matters Toolkit How to Create a Campaign for a Place You Love MAl{ERS \ ! � PLAT E y as Iljjiir FFIANTr y p pJALE o- , f .: MAT!ERS MA w SAVE ROUTE ®National Trust for Historic Preservation" IN ALBUQUERQUE JULY 16-31, 2016! 1 WIN PRIZES! DO GOOD! CASE STUDIES THIS PLACE MATTERS SET THE GOAL • IS THIS A PLACE YOU WANT TO SAVE? • IS IT THREATENED? • WHY DOES THE SITE MATTER? • WHO IS YOUR AUDIENCE? -DONORS -ELECTED OFFICIALS -PROPERTY OWNERS -VISITORS • WHAT IS THE VISUAL STORY TO TELL? • WHAT ARE THE MEDIA CHANNELS? -HANDOUTS AND POSTCARDS -SOCIAL MEDIA -NEWSPAPER FEATURES -SIGNAGE, T-SHIRTS, BUTTONS, BANNERS PLAN AN EVENT • CREATE A CONNECTION BETWEEN THE PUBLIC AND THE PLACE(S) CHOSEN TO HIGHLIGHT • HOLD A SPECIAL TOUR OR PARADE • CREATE A POP-UP SHOP EVENT • INCLUDE SYNERGISTIC VENDORS Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update -Amm a CASE STUDIES THIS PLACE MATTERS r , GET THE WORD OUT 3 • SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN • PRESS RELEASE • EMAILS • FACEBOOK PAGE • SHARE FLYERS AT CIVIC BUILDINGS AND BUSINESSES AIM, SHOOT & SHARE! • RECRUIT SOMEONE AND TAKE MULTIPLE PHOTOS • PUBLISH AND PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEOPLE TO SHARE FOND MEMORIES • ENJOY THE NARRATIVES AND DISCOVERY Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update N m v 0 fEll';.ALLEY. f V .riy�of San Antonio '. EA W 0 HEIGHTS' CASE STUDIES VACANT BUILDING PROGRAM GOALS OF VBP • ADDRESS THE ROOT CAUSES OF VACANCY • INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY • RETAIN VALUE AND QUALITY FOR SURROUNDING PROPERTIES • ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • BRING DILAPIDATED PROPERTIES BACK INTO PRODUCTIVE USE OVERVIEW • 18 MONTH PILOT PROGRAM IN 2017 • ADOPTED AS A NEW CHAPTER IN CODE OF ORDINANCES • ORIGINAL 25 SQUARE MILE PROGRAM, EXPANDED TO 112 SQUARE MILE AREA • APPLIED TO CBD, HD & HALF -MILE BUFFER AROUND ACTIVE BASES • INCLUDES SINGLE-FAMILY AND 1:125,000 NON -SINGLE FAMILY STRUCTURES 0 1 2 4ml o .. s.s 7km • THE INVENTORY IS PUBLISHED MONTHLY ONLINE TO MAINTAIN TRANSPARENCY AND NOTIFY PUBLIC Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update N t0 (D 1 -4011f III ;J I - g 777 CASE STUDIES VACANT BUILDING PROGRAM HEDRICKS BUILDING, 1928 601 NORTH ST. MARY'S STREET SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 42,000 SF ORIGINALLY 54 APARTMENTS BOUTIQUE HOTEL CONVERSION Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update CASE STUDIES VACANT BUILDING PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS • REGISTRATION PROCESS • MEET MINIMUM MAINTENANCE (STANDARD OF CARE) REQUIREMENTS • ANNUAL INSPECTIONS OR PENALTIES OPPORTUNITIES • ELIGIBILITY FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FUNDS • DEVELOPMENT FEE WAIVERS • OWNERS WORK WITH STAFF TO FIND LONG-TERM SOLUTIONS TO CONVERT SPACES INTO VIBRANT PLACES Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update -4*4� - -"I,- _._ CASE STUDIES VACANT BUILDING PROGRAM Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update CASE STUDIES VACANT BUILDING PROGRAM Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update CASE STUDIES VACANT BUILDING PROGRAM Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update CASE STUDIES VACANT BUILDING PROGRAM ' NOT N. NEW BRAUN1=E'L-S /UG / Io II I i WI n ti 1 I F 'IT Sll Jtii ' -- ARY Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update t% i III u r WOW \ .Aid how \ : ill AA ���� 11 r CASE STUDIES ADAPTIVE REUSE SAN ANTONIO LIGHT BUILDING, 1931 ATLEE B. AYERS, ARCHITECT 420 BROADWAY SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 50,000 SF (NOT INCLUDING REAR PRINT BUILDING) ADAPTIVE USE WITH SELECTIVE DEMOLITION RECEIVED $2.5 MILLION INCENTIVE FROM MIDTOWN TIRZ RECEIVED $75K IN FEE WAIVERS UNDER INNER CITY REINVESTMENT AND INFILL POLICY Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update CASE STUDIES NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICTS CONCEPTS OF A NCD • A NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT, OR NCD, IS A LAND USE OVERLAY TOOL • OFFERS COMMUNITIES THE ABILITY TO TAILOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COMMUNITY CHARACTER TO THE NEEDS OF SPECIFIC AREAS AND NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTS, AS OPPOSED TO THE ONE -SIZE -FITS -ALL APPROACH OF A TRADITIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE. • THROUGH THE USE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW OR PLANNING AND ZONING CONTROLS, NCDS ARE OFTEN USED IN TANDEM WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION REGULATION, BUT USUALLY ARE DESIGNED TO iM A PRESERVATION COMMISSION'S ) TO PROTECT CHARACTER -DEFINING HOUT A HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE :'RIATE DEMOLITION, OR REGULATING �NGE BY REQUIRING ARCHITECTURAL E FOOTAGE REQUIREMENTS, LOT ERVATION. REE OF REGULATION FOR AN NCD MORE LENIENT OR FLEXIBLE THAN TION REGULATION. Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update �� Mi L� APE PAM - �. p _' • III � �s` � ,.." t • <,� � ,x � h .r l� A' I�',ai Ml`�iN - �W YI�I L — a5it ' L Al - 14 z; I o ' KING PAR Vai ORIC & F JUNCTION A�NG { _• , of -::nN rr� .n +Y...,,,--:'_ . __. _- - t"- ■fi I fV� . r1tE PEAMIE 7 e'�e —_ _ AEWIALA � WI moes,lm � _ � • ll ='°ram •' tENE!, o slim mm" y a MI", M; t CASE STUDIES THE RIGHT WAY TO DEMOLISH • ACCURATELY AND OBJECTIVELY EVALUATE THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PROPERTY BEFORE IT IS THREATENED WITH DEMOLITION. • ACKNOWLEDGE THAT AN HISTORIC OR CULTURAL PROPERTY MAY HAVE MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS WITH COMPETING PRIORITIES. • CODIFY A FAIR PROCESS FOR ALL STAKEHOLDERS TO VOICE THEIR CONCERNS - EMOTIONS CAN RUN DEEP WHEN DISCUSSING ISSUES OF IDENTITY AND CULTURE. • DETERMINE WHAT IS IN THE OVERWHELMING BEST INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC GOOD. SOMETIMES THAT DOES MEAN A PROPERTY HAS TO BE DEMOLISHED. IF SO, DOCUMENT IT THOROUGHLY BEFORE DEMOLITION. • CONSIDER OPTIONS FOR ADAPTIVE REUSE, INCORPORATING HISTORIC ELEMENTS INTO THE REPLACEMENT PLANS, OR RELOCATION. • SALVAGE AND INCORPORATE HISTORIC MATERIALS INTO THE REPLACEMENT PLANS. • INCORPORATE INTERPRETIVE COMPONENTS INTO THE REPLACEMENT PLANS TO TELL STORY OF PLACE. Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update IRREGULARLY COURSED, ROUG 8OUARED ASHLAR LIMESTONE, CREAM COLORED CASE STUDIES THE RIGHT WAY TO DEMOLISH Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update NOTEWORTHY CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES IN LUBBOCK Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update NOTEWORTHY CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES IN LUBBOCK Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update NOTEWORTHY CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES IN LUBBOCK Downtown Lubbock Master Plan Update PARKS + OPEN SPACE _plant lectures _schools field trips _stormwater treatments movies on the lawn _social Saturday _farmers market _lunch carts _wifi m m _first friday art trail _tourist attraction art festivals howl-o-ween/costume _doggy birthdays _food trucks _blues on the green weekend band performance _battle of the bands lubbock masterplan 4THSTREEr 5TH STREET .1 -- NEW 1 1 mISTPEEr■ 1 1 ODn[PE-1-11T ■ 1 9THSTREET 1 1 10THSTREET 1 1 WIN=rPEErEl � RPaADwA � � 1 13THSTREET 1 - 1 ,<THSTPEET 1 1 15THSTREET 16THSTREET „THSTREET 1 1 I —STREET 1 1 1 ,9THsrREEr 1 a 1 1 a 1 1 1 downtown park character network RAIL SPUR PARK qFOODAN BARK 1p WHAT IS A CIVIC PLAZA? Imagine a safe, inviting, and vibrant civic space in downtown which is specifically designed to host and celebrate awide range of community activities, from concerts, to yoga, office workers on lunch break, and movies on the green... LUBBOCK'S LIVING ROOM Vibrant 21st century downtowns have spaces and activities that appeal to a wide variety of people. Plazas with inviting features and regular event programming encourage locals and tourists alike to visit downtown, which in turn supports a thriving mix of retail, residential and institutional uses. SYMBOLIC HEART OF THE CITY The civic plaza is for everyone in Lubbock to enjoy - young, old, and somewhere in- between! Whether you live in downtown or are just visiting, the plaza is a place to visit for special city-wide events, but also a spot for parents to enjoy a cup of coffee while their kids splash in the fountain, etc... WHAT WOULD IT LOOK LIKE? The design ofthe civic plaza will incorporate community and stakeholder feedback before being finalized; these preliminary visualizations are to help demonstrate potential ideas and uses. There are many opportunities for site elemnts such as paving and shade structures to reflect the unique culture and vernacular of Lubbock, creating a unique identity for the civic plaza. AN INVESTMENT IN OUR FUTURE Preliminary construction costs forthe plaza (using data from comparable projects in other cities) range from an estimated $4.7 million to $6.5 million. However, data shows that urban parks can generate signficant reinvestment and additional tax revenue for their downtowns. NEW LUBBOCK CIVIC PLAZA � a 05 01 rs 4'r • 04R � �4a�� I • ti - Legend \ 1 03 01 Event Lawn v u 02_ Cafe Seating 03 Informal seatwalls I III 04Fountain Interactive Fountain ,(y�y u 05_ Drought -tolerant 4:a1. native plants 06_ Public Art 07 Broadway Streetscape View 1; A bird's eye view of the plaza (looking from Broadway toward First United Methodist Church) movie and concert nights r yoga recharge design elements inspired by local vernacular WHERE WOULD THE URBAN PLAZA BE LOCATED? A potential site is the former location of Lubbock Power and Light at 1301 Broadway. The city -owned block is located on a prominent corridor leading into downtown, and in close proximity to churches, hotels, businesses and Citizen's Tower. res !ower Pioneer Hotel r _ 1 H 1 main corridor to downtown lubbock . •.•r. view 1 t Y „ First United I Is // W -49 View 2: Event lawn pictured from SE corner of Potential Project Timeline 2020 IF F 2021 2022 downtown LP&L site RFP issued public input groundbreaking masterplan cleared and plaza complete design phase POP-UP PARK ACTIVATIONS FUNDRAISING m m w TBG TBIG lubbock downtown masterplan sundance square fort worth, texas case study �I Sundance Square construction budget: $13 million cost per acre: $9.92 million area: 1.31 acres key elements: splash area _pavilion W-S Ilk p ♦ t ell XA- AYI Ilk 0;' r y, �. ", .. .. ,�_�• _ .. �T y. � Ay��te` ,: -�' - V�6 � -_Ak- _v F TBIG lubbock downtown masterplan clarksville downtown commons clarksville, tenessee case study Clarksville Commons construction budget: $4.2 million cost per acre: $3.52 million area: 1.19 acres key elements: _splash area _pavilion _open social lawn _event venue _coffee house I I I I I I 'yy' TBG CO m :A lubbock downtown masterplan director park portalnd, oregon case study Director Park construction budget: $9.5 million cost per acre: $13.19 million area: 0.72 acres key elements: _splash area GC IL ■ rl A ■ aL a Qj IL e_ r — — — — — — — — I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L - - - - - - - - J r— — — — — — — — I I I � Sundance Square Area: 1.31 acres Perimeter: 987.57 ft Construction Budget: $13 million Cost per acre: $ 9.92 million key elements: splash area pavilion The Hub Area: 1.84 acres Perimeter: 1133.84 ft Estimated Construction Budget: $ 4.7 million - 6.5 million Republic Square Area: 2.29 acres Perimeter: 1262.65 ft Construction Budget: $ 5.9 million Cost per acre: $ 2.58 million key elements: open social lawn seating 1110%G lubbock downtown masterplan scale comparisons r— — — — — — — — I I I I I I I I I J Clarksville Civic Square Area: 1.19 acres Perimeter: 912.82 ft Construction Budget: $ 4.2 million Cost per acre: $ 3.52 million key elements: splash area pavilion open social lawn event venue r— — — — — — — — , Director Park Area: 0.72 acres Perimeter: 736.12 ft Construction Budget: $ 9.5 million Cost per acre: $ 13.9 million key elements: splash area pavilion lll- TBG lubbock existing conditions masterplan sketch III- TBG lubbock temporary masterplan proposal sketch —parklet seating —urban swings TBG I — pop-up garden installation —food truck public plaza — parklet bench with planters lubbock downtown pop-up pocket parks masterplan parklets 6# ki — parklet lounge — provisional planters with seating — parklet seating with green areas TBG lubbock downtown masterplan immediate activation ART TO ' AT SOMA I NOW vsex.d quertwrw .ry N O N �i i..�_. ♦I••' _P. a.A —cif li F :zzi, F f�1q,.' -� - fir, �,�.'� } •,�. ,�•.} 9 G 14� r - ___ 1-7 RESTD47� .� wp«"' � ^�1 �_ :- • �; 'tee ;• .�M yg- ��+ _ �� + �. �S�jl�_ - i� t'TP" .��� - Iy J�� � j �i1 '� `J.^ , .E1 - 6.� _ i'� Y'� y �• � � 111�� — painted streets — playful crosswalk l � y, 1K\~ �° •.N —colorful activated pathwhways —defined lanes for pedestrians and bikes TBG lubbock downtown masterplan v N O A W —playful urban installations — pedestrian friendly streets tactical urbanism —activated alley's No Text 10 BG lubbock built out proposal masterplan sketch m m ," TBG lubbOck close-up masterplan built out proposal 7�1 summer fall spring winter The Hub Park Programming • Texas Tech College Events Tailgating Student activities Organization Fundraisers • • Holiday Trunk or Treat Pumpkin Trail Breakfast with Santa Holiday Happening Easter • New Years Eve Columbus Day 4th of July Earth Day MLK Day Cinco de Mayo • • Downtown Professionals Lunch carts Lunch Yoga W ifi Coffee Chat • � • Community Events R Moonlight Musicals: The Wizard of Oz Alzheimer's walk Learn to knit Stretch & Strength Family Dog trainer • • • • Pop -Up Events Farmers Market Book sale Ruffle and Rust Expo Buddy Holly Gallery E ," BG Iubbock programming masterplan m m N O 00 MEASURING THE ECONOMIC VALUE Of aCITY PARK SYSTEM THE TRUST ft, PUBLIC LAND CONSERVING LAND FOR PEOPLE ECONOMIC VALUE OF PARKS Seven Major Factors: 1. Property Value 2. Tourism 3. Direct Use 4. Heath 5. Community Cohesion 6. Clean Water 7. Clean Air Master Plan Update I CONCEPT Two of the factors provide a city with direct income to its treasury. The first factor is increased property tax from the increase in property value because of proximity to parks. (This is also called "hedonic value" by economists.) The second is increased sales tax on spending by tour- ists who visit primarily because of the cites parks. (Beyond the tax receipts, these factors also bolster the collective wealth of residents through property appreciation and tourism revenue.) Three other factors provide city residents with direct savings. By far the largest amount stems from residents' use of the cites free parkland and free (or low-cost) recreation opportuni- ties, which saves them from having to purchase these items in the marketplace. The second is the health benefit —savings in medical costs —due to the beneficial aspects of exercise in the parks. And the third is the community cohesion benefit of people banding together to save and improve their neighborhood parks. This "know -your -neighbor" social capital helps ward off antisocial problems that would otherwise cost the city more in police and fire protection, prisons, counseling, and rehabilitation. The last two factors provide environmental savings. The larger involves water pollution reduction —the retention of rainfall by the park system's trees, bushes, and soil, thus cutting the cost of treating stormwater. The other concerns air pollution —the fact that park trees and shrubs absorb a variety of air pollutants. T N CD CD Seven Major Factors: 1. Property Value direct income 2. Tourism 3. Direct Use 4. Heath direct savings 5. Community Cohesion .................................................................. 6. Clean Water environmental 7. Clean Air savings Master Plan Update CONCEPT 12 ■ in -k to atest ;ctly > deni- �rs are ty s lo Ilion lm 20o6 nollars). Using an average park value benent of 5 percent, we see that the total amount that parks increased property value is just under $1.2 billion. Using the effective annual tax rate of o.58 percent, we find that Washington reaped an additional $6,953,377 in property tax because of parks in 2oo6. (Property) Value of W"on, D.C.7606onic fproperties within 500 feet of parks $23,977,160,000 ed average value of a park 5% f properties attributed to parks $1,198,858,025 Effective annual residential tax rate 0.58% Annual property tax capture from value of property due to parks $6,953,377 ; Property values were obtained from the District of Columbia "conservative value" ECONOMIC VALUE OF PARKS 1 1 --% , — __ aTHSTREET — _ _ — — — _ STKET 51- 1 1 MPCDN s—E. 1 1 TMS ETA 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • . • ♦ ' , 1 ♦ Doa<RE:ITHSTREET � .♦♦ ♦♦♦ 1 1 � 911-1 STREET 1 ♦ ♦ ` , 1 ,oT~STREET 500' ' . : 2, 000' ' ♦ 1 1 1 -N—ET■s • ' , HUB , , ■ ■ eRoaov■ � � ■ 1 ■ 1 �, ■ .y a1 �: 131RHSTROT / go • 1 ' } ■ ■ t, uIHSTREET ♦ �� :. e• ♦ ♦ 1 JA t• :. I —STREET ' ♦ 1 ♦ � i ♦ IJTH STREET 1 ♦ ' ,ET -STREET 1 ♦ 1 ♦ . . 19T —EET <y! Master Plan Update I CONCEPT N (D a ON The most famous park in Washington, D.C. may be the National Mall with its museums and government agencies, but it is the many other parks —from huge Rock Creek Park to tiny Logan Circle, the ones surrounded by homes —that provide the city with the greatest property value benefit. The city's abundance of green has placed much of Washington's real estate either directly abutting or within a stone's throw of a park. This makes it convenient for the capital's deni- zens to toss a ball around, enjoy a picnic, or just get a pleasurable view. The city's coffers are also reaping the benefits. Getting to this number is fairly straightforward. Using GIS in combination with the city's assessment data, we find that the value of all residential properties (apartments, condo- miniums, row houses, and detached homes) within Soo feet of a park is almost $24 billion (in 20o6 dollars). Using an average park value benefit of 5 percent, we see that the total amount that parks increased property value is just under $1.2 billion. Using the effective annual tax rate of o.58 percent, we find that Washington reaped an additional $6,953,377 in property tax because of parks in 2oo6. onic (Property) Value of Wton, D.C: s Parks Value of properties within 500 feet of parks $23,977,160,000 Assumed average value of a park 5% Value of properties attributed to parks $1,198,858,025 Effective annual residential tax rate 0.58% Annual property tax capture from value of property due to parks $6,953,377 ; Property values were obtained from the District of Columbia "conservative value" ECONOMIC VALUE OF PARKS Master Plan Update I CONCEPT N (0 (D a 21 �Smale Riverfront Park. Cincinnati �---�' OOQ*kl 21 st Century Waterfront Chattanooga oo�© v W Three Rivers/Pa Pit a • Beltline f AOnO*JOOo Rose Kennedy Greenway Boston C� 0 Riverfront OLinear System 0 Parks Transit &L Peer City 0 One Brand &CSO 7 Comparison Metrics* Size : Acres of park, Miles of trails Status: Completed or In Progress Timeline: Construction Start Year and Opening Year Program: Parks, Trails, Transit, Housing, Retail, Stadiums, Streetscapes Total Project Costs: To Date , Projected Funding Type Breakdown: To Date, Projected Visitation Increases Property Value Increases": % increase of property values for properties located near the project. Development Catalyzed": $ of new development, located outside of the project area, spurred by parks improvements. Return on Investment = $ Development Catalyzed Total Project Costs * Information was not publicly available for all of the case studies. 9 ** Area of influence varies for each project �t comparison r-i LJ r-i LJ Smale Riverfront Park* $88M3 The Beltline* $4001VI15 21St Century Waterfront $120M10 Rose Kennedy Greenway $35M6 $750M3 9:1 37% 3 (2008-2013) $2,400M15 6:1 24%2 $2,000M14 17:1 27% 8 (1995-1999) $1,400M4 40:1 49% 4 (2005-2009) Note: The Rose Kennedy Greenway cost figure does not include costs attributable to the 'Big Dig' therefore artificially inflating the resulting ROI ratio. 23 N Cn :e+a -- � _ n - LL I _ -- - rt t, hdt ri5top e T. Via& courtesy _ OFF -i .viol :AF 6:1 ROI TO DATE 1 24% INCREASE IN PROPERTY VALUES (2002-2005, SOUTH) z 100+ PROJECTS CATALYZED UP TO DATE (2014)15 $2.4 BILLIO OF NEW DEVELOPMENT TO DATE 1, Smale Riverfront Park ;. $ 8 8 Million COSTS UP TO DATE' $120 Million TOTAL COSTS FOR 5 PHASES17 5 phases complete by 2016 kL OF FIVE PHASES 40 ACRES _- ALONG THE OHIO RIVER 3 Photo, credit Craig Kuhner, courtesy of Sasaki Associates. 19% 13% 3% $120m17 29% 36% Funding Federal State City County Private Unsecured Funding IL A& Rose Kenned ear. a AMP' G ree�way A irk -,;e it IL rx A -4r I State Private Donat'5WWdowment & Earned Revenue--4ce 60% AI, 1, - 2 40% Plhoto credit H !nwa d via Chattanooga RiverfrontA & & � & & 1w, W 1985 — 2005 s 22 miles of connected riverfront trails $ 129 acres of recently renovated 215t Century Wat _i"'I IFF 50, S12-0m Funding Public Private r as Photo courtesy of River City Company. J, PARKING Master Plan Update — Downtown Lubbock 2019 Parking Tasks Short Term • Identify downtown parking stakeholders o City o Community Organizations • Develop Parking Master Plan • Start collecting parking data now o Manual data collection o GIS/database updates o Technology o Stakeholder surveys • City collaboration o Planning o Traffic o Police o Finance o Marketing • Create organizational structure for parking decisions • Create a Downtown parking task force committee o Monthly meetings to discuss policies and practices o Management decisions to balance parking system o Review data analytic trends o Revenue evaluation o Marketing, education, and branding discussions • City to develop parking ratio within downtown boundary • Committee to work with City to develop process for parking variances within boundary o Consider small-scale, pedestrian friendly developments (less than 3,000 SF) o Mixed -use developments • Define downtown parking boundary • Create flexible parking and mobility program • Document parking inventory of both on- and off- street parking • Document inventory of current building programming/zoning (both occupied and unoccupied buildings) • Develop enforcement policies • Investigate current shared parking agreements within downtown boundary • City to develop Parking KPIs • Leverage transit center ridership • City to take parking occupancy counts • Committee to divide downtown boundary into parking sheds • City to create and manage parking inventory/management tool (GIS, database) • Develop temporary parking ratios for current conditions Page:221 • City to develop current effective parking ratio of downtown boundary (both occupied/unoccupied, shared/unshared, and current/future) • City to hold stakeholder meetings to discuss parking in effort to generate buy -in (in -person, surveys) o Define current parking perceptions • City to encourage and potentially incentivize public parking within private facilities Mid Term • Consolidation of Parking Management - Create Parking division (in -source, out -source) • Establish parking time limits • Enhance parking wayfinding and messaging • Investigate parking technology to leverage and make informed decisions o Appropriate technology —Toyota or Lexus o Low utilization of technology, if not understood by public o Marketing roll out • City to review and update on -street parking layout/configuration • City to develop walking distance parking corridors • City to develop daily parking and event parking operations • Committee to work with City to develop shared parking definitions/ordinance o Aim to reduce variances through defined exemptions, shared parking, parking reductions • Committee to work with City on parking marketing (banners, apps, signage) • Committee to work on Customer Experience marketing to relay information/commutation (social media, emails, etc.) • City to monitor parking ratio annually to make any updates and adjustments • City to investigate parking management systems for on -street parking • City to develop parking rate structure for on -street spaces Long Term • Develop an integrated parking and mobility program within the City • Develop parking investment strategy o Parking self sufficient o Establish parking budget o Right -sized parking - Develop codes designed to capture utilization of area rather than applying blanket codes to entire area regardless of context. ■ Reduces development barriers ■ Encourage alternative modes of transportation • City to require no parking requirements only market -based parking requirements • City to investigate and implement centralized parking strategies o Location o Demand mitigation o Multiple User groups o Revenue generation potential o Balance walking distance and mobility • City to define and develop management for on -curb demand (TNC, transit, etc.) Page:222 Master Plan Update - 2019 ®TY��V/ ,�T�11T® Downtown Lubbock, TX Parking Task List Time (0,1,2,3) Impact (1,2,3) Budget (1,2,3) Category Task 0 3 1 Customer Service Stakeholder meetings (forums, meetings, surveys) 0 3 1 Management Define downtown parking boundary 0 3 1 Management Inventory current shared parking agreements 0 3 2 Management Inventory current parking inventory (on/off street parking) 0 3 2 Management Inventory building program (occupied/unoccupied) 0 2 2 Management Parking occupancy 0 3 1 Management Define downtown parking sheds 0 3 2 Management Establish baseline current effective parking ratio 0 3 1 Task Force Identify downtown stakeholders 0 3 1 Task Force Establish City collaboration 0 3 2 Task Force Downtown Parking Task Force 1 3 2 Customer Service Parking marketing program 1 2 2 Management Parking master plan 1 3 2 Management Data collection 1 3 3 Management Create/develop parking management tool (GIS, database) 1 3 2 Management Develop parking ratios for Parking Sheds 1 3 2 Management Monitor and update parking ratio data 1 3 1 Policy Establish enforcement policy 1 2 2 Policy Establish parking time limits 1 3 1 Policy Develop parking KPI's for evaluation 1 3 1 Policy Develop formal parking variance process 1 2 3 Policy Implement parking rates 1 3 2 Policy Incentivize public/private facilities 2 3 2 Customer Service Parking wayfinding program 2 3 3 Customer Service Parking technology 2 2 1 Customer Service Establish customer service based marketing 2 3 2 Management Consolidate Parking Management 2 2 2 Management Leverage transit center 2 3 1 Management Establish on -street parking configuration 2 2 1 Management Establish daily, evening and event parking operations 2 2 2 Management Parking rate structure 2 2 2 Management Curb Management 2 2 2 Policy Develop walking distance parking criteria 2 3 2 Policy Develop shared parking definitions/ordinance 2 2 3 Policy Implement parking management systems 3 2 2 Management Integrated parking and mobility program 3 3 2 Management Parking investment strategy 3 2 2 Policy Require market based parking requirements 3 1 2 1 2 Policy Centralized parking Page:223 Integrated Cities What makes a city smart? lo 1 EM WGIO DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE Integrated Parking Foundational C y b e r s e c u r i t y Marketing Governance Data Enforcement E Mobility Vehicles Shared Use Smart Transit Mobility as a Service Pedestrians Built Environment Smart Infrastructure/ITS Smart Utilities Smart City Tech Mobility Hubs Parking System EM WGI. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE Parking System E.M., Ekctronkc Brake light Warning - Alerts thadrlver to hard braking ahead. Endof Ramp DesaIr .Warning-Warnsthedriver to slowdoomtca _mmentleci speed as the wNcle approaches the and of a queue. Forward Colfislon Warning - Warns the tlrhrer wren a fawartl w11k Jan k Immi-rL 1-4fig— Signal System - Optknkms traffic signaL gmhg based an cconected vehicle date lm—tion Mwament A in - Warns the driver when it Is not safe toecter an Intersection. Pedestrian Collision Warning- Warns the tlrivar whena ped tmm Is uslnq a cn—akk in the ,@NcleWS projected path. Pedestrian in a C--lir Vehicle Warning - Identifies potential conflicts between petlestriam In a crosswalk and approaching vehkles Probe Data Enabled Traffic Monitoring - Gathers traffic data from can..... to aptkNa9 transparlabon management Tnmk Signal Priority - Gives buses priority at traffic signals to keep them mnnhg an sehodW . V.W. T—ing Right in Font of Tramft Vahide - Warns the streetcar operator when a vehkde Is turning right at an intersection as the streetcar Is approaching Wrong Wry Entry- Warns me driver of a v Icla mat k entering the revs sible express lanes in the wronq direction and —other egWpped vehicles theta wrong -way driver is app—Nrg. Tampa WIL borough Evp—my Authority fn7-6740 LLS ,OR MAIN ST 164TH Lake AVE 5E Hills IP168TH AVE SC jap rW v xtoria Luk O o— O = v Somerset IAKEMO- BLVD SE EM WGI. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK I MASTER PLAN UPDATE Task Force 0 Stakeholders 0 F Downtown coordination k Q ` Establish goals and metrics Proper management is key to successful parking system ®WGIo DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK I MASTER PLAN UPDATE Management 0 Data, Planning, Occupancy ■ OF Management strategy/program Q `Curb management ■ Parking rate structure Data, Data, Data! Data drives all things parking [O WGI& DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK I MASTER PLAN UPDATE Policy OVariance process OUpdated ordinances ■ OQ On -street time limits, locations ■ Enforcement There won't be a singular solution that satisfies everyone EM WGI. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE Customer Service 0 Wayfinding ■ 0 F Technology k Q ` Public meetings ■ Marketing program Managing parking perception by leveraging reality based solutions ®WGI& DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK I MASTER PLAN UPDATE Immediate Task OData collection ODowntown Task Force ■ OBaseline parking information Today EM WGI. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE Short Term O 1 Parking planning OUpdate parking ordinances ■ OParking management tools (database, GIS, etc) Define policies (shared, enforcement, time limits) O1 Variance processes 1 Marketing plan (Park Lubbock, "plenty of parking downtown") 1-3 years EM WGI. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE Mid Term OTechnology OWayfinding/marketing program ■ OParking operations Customer service focus OR Begin process for consolidated parking management 3-5 years EM WGI. DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK MASTER PLAN UPDATE Long Term 0 Integrated parking and mobility program ■ OF Investment strategy 11 Q `Centralized parking ■ Parking Division establish 5-10 years [O WGI& DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK I MASTER PLAN UPDATE `\TTERI" • Apply time of day and monthly factors Shared Parking Methodology GATHER RATIOS 4 N A L Y Z F PLAN OPERATE SCENARIO • Develop scenarios for peak parking demand MOBILITY • Adjust for modal splits SHARED Q • Adjust of patrons parking once to patronize multiple land uses ®WGI- Master Plan Update I CONCEPT Comparable Cities KEY OBSERVATI • Lubbock has comparatively more parking spaces • All CBD's are exempt from parking requirements • All cities have a minimum of 10 parking staff members • 3 out of 4 have a dedicated parking manager • Parking is generally a self standing division, typically under a parking or transportation division • Leverage technology for revenue and management • Enforcement is active in all cities ®WGI. of A . FORT WORTH, b GVIJED Master Plan Update I CONCEPT LCZ:85ed NEW CITY HALL COMPLEX 11 TE AS AVENUE P-4 O m CD -v CD o AVENUE F Parking Management — Phase 1 No Adjustments EXISTING PROPOSED Block Development (SF) Effective Ratio Parking Req Development (SF) Effective Ratio Parking Req A 41,179 5.15 212 41,180 5.20 21 B 258,825 5.381 1,393 258,825 5.381 1392 C 50,505 5.19 262 341,135 6.58 224 D 117,742 6.61 778 117,742 6.63 781 E 204,276 5.00 1,022 204,276 5.00 1,021 F 77,140 1.501 97 77,140 1.50 116 G H 79,808 5.00 400 418,770 6.67 2793 I 1 36,319 5.34 194 36,319 1 5.27 191 24,607 5.57 137 30,367 5.95 181 K 148,335 5.541 822 152,710 6.06 926 L 112,000 5.00 560 112,000 5.00 560 M 26,290 3.00 79 26,290 1.50 39 OTALS 1,177,026 5.06 5,956 1,816,754 5.76 10,458 Development (SF) Proposed 11816,75 Existing ff 1,177,026 Proposed Req Existing Req Parking Req. ®WGI. 53% Increase 75% ncrease Parking Management — Phase 1 Downtown Ratio Adjustments EXISTING PROPOSED Block Development (SF) Effective Ratio Parking Req Development (SF) Effective Ratio Parking Req A 41,179 5.15 212 41,180 2.10 87 B 258,825 5.38 1,393 258,825 2.15 557 C 50,505 5.19 262 341,135 2.63 897 D 117,742 6.61 778 117,742 2.65 312 E 204,276 5.00 1,022 204,276 3.75 766 F 77,140 1.50 97 77,140 1.35 10 G H 79,808 5.00 400 418,770 2.67 1117 1 36,319 5.34 194 36,319 2.11 77 J 24,607 5.57 137 30,367 2.38 72 K 148,335 5.54 822 152,710 2.43 37 L 112,000 5.001 ,000 5.00 42 M 26,290 3.00 79 26,290 1.50 16 TOTALS 1,177,026 5.06 5,956 1,816,754 1 2.64 4,795 Proposed Existing Proposed Req Existing Req Development (SF) Parking Req. ®WGI. 53% Increase 20% Decrease Parking Management — Phase 1 Parking Ratio Adjustments EXISTING PROPOSED Block Development (SF) Effective Ratio Parking Req Development (SF) Effective Ratio Parking Req A 41,179 5.15 212 41,180 2.10 87 B 258,825 5.38 1,393 258,825 2.15 557 C 50,505 5.19 262 341,135 2.63 897 D 117,742 6.61 778 117,742 2.65 312 E 1 204,276 5.00 1,022 204,276 3.75 766 F 77,140 1.50 97 77,140 1.35 10 G H 79,808 5.00 400 418,770 2.67 1117 1 36,319 5.34 194 36,319 2.11 77 J 24,607 5.57 137 30,367 2.38 72 K 148,335 5.54 822 152,710 2.43 37 L 112,000 5.00 560 112,000 5.00 42 M 26,290 3.00 79 26,290 1.50 16 TOTALS 1,177,026 5.06 5,956 1 1,816,754 1 2.641 4,795 Development (SF) Proposed 1,816,754 Existing W11771026 Proposed Req Existing Req Parking Req. ®WGI. 53% Increase 40 Decrease —145 Acres surface parking assumes approx. 19,000 parking spaces ❑ SURFACE PARKING LOTS 0 PARKING & CIRCULATION -qllDrArr DARK IMr ------------ 3 1- --�� -- ! ���- , ��� 1 - -_ = - �, E: 57 1 � 81< ,THSTRET , r rri� r cEExxa—.SER11 eTH STREET� ."� r �b 3RGa�thds5i� STREET .® _ a �qN 4� A _4, a i —' \♦ �asljiT45'fl3�S :icy- ate..:_ - o.x nnEET � a ���.�• - � �,. —� _� .'ti � i � ;�„_ �._. - -. h 111=rHEET d-- - r rr 2. '�NEW T f. 31 TH STREET er n ,<TH 1TrEE1 7fl- L - O oil m 3 4`4`�� i 74 i E7; _r m r F me t— Plan Update CONCEPT 4 Garages (- 7,000 spaces) assumes — 20,000 total spaces downtown 13 EXISTING GARAGES ElPARKING & CIRCULATION eTP1grT11Drn DARK IMr — '� r� —� -NNa c000ac —TN s,reEET / // f '� \,• , -.11 -,i ITREFT r:. j �/ •/ \�� LUBBOCK COUNTY 7 7 — �a WELLS FARGO ITNITIA 0'. 'RD_P, RKING \i l t; l ill AM -- t ,T—TNEET tiee'� ------------ -�------------- - `" t--� --�• — �a�4 /1, 1 '- a _ Master Plan Update I CONCEPT gating coverage of core CBD area PARKING & CIRCULATION SURFACE PARKING Master Plan Update I CONCEPT co (D N A W LEGEND: oxTAnoTo NEW AND PROPOSED PARKS AND OPEN SPACE .. CONSOLIDATED PARKING pnorooso TRANSIT CENTER 0 PARKING & CIRCULATION DA DVU M r- 7n N� �� .~�~� f�1 \� ` m=*,,u"v,u",° oowocp, IRCIiV I III I It: I IUQ LI V 1 1 . Encourage different land uses to share parking during non -peak hours. Resulting in less parking built and less resources . Reduce inefficiencies, reduce congestion and encourage smarter development. . Reliable & timely parking data critical. Challenge Not all stakeholders will participate in shared parking. Those willing should be encouraged and engaged. . Better access to existing underutilized off-street parking. . Cost effective way to manage parking demand. . Partner with developers to encourage shared parking or access to parking. Takeawav Master Plan Update I CONCEPT IRCIiV I III I It: I IUQ LI V 1 1 Develop Downtown signage guidelines for parking. Coordinate all signage throughout Downtown with public, private and mixed parking. Align parking branding with holistic Downtown branding. Challenge Creating a universal parking branding program with full stakeholder participation in terms of cost, design standards and consistency. T T Create normal operation and event operations signage brand. Encourage existing parking facilities to participate in Downtown parking brand program. Downtown should invest and demonstrate benefits of parking brand program. Takeawav Master Plan Update I CONCEPT N (D N A 0) IRCIiV I III I It: I IUQ LI V 1 1 . Monitor parking through database of public and mixed facilities. . Invest in additional staff to coordinate parking and recommend policy updates. . Encourage a holistic Downtown parking system. Challenge Consistently monitoring and managing a parking area the size of Downtown Lubbock will require the need for dedicated staff or third party entity. . Focus on event and evening parking management. . Continue to encourage off-street parking throughout District. . Monitor enforcement and occupancy rates when appropriate. Takeawav Master Plan Update I CONCEPT IRCIiV I III I It: I IUQ LI V 1 1 Establish formal communication with stakeholders associated with parking. Communicate in advance any Downtown policy changes to parking, marketing or branding. Develop metrics to highlight parking improvements. Challenge Implementing holistic parking solutions, agreed upon but multiple stakeholders with individual agendas will not be an easy task. • Meet with stakeholders regularly and consistently. Encourage stakeholders to participate in shared parking program. Takeawav Master Plan Update I CONCEPT N m N A 00 IRCIiV I III I It: I IUQ LI V 1 1 • Invest in walkable pedestrian access to parking . Meet with stakeholders regularly and consistently facilities. to encourage "walkable" events.. • Walkability is a tool to manage and allocate parking demand. • Encourage stakeholders to participate in shared parking program. • Encourage utilization of modal options to connect parking facilities. Challenge Addressing the connectivity of the entire Downtown will be difficult. With physical and development barriers, Downtown will need to continue to actively plan walkable corridors. Takeawav Master Plan Update I CONCEPT IRCIiV I III I It: I IUQ LI V 1 1 • Actively promote the availability of parking within Downtown. • Create separate shared parking campaign for normal and event operations. Market modal options. challenge Coordination with multiple stakeholders to provide real time information of parking availability, location and pricing. k Improve messaging through all available media platforms. • Increase communication through online parking information. • Customer service focused marketing to provide friendly parking system. Takeawav Master Plan Update I CONCEPT UTILITIES + INFRASTRUCTURE Discipline Immediate Phased Implementation (0-5 years) Future Phased Implementation (5+years) Avenue Q Reconstruction CoL and TxDOT agreement on 5-lane section Integrate surrounding bike lanes in conjunction with proposed section Typical Section Agreement with CoL and TxDOT for placement of bike lanes within section with a Integrate cross street intersections where signals are eliminated Intersection/Signals recommendation of a two-way cycle track with protected curbed median buffer TxDOT is using 50' mast arms to improve intersection configuration including lighting (benefit Bike Lanes Potential elimination of signalized intersections following signal warrant study to be for lighting for pedestrian and bicycle) (also creates flexibility for ADA crossings/ramps) Drainage performed by TOOT HAWK signal consideration at key crossing locations Gateway locations TOOT to consider design elements for intercepting drainage impacting the northern part of Downtown Agreement on right turn lane access near Marsha Sharp and on -going developments Gateway locations to be identified for infrastructure upgrades in conjunction with Ave Q reconstruction and CBD TIF Available Funding TxDOT Gateway Construction and Green Spaces in CBD Gateway Construction and Green Spaces in CBD Pedestrian and Cyclist Enhancements Pedestrian and Cyclist Enhancements Discipline Immediate Phased Implementation (0-3 years) Future Phased Implementation (3+years) Utility Improvements & Relocations Replacing outdated water lines for improved services for development along Future conversion of electrical and telecom from overhead to underground at designated Water North/South Corridors alleys Sanitary Sewer Downtown sewer project (Phase I — 2020-2021) & (Phase II — 2021-2023) Alignment of potential projects to be reflected in downtown street sections Elec./Gas Conversion of electrical and telecom from overhead to underground at designated Designate utility corridors for main and secondary streets Telecom alleys Confirmation of costs to convert underground and feasibility with LPL Identify potential corridors for utility relocations along main and secondary streets Available Funding Utility Infrastructure Improvements Duct System Improvements for Downtown Redevelopment Duct System Improvements for Downtown Redevelopment Street Maintenance Program Downtown Sanitary Sewer Replacement (2020-2023) Brick Paver Brick paver hybrid section approval for implementation on Broadway Main St. brick removal project Brick paver hybrid installation with utility project upgrades in designated corridors Brick paver hybrid approval along Ave J, Texas Ave and Buddy Holly Ave, Crickets Ave Available Funding Street Maintenance Program Street Maintenance Program ADA Ramp and Sidewalk Project ADA Ramp and Sidewalk Project Discipline Immediate Phased Implementation (0-3 years) Future Phased Implementation (3+years) Traffic & Pedestrian — Mutli-modal Signal warrant study to maximize efficiency on Broadway (west of Ave Qto east of I- Evaluate signal, stop condition and overall movements within downtown (all streets) Signal warrant study 27) Signage and Striping Evaluate main corridors for implementing multi -modal user infrastructure Improved striping and Signage along main and secondary corridors Available Funding Pedestrian and Cyclist Enhancements Pedestrian and Cyclist Enhancements Gateway Construction and Green Spaces in CBD Street Maintenance Program - ADA Ramp and Sidewalk - Street Maintenance Program Discipline Immediate Phased Implementation (0-3 years) Future Phased Implementation (3+years) Downtown Street Sections Improved Stormwater lines and surface collection system for Broadway upgrades Utilize street maintenance program to effectively and strategically rehabilitate secondary Main and Secondary Corridors Designate utility corridors for main and secondary streets corridors in future years Drainage & Stormwater Upgrades Overlap CIP improvements to maximize cost for utility, storm and street upgrades Establish a strategy for street surface materials One-way streets Focus improvements in conjunction with improved parking strategy Input from public/private stakeholders to promote development without jeopardizing safety Angle parking conversion Perform study for potential elimination of one-way streets for safety and enhanced Convert one-way streets to two-way streets for all downtown property access, improved circulation downtown, Civic Center accessibility, and surrounding courthouse area (Focus on Ave J, Texas Ave & Buddy Holly) Eliminate angle parking stalls and convert to parallel parking stalls. Eliminate angle parking in conjunction with safety improvements for multi -modal users. Improved wayfinding signage and striping for bike lanes and improved mobility Update bike master plan for future routes through downtown corridors Available Funding Stormwater Repairs or Replacement in Downtown Civic Center Parking Lot Repairs Utility Infrastructure Improvements Street Maintenance Program Duct system improvements Street Maintenance Program Discipline Immediate Phased Implementation (0-3 years) Future Phased Implementation (3+years) Connectivity, Accessibility, & ADA Upgrades Improved ADA ramps along Broadway corridor Improved sidewalks and ADA upgrades at alley crossings ADA ramps Adding bulb -outs at pedestrian crossings Connectivity to Ave Q and 191h Street for Gateway locations Sidewalk strategy Improved crosswalk striping and visibility, and wayfinding signage for bicycle lanes Upgrades to other intersections along Ave Qand 19th Street as future downtown corridors are Bike Master Plan to provide access points to the Lakes system developed Update bike master plan for future routes through downtown corridors Establish/Implement downtown sidewalk strategy for brick paver reuse and consistency for Utilizing ADA ramp fund to improve key corridor intersections — (Ave J & Broadway downtown ADA upgrades and other high pedestrian volume crossings) Improve intersection function for multi -modal users for new Hub Park Available Funding Gateway Construction and Green Spaces Gateway Construction and Green Spaces Pedestrian and Cyclist Enhancements Pedestrian and Cyclist Enhancements - ADA Ramp and Sidewalk - ADA Ramp and Sidewalk Street Maintenance Program Street Maintenance Program Transfer Station Relocation Potential relocation west: - Potential locations Relocate to Gateway location along Ave Q at Broadway Relocate to area just south of Marsha Sharp/Wal-Mart Location near Ave Q may not be advantageous for City of Lubbock Potential relocation locations: Near location for future South Plains College Campus Southwest quadrant of downtown with access to Ave Q and 19'h Viable locations that allow for effective use of trolley system downtown Relocate east of downtown and east of 1-27 Relocate west of downtown and towards the Texas Tech campus Parking strategy will be a key to potential relocation sites Available Funding CBD TIF m (D N W W OVERLAND OVERLAND PARTNERS ARCHITECTS 1 203 E. JONES AVE., SUITE 104 1 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78215 1 210.829.7003 1 WWW.OVERLANDPARTNERS.COM