HomeMy WebLinkAbout110914I
On motion by Mr. Wright, seconded by Mr. Atkins, the following
Resolution was passed by a unanimous vote:
A R E S O L U T I O N
A RESOLUTION DETERRTINING THE NECESSITY OF ASSESSING THE COST OF
CYPRESS STREET
IMPROVING A PORTION OF ASH STREET" SOUTH SECOND STREET, AND NORT.K
,t
FIRST STREET BY CONSTRUCTING AND PUTTING IN FOUR FOOT CONCRETE SIDE-
WALIKS NX IN FRONT OF LOTS NMIBERED 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 22, 239
AND 24 in BLOCK NMIM EFIVE (5) ; LOT NMMER 11 IN BLOCK NMMBER TWKTTY
TWO (22) ; LOT NUMBER FOURTEEN (14) IN BLOCK NTMMER FIFTY THREE (5'3) ;
LOTS NITT BERED 17, 18, 19 , AND 20 IN BLOCK NT.,ABvR EIGHTY FIVE (85) ;M
LOT NUMBER 11 IN BLOCK NTEMER FI GH"_'Y FIVE (85) ; AND LOT NTP+M 15 IN
BLOCK NUI+MER ONE HUNDRED THIRTY TWO (132) : FOURTEEN FOOT CONCRETE SIDF-
WALKS IN FRONT OF LOTS NMIBERFD 3 AND 5 IN BLOCK NMBER ONF HUNDRED
NINETEEN (119) g xtkw AGAINST THE OWNERS OF SUCH PROPERTY AND
THEIR PROPERTY, AND NOTICE THEREOF AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR
SUCH HEARING: --
Be it resolved by the City'ouncil of the City of Lubbock, Texas: --
Whereas the City Council of the City of Lubbock, Texas, has here--.
tofore, by Resolution, directed the improvement of a portion Ash Street
By the construction of four $4) foot concrete sidewalks along and in
front of lot Number fifteen (15) in Block Number One -hundred -thirty-
two (132); and a portion of Cypress Street by the construction of
four (4) foot concrete sidewalks along and in frontof Lots numbered
13,14,15,16,17,18,22,23, and 24 in Block Number Five (5); Lot numbered
Fourteen (14) in Block Number Fifty-three; Lots numbered 11, 17, 1,8,
19, and 20 in Block Numbered Bighty-five (85); Lot Number 11 in Block
Number Twenty-two (22) on Ash AtimsU and North Sixth Streets; and
a portion of North First Street by the construction of Fourteen Foot
concrete sidewalks along and abutting Lots Numbered 3 and 5 in Block
Number One -hundred -nineteen (119) and whereas, thereafter plans and
specifications weee prepared by L.A,Hitchcock, City Engineer for the
City of Lubbock and advertisements f1=dD±AM an thMX6rft=x1MzAXtk
ic�xa�.g,��u¢$,x�Y�Y�rY were made for bids therefor, and there-
after bids were received therefor and opened and considered by the
City Council and thereafter the bid of J,,B.Pryor for the said work of
improvement was adopted by the Council; and
Q
WHEREAS and thereafter, said Engineer prepared and filed with the
Council his report, stating the total cost of such improvement and the
rr�?,nr+'rn o- g• ets, -.os+ rava'-le by ea^`i owner oA said a1huttinT prop-
f p.
,(J
U
Page No . 2.
erty and the cos' ^ of such improvement per front foot of abutting prop-
rty, and the names of the firms, persons, corporations, and estates
owning the property abutting on the proposed improvement, with a des-
oription of their property, and the total costs of such improvement to
such parcel of property; and,
wRr.rjr,As tine samca report was approved by the City Council by reso-
lution; and
WHEREAS, the said City Council has finally determined to assess the
cost of said improvement against the owners of the said abutting property
and tc,eir property:---
1. That it is finally determined hereby to assess the cost of 'aid
improvement ag:,inst the owners of the property abutting upon said streets
-rl t',,Pi r property as herein provided. That a hearing shall be given before
the City Council to the owners or se%nrovjertv,, their attorneys
or agents, which hearing shall be held in the Council Chamber in the City
of Lu'Dbock, Texas, on the 9th., day of November, A.Do10149, at 8 o'clock p.m.
and shall continue from time to time and from day to day until all persons
interested in said property shall be fully heard, at which time the owners
of said property or any person interested therein shall be entitled to a hear-
ing at to the benefits of said improvements to their property ar as to any
invalidity or irregularity with reference to said proclamation or as to
any other matter of objection connected with said proceedings, and at which
hearing said owners or any other person interested in said property may pro-
duce evidence in su?port of any objections,
2. That after said hearing, said Council will, by Ordinance, as-
sess against the owner of said property and their property, such such
sums as shall be determined to be just and equitable, and that said as-
sess:Iient will be made in accordance with the front foot plan and rule,
as the frontings of each owner is to the whole fronting to be improved,
provided if the said rule or plan shall be determined in any case to
be unjust or inequitable, then the Council will adopt such rule of
apportionment as shall be just and equitable, having in view the bene-
fits to each owner and burdens imposed upon them, provided than no as -
se ssment shall be Trade against any owner or 'his property in excess of
the benefits to said property in enhanced value thereof by reason of o
said improvement.
7, ments is the
_ That the total estimated costs of said improve
S
sum of Fi•� r-hundred-nineteen and 34/loo dollars (A519.34) and that
the amount per front .foot, which it is proposed to assess against
each parcel of property and its owner is, in the case of the fourtaen
foot sidewalks, the sum of two and 76/loo dollars (:2.76), and in the case
of the four foot sidewalks, the sum of 68/loo dollars (0.0.68)
That the names of the persons, firms. cornnrq.tinno J
owning property abutting said improvements, the description of their
property and the total amount to be assessed against each parcel of prop -
and its owner is as follows:
Estimated costs of sidewalks on North. First Street:
front
Lot No, 31 Block No. 1199 25 fmat feet, miss Willie Briggs P68.87
Lot No. 5, Block 70. 1199 25 front feet, Geo. N. Heifrin 68,P"
of sidewalks on Cypress Street:
Loth
�2 �� 74 Block N0.5978 ij v-+ �oPt. R.A. °al.lace 8,561f0
No, ..», _., . , _� ,
Lots TTo.13 114,159 7 g front feet, 'Morton Jo Smith 106. 60
16,17,18, Block No.59
�.? 86000
Lots No. 11, Block No, , 157 front feet, J. D.Lee
26 front feet rfoD,Henderson 17.60
Lot yo. 14, Block No 53, M'��R--
MAffic
Lots No.17918A�18'20, Block No, 859 114 front feet, VrsoElla ?�oore 73,4o
23.60
Lot No. 11, Block No. 859, 36 front feet, M.D,Henderson
Estimated costs of sidewalks on Ash Street.
�17 0 60
Lot N0.15, Block N0.132, 26 front feet, C.R.Nailor
4. That the City Secretary of the City of Lul bock is hereby
directed to give notice hereof by publication of this Resolution, signed
by him, which publication shall be by advertisement inserted three times
in the Lubbock Avalanche, a newspaper published in said City of Lubbock,
the first publication of which shall be at least ten days before the
date of the aforesaid hearing, and such notice will be further given
by the City Secretary mailing a copy hereof, signed by him, by registered
mail -to each of said owners at their adresses, if known, or if unknown,
then to their agent or a`torney, if known, which said notice shall be de-
posited in the Post Office of the City of Lubbock at least ten days
before the date set for said hearing.
5, That This Resolution shall take effect wjudx from and after its An
passage.
conded and carried, the City Council Adjourned)
(On motion duly made, se •
--- Cit-1-ecretary.
ti r
On rot!cn by ear. wrim,)t, by !fr. At�,Jn-me thtA ,c,,1jc-,ivjng
P,13Rio iut'o�► _ x ;f by Votes
A T
A T.MTfM '17 �-7P1,t1XTVT(3 1"", 07 A` '71173 TP' If, T
TYrP,!.Yw#Tr77t A rnr"If"N or Aotp
?Tr,"Mr," RY T*.4 rl***Tyr
'TALVS M9 TIT or TM
A7M 14 14n
�T MIT W-PSfM 11 TW PTMC."r "pFr4p TTWNTT
LOT VIT., M,�,P Fn TTR';P'-2M, 14 ) T!N IST.0 r -TP -T .rRY T
17 0 Ise 109 AWr *0 T* SVCev. XMMTlt ,T1,"TY TTIM(S5); M,
T*"' '"MTY PIT (85)8 AVVLOT W.".17 15 Tv.
R"T P-77rr "PTPTY "'0' "'T MWMv"T !T-7T.
"AL71 TV rVONT nT !^TS v,",IPV PT'T� 6 TN P-tnit'
F MTI 1RrWP
NAM 114"Ir Im T'T IvfWrg-.� 01P
rvPnrWPTY 0, A"N"' V0TT^-7 A"T VTXP?V- TP-9- ATM PT.Af�,R Yr)T4
"FARTMOt—
P-4 by ,ity 4
C`7 the of Lub'-oike Texe,;sq has here-r
tofcrn, bY
port.jnn Ash t r a t
10 ,Y '.bm !r�n-tructlon 0- -cur J4) I'cot -.:!om1r,.,!Vj sI1-iw%1ke &jc?nr
frorzt- Of "e-A Nut-lb.-Ir �V*t!llrl (I)) In Alock r3tx---blr
tylvO W13 a 1.crtion o' Cy-j-,re--,n IRtr:,.it. by of
*Mjr (4) frrt ";rtd In
rr0r*c," Lots rUvb:!r9..t
in 7310ak Rmber Fiver namet m
I .I
Fc-urt�-3n (14) In Vic TTur,.b?,r 7"i'ty-tbra..,!; T.ots numh-�raA 11, 17
In -r-lixik vim-blril R-1z
Let Narbf-r .1 1,n Plook
.b 1,
i-orttoil 00, 'North IFTrat Ptmat bY tb'!l •Mrx'stM.Ittin of Tcurt .n jvc.rt
:`rvnar-itoi of
Aul. ting- tots 06r;
c r, 3 wn re ro ;xro d Ity t - A - R i Qs or the
of Lubbock =4
tj M—A X
va, . _jr,% for b 1 d a ttlanioe.,ro w1,1 ttera-
&ftor blka w,,!m thor-l"Or anti fionaldorcil by
Cit- Cvlinill and birl vl, T.P.Pr,-,tcr fir' tho atij
rcvtin,,ent wtt,; tt,iopted by -tj%o er-kint-qIj gw-,,i
Wff!'� AS
Council his report, stating, the total -!ost Of" sunr impr,ovement and the
proportion of 'suih cost payable by each owner oP said abutting prop
arty and ttsa zc*',3
of
Z-T
an"
M14 Saw
r
_1,
..t,
so—
crt ; In. 1
t-h a
MRAF
nest of "114 lmprcv,,s,. >nt
and. t$,alr property t
1, Thut 1 117 I d
at Ej 'v�qurlrw S)%
e. r attorneya
e rcjjp,.v.,j !n tt,! CUtY
r ai,?atAq
:f T.W-A:ci!k* I h day 0 f 'ft FT,bo r p o 0 a I ock p. r
aul at t.-- -* t A, il parE�cn;�
11'rtv dmy tc a
bc�xrl, t1wo 1.1, i owner a
Int"r.,at(A In 4.jcL,,j r(q.otrty
rty or &viy toror, of 3a!
In at -tV t),Iq 1-4wPiJ?*1tS Of MA,4 to anyOO
Inver 11ty or 4*1-ree-ul4rlty or S.A 3 to
*P,Y Other tzn '21 tb nzo� l_ -irccoft_-�41w41 IMIIJ at
oTn..,r,.4 vr azv
-y
.,.Uae !.vjj Ij
by f1rdinar.1,vi. ILs-
%fv3r &01 be�trlrm, A
aess f1;;:a,1njt taw pwrv'�r 01 7..rc!�ert7. all It h
3tms 1'a t.-In-
?f ot plan ard rulo#
603arzent W!J! In
r T; a, tf, th-,i ^Olt rrpr.tlnr
as tile :r0nt,1n74 of Iwlh
provi 1 rule or p1mr., 41,ull, tc
eoljr t ru I e c,
be udt
p r W5 ju.=t
upen t.beir' 'bat no *a-
r v-, r 9
r, r c. r ct r t ex
3ff. 3 n t tf
ef
t.b 'J'0..%Cj vn.jjy� y
That the total estimated , 20sts of said, irprovernents is -the
Pa'uv. No."!A.
vur,r of rl",-hun and 154/loo 4ollars 0511,14) un4 that
th,ea arlt%,nt. v-,. r *rent-0- ot 9 v- I It I* prero*t%,4 to an-viss mjwln*t
each#ear l ," rc.
perty end ft,4 nwm�r In,, In thi oa.,vi of tb-i f�twtooft
-*Or-Ot sib tkOf two ani 7A/leo dellars 0.1.1,40, %-nA In the 1*14-6
9-,;� fcur �rt Allwulkao tb,-� ;5,m-n or SP/loe dcl.lara ($O.AO),
lh! nmrtwy ol, +11-.� -ra*rtons, *not -ini eutqo�o
y abuttinx eal- tho .4niiarlyptlen.c" their
proporty *n.� lho to" -%I wrtaunt to be at-m-l(j-44 tLmmtnat %rvi* pftrc�l of prv'p-
&nd Its o�Nn-�r a -. �s "ellowas
Tstlirat-3,j *ost,4 o'
st �nwtlks i.n rcrv� lPlr3l., qlreotl
T.Ot Iti, *50 'Rloav TO, 11"t "'S front fe- -to Yl ws W1 I I to �rl �m*
Lot No. 5* Plook log
"ront floo, 'r, llov'rin
'3 �k
'T.StImatil -,7cstx olf*
ml&valka en
!-.� t 8 Iqv 0 ft *VO*41,
frmt f,3-nt,
C
T.ots
tf-ts Nk-. I I�Tc.
f* 4FI
I" fr( nt �1,4itt
C!
n t t
tot l4o. 149 l7c
XXX3jtnxAxxv= k%%TV�n4-r;%cn
Ao
Lot* Flack
'Ro, 859 114 frv.-nt ''ant, Vrs.'RlIa
Veora '73,4o
T-Ot lk. l l $ '91CO ITC. Png
!M rrcnt 03--itt
79tlrrmt:m,A -ctjs of
a! r-n Alh
Tot Vc.159 P-14—�k Vc.111119
16 f'ront "!A, t%'POTmilor
4. That thm ellty
loorettxry co. h,,!rz%.by
by hIv-v which ea 1# v ri 1 b� ty %-lv4irt-lmom-:?nt
in tba Lub"leek, Avm)srcbi, a p4bll,*%ed In sail elty of Tvl�'-vokq
the -nr11ags-ticn of w)-J-Z+ abovil b-1 at 14mat Vm days t-'a'-,re trier
dot,,. or !�-n r0*c.ra&0d he%rtn.!T,, %nd mu'!n wIll tic '*i2rth,?.*r ;Zlvqn
'P)y the, C!ltovitnry ratlln7, copy b.eraorq n:vi by blurt by reglatered
rall to 4fvib of sald c*-nmiri at. ttll xtir or
1,0
tlt-al m to tbr &--nt or -.vtcrneyo I nC 4. t j!j
of' at lemst tan lay"3
*hal"nrq, the dat--*, not for soil boarIng,
5. mat. 11.1h I a Peso I ut I Cn "0*;%) 1 t110 I C Kxtx fry om i fifter I ti pK
(On xvtlan duly V#Ad*,O and aftrrl-40, 'rli �!Ay Vouriell Adjci-imcd)
,ury.