Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - Regular - 3/23/1966113 MAR 2 3 1966 [■ 4,. Larch 23, 1966 REGULAR MEETING: The City. Council of the: City of Lubbock, Texas, met at 94.00 o'clock a.m. in the regular meeting place in the City Hall, the following members thereof being present to -wit: Mayor Max Tidmore and Councilmen W. E. Alderson and Rolan Simpson, City Attorney Fred 0. Senter, Jr., City Manager William J. Pitstick, Jr., City Secretary -Treasurer Lavenia Lowe. Absent: Councilmen Jack Kastman and W. E. Medlock 66-25-113-291 Invocation was given by Mayor Max Tidmore. (1) 66-25-113-292 NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING (2) NOTICE is hereby given to owners of the property hereinafter Described or referred to and to all other persons as provided by law, that the City Council will hold a public hearing on the 23rd day of March, 1966, at 9:00 A.M., in the, City Council Chamber on the Second Floor of the City Hall in Lubbock, Texas, to consider the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission that the zoning district of the property herein described be changed; and at which time and place all interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard, after which hearing, the City Council will determine whether the Zoning Ordinance and map will be amended in accordance with such re- commendation. ZONE CASE NO. 1401 - Request of Emory Crockett and J. C. Davis to change Block 23; Lots 14 thru 17, Block 15, Vandelia Village Addition, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, from an "R-1" to an "R-3 " Zoning District. (Lots 14-17, Block 15 are at the NW Corner of Wolfforth Road and Avenue T; Block 23 is north of 66th Street between -Avenues R and S) The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that this request be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the property shall be limited to apartments. 2. A minimum of 1500 square feet of lot area and 1 1/2 paved off-street parking spaces spaces shall be provided for each apartment unit. ZONE CASE NO. 1402 - Request of the Planning and Zoning Commission, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, to change Lots 17 thru 24, Block 1 and Lots 1 thru 6, Block 2, Crouch Sub- division, an addition to the City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, from an "R-3" to a "C-4" Zoning District. (On each side of 3rd Place and between College Avenue and Avenue X) The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that this request be granted. ZONE CASE NO. 1403 - Request of Hugh Anderson (for Henry D. Loter) to change Lots 1 and 2, Block 53, Overton Addition, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, from an "R-2" to an "R-3" Zoning District. (SW Corner of Avenue U and 14th Street) The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that this request be granted, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development -of the property shall be limited to apartments. 2. A -minimum of 1000 square feet of lot area shall be provided for each apartment unit. 3. A minimum of one and one-half paved off-street parking spaces -shall be provided for each one bedroom -unit and two such spaces shall be provided for each apartment unit with two or more bedrooms. - ZONE CASE NO. 1404 - Request of Marion T. Key (for Frenchmen's Creek Corporation) for a Specific Use Permit Zone Change, under provisions of Section 14-A.41-15 of the Zoning Ord for a Dormitory -Project on Lots 5 thru 20, Block 98, Overton Addit-ion, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, -Texas. (East of College Avenue, between loth Street and Main Street) The Planning and -Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that this request be granted. ZONE CASE NO. 1405 - Request of Gene Blackburn (for Lona Owens, F. 0. Sparks and J. E. Alexander) to change all of -the southern portions of Lots 7 thru 12 lying south of the AT & SF Railroad and all of Lot 13, Block 64, Overton Addition, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, from an '14-1" and "R-2" (Lot 13) to an "R-3 " Zoning District. (Lot 13 is at the NE Corner of Avenue W and 5th Street. Remaining property is east of Avenue W, north of the alley between 4th and 5th Streets) The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that this request be granted_, except for Lot7, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the property shall be limited to apartments. 2. A minimum of 1000 square feet of lot area shall be provided for each apartment unit. 3. A minimum of one and one-half paved off-street parking spaces shall be provided for each one bedroom unit and two such spaces for each apartment unit with two or more bedrooms. 11_4 MAR 2 31966 ZONE CASE NO. 1407 - Request of Dr. R. A. Pillow to change Lot 41, Mackenzie Heights Additiol, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, from an "R-1" to an "R-3" Zoning District. (SW Corner of East 4th Street and Ute Avenue) The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that this request be granted, subject to the condition that use be limited to medical office use. ZONE CASE NO. 1400 - Request of the Planning and Zoning Commission, City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas, to change portions of Lots 12, 13, Block 20, and Lots 24 and 25, Block 22, Lyndale Acres Addition, City of Lubbock, Lubbock, County, Texas, from an "R-1"_Zoning District to a "C-3" Zoning District. Said property has now been replatted and is in the north portion of Block 23A, said addition. (North of 60th Street between Avenues A and H) The Planning and Zoning Commission -recommended to -the City Council that this request be granted. NOTICE•OY CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE is hereby given to all interested persons as provided by law, that the City Council will hold a public hearing on the 23rd day of March , 1966, at 9:00 A.M., in the City Council Chamber on the Second Floor of the City Hall in Lubbock, Texas, to consider the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission that the Zoning Ordinance 1695 be amended to include a new zoning district, "AM", Medical District, and to amend Sections and Subsections of said Zoning Ordinance as described below; and at which time and place all interested persons will be given an opportun- ity to be heard, after which hearing, the City Council will determine whether the Zoning Ordinance will be amended in accordance with such recommendation. PRESENT WORDING 2.25 CLINIC, MEDICAL: An institution or station for the examina- tion and treatment of ill and affected out- patients. 2.62 HOSPITAL: An institution or place where sick or in- jured patients are given medical or surgi- cal care, whether at public (Charity) or private expense. 2.129 - NONE 2.130 - NONE Section 3 - Districts The City of Lubbock is hereby divided into eleven classes of use districts termed respectively; "R-l" -Single Family District k!R-2" Two Family District "R-3 " Multi -Family District "A-3'.' Third Apartment District "C-l" Semi -Commercial District "C-2A" Restricted Local Retail District "C-2 " Local Retail District "C-3" General Retail District "C-4" Commercial District Light Manufacturing District "M-2" Heavy Manufacturing District Section 4.5 _(B) A new quadruplicate original zoning map shall be permanently sealed for preservation and is never to be changed in any manner and shall be hung in some con- venient place in City Hall for the use and benefit of the public; one other new quad- ruplicate original shall be hung in, the office of the Secretary of the Planning and Zoning Commission; one other new quadrupli- cate original shall be hung in the office of the Building Inspector of the City of Lubbock; and the remaining new quadrupli- cate original shall be hung in the City Commission Room for the use and benefit of the public; each of said new quadrupli- cate original maps provided for in the Subsection shall be used -in lieu and as •a substitute for the quadruplicate originals provided for by Subsection 4.1 of Zoning Ordinance 1695 of the City of Lubbock. A PROPOSED WORDING 2.25 CLINIC MEDICAL: A facility or station for the examination - and treatment of ill and affected out- patients excepting veterinary facilities. 2.62 HOSPITAL: A facility or station where sick or in- jured persons are given medical or surgi- cal care, whether at public or private expense. 2.129 MEDICAL OFFICE: A building or po-rtion thereof designed primarily for the medical examination of persons by a physician, doctor, or other medical personnel; such use does not in- clude major medical or surgical treatment or bed accomodations. 2,130 SANITATIUM: An institution or place for the treatment or recuperation of a particular physical - or mental disorder. Section 3 - Districts The City of Lubbock is hereby divided into twelve classes of use districts termed respectively: "R-l" Si.nglg Family District "R-2" Two Family District "R-3" Multi=Family District "A-3" Third Apartment District "AM" Medical District "C-l" Semi Commercial District "C-2A" Restricted Local Retail District "C-2". Local Retail District '.'C-V: General Retail District "C-4" Commercial District '14-1" Light Manufacturing District "M-2 " Heavy Manufacturing District Section 4.5 (B) A new quadruplicate original zoning map shall be permanently sealed for - preservation and is never to be changed in any manner and shall be hung in some con- venient place in City Hall for the use and -benefit of the public; one other new quad- ruplicate original shall be hung in the office of the Secretary of the Planning and Zoning Commission; one other new quadrupli- cate original shall be hung in the office of the. Building Inspector of the City of Lubbock; and the remaining new quadrupli- cate original shall be hung in the City Council Chamber for the use and benefit of the public; each of said new quadrupli- cate original maps provided for in the Subsection shall -be used in liew and as a substitute for the quadruplicate originals provided for by Subsection 4.1 of Zoning Ordinance 1695 of the City of Lubbock. A 115 MAR 2 3196E M" new color legend is hereby adopted for each of the said new quadruplicate original maps, which shall be as follows: Zoning District Shade or Color new color legend is hereby adopted for each of the said new quadruplicate original maps, which shall be as follows: - Zoning District. Shade or Color R-1 Medium.Yeliow R-1 Medium Yellow R-2 Light Orange R-2 Light Orange R-3 Medium Brown R-3 - Medium Brown A-3 Dark Green A-3 Dark Green C-1 Light Red AM Medium Blue C-2A Lavender C-1 Light Red C-2 Dark Orange C-2A Lavender C-3 Medium Red C-2 Dark Orange C-4 Dark Red C-3 Medium Red M-1 Dark Gray C-4 Dark Red M-2 Purple M-1 Dark Gray M-2 Purple 8.1-6 Apartment hotels in which incidental 8.1-6 DELETE business may be conducted for the con- venience of the occupants of the building, provided.there shall be no entrance to such - place of business except from the inside of the building, provided there are no - window displays or advertisements and provided further there is no sign advertising such business that ghall be visible from the outside of the building. 8.1-10 Hospital, health institution, clinics 8.1-10 Hospital, clinic, or medical office, or sanitariums,.except animal hospitals, except veterinary facilities. clinics, and hospitals, or sanitoriums for contagious, mental, drug or liquor addict - - cases. 8.1-12 Institutional homes, except of a 8.1-12 DELETE correctional nature. 14-A.1-16- NONE 17.2 The following name plates and signs shall be permitted in any "R-3" District: 14-A.1-16 Sanitarium on a site of 10 acres or more in any zoning district. 17.2 The following name plates and signs - shall be permitted in any "R-3" or Medical District. SECTION 8C "AM" MEDICAL DISTRICT The following regulations shall apply in all "AM" Districts: 8C.1 Uses Permitted The regulations as set forth for this district are intended to provide for and encourage the development of a medical center including individual medical facilities, in a functional and attractive environment. Medical buildings and uses are the basic and principle part of these regulations as are the accessory uses which are intended for use by the medical pro- fession and its clientel. No land can be used or occupied, and further, no building or structure, shall be used, occupied, erected,altered,..or extended unless such conforms to the regulations of the Medical District. 8C.1-1 All uses ugconditionally permitted in R-1, R-2, R-3 Districts. t - 8C.1'2 Blood Bank 8C.1-3 Administrative Offices for the medical profession including independent management, legal, accounting and bookkeeping service for doctors, hospitals, clinics, and medical persognel. 8C.1-4 Public or commercial parking lot or parking building. 8C.1-5 Accessory Uses - Within a building devoted to one of the primary permitted uses thq following incidental uses may be conducted for the convenience of the occupants and their clientel, provided there shall be no entrance to such use or uses except from the inside of the building and provided there are no window displays, adver- tisements or signs advertising such business that shall be Visible from the outside of the building. Such accessory uses may include such things as: 8C.1-5-1 Barber Shop 8C.1-5-2 Beauty Shop 8C.1-5-3 Cafeteria 8C.1-5-4 Coffee Shop 8C.1-5-5 Flower Shop 8C.1-5-6 Gift Shop 8C.1-5-7 Newsstand 8C.1-5-8 Pharmacy 8C.1-5-9 Recreational Facilities 8C.1-5-10 Establishments which sell, fit, or repair devices for the correction. or prevention of physical deformities, hearing, or vision. 8C.1-5-11 Medical, dental, and optical laboratories providing service for individual of the medical profession and their clientel provided that in no way 11f�AR 2 31966 8C.2 Conditional Uses 8C.3 Area Requirements (Reserved for future use) 8C.3-1 Front Yards - There shall be a front yard for every structure, excepting fences. The minimum required front yard shall not be less than 25 feet from the front property line to the structure. 8C.3-2 Rear Yard - There shall be a rear yard along the rear -lot line. The minimum depth of. -such rear yard for residential purposes shall be 20% of the lot depth provided such rear yard need not exceed 30 feet from the center of the alley, and provided further that on a corner lot an attached garage may extend to within 10 feet of the centerline of the alley. Extensions and wings for dwelling purposes may be con- structed toward the alley to a distance not closer than 15 feet from the centerline of -the alley, provided a minimum total rear yard square footage equal to the above requirements is retained in the rear yard area. For structures to be used for other than dwelling purposes, the rear yard shall be not less than 30 feet to the centerline of the alley. 8C.3-3 Side Yard --,There shall be two side yards for each structuref excepting fences, one on each side of the building, having a minumum width of 10 feet. 8C.3-4 Lot Width - The minimum lot width shall be 50 feet. 8C.3.5 Lot Area - The minimum lot area shall be 6,000 square feet. 8C.3-6 The combined ground coverage of all buildings shall not exceed 40% of the total area of the development lot. 8C.4 Density - One dwelling unit for each 1000 square feet of development lot area shall be allowed, such net area being defined by the property lines of the development lot and . exclusive of any area in adjacent streets or allevs. 8C.5 Off -Street Parking - It shall be unlawful for any owner, tenant or occupant to occupy, maintain, erect, alter, construct, extend, or use any building, structure or land within this district unless off-street parking facilities are provided in amounts not less than specified herein. 8C.5-1 Off -Street parking shall be provided for all uses within this district on the following basis: 8C.5-1-1 Hospital - two parking spaces for each bed exclusive of basinets. 8C.5-1-2 Clinic, Medical Office, and Administrative Office - 1 parking space for each 200 square feet of floor area, plus 1 parking space for each doctor.' 8C.5-1-3 Apartment - 1 1/2 ?arking spaces for each one bedroom apartment and two parking spaces for each apartment with two or more bedrooms. 8C.5-1-4 Church - 1 parking space for each five seats in the auditorium, if pews are used each 20 inches in length shall equal one seat. 8C.5-1-5 Blood Bank - 1 1/2 parking spaces for each doper table or chair, 1 park- ing space for each employee, 1 parking space for each company vehicle. 8C.5-2 All parking spaces required herein shall be located on the same lot with the building or use served, except that where an increase in the number of spaces is required by a change or enlargement of a permitted use or building, the required additional spaces may be located a distance not to exceed 300 feet from the building or use served. 8C.5-3 Off -Street Parking areas shall be checked and approved by the City Traffic Engineer under the terms of this district and the City's driveway regulations. The plans submitted shall indicate the location of the off-street parking area or areas in relation -to dedicated streets, alleys, and property -lines as well as indicating the location, arrangement, and dimensions of the off-street parking stalls, drives, isles, and driveway openings. 8C.5-4 Off -Street Parking may be located within the required -yards provided it is not closer than four (4) feet to any street property line and not closer than six (6) feet to any interior side lot line. 8C.6 Height Limit - The maximum height of buildings shall be 35 feet provided however, that buildings may be erected to a height not exceeding 75 feet when the side and rear yards are increased an additional foot for each foot such buildings exceed 35 feet in the front yard 1/2' setback for each 1 foot above 35' in height. Provided further that said lot is a minimum distance of 175' from any boundary of the Medical District. 8C.7 Screening Fence - There shall be a permanent screening fence or wall, constructed and maintained to a height of six (6) feet or the height allowed when located within the front yard, on the property line adjacent to or across the al ey from any roperty not designated as part of the Medical District. - LAYENIA LOWE, City Secret ry-Treasurer City"o€ Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas In accordance with the above Notice of Zoning Hearing, hearing was held on Zone Case No. 1401 - Request of Emory Crockett and J. C. Davis to change property located at the northwest corner of Wolfforth Road and Avenue T and property located north of-66th Street between Avenues R and S from "R-1" to "R-3" zoning district. No person appeared in -support of this zone change request and no person appeared in protest, whereupon the Mayor stated the hearing was closed. After consideration of all facts presented, motion was made by Councilman Alderson, seconded by Council- man Simpson, motion carried. Mayor Tidmore and Councilmen Alderson and Simpson voting Yea, none 1 ii MAR 2 3 1966 voting Nay, that Ordinance No. 4961 be passed on first reading, subject to development being limited to apartments with a minimum of 1500 square feet of lot area and 1 1/2 paved off-street parking spaces for each apartment unit. ORDINANCE NO. 4961 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1695 AND THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGE: ZONE CASE NO. 1401: CHANGE BLOCK 23; LOTS 14 THRU 17, BLOCK 15, VANDELIA VILLAGE ADDITION, CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK,COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM AN "R-l" TO AN "R-3" ZONING DISTRICT; SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. 66-25-117-293 In accordance with the above4Notice of Zoning Hearing,,hearing was held on Zone Case No. 1403 - (3) Request of Hugh Anderson (for Henry D. Loter) to change property located at the southwest corner of Avenue U and 14th Street from "R-2" to "R-3" zoning district. No person appeared in support of this zone change request and no person appeared in protest, whereupon the Mayor stated the hearing was closed. After consideration of all facts presented, motion was made by Councilman Simpson, seconded by Councilman Alderson, motion carried, Mayor Tidmore and Councilmen Alderson and Simpson voting Yea, none voting Nay, that Ordinance No. 4962 be passed on first reading, subject to conditions. ORDINANCE NO. 4962 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING,ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1695 AND THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGE: ZONE CASE NO. 1403: CHANGE LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 53, OVERTON ADDITION, CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM AN "R-2" TO AN "R-3" ZONING DISTRICT: SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. 66-25-117-294 In accordance with the above Notice of Zoning Hearing, hearing was held on Zone Case No. 1405 - - (5)_ Request of Gene Blackburn (for Lona Owens, F. 0. Sparks, and J. E. Alexander) to change all of the southern portions of Lot 7 thru 12 lying south of the AT & SF Railroad and all of Lot 13, Block 64, Overton Addition from "M-l" and "R-2" (Lot 13) to "R-3" zoning district. (Lot 13 is at the northeast corner of Avenue.W and 5th Street; the remaining property is east of Avenue W, north of the alley between 4th and 5th Streets. No person appeared in support of this zone change request and no person appeared in protest, whereupon the Mayor stated the hearing was closed. The Planninj and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that this request be granted, except Lot 7. . After consideration of all facts presented, motion was made by Councilman Alderson, seconded by Councilman Simpson, motion carried, Mayor Tidmore and Councilmen Alderson and Simpson voting Yea, noen voting Nay, that Ordinance No. 4963 be passed on first reading, subject to conditions. ORDINANCE NO. 4963 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1695 AND THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGE: ZONE CASE NO. 1405: CHANGE PORTIONS OF LOTS S THRU 12 LYING SOUTH OF THE AT & SF RAILROAD AND ALL OF LOT 13, BLOCK 64, OVERTON ADDITION, CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM AN "M-1" AND "R-2" (LOT_ 13) TO AN "R-3" ZONING DISTRICT; SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. 66-25-117-295 In accordance with the above Notice of Zoning Hearing, hearing was held on Zone Case No. 1407 - (6) Request of R. A. Pillow to change one lot located at the southwest corner of 4th Street and Ute Avenue from "R-l" to "R-3" zoning district. No person appeared in support of this zone change request and no person -appeared in protest, whereupon the Mayor stated the hearing was closed. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that this request be granted,. subject to the condition that use be limited to medical office use. After consideration of all facts presented, motion was made by Councilman Simpson, seconded by Councilman Alderson, motion carried, Mayor Tidmore and Councilmen Alderson and Simpson voting Yea, none voting Nay, that Ordinance No. 4964 be passed on first reading, subject to the condition that use be limited to medical office use. ORDINANCE NO. 4964 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1695 AND THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGE: ZONE CASE NO. 1407: CHANGE LOT 41, MACKENZIE HEIGHTS ADDI- TION, CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM AN "R-1" TO AN "R-3" ZONING DISTRICT; SUBJECT TO CONDITION: 66-25-117-296 In accordance with the above Notice of Zoning Hearing, hearing was held on Zone Case No. 1400 - (7) Request of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Lubbock to change property located north of 60th Street between Avenue A and Avenue H from "R-l" to "C-3" zoning district. Mr. R. W. Burr, Director of Planning, explained the City Planning and Zoning Commission's reasons for re- questing this zone change. No person appeared'in protest, whereupon the Mayor stated the hearing was closed. After consideration of all facts presented, motion was made by Councilman Alderson, seconded by Councilman Simpson, motion carried, Mayor Tidmore and Councilmen Alderson and Simpson voting Yea, none voting Nay, that Ordinance No. 4965 be passed on first reading. 66-25-117-297 (8) ORDINANCE No. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1695 AND THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGE: ZONE CASE NO. 1400: CHANGE PORTIONS OF LOTS 12, 13, BLOCK 20, AND LOTS 24 AND 25, BLOCK 22, LYNDALE ACRES ADDITION, CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM AN "R-l" TO A "C-3" ZONING DISTRICT. SAID PROPERTY HAS NOW BEEN REPLATTED AND IS IN THE NORTH PORTION OF BLOCK 23A, SAID ADDITION. In accordance with the above Notice of Zoning Hearing, hearing was held on Zone Case No. 1402 - Request of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Lubbock to change property on each side of 3rd Place between College Avenue and Avenue X from "R-3" to "C-4" zoning district. Mr. R. W. Burr, Director of Planning, explained the City Planning and Zoning Commission's reasons for requesting this zone change. No person appeared in protest, whereupon the Mayor stated the hearin was closed. After consideration of all facts presented, motion was made by Councilman Simpson, II seconded by Councilman Alderson, motion carried, Mayor Tidmore and Councilmen Alderson and Simpsoni voting Yea, none voting Nay, that Ordinance No. 4966 be passed on first reading. r 18 MAR 2 31966 ORDINANCE NO. 4966 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1695 AND THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGE: ZONE CASE NO. 1402: CHANGE LOTS 17 THRU 24, BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1 THRU 6, BLOCK 2, CROUCH SUBDIVISION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM AN "R-3" TO A "C-4" ZONING DISTRICT. 66-_25-118-298 In accordance with the above Notice of Zoning Hearing, hearing was held to consider the recommen- (9) dation of the Planning and Zoning Comission that the Zoning Ordinance No. 1695 be amended with regard to establishing a new district - within the zoning ordinance to be known as the "AM" Medical District. Mr. R. W. Burr, Director of Planning, explained to the City Council the City Planning and Zoning Commission's reasons for this amendment. No person appeared in protest, whereupon the Mayor stated the hearing was closed. After consideration of all facts presented, motion was made by Councilman Alderson, seconded by'Councilman Simpson, motion carried, Mayor Tidmore and Councilmen Alderson and Simpson voting Yea, none voting Nay, that Ordinance No. 4967 be passed on first reading. ORDINANCE N0. 4967 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1695 BY AMENDING SECTION 2 THEREOF TO REDEFINE CERTAIN TERMS; BY AMENDING SECTION 3 THEREOF TO INCLUDE A NEW ZONING DISTRICT. "AM" HE i DISTRICT; BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 4.5(B) THEREOF SO AS TO PROVIDE AN APPROPRIATE MAP COLOR FOR THE NEW ZONING DISTRICT; BY REPEALING SUBSECTION 8.1-6 THEREOF WHICH HERETOFORE ALLOWED CERTAIN TYPES OF APARTMENT HOTELS WITHIN "R-3" ZONING DISTRICTS; BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 8.1-10 THEREOF TO ALLOW ONLY HOSPITALS, CLINICS AND MEDICAL OFFICES WITHIN "R-3" ZONING DISTRICTS; BY REPEALING . SUBSECTION 8.1-12 WHICH HERETOFORE ALLOWED CERTAIN INSTITUTIONAL HOMES WITHIN "R-3" ZONING 1 DISTRICTS; BY ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 14-A.1-16 TO PROVIDE FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A SANITARIUM ON A SITE OF 10 ACRES IN ANY ZONING DISTRICT; BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 17.2 TO PERMIT ' THE SAME TYPE -NAMEPLATES AND'SIGNS'IN AN "AM" ZONING DISTRICT AS ARE PERMITTED IN AN "R-3 ZON- ING DISTRICT; BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 8C TO PROVIDE FOR A MEDICAL DISTRICT DESIGNATED AS "AM", i REGULATING THE USES PERMITTED THEREM, SETTING AREA AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR FRONT, REAR, AN SIDE YARDS, LIMITING THE HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS IN SUCH "AM" DISTRICT, SETTING MAXIMUM DENSITY, REQUIRING MINIMUM PARKING FACILITIES, REQUIRING SCREENING FENCES IN CERTAIN INSTANCES, REQUIRING PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL OF PARKING i FACILITIES REQUIRED HEREIN; PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR A EFFECTIVE DATE. j� 66-25-118-299 Motion by Councilman Simpson, seconded by Councilman Alderson, motion carried, Mayor Tidmore (9a) and Councilmen Alderson and Simpson voting Yea, none voting Nay, to authorize that the following ordinances covering zone case numbers as shown below, never be passed on second and final read- , ing. In the event the property owners of said property desire zone change of property listed in said ordinances, new application must be made. Zone Case No. 999 - Ordinance No. 3826 and 3826-B Zone Case No. 1029 - Ordinance No. 4025 Zone Case No. 1098 - Ordinance No. 4280 Zone Case No. 1156 - Ordinance No. 4219 Zone Case No. 1216 - Ordinance No. 4380 _ Zone Case No. 1355 - Tabled October 23, 1966. 66-25-118-300 In accordance with the Notice of Paving Hearing, City Council Minutes of March 10, 1966, said (10) hearing was held on General Work Orders 10502 (Major Thoroughfares) and 2907 (Residential Streets). A large number of persons appeared for the paving hearing. After consideration of all informa- tion presented at the hearing, motion was made by Councilman Simpson, seconded by Councilman Alderson, motion carried, Mayor Tidmore and Councilmen Alderson and Simpson voting Yea, none voting Nay, to authorize the hearing to be closed and Paving Ordinance No. 4970 to be passed on first reading. G.W.O. 10502 AND 2907 ORDINANCE NO. 4970 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR A PART OF THE COST OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF NORTH FLINT AVENUE, NORTH ELGIN AVENUE, 35TH STREET, AVENUE R, HERMAN AVENUE, TEMPLE AVENUE, WAYNE AVENUE, BATES STREET, AVENUE V, 21ST STREET,/hWORD AVENUE, AVENUE, ERSKINE STREET, NORTH BOSTON AVENUE, CORNELL STREET, NORTH AKRON AVENUE, AVENUE IDETROIT r D, 35TH STREET, 37TH STREET, 36TH STREET, WEST 1/2 OF GARY AVENUE, 60TH STREET, 59TH STREET, WEST 1/2 OF 30LIET AVENUE, KENOSHA AVENUE, 58TH STREET, SALEM AVENUE, 61ST STREET, SOUTH 1/2 OF co 00 54TH STREET, 54TH STREET, 45TH STREET, 23RD STREET, 22ND STREET, 17TH STREET, 16TR STREET, 8TH 3 STREET, 18TH STREET, KEWANEE AVENUE, 24TH STREET, OAK AVENUE, 38TH STREET, AVENUE L, NORTH 1/2 CO OF 66TH STREET, EAST 1/2 OF UTICA AVENUE, UTICA AVENUE, TOLEDO AVENUE, SOUTH 1/2 OF 4TH STREET, `c •`-' NORTH 1/2 OF 65TH DRIVE, 70TH STREET, WEST 1/2 OF PEORIA AVENUE, EAST 46TH STREET, 9TH STREET, m z QUIRT AVENUE, 34TH STREET, WEST 1/2 OF QUAKER AVENUE, 29TH DRIVE, SOUTH 1/2 OF 50TH STREET, N AVENUE H (REINFORCED CONCRETE RAILROAD CROSSINGS ONLY) SUCH PORTIONS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY v DESCRIBED IN THE PAVING ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF CU o AND PORTIONS OF OTHER SUNDRY STREETS, HIGHWAYS, AVENUES AND/OR ALLEYS IN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, � KJ TEXAS, AND/OR ALONG THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH ASSESS- o MENTS AND FOR THE ISSUANCE -OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, ALLOCATING FUNDS. o 4 z�, � WHEREAS, the City Engineer prepared rolls or statements for the improvements in each unit, showing the amounts to be assessed -against the various parcels of abutting property, and the Id r. owners thereof, and showing other matters and things; and the same were examined by the City Council and approved, and a time and place was fixed for hearing to the owners of such abutting ca property, and to all others in anywise interested, and due and proper notice was given in compli- ance ante with law and in addition notices were mailed to each known property owner to be. assessed addressed to his last known address, and such hearing was had and held at the time and place fixed therefor, to -wit: on the 23rd day of March; 1966, at 11:00 o'clock a.m. in the Council Room in the City of Lubbock, Texas, and at such hearing all desiring to be heard were fully and fairly heard, and evidence was received and considered and all protests and objections made were rnnnidPrad_ and said hearine was in all respects -held in the manner provided and required by the ' 119 MAR 2 3 196c charter and law in force in this city and by the proceedings of the City with reference to such matters, and the following protests were made concerning the improvements in the units indicated namely: Sub -Unit 3 of Unit 2144 Mrs. Hoyt R. Wright indicated by telephone that she was opposed -to the paving improvements on North Flint Avenue. Sub -Unit 4 of Unit 2144 Mr. George W. Blair appeared for himself and for Hector Guerrero opposing the paving improvements on North Elgin Avenue. Sub -Unit 5 of Unit 2144 Mr. Herman Meister and Dolores S. Trevino appeared opposing the paving improvements on Waco Avenue. Sub -Unit 6 of Unit 2144 Mr. John W. Grabber, Jr. appeared at the City Engineering Department opposing the paving improvements on Newcomb Avenue. Sub -Unit 7 of Unit 2144 Mr. Gene Pool appeared opposing the paving improvements on North Avenue E. Mr. John W. Grabber, Jr. appeared at the City Engineering Department opposing the paving improvements on North Avenue E. Sub -Unit 8 of Unit 2144 Mr. Joe Leaverton appeared on behalf of the Lubbock Country Club opposing the paving improvements on Marlboro Street. Sub -Unit 23 of Unit 2144 Mr. William R. Graves indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the paving improvements on 21st Street. Sub -Unit 24 of Unit 2144 Maude Lee Ferguson appeared opposing the paving improvements on 21st Street. Mrs. Dora Carver and Mr. Leo N. Parks indicated by telephone that they were opposed to the paving improvements on 21st Street. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit 2145 Mr. Andrew Gonzales, Jr. indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the paving improve- ments on North Hartford Avenue. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit 2145 Mr. George Worthington appeared opposing the paving improvements on North Hartford Avenue. Mr. E. L. Young indicated by mail that he was opposed to the paving improvements on North Hartford Avenue. Sub -Unit 5 of Unit 2145 Mr. Fred Stivers and Lois Stivers appeared opposing the paving improvements on Erskine Stre Sub -Unit 6 of Unit 2145 Mr. A. S. Meinecke appeared opposing the paving improvements on North Boston Avenue. Sub -Unit 8 of Unit 2145 Mr. Lester E. York appeared for himself and on behalf of Mr. J. W. Chapman opposing the paving improvements on Avenue R. Sub -Unit 10 of Unit 2145 Mr. W. D. Birdsong appeared opposing the paving improvements on East Stanford Street. Sub -Unit 11 of Unit 2145 Mr. W. D. Birdsong appeared opposing the paving improvements on East Stanford Street. A petition received by mail indicated that the following property owners W. B. Irvin, John Halbert, Peggy Nell Boone, Loyd E. Chastain, Jr., John Hernandez, Charles M. Whitson, Clyde Edw T. E. Standfield, John A. Roberts, C. L. Hefner and Dale Williams were opposed to the paving improvements on East Stanford Street. Sub -Unit 12 of Unit 2145 Mr. E. L. Fisher appeared opposing the paving improvements on East Stanford Street. 00 MAR 2 31966 A petition received by mail indicated that the following property owners H. V. Feazell, Paul Hartman, Gladys Clowers, Grace Duncan, Chester L. Weems and John F. Hazel were opposed to the paving improvements on Last Stanford Street. Sub -Unit 13 of Unit 2145 Mr. 0. B. McElroy appeared opposing the paving improvements on -East Stanford Street. A petition received by mail indicated that the following property owners B. W. Spain, Joseph T. Harris, Willie Bell Johnson, J. C. Pierce, Maude M. Green, W. L. Conger, Tom Mayo, Dorothy B. Anderson, Horace Johnson and Lional Arrizola were opposed to the paving improvements on East Stanford Street. Sub -Unit 14 of Unit 2145 Paul Hartman and Ernest Brewer appeared opposing the paving improvements on East Stanford Street. A petition received by mail indicated that the following property owners Robert L. Bailey, C. M. Spears, G. V. Dirickson, Opan Nichols, Roy V. Dies, Daniel G. Harris, Joe H. Rogers, were opposed to the paving improvements on East Stanford Street. Sub -Unit 15 of Unit 2145 Guy Cloyd and Dorris Lewis appeared opposing the paving improvements on East Stanford Street A petition received by mail indicated that the following property owners J. B. Self, Lois Alexander & W. L. McAfee, Odell J. Brothers, were opposed to the paving improvements on East Stanford Street. Harold Biffle indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the paving improvements on East Stanford Street. Sub -Unit lb of Unit 2145 Harold Biffle indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the paving improvements on East Stanford Street. A petition received by mail indicated that the following property owners J. J. Tipps Equipment Co., G. M. Butler, Hector N. Ramirez, Clifford Sherar, Truman D. Godwin, M. D. Altman, J. B. Hullum, Jack Morgan and D. C. Buchanan were opposed to the paving improvements on East Stanford Street. Sub -Unit 17 of Unit 2145 Jack Carlock appeared opposing the paving improvements on East -Stanford Street. A petition received by mail indicated that the following property owners P. H. Burleson, Lee Keesee, Ricardo S. Ramirez, A. P. Couch, Leslie E. Steele, Elwyn McMillan, Victor R. Alvarado' and Roylee Callicutt were opposed to the paving improvements on East Stanford Street. Sub -Unit 18 of Unit 2145 A petition presented by Meritt Clark indicated that the following property owners, Viola Day Battistoni, Evelyn Raybon Webb, Mrs. Fern Cone, DeWitt R. Gayle and Annah R. Bowen, L. L. Mc Clintock, Norbal A. Hefner, Clarence P. Thiel, Curtis E. Wilson, Hollis Hooten, D. V. Nesmith, Cassie L. Rogers, Don Delgado were opposed to the paving improvements on Cypress Road (North Avenue H). Sub -Unit 19 of Unit 2145 A petition presented by Meritt Clark indicated that L. J. Slagle was opposed to the paving improvements on Cypress Road (North Avenue H). Sub -Unit 20 of Unit 2145 Frank W. Rupich appeared opposing the paving improvements on Cypress Road (North Avenue H). Sub -Unit 21 of Unit 2145 Gay Crump appeared opposing the paving improvements on the East 1/2 of Cypress Road (North Avenue H). Sub -Unit 22 of Unit 2145 D. D. Mahon appeared opposing the paving improvements on the East 1/2 of Cypress Road (North Avenue H). Sub -Unit 23 of Unit 2145 James E. West, W. W. Anthony, Mrs. Roy Neal, Jr., Gay Crump, Charles McCollum and G. W. Simpson appeared opposing the paving improvements on Adrian Street (Vardo Lane). Sub -Unit 24 of Unit 2145 r� L A petition presented by Meritt Clark indicated that the following property owners Frank W. Rupich, Leroy Deardorff, L. W. Utley, Jr., James F. Webb, Horace C. Daniel, Robert L. Reinhart, Jesse Lee Young Sharpley and R. B. Torrance were opposed to the paving improvements on Sunset Lane (Xavier Street). 1_21 MAR 2 3196 dM Sub -Unit 25 of Unit 2145 A petition presented by Meritt Clark indicated that the following property owners L. J. Slagle, Nell V. Oldham, Oscar B. and Julie S. Ray, Viola Day Battistoni and Evelyn Rayybon Webb were opposed to the paving improvements onWabash Street. I Sub -Unit 26 of Unit 2145 . - ' A petition presented by Meritt Clark indicated that the following property owners Sam Lytal, J. E. Bowman, Jim P. Gilmore and Lena Spitzer were opposed to the paving improvements on Mesa -- Road (North Avenue F). Sub -Unit 27 of Unit 2145 A petition presented by Meritt Clark indicated that the following property owners Mrs. Fern Cone, Sue T. DeMarco, and Dale McClintock were opposed to the paving improvements on Mesa Road (North Avenue F). Sub -Unit 28 of Unit 2145 A petition presented by Meritt Clark indicated that the following property owners Evelyn Raybon Webb, W. T. Rabon and Buddy Webb were opposed to the paving improvements on Mesa Road (North Avenue F). Mrs. A. C. Bowden indicated by telephone that they were opposed to the paving improvements or Mesa Road (North Avenue F). Sub -Unit 29 of Unit 2145 A petition presented by Meritt Clark indicated that the following property owners R. B. Torrance, Bernie Howell, Oscar B. and Julie S. Ray were opposed to the paving improvements on Mesa Road (North Avenue F). James C. Coffman indicated by mail that he was opposed to the paving improvements on Mesa Road (North Avenue F). Sub -Unit 30 of Unit 2145 A petition presented by Meritt Clark indicated that the following property owners Guy B. Hilton and Roy W. Neal, Jr., were opposed to the paving improvements on Mesa Road (North Avenue F) Sub -Unit 31 of Unit 2145 A petition presented by Meritt Clark indicated that the following property owners Ralph Robinson, Ray Sandlin, Felix West and W. W. Anthony were opposed to the paving improvements on Mesa Road (North Avenue F). Sub -Unit 32 of Unit 2145 A petition presented by Meritt Clark indicated that the following property owners Bryan McDonald and Meritt Clark were opposed to the paving improvements on Mesa Road (North Avenue F). Robert E. Karper, Jr., appeared opposing the paving improvements on Mesa Road (North Avenue F). Sub -Unit 33 of Unit 2145 Robert E. Karper and Felix West appeared opposing the paving improvements on Vega Lane (Bradley Street). Sub -Unit 34 of Unit 2145 Joe Leaverton appeared on behalf of.the Lubbock Country Club opposing the paving improvement on Yucca Lane (Drake Street). Sub -Unit 35 of Unit 2145 Joe Leaverton appeared on behalf of the Lubbock Country Club opposing the paving improvement on Yucca Lane (Drake Street). Sub -Unit 36 of Unit 2145 Robert E. Karper and H. C. Ragland appeared opposing the paving improvements on Mesa Road (North Avenue F). A petition presented by Meritt Clark indicated that the following property owners Joe E. Baldridge and W. W. Anthony were opposed to the paving improvements on Mesa Road (North Avenue F), Joe Leaverton appeared on behalf of the Lubbock Country Club opposing the paving improvement on Mesa Road (North Avenue F). Sub -Unit 37 of Unit 2145 Joe Leaverton appeared on behalf of the Lubbock Country Club opposing the paving improvement4 on Mesa Road (North Avenue F). Halcyon H. Oldham appeared at the City Engineering Department opposing the paving on Mesa Road (North Avenue F). Sub -Unit 38 of Unit 2145 12 MAR 2 31966 John C. Oldham appeared at the City Engineering Department for himself and on behalf of Halcyon Oldham opposing the paving improvements on Mesa Road (North Avenue F). Sub -Unit 43 of Unit 2145 S. S. Buckner appeared at the City Engineering Department opposing the paving improvements on 35th Street. Sub -Unit 46 of Unit 2145 Marvin McLarty appeared on behalf of Circle Development Company opposing the paving improve- ments on Caprock Drive, Sub -Unit 47 of Unit 2145 Marvin McLarty appeared on behalf of Circle Development Company opposing the paving improve meats on Caprock Drive. Sub -Unit 54 of Unit 2145 L. L. Hendrix appeared opposing the paving improvements on 53rd Street. Sub -Unit 55 of Unit 2145 L. L. Hendrix appeared opposing the paving improvements -on -54th Street. Sub -Unit 60 of Unit 2145 Otis Maner indicated by telephone on behalf of Snodgrass Maner that they were opposed to the paving improvements on 61st Street. Sub -Unit 61 of Unit 2145 M. C. Fabus appeared for himself and on behalf of J. W. Jackson and Elbert Jackson opposing the paving improvements on 61st Street. Sub -Unit 62 of Unit 2145 Hugh Anderson appeared on behalf of C. C. Worrell and Wayne Wallace opposing the paving improvements on 57th Street. Sub -Unit 63 of Unit 2145 Hugh Anderson appeared on behalf of C. C. Worrell and Wayne Wallace opposing the paving improvements on the South 1/2 of•54th Street. Sub -Unit 67 0£ Unit 2145 Howard Bunch appeared for himself on an behalf of Melvin McClure and a Mr. Reed opposing thq paving improvements on 45th Street. Mrs. Jimmie Bell indicated by telephone that she was opposed to the paving improvements on 45th Street. Sub -Unit 75 of Unit 2145 Charlie Rand appeared on behalf of dolos Flora Rand and presented a petition listing H. R. Brock as opposing the paving improvements on 16th Street. Sub -Unit 78 of Unit 2145 Artis L. Davis and Aaron E. Davis indicated by telephone that they were opposed to the pav- ing improvements on Kewanee Avenue. Sub -Unit 79 of Unit 2145 J. M. Keith, Jr. indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the paving improvements on Kewanee Avenue. Sub -Unit 81 of Unit 2145 P. A. Askew and A. J. Bilberry appeared opposing the paving improvements on 24th Street. Sub -Unit 82 of Unit 2145 Carl W. Sargent and E. G. Peek appeared opposing the paving improvements on 24th Street. Sub -Unit 6 of Unit 2146 Hugh Anderson appeared on behalf of C. C-. Worrell and Wayne Wallace opposing the paving improvements on Vicksburg Avenue. Sub -Unit 7 of Unit 2146 Hugh Anderson appeared on behalf of C. G. Worrell and Wayne Wallace opposing the paving improvements on Vicksburg Avenue. Sub -Unit 8 of Unit 2146 L Hugh Anderson appeared on behalf of C. C. Worrell and Wayne Wallace opposing the paving 123 MAR 2 3196f am improvements on 56th Street. Sub -Unit 9 of Unit 2146 Hugh Anderson appeared on behalf of C. C. Worrell, Wayne Wallace and D. E. Sinclair opposing the paving improvements on Utica Avenue. Sub -Unit 10 of Unit 2146 Hugh Anderson appeared on behalf of C. C. Worrell, Wayne Wallace and D. E. Sinclair opposing the paving improvements on Utica Avenue. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2149 Mrs. Luther Bull appeared opposing the paving improvements on 7th Street. Otis Maner called for E. L. Snodgrass, Jr. opposing the -paving improvements on 7th Street. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit 2149 W. G. McMillan, Jr. appeared on behalf of the W. G. McMillan Estate opposing the paving improvements on Avenue D. Sub -Unit 9 of Unit 2149 A representative for Panhandle and Santa Fe Railway Company appeared opposing the construc- tion of the Concrete Railroad Crossing on 17th Street. Sub -Unit l of Unit 2150 J. A. Nunley, Sr, and Jr. appeared opposing the paving improvements on Quirt Avenue. Sub -Unit 4 of Unit 2150 Charles M. Robertson appeared at the City Engineering Department opposing the paving improv meets on Quirt Avenue. Sub-Udit 5 of Unit 2150 0. L. Head appeared opposing the paving improvements on Quirt Avenue. Sub -Unit 6 of Unit 2150 John Martin Pastor of Beliaire Baptist Church and Dr. F. W. Mattox on behalf of Lubbock Christian College appeared opposing the paving improvements on 34th Street. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2152 Dr. F. W. Mattox appeared opposing the paving improvements on 29th Drive. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit 2153 Chuck Pool appeared on behalf of Litton Systems, Inc. opposing the paving improvements on North Quirt Avenue. A petition received by mail indicated that the following property owners Jack Carlock, Ricardo Ramirez, Mrs, M. E. Tew (For F. A. Mitchell) and Waiter T. Busby were opposed to the paving improvements on North Quirt Avenue. Sub -Unit 8 of Unit 2154 Dr. F. W. Mattox appeared on behalf of Lubbock Christian College opposing the paving improvements on 34th Street. John R. Ragland appeared opposing the paving improvements on 34th Street. And all objections and protests made were fully considered and said hearing was continued from day to day and from time to time until this date, and the City Council having fully and fairly heard all parties making any protest and all parties desiring to be heard, and having fully considered all matters presented for consideration, and having fully considered all of the evidence, and all pertinent and proper matters is of opinion that the following disposition shou be made of such protests and objections, and that assessments should be made as herein ordained, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: I That all protest and objections, whether herein specifically mentioned or not, shall be and the same are hereby overruled and the said hearing, with respect to each and all Sub -Units, is hereby closed. Except that it was found that paving sub -units 5, 6, 7 and 8 of Unit 2144, Sub - Units 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 46, 47, 54, 55 and 62 of Unit 2145, Sub -Units 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of Unit 2146, Sub -Units 1 and 2 of Unit 2149, Sub-Unit.1 of Unit 2153, were erroneously included in the public notice and in the contemplated ordinance and in other proceedings; therefore NO ASSESSMENT shall be made against the property included in said Sub -Units and the City Engineer is hereby directed to delete and/or omit the engineer's assessment roll for said Sub -Units consis- tent with this finding. 1_24 MAR 2 31966 i66-25-124-301 (l0a) In accordance with the Notice of Paving Hearing, -City Council Minutes of March 10, 1966, said hearing was held on General Work Order 2906 (Alley Paving). A large number of persons appeared for the paving hearing. After consideration of all information presented at the hearing, motion was made by Councilman Simpson, seconded by Councilman Alderson, motion carried, Mayor Tidmore a Councilmen Alderson and Simpson voting Yea, none voting Nay, to authorize the hearing to be closed and Paving Ordinance No. 4971'to be passed on first reading. GWO 2906 - 'ORDINANCE NO.4971 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR A PART OF THE COST OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF THE NORTH -SOUTH AND EAST -WEST ALLEYS LOCATED IN THE FOLLOWING BLOCKS AND ADDITIONS - BLOCK 64, OVERTON ADDITION, BLOCK 114, OVERTON ADDITION, BLOCK 23, OVERTON ADDITION, BLACK 1, E. K. HUFSTEDLER ADDITION, BLOCK 2 AND 4, FLYNN PLACE ADDITION, BLOCK 1, BERRY ADDITION, REVISED SUBDIVISION OF TRACTS 11 THROUGH 23 OF STUBBS SUBDIVISION, SNELL ADDITION, BLOCK 1, C. C. HARKEY SUBDIVISION, RE -PLAT OF PART OF BLOCKS 5 AND'6,'MCLARTY'S CIRCLE VIEW ADDITION, BLACK 2, MCAFEE HEIGHTS ADDITION, KASTMAN HEIGHTS, BLOCK 4, ROBERSON ADDITION, BLACK 2, COLLEGE HEIGHTS ADDITION, BLOCK 3, WALDEN SUBDIVISION, BLOCK 6, COWAN ADDITION, BLOCK 2, REEDER SUBDIVISION, BLACK 2, MURF PLACE ADDITION, JIM FLOYD ADDITION, BLOCK 167, ORIGINAL TOWN ADDITION, BLOCK 1, MERRILLS ADDITIONS) SUCH PORTIONS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE PAVING ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF AND PORTIONS'OF OTHER SUNDRY ALiE YS IN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK41 TEXAS, AND/OR ALONG THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIP ICATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, ALLOCATING FUNDS: WHEREAS, the City Engineer prepared rolls or statements for the improvements in each unit, showing the amounts to -be assessed against the various parcels of abutting property, and the owners thereof, and showing other matters and things; and the same were examined by the City Council and approved, and a time and place was fixed for hearing to the owners of such abutting property, and to all others in anywise interested, and due and proper notice was given in com- pliance with law and in addition notices were mailed to each known property owner to be assessed addressed to his last known address, and such hearing was had and held at the time and place fixed therefor, to -wit: on the 23rd day of March, 1966, at 11:00 o'clock A.M. in the Council Room in the City of Lubbock, Texas, and at such hearing all desiring to be heard were fully and fairly heard, and evidence was received and considered and all protests and objections made were considered, and said hearing was in all respects held in the manner provided and required by the charter and law in force in this City and by the proceedings of the City with reference to such matters, and the following protests were made concerning the improvements in the units indicated namely: Sub -Unit 1 of Unit A-384 Frank King appeared representing Harry E. Miller as being opposed to the alley paving impr ments. M. S. Craig appeared for himself and on behalf of Owen W. McWhorter opposing the alley paving improvements. A. B. Ohlenbush indicated by mail that he was opposed to the -alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 3 of Unit A-384 Vaughn Douglas appeared on behalf of Bell Dairy Products, Inc. opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 5 of Unit A-384 Bill Sharpley appeared for himself and on behalf of Father Flanagan's Boys Home opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 8 of Unit A-384 E. House Murtry indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the alley improvements. Sub -Unit 10 of Unit A-384 W. L. Green appeared on behalf of Lula Kate Green opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 11 of Unit A-384 Clyde Foster appeared for himself and on behalf of the W. E. Foster Estate opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 13 of Unit A-384 Mrs. J. I. McCullough appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 14 of Unit A-384 H. H. Hughston appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. William G. Blair indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements, Sub -Unit 17 of Unit A-384 Roy A. Middleton presented a letter signed by himself and the following property owners, Homer Wilson, C. R. Meadows, Jr., Mel McDougle, and Leonard Wilson opposing the alley paving improvements. 15 MAR 2 31966 .W .., qM Sub -Unit 18 of Unit A-384 Roy A. Middleton presented a letter signed by himself and the following property owners, John J. C. O'Shea, Homer Wilson, C. R. Meadows, Jr., Leonard Wilson, opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 19 of Unit A-384 Bill Kirk appeared on behalf of Charles Galey opposing the alley paving improvements. Tom Johnston appeared on behalf of the Medical Associates, Inc.opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 20 of Unit A-384 A representative for Richard Mayer appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 22 of Unit A-384 Robert E. Abbe indicated by mail that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit -25 of Unit A-384 Kim Hardy appeared on behalf of the Medical Professional Bldg. of Lubbock opposing the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 26 of Unit A-384 Evelyn Grimes Allen and Harmon Scales indicated by mail that they were opposed to the alley paving improvements. - Sub -Unit 27 of Unit A-384 N. W. Rhodes Pastor for Memphis Avenue Church of Christ appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. j Sub -Unit 28 of Unit A-384 Preston Johnston appeared on behalf of Frontier Saving Stamps, Inc. opposing the alley paving! improvements. Sub -Unit 1 of Unit A-385 A. J. Huckabee indicated by telephone that he was opposed to the alley paving improvements. Sub -Unit 2 of Unit A-385 Mrs. W. D. Wilkins appeared opposing the alley paving improvements. And all objections and protests made were fully considered and said hearing was continued from day to day and from time to time until this date, and the City Council having fully and fair- ly heard all parties making any protest and all parties desiring to be heard, and having fully considered all matters presented for consideration, and having fully considered all of the evi- dence, and all pertindnt and proper matters is of opinion that the following disposition should be made of such protests and objections, and that assessments should be made as herein ordained, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK; 1. That all protests and objections, whether herein specifically mentioned or not, shall be and the same are hereby averruled and the said hearing, with respect to each and all Sub -Units and Units, is hereby closed except that it was found that alley paving Sub -Units 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 11, 19, and 28 of Unit A-384, were erroneously included in the public notice and in the contemplated ordinance and in other proceedings: therefore NO ASSESSMENT shall be wade against the property included in said Sub -Units and the City Engineer is hereby directed to delete and/or omit the engineer's assessment roll for said Sub -Units consistent with this finding. 66-25-125-302 In accordance with the Notice of zoning Hearing of record in Minute Book 25, Pages 113-116, hear- (4) ing was held on Zone Case No. 1404 - Request of Marion T. Key (for Frenchmen's Creek Corporation) for a Specific Use Permit Zone Change under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance for a Dormitory Project on the east side of College Avenue between loth Street and Main Street. Mr. and Mrs. George W. Blair appeared before the City Council requesting that a high fence be constructed between Lots 4 and 5. Mr.. George P. Green appeared before the City Council in connection with this zone case in regard to whether or not the sewer lines would be adequate. Mr. Marion Key, Attorney, appeared before the City Council in support of this zone change request stating that the dormitory would be seven stories high. No person appeared in protest,whereupon the Mayor stated the hearing was closed. After consideration of all facts presented, motion was made by Councilman Simpson, seconded by Councilman Alderson, motion carried, Mayor Tidmore and Councilmen Alderson and Simpson voting Yea, none voting Nay, to uphold the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, subject to conditions, and pass Ordinance No. 4968 on first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 4968 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IN ZONE CASE NO.1404: IMPOSING CONDITIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. ) w 2 31968 66-25-126-303 Motion by Councilman Simpson, seconded by Councilman Alderson, motion carried, Mayor Tidmore and (4a) Councilmen Alderson and Simpson voting Yea, none voting Nay that Ordinance No. 4969 be passed as i an emergency measure. ORDINANCE NO. 4969 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FIRE ZONE MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS -TO PLACE CERTAIN PROPERTY IN FIRE ZONE NO. 2, WHICH PROPERTY IS DESCRIBED IN A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A COMMER- CIAL USE IN ZONE CASE NO. 1404; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. NO FURTHER BUSINESS COMING UP FOR CONSIDERATION, THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED FROM REGULAR MEETING, MARCH 23RD, 1966. ATTEST • _ . LAV IA LOWE, City ecretary Treasurer READ AND APPROVED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AP ATTEST: UVMAA LOWE, City a retary-Treasurer