Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - Special - 1/10/1968 (5)JAN 10 1968 r. r r F January 10, 1968 SPECIAL CALLED CITY COUNCIL MEETING: The City Council of the City of Lubbock, Texas, met at 10:00 o'clock a.m. in the regular meeting place in the City Hall, the following members thereof being present to -wit: Mayor W. D. Rogers, Jr., and Councilmen James H. Granberry, Jack Kastman, Ray J. Diekemper, Jr., and W. E. Medlock, City Attorney Fred 0. Senter; Jr., City Manager W. R. Blackwell, Assistant City Manager Robert Wilson and City Secretary -Treasurer Lavenia Lowe. Absent; None 68-27-1-1 Invocation was given by Councilman W. E. Medlock. (1) 68-27-1-2 In accordance with the Notice of Paving Hearing, City Council Minutes of November 22, 1967, said (3) hearing was held on General Work Order No. 2935 (street paving). A large number of persons appeared for the paving hearing. After consideration of all information presented at the hearing, Mayor Rogers announced that the hearing was closed. Motion was then made by Councilman Medlock, 'seconded by Councilman Diekemper, motion carried, Mayor Rogers and Councilmen Granberry, Kastman, Diekemper, and Medlock voting Yea, none voting Nay, that Paving Ordinance No. 5388 be passed on first reading. G.W.O. 2935 ORDINANCE NO. 5388 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR A PART OF THE COST OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF SHERMAN AVENUE, EAST 15TH STREET, CHAPARRAL LANE (TUTANE STREET), AVENUE J, 37TH STREET, VANDELIA DRIVE, YORK AVENUE, 2ND PLACE, AUBURN STREET, TEMPLE AVENUE, NORTH PARIS AVENUE, NORTH IVORY AVENUE, EAST ERSKINE STREET, EAST 8TH STREET, EAST LOTH STREET, VANDA AVENUE, OAK AVENUE, EAST 16TH STREET, THE SOUTH 1/2 OF EAST 16TH STREET, AVENUE M, AVENUE V, EAST 49TH STREET, 53RD STREET, 57TH STREET, 62ND STREET, 54TH STREET, 61ST STREET, RALEIGH AVENUE, 24TH STREET, 21ST STREET, 25TH STREET, JUNEAU AVENUE, 23RD STREET, 2ND STREET, KEMPER STREET, JARVIS STREET AND QUINTON AVENUE, UTE AVENUE, ZENITH AVENUE, 35TH STREET, 56TH STREET, THE NORTH 1/2 OF 58TH STREET, DOVER AVENUE, MARSHALL STREET, NORTH AVENUE U, GLOBE AV-ENUE,THE WEST 1/2 OF GLOBE AVENUE, EAST 44TH STREET, EAST 46TH STREET, 5TH STREET AND THE EAST 68 FEET OF SLIDE ROAD, SUCH PORTIONS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE PAVING ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK ATTACHED HERE- TO AND MADE A PART HEREOF AND PORTIONS OF OTHER SUNDRY STREETS, HIGHWAYS, AVENUES AND/OR ALLEYS IN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, AND/OR ALONG THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, ALLOCATING FUNDS. (SEE SECTION ONE OF THIS ORDINANCE FOR UNITS DELETED BY CITY COUNCIL). WHEREAS, the City Engineer prepared rolls or statements for the improvements in each unit, showing the amounts to be assessed against the various parcels of abutting property, and the owners thereof, and showing other matters and things; and the same were examined by the City Council and approved, and a time and place was fixed for hearing to the owners of such abutting property, and to all others in anywise interested, and due and proper notice was given in com- pliance with law and notices were mailed to each known property owner to be assessed adressed to his last known address as listed on the current tax rolls of the City of Lubbock and such hearing was had and held at the time and place fixed therefor, to -wit: on the loth day of January, 1968, at 10:00 o'clock A.M. in the Council Room in the City of Lubbock, Texas, and at such hearing all desiring to be heard were fully and fairly heard, and -evidence was received and considered and all protests and objections made were considered, and said hearing was in all respects held in the manner provided and required by the charter and law in force in this city and by the proceedings of the city with reference to such matters, and the following protests were made concerning the improvements in the units indicated namely: Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2179 Mr. Raymond Hogan appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Sherman Avenue. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit 2179 Mr. Don King appeared on behalf of the A. L. King Estate opposing the proposed paving improvements on Chaparral Lane (Tulane Street). Sub -Unit 7 of Unit 2179 Mr. Ben Kucera appeared on behalf of Grace E. Chase.opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue J. Sub -Unit 9 of Unit 2179 Mr. John H. Dunn indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on 37th Street. Mr. A. P. Ccuch appeared at the City Engineering Department opposing the proposed paving improvements on 37th Street. C..1,-TTn41M in nF Unit 717Q JAN 10 1968 Sub -Unit 11 of Unit 2179 Mr. Ernest E. Rose appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Vandelia Drive. Sub -Unit 12 of Unit 2179 Mr. Jerry R. Bomar appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Vandelia Drive. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit 2180 Mr. W. B. Agee appeared at the City Engineering Department opposing the proposed paving improvement on Auburn Street. Maxey Lumber Company indicated by phone to Councilman Kastman that they were opposed to the paving improvements on Auburn Street. Mrs.. Pearl Markham indicated by .telephone that she was opposed ,to .the proposed paving improve- ments on Auburn Street. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit 2180 Mrs. Pearl Markham indicated by to Lephone that she was opposed t, the proposed paving improve- ments on Temple Avenue. Sub -Unit 4 of -Unit 2180 Mrs. H. A. Halford appeared for herself and on behalf of L. B. Davis, Roy Morris and Anson Donald Goolsby opposing the proposed paving improvements on North Paris Avenue. Mr. Harold Williams appeared on behalf of J. J. Williams opposing the proposed paving improve- ments on North Paris Avenue. Sub -Unit 5 of Unit 2180 Mr. Gene Anderson appeared on behalf of Mollie Abernathy opposing the proposed paving improve- ments on North Ivory Avenue. Mr. Paul Haley appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on North Ivory Avenue. Mr. H. D. Gregory appeared opposing the proposed paying improvements on North Ivory Avenue. Mr. R. M. Davis appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on North Ivory Avenue. Sub -Unit 6 of Unit 2180 Mr. Leonard Grantham appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East Erskine Street. Mr. Gene Anderson appeared on behalf of Mollie Abernathy opposing the proposed paving improvements on East Erskine Street. Sub -Unit 7 of Unit 2180 Mrs. Benny A. Xett appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East Erskine Street. Mr. R. M. Davis appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East Erskine Street. Mr. Gene Anderson appeared on behalf of Mollie Abernathy opposing the proposed paving improvements on East Erskine Street. Sub -Unit 9 of Unit 2180 Mr. & Mrs. C. D. Elliston indicated by mail and telephone that they opposed the proposed paving improvements on East loth Street. Sub -Unit 11 of Unit 2180 Mrs. Andrew Bascus appeared at the City Engineering Department opposing the proposed paving improvements on Oak Avenue. 0 Sub -'Unit 12 of Unit 2180 Mrs. Andrew Bascus appeared at the City Engineering Department opposing the proposed paving improvements on Oak Avenue. Sub -Unit 14 of Unit 2180 Mr. 0. D. Wallace indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improve- ments on Oak Avenue. Sub -Unit 15 of Unit 2180 Mr. Raymond Hogan appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 16th Street. Mr. C. G. Connell appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 16th Street. Q. $,_TT-, #- i A -r- TT--; � )1 on 3 Mr. C. G. Connell appeared on behalf of Jessie Davis New Owner of Lot 17, Block 6, White- head Addition opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 16th Street. Sub -Unit 17 of Unit 2180 Mr. F. Trotter appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 16th Street. Mr. S. 0. Gowen and John Spikes appeared on behalf of G. G. & W. opposing the proposed pav- ing improvements on East 16th Street. Sub -Unit 18 of Unit 2180 Mr. Seaman Smith appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on the South 1/2 of East 16th Street. Mr. E. L. Johnson appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on the South 1/2 of East 16th Street. Mr. John Phillips appeared on behalf of Rhyne Simpson opposing the proposed paving improve- ments on the South 1/2 of East 16th Street. Sub -Unit 19 of Unit 2180 Mr. F. M. Chancey appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue M. Sub -Unit 20 of Unit 2180 Mr. Johnny Brooks New Owner of Lot 11, Godwin Addition appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue V. Sub -Unit 21 of Unit 2180 Mr. John Phillips presented a petition listing the following property owners Bobby Jowers, K. C. Walker, W. E. White, P. S. James, Lillian McClain, Gabriel Medellin, 011ie Sawyer, Ernesto V. Holguin, Hovey D. Musick, Coy Lowe and William A. Mitchell as being opposed to the proposed paving improvements on East 49th Street. r r� F Sub -Unit 23 of Unit 2180. The Pastor of Butler Heights Baptist Church indicated by telephone that they were opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Avenue J: Sub -Unit 25 of Unit 2180 Mr. M. H. McMasters appeared on behalf of himself and Rolan Simpson as new owners of parts of Blocks 10 and 11 C. N. Hodges Addition opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue J. Sub -Unit 26 of Unit 2180 Mr. T. B. Fortenberry appeared for.himself apd on behalf of W. C. Fortenberry and Calvin Fortenberry opposing the proposed paving improvements on 57th Street. Sub -Unit 29 of Unit 2180 Mr. L. L. Hendrix appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 54th Street. Sub -Unit 31 of Unit 2180 Mr. Thomas R. Hudson appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 61st Street. Nora Humphrey appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 61st Street. Sub -Unit 33 of Unit 2180 Mr. Bill Kirk appeared on behalf of Rodney G. Joy opposing t1le proposed paving improvements on 24th Street. Sub -Unit 35 of Unit 2180 Mr. Lynn Ray indicated by letter that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on 24th Street. Sub -Unit 36 of Unit 2180 Mr. L. S. Turner appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 25th Street. Mr. R. W. Debnam indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improve- ments on 25th Street. Sub -Unit 37 of Unit 2180 Mrs. W. L. Hulen indicated by mail that she was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on 24th.Street. Mrs. Bess Atkenson appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 24th Street. Mra_ A_ F. Fnl_anm anoeared onuosine the proposed pavinm improvements on 24th Street. 4 JAIL 10 1968 Sub -Unit 38 of Unit 2180 Mrs. Willie G. Carathers appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Juneau Avenue. Mr. Ervin Gerlach indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improve- ments on Juneau Avenue. Sub -Unit 39 of Unit 2180 Mr. M. S. Craig appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 23rd Street. Mrs. Willie G. Carathers appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 23rd Street. Sub -Unit 41 of Unit 2180 Mr. W. B. Abbott, Jr. indicated by letter that he was opposed to the proposed paving meats on 2nd Street. Mr. R. W.-Green appeared on behalf of A. T. & S. F. Railway Company opposing the proposed paving improvements on 2nd Street. Mr. Larry Merriman appeared on behalf of Roberson Steel Company opposing the proposed paving improvements on 2nd Street. Sub -Unit 42 of Unit 2180 Mr. R. M. Portwood appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Kemper Street. Mrs. Carroll J. Anderson appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Kemper Street. Mr. Gerald D. Cook appeared at the City Engineering Department opposing the proposed paving improvements on Kemper Street. Mrs. Charlie Fox appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Kemper Street. Mable Stinson appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Kemper Street. Mr. Robert B. Davis indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving on Kemper Street. Mr. Everett A. Gillis appeared for himself and on behalf of Catalina McCuilen opposing the proposed paving improvements on Kemper Street. Mr. Chauncey Trout appeared on behalf of Mr. Harold Munn opposing the proposed paving improve- ments on Kemper Street. Sub -Unit 43 of Unit 2180 Mr. Chauncey Trout appeared for himself and on behalf of the following property owners Bobby J. Moody, Charles B. Jones, M. T. Jones, Mr. and Mrs. William.H. Evans, Dr. G. G. Porter, and Harold N. Munn opposing the proposed paving improvements on Jarvis Street and Quinton Avenue. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2182 II Mr. Raymond Hogan owner instead of J. B. Strawn appeared opposing the proposed paving improve- ments on Zenith Avenue. Sub -Unit 4 of Unit 2182 Mr. M. A. McMasters appeared for himself and on behalf of Rolan Simpson as the new owners of Block 11, C. N. Hodges Addition opposing the proposed paving improvements on 56th Street. Sub -Unit 5 of Unit 2182 Mr. M. A. McMasters appeared for himself And on behalf of Rolan Simpson as the new owners of Block 12, C. N. Hodges Addition opposing the proposed paving improvements on the North 1/2 of 58th Street. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2183 Mr. Joe V. Boerner, Jr. on behalf of Mr. Tom S. Milam indicated by mail that Mr. Tom S. Milam was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Marshall Street. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit 2183 Mr. Thomas Hudson appeared opposing the proposed pavingimprovements on North Avenue U. Mr. J. D. Jones appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on North Avenue U. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit 2183 11 I L11 1 11 Mr. John Phillips appeared on behalf of the following property owners Rhyne Simpson, Raul L. Campos, Jr., Jesse Calhoun and W. M. Monzilo opposing the proposed paving improvements on Globe Avenue. Sub -Unit 7 of Unit 2183 JAN 1.0 1968 r r r r r. f Sub -Unit 8 of Unit 2183 i Mr. Guy Southern appeared on behalf of F. W. & D. Railway Company, Sam H. Weaver, Jr., 1 Weaver Storage, Inc., opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 44th Street. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2184 Mr. Jack Spratt appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 5th Street. Mr. H. W. Green appeared on behalf of the A. T. & S. F. Railway Company opposing the proposed paving improvements on 5th Street. Mr. Noble Stidham appeared for himself and Texas Tech Foundation (Mrs. Alice Shewmaker) opposing the proposed paving improvements on 5th Street. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2185 Mr. Dale Johnson appeared on behalf of Mrs. Kathryn G. Bacon opposing the proposed improve- ments on the East 68' of Slide Road. Mr. Mickey W. Roper appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on the East 68' of Slide Road. And all objections and protests made were fully considered and said hearing was continued from day to day and from time to time until this date, and the City Council having fully and fair- ly heard all parties making any protest and all parties desiring to be heard, and having fully considered all matters presented for consideration, and -having fully considered all of the evidence, and all pertinent and proper matters is of opinion that the following disposition should be made of such protests and objections, and that ;assessments should be made.as herein ordained, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: That all protests and objections, whether herein specifically mentioned or not, shall be and the same are hereby overruled and the said hearing, with respect to each --and all Sub -Units and Units, is hereby closed. Except that it was found that paving Sub -Unit 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of Unit 2179, Sub -Unit 2, 3, 4; 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 25, 26, 29, 31, 33, 36, 37, 38, 39, 41, 42, and 43 of Unit 2180, Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2181, Sub -Unit 2 and 5 of Unit 2182, Sub -Unit 3, 7 and 8 of Unit 2183, Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2184, were erroneously included in the public notice and in the contemplated ordinance and in other proceedings: there- fore NO ASSESSMENT shall be made against the property included in said Sub -Units and the City Engineer is hereby directed to delete and/or omit the engineer's assessment roll for said Sub - Units consistent with this finding. 68-27-5-3 In accordance with the Notice of Paving Hearing, City Council Minutes of November 22, 1967, said (2) hearing was held on General Work Order No. 2934 (alley paving). A large number of persons appeared for the paving hearing. After consideration of all information presented, Mayor Rogers announced that the hearing was closed. Motion was then made by Councilman Kastman, seconded by Councilman Granberry,.motion carried, Mayor Rogers.and Councilmen Granberry, Kastman, Diekemper, and Medlock_voting Yea, none voting -Nay, that Paving.Ordinance No. 5389 be passed on first reading. G. W. 0. 2934 ORDINANCE NO. 5389 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR PART OF THE COST OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF THE NORTH -SOUTH AND EAST -WEST ALLEYS LOCATED IN THE FOLLOWING BLOCKS AND ADDITIONS - J. L. HINSON SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 33 AND 34 ARNETT-BENSON ADDITION, STANFORD SUBDIVISION PART OF BLOCK 76 ROBERTS AND MCWHORTER ADDITION, BLOCKS 76, 77,- AND 78 ROBERTS AND MCWHORTER ADDITION, BLOCK 124 OVERTON ADDITION, BLOCK 37 OVERTON ADDITION, BLOCK 130 OVERTON ADDITION, GARLAND SUB- DIVISION OF BLOCK 2 ROBERTS AND MCWHORTER ADDITION, BLOCK 33 ORIGINAL TOWN, CARL ROBERD'S SUBDIVI- SION, BLOCK 97 ORIGINAL TOWN, BLOCK 134 OVERTON ADDITION, BLOCK 113 ORIGINAL TOWN, BLOCK 1 NEAL AND ALEXANDER ADDITION, BLOCK 25 OVERTON ADDITION, BLOCK 74 OVERTON ADDITION, BLOCK 102 OVERTON ADDITION, BLOCK 78 OVERTON ADDITION, BLOCK 18 OVERTON ADDITION, BLOCK 1 C. C. LANE SUBDIVISION, BLOCK 195 ORIGINAL TOWN, BLOCK 217 ORIGINAL TOWN, BLOCK 4 O'NEAL TERRACE, BLOCK 9 SUMMER HILL ADDITION, BLOCK 5 MASSEY HEIGHTS ADDITION, BLOCK 4 COPP ADDITION, SCHARNBERG ADDITION, BLOCK 7 RIDGE CREST -ADDITION, SOUTH COLLEGE.ADDITION, LOTS 99 THRU 115 INCLUSIVE BRIERCROFT ADDITION, BLOCK 1 VANDELIA VILLAGE ADDITION, BLOCK 3 VANDELIA VILLAGE ADDITION, BLACK 6 DELMAR ADDITION, BLOCK I HARRIS SUBDIVISION, LOTS 181 THRU 198 INCLUSIVE LEFTWICH MONTEREY HEIGHTS ADDITION, FRY ADDITION, LOT 204 MURRYHILL ADDITION, LOTS 1 THRU 34 INCLUSIVE SOUTH GATE ADDITION, FILLMORE ADDITION, WESTWOOD DRIVE ADDITION, DAVIDSON ADDITION AND BLOCK 3 MERRILL'S ADDITION, SUCH PORTIONS - BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE PAVING ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF AND PORTIONS OF OTHER SUNDRY ALLEYS.IN THE CITY -OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, AND/OR ALONG THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, ALLOCATING FUNDS. (SEE SECTION ONE OF THIS ORDINANCE FOR UNITS DELETED BY CITY COUNCIL). WHEREAS, the City Engineer prepared rolls or statements for the improvements in each unit, showing the amounts to be -assessed against the various parcels of abutting property, and the owners thereof, and showing other matters and things; and the same were examined by the City Council and approved, and a time and place was fixed for hearing to the owners of such abutting property, and to.all others in anywise interested, and due and proper notice was given in com- pliance with law including notices mailed to each known property owner to be assessed addressed to his last known address as shown on the City of Lubbock Tax Rolls, and such hearing was had and held at the time and place fixed therefor, to -wit: on the 10th day of January, 1968, at 10:00 o'clock a.m.. in the Council Room in the City of Lubbock, Texas, and at such hearing all desiring to be heard were fully and fairly heard, and evidence was received and considered and all protests, and objections made were considered, and said hearing was in all respects held in the manner pro- 6 JAN 10 1968 in the units indicated namely: Sub -Unit 1 of Unit A-394 Mr. G. H. Nelson appeared opposing the paving improvements. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit A-394 Tom Clinton appeared representing M. S. Craig as being opposed to the alley paving improve- ments. A. B. Ohlenbush appeared at the Engineering Department and indicated that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit A-394 Mr. Ken Bowlin appeared representing Mary L. Livermore as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 4 of Unit A-394 Mrs. Jessie Nixon indicated by telephone that she was opposed to the alley paving improve- ments. Mrs. Ellen Lehuw indicated by 'telephone that she was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 5 of Unit A-394 Mr. J. T. Green indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 6 of Unit A-394 Mr. Bill Clark appeared representing Mr. S. L. Lindley, who is the owner of Robin Hood Inns, Inc. and Empire Finance Service, Inc., as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 7 of Unit A-394 Miss Irma Pryor appeared representing herself and Gladys Pryor as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Ray Chapman appeared zepresenting J. W. Chapman Estate as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Mrs. Maude Bledsoe appeared opposing -the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 11 of Unit A-394 Mrs. G. N. Atkinson appeared and presented a petition signed by Mr. and Mrs. W. A. McMurry, Mrs. W. W. Nelson, Otis Taylor, Mrs. Otis Taylor, C. G. Rook, Mrs. C. G. Rook, John N. Davidson, Mrs. John N. Davidson, Mr. and Mrs. M. W., Coulter, Mr..and Mrs. Lester E. Grimes, Jr., Mrs. Lucy Gray, Mr. and Mrs. W. G. Johnson, Mrs. R. A. Metclafe, Mrs. J. U. Borum and Mrs. G. N. Atkinson i opposing the alley paving improvements. Otis Taylor appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. John Davidson appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 12 of Unit A-394 Mrs. Jenkins indicated by telephone that she was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 13 of Unit A-394 Mr. E. H. McMurtry indicated by letter that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Henry Kight'appeared representing H. H. Kight as being opposed to the alley paving improve- ments. Sub -Unit 14 of Unit A-394 Warlick Carr appeared representing the J. A. Dean Estate and Marjorie Dean Bessent as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 15 of Unit A-394 G. A. Barnett appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. G. A. Barnett appeared representing Mrs. M. D. Lane as being opposed to the alley paving improvements: Mrs. N. S. McBride appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Bruce Ferrell appeared representing City Steam Laundry as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 18 of Unit A-394 JAN 10 19S8 r ,1 r r r Roy Page appeared representing Go Gas Co., Inc. as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. A. C. Arnett appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. A. C. Arnett represented Arnett Brokerage Co. as being opposed'to the alley paving improve- ments. Alton 0. Edler appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 20 of Unit A-394 A. M. Lesan indicated by telephone:that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Henry Huneke appeared representing Rosella Rushing Investment Co. as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Preston Johnston appeared representing Frontier Saving Stamps, Inc. as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Clarence Whiteside appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 22 of Unit A-394 Tom Johnson appeared representing Medical Association 'as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 23 of Unit A-394 Mrs. Jean Stalcup indicated by letter that she was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Mrs. Les Purkeypile appeared representing herself and Tom Prichett Hart as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Mrs. Charles Moss indicated by telephone that she was opposed to the alley paving improve- ments. Mr. Daniel T. Stickle appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 24 of Unit A-394 Mr. J. C. Davis appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 25 of Unit A-394 Mr. J. C. Davis appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 27 of Unit A-394 Gwin C. Harris appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. J. J. McLoen appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 28 of Unit A-394 R. T. Samford indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 30 of Unit A-394 William C. Sharpley indicated by letter that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements. W. C. Dull indicated by letter that he was opposed .to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 33 of Unit A-394 H. E. Morris appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Mr. R. A. Lipscomb appeared representing the partnership of Libscomb and Morris as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Homer Wilson indicated by telephone to Councilman Granberry that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit A-395 Guy Southern appeared representing Burlington Lines Inc. as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. And all objections and protests made were fully considered and said hearing was continued from day to day and from time to time until this date, and the City Council having fully and fairly heard all parties making any protest and all parties desiring to be heard, and having fully considered all matters presented for consideration, and having fully considered all of the evidence, and all pertinent and proper matters is of opinion that the following disposition should be made of -such protests and objections, and that assessments should be made as herein ordained, THEREFORE RV TT ORT)ATNED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: I JAN 10 1968 68-27-8-4 (4) I. That all protests and objections, whether herein specifically mentioned or not, shall be and the same are hereby overruled and the said hearing, with respect to each and all Sub -Units and Units is hereby closed EXCEPT that it was found that alley paving Sub -Units 2, 6, 7, 11, 14, 15, 19,- 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27,. and 33 of Unit A-394 and Sub -Unit 1 of Unit A-395 were erroneously included in the public notice and in the contemplated ordinance and in other proceedings: There- fore NO ASSESSMENT shall be made against the property included in said Sub -Units and the City Engineer is hereby directed to delete and/or omit the engineer's assessment roll for said Sub - Units consistent with this finding. Motion by Councilman Granberry, seconded by Councilman Medlock, motion carried, Mayor Rogers and Councilmen Granberry, Kastman, Diekemper, and Medlock voting Yea, none. voting Nay, that the following resolution be passed. RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the MAYOR of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock a Paving Release to Various Owners, attached herewith which shall be spread upon the minutes of the Council and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall constitute and be a part of this Resolution as if fully op d herein in deAil. Passed by the City Council this loth day of January, 1968. ATTEST: LAVEN LOWS, City ecreta -Treasurer APPROVED: FRED 0. SENTER, JR., City Attorney THE STATE OF TEXAS X COUNTY OF LUBBOCK X W. D. ROGERS, JR., Mayor PAVING RELEASE WHEREAS, heretofore, on September 14, 1967, the City of Lubbock passed a Resolution, which was amended on September 28, 1967 and October 12, 1967, such instrument being recorded in Volume 476, Page 109, of the Deed of Trust Records of Lubbock County, Texas, such Resolution containing a notice of improvements and apportionment of costs of such improvements, by assessing a lien upon the property abutting thereon, and in such Resolution there was included paving assessments for certain hereinafter described Paving Units; and, WHEREAS, under such Paving Units, such improvements have -created no lien or liens against the property assessed pursuant to said Paving Units, by reason of the fact that such paving improve- ments have been deleted from the stated paving program, and there is no immediate plan of making street improvements upon the streets under said Paving Units, and it is expedient to remove the cloud and apparent lien placed upon the title of property abutting the streets as aforementioned: NOW THEREFORE: KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT the City of Lubbock, acting by and through its duly authorized Mayor, in consideration of the premises, do hereby and by these presents, RELEASE, RELINQUISH AND FOREVER QUIT CLAIM to the owner or owners of property affected by the paving assessment liens hereinabove mentioned, their heirs, administrators, executors and assigns, all right, title and interest the City of Lubbock may have in and to all these lots, tracts or parcels of land being situated in the City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, and being further described as follows, to -wit: Unit 2179-8 Unit 2179-9 37th Street 37th Street Unit 2179-10 Vandelia Dr. Unit 2179-11 Vandelia Dr. Unit 2179-12 Vandelia Dr. Unit 2180-2 Auburn Street Unit 2180-3 Temple Avenue from the West Property.Line of Avenue E to 3' East of the East Property Line of Avenue F (North Leg) from the East Property Line of Avenue E to West Line of Lot 6, Block 2, Ross Putty Addition from the East Property Line of Sherman Avenue to the West Property Line of Avenue S. from the East Property line of Avenue S to the West Property Line of Avenue R. from the East Property Line of Avenue R to the West Pro- perty Line of Avenue Q. from 2' East of the East Property Line of North Avenue U to AT & SF RR ROW W. Line. from 13' South of South Property Line of Auburn Street to wnrth adoa Paxrina rintria unna I Li 9 JAN 1 0 .i9bg r r r_ r Unit 2180-5 North Ivory Avenue from South Property Line Municipal Drive to N. L. L. Erskine Street Unit 2180-6 East Erskine Street from 5' West of West Property Line North Globe Avenue to 5'-West of West Property Line North Hickory Avenue. Unit 2180-7 East Erskine Street from 5' West of West Property Line of North Hickory Avenue to 9' East of West Property Line North Ivory Avenue. Unit 2180-8 East 8th Street from 8' East of the East Property Line of Vanda Avenue to 6' West of -the West Property Line of Walnut Avenue (North Leg) Unit 2180-9 East 10th Street from 8' West of the West Property Line of Walnut Avenue to 8' West of the West Property Line of Vanda Avenue. Unit 2180-10 Vanda Ave. from 8' North of the North Property Line of East loth Street to the North Property Line of East 8th Street. Unit-2180-11 Oak Avenue from 13' North of the North Property Line of East 13th Street (East Leg) to 13' North of the North Property Line of East 14th Street. Unit 2180-12 Oak Avenue from 13' North of the North Property Line of East 14th Street to 15' North of the North Pro- perty Line of East 15th Street. Unit 2180-13 Oak Avenue from 15' South of the South Property Line of East 15th Street to 13' North of the North Pro- perty Line of East 16th Street. Unit 2180-14 Oak Avenue from 13' South of the South Property Line of East .16th Street to the North Property Line of East 17th Street (West Leg). Unit 2180-15 East 16th Street from 12' East of the West Property Line of Magno- lia Avenue to-13' West of the West Property Line of Oak Avenue Unit 2180-16 East 16th Street from 13' West of the West Property Line of Oak Avenue to 12' West of the West Property Line of Quirt Avenue. Unit 2180-17 East 16th Street from 12' East of the East Property Line of Quirt Avenue to 10.11' East of the East Property Line of Spruce Avenue (South Leg). Unit 2180-18 South 1/2 of East from 10' West of the West Property Line of Zenith 16th Street Avenue to 5' East of the East Property Line of Cherry Avenue. Unit 2180-19 Avenue M from 13' North of the South Property Line of 34th Street to 11' North of the North Property Line of 35th Street. Unit 2180-21 East 49th Street from B' West of the West Property Line of Teak Avenue to 8' West of .the West Property Line of Ute Avenue. Unit 2180-25 Avenue J from 8' South of the South Property Line of 56th Street to 8' North of the North Property Line of 58th Street. .Unit 2180-26 57th Street from 14' West of the West Property Line of Avenue, H to 8' West of the West Property Line of Avenue J. Unit 2180-29 54th Street from 16' West of the West Property Line of Quaker Avenue to 13' East of the East Property Line of Raleigh Avenue. Unit 2180-31 61st Street from 13' East of the East Property Line of Slide Road to 18' East of the East Property Line of York Avenue. Unit 2180-33 24th Street from 8' East of the East Property Line of Albany Avenue to 540' East of the East Property Lineof Albany Avenue. Unit 2180-36 25th Street from 11' East of the East Property Line of Chicago Avenue to 3' West of the West Property Line of Bangor Avenue. 1 JAft 10 1968 Unit 2180-38 Juneau Avenue Unit 2180-39 23rd Street Unit 2180.41 2nd Street Unit 2180-42 Unit 2180-43 Unit 2181-1 Kemper Street Jarvis Street & Quinton Ave. Ute Avenue Unit 2182-2 35th Street Unit 2182-5 N 1/2 of 58th Street Unit 2183-3 Globe Avenue Unit 2183-7 E. 44th Street Unit 2183 -8 E. 44th Street Unit 2184-1 5th Street from 18' South of the South Property Line of 23rd Street to 18' North of the North Property Line of 24th Street. from 5' West of the West Property Line of Iola Avenue to 13' West of the West Property Line of Juneau Avenue. from 12' East of the West Property Line of Avenue P to 2' East of the East Property Line of Paris Menue. from 35' East of the West Property Line of Quaker Avenue to the West Property Line of Salem Avenue. from 15' South of the South Property Line of Kemper Street to the West Property Line of Salem Avenue. from 8' North of the North Property Line of East 49th Street to 12' North of the North Property Line of E. 50th Street. from the East Lip Line of Avenue N to the East Pro- perty Line of Avenue M. from the East Lip Line of Avenue Q S. Drive to 8' West of the West Property Line of Avenue J. from 4.5' South of the South Property Line of the alley South of East 35th Street to 15' North of the North Property Line of East 37th Street. from 15' West of the East Property Line of Quirt Avenue (South Side) to 8' East of the East Pro- perty Line of Vanda Avenue (South Leg). from 13.5' East of the East Property Line of Locust Avenue to 441' East of the East Property., Line of Magnolia Avenue. from East Property Line of Avenue H to 10.5' East of the West Property Line of Avenue G. This release affects only the property hereinabove described and in no way affects any pro- perty or -liens not specifically described herein, and all liens and apparent liens against pro- perty owners not otherwise released are hereby expressly retained. EXECUTED THIS 10th day of January, 1968. r'\ At BY: ;'y a 1N61 A 1 W. D. ROGERS, JR., ATTEST: LAVENIA LOWE, City Secre APPROVED: /s/ Fred 0. Senter, Jr_._ _ - -- - ----------- FRED 0. SENTER, JR., City Attorney NO FURTHER BUSINESS COMING UP FOR CONSIDERATION, THE C MEETING, JANUARY 10, 1968.E ATTEST: READ AND APPROVED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, ATTEST: w . V . Kuc tkus , I tary-Treasurer