Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - Regular - 2/27/1986M REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FE8RUARY 27, 1986 The City Council of the City of Lubbock, Texas met in regular session on the 27th day of February, I986 in the City Council Chambers" first floor, City Hall, I625 13th Street, Lubbock, Texas at 4:00 p.0~ Present: Mayor Alan Henry, Mayor Pro T80 George Carpenter, Councilman T. J. Patterson, Councilman E. Jack Brown, Councilwoman J0dD Baker, Councilwoman Maggie Tr 'U, Councilman Bob Nash, City Manager Larry J. Cunningham, City Attorney John C. Ross, Jr., and City Secretary RaOette Boyd. Mayor Henry called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. 86-45-97-15I / l~\ The 1nY0cdti0O was given by Bob Cass, Deputy City rmOdger~ 80-45'97-152 / 2"\ The Pledge Of Allegiance to the Flag was given in unison by those in the Council Chambers. 86-45-97-I53 "Social Work Month" March, 1986 "Dudley Strain Lectureship Week" March 2-8^ 1986 85-45-97-I54 / 4~\ Motion was made by Councilwoman Tr 'O, seconded by Councilman Patterson to approve the Minutes of the February 13, 1986 Regular City Council Meeting as written. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; O Nays 86-45-97-155 / 5"\ George Miller, representing the Lubbock Industrial Development CorporatTon, -will request that the City Council consider adopting a Resolution approving agree- ment by Lubbock Industrial Development Corporation to issue bonds for Lubbock Hotel Associates, Ltd. RESOLUTION #2255 RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT BY LUBBOCK INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO ISSUE BONDS FOR LUBBOCK HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LTD. WHEREAS, the board of directors (the "Board") of the Lubbock Indus- trial Development Corporation has, by a Resolution Concerning Issuance of Bonds to Finance 8 Project for Lubbock Hotel Associates, Ltd. adopted February 14, 1486 (the "Resolution"), a Copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, agreed and declared its intent to issue its limited obligation revenue bonds pursuant to the terms of the Development Corporation Act Of I979, Article 5190.0, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, as amended (the "Act") and such other statutes as may provide authority therefor, to finance the costs of the project and in the amount set forth in the Resolution for the benefit of Lubbock Hotel Associates, Ltd~; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City Of Lubbock, Texas (the ^WOito\ finds and declares that the dctƒUD of the Board approving the Resolution should be approved and is in the best interests of the inhabitants Of the Unit for the reasons therein set forth; NOW THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, THAT: SECTION l. The Resolution, as adopted by the Board, agreeing and declaring an intent to issue limited obligation revenue bonds for the 98 February 27, 1986 SECTION 2. This Resolution is adopted for the purpose of satisfying the conditions and requirements of the Act and Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and the regulations promulgated there- under. Passed by the City Council this 27th day of February, 1986. /s/ Alan Henry ALAN HENRY, MAYOR ATTEST: /s/ Ranette Boyd Ranette Boyd, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: /s/ Donald G. Vandiver Donald G. Vandiver, First Assistant City Attorney George Miller, Vice President of the Lubbock Industrial Development Corporation, appeared toe present the Corporation request that the City Council approve the issuance of bonds for Lubbock Hotel Associates, Ltd. The bond issue is proposed to be five and one-half million dollars to renovate the Hilton Inn at 505 Avenue Q. Mr. Miller stated further that City Council passed a Resolution July 16, 1984 outlining the areas that the City Council designated as blighted or economically depressed areas, and that the Hilton Inn lies within the economically depressed areas outlined. He said that. Council had also requested that the Texas Economic Development Commission approve commercial projects within the blighted area and specifically mentioned hotels, motels or related facilities as acceptable projects. City Manager Larry Cunningham stated that City Council also passed a Resolution on October 5, 1984 that sets out criteria to be used by the Lubbock Industrial Corporation and Lubbock City Council in considering applications for industrial development bonds. This Resolution was passed to insure that the bond funds be used for their original" intent --the creation of jobs. The Lubbock Industrial Development Corporation did not complete this analysis because they were under the impression that the Council passed this Resolution because of legislation that might limit the availability of Industrial Revenue Bond money for the City of Lubbock. Apparently, this law was never enacted and they did not see the need to rate future bond applications. Instead of placing caps on each individual city, the State of Texas is approving applications on a first come first serve basis. The Lubbock Industrial Development Corporation believed that since this was the case, the City Council did not intend to have the board rate these projects. Motion was made by Councilwoman Baker, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Carpenter adopting Resolution #2255 and instructing the Lubbock Industrial Development Corporation Board to submit completed rating applications on this request. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays. 86-45-98-156 ( 7.) Jake Webb will appear to present rate request amendments and request Council to take appropriate action. RESOLUTION #2256 ORDER AND RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Southwestern Public Service Company has heretofore on February 13, 1986, filed a notice of intent to change rates within the City of Lubbock; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that such rate change is not a major change within the meaning of Section 43 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act; and February 27, 1986 M WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Lubbock to go into effect immediately upon passage of this Order and Resolution, since such change will result in a reduction in rates for some classes of customers; NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDERED AND RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the request for a rate change heretofore filed by Southwestern Public Service Company on February 13, 1986, may, for good cause shown, be allowed to go into effect immediately upon passage of this Order -and. 1 Resolution. ORDERED AND RESOLVED by the City Council this 27th day of February, 1986. /s/ Alan Henry ALAN HENRY, MAYOR ATTEST: /s/ Ranette Boyd Ranette Boyd, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: /s/ Donald G. Vandiver Donald G. Vandiver, First Assistant City Attorney At the last City Council meeting, the City Council approved a new rate for Southwestern Public Service that varied slightly from the rate that the City Council had approved for Lubbock Power and Light. Jake Webb, representing Southwestern Public Service, stated that on February 14, 1986 SPS filed the following tariffs: 1011.2--Experimental Residential Tariff Payment Discount Rider; 2011.2--Late Payment Rider; 3113.1-- Church Service; 6511 Public and Parochial School, which would make SPS competitive with LP&L Tariff approved by Council on February 13. Mr. Webb went on to state and on February 21 SPS filed an addendum to #1101.2 concerning the 5% late -pay penalty for residential customers, now pending in court system. Mr. Webb requested further that Council waive the 35-day waiting period since this is not a major rate change request. Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Carpenter, seconded by Councilman Nash authorizing rate adjustment requests as set out above. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays. a M232O—R125° THE STATE OF TEXAS Sonihel COUNTY OF LUBBOCKi«�r+t fyt�fiVfiersffi+��` 5t." �ubboGk �7eXhs Ufa co �� Before me Dorothy Russe I I a Notary Public in and ereq r�arNaah� , exas on this day fiaCfinl�r �v°h}� GoEnnnis§t personally appeared Twi I aAufi I I o Account Mana>sert�� ti�� western Newspa- pers Corporation, publishers of the Lubbock Avalanche -Journal r nd Sunday, who tere�te� perSQ yt1#fig be yen �being by me duly sworn did depose and say that said newspaper ha iuously for more Iring rtl�e ��} 4n� ,a than fifty-two weeks prior to the first insertion of this L!.�fi ri�a°&fin No. 731717 at Lubboe attached print- ed copy of the Legal Notice is a true copy of the �� � �+ � � � �} d in the Lubbock Avalanche -Journal on the following dates: February 129 338 Words Ca 38t Per word = $128.44 �r re3 n �a�a�t rcr ��ii Account Manager INA LUBBOCK AVALANCHE -JOURNAL Southwestern Newspapers Corporation Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12 day of Fe b ru a r �. ec OTNY RUSSELL . Anti Eor Tf.^ State Of Texas G n Lx�ires Nov. 9, 1988 100 February 27, 1986 86-45-100-157 (10.) ORDINANCE #8893--ZONE CASE #2554: (34th Street and Wausau Avenue). Hold a Public Hearing on the request of Harold P. Brown, Jr. for Southwest Prestressed Concrete, Inc. for a change of zoning from T to M-2 under provisions of Section 29-29 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Lubbock, on a tract of land out of Section 39, Block A-K, Lubbock County, Texas. L �(:n►[ ORDINANCE NO. 8893 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 7084 AND THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: ZONE CASE NO. 2554; A CHANGE OF ZONING FROM T TO M-2 ZONING DISTRICT, LIMITED TO: 1) CONCRETE PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING AND 2) USES UNCONDITIONALLY PERMITTED IN THE M-1 ZONING DISTRICT, UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 29-29 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, ON A TRACT OF AND OUT OF SECTION 39, BLOCK A-K, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS; SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 29-31(a) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. Harold P. Brown, Jr., representing Southwest Pre -stressed Concrete, Inc., appeared to speak in favor of this request. No one appeared in opposition. Assistant City Manager Jim Bertram reported that this case is for zoning on a concrete product manufacturing plant that is currently zoned "T" by virtue of the recent West Lubbock annexation. The use is legal non- conforming, but the owners want to make it a legal use by establishing appropriate zoning, so that in the future any renovation or expansion project would not have to go to the Zoning Board of Adjustment to expand a legal non -conforming use. The adjacent land use relationships are as follows: North - Vacant R-1 zoning South - Vacant T zoning in an IDP policy area East - Vacant R-1 zoning West - Vacant R-1 zoning in an IDP policy area Mr. Bertram said that this case is not consistent with the recently approved West Lubbock Land Use Plan nor is it consistent with the 2005 Goals Committee's work. The one issue that kept surfacing as this request was reviewed was the notation for "upgrading the image of land uses along our entry corridors" as per the Committee 2005 Goals statement. This Goals statement is supported by the recently approved Land Use Plan for this area when the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that the area be designated IDP or indus- trial park development. The IDP designation is representa- tive of the "upgraded" image because it contains set- backs, landscaping, parking, and sometimes design features that are less akin to just wide open roll -your - own industrial development. But as a practical matter, the existing land use is not going to go away and they feel they are entitled to be accommodated by virtue of having been annexed just a few months ago. Mr. Bertram went on to report that even though the existing land use is not any more or less obtrusive than several of the other land uses in the immediate vicinity, it would still be a violation of the Land Use Plan to recommend an open M-2 zoning district in this area. He said Staff was not opposed to the use, but more opposed to the idea of violating the Land Use Plan which repre- sents the first effort toward trying to substantiate or give credence to the Committee 2005 Goals Statement. The Planning Commission, after exploring several alter- natives, approved the case with the following conditions: a. The zoning shall be M-2 limited to concrete products manufacturing; and b. All M-1 uses. The Staff was reluctant to recommend heavy industrial zoning in this newly annexed area; however, they were not totally in disagreement with P&Z's position. Motion was made by Councilwoman Baker, seconded by Councilman Brown passing on first reading Ordinance #8893 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and February 27, 1986 101 86-45-101-158 (12.) Consider Ordinance #8894 amendi of Ordinances, City of Lubbock, adding to Section 2q_.'VA1 A Hof ORDINANCE #8894 r 29 of the Code ORDINANCE NO. 8894 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 29 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF LUBBOCK, ENTITLED "ZONING," BY ADDING TO SECTION 29-3 A DEFINITION FOR "GAME ROOM, POOL HALL OR BILLIARD PARLOR;" BY PERMITTING FIVE OR LESS COIN -OPERATED MACHINES AS AN INCIDENTAL USE IN THE "CA" AND "C-2A" ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. Assistant City Manager Jim Bertram reported that prior to 1975, all of the uses mentioned were allowed in a C-2 district. In 1975, these uses were restricted to C-4 districts; however, definitions were never included in the Zoning Ordinance. This Ordinance puts the defini- tions in writing and allows these types of machines (5 or less coin -operated machines) in "C-A" and "C-2A" dis- tricts as an incidental use. The Planning Commission approved this request and the Staff recommended that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission. No one appeared in opposition to this request. Motion was made by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilwoman Baker passing on first reading Ordinance #8894 as recommended by City Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays. 86-45-101-159 ( 6.) A representative of the Lubbock City Board of Health will appear to present a recommendation on Clinical Service Fees for the Health Department. RESOLUTION #2257 RFSni 11TrnN WHEREAS, the City of Lubbock has been notified by the Texas Department of Health that all local health departments, including the City of Lubbock, must begin charging fees for clinical health services; and WHEREAS, all such fees must be utilized in the conduct of the program generating such fees or else deducted from the state contract; and WHEREAS, the City Health Board has recommended a fee schedule for such services.to the City Council ,NOW -THEREFORE: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the schedule of fees attached hereto as Exhibit A shall be charged by the City Health Department for the named services in accordance with the rules of the Texas Department of Health and any contract between the City and the Texas Department of Health dealing with such services. Such schedule of services and fees may be modified annually upon recom- mendation of the City Health Board. Passed by the City Council this 27th day of February, 1986. /s/ Alan Henry ALAN HENRY, MAYOR ATTEST: /s/ Ranette Boyd Ranette Boyd, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: /s/ Rita Harmon /s/ Donald G. Vandiver Rita Harmon, Assistant City Manager Donald G. Vandiver, First Assistant City Attorney 102 February 27, 1986 86-45-102-160 ( 9.) Greg Garrison, Chairman of the Board of Health, presented recommendations to the Council regarding Clinical Service Fees for the Health Department. He stated that a new State law requires that the City of Lubbock Health Department charge fees for personal health care effective January 1, 1986. This includes assessing a fee to patients of the various clinics such as maternity, family planning, pediatrics, immunizations, venereal disease, and dental clinics. The State Health Department is requiring that the City of Lubbock maintain records on these clients, their ability to pay, and the cost of delivering services to these patients. The City must use these funds obtained to offset the expenses related to providing services. These fees will offset the decrease in assistance that the Health Department currently receives from the State Health Department. Mr. Garrison pointed out that the rules specifically state that no one will be denied services due to an inability to pay the fees. The following Fee schedule was recommended, and would establish an Administrative Fee (on an annual basis) for completing the initial case history, examination, and opening up the case file; after that, the client would be assessed a fee per visit. Clinic Maternity Family Planning Pediatric Immunizations Venereal Disease Dental Fee Total Admin/Per Visit Income $15.00/$2.00 $ 41,382 10.00/ 2.00 36,239 10.00/ 2.00 4,463 3.00/ 2.00 51,009 5.00/ 2.00 18,857 5.00/ 2.00 13,705 Total $165,655* *Total income is assuming that all individuals receiving care at the Health Department can pay the assessed fees. If all fees were collected from each patient visiting the clinic, the total possible income for the entire fiscal year is projected at $165,655. The income from the Administrative Fee represents about 61% of the total possible income. The fees assessed will offset a nominal percentage of the total cost of providing services, but will allow the City to recover the cost of keeping records on the clients, collecting the fees, and of supplies used in patient care. The fees will be assessed on at least an annual basis by the Health Department staff and the Director of Finance and changes will be made as necessary. The Board of Health reviewed the recommendation for the fees on Friday, February 14 and 'is recommended City Council approval of the fee structure. Motion was made by Councilwoman Baker, seconded by Councilwoman Trejo authorizing the recommended Fee Schedule recommended by the Board of Health and City Staff. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays. ORDINANCE #8889 establishing Regular Municipal Election for 1-986. I I I ORDINANCE NO. 8889 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE DATE OF THE REGULAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK FOR THE YEAR OF 1986. Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Carpenter, seconded by Councilman Patterson passing on second and final reading Ordinance #8899. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays. 86-45-102-161 (15.) Consider Ordinance #8895 closing 6th Street on the Texas Tech Campus, between University Avenue and Boston Avenue. ORDINANCE #8895 February 27, 1986 103 AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND CLOSING A PORTION OF 6TH STREET BETWEEN UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND BOSTON AVENUE IN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO MARK THE OFFICIAL MAPS OF THE CITY TO REFLECT SAID ABANDONING AND CLOSING; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. Bob Bray, on behalf of the Texas Tech Board of Regents, requested closure of this street to achieve a con- nection between the new athletic complex building and the Texas Tech football stadium. A primary point of concern on this request is the issue of adequate access to the Auditorium/Coliseum from University Avenue. 1. If 6th Street is closed and another opening is not provided at 8th Street (with center turning move- ments) traffic bound for the Auditorium/ Coliseum will be forced to enter the campus at Broadway or be diverted to 4th Street. 2. If turning movements are provided at 8th Street, it will probably require moving the traffic signal from 6th and University to 8th and University. 3. The median at University and 8th Street will have to be modified for center turn lanes and the existing right -turn lanes onto 8th Street must either be converted to through lanes, or additional right-of- way will be needed from Texas Tech for new right - turn lanes. 4. Depending on the final design, existing LP&L light poles and 2 storm sewer inlets must be modified. This issue was discussed on February 18, 1986 with the Civic Centers Board. It was the unanimous decision of the Board to: a. Support Texas Tech in its efforts to beautify the north end of the Campus, b. Support the closure of 6th Street if a median break with turn lanes and a traffic signal can be in- stalled at the intersection of 8th and University Avenue. Staff advised that if Council were to grant tentative approval, it should be with the condition that a center turn lane modification must be made at 8th and University, together with street light and traffic signal modifications, and that all costs associated with this project be paid by Texas Tech University. When University Avenue, from 19th-4th Street was modified in 1981, it was done according to a Lease Agreement between Texas Tech and the City of Lubbock, authorized by Resolution #770. Since that time, Texas Tech has modified University Avenue with new turn lanes at 8th Street. If the median is modified with a widening at 8th Street, the existing Agreement should be updated. Motion was made by Councilman Carpenter, seconded by Councilwoman Trejo passing on first reading Ordinance #8895 closing 6th Street and requesting that Texas Tech University participate in the closing costs and the development of 8th Street opening at a 50% participation for the City and 50% for Texas Tech. The motion further stipulated that the arrangements for funding of street modifications as set out in Alternative "B" presented to Council by Staff, be considered and worked out before second reading by City Council. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays. 86-45-103-162 (16.) Consider Resolution #2258 authorizing the Mayor to sign an Amendment to the Contract with Texas Tech University Amendment to Contract N0. MU19/1 for Physical Fitness Program for the Fire Department. in files RESOLUTION #2258 04February 27, 1986 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the Mayor of the [jtV Of Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and f d behalf f th City Of Lubbock a Professional directed to 8X��Ut� 0r and VD0 � ~ Services Agreement between the City of Lubbock and T2XdS Tech University, attached herewith, which shall be spread UpOO the minutes of the Council and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall constitute and be a part of this Resolution as fully copied herein in detail. Passed by the City Council this 27th day of February, 1986. MAYOR ATTEST: Ranette Boyd, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: /s/ Horace Anglin Horace Anglin, Acting Fire Chief APPROVED AS TO FORM: Johnson Si5taOt City Attorney In 1983, the Cre68p, McCormick and Paget Management Study recommended the Fire Department begin d Physical Fitness Program. In January 1985, the City entered into d Contract with Texas Tech University Department Of Health, Physical Education and Recreation to provide d complete fitness eVdlUdti0O and individual exercise prescriptions, along with d follow-up physical eX80iOdti0A for 90 fire fighters. The Fire Department is in the process of conducting the follow-up eYdlUdtiUO8 on the first group of 90 fire fighters. This Contract expires February 28, 1986, and in Order to continue the Program Council needed to extend the terms Of the Contract through February l, 1487. Additional funds have been provided in the I985~86 Budget for physical evaluations for an additional 155 fire fighters, which includes the entire department. The Staff recommended that the Contract be amended for an extension to February I, I987, Motion was made by Councilman Nash, seconded by Councilman Brown authorizing Resolution #2258 as recommended by City Staff. Motion carried: y Yeas; O nays. 86-45-I04-163 /17,\ Consider a Resolutionh i ithe City Manager to make Application for contribution of funds for second year funding of the Organized Crime and Drug Control Program Grant. RESOLUTION #2259 February 27, 1986 105 I'mulleasul BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the City Manager of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby autho- rized and directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock a Grant Application entitled Local Dangerous Drug Control Unit, attached herewith, and such program shall provide funding for one full-time police officer for street level narcotics investigations and intelligence sur- veillance and dissemination of such information collected, which shall be spread upon the minutes of the Council and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall constitute and be a part of this Resolution as if fully copied herein in detail. Passed by the City Council this 27th day of February, 1986. ATTEST: /s/ Ranette Boyd Ranette Boyd, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: /s/ Thomas Nichols Thomas Nichols, Chief of Police APPROVED AS TO FORM: /s/ Ken Johnson Ken Johnson, Assistant City Attorney 86-45-105-164 (18.) /s/ Alan Henry ALAN HENRY, MAYOR The Lubbock Police Department currently works, to a limited degree, with State and Federal drug enforcement agencies toward the enforcement of controlled substance statutes. However, the nature and volume of the investi- gations conducted by these agencies leaves virtually no resources for the enforcement of "street -level" drug problems. This Program is designed to focus on problems at the "street" or "user" level as opposed to emphasis on interstate transport, manufacture and sale of narcotics. The Officer funded by this Program will be free to follow up on calls of individual sales and use of drugs which are received daily but which cannot be properly investi- gated due to a current lack of resources, and also will work with school officials as well as officers working with the Lubbock Independent School District. Data will be collected on a monthly basis from the beginning of the Program detailing such areas as calls received, contacts made, the number of arrests and cases filed. Analysis of such data will provide information which will assist in overall Program evaluation as well as providing a basis for specific concentration of enforcement. The total costs for this Project are $53,362.30. The City's part is included in the present Police Department budget. Staff recommended approval of this request. Motion was made by Councilwoman Baker, seconded by Councilman Patterson authorizing Resolution #2259 as recommended by City Staff. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays. Consider Resolution #2260 authorizin make Ap lication for contribution of Prevention Officer. RESOLUTION #2260 the City Manager to unds for a Crime PF'CM111TT0N BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the City Manager of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby author- ized and directed to make application for the renewal of d Crime Pre- vention,Community Relations, and Citizen Involvement Program to assist in the prevention d.investigation Of crimes in the dONOt0wO area and other high crime areas hv promoting Neighborhood Watch, security surveys, Operation ID* lOc-^--for the elderly, and educating the public in Crime prevention; 0O^ and such application shall be spread UpUO the minutes Of the Council and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall constitute and be O part Of this Resolution as if fully copied herein in detail. Passed by the City Council this 27th day of February, 1986. /s/ Alan Henry ALAN -HENRY, MAYOR ATTEST: Boyd,Ranette City Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Thomas Nichols Chief of Police APPROVED AS TO FORM: Johnson 1�en -Johnson, Assistant City Attorney The Grant Proposal from Criminal Justice Division includes d 60% funding for d Crime Prevention OffiCer° and will require 40% in -kind matched by the City of Lubbock ('$18,921 C.J.D. funding and $14,813 matchin g funds from t�� City Of Lubbock for this year, with decreasing amounts for t�0 additional years, at d tot al for this year Of $33,734)^ The Grant e0000pDSse9 the City Of Lubbock, but targets the Overton area as the primary area Of work for this Officer. The objective of this Program will be to reduce crime in the impact area by 5% per year. The Staff recommended approval of this program. Motion was made by Councilwoman Tr 'O, seconded by Councilwoman Baker authorizing Resolution #2260 as recommended by City Staff. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays. 86-45-106-165 authorizingh CityManager (19.)"Fo -make for funds for third Consider Vasn|u��un year funding of the School Resource Officer Program. � ��Ul n S MIT 9 R-�� BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the City Manager of the City Of Lubbock BE and is hereby autho- rized and directed to execute for and OD behalf of the City of Lubbock an Application to the Governor's Office Of General Counsel and Criminal Justice on behalf of the City of Lubbock for renewal of a program entitled School Resource Officer III, attached herewith, and such program shall provide that police officer's work with 'UDiOr high schools hv COUD3eliOg i- students, making presentations to students, P^T.A°, and otherschool groups, and will strive to improve r8|dtf0n5 between 8tUd8DtS and police officers, which shall be spread VpOD the minutes Of the Council and as spread UpVO the minutes of this Council Shall constitute and be a part of U this R8SOlUtiOO as if fully copied herein in detail. Passed by the City Council this 27th day Of February, 1986. /s/ Alan Henry ATTEST: ALAN HE Y, MAYOR Ranette Boyd, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Chief /s/ Thomas Nichols Thomas Nichols, of Police /s/ Ken Johnson Ken Johnson, Assistant City Attorney The two Officers presently funded work in 'UOi0r high schools in Lubbock with the goal to improve - the rela- tionships juveniles have with the police hv improving /] their attitudes toward the police. ' The total cost of this program is $73,183^ with the City^S share being $28,273° The City Share is included in this year's operating budget. The Staff recommended approval Of this grant application. Motion was 0dd8 by Mayor Pro Te0 Carpenter, seconded by Councilman Patterson authorizing Resolution #226I as recommended by City Staff. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; O Nays. 86~45~107-106 /20°\ Consider Resolution #2 to make Application Selective Law Enforcement Offi-c-er. U RESOLUTION #2262 108 February 27, 1986 MINHWIR BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the City Manager of the City of Lubbock BE and is hereby autho- rized and directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock a Selective Law Enforcement Unit and Program to fund one full time officer to concentrate on daytime house burglaries, attached herewith, which shall be spread upon the minutes of the Council and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall constitute and be a part of this Resolution as if fully copied herein in detail. Passed by the City Council this 27th day of February, 1986. /s/ Alan Henry ALAN HENRY, MAYOR ATTEST: /s/ Ranette Boyd Ranette Boyd, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: /s/ Thomas Nichols Tom Nichols, Chief of Police APPROVED AS TO FORM: /s/ Ken Johnson Ken Johnson, Assistant City Attorney The Grant Proposal for a Selective Law Enforcement Officer from Criminal Justice Division includes funding for the third year of the Grant Contract. This will constitute a 40% match in funds from the City of Lubbock and a 60% contribution from Criminal Justice Division. This position is comprised of one Police Corporal working 10% of assigned duty hours on daytime residence bur- glaries in targeted areas of the City. The total cost for fiscal year is $36,103 with the City share amounting to $14,076. The Program encompasses the entire City. The Staff recommended approval of this grant application. Motion was made by Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilwoman Baker authorizing Resolution #2262 as recommended by City Staff. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays. 86-45-108-167 (21.) Consider Ordinance #8896 amending Ordinance #8803, abolishing the rank and classification title of Police Major and establishing a second position in the rank and classification title of Assistant Police Chief. ORDINANCE #8896 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8803, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1985- 1986, BY ABOLISHING THE RANK AND CLASSIFICATION TITLE OF "POLICE MAJOR" IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, AND ESTABLISHING A SECOND POSITION IN THE RANK AND CLASSIFICATION TITLE OF "ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, BY PROVIDING THAT THE RANK AND CLASSIFICATION TITLE OF "POLICE MAJOR" BE ABOLISHED AND PROVIDING THAT THE RANK AND CLASSIFICATION TITLE OF "ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF" BE ESTABLISHED AND THEREBY INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SUCH FUNDED CLASSIFICATION TITLES FROM ONE (1) POSITION TO TWO (2) POSITIONS; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. Staff has recommended reorganization of the Police Department which would provide for better management throughout the Department and which could be accomplished at minimal cost. The projected target date for the implementation is March 1, 1986. February 27, 1986 109 The recommended reorganization would not require new personnel to be added, and would cost about $2,400 in additional salaries per year, due to the elimination of the rank of Police Major and addition of one Assistant Chief. Modest costs were also anticipated for the movement of telephones in the Police Department, but no furniture purchases were anticipated. 71 As proposed, the Patrol Division would be headed by a Captain and would have five Lieutenants. Four Lieu- tenants would command the four shifts and the fifth Lieutenant would serve in relief, and would come from Internal Affairs. The Internal Affairs Lieutenant would be replaced by a Sergeant and that Sergeant's position would come from the current Uniform Division's Staff Sergeant's position. The Special Services Division would be headed by a Captain and have one Lieutenant. This Division would consist of Solo Motorcycles, Accident Investigation, School Crossing Guards, Parking Control, Tactical Operations Squad, Selective Law Enforcement Unit, and Canine. The most notable difference in this organiza- tional alignment is the movement of the Tactical Squad from the Detective Division to the Special Services Division. The Detective Division would consist of Crimes Against Property Section, Crimes Against Persons Section, Investigative Support Section, and the Juvenile Section. The difference in the proposed organization is the changing of the Juvenile Division to a Juvenile Section and becoming part of the Detective Division. These Divisions --Patrol, Special Services, and Detective --would report to the Assistant Chief of Police for Field Operations. The other Bureau --the Staff Services Bureau-- would be headed by the other Assistant Chief of Police and would consist of three Divisions: Administration Division headed by a Captain, but would not have a Lieutenant. Budgetarily, the Chief of Police and the two Assistant Chiefs of Police would be funded in the Administration Division. Training Division would be headed by a Captain and would have one Lieutenant. Information Services Division would be headed by a Captain and would have one Lieutenant. The proposal includes the implementation of a new Divi- sion, the Special Investigation Division. This Division would be headed by a Captain (the Captain's position from the current Juvenile Division). This Division would consist of two sections, Internal Affairs and Special Investigations. Internal Affairs would be manned by a Sergeant. Special Investigations would be staffed as now, one Lieutenant, the Drug Enforcement Administration Task Force, the Local Drug Control Unit, and the License and Permit Unit. As the reorganization is implemented, personnel evalua- tions on an annual basis for Captains and Assistant Chiefs will be reinstated. The specific recommendation made was to delete the position of Major and to add an additional position of Assistant Chief of Police, and Staff recommended approval of this Ordinance. Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Carpenter, seconded by Councilwoman Trejo passing on first reading Ordinance #8896 as recommended by City Staff. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays. 86-45-109-168 (22.) BID #8845--Graders and Loaders (Garage). Plains Machinery--2 motor graders; I extended warranty. Associated Supply --I wheel loader. Motion was made by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilwoman Baker authorizing low bid meeting 110 February 27, 1986 86-45-110-169 (23.) BID #8874--Ready-mix concrete and related items (Streets). Cement and Supply Company--1 c.y. class A (5 1/2 sack) regular: 1 c.y. class A (high early strength); I c.y. class A (calcium chloride); I c.y. class C regular; I c.y. class C (high early strength ); 1 c.y. class C (calcium chloride); 1 c.y. class A (6 sack)regular; 1 c.y. class A (high early strength); I c.y. class A (calcium chloride); I c.y.; 1 c.y. class b (high early strength); 1 c.y. class B. calcium chloride; 3 l.f. expansion joint material; 1 30" curb/gutter expansion joint material; 1 gal. clear membrane curing compound; 1 gal clear waterseal . Motion was made by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilwoman Baker authorizing low bid meeting specifications. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays 86-45-110-170 (24.) BID #8878--Pump repair (Water Reclamation). Pump Speciality --pump repair on 1 6,000 gpm effluent pump. Motion was made by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilwoman Baker authorizing low bid meeting specifications. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays 86-45-110-171 (25.) BID #8887--Data communications equipment, and authorize same (Information Services). RESOLUTION #2263 IBM Corporation --Mainframe communication hardware; CAD System communication hardware. Motion was made by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilwoman Baker authorizing Resolution #2263 as recommended by City Staff. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nav-, February 27, 1986 ill 86-45- 111-172 (26.) BID #8889--Southeast Reclamation Plant Renovation filters #'s 1 and 2, and authorize same (Water Utilities Enqineerinq). Contract in Files RESOLUTION #2264 RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: THAT the Mayor of the City.of.Lubbock BE and is hereby authorized and directed to execute for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock a Contract with Rhode Pipe Company for the renovations at the Southeast Reclamation Plant, attached herewith, which shall be spread upon the minutes of the Council and as spread upon the minutes of this Council shall constitute and be a part of this Resolution as fully copied herein in detail. Passed by the City Council this 27th day of February, 1986. /s/ Alan Henry AIAN RENRT,-77YOR ATTEST: /s/ Ranette Boyd Ranette Ro_y_U=,ity Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: /s/ Gene Eads ., Gene Ead,_Tu_rchasing Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: /s/ Harold Willard Harold WiT7_ar_U-,-A`ssistant City Attorney Rhode Pipe Company --Southeast Reclamation Plan Rehabilitation Filters 1 & 2. Motion was made by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilwoman Baker authorizing Resolution #2264 as recommended by City Staff. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays 86-45- 111-173 (27.) BID #8892--Annual lamp requirements (Warehouse Stock). Westinghouse Electric Supply Company--1 lot miscellaneous lamps. Motion was made by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilwoman Baker authorizing low bid meeting specifications. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays Fill, 86-45-111-174 (28.) Repair work to LP&L Substation (Electric Distribution). Westinghouse Electric Supply Company--labor/material to repair Westinghouse Erskine Substation Voltage Regulator. Motion was made by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilwoman Baker authorizing low bid meeting specifications. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays 86-45-112-175 (21A.) Consider Ordinance #8897 amending Ordinance #8892 calling a Charter Amendment Election. ORDINANCE #_8897 ORDINANCE NO. 8897 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8892 CALLING A CHARTER AMENDMENT ELECTION FOR APRIL 5, 1986, AND ESTABLISHING THE WORDING OF AMENDMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED; ALTERING WORDING CITOYFOFFOCOESITION REQUIR0INGIPUBLICATIONGOFOTHIS QUALIFICATIONS FOR CANDIDACY AMENDMENT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Ordinance #8892 passed by Council at the February 13, 1986 regular meeting contained a proposed Amendment which the Legal Department had found to be in violation of the new Texas Election Code. This Amendment was to have been voted on in the Charter Amendment Election called for April 5, 1986. Council had proposed a filing fee and a petition for qualifying for candidacy for Mayor, City Council Member, or Municipal Court Judge. The Election Code states that if there is a filing fee, the candidate must be given the option of either paying the fee or submitting a petition signed by not less than 25 qualified voters in the area or district from which the Candidate is running. The Legal Department recom- mended that Council pass, on emergency reading, an Ordinance amending Ordinance #8822 which would be in compliance with the Election Code. Motion was made by Councilwoman Baker, seconded by Councilman Patterson to pass on emergency reading Ordinance #8897, as written. Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Carpenter, seconded by Councilman Brown to consider amending the previous motion to set the filing fee at $100 for each candidate. Motion to consider Amendment carried: 5 Yeas; 2 Nays --Councilwoman Trejo and Councilwoman Baker. Motion to pass Ordinance #8897, as amended, on emergency reading carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays. 86-45-112-176 g.) Marjorie Kastman will app ear to recommend that Council ( approve a Contract for professional services for the Board of City Development. Marjorie Kastman, Vice Chairperson of the Board of City Development, reported to Council that on Thursday, February 20, the Search Committee of the Board of City Development interviewed three firms to provide profes- sional services for recruitment and selection for the position of Director of Economic Development. From the information contained in the written proposals submitted, the personal presentations and the references received, the Search Committee recommended that the firm Jensen- Oldani be retained to provide professional services. She reported that the Board of City Development reviewed a h e recommendation and contract on Monday, Y approved same. Mrs. Kastman requested that the City Council approve the Contract, as recommended by the Board of City Development. Motion was made by Councilman Brown, seconded by Council- woman Trejo authorizing the Contract as recommended by the Board of City Development. Motion carried: 6 Yeas; 1 Nay --Councilman Nash. 86-45- 112-177 (11.) ORDINANCE #8898--ZONE CASE #2555--(106th Street and Quaker Avenue Hold a Public Hearing on the request of Cam Fannin for Sout crest Baptist Churc for a change of zoning from T to A-2 under provisions of Section 29-29 of the Code of Ordinances of the city of Lubbock, on a tract of and out of Section 16, B ock E-2, Lubbock County, Texas. 112 February 27, 1986 86-45-112-175 (21A.) Consider Ordinance #8897 amending Ordinance #8892 calling a Charter Amendment Election. ORDINANCE #8897 ORDINANCE NO. 8897 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8892 CALLING A CHARTER AMENDMENT ELECTION FOR APRIL 5, 1986, AND ESTABLISHING THE WORDING OF AMENDMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED; ALTERING THE WORDING OF PROPOSITION NO. 19 PERTAINING TO QUALIFICATIONS FOR CANDIDACY FOR CITY OFFICE; REQUIRING PUBLICATION OF THIS AMENDMENT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. COUNTY OF LUBBOCK § ion for cil Member, This Agreement made and entered into on.this the 27th day of February , 1986, by and between the Board of City Develop- 'iling fee, ment of Lubbock, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "BCD" and her paying Jensen-Oldani and Associates, Inc., hereinafter referred to as t less than "Associates", and approved by the City of Lubbock, Texas, herein rom which called "City", WITNESSETH: nt recom- WHEREAS, the BCD has been charged by Ordinance No. 8859 with i9, an acquiring the services of a Director of Economic Development, and d be in WHEREAS, the BCD has determined that it is in the best fed by interest of the BCD to retain the services of a qualified iding national search firm to assist the BCD in retaining applicants �! by Mayor for the position of Director of Economic Development, and )wn to the filing WHEREAS, the BCD has received proposals from several isider national search firms throughout the United States, and )man Trejo WHEREAS, the BCD has determined that the best interests of lance #8897, Yeas; 0 the BCD will be served by selecting the firm of Jensen-Oldani and Associates, Inc., and WHEREAS, the aforementioned firm has indicated that it is in a position and able to assist the BCD in obtaining applicants for at Council the position of Director of Economic Development, for the NOW THEREFORE THE BCD AND ASSOCIATES DO HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: and of City rsday,rd I. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT of City de profes- The purpose of this Agreement is to provide professional n for the recruitment services to the BCD, to assist the BCD in the . From the selection of a Director of Economic Development. is submitted, s received, II. SCOPE OF SERVICES rm Jensen - Associates hereby agree to perform professional selection ervices. She reviewed the services on behalf of the BCD as follows: ary 24, and a. Develop a position specification for the position of Director of Economic Development based on in-depth approve the interviews with Board of City Development members and selected community and civic leaders as designated by y the Search Committee of the Board of City Development. Mr. Bruce Jensen of Jensen-Oldani Associates will d by Council - personally conduct the interviews with board members mmended by ed: 6 Yeas; -eet and quaxer--Avenuej 0 rv-ra d rUVrTU-„U-e request of Cam Fannin or Sout crest Baptist Church) for a change of zoning from T to A-2 under provisions of Section 29-29 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Lubbock, on a tract of and out of -Section 16, Block E-2, Lubbock County, Texas. February 27, 1986 113 F�' 7 LJ ORDINANCE NO. 8898 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 7084 AND THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: ZONE CASE NO. 2555; A CHANGE OF ZONING FROM T TO A-2 ZONING DISTRICT, LIMITED TO A CHURCH AND CHURCH RELATED USES, UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 29-29 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, ON A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 16, BLOCK E-2, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS; SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 29-31(a) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. Cam Fannin, on behalf of Southcrest Baptist Church, appeared to present this request for zone change. He stated that this is a routine request. The adjacent land use relationships are as follows: North - Vacant T zoning South - Agricultural land outside of the City limits East - Existing electrical substation and vacant T zoning West - Agricultural land outside of the City limits Assistant City Manager Jim Bertram stated that the case meets City planning policies and Comprehensive Land Use Plan since it is located on a major thoroughfare, is on the fringe of a neighborhood, and is large enough to accommodate the required parking and building expansion. He went on to report that the Planning Commission approved the case with the following conditions: a. That the zoning be A-2 limited to church and church -related uses. The Staff recommended that the City Council uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission. No one appeared to speak in opposition to the request. Motion was made by Councilman Nash, seconded by Councilwoman Trejo passing on first reading Ordinance #8898 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and stipulating that the A-2 zoning be limited to church and church -related uses. Motion carried: 7 Yeas; 0 Nays. M2320-R115 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF LUBBOCK Before me _D o r o t h y R u s s e l l a Notary Public i personally appeared Rose Santos+ Contro'I Clerl pers Corporation, publishers of the Lubbock Avalanche-Jour being by me duly sworn did depose and say that said newspap than fifty-two weeks prior to the .first insertion of this No 729090 at Li ed copy of the Legal o i c e D i s P A ya true copy of Avalanche -Journal on the following dates: February 2x7 1/2 @ 20.35 per inch = $305.25 Control Clerk LUBBOCK AVALANCHE -JOURNAL Southwestern Newspapers Corporation Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17thday of DOR�iHY RiJ�S L Notary Ptibiir in And for The State Of Texas` FORM 58-10 My CommiSsi,;n Expires Nov. 9, 1989' 86-45-113-178 (13.) Hold a Public Hearing for the 1986-87 Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program. 114 February 27, 1986 Mayor Henry opened the Public Hearing and 8OOoUOCed that those who had signed up to speak would be called OD in the order in which they signed. Jim Douglass, Chairman Of the CDAC, reported to Council that as part Of the City of Lubbock's Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program, the City solicits citizen input in developing the Annual Statement of Objectives. The Community Development Advisory Committee held three public 0p8tiDgS during January, 1986 to receive citizen input. The three 02gtiOgS were held at Mae Simmons Community Center, Rodgers Community Center and Central Senior Citizens Center. In addition to citizen input, City departments submitted requests and backup material for funding City projects. While neighborhood meetings were held in areas most effected by Community Development funding, d question- naire was included in the September, 1985 water bills to all residents Of the City. Approximately 05,000 surveys were mailed and 3,035 (4°6%) were returned. The ques- tionnaire asked the respondent to circle their sector Of the City to help determine priorities of each area. The top three priorities City-wide were: I. Street Maintenance 2~ Mowing weeds 3. Street cleaning At the completion of the neighborhood meetings, the CU00UOitv Development Advisory Committee met to consider the input received and to develop their recommendation to the City Council. From the proposed projects and activ- ity, the Community Development Advisory Committee recom- mends funding the following projects. Concentrated Code Enforcement $ 219,218 Arnett B8Ds0O Redevelopment 146,000 Arnett BeDS0M Detroit Widening 4I,600 Phyllis Wheatley Redevelopment 158,000 Residential Rehabilitation 550,000 Emergency Repair 100,000 Community Development Administration 148,I71 Community Development Field Services 210,079 Indirect Costs I00,000 Locks for the Elderly 10,000 Paint -Up Program 20,000 W8ath8rizdtiOn 75,000 Lake 0 Road Low Water Crossing I4I,700 Park Area Lighting 38,000 Contingency Fund 50,000 Berry Park 11,445 Guadalupe Neighborhood Center 25,000 Parkway Neighborhood Center 15»210 TOTAL $2,060^023 Mr. Douglass expressed his appreciation to the CDAC members for their diligent work. James PitkiD, representing the Neighborhood Redevelopment Commission, stated that the NRC supports the recommendations of the CDAC. He stated that they realize that a substantial portion of the funds are earmarked for housing, but that there are no other 50UrC8s Of funding available to take care of these needs. Jack Thompson, representing the Lubbock Redevelopment Association, requested that $I50^000 be allocated to fund d portion of the PeDg Plan for the Overton Area. He stated that Texas Tech and private citizens had contributed substantially to this, and he asked that the City be a third partner. Councilwoman Baker asked if this request had gone before the CDAC, and Mr. Th0O0sVO stated it had not. W.R. Collier, representing Association, indicated his request. the Lubbock Redevelopment support for Mr. Th0mpsUO/S Jim Kersey, representing the Community Services Advisory Council, 'Indicated the support of the CSAC for the CDAC recommendations. Alice Moreno, Co -Chairperson of the Berry Park Neighborhood Association, requested that in addition to the $11,445 recommended for Berry Park, that Council authorize $41,305 for other park i0pr0V808DtS, February 27, 1986 115 86-45-115-179 (14.) Federal Assistance Grant Application in Files Craig Brummett, representing Guadalupe Park Neighborhood Association, expressed support and gratitude of his organization for the CDAC recommended allocation for Guadalupe Neighborhood Center. Orville Alderson stated that this funding is the only source of money for housing, and urged Council considera- tion of larger allocations of funding for housing. He alleged that Council had not been informed of all funds available to them for distribution. Councilman Nash requested that City Manager Larry Cunningham speak to this, and Mr. Cunningham stated that Council is aware of all funds available, but has, in the past, chosen to allocate only a portion of the total program income each year, thereby spreading the use of the funds over several years rather than expending it all in one year. Mr. Cunningham went on to state that Council could allocate the entire amount, if it was their desire to do so Lucille Minter, representing the East Side Association, requested that funding be given to housing needs in the Idalou Highway area, and requested further that no heavy industries be authorized by Council for that area. Councilman Patterson pointed out that the East Lubbock Advisory Committee is working on plans which will include addressing the needs of this area. Mayor Henry closed the hearing. Authorize the Development B rinriimant c Mayor to execute and submit the Communit ock Grant Application and all related RESOLUTION #2265 RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK: SECTION 1. THAT the Mayor of the City of Lubbock is hereby authorized and directed to execute and submit for the City of Lubbock the Community Development Block Grant Application of 1986-87 for the year 1986 and related documents, which Application shall be spread upon the minutes of the City Council, and as spread upon said minutes shall constitute a part hereof for all purposes. Passed by the City Council this 27th day of February, 1986. /s/ Alan Henry ALAN HENRY, MAYOR ATTEST: /s/ Ranette Boyd Ranette Boyd, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: /s/ Sandy Ogletree Sandy Ogletree, Community Development Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: /s/ Michele Hart Michele Hart, Assistant City Attorney The City staff recommendation differed from the CDAC recommendation on the funding of one project. The Staff did not recommend funding the Parkway Neighborhood Center project while the CDAC recommended $15,210 for the project. Staff recommended renovation of the Guadalupe Center, but since that time, we understand many residents of the Guadalupe area are concerned with the limited services offered at the Center. It was be Staff's sug- gestion that the $25,000 for remodeling Guadalupe be approved, subject to a commitment from the Parkway/ Guadalupe Neighborhood Center's Board that they will strengthen the programs at the Guadalupe Center. The c+I F-FIn 1'-4-,..-- 116 Febru)ary 27, 1986 The current 1985-86 Entitlement amount for the City of Lubbock is $2,662,000. A 30% decrease -in the funding level is anticipated for the following reasons. 1. A 10% overall CDBG Program reduction, 2. A 6% decrease due to Gramm -Rudman -Hollings Legis- lation, 3. An increase in the number of entitlement cities, 4. A change in the funding formula from 70/30% to 65/35%, and 5. A $500 million HUD administrative deferral. A 30% decrease in the funding is the equivalent of $798,000. The 1986-87 entitlement is anticipated to be $1,863,400. The recommendation was to fund the difference between the City's 1986-87 entitlement and the recommended program, approximately $202,623, from unallocated Community Development funds. The source of these funds is from Program Income which has been received during the course of the CDBG program. The City of Lubbock receives Program Income from several sources which include: NIDP Loans which are repaid, land sales from land originally acquired with CD funds, and weed and rubbish liens paid by Community Development. This approach will help the City phase the reductions into the Program. At the current time the $500 million deferral proposal has encountered significant Congressional opposition. If this deferral is defeated, the City's entitlement amount should be increased, but no definite funding allocations had been made from the HUD Regional Office. The City's Community Development Program is administered in accordance with the Federal Regulations adopted in October, 1983. The application has been prepared as stipulated in the regulations. An Amendment to the October, 1983 regulations is pending in Congress and is expected to be finalized sometime in 1986, but should not impact upon our current Statement of Objectives. Also, the City's entitlement amount is not currently known, as the appropriations have not been released from Congress or the HUD Regional Office. The City's Statement of Objectives does anticipate a decrease of 30%, but this figure may be revised as legislation is revised. The Staff recommended that the City Council continue with the present time table and authorize Community Develop- ment Block Grant submission so that the environmental assessments and other planning activities can be con- tinued without delaying the Community Development Fiscal Year start-up on June 1, 1986. They also recommended that the projects as recommended by CDAC be approved with the condition that before funds are expended at the Guadalupe Center that a commitment be obtained from the Parkway/Guadalupe Center's Board to strengthen the programming at the Guadalupe Center. Sandy Ogletree, Community Development Coordinator, responded to a question by Mayor Pro Tem Carpenter regarding the outlook for continued Community Development Funds. She stated that there has been some commitment on the part of the Federal Government in this area; that allocations for the past three years have been relatively steady and she did not expect the program to be abandoned. Ms. Ogletree responded to a question by Councilwoman Baker that $250,000 are left in CD Contingency Funds. Councilwoman Trejo stated that paving for East Lubbock needs to be a part of the Capital Improvements Program. Councilman Brown indicated that allocations from Community Development Funds for paving have, in the past, been for non -assessable paving. Mayor Pro Tem Carpenter stated that more money and emphasis needs to go toward housing. He favored holding allocation of funding for the Lake #6 low water crossing and expending the recommended funds in the East Lubbock and Overton South/North areas. RIK 86-45-117-I80 (29^) Councilman Patterson indicated his d831r8 to finish the project begun at Lake #6" Motion was 0dd8 by COUOci|0On Nash, seconded by COVDci|mdD Brown accepting CDAC recommendations and recommendation to gain CVm01t0eDt from Parkway -Guadalupe Board to increase programming at Guadalupe Center prior to expending $25»000 for renovation Of the Center. Motion was made by Mayor Pro Te0 Carpenter to consider an d08Od0e0t to the previous 0Ut1VO, which would delete the $14I,700 recommended for Lake #0 Low Water Crossing and add it to the contingency 0008y and earmark it for home improvements and other committee items Council has Sp0k8O above in all areas Of the City for citizens in ne8d. There was DV SeCUOd to Mayor Pro Te0 Carpenter's amendment and it failed. Original motion carried to approve CDAD recommendations: O Yeas; I Nay --Mayor Pro T80 Carpenter. Consider it t to the Housing Standards Commission to fill the unexpired term of Alphonso Castaneda, who has resigned. This 1tB0 was held Until the next regular City Council meeting. There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Henry adjourned the meeting at 6:50 p~0~ ATTEST: ATTEST: (40 City Secretary "-7-