HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - Regular - 9/9/1971 September 9, 197.1.
f
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The City Council of the City of Lubbock., Texas, met at 10.,00 o'clock a,m. in the regular
meeting place in the City Hall, the following members being present to-wit„
Mayor J. H. Granberry, Councilmen Deacon Rigsby, Lonnie F. Hollingsworth, John E. Baker., and
Morris W. Turner, City Manager W. R. Blackwell, Assistant City Manager Robert Wilson, City
Attorney Fred 0. Senter, Jr., and City Secretary-Treasurer Lavenia Lowe.
Absent None
71-30-366-918 The invocation was given by Sam Wahl, Director of Public Works.,
(1) Lj
71-20-366-919 The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was given in unison by those present in the Council Chamber.
(2)
71-30-366-920 Motion was made by Councilman Baker, seconded by Councilman Rigsby, motion carried,, Mayor
(3) Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner Voting Yea, none voting Nay,
to approve City Council Minutes .- Regular Meeting held August 25, 1971; Regular Meeting held
Augupt, 26, 1971; and Special Meeting held September 1, 1971.
71-30-266-921 Motion was made by CounciLman Baker, seconded by Councilmen Hollingsworth, motion carried, Mayor
Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting Nay,
to pass Ordinance No® 6160 on second and final reading.
AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO, 6160
WHEREAS, the City Council of the C.ity of Lubbock finds it is necessary to appropriate
certain specific funds out of bond funds for an approved project;
NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:::
There is herby appropriated out of the following described bond fund, to-wait; Water Capital
Project Fund
The sum $ 18,641,44
For the following purpose: Construction of fire protection line for Lubbock Industrial Park
Addition,
71-30-366-922 Motion was inade by Councilmen Baker, seconded by Councilmen Hollingsworth, motion carried, K—Ryor
(9) Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none Voting Nay,
to pass Ordinance No. 6161 on second and final reading.
AN APPROPRIATION ORD-IlWiCE ORDINANCE No. 6161
WREREAS,, the City Council of the City of Lubbock finds it is necessary to appropriate
certain specific funds out of bond funds for an approved project;
NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORNUNED BY'THE CITY COUNCIL OF mE CITY OF LUBBOCK,
There is hereby appropriated out of the following described bond fund, Lo-wit, Water Capital
Project Fund
The so. $ 129,363.64
For the Following purpose, Com eruct water lines, caliche roads and wells in San.dhills Well
Field.
Reeds and Collector lines $60,841,77
Wells and pumps 62,211.70
Engineering and City expenses 6,310,17
TOTAL $129,363064
71-30-366-923 Motion was made by Councilmen Baker, seconded by Councilman Hollingsworth, motion carried,
(10) Mayor. Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting
Nay, to pass Ordinance No. 6163 ark second and final reading,
AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO, 6163
WH FAS, the City Council of the City of Lubbock finds it is necessary to appropriate
certain specific funds out of bond funds :for an approved project, Widening of University Ave.
NOW THEREF"OREt
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK,.
...........- ........ ...............
.........
..........1- . .................................------- ....................... ........
................... .........................................-, ----.................... ................ ..............................
Ty`r
p 6,
SEP 9 191;
There is hereby appropriated out of the following described bond fund, to-wiL, Street:.
lmprovements Bond Fund 76--6061-551
The sum $19,495,
For the followal,ag purpose; Aczla:a:lsition of (Right of Way to widen Llniversi,:y Ave.
2501 48th Street (Land only-portion of Tract 5, Blk 4, Witt acreage
addition $3,800
2.502 45th Street (W,50"of Lot 20" of Lot 19, ]alk 2, Sunny Slope Addition
A—IL 165
Total Land $18,963
S'ugpplemental. Expend
TOTAL $1.9,495
71-30-367-924 Motion was made by Councilmen Baker, seconded by Councilman Hollingsworth, motion carried, Mayor
(11) Cranberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingawuror1f, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting Nay,
to pass Ordinance No. 6164 on second and final reading,
AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE ORDINANCE No:, 6164
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of 'Lubbock finds it is necessary to appropriate certain
specific funds out of bond funds for an approved projects
NOW TREREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINI-M BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCKa
There is hereby appropriated out of the following described bond fund, to-wit. Street
Improvement Fund
The sum $22.,000
For tho following purpose: City cost. and Engineering on several. new subdivision's paving
improvements, Melonie Park South (30), Time Square, Ku®land
Park, South Plains Hall Addition and Indiana Park Addition,
71-30-367-925 Motion was made by Councilmen .Balmer, seconded, by Councilasua Hollingsworth, motion carried, Mayor
(12), Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby., Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting Nay,
to pass Ordinance No, 6153 on second and final reading.
ORDINANCE NO, 6153
AN ORDINANCE AI„1ENDING ZONING ORDI'„dut"VCE NO. 1695 AND THE OFFICIAL NAP OF IRE CITY OF LUBBOCK
SO AS TO NAKIl THE FOLLOWING CHANGE: ZONE CASE NO. 1750: CNAPdGE LATS 11 TEROUGH 20, BLOCK 8,
SLI YELL ADDITION, LOTS 11 TUROUGFI 20, BLOCK 8, SLI:DELL ANNEADDITION AND LOTS 11 'IHR()UrwH 10,
BLOCK 4, AVALON ADDITION FROM AN OR-1" TO AN "'E-2" ZONING DISTRICT AND CHANCE ALL OF BLOCKS 1 AND
2, SOUTHWEST HAVEN ADDITION ANDA TRACT OF HAND BETWEEN A 'POINT EVEN WITH[ THE EAST RIGHT OF (JAY OF
VICKSBURG AND THE WEST RIGHJ:' OF WAY LINE OF UTICA AVENUE AND BEDEEN' 66TH S".CL'R.EET AND LOOP 2.89 FROM
AN R-P' To AN "A-M"" 1;01+611;11; DISTRICT„ PROVIDING, A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION,
71-30-367-916 Motion was made by Councilmen Baker, seconded by Councilmen Hollingsworth, motion carried., yor
(13) Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, 'Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting Nay, to
pass Ordinance No. 6154 on second and final reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 6154
AN ORDINANCE 13PiA:IWING ZONING ORDIKA110E No. 1695 AND THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CI'T'Y OF :LUDEOCK SO
AS TO MAI.CE THE FOLLOWING CHANGE; ZONE CASE NO, 1752; CEANGE THE WEST 290 FEET OF LOT 11, BLOCK I,
VANDELIA VILLAGE ADDITION, CITY OF LUBBOCV, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM A "c-2" TO AN "A....2"" {
ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
71-30-367.927 Motion was made by Counciluan Baker„ seconded by Councilmen. 1€olli.ngsworth, notion carried:, Mayor
(14) Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and 'Turner voting Yea„ none voting Nay, to
pass Ordinance No, 6155 on second and final reading„
ORDINANCE NO. 6155
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING 'TRg FIRE ZONE MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO CHANCE THE &ES'T 290
FEET OF LOT 11, BLOCK1, VANDELIA VILLAGE ADDITION, CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK COUIM, EI(AS, DESCRIBEkj
HEREIN FROM FIRE ZONE No. 2 TO FIRE ZONE No. 3; DIRECTING THE BUILDING INSPECTION ADMINISTRATOR
TO INDICATE SUCH CHANGE ON THE OFFICIAL FIRE ZONE MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK,
71._30-367-928 Motion wag evade by Counci-Iran Baker, seconded by Councilman $iol.l.i,ngsworth, motion carried, Mayor
(15) Granberry and C-,uncilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting Nay, to
pass Ordinance No. 6156 on second and final reading
ORDINANCE NO. 6156
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONXNG ORDINANCE: NO. 1695 AND TELE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK
So AS TO LiA„11F, THE FOLLOWING LHANGEa ZONE CASE NO. .17534 CHANGE A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 4,
BLOCY E-2, CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TFXAS, FRUH AN R-1." TO AN tlA-1" ZONING DIS'fiH,T.'CT;
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS: PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICA-®
,ION.
78-10..,967-929 Notion was made by Councilmen Baker, seconded by Cooncileman Rolling
peworth, notion carried„ Mayor
ORDINANCE NO, 6157
AN ORDINANCE A1,MNDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1695 AND THE OFFICIAL 90P OF THE CITY OF
LUBBOCK SO AS 10 MANY IHE FOLLOWING CHANCE. zovm CASE NO. 1754: CHANCE LOTS 23 Tir.Roura 29,
BLOCK 1, HIGHLAND PLACE ADDITION, CITY OF LUBBGCK, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM AN "R-2" TO AN
"A.,11' ZONING DISTRICT; SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS; FROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION,
71-30-36B--930 Motion was made by Connell Baker, seconded by Councilman Hollingsworth, motion carried., mayor
(17) Grsinkmrry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting May,
to pass Ordinance No. 6158 on second and final reading.
'ORDINANCE NO. 6158
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1695 AND THE OFFICIAL HAP OF THE CITY Op, tUBBOCK
TEXAS, SO AS TO MARE THE FOLLOWING CHANGE: ZOTd CASE NO. 1755. CHANGE TRACTS OF LAND AS SH()WN ON
THE PRELIKINARY PLAT OF THE FARRAR ESTATE AUDITION TO THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS
FROM "R-I" TO AN "A-l", -C-2" AND "R-2" ZONING DISTRICTS; M.tOVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVID-
ING FOR PUBLICATION.
71--30-368-931 !lotion was made by Councilman Baker, seconded by Councilman Hollingsworth, motion carried, Mayor
(18) Grariberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, no,L voting Nay,
to pass Ordinance No. 6159 on second and final reading. ORDINANCE No. 6159
AN ORDINANCE A-MENDINGCHAPTER 29 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS,
ENTITLED "SUBDIVISIONS" BY Af*,'ND194G, SECTION 29-3A (2) TO REQUIRE TWENTY COPIES OF THE PRELIMINARY
PLAT BE SUBMITTED TO THE TLANNINC AND ZONING COHHISSiON , AT LEAST TWENTY DAYS FRIOR TO THE
METING; SECTION 29-3B(2) TO REQUIRE TEN COPIES OF THE FINAL FIAT BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO
THE PLANNING COPRWSION; SECTION 29-5-A TO REQUIRE TWENTY COPIES OR PRINTS OF THE PROPOSED
SUBDIVISION DRAWN TO SCALE; SECTION 29-6.A(I) TO REQUIRE TEN COPIES OF THE FINAL FIAT DRAWN AND
SUBMITTED TO T111E, PLANNING COMMISSION; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
71-30-368-932 Motion was made by Councilman, Baker', seconded by Councilman Hollingsworth, motion carried, Mayor
(19) Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting Nay,
to pass Ordinance No. 6162 on second and final reading,
ORDINAMCE NO. 6162
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCEZ OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK BY ADDING A NEW
SECTION 19-20 TO CHAPTER 19 THFI(EOF TO MAKE-, IT UNLAWFUL TO REMOVE PROPERTY FROM THE ALLEY BEHIND
A RESIDENCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
71-30.-368-933 Motion was made by Councilman Baker, seconded by Councilman Rigsby, motion carried, Mayor Gran-
(20) berry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner. voting 'Yea, none voting May, t�mt
the following Resolution be passed.
RFS-0I UTION
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that effective access to the Memorial Civic center
necessitates a revision of streets within and adjacent Li suer area, NOW THEREFORE
BE IT REROLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT there, is herebY established a street sy.,,Atem pattern within and adjacent to the Memorial
Civic Center as shown on the plat prepared by the Traffic Engineering Department and attached
hereto and made a, part hereof.
Passed by the City council this 9th day of SepLatember, 1971.
ATTEST,
lAvenia Lowe, Cicy �ecxe� ary-Treasurer
Map set in on Page368-A
71-30-369-934 Motion was made by Councilman Baker, seconded by Councilman Turner, motion carried, Kayor
(22) Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting Nay, to
pass Ordinance no. 6165 on first reading.,
AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NU. 6165
WHEREAS, tha City Council of the City of Lubbock finds it is necessary to appropriate
certain specific funds out of bond funds ror approved praj set;
NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT (,A1UA11,,4ED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
There is hereby appropriated out of the following described bond fund, Lo-wit: Storm
Sewer Improvement
The sum X11,500
---------------- ----------------- --—----------.................................. ------
...= .................... T.....................
==............................. ......................................................
��j=
! �'
„'
.�
)�),
v 2'1«9\V - 4 3f N3M19 j_
�.
� S
.- ��.
3[;:
i,=
� �,+
f'
<<
�N3�>
lu �"
w � �,
,:
��9 z �r � z
� rt ;m
� �_
i �.
� ¢„
i ; , �'-
�,.
1 � - i �`
� �� € sSHiAY `'�
t € T
'.€ - ttt{
� ('��
t
I
E � — n S tla*Y �
a � �
� ; � �1
is
j
� j ''
I{ cl,
.,ro
L
j
� f
{ �.
i� ,. �:�;
r.{'
� 3
� L - �� 7 v3x�
i
s
1
., x m
! a i
i
I
. ,
3:,
II
i-'
)�.,I.
{;
��,
'' �._ `:.
t — 1
L. f y ) 31�.. i �.J�
r 1 I
c ..J _.. S-. __' ryi
u is,1
1 E,
€i
{I
. ..�.�.�__ ..._.. ..,.._.......P..,. ._...._...� .-,.__..e.__..._ �. �__.__�_. _...a�
Page 1
:!M1 yy ti-J
'TERAS CR31INAL JUSTICE COUNCIL APPLICATION FOR GRANT
1. Short Title of Project: (Do not exceed one typed line)
Identification Microfilm System
Z Type of Application: (Check one) Grant Number (C.J.C. use only)
Original K Revision Continuation
Grant Number of Application to he }Lis ,I or Program No. Lander Which Funding Expected:
Continued
3. Project Duration: 4. Total C. .C- Support Sought:
_ (Total for project}
Total length 12 montes "
$
From January 1, 1972
5. Request for First Year:
Through December 31, 1972 (Project exceeding 16 months)
$ •a.
6. Applicant Agency or Institution: 7. Project Director:
(Name,address,planning region) (Name,title,address, telephone)
Lubbock Police Department Lt. Claude Keaton
Post Office Box 2000 Lieutenant of Services
Lubbock, Texas 79457 Post Office Box 2000
Lubbock, Texas 79457
South Plains Association of Government
Is 806-763-5333
8. Financial Officer; 9. Official Authorized to Sign Application:
(Name,title,address, telephone) (Name,title,address)
Mr. Sterling Miller Mr. W. R. Blackwell
Finance Officer r City Manager
City of Lubbock City of Lubbock
Lubbock, Texas 79401 Lubbock, Texas
806-762-6411
10. Type of Agency or Institution: 11. Federal Tax Exemption Determination:
A Public Private Nonprofit —1—yes* Date
Pending: Yes No
•If yes,attach copy of letter of exemption determination.
12. Federal Support: 13. Federal Submissions:
Will other federal support be available Have other federal agencies been contacted for
for any part of this project? assistance on this or similar projects?
Yes X No. If yes, identify Yes K No. If yes, specify:
and explain:
14. Date: 15. Total Pages in application:
17
Form cdc-1 (211172)
Page 2
TEXAS CRIB•SINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL APPLICATION FOR GRANT
Detailed Project Budget:
�K mplete Project (16 months or less) Period FromTarry 1, 1972
First Year Only (Projects exceeding 16 months) Through n ether 31 , 1979
C.J.C. Grantee Category
Support Contribution Total
A. Personnel (Employees)
1. Salaries (list each position i h salary rate & percentage
of time to be devoted)
See Continuation Si?2?t - Page 2A $ $
2. FICA, Retirement, etc. $ $ 1,857.21
Sub Totals $ $ 20,433.21 $20,433.21
B. Professional and Contract Services
Sub Totals $ $ $C. Travel (Transportation & subsistence)
Sub Totals $ Is _
D. Equipment
See Continuation Sheet - Page 2-B $39,926.00 $
Sub Totals $39,926.00 $ $39,926.00
E. Construction
Plumbing for Film Processor $ 100.00 $ 100.00
Sub Totals $ 100.00 $ 100.00 IS 200.00
F. Supplies & Other Operating Expenses
See Continuation Sheet - Page 2C $ 1,769.60 $
Sub Totals $ 1,769.60 $ $ 1,76
G. Total Project Costs $41,795.60 r$20,533.21 1$62,328.81
Farra CSC-1 (211171)
A. PERSONNEL (EMPLOYEES) PAGE 2A
% of
No. Employee Salary Time Amount FICA Retirement Ins.
1 Lt. of Services $ 8,880.00 20% $1,776.00 $ 95.90 $ 88.80 $ .88
1 Sgt. of Records 8,400.00 40% 3,360.00 181.44 84.00 1.68
5 I. D. Officers 39,000.00 20% 7,800.00 421.20 390.00 3.90
1 Clerk 3,760.00 100 , 3,760.00 203.04 188.00 1.90
r
1 Clerk 3,760.00 50% 1,880.00 101.52 94.00 .95
TOTALS $631800.00 $18,576.00 $1,003.10 $844.80 $9.31
--ti
t
D. EQUIPDIEL PAGE 2B
quantity Description Amount
1 Reader-Printer Including Parity $ 9,960.00*
Check Keyboard Control Unit,
Logic Package
6 Inequality Keyboards @ $1,175 ea. 7,050.00
I Response Monitor 1,120.00*
1 Equidigit Logic Selection Control 485.00
2 Keyboard Cabinets 40.00
1 Retrieval Station Console 395.00
1 Microfilm File Console 300.00
I Twin Tier Mounting Kit 60.00
I Interpolation Logic Selection Control 640.00
I MIR.ACODE WORD OR Logic 500.00
1 Microfilmer with Film Unit 10$ 00.00
1 Input Keyboard 4,215.00
1 Magazine Loading Station 70.00
1 Film Processor, including basic 4,591.00
installation kit w/processing rack
VRU, Thermostatic Mixing Valve
(not including installation) ,
accessory stand and sink and film
inspection kit
$39,926.00
•
* Reconditioned with new equipment warranty.
l
F. SUPPLIES AL\TD i`IT SC, SPEMSES PAGE 2C
Supplies
Tape & Dispenser (2) 5.90
16mm Self-Threader, Package of three (2) 2.30
Film Magazines 150 ea. w/$1.15 172.50
Developer, 8 gals. 41.60
Fixer, 8 gals. 26.00
Developer Systems Cleaner, 24 bottles 34.80
ARU Microfilm, 100 rolls 355.00
Paper for Reader-Printer, 20 Rolls 281.00
Microfilm Presstapes, 2 boxes 22.00
Monobath for Reader-Printer, 10 cartons 133.50
.� 1,074.60
r
Misc. Expenses
Film Duplication 695.00 695.00
TOTAL $1,769.60
4 •
i
Page 3
'TEXAS CRIIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL = +�� APPLICATION FOR GRANT
.s:�•l
A. Budget Summary for Project Exceeding 16 Months Duration
Beyond 2nd
Budget Categories—C.J.C. Funds Year Ye d Year Total
Months
Personnel (Employees)
Professional and Contract Services
Travel (Trans. & Subsistence)
Equipment
Construction
Supplies & Other Operating Expenses
Total C.J.C. Funds Requested
Total Grantee Contribution
Total Project Costs
B. Explanation of Grantee contribution. Describe (1) nature, (2) sources, and (3) project utilization
of the Grantee Contribution by year as specified in A above. Where the project does not exceed 16 months,
explain the contribution listed in the Grantee Contribution column of page 2 of this application for the
entire period.
1. PERSONNEL (Employees)
Salaries, FICA, Retirement and Insurance
SOURCE - City Budget
NATURE - Man hours necessary to change from present system
to a microfilm system.
PROJECT UTILIZATION- On the job labor to microfilm current file of mug
shots and fingerprint cards for program conversion.
2. CONSTRUCTION
,rlumbing for Film Processor
SQURCE - City Budget
NATURE - $100.00 Cash
PROJECT UTILIZATION- Due to the fact that the film requires hot and cold
water with a drain to function properly, we need
this construction contribution.
Form CJC•I (211171)
Page 4
TEXAS CRIINII.NAL JUSTICE COUNCIL APPLICATION FOR GRANT _
Budget Narrative
-Bean below and add as many continuation paves (4a, 4b, etc.) as may be needed to explain each item of the
project budget. Limit this narrative to an explanation of the basis for arriving at the cost of each item.
;. PERSOWEL
1 - Lieutenant of Services will dedicate 20% of his time in total supervi-
sion of the projecL.
1 - Sargent of Records, spending 40% of his time as a Project Supervisor
and Monitor of Code Classification.
5 - I. D. Officers, who will each spend 20% of their time in preparing,
coding and classifying fingerprint cards.
1 - Clerk, 100% of her time in operating the input microfilmer and search-
ing the completed file.
1 - Clerk, 50% of her time to process film and make'necessary film retrievals
as requested.
II. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE
1 - Microfilm Reader/Printer to be used in microfilm scanning, making
necessary retrievals, and producing paper prints upon demand.
6 - Inequality Keyboards which give complete control and latitude of search
and offer seven different seatch modes.
1 - Response Monitor to give statistical information from the Data File.
1 - Logic Selection Control which allows for data retrieval when all of the
coding necessary is not known at the time of data input.
2 - Keyboard Cabinets to mount keyboards and controls.
1 - Retrieval Station Console to accommodate the Reader/Printer and Logic
Control.
1 - Microfilm File Console which accommodates the necessary Keyboard Controls
and furnishes storage for microfilm magazine files.
1 - Twin Tier Mounting Kit two hold the assembled Keyboards.
1 - Interpolation Logic Selection Control to be usedin conjunction with the
"Word Or" Logic for searching "and" " "
� ❑rsituation.
1 - MIRACODE Word "Or" Logic, which is used when any answer to two questions
can satisfy the search requirement.
Form CJC-1 (2/1/71)
BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued) PAGE 4A
II. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE (continued)
1 - Microfilmer with ir_put to accourzodate the necessary document that will be
converted from the manual file to the microfilm system. Rate of document
input will be up to 250 docuzents per hour on an average basis.
1 - Input Keyboard *. hick houses all operator controls to code on the film and
record documents.
I - Magazine Loading Station to load processed film into the magazines.
I - Daylight Film Processor which will provide for immediate film processing
and reduced through-put time into the system to less than 24 hours.
III. CONSTRUCTION - PLUI'iBING FOR PROSTAR
*t►
This construction provides for the necessary installation of a Thermostatic
Mixing Valve necessary for the operation of the film processor. The film
processor will be connected to hot and cold water and a output drain.
VI. SUPPLIES
2 - Tapes and Dispensers for attaching self-threader to film
2 - Packages of three 16mm Self-threaders for threading film through processor.
150 - Film magazines to be used for handling and storage of film.
8 - Gallons of Film Developer ft process film.
8 - Gallons of Fixer to process film.
24 - Bottles of Developer Systems Cleaner to clean the internal part of the
film processor.
100 - Rolls of AHU Microfilm with which to film the original file.
20 - Rolls of paper for the Reader/Printer with which to furnish hard copies.
2 - Boxes of Microfilm Press Tapes for film splicing.
10 - Cartons of Mollobath for Reader/Printer to process paper copies.
V. MISCELLANEOUS EKPENSES
The necessary miscellaneous expenses required from the system will be for film
duplication. The duplicated copy of the film is a requirement for positive
film when we are searching fingerprints and mug shots. The original camera
film will be the security copy which will be stored at some other location.
Page 5
TEXAS CRLY"AL JUSTICE COUNCIL x:. , ;i APPLICATION'FOR GRANT
Project Plan and Supporting Data
This section constitutes the hent of the grant application. It_,is the applicant's detailed statement of the
project—its aims, precisely what v:ill be done, who will be involved, and what is expected to result. Together
with the project budget, it constit-_rtes primary evidence to the C.J.C. of the soundness of the project, the care
and planning that has gone into iia formulation, and the responsibility and qualifications of the applicant and
others who will be involved in carry-hag it out.
This section consists of two parts: The Summary and The Detailed Project Description.
The Summary
Write a brief summary of total project not to exceed 200 words in length in the space below.
This proposed project offers the Lubbock Police Department a much better means
of identification of fingerprints and mug shots, we expect the microfilm system
to support us in the apprehension of criminals. Through the use of this auto-
mated data file that contains our fingerprint cards and mug shots, we anticipate
an increase in the number of arrests and a reduction in the growing list of
unwanted crimes.
This microfilm system will offer us a highly automated means by which we can
accumulate a suspect list when a Latent print has been lifted and classified
from the scene of the crime. A modern means to improve our identification and
information handling methods definitely exists. We also expect to relieve our
over crowded and cramped conditions, due to an increase in paper work, and a
microfilm system will relieve this situation. Complete security of vital records
can be obtained from the microfilm duplicate that will be stored off premises.
�r
In conclusion, we anticipate that this project, when completed, will, give us a
tool with which the Lubbock Police Department can reduce crime in the streets
and add further protection to the citizens residing in this county and area.
The Detailed Project Description
Organize the remainder of this section as per instructions under the following headings: A_ Goals, B. Methods, C.
Results; D. Resources;and E. Evaluation.
L
Insert after this sheet as many additional pages (8 1/2"x -11") as may be needed to complete the description of
the Project Plan and Supporting Data. Where the applicant wishes to append documents as supplemental
information and these cannot be readily placed on continuation sheets, they should be listed on the last page of
the Project Plan and copies furnished with the application for staff review.
THE DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 5A
--A. GOALS
1. Problems
a. Currently, we have approximately 30,000 fingerprint cards
an file and these cards offer a very voluminous information
base, which is almost impossible to search without a known
suspect. There exists no rapid or orderly method for
matching a latent print found at the scene of the crime
with our fingerprint card file.
b. In regards to our mug shot file, when a witness or victim
is presented to the file to locate a suspect, this witness
or victim has to wade through an enormoLs number of mug
shots in an attempt to locate a suspect. Fatigue and con-
fusion often overcome the witness and simply adds to the
difficulty in making an identification.
2. Solutions
a. The Lubbock Police Department requests that an automated
data retrieval system be installed with which we can
readily search our fingerprint file and display to us only
those prints which approximate a latent found at the scene
of the crime. A system such as this eliminates the necessity
of having the name of a known suspect.
b. Mug shots, modus o&erandi files, and physical characteristics
of known criminals can be stored and displayed with the same
microfilm system. The witnesses and victims will now be able
to scan the mug shot file by identifying characteristics, both
physical and methods of operation so that only suspects With
the same characteristics will be displayed to the witnesses or
victims. Such a system will speed identification, ease the
strain on the victim or witnesses, and speed up the subsequent
apprehension process.
C. We plan to use this system on a city, county, and regional.
basis. We intend to offer support to the surrounding towns
in our region by offering them access to the system and on a
state-wide basis in the exchange of information with other
regions and the Department of Public Safety in Austin.
r �
d. In conclusion, we anticipate that this effective tool in our
WAR ON CRIME will provide to ourselves and other area Police
Departments immediate access to a very-comprehensive fingerprint
and mug shot microfilm system.
THE DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 5B
B. METHODS
1. Step One - The Five I. D. Specialists -assigned to spend 20% of
their time will provide the classification and the coding of the
fingerprint cards. The fingerprint coding scheme that will be
utilized by tie Lubbock Police Department will be compatible
to the system employed by the Texas Department of Public Safety
in Austin. We will convert 30,000 fingerprint cards currently
in the file.
Simultaneously with the classifying of fingerprint cards, one I.
D. Clerk .will. spend the necessary time for coding mug shots for
input.
2. Step Two - Upon completion of the preparatiorlZDf the documents,
the pre-coded documents will then be passed to the microfilm
input camera where a full-time clerk will microfilm the documents.
The second clerk will spend 50% of her time involved in the pro-
cessing of the film, loading it into the magazines and making a
small number of retrievals. These two steps will take the 12
months of the project time to accomplish.
3. Step Three - Upon completion of Steps One and Two, we expect to
offer the availability of the system to the surrounding towns and
to the Sheriff's Department for the purpose of any conversion
that they might wish to do to their records. These records can
be stored at the primary retrieval device located in Lubbock and
various means of communipation can be utilized by the surrounding
law enforcement agencies. We visualize that this step will benefit
the entire region.
C. RESULTS
1. The result will be a completely improved identification and mug
shot system located in the Lubbock, Texas, Area. With this new
law enforcement tool, we will have a more efficient crime fighting
weapon and a better record in solving crimes.
We will also offer the exchange of microfilms containing this
data with Qther cities and regions that are using the same system.
For example, the cities in the Rio Grande Counsel of Governments
Area and the Department of Public Safety in Austin, Texas.
We think that this is a most efficient method of helping to fight
crime and would expect to see coverage throughout the State.
THE DETAILED PROTECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 5C
D. RESOURCES
1. Staff - This proposed project will be totally implemented by
the employees on the staff of the Lubbock Police Department
as previously listed.
2. Cooperation - The vendor, from which we would expect to purchase
this system, will be responsible for the total implementation
of the system by installing, training our operators, and the
maintenance of the equipment. All additional advice and techni-
cal assistance will be offered by the vendor at no additional
charge to the user, which is the vendor's usual manner of doing
business. After the expiration of the normal warranty period on
service and parts of one year, an Annual Maintenance Contract
can be purchased.
3. Future Needs - The first year will see the major work of conver-
sion and the larger amount of the system expenses incurred. In
subsequent years, the operating• costs will become negligible and
will be financed by our own budget. The expense of man-hours
required for the on-going maintenance of the system will definitely
be more than off set by the fast response time of data retrieval
from the microfilm file.
The Lubbock Police Department is absolutely confident that the
maintenance of this syssem can be effectively maintained after any
Federal Assistance is t9rminated.
r
E. EVALUATION
1. The project's progress and evaluation reports, that will be rendered
at regular intervals for the purpose of evaluating this system, will
be the responsibility of Lieutenant Claude Keaton, Lieutenant of
Services, Lubbock Police Department. This evaluation shall consist
of a comparison between the old I. D. Methods and the new Automated
Microfilm Retrieval System.
c
PAGE 5D
(shown three-fourths of original si»e) ?
nPAISSION & BURM OF CARD
• I.R
yAkl licit Y.Cal 1
PO—E Wilson _ Stan _ B. iN.C�namegla.
reln,.e eve: rtia Pr n., 3. _ �•:^�= Bob Wilson _
�y —�— - 1
Z. !-��� m a,e ��� jei,�,hr � ILke•ghl 1 Ploer o!3irr!•, P1C0 Il' a T'r35 3 -`
Arrrsrod 8f — — - s --—� Docker Na .� Pogo book ,
Moro In - — Yrme _ Phone Na. _
Address a--_ - Crty�S sr�•r MA$ITAL STATUS
A.esled W,h Wha n Pa Yes i l No ❑ Divorced
_•.�.. -- u S.CITIZEN lU Yes L,N9
Occupa on dal
Fmpiayect 9v� tastnan f0�31� -0 J_
$r�0 '�TT1 n015
For.nrr fmphyee
'al Se[urr*y No •®.A'- 1F 8 i Na^T_ 51ole No
DPldnl•y Lrc ka ^_- __m _ � Y 15191! __ _
Schooling last Geode Cam;ived 1Ph grcal Condrr.on of subject Excel I entt _
Charge None
CfrCYe4 Cour, �Crxe rrh Coun 1Mag D.. Judg■
Remarks __ _ ' Mghl Thumb q
_ �F.am Oolr 3 Tlme
Recd Fran•
How ieleased- -- —� Date Tlme __yJa�ler ��® �ji..a�,�'•.:•.-_' •
Who To 8ekat f.ed In C.%e of Err.erger.Cy
Name --
COLUMN o and e2 COLUmN A4Y UTILITY BIT l (Check at many os needadj
Ampus-Pions and
I R NO Scan Tattoos DQFarMilieB
CotumN '$ 1 l00 Forehead _1 10 Hood _ I X Fingers r nand
Sas Baee CDenpl salon 101 Naso III Rrghr Arm __121 Fragers I hand
0 0 0 __102 Cheeks T 11 2 Leh Arm 02 122 R-ghr hand
y+' .f,I. we, V!h re I Lrghr _ 103 Up �113 Hands 123 Left hand
2 Female 7 Negrg 2 ked,um _-104 Ch'. !IA Fingers F-174 A-
3 me=.tan kel Dark ®105 Neck 115 (-heal - -125 Foot L leg
_4 Oriental -4 Fre'Lled _106 106 Arms _116 legs 126 Ear
5 Ind.on __5 P.-pi, 107 Hands _ 111 Needle Ala rks 127 L•mps
_•®6 Ruddy _103 Legs ml 10 Words b No-e4_ 2B Blrlhmgrks
- COLUMN r4 2 •_109 Body —119 P.uuresf0eogns 129 Warts b males
Hrlghl Weigh+ Build (Other
0 0 _0 Ale
I sharp I U1der 100. I Tn Char®crvnuics
Under 5 4 11 "0O•1 130 mhi2 Med.um 200 Mare Ir _
I ""` P. 208 Broken or 216 Long _ western
5 5 to 3 131 70 ] Far ar wea.•y
S S 5 l W'.14 _2p1 DeoP'a 171-200 a Musc uiar mrss.ng rgorh 717 long _eastern
_3 T91i aver 6 5 201 250 702 Eye m,ss.ng ®209 0".,r.d eee•h �_218 Stutte,s
6 Over 250 `203 Crass eyed ®21D Crooked nose 219 Dperut.anol scan
!`
• -._
__ �_204 Glosses warn __277 Hooked case -220 Accrdenral seers
Dale of Birth COLUMN 0 � Eye Color 205 Glasses warn 212 LAS®S _271 Burns
Lost Iwo 0,9PPti osameres _21 3 Speech-poor ®222 Non•camc I tattoos
oe Year Born _ 1 Blue 206 He" eye Brows __214 Long -fore.gn ®777 Hrcp,o
E.vmyle 1045 _ 2 Greer 207 Prot seesh ®•215 long -southern _224 Leb handed
would be 5451 _ 3 Graf _725 Amb.de.lrOus
a Hprel OenuP.6ors Charges
5 Brown —300 TruckfCab onyer 500 Homlude 511 L+gwr and
6 Block 301 Rearavront emp 501 r.s
See aFfee 93mrl.ng
__7 r4aragn __302 Cansrr worker ®_502 %.dnopp•ng _512 vucdal.sn+ and
COLUMN so 4 w 303 Faclary warker _503 Assau'r 3 6vraery c— dc•nage to
Half Calor Half Type Hair Choroelernhe p30', salesraon 504 gwglory robbery properry
0 0 _0 tl305 Sro,dent 505 Theft 513 Threg•s 3 ear
WM Blur.: - I Srra•ght C'M Graying `_306 Prgf'l Peiple y+/506 Auto elefr 514 TrufFe 'mlarrons
_ 2 Brg,.,r 7 Wa.Y ar Curly __ 2 4eeerlg 307 Office wOrker x507 Embe:elanear 515 Demesne rrodble
L Red y.03.+ ky 3 Bald __308 House..le S fo'ge" —516 Mob acnon
4 Bl.-dr D.k 4 P'ace'd 508 Fraud 517 4eslshng acreu
®_5 blo>de .7bv _ 5 Void _509 NOKarles 518 Orsorderiy conduce
6 Gray S '.'jr-Ie -__510 Arson 519 Contempt cf caurs
7 Reld __520 Probor'n elalO'lan
Ifs AR%5 - Scars Tattoos, Ampu,oPion d Defanm Nes - Other
NOTE! As Columns #1 and 112 are not being used in the current
miCrofilrn System, Co?Umn #3 becon*S .f1, Column 14 becon*s ,#2,
Column #5 becomes #3, and Column 96 becomes #4 on the Admis-
sion b Bureau of ldentifCation Card.
-16-
NINE DIGIT CODE SYSTEM CHART PAGE 5E
COLUMN 1
PATTERN TYPE RIDGE COUNT OR TRACE CORE TYPE
0 = Ampt 0 = No count or trace 0' = t1 Plain recurve
1 - Arch 1 = 1 - 5 ridges I = Recurve with one rod
2 = Tented Arch 2 = 6 - 10 ridges 2 = lr Recurve with multiple rods
3 = Right Slope Loop 3 = 11 - 15 ridges 3 =rl"1 Any recurve that is spoiled
4 = Left Slope Loop 4 = 16 - 20 ridges 4 = Clockwise twist
5 = Plain Whorl 5 = 21 - out 5 = Counter-clockwise twist
6 = Central Pocket Wh Irl 6 = Inner 6 Complete enclosure
7 = Double Loop Whorl 7 = Meeting 7 Almond shape whorl
8 = Accidental 8 = Outer 8 = Upthrust
9 = Mutilated (can' t read) 9 = Scar 9 .�! Loop type
COLU�V II - POINT CLEAREST CORES
NIT BER OF TYPE OF
CORE TYPE IDENTIFYING POINTS IDENTIFYING POINTS
0 = n Plain Recurve 0 = None 0 = No ID points
1 =47 Recurve With one rod 1 = One 11 = Ending ridge right
2 = Recurve with multiple rods 2 = Two 2 = Ending ridge left
3 =?I Any recurve that is spoiled 3 = Three 3 = Bifurcation right
4 = Clockwise Twist 4 = Four 4 = Bifurcation left
5 = Counter-clockwise twist 5 = Five 5 = Short ridge or dot
6 =d Complete enclosure 6 = Six 6 = Island
7 = r� Almond shape whorl 7 = Seven 7 = Bifurcation and short ridge
8 Upthrust 8 = -Eight or more 8 = Double bifurcation same ridge
9 Loop type 9 = Scar - 9 = Double bifurcation two ridges
or more
COLUrV III - POINT NEAREST DELTA
r
FIRST ID POINT FIRST ID POINT FIRST ID POINT
FRONT OF DELTA AT RIGHT OF DELTA AT LEFT OF DELTA
0 - No ID Point 0 = No ID Points 0 = No ID Points
1 = Ending ridge right I = Ascending ridge type line 1 = Ascending ridge type
line
2 = Ending ridge left 2 = Descending ridge 'type line 2 = Descending ridge type
lines
3 = Bifurcation right 3 = Ascending bifurcation on 3 = Ascending bifurcation f
type line on type lines
4 = Bifurcation left 4 = Descending bifurcation on 4 = Descending bifurcation
_ type line on type lines
5 = Short Ridge; 5 = Ascending ridge ending 5 = Ascending ridge ending
6 = Island 6 = Descending ridge ending 6 = Descending ride endin-
7 = Bifurcation and short ridge 7 =Ascending bifurcation 7 = Ascending bifurcation
8 = Double Bifurcation same 8 = Descending bifurcation 8 = Descending bifurcation
ridge
9 = Double bifurcation connect- 9 = -Short ridge or island 9 = Short ridge or island
ing two ridges or more
If Delta runs into first ridge then Use ascending code number if type line
D points are counted. ends on both ends inside circle.
Page 6
TEXAS CRINMNAL JUICE COLNCIL APPLICATION FOR GRANT
Project Title:
To Validate Ibis application, the following standard g.ar.It conditions, where applicable,must tie certified and agreed to by We applicant.Also,where a conditio
applicable and requires additional information, such infii-m-,tion should be included in or as an addition to the application. (Additional explanation of these V
conditions may be found in C.J.C. publications, Finane.al,Manual for Action amd PLinnin:Grants and Action Grant Policies and Procedures Guide.)
Standard Grant Conditions
(1) Reports. The grantee shall submit, at such tir- and in such forms as may be prescribed,such reports as the Criminal Justice Council(C.J.C.)may requ
including quarterly financial and prog.-css repori and final imanciai ane progress reports.
(2) Fiscal Regulations.The fiscal adminkiritinn of ora its shill be subject to such ruien,regulations,and pol.1cies,concerning accounting and records,paymen
'funds, cost allowability,sub-nisszon of iinanrial reports, etc.,as may be prescribed by C.J.C..including those set forth in the C.J.C.Action Grant Policies 4
Procedures Guide and Financial Manual for Action ird I!IannLrig Grants.
(3) Utilization and payment of Funds. Funds awarded may he expended only for purposes and activities covered by the grantee's approved project plan i
budget. Payments will be made on the basis of periodic requ Lsts and estimates of fund needs submitted by the grantee,Payments will be adjusted to cors
previous overpayments or underpayments and disallowances resulting from audit.
let changes. These include (a) changes of substance
(4) Written Approval of Changcs.G ran tees must obtain priar written approval from C.J.G. for major pro4e
—pizoject activities• deaign,at research plans set forth in the approved application-,(b)changes in the proitut director or key personnel identified in the appro,
application; (c) expenditure of grant funds representing more than a 5% increase in any tate;o ry of the approved budget;and (d)any increase or decreast
grantee contribution exceeding.51.within any budget category.
(5) Application Review Changes.Any changes effected in this application as a result of or during the course of C.J.C.review will be deemed to have been accep
upon receipt of the grantee's request for funds.
(6) MAntenince of Records. Ali required records shall be maintained until an audit by L.E.A.A. or its representatives is completed and all questions axis
therefrom are resolved,or for three years after final payment is made on the grant, contract, or subcontract under which this project is being implement
whichever is sooner.
17) Inspection and Audit.The C.J.C., LE A A, and the Comptroller General of the United States,o r any of their duly authorized representatives,shall have acc
for purposes of audit and examinations to any books, documents,papers, and record-Li of the grantee, and to relevant books and records of contractors,
provided in Section 521 of P.L.90-351.A notice to this effect shall appear in all arrangements for implementation of this project.
(9) Termination of Aid This grant may be terminated or fund payments discontinued by C.J.C.where it finds a substantial failure to comply with the provisic
of P.L. 9()-351 of regulations promulgated thereunder, including these grant conditions or application obligations, but only after notice and bearing a
pursuant to all procedures set forth in Sections 510 and 511 of P.L.90-351,
(9) Obligation of Grant Funds. Grant funds may no L, w i tb ou t advance written approval by C.J.C be obligated prior to the effective date or subsequent to t
termination date of the grant period.Obligations outstanding as of the termination date shall be liquidated within 90 days.Such obligations must be related
goods or services provided and utdized within the grant period,
(10) Title to Property.Title to property acquired in whole or in part with grant funds in accordance with approved budgets shall vest in the grantee, subject
divestment at the option of C.J.G. (to the extent of C.J.C. contribution toward the purchase thereof) exercisable only upon notice within 90 days after t
end of the grant period or termination of the grant. Grantees shall exercise due cite in the use, maintenance, protection and preservation of such proper
during the period of project use.
(11) Project Income. All interest or other income earned by the grantee with respect to grant funds or as a result of conduct of the grant project (-sale
publications,registrations fees, service charges on fees, etc.) must be accounted for. Income should be applied to project purposes or in reduction of proje
costs.
(12) Publications.The grantee may publish, at its own expense, the results of grant activity without Prior review by C.J.C.provided that any publication(wrUte
visual, or sound) contains an acknowledgement of C.J.C.grant support.The following disclaimer must be contained in the aforementioned aclkriowledgemen
The fact that the Criminal Justice Council furnished financial support to the activity described in this(written,visual,or sound) publication do
not necess4xiiy indicate the concurrence of the Criminal Justice COU-161 in the statements Or conclusions contained herein.
At least 25 copies of any such publication must be furnished to C.J.C.but only 10 copies of training materials(where used in grant project)must be supplle
except as otherwise requested or approved by G.J.C.Publication of documents or reports with grant funds beyond quantities required to meet standard repo
requirements must be provided for in approved project plans or hudgeLs or otherwise approved by C.J.C.and,for large quantity publication,manuscripts rn,.A
be submitted in adtance to C.J.C.
(13) Copyrights. Where activities supported by-this grant produce original boo",manuals,films,or other copyrightable material,the grantee may copyrightsuc'
but C.J.C.reserves a Myalty-free,non-exclusive and irrevocable license to produce•publLsb•arid use such materials,and to authorize others to do so.
(14) Patents. If any discovery or invention arises or is developSd in the couxse of or as a result of work performed under this grant,by any level of implemff-it_r
grantee or contractor,the grantee shall refer the discovery%or invention to C.J.C.•which will determine whether or not patent protection will he sought,ho
_Any rights therein, irtclu"ding patent rights, will be disposed of a'nd administered,and the necessity of other action required to protect the public interest i
work supported with federal funds, all in accordance with the Presidential Memorandum of October 10,1983,on Government Patent Policy,The grantee i
his final narrative report shall identify any discovery or invention arising Linder or developed in the course of or as a result of work performed under this&-,it
or shall certify that there are no such inventions or discoveries.
(15) Allowable Costs.The allowability of costs incurred Linder any grant shall be determined in accordance faith the general principles of allowability and sto.idaZZ5
for selected cost items set forth in Bureau of Budget Circular A-87."Principles for Determining Cos"Applicable to Grants;and Contracts with State and Luc
- Govern man ts,"as further defined and delimited in condi tons in the C.J.C.Financial Manual for Action and Planning Grants.
'16) ExPe[3309 Not Allowable. Gr3ny, funds may not be-expended for (a) items not part of the approved budget or separately approved by C.J.C.;(b)purchas,?u
construction of land and bui!dincs or improvements thereon, or payment of real estate mortgages pr taxes, unlass specifically-provided fur inthe gran
agreement;(c)entertainment,amusements,or social activities,incidental casts related tharLLD,(d)purchase of automobiles or other automotive vahieles unl
Provided for in the grant agreement;or(e)indirect(overhead) costs,where the grantee does not have an indirect expense allocation systern and rate accuptab
to C.J.C.,except rlat amounts included in the approved budget application.
Page 6
(17) Pre&gcoement Gosty.Grant funds may not be used to reimburse costs incurred prior to the date of the grant award without specific written C.J.C,approval.
--(IS) Automatic Data Processing Equipment. Grant funds may not he expended or committed for the acquisition of automatic data processing equipment,whether
by outright purchase.rental purchase agreement,or by other method of purchase without prior C.J.C.approval.
A7,9) Rental Costs. Grant funds may not be expended or committed for rental costs unless total space does not exceed 150 square feet per employee and unless the
rental rate is consitent with the prevailing rates in the area and not in excess of$7 annually per square foot.Deviations require prior C.J.C.approval.
(20) Maintenance and Operations.Grant funds may not be expanded or committed, without prior C.J,O.approval, for maintenance and operations expenses(w,
defined in Bureau of the Budget Circular A-37).
(21) Rearran.pmeats and Alternations.Grant funds may n '.b- tip�nded or committed for rearrangements and alterations without prior C,J,C,approval where such
cods exceed $1,500. Such approval will be gninted ni n-re it can he shown that (a) the building(s)involved is in reasonably good condition with a Life
expectancy of five years or more; (b) the co5cs as, -ru or renovation costs not involving the erection,acquisiton,expansion or repair of new
or existing buildings or other physical facffl0es;an 1 1r) 7i )s:s do not exceed 257-OL the current value of the building(s).
(22Y Depreciation and Use Allowances no Publicly 2u-1dhizi. A grant is not sand-ti-uv grant funds may not be requested or accepted under this application
until the grantee (a) c2fti,;2s t%.it t h- 1 n.-.s)on which tlep-cciation or use allowances are to be charged are not temporarily idle or excess
facilities; (h) pro6ides the d_-ta_1ld b-.An for Lh, :.)T- 'a-n o€the depreciation or use allowance to be used:and(c) certifies that the allowance method to be
used has been determined and will b. in ici,ordance with the pz-oviArin of pazagraph B,lL of attachment B,Bureau of the Budget Circular A-97,
(23) Occupancy Under Rental Puzchas._, or Agreement.Grant funds rnay not be requested until the applicant has certified in writing
that the occupancy of facilities wdl not be under either a rental purchase or leas®-tv ith-option-to-p urc base agreement.
(24) Equipment and Other Capital E%penzlitux.s. The applicant hereby certifies that (a) no other equipment owned by the grantee Is available for the project,(b)
grault funds will not be used to pro6ide rzimljuxswment for the purchase price of equLprnEmt already owned by grantee except through permissible depreciation
or use allowance actually char.- d to the grantee. (c) if equipment is u-,ed far purposes other than this project, the appropriate proration of cost to each
activity involved w HI be effected;and (d) the cost of equipment purchased with C.J.C. funds will be reduced to the a%ton t of resale or recovery valu a where
use of such equipment for carrying out the purposes of the grant project is discontinued(during the life of the project)or use for la%v enforcement purposes i
discontinued (after completion of the project) unless all credit relating to such contingencies as set forth in Section C3 of Circular A-87,"Applicable Credit"
are applied to offset or,reduce grant charges. 1
(25) Insurance and Indemnification. Grant funds may not be committed for insurance at lndzrnnification expense until the applicant hereby certifies that(a)types
and extent and cast of coterjge will be in accordance with general local gos ernrneriL policy and sound business pr-Lctjee;and(b)costs twill not be charged for
contributions to a reserve for a self-insurance program. Grant funds may not be requested by applicant if any expenditures are to be niade for insurance or
indemnification costs for which the above certification cannot be made unless complete details and justification hale been submitted to CbJX° as an
amendment to the grant application.
(26) Proposal Costs.Grant funds may not be committed or expended for costs of preparing proposals without prior approval of C.I.C.
(27) Third Party Participation. No contract or agreement may he entered into by the grantee for execution of project activities or provision of services to a grant
project tother than purcha3c of supplies or standard commercial or mainten-wrioe services) which is not incorporated in the jppriased propusdl or approved in
advance by C.J.C. Any such arrangements shall provide that the grantee tail] retain ultimate control and responsibility for the grant project and that the
contractor shall be bound by these grant conditions and any other requirements applicable to the grantee in the conduct of the project.
(28) Professaonal and Contract Services.The applicant hereby certifies that(a)with re,pect tc arrangements with individuals(1,)the retainer arrangement is formal
and proper and otherwise consistent with the grantee's usual practices for obtjlntng such services, (2.) time and/or services for which payment swill be made
and rates or compensation will be supported by documentation, (3.) the compensation is reasonable and consistent with that paid for similar%vork in other
activities of the grantee, (4.)the daily or hourly rate does not exceed$100 per r:ay.(5.)no individual retained is an employee of the ececutive branch of state
government, (G.) no individual will receive compensation from his regular employer and the grantee for work performed during a sin.,le period of time evert
&bough services benefit both,and(7.)transportation and subsistencLtosts for travel performed are to be at an identified rate consistent with the general trawl
reimbursement practices of the State of Texas; (b) with respect Looffrangements with agencies of units of government (I.) the work or services for which
reimbursement will be made urill be directly and exclusively devoted to grant purposes and at rates not in exce55 of actual costs to the "contractor"
governmental agency, (2,) the work or services(or which reimbursement will be made or for which credit for matching contribution of grantee will be claimed
Is not wholly or In Part covered by funds of other federal grants;(c)with respect to arrangements with non-governmental organizations(I.)the arrangement is
formal and proper and consistent with the usual practice and policies of the applicant in contracting for or othern i&c obtaining sen ices of the type required,
(2.) selection of contractors has involved the securing of competitive bids or proposals from a group of qua Efled organizations.(3.)in cost-type arrangements.
any indirect costs or overhead charges are based on an audited or negotiated rate previously approved by a state or federal agency or are based on an indirpet
cast submission, preferably incorporating a wage and salary base, reflecting actual cost experience during the contractor's last annual oraLber recenLl}
completed fiscal period,(4.)the fixed fee or profit allowance,in cost-type arrangements,does not exceed 1()l o f total costs.
(29) Confidential Expenditures. Grant funds may not be expended or committed for purchase of information or evidence from informers without obtaining prior
C.J.C.approval.
(20) Compensation for Personal Services. (a) costs ch ed to a grant Prollet for Personal services(direct or indirect costs)must be based on payrolls documented
and approved in accordance with generally accepted practice of the grantee. Payrolls must he supported by time and attendance or equivalent records for
individual full-time employees; (b) salaries and wages paid to employees liorking on more than one project or cost objective must be prorated to each project
or objective to produce an equitable distribution of costs to each,The basis Of proration must he documented and supported by appropriate time distribution
records clearly identifying the sexvices perloryned as directly and exclusively related to defined objectives of the appro6ed grant program: (c)written C.J.C.
Permission must be obtained to Permit charges of salaries to one grant in cases where two or more federal grants constitute one identified-activity or project.
(21) Employee's Travel Expenses. Grant funds may not be expended for costs incurred for transportation,lodging,subsistence,and related items by an employed
unless(a) the employee is in a travel status on official business incident to the grant project.It the costs incurred axe properly chargeable to two or more grant
Projects, proration to each will be made on an equitable basis; (b)the b-ujs of the charges(actual,per diem andjor mileage in lieu of actual costs incurred,or
combination of the twop ijet forth in the grant application must be applied in like manner to all phases of an'entire trip.The results of the basis used must not
exceed ebarges normally allowed in like circumstances in non-redLrally sponsored activities, (c) if there is no established basis for travel expenses for
non-federally sponsored activities,the applicable rates in like circumstances under the general travel regulations for the State of Texas will be used.
Travel Expenses of Non-employees.Travel expenses for persons other than employees will not be charged to the grant provarn unless specifically pr&vided for
in the approved budiet application,
(32) Plivately Donated Services.The value of services voluntarily rendered to a grant program by private businesses,agencies,associations,or firms which perform
commercially the services donated may not be charged to the project as any portion of the grentee's matching contribution unless such services are necesqary
to achieve Ptoject PurPoscs and are 6alued at actual cost to the donar(s).Monthly or Quarterly records of such services mus'be maintained for each in,lhidu d
performing such services indicating dates and hours performed, type service, hourly rate,and any incidental costs-The total amount of such donated sornsGes
to be counted as part Of the ®rant-,e's matching contribution cannot exceed 50- of the total required by the grant award- No more than 5010 of th- gran' ,
contribution may be in the form of such donated services. Records o f donated services as outlined ah ri6 o must be i;ij ned by the in li6idu at pe rfo rrn t n� the
Services. A statement will be included, signed by the donor, that the services were necessary- to the project, the !jenices tvzre acCuffly perforrncd, and th
amounts represent actual cost to the donor. The records will bear the notation of the pro3oct director that the don-ted ser+;ees have been approv-d and
accepted by him on the ab,),,e basis as an allowable cost. The "actual" cost to the don.,r must not ircludt: any costs charg-d to f6deral funds p,osii I tLi-
Page 6
(33) Audit E.<peuses,Grant funds may not be expended or Committed for audit purposes unless(a)the arrangeanent for audit 1s formal and proper and currsistet
with the usual practice and policies of the grantee in contracting for or otherwise obtaining services of the type required;(b)Proration of the total cost ft
—with
services is made where the arrangement covers audit of the grant program in'addition to other activities of the grantee.The h$sis for proration must b
included in the arrangement or otherwise set forth in writing; (c) The proposed ariangement, including any proration of costs,is submitted to CJO an
vol bas been received.
q34) Diaeamiaation Prohibited.No person shall on the ®rounds of race, creed, color, or national origin,be excluded from participation in,be refused the beneti
of,or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under grants awarded pursuant to P.L.90-351 or any project, program,activity, or grant supported by suc
gimmes, Grantees must comply with the provisions and requirements of Title V1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1864 and regulations issued by the Department c
Justice thereunder as a condition of award of federal funds and continued grant support, Grantees further must comply with the Justice Department equ
-employment opportunity regulation in federally :s3i..Z0d pro®rams, to the end that discrinilnation in employment practices of law enforcement agencies an
other agencies or offices administering. canl„ctin_ or pa%ticipating in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance, on the grounds of rac
color,[seed,or national origin,be eliminated. i h! Unit,vd Stdtes reserves the right to seek judicial enforcement of this condition.
To validate this application,the following special iterns-must ba czrtified and agreed to by the applicant:
Special rtems
Zion-Supplanting Requirement. in compliance with the r^quirement that federal funds, made available under Part C.,Title 1,Public Law 90-351,as amended,b
used so 7s"not to supplant state or local funds'; this is to certify that the below described recipient of federal funds under Part C.,Title f,Public Law 90-351,a
amended,will use such funds to increase state or local funds that would,in the absence of such fed era]aid,be made available for law enforcement purposes.
Axnurance of Compliance with Civil Ri:rts Act of 1964.The applicant hereby agrees that it will Comply and will insure compliance by its contractors with Title V
z of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub Le Law 83-352) and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Regulations of the Department of Justice(28 CFR Part 42
ued pursuant to that title, to the end that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied th
ttenefits of, or be Otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for .which the Applicant receives federal financial assistance from th
Department. The grantee further will comply with and insure compliance by its contractors tr•ith Justice Department equal employment regulation in federall
assisted programs to the end that employment discrimination in such programs on the grounds of race, color, creed, or national origin,shall be eliminated. Th
grantee recognizes the right of the United States to seek judicial enforcement in its contracts. �•
Applicant's Agreement
It is understood and agreed by the Applicant that any grant received as a result of this application shall be subject to the above standard conditions,special items,
and other policies and rules issued by the Criminal Justice Council for administration of grant projects and all provisions under P.L. 80-351, as amended,and
memorandums issued by C.J.C.
Certified by;
Signature
t
Name
r
Title
Agency
Date:
Form CJC-1(211171)
•
t
r
36
SEP 9 1977
7:
For the following purpose: Avenue Storm Sewer to be constructed by T,HD. 3rd check making a
total of $31,000, 2nd Check, may 28, 1970, $2,000; let check April 9,
1970, $17,500.,
71.-30-369-935
(24) August 31, 1971
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Lubbock,
Texas Re. Letter of Guarantee
for City Streets
Gentlemen,,
The recent wet spell here in Lubbock caught us with four projects still unsurfaced when the
August 15 penetration asphalt surface deadline arrived.
These streets are-
20th Street from Slide Road to cul de sac one block west
27th Street from York Avenue to cul de sac one block ease
38th Street from Frankford Avenue to Englewood Avenue
74th Streej,- from Avenue W to University Avenue
We need to complete these streets this year.
We respectfully request your approval of our providing the City of Lubbock with a letter guarantee•
Ing our maintenance of the surface on these four streets for one year, Instead of our buying ai
maintenance bond, which would cost "o uL $350.00,
Thank you.
Yours very truly,
KERR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
/a/ Ken Hancock
Ken Hancock
KH/bag
Mr. Ken Hancock of Kerr Construction Company appeared before the City Council to request an exten-
sion of paving construction deadline for Kerr Construction Company. After consideration of all inr
form tion presented, motion was made by Councilman Rigsby, seconded by Councilman Hollingsworth,
motion carried, Mayor Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea,
none voting Nay, to deny this request for an extension of paving construction deddline for Kerr
Construction Company.
71-30-369-936 Motion was made by Councilman Hollingsworth, seconded by Councilman Baker, motion carried, mayor
(29) Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting Nay, to
pass Ordinance No. 6166 on first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 6166
AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND CLOSING THE EAST-WEST ALLEY AND A UTILITY EASEMENT BOTH SITUATED
IN BLOCK 8, SYLAVAN DELL HEIGHTS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK CO UM, TEYAS, AS WRE
PARTICUIARLY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER To MARK THE OFFIC-.
IAL MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK TO INDICATE THE CLOSING AND NBANDONMENT OF THE ALLEY AND UTILITY
EASEMENT AS AFORESAID.
71-30-369-937 Motion was made by Councilman Hollingsworth, seconded by Councilman Baker, motion carried, mayor
(32) Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting Nay, that
the following Resolution be passed,
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that Grant described below will assist in more
effective law enforcement, NOW TLIERFVORE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK:
THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized to execute for and on
behalf of the City of Lubbock an application for a Grant offered by the Criminal Justice Council
of the Stateof Texas for establishing a microfilm information retrieval system to be used by the
Lubbock Police Depart ment,,the total Grant amount being $41,795.60 and a copy of such grant app-
lication is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Passed by the City Council this 9th day of September, 1971.
J. NB Y, OR
ATTEST.
71-30-370 938 The following bids were received for purchase of pump and motor for Water Reclamation Plant,
(34) being Bid Dlo. 171.4
Bid Tabulation got in Bid Back.,
After consideration of all bids received, motion was made by Councilman Hollingsworth, seconded
by Councilman Rigsby, Motion carried, Mayor Granberry and Councilman Rigsby., Hollingsworth, Bakel,
and Turner voting 'Yea, none voting Nay, to accept the bid of Arthur G. 'McKee amid Company San
Franci-sco, California, for the purchase of pump and motor :for water Reclamation Plant.
F1-30-370-939 The following bids were received for the purchase of insecticides for the Health Department,
(35) Being Bid No. 172':Rµ
Bid Tabulation set in Bid Book.
After consideration of all bids received, motion war, made by Councilman Rigsby, Seconded by
Councilman Baker, motion carried, Mayor Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker
and Turner voting Yea, none voting Nay, to accept the bid of Estes Chemical Company, Wichita
Falls, Texas, for the purchase of Item I Tie bids were received from Estes Chemical Company
Wichita Falls. Texas, and Plainsman. Supply Company, Plainview, Texas, for the purchase of Item
2. Lot was drawn and the bid of Plainsman Supply Company, Plainview, Texas, was accepted.
71-30-370 940 Motion was made by CounciJimami Turner, seconded by Councilman Rigsby, motion carried, Mayor,
(21) Granberry and CaunclAmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting
Nay, that the following Resolution be passed.
G.W,O. 10,733 A
RESOLUTION
N1HEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lubbock by resolutions passed on August 26th, 1911
in rk�gular sessions or said �rity Council declaii-.,ed a necessity for and ordered the improve
of those certain hi&ways, streets and alleys or portions thereof in the City of Lubbock,
Lubbock, Texas, as mare particularly described hereafter, by excavating, grading, and paving
the samip and by the construction of drainage :facilities therein. and by the construction of curbs
and gutters wherein curbs and gutters are not now in place, and directing the City Engineer to
prepare plans and specifications for said improvements; and,
WHEREAS, thLe plans and specifications for the improvements of said highways, streets and
alleys have now been duly approved by the City Council of she City of Lubbock, Lubbock, Texas.
WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Lubbock, Lubbock, Texas to be
necessary in the public interest to make the improvcTWnLs herein designated ork those certain
highways, public streets and alleys cir portions thereof,
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TRIN CITY OF LUBBOCK,.,
THAT improving the hereinafter described highways, streets and alleys, or portions thereof
located within the City of Lubbock by excavating, grading and paving the surface theref. and the
construction of drainage facilities therein as well as the necessary curbs and gutters which
are now in place be and are hereby found to be a necessl1,ty; and,
THAT the cost of naking such improveuments be partly paid for 'by the City of Lubbock and
partly Iby the hereinafter described. property albutting upon the highway, street or streets, and
a llnys or portions thereof which are hereby ordered to be improved, and the owners of such
property as a personal liability, after, public hearing all in accordance with and as required
by Article 1105b, of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas amended by ChapK:.er 281 Acts of the
52nd Legislature and amendments thereto.
The portions of streets and allays upon whicn improvements are proposed aro be colastructed
and the abutting property proposed to be assessed for said improvememtsdesignated and defined
by 4jnl,t and Sub-Unit are as ffallows-.
UNIT AND
SUB-UNIT NO., STREXIN FROM TO
2220-12 62nd Street Toledo Avenue Salem Avenue
2220-13 62nd Street Utica Avenue T"oledo Avenue
2220-14 63rd Street Toledo Avenue Sakem Avenue
2220-15 63rd Street Utica Avenue Toledo Avenue
2220-16 64th Street Toledo Avenue Salem Avenue
2220-1.7 64th Street Utica Avenue Toledo Avenue
2220-18 Toledo Avenue 61st Street 62nd Street
2220-19 roledo Avenue 62nd Street 63rd Street
2220.20 Toledo Avemue 63rd Street 64th Street
2220-21 yorkAvenue 57th Street 58th Street
2220-22 Avenue "D" 48th Street 50th Street
2220-23 24th street Albany Avenue 5140.8 feet East
of Albany Avenue
2220--24 2nd Place Indiana Avenue Hartford akvenue
n-f1AT the City Secretary be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare a certified
copy of this resolutiora and to record or cause same to be recorded in the Deed of Trust Records
of Lubbock Counnty, Texas..
This res6lution shall take effect and be in force from and after 1.tn passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 9TR DAY OF SEPT NBER, 1911.
......... ............................... ..............................
.................... .............................. =—,mossm:............
............................................................... ------------
...........
r3lill
SEP �, 1971
.............?'m
................... ....................
Resolution G. W. 0. 1.0,733 A continued
J. H G W
ATTEST
71-30-371-941 Motion was made by Councilmen Turner, seconded by Councilman Rigsby, motion carried, Mayor Granberry
(218) and Councilman Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea,none voting Nay, that the follow-
ing Resolution be passed.
G.W.O. 10,733 A
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING CSTIKkTR OF THE COST OF IMPROVEMENT OF AMOUNTS TO BE ASSESSED
FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE NATURE OF GRADING, LAYING CURB AND rUTTER AND PAVING PORTIONS OFCERTAIN
STREETS, HIGHWAYS, AVENUES, AND/OR ALLEYS IN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS AND CERTAIN STREETS AND
HIGHWAYS, AVENUES AND/OR ALLEYS ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID CITY, SAID IMPROVEMENTS BEING DESIGNATED
AS G.W.O. NO. 10,733, FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING TO THE OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY.
RAILWAYS, OR RAILWAY COMPANIES USING, OCCUPYING OR CROSSINC ANY PORTION OF STREETS AND/ OR ALLEYS
AND OTHER PERSONS .INTERESTED IN SAID PROPERTY AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO PUBLISH NOTICE
ON BEHALF OF TILE GOVERIrING BODY OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS..
WFERE?AS, the governing Body of the City of Lubbock ties heretofore ordered that portions 0:1
streets, highways, avenues and/or alleys be imT,.Prwved by grading, installing concrete curb and gutter
reinfor,ced concrete five (5) inch thich alley pavement, reinforced concrete railroad crossings and
street pavement with caliche base and four (4) course asphalt surface together with incidentals
and appurtenances,
WTI-ERW, the Governing Body of the City of Lubbock has caused the City Engineer to prepare and
file estimates of the cost of such :improvements and estimates of the amounts per front foot to
be assessed agAinst abutting propertyand the owners therof, and railways or RailA ay Companies
using, occupying or crossing any portion of streets and/or alleys, and such estimates have been
prepared and examined;
THFRFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK TEXAS:
I.
Such estimates be and they are hereby adopted and approved.
II.
NOTICE TO THE OWMRS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE HERZINBELOW )MENTIONED PORTIONS OF STREETS,
HIGHWAYS, AVENUES AND/OR ALLEYS, RAILWAYS AND/OR RAILWAY COMPANIES USING, OCCUPYING OR CROSSING
ANY PORTION OF STREETS AND/OR ALLEYS AND TO ALL OTHERS AFFECTED*
The Governing Body of the City of Lubbock has heretofore ordered that the following portions
of streets, highways, avenues and/or alleys in and along the boundary of the said City of Lubbock,
Texas, be improved by raising, grading add filling and installing concrete curbs and gutters,
reinforced concrete five(S) inch thich alley pavement, reinforced concrete railroad crossings
and street pavement with caliche base, four (4) course asphalt surface, storm sewers and drains
where necessary on streets, highways, avenues and/or alleys, designated below:
It is hereby found and determined that the cost of the improvements on such portions of said
streets, avenues, highways, and/or alleys with the amount oramounts per front foot proposed to be
assessed for such improvements against the abutting property, the owners thereof, an the portions
of said streets, avenues, highways and/or alleys and railways and/or railway companies, using,
occupying or crossing any portion of said streets, avenues, highways and/or alleys as follows,
to-wit:
The following thirty-six (36) foot width streets are known and designated as Unit Number 2220
Sub-Unit 12-24 (inclusive), the total estimated cost of the improvements is $78,399.72; the
estimated amount; per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and the owners thereof
for curb and gutter is $2.10; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abut-
ting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of property owner curb and gutter
is $2.33 for front abutting and $3.50 for side abutting property.
The estimated cost of each Sub-Unit is as follows:
Sub-Unit 12, 62nd Street, from Toledo Avenue to Salem Avenue, the estimated cost of Sub-Unit 12 of
Unit 2220 is $8,369.69.
Sub-Unit 13, 62nd Street from Utica Avenue to Toledo Avenue, the estimated cost of Sub-Unit 13 of
Unit 2220 is $8,008.77.
Sub-Unit 14, 63rd Street from Toledo Avenue to Salem Avenue, the estimated cost of Sub-Unit 14 of
Unit 2220 is $8,369.69.
Sub-Unit 15, 63rd Street from Utica Avenue to Toledo Avenue, the estimated cost of Sub-Unit 15 of
Unit 2220 is $7,930.29.
Sub-Unit 16, 64th Street from Toledo Avenue to Salem Avenue, the estimated cost of Sub-Unit 16 of
Sub-Unit 17, 64th Street from Utica Avenue to Toledo Avenue, the estimated cost of Sub Unit 17 of
Unit 2220 is $8,046.32.
Sub--Unit 18, Toledo Avenue from 619t street to 62nd Street, the estimated cost of 5ub--U11A.L 18 of
Unit 2220 is $2,796,21.
Sub.-unit 19, Toledo Avenue from 62nd Street to 63rd Street the estimated cost of Sub...Unit 19 of
Unit 2220 is $2,744.03.
Sub-Unit 20, Toledo Avenue from 63rd Street to 64th Street, the estimated cost of Sub-Unit 20 of
Unit.-. 2270 is $2,744.013.
Sub-Unit 21:, York Avenue from 57th Street to 58th Street, the estimated cost of Sub-Unit 21 of
Unit 2220 is $2,742..34.
Sub-Unit 22, Avenue "D" from 48th, Street to 50th Street, the estimated cost of Sub Unit 22 of
Unit 2220 :in $7,010.45.
Sub-Unit 23,, 24rth Street :from Albany Avenue to 540.80 feet East of Albany Avenue, the estimated cost
of Sub-Unit 23 of Unit 2220 is $5,723.39.
Sub-Unit 24, 2nd Place from Indiana Avenue to Hartford Avenue, the estimated cost of Sub.-Unit 24 of
Unit 2220 is $5,544.82
An arrangement for the making andconstruction of such improvements with pavement of four course
asphalt surface treatment (Inverted Penetration Type) and a six (6) inch compacted caliche base in
streets, highways and avenues, alleys to be constructed with pavement of five (5) inch reinforced
concrete slab has been made and entered into by the City of Lubbock, Texas and rolls or statements
showing the proposed amounts to be assessed against the abutting property, the owners thereof and
the Railways and/or Railway Companies, using occupying or crossing any portion of said streets or
alleys , their roils, tracks, couble tracks, turnouts and switches and two (2) feet on each side
thereof for reinforced concrete street crossings and reinforced concrete alley slabs in said
streets or alleys have been filed with the City, such rolls or statements showing other matters and
things, and have been approved and the City Council of said City has fixed a time and place for
hearing to the owners of property abutting upon saidportions of streets, highways, avenues and/or
alleys and Railways or Railway Companies using., occupying or crossing any portion of said streets or
alleys, and to all others affected, at which hearing the amounts to,be assessed against the respect-
ive parcels of abutting land and the owners therof for improvemente in the units u�qn which the
particular parcels of Property abut, the amounts of benefits to the respeen.ve parcels of property
by cx,ans of the Improvements in the unit upon which the particular property abuts the regularity
of the proceedings with tolerance to such improvements, the apportionment of the cost of such
improvements, and other matters and things will. be determined and after such hearings assessments
will by ordinance be made and levied, and such hearing will be had and held by and before the City
COUnC:ij Of the City of. Lubbock, Texas in reguidn: Council Meeting Room in the City Hall, in the City
of Lubbock, Texas on the 28th day of October 1971, at 2:00 p.m. o'clock. The rolls or statements
showing the proposed amounts of such assessments are on file in the office of the City Secretary
and copies therof are in the office of the City Engineer of the City of Lubbock and open to inspect-
ion of any interested parties at any time, and of all said matters and things all such owners of
property, as well as any and others in anywise affected or interested, will take due notice.
By order of the City Council of the City of Lubbock, this she 9th day of September, 1971,
No notice other than that herin provided for shall be necessary and such notice shall be due
and sufficient notice to any and all persons., firms, corporations and other parties.
III.
That a hearing be given and held by and before the Governing Body of the City of Lubbock,
Texas, to all persons owning or claiming any property abutting any part or portion of said streets,
highways, avenues and/or alleys or any Railway or Railway Company using, occupying or crossing
any street, avenue or alley described in Section IT, of this Resolution, as well as all owning or
claiming any interest in any such property. Such hearing shall be given and held an the 28th day
of October, 1971, at; 2-00 p.m. o'clock on the second floor in the City Hall, City of Lubbock, Texas
and the City Secretary is hereby directed to give notice of the time and place of such hearing, and
of other matters and facts in accordance, with the terms and provisions of an Act passed at the first
called session of the 40th Legislature of. the State of Texas and known as Chapter 106 of the Acts
of said Legislature which has been adopted as an amendment to and made a part of the Charter of the
City of Lubbock, Texas, and as amended by Chapter 176 Acts of the 60th Regular Session of said
Legislature. Such notice shall be by advertisement inserted at least three times in a newspaper
published in the City of Lubbock, Texas; the first publication shall be made at least twenty-one
days before the said hearing; and, additional written notice of the hearing shall be given by de-
positing in the United States mail, at least fourteen (14) days before the date of the hearing,
written notice of such hearing, postage prepaid, in an envelope addressed to the owners of the
respective properties abutting such highway, highways or portion or portions hereof and any rail-
way or street railway using, occupying or crosEL ng any highway, portion or portions therof to be
improved, as the names of such owners are shown on the then current rendered tax rolls of the City
of Lubbock and at the addresses so shown, or if the names of such respective owners do not appear on
such rendered tax rolls, then addressed to such owners as their names are shown on the current on-
rendered rolls of the city at the addresses shown thereon. Said notice shall comply with and be
in accordance with the terms and provisions of this resolution and said Act as amended
PASSED AND APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS! VOTE OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF LUi3 K, TEXAS, THIS,
THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1971.
ATTEST: GRAD ERRY,001YOR
Lavenia Lowe, City Se. urer
z .........................................................................................I..................... .....................=::::::..........:............ ................
�9
, i Aga.
3 a.
SEP b isn
�rrrrr���.....- .....� .,..,,,. ... _.ha._......�rtan,�rrz.. r,.:...,.n ...-._. .:��vu., �.,,.,.:::: ,..,o�:...... .,. .wtti•�. r_ nr.ru.,.:ura„r, w.......'.z::wura,i,.a"...,,--.. ..- " ,w�-,r......... ....." ..r�;.�",�,a,�.m�....rr�ru.,4Eu--- .;
71-30-37`-942 Motion was made by Councilman Baker, seconded by Couau;cilmman Rigsby, notion carried" Mayor Granberry
(2.3) and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting `.Yea, none voting May., to a.uthor:n.mej
publication of "Notice to Bidders" on Avenue R Storm Sewer Project.
NOTICE TO BIDDERS
4
G.W.O. 10735
Sealed proposals addressed to the City Council of Lubbock., Texas will be received at the
office of the Purchasing Agent until 2000 p.m. October 19;, 1971„ for storm sewer construction con-
sisting of fuurni.shing and installing a sppraa:inrmaa:e'l.;y 8„151 :feet of 12.0" I.D. 1,005 :Feet of 84" I. D.M
1,6.30 feet of 72." I.D. 672 feet of 54" I. ID., 3,160 :feet: of 48"" I.D., 1,580 feet of 421' I� D.,
1,505 feet: of 36"" I. 1D., apprarvred Concrete Conduit., together with lead lines, inlet boxes and
other necessary appurtenances.
The City Cou mncl:l will consider bide on October 28, 1971, at the City Hall, subject to the
right to reject any or all bids and to waive formalities. Bide may not be uwa:ii.thdrawrn after they are
subimrl.u'.:ped Bidders are t:equ:ired to subwmat a rchashi.er"s or certified check or bald bond. in the
amount of 5% of the totalbid and the successful 'bidder shall provide bond in the full amount of
the contract price executed by a surety company authroized to do business is Texas.
Flans and specifications are on file in the office of the Q'l.ty Hxhgineer, 'Lubbock, Texas.
CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS
/a! I".10 d Nesb,i,tt
Fl.rayd. Nesbitt
Purchasing Agent
City of. 'Lubbock, Texas
71-30..373....943 August .31, 1971
(25)
lira Sam Wahl, F.B%
Director of Public Works
City of Lubbock
P.C. Box 2000
Lubbock, Texas 7.9408
Re: Water, Distribution System Stwlies
Dear Sam,
Pursant to our conversations concerning engineering studies for the City of Lubbock water distri-
bution syuat.e"n, we offer for your consideration the following proposal for accomplishing the
studies as outlined below.
The ob..pective of the studies is tri develop a plan for orderly development of the west distribution
system. This includes, basically, all areas west of Indiana Avenue. The studies would ai.ncluade
preparation of :input. data :for cmxputer network analyses of the west distribution system for present
peak hour flaws and for anticipated 1.975 and 1.9EBO peak hour flows. The results would be presented
in ,graphic form showing flaws and head losses for each of the three conditions being !studies. A
writtez'a report discussing tl.te resul.t.s would also be pvepared.
Dur studies would not include projections of growth or water demands in the areas under study.
However, we would work closely wih your staff in preparing this information.
We would conduct the studies as described for a 'lumps sum of $.3,000. As an alternative, reimburse-
ment could be on the basis of. salary costs times a factor of 2.2.5 pluus direct reimbarsable expenses
tunes a factor of 1.1,5 with a maximum limit of $3,6000.
Sincerely,
„ P?RIILL, SMITH & COOPER., INC,
m/s1 ClhcsLer_A. Green
Chester kh, Greeza,.....1?„Es
CAG/lm
Motion was made by Councilman Rigsby, seconded by Councilman Baker, motion carried, Mayor Gran-
berry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting 'Y'ea, none -voting Na;r, to
accept the proposal. of Pa.r"khill, xrmdth and Cooper, Inc. as set out in the above letter.
otion
71-n(26)73-94/.c Gravbe'r.rywas
andmade
CouncillmenCouncilman
R Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Bakseconded
.�r and Councilman
Tuaner voting
euunonen voting
carried:, ,Mayor
ng Yea, none voting Clay, to
pass Ordinance No., 6169 on first reading,
AN APkSa,.OPRIATION ORDINANCE ORDINANCE No. 6169
WHEREAS, the. City Coucnci.l of the City of Lubbock finds it is necessary to appropriate certain
specific fonds out of bond funds :for an approved, project;
NOW THEREFORE.,
There is hereby appropriated out of the following described bond fuW1, Lo-wit: Water
Capital Project Fund
The sum $84,995,00
For the following purposeg.
Purchase two (2) high service pumps for water distrihution, #8 Pump
Station,, 66th Street aT.%d Guava Avenue.
71 30-374-945 Motion was made bV CouncilwAn Turner, seconded by Councilman R.igsby, motion carried, Mayor. Gran
(27) berry and Councilmen :Rigsby, Hollingsworth,, Baker and Turner Voting Yea, none voting Nay to
authorize fin0l paymenL to United States Steel Corporation in the amount of $720.82 for con-
SLruction of Steel Fence, 26th Street Over pass, Contract was for $6,496,00, final cost
was $7.208.24.,
August 30, 1971
Certificate of Completion
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Lubbock, Texas
Gentlemen:
On September 10, 1971, 1 inspected the Steel Fence at 26th Street Overpass constructed by
United States Steel Corporation under contract dated July 16, 1971, and found said improvements
to have been completed in accordance with the plan6 and specifications.
Therefore, I recommend that you accept said improvements and authorize final payment to the
contracLor.,
Very truly your,
/m/ Wilfotd 11. Watson
Y�.Ij....... .... .
or U. Watson
City Engineer
See: Page 374-A for Set in on Contractors Affidavit for Closing Job.
71 30-374-946 Motion was made by Councilman Rigsby, seconded by Councilman Hollingsworth, motion carried,
(28) Mayor Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker and Turner voting Yea, none voting
Nay, to pass Ordinance No. 6170 as an emergency measure.
AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO® 6170
WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Lubbock finds it is necessary to appropriate cer-
tain specific funds out of bond funds for an approved project, and this ordinance deals with the
daily operation of City departments in'the public interest which creates an emergency;
NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK,
There is hereby appropriated out of the following described bond fund, Lo-wit: Street
Improvement
The sum $712.24
For the following purpose
Change Order #1 for additional work on G.W.0, 10742, Steel Fence for the 26th Street
Overpass.
WHEREAS, an emergency exists as shown in the preamble to this ordinance, the enactment
of this ordinance is declared to be an emergency measure thereby creating a public necessity
that the rule requiring proposed ordinances to be presented at two (2) separate council meetings
be dispensed with; and this ordinance shall beeeffective from the date of its passage.
71-30-374-947 Motion was made by Councilman Hollingsworth, seconded by Councilman Baker, motion carried,
(33) Mayor Granberry and Councilmen Rigsby, Hollingsworth, Baker, and Turner voting Rep, none voting
Nay, to authorize the City of Lubbock to act as sponsor 6or the second year of a Criminal
Justice Council grant for "Project New Directions" to be execi;ted by the 7WCA,
71-30-374-948 Mr. NephLalie DeLeon appeared before the City Council and requested that the City give an
(7) annuity to the family of Ernesto Nerios and that the City pay the burial expenses. Mr. DeLeon
also asked that the City Council coke a further investigation as to police. Mayor Granberry
and City Attorney Fred 0. SenLer, Jr. advised Mr. DeLeon that the State Law does not permit
the paying of annuity and the paying of burial expenses. Also that any additional information
or question that might have to do with police action be reported to the District Attorney.
Mr. Carlor Coreno, Jr., Mr. Billy Aguerro and Mr. Evandro Guzman also appeared before the City
Council and questioned action of the Police Department, Mayor Granberry and City Attorney Fred
0. Seater, Jr. also referred them to the District Attorney if there was additional information
that should be presented or investigated.
- ---------------
.......... .............= ........... -------------------- ............ .......--------- ...... ...............
.......... ....
...........
=...........
........................ ..................... .............................................................................. -=�Fl`.................-,...................
.............. ...........--------- ................
P 9 19'71
71-30-375-949 The City Council considered revision of "Rules and Regu3ations}P of said Council, and the City
(31) Attorney spas instructed to prepare said revisions for consideration for the ty, Council in their
next regular meeting.
BF
kqO FURTHER BUSINESS COMING UP FOR CONSIDERATION, T CI COUNCIL NED :FROM REQ .
WETING, SE'PTMF F„E 9, 1971
ATTEST.,
Laveni'a Lowe, CW—Secretary-Treasurer
READ AND APPROVED THIS THE 9TH MY OF SEPTEMBER, 7971,
Nd Y r N94YCPlt
ATTEST: 41
Lavenia Lowe, City Secretary-Treasurer
ISI
I