Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - Regular - 1/25/1967¢AN 25 19s January 25, 1967 REGULAR MEETING: The City Council of the City of Lubbock, Texas, met at 9:00 o'clock a.m. in the regular meeting place in the City Hall, the following members thereof being present to -wit: Mayor W. D. Rogers, Jr., and Councilmen JamesH. Granberry, Jack Kastman, Ray J. Diekemper, Jr., and W. E. Medlock, City Attorney Fred 0. Senter, Jr., Acting City Manager N. B. McCullough and City Secretary -Treasurer Lavenia Lowe. Absent: None 67-26-19-59 Invocation was given by R. W. Burr, Director of Planning and Traffic. (1) 67-26-19-60 NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING (3) NOTICE is hereby given to owners of the property hereinafter described or referred to and to all other persons as provided by law, that the City Council will hold a public hearing on the 25th day of January, 1967, 9:00 a.m., in the City Council Chamber on the Second Floor of the City Hall in Lubbock, Texas, to consider the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission that the zoning district of the property herein described be changed; and at which time and place all interested. persons will be given an opportunity to be heard, after which hearing, the City Council will determine whether the Zoning Ordinance and map will be amended in accordance with such recommendation: ZONE CASE NO. 1281-B - Request of the City of Lubbock to change a tract of land out of Sectio 6, Block E-2, Lubbock County, Texas, from an "R-3" to a "C-2" Zoning District. Property is further described by metes and bounds to wit: BEGINNING at a point 1300' south and 7D' west of the northeast corner of said Section 6, Block E-2; THENCE West 190' to a point; THENCE Northwest 450 a distance of 14.141,to.a point; THENCE North 242.46' to a point; THENCE Northeast 450 a distance of 14.14' to a point; THENCE East 190' to a point. in the west right-of-way line of Slide Road; THENCE South along the west right-of-way line of Slide Road 262.46' to the PLACE OF BEGINNING (West side of Slide Road between points even with 37th and 38th Streets) The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that this request be granted subject to the following conditions: . 1. That a solid 6' permanent type screening fence shall be.erected and permanently maintain- ed along the south and west property lines outside any alley or easement serving the commercial area. 2. That no openings, except maximum of 5' "pedestrian gates", shall be permitted in the screening fence. ZONE CASE NO. 1453 - Request of D. Thomas Johnson (for Skibell and Moser) to change Lots 5 thru 7, Block 27, Modern Manors Addition, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, from an "R-1" to a "C-2A" Zoning District. (Northwest corner of Canton Avenue and 50th Street) The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that this request be granted for change to "C-2A"on Lots 6 and 7 only and for change to "R-3 " on Lot 5,_ subject to condition that a solid permanent type screening fence be erected and permanently maintained along the north property line of Lot 5. Said fence to comply with Section 15.1-2-2 of the Zoning Ordinance. ZONE CASE NO. 1455 - Request of Arnold Maeker (for Buckner Baptist Benevolences) to change a tract of land out of Section 1, Block J.S., Lubbock County, Texas, from an "R-l" to an "R-3" Zoning District. Property is further described by metes and bounds to wit: BEGINNING at a 1" iron pipe that is 60.0' north 00 01' 20 " east, and 266.4' north 890 58' 40" west, of the southeast corner of Section 1, Block J.S., E.L. & R.R. Company Survey, Lubbock County, Texas, said pipe being the southwest and beginning corner of this tract; THENCE South 890 58' 40" east, a distance of 68.37' to a 1" iron pipe, -the beginning of a curve; THENCE Northeasterly along the arc of a curve to the left of radius 215' (tangent = 60.151) a distance of 117.3' to a 1" iron pipe, the end of curve; THENCE North 580 47' east, along north right-of-way line of Loop 289, a distance of 628.3' to Y ii � 1 1 2 5 1967 THENCE North 530 03' east, along said right-of-way line, a distance of 1167.3' to a 1" iron pipe, the southeast corner of this tract; THENCE North 00 01' 20" east, a distance of 1520.8' to a 1" iron pipe, the northeast corner of this tract; THENCE North 890 58' 40 " west, 891.0' to a 1/2" reinforcing steel, said reinforcing steel being a corner of this tract and also the northeast corner of a 10.002 acre tract of land; THENCE South 00 01' 20" west, 574.0' to a 1/2" iron pipe set for a corner of this tract and the southeast corner of said 10.002 acre tract; THENCE North 890 58' 40 " west, 759.0' to a 1/2" reinforcing steel, said reinforcing steel being a corner of this tract and the southwest corner of said 10.002 acre tract; THENCE South 00 01' 20" west, 2006.0' to the PLACE OF BEGINNING: containing 70.152 acres. (Northeast corner of Loop 289 and Chicago Avenue if extended north above 4th Street) The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that this request be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. That all uses of the property shall be related to operation of a benevolent and charit- able institution. 2. That areas on the periphery of the property shall be limited to residential type uses. i s enia we, City Se retary Treasurer City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas In accordance with the above Notice of Zoning Hearing, hearing was held on Zone Case No. 1455 - Request of Arnold Maeker (for Buckner Baptist Benevolences) to change property located at the northeast corner of Loop.289 and'Chicago Avenue, if extended north above 4th Street from "R-1" to "R-3" zoning district. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that this request be granted, subject to the following two conditions: 1. That all uses of the property shall be related to operation of a benevolent and charit- able institution. 2. That areas on the periphery of the property shall be limited to residential type uses. Mr. Arnold Maeker and Mr. A. L. Gatewood appeared before the City Council in support of this zone change request. Mayor Rogers called for opponents to appear before the City Council, but no one came forward; whereupon Mayor Rogers announced that the hearing was closed. After con- sideration of all facts presented, motion was made by Councilman Granberry, seconded by Council- man Kastman, motion carried, Mayor Rogers and' Councilmen Granberry, Kastman, Diekemper and Medlock voting Yea, none voting Nay, to uphold the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and pass Ordinance No. 5181 on ;first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 5185 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1695•AND THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGE: ZONE CASE NO. 1455: CHANGE SECTION 1, BLOCK J.S., LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM AN "R-1" TO AN "R-3 " ZONING DISTRICT; SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS: 67-26-20-61 In accordance with the above Notice of Zoning Hearing, hearing was held on Zone Case No. 1281-B - (4) Request of the City of Lubbock to change property located on the west side of Slide Road between points even with 37th and 38th Streets from "R-3" to "C-2" zoning district. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that this request be granted, subject to the following two condi- tions; 1. That a solid 6' permanent type screening fence shall be erected and permanently maintain- ed along the south and west property lines outside any alley or easement serving the commercial area. 2. That no openings, except maximum of 5' "Pedestrian gates", shall be permitted in the screening fence. Mr. R. W. Burr, Director of Planning and - Traffic, appeared before the City Council and presented the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission: Mr. Frank Wilson appeared before the City Council in protest to this zone change request. After consideration of all facts presented Mayor Rogers announced that the hearing was closed. Motion was then made by Councilman Diekemper seconded by Councilman Medlock, motion carried, Mayor Rogers and Councilmen Granberry, Kastman, Diekemper and Medlock voting Yea, none voting Nay, to overrule the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission -and DENY request for zone change of Zone Case No. 1281-A. 67-26-20-62 NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING. (5) NOTICE is hereby given to all -interested persons 'as provided by law, that the City Council will hold a public hearing on the 25th day of January, 1967 at 9:00 a.m., in the City Council Chamber on the Second Floor of the City Hall in Lubbock, Texas, to consider the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission that the Zoning Ordinance 1695 be amended to amend Sections of said Zoning Ordinance as described below; and at which time and place all interested persons will be givem an opportunity to be heard, after which hearing, the City Council will determine whether the Zoning Ordinance will be amended in accordance with such recommendation. Proposed Amendment to Zoning Ordinance JAN 2 5 go - ,.� Rogers Present Wording, Section 10A.1 Uses Permitted.. It is declared that the public policy of the City of Lubbock that the regulations set forth in this district are intended to encourage orderly development of a high character in attractive landscaped surroundings with the design of buildings, and exterior indications so controlled as. to be more compatible with residential development in the vicinity or within the district to preserve property values and protect the health and welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Lubbock. All operations and uses,.with the limited exception of the service station, shall be conducted entirely within a building and no outside display of merchandise shall be permitted. No use shall be per- mitted which will be injurious or offen- sive to the occupants of the adjacent .prem- ises or area by reason of emission of dust, smoke, odor, glare, noise, vibration, trash, or other causes. Section 10A.1-12 None Section 11.1-19 None Section 11.1-11 None Section 17.5-3 - Signs suspended from any building shall not project more than two-thirds the width of the side- walk from any building and the bottom of such signs shall be not less than 8 feet from the finished grade of the sidewalk. No signs except those sus- pended from buildings shall be erected, or placed between the street line and the building line. Section 17.5-4 Signs not suspended from any building shall not project more than forty-two inches over the building line and the bottom of such signs shall not be less than 8 feet above the finished grade of the sidewalk. Where drive-in service or parking is provided, leaving a distance between the building structure and the building Tine, one such free standing suspended sign shall be permitted per building or building unit. Proposed -,Wording Section 10A,1 Uses Permitted It is declared to be the public policy of the City of Lubbock that the regulations, set forth in this district are intended to encourage orderly development of a high character in attractive landscaped surroundings with the design of buildings and exterior .. indications so controlled as to be more capatibl with residential development in the vicinity or within -the district to preserve property values and protect the health and welfare of the inhabitants.of the City of Lubbock. No use shall be permitted which will be injurious or offensive to the occupants of the adjacent pre- mises or area by reason of emission of dust, smoke,.odor, glare, noise, vibration, trash, or other causes. All business must be conducted entirely within a building and no outside display of merchandise shall be permitted. Section 10A.1-12 Tire, Battery and Accessory stores for passenger automobiles. (No recappinE of tires permitted..) Section 11.1-19 Rental Store (No trailers or outside display of merchandise allowed.) Section 11.1-1 Tire, Battery and Accessory Stores for passenger automobiles. (No recappinE of tires permitted. Outside display of merchan- dise permitted starting 10' from any street property line. Section 17.5-3 Signs suspended from a build- ing or other support may extend 6 feet over the property line provided that the lowest point of such signs is not less than 8 feet above the sidewalk or ground elevation; provided further, that no signs shall pro- ject horizontally within 1 1/2 feet of a street curb (Exception: When the street curb has been recessed for parking, signs may extend horizontally to a point even with such recessed curb, provided that such extensioi does not project more than 6 feet beyond the property line.) In the event there is no curb or gutter opposite the sign no extension shall be permitted beyond the property line. Section 17.5-4 Delete Lavenia Lowe,,City Secrets -Treasurer City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas In accordance with the above Notice of Zoning Hearing, hearing was held as to amending certain sections of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. R. W. Burr, Director of Planning and Traffic, presented the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mayor Rogers called for opponents to appear before the -City Council, but no one came forward; whereupon Mayor Rogers announced that thi hearing was closed. After consideration of all fac ` relbcke ��;�° �t'�'n��$ B I$$� Free y° and•Councilmen Granberry, Kastman, Diekemper and Medlock voting Yea, none voting Nay, to uphold the recommenda- tion of the Planning and Zoning Commission and pass Ordinance No. 5182 on first reading to amend the.Zoning Ordinance. As set out in the above notice. ORDINANCE NO. 5182 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1695 AS FOLLOWS: BY AMENDING SECTION 10A.1 SO AS TO OMI THE EXCEPTION ALLOWING SERVICE STATIONS TO -DISPLAY MERCHANDISE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING; BY ADDING NEW SECTION 10A.1-12 ALLOWING TIRE, BATTERY AND ACCESSORY STORES FOR PASSENGER AUTOMOBILES IN C-2. ZONES; BY ADDING NEW SECTION 11.1-11, TO INCLUDE TIRE, ACCESSORY AND BATTERY STORES FOR PASSENGER AUTOMOBILES WITHIN THE EXCEPTIONS IN C-3 ZONES ALLOWING CERTAIN BUSINESSES TO DISPLAY MERCHANDISE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING; BY ADDING NEW SECTION 11.1-19 TO INCLUDE RENTAL STORES WITHIN THE 1lT "^TTA IITT\TC T7 AT~ TT1D f%V MM1 DTTTT T%'rM 10 # z 5 1967 BY AMENDING SECTION 17.5-3 TO PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONAL REGULATION OF SIGNS SUSPENDED FROM EITHER A BUILDING OR OTHER SUPPORT; AND BY REPEALING SECTION 17.5-4 WHICH PERTAINED TO SIGNS NOT SUSPENDED FROM ANY BUILDING; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION OF' THE DESCRIPTIVE CAPTION AND PENALTY CLAUSE HEREOF. 67-26-22-63 Motion by Councilman Diekemper, seconded by Councilman Medlock, motion carried, Mayor Rogers and (6) Councilmen Granberry, Kastman, Diekemper and Medlock voting Yea, none voting Nay, that Zone Case No. 1281-A be removed from the Table. 67-26-22-64 The City Council'again considered Zone Case No. 1281-A, having been tabled November 23, 1966 - (6a), Request of Forrest Baker (for 0. G. Andrews) to change property located on the west side of Slide Road about in line with 37th Street from "R-3" to "C-2" zoning district. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that this request be granted. Mayor Rogers called for proponents and opponents to appear before the City Council, but no one came forward. After consideration of all facts presented, motion was made by Councilman Diekemper, seconded by Councilman Medlock, motion carried, Mayor Rogers and Councilmen Granberry, Kastman, Diekemper and Medlock voting Yea, none voting Nay, to overrule the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and DENY request for zone change of Zone Case No..1281-A. 67-26-22-65 In accordance with the Notice of Zoning Hearing, of record -in Minute Book 26, Page 19, hearing (2) was held on Zone Case No. 1453 - Request of D. Thomas Johnson (for Skibell and Moser) to change property located at the northwest corner -of Canton Avenue and 50th Street from "R-l" to "C-2A" zoning district. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that this request be granted for change to "C-2A" on Lots 6 and 7 only and for change to "R-3 " on Lot 5, subject to the condition that a solid permanent type screening fence be erected and permanently maintained along the north property line on Lot 5, Construction of said fence to comply with the requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Tom Johnson, Attorney, appeared before the City Council in support of this zone change request in behalf of Mr. Albert Skibell and Mr. Sam Moser. Mr. Dan Parks, Manager of B. F. Goodrich Company, also appeared in support of this zone change request. Mr. L. Brann, owner of property along 50th Street, appeared before the City Council and requested that the City Council require a setback from Canton Avenue and 50th Street. Mayor Rogers called for opponents to,appear before the City Council, but no one came forward; whereupon Mayor Rogers announced that the hearing was closed. After consideration of all facts presented, motion was made by Councilman Diekemper, seconded by Councilman Medlock, motion carried, Mayor Rogers and Councilmen Granberry, Kastman, Diekemper and Medlock voting Yea, none voting Nay, to grant the zone change request for change from "R-l" to "C-2A" on Lots 5, 6 and 7 and pass Ordinance No. 5183, subject to the following two conditions: 1. That any building constructed on said property be set back a minimum of 25' from the north property line. 2. That a solid permanent type screening fence be erected and -permanently maintained along the north property line; such fence extend to the Canton Street property line at a point 35' from said property line, shall be slanted or "stepped down" from a height of 4-1/2' down'to a height of 2-1/2' at the Canton Street property line. ORDINANCE NO. 5183 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1695 AND THE OFFICIAL MAP -OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGE: ZONE CASE # 1453: CHANGE LOTS 5, 6, and 7, BLACK 27, MODERN MANORS ADDITION; CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM AN "R-l" TO A "C-2A" ZONING DISTRICT: SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS: 67-26-22-66 Mr. Paul'Payne, Jr., appeared before the City Council requesting that North Indiana Avenue be (11) widened and paved, also that Erskine Street in this area be paved. This request was taken under advisement. 67-26-22-67 In accordance with the Notice of Paving Hearing, City Council Minutes of December 8, 1966, said (9) hearing was held on General Work Order 10555 (Alley Paving). A large number of persons appeared for the paving hearing. After consideration of all'information presented at the hearing, Mayor Rogers announced that the hearing was closed. Motion was then made Vy Councilman Diekemper, seconded by Councilman Kastman, motion carried, Mayor Rogers and Councilmen'Granberry, Kastman, Diekemper and Medlock voting Yea, none voting Nay, that Paving Ordinance No. 5184 be passed on first reading. G.W.O. 10555 ORDINANCE NO. 5184 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR PART OF THE COST OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF THE NORTH -SOUTH AND EAST -WEST ALLEYS LOCATED IN THE FOLLOWING BLOCKS AND ADDITIONS - BLOCK 4, PERKINS SUBDIVISION OF BLACK 17, ROBERTS AND MCWHORTER ADDITION, BLACK 2, PAUL M. CROUCH SUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 15 AND 16 ROBERTS AND MCWHORTER ADDITION, C. D. CRUMP'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 9,' ROBERTS AND MCWHORTER ADDITION, J. H. DODSON SUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 3, ROBERTS AND MCWHORTER ADDITION, BLOCK 3, ROBERTS AND MCWHORTER ADDITION, BLOCK 85,- ORIGINAL TOWN, BLOCK 83, ORIGINAL TOWN, BLOCK 97, ORIGINAL TOWN, BLOCK 134, OVERTON ADDITION, NORTON ADDITION, BLOCK 58, OVERTON ADDITION, BLOCK 71, OVERTON ADDITION„ BLOCK 101, OVERTON ADDITION, BLACK 49, OVERTON ADDITION, BLOCK 7, ELLWOOD PLACE, BLOCK 1,•ELLWOOD PLACE, BLOCK 14,-0'NEAL TERRACE ANNEX, ARM- STRONG-ALDRLDGE ADDITION,' -BLACK 1, VANDELIA VILLAGE, BLOCK 3, VANDELIA VILLAGE, DOLLIE MAC ADDI- TION INSTALLMENT NUMBER 2, BLOCK ll,'C. C. LEFTWICH SUBDIVISION, BLACK 9, ORIGINAL TOWN, SUCH PORTIONS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THEFAVING-ASSESSMENTS OF-THE'CITY OF LUBBOCK ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF AND PORTIONS OF OTHER SUNDRY ALLEYS IN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, AND/OR ALONG THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH ASSESS- MENTS AND FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, ALLOCATING FUNDS. C WHEREAS, the City Engineer prepared rolls or statements for the improvements in each unit, showing the amounts to be assessed against the various parcels of abutting property, and the owners thereof, and showing other matters and things; and the same were examined by the City Council and approved, and a time and place was fixed for hearing to the owners of such abutting property, and to all others in anywise interested, and due and proper notice was given in com- 9 t,V, JAIL Z 5 19 addressed to his.last known address,.and such he was had and held at the time and place fixed therefore, to -wit: on the 25th day of January, 1967, at 10:00 o'clock a.m. in the Council Room in the City of Lubbock, Texas, and at such hearing all desiring to be heard were fully and fairly heard,. and evidence was received and considered. ar<d All protests and objections made were considered, and said hearing was in all respects held in the manner provided and required by the charter and law in force in this City and by the proceedings of the City with reference to such matters, and the following protests were made concerning the improvements in the units indicated namely: Sub -Unit 2 of Unit A-391 Mr. Claude Brooks appeared representing Mr. Fred Worsham, Trustee, as being opposed to the alley.paving improvements. Sub -Unit 3 of. Unit A-391 Clara M. Ater indicated by telephone that she was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 5 of Unit A-391 Fenner Tubbs indicated by -telephone that he was opposed. to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 7 of Unit A-391 Willie Thomas Wilson indicated by telephone that she was opposed.to the alley paving improve- ments. De ,Busk. Ente.rprised, Inc.. indicated by letter that they were opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit, 8 of Unit A-391 Tom Johnson appeared representing Charles Cobb as being opposed to the alley paving improve- ments. Homer Hensley indicated to the Engineering Department that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 9 of Unit A-391 Alton Abbott indicated by letter.that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 10 of Unit A-391 Mr. J. B.-Franklin appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. J. B. Franklin, C. E. Newsom and Mrs.. Mary Hartnett indicated by petition that they were opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 11 of Unit A-391 Henry Diebel appeared opposing the alley paving improvements and presented a petition oppos- ing the alley paving improvements. The petition was signed by A. L. Featherston, Henry Diebel, S. R. Williams, Sam Roberts, Mrs. A. L. Featherston and Mrs. S. R. Williams. Henry Diebel represented Archie Sims as being opposed to the alley improvements. Sub -Unit 12 of Unit A-391 C. G. Webster appeared representing the C & G Corp. as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. E. E. Patterson appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. H. W. Green appeared representing South Plains and Santa Fe Railway Co. as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Bill Whitwell for Ater-Whitwell Lumber Co. indicated by letter that they were opposed to the alley paving improvements. Frank McNeil indicated by letter that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Merle (Whatley) Hill indicated by letter that she was opposed to the alley paving improve- ments. Mrs. J. 0. (Turney) McDaniel indicated by letter that she was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Mrs. Lora Matthews indicated by letter that she was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Mr. and Mrs. Jack Kirk indicated by letter that they were opposed to the alley paving improve meats. Sub -Unit 13 of Unit A-391 Joe Phillips appeared representing H. E. Griffith, Trustee as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Joe Phillips appeared representing R. S. Bruce and Claude Fletcher as being opposed to the 24 25 1967 Mr. and Mrs. Claude -Fletcher indicated by letter that they were opposed to the alley paving improvements. Mr. and Mrs. R. S. Bruce indicated by letter that they were opposed to the alley paving improvements. W. J. Rogers appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Ressie Mae Rodgers appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Mrs. C. G. Morton appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. w Mr. Sam McMillian appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Mrs. Nina Latham indicated by telephone that she opposed the alley paving improvements. 'Sub -Unit 14 of Unit A-391 Mrs. Onis B. Carter appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Floyd Koen appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 15 of Unit A-391 L. E. James appeared representing Verble V. McIver as•being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Nona Jean Baker appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Roy Benskin, Mrs. Roy Benskin, Mrs. Lura Nell Matsler, Mrs. L. E. James, L. E. James, F. S. Teague, Mrs. F. S. Teague, Mrs. Audrie Warren, and C. I. Waller indicated by petition that they were opposed to the alley paving ,improvements. Sub -Unit 17 of Unit A-391 Raymond Allen appeared on behalf of himself and Evelyn Grimes Allen opposing the alley pav- ing improvements. Edna Buster appeared and presented a petition signed by Mrs. C. C. Cox, C. B. McCollum, Mrs. J. C. Coe, L. 0. White, Mrs. Ira Lee, Mrs. Dude Buster, Raymond Allen, and Mrs. C. C. Rister opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 18 of Unit A-391 Doyle McLeod appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Tom Ansley appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Leonard W. Evans indicated by telephone that he opposed the alley paving improvements. E. F. Williams indicated by telephone that he opposed the alley paving improvements. C. P. Gollier indicated by telephone that he opposed the alley paving improvements. Mrs. Norcross indicated by telephone that she opposed the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 19 of Unit A-391 Bill Tucker appeared representing Mrs. Lora Ferrell Tucker as being opposed to the alley paving improvements.. Mrs. J. J. Clements indicated by letter that she was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Mrs. Eathel Roddy indicated by letter that she opposed the alley paving improvements. Mrs. Emma N. Johnson indicated by letter that she opposed the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 21 of Unit A-391 R. H. bowery, Jr. appeared representing the R. H. Lowery Trust as opposing the alley paving improvements. John Zournas appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 22 of Unit A-391 Fred Warren appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Doyle Mcleod appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 23 of Unit A-391'' Don Graf represented the Redeemer Evangelical Lutheran Church of Lubbock as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 24 of Unit A-391 G. H. Nelson represented J. R. Leftwich as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. c' J JAN 2 5 19 Sub -Unit 25 of Unit A-391 ` J. L.-Harris appeared.and presented a_petition signed by himself, Bert A. Mackey, J. L. Park- hill, Mrs. Iva Edington, Homer L. Hensley, Mary Forrest, John E. Harvey, Ralph L. Willhite, Ruth Aileen Dunn,•Nadine Jones, John C. Crawford and Mrs. Harold Mclnroe as being opposed to the alley paving. improvements. Sub -Unit 26 of Unit A-391 Rev. Billy Sanders appeared representing the First Church of God as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. W. E. Medlock -appeared representing Medlock Well Built Homes as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 27 of Unit A-391 Leta L. Rankin appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Pat Barnard appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 31 of Unit A-391 Hudson Bird appeared representing Fawn Bird, C. C. Leftwich and Herman B. Guinn as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 32 of Unit A-391 Kenneth Bowlin appeared and presented a petition signed -by Frank 0. Bennett, J. 0. Hunter, Bill Gibson and Robert Howard opposing the alley paving improvements. Bud W. Meyers appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Tom Johnson appeared representing the Panhandle and Santa Fe Railway Company as being opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit A-392 Joe Hazelwood appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Gerald C. Sandlin appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit A-392 B. C. "Jack" Spratt appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. And all objections and protests made were fully considered and said hearing was continued from day to day and from time to time until this date, and the City Council having fully and fairly heard all parties making any protest and all parties desiring to be heard, and having fully considered all matters presented for consideration, and having fully considered all of the evi- dence, and all pertinent and proper matters is of opinion that the following disposition should be made of such protests and objections, and that assessments should be made as herein ordained, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: I. That all protests and objections, whether herein specifically mentioned or not, shall be and the same are hereby overruled and the said hearing, with respect to each and all Sub-Units,/Md U, hereby closed EXCEPT that it was found that alley paving Sub -Units 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27 and 32 of Unit A-391 and Sub -Unit l of Unit A-392, were erroneously included in the public notice and in the contemplated ordinance and in other proceedings: therefore NO ASSESSMENT shall be made against the property included in said Sub -Units and the City Engineer is hereby directed to delete and/or omit the engineer's.assessment roll for said Sub -Units consistent with this finding. 67-26-25-68 In accordance with the Notice of Paving Hearing, City Council Minutes of December 8, 1966, said (9a) hearing was held on,General Work Order 10554 (Street Paving). .A large number of persons appeared for the paving hearing. After consideration of all information presented at the hearing, Mayor Rogers announced that the hearing was closed. Motion was then made by Councilman Diekemper, seconded by Councilman Medlock, motion carried, Mayor Rogers and Councilmen Granberry, Kastman, Diekemper and Medlock voting Yea, none voting Nay, that Paving Ordinance No. 5185 be passed on first reading. G.W.O. 10554 ORDINANCE NO. 5185 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR A PART OF THE COST OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF NORTH HARTFORD AVENUE, NORTH GARY AVENUE, WACO AVENUE, 3RD STREET, EAST 15TH STREET, 28TH STREET, TEMPLE AVENUE, UVALDE AVENUE, AKRON AVENUE, VICKSBURG AVENUE, JOLIET AVENUE, EAST 1/2 OF NASHVILLE AVENUE, ERSKINE STREET, AVENUE K, KEMPER STREET, EAST 7TH STREET, UTE AVENUE, VANDA AVENUE, EAST LOTH STREET, REDBUD AVENUE, AVENUE D, AVENUE B, EAST 38TH STREET, 46TH STREET, AVENUE-J, AVENUE V, RALEIGH AVENUE, TOLEDO AVENUE, PEORIA AVENUE, 17TH STREET, 18TH STREET, 24TH STREET, CEDAR AVENUE T, EAST ITASCA STREET, EAST EMORY STREET, EAST 42ND STREET, UTICA DRIVE, YUCCA LANE, 66TH STREET, MARSHALL STREET, NORTH AVENUE T, 8TH STREET, GLOBE AVENUE, IVORY AVENUE, MAGNOLIA AVENUE, OAK AVENUE AND -SLIDE ROAD SUCH PORTIONS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE PAVING ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF AND PORTIONS OF OTHER SUNDRY STREETS, HIGHWAYS, AVENUES AND/OR ALLEYS IN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, AND/OR ALONG THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND FOR THE )6 )AN 2 5 1967 THIS ORDINANCE FOR UNITS DELETED BY CITY COUNCIL). WHEREAS, the City•Engineer prepared rolls or statements for the improvements in each unit, showing the amounts to be assessed against the various parcels of abutting property, -and the owners thereof, and showing other matters and things; and the same were examined by the City Council and approved, and a time and place was fixed for hearing to the owners of such abutting property, and to all others in anywise interested, and due and proper notice was given in com- pliance with law and in addition notices were mailed to each known property owner to be assessed addressed to his last known address, and such hearing was had and held at the time and place fixed therefore, to -wit: on the 25th day of January, 1967, at 10:00 o'clock A.M. in the Council Room in the City of Lubbock, Texas, and at such hearing all desiring to be heard were fully and fairly heard, and evidence was received and considered and all protests and objections made were considered, and said hearing was in all respects held in the manner provided and required by the charter and law in force in this City and by the proceedings of the City with reference to such matters, and the following protests were made concerning the improvements in the units indicated namely: Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2158 Mrs. Will D. Groseclose indicated by telephone that they were opposed to the proposed paving improvements on North Hartford Avenue. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit 2158 Mr. J. W. Dennis indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improve- ments on North Hartford Avenue. M. A. Stucker indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on North Hartford Avenue. Sub -Unit 5 of Unit 2158 Mr. Arnold R. Richards appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on North Gary Avenue. Sub -Unit 6 of Unit 2158 Mr. Hobert W. White indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Waco Avenue. Sub -Unit 7 of Unit 2158 Mrs. John Haddock appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 3rd Street. Mr. Tom Johnson appeared on behalf of the Panhandle and Santa Fe Railway Company opposing the proposed paving improvements on 3rd Street. Sub -Unit 8 of Unit 2158 Roberta Bascus, widow of Andrew Bascus, indicated by telephone that she was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on 3rd Street. Sub -Unit 9 of Unit 2158 Mrs. J. L. Davis appeared opposing the -proposed paving improvements on East 15th Street. Mr. Luther Bull appeared at the City Engineering Department opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 15th Street. Mr. Rolan Simpson indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on the West End of East 15th Street, Sub -Unit 10 of Unit 2158 Mr. George W. Blair appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 28th Street. Sub -Unit 12 of Unit 2158 Mr. C. 0. Blackburn appeared for himself and on behalf of Mr. J. 0. Blackburn and Mr. C. M. Robertson opposing the proposed paving improvements on Uvalde Avenue. Mr. Herbert H. Case indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improve- ments on Uvalde Avenue. Sub -Unit 15 of Unit 2158 Mrs. J. R. Gibson indicated by mail that she was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Vicksburg Avenue. Percy A. Williams indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Vicksburg Avenue. Charles Leland Brock indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improve- ments on Vicksburg Avenue. Ray E. Dilbeck indicated by mail that he was opposed to.the proposed paving improvements on Vicksburg Avenue. Sub -Unit 20 of Unit 2158 JAN 2 5 1967 ►� Mr. Milton Gardner indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Vicksburg Avenue. Mr. William Pearson appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Vicksburg Avenue. Sub -Unit 21 of Unit 2158 Mrs. David L. Ivey indicated by mail that -they were opposed to the proposed paving improve- ments on Vicksburg Avenue. Mr. H. H. Holman indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Vicksburg Avenue. Ruby Lee Summers indicated by telephone that she was opposed to the proposed paving improve- ments on Vicksburg Avenue. Sub -Unit 23 of Unit 2158 Lawton H. Ware indicated by telephone that he opposed the proposed paving improvements on Nashville Avenue. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2159 Mr. H. L. Post indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Erskine Street. Mr. L. L. Hendrix appeared for himself and on behalf of Edward Quevedo, James F. McCasland, Leol.a Linn, Tom Kelly, Loyd Hendrix, Mrs. H. L. Post, L. J. Randolph, and H. L. Post opposing the proposed paving improvements on Erskine Street. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit 2159 Mr. Charles R. Boortz indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on 3rd Street. Sub -Unit 4 of Unit 2159 Mr. Dan Hurley appeared on behalf of Mr. J. F. McGregor opposing the proposed paving improve- ments on 3rd Street. Sub -Unit 5 of Unit 2159 Mrs. Sadie Norton appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 3rd Street. Sub-Unit-6 of Unit 2159 Mr. T. E. Patterson appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue K. Sub -Unit 7 of Unit 2159 Mrs. H. L. Abernathy appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Kemper Street. Mr. Ivan Fowler appeared on behalf of the J. 0. Garlington Estate opposing the proposed paving improvements on Kemper Street. Sub -Unit 8 of Unit 2159 Mr. W. W. Buckner appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 7th Street. Mr. Jim Eldredge appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 7th Street. Sub -Unit 11 of Unit 2159 Mr. C. D. Elliston appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East Loth Street. Sub -Unit 13 of Unit 2159 Mr. George W. Blair appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements. Sub -Unit 16 of Unit 2159 Mr. C. M. Lang appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 38th Street. Sub -Unit 18 of Unit 2159 Mr. Joe L. Tarver appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue K. Mr. Frank E. Hoop appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue K. Sub -Unit 20 of Unit 2159 Mr. Joe Dale Bryan Vice -President, First National Bank, Administrator for the Estate of C. N Hodges and Co -Administrator for the Estate of Linnie-Jane Hodges indicated -by mail that they were opposed to proposed paving improvements on Avenue J. Sub -Unit 21 of Unit 2159 Mr. Alvin D. Scoggin appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue T. I8 A 2 5 1667 Mr. Tucker Rudder appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue T. Sub -Unit 22 of Unit 2159 Mr. John T. Burns indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Avenue V. Mr. Henry T. Young appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue V. Mr. D. D. Lacy appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Avenue V. Sub -Unit 24 of Unit 2159 Mr. Harold L. Paden appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Akron Avenue. Mr. LeRoy Morrison, Jr. indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Akron Avenue. ' Sub -Unit 25 -of Unit 2159 Mr. P. W. Wassom appeared on behalf of Prudy Wassom opposing the proposed paving improvements on Akron Avenue. Sub-Unit-26 of Unit 2159 Mr. J. T. Carr appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Raleigh Avenue. Sub -Unit 27 of Unit 2.159 Mr. Carl R. Brown appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Raleigh Avenue. Lottie Pinkston appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Raleigh Avenue. Carl Teeter indicated by mail that he was opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Raleigh Avenue. Sub -Unit 28 of Unit 2159 Roy L. Taylor appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Raleigh Avenue. Mr. Charles H. Payne appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Raleigh Avenue. Sub -Unit 32 of Unit 2159 Mr. Weldon Putman, J. D. Hamilton and Mrs. Homer Stanton indicated by mail that they were opposed to the proposed paving improvements on Toledo Avenue. Sub -Unit 35 of Unit 2159 Mr. William W. Brown appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 17th Street. Mr. Fletcher N. Green appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 17th Street. Mr. Larry 0. Holly appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on 17th Street. Sub -Unit 38 of Unit 2159 Mr. D. E. Sinclair indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the proposed paving improve- ments on 24th Street. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2161 Mr. Linus Wright, Business Manager for Lubbock Independent School District, requested that Itasca Street be deleted from proposed paving contract. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit 2161 Mackerizie Manor Church of Christ indicated by mail that they were opposed to the proposed paving improvements on East Emory Street. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit 2161 r Tasco Grain Company indicated by telephone that they were opposed to the proposed paving improvements on East 42nd Street. Mr. -Tucker Rudder appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 42nd Street. Sub -Unit 4 of Unit 2161 Mrs. J. M. Ayers appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on East 42nd Street. Mrs. Monte Bain appeared on behalf of Norman D. Bain opposing the proposed paving improve- ments on East 42nd Street. Sub -Unit 6 of Unit 2161 Mr. Larry 0. Holly appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Utica Drive. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2162 JAN 2 5 196, r+ F A representative for Lubbock Country Club appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Yucca Lane. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit 2162 A representative for Lubbock Country Club appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Yucca Lane. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2164. Western Tank and Steel Co. indicated by mail that they were opposed to the proposed paving improvements on North Gary Avenue. Texaco Inc. indicated by mail that they did not abut the proposed paving so they were against the proposed assessment. The Engineer for Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co. appeared opposing the proposed concrete railroad crossings. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit 2164 Gifford -Hill Western, Inc., Mr. R. S. Gentry and W. S. Henry, indicated by mail that they were opposed to the proposed paving length on Marshall Street. Sub -Unit 4 of Unit 2164 Mr. Benidean Hammock appeared opposing the proposed - paving improvements on North Avenue T. Knox, Gailey & Meador indicated by mail that they were opposed to the proposed paving improve ments on North Avenue T. Mr. Deloy Randolph appeared on behalf of the Josh Randolph Trust opposing the proposed paving improvements on North Avenue T. Mr. A. J. Jones appeared on behalf of BOK Investment Corporation opposing the proposed paving improvements on North Avenue T. Sub -Unit 6 of Unit 2164 Mr. Don Graf appeared on behalf of Rhyne Simpson opposing the proposed paving improvements on Globe Avenue. Sub -Unit 8 of Unit 2164 Mrs. L. V. Richardson appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Globe Avenue. .Sub -.Unit 9 of Unit 2164 Mrs. L. V. Richardson aPPeared, opposing the proposed paving improvements on Globe Avenue. Sub -Unit 11 of Unit 2164 Mr. Jack Foster appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Ivory Avenue. Sub -Unit 13 of Unit 2164 LaVada M. Paul Petty, Mr. Petty indicated by telephone that they were opposed to the proposes paving improvements on Magnolia. Avenue. .Sub -Unit 14 of Unit 2164 Weldon Gibbs & 0. Gowen appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Oak Avenue. R. B. Blaylock appeared - opposing the proposed paving improvements on Oak Avenue. Wade Kelly appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Oak Avenue. Sub -Unit 15 of Unit 2164 Mr. J. W. Blackstock appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Oak Avenue. Mr. H. L. Bradford appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Oak Avenue. Mr. C. E. Husky appeared opposing the.proposed paving improvements on Oak Avenue. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2165 Mr. Buster Long appeared opposing the proposed paving improvements on Slide Road. And all objections and protest made were fully considered and said hearing was continued fror day to day and from time to time until this date, and the City Council having fully and fairly heard all parties making any protest and all parties desiring to be heard, and having fully consic erect all matters presented for consideration, and having fully considered all of the evidence, an( all.pertinent and proper.matters.is of opinion that the following disposition should be made of such protests and objections, and that assessments should be made as herein ordained, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK; j()5 4967 I. That all protests and objections, whether herein specifically mentioned or not, shall be and the same are hereby overruled and the said hearing, with respect to each and all Sub -Units and Units, is hereby closed, except that it was found that paving Sub -Unit 10 of Unit 2158, Sub -Units 1, 7; 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28 of Unit 2159, Sub -Units 1, 3, 4, of Unit 2161, Sub -Units 1, 2 of Unit 2162, Sub -Units 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 of Unit 2164, Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2165, were erroneously included in the public notice and in the contemplated ordinance and in other proceedings; therefore NO ASSESSMENT shall be made against the property included in said Sub -Units and the City Engineer is hereby directed to delete and/or omit the engineer's assessment roll for said Sub -Units consistent with this finding. 67-26-30-69 Motion by Councilman Granberry, seconded by Councilman Kastman, motion carried, Mayor Rogers and (10) Councilmen Granberry, Kastman, Diekemper and Medlock voting Yea, none voting May, that the following Resolution be passed. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution adopted November 10, 1966, recorded in Volume 459, Pages 437 et. seq. Deed of Trust Records of Lubbock County, Texas expressed the intent to improve certain streets and avenues within the City of Lubbock as more particularly described and desig- nated therein, and. WHEREAS, the City Council, after a public hearing, determined that certain streets and avenues should, at this time, be deleted from the street. improvement program for 1967 as more particularly set out in such Resolution and the City Council is of the opinion that the streets and avenues as more particularly described hereinafter in the body of this Resolution should now be deleted from the street improvements as described in said Resolution and that all liens expressed and implied in law, created or affixed on the lots, tracts or parcels of land abutting or adjacent to such streets and avenues as well as any and all clouds on the title thereto aris- ing out of or by virtue of such Resolution be released and removed; Now THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: THAT those certain streets and avenues described as follows: Unit No. Street From To 2158-7 Delete Lot 7, Block 2, Li£f Sanders Addition 2158-10 28th Street W.P.L. of alley W. of Ave. D 2159-1 Erskine Street E.P.L. of N. Canton Ave.. (S. Leg) 2159-6 Delete Lot 8, Block 12, William Tubbs Addition 2159-7 Kemper Street E.P.L. of Lot 1, Garling- ton fits. Add. 2159-9 Ute Avenue N.P.L. of E. 10th St. 2159-10 Vanda Avenue N.P.L. of E. 10th St. 2159-11 E. loth Street W.P.L. of Walnut Ave. 2159-13 Avenue D N.P.L. of 29th St. (E. Leg) 2159-16 E. 38th Street W.P.L. of Quirt Ave. 2159-18 2159-19 2159-21 2159-22 2159-25 2159-2 6 2159-27 2159-28 2161-1 2161-3 2161-4 2162-1 2162-2 Avenue K S.P.L. of 36th St. Delete Lot 9, Block 1, Hilton Addition Avenue T. S.P.L. of 41st St. (W. Leg) Avenue V S.P.L. of 38th St. (E.Leg) Akron Avenue S.P.L. of 40th St. Raleigh Avenue S.P.L. of 38th St.. Raleigh Avenue S.P.L. of 39th St. Raleigh Avenue S.P.L. of 40th St. E. Itasca Street 26' E. of the WPL of Quirt Ave. (S. Leg) E. 42nd Street E.P.L. of Locust Ave. E. 42nd Street Yucca Lane Yucca Lane Part of 2164-3 That part of Marshall St. 2164-4 N. Avenue T 2164-6 Globe Avenue 2164-7 Globe Avenue 2164-8 Globe Avenue, 2164-9 Globe Avenue 2164-11 Ivory Avenue 2164-12 Ivory Avenue 2164-13 Magnolia Avenue 2164-14 Oak Avenue 2164-15 Oak Avenue E.P.L. of Magnolia Ave. (S. Leg) E.P.L. of Mesa Road (S. Leg) E.P.L. of Valley View Drive (S. Leg) 3' E. of the alley E. of College Ave. 30' S. of the N.P.L. of Harvard St. N.P.L. of 37th St. (W. Leg) N.P.L. of E. 47th St. N.P.L. of E. 48th St. N.P.L. of E. 49th St. S.P.L. of 50th St. S.P.L. of 52nd St. S.P.L. of 50th St. S.P.L. of 50th St. S.P.L. of 52nd St. W. P. L. of Ave. D S.W.P.L. of Clovis Road 40' W. of the E.P.L. of N. Ash Ave. S.P.L. of E. 8th St. S.P.L. of E. 8th St. W.P.L. of Ute Ave. 210' N. of the N.P.L. of 29th St. (E. Leg) 215' W. of the E.P.L. of Lot 2, Block 7, Nelson - Brown Add. N.P.L. of 37th St. N.P.L. of 42nd St. (W. Leg) N.P.L. of 39th St. N.P.L. of 41st St. N.P.L. of 39th St. N.P.L. of 40th St. N.P.L. of 42nd St. 765.77' W. of the W.P.L. of Quirt Ave. (S. Leg) E.F.L. of Magnolia Ave. (S. Leg) W.P.L. of Quirt Ave. E.P.L. of Valley View Drive (S. Leg) 34' E. of the E.P.L. of Highland Drive (N. Ave. A) E.P.L. of Lot 12, Block 8, Burleson & Osborn's Stan- ton Add. No. 1 200' N. of the N.P.L. of Lot 13, Stanton's Indus- trial Add. S.P.L. of the alley N. of 36th St. N.P.L. of E. 48th St. N.P.L. of E. 49th St. N.P.L. of E. 50th St. S.P.L. of 52nd St. S.P.L. of 54th St. S.P.L. of 52nd St. S.P.L. of 52nd St. S.P.L. of 54th St. r^ R An 25 2165-1 Slide Road S.P.L. of 50th St. S.P.L. of 54th St. (E. Leg) BE and the same are hereby deleted from said street improvement program of the City of Lubbock for 1967; same being a part or portion of the streets and avenues within the City of Lubbock described in that certain Resolution adopted November 10, 1966, recorded in Volume 459, Pages 437 et. seq. Deed of Trust Records of Lubbock County, Texas, and said Resolution shall have no further legal force or effect on said streets and avenues as described herein; and any and all liens expressed and implied in law, created or affixed on the lots, tracts, or parcels of land abutting or adjacen to such streets and avenues as well as any and all clouds on the title thereto arising out of or by virtue of such Resolution be and the same are hereby released and removed. Provided, however, that this Resolution shall not in any wise be construed as altering, changing or releasing the legal force and effect of said Resolution and Ordinance No. 5185 enacted pursuant to the intent expressed in such Resolution in so far as those streets and avenues which are not particularly daQe rihad harain_ Passed and approved this 25th day of January, 1967 F- ATTEST: OL LAVENIWO IM, City ecreta y-Treasurer APPROVED: /s/ Samuel W. Wahl, City Engineer _ Samuel W. Wahl, City Engineer APPROVED: Lsl Fred 0. Senter, Jr. Fred 0. Senter, Jr., City Attorney NO FURTHER BUSINESS COMING UP FOR CONSIDERATION, THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED FROM REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 25TH, 1967. ATTEST: IAVENIA44WE, City cretary-Treasurer READ AND APPROVED THIS THE 91H DAY OF FEBRUARY2 1°r1' ATTEST: LAVEN LOWE, City Secre ry-Treasurer P� 32 F L Ll li