Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - Regular - 7/27/1950REGULAR MEETING Lubbock, Texas July 27, 1950 The City Commission of the City of Lubbock, Texas, met at 1:30 P.M. in regular session at the regular meeting place in the City Hall, the .fol- lowing members -thereof beinS present, to -wit: Mayor Clarence K. Whiteside, Commissioners Harry MORris, E.K. Hufstedler, L. E. Davis, Lucian Thomas, City Attorney Vaughn E. Wilson, City Secretary Lavenia Lowe. Absent: City Manager Steve Matthews. The Minutes of Regular meeting of July 13, 1950, were read, and upon motion by Commissioner HUFstedler, seconded by Commissioner Morris, carried unani- mously, they were approved. Motion by Conunissioner HUFstedler, seconded by Commissioner Davis, carried unanimously, Ordinance No. 1004 passed second and final reading. ORDINANCE NO. 1004 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION TWENTY-THREE (23) OF THE PARKING METER ORDINANCE NO. 564 SO AS.TO INCLUDE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE, AND PROVIDING A NEW PARKING METER ZONE EMBRACING THE EAST SIDE OF.TSXAS AVENUE, FROM FIFTEENTH (15TH) STREET TO SIXTEENTH (16TH) STREET AS A n1p (2) HOUR PARKING -ZONE., AND PROVIDING FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TWO (2) HOUR I•MTERS, REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES RELATING TO PARKING ON THAT PART OF THS STREETS HEREIN DESIGNATED AND CONFLICTING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINAL►;CE NO. 564, PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION I-IOT TO EXCEED ONE HUNDRED ($100.00) DOLLARS, AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO PUBLISH THE CAPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE, TOGETHER WITH THE PENALTY CLAUSE, THEREFORE; Motion by Commissioner Morris, seconded by Commissioner Davis, carried unanimously, Ordinance No. 1005 passed second and final reading. ORDINANCE NO. 1005 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHARGES FOR THREE -FOURTH (3/411) INCH AND ONE (111) INCH WATER TAPS, REPEALING ALL TkCO)jSISTENT ORDINANCES AND ORDERS. Motion by Commissioner Morris, seconded by Commissioner Davis, that Ordinance No. 1006 be passed on second and final reading. This motion carried by the following vote: Mayor Whiteside, Corivaissioners Toiorris, Davis, and Thomas voting AYE. Commissioner E. K. Hufstedler voting NO. ORDINANCE NO. 1006 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE TEXAS MTJNICIPAL, RE- TIREMENT SYSTEM BY THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR AND ELECTING TO HAVE ALL OF THE EMPLOYEES OF ALL DEPARTMENTS OF THE CITY GOVERNMENT, EXCEPT FOR_FIRF DEPARTMENT PARTICIPATE IN SUCH SYSTEM; AND ACCEPTING ALL OF THE OBLIGATIONS AND BENAFITS OF SUCH SYSTEM. Motion by Commissioner MORris, seconded by Commissioner Davis, carried unanimously, Ordinance No. 1007 passed second and final reading. ORDINANCE NO.. 1007 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A LOADING ZONE ON THE VEST SIDE, OF AVENUE K, ADJACENT TO THE I -EST CURB AND BEGINNING ON THE WEST CURB AT A.POINT WHERE THE SAID CURB INTERSECTS WITH THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF BROADWAY STREET AND EX- TENDING -NORTH FROM SAID POINT TO THE EAST -WEST ALLEY BET41EEN MliIN' AND BROAD- 1AY -STREETS AT ITS POINT OF INTERSLCTIOId '�1ITH AVENUE K; .PROVIDING FOR PAINTING AND MARKING THE CURB ALONG SAID ZONE; PROVIDING A PENALTY UPON CONVICTION FOR PARKING IN SAID AREA FOR A PURPOSE OTHER THAN LOADING AND UNLQADING AND FOR PARKING THE VEHICLE A GREATER DISTA?qCE FRO.rd CURB THAN EIGHTEEN (1$1t) INCHES BETWiEN RIGHT-HAND WHEELS AND RIGHT-HAND CURB; DIRECTING AND EMPOI ERING THE CITY SECRETARY TO CAUSE PUBLICATION OF THE DESCRIPTIVE CAPTION OF THIS ORDI- NANCE TOGETHER WITH THE PENALTIES AS SET HEREIN; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFEC- TIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE AFTER ITS PASSAGE. If. Motion by Commissioner Hufstedler, seconder: by Commissioner Morris, carried unanimously, Ordinance No. 1008 passed second and final reading. ORDINANCE NO. 1008 AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING ONE-WAY ALLEYS FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IN ALL BLOCKS IN THE BUSINESS ARE:' BOU;,,DED BY AVENUE 'IF" ON THE EAST; AVENUE T'M" ON THE WEST; LOTH STREET ON THE NORTH AND 13TH STREET ON THE SOUTH; AND THE AREA BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY AVENUE "G'T ON THE WEST BY ATENUE TTJT1. ON THE . NORTH BY 9TH STREET AND ON THE SOUTH BY LOTH STREET; PRESCRIBING THE SIZE AND WORDING OF SIGNS DESIGNATING ENTRANCE AND EXITS OF ONE-WAY ALLEYS; THE HEIGHT OF SIGNS FROM ALLEY SURFACE AND PROVIDING PENALTIES NOT EXCEEDING. $200.00 FINE FOR OPERATING VEHICLES IN SAID DESIGNATED ALLEYS IN VIOLATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE, AND DIRECTING CITY•SECRETARY TO PUBLISH THE DESCRIPTIVE CAPTION OF `PHIS ORDINANCE WITH PE=MALTY CLAUSES. Motion by Commissioner Davis, seconded by Commissioner Morris, carried unanimously, Ordinance No. 1009 passed second and final reading. ORDINANCE NO. 1009 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 661 AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: (1) CHANGE THE EAST 3.68 ACRES OF TRACT 2, BLOCK 10, ROLES ACRES FROM AN TTATT ZIJ _`VE DIS- TRICT TO A "JTT ZONE DISTRICT; (5) CHANGE LOTS 12, 1L,2 16, BLOCK 3, USLEA- MAN ADDITION FROM AN . "ET1 ZONE TO A "JTT ZONE DISTRICT, (6 ) CHANGE ALL OF LOTS 11 21-31 5, 45 6, 7, 81 9, 10, 11, 13 AND 157 BLOCK 32 USLEAMAN ADDITION, FROM AN "Ell ZONE DISTRICT TO A "J" ZONE DISTRICT. Motion by Commissioner Morris, seconded by Commissioner Thomas, carried unanimously, Ordinance No. 1010 passed second and final reading. ORDINANCE NO. 1010 AN ORDIN+':I`ICE AP•ZENDING ZONING ORDINANCE Im. 661 AND �'HE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LUP;:OCK SO :L_ S TO CHAIIGE THE WEST 305 FELT OF BLOCK SIX- TEEN (16), HAPPY HODS ADDITION, FROM AAj TTATT DISTRICT TO A TTGTT DISTRICT. This being the date set for heai,in oa Zone Change as set out in Mize follo��Tinb Notice: LEGAL NOTID E C1F PROPOSED AMENDIIENTS TO ZONING ORDINANCE 'OF THE CITY OF LUBBOT ,TEXAS NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended to the City Commis -ion that Zoning ORdinance No. 661 be aindnded so that: 1. ZONII•IG CAS! #106 - Change West 1001 of Lot 1 and all of Lots 2, _3j 4, 5, , 7, B, 9, 10, Block 1, Burleson & Osborne Heights Addition from an "All zone district to a 1TG11 zone district. 2. ZONING CASE -108 - Change all of Block 39, Brown Subdivision from an TIATI zone district to a. "GTT zone district. 3. ZONING CASE J144 - Chan,_;e Lots 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Block 79, Original Town From TIE" zone district to an-"FT1 zone district. 4. 'ZONING CASE 1163 - Change Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, Block 107, Overton Addition from a T1BTT zone district to an "Ell zone district. 5. ZONING CASE 165 - Change Lots 11, 12 in Block 74, 1heelockts Second Addition from an "All zone district t6 a "G1T zone district. -�A --- 6. ZONING CASE #167 - Change Lot 13 and the East 251 of 14, Broad- way Heights Addition from an "All zone district to a "G11 zone district. 1.7. ZONIIdG CASE '-168 - Change a triangularly shaped tract being 1001 x 1301 x lbO! 1001 side on College Avenue) lying at the Southeast corner of the intersection of NW Avenue Q and Co11eL3 avenue and being in Block 108 of Markowitz Subdivision of Roberts & EcWhorter Addition from an "All zone district to an f1F" zone district. 8. ZONING CASE #174 - Chan,-e Lots 1 through 11 inclusive in Block 1 East Broadway School Addition from an "Alt zone district to a 1TG'T- 'Lone District! W 9. ZONING CASE - Change all of Blocks 102 and 108 of the IZarkowitz Subdivision of Roberts and McWhorter Addition, Block 86, lying South and Vilest of Clovis Road from temporary ttAtt zone district to ttFtt district. Change all of Blocks 102 and 108 of the Markowitz Subdivision of Roberts and McWhorter, Block 86, lying between. the Panhandle and Santa Fe R.O.W. arts Clovis Road from a temporary "All district to a 1tJtt district. The City Commission will hold a public hearing on July 27, 1950, at 2:00 o'clock P. M., in the City Commission room on the second floor of tl:e City Hall in Lubbock, to consider the reconlnen ons of the Zonirz and Plan.-ing Commission to determine the advisability of adopting its proposAl, and at which time and place all interested persons will be given an oppor- tunity to protest against the proposed amendment or -rec0in-_ie-k-da.t :oils in support thereof. AFte-r said hearing the City CommissI.on will determine whether the Zoning Ordinance will be amended in accordance with such recommendation. Clarence K. Whiteside Mayor of the City of Luber, Texas � ATT.�:ST : Lavenia Lowe City Secretary (SEAL) Mr. Morris Davis, owner of all of Blocks 81 and 82, North of and Denver Railway tracks, appeared to protest ciian,,-e of zone ZOning.Case No. 165, also the following petition was received this change in zone. ZONING CASE I10 . 165 Mayor and City Commission Lubbock-.., Texas the Fort TVorth as set out in protesting Petition to protest Zoning Case # 165 The undersigne-rs property oim. ers in 2800 block K1i1g Avenue, being on the same side :.nd opposite side of street to Lots .11 and. 12, Block 71�, Wheelock Second bit Addition, y of Lubbock. Protest the changing of these lots from "All to ttGtt zone. Signed, Address Manuel Foster 2819 King Avenue Mareta Brigs 2817 King Avaue -Jesse Johnson 2$10' King Avenue Mimic, Walker 2802 King Avenue Mary Langs 2815 King Avaue No protest beins received on any of the other zone changes as set out in the above Notice, motion was made by Com.issioner Hufstedler, seconded by Commissioner Thomas, carried unanimously that the Hearin.- be closed, ex- cept that the Hearing be continued on ZAe Case #165. Motion by Commissioner Hufstedler, seconded by Coiamissionor Thomas, carried unanimously, ORdinance No. 1011 passed first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 1011 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 661 AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO P.IAKE THE FOLLOWINGS 9 CHANGES: 1 S:BLQCK HA NGE WEST 1001 OF LOT 1 AND ALL OF LOTS 21 31 43 51 61 71 , , > > BURLE - SON & OSBORNE HEIGHTS ADDITIONI, FROM AN "All ZDNE DISTRICT TO A "G11 ZONE DIS- TRICT; (2) CHANGE ALL OF BLOCK 392 BROWN SUBDIVISION FROM AN "Att ZONE DISTRICT TO A ttGtt ZONE DISTRICT; (3) CHAI,IGE LOTS 11 12, 13, 14 15 • 16 BLOCK 7.9 ORIGINAL TOWN, FROM AN ??Ell ZONE DISTRICT Tb AN 11F1f ZONI DfSTRfCT; (4) �HANGE $ BLOCK 107 OVE-.TON ADDITION, FROM A t1B1f ZONE DISTRICT TO AN LOTS 5, 6, 7, � �, "Ell ZONE DISTRICT; (6) CHANGE LOT 13 AND THE EAST 25 FEET OF 14, BROADWAY HEIGHTS ADDITION, FROM AN "All ZONE DISTRICT TO A 11Gtt ZONE DISTRICT; (7) CHANGE A TRZINGULARLY SHAPED TRACT BEING 1001 X 1301 X 1601 (1001 SIDE ON COLLEGE AVENUE) LYING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF N"-'W AVENUE Q AND COLLEGE AVENUE, AND BEING IN BLOCK 108 OF MARKOWITZ SUBDIVISION OF ROBERTS AND MCWHORTER ADDITION, FROM AN "A" ZONE DISTRICT TO AN "F" ZONE DISTRICT; (8) CHANGE LOTS 1 THROUGH 11, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 1)-.EAST BROAD - WAY SCHOOL ADDITION, FROM AN "A" ZONE DISTRICT TO A 11G" ZONE DISTRICT; (9) CHANGE ALL OF BLOCKS 102 AND 108 OF THE MARKOWITZ SUBDIVISION OF ROBERTS AND MCWHORTER ADDITION, BLOCK 86, LYING SOUTH AND WEST OF CLOVIS RAOD FROM TEMPORARY "A" ZONE'DISTRICT TO AN "F" DISTRICT, CHANGE ALL OF BLOCKS 102 AND 10$2 OF THE 11ARKOWITZ SUBDIVISION OF ROBERTS AND DCWHORTER ADDITION, BLOCK 86, LYING BETWEEN THE PANHANDLE AND SANTA FE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND CLOVIS RQAD, FROM A TEMPORARY "A" ZONE DISTRICT TO A "J" ZONE DISTRICT. Motion by Commissioner Morris seconded by Commissioner Davis, carried unanimously, Ordinance No. l012 was passed on first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 1012 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER TWO (2), SECTION 203, OF ORDINANCE NO. 5$7' BEING THE BUILDING CODE OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK; SAID SECTION RELATING TO FEES TO BE CHARGED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR AND INCREASING CHARGES FOR NEW BUILDINGS AND ADDITIOIIS ON ALL TYPES OF BUILDINGS, PER SQUARE FOOT OF FLOOR SPACE, TO $0.005 AND OPEN SHEDS, COTTON WAREHOUSES, LOADING TRUCKS AND PLATFORMS, TO W-003 PER SQUARE FOOT, AND REPEALING ALL PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 648. Mr. W. C. Reynolds appeared before the City Commission, and after discussion was awarded contract for placing bus benches in the City. The Mayor being authorized to enter into contract with Mr. Reynolds and his partner, Mr. Blake. 100 benches to be placed within the next ninety day period. Details of the agreement to be shown in the Contract. There was discussion of purchase of equipment included for purchase in the 1950-51 Budget, and it was unanimously agreed to authorize purchase of this equipment as needed. There was discussion of purchase of water well sites or water rights on 240 Acres of land in the N2 of Section 5, Block JS, Lubbock County at $100.00 per acre for water rights or $15,000 for four water well sites, but action was deferred. Messrs. Fred Kelly, A. C. McGee and 0. E. Lanham appeared before the City Commission requesting that 30th Street from Avenue L to Avenue M, be paved, stating that one property owner in this block had refused to sign for paving. After discussion, it was unanimously agreed that the City Commission do everything possible to get the property owner, Mr. Jenkins, to sign for the paving in order that the street may be paved. Motion by Commissioner Hufstedler, seconded by Commissioner Morris, carried unanimously, the following Resolution was passed: RESOLUTION �- RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING ESTIMATE OF THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS OF AMOUNTS TO BE ASSESSED FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE NATURE OF GRADILAYING CURB AND GUTTER AND PAVING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN STREETS, AVENUES AND/AND/OR ALLEYS IN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, SAID IMPROVEMENTS BEING DESIGNATED AS GM 57 FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING TO THE 01111ERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY, ANDS rr�(f OTHER PERSONS INTERESTED IN SAID PROPERTY AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO PUBLISH NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE GOWERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS: WHEREAS, the Governing Body of the City of Lubbock has heretofore ordered that portions of the streets, avenues and alleys be improved by grading, in- stalling concrete curb.and gutter and paving with caliche base and quadruple asphalt surface together with incidentals and appurtenances, and arrangements therefore have been made and entered into by the City of Lubbock, Texas, Con- tractor, and, WHEREAS, the Governing Body of the City of Lubbock, has caused the Clty Engineer to prepare and file estimates of the cost of improvements and esti- mates of the amounts per front foot proposed to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof, and such estimates have been prepared and examined; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COPI ISSION OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS: 1. Such estimates be and they are hereby adopted and approved. NOTICE T& THE 0111iERS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE HEREINBELOW MENTIONED PORTIONS OF STREETS, AVENUES AND OR ALLEYS, AND TO ALL OTHERS AFFECTED: The governing body of the City of Lubbock has heretofore ordered that the following portions of streets, avenues and/or alleys in said City of Lubbock, Texas be improved by raising grading -and filling and paving and by installing concrete curbs and gutterp and storm sewers and drains where necessary on streets and allevs designated below: It is hereby found and determined that the cost of improvements on such portions of said streets, avenues and alleys with the amount or amounts per front foot proposed to be assessed for such improvements against' the abutting property and the owners thei,eof, on the portions of said streets, avenues and alleys are as follows, to -wit: Cornell Street from its intersection with the East Property Line of Gary Avenue to its intersection with the'East Property Line of Elgin Avenue, known and designated as Unit Number 920-A, the estimated cost of improvements is �p6735.30-; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abut- ting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is �2.94 for front abutting property and $1.96 for side abutting property. Boston Avenue from its intersection -'with the North Property Line of Dartmouth Strect to its intersection with the South Property LineofDuke Street, kriot,m and designated as -Unit Number 96$, the estimated cost of improvements is $1949.34; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed a:='ainst the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per -froth foot to be assessed against the abutting property gnd owners thereof for improvements exclu- sive o2 curb is $3.24 for Front abutting prop, rty and �2..16 for side abutting property. Dartmouth Street from its intersection with tie West PROperty LINe of Canton Avenue to its intersection with the East Property Line of Boston Avenue, known and designated as Unit Number 980, the estimated cost of improvements is y$5305.40; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and oWriers thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements ex- clusive of curb is $2.97 for front abutting property and $1.98 for side abutting property. Duke Street from its intersection with the West Property Line of Canton Avenue to its intersection with the East Property Line of Boston Avenue, know�n and desits I ,,nated as Unit Number 979 the estimated cost of�iinrovemenabutting53property the estimated amount per fron�,f oot to be assessed against rb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be and owners thereof for cu assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for impro vements ex- clusive of curb is �2.97, for front abutting property and $1.9� for side abutting property. Emory Street from its intersection with the West Property Llne of Detroit Avenue to its intersection with the East Property Line of Burleson & Osborn Addition, known and designated as Unit Number 1006, the estimated cost of improvements is $11,674.50; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abut- ting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improve- ments exclusive of curb is �$2..75 for front abutting property and 41.83 for side abutting property. The East Side of Avenue H from its intersection with the South Property Line of 30th STreet to its intersection with the South Property Line of 29th Street, known and designated as -Unit Number 1036, the estimated cost of improvements is 1,340.37; the estimated amount per front foot to betheassessed estimatgdinst amountthe p but- ting property and owners thereof - for curb isp0.55; front foot to be assessed against the abuttingand propertytande�2.�4r improvements exclusive of curb �3 -for side abutting property. Property Line of 31st Louisville Avenue Erect ion withrthetSouthion iPropertyth the oLinerth of30th Street, known Street to its inters the estimated cost of improvements is and designated as Unit Number 10 per the estimated amount 1,93 2.$5• the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the 55; abutting property and owners thereof for curb is 'ro ert and owners thereof per front foot to be assessed curbnis 2st e79bfor ifront abutting property and for improvements exclusi property- $1.86 for side abutting pro P of Avenue t?r known and desig- its intersection with the East Property Line of Avenue T1T 33rd Street from p Line 79• to its intersection with the West Pro edc against the abutting property Number 103�, the estimated cost of improvement's is. 4,442� to be nated as Unit Num per front foot to be assessed per front foot the estimated amount 0.55; the estimated amount and owners thereof foabuttbng property and owners thereof for improvements side nts ex abutting assessed again. the a ro erty and A. $7 clusive of curb is $2•80 for front abutting p property. Bates Street from its intersection with the West Property Line of Indiana Avenue to its intersection with the East Property Line of Gary Avenue, known and designated as Unit Number 1040, the estimated cnot of improvements is $8,,782.45; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is 0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property -and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $2.91 for front abutting property and $1.94 for side abutting property. Louisville Avenue from its intersection with the South Property Line of 31st Street to its intersection with the North Property Line of 32nd Street, known and designated as Unit Number 1041, the estimated cost of improvements is $1,932.85; the estimated amount Per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0,55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed a-,,inst the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $2.79 for front abutting_; property and $1.86 for side abutting property. Louisville Avenue from its intersection with the North Property Line of 33rd Street to its intersection with the South Property Line of 32nd Street,. known and designated as Unit Number 1042, the estimated cost of improvements is $1,932.8�; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; t:,e estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $2.79 for front abutting property and $1.86 for side abutting property. Louisville Avenue from its intersection with the North Pavia Line of 34th Street, to its intersection with the South PROperty Line of 33rd Street, known and designated as Unit Number 1043, the estimated cost of improvements is $2,148.12; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $�3.53 for front abutting property and $2.36 for side abutting property. Fir avenue from its intersection with the South Property Line of East 28th Street to its intersection with the North Gutter Line of East 22nd Street, known and designated as Unit Number 10452 the estimated cost of improvements is $15,453.95; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $2.97 for front abutting property and $1.98 for side abutting property. 23rd Street from its intersection with the East Property Line of Louisville Avenue to its intersection with the East Property Line of Knoxville Avenue, known and designated as Unit Number 1046, the estimated cost of improvements is $p4, 471.2D' the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55-; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $2.86 for front abutting property and $1.90 for side abutting property. Memphis Avenue from its intersection with the North Property Line of 27th Street to its intersection with the South Property Line of 26th Street, known and desig- nated as Unit Number 1047 the estimated cost of improvements is $�2;090.35; the estimated amount per cuLois foo55totbe ae estimatedssessed aamount per fainst the rontlf8otprtoebey and owners thereof for assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements ex- clusive of curb is3.01 for front abutting property and for side abuttinc property. Knoxville 25th Street from its inter withoth1th he West Property eWestPropertyLineof•Joliet Avenue, known Avenue to its intersection is and designated as Unit uamount0per frontthe sfoottto besassessedragainststhe abut- '$4,412.47, the estimated the estimated amount per ting property and owners thereof for curb is0.55' front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $$2.77 for front abutting property and $1.85 for side abutting property. Avenue T from its intersection with the North Property Line of 33rd Street to its intersection with the Sou�heestimated costof Property tLine f2nd improvementsknown $�2,075.94; designated as Unit Number 101�9, the estimated amount per front foot tOagainst amount per front1fooprtoebef and owners thereof for curb is $0.55, the estimated assessed a ;ainst the abutting fproperty abuttingowners propertythereof for $1.891forosiden ats ex- ndabutting clusive of curie is $2.84 for on property. 2nd StreRoad to ;::t from its intersection withtthLinesofGAvenueatter L�,eknownof land sdesignated its intersection with the West Proper y 21 .84• the as Unit Number 10pe the estimated eo best of assessedragainststhe abutting proprty estimated amount per front foot t the estimated amount per front foot and owners thereof for curb is 0.55;ro ert and owners thereof for improve to be assessed against the abutting p p Y ropert and $ .5 ments exclusive of curb is $�3.84 for front abutting p Y side abutting property. Avenue Q from its intersection with the North Gutter Line of Clovis Road to its intersection with the Panhandle and Santa Fe Railroad Right -of -Way, known and designated as Unit Number 1051, the estimated cost of improvements is $5,484.1�; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abut- ting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $2.96 for front abutting property and $1.97 for side abutting property. 41st Street from its intersection with the East Property Line of Boston Avenue to its intersection with the East Property Line of Akron Avenue, known and designated as Unit Number 1052, the estimated cost of improvements is $4,348.18; the estimate:' amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements ex- clusive of curb is $2.70 for front abutting property and $1.80 for side abutting property. 48th Street from its intersection with the West Property Line of Avenue S to its intersection with the West PAving Line of Avenue Q, known and designated as Unit Number 1053, the estimated cost of improvements is $4,136.41; the esti- mated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abut'�ing property and owners thereof for improvenents ex- clusive of curb is "2.92 for front abutting property and 91.95 for side abutting property. 39th Street from its intersection with the East Property Line of Akron Avenue to its intersection with the East Property Line of College Avenue, known and designated as Unit Number 1055, the estimated cost of improvements is $4,383.25; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the.abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improverents ex- clusive of curb is $2.75 for front abutting property and $1.$3 fbr side abutting property. Colgate Street from its intersection with the East Paving Line of College Avenue to its intersection with the East Property Line of Garrison Subdivision, known and designated as Unit Number 1056, the estimated cost of improvements is $6,358.92; the estimated amount per front foot.to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is W.55; the. estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property an4 owners thereof for improvements ex- clusive of curb is $2.67 for front abutting property and $1.78 for side abutting property. Indiana Avenue from its intersection with the North Property Line of Bates Street to its intersection with the South Property Line of Baylor Street, known and designated as Unit Number 1057, the estimated cost of improvements is $1,$61.25; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abut- ting property and owners thereof for.curb is $ 0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improve --cents exclusive of curb -is $2.64 for front abutting property and $1.76 for side abutting property. 36th Street from its intersection with the West Property Line of Elgin Avenue ,to its intersection with the West Property Line of Canton Avenue, known and designated as Ullit Number 105$, the estimated cost of improvements is $4,382.02; the estimated amount per front foot to be ass68sed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount; per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements ex- clusive of curb is $2.72 for•front•abutting .property and $1.82 for side abutting CD property. Knox ville Avenue from its intersection witj, the North Property Line of 29th Street to its intersection with the South -Property Line of 28t� Street, known nd designated as Unit Number 1060, the estimated cost of improvements is 2,157.26; the estimated amount per front foo to be assessed against the abut- ting property and owners thereof for curb is 0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the albuttin� property ,Ind owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $3.22 for front abutting property and $2.15 for side abutting property. 3rd Place from its intersection with the East Property Line of Avenue H to its intersection with the Vilest Property Line of Avenue G, known and designated as Unit Number 1061, the estimated cost of improvements is $1,784.69; the estimated amount per front foot, to be assessed against the abutting ro erty and owners thereof for curb is .�0.55; the estimated amount per front Not to be, assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is w2.63 for front abutting property and $1.75 for side abutting property; the esti.mUted amount to be assessed against the street area occupied by the railway roadbed, i.e., that area between the rails and two (2) f et on each side thereof, and the railway company granted such occupancy is 4$.70• Avenue B from its intersection with a line 30feet South of North Property Line of Broadway to its intersection with a line 12� feat North of Sout# Property Line of K.a.i.n Street, known and designated as Unit Number 10623 the estimated. cost of improvements is ';,'3,155.72; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $4.97 for front abutting property and $3•31 for side abutting property. 2nd Street from its intersection with the East Property Line of AV6nue Q to its intersection with the West PROPe-r•ty Line of Amarillo Road, known and designated as Unit Number 1063, the estimated cost of improvements is $$618.06; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners therebf for improvementu exclusive of curb is $2.80 for front abutting property and $1.87 for side abutting property. 46th Street from its intersection with the East Property Line of Avenue L, to its intersection with the West Paving Line of Avenue H, known and desig- nated as Unit Number 1064, the estimated cost of improvements is 3$,402.77; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $$0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $2.60 for front abutting property and 01.73 for side abutting property. 21st Street from its intersection with the West Property Line of Miami Avenue to its intersection with the West Property Line of Memphis Avenue, known aid designated as Unit Number 1065, the estimated cost of improvements is $$2,133.35; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $2.71 for froxit abutting property and $1.80 for side abutting property. Avenue J from its intersection with the South Property Line of 36th Street to its intersection with the South Paving Line of 34th Street, known and designated as UNit Number 1066, the estimated cost of improvements is $4,525.88; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof far curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $3.10 for front abutting pro- perty and $2.07 for side abutting property. Knoxville Avenue from its intersection with the korth Propert Line of 30th Street, to its intersection with the South PROperty Line of 2�th Street, known and designated as Unit NUmber 1067, the estimated cost of improvements is 42,157.26; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owr_e-rs thereof for improvemej.- is e)1clusi ve of curb is $3.22 for front abutting property and y 2.15 for side abutting property. 38th Street from its intersection with the East Property Line 'of :;kron Avenue to its intersection with the East Property Line of Col'_ege AvEinue, known and designated as Unit Number loo$, the estimated cost of improvements is $$4,36.25; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abuttin.-. property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated,amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improverre nts exclusive of curb .is �2 .75 for front abutting; property and 4.83 for side abutting property. 3rd Street from its intersection with the West Property Line of Avenue F to its intersection with the'East Property Line of Avenue H, known and desig- nated as Unit Number 1069 the estimated cost of improvements is $$tt0n4.07; the estimated amount per Front foot to be'assessed againstg pro- perty and owners thereof for curb is $$0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $�2•81 for front abutting property and $1.87 for side abutting property; the estimated amount thabear�aebetweenainst the street area occu ied by the railvaay roadbed, he railway company i.e., the rails and two (2� feet on each side thereof) and t granted such occupancy is $48 •7 2. 29th Street from its intersection with the West Gutter rALine of kAvenua nd des - its intersection with the West Property Line of TeXas mated as Unit T,Lnaber 1070, the estii,iated cost of improvements is 6,334•ncr 02; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed a�D d amounthe bue,rlfronnto- erty and owners ther._oz for curb is �0.55; the estimated P Kot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for ini- proverri�nts exclusive of curb is $2.75 for front abutting property and ;;?1.�4 for side abutting property; the estimated amount tobe asbetssesed weennthe7aisttrails street area occupied by the railway roadbed, i.thatarea e., ranted such and two (2) feet on each side thereof, and the railway company g occupancy is $35.32• of Memphis Avenue from its intersection thenNorth PropeTrtyhLinepof 20thLine Straet ) Street to its intersection faith the estimated cost of improvements known and designated as Unit Number 1071, is $2,170.46; the estimated amount per front foot�torbe theuss��estimatednamount abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; tt and owners thereof per front foot tsobe exclassessede of curbnis ; 3st e22bforlfrong nt abutting property and for improvements 2.15 for side abutting property. r--\ g 39th Street from its intersection with the West Property Line of Canton Avenue to its intersection with the West Property Line of Elgin Avenue, known and designated as Unit Number 10 7 2, the estimated cost of improve- ments is 4,349.18; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is 40.55; the estimated amount per frbnt foot to be assessed against the abutting pro- perty and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $2.70 for front abutting property and 01.80 for side abutting property. Memphis :,venue from its intersection with the North Property Line of 21st Street to its intersection with the South Property Line of 20th Street, known and designated as Unit Number 1073, the estimated cost of improve- mLnts is $2,175.59; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting; property and ot,ners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting pro- perty and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is $3.22 for front abutting property and $2.15 for side abutting property. . Memphis Avenue from its intersection with the North P-ropert- Line of 22nd place to its intersection with the South'Property Line of 2 st Street, knowln and designated as Unit Number 1074 the estimated cost of improvements is $ 777.25; the estimated amount pe,.° front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for curb is $0.55; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed a-ainst the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb is 0.47 for front abutting pro- perty and y'2.32 for side abutting property. North -South Alley in Block 23, Original Town of the City of Lubbock, Texas from its intersection with the North Gutter Line -of 6th Street to its inter- sedtion with the•South Gutter Line of 5th Str�:et, known and des_ 'aced as Unit Number A-58, the estimated cost of improvements is $7,118.6 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements is $2.23; the amount to be assessed against the alley area occupied by the rail,. -ay roadbed,-i.e., that area between the rails and two (2) feet on each side thereof, and the railway company _:;ranted such occupancy is $5,829.70. East -:Jest Alley in Block 127, Original Town of the City of Lubbock, Texas from its intersection with the ;,Test Prope-•ty. Line of • avenue P to its intersection with the Jest Property Line of Avenue 0, known and designated as Unit Number A-121, the estimated cost of improvements is $985.94; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed.against the abutting pro- perty and owners thereof for improvene nts is $3.55;► North -South Alley in Block 137; Original Town of the City of Lubbock, Texas from its intersection 'zrith the North Gutter Line of 13th Street to its intersection with the South Property Line of Broadway, I;novrn ailcc�� estnated as Unit Number A-129, the estimated cost of improvements is qp2,b0.10, oot to be assessed a�-ainst t the esti::iated arn� unt per front fhe abutting pro- perty and owners thereof for improvements is 44.02• the amount to be assessed against the alley area occupied by the railizay roadbed •i.e., that area between the rails and two (2) feet on each side thereo, and the railway company granted the occupancy is �417.89. North -South Alley in Block 151, Original Town of the City of Lubbock, Texas from its intersection with the North Gutt. r Line of 14th' Street to its intersection with the South Property Line of 13th Street, known and desig- nated as Unit Nui.iber A-138, the estu:iated cost of improvements is $61076.28; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements is 02.15; the amount to'bethat assessed against the alley area occupied by the railway roadbed, i.e., area between the rails and two (2) feet on each side thereof, and the railway company granted such occupancy is 45,631.18. North -South Alley, Block 183, Or�,ginal Town of the City of Lubbock, Texas from its intersection with the North Gutter Line of 16th Street to its intersection with the South Gutter Line of 15th Street, known and designated as Unit Number A-162, the estimated cost of improvements is �7,226.17, the estimated amount per front _Coot to be ussesced against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements is $2.23; the amount to be assessed against the alley area occupied by the railway roadbed, _.e., that area between the rails and two (2) feet oin each side thereof, and the railway company granted such occupancy is $5,936.25. EAst-West Alley in Block 1, Overton Addition to the City of Lubbock, Texas and the Adjacent East Property Line from its intersection with the East Gutter Line of Avenue Q to its intersection :with the ;lest Property Line of Avenue P, known and designated as UNi.t Nuinber 'A-219, the esti:�iated cost of improvements is 9"5,207.19, the estimated amount der front foot to be assessed against abutting property and owners thereof is 43.91. E-st 6Jest :'alley, Block 99, Overton Addition to the City of Lubbock, Texas from its intersection with the East Property Line of -College Avenue to its intersection with the ;Jest Property Line of Avenue X, known and desi�--nated as Unit Iduiiiber :,,-248, the estimated cost of improvements is $5,039.9§; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof L'or improvements is 93.78. East One Half (1) of the East-West :alley in Block 120, Original Town of the City of Lubbocl_, Texas from its intersection with the tidest Gutter Line of Avenue F to its intersection with the .East Property Line of the North -South Alley, Block 120, Original Town -of the City of Lubbock, Texas, known and designated as Unit Number A—'300, the estimated cost of the improvements is $3,791.99, the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against the abutting property and owners thereof for improvements is $2.06; the amount to be assessed against the Alley area occupied by the railway roadbed, i.e., that area between tIL- rails and two (2) feet•on each side thereof, and the railway company granted such occupancy is $3,190.99. And ar=angement for the making and construction of such improvements with pavement of quadru le course asphalt surface treatment�(Inver ed Penetration Type) and,a Six (bj Inch compacted•caliche base in streets with pavement of Five (5) Inch concrete slab and, where applicable, with timber planking along and between rails -in alleys has been made and entered into by the City of Lubbock, Texas, and rolls or statements.showing the proposed am..unts to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof l-iavo been filed with the City, such rolls or statements showing other matters and things, and have been approved and the City Commission of said City has fixed a time and place for hearing to'the owners of property abutting upon said portions of streets, avenues and/or alleys, and to all others affected, at which hearing the amounts to be assessed against the respective parcels of abutting land and the ol;mers thereof for improvements in the units upon which the particular parcels of property abut; the amounts of benefits to the respective parcels of property by 111vans of the improvements in the unit upon which the particular property abuts, the regularity of the p-roceedin�s with reference to such im- provements, the apportionment of the cost of such improvements, and other matters and things will be determined, and after such hearings assessments will by ordinance be made and levied, and such hearing will be had and held by and before the City Commission of the -City of Lubbock, Texas, -in regular Commission meeting room in the City Hall, in the City of Lubbock, Texas on the day of , 1950, at P.E. o'clock. The rolls or statements showing the proposed amounts�o' such assessments are on filc in the office of the City Secretary and copied thereof are in the office of the City Engineer of the City of Lubbock and open to inspection of any interested parties -at any time, and of all said matters and things all such owners of property, as well as any and others in any wise .affected or inte- rested, will take due notice. By 'Order of the City Comi.-_ii L,dDn of the City of Lubbock, tia-s dLy of , 1950. No notice other than that hereinabove provided for shall be -necessary) but publication of such notice shall be due and sufficient notice to any and all persons, firms, corporations and other parties. ' III That a hey -ring -be given and held by and before the Governing Body of the City of Lubbock, Texas) to all persons owning or claiming any pproperty abutting any part or portion of said streets described in Section II, of this Resolution, as ,,ell as all'owfting or claiming any interest in any such property. Such hearing shall be given and held on the loth day of August, 1950, at 1:30 o'clock on the second floor of the City Hall, City of Lubbock, Texas, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to ;ivy notice of the time and' place of such hearing, and of other matters and facts in accordance tieith the terms and provisions of an Act passed at the first cal led session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas and known as Chapter 10b of the Acts of said Legislature which has been adopted'as an amendment to and madeall be by part of the Charter of the Cit;r of LUBbock, Texas. Such advertisement inserted'at least three times in a newspaper pull be made blished least menthe City of Lubbock, Texas; the�firStaiauNotice1on shall comply faith and be in ac- cordance daysbefore the said he'arint, with the terms and provisions of this resolution and said Act. PASSED AND APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEX.,s, this 27th day of July, 1950. Clarence K. j'hiteside wa,ror, City o Lubbock, Texas ATTEST: Lavenia Lowe City Secretary r .) J 1 J Lubbock; Texas July 27, 1950 Honorable Mayor and City Commission Lubbock, Texas Gentlemen: This is to certify that all work-under"GWO No. 5141. Panhandle Con- struction Company contract of September 22, 1949, Alley Improvements, which could be accomplished, has been inspected and found to be completed in accor- dance wi'ci1 plans and specifications. A release of the statutory lien on those units which are not to be completed has heretofore been executed. With the acceptance of the attached units of alley paving improve- ments, all improvements which could be constructed under this contract will have been accepted by the City of Lubbocll-, Texas. Therefore, I recoinend that the remainder of the cash due the contractor, 4459.05, be paid and the remaining certificates against property owners for their respectivLs amounts be issued. Altached herewith is the Contractorts Affidavit on Closing Job. Very truly yours, IS, W. B. Holmes W.B. H03.mes City Engineer WBH : van Encl. Lubbock, Texas July 27, 1950 Honorable Mayor and City Coruiission Lubbock, TexL:s Gentlemen: I have examined the improvements and paving constructed by the Panhandle Construction Company under their contract dated September 22, 1949, and find the improvements in East and West Alley in Block 100, Original Town Addition, to have been completed in accordance with plans and specifications and recoi..raend that you accept the improvements "n said alley, - payin�,, the Con- tractor the amount shown hereon as due by the City of Lubbock, and issue as- signa'ole certificates a ,ainst property owners for the respective amounts here- inafter shown as being due against then and their respective properties: Final EStimate for paving and improving the Exst and ;°Jest Alley in Block 100, 0rriginal Town Addition to the City of Lubbock, Texas: Known and desi; nated as Uni-u No. A-102. 465.83 sq. yds. EXcavation G 250 per sq. $2.44 yd. 116.46 1136.62 4n5.83 sq. yds. Concrete paving Sub per yd. Total 1253.0 Eng-ineering Fee 40% of $ 50.12 3.20 Total Cost of Improvements 124.816 Less Cityts Amount to be Share paid by Property Owners 117 .3 Itemized Statement of Property Costs: Description of Property Lots Block From Chsts Name NORTH SIDE Dunn 100 O.T. 1251 283.26 283.26 Sam G- 16 100 O.T. 125' Mary Caldwell SOUTH SIDE Professional Bldg. Inc. 6; 7, 8 T. 100 O.T "O.T. t 75t 70 169.94 158.62 West Texas Clinic 9, 10, �c 20t 10 L 100 11 'Nest Texas Hospital bets ,e—n 11 thru 15 lU0 O.T. 125 t 2L.26 $1170.34 Total Amount TO Be P1yID By Property Owners Respectfully submitted i:I.B. Holmes City Engineer Lubbock, Texas July 27, 1950 Honorable Mayor and City Coin ission Lubbock, Texas Gentlemen: I have examined the improvements and paving; constructed by the Pan— handle Construction Company under their contract dated September 2.', 1%9, and find the improvements in North and South Alley in Block 212, Original Town addition, to have been completed in accordance with plans and speci- fications and -reco.rhiiend that you accept the improvements in said alley, paying the contractor the am-unt shown hereon as due by the City of Lubbock, and is6ue assignable certificates against property cx,,Tners for the respective amounts hereinafter shown as being due a"ainst them and their respective propertias: Final Estimate for paving and improvin,t1ie North and South t,lley in Block 212, Ori ;inal Town Addition to the City of Lub'Dock, Texas: Known and desig- nated as Unit No. A-180. 662.22 sq. yds. Excavation P_ 25� pqr sq. yd. 16555 662.22 sq. yds. Concrete Paving Q 42.44 per yd. 1615:82 Sub Total 1761.- Engine -ring Fee 4 0 of 71.25 Total Cost of Improvements i8 2;b2 Less Cityts Share 207.E Amount to be Paid by Property Owners Itemized Statement of Property Costs: IJame IJEST SIDE, Fritz: Speckman Clarence Whiteside &",ST SIDE Mrs. S.C. Spikes E.-L. Snodgrass A.L. Fcr�uson Lot s 1 t hru 5 6 thru 10 11, 12 13, 14 15,16,17,18,19,20 DEscription of Property Block Fronta;c Costs 212 O.T. 130 411.24 212 O.T. 130 411.25 212 O.T. 52 212 O.T. 52 212 O.T. 156 Total Amountoto be paid by Property Owners 164.50 164.50 493.49 41644.98 Respectfull;T submitted, I. B. Holmes City Engineer In accordance with -the above recormiiendations of the City Engineer, motion was made by- Commissionor Hufstedl.:r, seconded by Ca.-miissioner 7avis, c.ariied unal1i:iously, to accept the completed :•:ork under G',TO I3o. 514, Panhandle Con- struction Company, Contractor, the following Resolution being passed. CD RESOLUTION RESOLUTI014 ACCEPITING IIVTROVEr,i�NTS. O3 'NORTH 2k D SOUTH ALLEY IN BLOC�,". 212, ORIGINXIL TOWN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS AND ANOTH1I R :ALLEY IN SAID CITY I E'lPWI_`;,IFTJR ENUIi;RAT-�D l.119 DI.1__;CTI_1 THE 1SSUA:'jC� :=,D DELIV1.]RY OF CE'�TIFICATES Iid EVIDEI! CE OF SPECIAL ASSESS'•iSIITS IC,, VIED. iJiiEHE-',S, the City of Lubbock heretofore entered into a contract with the Panhandle Construction Company for making nd construction of certain improve- ments on the folloiing named alleys, to -wit: North -and South .alley in Block 212, Original Town Addition to the City of Lubbock, Texas, known and designated as Unit No. A-180. East and :•;est Alley in Bloch 100, Original Town addition to the Cittr. of ,Lubboc':, Texas, known and designated as Unit No. A-102. IHEREAS, such imprbvements have been complet-d upon said portions of said alleys and have been ins petted and found to be complete in accordance wits- the contract therefor. THEREFO`IE, BE IT RLSOLVJD BY THE BOARD OF COI-Z(II_;SION_RS OF '-'HE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXY.S, `l'H_,T : i 1. The improvements on said portions of said alleys be, and they are hereby accepted and the'coiitract with reference to the construction of such improvements found and declared to '>e completed and pe.rfor ne-_i. 11. T"ic iIayor be, and he is hereby directed to is:ue wn1 execute in the name of the Clty, certificates in evidence of the special assessment levied against abutting property and the owpers thereof for such improvements, and the City Secretary is directed to execute same and i,inress thereon the Cor- porate Seal, all in accordance with the proceedinZs relatin; to such improve- ments and assessments; such certificates shall br: deli.v_-:-e 3 110 s�ii.d Campany. ill. This resolut_oi, shall take effect and be 'in force fro,:l and after its passage. PASSED AND APP-OVED, t'zis the 27th day of July, 1950. Clarence K-. Whiteside Mairor, ity oT_'Lu'5boc7 ,-'Texas ATTEST: La.veHia Lowe City Secretary Motion by Commissioner i,lorris, seconded by Commissioner Davis, carried unanimously, to approve Chan,o Order No. 1 to'contract for construction of .sixty-'Uwo (62) blocks of alley paving and cemetery improvements, GWO 557, J. R. Fanning, Contractor; the Change Order as authorized being as follows: Change Order No. 1 62 Blocks Street Paving 5 Blocks Alley Paving Cemetery Improvements General . ,Tork Order 557 Contract of July 5, 1950 TO: J. R. FANNING CHANGE ORDER Original Amount of contract $230,523.81 Net amount of previous change orders (add) None Net amount bf this change order (add) 12,7$0.28' Amount of contract, including this change 243,304.©9 Original contract time October 15, 1950 Additional time due to this change None Contract time including this change October 15, 19,50 WHEREAS, it is desirable to make changes in the plans and specifications for this project. THIS AGREEMENT In consideration of the mutual advantages gained, the Owner and the Contractor agree to the change shown herein and in the attached exhibits and data, and the Owner agrees to pay the Contractor the amount of the increase, if any, in paving certificates and the Cityts portion by cash, and in the event of a decrease, the parties agree that the -original contract between the Owner and the Contractor shall be modified to the extent herein indicated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner and the Contractor have hereto set their hands this the day of 1950• J. R. Fanning CONTRACTCR By /S/ J. R. Fanning Attachments: (1) Breakdown of change order (2) Preliminary Estimates for alley paving units A-121, A-219, & A-162 CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS OWNER By Isl Clarence K. Whiteside Mayor ATTEST: /S/ Lavenia Lowe City Secretary RECOMENDED FOR APPROVAL W. B. HOlmes City Engineer Motion by Commissioner Hufstedler, seconded by Commissioner Thomas, carried unanimously, to approve final estimate on'installation of sprinkler system and fire protection system for the Lubbock Municipal Airport Administration building. Amount of first and final estimate being $12,039.83. Original estimated cost was $9,800.00. Change order having been authorized by the City Commission in the amount of $2,239.83. Total amount authorized, $12,039.83. John F. Beavers, Contractor on this job., being Project No. 9-41-071-002. Work having been started 1-20-50. Motion by Commissioner Hufstedler, seconded by Commissioner Thomas, carried unanimously, to approve final estimate for Electric Wiring and front entrance marker at Lubbock Municipal Airport, Tarver Electric Company, Contractor. This being third and final estimate, in amount of $769.00. Total Contract price being $7,690.00. Work on project having been started February 27, 1950. Motion by Commissioner Thomas, seconded by Commissioner Davis, carried unani- mously, to authorize water service to be extended to Block 1, Manson Heights Addition, located between Baylor and Cornell and East of AVEnue R. 'This authorizing that the City will pay the difference between cost of 6T1 line and proposed 1211 line. Mr. Harold Chapman to make deposit to extend the water service and be refunded under the water and sewer policy now in effect. The cost of the project including the 1211 line is $2,033.22. Cost of City's portion, being difference between the 6t1 and 12i1 line, $578.72• Motion by Commissioner Morris, seconded by Commissioner Thomas, carried unanimously, to authorize payment by the City of difference in cost of 611 and 10f1 water line in Avenue U, from Alley between 40th and 41st Street to 50th Street. Total cost of line: $19 449.41. CITY to pay 4 358.60. The M & M Development Company to make 'deposit and be reimbursed for the construction of this water main, except the amount to be paid for by the City, under the Water and Sewer Policy Agreement. Motion by Commissioner Morris, seconded by Commissioner Davis, carried unanimously, to appoint Fred Hackel; and Mr. Jondahl of Watson Furniture Company, 'to serve as members of the Board of Equalization) now in effect. Mr. Freeland Groce having refused to serve as a member of this Board. . Messrs. Freeland Groce and Joe Stanley appeared before the City Commission requesting that Mr. Groce be allowed to tap the 6T1 water main in the street in front of 1920 29th Street, to serve sprinkler system. The City's policy being to run water service lines from the alley. This matter was discussed, but no action was taken. Motion by Commissioner Hufstedler, seconded by Commissioner Thomas, carried unanimously, to authorize Mr. James Spears to remove curb and provide for angle parking in front of his store at 28th Street and Avenue Q. CD Garnet Reeves, Jr. appeared before the City Commission recuesting permission for 11Youth of Lubbock County" to parade, Saturday: JULY 2, 1950, also to use sound truck in the parade. Tfie parade to begin at Main Street, and Avenue 0; thence East to Texas Avenue• thence South to Broadway• thence WEst to Avenue Q. The parade to begin at :30 P.M. It was unanimously agreed to grant this request. Motion was made by Conmaissi.oner Hufstedler seconded by Commissioner Davis, carried unanimously, that the Engineering hepartment prepare and have pre- pared a suggested plan for presentation to.the Texas State. Highway Department for the construction of an underpass and service roads on 4th Street at Avenue H and adjacent thereto. The Plan to consist of areal photographs with the proposed underpass and service roads imposed thereon. Estimated cost to be from $500.00 to $600.00, Motion by Commissioner Davis, seconded by Commissioner Hufstedler, carried - unanimously, to authorize purchase of the following Transformers: 43 - 10 Kva - 2400/4160Y - 120/240 LV 60 cycle Single phase distribution Transf. 10 - 15 Kva - . TT 1T 1T IT 11 TT TT TT 11. 9 - 50 KVa - 60 ccle, single phase 2400 4160Y - 120/240 distribution Transf. y 6 - 5 Kva, 60 cycle single phase 72b0/124�JOY, 120/240 distribution Transformers 15 - 5 Kva, 60 cycle single phase 2400/1160Y 120/210 distribution Transformers 3 - 333.Kva, 60 cycle, sin -le phase 4100 volts delta 480 volts delta power trans. 4 - 167 Kva single phase, 60 cycle 2400/4160Y HV to 120/240 LV distribution transformers, less hangers. There was discussion of request -'of Reese Air Force Base to use the Lubbock Municipal Airport as an emergency field at certain times during July 31 through August 5, 1950, and motion was made by Commissioner Hufstedler, seconded by Commissioner Thomas, carried unanimously, to authorize Ed Colby, Airport Manager to allow thisenorgency use of the field by Reese Air Force Base. Acting on the request of the Citizens National Bank to remove parking meters and curb sections along 14th Street between Avenues J, K, and L so that adequate entrances and exits could be provided for proposed parking lots in this area, motion was made by Commissioner Thomas, seconded by Commissioner Hufstedler, carried unanimously, the Commission approved the removal of eight (8) parking meters on the South side of-14th Street from Avenue K East to the alley, for the removal of two (2) 10 foot curb sections on this same length of street to Provide an entrance and an exit; angle parking along this length of street to be discontinued; parallel parking to be permitted when work has been completed` For the removal of a 20 foot curb section on the North side of 14th Street fY-04 Avenue L East to the alley to permit entrance to the parking lot; for the removal of a 20 foot section of curb on the East side of Avenue L from 14th Street North to the Bus Station building to provide an exit for toe parking lot. Suitable concrete curbs and guard rails placed two feet (21) inside the sidewalk on all parking areas to provide a safeguard for pedestrian traffic to be required. No entrance or exit shall be closer than 10 feet (101) to an existing alley, street, or avenue. Mr. Frank -Posey, Electrical -Superintendent, appeared before the City Commission and stated that he had received an oral proposal from representatives of the Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Corporation that they would duplicate the order for one 11,500 KW Steam Turbo Generating Unit and Condenser, which order was placed with Westinghouse by the City of Lub'zock on March 9, 1950 for the turbo generator and March 23, 1950 for the condenser, for the same price as -_bld by Westinghouse on this equipment on March 2, 1�50, such bids being of record at Page 192, Minute Book 9, of the records of the City Commission of the City of Lubbock, Texas, A general discussion followed Mr. Posey's announce- ment. Mr. Oldham, Director of Public 'Jorks, stated that when advised by Mr. Posey that the offer had been received, he, Mr. Oldham, felt that such informa- tion should be given the City Commission for their consideration. After a thorough discussion by all present, motion was made by Commissioner Hufstedler, seconded by Commissioner Thomas, carried unanimously that the City's order for such turbine generating unit and condenser this date ordered to be purchased on a firm price of $309,715'.00 for the turbine generator, and $69,285.00 for the condenser as quoted the City of Lubbock by Westinghouse Manufacturing Cor- poration in their'bid of March 2, 1950. Delivery promised on this rr2 generator to be 20 months from July 27, 1950, subject to cancellation by the City of 1`ubbock, with no charge for cancellation,as of October 30, 1950, without recourse -on thb City of Lubbock. The order for this equipment as stated above to be conditioned upon the approval of City Bond Issue to pay for it, at an election tentatively set for the latter part.of September, 1950. Motion by Commissioner Davis, seconded by Commissioner Hufstedler, carried unanimously, to authorize Ntr, Posey, Electrical Superintendent, to proceed with pregration of lans and specifications and advertise for bids to be received October 14, 1950 on 11,500 KW Steam Turbo Generating Unit and Condenser. This being the date set for receipt of bids on sale of barracks buildings at Municipal Airport as per minutes set out at Page 335, i•:inute Book 9, the fol- lowing bids were received:' Surplus BuildinC, Sale, Lubbock Municipal Airport, July 27, 1950 Building No. T-105 Building No. T-106 Building No. T-202 Bishop and 1,'Ilam Elmer Terry S•J. Bozeman J. 0. Dickey Charles Carlow Building No. T-205 Bishop and Milam Howard Harvey S. J.-Bozeman J., 0. Dickey Charles Carlow $$.12 Darold Young 101.00 Bishop and Milam 40.00 Howard Harvey 21.00 S. J. Bozeman 87.17 J. 0. Dickey F. 0. Donohue Charles Carlow Building No. T-304 1,02$.$$ Harold Young 931.00 Bishop and Milam 930.00 Brown & McCreary $$1.00 Howard Harvey 817.17 S. J. Bozeman J. 0. Dickey Charles Carlow 1,801.00 Bishop and Milam 1,6$$.$$ Elmer Terry 1,331.00 S. J. Bozeman 1,705.00 J. 0. Dickey 1,3$1.00 Charles Carlow 913.10 1,427.17 Building No. T-305 12 .12 10 .00 4 .00 21,00 15 .17 1,$01.00 Bishop and Milam $$.$$ 1,6$$.12 Elmer Terry 101.00 190.00 S. J. Bozeman 49.00 1,331.00 J. 0. Dickey 21.00 1,361.90 Charles Carlow 87.17 1,3$1.00 11327.17 . Building No. T-320 Building No. T-1002 Building No. T-1004 Harold Young 11001.00 Harold Young 801.00 Harold Young 851.00* Bishop and Milam 828.12 Bishop and Milam 738.88 Bishop & Milam 738.88 Brown and McCreary 160.00 Howard Harvey 631.00 Howard Harvey 631.00 Howard Harvey 831.00 S. J. Bozeman 627.88 S.J. Bozeman 527.88 S.J. Bozeman 660.00 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 J. 0. Dickey $$1.00 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 567.17 Building No. T-1005 Building No. T-1006 Building No. T-1007 Harold Young 851.00* Harold Young 841.00* Harold Young 841.00:,= Bishop and Milam 73$.1� Bishop and Milam 738.88 Bishop and Milam 738.12- Howard Harvey 567.00 Howard Harvey 631.00 Howard Harvey 567.00 S. J. Bozeman 527.88 S. J. Bozeman 527.88 S. J. Bozeman 547.00 J. 0. Dickey 461.600 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 Building No. T-1008 Building No. T-1011 Building No. T-1012 Harold Young 841.00=" Harold Young 627.00 Harold Young 251.00" Bishop and Milam 738.88 Bishop and Milam 508.12. Bishop and Milam 22$-1$$ Brown & MCCreary 52.50 Brown & McCreary 50.00 Howard Harvey 231.00 Howard Harvey 631.00 Lub.Jr.Welf.League 1.00=, S. J. Bozeman 167.00 S. J. Bozeman 547.00 Howard Harvey 427.00 J. 0. Dickey 151.60 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 S. J. Bozeman 512.00 Charles Carlow 127.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 Charles Carlow 367.17 Building No. T-1013 Building No, T-1014 Building No. T-1015 Harold Young 533.00 Harold Young 831.00m Harold Young 831.00", Bishop and Milam 538.12 Bishop and Milam 7 48.85 Bishop and Milam 748.12 Brown & McCreary 160.00 Guy,Gilstrap 826.50 Brown & McCreary 58.00 Victor Voegeli 550.60 Howard Harvey 557.00 Guy Gilstrap 826.50 Howard Harvey 557.00 S. J. Bozeman 637.85 HOward Harvey 557.00 S. J. Bozeman 510.00 J. 0. Dickey 561.60 S. J. Bozeman 637.14 J. 0. Dickey 561.60, A. L. Stovall 303.00 J. 0. Dickey 561.60 A. L. Stovall. 401.00 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 T-1016 South Plains. Fair Assn. 1.00 Building No. T-1017 Building; No. T-1018 Building No. T-1023 Harold Youno 201.00 Harold Young 601.00", Harold Young 801.00* Bishop and Milam 20$.$$ Bishop and D'Iilam 508.12 Bishop and Milam 738.88 Howard Harvey 187.00 Howard Harvey 557.00 Howard Harvey 557.00 S. J. Bozeman 177.00 S. J. Bozeman 501.00 S. J. Bozeman 527.00 J. 0. Dickey 161.60 J. 0. Dickey 42.1.60 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 Charles Carlow 127.17 Charles Carlow 367.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 Buildin; No. T-1024 Building NO T-1025 Building; No. T-1026 Harold Young $01.00-,, Harold Young $01.00* Harold Young 751.00* Bishop and Milam 718.12 Bishop and Milam 668.88 Bishop and Milam 66$.12 Howard Harvey 557.00 Howard Harvey 487.00 Howard Harvey 507.00 S. J. Bozeman 536.40 S. J. Bozeman 527•89 S. J. Bozeman 627.88 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 J. 0. Dickey 461.00 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles CArlow 437.17 Buildins No. T*-1027 Building No. T-102$; Building No. T-1029 Harold Young 751,00=,=„ Harold Young 751:00' Harold Young 751.00"' Bishop and I,Iilam 668.88 Bishop and Milam 668.12 Bishop and Milam 668.88 Howard Harvey 507.00 Howard Harvey' 507.00 Howard Harvey 507.00 S. J. Bozeman 507.00 S. J. Bozeman 507.00 S. J. Bozeman 507.00 J. 0. Dickey 461.6o J. 0. Dickey 461.60 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 Building No. T-1502 Building No. T-1601 Building No. T-1602 Bishop and Milam 988.12 Harold Young 751.00* - Harold Young 751.00* Elmer Terry 715.00 ' Bishop and Milam 718.88 Bishop and Milam 718.12 H. ti. Allen 256.15 Howard Harvey 537.00 Howard Harvey 537.00 Victor Voe6eli 575.65 S. J. Bozeman 527.00 S. J. Bozeman 527.00 Howard Harvey 757.00 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 - S. J. Bozeman 1,166.27:1-c' Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 J. 0. Dickey 681.60 F. 0• Donohue 613.00 Charles Carlow 867.17 r i Buildinn No. T-1603 Building No. T-1604 Building No. T-1605 : ;Harold Young 751.00,E -Harold Young 751.00* Darold Young 751.00" 7_0113;ishop and Milani 718.88 Bishop and Milam 628.12 Bishop and Milam 718.88 H. A. Allen 77.35 -Howard Harvey 537.00 Howard Harvey 512.00 Howard Harvey 537.00 -S. J. Bozeman 533.00 S. J. Bozeman 536.0o S. J. Bozeman 536.00 -J. 0. Dickey 461.60 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 J. 0. Dickey 461.6o -Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles CARlow 437.17 Building No.T-1606 BuildinngNo. T- 1607 Buildinh No. T-1611 Harold Young 751.00,E Harold Young 751.00,- Harold Young 251.00* Bishop and Milam 628.12 Bishop and IRIi.lam 608.88 Bishop and Milani 248.12 Howard Harvey 537.00 Howard HARvey 507.00 Victor Voegeli 152.65 S. J. Bozeman 536.40 .S. U. Bozeman 527.00 Howard Harvey 187.00 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 S. J. Bozeman 187.00 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 J. 0. Dickey 161.60 Charles Carlow 127.17 Building No. T-1612 Building No. T-16;j Building No. T-1614 Harold Young 601.00,= *Harold Young 555.00 Harold Young 601.00* Bishop and Milam 428.88 Bishop and Milam 438.12 Bishop and Milam 388.88 Victor Voegeli 337.55 H. A. Allen 253.80 L. C. Wheeler 550.00 Howard Harvey 427.00 Victor Voegeli 465.30 H. A. Allen 278.30 S. J. Bozeman 452.00 H ward Harvey 531.00 Victor Voegeli 455.80 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 S° J.Bozeman 565.00,- Howard Purvey 531.00 Charles Carlow 367.17 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 S. J. Bozeman 4�6.40 A. L. Stovall 376.00 J. 0. Dickey F. 0. Donohue 367.00 A. L. Stovall 375.00 _Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 Building No. T :1615 Harold Young 801.00,= Bishop and Milam 718.12 Brown L McCreary 54.50 H. A. Allen 58.90 Howard Harvey 537.00 S. 'J- Bozeman 639.00 J. 0. Dickey 561.60 A. L. Stovall 312.00 Charles Carlow 437.17 Building_No. T-1616 Building No.__T-1617 Harold Young 751.00=' Harold Young 555.00,E Bishop and Milam 718.88 Bishop and Milani 408.12 Brown & McCreary 54.50 Victor Voegeli 446.55 Howard Harvey 031.00 Howard Harvey 507.00 S. J. Bozeman 604.00 S. J. Bozeman 427.00 461.60 J. 0. Dickey 561.60 J. 0. Dickey Charles Carlow 437.17 A. L. Stovall 370.00 Charles Carlow 437.17 Building No . T-1619 Building Ido . T_-1620 Harold Bishop Young and Milam 201.00 228.884= Harold Young Bishop and Milam 351.00 388.12 Howard Harvey 187.00 H. A• Allen 56.15 S. J. Bozeman 187.00 -C. G. Connell 552.50"' J. 0. Dickey 161.60 Howard Harvey 287.00 Charles Carlow 127.17 J. 0. Dickey 3o6.00 -S. J. Bozeman 367.00 .Charles Carlow 127.17 Building No.µ T-1622 Harold Young Bishop and Milam Howard Harvey S. J. Bozeman J. 0. Dickey Charles Carlow Building No. T-1623 701.00 * Harold Young. 638.12 Bishop and Milam 537.00 Lub.Jr.Welf.League 527.00 Howard Harvey 461.60 S. J. Bozeman 437.17 Charles Cttrlow J. 0. Dickey 701.00 688.88 1.00,= 537.00 5o6.00 437.17 461.6o Buildine No. T-1621 Harold Young 701.00 Bishop and Milam 718.88,- Howard Harvey 537.00 S. J. Bozeman 538.90 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 Charles Carlow 437.17 Building No. T-1624 Harold Young 701.00 Bishop and Milam 718.12 Howard Harvey 537.00 S. J. Bozeman 507.00 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 Charles Carlow 437.17 Building No. T-1625 Building No. T-1626 Building; No. T-1627 Harold Young Bishop and Milam 701.00 708.88,- Harold Young Bishop and Milani 701.00 71$.12= Harold Young Bishop and Milam638.88 701.00 Howard I►arvey 507.00 Howard Harvey 507.00 526.00 HClgard Harvey S. J. Bozeman 507.00 510.00 S. J. Bozeman J. 0. Dickey 527.00 461.60 S. J. Bozeman J. 0. Dickey 461.60 J. 0. Dickey 461.60 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow 437.17 Charles Carlow Building No. T-1628 Building NO. T-2404 Building No. T-2405 Harold Yourig 701.00' Harold Young 351.00 Harold Young 101.00 Bishop and Milam 638.12 Bishop and Milam 508.88' Bishop and Milam 208.12 Howard Harvey 507.00 Brown and McCreary. 56.50 Brown & McCreary 51.00 S. J. Bozeman J. 0. Dickey 506.77 461.60 Howard Harvey S. 337.00 L. C. Wheeler 300.00"' Charles Carlow 437.17 J. Bozeman J. 0. Dickey 301.00 261.60 Howard Harvey S. J. Bozeman 137.00 201.00 Charles Carlow Z67.17 J. 0. Dickey 261.63 Charles Carlow 127.17 Building No. T-2406 Building No. T-2407 Buildin,, No. T-2811 Harold Young and Ki.lam 701.00,,= 688.88' HA old YOun Milam 1 101 00^� ' Bishop and Milani -,.,- 1,402.50 .8ishop Howard Harveyp 507.00 Bitho and .Howard Harvey 7$$.12 587.00 H. A. Allen Howard Harvey 402.50 11331.00 S. J. Bozeman 440.00 S. J. Bozeman 727.00 S. J. Bozeman 13547.77 J. 0. Dickey 561.60 J. 0. Dickey 661.60 J. 0. Dickey 1,381.00 Charles Carlow .437.17 Charles Carlow 567.17 Charles Carlow 13337.17 Building No. T-3010 Buildin; No. T-2409 Building No. T-30 Bishop and Milam 777.00 Harold Young 601.500, Harold Young- 351.00 Howard Harvey 735.00 -Howard Harvey 507.00 -Bishop and Milam 408.12"' S. J. Bozeman 520.90 S. J. Bozeman 440.00 Howard Harvey 287.00 J. 0. Dickey .$61.60=,. Charles Carlow 437.17 •S. J. Bozeman 377.00 Charles Carlow 367.17 J. 0. Dickey 253.60 ' -Charles Carlow •262.17 Buildinc, No. T-306 Building No. T-303 Buildi S No. T-301 (AII bids rejecte ( bids rejected Harold Young 351.00 Harold You � 351.00 Harold d Young 351.00 Bishop and Milani 418.88 Bishop and Ililam 428.12* Bishop and Milam 438.88 Howard Harvey 287.00 Howard Harvey 287.00 Howard Harvey 287.00 S. J. Bozeman 369.89 S. J. Bozeman 377.00 S. J. Bozeman 417.79 J. 0. Dickey 253.60 J. 0. Dickey 253.60 J. 0. Dickey 253.60 Charles Carlow 262.17 Charles C,;rlow 262.17 Charles Carlow 262.17 Building No. T-109 Building No Buildin No. T-1 �4 Harold You 351.00 A11 bids rejected) Harold Young 351.00 Harold Young 351.00 Bishop and Milani Howard Harvey 538.12* 287.00 Bishop and Milam 43$.88 'Bishop and T�Iilam 425.12= S. J. Bozeman 377.00 Howard Harvey S. J. Bozeman 287.00 377.00 Howard H=LRvey S. J. 287.00 J. 0. Dickey 253.60 J. 0. Dickey 253.60 Bozeman J. 0. Dickey 377.00 253.60 Charles Carlow 262.17 Charles Carlow 262.17 Charles Carlow 262.17 • Building No. T-102 .Harold Young 3510 Bishop and Milani 418.88 Howard Harvey 287.00 S. J. Bozeman 417.79 J. 0. Dickey 253.60 .Charles Carlow 262.17 After consideration of all bids, motion was made by CoOmissioner Davis, . seconded by Comi,iissioner HufstclIdler, carried unanimously, that the fol- lowing RLsolution be passed, authorizing acceptance of certain bids on said barracks buildin7s« R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Lubbock has authorized the advertising of seventy-four (74) buildings at the Lubbock Municipal Airport, and i- WHEREAS, in accordance with that advertisin" the bids have been received on those buildings. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COIIII SSION OF THE CITY OF LUBIOCK: THAT, Mayor Clarence K. Whiteside be, and he is hereby authorized to execute contracts of sale for the following buildi r�,�_;s with the buyers and price as shown hereunder; Item Building Noe Buyer Amount 1 T-105 2 106 3 202 4 2 05 5 304 6 305 8 320 9 1002 10 1003 11 1004 12 1005 13 1000 15 1008 16 1011 17 1012 19 1014 20 21 1016 22 1017 24 10233 25 1024 26 1025 27 1026 28 1027 29 1028 30 1029 31 1502 32 10,01 33 1602 34 1603 36 160 5 37 16D6 38 1607 39 1611 40 1612 41 1613 42 1614 1615 44 43 1616 45 17 46 1619 47 1620 48 1621 49 1tD22 54 1623 51 1624 1625 53 1626 54 1627 55 1628 2404 57 2405 58 24o6 59 2407 60 2811 62 3o8 6 109 60 104 2409 70 Elmer Terry Harold Young Bishop and i,ilam Bishop and Nilam Harold Young Elmer Terry Harold Young Harold Young Lubbock Lions Club (Girl Scouts) Harold Young Harold Younr, Harold Young; Harold Young Harold Young Harold Young Harold Young J. 0. Dickey Harold Young Harold Young South Plains Fair Association Bishop and Milan Harold Young Harold Young Harold Youn Harold Young Harold Young Harold Young Harrold Young Harold Young S. J. Bozeman H�Rold Yount; Harold Young Harold Young Harold YOUng Harold Young Harold Young Harold Young Harold Young Harold Youn S. J. Bozeman H:,rold Young Harold Young:, Harold Young Harold Young Bishop and Milan C. G. Connell Bishop and Milan Harold Young Lubbock Jr. Ydelfare Bishop and Milan Bishop and Milan Bishop and Milan Harold Young Harold Young Bishop and Milam L. C. 11heeler Harold Young Harold Young Bishop and Milan J. 0. Dickey Bishop and Milan Bishop and Milan Bishop and 1�Iilam Bishop and Milan Harold Youn" Tot al 101.00 1,801.00 128.12 1,028.$$ 1,861.0o 101.00 1)001.00 8ol.00 1.00 851.00 851.00 841.00 841.00 841.00 627.00 251.00 56116o 831.00 831.00 1.00 20$.$$ 001.00 801.00 801.00 801.00 751.00 751.00 751.00 7 51.00 1,166.2� 751.0 751.00 751.00 751.00 7 51.00 751.00 7 51.00 251.00 601.00 565.00 601.00 801.00 751.00 555.00 228.88 552.50 718.$$ 701.00 League(Well Baby Clinic) 1.00 71A 12 7o8.$8 718.12 501.00 701.00 508.88 300.00 701.00 12101.00 7. 588.88 '861.60 40$.12 428.00 53.12 428.12 6ol.50 $44,071.35 Upon motion of Commissioner Davis) seconded boteo nisif the o er HConmidleon the fore oin ResoJ_ution was passed T unanimous ci of the City of Lubbock this 27th day of July, 1954• ATTEST: Lavenia Lowe City Secretary Clarence K. Whiteside Mayor further business coming up for conside�I.tion, the City Comrllission No gust 1, 1954 at 4 P adjourned to meet AuP; 1950 Read and approved this the 1___---- day of �u��----------�"'' kNe �ATTEST:z tar Ci I