Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - Special - 1/8/1969s JAN s 1969 ; January 8, 1969 SPECIAL CALLED CITY COUNCIL MEETING: The City Council of the City of Lubbock, Texas, met at 10:00 o'clock a.m, in the regular meeting place in the -City Hall, the following members thereof being present to -wit: Mayor W. D. Rogers, Jr., and Councilmen James H. Granberry, Lonnie F. Hollingsworth, Deaton Rigsby, and Morris W. Turner, Assistant City Attorney Kenneth Jones, City Manager W. R. Blackwell, Assistant City Manager Robert Wilson and City Secretary -Treasurer Lavenia Lowe. Absent: City Attorney Fred O.-Senter, Jr. 69-28-1-1 Invocation was given by Mayor W. D. Rogers, Jr. (1) 69-28-1-2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was given in unison by those present in the Council Chamber. (2) 69-28-1-3 In accordance with the Notice of Paving Hearing, City Council Minutes of November 26, 1968, said (3) hearing was held on General Work Order No. 2970 (alley paving). A large number of persons appeared for paving hearing. After consideration of all information presented, Mayor Rogers announced the hearing was closed. Motion was then made by Councilman Granberry, seconded by Councilman Rigsby, motion carried, Mayor Rogers and Councilmen Granberry, Hollingsworth, Rigsby, and Turner voting Yea, none voting Nay, that Paving Ordinance No. 5587 be passed on first reading. G.W.O. 2970 ORDINANCE NO. 5587 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR PART OF THE COST OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF THE NORTH -SOUTH AND EAST -WEST ALLEYS LOCATED IN THE FOLLOWING BLOCKS AND ADDITIONS: J. L. HINSON SUBDIVISION OF PARTS OF BLOCKS 35 AND 36 ARNETT AND BENSON ADDITION, PARTS OF BLACKS 35-AND 36 ARNETT AND BENSON ADDITION, PART OF BLACK 68 ARNETT-AND BENSON ADDITION, STANFORD SUBDIVISION, PARTS OF BLOCKS 76, 77 AND 78 ROBERTS AND MCWHORTER ADDITION, WILSHIRE PARK ADDITION, MCKENZIE TERRACE ADDITION, BLOCKS 6, 7, 8,15, 16, 17, 18, 28, 63, 73 AND 129 OVERTON ADDITION, NEAL AND ALEXANDER ADDITION, BLOCKS 161, 177, 179, 197 AND 228 ORIGINAL TOWN ADDITION, BLOCK 3 SUNSHINE ADDITION, BLOCK 3 FLYNN PLACE, BLOCK 9 SUMMER HILL ADDITION, BLOCKS 6 AND 12 SOUTHPORT ADDITION, ARMSTRONG-ALLDREDGE ADDITION, TOWNHOUSE ADDITION, BLOCK 23-A'LYNDALE ACRES ADDITION, BLOCK 8, RIDGECREST ADDITION, BLOCK 5 MASSEY HEIGHTS ADDITION, PART OF BLOCK 4 COPP ADDITION, SCHARNBERG ADDITION, SOUTH COLLEGE ADDITION, OSTEOPATHY ADDITION, LEFTWICH MONTEREY HEIGHTS ADDI- TION, MELONIE PARK ADDITION, BLOCK 5 CENTRAL HEIGHTS ADDITION, AGNEW-KENDRICK ADDITION, PART OF BLOCK 7, JOHN W. JARROTT ADDITION, HOWARD AND GARLINGTON ADDITION AND BLOCK 11 RUSHLAND PARK ADDITION, SUCH PORTIONS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE PAVING ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF AND PORTIONS OF OTHER SUNDRY ALLEYS IN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, AND/OR ALONG THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, ALLOCATING FUNDS. (SEE SECTION ONE OF THIS ORDINANCE FOR UNITS DELETED BY CITY COUNCIL).' WHEREAS, the City Engineer prepared rolls or statements for the improvements in each unit, showing the amounts to be assessed against the various parcels of abutting property, and the owners thereof, and showing other matters and things; and the same were examined by the City Council and approved, and a time and place was fixed for hearing to the owners of such abutting property, and to -all others in anywise interested, and due and proper notice was given in compli- ance with law including notices mailed to each known property owner to be assessed, addressed to his last known address as shown on the City of Lubbock Tax Rolls, and such hearing was had and held at the time and place fixed therefor, to -wit: on the 8th day of January, 1969, at 1:00 o'clock p.m. in the Council Room in'the City of Lubbock, Texas, and at such hearing all desiring to be heard were fully and fairly heard, and evidence was received and considered and all protests and objections made were considered, and said hearing was in all respects held in the manner pro- vided and required by the charter and law in force in this City and by the proceedings of the City' with reference to such matters, and the following protests were made concerning the improvements in the units indicated namely: Sub -Unit i of Unit A-396 H. H. Hinson by letter represented the Hinson Estate as being opposed to the paving improve- ments. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit A-396 Herbert Franke appeared opposing paving improvements: Sub -Unit 4 of Unit A-396 Gene Sneed appeared representing Briercroft Savings and Loan Co. (now owners of property shown as belonging to Jim Watson) as being opposed to paving improvements. Sub -Unit 8 of Unit A-396 C. G. Webster appeared representing himself and Lone Star Ceramics as being opposed to the paving improvements. 2 JAN 8 1969 A.& W Construction Company opposed the paving improvements by letter signed by Bill Whitwell. Merle Whatley Hill opposed the paving improvements by letter. Mrs. J. 0. (Turney) McDaniel opposed the paving improvements by letter. Mr. E. E. Patterson opposed the paving improvements by letter. Frank McNeil opposed the paving improvements by letter. Sub -Unit 9 of Unit A-396 Bill Evans appeared representing the Estate of Melville Hankins as being opposed to the pav- ing improvements. Mr. Jack Gaulding appeared representing Rosston Land Co. as being opposed to the paving improvements. Mr. John Vickers appeared representing R. E. Matthews as being opposed to the paving improvements, Gusta L. Nickels opposed the paving improvements by letter. Alice J. McAllister opposed the paving improvements by phone. Sub -Unit 10 of Unit A-396 11 Mr..C. B. McCollum appeared for himself and presented a petition signed by Mrs. C. C. Cox, Sidney Claiborne and L. 0. White opposing the paving improvements. Sub -Unit 11 of Unit A-396 Henry Diebel appeared opposing the paving improvements. Sub-Unit.12 of Unit A-396 Mrs. W. C. Powell,. Jr. appeared representing Mrs. George Clifton as being opposed to the paving improvements. Mrs. F. M. Maddox opposed the paving improvements by telephone call. Sub -Unit 13 of Unit A-396 Mrs. Lora Tucker appeared opposing the paving improvements. Mrs. Eathel Roddy opposed the paving improvements by telephone call. Sub -Unit 15 of Unit A-396 John Steele appeared representing Mrs. Bertha B. Harber and Mrs. Ellis Martin as being opposed to the paving improvements. . Janet McDonald appeared opposing the paving improvements. Sub -Unit 16 of Unit A-396 Henry Diebel appeared opposing the paving improvements. Sub -Unit 25 of Unit A-396 Mr. Tom Johnson appeared representing Casie L. Rodgers and J..C. Davis as being opposed to the,paving improvements. Sub -Unit 26-of Unit A-396 Mr. Preston Johnston appeared opposing the paving improvements. Sub -Unit 27 of Unit A-396 Mr. Clyde Foster represented himself and Lou Maude Foster as being opposed to the paving improvements. Sub -Unit 28 of Unit A-396 Alton Edler appeared opposing the paving improvements. John Page appeared representing the Go Gas Company as being opposed to the paving improve- ments. Sub -Unit 31 of Unit A-396 Mr. James F. Fisher opposed the paving improvements by telephone - Sub -Unit 34 of Unit A-396 Henry Huneke appeared representing Rosella Rushing Investments, Inc. as being opposed to 3 JAN 8 1969 mom I. r r r r Preston Johnston appeared representing Frontier Savings -Stamps as beingopposed to the pav- ing P ing improvements. tA. M. Lesan opposed the paving improvements by telephone call.. Sub -Unit 35 of Unit A-396 Tom Johnson represented the Highland Hospital as being opposed to the paving improvements. f Sub -Unit 37 of Unit A-396 ' E. L. Rabun appeared opposing the paving improvements. Billy Davis represented Charles C. Davis as being opposed to the paving improvements. Leo E. McCune -appeared opposing the paving improvements. Sub -Unit 38 of Unit A-396 Bill Evans appeared representing Jettie Garfield as being opposed to the paving improvements. Mr. Nolen representing the owner of Lot 249 Melonie Park opposed the paving improvements by telephone. Sub -Unit 39 of Unit A-396 Russell L. Bliss opposed the paving improvements by telephone call. Sub -Unit 41 of Unit A-396 Mrs. A. B. Parks represented herself and Joyce Agnew Steele as being opposed to the paving improvements. Sub -Unit 42 0£ Unit A-396 Herman Green appeared representing the Santa Fe Railway Company as being opposed to the paving improvements. Sub -Unit 43 of Unit A-396 Bill Evans appeared representing the Estate of Melville Hankins as being opposed to the I paving improvements. And all objections and protests made were fully -considered and the City Council having fully and fairly heard all parties making any protest and all parties desiring to be heard, and having fully considered all matters presented for consideration, and having fully considered all of the evidence, and all pertinent and proper matters is of opinion that the following disposition should be made of such protests add objections, and that assessments should -be made as herein ordained, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: I. That all protests and objections, whether herein -specifically mentioned or not, shall be and the same are hereby overruled and the said -hearing, with respect to each and all Sub -Units and Units is hereby closed EXCEPT that it was found that alley paving Sub -Units 2, 4, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, 16, 26, 27, 28, 34, 35, 38 and 41 of Unit A-396 were erroneously included in the public notice and in the contemplated ordinance and in other proceedings: Therefore NO ASSESSMENT shall be made against the property included in said Sub -Units and the City Engineer is hereby directed to delete and/or omit the engineer's assessment roll for said Sub -Units consistent with this finding. 69-28-3-4 In accordance with the Notice of Paving Hearing, City Council Minutes of November 26, 1968, said (4) hearing was held on General Work Order No. 2969 (street paving). A large number of persons appeared for the paving -hearing. After consideration of all information presented, Mayor Rogers announced that the hearing was closed. Motion -was then made by Councilman Hollingsworth, seconded by Councilman Turner, motion carried, Mayor Rogers and Councilmen Granberry, Hollingsworth, Rigsby, and Turner voting Yea, none voting Nay, that Paving Ordinance No. 5586 be passed on first reading. G.W.O. 2969 ORDINANCE NO. 5586 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR A PART OF THE COST OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF AVENUE R, EAST LOTH STREET, 37TH STREET, VANDELIA DRIVE, TEMPLE AVENUE, CHAPARRAL LANE, CYPRESS ROAD, EAST 8TH STREET, EAST 7TH STREET, VANDA AVENUE, EAST 16TH STREET, AVENUE J, AVENUE M, EAST 37TH STREET, 46TH STREET, AVENUE T, 53RD STREET, WAYNE AVENUE DOVER AVENUE, ENGLEWOOD AVENUE, 25TH STREET, VICKSBURG AVENUE, 43RD STREET, 35TH STREET, AVENUE D, 66TH STREET, ASHAVENUE, EAST 66TH STREET, AVENUE E, THE SOUTH 1/2 OF 50TH STREET, SUCH PORTIONS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY i DESCRIBED IN THE PAVING ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF AND PORTIONS OF OTHER SUNDRY STREETS, HIGHWAYS, AVENUES AND/OR ALLEYS IN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, AND/OR ALONG THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH ASSESS- MENTS AND FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, ALLOCATING FUNDS. (SEE SECTION ONE OF THIS ORDINANCE FOR UNITS DELETED BY CITY_. COUNCIL). WHEREAS, the City Engineer prepared rolls or statements for the improvements in each unit, showing the amounts to be assessed against the various parcels of abutting property, and the H JAN 8 1969 with law.including notices mailed to each known property, owner to be assessed addressed to his last known address as shown on the current City of Lubbock tax rolls, and such hearing was had and held at the time and place fixed therefor, to wit: on the 8th day of January 1969, at 1:00 o'clock p.m. in the Council Room.in the City of Lubbock, Texas, and. at such hearing all desiring to be heard were fully and fairly heard, and evidence was received and considered and all protests and objections made were considered, and said hearing was in.all respects held in the manner provided and required by the charter and law in force in this City and by the proceedings of the City with reference to such matters, -and the following protests were made concerning the improve- ments in the units indicated namely: Sub -Unit 2 of Unit 2194 Mr. Ronnie Purtell appeared on behalf of Mr. D. C. Seymore opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 10th Street. Mr. Ronnie Purtell appeared on behalf -of Mr. Raymond Hogan opposing the proposed paving' improvements on East 10th Street. Mr. W. B. Wood appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 10th Street. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit 2194 Mr. A. P. Couch indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on 37th Street. Sub -Unit 4 of Unit 2194 Mr. Ronnie Purtell appeared on behalf of Mr. Raymond Hogan opposing the proposed paving improvements on 37th Street. Sub-Unit-5 of Unit 2194 Mrs. Jerry R. Bomar appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Vandelia Drive. Mr. Byron Lee Stovall indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements -on Vandelia Drive. Sub -Unit 6 of Unit 2194 Mrs. Odis R. L. Helms indicated by telephone that she was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Vandelia Drive. Mr. Ernest E. Rose indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improve- ments on Vandelia Drive. Sub -Unit 7 of Unit 2194 Mr. M. L. Sweeten indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improve- ments on Vandelia Drive. Mrs. Jerry Howard•appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Vandelia Drive. Sub -Unit 9 of Unit 2194 Mr. Don King appeared on behalf of A. L. King Estate opposing the proposed paving improvements on Chaparral Lane (Tulane Street). Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2195 Mr. James Henson appeared on behalf of Mrs. Pearl Markham opposing the proposed paving improvements on Temple Avenue. Mr. James Henson appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Temple Avenue. Mr. James Henson appeared -on behalf of Mr. L. R. Crump opposing the proposed paving improvements on Temple Avenue. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit 2195 Mr. D. D. Mahon appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Cypress Road. Sub -Unit 5 of Unit 2195 Mr. Robert Z. Wilkinson indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on East 7th Street. Sub -Unit 6 of Unit 2195 Mrs. Birda Joiner indicated by mail that she was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on East 6th Street. FI, 1 Fi Sub -Unit 7 of Unit 2195 Mr. Marvin L. McNutt appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Vanda Avenue. Mary Ward appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Vanda Avenue. JAI 8 1969 r r r r r Mr. and Mrs. C. D. Elliston indicated by mail that they were apposed to the proposed paving improvements on East loth Street. Ricardo C. Calderon appeared in the office of the City Engineer opposing the proposed paving improvements. Sub -Unit 10 of Unit 2195 Mr. Ronnie Purtell appeared on behalf of Mr. Raymond Hogan opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 16th Street. Mr. C. G. Connell appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 16th Street. Mrs. Emma Beevers appeared on behalf -of Mr. Jimmie Loyd Beevers opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 16th Street. Sub -Unit 11 of Unit 2195 Mr. Jack Hazlett appeared on behalf of Snodgrass-Maner Company opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 16th Street. Mr. C. G. Connell appeared as lien holder on Lot 12 and Lot 17, Block 6, Whitehead Addition opposing the proposed pavingimprovements on East 16th Street. Sub -Unit 14 of Unit 2195 Mr. B. W. Lane appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue J. Mr. Nat Hudgens appeared on behalf of R. B. Melton opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue J. Sub -Unit 16 of Unit 2195 Mr. W. D. Benson appeared on behalf of Lang Transit Company opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 37th Street. Mr. Guy Southern appeared on behalf of the Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 37th Street. Sub -Unit 17 of Unit 2195 Mrs. John H. Hawkins appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 46th Street. Sub -Unit 18 of Unit 2195 Mrs. A. D. Bradley appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 46th Street. Mrs. A. D. Bradley appeared -on behalf -of T. C. Scott opposing the proposed paving improve- ments on 46th Street. Sub -Unit 22 of Unit 2195 Mrs. Alvin D. Scoggin appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue T. Mr. J. D. Rudder appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue T. Sub -Unit 23 of Unit 2195 Mr. Edmon L. Hardy appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue T. Mr. R. L. Stinnett appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue T. Mr. Carl M. Smith appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue T. Mr. Leroy E. Will appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue T. Sub -Unit 25 of Unit 2195 Mr. John Prichard, .Sr. -indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Avenue T. Sub -Unit 27 of Unit 2195 Mr. W. B. Rushing indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Avenue T. Sub -Unit 28 of Unit 2195 Mrs. Alva Lee Green appeared -at the City Engineering Department opposing the proposed paving improvements on 53rd Street. Mrs. Alva Lee Green appeared at the City Engineering Department on behalf of Cosma McCullough; opposing the proposed paving improvements on 53rd Street. Mrs. George Blair appeared on behalf of the Rebekah Lodge opposing the proposed paving improvements on 53rd Street. b JA% 8 1969 Mr. W. C. Young appeared opposing the .proposed paving improvements on Dover Avenue. Sub -Unit 35 of Unit 2195 Mr. Gary Don Bowe appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 25th Street. Mr. R. W. Debnam indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on 25th Street. Sub -Unit 37 of Unit 2195 Mr. Doyle W. McLeod appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Vicksburg Avenue. Mr. Doyle McLeod appeared on behalf:of Mrs..W. G. McMillan and .Grey Lewis opposing the � proposed paving improvements on Vicksburg Avenue. I' Sub -Unit 42 of Unit 2195 A I' Mr. Ronnie Purtell appeared on behalf of Mr. Raymond Hogan oppos.ing the proposed paving improvements on 43rd Street. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit 2196 Mr. Eastman M. Dickerson appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue D. Mr. James A. Flatt appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue D. Mr. C. V. Weir appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue D. Mr. R. M. Hopper appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue D. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit 2196 Mr. J. W. Bullard indicated by mail that he was opposed. to the proposed paving improvements on Avenue D. Sub -Unit 4 of Unit 2196 Mr. A. L. 0' Neal appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 66th Street. Mr. Ken Flagg appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 66th Street. Mr. G. W. Jones appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 66th Street. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2197 T. G. and Y. Stores Company indicated by letter signed by C. A. Henderson that they were opposed to the proposed paving improvements. W. C. Merrett appeared in behalf of the A. T. & S. F. Railway Co. opposing the proposed paving improvements. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit 2197 Mr. David P. Pinkston indicated by telephone that he was QppQsed to the proposed paving improvements on East 66th Street. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2198 I Mr. J. Q. Warnick appeared on behalf of Mr. R. G. Dudley and Luther Van and Storage opposing ,I the proposed paving improvements on Avenue E. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit 2199 Mr. J. C. Davis appeared at the office of the City Engineer and .indicated that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements. And all objections and protests made were fully considered and the City Council having fully and fairly heard all parties making any protest and all parties desiring to be heard, and having fully considered all matters presented for consideration, and having fully considered all of the evidence, and all pertinent and proper matters is of opinion that the following disposition should be made of such protests and objections, and that assessments should be made as herein ordained, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: I. That all protests and objections, whether herein specifically mentioned or not, shall be and the same are hereby overruled and the said hearing, with respect to each and all Sub -Units and Units, is hereby closed, except that it was found that paving Sub -Units 5, 6, 7 of Unit 2194, Sub -Units 8, 17, 18, 22, 23, 27, 28 of Unit 2195, Sub -Units 2, 3, 4.of Unit 2196, Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2197, Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2198, were erroneously included in the public notice and in the contemplated ordinance and in other proceedings; therefore NO ASSESSMENT shall be made against the property included in said Sub -Units and the City Engineer is hereby directed to delete and/or omit the engineer's assessment roll for said Sub -Units consistent with this finding. JAN 8 1969 NO FURTHER BUSINESS COMING UP FOR CONSIDERATION, THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED FROM SPECIAL CALLED MEETING, JANUARY 8, 1969. ATTEST r �w LAVIM IA LOWE, CitySecretary-Treasurer READ AND APPROVED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY. ATTEST LAV IA LOWE, City Secretary -Treasurer r r ►^ i 0 r I to 11 Fl r r r r 12 E I El 11 I